Synthesis of Linear Geranylphenols and Their Effect on Mycelial Growth of Plant Pathogen Botrytis cinerea

Abstract

Natural geranyl compounds are known to exhibit important biological activities. In this work a series of geranylphenols were synthesized to evaluate their effect on the mycelial growth of Botrytis cinerea. Geranyl derivatives were synthesized by direct geranylation reactions between the corresponding phenol derivatives and geraniol, using BF₃^.OEt₂ as catalyst and AgNO₃ as secondary catalyst. Previously reported molecules [geranylhydroquinone (2), geranylhydroquinone diacetate (6) and geranylphloroglucinol (9)], and new substances [(E)-4-(3,7-dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl)benzene-1,2,3-triol (geranyl-pyrogallol, 7), (E)-4-(3,7-dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl)benzene-1,2,3-triyl triacetate (8), (E)-2-(3,7-dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl)benzene-1,3,5-triyl triacetate geranylphloroglucinol triacetate (10), 2,4-bis((E)-3,7-dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl)benzene-1,3,5-triyl triacetate (11), 2,6-bis((E)-3,7-dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl)-3,5-dihydroxyphenyl acetate (12)], were obtained. All compounds were characterized by IR, HRMS and NMR spectroscopic data. The inhibitory effect of the synthesized compounds on the mycelial growth of Botrytis cinerea was tested in vitro. Excepting compound 11, all substances constrained the mycelial growth of Botrytis cinerea. The antifungal activity depends on the chemical structure of geranylphenol derivatives. Compounds 2 and 9 were the more effective substances showing inhibition degrees higher than those obtained with the commercial fungicide Captan, even at lower concentrations. Monosubstitution on the aromatic nucleus by a geranyl chain seems to be more effective for the inhibition of mycelial growth than a double substitution. These results suggest that the new derivatives of geranylphenols have the ability to block the mycelial development of the plant pathogen B. cinerea and that this capacity depends strongly on the structural features and lipophilicity of the compounds.

1. Introduction

Several factors highlight the urgent need for the development of new control strategies for the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea and other plagues affecting important agricultural crops. They include the emergence of highly resistant strains of B. cinerea to fungicides, contamination of soil and water, high cost of chemical control and the limited availability of fungicides [1]. In addition, the strong worldwide trend towards sustainable development and environmentally friendly substances should be considered [2]. It has been extensively documented that multiple metabolites, obtained from species belonging to the plant kingdom, have special biological properties suitable for controlling several types of animal and plant pathogens. For instance, linear geranylquinones or geranylhydroquinones, present in higher plants and in marine urochordates [3], exhibit cytotoxic activity and inhibit larval growth and development. Some particular compounds such as 2-geranylbenzoquinone (1), isolated from Ascindian Synoicum castellatum [4], 2-geranylhydroquinone (2) isolated from the Cordia alliodora tree [2], Phacelia crenulata [5,6,7], Aplidium antillense [8] and the tunicate Amaroucium multiplicatum [9], have been related to biological activities including toxicity, cytotoxicity, antimicrobial, anti-cancer protective and antioxidant effects, among others [6,9,10,11,12,13]. Additionally, linear geranylmethoxyphenol/acetates (compounds 3–5, see Figure 1), isolated from Phaceliaixodes [8], are cytotoxic, allergenic and insecticidal, and topical application of 100 µg of geranylbenzoquinone on pupae of Tenebrio caused severe abnormalities and death [14].

Several marine sesquiterpenoid quinones and hydroquinones are of considerable scientific interest because of their versatile biological activities where a particular (hydro)quinone may display multiple activities [15].

In previous studies we have reported the synthesis and cytotoxic activity of compounds 1–2 and some geranylmethoxyphenol/acetate analogs [16,17]. Considering the activity against phytophagous insects and pathohens of compounds 3 and 4 [14] and assuming the presence of this property in other geranylphenol analogs, we have recently reported the synthesis and structure determination of 14 linear geranylphenols molecules [16].

Thus, our interest is to get a broader insight into the relationship between the molecular structure and the biological activity against plant pathogens of geranylquinone and geranylhydroquinone derivatives and geranylphenols. We believe that this knowledge might be useful to provide new substances to control such kinds of pathogens. Therefore, in this research we report the synthesis, structure determination, and in-vitro antifungal effect against phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea of a series of geranylphenols derivatives 2, 6–12, (see Figure 2). These compounds were obtained by a modification of a previously reported synthetic method [12,14,16], which consisted in the use of acetonitrile as a solvent instead of dioxane. Also we have evaluated the use of AgNO₃ as secondary catalyst.

Figure 1. Structure of some active linear geranylphenols.

Figure 1. Structure of some active linear geranylphenols.

Figure 2. Structure of linear geranylphenols 2, 6–12 synthesized in this work.

Figure 2. Structure of linear geranylphenols 2, 6–12 synthesized in this work.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

Compound 2 was prepared by using the previously described coupling between geraniol and hydroquinone [16,17,18], but using acetonitrile instead of dioxane as solvent and assessing the use of AgNO₃ as secondary catalyst. In this case, the compound 2 was obtained with a 32% yield, which is slightly higher than that previously reported by us [16], but similar to that reported by other authors [19]. Compound 6 was obtained in 92.8% yield from compound 2 by a standard acetylation reaction using Ac₂O and DMAP in CH₂Cl₂. The spectroscopic data of compounds 2 and 6 were consistent with those previously reported [5,6,8,20].

Compound 7 (for which the name geranylpyrogallol is proposed in analogy with the name of geranylphloroglucinol [18,21]) was prepared in 18.1% yield following the same experimental procedure described for the synthesis of compound 2. The structure of 7 was mainly established by NMR, where aromatic signals at δ_H = 6.53 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H) and δ_H = 6.44 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H) were observed as two doublets for hydrogens H-5 and H-6, confirming the aromatic monosubstitution position. Additionally, in the HMBC spectrum, the signal at δ_H = 3.30 ppm assigned to H-1' (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, H-1') shows ³J_H-C coupling with C-3 (δ_C = 142.5), C-3' (δ_C = 138.4 ppm) and C-5 (δ_C = 120.2 ppm) and ²J_H-C coupling with C-2' and C-4 (δ_C = 122.2 ppm and 119.5 respectively). These HMBC correlations are shown in Figure 3. In order to establish the E geometry of the C-2'-C-3' double bond of the geranyl chain, selective 1D NOESY NMR experiments were recorded for compound 7. These correlations are shown in Figure 3, where the most important of those correspond to the correlations observed between the H-1' and the hydrogen H-5 and methyl group in the C-3' position.

Figure 3. Top: mayor 2D ¹H-¹³C HMBC and sel. 1D NOESY correlations for compound 7. Bottom: standard ¹H-NMR spectrum; (a) selective irradiation NOESY at 5.31ppm (H-2'). (b) selective irradiation NOESY at 3.30 ppm (H-1').

Figure 3. Top: mayor 2D ¹H-¹³C HMBC and sel. 1D NOESY correlations for compound 7. Bottom: standard ¹H-NMR spectrum; (a) selective irradiation NOESY at 5.31ppm (H-2'). (b) selective irradiation NOESY at 3.30 ppm (H-1').

Compound 8 was obtained from compound 7 in 93% yield by standard acetylation, using Ac₂O and DMAP in CH₂Cl₂. In the ¹H-NMR spectrum of the triacetylated derivative 8, three singlets at δ_H = 2.29, 2.27 and 2.26 ppm (each 3H, CH₃CO) were observed. Additionally, in the ¹³C-NMR spectrum the signals appearing at δ_C = 168.0, 167.7 and 167.1 ppm (C=O), confirmed the presence of the triacetylated derivative.

The synthesis of compound 9 from phloroglucinol and geraniol was performed following the experimental procedure described in Scheme 1. However, after completion of reaction two main spots were observed in the TLC analysis. Subsequent column chromatography (C.C.) separation and purification allowed the isolation of the two fractions, a less polar one corresponding to a complex mixture (Fraction I), and a more polar fraction (Fraction II) corresponding to compound 9, obtained in 32% yield. The spectroscopic data of compound 9 was consistent with that previously reported [18,21].

Scheme 1. Synthesis of compounds 9–12.

Scheme 1. Synthesis of compounds 9–12.

Subsequently, compound 10 was obtained (in 86.8% yield) from 9 by standard acetylation with Ac₂O and DMAP in CH₂Cl₂. The ¹H-NMR spectrum of the triacetylated derivative 10 shows two singlet signals at δ_H = 2.26 ppm (2 × CH₃CO) and 2.24 ppm (CH₃CO). Additionally, in the ¹³C-NMR spectrum the signals at δ_C = 168.6 (2 × C=O) and 168.5 ppm (C=O), confirm the presence of the triacetylated derivative.

Compound 11 was obtained in 70.3% yield by standard acetylation of the complex mixture (Fraction I). Spectroscopic evidence of double substitution on the aromatic nucleus by geranyl chains was established from the ¹H-NMR spectrum by the following observations: a unique Ar-H signal appears at 6.83 ppm (s, 1H, H-6); and the intensity of this signal was 1:4 relative to the signal at 3.12 ppm (bs, 4H, H-1'). The presence of three acetate groups was evidenced in the ¹H-NMR spectrum by the observed signals at δ_H = 2.26 ppm (s, 3H, COCH₃) and 2.24 ppm (s, 6H, COCH₃), and corroborated by the presence in the ¹³C-NMR spectrum of signals at δ_C = 168.6 (2 × COCH₃) and 168.4 (COCH₃). Finally, the complete determination of symmetrical structure was established by 2D HMBC and selective 1D NOESY experiments. The major 2D HMBC correlations, which were considered to confirm the structure of compound 11 were a ³J_H-C coupling observed between H-1' with C-3 (δ_C = 148.6 ppm), with C-1 and C-5 (δ_C = 147.2 ppm) and C-3' (δ_C = 135.6 ppm), while ²J_H-C coupling was observed with C-2 and C-4 (δ_C = 124.6 ppm) and C-2' (δ_C = 121.0 ppm). From selective 1D NOESY experiments, the E geometry in the C-2'-C-3' double bond position of the geranyl chain was established. Here the most important correlations were observed between the H-1' and methyl group in C-3' position and those detected with the acetate groups (Figure 4). The 2D HMBC and 1D NOESY correlations are shown in Figure 4. Additionally, the possible incorporation of two geranyl chains in the aromatic ring was previously described for geranylmethoxyphenol analogues by other authors [22].

Figure 4. Top: mayor 2D ¹H-¹³C HMBC and sel. 1D NOESY correlations for compound 11. Bottom: standard ¹H-NMR spectrum; (a) selective irradiation NOESY at 5.02 ppm (H-2'). (b) selective irradiation NOESY at 3.12 ppm (H-1').

Figure 4. Top: mayor 2D ¹H-¹³C HMBC and sel. 1D NOESY correlations for compound 11. Bottom: standard ¹H-NMR spectrum; (a) selective irradiation NOESY at 5.02 ppm (H-2'). (b) selective irradiation NOESY at 3.12 ppm (H-1').

Finally, compound 12 was obtained in 96% yield by saponification of 11 under mild conditions (Et₃N/MeOH) at room temperature. The structure of compound 12 was established mainly by comparison of the NMR spectra of compounds 11 and 12. In the ¹H-NMR of compound 12, only one acetate group signal was observed at δ_H = 2.30 ppm (s, 3H, CH₃CO), while in the ¹³C-NMR spectrum, only the signal at δ_C = 169.3 ppm (CO₂) was observed. The position of the acetyl group in the structure was proposed from the observation of long-range interactions in the 1D NOESY experiments between CH₃CO and the hydrogens of C-1' (see Figure 5).

On the other hand, the use of AgNO₃ as secondary catalyst has significant effects on the Friedel-Crafts direct geranylation reaction used to obtain compound 9, namely, the reaction yield was increased from 4.2% to 32% [20], the formation of compounds disubstituted in the aromatic ring is enhanced, and the degradation of geraniol products is reduced (as evidenced by TLC analysis) and a lower difficulty in the C.C. separation process is observed in all of the cases. This suggests that AgNO₃ stabilizes geraniol during the reaction process in CH₃CN solution.

Figure 5. Main selective 1D NOESY correlations for compound 12.

Figure 5. Main selective 1D NOESY correlations for compound 12.

2.2. Anti-phytopathogenic Activity against Botrytis cinerea

To evaluate the biological activity of the geranylphenol derivatives 2, 6–12 (Figure 2), their effect on the growth of mycelia of B. cinerea was determined in vitro after 48 h of incubation by using the agar-diffusion assay technique with PDA as medium. Figure 6 shows a representative example of three independent assays for evaluating the biological activity of the studied compounds. Details of experimental conditions are given in the Experimental section. The results are expressed as percentage of inhibition, which is calculated as the ratio of the area of B. cinerea in the presence and absence of geranylphenols, are summarized in Table 1. For comparison, in this table the percentage of inhibition values of captan, a molecule that is widely used to control the growth of B. cinerea are included (measured at the same concentration used to determine the activity of geranylphenols).

Figure 6. Effect of linear geranylphenols on in vitro mycelial growth of B. cinerea. (a) Negative control, represents a medium containing only PDA; (b) positive control, measured in the presence of 250 mg/L of Captan; (c) the medium includes compound 2 at 250 mg/L; (d) medium contains compound 9 at 250 mg/L.

Figure 6. Effect of linear geranylphenols on in vitro mycelial growth of B. cinerea. (a) Negative control, represents a medium containing only PDA; (b) positive control, measured in the presence of 250 mg/L of Captan; (c) the medium includes compound 2 at 250 mg/L; (d) medium contains compound 9 at 250 mg/L.

The data in Table 1 shows that all compounds, with the exception of compound 11, affect the development of the mycelia of B. cinerea, reducing its growth between 56%–86%, compared to the negative control, at concentrations of 150–250 mg/L after 48 h of incubation. Compounds 2 and 9 were the more active ones, showing an inhibitory effect on the mycelial growth that depends on the applied concentration. At 150 mg/L compounds 9 and 2 exhibited inhibitory effects of 66% and 81%, respectively, which increased up to 81% and 86% at higher concentration (250 mg/L). The observed inhibitory capacity exceeds even the value of inhibition obtained with the commercial fungicide captan used as positive control (Table 1). On the other hand, compound 11 seems to be inactive against B. cinerea. A grade of the mycelial growth inhibition lower than 50% is observed, independently of the applied concentration.

Table 1. Effect of linear geranylphenols and new derivatives on mycelial growth of B. cinerea.

Compounds	Percentage of inhibition on in vitro mycelial growth of Botrytis cinerea (%) a
	50 mg/L	150 mg/L	250 mg/L
2	58 ± 2.15	82 ± 3.04	86 ± 1.35
6	40 ± 7.20	67 ± 1.67	76 ± 1.54
7	45 ± 1.36	63 ± 0.65	72 ± 1.78
8	28 ± 2.44	56 ± 5.70	64 ± 1.76
9	38 ± 0.21	66 ± 7.95	81 ± 2.57
10	33 ± 5.48	56 ± 1.80	72 ± 0.87
11	0 ± 0.00	16 ± 4.10	26 ± 0.00
12	0 ± 0.00	30.4 ± 2.30	66 ± 3.90
C–	0 ± 0.00	0 ± 0.00	0 ± 0.00
Captan	39 ± 7.33	60 ± 8.45	80 ± 2.92

^a The percentage of inhibition of mycelial growth was based on colony diameter measurements after 48 h of incubation. Each point represents the mean of at least three independent experiments ± standard deviation.

Table 1. Effect of linear geranylphenols and new derivatives on mycelial growth of B. cinerea.

Compounds	Percentage of inhibition on in vitro mycelial growth of Botrytis cinerea (%) a
	50 mg/L	150 mg/L	250 mg/L
2	58 ± 2.15	82 ± 3.04	86 ± 1.35
6	40 ± 7.20	67 ± 1.67	76 ± 1.54
7	45 ± 1.36	63 ± 0.65	72 ± 1.78
8	28 ± 2.44	56 ± 5.70	64 ± 1.76
9	38 ± 0.21	66 ± 7.95	81 ± 2.57
10	33 ± 5.48	56 ± 1.80	72 ± 0.87
11	0 ± 0.00	16 ± 4.10	26 ± 0.00
12	0 ± 0.00	30.4 ± 2.30	66 ± 3.90
C–	0 ± 0.00	0 ± 0.00	0 ± 0.00
Captan	39 ± 7.33	60 ± 8.45	80 ± 2.92

^a The percentage of inhibition of mycelial growth was based on colony diameter measurements after 48 h of incubation. Each point represents the mean of at least three independent experiments ± standard deviation.

Analysis of the results indicates that the antifungal activity depends on the chemical structure of the geranylphenol derivatives. Thus, compounds having hydroxyl groups attached to the aromatic nucleus (compounds 2, 7, and 9) exhibit a 86%, 72% and 81% of inhibitory activity against the growth of the mycelia of B. cinerea compared to those acetylated compounds having acetate groups in the same positions which have 76, 64 and 72% mycelial growth inhibition (compounds 6, 8 and 10). These results suggest that the activity is mainly determined by the presence of the geranyl chain. However, by comparing the activities of compounds 11 and 10 it can be concluded that the inhibitory effect almost disappears with a double geranyl chain substitution on the triacetylated aromatic nucleus. The activity is partly recovered when two acetyl groups of compound 11 are replaced by two hydroxyl groups in compound 12. Thus, for double geranyl substituted compounds the activity depends strongly on the presence of hydroxyl groups.

Our results are consistent with previous investigations [23,24,25,26] reporting that molecules with similar structure present high potential antifungal activity (in the range 1.0 to 10.0 µg) against Cladosporium cladosporioides and C. sphaerospermum [25]. Taken together with our results it could be concluded that addition of a geranyl chain and hydroxyl groups to the aromatic nucleus increases the biological activity of the molecule by at least a factor of two.

3. Experimental

3.1. General

Unless otherwise stated, all chemical reagents purchased (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany or Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were of the highest commercially available purity and were used without previous purification. IR spectra were recorded as thin films in a FT-IR Nicolet 6700 spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) and frequencies are reported in cm⁻¹. Low resolution mass spectra were recorded on an Agilent 5973 spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at 70eV ionising voltage in a DB-5 m, 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm column, and data are given as m/z (% rel. int.). High resolution mass spectra were recorded on an LTQ Orbitrap XL spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) by applying a voltage of 1.8 kV in the positive and 1.9 kV in the negative, ionization mode. The spectra were recorded using full scan mode, covering a mass range from m/z 100–1,300. The resolution was set to 50,000 and maximum loading time for the ICR cell was set to 250 ms.¹H, ¹³C, ¹³C DEPT-135, sel. gs1D ¹H NOESY, gs2D HSQC and gs2D HMBC spectra were recorded in CDCl₃ solutions and are referenced to the residual peaks of CHCl₃ at δ = 7.26 ppm and δ = 77.0 ppm for ¹H and ¹³C, respectively, on a Bruker Avance 400 Digital NMR spectrometer (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany), operating at 400.1 MHz for 1H and 100.6 MHz for ¹³C. Chemical shifts are reported in δ ppm and coupling constants (J) are given in Hz. Silica gel (Merck 200–300 mesh) was used for C.C. and silica gel plates HF₂₅₄ for TLC. TLC spots were detected by heating after spraying with 25% H₂SO₄ in H₂O.

3.2. Synthesis of Geranylphenol Derivatives

(E)-2-(3,7-Dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl)benzene-1,4-diol (1,4-geranylhydroquinone) (2). To a solution of 1,4-hydroquinone (1.12 g, 10.2 mmol) and geraniol (1.57 g, 10.2 mmol) in acetonitrile (30 mL), saturated with AgNO₃, was slowly added BF₃^.OEt₂ (0.45 g, 3.2 mmol) dropwise with stirring at room temperature and under a N₂ atmosphere. After the addition was completed, the stirring was continued for 48 h. The end of the reaction was verified by TLC, and then the mixture was poured onto crushed ice (30 g) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The organic layer was washed with 5% NaHCO₃ (30 mL) and water (2 × 15 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, and filtered. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude was re-dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) and chromatographed on silica gel with petroleum ether/EtOAc mixtures of increasing polarity (19.8:0.2→14.0:6.0). Compound 2 was obtained as a brownish oil (0.736 g, 32% yield). Spectroscopic data of compound 2 was consistent with those in the literature [12,16,17].

(E)-2-(3,7-Dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl)-1,4-phenylene diacetate (6). To a solution of compound 2 (0.05 g, 0.45 mmol), DMAP (5.0 mg) in dichloromethane (20 mL) and pyridine (2.0 mL) was added Ac₂O (0.54 g, 5.3 mmol). The end of the reaction was verified by TLC (0.5 h), and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 20 mL). Then the organic layer was washed with 5% KHSO₄ (2 × 10 mL) and water (2 × 10 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude was re-dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) and chromatographed on silica gel with petroleum ether/EtOAc mixtures of increasing polarity (19.8:0.2→16.8:3.2). Compound 6 was obtained as a viscous yellow oil (0.0818 g, 92.8% yield). IR (cm⁻¹): 2967; 2917; 1763; 1490; 1368; 1169; 1012; 914. ¹H-NMR: 7.02 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, H-6); 6.94 (m, 2H, H-3 and H-5); 5.22 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, H-2'); 5.09 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 1H, H-6'); 3.23 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, H-1'); 2.30 (s, 3H, COCH₃); 2.28 (s, 3H, COCH₃); 2.09–2.08 (m, 2H, H-5'); 2.06–2.05 (m, 2H, H-4'); 1.68 (s, 3H, H-8'); 1.66 (s, 3H, CH₃-C3'); 1.60 (s, 3H, CH₃-C7'). ¹³C-NMR: 169.4 (2 × COCH₃); 148.3 (C-4); 146.3 (C-1); 137.6 (C-3'); 134.9 (C-2); 131.6 (C-7'); 124.1 (C-6'); 122.9 (C-6); 122.6 (C-3); 120.7 (C-2'); 119.9 (C-5); 39.6 (C-4'); 28.5 (C-1'); 26.5 (C-5'); 25.7 (C-8'); 21.1 (COCH₃); 20.8 (COCH₃); 17.7 (CH₃-C7'); 16.1 (CH₃-C3').

(E)-4-(3,7-Dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl)benzene-1,2,3-triol (7). To a solution of pyrogallol (1.25 g, 9.9 mmol) and geraniol (1.8 g, 11.9 mmol) in acetonitrile (30 mL), saturated with AgNO₃, was slowly added BF₃^.OEt₂ (0.7 g, 4.8 mmol) dropwise with stirring at room temperature and under a N₂ atmosphere. After the addition was completed, the stirring was continued for 24 h. The end of the reaction was verified by TLC, and then the mixture was poured onto crushed ice (30 g) and it was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The organic layer was washed with 5% NaHCO₃ (30 mL) and water (2 × 15 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, and filtered. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was redissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) and chromatographed on silica gel with petroleum ether/EtOAc in isocratic mixtures (20:80). Compound 7 was obtained as a reddish oil (0.47 g, 18.1% yield). IR (cm⁻¹): 3396; 2966; 2917; 1627; 1472; 1375; 1285; 1027; 794. ¹H-NMR: 6.53 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, H-5); 6.44 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, H-6); 5.45 (bs, 3H, OH); 5.31 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, H-2'); 5.06 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H, H-6'); 3.30 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, H-1'); 2.13–2.11 (m, 2H, H-5'); 2.09–2.06 (m, 2H, H-4'); 1.76 (s, 3H, CH₃-C3'); 1.68 (s, 3H, H-8'); 1.60 (s, 3H, CH₃-C7'). ¹³C-NMR: 142.5 (C-3); 142.3 (C-1); 138.4 (C-3'); 132.1 (C-7'); 132.0 (C-2); 123.8 (C-6'); 122.2 (C-2'); 120.2 (C-5); 119.5 (C-4); 107.4 (C-6); 39.6 (C-4'); 29.4 (C-1'); 26.3 (C-5'); 25.7 (C-8'); 17.7 (CH₃-C7'); 16.1 (CH₃-C3'). HRMS: (M + 1) calcd. for C₁₆H₂₂O₃: 263.1569, found: 263.1547.

(E)-4-(3,7-Dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl)benzene-1,2,3-triyl triacetate (8). To a solution of compound 7 (0.05 g, 0.129 mmol) and DMAP (3.0 mg) in dichloromethane (20 mL) and pyridine (1.0 mL) was added Ac₂O (0.54 g, 5.3 mmol). The end of the reaction was verified by TLC (0.5 h), and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 20 mL). The organic layer was washed with 5% NaHCO₃ (30 mL) and water (2 × 15 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, and filtered. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. Then the organic layer was washed with 5% KHSO₄ (2 × 10 mL) and water (2 × 10 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude was re-dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) and chromatographed on silica gel with petroleum ether/EtOAc mixtures of increasing polarity (19.8:0.2→15.4:4.6). Compound 8 was obtained as a viscous yellow oil (0.0686 g, 93% yield). IR (cm⁻¹): 2925; 1781; 1491; 1370; 1188; 1045; 871. ¹H-NMR: 7.12 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, H-5); 7.05 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H, H-6); 5.21 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, H-2'); 5.09 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H, H-6'); 3.23 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, H-1'); 2.29 (s, 3H, COCH₃); 2.27 (s, 3H, COCH₃); 2.26 (s, 3H, COCH₃); 2.11–2.09 (m, 2H, H-5'); 2.08–2.05 (m, 2H, H-4'); 1.69 (s, 3H, H-8'); 1.66 (s, 3H, CH₃-C3'); 1.60 (s, 3H, CH₃-C7'). ¹³C-NMR: 168.0 (COCH₃); 167.7 (COCH₃); 167.1 (COCH₃); 141.7 (C-3); 141.3 (C-2); 137.6 (C-3'); 134.7 (C-1); 132.7 (C-4); 131.6 (C-7'); 126.3 (C-5); 124.1 (C-6'); 120.6 (C-2'); 120.4 (C-6); 39.6 (C-4'); 28.2 (C-1'); 26.4 (C-5'); 25.7 (C-8'); 20.6 (COCH₃); 20.2 (COCH₃); 20.1 (COCH₃); 17.7 (CH₃-C7'); 16.0 (CH₃-C3'). HRMS: (M + 1) calcd. for C₂₂H₂₈O₆: 389.1886, found: 389.1867.

(E)-2-(3,7-Dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl)benzene-1,3,5-triol (9). To a solution of phloroglucinol (5.0 g, 39.6 mmol) and geraniol (6.12 g, 39.6 mmol) in acetonitrile (60 mL), saturated with AgNO₃, was slowly added BF₃^.OEt₂ (1.84 g, 12.8 mmol) dropwise with stirring at room temperature and under a N₂ atmosphere. After the addition was completed, the stirring was continued for 48 h. The end of the reaction was verified by TLC. The mixture was poured onto crushed ice (30 g) and 20 mL of NaCl (10%) and extracted with EtOAc (3 × 30 mL). Then the organic layer was washed with 5% NaHCO₃ (30 mL) and water (2 × 20 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude was re-dissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) and chromatographed on silicagel with petroleum ether/EtOAc mixtures of increasing polarity (19.8:0.2→6.0:14.0). Two fractions were obtained. Fraction I: a complex mixture (630 mg), and Fraction II: Compound 9 (3.30 g, 32% yield) obtained as yellow viscous oil. MS (m/z, %): M⁺ 262 (0.2); 191 (100); 175 (52.7); 137 (49.8); 123 (47.8); 69 (22.1). IR (cm⁻¹): 3397; 2967; 2925; 1706; 1620; 1515; 1463; 1377. ¹H-NMR: 5.99 (bs, 2H, OH); 5.93 (s, 2H, H-4 and H-6); 5.22 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H, H-2'); 5.03 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H, H-6'); 3.30 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, H-1'); 2.08–2.05 (m, 2H, H-5'); 2.03–2.02 (m, 2H, H-4'); 1.76 (s, 3H, CH₃-C3'); 1.66 (s, 3H, H-8'); 1.57 (s, 3H, CH₃-C7'). ¹³C-NMR: 155.7 (C-1 and C-3); 154.7 (C-5); 138.7 (C-3'); 131.9 (C-7'); 123.7 (C-6'); 122.0 (C-2'); 106.3 (C-2); 96.07 (C-4 and C-6); 39.6 (C-4'); 26.3 (C-5'); 25.6 (C-8'); 21.9 (C-1'); 17.6 (CH₃-C3'); 16.0 (CH₃-C7').

(E)-2-(3,7-Dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl) benzene-1,3,5-triyl triacetate (10). To a solution of compound 9 (0.109 g, 0.41 mmol) and DMAP (5.0 mg) in dichloromethane (20 mL) and pyridine (2.0 mL) was added Ac₂O (1.08 g, 10.6 mmol). The end of the reaction was verified by TLC (~1 h), and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 25 mL). The organic layer was washed with 5% NaHCO₃ (30 mL) and water (2 × 15 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, and filtered. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. Then the organic layer was washed with 5% KHSO₄ (2 × 15 mL) and water (2 × 10 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude was redissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) and chromatographed on silica gel with petroleum ether/EtOAc mixtures of increasing polarity (19.8:0.2→13.6:6.4). Compound 10 was obtained as a viscous yellow oil (0.138 g, 86.8% yield). MS (m/z, %): 240 (27.5); 180 (18.8); 121 (39.8); 120 (64.0); 109 (54.7); 97 (82.3); 82 (49.4); 69 (56.2); 68 (100). IR (cm⁻¹): 2969; 2924; 2851; 1775; 1620; 1432. ¹H-NMR: 6.82 (s, 2H, H-4 and H-6); 5.06 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H, H-2'); 5,02 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H, H-6'); 3.17 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H, H-1'); 2.26 (s, 6H, COCH₃); 2.24 (s, 3H, COCH₃); 2.04–2.03 (m, 2H, H-5'); 1.97–1.95 (m, 2H, H-4'); 1.71 (s, 3H, H-8'); 1.66 (s, 3H, CH₃-C3'); 1.58 (s, 3H, CH₃-C7'). ¹³C-NMR: 168.6 (COCH₃); 168.5 (COCH₃); 149.6 (C-1 and C-3); 148.5 (C-5); 135.9 (C-3'); 131.5 (C-7'); 124.0 (C-2); 124.0 (C-2'); 120.8 (C-6'); 113.8 (C-4 and C-6); 39.5 (C-4'); 26.5 (C-5'); 25.6 (C-8'); 23.6 (C-1'); 21.0 (COCH₃); 20.8 (COCH₃); 17.6 (CH₃-C3'); 16.2 (CH₃-C7'). HRMS: (M + 1) calcd. for C₂₂H₂₈O₆: 389.1886, found: 389.1855.

2,4-bis((E)-3,7-Dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl)benzene-1,3,5-triyl triacetate (11). To a solution containing Fraction I (630 mg), DMAP (6.0 mg) in dichloromethane (20 mL) and pyridine (2.0 mL) was added Ac₂O (1.08 g, 10.6 mmol). The end of the reaction was verified by TLC (~1 h), and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 25 mL). Then the organic layer was washed with 5% KHSO₄ (2 × 20 mL) and water (2 × 20 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude was redissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) and chromatographed on silica gel with petroleum ether/EtOAc in isocratic mixtures (90:10). Compound 11 was obtained as viscous yellow oil (443 mg, 70.3% yield from mixture). IR (cm⁻¹): 2968; 2923; 2867; 1772; 1615; 1434. ¹H-NMR: 6.83 (s, 1H, H-6); 5.06 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, H-6'); 5.02 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H, H-2'); 3.12 (bs, 4H, H-1'); 2.26 (s, 3H, COCH₃); 2.24 (s, 6H, COCH₃); 2.07–2.02 (m, 4H, H-5'); 1.97–1.94 (m, 4H, H-4'); 1.70 (s, 6H, CH₃-C3'); 1.66 (s, 6H, H-8'); 1.58 (s, 6H, CH₃-C7'); ¹³C-NMR: 168.6 (COCH₃); 168.4 (COCH₃); 148.6 (C-3); 147.2 (C-1 and C-5); 135.6 (C-3'); 131.3 (C-7'); 124.6 (C-2 and C-4); 124.0 (C-6'); 121.0 (C-2'); 114.9 (C-6); 39.4 (C-4'); 26.4 (C-5'); 25.5 (C-8'); 24.1 (C-1'); 20.7 (COCH₃); 20.4 (COCH₃); 17.6 (CH₃-C7'); 16.1 (CH₃-C3'). HRMS: (M + 1) calcd. for C₃₂H₄₄O₆: 525. 3138, found: 525.3114.

2,6-bis((E)-3,7-Dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl)-3,5-dihydroxyphenyl acetate (12). To a solution of compound 11 (0.109 g, 0.41 mmol) in methanol (30 mL) was added Et₃N (0.218 g, 2.15 mmol). Then the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for two hours. The end of the reaction was verified by TLC. The solvent was evaporated and the residue resuspended in EtOAc (25 mL). The organic layer was washed with 5% HCl (2 × 10 mL) and water (2 × 20 mL), dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered, and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude was redissolved in CH₂Cl₂ (5 mL) and chromatographed on silica gel with petroleum ether/EtOAc mixtures of increasing polarity (19.8:0.2→10.6:9.4). Compound 12 was obtained as a viscous yellow oil (0.098 g, 96% yield). IR (cm⁻¹): 3446; 2967; 2922; 2856; 1738; 1622; 1446. ¹H-NMR: 6.16 (s, 1H, H-4); 5.16 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H, H2'); 5.05 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H, H-6'); 3.14 (bs, 4H, H-1'); 2.30 (s, 3H, COCH₃); 2.10–2.05(m, 4H, H-5'); 2.02–2.01 (m, 4H, H-4'); 1.75 (s, 6H, CH₃-C3'); 1.66 (s, 6H, H-8'); 1.58 (s, 6H, CH₃-C7'); ¹³C-NMR: 169.6 (COCH₃); 153.8 (C-3 and C-5); 147.8 (C-1); 137.5 (C-3'); 131.8 (C-7'); 123.9 (C-6'); 121.8 (C-2'); 112.2 (C-2 and C-6); 102.4 (C-4); 39.6 (C-4'); 26.4 (C-5'); 25.6 (C-8'); 23.5 (C-1'); 20.6 (COCH₃); 17.6 (CH₃-C7'); 16.1 (CH₃-C3'). HRMS: (M + 1) calcd. for C₂₈H₄₀O₄: 441.2927, found: 441.2909.

3.3. Fungal Isolate and Culture Condition

In this study, the strain UK of Botrytis cinerea was used in all experiments. This strain was isolated from a naturally infected grape (Vitis vinifera) and was maintained on potato dextrose agar medium (PDA; Difco, Detroit, MI, USA) at 4 °C. The inoculum of the pathogen was grown on PDA inphotoperiod of 16 h light/8 h dark at 23 °C for 5 days.

3.4. Effect of the Compounds on the Mycelial Growth of Botrytis Cinerea In Vitro

The anti-phytophatogenic activities of compounds, the negative control (C−) and the positive control (commercial fungicide captan (C+) were assessed using the agar-diffusion assay technique on PDA medium [27]. The compounds were dissolved in ethanol (1%) and water; added at different amounts to obtain a final concentrations of 50, 150 and 250 mg/L in the PDA medium. Negative and positive control experimental conditions for the growth of mycelia of B. cinerea were included. Negative control conditions means PDA medium containing 1% ethanol, whereas positive control indicates PDA medium including the commercial fungicide captan at the same concentration specified for the compounds of interest.

A plug (4 mm) of PDA medium with 5-day-old mycelium colonies of the pathogen was placed at the center of a Petri dish with PDA medium with or without compounds of interest. Subsequently, they were incubated under controlled conditions of temperature to 23 °C and photoperiod 16 h light/8 h for 48 h.

The percentage of inhibition was determined for each compounds by expressing the area of B. cinerea as a percentage of the negative control. The evaluation was conducted through measuring diameters of mycelial growth after 48 h of incubation. The inhibition percentages of mycelial growth were calculated according to Hou et al. [23] for each compound and compared with the negative control. All treatments were performed independently three times in triplicate.

4. Conclusions

Linear geranylphenols 2, 7, 9 were obtained in yields ranging from 18% to 32% by a previously reported direct Friedel-Craft geranylation reaction. In this work acetonitrile was used as solvent instead of dioxane, and AgNO₃ was used as secondary catalyst. Under these conditions the yield of 9 was increased from 4% to 32% and a disubstituted coupling product is formed. It seems that AgNO₃ is able to stabilize the geraniol in CH₃CN solution. The acetylated derivatives 6, 8, 10, 11 were obtained with yields over 70% by standard acetylation reactions with Ac₂O and DMAP in CH₂Cl₂.

The evaluation of biological activity of geranylphenol derivatives on the growth of mycelia of B. cinerea was determined in vitro after 48 h of incubation by using an agar-diffusion assay technique with PDA medium. The results show that all compounds, excepting 11, inhibit its growth between 56%–86% compared to the negative control, at concentrations between 150 to 250 mg/L. The antifungal activity depends on the chemical structure of the geranylphenol derivatives and is mainly determined by the presence of the geranyl chain. Interestingly, the activity is strongly reduced when the aromatic nucleus is substituted with two geranyl chains. Finally, the activity of these compounds is also enhanced by the presence of hydroxyl groups, which is in line with results reported by other authors for similar systems.