Next Article in Journal
Structural Diversity and Biological Activities of Diterpenoids Derived from Euphorbia fischeriana Steud
Next Article in Special Issue
Three New Cytotoxic Steroidal Alkaloids from Sarcococca hookeriana
Previous Article in Journal
HIV Tat/P-TEFb Interaction: A Potential Target for Novel Anti-HIV Therapies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Huberine, a New Canthin-6-One Alkaloid from the Bark of Picrolemma huberi

1
Instituto de Química, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín 050010, Colombia
2
Grupo Malaria, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín 050010, Colombia
3
Jardín Botánico Joaquín Antonio Uribe, Medellín 050010, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(4), 934; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040934
Submission received: 6 February 2018 / Revised: 7 March 2018 / Accepted: 14 March 2018 / Published: 17 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Plant Alkaloid Research)

Abstract

:
A new alkaloid, Canthin-6-one, Huberine (1), together with three known compounds including 1-Hydroxy-canthin-6-one (2), Canthin-6-one (3) and stigma sterol (4), were isolated from the stem bark of Picrolemma huberi. The isolation was achieved by chromatographic techniques and the purification was performed on a C18 column using acetonitrile/water (90:10, v/v) with 0.1% formic acid as the mobile phase. The structural elucidation was performed via spectroscopic methods, notably 1D- and 2D-NMR, UV, IR, MS and HRMS. The antiplasmodial activity of the compounds was studied.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Plants of the family Simaroubaceae are widely used in traditional medicine for the treatment of diseases in different countries around the world. Species belonging to the genus Picrolemma (Simaroubaceae) have long been used in traditional medicine for their antitumoral and antimalarial properties [1]. Previous phytochemical investigations of Picrolema huberi revealed the presence of terpenoids and alkaloids. Among these compounds, quassinoids and canthin-6-ones are principal constituents of the Picrolemma species [2,3,4,5]. Canthin-6-ones are a subclass of tryptophan-derived β-carboline alkaloids, and are characterized by an additional ring, D, giving the 6H-Indolo(3,2,1-de) (1,5) naphthyridin backbone. A general biosynthetic pathway of canthin-6-one alkaloids starts from tryptophan as a precursor and produces tryptamine which condense with acetic or ketoglutarate units, giving rise to a series of β-carboline intermediates, each time more oxidized. Except canthin-6-one itself, which has a simple structure, all the canthin-6-one alkaloids isolated from plants are oxidized at any position from C-1 to C-11 of the skeleton to form hydroxy and/or methoxy derivatives [1,6,7,8,9]. Meanwhile, more than 60 canthin-6-one alkaloids have been isolated from natural sources, mainly plants from the Rutaceae and Simaroubaceae families [10]. A broad range of biological activities has been reported for canthin-6-ones, such as antitumor, antibacterial, antifungal, antiparasitic, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative, and aphrodisiacal properties [11]. In this paper, we report the results of an investigation of the stem barks of Picrolemma huberi. Three canthinone alkaloids have been isolated; one of which is new, Figure 1. All of these alkaloids are reported for the first time from the genus Picrolemma.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Identification of Isolated Compounds

Identification of compound 1 from the Picrolemma huberi bark. Compound 1, named Huberine, was isolated as an amorphous, pale-yellow solid. The HR LCMS spectrum of 1 showed a pseudomolecular ion peak, [M + H] at m/z 281.0926, corresponding to a molecular formula C16H12N2O3. A positive Dragendorff test was obtained, suggesting that 1 was an alkaloid. IR absorption bands of conjugated carbonyl group were observed at 1664 cm−1 and unsaturation 1630 and 1598 cm−1. The UV spectrum of 1 displayed absorption maxima at 227, 296, 356, and 376 nm, which were similar to those reported for canthin-6-one alkaloids [12]. The 13C-NMR and DEPT-NMR spectra for 1 indicated the presence of 16 carbon signals, including two methoxyls, six methines and eight quaternary carbon signals. All the proton and protonated carbon signals of 1 were assigned unambiguously by an 2D-HSQC (Heteronuclear Single-Quantum Correlation) experiment. In the 1H-NMR spectrum (Table 1), four mutually coupled aromatic protons at δ 8.67 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, H-8), δ 7.66 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, H-9), δ 7.51 (1H, t, J = 7.7 Hz, H-10) and δ 8.22 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, H-11) were observed in the 1H-1H COSY spectrum, meaning that the ring A of compound 1 is not substituted.
Isolated vicinal doublets at δ 7.83 (1H, J = 9.6 Hz, H-4) and δ 6.82 (1H, J = 9.6 Hz, H-5) were characteristic of cis-coupled protons on the conjugated lactam ring of a canthin-6-one. A 2D-HMBC (Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation) experiment further confirmed the structure of alkaloid 1. In the spectrum, cross-peaks were found for H-4 (δ 7.83) with C-6 (δ 160.1) and C-15 (δ 130.3), H-5 (δ 6.82) with C-16 (δ 126.4), showing that these are the quaternary carbons that join the C and D rings.
The placement of the methoxy groups was deduced from the HMBC experiments. The methoxy signals showed clear HMBC correlations with the C at 141.1 and 154.9, assigned as C-1 and C-2. The assignment of quaternary carbons was established by HSQC and HMBC spectral data. Thus, the structure of Huberine 1 was established as 1,2-dimethoxycanthin-6-one, which is reported here for the first time. The new compound 1 showed no effective antiplasmodial activity at concentrations evaluated (from 100 μg/mL to 1.56 μg/mL) in Plasmodium falciparum strain FCR-3.
Identification of compound 2 and 3 from the Picrolemma huberi bark. The structures of the known compounds 2 and 3 were identified as 1 hydroxycanthin-6-one (2) [13,14] and canthin-6-one (3) [15], by spectroscopic data (1H-NMR,13C-NMR, 2D-NMR, and MS) and by comparison with published values. Although 1-hydroxycanthin-6-one (3) was isolated from the Simaroubaceae family, it has not been reported from P. huberi. Stigmasterol (4) was also isolated.

2.2. Antiplasmodial Activity In Vitro

The antiplasmodial activity of compounds 1, 2 and 3 was evaluated in vitro against the multi-resistant strain of FCR-3 of P. falciparum. In the concentrations evaluated (from 100 μg/mL to 1.5 μg/mL), they did not show any activity.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Procedures

Spectra were recorded on the following instruments: UV: Shimadzu UV-250 UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Canby, OR, USA); IR: Perkin Elmer 1600 (Waltham, MA, USA); NMR: BRUKER 600 MHz (Silberstreifen, Rheinstetten, DE); HRMS to compound (1) were measured on a Xevo Q-Tof Waters® spectrometer (Milford, MA, USA) and MS of compounds 2, 3 and 4 were measured on a Nermag-Sidar R10-10C spectrometer (Argenteuil, FR) with a quadrupolar filter. All solvents, except those used for bulk extraction, were AR grade. Silica gel 60 F254 was used for column chromatography. Glass and aluminum-supported silica gel 60 F254 plates were used for preparative TLC. TLC spots were visualized under UV light (254 and 365 nm) after spraying with Dragendorff’s reagent for alkaloid detection.

3.2. Plant Material

The stem bark of P. huberi was collected from the village, La Guada Reserve, [coordinates: 06°52′006′′ N to 75°08′49.9′′ W, (1.662 msnm)], close to Amalfi, Antioquia, Colombia, in January 2017. A voucher specimen (Tobón Juan Pablo 2392) has been deposited in the Herbarium JAUM (Joaquín Antonio Uribe Botanic Garden of Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia).

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

Dried stem bark (1.5 kg) of P. huberi was defatted with n-hexane (3 L). The marc was extracted with MeOH-H2O (90:10) (6 L) by percolation for 72 h and the same material was re-extracted in the same manner. The extract was filtered and concentrated up to 1 L under reduced pressure, and then partitioned with EtOAc (2 L). The EtOAc layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and then concentrated under reduced pressure (0.5 L). This extract (30 g) was initially subjected to an acid-base extraction [11] to give CHCl3 alkaloid (2.0 g).
The crude alkaloid (2.0 g) was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel using CH2Cl2 gradually enriched with methanol as eluent to yield ten fractions (A−J).
Fraction A (102 mg) was chromatographed on a silica gel column and eluted with DCM-AcOEt (1:1) to give six subfractions, A1−A6. Fraction A1 (75 mg) was chromatographed by preparative TLC with CH2Cl2-MeOH (95:5) and further purified by preparative RP-HPLC using the mobile phase CH3CN/H2O (90:10), 0.1% formic acid to yield compound 1 (10 mg). Similar HPLC of fraction A2 (15.0 mg) yielded compound 2 (1.3 mg) eluting at 13.2 min, and HPLC of fraction A3 (38.0 mg) yielded compound 3 (1.0 mg) eluting at 9.5 min.
Antiplasmodial in vitro activity assay of each compound (from 100 μg/mL to 1.5 μg/mL) was evaluated in FCR3 strain. The diphosphate salt of chloroquine (≥98%, SIGMA C6628), evaluated in a range of 2000 nM to 2.3 nM, was used as a treatment control in each assay [16].

3.4. Spectral Data

Huberine: 1,2-Dimethoxy-canthin-6-one (1). Yellow amorphous powder; UV (MeOH, max, nm): 207, 266, 294, 354, 369. IR (KBr, n, cm−1): 1664, 1550, 1439, 1214, 1086, 753; 1H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 1; MS: Waters LCT Premier (ESI-TOF) spectrometer at m/z 281.0926 [M + H]+; calcd. for C16H12N2O3, 281.0926.
1-Hydroxy-canthin-6-one (2). Yellow amorphous powder. UV (MeOH, nm): 210, 249, 256,288, 341, 415. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3276, 1567, 1600, 1629. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, MeOD-d4, δ in ppm, J), 8.60 (d, 1H, 8.4Hz), 8.35 (s, 1H), 8.27 (d, 1H, 7.7Hz), 8.02 (d, 1H, 9.7Hz), 7.69 (t, 1H, 8.4Hz), 7.58 (t, 1H, 8.0Hz), 6.80 (d, 1H, 9.7Hz). 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ in ppm): 151.39 (C-1), 135.55 (C-2), 139.48 (C-4), 123.38 (C-5), 159.66 (C-6), 123.60 (C-8), 125.79 (C-9), 129.16 (C-10), 116.22 (C-11), 137.61 (C-12), 137.5 (C-13), 114.31(C-14), 133.32 (C-15), 128.11 (C-16). MS TOF ES+ spectrometer at m/z 237.0708 [M + H]+.
Canthin-6-one (3). Yellow amorphous powder. UV (MeOH, nm): 210, 249, 256,288, 341, 415. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3276, 1567, 1600, 1629. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ, ppm, J/Hz): 8.35 (1H, d, J = 4.8 Hz, H-1, 8.86 (1H, d, J = 4.8 Hz, H-2), 8.7 (1H, d, J = 9.7 Hz, H-4), 7.02 (1H, d, J = 9.7 Hz, H-5), 8.55 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, H-8), 7.79 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, H-9), 7.62 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, H-10), 8.42 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H-11). MS TOF ES+ spectrometer at m/z 221.0715 [M + H]+. Supplementary material is available online.

4. Conclusions

Huberine, a new canthin-6-one alkaloid (1) and 3 known compounds (2, 3 and 4) were isolated from the stem bark of P. huberi. The structure of the new compound (1) was elucidated by spectroscopic data Huberine (1); it was isolated from this plant for the first time. The isolates were screened for inhibitory activity against Plasmodium falciparum strains. Compounds 1, and 2 showed no effective antiplasmodial activity.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Figure S1: Huberine: 1,2-Dimethoxy-canthin-6-one (1). 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 600 MHz); Huberine: 1,2-Dimethoxy-canthin-6-one (1). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 150 MHz); Huberine: 1,2-Dimethoxy-canthin-6-one (1). COSY H-H (CDCl3); Huberine: 1,2-Dimethoxy-canthin-6-one (1). HSQC (CDCl3); Huberine: 1,2-Dimethoxy-canthin-6-one (1). HMBC (CDCl3); Huberine: 1,2-Dimethoxy-canthin-6-one (1). HRMS; Huberine: 1,2-Dimethoxy-canthin-6-one (1). FT-IR, 1-Hydroxy-canthin-6-one (2). 1H-NMR (MeOD-d4, 600 MHz); 1-Hydroxy-canthin-6-one (2). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 150 MHz); 1-Hydroxy-canthin-6-one (2). COSY H-H (MeOD-d4); 1-Hydroxy-canthin-6-one (2). HSQC (MeOD-d4); 1-Hydroxy-canthin-6-one (2). HRMS; Canthin-6-one (3). 1H-NMR (DMOS-d6, 600 MHz); Canthin-6-one (3). HRMS.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by General system of Royalties of Colombia (SGR), contract RC:20702305-8399DZZZZ.The authors would like to give special thanks to Silvia Blair for being the manager of this project and obtaining their funding. Also, to Jairo Saez for the advice on identification of the compounds from P. huberi and to Juan Pablo Tobón Agudelo who very kindly accompanied us to the collection of plant material. The authors are also very grateful to Bruno Figadere of l’UMR 8076 Bio CIS-Laboratoire Pharmacognosie, Faculté de Pharmacie—Université Paris-Sud for the high-resolution mass spectra.

Author Contributions

C.L.: Identification of the compounds from P. huberi and writing of the manuscript; M.P.: Preparation of extracts, isolation and purification of the compounds; A.R.: Conducting biological tests; A.C.: Identification, classification, collection and knowledge of the plant; A.P.: Conception, design, analysis and interpretation of results, and writing of the manuscript

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ohmoto, T.; Koike, K. The Alkaloids; Brossi, A., Ed.; Academic: New York, NY, USA, 1989; Volume 36, pp. 135–170. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tischler, M.; Cardellina, J.H., II; Boyd, M.R.; Cragg, G.M. Cytotoxic quassinoids from Cedronia granatensis. J. Nat. Prod. 1992, 55, 667–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fo, E.R.; Fernandes, J.B.; Vieira, P.C.; da Silva, M.F.G.F. Canthin-6-one alkaloids from Picrolemma granatensis. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 2499–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rodrigues-Filho, E.; Fernandes, J.B.; Vieira, P.C.; Silva, M.F.G.F. Quassinoids and tetranortriterpenoids from Picrolemma granatensis. Phytochemistry 1993, 34, 501–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fo, E.R.; Fernandes, J.B.; Vieira, P.C.; da Silva, M.F.G.F.; Zukerman-Schpector, J.; Corrêa de Lima, R.M.O.; Nascimento, S.C.; Thomas, W. Protolimonoids and quassinoids from Picrolemma granatensis. Phytochemistry 1996, 43, 857–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Haynes, H.F.; Nelson, E.R.; Price, J.R. Alkaloids of the Australian Rutaceae: Pentaceras australis Hook. FI Isolation of the alkaloids and identification of canthin-6-one. Aust. J. Chem. 1952, 5, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Crespi-Perellino, N.; Guicciardi, A.; Malyszko, G.; Minghetti, A. Biosynthetic relationship between indole alkaloids produced by cell cultures of Ailanthus altissima. J. Nat. Prod. 1986, 49, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aragozzini, F.; Maconi, E.; Gualandris, R. Evidence for involvement of ketoglutarate in the biosynthesis of canthin-6-one from cell cultures of Ailanthus altissima. Plant Cell Rep. 1988, 7, 213–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Anderson, L.A.; Hay, C.A.; Roberts, M.F.; Phillipson, J.D. Studies on Ailanthus altissima cell suspension cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 1986, 5, 387–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Showalter, H.D.H. Progress in the synthesis of canthine alkaloids and ring-truncated congeners. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 455–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dai, J.; Li, N.; Wang, J.; Schneider, U. Fruitful Decades for Canthin-6-ones from 1952 to 2015: Biosynthesis, Chemistry, and Biological Activities. Molecules 2016, 21, 493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ohmoto, T.; Koike, K.; Sakamoto, Y. Studies on the constituents of Ailanthus altissima Swingle. II. Alkaloidal constituents. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1981, 29, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Suroor, A.K.; Shamsuddin, K.M. 1-Hydroxycanthin-6-one, an alkaloid from Ailanthus giraldii. Phytochemistry 1981, 20, 2062–2063. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ohmoto, T.; Koike, K. Studies on the Constituents of Ailanthus altissima SWINGLE.III. The Alkaloidal Constituents. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1984, 32, 170–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nafiah, M.A.; Mukhtar, M.R.; Omar, H.; Ahmad, K.; Morita, H.; Litaudon, M.; Awang, K.; Hadi, A.H. N-Cyanomethylnorboldine: A New Aporphine Isolated from Alseodaphneperakensis (Lauraceae). Molecules 2011, 16, 3402–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pabón, A.; Ramirez, O.; Rios, A.; López, E.; De Las Salas, B.; Cardona, F.; Blair, S. Antiplasmodial and Cytotoxic Activity of Raw Plant extracts as reported by knowledgeable indigenous people of the amazon region (Vaupés Medio in Colombia). Plant Med. 2016, 82, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 1, 2 and 3 are available from the authors.
Figure 1. Canthin-6-one alkaloids isolated from Picrolemma huberi bark.
Figure 1. Canthin-6-one alkaloids isolated from Picrolemma huberi bark.
Molecules 23 00934 g001
Table 1. 1H-NMR (600 MHz) and 13C-NMR (125 MHz) spectral data of compound 1 in CDCl3 (δ, in ppm, J in Hz).
Table 1. 1H-NMR (600 MHz) and 13C-NMR (125 MHz) spectral data of compound 1 in CDCl3 (δ, in ppm, J in Hz).
Position1H (ppm), J (Hz)13C (ppm)COSY CouplingHMBC Coupling(2,3J)
1 141.3 OCH3
2 155.1 OCH3
47.83(d, 9.6)138.2H-5H-5
56.82(d, 9.6)125.6H-4
6 160.1 H-4
88.67(d, 8.1)117.4 H-9H-9
97.66 (t, 7.6)130.4H-8, H-10H-11
107.51 (t, 7.7)125.8H-9, H-11
118.22(d, 7.6)124.9H-10H-9
12 123.5 H-10
13 140.1 H-9, H-11
14 130.3
15 130.3 H-4
16 126.4 H-5
OCH34.15 (s)54.7
OCH34.20 (s)61.3

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

López, C.; Pastrana, M.; Ríos, A.; Cogollo, A.; Pabón, A. Huberine, a New Canthin-6-One Alkaloid from the Bark of Picrolemma huberi. Molecules 2018, 23, 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040934

AMA Style

López C, Pastrana M, Ríos A, Cogollo A, Pabón A. Huberine, a New Canthin-6-One Alkaloid from the Bark of Picrolemma huberi. Molecules. 2018; 23(4):934. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040934

Chicago/Turabian Style

López, Carlos, Manuel Pastrana, Alexandra Ríos, Alvaro Cogollo, and Adriana Pabón. 2018. "Huberine, a New Canthin-6-One Alkaloid from the Bark of Picrolemma huberi" Molecules 23, no. 4: 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040934

APA Style

López, C., Pastrana, M., Ríos, A., Cogollo, A., & Pabón, A. (2018). Huberine, a New Canthin-6-One Alkaloid from the Bark of Picrolemma huberi. Molecules, 23(4), 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040934

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop