Next Article in Journal
Heterocycles in Medicinal Chemistry
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolomic Approach for Discrimination of Cultivation Age and Ripening Stage in Ginseng Berry Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Trash to Treasure: Eco-Friendly and Practical Synthesis of Amides by Nitriles Hydrolysis in WEPPA

The Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Fine Chemicals, Ministry of Education & Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi Key Laboratory of Green Catalysis and Synthesis Technology, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(21), 3838; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24213838
Submission received: 13 September 2019 / Revised: 15 October 2019 / Accepted: 21 October 2019 / Published: 24 October 2019

Abstract

:
The hydration of nitriles to amides in a water extract of pomelo peel ash (WEPPA) was realized with moderate to excellent yields without using external transition metals, bases or organic solvents. This reaction features a broad substrate scope, wide functional group tolerance, prominent chemoselectivity, and good reusability. Notably, a magnification experiment in this bio-based solvent at 100 mmol further demonstrated its practicability.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, with the aggravation of the environmental crisis, there is an increasing requirement for sustainable chemical technologies from academia and industry. Significant advances have been made in the exploitation of greener processes from renewable feedstocks [1,2,3]. Volatile organic solvents (VOCs) are recognized as one of the major contributors to the generation of bulky chemical waste. A range of green solvents such as ionic liquids [4,5], deep eutectic solvents [6], super critical fluids [7,8,9], and biosolvents [10], fluorinated solvents [11], water [12], and so on have been developed as alternative solutions. In recent years, a water extract of agro-waste ash (AWEs) has emerged as a novel green reaction medium [13] and has been successfully employed in transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions (Suzuki–Miyaura [14,15,16,17,18,19], Sonogashira [20], Ullmann [21]), Dakin reaction [22], Henry reaction [23], peptide synthesis [24], ipso-hydroxylation [25], and biodiesel synthesis [26] (Scheme 1a–h)). AWEs, easily prepared from various renewable agricultural waste products, can be a rich source of raw materials and play multiple roles, including those of the water, in situ base, reductant, and so forth.
Amides are an important class of organic synthetic building blocks and have been widely used in the construction of pharmaceutical molecules, in pesticide chemistry, and as advanced functional materials [27,28,29]. Among the well-established synthetic methods for amide synthesis, nitrile hydration reactions are considered one of the most straightforward and economic. For this purpose, some elegant synthetic methods involving the hydration of nitriles and employing transition metal catalysts (e.g., Ru [30,31,32,33,34,35], Rh [36,37], Pd [38,39], Os [40], Ir [41], Pt [42], Cu [43,44,45], Ag [46,47], Au [48,49], Fe [50], Co [51], Ni [52,53], Mn [54,55], etc.) have been well documented. Meanwhile, some alternative methods for the nitriles’ hydration reactions with transition-metal-free catalysts such as acids [56,57,58], bases [59,60,61,62,63,64,65], and others [66,67] have also been developed. These protocols usually have some inherent drawbacks. Some nitrile hydration reactions in aqueous media have been well documented, but transition metal catalysts, external strong acids, strong bases, and/or volatile organic solvents are usually indispensable in these transformations [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65].
As a result, developing a biocompatible, recyclable, and practical procedure for the construction of amides is still highly desirable. In light of Green Chemistry Principles 5 and 7 [68], and also as part of our long-term pursuit of environmentally benign chemistry [69,70,71,72], we present herein our systematic studies on the preparation and characterization of several kinds of water extract of agro-waste ash and their performance in the multiple roles of base, solvent, and promoter in the hydration of nitriles to amides (Scheme 1i). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of the formation of valuable amide derivatives through the hydrolysis of nitriles using a water extract of agro-waste ash as the green reaction medium.

2. Results and Discussion

The AWEs used in this paper were prepared according to the literature methods [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]: (i) drying the agro-waste; (ii) burning the dried agro-waste to get the ash; (iii) suspension and stirring of the ash in distilled water, followed by filtration with sintered glass crucible and collection filtrate (Figure 1). For a comparison with the reported methods, we prepared two kinds of AWEs using the ash obtained by high-temperature calcination and marked them as WEPPA(C) and WEWSA(C). The pH values of AWEs were measured by the pH meter, as shown in Figure 2. Among them, WEPPA had the highest basicity (pH = 11.21), while high-temperature calcination led to an obvious decrease in basicity (pH: 10.57 versus 6.43, 11.21 versus 7.60).
To illustrate the origin of the basicity and analyze the kinds and concentrations of the remaining elements, the pomelo peel ash was characterized by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) (Table 1), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) (Figure 3), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Figure 4 and Table 2, respectively. The high element concentrations of K, Ca, Mg, and Na were revealed by the ICP-AES analysis. That was why the aqueous pomelo peel ash had strong basicity. The EDX and XPS spectrums jointly revealed an abundance of the oxides and/or carbonates of K, Ca, Mg, and Na.
The hydration of benzonitrile (1a) to benzamide (2a) was selected as the model reaction to optimize the reaction conditions (Table 3). Among a range of AWEs screened, WEPPA produced the best results and produced benzamide in a 41% conversion (entries 1–6). This result could be ascribed to the strongest basicity of WEPPA. Notably, the different preparation methods of AWEs were critical for the efficient hydration of the substrate, and the results were consistent with their relative weakly acidity or alkalinity (entries 7–8, pH = 6.43 or 7.60). Extending the reaction time to 24 or 36 h had only limited effects on the conversion (entries 9–10), while the conversions could be remarkably improved by increasing the reaction temperature (entries 11–13). To our delight, the reaction efficiency could be further boosted when performed the model reaction in the closed vessel synthesis reactor (entries 14–16). The best isolated yield, 94%, was obtained at 150 °C for 0.5 h (entry 17). Reducing the reaction time had a negative impact on the reaction activity (entry 18). A control experiment showed that WEPPA was essential; no reaction was happened in distilled water (entry 19).
Having established the optimized reaction conditions in hand, the versatility of this protocol was then exploited (Table 4). Generally, various functional benzonitriles with electron-donating or -withdrawing groups reacted smoothly to generate the desired amide products 2ay in moderate to excellent yields (41–96%). The steric hindrance of the methyl group on the phenyl ring had little influence on the isolated yields (2bd). The condensed aromatic nitriles could also be converted into the corresponding products 2m and 2n in moderate yields. Aminobenzamide derivatives, especially o-aminobenzamides, which are important synthetic structural units, could be conveniently prepared with 79–96% yields (2ov). Isophthalamide (2w) and terephthalamide (2x) were obtained by the concurrent hydrolysis of two cyano groups of phthalonitriles. The total chemoselectivity of this catalytic system was verified by the hydrolysis of starting material 1y containing both the aromatic and aliphatic cyano groups, only the aromatic cyano group was transformed to the amide group with a 77% yield. In a similar fashion, trans-cinnamonitrile and ferroceneactonitrile underwent an efficient hydrolysis reaction, producing the desired trans-cinnamamide (2z) and ferrocenecarboxamide (2aa) with good yields (84% and 63%, respectively). This methodology could also be extended to the heteroaromatic nitriles including five- and six- membered N-, O-, and S-containing heterocycles (2a′g′). To our delight, aliphatic nitriles could also be efficiently involved in this catalytic system (2a″d″).
The potential and practical applications of this environmentally benign protocol were firmly demonstrated by the scaling-up experiments of 1o and 1e′ at 10 mmol; the desired hydration products 2o and 2e′ were obtained with 79% and 61% yields, respectively. Notably, the hydration of o-aminobenzonitrile was further amplified to 100 mmol to assemble the o-aminobenzoamide 2o in 85% yield (Scheme 2). The synthetic significance of amides was confirmed by the transformation of aromatic amides to useful synthetic intermediates. With Lawesson reagent as the thionation reagent, benzothioamide 3a was readily obtained with a 73% yield [73] (Equation (1)). Based on a consecutive iodination/Kornblum oxidation/annulation tandem reaction, 2-aminobenzamide (2o) was transformed to the heterocyclic product 2-benzoylquinazolin-4(3H)-one 3c (75%), which was an analogue of alkaloid Luotonin F [74] (Equation (2)).
Molecules 24 03838 i002
Molecules 24 03838 i003.
It is worth noting that the AWEs could be easily recycled. The good reusability performance of WEPPA was evaluated in the hydration of 4-fluorobenzonitrile 1g under optimal conditions. WEPPA could be reused at least four times with good yields (Figure 5). Interestingly, the target product 4-fluorobenzamide 2g was a water-insoluble white solid and WEPPA could be easily separated by simple filtering with a sintered glass crucible without further purification by column chromatography. Then the recovered WEPPA filtrate could be reused for the subsequent hydrolysis reaction. Actually, the reduction of catalytic efficiency was largely due to the gradual volumetric loss of WEPPA during the product purification process.
In order to probe the real role of the water extract of agro-waste ash, some comparative experiments were designed and conducted (Table 5). A series of water solutions were prepared by dissolving commercially available inorganic carbonates or oxides of K, Na, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, and Mn in distilled water. The dosage of carbonates or oxides was based on the results of the ICP-AES analysis of the pomelo peel ash. Under standard conditions, not all of them could give similar results to WEPPA; the water solution of CaO produced the highest yield of the target product 2a in 40% (Table 5, entry 7). Even the water solution that combined these inorganic carbonates and oxides only produced 2a with a 26% yield (Table 5, entry 12). Although the real role of the water extract of agro-waste ash is not clear at present, these preliminary results demonstrated that it may not be functioning as the green reaction medium and base.
The concrete mechanism was also not clear. Based on literature reports and the primary results mentioned above, we thought the mixture materials showed a synergistic effect [9e], which is obviously different from the hydrolysis reaction in a water solution of single inorganic carbonates or oxides (for example, K2CO3, Na2CO3, etc.) and produced the result of “a whole greater than the sum of the parts.”

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

1H-, 13C-, and 19F-NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Inova-400 (400 MHz, 100 MHz and 376 MHz, respectively) spectrometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). 1H- and 13C-NMR chemical shifts were determined relative to internal standard TMS at δ 0.0 or CDCl3 (δ(1H), 7.26 ppm; δ(13C), 77.16 ppm) or d6-DMSO (δ(1H), 2.54 ppm; δ(13C), 39.50 ppm), and 19F NMR chemical shifts were determined relative to CFCl3 as internal standard. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm, and coupling constants (J) are in hertz (Hz). The following abbreviations are used to explain the multiplicities: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, m = multiplet, bs = broad singlet. pH values were detected by a PHS-3C acidometer (Rex Electric Chemical, Shanghai, China). Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) analysis was carried out on a Varian VISTA-PRO spectrometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was detected on a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha+X spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Energy-dispersive X-rays (EDX) were recorded on the SU8010 cold field emission ultra-high-resolution scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany). The melting point was recorded on BÜCHI (M-560) (WoLong Instrument, Shanghai, China) and uncorrected. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on 0.25 mm silica gel 60 F254 plates and viewed by UV light (254 nm). Column chromatographic purification was performed using a 200–300 mesh silica gel. All the chemical reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used as received unless otherwise indicated.

3.2. General Procedure for the Preparation of AWEs (Taking WEPPA as an Example)

The pomelo peel was obtained and dried naturally. The dried pomelo peel was burned to get its ash. Then, one gram pomelo peel ash was suspended into 10.0 mL of distilled water at room temperature for 30 min with constant stiring. The suspension was then filtered to obtain a pale yellow extract which named as WEPPA.

3.3. General Procedure for the Hydrolysis of Nitriles in WEPPA (Taking 1a as an Example)

Molecules 24 03838 i004
Benzonitrile 1a (103 mg, 1.0 mmol) and WEPPA (2.0 mL) were added into a 10-mL closed tube with a stir bar. Then the reaction was stirred in a closed vessel synthesis reactor at 150 °C for 0.5 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, the resulting precipitate was collected by filtration, washed with ice water, and further dried in a vacuum drying oven. The filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure. The resultant residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (eluent: petroleum ether (35–60 °C)/EtOAc = 2:1 to 0:1, v/v). Finally, these two parts were combined to produce the desired benzamide 2a with a 94% yield. Benzamide (2a): Known compound. 114.2 mg, 94% yield. White solid. m.p.: 127.3–129.1 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.83–7.80 (m, 2H), 7.54–7.50 (m, 1H), 7.46–7.42 (m, 2H), 6.26 (bs, 2H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 169.7, 133.5, 132.1, 128.8, 127.5.

3.4. Gram-Scale Experiments (Taking 1o at 100 mmol as an Example)

Molecules 24 03838 i005
2-Aminobenzonitrile 1o (11.8 g, 100.0 mmol) and WEPPA (150.0 mL) were added into a 300 mL closed tube with a stir bar. Then the reaction was stirred in an oil bath at 150 °C for 5 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, large amount of white solid precipitated out and was collected by filtration, washed with ice water and further dried in the vacuum drying oven. The filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure to get the residual product. Finally, cmbining these two parts to afford the desired 2-aminobenzamide 2o (11.6 g) in 85% yield.

3.5. Recycling Experiments

Molecules 24 03838 i006
4-Fluorobenzamide 1g (121 mg, 1.0 mmol) and WEPPA (2.0 mL) were added into a 10 mL closed tube with a stir bar. Then the reaction was stirred in a closed vessel synthesis reactor at 150 °C for 0.5 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, the resulting precipitate was collected by filtration, washed with ice water and further dried in the vacuum drying oven. The WEPPA filtrate could be reused at least four times in good yields (89%, 88%, 84% and 75%).

3.6. Comparative Experiments

The results are summarized in Table 4. All products are known compounds, and were characterized by their 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra (see the Supplementary Materials).
2-Methylbenzamide (2b): Known compound. 114.1 mg, 84% yield. White solid. m.p.: 140.1–142.9 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.43 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (td, J = 7.6 and 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 6.28 (bs, 1H), 5.86 (bs, 1H), 2.49 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 172.4, 136.4, 135.4, 131.3, 130.4, 127.1, 125.8, 20.1.
3-Methylbenzamide (2c): Known compound. 108.2 mg, 80% yield. White solid. m.p.: 90.1–91.1 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.65 (s, 1H), 7.60–7.58 (m, 1H), 7.33–7.29 (m, 2H), 6.30 (bs, 2H), 2.39 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 170.0, 138.6, 133.5, 132.8, 128.6, 128.2, 124.4, 21.4.
4-Methylbenzamide (2d): Known compound. 120.2 mg, 89% yield. White solid. m.p.: 148.1–148.8 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.71 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.25 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 5.93 (bs, 2H), 2.42 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 169.5, 142.7, 130.6, 129.4, 127.5, 21.6.
4-Ethylbenzamide (2e): Known compound. 132.6 mg, 89% yield. White solid. m.p.: 160.2–162.5 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.74 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 6.06 (bs, 2H), 2.70 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.25 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 169.7, 148.8, 130.9, 128.2, 127.6, 28.9, 15.4.
4-(Chloromethyl)benzamide (2f): Known compound. 107.2 mg, 63% yield. White solid. m.p.: 133.3–135.1 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 7.92 (bs, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.30 (bs, 1H), 4.56 (s, 2H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 167.8, 145.9, 132.6, 127.3, 125.9, 62.5.
4-Fluorobenzamide (2g): Known compound. 127.0 mg, 91% yield. White solid. m.p.: 155.3–155.5 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 8.03 (bs, 1H), 8.00–7.96 (m, 2H), 7.43 (bs, 1H), 7.34–7.28 (m, 2H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 166.8, 163.9 (d, J = 245.8 Hz), 130.7 (d, J = 11.5 Hz), 130.1 (d, J = 9.0 Hz), 115.1 (d, J = 21.6 Hz); 19F NMR (d6-DMSO, 376 MHz) δ −109.6.
4-Chlorobenzamide (2h): Known compound. 130.1 mg, 84% yield. White solid. m.p.: 177.4–178.8 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.77–7.74 (m, 2H), 7.45–7.42 (m, 2H), 5.85 (bs, 2H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 168.3, 138.5, 131.8, 129.1, 128.9.
4-Bromobenzamide (2i): Known compound. 165.0 mg, 83% yield. White solid. m.p.: 188.9–191.6 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 8.08 (bs, 1H), 7.87–7.84 (m, 2H), 7.72–7.68 (m, 2H), 7.49 (bs, 1H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 166.9, 133.4, 131.2, 129.6, 125.0.
4-Formylbenzamide (2j): Known compound. 91.0 mg, 61% yield. White solid. m.p.: 178.9–182.1 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 10.09 (bs, 1H), 8.19 (bs, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (bs, 1H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 192.9, 167.0, 139.3, 137.8, 129.3, 128.1.
4-Acetylbenzamide (2k): Known compound. 110.8 mg, 68% yield. Yellow solid. m.p.: 192.5–194.1 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 8.15 (bs, 1H), 8.04–7.98 (m, 4H), 7.57 (bs, 1H), 2.62 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 197.7, 167.1, 138.6, 138.1, 128.1, 127.7, 26.9.
[1,1′-Biphenyl]-4-carboxamide (2l): Known compound. 164.1 mg, 83% yield. White solid. m.p.: 232.1–234.5 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 8.08 (bs, 1H), 8.02 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.80 (bs, 1H), 7.78–7.75 (m, 3H), 7.53 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 167.5, 142.7, 139.2, 133.1, 129.0, 128.1, 128.0, 126.8, 126.4.
1-Naphthamide (2m): Known compound. 94.6 mg, 55% yield. White solid. m.p.: 204.8–206.2 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 8.36 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.05–8.00 (m, 3H), 7.70–7.55 (m, 5H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 170.5, 134.6, 133.2, 129.7 × 2, 128.1, 126.6, 126.1, 125.6, 125.1, 124.9.
Anthracene-9-carboxamide (2n): Known compound. 90.7 mg, 41% yield. Yellow solid. m.p.: 186.2–188.6 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 8.68 (bs, 1H), 8.30 (bs, 1H), 8.16 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 8.08 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 3H), 7.64–7.57 (m, 4H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 170.2, 133.7, 130.7, 128.3, 126.8 × 2, 126.2, 125.5, 125.4.
2-Aminobenzamide (2o): Known compound. 130.5 mg, 96% yield. Yellow solid. m.p.: 110.1–111.5 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.36 (dd, J = 7.9 and 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.20 (m, 1H), 6.68 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.66–6.62 (m, 1H), 5.90 (bs, 2H), 5.67 (bs, 2H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 171.8, 149.6, 133.1, 128.1, 117.6, 116.5, 114.1.
2-Amino-6-methylbenzamide (2p): Known compound. 139.9 mg, 93% yield. White solid. m.p.: 143.7–144.8 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 7.63 (bs, 1H), 7.42 (bs, 1H), 6.92 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.51 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.39 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.90 (bs, 2H), 2.21 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 170.5, 145.4, 134.2, 128.7, 123.0, 117.9, 112.7, 19.9.
2-Amino-5-methylbenzamide (2q): Known compound. 135.9 mg, 90% yield. Yellow solid. m.p.: 172.6–174.3 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 7.65 (bs, 1H), 7.34 (bs, 1H), 6.95 (dd, J = 8.2 and 1.5 Hz, 2H), 6.59 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.31 (bs, 2H), 2.15 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 171.3, 147.8, 132.7, 128.6, 122.7, 116.5, 113.7, 20.0.
2-Amino-4-methylbenzamide (2r): Known compound. 146.1 mg, 97% yield. White solid. m.p.: 148.9–149.5 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 7.62 (bs, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (bs, 1H), 6.53 (bs, 2H), 6.47 (s, 1H), 6.29 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 2.16 (s, 3H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 171.2, 150.3, 141.6, 128.8, 116.4, 115.6, 111.1, 21.0.
Amino-6-chlorobenzamide (2s): Known compound. 135.6 mg, 79% yield. White solid. m.p.: 131.6–132.3 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 7.81 (bs, 1H), 7.58 (bs, 1H), 7.01 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 5.21 (bs, 2H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 167.5, 147.0, 130.0, 129.8, 121.7, 116.1, 113.6.
2-Amino-4-chlorobenzamide (2t): Known compound. 155.2 mg, 91% yield. White solid. m.p.: 179.7–180.6 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 7.81 (bs, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (bs, 1H), 6.86 (bs, 2H), 6.77 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 6.52 (dd, J = 8.5 and 2.2 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 170.4, 151.5, 136.3, 130.6, 115.1, 114.0, 112.4.
2-Amino-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide (2u): Known compound. 175.8 mg, 86% yield. White solid. m.p.: 150.8–151.1 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 7.96 (bs, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (s, 1H), 7.07 (d, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (bs, 2H), 6.78 (dd, J = 8.2 and 1.7 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 170.2, 150.2, 131.8 (q, J = 31.0 Hz), 129.9, 124.0 (d, J = 271.1 Hz), 116.7, 112.5 (d, J = 4.0 Hz), 109.9 (d, J = 3.6 Hz).
3-Aminobenzamide (2v): Known compound. 125.5 mg, 92% yield. Yellow solid. m.p.: 112.1–112.7 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 7.74 (bs, 1H), 7.15 (bs, 1H), 7.10–7.07 (m, 2H), 7.02–7.00 (m, 1H), 6.72–6.70 (m, 1H), 5.21 (bs 2H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 168.7, 148.5, 135.2, 128.5, 116.5, 114.7, 113.1.
Isophthalamide (2w): Known compound. 136.1 mg, 83% yield. Pale yellow solid. m.p.: > 300 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 8.42 (bs, 1H), 8.13 (bs, 2H), 8.03 (dd, J = 7.7 and 1.7 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (bs, 2H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 167.5, 134.4, 130.1, 128.2, 126.8.
Terephthalamide (2x): Known compound. 143.0 mg, 87% yield. Pale yellow solid. m.p.: > 300 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 8.11 (bs, 2H), 7.97 (s, 4H), 7.52 (bs, 2H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 167.3, 136.5, 127.3.
4-(Cyanomethyl)benzamide (2y): Known compound. 123.6 mg, 77% yield. White solid. m.p.: > 300 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 8.02 (bs, 1H), 7.94–7.92 (m, 1H), 7.92 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (bs, 1H), 4.15 (s, 2H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 167.3, 134.4, 133.6, 128.1, 127.9, 118.9, 22.2.
Cinnamamide (2z): Known compound. 123.0 mg, 84% yield. White solid. m.p.: 148.2–148.8 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 7.56 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 7.42–7.36 (m, 4H), 7.15 (bs, 1H), 6.63 (d, J = 15.9 Hz 1H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 166.7, 139.1, 134.9, 129.4, 128.9, 127.5, 122.3.
Phenyl(o-tolyl)methanone (2aa): Known compound. 144.4 mg, 63% yield. Yellow solid. m.p.: 160.9–162.5 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 7.35 (bs, 1H), 6.98 (bs, 1H), 4.80 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 2H), 4.36 (t, J = 1.8 Hz, 2H), 4.20 (s, 5H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 171.5, 76.9, 70.4, 69.8, 69.0.
Furan-2-carboxamide (2a′): Known compound. 79.0 mg, 71% yield. White solid. m.p.: 140.1–141.3 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 7.83 (t, J = 0.7 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (bs, 1H), 7.41 (bs,1H), 7.14 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, 1H), 6.62 (q, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 159.4, 148.0, 145.0, 113.6, 111.8.
Thiophene-2-carboxamide (2b′): Known compound. 101.6 mg, 80% yield. White solid. m.p.: 178.2–179.3 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 7.95 (bs, 1H), 7.74 (s, 2H), 7.37 (bs, 1H), 7.13 (t, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 162.8, 140.3, 130.9, 128.6, 127.8.
Thiazole-2-carboxamide (2c′): Known compound. 78.1 mg, 61% yield. White solid. m.p.: 119.0–122.1 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 8.21 (bs, 1H), 8.06 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 8.03 (d, J = 3.1 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (bs, 1H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 164.3, 160.9, 143.9, 125.9.
Picolinamide (2d′): Known compound. 83.3 mg, 69% yield. White solid. m.p.: 106.3–108.8 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 8.56 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 1H), 8.19 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (bs, 1H), 7.83 (td, J = 7.7 and 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.41 (m, 1H), 6.41 (bs, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 167.2, 149.7, 148.4, 137.4, 126.5, 122.5.
Nicotinamide (2e): Known compound. 91.2 mg, 75% yield. White solid. m.p.: 134.4–137.5 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 9.03 (d, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 8.69 (dd, J = 4.7 and 1.4 Hz, 1H), 8.22–8.19 (m, 1H), 8.18 (bs, 1H), 7.63 (bs, 1H), 7.49 (dd, J = 7.8 and 4.8 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 166.5, 151.9, 148.7, 135.2, 129.7, 123.4.
Isonicotinamide (2f′): Known compound. 104.8 mg, 86% yield. White solid. m.p.: 151.1–153.9 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 8.64 (dd, J = 4.3 and 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.78 (dd, J = 4.3 and 1.6 Hz, 2H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 167.3, 149.6, 144.6, 123.1.
1H-Indole-4-carboxamide (2g′): Known compound. 130.9 mg, 82% yield. Pale yellow solid. m.p.: 143.2–145.7 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 11.3 (bs, 1H), 7.75 (bs, 1H), 7.58 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (t, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (bs, 1H), 7.16 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 169.8, 136.6, 126.4, 126.2, 126.1, 120.0, 118.9, 114.2, 102.0.
Phenylacetamide (2a″): Known compound. 109.4 mg, 81% yield. White solid. m.p.: 152.6–155.1 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.38–7.34 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.27 (m, 3H), 5.82 (bs, 1H), 5.41 (bs, 1H), 3.58 (s, 2H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 173.7, 135.0, 129.5, 129.2, 127.6, 43.5.
1,2,3,4-Tetrahydronaphthalene-1-carboxamide (2b″): Known compound. 130.3 mg, 74% yield. White solid. m.p.: > 300 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ 7.49 (bs, 1H), 7.15–7.09 (m, 4H), 6.99 (bs, 1H), 3.64 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.75–2.72 (m, 2H), 1.97–1.91 (m, 3H), 1.69–1.60 (m, 1H); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ 176.2, 137.0, 135.3, 128.9, 128.4, 126.0, 125.4, 45.0, 28.8, 26.9, 20.6.
Benzothioamide (3a): Known compound. 99.8 mg, 73% yield. Yellow solid. m.p.: 114.5–115.7 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 7.95 (bs, 1H), 7.87–7.86 (m, 1H), 7.85–7.84 (m, 1H), 7.52–7.48 (m, 1H), 7.42–7.37 (m, 2H), 7.30 (bs, 1H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 202.9, 139.2, 132.1, 128.6, 127.0.
2-Benzoylquinazolin-4(3H)-one (3c): Known compound. 188.0 mg, 75% yield. White solid. m.p.: 182.5–183.9 °C. 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ 10.5 (bs, 1H), 8.52–8.49 (m, 2H), 8.39 (dd, J = 7.9 and 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.93–7.91 (m, 1H), 7.86–7.82 (m, 1H), 7.69–7.61 (m, 2H), 7.56–7.52 (m, 2H); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 185.7, 161.1, 147.6, 146.1, 134.9, 134.4, 134.1, 131.9, 129.5 x 2, 128.5, 127.0, 123.4.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have developed an environmentally friendly and practical methodology for the hydrolysis of nitriles to amides in WEPPA with transition metal catalysts, external bases, and organic solvent-free conditions. A variety of substrates including aryl, heteroaryl, vinyl, and alkyl nitriles with high functional group compatibility were tolerated to deliver the desired products with moderate to excellent yields. This hydrolysis reaction could easily be scaled up to 10 or even 100 mmol with good yields and WEPPA could be reused at least four times. This work opens the way for the reclamation of agricultural waste. Further applications of AWEs in other organic reactions are ongoing in our laboratory and will be reported on in due course.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials are available online.

Author Contributions

W.J. and C.L. conceived the idea for this piece of research. W.J. wrote the paper. Y.S. performed the chemical experiments.

Funding

We are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 21572195 and 21702175), the Tianshan Cedar Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (grant no. 2017XS16), the Scientific and Technological Innovation Leading Talent Reserve of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (grant no. wr2016cx0145) and the Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang University (grant no. BS160219) for support of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mgaya, J.E.; Shombe, G.B.; Masikane, S.C.; Mlowe, S.; Mubofu, E.B.; Revaprasadu, N. Cashew nut shell: A potential bio-resource for the production of green environmentally friendly chemicals, materials and fuels. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 1186–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Clarke, C.J.; Tu, W.C.; Levers, O.; Brohl, A.; Hallett, J.P. Green and sustainable solvents in chemical processes. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 747–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lipshutz, B.H.; Gallou, F.; Handa, S. Evolution of solvents in organic chemistry. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 5838–5849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, Y. Nanoconfined ionic liquids. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 6755–6833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Amarasekara, A.S. Acidic ionic liquids. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 6133–6183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Smith, E.L.; Abbott, A.P.; Ryder, K.S. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) and their applications. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11060–11082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Peach, J.; Eastoe, J. Supercritical carbon dioxide: A solvent like no other. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 1878–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ramsey, E.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Gou, W. Green sustainable processes using supercritical fluid carbon dioxide. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 720–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leitner, W. Supercritical carbon dioxide as a green reaction medium for catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 746–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gu, Y.; Jerome, F. Bio-based solvents: An emerging generation of fluids for the design of eco-efficient processes in catalysis and organic chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 9550–9570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fustero, S.; Simon-Fuentes, A.; Barrio, P.; Haufe, G. Olefin metathesis reactions with fluorinated substrates, catalysts, and solvents. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 871–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kitanosono, T.; Masuda, K.; Xu, P.; Kobayashi, S. Catalytic organic reactions in water toward sustainable society. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 679–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sarmah, M.; Mondal, M.; Bora, U. Agro-waste extract based solvents: Emergence of novel green solvent for the design of sustainable processes in catalysis and organic chemistry. ChemistrySelect 2017, 2, 5180–5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hooshmand, S.E.; Heidari, B.; Sedghi, R.; Varma, R.S. Recent advances in the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction using efficient catalysts in eco-friendly media. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 381–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dewan, A.; Sarmah, M.; Thakur, A.J.; Bharali, P.; Bora, U. Greener biogenic approach for the synthesis of palladium nanoparticles using papaya peel: An eco-friendly catalyst for C–C coupling reaction. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 5327–5335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Boruah, P.R.; Ali, A.A.; Saikia, B.; Sarma, D. A novel green protocol for ligand free Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reactions in WEB at room temperature. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 1442–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Boruah, P.R.; Ali, A.A.; Chetia, M.; Saikia, B.; Sarma, D. Pd(OAc)2 in WERSA: A novel green catalytic system for Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reactions at room temperature. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 11489–11492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sarmah, M.; Dewan, A.; Mondal, M.; Thakur, A.J.; Bora, U. Analysis of the water extract of waste papaya bark ash and its implications as an in situ base in the ligand-free recyclable Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reaction. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 28981–28985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mahanta, A.; Mondal, M.; Thakur, A.J.; Bora, U. An improved Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction with the aid of in situ generated PdNPs: Evidence for enhancing effect with biphasic system. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 3091–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dewan, A.; Sarmah, M.; Bora, U.; Thakur, A.J. A green protocol for ligand, copper and base free Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 3760–3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lakshmidevi, J.; Appa, R.M.; Naidu, B.R.; Prasad, S.S.; Sarma, L.S.; Venkateswarlu, K. WEPA: A bio-derived medium for added base, pi-acid and ligand free Ullmann coupling of aryl halides using Pd(OAc)2. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 12333–12336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Saikia, B.; Borah, P. A new avenue to the Dakin reaction in H2O2–WERSA. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 105583–105586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Surneni, N.; Barua, N.C.; Saikia, B. Application of natural feedstock extract: The Henry reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 2814–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Konwar, M.; Ali, A.A.; Sarma, D. A green protocol for peptide bond formation in WEB. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 2283–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saikia, E.; Bora, S.J.; Chetia, B. H2O2 in WERSA: An efficient green protocol for ipso-hydroxylation of aryl/heteroarylboronic acid. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 102723–102726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Basumatary, S.; Nath, B.; Kalita, P. Application of agro-waste derived materials as heterogeneous base catalysts for biodiesel synthesis. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2018, 10, 043105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dander, J.E.; Garg, N.K. Breaking amides using nickel catalysis. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 1413–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Deopura, B.L.; Alagirusamy, R.; Joshi, M.; Gupta, B. Polyesters and Polyamides; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  29. Humphrey, J.M.; Chamberlin, A.R. Chemical synthesis of natural product peptides: Coupling methods for the incorporation of noncoded amino acids into peptides. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2243–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rong, M.K.; van Duin, K.; van Dijk, T.; de Pater, J.J.; Deelman, B.J.; Nieger, M.; Ehlers, A.W.; Slootweg, J.C.; Lammertsma, K. Iminophosphanes: Synthesis, rhodium complexes, and ruthenium(II)-catalyzed hydration of nitriles. Organometallics 2017, 36, 1079–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tomás-Mendivil, E.; Cadierno, V.; Menéndez, M.I.; López, R. Unmasking the action of phosphinous acid ligands in nitrile hydration reactions catalyzed by arene-ruthenium(II) complexes. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 16874–16886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. García-Álvarez, R.; Zablocka, M.; Crochet, P.; Duhayon, C.; Majoral, J.-P.; Cadierno, V. Thiazolyl-phosphine hydrochloride salts: Effective auxiliary ligands for ruthenium-catalyzed nitrile hydration reactions and related amide bond forming processes in water. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 2447–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lee, W.-C.; Frost, B.J. Aqueous and biphasic nitrile hydration catalyzed by a recyclable Ru(ii) complex under atmospheric conditions. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nasir Baig, R.B.; Nadagouda, M.N.; Varma, R.S. Ruthenium on chitosan: A recyclable heterogeneous catalyst for aqueous hydration of nitriles to amides. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 2122–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nasir Baig, R.B.; Varma, R.S. A facile one-pot synthesis of ruthenium hydroxide nanoparticles on magnetic silica: Aqueous hydration of nitriles to amides. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 6220–6222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tomás-Mendivil, E.; García-Álvarez, R.; Vidal, C.; Crochet, P.; Cadierno, V. Exploring rhodium(I) complexes [RhCl(COD)(PR3)] (COD = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) as catalysts for nitrile nydration reactions in water: The aminophosphines make the difference. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 1901–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Goto, A.; Endo, K.; Saito, S. Rh(I)-catalyzed hydration of organonitriles under ambient conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3607–3609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hirano, T.; Uehara, K.; Kamata, K.; Mizuno, N. Palladium(II) containing gamma-Keggin silicodecatungstate that efficiently catalyzes hydration of nitriles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6425–6433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shimizu, K.-I.; Kubo, T.; Satsuma, A.; Kamachi, T.; Yoshizawa, K. Surface oxygen atom as a cooperative ligand in Pd nanoparticle catalysis for selective hydration of nitriles to amides in water: Experimental and theoretical studies. ACS Catal. 2012, 2, 2467–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Buil, M.A.L.; Cadierno, V.; Esteruelas, M.A.; Gimeno, J.; Herrero, J.; Izquierdo, S.; OñAte, E. Selective hydration of nitriles to amides promoted by an Os−NHC catalyst: Formation and X-ray characterization of κ2-amidate intermediates. Organometallics 2012, 31, 6861–6867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, N.; Zou, X.; Ma, J.; Li, F. The direct synthesis of N-alkylated amides via a tandem hydration/N-alkylation reaction from nitriles, aldoximes and alcohols. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 8303–8305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gulyás, H.; Rivilla, I.; Curreli, S.; Freixa, Z.; van Leeuwen, P.W.N.M. Highly active, chemo- and enantioselective Pt-SPO catalytic systems for the synthesis of aromatic carboxamides. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 3822–3828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Marce, P.; Lynch, J.; Blacker, A.J.; Williams, J.M. A mild hydration of nitriles catalysed by copper(II) acetate. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 1436–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhou, X. An efficient and practical protocol for catalytic hydrolysis of nitriles by a copper(I) complex in water. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2012, 354, 584–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kuwabara, J.; Sawada, Y.; Yoshimatsu, M. Nitrile hydration reaction using copper iodide/cesium carbonate/DBU in nitromethane–water. Synlett 2018, 29, 2061–2065. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sherbow, T.J.; Downs, E.L.; Sayler, R.I.; Razink, J.J.; Juliette, J.J.; Tyler, D.R. Investigation of 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane-stabilized silver nanoparticles as catalysts for the hydration of benzonitriles and acetone cyanohydrin. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 3096–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, A.Y.; Bae, H.S.; Park, S.; Park, S.; Park, K.H. Silver nanoparticle catalyzed selective hydration of nitriles to amides in water under neutral conditions. Catal Lett. 2011, 141, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kumar, S.; Sharma, S.; Das, P. Supported gold nanoparticles-catalyzed microwave-assisted hydration of nitriles to amides under base-free Conditions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 2889–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ramón, R.S.; Marion, N.; Nolan, S.P. Gold activation of nitriles: Catalytic hydration to amides. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 8695–8697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Gawande, M.B.; Branco, P.S.; Nogueira, I.D.; Ghumman, C.A.A.; Bundaleski, N.; Santos, A.; Teodoro, O.M.N.D.; Luque, R. Catalytic applications of a versatile magnetically separable Fe–Mo (Nanocat-Fe–Mo) nanocatalyst. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Byrne, C.; Houlihan, K.M.; Devi, P.; Jensen, P.; Rutledge, P.J. Bio-inspired nitrile hydration by peptidic ligands based on L-cysteine, L-methionine or L-penicillamine and pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid. Molecules 2014, 19, 20751–20767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Thenmozhi, S.; Kadirvelu, K. Transfer hydrogenation and hydration of aromatic aldehydes and nitriles using heterogeneous NiO nanofibers as a catalyst. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 15572–15577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Singh, K.; Sarbajna, A.; Dutta, I.; Pandey, P.; Bera, J.K. Hemilability-driven water activation: A Ni(II) catalyst for base-free hydration of nitriles to amides. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 7761–7771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Garduño, J.A.; Arévalo, A.; Flores-Alamo, M.; García, J.J. Mn(I) organometallics containing the iPr2P(CH2)2PiPr2 ligand for the catalytic hydration of aromatic nitriles. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 2606–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Battilocchio, C.; Hawkins, J.M.; Ley, S.V. Mild and selective heterogeneous catalytic hydration of nitriles to amides by flowing through manganese dioxide. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 1060–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Deng, T.; Wang, C.Z. Efficient hydration of nitriles promoted by gallic acid derived from renewable bioresources. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 1349–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Noè, M.; Perosa, A.; Selva, M. A flexible pinner preparation of orthoesters: The model case of trimethylorthobenzoate. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 2252–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Moorthy, J.N.; Singhal, N. Facile and highly selective conversion of nitriles to amides via indirect acid-catalyzed hydration using TFA or AcOH-H2SO4. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1926–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhan, W.; Ji, L.; Ge, Z.-M.; Wang, X.; Li, R.-T. A continuous-flow synthesis of primary amides from hydrolysis of nitriles using hydrogen peroxide as oxidant. Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 1527–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yao, S.; Zhou, K.; Wang, J.; Cao, H.; Yu, L.; Wu, J.; Qiu, P.; Xu, Q. Synthesis of 2-substituted quinazolines by CsOH-mediated direct aerobic oxidative cyclocondensation of 2-aminoarylmethanols with nitriles in air. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 2945–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yang, L.; Chen, H.; Liu, J.; Wan, X.; Xu, Q. Clean synthesis of primary to tertiary carboxamides by CsOH-catalyzed aminolysis of nitriles in water. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 4865–4870. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ganesh, C.M.; Ajoy, K.; Subhadip, M.; Jyotirmayee, D. Transition-metal-free hydration of nitriles using potassium tert-butoxide under anhydrous conditions. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 4148–4151. [Google Scholar]
  63. Schmid, T.E.; Gómez-Herrera, A.; Songis, O.; Sneddon, D.; Révolte, A.; Nahra, F.; Cazin, C.S.J. Selective NaOH-catalysed hydration of aromatic nitriles to amides. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 2865–2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Chen, H.; Dai, W.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Q.; Chen, J.; Yu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Ye, M.; Pan, Y. Efficient and selective nitrile hydration reactions in water catalyzed by an unexpected dimethylsulfinyl anion generated in situ from CsOH and DMSO. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 2136–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tu, T.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Feng, X.; Wang, Q. Efficient and practical transition metal-free catalytic hydration of organonitriles to amides. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 921–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, Y.; Du, Y.; He, J.; Zhang, Y. Transformation of lignin model compounds to N-substituted aromatics via Beckmann rearrangement. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 3318–3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, S.; Zhao, X.; Zhang-Negrerie, D.; Du, Y. Reductive cleavage of the N–O bond: Elemental sulfur-mediated conversion of N-alkoxyamides to amides. Org. Chem. Front. 2019, 6, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Anastas, P.T.; Warner, J.C. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  69. Jin, W.; Zheng, P.; Wong, W.-T.; Law, G.-L. Efficient selenium-satalyzed selective C(sp3)−H oxidation of benzylpyridines with molecular oxygen. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2017, 359, 1588–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sun, Y.; Abdukader, A.; Lu, D.; Zhang, H.; Liu, C. Synthesis of (E)-β-iodo vinylsulfones via iodine-promoted iodosulfonylation of alkynes with sodium sulfinates in an aqueous medium at room temperature. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1255–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cao, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, B.; Sun, Y.; Abdukadera, A.; Hu, H.; Liu, Q. Ionic liquid promoted diazenylation of N-heterocyclic compounds with aryltriazenes under mild conditions. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 2000–2003. [Google Scholar]
  72. Li, H.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wang, B.; Liu, W. Green method for the synthesis of chromeno[2,3-c]pyrazol-4(1H)-ones through ionic liquid promoted directed annulation of 5-(aryloxy)-1H-pyrazole-4-carbaldehydes in aqueous media. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 932–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kaleta, Z.; Makowski, B.T.; Soós, T.; Dembinski, R. Thionation using fluorous Lawesson′s reagent. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1625–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhu, Y.-P.; Fei, Z.; Liu, M.-C.; Jia, F.-C.; Wu, A.-X. Direct one-pot synthesis of Luotonin F and analogues via rational logical design. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 378–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Scheme 1. Representative reactions realized in AWEs.
Scheme 1. Representative reactions realized in AWEs.
Molecules 24 03838 sch001
Figure 1. Preparation of AWEs.
Figure 1. Preparation of AWEs.
Molecules 24 03838 g001
Figure 2. pH values of AWEs.
Figure 2. pH values of AWEs.
Molecules 24 03838 g002
Figure 3. EDX spectrum of the pomelo peel ash.
Figure 3. EDX spectrum of the pomelo peel ash.
Molecules 24 03838 g003
Figure 4. XPS spectrum of the pomelo peel ash.
Figure 4. XPS spectrum of the pomelo peel ash.
Molecules 24 03838 g004
Scheme 2. Gram-scale reactions of 1o and 1e′.
Scheme 2. Gram-scale reactions of 1o and 1e′.
Molecules 24 03838 sch002
Figure 5. Recycling use of the WEPPA in the synthesis of 4-fluorobenzamide 2g.
Figure 5. Recycling use of the WEPPA in the synthesis of 4-fluorobenzamide 2g.
Molecules 24 03838 g005
Table 1. ICP-AES analysis of the pomelo peel ash.
Table 1. ICP-AES analysis of the pomelo peel ash.
EntryElementwt %
1K21.36
2Na0.12
3Ca7.41
4Mg1.92
5Cu0.0054
6Fe0.018
7Mn0.012
Table 2. XPS analysis.
Table 2. XPS analysis.
ElementStart BEPeak BEEnd BEHeight CPSFWHM eVArea (P) CPS.eVArea (N)Atomic %
O537.48531.34524.28461018.182.41200937.116963.7933.76
K298.68293.22290.76270622.922.4704963.772127.9710.32
C290.69284.78277.28342691.772.05760946.0710670.1651.73
Ca360.08347.26343.6860779.22.4158327.81387.41.88
P138.08133.08124.887161.842.418656.35176.390.86
S174.68168.95159.886485.172.416893.65117.310.57
Cl210.08198.79188.085350.362.413937.5167.60.33
Si105.68102.2493.283240.342.48440.99117.890.57
Table 3. Optimization of reaction conditions for the hydration of benzonitrile 1a in AWEs a.
Table 3. Optimization of reaction conditions for the hydration of benzonitrile 1a in AWEs a.
EntryAWEsT (°C)t (h)Conv. (%) b
1WEWSA100127
2WEHMPA1001219
3WEAA10012Trace
4WEBSA1001213
5WEPPA1001241
6WEPA100127
7 cWEPPA(C)10012N.R.
8 cWEWSA(C)10012N.R.
9WEPPA1002443
10WEPPA1003650
11WEPPA1202483
12WEPPA1302493
13WEPPA1402497
14WEPPA1000.549
15WEPPA1200.556
16WEPPA1400.588
17 dWEPPA1500.5>99 (94)
18WEPPA1500.2588
19 e------1500.5N.R.
a Reaction conditions: 1a (1.0 mmol), AWEs (2.0 mL), for entries 1–13 reacted in the oil bath, for entries 14–19 reacted in the closed vessel synthesis reactor. b Determined by GC analysis. c The dried walnut shell and pomelo peel were obtained by calcination at 300 °C for 3 h with a rising rate of 0.5 °C min−1. d Isolated yield of 2a in parentheses. e Distilled water. WEWSA: water extract of walnut shell ash, WEHMPA: water extract of Hami melon peel ash, WEAA: water extract of alfalfa ash, WEBSA: water extract of badam shell ash, WEPPA: water extract of pomelo peel ash, WEPA: water extract of pomegranate ash. N.R. = no reaction.
Table 4. The substrate scope for the hydration of nitriles 1 in WEPPA a,b.
Table 4. The substrate scope for the hydration of nitriles 1 in WEPPA a,b.
Molecules 24 03838 i001
a Reaction conditions: 1 (1.0 mmol), WEPPA (2.0 mL), 150 °C, 0.5 h, closed vessel synthesis reactor. b Isolated yields. c 0.75 h. d 2 h. e 1 h. f 4 h. g GC yields.
Table 5. The conversions of 1a in the water solutions of different inorganic carbonates or oxides a.
Table 5. The conversions of 1a in the water solutions of different inorganic carbonates or oxides a.
Molecules 24 03838 i007
EntryCompoundLoading (g/10 mL)GC yields (%) b
1K2CO30.213617
2Na2CO31.2 × 10−3N.R
3CaCO30.0741N.R
4MgCO30.0192Trace
5CuCO30.054 × 10−3N.R
6MnCO30.012N.R
7CaO0.074140
8MgO0.0192N.R
9CuO0.054 × 10−3N.R
10Fe2O30.18 × 10−3N.R
11MnO20.012N.R
12 cmixture26
a Reaction conditions: 1a (1.0 mmol), water solutions of inorganic carbonates or oxides (2.0 mL), 150 °C, 0.5 h. b Determined by GC analysis. c According to the ICP analysis, water solution of all these inorganic carbonates and oxides entries 1–11.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, Y.; Jin, W.; Liu, C. Trash to Treasure: Eco-Friendly and Practical Synthesis of Amides by Nitriles Hydrolysis in WEPPA. Molecules 2019, 24, 3838. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24213838

AMA Style

Sun Y, Jin W, Liu C. Trash to Treasure: Eco-Friendly and Practical Synthesis of Amides by Nitriles Hydrolysis in WEPPA. Molecules. 2019; 24(21):3838. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24213838

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Yajun, Weiwei Jin, and Chenjiang Liu. 2019. "Trash to Treasure: Eco-Friendly and Practical Synthesis of Amides by Nitriles Hydrolysis in WEPPA" Molecules 24, no. 21: 3838. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24213838

APA Style

Sun, Y., Jin, W., & Liu, C. (2019). Trash to Treasure: Eco-Friendly and Practical Synthesis of Amides by Nitriles Hydrolysis in WEPPA. Molecules, 24(21), 3838. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24213838

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop