Next Article in Journal
Rapid Monitoring of Organochlorine Pesticide Residues in Various Fruit Juices and Water Samples Using Fabric Phase Sorptive Extraction and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Journal
The Studies on Structure and Stability of CaBn Clusters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diversity in Accessions of Panicum miliaceum L. Based on Agro-Morphological, Antioxidative, and Genetic Traits

1
Department of Applied Life Science, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Korea
2
Bioherb Research Institute, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(6), 1012; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061012
Submission received: 31 January 2019 / Revised: 2 March 2019 / Accepted: 8 March 2019 / Published: 13 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)

Abstract

:
The genetic diversity and antioxidant potential of Panicum miliaceum L. accessions collected from different geo-ecological regions of South Korea were evaluated and compared. Antioxidant potential of seeds was estimated by the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and 2,2′-azino-bis-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging assays and total phenolic content was determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method. Total phenolic content (TPC) in 80% methanolic extracts ranged from 16.24 ± 0.86 to 58.04 ± 1.00 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g of the sample extracts and total flavonoid content (TFC) varied from 7.19 ± 1.05 to 52.56 ± 1.50 mg quercetin equivalents (QE) mg/g of the sample extracts. DPPH radical scavenging capacity of the extracts from the 15 accessions of P. miliaceum varied from 206.44 ± 7.72 to 2490.24 ± 4.641 mg GAE/g of the sample extracts and ABTS radical scavenging capacity ranged from 624.85 ± 13.1 to 1087. 77 ± 9.58 mg GAE/g of the sample extracts. A wide range of genetic variation was observed as measured by Shannon’s information index (I), number of effective alleles (Ne), number of observed alleles (Na), expected heterozygosity (He), unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHe). The observed variation in the bioactive properties, morphological traits, and genetic diversity among the accessions may provide useful information for breeding programs seeking to improve bioactive properties of P. miliaceum.

1. Introduction

Panicum miliaceum L., also known as proso millet, belongs to the Graminacea family and is an ancient crop that has been cultivated for more than 7000 years [1]. It is also considered an economically important crop that is cultivated mainly in China, Eastern Europe, India, Russia, and Northern America [2]. This plant is mainly used as functional food owing to its high protein content [3,4]. In addition, it is also used as a raw material for liquor and beer, animal fodder, and as a sizing agent in the textile industry in Africa and Asia [5,6]. It is a gluten-free food whose mild flavor is used in food industries of America and Europe [7]. Moreover, millet requires relatively low amounts of water and nutrients for growth and can be cultivated in a wide range of altitudes [6]. It is considered a rich source of micronutrients such as iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), vitamins, and trace elements [8]. Therefore, this plant is receiving increasing attention from food industries. Moreover, previous studies on this plant reported about its anticancer and antidiabetic properties and its ability to prevent coronary heart disease and liver diseases [9,10,11].
The rapid loss of genetic diversity of plant species due to changing environment creates an urgent need to conserve existing important alleles and valuable phenotypic traits of genetic resources and to gather information about the genetic variation of different accessions. Studies on genetic diversity not only increase our knowledge but are also vital for improving yield, disease resistance, and nutritional value [12], as they facilitate the genetic integration of new useful genes [13], and are important for future breeding programs [14]. Moreover, characterizing genetic variation of plant species helps select superior germplasm for the rational use of genetic resources [15].
Characterizing morphological traits is very important when assessing the agronomic value and taxonomically classifying of plant species [16]. Morphological traits are also useful tools in studying geographical patterns in large gene bank collections of plant species [17,18]. However, morphological characterization has its own disadvantages, as it is time-consuming and varies according to the environmental changes and low level of polymorphism, low heritability, late expression, limited discriminative power, and lower potential to measure relatedness and genetic similarity [19]. DNA fingerprinting markers play a major role in revealing polymorphisms. The selection of accessions is more accurate when genetic markers are used rather than morphological traits, as genetic markers can be obtained from all tissues of organisms, allow early detection, and can produce highly specific pattern of bands for each individual. Genetic markers, also called DNA markers, show variation among individuals based on variation in DNA sequences [20,21,22]. There are many kinds of molecular markers available, including amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), simple sequence repeats (SSR), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR), and diversity arrays technology (DArT) markers, among which ISSR markers are most reliable as they are simple, cost-effective, and highly polymorphic, and can augment plant breeding programs [23].
ISSR markers have become reliable tools in the field of DNA fingerprinting and analyzing genetic diversity of plants. Since these markers do not require sequence information, variations may be found at several loci simultaneously, are microsatellite-sequence specific, are reliable for DNA profiling, especially for closely related species [24], and are highly reproducible and polymorphic, ISSRs are used extensively in taxonomic studies [25] to determine phylogenetic relationships and plant breeding programs [26,27,28]. In contrast, the use of RAPD represents a very cost-effective, rapid, and efficient approach in detect higher levels of polymorphisms and unique alleles in plants [20]. The usefulness of these molecular markers has been extensively demonstrated for detecting genetic variations in several plant species [29,30,31,32]. Applying two marker systems gives more reliable and correct information about genetic diversity. Moreover, the omissions recorded by certain markers can be solved or minimized by using more than one marker [33].
Previous studies on the genetic diversity in P. miliaceum were employed by using genetic markers [34,35,36,37]. Even though genetic diversity was assessed using different types of DNA markers, the genetic diversity of P. miliaceum has been inadequately assessed. Variation in the chlorophyll content in the plant can be used as an indicator of plant vigor [38]. These pigments are also associated with the antioxidant properties of plants [38]. A number of studies have reported that phytochemicals, such as phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and isoflavones not only act as antioxidant compounds [39], but are also safe for consumption as dietary supplements. Other studies have reported natural antioxidants extracted from plants that effectively inhibited or reduced the formation or scavenging of free radicals and carcinogens [40]. P. miliaceum has a wide geographical range, which results in variations in nutritional value, biological activity, and agro-morphological traits. To our knowledge, there is no report on the chlorophyll content, morphological variation, and antioxidant and genetic diversity assessed using a combined molecular marker technique in P. miliaceum accessions. Moreover, the antioxidant profiles of P. miliaceum accessions that originate from different parts of the Korean peninsula have not been fully examined in earlier studies. Previous research on P. miliaceum accessions were limited and incomplete in the absence of these parameters. Therefore, the objectives of the present study were to compare the bio-morphological and genetic traits in the accessions and to screen biological activities and their correlations with total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC). By screening the accessions, we can have diverse adapted germplasm for safe and productive P. miliaceum production. Furthermore, the present comparative study might identify accessions with useful genes for breeding programs, and may be able to introduce a commercial variety to farmers.

2. Results

2.1. Morphological Variation in P. miliaceum

A total of 18 quantitative and qualitative traits of the 15 accessions of P. miliaceum studies are shown in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3. 13.33% of the accessions (PM-04 and PM-05) took a long period to begin blooming and attain full bloom, while 46.67% of the accessions showed early bloom start and full bloom (PM-01, PM-02, PM-06, PM-08, PM-14, PM-015). A significant positive correlation was observed between bloom begin and full bloom (r = 0.995, p < 0.01) (Table 3). In this study, days to bloom was moderately positively correlated with leaf length and plant height (r = 0.453 and r = 0.420, p < 0.01, respectively), indicating that leaf number of accessions was a critical factor that directly influenced the initiation of flowering. Plant height, an important parameter in plant breeding, showed a wide variation ranging from 111.03 ± 2.00 cm to 186.30 ± 3.50 cm. Among all the accessions, PM-07 displayed the tallest height (186.30 ± 3.50 cm), while accession PM-09 showed the shortest height (111.03 ± 2.00 cm). In this report, plant height was shown to be highly positively correlated with culm length (r = 0.980, p < 0.01), and moderately positively correlated with stem diameter (r = 0.621, p < 0.01), total number of leaves (r = 0.608, p < 0.01), average leaf length (r = 0.630, p < 0.01) indicating that these parameters were critical factors that directly influenced the growth of P. miliaceum accessions.
The accessions had a wide range of variation in culm length, ranging from 74. 00 ± 2.00 cm (in PM-09) to 148.50 ± 1.50 cm (in PM-07). Culm length showed significant moderate positive correlations with stem diameter, number of leaves, and leaf length (r = 0.595 and r = 0.626, r = 0.652, p < 0.01, respectively). However, culm length weakly correlation with the bloom begin and full bloom (r = 0.190 and r = 0.157 p < 0.01), although there was no significant correlation between these parameters at p < 0.01. In the present study, spike length and width were also distinctive morphological markers to distinguish among the studied P. miliaceum accessions. The spike length ranged from 34.8 ± 2.80 cm to 52.5 ± 7.50 cm, while spike width ranged from 2.6 ± 0.60 cm to 5.0 ± 1.00 cm. The highest spike length and width was observed in PM-12 (52.5 ± 7.5 cm and 5.0 ± 1.0 cm, respectively) (Figure 1). Other quantitative traits such as spike type and tiller number were not significantly different among the accessions. The majority of accessions exhibited a single tiller. Leaf color and leaf orientation were the only qualitative parameters and a significant polymorphism was observed within the accessions. Leaf orientation was almost horizontal with respect to the stem axis in the majority of accessions. Accessions PM-02 and PM-15 were remarkably different from the rest of the accessions with leaves slightly below the horizontal axis, pointing downwards. A wide range of variation in the leaf length and width was observed among the 15 accessions. Accession PM-10 displayed the longest leaf length (54.17 ± 2.00 cm), with higher leaf length/width ratio (18.48 ± 0.07), while PM-14 displayed the shortest leaf length (31.00 ± 2.00). The average number of leaves and average stem diameter also varied significantly (p < 0.01) among the 15 accessions. The average stem diameter of accessions ranged from 0.4 ± 0.0 cm to 1.41 ± 0.3 cm in PM-08 and PM-13, respectively. Leaf length was shown to be highly positively correlated with leaf width and stem diameter (r = 0.763 and r = 0.764, p < 0.01, respectively).
The accessions exhibited a wide range of variation in seed color. The majority of accessions exhibited creamy seed coat. The average weight of 1000 seeds per accessions varied from 4.41 ± 0.1 g in PM-03 to 6.36 ± 0.06 g in PM-08, however, 1000 seed weight exhibited moderate negative correlations with bloom begin and full bloom both (r = −0.482 and −0.477, respectively), although there was no significance between these parameters at p < 0.01 (Table 3).

2.2. Variations in Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyl b, and Carotenoid Content

Relative chlorophyll pigment (Chl a, Chl b, ratio of Chl a/chl b, and carotenoids) contents were measured in the 15 accessions (Table 4). In general, a wide range of variability was observed among the accessions. Results revealed a higher concentration of Chl a and Chl b in PM-02 and PM-09, while PM-11 exhibited the lowest amount of Chl a and Chl b accumulation. However, no significant differentiation was observed in carotenoid concentration within the studied accessions. A significant and high positive association was observed between Chl a and Chl b with carotenoids (r = 0.997, p < 0.01). A strong negative interrelationship was also observed between Chl a and Chl b with carotenoid contents in the accessions (r = −0.912 and r = −0.935, p < 0.01, respectively).

2.3. Principal Component Analysis

In this study, PCA was applied to assess the morphological variations using 18 morphological traits obtained from the fifteen accessions of P. miliaceum (Figure 2). The first and second principal components scores were 35.540% and 18.506% of the total variance, respectively. Along axis 1 of the PCA analysis, three accessions formed a group (PM-02, PM-04, PM-07) for the positive side of the PC1 axis, mainly characterized by the morphological traits such as higher culm length, leaf length and width, and average number of leaves, indicating that these accessions were closely related genotypes. Five accessions (P-03, PM-05, PM-09, PM-10, PM-15) formed a separate group on the positive side of the PC2 axis, mostly sharing the characteristics of longer time to bloom start and full bloom. Six other accessions (PM-01, PM-05, PM-08, PM-11, PM-13, PM-14) formed another group on the negative side of the PC2 axis, mainly characterized by morphological traits such as higher weight of 1000 seeds. Accession PM-12, a sole representative on the negative side of the PC1 axis, strongly contributed to morphological traits, such as higher spike length, plant height, stem diameter, and spike length. The present study revealed that the studied accessions did not group according to their geographical origins.

2.4. Screening of Total Phenolic Content, Total Flavonoid Content and Antioxidant Potential of P. miliaceum Accessions

Total phenolic contents of 15 P. miliaceum accessions are presented in the Table 5. Total phenolic content in 80% methanolic extracts at a concentration of 1000 ppm ranged from 16.24 ± 0.86 to 58.04 ± 1.00 mg GAE per 1 g of sample. PM-03 had a significantly higher total phenolic content (58.04 ± 1.00 mg GAE per 1 g of sample). A wide range of significant variations (p < 0.001) in TFC were observed among the studied accessions, ranging from 7.19 ± 1.05 to 52.56 ± 1.50 mg quercetin equivalent per 1 g sample.
At the accessions level, PM-05 displayed the highest TFC (52.56 ± 1.50 mg quercetin equivalent per 1 g of sample) and the lowest amount of total flavonoid contents (7.19 ± 1.05 mg quercetin equivalent per 1 g sample) was observed in PM-04. DPPH radical scavenging capacity of the extracts from the 15 accessions of P. miliaceum are shown in the Table 5. The RC50 values among the studied accessions ranged from 206.44 ± 7.72 to 2490.24 ± 4.641 µg mL−1. The extracts from accession PM-05 exhibited the highest antioxidant capacity as represented by a lower RC50 value (206.44 ± 7.72 µg mL−1), while the lowest DPPH radical scavenging activity was observed in the extracts of PM-04 (2490.24 ± 4.64 µg mL−1). The ABTS radical scavenging capacity of the different accessions of P. miliaceum varied considerably (Table 5). The highest ABTS scavenging capacity was observed in PM-14 as represented by lower RC50 values (624.85 ± 13.1 µg mL−1), while the lowest ABTS scavenging capacity (1087.77 ± 9.58 µg mL−1) was recorded in extracts of PM-04. In the present study, it is likely that collecting accessions from different geo-ecological regions with different altitudes may have significantly influenced these parameters.

2.5. Correlation between Antioxidant Capacity, Total Phenolic, and Total Flavonoid Contents

Pearson’s correlation coefficients were obtained to determine the relationship between antioxidant capacity, total phenolic content, and total flavonoid contents (Table 6). A significant, high correlation (p < 0.01) was observed between DPPH scavenging activity with total phenolic and total flavonoid contents (r = 0.732 and r = 0.933, p < 0.01, respectively). In contrast, a weak and nonsignificant association was observed between ABTS scavenging activity with TPC and TFC (r = 0.370 and r = 0.268, p < 0.01, respectively).

2.5.1. Genetic Variability Details from ISSR Markers

A total of 29 ISSR primers were screened for the ISSR analysis and 22 of them resulted in amplification of DNA from accessions. A wide variation was recorded in the amplification products (200 to 800 bp). A total of 160 bands were generated, 30% of which showed polymorphism. All the generated bands were distinct and varied in size and type (monomorphic and polymorphic). The highest number of scorable bands (15) was observed in ISSR-809 primers (Figure 3), while the least number of bands were scored from ISS-854. Out of the 22 scorable primers used, 22.22% showed 100% polymorphism (Table 7). A wide range of variation was also observed from determining Shannon’s information index (I), number of effective alleles (Ne), number of observed alleles (Na), expected heterozygosity (He), and unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHe) (Table 9). The average Shannon’s information index value (I) was 0.581 ± 0.006 (ranged from 0.337 to 0.693). The average number of effective alleles (Ne) was 1.675 ± 0.015 (ranged from 1.233 to 1.998). The observed average number of different alleles (Na) was 2.00. The average expected heterozygosity (He) and unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHe) in the accessions were 0.395 ± 0.006 and 0.408 ± 0.006, respectively.

2.5.2. Genetic Variability Details from RAPD Markers

Eleven RAPD primers were selected for amplifying DNA of P. miliaceum accessions (Table 8). A total of 46 bands were generated, 27.27% of which showed polymorphism. The number of polymorphic bands varied widely among the primers used. The maximum number of polymorphic bands (seven bands per primer) was observed in RAPD-1 (Figure 4), while the least number of polymorphic bands (3 bands per primer) was generated using RAPD-7. The size of polymorphic bands varied from 250 to 900 bp. A wide range of variation was also observed in Shannon’s information index (I), number of effective alleles (Ne), number of observed alleles (Na), expected heterozygosity (He), and unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHe) (Table 9). The average Shannon’s information index value (I) was 0.578 ± 0.29 (ranged from 1.383 to 1.999. The average number of effective alleles (Ne) was 1.662 ± 0.048 (ranged from 1.383 to 1.99). The observed average number of different alleles (Na) was 2.00 ± 0.00. The average expected heterozygosity (He) and unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHe) in the accessions was 0.391 ± 0.018 and 0.396 ± 0.01, respectively.

2.5.3. Genetic Variability Details from RAPD + ISSR Combined Data

In the present study, we used two different marker systems (ISSR and RAPD), to maximize the efficiency of detecting polymorphisms and to define genetic similarity within the accessions. A total of 206 bands were generated by combining both ISSR and RAPD primers. None of the primers generated identical band patterns, indicating a wide range of diversity within the accessions. The observed differences in loci number by using RAPD and ISSR marker indicate differences in the genetic sequence in the studied accessions. The average Shannon’s information index value (I) was 0.601 ± 0.007 (ranged from 0.538 to 0.644). The average number of effective alleles (Ne) was 1.700 ± 0.018 (ranged from 1.546 to 1.823). The observed average number of different alleles (Na) was 2.00 ± 0.00. The average expected heterozygosity (He) and unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHe) in the accessions was 0.411 ± 0.006 and 0.412 ± 0.006, respectively (Table 10). In the present study, combining molecular marker systems produced higher informative classification than single markers alone.

2.5.4. UPGMA Cluster Analysis Using ISSR and RAPD Marker

Based on the ISSR marker data, similar coefficient values among the accessions ranged from 0.78 to 0.95 (Figure 5). These data were used to construct a dendrogram using the UPGMA method. All accessions can be classified into five major groups.
Group I consisted of five accessions (PM-01, PM-02, PM-04, PM-07, PM-08). Group II comprises five accessions (PM-09, PM-10, PM-11, PM-12, PM-13). Group III consisted of a single accession (PM-06), characterized by strong antioxidant properties. Group IV comprises two accessions (PM-14, PM-15) that mostly shared characteristics of similar seed color, tiller number, color of leaves, average number of leaves, bloom start, and full bloom. Group V consisted of two accessions (PM-03, PM-05), the majority of which were characterized by identical stem diameter, plant height, full bloom duration, spike length and width, and leaf orientation.
Based on RAPD markers, similar coefficient values among the accessions ranged from 0.18 to 0.84. From the data, five distinct groups were observed (Figure 6). Group I consisted of six accessions (PM-01, PM-15, PM-07, PM-08, PM-09, PM-11), the majority of which were characterized by a short duration until bloom start and full bloom. Group II was comprised of three accessions (PM-02, PM-03, PM-05), mostly sharing the characteristic of short spike width. Group III consisted of two accessions (PM-06, PM-10), sharing the common feature of identical leaf width, while group IV and V comprised a single accession in each group. The polymorphisms shown by RAPD analysis among the accessions indicate that this tool is effective in distinguishing P. miliaceum accessions and determining their genetic diversity.

2.5.5. RAPD and ISSR Combined Data for Cluster Analysis

Based on the combination of ISSR + RAPD markers, similar coefficients among the fifteen accessions ranged from 0.75 to 0.92 (Figure 7). These values were used to construct a dendrogram using UPGMA. All the accessions could be clustered into five main groups. Group I consisted of four accessions (PM-01, PM-04, PM-07, PM-08), while group II comprises five accessions (PM-09, PM-10, PM-11, PM-13, and PM-12), which were distinguished from other groups because of identical bloom begin and full bloom. Group III consisted of a single accession (PM-06), while group IV consisted of two accessions (PM-14 and PM-15), which were distinguished from other accessions of other groups due to identical short duration of bloom begin and full bloom. Group V consisted of three accessions (PM-02, PM-03, PM-05) that mostly shared the characteristic of short spike width. In this study, the total number of clusters and identification of accessions in each cluster by using morphological traits and molecular markers varied. The distant accessions such as PM-01 and PM-15 identified on the basis of combined ISSR and RAPD markers were found to be identical in terms of bloom start, full bloom, and culm length, whereas genetically identical accessions (PM-14 and PM-15) differed in terms of plant height, leaf length, leaf width, ration of leaf length/width, culm length, stem diameter, and spike length and width. The present study observed no correlation between the agro-morphological characteristics and genetic diversity.

3. Discussions

3.1. Morphological Variation in P. miliaceum

Characterizing agro-morphological traits is not only helpful in breeding programs but is also useful for improving the biological and functional properties of food [41]. The characteristics and diversity of fifteen P. miliaceum accessions were assessed using agro-morphological traits. In our study, there was a wide range of variation in the morphological traits among the accessions. Full bloom period was significantly different (p < 0.05) but varied within the studied accessions. These results were consistent with findings of Vetriventhana and Upadhyaya [6]. It has been argued that the full bloom period is important because it provides information about the time of flowering, pollination, and seed development and dispersal [42]. In this study, days to bloom was moderate, positively correlated with leaf length and plant height (r = 0.453, p < 0.01), indicating that leaf length of accessions was a critical factor that directly influenced the initiation of flowering. A significant positive correlations have been found between plant height and bloom begin (r = 0.420, p < 0.01). It has been reported that short height and early bloom of crops are generally associated with higher ability to compete with nutrition and light for higher yield, require a small cultivation area, and have increased density compared to taller accessions [43,44]. Other quantitative traits such as culm length were significantly different among the accessions and showed significant moderate positive correlations with stem diameter, number of leaves, and leaf length. In the present study, spike length and width were also distinctive morphological markers to distinguish among the studied P. miliaceum accessions. Leaf color and leaf orientation were the only qualitative parameters and a significant polymorphism was observed within the accessions. Leaf orientation was almost horizontal with respect to the stem axis in the majority of accessions. It has been suggested that leaf orientation is directly associated with plant growth and yield [45,46]. Moreover, our study corroborated the findings of Trivedi et al. [47] and Lagler et al. [48], who reported phenotypic variation including leaf length, leaf width, plant height, bloom begin, 1000 seed weight, and seed color in the P. miliaceum accessions. However, in this study, 1000 seed weight exhibited moderate negative correlations with bloom begin and full bloom both. In a similar study, a negative correlation was observed between 1000 grain weight and days to maturity [49] and plant height of wheat accessions [50]. Other studies found that variations in agro-morphological traits such as plant height leaf orientation and duration of maturity were clearly associated with survival and yield of P. miliaceum plants [51,52,53]. According to these studies, variation in these parameters helps accessions of various altitude and origin to adapt to different agro-climatic conditions. Moreover, a number of previous studies attributed the variation in morphological traits to genetic, developmental, and environmental factors [54,55].

3.2. Variations in Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyl b, and Carotenoid Content

Information about the chlorophyll contents of the plant accessions can be used as an indicator of plant vigor and contribute significantly in improving the plant biomass and grain yield [38]. It has been reported that the amount of these pigments are associated with genetical and environmental factor [56] and related to the photosystem II and oxidative stress of the plant [57,58]. In the present study, the accessions exhibited a wide range of variation in relative chlorophyll pigment (Chl a, Chl b, and ratio of Chl a/chl b). However, No clear trend was observed in the carotenoid content of the accessions. Our study corroborated the findings of Trivedi et al. [47], wherein they reported wide variation in these parameters among P. miliaceum accessions. In the present studies, a moderate and significantly positive correlation between chlorophyll contents and weight of 1000 seed (data not shown), indicating that these pigments are associated with the grain yield of P. miliaceum accessions. Previous studies have shown that a positive correlation between chlorophyll content and photosynthesis rate [59]. Beside role in photosynthesis, chlorophylls and carotenoids are known for its antioxidant properties [60]. In the present studies, we observed a weak positive correlation between chlorophyll contents and antioxidant activity, (though not significant), indicating that these metabolites contributed partially in the antioxidant activity of P. miliaceum accessions. Moreover, other researchers have concluded that greater chlorophyll a and b accumulation increases light absorption and ROS removal from plants, ultimately facilitating plant growth and increased the grain yield [61,62].

3.3. Screening of Total Phenolic Content, Total Flavonoid Content and Antioxidant Potential of P. miliaceum Accessions

Previous studies reported the close association between TPC and antioxidant potential, which is significantly influenced by variation in the plant of origin, its climatic conditions, and environment and plant populations [63,64]. Meanwhile, other studies emphasized the importance of growth season, altitudinal variation, and duration of plant maturity for variations in antioxidant activity [65,66,67]. In the present study, it is likely that collecting accessions from different geo-ecological regions with different altitudes may have significantly influenced these parameters. Moreover, our study corroborated the findings Chandrasekara and Shahidi [68], wherein they reported a wide variation in antioxidant activity in P. miliaceum collected from different geographical locations. Furthermore, they observed a higher, positive correlation between DPPH and ABTS (r = 0.820, p < 0.01), which is good agreement with the observations of the present study. Several studies reported a linear correlation between the antioxidant capacity of a plant with its types and concentration of phenolic compounds [69,70,71]. In the present study, the wide range of variation observed in the antioxidant capacity of the accessions can be associated with variations in the total phenolic and total flavonoid contents within them. It has been reported that the number of OH groups, arrangement of OH groups, and availability of electron-donating and withdrawing substituents in the phenolic compounds significantly determines the antioxidant capacity of plant extracts [72,73,74]. Aromatic rings and hydroxyl groups vary widely in the phenolic compounds, thus causing differences in the antioxidant capacity of plants [75,76]. Other studies pointed out that differences in genotypic and environmental factors during growth account for variation in the antioxidant potential in accessions [69,70,71]. Thus, present data can serve as an initial material for plant breeding programs of P. miliaceum for higher antioxidant activity and chlorophyll contents.

3.4. Genetic Variability Details from ISSR and RAPD Markers

In order to understand the distribution and genetic variation, an adequate knowledge about the existing plant population and traits is essential for the improvement of genetic resources [77]. Study of the plant population diversity considering only morphological traits is inadequate and inconvincing due to environmental influences [78,79]. Moreover, DNA fingerprinting methods employed in the study of genetic variation is a most steady and reliable methods across the plant accessions [80]. Use of ISSR and RAPD markers have become reliable tools in the field of DNA finger printing and analyzing genetic diversity, germplasm conservation and genomic mapping [81,82].
In the present study, a total of 22 ISSR primers and eleven RAPD primers were selected for amplifying DNA of P. miliaceum accessions. Both ISSR and RAPD markers showed more than 70% polymorphism. The results indicate that both ISSR and RAPD markers were effective in identifying the genetic variability in the P. miliaceum accessions. The average Shannon’s information index value (I), average number of effective alleles (Ne), average expected heterozygosity (He) and unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHe) detected by ISSR primers was higher than that of the RAPD primers. Based on comparison with the earlier reports, the present study essentially did not agree with the results of Trivedi et al. [47], where they reported low number of effective alleles (Ne) and low Shannon’s information index (I) values using ISSR marker in the studied P. miliaceum accessions, which might be due to different genetic backgrounds and better primer selection for the genetic diversity assessments in this study. The result indicates that ISSR markers are more effective for assessing genetic diversity. In terms of number of bands generated per primer, ISSR primers were a more efficient marker system than RAPD primers for determining polymorphic bands and to determine genetic diversity, which is corroborated with reports in peanut [83], chickpea [84], barley [85], pepper [86], and rice [87]. It has been reported that ISSR markers produce more polymorphism by amplifying microsatellite-rich regions of DNA due to mutations during replication [88]. On the other hand, comparatively, RAPD is less responsible and causes variable DNA band patterns, and is also highly influenced by experimental conditions [89,90]. In contrast, using RAPD markers, M’Ribu et al. [91] reported great polymorphism among proso millet cultivars. Similar to the present study, de Wet et al. [92] and Reddy et al. [93] reported high genetic diversity and morphological variation in proso millet accessions using RAPD primers. In the present study, combining molecular marker systems produced higher informative classification than single markers alone. The high level of polymorphism and genetic variation values using both ISSR and RAPD markers were in agreement with report for Stevia rebaudiana [33], Cucumis sativus [94], Cucurbitaceae [95], Pleurotus eryngii [31], and Vigna unguiculata [96]. It has been suggested that applying diverse marker types can provide more accurate results, thus helping evaluate genetic diversity efficiently [33]. It is worth emphasizing here that the combined used of ISSR and RAPD markers on the accessions of P. miliaceum and comparing the efficiency in determining genetic diversity had not been performed previously in P. miliaceum.

3.5. ISSR and RAPD Combined Data for Cluster Analysis

The dendogram clusters obtained could show the genetic relationship between the 15 accessions of P. miliaceum. The present study reveals that all 15 accessions were clustered into five major groups in both ISSR and RAPD methods. In a similar study, Trivedi et al. [47] reported different cluster patterns in accessions of P. miliaceum using ISSR markers. In other studies, Karam et al. [34] reported different cluster patterns in accessions of P. miliaceum using AFLP markers, whereas Liu et al. [35] reported four major groups at a genetic similarity level of 0.633 using SSR markers. In this study, the total number of clusters and identification of accessions in each cluster by using morphological traits and molecular markers varied. The distant accessions such as PM-01 and PM-15 identified on the basis of combined ISSR and RAPD markers were found to be identical in terms of bloom start, full bloom, and culm length, whereas genetically identical accessions (PM-14 and PM-15) differed in terms of plant height, leaf length, leaf width, ration of leaf length/width, culm length, stem diameter, and spike length and width. The lack of correlation between these two different approaches agreed with the report of Pathak et al. [97] in lychee cultivars, where they observed different identification results using molecular markers and morphological traits. Meanwhile, others argued that variability among accessions may be caused by uncontrolled spread of plant materials and longtime sexual reproduction and different degrees of domestication causing regular expression of certain genes and inactivation of other genes [98].

3.6. Conclusions

The present study is the first to assess the relationships among antioxidant capacity, morphological characteristics, and genetics of accessions of P. miliaceum using RAPD and ISSR markers. Wide differences in loci number by using RAPD and ISSR indicated differences in the genetic sequences of the studied accessions. This important information about the variations in the antioxidant capacity, morphological, and genetic diversity may be used in germplasm conservation and to assist molecular breeding programs for P. miliaceum with improved bioactive capacity. However, in the present study, a relatively small number of accessions was used for assessing biological activity, morphological characteristics, and genetic characterization of P. miliaceum accessions. Therefore, our future work will focus on considering a greater number of accessions for elucidating the relationship between these parameters.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Chemicals, Standard Compounds and Solvents

All commercial standard compounds with at least 99% purity used for analyzing individual phenolic compounds were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) and Extrasynthese (Genay Cedex, France). HPLC-grade methanol hexane, ethyl acetate, and butanol were supplied from Avantor–J. T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). Water used in this study was of analytical grade purified by a Milli-Q Water Purification System (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Other chemical compounds such as DPPH and ABTS, which were used for assessing biological activity, were purchased from Avantor–J. T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA).

4.2. Plant Materials

In this study, 15 accessions of P. miliaceum collected from different eco-geographical regions of Korea were grown from 2014–2017 at the Agriculture Research Field of Kangwon National University, South Korea (Table 10). All the accessions used in this study were grown naturally under ideal, similar plant growth conditions using the same field management practices at 99 m elevation.

4.3. Evaluation of Morphological Traits in P. miliaceum Accessions

Prior to cultivating the accessions, experimental units were prepared in a completely randomized block design, each unit consisting of 10 replicates. The length of each row was maintained at 70 m with 1 m between adjacent rows with approximately 80-cm gaps between seedlings. The rainfall recorded during the cultivated period was 200 nm with the average minimum and maximum temperature of 20 °C and 35 °C, respectively. The soil of the experimental field was maintained at pH of 6.1 and irrigated regularly (once a week) using a drip-irrigation system. To increase the nutrient contents of soil, the recommended dose of fertilizers (N:P:K = 15%:15%:15%) at a rate of 125 kg ha−1 were supplied when the land was prepared. To control weeds, landscape fabric was used to cover the spaces between the rows. The weeds that appeared within the rows were hand-picked at regular intervals. The recommended dose of pesticides was used to control pests. Quantitative and qualitative characteristics of field-grown accessions were recorded during the second week of October in 2014–2017. The morphological traits of each accession were recorded from five randomly selected plants of each accession. The different quantitative parameters considered for the study included: fresh weight, dry weight, plant height, leaf length, leaf width, number of leaves, leaf color, leaf orientation, ratio of leaf length to leaf width, culm length, number of nodes, tiller number, weight of 1000 seeds, full bloom time, bloom beginning, spike width, and spike length. Qualitative traits such as seed shape and seed color of each accession were rated (visually) and analyzed. The average height of each accession was measured using a ruler from the base of the plant to the apex of the stem. The emergence of flower (bloom beginning) was measured as the time duration (days) between the sowing and the emergence of the first flower. Full bloom was the time duration (days) between planting and emergence of approximately 50% of the flowers from each accession. The average weight of 1000 seeds was measured from 10 randomly selected samples from each P. miliaceum accession.

4.4. Screening of Chlorophyll Contents

To extract chlorophyll a, b, and carotenoid, 0.5 g of leaf sample was taken, and homogenized with 10 mL of 80% acetone. The homogenized sample was centrifuged for 4000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were collected in the cuvette. The chlorophyll a, b, and carotenoid content was spectrophotometrically analysed using a Shimadju UV-1800 UV-VS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) by following method described previously [99]. The concentration of chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, and carotenoids was calculated using following equation:
Chlorophyll-a = 12.25A663.2 − 279A646.8Chlorophyll-b = 21.5A646.8 − 5.1A663.2
Carotenoids = (1000A470 − 1.82Chla − 85.02Chlb)/198

4.5. Screening of Total Phenolic Concentration

The TPC of different extracts was determined using Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent by following the method described previously [100]. Briefly, 100 µL of plant extracts (1000 ppm) or standard compounds (gallic acid) were mixed with 200 µL of Folin–Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent and allowed stand for 5 min at room temperature (25 °C). After five minutes, 300 µL of Na2CO3 (20% w/v) solution was added to the mixture to stop the reaction. After incubating for 40 min at room temperature, the absorbance value was recorded at 765 nm against a blank solution (200 µL of 80% methanol). Gallic acid at various concentrations (1, 5, 10, 100 mg/L) was used for obtaining a calibration curve. Total phenolic contents of samples were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g of sample. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

4.6. Screening of Total Flavonoids Concentration

The TFC of different extracts was determined using a spectrophotometric method [101]. Briefly, 500 mL of plant extract (1000 ppm) or standard (quercetin) were added to 300 µL of AlCl3 and 200 µL of potassium cyanide. The mixtures were incubated for 30 min and absorbance value of the solution was measured immediately at 510 nm against a blank. The blank consisted of 500 mL of 80% methanol. A calibration curve was drawn using various concentrations of quercetin (1, 3, 5, 10 mg/L) and the TFCs of tested samples were expressed as mg quercetin equivalent (Qu)/G sample. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

4.7. Screening of Antioxidant Activity of P. miliaceum Accessions

4.7.1. Evaluation of DPPH Assay

Antioxidant activity of fifteen P. miliaceum accessions was determined using a 1,1-diphenyl-2-picryl-hydrazyl radical (DPPH) assay by following the methods described previously [102]. Briefly, 200 µL of plant crude extracts at different concentrations (ranging from 10,000 ppm to 100 ppm) or standard compounds mixed with 300 µL of 0.004% freshly prepared methanol solution of DPPH in a 96-well plate. The mixture was incubated at room temperature (25 °C) for 30 min in the dark. The absorbance value of each test solution was measured at 515 nm using a V530 UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) connected with an automated plate reader. α-tocopherol was used as a positive control. The DPPH scavenging potential of each sample was measured using the following equation:
RC50 = Abcontrol − Absample/Abcontrol
where Abcontrol is the absorbance value of the control reaction (only DPPH radical solution) and Absample is the absorbance value of the plant sample (plant extract mixed with DPPH radical solution).

4.7.2. Evaluation of ABTS Assay

An ABTS assay was performed using a previously described previously [103] with some modifications. Initially, a working solution of ABTS (7.4 mM) potassium persulfate solution (2.6 mM) was mixed in an equal ratio (1:1, v/v) and allowed to react for 12 h at room temperature (25 °C) in the dark. The mixture was then diluted in methanol and the absorbance at 734 nm of the solution was adjusted to 0.600 ± 0.01. Then, 2.5-mL aliquots of extracts were added to 2.5 mL of ABTS solution. After gentle agitation, the solution was allowed to stand for 2 h in the dark. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 734 nm. A standard curve was generated using a Trolox standard solution at various concentrations (500–1000 µM). The radical scavenging activity of each sample was expressed as mmol Trolox equivalent/100 g. All the experiments were performed in triplicate. The ABTS capacity of each sample was calculated as follows:
RC50 = Abcontrol − Absample/Abcontrol
where Abcontrol is the absorbance of the control reaction (ABTS radical solution with no sample and positive control) and Absample is the absorbance of the test compound (ABTS radical solution with a sample or positive control).

4.8. DNA Extraction

Young leaves each from fifteen P. miliaceum accessions were collected for DNA extraction. DNA of individual accessions was extracted by following the standard CTAB method [104]. Approximately one gram of fresh leaf from 15 accessions was crushed individually in liquid nitrogen and suspended with extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 1.4 mM NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, 2% CTAB, and 0.2% β-mercaptoethanol) and incubated in a water bath for 45 min at 65 °C. After incubation, the supernatant was transferred to another 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube and an equal volume of ice-cold chloroform–isoamyl alcohol was added and the mixture were inverted and then spun at 11,952× g for 10 min. The supernatant was placed into another Eppendorf tube and an equal volume of ice-cold isopropanol was added to the mixture and incubated at −20 °C for 40 min. Then, the tube was centrifuged at 17,226× g for 10 min. After discarding the supernatant, 70% ice-cold ethanol was added to the DNA pellet. The DNA pellet was air dried and dissolved in 30 µL of nuclease-free water. The quality and concentration of DNA genomic DNA of all accessions was determined using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Jasco V530 UV-VIS) and 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. Extracted DNA was diluted to 5 ng/µL using 1 mmol/L TE buffer.

PCR Amplification and Electrophoresis

A total of 29 ISSR primers used to amplify the DNA of 15 accessions of P. miliaceum were obtained from the Bioherb Research Institute, Kangwon National University, South Korea. A total of 15 highly polymorphic ISSR markers were selected for this study. PCR amplification for the genomic DNA of each accession was performed in a 20-µL reaction volume containing 50 ng genomic DNA, 2 µL 1X PCR buffer, 1 U Taq DNA polymerase; 1 µM of primer, and 300 µM of dNTPs. PCR conditions for DNA amplification were as follows: initial denaturation step for 4 min at 95 °C, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94 °C, primer annealing for 45 s at 48–52 °C, and extension for 2 min at 72 °C, followed by a final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. The amplified products were loaded onto the 1% gel in 0.5X TBE buffer. The amplified PCR products were electrophoretically separated on 0.8% agarose in 0.5X TBE buffer for 20 min at 25 V and observed under UV light.
A total of eleven RAPD primers used to amplify the DNA of 15 accessions of P. miliaceum were obtained from Bioherb Research Institute (Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea). RAPD amplification reactions were performed in a 20-µL reaction volume containing 50 ng genomic DNA, 2 µL 1X PCR buffer, 1 U Taq DNA polymerase, 1 µM of primer, and 300 µM of dNTPs obtained from Bioneer (Daejeon, South Korea). The amplification conditions were an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 45 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 1 min at 42 °C, and 2 min at 72 °C; a final extension of 5 min at 72 ° C, followed by storage at 4 °C.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

Each experiment was performed in triplicate. The data obtained from the experiments were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Quantitative data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significant differences between the obtained data were determined by using Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.05 (SPSS ver. 20.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Correlations among the morphological traits, antioxidant activities, total phenolic content, and total flavonoid content were obtained by calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficient using SPSS software ver. 20.0. Principal component analysis (PCA) of quantitative morphological traits was performed using SPSS software ver. 20.0. Cluster analysis using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA) was performed using SPSS software ver. 20. Shannon’s information index (I), number of effective alleles (Ne), number of observed alleles (Na), expected heterozygosity (He), and unbiased expected heterozygosity (uHe) were determined using GenAlEx software. NTSYS software v. 2.00 [105] (Exeter Publishing, Ltd., Setauket, NY, USA) was used to generate a UPGMA dendrogram.

Author Contributions

B.K.G. contributed by performing experiments and writing the manuscript. C.Y.Y. supervised the experiments. I.-M.C. and S.H.K. contributed by analyzing biological activities of plant samples and editing the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Education and by the National Research Foundation of Korea through the Human Resource Training Project for Regional Innovation (No. 2014H1C1A1067085).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funding from the KU research professor program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, L.; Wang, X.Y.; Wen, Q.F. Research and utilization of proso millet germplasm resource in China. J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2005, 6, 471–474. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baltensperger, D.D. Foxtail and proso millet. In Progress in New Crops; Janick, J., Ed.; ASHS Press: Alexandria, VA, USA, 1996; pp. 182–190. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kalinova, J.; Moudry, J. Content and quality of protein in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) varieties. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2006, 61, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Saleh, A.S.M.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, J.; Shen, Q. Millet grains: Nutritional quality, processing, and potential health benefits. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rajput, S.G.; Santra, D.K. Evaluation of genetic diversity of proso millet germplasm available in the United States using simple-sequence repeat markers. Crop Sci. 2016, 56, 2401–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vetriventhana, M.; Upadhyaya, H.D. Diversity and trait-specific sources for productivity and nutritional traits in the global proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) germplasm collection. Crop J. 2018, 6, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, R.; Hunt, H.V.; Qiao, Z.; Wang, L.; Han, Y. Diversity and cultivation of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in China: A review. Econ. Bot. 2016, 70, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gomeshe, S.S. Proso millet, Panicum miliaceum (L.): Genetic improvement and research needs. In Millets and Sorghum. Biology and Genetic Improvement; Patil, J.V., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 150–179. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shen, R.; Ma, Y.; Jiang, L.; Dong, J.; Zhu, Y.; Ren, G. Chemical composition, antioxidant, and antiproliferative activities of nine Chinese proso millet varieties. Food Agric. Immunol. 2018, 29, 625–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ramadoss, D.P.; Sivalingam, N. Vanillin extracted from proso millet and barnyard millet induce apoptosis in HT-29 and MCF-7 cell line through mitochondria mediated pathway. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2017, 10, 226–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, L.; Liu, R.; Niu, W. Phytochemical and antiproliferative activity of proso millet. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, L.; Guan, R.; Zhang, X.L.; Chang, R.; Qiu, L. Genetic diversity of Chinese cultivated soybean revealed by SSR markers. Crop Sci. 2006, 46, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Satyavathi, C.T.; Bhat, K.V.; Bharadwaj, C.; Tiwari, S.P.; Chaudhury, V.K. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity in Indian soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] varieties. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2006, 53, 1069–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Upadhyaya, H.D.; Reddy, K.N.; Gowda, C.L.; Singh, S. Phenotypic diversity in the pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) core collection. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2007, 54, 1167–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Binalfew, T.; Alemu, Y. Characterization of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) germplasms collected from Western Ethiopia. Int. J. Res Agric. For. 2016, 3, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ortiz, R.; Crossa, J.; Franco, J.; Sevilla, R.; Burgueño, J. Classification of Peruvian highland maize races using plant traits. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2008, 55, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Borner, A.; Schäfer, M.; Schmidt, A.; Grau, M.; Vorwald, J. Associations between geographical origin and morphological characters in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Genet. Resour. 2005, 3, 360–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Furman, B.J.; Qualset, C.O.; Skovmand, B.; Heaton, J.H.; Corke, H.; Wesenberg, D.M. Characterization and analysis of North American triticale genetic resources. Crop Sci. 1997, 37, 1951–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Babic, V.; Nikolic, A.; Andjelkovic, V.; Kovacevic, D.; Filipovic, M.; Vasic, V.; Mladenovic-Drinic, S. AUPOV morphological versus molecular markers for maize inbred lines variability determination. Chilean J. Agric. Res. 2016, 76, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barkley, N.A.; Dean, R.E.; Pittman, R.N.; Wang, M.L.; Holbrook, C.C.; Pederson, G.A. Genetic diversity of cultivated and wild-type peanuts evaluated with M13-tailed SSR markers and sequencing. Genet. Res. 2007, 89, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, S.; Feuerstein, U.; Luesink, W.; Schulze, S.; Asp, T.; Studer, B.; Becker, H.C.; Dehmer, K.J. DArT, SNP, and SSR analyses of genetic diversity in Lolium perenne L. using bulk sampling. BMC Genet. 2018, 19, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Agarwal, M.; Shrivastava, N.; Padh, H. Advances in molecular marker techniques and their replications in plant sciences. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 617–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Williams, J.G.K.; Kubelik, A.R.; Livak, K.J.; Rafalski, J.A.; Tingey, S.V. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acid Res. 1990, 18, 6531–6535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Zietkiewicz, E.; Rafalski, A.; Labuda, D. Genome fingerprinting by Simple Sequence/Repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 1994, 20, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dogan, B.; Duran, A.; Hakki, E.E. Phylogenetic analysis of Jurinea (Asteraceae) species from Turkey based on ISSR amplification. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 2007, 44, 353–358. [Google Scholar]
  26. Adams, R.P.; Schwarzbach, A.E.; Pandey, R.N. The concordance of terpenoid, ISSR and RAPD markers, and ITS sequence data sets among genotypes: An example from Juniperus. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2003, 31, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Galvan, M.Z.; Bornet, B.; Balatti, P.A.; Branchard, M. Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers as a tool for the assessment of both genetic diversity and gene pool origin in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 2003, 132, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rao, V.R.; Hodgkin, T. Genetic diversity and conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2002, 68, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ding, G.; Li, X.; Ding, X.; Qian, L. Genetic diversity across natural populations of Dendrobium officinale, the endangered medicinal herb endemic to China, revealed by ISSR and RAPD markers. Russ. J. Genet. 2009, 45, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Han, Y.; Wang, H.Y. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of two closely related Northeast China Vicia species revealed with RAPD and ISSR markers. Biochem. Genet. 2010, 48, 385–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, S.; Yin, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xu, F. Evaluation of Genetic Diversity Among Chinese Pleurotus eryngii Cultivars by Combined RAPD/ISSR Marker. Curr. Microbiol. 2012, 65, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Babu, C.; Sundaramoorthi, J.; Vijayakumar, G.; Ganesh Ram, S. Analysis of genetic diversity in Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum) as detected by RAPD and ISSR markers. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2009, 18, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sharma, N.; Kaur, R.; Era, V. Potential of RAPD and ISSR markers for assessing genetic diversity among Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni accessions. Indian J. Biotechnol. 2016, 15, 95–100. [Google Scholar]
  34. Karam, D.; Westra, P.; Nissen, S.J.; Ward, S.M.; Figueiredo, J.E.F. Genetic diversity among Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) biotypes assessed by AFLP technique. Planta Daninha 2004, 22, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, M.; Xu, Y.; He, J.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Lu, P. Genetic diversity and population structure of Broomcorn Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) cultivars and Landraces in China based on microsatellite markers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Warwick, S.I. Isozyme variation in proso millet. J. Hered. 1987, 78, 210–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hu, X.Y.; Wang, J.F.; Lu, P.; Zhang, H.S. Assessment of genetic diversity in broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) using SSR markers. J. Genet. Genom. 2009, 36, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Carter, A.G.; Spiering, B.A. Optical properties of intact leaves for estimating chlorophyll concentration. J. Environ. Qual. 2002, 31, 1424–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mathew, S.; Abraham, T.E. Studies on the antioxidant activities of cinnamon (Cinnamonum verum) bank extracts, through various in vitro models. Food Chem. 2006, 94, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Negi, P.S.; Jayaprakash, G.K.; Jena, B.S. Antioxidant and antimutagenic activities of pomegranate peel extracts. Food Chem. 2003, 80, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bhartiya, A.; Aditya, J.P.; Pal, R.S.; Bajeli, J. Agromorphological, nutritional and antioxidant properties in Horsegram [Macrotyloma Uniflorum (Lam) Verdc germplasm collection from diverse altitudinal range of north western himalayan hills of India. Int. J. Plant Res. 2017, 30, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cockram, J.; Jones, H.; Leigh, F.J.; O’Sullivan, D.; Powell, W.; Laurie, D.A.; Greenland, A.J. Control of flowering time in temperate cereals: Genes domestication and sustainable productivity. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1231–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nik, M.M.; Babaeian, M.; Tavassoli, A.; Asgharzade, A. Effect of plant density on yield and yield components of corn hybrids (Zea mays L.). Sci. Res. Essays 2011, 6, 4821–4825. [Google Scholar]
  44. Grela, E.R.; Rybinski, W.; Klebaniuk, R.; Matras, J. Morphological characteristics of some accessions of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) grown in Europe and nutritional traits of their seeds. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2010, 57, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Duvick, D.N. Genetic progress in yield of United States maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 2005, 50, 193–202. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mansfield, B.D.; Mumm, R.H. Survey of plant density tolerance in US maize germplasm. Crop Sci. 2014, 54, 157–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Trivedi, A.K.; Arya, L.; Verma, M.; Verma, S.K.; Tyagi, R.K.; Hemantaranjan, A. Genetic variability in proso millet [Panicum miliaceum] germplasm of Central Himalayan Region based on morpho-physiological traits and molecular markers. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lagler, R.; Gyulai, G.; Humphreys, M.; Szabo, Z.; Horvath, L.; Bittsanszky, A.; Kiss, J.; Holly, L.; Heszky, L. Morphological and molecular analysis of common millet (P. miliaceum) cultivars compared to an aDNA sample from the 15th century (Hungary). Euphytica 2005, 146, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Khan, A.J.; Azam, F.; Ali, A. Relationship of morphological traits and grain yield in recombinant inbred wheat lines grown under drought conditions. Pak. J. Bot. 2010, 42, 259–267. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bano, S.; Kaleri, A.A.; Keerio, R.; Memon, S.; Kaleri, R.R.; Akram, R.; Laghari, A.L.; Chandio, I.A.; Nazeer, S. Analysis of correlation and regression among M2 wheat mutant population for yield and its associated traits. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2017, 13, 522–526. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lindquist, J.L.; Mortensen, D.A.; Johnson, B.E. Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability. Agron. J. 1998, 90, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sankula, S.; Van Gessel, M.J.; Mulford, R.R. Corn leaf architecture as a tool for weed management in two production systems. Weed Sci. 2004, 52, 1026–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Begna, S.H.; Smith, D.L.; Hamilton, R.I.; Dwyer, L.M.; Stewart, D.W. Corn genotypic variation effects on seedling emergence and leaf appearance of short-season areas. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2001, 186, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Labra, M.; Miele, M.; Ledda, B.; Grassi, F.; Mazzei, M.; Sala, F. Morphological characterization: Essential oil composition and DNA genotyping of Ocimum basilicum L. Cultivars. Plant Sci. 2004, 167, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, K.; Fan, G.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, F.; Wei, W.; Du, G.; Feng, X.; Wang, X.; Feng, W.F.; Song, G.; et al. Identification of QTLs for 14 agronomically important traits in Setaria italica based on SNPs generated from high-throughput sequencing. G3 Gene Genom. Genet. 2017, 7, 1587–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Abou-Ellail, M.; El-Shabrawi, H.M.; Matter, M.A.; Aly, U.I.; Ghareeb, H.A.; Eissa, E.A. Appraisal of biochemical and genetic diversity of mango cultivars using molecular markers. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2014, 13, 2796–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Negrão, S.; Schmöckel, S.M.; Tester, M. Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Ann. Bot. 2017, 119, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chaves, M.M.; Flexas, J.; Pinheiro, C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: Regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Thomas, J.A.; Jeffrey, A.C.; Atsuko, K.; David, M.K. Regulating the proton budget of higher plant photosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 9709–9713. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  60. Cervantes-Paz, B.; Yahia, E.M.; de Jesús Ornelas-Paz, J.; Victoria-Campos, C.I.; Ibarra-Junquera, V.; Pérez-Martínez, J.D.; Escalante-Minakata, P. Antioxidant activity and content of chlorophylls and carotenoids in raw and heat-processed Jalapeno peppers at intermediate stages of ripening. Food Chem. 2014, 146, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Johkan, M.; Shoji, K.; Goto, F.; Hashida, S.; Yoshihara, T. Blue light-emitting diode light irradiation of seedlings improves seedling quality and growth after transplanting in red leaf lettuce. HortScience 2010, 45, 1809–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Heo, J.W.; Kang, D.H.; Bang, H.S.; Hong, S.G.; Chun, C.; Kang, K.K. Early growth, pigmentation, protein content, and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity of red curled lettuces grown under different lighting conditions. Korean J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2012, 30, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ghasemi, P.A.; Hashemi, M.; Taherian Ghahfarokhi, F. Essential oil and chemical compositions of wild and cultivated Thymus daenensis Celak and Thymus vulgaris L. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 48, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gasch, A.P.; Spellman, P.T.; Kao, C.M.; Carmel-Harel, O.; Eisen, M.B.; Storz, G.; Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar]
  65. Mediani, A.; Abas, F.; Khatib, A.; Ping, T.C.; Lajis, N.H. Influence of growth stage and season on the antioxidant constituents of Cosmos caudatus. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2012, 67, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ghasemi, P.A.; Setayesh, M.; Siahpoosh, A.; Mashayekhi, H. Antioxidant activity, total phenolic and flavonoids contents of three herbs used as condiments and additives in pickles products. Herb. Pol. 2013, 59, 51–62. [Google Scholar]
  67. Jugran, A.K.; Bahukhandi, A.; Dhyani, P.; Bhatt, I.D.; Rawal, R.S.; Nandi, S.K. Impact of Altitudes and Habitats on Valerenic Acid, Total Phenolics, Flavonoids, Tannins, and Antioxidant Activity of Valeriana jatamansi. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 179, 911–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chandrasekara, A.; Shahidi, F. Antioxidant phenolics of millet control lipid peroxidation in human LDL cholesterol and food systems. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2012, 89, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Karimi, A.; Hadian, A.; Farzaneh, M.; Khadivi-Khub, A. Phenotypic diversity and volatile composition of Iranian Artemisia dracunculus. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 65, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ghahremani-majd, H.; Dashti, F.; Dastan, D.; Mumivand, H.; Hadian, J.; Esna-Ashari, M. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Iranian mooseer (Allium hirtifolium Boiss) populations. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2012, 53, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Faudale, M.; Viladomat, F.; Bastida, J.; Poli, F.; Codina, C. Antioxidant activity and phenolic composition of wild, edible, and medicinal fennel from different Mediterranean countries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 1912–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Amarowicz, R.; Pegg, R.B.; Rahimi-Moghaddam, P.; Barl, B.; Weil, J.A. Free-radical scavenging capacity and antioxidant activity of selected plant species from the Canadian prairies. Food Chem. 2004, 84, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Balasundram, N.; Sundram, K.; Samman, S. Phenolic compounds in plants and agri-industrial by-products: Antioxidant activity occurrence, and potential uses. Food Chem. 2006, 99, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, H.Y.; Sun, Y.M.; Wang, X.L. Substituent effects on OH bond dissociation enthalpies and ionization potentials of catechols: A DFT study and its implications in the rational design of phenolic antioxidants and elucidation of structure–activity relationships for flavonoid antioxidants. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Moghaddam, M.; Mehdizadeh, L. Variability of total phenolic, flavonoid and rosmarinic acid content among Iranian basil accessions. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 63, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Neuhouser, M.L. Flavonoids and cancer prevention: What is the evidence in humans? Pharm. Biol. 2004, 42, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Baruah, J.; Pandey, SK.; Begum, T.; Sarma, N.; Paw, M.; Lal, M. Molecular diversity assessed amongst high dry rhizome recovery Ginger germplasm (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) from NE-India using RAPD and ISSR markers. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 129, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Banerjee, P.P.; Kole, P.C. Analysis of genetic architecture for some physiological characters in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Euphytica 2009, 168, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tabatabaei, I.; Pazouki, L.; Bihamta, M.R.; Mansoori, S.; Javaran, M.J.; Niinemets, Ü. Genetic variation among Iranian sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) accessions vis-à-vis exotic genotypes on the basis of morpho-physiological traits and RAPD markers. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2011, 5, 1396–1407. [Google Scholar]
  80. Kasture, A.; Krishnamurthy, R.; Katagi, R.B. Genetic variation in the endangered Indian sweet flag (Acorus calamus L.) estimated using ISSR and RAPD markers. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2016, 3, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gajera, B.B.; Kumar, N.; Singh, A.S.; Punvar, B.S.; Ravikiran, R.; Subhash, N.; Jadeja, G.C. Assessment of genetic diversity in castor (Ricinus communis L.) using RAPD and ISSR markers. Ind. Crops Prod. 2010, 32, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mei, Z.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Imani, S.; Fu, J. Genetic analysis of Canarium album in different areas of China by improved RAPD and ISSR. C. R. Biol. 2017, 340, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Raina, S.N.; Rani, V.; Kojima, T.; Ogihara, Y.; Singh, K.P.; Devarumath, R.M. RAPD and ISSR fingerprints as useful genetic markers for analysis of genetic diversity, varietal identification and phylogenetic relationships in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars and wild species. Genome 2001, 44, 763–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chowdhury, M.A.; Vandenberg, B.; Warkentin, T. Cultivar identification and genetic relationship among selected breeding lines and cultivars in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 2002, 127, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fernandez, M.E.; Figueiras, A.M.; Benito, C. The use of ISSR and RAPD markers for detecting DNA polymorphism, genotype identification and genetic diversity among barley cultivars with known origin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 104, 845–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Thul, S.T.; Darokar, M.P.; Shasany, A.K.; Khanuja, S.P.S. Molecular profiling for genetic variability in Capsicum species based on ISSR and RAPD markers. Mol. Biotechnol. 2012, 51, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Qian, W.; Ge, S.; Hong, D.Y. Genetic variation within and among populations of wild rice Oryza granulate from China detected by RAPD and ISSR markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2001, 102, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Da Costa, M.L.M.; Amorim, L.L.B.; Onofre, A.V.C.; De Melo, L.J.O.T.; De Oliveira, M.B.M.; De Carvalho, R.; Benko-Iseppon, A.M. Assessment of genetic diversity in contrasting sugarcane varieties using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2011, 2, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wolff, K.; Schoen, E.D.; Peters-Van Rijn, J. Optimizing the generation of random amplified polymorphic DNAs in chrysanthemum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1993, 86, 1033–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Devos, K.M.; Gale, M.D. The use of random amplified polymorphic DNA markers in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1992, 84, 567–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. M’Ribu, H.K.; Hilu, K.W. Detection of interspecific and intraspecific variation in Panicum millets through random amplified polymorphic DNA. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1994, 88, 412–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. de Wet, J.M.J.; Rao, K.E.P.; Brink, D.E. Systematics and domestication of Panicurn sumatrense (Gramineae). J. Agric. Trad. Bot. Appl. 1983, 30, 159–168. [Google Scholar]
  93. Reddy, H.D.; Seetharam, A.; Mallikarjunaradhya, K. Genetic variability and path analysis in 225 accessions of little millet germplasm. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 1984, 54, 365–368. [Google Scholar]
  94. Manohar, S.H.; Murthy, H.N.; Ravishankar, K.V. Genetic diversity in a collection of Cucumis sativus L. assessed by RAPD and ISSR markers. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 22, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sikhdar, B.; Bhattacharya, M.; Mukherjee, A.; Banerjee, A.; Ghosh, E.; Ghosh, B.; Roy, S.C. Genetic diversity in important members of Cucurbitaceae using isozyme, RAPD and ISSR markers. Biol. Plant. 2010, 54, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gajera, H.P.; Domadiya, R.K.; Patel, S.V.; Golakiya, B.A. Appraisal of RAPD and ISSR Markers for Genetic Diversity Analysis among Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Genotypes. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 17, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pathak, A.K.; Singh, S.P.; Tuli, R. Amplified fragment length polymorphism finger printing to identify genetic relatedness among lychee cultivars and markers associated with small-seeded cultivars. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2014, 139, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rebman, J.P.; Pinkava, D.J. Opuntia cacti of North America—An overview. Fla. Entomol. 2001, 84, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Wellburn, A.R. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts indifferent solvents. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1983, 11, 591–592. [Google Scholar]
  100. Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A., Jr. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic–phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar]
  101. Moreno, M.I.N.; Isla, M.I.; Sampietro, A.R.; Vattuone, M.A. Comparison of the free radical-scavenging activity of propolis from several regions of Argentina. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 7, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ghimire, B.K.; Yu, C.Y.; Chung, I.M. Assessment of the phenolic profile, antimicrobial activity and oxidative stability of transgenic Perilla frutescens L. overexpressing tocopherol methyltransferase (g-tmt) gene. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 118, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Thaipong, K.; Boonprakob, U.; Crosby, K.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L.; Hawkins Byrne, D. Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2006, 19, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1990, 12, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  105. Rohlf, F.J. NTSYSpc: Numerical Taxonomy System. Ver. 2.20; Exeter Publishing, Ltd.: Setauket, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Figure 1. Variation in spike morphology in the 15 accessions of P. miliaceum studied.
Figure 1. Variation in spike morphology in the 15 accessions of P. miliaceum studied.
Molecules 24 01012 g001
Figure 2. Principal component analysis in the 15 accessions in P. miliaceum studied based on morphological characteristics.
Figure 2. Principal component analysis in the 15 accessions in P. miliaceum studied based on morphological characteristics.
Molecules 24 01012 g002
Figure 3. Banding pattern generated by the ISSR-844 primer. M: DNA ladder, 1–15 represent the DNA banding pattern of fifteen accessions of P. miliaceum.
Figure 3. Banding pattern generated by the ISSR-844 primer. M: DNA ladder, 1–15 represent the DNA banding pattern of fifteen accessions of P. miliaceum.
Molecules 24 01012 g003
Figure 4. Banding pattern generated by the RAPD-1 primer. M: DNA ladder, 1-15 represent the DNA banding pattern of fifteen accessions of P. miliaceum.
Figure 4. Banding pattern generated by the RAPD-1 primer. M: DNA ladder, 1-15 represent the DNA banding pattern of fifteen accessions of P. miliaceum.
Molecules 24 01012 g004
Figure 5. Dendrogram using UPGMA clustering procedures in 15 P. miliaceum accessions based on combined ISSR and RAPD markers.
Figure 5. Dendrogram using UPGMA clustering procedures in 15 P. miliaceum accessions based on combined ISSR and RAPD markers.
Molecules 24 01012 g005
Figure 6. Dendrogram using UPGMA clustering procedures in 15 P. miliaceum accessions based on RAPD markers.
Figure 6. Dendrogram using UPGMA clustering procedures in 15 P. miliaceum accessions based on RAPD markers.
Molecules 24 01012 g006
Figure 7. Dendrogram using UPGMA clustering procedures in 15 P. miliaceum accessions based on combined ISSR and RAPD markers.
Figure 7. Dendrogram using UPGMA clustering procedures in 15 P. miliaceum accessions based on combined ISSR and RAPD markers.
Molecules 24 01012 g007
Table 1. Morphological characteristics of selected accessions of P. miliaceum.
Table 1. Morphological characteristics of selected accessions of P. miliaceum.
AccessionBloom Begin (Days)Full Bloom (Days)Plant Height (cm)No. of LeavesLeaf Length (cm)Leaf Width (cm)Ratio (L/B)Culm Length (cm)Stem Diameter (cm) **Spike Length (cm)Spike Width (cm)
PM-0185.33±1.53 a92.33 ± 1.40 a137.03 ± 2.00 h6.0 ± 1.0 d38.3 ± 1.8 c2.4 ± 0.4 e15.9692.00 ± 4.00 e,f0.8 ± 0.2 c4.5 ± 0.5 h45.0 ± 3.0 k
PM-0285.67 ± 3.06 a91.67 ± 1.50 a170.43 ± 2.50 l8.0 ± 1.0 h52.2 ± 0.4 j3.0 ± 0.2 f17.40135.50 ± 3.50 i1.3 ± 0.1 h4.9 ± 0.1 i34.8 ± 2.8 a
PM-0392.67 ± 1.15 b99.33 ± 1.70 b115.23 ± 2.10 c4.5 ± 0.5 a48.0 ± 1.0 h3.3 ± 0.5 h14.5579.80 ± 2.30 c0.9 ± 0.2 d3.7 ± 0.2 f35.8 ± 3.3 b
PM-0499.67 ± 2.08 c105.67 ± 1.53 c140.30 ± 3.0 k5.0 ± 1.0 b51.5 ± 2.5 i3.3 ± 0.6 h15.6196.50 ± 3.50 g1.1 ± 0.1 f3.3 ± 0.2 c44.3 ± 1.8 k
PM-0598.67 ± 1.53 c106.33 ± 1.53 c123.13 ± 2.50 d6.5 ± 0.5 e40.8 ± 2.8 e2.2 ± 0.1 d18.5186.80 ± 3.30 d0.7 ± 0.1 b3.5 ± 0.5 e36.5 ± 1.5 c
PM-0685.67 ± 3.06 a92.33 ± 1.67 a135.20 ± 3.0 g5.5 ± 0.5 c43.5 ± 1.5 f3.0 ± 0.0 f14.5094.50 ± 4.50 f,g1.0 ± 0.0 e3.3 ± 0.1 c41.0 ± 1.0 h
PM-0793.33 ± 3.51 b100.00 ± 1.80 b186.30 ± 3.50 n7.5 ± 0.5 g54.0 ± 2.0 l3.2 ± 0.2 g18.00148.50 ± 1.50 j1.4 ± 0.1 i4.5 ± 0.5 h38.3 ± 1.3 e
PM-0884.33 ± 2.08 a92.00 ± 2.00 a112.33 ± 1.50 b5.5 ± 0.5 c31.0 ± 2.0 a2.10 ± 0.1 b c14.7677.00 ± 3.00 b0.4 ± 0.0 a3.1 ± 0.3 b35.5 ± 1.5 b
PM-0985.33 ± 1.53 a92.00 ± 1.50 a111.03 ± 2.00 a6.5 ± 0.5 e45.0 ± 3.0 g3.07 ± 0.1 f14.6674.00 ± 2.00 a1.1 ± 0.1 f2.6 ± 0.6 a37.0 ± 3.0 d
PM-1093.67 ± 2.08 b99.67 ± 1.00 b128.30 ± 2.50 e7.0 ± 0.5 f54.17 ± 2.0 l3.09 ± 0.1 f17.5390.00 ± 2.00 e1.41 ± 0.3 i4.4 ± 0.6 h38.9 ± 1.1 e
PM-1193.33 ± 1.53 b100.00 ± 1.20 b138.03 ± 1.90 i7.5 ± 0.5 g43.5 ± 1.5 f1.9 ± 0.1 a22.8995.80 ± 1.30 g0.9 ± 0.0 d4.5 ± 0.5 h42.3 ± 2.8 i
PM-1293.33 ± 2.51 b100.00 ± 2.00 b182.27 ± 2.50 m8.5 ± 0.5 i53.0 ± 1.0 k3.4 ± 0.1 i15.59130.30 ± 1.80 h1.3 ± 0.2 h5.0 ± 1.0 j52.5 ± 7.5 m
PM-1392.67 ± 2.51 b100.00 ± 2.00 b139.00 ± 2.00 j4.5 ± 0.5 a39.3 ± 1.8 d2.17 ± 0.1 c,d18.1192.50 ± 4.50 e,f1.4 ± 0.3 i3.8 ± 0.8 g46.5 ± 0.5 l
PM-1485.00 ± 2.00 a91.67 ± 1.00 a115.15 ± 3.00 c6.5 ± 0.5 e32.5 ± 2.5 b2.2 ± 0.4 d14.7775.50 ± 1.50 a b0.8 ± 0.0 c3.4 ± 0.6 d39.5 ± 2.5 f
PM-1585.00 ± 2.00 a91.67 ± 2.10 a133.78 ± 1.80 f6.5 ± 0.5 e45.5 ± 2.5 g2.07 ± 0.2 b21.9892.50 ± 2.50 e,f1.2 ± 0.1 g3.5 ± 0.5 e40.5 ± 0.5 g
** Experimental data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Data having the same letter in a row were not significantly different as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Table 2. Morphological characteristics of the selected accessions of P. miliaceum.
Table 2. Morphological characteristics of the selected accessions of P. miliaceum.
AccessionWeight of 1000 Seed (g) ***Seed Color **Tiller NumberLeaf Orientation *Color of Leaves
PM-015.43 ± 0.15 f311Green
PM-025.95 ± 0.45 h113Green
PM-034.41 ± 0.10 a122Light
PM-045.24 ± 0.05 e211Green
PM-054.92 ± 0.25 b312Green
PM-065.43 ± 0.70 f521Green
PM-075.75 ± 0.05 g312Green
PM-086.36 ± 0.06 i312Light
PM-095.07 ± 0.11 c,d212Light
PM-105.72 ± 0.11 g212Green
PM-115.04 ± 0.05 b,c212Green
PM-125.19 ± 0.08 d,e222Light
PM-135.75 ± 0.03 g122Dark green
PM-145.74 ± 0.06 g522Dark green
PM-155.79 ± 0.04 g523Dark green
* 1 = Slightly above the horizontal axis, 2 = almost horizontal with respect to the stem, 3 = slightly below the horizontal axis pointing downwards. ** 1 = Cream, 2 = Yellow, 3 = Orange red, 4 = Brown, 5 = Dark brown. *** Experimental data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Data having the same letter in a row were not significantly different as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the main morphological characteristics in P. miliaceum accessions.
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the main morphological characteristics in P. miliaceum accessions.
AnalytesBloom Begin **Full BloomCulm LengthStem DiameterNo. of LeavesLeaf LengthLeaf WidthPlant HeightRatio of L/WWeight of 1000 Seeds
Bloom begin10.995 **0.1900.229−0.0410.453 *0.2610.420 *−0.092−0.482
Full bloom 10.1570.172−0.0710.3830.2020.188−0.111−0.477
Culm length 10.595 *0.626 *0.652 **0.4250.980 **−0.4200.192
Stem diameter 10.3150.764 **0.4870.621 *−0.0310.066
No. of leaves 10.4160.1220.608 *−0.2220.142
Leaf length 10.763 **0.630 *−0.069−0.249
Leaf width 10.404−0.089−0.305
Plant height 1−0.3810.164
Ratio of L/W 1−0.288
Weight of 1000 seeds 1
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Table 4. Average concentration of chlorophyll pigments of the selected accessions of P. miliaceum grown in the field.
Table 4. Average concentration of chlorophyll pigments of the selected accessions of P. miliaceum grown in the field.
AccessionChl a (µg/mL−1)Chl b (µg/mL−1)Ratio of Chl a and Chl bCarotenoid ** (µg/mL−1)
PM-01412.67 ± 7.02 c,d20.96 ± 3.00 a19.49 ± 1.61 b,c13.49 ± 1.01 a
PM-02628.15 ± 6.53 k36.82 ± 2.56 f16.95 ± 0.41 a13.26 ± 0.67 a
PM-03504.44 ± 5.50 e27.74 ± 2.53 b18.29 ± 0.95 a,b13.56 ± 0.96 a
PM-04607.03 ± 7.00 j35.60 ± 1.51 d,e,f17.15 ±0.60 a12.91 ± 1.83 a
PM-05594.96 ± 5.56 i34.28 ± 2.06 c,d,e,f17.25 ± 0.71 a12.81 ± 0.20 a
PM-06521.44 ± 6.50 f,g29.72 ± 2.06 b,c17.35 ± 0.70 a12.44 ± 0.45 a
PM-07552.16 ± 7.01 h31.11 ± 3.01 b,c,d17.45 ± 0.74 a,b12.86 ± 0.81 a
PM-08523.79 ± 5.64 g29.01 ± 3.00 b18.16 ± 0.71 a,b12.71 ± 1.14 a
PM-09625.05 ± 5.00 k35.96 ± 2.62 e,f17.66 ± 0.83 a,b12.64 ± 0.55 a
PM-10403.44 ± 6.08 b,c19.61 ± 3.51 a20.49 ± 1.55 c,d12.69 ± 0.82 a
PM-11372.75 ± 7.51 a17.56 ± 1.50 a21.61 ± 1.24 d12.54 ± 0.50 a
PM-12398.93 ± 9.00 b19.53 ± 2.50 a20.31 ± 1.75 c,d12.21 ± 0.62 a
PM-13559.17 ± 4.54 h31.71 ± 1.54 b,c,d,e17.78 ± 1.16 a,b12.59 ± 0.53 a
PM-14422.08 ± 6.54 d21.55 ± 2.50 a19.53 ± 1.14 b,c13.56 ± 0.75 a
PM-15511.94 ± 8.00 e,f29.50 ± 3.12 b17.28 ± 0.75 a12.45 ± 0.51 a
** Experimental data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Data having the same letter in a row were not significantly different as determined by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Table 5. Total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity of selected accessions of P. miliaceum.
Table 5. Total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity of selected accessions of P. miliaceum.
AccessionTPC 1 (mg/g)TFC 2 (mg/g)DPPH (µg/mL)ABTS (µg/mL) **
PM-0124.62 ±1.21 d11.82 ± 1.05 c,d,e1881.53 ± 19.82 h888.49 ± 8.05 h
PM-0231.32±1.15 f13.28 ± 1.11 e,f1861.66 ± 7.63 g716.59 ± 7.66 d
PM-0346.01 ± 1.00 h19.58 ± 1.51 g2304.24 ± 5.17 k883.63 ± 5.70 g,h
PM-0415.97 ± 0.95 a7.19 ± 1.05 a2490.24 ± 4.64 l1087.77 ± 9.58 j
PM-0558.04 ± 1.00 e52.56 ± 1.50 d,e206.44 ± 7.72 a688.08 ± 7.56 c
PM-0649.81 ± 1.25 b38.33 ± 1.15 a,b316.39 ± 13.22 b673.77 ± 6.01 g
PM-0716.24 ± 0.86 a7.22 ± 1.75 a858.77 ± 6.37 c822.74 ± 7.51 f
PM-0823.36 ± 0.60 c,d10.43 ± 1.78 b,c.d978.80 ± 9.01 d719.58 ± 5.05 d
PM-0930.44 ± 0.67 f13.08 ± 1.01 e,f1452. 96 ± 6.00 f688.19 ± 9.11 c
PM-1024.30 ± 0.62 d10.92 ± 1.01 c,d,e1964.58 ± 9.03 i772.54 ± 7.50 e
PM-1123.07 ± 1.00 c,d10.35 ± 1.52 b,c,d1967.33 ± 8.08 i706.46 ± 6.50 d
PM-1229.43 ± 2.67 e,f15.02 ± 1.00 f2245.59 ± 8.50 j932.55 ± 5.74 i
PM-1321.61 ± 0.54 b,c9.61 ± 1.51 b,c1447.61 ± 11.66 f682.36 ± 5.85 c
PM-1436.85 ± 0.97 g9.79 ± 1.64 b,c1262.96 ± 7.54 e624.85 ± 13.14 a
PM-1531.42 ± 0.61 f15.40 ± 0.96 f1436.89 ± 7.00 f657.57± 7.50 b
** Experimental data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Data having the same letter in a row were not significantly differed by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: TPC, total phenolic content; TFC, total flavonoid content; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS. 1 TPC is given as gallic acid equivalent (GAE) mg/g of the extracts and fractions, values are the mean ± standard deviation of triplicate tests. 2 TFC is given as quercetin equivalent (QE) mg/g of the extracts and fractions, values are the mean ± standard deviation of triplicates.
Table 6. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the antioxidant activity and total phenolic content and total flavonoid content in P. miliaceum accessions.
Table 6. Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the antioxidant activity and total phenolic content and total flavonoid content in P. miliaceum accessions.
AnalytesTPC 1TFCDPPHABTSChl aChl bRatio of Chl a and bCarotenoid
TPC10.886 **0.732 **0.3700.1220.137−0.2210.123
TFC 10.933 **0.2680.2230.237−0.299−0.138
DPPH 10.3370.2910.299−0.357−0.169
ABTS 10.0640.073−0.092−0.127
Chl a 10.997 **−0.912 **0.017
Chl b 1−0.935 **0.013
Ratio of Chl a and b 1−0.06
Carotenoid 1
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). 1 Abbreviations: TPC, total phenolic content; TFC, total flavonoid content; DPPH, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); Chl a, chlorophyll a; Chl b, chlorophyll b.
Table 7. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers used for determining the genetic diversity of P. miliaceum.
Table 7. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers used for determining the genetic diversity of P. miliaceum.
ISSR PrimerBase Sequence (5′-3′)Total AmpliconNo. of Polymorphic AmpliconPercentage of Polymorphism (%)
UBC809(AGA GAG)2AGA GG151280.00
UBC811(GAG AGA)2GAG AC6350.00
UBC818(CAC ACA)2CAC AG8337.50
UBC820(GTG TGT)2GTG TC33100.00
UBC827(ACA CAC)2ACA CG10550.00
UBC824(TCT CTC)2TCT CG4250.00
UBC829(TGT GTG)2TGT GC4375.00
UBC841(GAG AGA)2GAG AYC8787.50
UBC844(CTC TCT)2CTC TRC9666.67
UBC850(GTG TGT)2GTG TYC66100.00
ISSR2(GAG)6C1111100.00
ISSR3(GAC)6T9666.67
ISSR4(GACA)53266.67
ISSR5(GTC)6A6466.67
ISSR6(GTG)6C6466.67
ISSR8(GTG)6A7342.86
ISSR9A(CACA)3CACTG4250.00
ISSR10(GAC)644100.00
ISSR11(GACA)49666.67
ISSR12(CTC)7A5480.00
ISSR13(GACA)4A8225.00
ISSR14(TC)8AG7685.79
ISSR15TG(TACA)466100.00
Total 15811070.16
Table 8. RAPD marker used for genetic diversity of P. miliaceum.
Table 8. RAPD marker used for genetic diversity of P. miliaceum.
ISSR PrimerBase Sequence (5′-3′)Total AmpliconNo. of Polymorphic AmpliconPercentage of Polymorphism (%)
RAPD1CCAGCCGAAC4375
RAPD2ATGGATCCGC4375
RAPD3BTTGCCAGCC55100
RAPD4AGGGAACGAG44100
RAPD5AGCGCCATTG9888.89
RAPD6CCAAGCTGCC2150
RAPD7ACCCGGTCAC7685.71
RAPD8GGGCTCATAG4375
RAPD9ATGGATCCGC000
RAPD10AGGTGAACGG3266.67
RAPD11CGAGTGCCTA44100
Total 463991.67
Table 9. Summary of genetic variation estimated using RAPD and ISSR markers among the P. miliaceum accessions.
Table 9. Summary of genetic variation estimated using RAPD and ISSR markers among the P. miliaceum accessions.
Molecular MarkerNNa *NeIHeuHe
ISSR + RAPD2062.00 ± 0.00 a1.700 ± 0.018 c0.601 ± 0.007 c0.411 ± 0.006 c0.412 ± 0.006 c
RAPD462.00 ± 0.00 a1.662 ± 0.048 a0.578 ± 0.290 a0.391 ± 0.018 a0.396 ± 0.010 a
ISSR1602.00 ± 0.00 a.1.675 ± 0.015 b0.581 ± 0.006 b0.395 ± 0.006 b0.408 ± 0.006 b
Abbreviations: N = No. of loci, Na = No. of Different Alleles, Ne = No. of Effective Alleles, I = Shannon’s Information Index, He = Expected Heterozygosity, uHe = Unbiased Expected Heterozygosity, ISSR = inter-simple sequence repeat, RAPD = random amplified polymorphic DNA. * Experimental data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Data having the same letter in a row were not significantly differed by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Table 10. Location of P. miliaceum accessions collected from different provinces of South Korea.
Table 10. Location of P. miliaceum accessions collected from different provinces of South Korea.
Sl. No.AccessionCodeCollection SiteCountry
1P. miliaceum L.PM-01Hwacheon-myeon, Hongcheon-gunSouth Korea
2P. miliaceum L.PM-02Hoengseong-gun, anheungmyeon saemalSouth Korea
3P. miliaceum L.PM-03Chuncheonsi dongsanmyeon gunjaliSouth Korea
4P. miliaceum L.PM-04Hoengseong-gun, gabcheonmyeon yuldongliSouth Korea
5P. miliaceum L.PM-05Kangwondo, hwacheongun gandongmyeon o-eum2liSouth Korea
6P. miliaceum L.PM-06Kangwondo, injegun, nammyeon bupyeongliSouth Korea
7P. miliaceum L.PM-07Kangwondo, hongcheongun seoseogmyeon saeng-gog1liSouth Korea
8P. miliaceum L.PM-08Kangwondo, yang-yang-gun seomyeon hwang-iliSouth Korea
9P. miliaceum L.PM-09Kangwondo, yang-yang-gun ganghyeonmyeon jeonjin1liSouth Korea
10P. miliaceum L.PM-10Kangwondo, hongcheongun nammyeon wolcheonliSouth Korea
11P. miliaceum L.PM-11Kyeongido, yangpyeong-gun cheong-unmyeon bilyong2liSouth Korea
12P. miliaceum L.PM-12Kangwondo, hwacheongun sangseomyeon mahyeonliSouth Korea
13P. miliaceum L.PM-13Kangwondo, pyeongchang-gun daehwamyeon haan3liSouth Korea
14P. miliaceum L.PM-14Kangwondo, pyeongchang-gun daehwamyeon haan5liSouth Korea
15P. miliaceum L.PM-15Kangwondo, pyeongchang-gun daehwamyeon haan4liSouth Korea

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghimire, B.K.; Yu, C.Y.; Kim, S.H.; Chung, I.-M. Diversity in Accessions of Panicum miliaceum L. Based on Agro-Morphological, Antioxidative, and Genetic Traits. Molecules 2019, 24, 1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061012

AMA Style

Ghimire BK, Yu CY, Kim SH, Chung I-M. Diversity in Accessions of Panicum miliaceum L. Based on Agro-Morphological, Antioxidative, and Genetic Traits. Molecules. 2019; 24(6):1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghimire, Bimal Kumar, Chang Yeon Yu, Seung Hyun Kim, and Ill-Min Chung. 2019. "Diversity in Accessions of Panicum miliaceum L. Based on Agro-Morphological, Antioxidative, and Genetic Traits" Molecules 24, no. 6: 1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061012

APA Style

Ghimire, B. K., Yu, C. Y., Kim, S. H., & Chung, I. -M. (2019). Diversity in Accessions of Panicum miliaceum L. Based on Agro-Morphological, Antioxidative, and Genetic Traits. Molecules, 24(6), 1012. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop