Next Article in Journal
Natural Compounds Rosmarinic Acid and Carvacrol Counteract Aluminium-Induced Oxidative Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Iron’s Wake: The Performance of Quantum Mechanical-Derived Versus General-Purpose Force Fields Tested on a Luminescent Iron Complex
Previous Article in Journal
Key Aroma Compounds of Dark Chocolates Differing in Organoleptic Properties: A GC-O Comparative Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ferrocenyl Phosphorhydrazone Dendrimers Synthesis, and Electrochemical and Catalytic Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Iron-Catalyzed C–H Functionalizations under Triazole-Assistance

1
Laboratoire de Chemie Moléculaire (UMR CNRS 7509), Université de Strasbourg, ECPM 25 Rue Becquerel, 67087 Strasbourg, France
2
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, della Vita e della Sostenibilità Ambientale, Università di Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 17/A, I-43124 Parma, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(8), 1806; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081806
Submission received: 30 March 2020 / Revised: 10 April 2020 / Accepted: 11 April 2020 / Published: 15 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in the Chemistry of Organoiron Compounds)

Abstract

:
3d transition metals-catalyzed C–H bond functionalizations represent nowadays an important tool in organic synthesis, appearing as the most promising alternative to cross-coupling reactions. Among 3d transition metals, iron found widespread application due to its availability and benign nature, and it was established as an efficient catalyst in organic synthesis. In this context, the use of ortho-orientating directing groups (DGs) turned out to be necessary for promoting selective iron-catalyzed C–H functionalization reactions. Very recently, triazoles DGs were demonstrated to be more than an excellent alternative to the commonly employed 8-aminoquinoline (AQ) DG, as a result of their modular synthesis as well as the mild reaction conditions applied for their removal. In addition, their tunable geometry and electronics allowed for new unprecedented reactivities in iron-catalyzed C–H activation methodologies that will be summarized within this review.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Transition metals-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions are a powerful tool in organic synthesis. Since pioneering works in the 1940s [1], and afterwards on modern palladium catalysis [2], they continue to play an important role for the construction of new C–C bonds [3,4]. Despite a wide application in pharmaceutical and agrochemical industries, these reactions require pre-functionalized starting materials and suffer from the production of stochiometric amounts of metal and organic by-products [5]. Therefore, one of the most important goals for the scientific community is to develop new and more suitable synthetic methodologies [6].
In recent years, C–H bond functionalization reactions have emerged as an attractive atom- and step-economical alternative. In this context, precious 4d and 5d metals such as palladium, ruthenium, iridium, and rhodium have been well explored [7,8,9,10]. Albeit the wide applicability and selectivity demonstrated by these metals, their high cost and rather high toxicity constitute a limitation in the development of valuable alternatives to the classic metal-catalyzed cross-couplings [11]. Hence, a more sustainable solution arises from the development of 3d metals-catalyzed methodologies [12,13]. In fact, due to the low toxicity and vast availability, the use of earth-abundant metals such as iron, cobalt, and manganese represents a valuable and appealing area of research [12,13,14,15,16].
Iron is the second most abundant metal on Earth’s crust after aluminum and, therefore, the most abundant transition metal. During life evolution, iron has become essential, and it is present in several functional biological molecules such as cytochrome P450 [17]. The broad catalytic activity of iron in organic synthesis has been well documented [18,19,20,21]. Iron can explore multiple oxidation states (from −2 to +5), rendering its catalytic versatility almost unlimited. Inspired by early reports on cross-coupling reactions [22], the discovery in 2008 of the first example of organometallic iron-catalyzed C–H functionalization [23] constituted an important advance in this area of research, prompting several research groups to investigate in this direction [24,25,26].
It is a matter of fact that the selective activation of an overwhelming number of C–H bonds, present in organic molecules, remains highly challenging. This problem has been mitigated with the introduction of a large number of directing groups (DGs) [27]. These functional moieties, placed in proximity to the C–H bonds are able to coordinate the metal center and guide the substrate functionalization, usually forming thermodynamically stable six- or five-membered metallacycles. DGs are classified as monodentate or bidentate and often characterized by the presence of heteroatoms such as nitrogen, sulfur, or phosphorous, which are strong σ-donors and π-acceptors. Nevertheless, an important point for the application of DGs in organic synthesis can be found in the convenience of the introduction and cleavage of these functional moieties [28,29].
In this context, 8-aminoquinolines (8-AQ) bidentate DGs have proven to be widely applicable for selective ortho-C–H activation of benzoic acid derivatives [30,31]. Seminal works reported by Nakamura and co-workers, emphasized the use of the 8-aminoquinoline in C–H bond activation, exploring its use along with iron catalysts [32,33]. However, the limited structural modification, in concomitance with the low chemo-selectivity often resulting from undesired functionalizations of its aromatic ring, restricts somehow the use of 8-AQ as DG in 3d metals-catalyzed C–H activations.
As a result of longstanding investigations on the use of triazole DGs for C–H functionalizations [34,35], in 2014, Ackermann and co-workers proved the use of a new class of bidentate DGs for ruthenium-catalyzed C–H arylations [36]. The straightforward and modular synthesis of triazoles [37] represents a main advantage that has been explored, parallelly, by other research groups for promoting palladium-catalyzed C–H activation methodologies [38,39]. The copper-catalyzed [3+2] cycloaddition (CuAAC) within an alkyne and an organic azide proceeds under mild reaction conditions to provide 1,2,3-triazoles in excellent yields and complete regioselectivity. As a result, the correct choice of the reaction partners allowed for the synthesis of a broad family of triazoles (Scheme 1).
Importantly, this class of DGs could be easily installed and subsequently cleaved under mild reaction conditions with a wide functional group tolerance, leading to the synthesis of key organic molecules amenable to further structural modifications. From a historical perspective, the first generation of TAMBn was demonstrated to be a widely applicable bidentate DG for iron-catalyzed C–H transformations. Subsequently, a number of new disconnections could be obtained by a proper interplay of electronic and steric properties of the triazole motif, with the introduction of new families of triazole-based DGs. Within this review, we aim to offer to the reader a complete overview of the synthetic possibility of 1,2,3-triazole directing-groups in the field of iron-catalyzed C–H functionalizations.

2. Iron-Catalyzed C–H Arylations

After discovering the ability of triazole TAM (triazolyldimethylmethyl), as directing-group for ruthenium-catalyzed C–H arylations of benzamide derivatives, Ackermann and co-workers reported a protocol based on Earth-abundant and non-toxic iron salts [40]. The catalytic system required the use of bidentate phosphine ligands such as 1,2-bis(dipHence, the introduction of a new triazole TAHhenylphosphino)ethane (dppe), an in situ-formed organozinc reagent of type Ar2Zn•MgBr2(TMEDA), as both base and arylating reagent and an external oxidant such as 1,2-dichloroisobutane (DCIB). This method converted benzamide derivatives 1a-d in to their corresponding ortho-arylated products 2a-d in good yields and functional group tolerance (Scheme 2a). Interesting, by intermolecular competition experiments, TAMBn DG was found to be better performing with respect to the so far widely employed 8-aminoquinoline (AQ). It is noteworthy that the catalytic protocol was also suitable for the functionalization of olefins such as 3a (Scheme 2b). Thus, 4a could be obtained with good yield as a unique Z-isomer proving the high selectivity of the TAM with respect to other ortho-orientating DGs, used in iron-catalyzed C–H arylations of alkenes [41].
The deprotection of TAM DG was carried out under acidic conditions, leading to ortho-arylated benzoic acid 5b in high yields (Scheme 2c). TAM DG was found applicable for C–H arylations of ferrocene derivatives 6 as well [42]. Again, the combination of diphosphine ligand dppe and 2,3-dichlorobutane (2,3-DCB) as external oxidant was found essential for the transformation. The use of an in situ-formed Ar2Zn•MgBr2(TMEDA) organometallic base allowed for the conversion of amides 6a-b into racemic products 7a-b in good yields. Noteworthy, the use of a chiral ligand such as R,R-chiraphos led to the formation of a planar chiral ferrocene derivative 7c with moderate enantiomeric ratio (Scheme 3).
The activation of C(sp3)–H is generally more challenging than C(sp2)–H due to their lower acidity [43,44]. In analogy with previous reports on iron-catalyzed C(sp3)–H arylations enabled by 8-AQ DGs, TAM DG was found operative under similar conditions [40,45]. A broad range of substrates 8 was functionalized in good yields with a complete selectivity of the primary over the secondary C–H bond, rendering an organometallic C–H activation mechanism likely to be operative under present conditions (Scheme 4).
In a parallel fashion, the development of TST (tri-substituted triazole) DG opened access to C–H arylations of geometrically flexible, electron-rich benzylamide derivatives [46]. Here, a phosphine with a rigid back-bone, such as cis-1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethene (dppen), was the key to efficiently functionalize benzylamides 10 in the presence of 1,2-DCIB as the mild oxidizing reagent (Scheme 5).
Ackermann and co-workers recently explored, by computational analysis, the oxidation potential of the iron(II)/(III) manifold, revealing a viable redox event at E1/2 = 0.01 V (vs Fc0/+) that could be exploited under electrochemical conditions [47]. Interestingly, electrochemical C–H arylations of TAM amides 12 were feasible at an exceedingly mild reaction temperature of 40 °C, when using a reticulated vitreous carbon (RVC) anode, along with a platinum cathode (Scheme 6).
Hence, the dichloroisobutane (DCIB) sacrificial oxidant could be replaced by the introduction of the electrochemical oxidation. The robustness of the methodology was proved by the synthesis of oxidation-sensitive thioether 13c and the electrochemical active ferrocene 13d, which were perfectly tolerated, as well as the gram-scale reaction for the synthesis of 13a. The performance of the heterogenous ferraelectrocatalysis was analyzed with respect to the homogeneous DCIB-mediated protocol. Indeed, the electrochemical oxidant-free approach outcompeted the chemical oxidant one in terms of chemical yields and kinetic profile.
Very recently, mechanistic studies performed by Neidig and co-workers finally shed some light on the mechanism operating in these transformations, by the identification of key cyclometallated iron(II) intermediates present in triazole-directed C–H arylations [48]. Particularly, substrate 1a was treated with 1 equiv of Ar2Zn reagent in the presence of Fe(acac)3 and 1,2-Bis(diphenylphosphino)benzene (dppz), leading to the predominant formation of a high-spin iron(II) species with 57Fe Mössbauer parameters of δ = 0.94 mm/s and ∆EQ = 3.14 mm/s. Further studies conducted with magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) enabled the assignment of this species as a distorted, tetrahedral complex of type 1aA. An analogous reaction performed with 3 equiv of organozinc reagent led to the consumption of intermediate 1aA with the formation of two new low-spin iron species with Mössbauer parameters of δ = 0.30 mm/s and ∆EQ = 1.92 mm/s (60%) and δ = 0.24 mm/s and ∆EQ = 1.19 mm/s (17%), respectively. Further experimental work led to the identification of the major species as a cyclometallated iron(II) dimer [(1a)(dppbz)(THF)Fe]2(μ-MgX2) 1aC by X-ray spectroscopy, in which a magnesium salt bridges two neutral monomers. The minor species was assigned to the five-coordinate, non-THF-ligated analogue 1aB. To determine the rate of the formation of these two species, pseudo-single turnover studies using time-resolved, freeze quenched 57Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy were employed. Hence, a rate constant of 0.26 ± 0.03 min−1 via a pseudo first-order kinetic fit suggested a facile C–H activation. Furthermore, the stoichiometric addition of two more equivalents of Ar2Zn to a THF solution of 1aB/C led to the formation of a new species, with Mössbauer parameters δ = 0.15 mm/s and ∆EQ = 0.54 mm/s, which was indirectly identified with a cyclometallated low-spin iron(II)−phenyl dimer, [(1a)-(dppz)(Ph)Fe]2(μ-Mg(THF)3) 1aD. Interestingly, this intermediate was found to be competent for C–C bond formation. Hence, its consumption to give the ortho-arylated product by stoichiometric reaction with DCIB was estimated again by freeze-trapped, time-resolved 57Fe Mössbauer studies to occur at an observed rate constant of 0.18 ± 0.04 min−1 under pseudo-first-order conditions. In this scenario, the role of DCIB was crucial; it promoted the oxidation of 1aD via single-electron type (SET) mechanism to a putative iron(III) intermediate that subsequently undergoes reductive elimination to give the corresponding ortho-functionalized product 2a and lower-valent iron(I) species. This finally re-enters the catalytic cycle after oxidation operated by a second equivalent of dihaloalkane (Scheme 7).

3. Iron-Catalyzed C–H Alkylations/Allylations

The development of atom- and step-economical strategies for the direct installation of medicinally relevant methyl groups are of high interest [49,50]. In this context, in 2015, Ackermann and co-workers reported the first example of iron-catalyzed methylation under triazole assistance [51]. It is noteworthy, that copper, palladium, and cobalt were ineffective in C–H methylations under otherwise identical reaction conditions, proving the advantage of iron catalysis [52]. The inexpensive FeCl3 catalyst and dppe as ligand enabled this transformation in the presence of an in situ-generated dimethyl zinc species and DCIB as mild oxidizing reagent. The TAM-assisted functionalization proved widely applicable for the activation of C(sp2)–H bonds of various aromatic TAM-amides 1, with high yields and site selectivity (Scheme 8a). The procedure was not confined to aromatic C–H bonds but also enabled the activation of alkenyl C(sp2)–H bonds 14d with good yield. In particular, the sole thermodynamically less stable Z-alkene was isolated, highlighting the fundamental triazole activity. In analogy with the arylation procedure, in 2017, Butenschön and co-workers achieved the methylation of ferrocene derivative 6a in moderate yields, using analogous reaction conditions (Scheme 8b) [42].
Challenging C(sp3)–H bonds were found to be suitable for the transformation as well; hence, Ackermann and co-workers exploited the high versatility of the triazole protocol showing C–H methylations to be applicable for the synthesis of various aliphatic amides 16a-c (Scheme 9a). Finally, a complementary DG removal procedure was reported, leading to the ortho-methylated benzoic acid 5e in high yields under remarkably mild reaction conditions (Scheme 9b).
Due to the importance of the methyl group in medicinal chemistry, the protocol was extended to pharmacologically relevant benzylamides derivatives [46]. The trisubstituted triazole TST DG was found essential in promoting C–H methylations with high levels of chemoselectivity and positional selectivity for a broad family of benzylamides 10 (Scheme 10a).
Differently from the C–H arylation protocol and for reason yet to be clarified, here 2,3-DCB outcompeted 1,2-DCIB as the oxidant. The synthetic utility of the methodology was, among others, reflected by the racemization-free protocol for the functionalization of enantiomerically-rich benzamides (S)-10d (Scheme 10b). Finally, aqueous acidic conditions led to the deprotection of desired amines 18b,e and allowed for the recovery of the reusable TST directing group 19, in high yields (Scheme 11).
Intermolecular competition experiments demonstrated the highest reactivity of triazole DG TST compared to the picolinamide DG [31]. In sharp contrast with all the other methodologies described for oxidative iron-catalyzed C–H functionalizations, here a kinetic isotopic effect of kH/kD = 1.8 was revealed. This suggested a kinetical relevant C–H activation step as a consequence of the inherent flexibility of substrates 10 that makes the cyclometallation challenging to occur.
Oxidative conditions were found eligible for triazole-assisted, iron-catalyzed C–H ethylation, as well [42,46,51]. In this regard, Ackermann and co-workers reported C–H ethylations of benzamides 1 enabled by TAM that proceeded under oxidative conditions with 1,2-DCIB as the oxidant (Scheme 12a), whereas in 2017, the same group extended this methodology for the synthesis of benzylamine derivative 21f, exploiting TST DG (Scheme 12b). In analogy with previous studies, Butenschön and co-workers reported the ethylation of challenging ferrocene derivative 6a, albeit in lower yields (Scheme 12c). Surprisingly, in the case of 20e, the removal of the TAM directing group under acidic conditions allowed to recover the ortho-functionalized primary amide 23e in high yields. (Scheme 12d).
In 2016, Ackermann and co-workers reported the alkylation of aromatic C(sp2)–H bond using alkyl halides enabled by TAM-assisted iron catalysis [53]. Fe(acac)3 pre-catalyst and dppe as the ligand, provided the formation of new C–C bonds using commercially available primary and secondary alkyl bromides 24 [54,55]. The dropwise addition of the Grignard reagent allowed the reaction to proceed smoothly at a remarkable reaction time of 30 min, leading to the synthesis of ortho-functionalized benzoic acids derivatives 25 in high yields and functional-group tolerance (Scheme 13a). Interestingly, the AQ was found inactive under these reaction conditions. Moreover, iodomethane and benzyl chloride were also found suitable for C–H methylations and benzylations, highlighting the ample synthetical applicability of the catalytic methodology.
Hence, traceless removal of the TAM DG furnished 2-cyclopentylbenzoic acid 26f from its parental amide 25f in good yields under aqueous acidic conditions (Scheme 13b).
To probe the mechanism, iron-catalyzed C–H alkylations were performed with 6-bromohex-1-ene 24i and cyclopropylmethyl bromide 24j (Scheme 14a,b).
Hence, cyclopentylmethyl product 25i and the linear alkene 25j were delivered, respectively. In addition, complete racemization was observed in the product 25k that was obtained starting from the diasteromerically pure cis-1-bromo-4-methylcyclohexane 24k (Scheme 14c). Additionally, a considerable reduction of the conversion was also reported in presence of stoichiometric amounts of the radical scavenger TEMPO [(2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl]. All these observations suggested a single-electron-transfer (SET)-type mechanism to be operative [56].
The optimized catalytic system was subsequently tested for ortho-allylation of carboxamide derivatives 1. Under these conditions, allyl chlorides 27, which were previously proved ineffective using the 8-AQ DG [57,58], could be efficiently employed. High yields and regioselectivities were obtained for a broad family of amides 1 under oxidant-free conditions using Fe(acac)3 as the iron precursor and dppe as the ligand (Scheme 15).
As for C–H alkylations, dropwise addition of phenylmagnesium bromide was necessary for the reactivity. C(sp2)–H bond allylations were demonstrated to be applicable not only to functionalize aromatic and heteroaromatic rings but also for the synthesis of ortho-allylated alkenes 28e-h. In this case, Z-alkenes stereoisomers were obtained with high yields and regioselectivity.
The TAM DG proved its versatility allowing the use of substituted allyl chlorides 27i-l. Intriguingly, the reaction with E-crotyl chloride 27i and α-methyl allyl chloride 27j yielded the same product 28i with comparable regioselectivity (Scheme 16a). These results might suggest the presence of η3-allyl iron intermediates. Moreover, the regioselectivity associated to the formation of the branched product seemed to be dictated by the bidentate nature of the ligand, dppe, as observed in precedent studies by Plietker and co-workers [59,60,61]. This influence was further demonstrated conducting the reaction in the presence of a chiral ligand, such as commercially available (S,S)-DIPAMP. Under these conditions, 28i could be isolated with a low, yet reproducible enantiomeric ratio; this result prompted subsequent studies on enantioselective iron-catalyzed C–H alkylations [62]. It is worth noting that the usefulness of the methodology was further revealed by the deprotection/functionalization of ortho-allylated benzamide derivative 28m that selectively formed naturally-occurring isochromanone synthon 29m in high yields (Scheme 16b).
Mechanistically, competition experiments with isotopically labelled substrates showed a kinetic isotope effect of kH/kD 1.8 and 2.1 for intra- and intermolecular reactions, respectively. These results are coherent with a C–H bond activation step as rate determining in the reaction. Finally, a radical reaction pathway was excluded since the addition of radical scavengers did not affect the outcome of the catalysis.

4. Iron-Catalyzed C–H Functionalizations with Alkynes and Allenes

The alkyne fragment is one of the most versatile structures in organic synthesis; for this reason, synthetic and catalytic sustainable methodologies are constantly desired for their introduction in complex scaffolds. Transition metals-catalyzed alkynylation, often achieved through the well-established Sonogashira reaction, represents a strategic approach for the synthesis of alkynes derivatives [63,64,65]. In the context of C–H bond functionalizations [66], Ackermann and co-workers reported in 2017 the first iron-catalyzed C–H alkynylation using TIPS-bromoalkyne derivates 30a [67]. The reaction proceeded with an iron(III) source as the pre-catalyst and a rigid dppen ligand, in presence of an organozinc base of type PhZnCl•MgBrCl(TMEDA) that was mandatory for the transformation. The TAM DG allowed the synthesis of a family of ortho-alkynylated carboxamides 31 with high yields and site selectivity (Scheme 17).
Moreover, the reactivity of different haloalkynes 30 was tested employing the TAMPMP DG; indeed, the supremacy of the bromide leaving group in iron-catalyzed C–H alkynylations was highlighted (Scheme 18).
Mechanistic investigations were reported; the use of radical scavengers led only to a slight reduction of the yields, excluding a single-electron-transfer mechanism to be operative. The superior reactivity of electron-poor arenes, with respect to the corresponding electron-rich, in intermolecular competition experiments suggested a deprotonative σ-bond metathesis (DBM) as the C–H activation step. In addition, cyclometallation was proposed to be not rate determining as indicated by a low kinetic isotopic effect of kH/kD = 1.1. On the basis of these experimental results, the authors proposed a plausible catalytic cycle (Scheme 19). Organometallic iron species A, formed through coordination of iron pre-catalyst with amide 1 in the presence of organozinc reagent, was converted into B through a reversable C–H bond activation. A subsequent bromo-alkyne regioselective insertion provided metallacycle C that finally released product 31 and the active catalytic species via β−Br-elimination.
The use of alkynes in C–H functionalization methodologies, could be exploited for the synthesis of bioactive heterocycles. Among these molecules, isoquinolones have an interesting bicyclic structure that is present in multiple natural products and often used as a synthetic building block. Pictet–Spengler and Bischler–Napieralski reactions are the common strategies for the synthesis of these naturally occurring scaffolds. However, these methodologies require the use of pre-functionalized substrates [68]. Interestingly, by the interplay of reaction conditions, the triazole-assisted, iron-catalyzed C–H alkynylation reaction offered the opportunity to synthesize isoquinolone and isoindolinones in a sustainable, efficient manner [67]. Indeed, a one-pot/two-step cascade C–H alkynylation/6-endo-dig annulation proceeded smoothly with TMS-bromoalkyne 30d and allowed for the synthesis of isoquinolone 33 after basic deprotection of TMS group (Scheme 20a). Parallelly, when ortho-alkynylated benzamides 33, obtained by C–H alkynylation of 30, were submitted to typical desilylative conditions, a 5-exo-dig annulation provided isoindolinones 34. This class of molecules was obtained with excellent site- and chemoselectivity, and the protocol was found suitable for the synthesis of pyrrolone 35c as well (Scheme 20b). Notably, NH-free isoquinolone 36a could be isolated in high yields by TAM removal under acidic conditions (Scheme 20c).
In order to devise a complementary approach for the synthesis of isoquinolones, Ackermann and co-workers probed TAM benzamides 1 for iron-catalyzed C–H annulation with alkynes 38 [69]. Interestingly, they always observed a lack of reactivity, leading to hypothesize an important contribution of the Thorpe–Ingold effect on the catalytic manifold [70]. Hence, the introduction of a new triazole TAH (triazolyldihydrogenmethyl) DG, being devoid of the gem-disubstitution, was demonstrated to be necessary for the synthesis of decorated isoquinolones 39 [71]. The use of an in situ-formed iPr2Zn•MgBr2(TMEDA) organometallic base was mandatory to promote the catalytic annulation with alkynes, along with the use of 1,2-DCIB as the oxidant. A broad range of TAH-benzamides 37 and internal alkynes 38 was suitable for the annulation, providing isoquinolone products 39a-d with good yields (Scheme 21a). Disappointingly, for reasons yet to be rationalized, meta-substituents depleted the reactivity of the iron catalysis. The C–H annulation with alkynes proceeded with complete anti-Markovnikov regioselectivity for a broad range of methyl-aryl alkynes, delivering isoquinolones 39e-h (Scheme 21b) in good yields. The regioselectivity observed in this process might be ascribed to the compact nature of the iron catalyst that influenced the coordination geometry of the alkyne in the key migratory insertion step.
The mechanism was subsequently probed with several experiments. The reaction performed in the presence of radical scavengers led to a mixture of 39b and the hydroarylated product 39b’ as the side-product. This latter, resubmitted to the optimized reaction conditions did not convert to the desired product 39b, suggesting that a 7-membered metallacycle species represented a key intermediate in the reaction mechanism (Scheme 22a). As for previously illustrated C–H alkynylations, a kinetic isotopic effect as low as 1.1 suggested a C–H bond activation step not to be rate determining in the catalytic cycle. Finally, a stoichiometric reaction failed in delivering any product highlighting the crucial role of the dihaloalkane oxidant (Scheme 22b).
More recently, iron-catalyzed, triazole-assisted C–H functionalization methodologies have been exploited in the presence of propargyl acetates 40 for the synthesis of highly decorated isoquinolone derivatives [72]. As previously discussed, only TAH DGs were able to promote the highly selective C–H/N–H annulation reaction. In sharp contrast, various iron(II) and iron(III) pre-catalysts were demonstrated applicable for the catalysis, while only dppe ligand allowed the transformation to proceed in high yields. Notably, the catalysis occurred without the presence of an external oxidant. The versatile catalytic procedure led to the synthesis of a wide family of isoquinolones 41 in excellent to good yields and regioselectivities (Scheme 23a). The synthetic advantages were demonstrated by using different acetates and TAH-benzamides 37, proving a high functional-group tolerance. The synthetic utility of the methodology was additionally demonstrated by a simple electrochemical cleavage of the TAH DG that delivered NH-free isoquinolone 42a in high yield and chemoselectivity (Scheme 23b). This approach presented a notable advantage with respect to recent removal protocols of the AQ DG that required the use of hazardous chemicals such as ozone and dimethylsulfide (DMS) (Scheme 23c) [73].
Detailed mechanistic studies were conducted submitting deuterium-labelled benzamides 37 to the optimized reaction conditions. Hence, a considerable H/D exchange at the ortho-position was suggestive of a reversible C–H bond activation step. In addition, a kinetic isotope effect of kH/kD~1.1, excluded the C–H metalation as part of the rate-determining step. The mode of action of the C–H/N–H activation reaction was also investigated by DFT calculations taking in consideration all the possible iron(II) spin configurations. The lowest energy pathway was described by a sequence of four elementary steps: (1) C–H bond activation, (2) alkyne insertion, (3) β-O-elimination, and (4) allene migratory insertion. Subsequently, more detailed studies performed via Mössbauer spectroscopy [74] provided strong support for high-spin iron(II) intermediates [75], in sharp contrast to recent findings obtained for iron-catalyzed C–H arylations [48,63]. On the base of experimental and computational results, the authors proposed a catalytic cycle for the iron(II)-catalyzed C–H/N–H annulation sequence (Scheme 24).
Initially, the coordination of iron(II) to substrate 37a in the presence of the organometallic base, led to intermediate E. Then, through a ligand-to-ligand hydrogen transfer (LLHT), metallacycle F could be formed [76]. After coordination of the ligand, a migratory insertion of the alkyne provided H, with the oxygen coordinated to the metal center, which subsequently underwent a C–O bond cleavage to deliver allenyl intermediate I. Insertion of the allene moiety into the N–Fe bond formed the annulated iron complex J, which finally released product 41a through proto-demetalation with the regeneration of the catalytically active species E.
Encouraged by the high catalytic activity demonstrated by iron catalysts along with triazoles and interested in the singular synthetic versatility of allene fragments [77], Ackermann and co-workers turned their attention to allenenyl acetates 45 as possible reagents for iron-catalyzed C–H/N–H annulation [78]. Indeed, the TAH-assisted annulation reaction within benzamides 37 proceeded smoothly in presence of Fe(acac)3 and dppe as the ligand. The use of an in situ-formed iPr2Zn•MgBr2(TMEDA) organometallic base was necessary, whereas, also in this case, no external oxidant was required. Noteworthy, for the first time, the modular electronic and steric properties of the triazole DG enabled complementary reactivities. As already observed, an important Thorpe–Ingold effect of methylene-tethered triazole moiety was responsible of the chemoselectivity associated to the transformation. Hence, under identical reaction conditions, a more flexible TAH DG provided the sole formation of isoquinolone products 46 (Scheme 25a), while the use of TAM DG, led to non-aromatic exo-methylene dihydroisoquinolones 47 (Scheme 25b). Finally, a one-pot/two-step protocol was realized for the selective synthesis of NH-free product 48a in high yields (Scheme 25c).
To shed light on the reaction mechanism, intermolecular competition experiments were performed, and deuterium-labelled substrates were tested. The higher reactivity demonstrated by electron-deficient aromatic rings excluded a concerted-metalation-deprotonation (CMD) pathway [79,80]. Hence, that reactivity could be explained in terms of LLHT pathway or base-assisted internal electrophilic-type substitution (BIES) [81,82] Isotopically-labelled benzamides 37 shown a kH/kD = 1.2 value proving a facile C–H bond cleavage that is therefore not involved in the rate-determining step. Under the standard conditions, the use of the gem-deuterated allene [D2]-45a in presence of TAHHex and TAMBu DGs, led to the formation of products [D2]-46a and [D2]-47a, respectively. Hence, a selective deuterium transposition was observed for both cases (Scheme 26).
Based on these findings, the authors proposed a plausible mechanism pathway (Scheme 27).
The annulation reaction begins with a base-assisted coordination of the metal center to TAM-benzamide 12a, forming intermediate K. Hence, a reversable C–H metalation followed by allene migratory insertion delivered cyclometalated species L. The latter could generate an η3-allyl-iron intermediate through an oxidative-induced reductive elimination to M. At this point, according to deuterium-labelling studies, a 1,4-iron migration eventually led to key intermediate N, that finally furnished the product via proto-demetallation, reforming the catalytic active specie K.

5. Conclusions

The development of sustainable 3d metals-catalyzed C–H bond functionalizations results nowadays as an important alternative to the use of toxic and expensive noble metals. In particular, the use of Earth-abundant, cheap, and non-toxic iron catalysts, renders organometallic C–H activation strategies the most user-friendly platform for the development of new catalytic methodologies for the constructions of C–C and C–Het bonds (for ortho-selective miscellaneous reactions, see [83,84]). In this context, the use of triazole-based ortho-orientating DGs enables complementary reactivities in iron-catalyzed C–H bond functionalizations, dictated by their modular geometry and electronics. Hence, C–H arylations, alkylations, and alkyne-annulations of amides and amines can be achieved with high yields and regioselectivity. In addition, simple and mild procedures for the introduction and removal of this DG result applicable for a wide range of functional groups. Recently, elegant experimental and computational studies shed some light on the valence and the spin state of catalytically active iron species, highlighting the crucial role played by phosphine ligands and triazole DG in controlling SET-type chemistry of organoiron compounds. This constitutes an important advance toward the design of more sustainable, organometallic reagent or eventually, DG-free catalytic systems. Furthermore, major efforts need to be directed toward the development of novel asymmetric C–H functionalization methodologies and heterogenous iron-catalyzed transformations, with the aim to impact this fascinating area of research.

Funding

This research received no external funding

Conflicts of Interest

“The authors declare no conflict of interest.”

References

  1. Kharasch, M.S.; Fields, E.K. Factors Determining the Course and Mechanisms of Grignard Reactions. IV. The Effect of Metallic Halides on the Reaction of Aryl Grignard Reagents and Organic Halides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1941, 63, 2316–2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yamamura, M.; Moritami, I.; Murahashi, S. The reaction of σ-vinylpalladium complexes with alkyllithiums. Stereospecific syntheses of olefins from vinyl halides and alkyllithiums. J. Organomet. Chem. 1975, 91, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Johansson Seechurn, C.C.C.; Kitching, M.O.; Colacot, T.J.; Snieckus, V. Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling: A Historical Contextual Perspective to the 2010 Nobel Prize. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5062–5085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jana, R.; Pathak, T.P.; Sigman, M.S. Advances in Transition Metal (Pd,Ni,Fe)-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions Using Alkyl-organometallics as Reaction Partners. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1417–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tietze, L.F.; Düfert, A. Multiple Pd-catalyzed reactions in the synthesis of natural products, drugs, and materials. Pure Appl. Chem. 2010, 82, 1375–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rodríguez-Padrón, D.; Puente-Santiago, A.R.; Balu, A.M.; Muñoz-Batista, M.J.; Luque, R. Environmental Catalysis: Present and Future. Chem. Cat. Chem. 2019, 11, 18–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, D.-S.; Park, W.-J.; Jun, C.-H. Metal–Organic Cooperative Catalysis in C–H and C–C Bond Activation. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8977–9015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gensch, T.; Hopkinson, M.N.; Glorius, F.; Wencel-Delord, J. Mild metal-catalyzed C–H activation: Examples and concepts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2900–2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Chen, X.; Engle, K.M.; Wang, D.-H.; Yu, J.-Q. Palladium(II)-Catalyzed C–H Activation/C–C Cross-Coupling Reactions: Versatility and Practicality. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5094–5115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arockiam, P.B.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P.H. Ruthenium(II)-Catalyzed C–H Bond Activation and Functionalization. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 5879–5918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Basu, D.; Kumar, S.; Sudhir V, S.; Bandichhor, R. Transition metal catalyzed C–H activation for the synthesis of medicinally relevant molecules: A Review. J. Chem. Sci. 2018, 130, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gandeepan, P.; Müller, T.; Zell, D.; Cera, G.; Warratz, S.; Ackermann, L. 3d Transition Metals for C–H Activation. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 2192–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Loup, J.; Dhawa, U.; Pesciaioli, F.; Wencel-Delord, J.; Ackermann, L. Enantioselective C−H Activation with Earth-Abundant 3d Transition Metals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12803–12818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sherry, B.D.; Fürstner, A. The Promise and Challenge of Iron-Catalyzed Cross Coupling. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1500–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Moselage, M.; Li, J.; Ackermann, L. Cobalt-Catalyzed C–H Activation. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 498–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, W.; Ackermann, L. Manganese-catalyzed C–H Activation. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 3743–3752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kaplan, J.; Ward, D.M. The Essential Nature of Iron Usage and Regulation. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 642–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bauer, I.; Knölker, H.-J. Iron Catalysis in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 3170–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fürstner, A. Iron Catalysis in Organic Synthesis: A Critical Assessment of What It Takes to Make This Base Metal a Multitasking Champion. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 778–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bisz, E.; Szostak, M. Iron-Catalyzed C−O Bond Activation: Opportunity for Sustainable Catalysis. Chem SusChem 2017, 19, 3964–3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guðmundsson, A.; Bäckvall, J.-E. On the Use of Iron in Organic Chemistry. Molecules 2020, 25, 1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Tamura, M.; Kochi, J.K. Vinylation of Grignard reagents. Catalysis by Iron. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 1487–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Norinder, J.; Matsumoto, A.; Yoshikai, N.; Nakamura, E. Iron-Catalyzed Direct Arylation through Directed C–H Bond Activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 18, 5858–5859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shang, R.; Ilies, L.; Nakamura, E. Iron-Catalyzed C–H Bond Activation. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 9086–9139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yoshikai, N. Iron-Catalyzed C−C Bond Formation via Chelation-Assisted C–H Activation. Isr. J. Chem. 2017, 57, 11171130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cera, G.; Ackermann, L. Iron-Catalyzed C–H Functionalization Processes. Top. Curr. Chem. 2016, 374, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, Z.; Wang, B.; Zhang, J.; Yu, W.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y. Transition Metal-catalyzed C–H bond functionalizations by the use of diverse directing groups. Org. Chem. Front. 2015, 2, 1107–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sambiagio, C.; Schönbauer, D.; Blieck, R.; Dao-Huy, T.; Pototschnig, G.; Schaaf, P.; Wiesinger, T.; Zia, M.F.; Wencel-Delord, J.; Besset, T.; et al. A comprehensive overview of directing groups applied in metal-catalysed C–H functionalisation chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 6603–6743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Rej, S.; Ano, Y.; Chatani, N. Bidentate Directing Groups: An Efficient Tool in C–H Bond Functionalization Chemistry for the Expedient Construction of C–C Bonds. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 1788–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zaitsev, V.G.; Shabashov, D.; Daugulis, O. Highly Regioselective Arylation of sp3 C−H Bonds Catalyzed by Palladium Acetate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13154–13155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rouquet, G.; Chatani, N. Catalytic Functionalization of C(sp2)−H and C(sp3)−H Bonds by Using Bidentate Directing Groups. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 11726–11743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Doba, T.; Matsubara, T.; Ilies, L.; Shang, R.; Nakamura, E. Homocoupling-free iron-catalysed twofold C–H activation/cross-couplings of aromatics via transient connection of reactants. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shang, R.; Ilies, L.; Matsumoto, A.; Nakamura, E. β-Arylation of Carboxamides via Iron-Catalyzed C(sp3)–H Bond Activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 6030–6032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ackermann, L.; Vicente, R.; Born, R. Palladium-Catalyzed Direct Arylations of 1,2,3-Triazoles with Aryl Chlorides using Conventional Heating. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ackermann, L.; Vicente, R.; Althammer, A. Assisted Ruthenium-Catalyzed C–H Bond Activation: Carboxylic Acids as Cocatalysts for Generally Applicable Direct Arylations in Apolar Solvents. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2299–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Al Mamari, H.H.; Diers, E.; Ackermann, L. Triazole-Assisted Ruthenium-Catalyzed C−H Arylation of Aromatic Amides. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 9739–9743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meldal, M.; Tornøe, C.W. Cu-Catalyzed Azide−Alkyne Cycloaddition. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2952–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Guerrero, I.; Correa, A. Metal-Catalyzed C−H Functionalization Processes with “Click”-Triazole Assistance. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 6034–6049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ye, X.; He, Z.; Ahmed, T.; Weise, K.; Akhmedov, N.G.; Petersen, J.L.; Shi, X. 1,2,3-Triazoles as versatile directing group for selective sp2 and sp3 C–H activation: Cyclization vs. substitution. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 3712–3716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gu, Q.; Al Mamari, H.H.; Graczyk, K.; Diers, E.; Ackermann, L. Iron-Catalyzed C(sp2)−H and C(sp3)−H Arylation by Triazole Assistance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 3868–3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ilies, L.; Asako, S.; Nakamura, E. Iron-Catalyzed Stereospecific Activation of Olefinic C–H Bonds with Grignard Reagent for Synthesis of Substituted Olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7672–7675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Schmiel, D.; Butenschön, H. Directed Iron-Catalyzed ortho-Alkylation and Arylation: Toward the Stereoselective Catalytic Synthesis of 1,2-Disubstituted Planar-Chiral Ferrocene Derivatives. Organometallics 2017, 36, 4979–4989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Baudoin, O. Transition metal-catalyzed arylation of unactivated C(sp3)–H bonds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 4902–4911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Daugulis, O.; Roane, J.; Dieu Tran, L. Bidentate, Monoanionic Auxiliary-Directed Functionalization of Carbon–Hydrogen Bonds. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1053–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ilies, L.; Itabashi, Y.; Shang, R.; Nakamura, E. Iron/Zinc-Co-catalyzed Directed Arylation and Alkenylation of C(sp3)–H Bonds with Organoborates. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shen, Z.; Cera, G.; Haven, T.; Ackermann, L. Tri-Substituted Triazole-Enabled C–H Activation of Benzyl and Aryl Amines by Iron Catalysis. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 3795–3798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhu, C.; Stangier, M.; Oliveira, J.C.A.; Massignan, L.; Ackermann, L. Iron-Electrocatalyzed C−H Arylations: Mechanistic Insights into Oxidation-Induced Reductive Elimination for Ferraelectrocatalysis. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 16382–16389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Boddie, T.E.; Carpenter, S.H.; Baker, T.M.; DeMuth, J.C.; Cera, G.; Brennessel, W.W.; Ackermann, L.; Neidig, M.L. Identification and Reactivity of Cyclometalated Iron(II) Intermediates in Triazole-Directed Iron-Catalyzed C–H Activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 12338–12345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Barreiro, E.J.; Kümmerle, A.E.; Fraga, C.A.M. The Methylation Effect in Medicinal Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 5215–5246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schönherr, H.; Cernak, T. Profound Methyl Effects in Drug Discovery and a Call for New C–H Methylation Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12256–12267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Graczyk, K.; Haven, T.; Ackermann, L. Iron-Catalyzed C(sp2)–H and C(sp3)–H Methylations of Amides and Anilides. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 8812–8815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Shang, R.; Ilies, L.; Nakamura, E. Iron-Catalyzed Directed C(sp2)–H and C(sp3)–H Functionalization with Trimethylaluminum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7660–7663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Cera, G.; Haven, T.; Ackermann, L. Expedient Iron-Catalyzed C−H Allylation/Alkylation by Triazole Assistance with Ample Scope. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1484–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Monks, B.M.; Fruchey, E.R.; Cook, S.P. Iron-Catalyzed C(sp2)−H Alkylation of Carboxamides with Primary Electrophiles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 11065–11069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fruchey, E.R.; Monks, B.M.; Cook, S.P. A Unified Strategy for Iron-Catalyzed ortho-Alkylation of Carboxamides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 13130–13133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Noda, D.; Sunada, Y.; Hatakeyama, T.; Nakamura, M.; Nagashima, H. Effect of TMEDA on Iron-Catalyzed Coupling Reactions of ArMgX with Alkyl Halides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6078–6079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Asako, S.; Ilies, L.; Nakamura, E. Iron-Catalyzed Ortho-Allylation of Aromatic Carboxamides with Allyl Ethers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 17755–17757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Asako, S.; Norinder, J.; Ilies, L.; Yoshikai, N.; Nakamura, E. ortho-Allylation of 1-Arylpyrazoles with Allyl Phenyl Ether via Iron-Catalyzed C–H Bond Activation under Mild Conditions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2014, 356, 1481–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Plietker, B. Regioselective Iron-Catalyzed Allylic Amination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6053–6056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Plietker, B. A Highly Regioselective Salt-Free Iron-Catalyzed Allylic Alkylation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1469–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Plietker, B.; Dieskau, A.; Möws, K.; Jatsch, A. Ligand-Dependent Mechanistic Dichotomy in Iron-Catalyzed Allylic Substitutions: σ-Allyl versus π-Allyl Mechanism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 198–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Loup, J.; Zell, D.; Oliveira, J.C.A.; Keil, H.; Stalke, D.; Ackermann, L. Asymmetric Iron-Catalyzed C−H Alkylation Enabled by Remote Ligand meta-Substitution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 14197–14201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Dudnik, A.S.; Gevorgyan, V. Formal Inverse Sonogashira Reaction: Direct Alkynylation of Arenes and Heterocycles with Alkynyl Halides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2096–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Negishi, E.; Anastasia, L. Palladium-Catalyzed Alkynylation. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1979–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Carril, M.; Correa, A.; Bolm, C. Iron-Catalyzed Sonogashira Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4862–4865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ye, X.; Xu, C.; Wojtas, L.; Akhmedov, N.G.; Chen, H.; Shi, X. Silver-Free Palladium-Catalyzed sp3 and sp2 C–H Alkynylation Promoted by a 1,2,3-Triazole Amine Directing Group. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 2970–2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cera, G.; Haven, T.; Ackermann, L. Iron-Catalyzed C−H Alkynylation through Triazole Assistance: Expedient Access to Bioactive Heterocycles. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 3577–3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chrzanowska, M.; Grajewska, A.; Rozwadowska, M.D. Asymmetric Synthesis of Isoquinoline Alkaloids: 2004−2015. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 12369–12465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Matsubara, T.; Ilies, L.; Nakamura, E. Oxidative C−H Activation Approach to Pyridone and Isoquinolone through an Iron-Catalyzed Coupling of Amides with Alkynes. Chem. Asian J. 2016, 11, 380–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jung, E.M.; Piizzi, G. gem-Disubstituent Effect: Theoretical Basis and Synthetic Applications. Chem. Rev. 2015, 105, 1735–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cera, G.; Haven, T.; Ackermann, L. Iron-catalyzed C–H/N–H activation by triazole guidance: Versatile alkyne annulation. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 6460–6463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Mo, J.; Müller, T.; Oliveira, J.C.A.; Demeshko, S.; Meyer, F.; Ackermann, L. Iron-Catalyzed C−H Activation with Propargyl Acetates: Mechanistic Insights into Iron(II) by Experiment, Kinetics, Mössbauer Spectroscopy, and Computation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12874–12878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Berger, M.; Chauhan, R.; Rodrigues, C.A.B.; Maulide, N. Bridging C−H Activation: Mild and Versatile Cleavage of the 8-Aminoquinoline Directing Group. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 16805–16808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Loup, J.; Parchomyk, T.; Lülf, S.; Demeshko, S.; Meyer, F.; Koszinowski, K.; Ackermann, L. Mössbauer and mass spectrometry support for iron(II) catalysts in enantioselective C–H activation. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 5135–5139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Sun, Y.; Tang, H.; Chen, K.; Hu, L.; Yao, J.; Shaik, S.; Chen, H. Two-State Reactivity in Low-Valent Iron-Mediated C–H Activation and the Implications for Other First-Row Transition Metals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3715–3730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Balcells, D.; Clot, E.; Eisenstein, O. C–H Bond Activation in Transition Metal Species from a Computational Perspective. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 749–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yu, S.; Ma, S. Allenes in Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis and Natural Product Syntheses. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3074–3112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mo, J.; Müller, T.; Oliveira, J.C.A.; Ackermann, L. 1,4-Iron Migration for Expedient Allene Annulations through Iron-Catalyzed C−H/N−H/C−O/C−H Functionalizations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 7719–7723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Davies, D.L.; Macgregor, S.A.; McMullin, C.L. Computational Studies of Carboxylate-Assisted C–H Activation and Functionalization at Group 8–10 Transition Metal Centers. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8649–8709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ackermann, L. Carboxylate-Assisted Transition-Metal-Catalyzed C−H Bond Functionalizations: Mechanism and Scope. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1315–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zell, D.; Bursch, M.; Müller, V.; Grimme, S.; Ackermann, L. Full Selectivity Control in Cobalt(III)-Catalyzed C−H Alkylations by Switching of the C−H Activation Mechanism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 10378–10382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wang, L.; Carrow, B.P. Oligothiophene Synthesis by a General C–H Activation Mechanism: Electrophilic Concerted Metalation–Deprotonation (eCMD). ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 6821–6836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Matsubara, T.; Asako, S.; Ilies, L.; Nakamura, E. Synthesis of Anthranilic Acid Derivatives through Iron-Catalyzed Ortho Amination of Aromatic Carboxamides with N-Chloroamines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 646–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yoshigoe, Y.; Kuninobu, Y. Iron-Catalyzed ortho-Selective C–H Borylation of 2-Phenylpyridines and Their Analogs. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 3450–3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Examples of 1,2,3-triazoles directing groups (DGs).
Scheme 1. Examples of 1,2,3-triazoles directing groups (DGs).
Molecules 25 01806 sch001
Scheme 2. Triazole-assisted C(sp2)–H arylation; (a) Aryl amides functionalizations; (b) Acrylamide functionalization; (c) Removal of TAM DG.
Scheme 2. Triazole-assisted C(sp2)–H arylation; (a) Aryl amides functionalizations; (b) Acrylamide functionalization; (c) Removal of TAM DG.
Molecules 25 01806 sch002
Scheme 3. Iron-catalyzed C(sp2)–H arylation of ferrocenes aromatic rings with TAM DG.
Scheme 3. Iron-catalyzed C(sp2)–H arylation of ferrocenes aromatic rings with TAM DG.
Molecules 25 01806 sch003
Scheme 4. Iron-catalyzed C(sp3)–H arylation with TAM DG.
Scheme 4. Iron-catalyzed C(sp3)–H arylation with TAM DG.
Molecules 25 01806 sch004
Scheme 5. Iron-catalyzed C(sp2)–H arylations of benzylamides with tri-substituted triazole (TST) DG.
Scheme 5. Iron-catalyzed C(sp2)–H arylations of benzylamides with tri-substituted triazole (TST) DG.
Molecules 25 01806 sch005
Scheme 6. Electrochemical iron-catalyzed C(sp2)–H arylation with TAM DG.
Scheme 6. Electrochemical iron-catalyzed C(sp2)–H arylation with TAM DG.
Molecules 25 01806 sch006
Scheme 7. Proposed mechanism for iron-catalyzed C(sp2)–H bond arylation with TAM DG.
Scheme 7. Proposed mechanism for iron-catalyzed C(sp2)–H bond arylation with TAM DG.
Molecules 25 01806 sch007
Scheme 8. Triazole-assisted methylation of C(sp2)–H bond; (a) Selected examples of aryl amides; (b) C(sp2)–H methylation of ferrocene.
Scheme 8. Triazole-assisted methylation of C(sp2)–H bond; (a) Selected examples of aryl amides; (b) C(sp2)–H methylation of ferrocene.
Molecules 25 01806 sch008
Scheme 9. (a) Triazole-assisted methylation of amides; (b) Mild triazole removal to 2-methyl benzoic acid 5e.
Scheme 9. (a) Triazole-assisted methylation of amides; (b) Mild triazole removal to 2-methyl benzoic acid 5e.
Molecules 25 01806 sch009
Scheme 10. Iron-catalyzed triazole-assisted methylation of C(sp2)–H bonds; (a) Methylation of benzylamides 17a-c; (b) Methylation of the enantioenriched amine (S)-10d.
Scheme 10. Iron-catalyzed triazole-assisted methylation of C(sp2)–H bonds; (a) Methylation of benzylamides 17a-c; (b) Methylation of the enantioenriched amine (S)-10d.
Molecules 25 01806 sch010
Scheme 11. Removal and recovery of TST DG under acidic conditions.
Scheme 11. Removal and recovery of TST DG under acidic conditions.
Molecules 25 01806 sch011
Scheme 12. Iron-catalyzed triazole assisted ethylation of C(sp2)–H bond. (a) Ethylation of TAM amides 1; (b) Ethylation of TST amide 10f; (c) Ethylation of ferrocene amide 6a; (d) Triazole removal protocol.
Scheme 12. Iron-catalyzed triazole assisted ethylation of C(sp2)–H bond. (a) Ethylation of TAM amides 1; (b) Ethylation of TST amide 10f; (c) Ethylation of ferrocene amide 6a; (d) Triazole removal protocol.
Molecules 25 01806 sch012
Scheme 13. (a) Iron-catalyzed, TAM-assisted alkylation of C(sp2)–H bond; (b) TAM removal.
Scheme 13. (a) Iron-catalyzed, TAM-assisted alkylation of C(sp2)–H bond; (b) TAM removal.
Molecules 25 01806 sch013
Scheme 14. Radical mechanistic finding in iron-catalyzed alkylation of C(sp2)–H bond with (a) 6-bromohex-1-ene 24i, (b) cyclopropylmethyl bromide 24j, (c) cis-1-bromo-4-methylcyclohexane 24k.
Scheme 14. Radical mechanistic finding in iron-catalyzed alkylation of C(sp2)–H bond with (a) 6-bromohex-1-ene 24i, (b) cyclopropylmethyl bromide 24j, (c) cis-1-bromo-4-methylcyclohexane 24k.
Molecules 25 01806 sch014
Scheme 15. Iron-catalyzed TAM-assisted allylation of C(sp2)–H bond with allylchloride 27.
Scheme 15. Iron-catalyzed TAM-assisted allylation of C(sp2)–H bond with allylchloride 27.
Molecules 25 01806 sch015
Scheme 16. (a) Iron-catalyzed TAM-assisted allylation of C(sp2)–H bond with allylchlorides 27i-l; (b) Isochromanone synthesis via TAM-deprotection.
Scheme 16. (a) Iron-catalyzed TAM-assisted allylation of C(sp2)–H bond with allylchlorides 27i-l; (b) Isochromanone synthesis via TAM-deprotection.
Molecules 25 01806 sch016
Scheme 17. Iron-catalyzed TAM-assisted alkynylation of C(sp2)–H bonds with bromoalkyne 30.
Scheme 17. Iron-catalyzed TAM-assisted alkynylation of C(sp2)–H bonds with bromoalkyne 30.
Molecules 25 01806 sch017
Scheme 18. Probing iron-catalyzed C(sp2)–H alkynylation with haloakynes 30.
Scheme 18. Probing iron-catalyzed C(sp2)–H alkynylation with haloakynes 30.
Molecules 25 01806 sch018
Scheme 19. Proposed mechanism of iron-catalyzed TAM-assisted C–H alkynylation of amides.
Scheme 19. Proposed mechanism of iron-catalyzed TAM-assisted C–H alkynylation of amides.
Molecules 25 01806 sch019
Scheme 20. Iron-catalyzed C–H alkynylation/annulation. (a) Isoquinolones synthesis; (b) Isoindolinones synthesis; (c) Removal of TAM DG.
Scheme 20. Iron-catalyzed C–H alkynylation/annulation. (a) Isoquinolones synthesis; (b) Isoindolinones synthesis; (c) Removal of TAM DG.
Molecules 25 01806 sch020
Scheme 21. Iron-catalyzed C–H annulation of triazolyldihydrogenmethyl (TAH) amides. (a) Symmetric internal alkynes; (b) Methyl-aryl alkynes.
Scheme 21. Iron-catalyzed C–H annulation of triazolyldihydrogenmethyl (TAH) amides. (a) Symmetric internal alkynes; (b) Methyl-aryl alkynes.
Molecules 25 01806 sch021
Scheme 22. Mechanistic experiments for iron-catalyzed C–H annulations with alkynes; (a) Reaction conduced in presence of BHT as radical scavenger; (b) Stoichiometric reaction in absence of oxidant.
Scheme 22. Mechanistic experiments for iron-catalyzed C–H annulations with alkynes; (a) Reaction conduced in presence of BHT as radical scavenger; (b) Stoichiometric reaction in absence of oxidant.
Molecules 25 01806 sch022
Scheme 23. (a) Iron-catalyzed C–H annulation with propargyl acetate; (b) Electrochemical removal of TAH DG. (c) Oxidative cleavage of aminoquinoline (AQ) DG.
Scheme 23. (a) Iron-catalyzed C–H annulation with propargyl acetate; (b) Electrochemical removal of TAH DG. (c) Oxidative cleavage of aminoquinoline (AQ) DG.
Molecules 25 01806 sch023
Scheme 24. Proposed catalytic cycle for TAH-assisted C–H/N–H annulation with propargyl acetates.
Scheme 24. Proposed catalytic cycle for TAH-assisted C–H/N–H annulation with propargyl acetates.
Molecules 25 01806 sch024
Scheme 25. Iron-catalyzed C–H/N–H bonds activation/annulation with allenes; (a) TAH-assisted isoquinolones synthesis; (b) TAM-assisted dihydroisoquinolones synthesis; (c) One-pot/two-step isoquinolone 48a synthesis.
Scheme 25. Iron-catalyzed C–H/N–H bonds activation/annulation with allenes; (a) TAH-assisted isoquinolones synthesis; (b) TAM-assisted dihydroisoquinolones synthesis; (c) One-pot/two-step isoquinolone 48a synthesis.
Molecules 25 01806 sch025
Scheme 26. Mechanism investigation with isotopically labelled allene [D2]-45a.
Scheme 26. Mechanism investigation with isotopically labelled allene [D2]-45a.
Molecules 25 01806 sch026
Scheme 27. TAM-assisted C–H/N–H/C–O/C–H activation/annulation with allenes.
Scheme 27. TAM-assisted C–H/N–H/C–O/C–H activation/annulation with allenes.
Molecules 25 01806 sch027

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lanzi, M.; Cera, G. Iron-Catalyzed C–H Functionalizations under Triazole-Assistance. Molecules 2020, 25, 1806. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081806

AMA Style

Lanzi M, Cera G. Iron-Catalyzed C–H Functionalizations under Triazole-Assistance. Molecules. 2020; 25(8):1806. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081806

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lanzi, Matteo, and Gianpiero Cera. 2020. "Iron-Catalyzed C–H Functionalizations under Triazole-Assistance" Molecules 25, no. 8: 1806. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081806

APA Style

Lanzi, M., & Cera, G. (2020). Iron-Catalyzed C–H Functionalizations under Triazole-Assistance. Molecules, 25(8), 1806. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081806

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop