Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant Properties of Fruit and Vegetable Whey Beverages and Fruit and Vegetable Mousses
Next Article in Special Issue
Benefits and Pitfalls of HPLC Coupled to Diode-Array, Charged Aerosol, and Coulometric Detections: Effect of Detection on Screening of Bioactive Compounds in Apples
Previous Article in Journal
Yeast Cells in Microencapsulation. General Features and Controlling Factors of the Encapsulation Process
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inorganic Elements in Mytilus galloprovincialis Shells: Geographic Traceability by Multivariate Analysis of ICP-MS Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Non-Invasive Identification of Nutrient Components in Grain

by
Charles Farber
1,
A. S. M. Faridul Islam
2,
Endang M. Septiningsih
2,
Michael J. Thomson
2 and
Dmitry Kurouski
1,3,*
1
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
2
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
3
The Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(11), 3124; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113124
Submission received: 7 May 2021 / Revised: 19 May 2021 / Accepted: 22 May 2021 / Published: 24 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Methods in Food Analysis)

Abstract

:
Digital farming is a modern agricultural concept that aims to maximize the crop yield while simultaneously minimizing the environmental impact of farming. Successful implementation of digital farming requires development of sensors to detect and identify diseases and abiotic stresses in plants, as well as to probe the nutrient content of seeds and identify plant varieties. Experimental evidence of the suitability of Raman spectroscopy (RS) for confirmatory diagnostics of plant diseases was previously provided by our team and other research groups. In this study, we investigate the potential use of RS as a label-free, non-invasive and non-destructive analytical technique for the fast and accurate identification of nutrient components in the grains from 15 different rice genotypes. We demonstrate that spectroscopic analysis of intact rice seeds provides the accurate rice variety identification in ~86% of samples. These results suggest that RS can be used for fully automated, fast and accurate identification of seeds nutrient components.

1. Introduction

Digital agriculture is an emerging paradigm that aims to maximize crop yields while simultaneously minimizing the environmental impact of farming. Crop yields can be maximized by timely detection and identification of biotic stresses [1,2]. This information can be used for site- and dose-specific applications of fungicides and pesticides to cease the proliferation of pathogens and minimize crop losses associated with plant diseases. Abiotic stresses, including drought and nutrient deficiencies, can cause even higher crop losses than biotic stresses [3,4]. If detected early, water and fertilizers can be administrated to mitigate crop losses caused by these stresses. Digital farming also requires advanced methodologies for plant breeding and selection to develop a germplasm of crops that includes varieties with higher drought or salinity tolerance as well as enhanced resistance to pathogens. A major drawback of conventional phenotyping techniques is the long period of time required to measure the effect of stress on plants [5,6]. Since destructive, traditional wet lab methods take a long time to get the nutritional data of a germplasm or breeding population, RS could be a good alternative for screening the germplasm or breeding population quickly, helping the breeder in selection for crop improvement.
Raman spectroscopy (RS) is an analytical technique that can be used to detect plant biotic and abiotic stresses, as well as to identify plant varieties and probe their nutritional content [7,8,9]. For instance, Farber and co-workers demonstrated that RS could be used to identify whether maize kernels were healthy or infected by Aspergillus flavus, A. niger, Fusarium spp., or Diplodia spp. with 100% accuracy [10]. Recently, Sanchez and co-workers demonstrated high accuracy of diagnostics of Huanglongbing (HLB) or citrus greening on both orange and grapefruit trees using RS [11]. Moreover, the researchers demonstrated that spectra of HLB-infected plants are drastically different from plants that experienced nutritional deficiencies. These results suggested that RS can be used to distinguish between biotic and abiotic stresses. RS is a non-invasive, non-destructive and a chemical-free technique. Thus, the direct cost of analysis is small [2]. Over the last decade, several companies have developed hand-held spectrometers that could be used in field to probe plant health in real time [10,11,12]. This eliminates the need for transportation of plant material, further reducing the cost of analysis, simultaneously minimizing the potential spread of pathogens. Experimental results reported by the our group [10,11,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and other research laboratories [12,21,22,23,24] show that hand-held Raman spectrometers could be used for fast (one second spectral acquisition time) and nearly 100% accurate diagnostics of biotic and abiotic stresses [10,11,13,16,19,20,25]. This innovative sensing approach is based on detecting and identifying pathogen-induced changes in plant biochemistry. RS can be used to distinguish between biotic and abiotic stresses [11], identify pathogens on the species level [10] and reveal the cause of abiotic stresses [26]. Our group has shown that RS can be used for non-invasive plant phenotyping [14,15,27]. We also found that RS can differentiate between nematode-resistant and nematode-susceptible peanut varieties [15]. Our recent findings show that RS can be used to identify varieties of plant species based on the unique spectroscopic signatures of their leaves and seeds [15,27,28]. Moreover, RS enables non-invasive and non-destructive assessment of the nutrient content of seeds, that is, carbohydrate, protein, fiber, oil, and unsaturated fatty acids in peanut seeds [15,27].
The question to ask is whether RS can identify the nutritional content of the intact grain. To answer this question, we collected Raman spectra from intact seeds of 15 different rice varieties. We employed chemometric tools to identify and differentiate these varieties. Our findings suggest that Raman spectra acquired from the intact rice grain are dominated by vibrational bands originating from starch and fiber. We performed detailed spectroscopic analysis of these compounds to confirm these hypotheses. Finally, we investigated the extent to which RS can be used to determine the nutritional content of intact corn kernels in the corn cob. Our results suggest that more sophisticated spectroscopic approaches are required to deliver the laser light through opaque and light-scattering husk material. This obstacle can be partially overcome by spatially offset Raman spectroscopy (SORS). Our results show that although SORS is not capable of probing the composition of intact corn kernels through the intact husk, decent signal-to-noise spectra can be obtained through two layers of husk material with 3–4 mm offset. These results further reflect the potential of RS in assessment of the nutritional content of intact seeds and spectroscopic identification of rice varieties.

2. Results and Discussion

Raman spectra collected from intact rice seeds exhibit vibrational bands that can be assigned to carbohydrates (410–1259 cm−1), aliphatic (CH2 and CH2/CH3 vibrations) (1339–1459 cm−1), and lignin (1601–1633 cm−1) (Table 1 and Figure 1). The vibrational band at 1005 cm−1 can be assigned to both carotenoids and proteins. Therefore, this band cannot be used for unambiguous interpretation of the nutritional content of rice seeds and will be excluded from the band analysis. These findings suggest that spectroscopic analysis of interact seeds can be used to probe the content of starch (410–1259 cm−1) and fiber (1601–1633 cm−1).
To prove the accuracy of the band assignment, we collected the spectra from amylose and amylopectin, two essential components of starch, as well as from the rice hull and de-hulled, cleaned rice (Figure 2). We found that amylose and amylopectin had very similar spectra. If normalized on the intensity of 479 cm−1, the spectrum of amylopectin had slightly more intense 865 cm−1, 1054 cm−1 and 1460 cm−1 bands, whereas the intensity of 1340, 1383 and 1397 cm−1 bands was found to be slightly lower than in the spectrum of amylose. This experimental evidence confirmed that the observed 410–1459 vibrational bands in the spectrum of the intact rice seeds originated from starch. Our findings also demonstrated that RS could not be used for differentiation between amylose vs. amylopectin in the grain. Thus, only total starch content could be probed in the intact rice using RS.
We have also found that the spectrum of the rice hull is dominated by two vibrational bands at 1601–1630 cm−1 that originate from aromatic vibrations of polyphenols, the building blocks of lignin. This finding suggests that fiber content in the intact grain cannot be determined because this spectral region is obscured by the vibrations originating from the hull. Spectroscopic analysis of amylose, amylopectin, rice hulls and de-hulled rice revealed that only amount of the starch can be determined in the intact rice.
Next, we used OPLS-DA to determine the extent to which RS can be used for the quantitative identification of rice varieties based on their spectroscopic signatures. The loading plot and confusion matrix were then generated using this model, which contained nine predictive components (PCs) and 1087 (607–1693 cm−1) original wavenumbers from the standard normal variate (SNV) pre-processed first derivative spectra. The nine PCs explained a total of 33% variation between the classes. The model identified the oils peak at 1440 cm−1, the protein peaks at 1000 cm−1 (PC1) and 1655 cm−1 (PC2), the fiber peak at 1601 cm−1 (PC2) as the strongest predictors of rice variety, which supports the conclusions of our qualitative spectral analysis discussed above. The model also explained 55% of the variation (R2X) in the spectra.
Our results demonstrated that RS can be used for highly accurate (86.2%) identification of rice varieties through intact rice hulls (Table 2). This high accuracy can be explained by the very low if any metabolic rates in the seeds as compared to actively growing plants.
Our group previously demonstrated that RS could be used for highly accurate identification of corn kernels and nutritional assessment of corn starch, fiber, protein and carotenoids content [27]. The accuracy of these analyses was confirmed by Dumas Combustion Analysis, Megazyme Assay and Near-Infrared (NIR) readings form the same corn varieties. In this study, we investigated the extent to which RS could be used to access the nutritional values of the intact corn kernels in the corn cob. We found that corn husk both blocked and dispersed laser light preventing acquisition of spectra from the intact corn kernels. Only vibrational bands that originated from phenolic compounds could be observed in such spectra (Figure 3). We hypothesized that this problem could be overcome by spatially offset Raman spectroscopy (SORS). In SORS, two types of spectra are collected in a sequential order. The first type of spectra was collected when both excitation and collection axes were spatially co-aligned. These were typical normal Raman spectra that were discussed above. The second type of spectra was collected with spatial offsets between the excitation and collection optical axes. These spectra were called ‘offset Raman spectra’. This spectral collection approach allowed for probing deeper layers of the analyzed sample. First pioneered by Matousek group, SORS quickly became broadly utilized to detect explosives and illicit drugs in opaque bags and containers [37,38,39]. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that SORS can be used to probe brain biochemistry through the intact skull [40]. Our group previously demonstrated that SORS could be used to probe nutritional content of intact potato tubers though the opaque peal [41].
The use of SORS for analysis of the intact corn cob showed that SORS failed to read the content of intact corn kernels (data not shown). We found that only if the husk were partially peeled and two husk layers remained, SORS could reveal the vibrational signatures of corn kernels (Figure 3). It should be noted that excellent signals from the underlying corn kernels were obtained at all offsets ranging from 3.0 to 4.0 mm. In the acquired offset Raman spectra, we observed vibrational bands originating from carbohydrates and carotenoids. Similar to the discussed above rice hull, we found that corn husk provides strong signals of the fiber (1601–1632 cm−1). These signals obscure readings of the fiber content of the intact corn kernels.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Raman Spectroscopy

Spectra from intact seeds of 15 different rice varieties (Figure 4) were collected using a hand-held Resolve Agilent spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with 830 nm laser. The following experimental parameters were used for all collected spectra: 1 s acquisition time, 1 accumulation, 495 mW power, surface scanning mode, and baseline spectral subtraction by device software. Spectra from the corn cob were acquired with the same settings as described for rice except that the instrument was in through-barrier mode, the offset distance was changed from 0–5 mm, and 10 accumulations were used instead of 1.

3.2. Statistical Analysis

Orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA): all collected Raman spectra were imported into SIMCA 14 (Umetrics, Umea, Sweden) for statistical analysis and scaled to unit variance to give all spectral regions equal importance. OPLS-DA was performed to determine the number of predicting and orthogonal significant components and identify spectral regions that best explain the separation between the classes.

4. Conclusions

This work demonstrated that RS can be used for identification of the intact rice. OPLS-DA results show that rice seeds can be identified with on average 86.2% accuracy. This work also revealed limitations of RS and SORS for nutrient analysis. We found that a thick husk limited direct assessment of the nutritional content of corn kernels. This information could be revealed only if only two layers of husk material obscured the kernels.

Author Contributions

C.F.: investigation, data curation, and methodology; A.S.M.F.I.: crop cultivation, and methodology; E.M.S.: methodology and supervision; M.J.T. methodology and supervision; D.K.: methodology, funding acquisition, and supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Governor’s University Research Initiative Grant to DK (no. 12-2016, M1700437).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of compounds are available on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Lew, T.T.S.; Sarojam, R.; Jang, I.C.; Park, B.S.; Naqvi, N.I.; Wong, M.H.; Singh, G.P.; Ram, R.J.; Shoseyov, O.; Saito, K.; et al. Species-independent analytical tools for next-generation agriculture. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 1408–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Payne, W.Z.; Kurouski, D. Raman-based diagnostics of biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. A review. Front. Plant. Sci. 2021, 11, 616672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mantri, N.; Patade, V.; Penna, S.; Ford, R.; Pang, E. Abiotic stress responses in plants: Present and future. In Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  4. Waqas, M.A.; Kaya, C.; Riaz, A.; Farooq, M.; Nawaz, I.; Wilkes, A.; Li, Y. Potential Mechanisms of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants Induced by Thiourea. Front. Plant. Sci. 2019, 10, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, K.D.; Borrego, E.J.; Kenerley, C.M.; Kolomiets, M.V. Oxylipins Other Than Jasmonic Acid Are Xylem-Resident Signals Regulating Systemic Resistance Induced by Trichoderma virens in Maize. Plant. Cell 2020, 32, 166–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. He, Y.; Borrego, E.J.; Gorman, Z.; Huang, P.C.; Kolomiets, M.V. Relative contribution of LOX10, green leaf volatiles and JA to wound-induced local and systemic oxylipin and hormone signature in Zea mays (maize). Phytochemistry 2020, 174, 112334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Farber, C.; Mahnke, M.; Sanchez, L.; Kurouski, D. Advanced Spectroscopic Techniques for Plant Disease Diagnostics. A Review. Trends Analyt. Chem. 2019, 118, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kurouski, D. A Spectroscopic Revolution in Agricultural World. Spectroscopy 2020, 35, 38–40. [Google Scholar]
  9. Qin, J.; Kim, M.S.; Chao, K.; Cho, B.-K. Raman Chemical Imaging Technology for Food and Agricultural Applications. J. Biosyst. Eng. 2017, 42, 170–189. [Google Scholar]
  10. Farber, C.; Kurouski, D. Detection and Identification of Plant Pathogens on Maize Kernels with a Hand-Held Raman Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 3009–3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sanchez, L.; Pant, S.; Xing, Z.; Mandadi, K.; Kurouski, D. Rapid and noninvasive diagnostics of Huanglongbing and nutrient deficits on citrus trees with a handheld Raman spectrometer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gupta, S.; Huang, C.H.; Singh, G.P.; Park, B.S.; Chua, N.-H.; Ram, R.J. Portable Raman leaf-clip sensor for rapid detection of plant stress. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Egging, V.; Nguyen, J.; Kurouski, D. Detection and Identification of Fungal Infections in Intact Wheat and Sorghum Grain Using a Hand-Held Raman Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2018, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Farber, C.; Sanchez, L.; Kurouski, D. Confirmatory Non-Invasive and Non-Destructive Identification of Poison Ivy Using A Hand-Held Raman Spectrometer. RCS Adv. 2020, 10, 21530–21534. [Google Scholar]
  15. Farber, C.; Sanchez, L.; Rizevsky, S.; Ermolenkov, A.; McCutchen, B.; Cason, J.; Simpson, C.; Burrow, M.; Kurouski, D. Raman Spectroscopy Enables Non-Invasive Identification of Peanut Genotypes and Value-Added Traits. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Farber, C.; Shires, M.; Ong, K.; Byrne, D.; Kurouski, D. Raman spectroscopy as an early detection tool for rose rosette infection. Planta 2019, 250, 1247–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sanchez, L.; Ermolenkov, A.; Tang, X.T.; Tamborindeguy, C.; Kurouski, D. Non-invasive diagnostics of Liberibacter disease on tomatoes using a hand-held Raman spectrometer. Planta 2020, 251, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sanchez, L.; Farber, C.; Lei, J.; Zhu-Salzman, K.; Kurouski, D. Noninvasive and Nondestructive Detection of Cowpea Bruchid within Cowpea Seeds with a Hand-Held Raman Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 1733–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sanchez, L.; Pant, S.; Irey, M.S.; Mandadi, K.; Kurouski, D. Detection and Identification of Canker and Blight on Orange Trees Using a Hand-Held Raman Spectrometer. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2019, 50, 1875–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sanchez, L.; Pant, S.; Mandadi, K.; Kurouski, D. Raman Spectroscopy vs Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction In Early Stage Huanglongbing Diagnostics. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Altangerel, N.; Ariunbold, G.O.; Gorman, C.; Alkahtani, M.H.; Borrego, E.J.; Bohlmeyer, D.; Hemmer, P.; Kolomiets, M.V.; Yuan, J.S.; Scully, M.O. In vivo diagnostics of early abiotic plant stress response via Raman spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 3393–3396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Mandrile, L.; Rotunno, S.; Miozzi, L.; Vaira, A.M.; Giovannozzi, A.M.; Rossi, A.M.; Noris, E. Nondestructive Raman Spectroscopy as a Tool for Early Detection and Discrimination of the Infection of Tomato Plants by Two Economically Important Viruses. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 9025–9031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yeturu, S.; Vargas Jentzsch, P.; Ciobotă, V.; Guerrero, R.; Garrido, P.; Ramos, L.A. Handheld Raman spectroscopy for the early detection of plant diseases: Abutilon mosaic virus infecting Abutilon sp. Anal. Methods 2016, 8, 3450–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, C.H.; Singh, G.P.; Park, S.H.; Chua, N.H.; Ram, R.J.; Park, B.S. Early Diagnosis and Management of Nitrogen Deficiency in Plants Utilizing Raman Spectroscopy. Front. Plant. Sci. 2020, 11, 663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Farber, C.; Bryan, R.; Paetzold, L.; Rush, C.; Kurouski, D. Non-Invasive Characterization of Single-, Double- and Triple-Viral Diseases of Wheat With a Hand-Held Raman Spectrometer. Front. Plant. Sci. 2020, 11, 01300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sanchez, L.; Ermolenkov, A.; Biswas, S.; Septiningshih, E.M.; Kurouski, D. Raman Spectroscopy Enables Non-invasive and Confirmatory Diagnostics of Salinity Stresses, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Deficiencies in Rice. Front. Plant. Sci. 2020, 11, 573321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Krimmer, M.; Farber, C.; Kurouski, D. Rapid and Noninvasive Typing and Assessment of Nutrient Content of Maize Kernels Using a Handheld Raman Spectrometer. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 16330–16335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Sanchez, L.; Filter, C.; Baltensperger, D.; Kurouski, D. Confirmatory Non-Invasive and Non-Destructive Differentiation Between Hemp and Cannabis Using A Hand-Held Raman Spectrometer. RCS Adv. 2020, 10, 3212–3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Almeida, M.R.; Alves, R.S.; Nascimbem, L.B.; Stephani, R.; Poppi, R.J.; de Oliveira, L.F. Determination of amylose content in starch using Raman spectroscopy and multivariate calibration analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 397, 2693–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Schulz, H.; Baranska, M.; Baranski, R. Potential of NIR-FT-Raman spectroscopy in natural carotenoid analysis. Biopolymers 2005, 77, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Edwards, H.G.; Farwell, D.W.; Webster, D. FT Raman microscopy of untreated natural plant fibres. Spectrochim. Acta A 1997, 53, 2383–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cao, Y.; Shen, D.; Lu, Y.; Huang, J. A Raman-scattering study on the net orientation of biomacromolecules in the outer epidermal walls of mature wheat stems (Triticum aestivum). Ann. Bot. 2006, 97, 1091–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Jamieson, L.E.; Li, A.; Faulds, K.; Graham, D. Ratiometric analysis using Raman spectroscopy as a powerful predictor of structural properties of fatty acids. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 181483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yu, M.M.; Schulze, H.G.; Jetter, R.; Blades, M.W.; Turner, R.F. Raman microspectroscopic analysis of triterpenoids found in plant cuticles. Appl. Spectrosc. 2007, 61, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kang, L.; Wang, K.; Li, X.; Zou, B. High pressure structural investigation of benzoic acid: Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 14758–14766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Agarwal, U.P. Raman imaging to investigate ultrastructure and composition of plant cell walls: Distribution of lignin and cellulose in black spruce wood (Picea mariana). Planta 2006, 224, 1141–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Matousek, P.; Stone, N. Development of deep subsurface Raman spectroscopy for medical diagnosis and disease monitoring. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 1794–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. López-López, M.; García-Ruiz, C. Infrared and Raman spectroscopy techniques applied to identification of explosives. Trends Anal. Chem. 2014, 54, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bloomfield, M.; Andrews, D.; Loeffen, P.; Tombling, C.; York, T.; Matousek, P. Non-invasive identification of incoming raw pharmaceutical materials using Spatially Offset Raman Spectroscopy. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2013, 76, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sharma, B.; Ma, K.; Glucksberg, M.R.; Van Duyne, R. Seeing through bone with surface-enhanced spatially-offset Raman spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 17290–17293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Morey, R.; Ermolenkov, A.; Payne, W.Z.; Scheuring, D.C.; Koym, J.W.; Vales, M.I.; Kurouski, D. Non-invasive identification of potato varieties and prediction of the origin of tuber cultivation using spatially offset Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 4585–4594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Raw (A) and area normalized (B) Raman spectra collected from intact seeds of 15 different rice genotypes.
Figure 1. Raw (A) and area normalized (B) Raman spectra collected from intact seeds of 15 different rice genotypes.
Molecules 26 03124 g001
Figure 2. Raman spectra of amylose, amylopectin, intact rice grain and rice hull.
Figure 2. Raman spectra of amylose, amylopectin, intact rice grain and rice hull.
Molecules 26 03124 g002
Figure 3. Raman spectra of corn husk (black) and kernels (maroon), as well as offset Raman spectra collected from the corn cob with two layers of husk material.
Figure 3. Raman spectra of corn husk (black) and kernels (maroon), as well as offset Raman spectra collected from the corn cob with two layers of husk material.
Molecules 26 03124 g003
Figure 4. Photographs of seeds of 15 different rice varieties.
Figure 4. Photographs of seeds of 15 different rice varieties.
Molecules 26 03124 g004
Table 1. Vibrational bands and their assignments for spectra collected form leaves and seeds of peanuts.
Table 1. Vibrational bands and their assignments for spectra collected form leaves and seeds of peanuts.
BandVibrational ModeAssignment
410–479C-C-O and C-C-C deformations; related to glycosidic ring skeletal deformations
δ(C-C-C) + τ(C-O) scissoring of C-C-C and out-of-plane bending of C-O
Carbohydrates [29]
577–615ν(C-O-C) Glycosidic Carbohydrates [29]
715–770δ(C-C-O)Carbohydrates [29]
862–937(C6–C5–O5–C1–O1)Carbohydrates [29]
1005In-plane CH3 rocking of polyene
aromatic ring of phenylalanine
Carotenoids [30]; protein
1049ν(C-O) + ν(C-C) + δ(C-O-H)Cellulose, lignin [31]
1087ν(C-O) + ν(C-C) + δ(C-O-H)Carbohydrates [29]
1126ν(C-O) + ν(C-C) + δ(C-O-H)Carbohydrates [29]
1207δ(C-C-H)Carbohydrates [29]
1259Guaiacyl ring breathing, C-O stretching (aromatic); -C=C-Lignin [32], carbohydrates, [29] unsaturated fatty acids [33]
1339ν(C-O); δ(C-O-H)Aliphatic, [34] carbohydrates [29]
1381–1396δCH2 bending Aliphatics [34]
1460δ(CH2) + δ(CH3)Aliphatics [34]
1601–1627ν(C-C) aromatic ring + σ(CH)Lignin [35,36]
Table 2. OPLS-DA confusion matrix of Raman spectra collected from seeds of 15 different varieties (1–15) of rice.
Table 2. OPLS-DA confusion matrix of Raman spectra collected from seeds of 15 different varieties (1–15) of rice.
Genotype NumberMembersTrue Positive Rate123456789101112131415
12075%1501400000000000
22181%0170000012100000
32090%1018000000100000
41385%1001100000000100
52080%0030160000100000
62176%0100016001100002
72085%0000001700201000
82085%0000000171010001
92095%0100000019000000
102090%0010000001801000
112090%0000000020180000
121687%0000000002014000
1320100%0000000000002000
142075%0001010020000151
1520100%0000000000000020
Total34286.2%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Farber, C.; Islam, A.S.M.F.; Septiningsih, E.M.; Thomson, M.J.; Kurouski, D. Non-Invasive Identification of Nutrient Components in Grain. Molecules 2021, 26, 3124. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113124

AMA Style

Farber C, Islam ASMF, Septiningsih EM, Thomson MJ, Kurouski D. Non-Invasive Identification of Nutrient Components in Grain. Molecules. 2021; 26(11):3124. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113124

Chicago/Turabian Style

Farber, Charles, A. S. M. Faridul Islam, Endang M. Septiningsih, Michael J. Thomson, and Dmitry Kurouski. 2021. "Non-Invasive Identification of Nutrient Components in Grain" Molecules 26, no. 11: 3124. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113124

APA Style

Farber, C., Islam, A. S. M. F., Septiningsih, E. M., Thomson, M. J., & Kurouski, D. (2021). Non-Invasive Identification of Nutrient Components in Grain. Molecules, 26(11), 3124. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113124

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop