Study on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logging T2 Spectrum Shape Correction of Sandstone Reservoirs in Oil-Based Mud Wells
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- The undisturbed formation does not contain mud filtrate, and the natural gas is a fluid of nonwetting phase in the formation pores of the study area. Its NMR signal only includes diffusion relaxation and free relaxation, which is not affected by surface relaxation. Due to the fast diffusion rate of natural gas, it has a short T2 time [13]. Figure 2a shows the rock volume model and ideal NMR T2 spectrum of the undisturbed formation, and the red part represents natural gas.
- In the process of nuclear magnetic resonance logging, the response of the instrument will be affected by the mud filtrate in the invasion zone. Figure 2b shows the rock volume model and ideal nuclear magnetic resonance T2 spectrum in the water-based mud well: some natural gas and movable water in the formation invasion zone in the water-based mud well are displaced by the water-based mud filtrate, and the properties of the fluid are changed. The free gas product in the intrusion zone is less, and the signal of gas in the corresponding NMR T2 spectrum decreases. Because the wettability of the formation in the study area is strong water wet, the filtrate of water-based mud contacts the skeleton minerals on the pore surface, and its NMR response characteristics are affected by surface relaxation. Therefore, the T2 signals of the water-based mud filtrate and movable water overlap. For sandstone gas reservoirs, researchers usually use the T2 spectrum of nuclear magnetic resonance logging in water-based mud wells to calculate basic reservoir parameters.
- Figure 2c shows the rock volume model and ideal nuclear magnetic resonance T2 spectrum in the oil-based mud well: in the oil-based mud well, in addition to some natural gas and movable water in the formation invasion zone being displaced by the oil-based mud filtrate, the oil-based mud filtrate will also be miscible with the residual natural gas in the invasion zone, resulting in a significant reduction in the natural gas signal collected by nuclear magnetic resonance logging. Because the filtrate of oil-based mud is in a nonwetting phase, the flow channel in the formation rock is the central area of the pore and does not contact the pore surface. Its NMR response is mainly characterized by volume relaxation. The viscosity of oil-based mud in the study area is 18 mPa.s, which is a low viscosity drilling fluid. Its body relaxation time is long, which significantly changes the T2 spectrum shape of the undisturbed formation. Therefore, if the existing reservoir parameter calculation methods are directly applied to the T2 spectrum of NMR logging in oil-based mud wells, it may lead to large calculation errors.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Comparison of NMR Logging Responses in Different Mud Environments
2.2. Classification of Pore Structure Types of Reservoir Rocks
2.3. Determination of Optimal T2cut-off
2.4. Case Studies
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Workflow of T2 Spectrum Shape Correction Method
3.2. Extraction of T2 Spectrum from NMR Logging by the Multidimensional Matrix Method
3.3. Development of T2 Spectrum Shape Correction Model for Oil-Based Mud Wells
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Sample Availability
References
- Mohamed, A.; Salehi, S.; Ahmed, R. Significance and complications of drilling fluid rheology in geothermal drilling: A review. Geothermics 2021, 93, 102066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adebayo, A.R.; Bageri, B.S.; Al Jaberi, J.; Salin, R.B. A calibration method for estimating mudcake thickness and porosity using NMR data. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020, 195, 107582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gamal, H.; Elkatatny, S.; Adebayo, A. Influence of mud filtrate on the pore system of different sandstone rocks. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2021, 202, 108595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Fan, Y.; Wu, F.; Li, C. Combining large-sized model flow experiment and NMR measurement to investigate drilling induced formation damage in sandstone reservoir. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 176, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agwu, Q.E.; Akpabio, J.U. Using agro-waste materials as possible filter loss control agents in drilling muds: A review. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2018, 163, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Arfaj, M.K.; Abdulraheem, A.; Sultan, A.; Amanullah; Hussein, I. Mitigating Shale Drilling Problems through Comprehensive Understanding of Shale Formations. In Proceedings of the Day 2 Mon, Doha, Qatar, 7 December 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Elshehabi, T.; Ilkin, B. Well Integrity and Pressure Control in Unconventional Reservoirs: A Comparative Study of Marcellus and Utica Shales. In Proceedings of the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Canton, OH, USA, 13 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Doak, J.; Kravits, M.; Spartz, M.; Quinn, P. Drilling Extended Laterals in the Marcellus Shale. In Proceedings of the Day 3 Tue, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 9 October 2018; SPE: Richardson, TX, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, H.; Li, H. Determination of movable fluid percentage and movable fluid porosity in ultra-low permeability sandstone using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2015, 133, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitchell, J.; Valori, A.; Fordham, E.J. A robust nuclear magnetic resonance workflow for quantitative determination of petrophysical properties from drill cuttings. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 174, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walsh, R.; Ramamoorthy, R.; Azhan, M. Applications of NMR Logging in Synthetic Oil-Base Muds in The Sirikit West Field, Onshore Thailand. In Proceedings of the SPWLA 42nd Annual Logging Symposium, Houston, TX, USA, 17 June 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Z.X.; Dong, C.M.; Zhang, X.G.; Lin, C.Y.; Huang, X.; Duan, D.P.; Lin, J.L.; Zeng, F.; Li, D. Reservoir controlling factors of the Paleogene Oligocene Huagang Formation in the north central part of the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin, China. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 175, 159–172. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, F.; Zhou, C.; Li, C.; Xu, H.; Zhou, F.; Si, Z. Water spectrum method of NMR logging for identifying fluids. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2016, 43, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Hirasaki, G.; Flaum, M. NMR wettability indices: Effect of OBM on wettability and NMR responses. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2006, 52, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.; Hirasaki, G.J.; Flaum, M. Effects of OBM Invasion on Irreducible Water Saturation: Mechanisms and Modifications of NMR Interpretation. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, USA, 26 September 2004; 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Marschall, D.M.; Coates, G. Laboratory MRI Investigation in the Effects of Invert Oil Muds on Primary MRI Log Determinations. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, USA, 5 October 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Ighodalo, E.; Hursan, G.; McCrossan, J.; Belowi, A. Integrated NMR Fluid Characterization Guides Stimulation in Tight Sand Reservoirs. In Proceedings of the Day 3 Wed, Manama, Bahrain, 20 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Mahrooqi, S.; Grattoni, C.; Moss, A.; Jing, X. An investigation of the effect of wettability on NMR characteristics of sandstone rock and fluid systems. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2003, 39, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmitt, M.; Fernandes, C.P.; Wolf, F.G.; Neto, J.A.B.D.C.; Rahner, C.P.; dos Santos, V.S.S. Characterization of Brazilian tight gas sandstones relating permeability and Angstrom-to micron-scale pore structures. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2015, 27, 785–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakhaee-Pour, A.; Bryant, S.L. Effect of pore structure on the producibility of tight-gas sandstones. AAPG Bull. 2014, 98, 663–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wu, F.; Wu, J.; Wang, L. Simulation of mud invasion and analysis of resistivity profile in sandstone formation module. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2017, 44, 1045–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Yuan, S.; Li, W.; Ji, Y.; Liu, K. Numerical simulation and correction of electric logging under the condition of oil-based mud invasion. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 176, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.C.; Torres-Verodin, C. Quantifying fluid distribution and phase connectivity with a simple 3D cubic pore network model constrained by NMR and MICP data. Comput. Geosci. 2013, 61, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Y.; Zhou, C.; Fan, Y.; Li, C.; Yuan, C.; Cong, Y. A new permeability calculation method using nuclear magnetic resonance logging based on pore sizes: A case study of bioclastic limestone reservoirs in the A oilfield of the Mid-East. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2018, 45, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hursan, G.; Silva, A.; Van Steene, M.; Mutina, A. Learnings from a New Slim Hole LWD NMR Technology. In Proceedings of the Day 1 Mon, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 9 November 2020; SPE: Richardson, TX, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, Q.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Qi, Z.; Wang, X.; Xiong, S. A full-scale characterization method and application for pore-throat radius distribution in tight oil reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2020, 187, 106857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valle, B.; Bó, P.F.D.; Santos, J.; Aguiar, L.; Coelho, P.; Favoreto, J.; Arena, M.; dos Santos, H.N.; Ribeiro, C.; Borghi, L. A new method to improve the NMR log interpretation in drilling mud-invaded zones: A case study from the Brazilian Pre-salt. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2021, 203, 108692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, L.; Mao, Z.; Li, J.; Yu, H. Effect of hydrocarbon on evaluating formation pore structure using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging. Fuel 2018, 216, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kenyon, W.E. Petrophysical principles of applications of NMR logging. Log. Anal. 1997, 38, 21–43. [Google Scholar]
Rock Structure Type | T2 Peak/ms | T2 Geometric Average/ms | Proportion of Pores Greater than 600 ms/% |
---|---|---|---|
I (Water-based mud) | 125.26 | 140.97 | 8.07 |
I (Oil-based mud) | 1156.99 | 363.55 | 66.12 |
II (Water-based mud) | 125.26 | 58.92 | 0 |
II (Oil-based mud) | 842.16 | 148.35 | 42.61 |
III (Water-based mud) | 125.26 | 36.91 | 0.17 |
III (Oil-based mud) | 446.21 | 82.47 | 26.85 |
IV (Water-based mud) | 13.56 | 25.98 | 0.11 |
IV (Oil-based mud) | 125.26 | 35.17 | 1.48 |
Core No | T2cutoff/ms | Permeability/mD | NMR Porosity/% | T2 Geometric Average/ms | Irreducible Water Saturation/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 10.35 | 10.80 | 17.09 | 11.91 | 38.74 |
2 | 15.70 | 15.30 | 16.73 | 20.96 | 34.25 |
3 | 13.66 | 17.51 | 16.57 | 16.06 | 44.48 |
4 | 44.48 | 522.3 | 21.10 | 101.65 | 23.12 |
5 | 23.81 | 63.10 | 18.4 | 35.50 | 31.74 |
6 | 12.75 | 5.40 | 12.35 | 6.63 | 55.37 |
7 | 22.21 | 18.45 | 17.26 | 22.97 | 55.37 |
8 | 12.75 | 3.20 | 12.88 | 9.48 | 53.47 |
9 | 5.54 | 9.90 | 14.9 | 8.50 | 43.86 |
10 | 15.70 | 4.20 | 14.38 | 12.39 | 51.74 |
11 | 18.04 | 4.20 | 8.78 | 2.36 | 77.81 |
12 | 14.64 | 4.83 | 15.11 | 8.32 | 57.03 |
13 | 12.75 | 2.18 | 14.22 | 9.98 | 54.19 |
14 | 22.21 | 0.43 | 9.82 | 16.38 | 44.48 |
15 | 19.33 | 0.20 | 8.66 | 5.57 | 73.46 |
16 | 5.54 | 6.56 | 14.54 | 5.51 | 53.65 |
17 | 12.75 | 1.73 | 13.39 | 10.08 | 51.82 |
18 | 16.83 | 1.23 | 12.13 | 9.91 | 55.3 |
19 | 38.72 | 68.40 | 17.58 | 37.19 | 46.32 |
20 | 18.04 | 2.87 | 15.47 | 14.73 | 49.42 |
21 | 4.82 | 1.65 | 13.32 | 6.40 | 47.75 |
22 | 5.94 | 39.40 | 14.11 | 13.88 | 38.10 |
23 | 11.09 | 2.50 | 13.65 | 9.40 | 51.29 |
24 | 10.35 | 18.20 | 15.64 | 15.37 | 42.69 |
25 | 6.36 | 3.25 | 13.3 | 8.97 | 44.96 |
26 | 3.65 | 2.85 | 11.09 | 6.33 | 43.44 |
27 | 27.36 | 29.70 | 18.31 | 29.38 | 39.56 |
28 | 47.68 | 1246.0 | 22.60 | 158.28 | 18.58 |
29 | 33.70 | 145.9 | 18.51 | 69.84 | 26.81 |
Well. | Mud Type | Lithology | Wellbore Orientation | Logs |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | WBM | Sand | Vertical | WL 3combo 1+WLNMR |
B | OBM | Sand | Vertical | LWD 3combo+WLNMR |
C | OBM | Sand | Vertical | LWD 3combo+WLNMR |
D | WBM | Sand | Vertical | WL 3combo+WLNMR |
E | WBM | Sand | Vertical | WL 3combo+WLNMR |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sun, J.; Cai, J.; Feng, P.; Sun, F.; Li, J.; Lu, J.; Yan, W. Study on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logging T2 Spectrum Shape Correction of Sandstone Reservoirs in Oil-Based Mud Wells. Molecules 2021, 26, 6082. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26196082
Sun J, Cai J, Feng P, Sun F, Li J, Lu J, Yan W. Study on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logging T2 Spectrum Shape Correction of Sandstone Reservoirs in Oil-Based Mud Wells. Molecules. 2021; 26(19):6082. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26196082
Chicago/Turabian StyleSun, Jianmeng, Jun Cai, Ping Feng, Fujing Sun, Jun Li, Jing Lu, and Weichao Yan. 2021. "Study on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logging T2 Spectrum Shape Correction of Sandstone Reservoirs in Oil-Based Mud Wells" Molecules 26, no. 19: 6082. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26196082
APA StyleSun, J., Cai, J., Feng, P., Sun, F., Li, J., Lu, J., & Yan, W. (2021). Study on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logging T2 Spectrum Shape Correction of Sandstone Reservoirs in Oil-Based Mud Wells. Molecules, 26(19), 6082. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26196082