Next Article in Journal
AaTs-1: A Tetrapeptide from Androctonus australis Scorpion Venom, Inhibiting U87 Glioblastoma Cells Proliferation by p53 and FPRL-1 Up-Regulations
Next Article in Special Issue
Intramolecular Aminolactonization for Synthesis of Furoindolin-2-One
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Studies of Au(I) and Au(III) Anticancer MetalLodrugs: A Survey
Previous Article in Special Issue
Total Synthesis of Decahydroquinoline Poison Frog Alkaloids ent-cis-195A and cis-211A
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 24
10.3390/molecules26247599
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Search of Small Molecules That Selectively Inhibit MBOAT4

by
Emily S. Murzinski
1,
Ishika Saha
1,
Hui Ding
1,
David Strugatsky
2,
Ryan A. Hollibaugh
1,
Haixia Liu
1,
Peter Tontonoz
3 and
Patrick G. Harran
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
2
Department of Microbiology, Immunology & Molecular Genetics, California and Nano Systems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
3
Department of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(24), 7599; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247599
Submission received: 18 November 2021 / Revised: 11 December 2021 / Accepted: 13 December 2021 / Published: 15 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heterocyclic and Organometallic Chemistry: Theme Issue in Honor of Prof. Daniel Comins’ Great Contribution)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ghrelin is a 28-residue peptide hormone produced by stomach P/D1 cells located in oxyntic glands of the fundus mucosa. Post-translational octanoylation of its Ser-3 residue, catalyzed by MBOAT4 (aka ghrelin O-acyl transferase (GOAT)), is essential for the binding of the hormone to its receptor in target tissues. Physiological roles of acyl ghrelin include the regulation of food intake, growth hormone secretion from the pituitary, and inhibition of insulin secretion from the pancreas. Here, we describe a medicinal chemistry campaign that led to the identification of small lipopeptidomimetics that inhibit GOAT in vitro. These molecules compete directly for substrate binding. We further describe the synthesis of heterocyclic inhibitors that compete at the acyl coenzyme A binding site.

1. Introduction

Ghrelin is a 28-residue lipopeptide (Figure 1A) discovered by Kojima and co-workers as the endogenous ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-r) [1]. It was found that the octanoylation of Ser3 was required for ghrelin’s endocrine activities. At the time, the enzyme responsible for this modification was unknown. Later, Yang hypothesized this atypical lipidation was likely performed by a member of the membrane-bound O-acyl transferase (MBOAT) family of enzymes [2]. The MBOATs catalyze the lipidation of a variety of substrates including phospholipids, neutral lipids, and proteins using saturated and unsaturated acyl coenzyme-A derivatives as acyl donors [3]. In 2008, Yang et al. utilized a candidate cloning approach to demonstrate that MBOAT 4, now termed ghrelin O-acyl transferase (GOAT), the only MBOAT capable of catalyzing proghrelin octanoylation [2]. Gutierrez used a candidate gene silencing approach to independently reach the same conclusion for human GOAT [4]. Short-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were produced and the effects of silencing individual MBOAT genes were observed. MS/MS fragmentation analyses of GOAT acylated ghrelin showed that the acylation is on serine-3, identical to acyl ghrelin produced in the stomach.
Active ghrelin (hereafter referred to as ghrelin) was shown to induce adiposity in rodents and food intake in both rodents and humans [5,6]. Ghrelin was also found to play a role in glucose homeostasis by inhibiting insulin secretion from the pancreas [7,8]. Levels of active ghrelin in the blood peak during fasting and decrease after meals [9,10]. Ghrelin is primarily produced by peripheral tissues, rather than the central nervous system [11]. In addition, no other hormone is known to be octanoylated [12]. Given the biological specificity of GOAT and ghrelin, it was thought that, unlike GHS-r ligands, an inhibitor of GOAT would not need to penetrate the brain to cause pharmacological effects. The potential therapeutic effect of suppressing circulating ghrelin levels fueled efforts to identify inhibitors of the enzyme. Such molecules could clarify the roles of ghrelin in feeding, weight gain and glucose homeostasis, both in normal physiology and in disease.
A general model of GOAT transmembrane architecture was proposed, which describes eleven membrane-spanning helix domains and two intramembrane domains [13,14]. Although integral membrane proteins constitute an essential portion of the proteome, they are often difficult to purify and analyze because of their hydrophobicity and reliance on lipid–bilayer interactions for stability and activity. Since a purified form of GOAT has yet to be described, medicinal chemistry efforts lack the benefit of high-resolution structural data and detailed binding models. Crude membrane preparations from GOAT expressing cells are used as a source of enzymatic activity for inhibitor assays. Despite this challenge, several groups reported GOAT inhibitors (Figure 1B–E) [15,16,17]. Shortly after identifying GOAT, Yang et al. demonstrated the enzyme was inhibited by its reaction product 1, and more potently by esterase resistant octanamide analog 2 (IC50 = 200 nM) [18]. A truncated peptide (3) consisting of the first five N-terminal ghrelin residues also inhibited GOAT, albeit five-fold less potently (IC50 = 0.1 µM). Barnett et al. developed ‘bi-substrate’ mimic GO-CoA-Tat (4, IC50 = 3 mM). This inhibitor incorporated the first ten N-terminal residues of active ghrelin, which is S-linked to a coenzyme A molecule, and fused to a Tat sequence to promote endocytosis [19]. We found GO-CoA-Tat less potent than 2 in vitro, but it was reported to reduce circulating ghrelin levels in vivo, improve glucose tolerance and limit weight gain in mice fed a high-fat diet. These findings were attributed to effects on ghrelin signaling because they were not observed in ghrelin knockout mice. Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim and Takeda recently patented more drug-like, heterocyclic inhibitors of GOAT [20,21,22]. Takeda showed that their inhibitor 7 competed at the CoA site on GOAT, presumably by mimicking elements of an adenine base. It is likely that amino pyrimidine 5 and oxadiazolopyridine 6 function similarly.
Whereas GO-CoA-Tat exploits the ability of a polyarginine sequence to promote active cellular uptake, we sought a ghrelin peptidomimetic showing passive membrane permeability. There was precedent for this outcome; for example, the marketed drug Aliskiren was designed based on the peptide sequence of renin [23]. Nonetheless, we faced a difficult problem. Rather than elaborating a screening hit to a (typically larger) end-product, an effective GOAT inhibitor would need to be smaller, less polar, and metabolically stable relative to the parent peptide. We sought to identify and enhance key binding interactions while removing superfluous functionality. Herein, we report peptidomimetic GOAT inhibitors, including 8 and 9, and describe their in vitro performance. We also outline the synthesis of novel hybrid heterocyclic GOAT inhibitors based on the structures of prototypes 5 and 6.

2. Results and Discussion

Building on data reported by Brown and Goldstein [18], we began our studies by evaluating a series of modified truncation peptides ranging from 3–8 amino acids in length (Figure 2). We discovered that mono methylating the N-terminus and replacing Ser2 with t-butyl glycine increased the in vitro potency of 5-mer 3 by 20-fold (see 13, Figure 2). The corresponding 4-mer 8 was even more effective. It showed an IC50 of 14 nM when assayed in membrane fractions. The phenyl ring in 8 was important. Analogs of 8 with either histidine or tyrosine at P4 were inactive, as was three residue peptide 12.
Peptides chains longer than three amino acids are generally not taken up into cells passively. However, their cyclic counterparts can show an improved stability, pharmacokinetics and, if their structure facilitates internal shielding of the polar surface area, useful levels of cell permeability [26]. We used Schrödinger’s Macromodel software to conduct molecular modeling studies, using AMBER in a continuum solvation model (octanol) to inform the design of hypothetical macrocyclic analogs of compound 8, which was our best performing tetrapeptide. During these studies, we were pleased to find that the peptide backbone of the macrocyclic analog 9b overlaid almost perfectly with that of 8 (Figure 2C). The root mean square deviation (RMSD) between the two structures was 0.06 Å at the α-carbon atoms for the lowest energy conformations of both molecules. We ignored variations of the octanamide chain in these analyses as this group was expected to be highly flexible. Based on our observations, we synthesized cyclic variants 9 and 17 using catalyzed ring-closing metatheses of bis-allyl ether precursors, (Figure 2), resulting in mixtures of separable alkene geometric isomers. The ability of these compounds to inhibit GOAT activity in vitro was comparable to their linear peptide counterparts. Moreover, enzymatic reaction rates measured while varying substrate concentrations in the presence of a fixed concentration of 17a suggested that the compound inhibited GOAT by competing for the peptide substrate (see Materials and Methods). With both linear and cyclic inhibitors in hand, we began an extensive program to synthesize and assay analogs, wherein the octanamide side chain, the P4 aromatic moiety, N-methylation patterns, ring substituents and connectivity (for 9/17) and stereochemistry were varied in search of molecules that inhibited GOAT potently in vitro, which could block acyl ghrelin secretion from an engineered insulinoma cell line (INS-1, see Materials and Methods). Over time hundreds of compounds were evaluated [27,28]. While several of those components inhibited GOAT activity in membrane fractions in the 50–200 nM range, none were superior to prototypic peptide 8 and none, including 8, showed significant activity in cell culture. Actually, the best performing oligomer in cell culture was lipopentapeptide 13 (Figure 2). Unfortunately, that molecule showed poor pharmacokinetics and a low oral bioavailability in mice.
During this time, pharmaceutical companies began publishing patent literature on GOAT inhibitors discovered through high-throughput screening. Takeda reported data indicating a series of benzoxazole carboxylates (including 7 in Figure 1D), which inhibited the enzyme by competing at its co-enzyme A binding site [21]. Based on their structures, we believed it likely the aminopyrimidines reported by Eli Lilly [20] and the oxadiazolopyridines described by Boehringer Ingelheim [22] functioned similarly. Because numerous metabolic enzymes utilize co-enzyme A derivatives for catalysis, there was the risk of the unanticipated off-target effects for inhibitors of this kind. Nonetheless, Eli Lilly reported that compound 5 was orally bioavailable and inhibited ghrelin production in vivo at doses that did not cause observable adverse side effects.
We sought a hybrid molecule that would contain an oxadiazolopyridine linked to an octanoyl motif through the piperidinyl ethyl scaffold used in Eli Lilly compound 5 (and also a feature of certain ACAT inhibitors) [29]. We first synthesized compounds 5 and 6 in house and tested them in our own assays. We found the membrane fraction IC50 = 88 nM and 64 nM, as well as INS-1 cellular IC50 = 670 nM and 540 nM, respectively. Having roughly confirmed literature activities, we targeted new hybrids 10 and 11 wherein the oxadiazolopyridine would replace the aminopyrimidine in 5 and, in 10, its dipeptidyl segment would be replaced by an octanoyl unit, a feature essential for activity in our previous peptidomimetic efforts.
Amino-iodinated oxadiazolopyridine 19 (Scheme 1) was synthesized from amino cyano oxadiazole 18 and ethyl acetoacetate, as described by Boehringer Ingelheim. Sonogashira coupling of 19 with 4-ethynyl piperidine 20 (prepared via Ohira–Bestmann homologation of the corresponding aldehyde) gave chromophore 21. The attempted saturation of the alkyne in this molecule by hydrogenation over PtO2 gave mainly cis-alkene 22 alongside a by-product that lacked an oxadiazole ring, presumably formed via N-O bond reduction. The attempted hydrogenation over various other heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysts gave similar results. Only when catalytic Pd(OH)2/C was used (EtOH, 1 atm H2(g)), were small amounts of alkane 23 formed in a mixture that predominately contained 22. Treatment of the crude mixture with TFA followed by acylation with butylated glycolic acid 24 allowed pure target 10 to be isolated (along with alkene congener 25) following column chromatography on silica gel, albeit in low yield.
To avoid the problematic hydrogenation of 21, we developed a different route to access target 11, a path also applicable to 10. In this sequence, the oxadiazolopyridine unit is installed late via annulation onto an intermediate already at the desired oxidation state. We required a protected 5-piperidinyl-2-pentanone for this purpose. Boc derivative 28 (Scheme 2) was known, although it was prepared via a 3-step sequence beginning with a relatively costly starting material [30]. We instead developed a one-step synthesis of 28 from commercial acid 27 using Me2CuLi.LiCN, as described by Posner and Genna [31]. Multiple grams of 28 were prepared readily using this method. Degradation of the carbamate in 28 with TFA and acylation of the incipient amino ketone salt with Boc-L-Ala-OSu produced piperidyl amide 29. Further N-terminal extension with N-Me pyrazole derivative 30 afforded compound 31. Structure 35 contains the dipeptide segment of Eli Lilly compound 5 tethered to a methyl ketone handle from which varied heterocycles can derive. To prepare target oxadiazolopyridine 11, we condensed 31 with cyanofurazan 18 [32] using SnCl4 as promoter. This construction was originally developed by Vasil’ev et al. [33] and, in the current example, affords oxadiazolopyridine 11, directly following aqueous workup. A second regioisomer (35) was also isolated from the reaction (dr = 1.5:1), a result we interpret in terms of the competing formation of regioisomeric enamine intermediates 32/33 that cyclize onto the pendant nitrile. Subsequent tautomerization would afford oxadiazolopyridines.
Synthetic compounds 10, 11, alkene 25 and regiosiomer 35 were tested in membrane fractions containing GOAT and in ghrelin-secreting INS-1 cells. As shown in Figure 3, both 25 and 35 were significantly impaired, likely a result of their altered geometries. However, both 10 and 11 inhibited membrane GOAT as potently as did 5 and 6. Notably, compound 11 blocked ghrelin secretion from INS-1 cells 4-fold more potently than 5. To date, it is the most potent compound we have tested in our cellular assay. Because 10 is much less active in cells, yet it inhibits GOAT in membrane fractions just as well as 11, we speculate that the adenine mimcry provided by the oxadiazolopyridine is key, with a linked functionality contributing mainly to stability and cellular uptake, or lack thereof.

3. Materials and Methods

NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Advance spectrometers (300 MHz, 400 MHz, 500 MHz) and are reported as δ values in ppm relative to CDCl3 (calibrated to 7.26 ppm in 1H NMR and 77.16 ppm in 13C NMR, unless otherwise indicated). Splitting patterns are abbreviated as follows: singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q), multiplet (m), broad (br), and combinations thereof. Column chromatography was conducted on silica gel 60 (240–400 mesh) purchased from Sillicycle. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed using pre-coated, glass-backed plates (silica gel 60 PF254, 0.25 mm) and visualized using a combination of UV and potassium permanganate staining. HPLC analyses were carried out using an Agilent 1200 HPLC system equipped with an Agilent Quadrupole 6130 ESI-MS detector. Mobile phase was prepared with 0.1% TFA.

3.1. Preparation of Macrocycles 9A and 9B

tert-butyl (S)-(1-(allyloxy)-3-phenylpropan-2-yl)carbamate (ii, Scheme 3): To a solution of i (1.0 g, 3.98 mmol) in DMF (22 mL) at 0 °C, NaH was added (60% in mineral oil, 365 mg, 9.12 mmol) followed by allyl bromide (0.77 mL, 9.72 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NH4Cl and extracted with EtOAc (×2). The organics were dried (MgSO4), filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resultant oil was purified by column chromatography using 9:1 hexanes: EtOAc as eluents to afford ii (526 mg, 45%) as a clear oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.28 (q, J = 4.9 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H), 5.91 (m, 1H), 5.27 (q, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 5.19 (q, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.86 (s, 1H), 3.96 (m, 2H), 3.34 (m, 2H), 2.87 (m, 2H), 1.42 (s, 9H). HPLC/MS MH+ 192.1 (-Boc).
(9H-fluoren-9-yl) methyl((S)-1-(((S)-1-(allyloxy)-3-phenylpropan-2-yl)amino)-3-octanamido-1-oxopropan-2-yl)carbamate (iii): To a solution of ii (1 eq.) in CH2Cl2 (0.4 M) was added TFA (10% v/v). The resulting solution was stirred at room temperature until completion as determine by LCMS. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and the resultant TFA salt was used without further purification. The resultant residue (1.1 eq.), Fmoc-Dap(octanoyl)-OH (1 eq.) and HATU (1.1 eq.) was suspended in DMF (0.3 M). To the suspension DIPEA was added (2.5 eq.) and the resulting solution was stirred at room temperature until completion, as determined by LCMS. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc and washed with saturated aqueous NH4Cl (×2), water (×3), saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (×1), and brine (×1). The organics were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford iii (178 mg, 95%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.77 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.32 (m, 2H), 7.25 (d, J = 14.7 Hz, 2H), 7.19 (q, J = 3.5 Hz, 3H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.41 (d, J = 4.3 Hz, 1H), 6.12 (s, 1H), 5.84 (m, 1H), 5.22 (d, J = 17.1 Hz, 1H), 5.12 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, 1H), 4.37 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (m, 2H), 4.21 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.94 (s, 2H), 3.69 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 3.49 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.37 (s, 2H), 2.87 (m, 2H), 2.13 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.74 (s, 1H), 1.60 (s, 2H), 1.26 (t, J = 5.2 Hz, 8H), 0.85 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 175.37, 169.47, 143.74, 141.29 (d, J = 2.4 Hz), 137.81, 134.40, 129.30, 128.44, 127.80, 127.15 (d, J = 2.7 Hz), 126.53, 125.20, 120.03, 117.20, 72.14, 69.90, 67.52, 56.73, 50.35, 47.07, 42.15, 37.54, 36.51, 31.67, 29.24, 29.01, 25.66, 22.62, 14.06. HPLC/MS MH+ 626.1.
Boc-Ser(O-allyl)-OMe: To a solution of Boc-Ser-OMe (1.28 g, 5.85 mmol) in THF (11.7 mL) a solution of allyl ethyl carbonate (1.54 mL, 11.7 mmol), allyl palladium chloride dimer (43 mg, 0.12 mmol) and PPh3 (138 mg, 0.53 mmol) was added dropwise to THF (5.85 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was refluxed under argon overnight. The reaction mixture was concentrated under a reduced pressure and the resultant residue was purified by column chromatography using 9:1 hexanes: EtOAc as eluents to afford the desired product (1.24 g, 82%) as a clear oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.82 (m, 1H), 5.37 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 5.23 (m, 1H), 5.17 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (t, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.97 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 3.84 (q, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (s, 9H), 3.64 (q, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.23, 155.51, 134.06, 117.40, 79.99, 72.24, 69.94, 53.99, 52.48, 28.32. HPLC/MS MH+ 1601.1 (-Boc).
Boc-Ser(O-allyl)-OH (iv): To a solution of Boc-Ser(O-allyl)-OMe (1.24 g, 4.78 mmol) in a mixture of THF/MeOH/H2O (1:1:1, 75 mL) LiOH•H2O (502 mg, 11.96 mmol) was added and the reaction was stirred at room temperature until completion as determined by TLC. THF and MeOH were removed under reduced pressure and the resulting solution was partitioned between 1 N HCl (70 mL) and DCM (150 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with DCM (×2) and the combined organics were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford the desired product, iv (1.1 g) as a colorless oil, which was used without further purification. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.85 (m, 1H), 5.40 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 5.25 (m, 1H), 5.19 (q, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 4.45 (t, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 4.01 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 3.90 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 3.67 (q, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H).
tert-butyl ((6S,9S,12S)-6-benzyl-9-(octanamidomethyl)-8,11-dioxo-4,14-dioxa-7,10-diazaheptadeca-1,16-dien-12-yl)carbamate (v): To a solution of the Fmoc-protected amine iv (1 eq.) and octanethiol (10 eq.) in THF (0.1 M) DBU (1.1 eq.) was added. The resultant solution was stirred at room temperature for 15 min and then concentrated under reduced pressure. The resultant residue was purified by column chromatography. The resultant residue (1.1 eq.), iv (1 eq.) and HATU (1.1 eq.) was suspended in DMF (0.3 M). To the suspension was added DIPEA (2.5 eq.) and the resulting solution was stirred at room temperature until completion, as determined by LCMS. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc and washed with saturated aqueous NH4Cl (×2), water (×3), saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (×1), and brine (×1). The organics were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford v (195 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.98 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (t, J = 3.8 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (q, J = 3.4 Hz, 3H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 6.01 (s, 1H), 5.87 (m, 2H), 5.42 (d, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (m, 1H), 5.24 (m, 1H), 5.19 (dd, J = 1.5, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 5.16 (dd, J = 1.5, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 4.40 (m, 1H), 4.35 (t, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (t, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 3.98 (m, 4H), 3.78 (q, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (q, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 3.58 (q, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 3.46 (m, 1H), 3.38 (m, 2H), 2.94 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.77 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.01 (q, J = 4.9 Hz, 1H), 1.64 (s, 6H), 1.56 (s, 1H), 1.46 (s, 9H), 1.26 (s, 8H), 0.87 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 175.55, 170.73, 134.72, 133.96, 129.31, 129.16, 128.37, 126.38, 117.78, 117.02, 72.29, 72.26, 72.16, 70.33, 69.43, 55.64, 54.95, 50.17, 41.78, 37.50, 36.29, 31.66, 29.22, 28.98, 28.34, 25.57, 22.61, 14.05. HPLC/MS MH+ 631.1.
tert-butyl ((3S,6S,9S)-3-benzyl-6-(octanamidomethyl)-5,8-dioxo-1,11-dioxa-4,7-diazacyclopentadec-13-en-9-yl)carbamate (vi): The diene, v (158 mg, 0.25 mmol) was dissolved in CHCl3 (0.01 M) and sparged with argon for 10 min, and then a solution of Grubbs I (20 mol %) in CHCl3 (0.02 M) was added. The resultant solution was stirred under argon until completion as determined by LCMS. Column purification afforded vi (134 mg) as a mixture of alkene isomers. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.25 (m, 2H), 7.18 (m, 3H), 5.83 (m, 1H), 5.49 (dd, J = 8.5, 32.0 Hz, 1H), 5.20 (m, 1H), 4.33 (m, 2H), 4.12 (m, 1H), 3.97 (m, 2H), 3.85 (q, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (m, 1H), 3.69 (q, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 3.57 (m, 2H), 3.44 (m, 1H), 3.31 (m, 2H), 2.91 (m, 1H), 2.76 (m, 1H), 2.25 (s, 1H), 2.13 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.04 (m, 1H), 1.90 (d, J = 12.7 Hz, 3H), 1.82 (s, 5H), 1.71 (s, 2H), 1.56 (m, 2H), 1.50 (s, 1H), 1.42 (m, 11H), 1.23 (s, 13H), 0.85 (t, J = 4.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.40, 175.77, 175.58, 175.52, 171.65, 170.67, 170.57, 169.48, 169.24, 169.00, 168.77, 155.24, 155.18, 138.20, 129.37, 129.31, 129.15, 128.43, 128.42, 128.38, 128.34, 126.47, 126.44, 117.74, 72.23, 72.13, 71.19, 70.31, 70.22, 69.23, 69.46, 69.34, 69.02, 68.69, 67.29, 67.18, 56.44, 54.34, 50.95, 41.74, 37.45, 36.37, 36.32, 35.54, 35.06, 31.68, 31.66, 29.30, 29.27, 29.01, 28.33, 26.95, 26.86, 26.34, 26.32, 26.13, 22.61, 14.06. HPLC/MS MH+ 603.1.
N-(((3S,6S,9S)-9-(2-aminoacetamido)-3-benzyl-5,8-dioxo-1,11-dioxa-4,7-diazacyclopentadec-13-en-6-yl)methyl)octanamide (9): To a solution of ii (1 eq.) in CH2Cl2 (0.4 M) was added TFA (10% v/v). The resulting solution was stirred at room temperature until completion as determine by LCMS. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and the resultant TFA salt was used without further purification. The resultant residue (1.1 eq.), Boc-Gly-OH (1 eq.) and HATU (1.1 eq.) was suspended in DMF (0.3 M). DIPEA (2.5 eq.) was added to the suspension and the resulting solution was stirred at room temperature until completion, as determined by LCMS. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc and washed with saturated aqueous NH4Cl (×2), water (×3), saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (×1), and brine (x1). The organics were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford Boc-vi (178 mg, 95%). To a solution of Boc-vi. (1 eq.) in CH2Cl2 (0.4 M), TFA (10% v/v) was added. The resulting solution was stirred at room temperature until completion, as determined by LCMSvto afford 9 (50 mg) which was purified by preparative HPLC to separate the alkene isomers. HRMS m/z: [M + H]+ Calculated for C32H52N5O9 602.3918; Found 602.3871. Z-9: 1H NMR (500 MHz, MeOD) δ 8.35 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H), 7.18 (m, 2H), 5.79 (m, 2H), 4.46 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (m, 1H), 4.17 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 4.03 (m, 3H), 3.83 (dd, J = 3.2, 9.8 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (dd, J = 8.1, 14.3 Hz, 1H), 3.54 (dd, J = 5.2, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 3.48 (q, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 3.35 (dd, J = 2.2, 10.5 Hz, 1H), 3.19 (dd, J = 2.4, 14.2 Hz, 1H), 2.92 (dd, J = 6.5, 13.0 Hz, 1H), 2.78 (dd, J = 8.7, 13.4 Hz, 1H), 2.20 (m, 2H), 1.93 (m, 2H), 1.85 (m, 2H), 1.75 (s, 1H), 1.59 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 2H), 1.31 (m, 11H), 0.88 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, MeOD) δ 172.09, 170.08, 166.86, 138.15, 130.16, 129.01, 128.04, 127.50, 126.12, 69.47, 69.22, 69.02, 66.63, 57.29, 57.19, 55.21, 52.59, 41.30, 41.25, 40.60, 36.47, 35.67, 34.96, 34.47, 31.48, 29.01, 28.76, 26.41, 26.32, 25.82 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1C), 25.75, 25.65, 22.30. E-9: 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 7.35 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (t, J = 4.1 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (m, 1H), 5.87 (m, 2H), 4.57 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 4.35 (m, 2H), 4.10 (dd, J = 4.7, 12.2 Hz, 2H), 4.01 (dd, J = 5.7, 11.4 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (dd, J = 6.3, 12.7 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (m, 2H), 3.72 (s, 2H), 3.47 (m, 2H), 3.37 (dq, J = 3.2, 9.5 Hz, 2H), 2.92 (q, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (q, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 2.19 (m, 2H), 1.89 (m, 1H), 1.59 (m, 2H), 1.42 (m, 1H), 1.31 (s, 9H), 0.89 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). HPLC/MS MH+ 560.3.

3.2. Preparation of Macrocycles 17A and 17B

Boc-D-Ser-OMe (viii, Scheme 4): To a solution of vii (1.0 g, 8.39 mmol) and Et3N (2.51 mL, 18.04 mmol) in THF (22 mL) at 0 °C, a solution of Boc2O was added (1.81 g, 8.31 mmol) in THF (7 mL) dropwise over 20 min. The resulting solution was warmed to room temperature, stirred at that temperature overnight, and then stirred at 50 °C for 3 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the resultant residue was taken up in ether (15 mL) and saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (20 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with ether (×3). The organics were combined, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under a reduced pressure to afford viii (1.61 g, 87%) as a colorless oil which was used without further purification. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.46 (s, 1H), 4.38 (s, 1H), 3.95 (m, 1H), 3.89 (m, 1H), 3.77 (s, 3H), 2.46 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 1.44 (s, 9H).
3-(tert-butyl) 4-methyl (R)-2,2-dimethyloxazolidine-3,4-dicarboxylate (ix): To a solution of viii (1.67 g, 7.33 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (9 mL) at 0 °C, 2,2-dimethoxypropane (4.50 mL, 36.66 mmol) and pTsOH (140 mg, 0.73 mmol) were added. The resulting mixture was warmed to room temperature and then stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was then poured into saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (10 mL) and extracted with ether (×3). The organics were combined and washed with NaHCO3 and brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography using 1:1 hexanes: EtOAc as eluents to afford ix (1.63 g, 86%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.48 (dd, J = 2.4, 6.8 Hz, 0.4H), 4.37 (dd, J = 3.0, 6.8 Hz, 0.6H), 4.13 (m, 1H), 4.03 (m, 1H), 3.75 (s, 3H), 1.66 (s, 1.89H), 1.63 (s, 1.42H), 1.52 (s, 1.77H), 1.49 (s, 5.11H), 1.40 (s, 5.29H).
tert-butyl(R)-4-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2,2-dimethyloxazolidine-3-carboxylate (x): To a solution of ix (1.63 g, 6.29 mmol) in THF (50 mL) at −20 °C MeMgBr (1.95 M in Et2O, 10.8 mL, 21.13 mmol) was added dropwise. The resulting mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 4 h. Saturated, aqueous NH4Cl was added to the reaction mixture to quench the reaction, and then extracted with EtOAc (×3). The organics were combined, washed with brine (×2), dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography using 3:1 hexanes:EtOAc as eluents to afford x (982 mg, 60%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.00 (m, 2H), 3.79 (s, 1H), 1.59 (s, 3H), 1.50 (s, 12H), 1.17 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H). HPLC/MS MH+ 186.2 (-Boc + Na).
tert-butyl (R)-4-(2-(allyloxy)propan-2-yl)-2,2-dimethyloxazolidine-3-carboxylate (xi): To a solution of x (289 mg, 1.12 mmol) in DMF (5.2 mL) at 0 °C, NaH (60% in mineral oil, 90 mg, 2.24 mmol) was added, followed by allyl bromide (0.11 mL, 1.25 mmol). The resulting solution was warmed to room temperature, stirred for 1 h, and cooled back to 0 °C. The reaction was quenched with the addition of saturated aqueous NH4Cl and organics were extracted with EtOAc (×3). The organics were combined, washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resultant residue was purified by column chromatography using 3:1 hexanes: EtOAc to afford xi (89 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.88 (m, 1H), 5.25 (m,1H), 5.09 (d, 1H), 4.20 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.94 (m, 2H), 3.87 (m, 1H), 1.60 (s, 3H), 1.49 (s, 3H), 1.48 (s, 9H), 1.22 (s, 3H), 1.17 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.18, 136.00, 115.46, 80.16, 62.87, 29.71, 28.35. HPLC/MS MH+ 200.2 (-Boc).
(S)-3-(allyloxy)-2-((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)-3-methylbutanoic acid (xii): To a solution of xi (80 mg, 0.27 mmol) in acetone (3 mL), Jones’ reagent (2.5 M in H2O, 0.16 mL, 0.40 mmol) was added at 0 °C. The resulting mixture was warmed to room temperature, and then stirred at this temperature overnight. To the reaction mixture, celite (100 mg) and isopropanol (0.5 mL) were added, and the resulting precipitate was filtered through off through a plug of celite. The filtrate was adjusted to pH 9 with aqueous NaHCO3, and then concentrated under reduced pressure. The aqueous layer was washed with ether (×2) and acidified to pH 3 with citric acid. The resulting solution was extracted with EtOAc (×3) and the combined extracts were washed with brine (×2), dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford xii (50 mg, 68%), which was used without further purification. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.89 (m, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 5.30 (q, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 5.20 (q, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (s, 1H), 4.04 (m, 2H), 1.44 (s, 9H), 1.35 (s, 3H), 1.24 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.36, 56.00, 133.90, 117.54, 80.37, 78.67, 63.60, 28.26, 22.64, 21.11.
N-(((3S,6S,9S)-9-(2-aminoacetamido)-3-benzyl-10,10-dimethyl-5,8-dioxo-1,11-dioxa-4,7-diazacyclopentadec-13-en-6-yl)methyl)octanamide (17): Macrocycles 17 were synthesized in the same manner as 9 with the modified residue substituted in where necessary. Z-17: 1H NMR (500 MHz, MeOD) δ 8.06 (q, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (m, 1H), 7.54 (t, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (t, J = 4.1 Hz, 2H), 7.19 (m, 1H), 5.79 (m, 2H), 4.56 (s, 1H), 4.49 (m, 1H), 4.02 (m, 2H), 3.94 (t, J = 5.3 Hz, 2H), 3.90 (t, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (q, J = 13.5 Hz, 2H), 3.62 (m, 1H), 3.45 (q, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H), 3.36 (q, J = 4.6 Hz, 1H), 3.34 (s, 1H), 2.97 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 2.14 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.57 (m, 2H), 1.43 (s, 2H), 1.29 (m, 9H), 1.27 (s, 3H), 1.24 (s, 3H), 0.89 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, MeOD) δ 175.69, 170.13, 169.79, 165.86, 138.42, 131.02, 128.93, 128.09, 127.22, 126.12, 77.02, 69.39, 67.88, 60.51, 60.33, 54.35, 53.18, 41.01, 40.15, 35.83, 35.70, 31.51, 29.00, 28.80, 25.47, 22.62, 22.31, 18.77, 13.02. E-17: 1H NMR (500 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.25 (m, 5H), 5.82 (m, 2H), 4.50 (s, 1H), 4.41 (t, J = 5.4 Hz, 1H), 4.24 (q, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.17 (q, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 4.05 (m, 2H), 3.96 (q, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (d, J = 4.3 Hz, 2H), 3.52 (t, J = 4.7 Hz, 2H), 3.43 (q, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.34 (q, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H), 2.97 (m, 1H), 2.78 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.18 (m, 2H), 1.60 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.36 (s, 3H), 1.30 (m, 11H), 0.89 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, MeOD) δ 176.54, 169.93, 138.18, 131.29, 129.02, 128.82, 128.13, 126.14, 77.43, 68.71, 65.98, 60.13, 58.53, 55.14, 51.81, 40.56, 36.52, 35.57, 31.49, 29.04, 28.84, 25.54, 22.47, 22.33, 21.13, 13.03. HPLC/MS MH+ 588.3.

3.3. Preparation of Heterocyclic Analog 10

tert-butyl 4-((7-amino-5-methyl-[1,2,5]oxadiazolo[3,4-b]pyridin-6-yl)ethynyl)piperi-dine-1-carboxylate (21): 18 and 19 were prepared using methods described in the literature [22,32]. A solution of 19 (1.35 g, 4.89 mmol), 20 (1.45 g, 7.15 mmol), (PPh3)2PdCl2 (687 mg, 0.98 mmol), and CuI (93 mg, 0.49 mmol) in Et3N (20 mL) was degassed with argon for 15 min and then heated at 80 °C for 24 h. The mixture was then stirred at room temperature for 2 days, diluted with EtOAc and filtered through a pad of celite. The filter cake was rinsed with EtOAc. The organics were washed with brine (×2), dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under a reduced pressure. The resultant residue was purified via column chromatography using hexanes:EtOAc as eluents to afford 21 (889 mg, 51%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO) δ 3.63 (m, 2H), 3.15 (s, 2H), 2.94 (m, 1H), 2.53 (s, 3H), 1.83 (m, 2H), 1.61 (m, 2H), 1.38 (s, 9H). HPLC/MS MH+ 358.3.
tert-butyl (Z)-4-(2-(7-amino-5-methyl-[1,2,5]oxadiazolo[3,4-b]pyridin-6-yl)vinyl)piperidine-1-carboxylate (23): To a solution of 21 (250 mg, 0.70 mmol) in EtOH (7 mL) under argon Pd(OH)2 was added (20% on carbon, 150 mg, 0.21 mmol). Argon was removed and reaction was conducted under an H2 atmosphere and stirred at room temperature. Upon completion, as determined by LCMS, the reaction mixture was diluted with EtOH and filtered through a pad of celite to remove the catalyst. The filter cake was rinsed with EtOH and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to afford 22 and 23 (276 mg crude) which were identified by HPLC/MS analysis. The crude mixture was used in the next step without further purification.
(Z)-1-(4-(2-(7-amino-5-methyl-[1,2,5]oxadiazolo[3,4-b]pyridin-6-yl)vinyl)piperidin-1-yl)-2-butoxyethan-1-one (25) and 1-(4-(2-(7-amino-5-methyl-[1,2,5]oxadiazolo[3,4-b]pyridin-6-yl)ethyl)piperidin-1-yl)-2-butoxyethan-1-one (10): To the crude mixture of 22 and 23 (252 mg, 0.70 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (16 mL) TFA was added (10% v/v, 1.61 mL, 21.0 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature until completion as determined by LCMS. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was concentrated under a reduced pressure to afford the TFA salts, which were immediately suspended with (0.70 mmol), n-butoxyacetic acid (0.10 mL, 0.77 mmol), and HATU (293 mg, 0.77 mmol) in DMF (3 mL). DIPEA (0.37 mL, 2.10 mmol) was added to the suspension, and the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature until completion, as determined by LCMS. Upon completion, the reaction was diluted with EtOAc and washed with saturated, aqueous NH4Cl (×2), water (×2); saturated, aqueous NaHCO3 (×2); and brine (×2). The organics were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography using hexanes:EtOAc as eluents to afford 25 (300 mg) and 10 (10 mg) as yellow residues. 25: 1H NMR (500 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.89 (s, 2H), 6.15 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1H), 5.87 (dd, J = 9.7, 10.7 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (d, J = 13.0 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (q, J = 18.1 Hz, 2H), 3.88 (s, 1H), 3.85 (d, J = 12.8 Hz, 1H), 3.51 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 3.46 (q, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 2.98 (s, 1H), 2.94 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.85 (d, J = 0.6 Hz, 1H), 2.80 (s, 1H), 2.58 (t, J = 11.7 Hz, 1H), 2.44 (s, 3H), 2.26 (m, 1H), 1.57 (m, 4H), 1.38 (m, 5H), 0.92 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, MeOD) δ 169.65, 168.58, 158.30, 141.64, 140.78, 139.02, 120.46, 109.81, 78.08, 71.12, 70.88, 69.36, 44.37, 41.23, 37.48, 36.17, 31.33, 31.25, 23.91, 18.89, 12.79. HRMS m/z: [M + H]+ Calculated for C19H28N5O3 374.2192; Found 374.2159. 10: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.13 (br s, 2H), 4.62 (d, J = 13.2 Hz, 1H), 4.13 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 2H), 4.00 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 1H), 3.49 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.03 (t, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.62 (s, 3H), 2.59 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 1.87 (t, J = 12.8 Hz, 2H), 1.66 (m, 1H), 1.58 (m, 2H), 1.49 (m, 2H), 1.37 (m, 2H), 1.24 (s, 2H), 1.21 (s, 1H), 1.20 (s, 1H), 0.91 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 170.01, 167.86, 157.97, 139.23, 138.21, 114.14, 71.29, 70.72, 45.33, 42.13, 36.51, 34.10, 32.81, 31.67, 29.71, 25.37, 25.00, 24.02, 19.28, 13.88. HRMS m/z: [M + H]+ Calculated for C19H30N5O3 376.2349; Found 376.2315.

3.4. Preparation of Heterocyclic Analog 11

tert-butyl 4-(4-oxopentyl)piperidine-1-carboxylate (28): To a flask containing CuCN (1.65 g, 18.42 mmol), dry Et2O (30 mL) was added. The resulting suspension was cooled to 0 °C and MeLi (1.6 M in Et2O, 23 mL, 36.85 mmol) was added dropwise. After addition, the resulting mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 5 min before the dropwise addition of a solution of 27 (1.00 g, 3.68 mmol) in Et2O (18.4 mL). The resulting reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature over an hour and then stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NH4Cl, and then extracted with CH2Cl2 (×2). The organics were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford 28 (703 mg, 71%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.05 (d, J = 13.2 Hz, 2H), 2.65 (dt, J = 2.6, 12.8 Hz, 2H), 2.40 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.12 (s, 3H), 1.63 (m, 2H), 1.58 (m, 2H), 1.44 (s, 9H), 1.36 (m, 1H), 1.21 (m, 2H), 1.05 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 208.99, 154.90, 79.20, 43.99, 43.82, 35.98, 35.91, 32.07, 29.93, 28.48, 20.88. HPLC/MS MH+ 170.2 (-Boc).
tert-butyl (S)-(1-oxo-1-(4-(4-oxopentyl)piperidin-1-yl)propan-2-yl)carbamate (29): To a solution of 28 (200 mg, 0.74 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) at 0 °C TFA was added (10% v/v, 1.14 mL, 14.85 mmol). The resulting solution was stirred at 0 °C until completion as determined by TLC. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure and the resultant residue was immediately used. To a solution of the TFA salt (188 mg, 0.74 mmol) and Boc-Ala-OSu (203 mg, 0.71 mmol) in MeCN (3 mL) DIPEA was added (0.39 mL, 2.22 mmol) at 0 °C. The resulting mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 2 h, diluted with EtOAc and washed with saturated aqueous NH4Cl and H2O (×3). The organics were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. Residue was purified by column chromatography using 1:1 hexanes: EtOAc as eluents to afford 29 (122 mg, 50%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.59 (s, 1H), 4.56 (m, 2H), 3.83 (t, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 3.00 (m, 1H), 2.57 (m, 1H), 2.42 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 2.13 (s, 3H), 1.77 (m, 2H), 1.59 (t, J = 3.8 Hz, 2H), 1.49 (m, 2H), 1.43 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 9H), 1.28 (dd, J = 6.9, 8.5 Hz, 1H), 1.10 (m, 3H).
(S)-1-methyl-N-(1-oxo-1-(4-(4-oxopentyl)piperidin-1-yl)propan-2-yl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide (31): To a solution of 29 (122 mg, 0.36 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) at 0 °C, TFA was added (10% v/v, 0.55 mL, 7.16 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at 0 °C until completion as determined by TLC. The reaction mixture was concentrated under a reduced pressure and the resultant residue was used immediately without purification. The deprotected material (0.36 mmol) and 30 (80 mg, 0.36 mmol) were suspended in MeCN (1.5 mL) at 0 °C. DIPEA was added (0.19 mL, 1.08 mmol) to the suspension, and the resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 2 h and diluted with EtOAc. Organics were washed with saturated, aqueous NH4Cl and H2O (×3), dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography using 1:1 hexanes: EtOAc as eluents to afford 31 (90 mg, 72%). (Rotational isomers present.) 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.44 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (s, 1H), 6.60 (q, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (q, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (t, J = 12.9 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (s, 3H), 3.87 (m, 1H), 3.06 (m, 1H), 2.62 (m, 1H), 2.43 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.13 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 3H), 1.81 (m, 2H), 1.58 (m, 2H), 1.52 (m, 1H), 1.40 (q, J = 5.5 Hz, 3H), 1.24 (t, J = 18.2 Hz, 2H), 1.11 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, MeOD) δ 208.73, 170.13, 169.94, 158.81, 137.51, 106.76, 60.41, 45.90, 45.52, 45.41, 43.64 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1C), 42.85, 42.51, 39.26, 36.06, 35.89, 35.69, 35.62, 32.66, 32.47, 31.71 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1C), 29.98, 20.74, 19.42, 18.91, 14.21.
(S)-N-(1-(4-(2-(7-amino-5-methyl-[1,2,5]oxadiazolo[3,4-b]pyridin-6-yl)ethyl)pip-eridin-1-yl)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide (11) and (S)-N-(1-(4-(3-(7-amino-[1,2,5]oxadiazolo[3,4-b]pyridin-5-yl)propyl)pip-eridin-1-yl)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-1-methyl-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide (35): To a suspension of 31 (90 mg, 0.26 mmol) and 18 (28 mg, 0.26 mmol) in toluene (0.2M) tin(IV) chloride was added (2 eq). The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 min, and then refluxed for 18 h. The reaction was cooled to room temperature and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resultant residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (×1). The aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2 (×3). The organics were combined, washed with brine (×1), dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography using 5% MeOH in CH2Cl2 as eluents to afford 11 and 35. HRMS m/z: [M + H]+ Calculated for C21H29N5O6 441.2363; Found 441.2313. 11: 1H NMR (500 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.43 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (s, 1H), 4.97 (m, 1H), 4.47 (m, 1H), 4.06 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.01 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (m, 1H), 2.65 (m, 1H), 2.46 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 2.10 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 3H), 1.78 (m, 2H), 1.55 (m, 3H), 1.36 (dd, J = 7.1, 13.9 Hz, 3H), 1.24 (m, 3H), 1.07 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, MeOD) δ 210.31, 170.8, 164.8, 137.12, 107.16, 45.69, 45.36, 45.22, 42.74, 42.55, 42.19, 37.73, 35.64, 35.43, 35.35, 35.23, 32.35, 32.21, 31.53, 31.43, 28.29, 20.32, 16.46, 15.98. 35: 1H NMR (500 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.42 (q, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (m, 1H), 6.29 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 4.97 (m, 1H), 4.46 (m, 1H), 4.05 (s, 3H), 4.02 (s, 1H), 3.13 (m, 1H), 2.67 (m, 3H), 2.53 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 1.88 (q, J = 12.7 Hz, 1H), 1.75 (m, 3H), 1.59 (s, 1H), 1.46 (q, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 1.35 (dd, J = 7.1, 13.0 Hz, 3H), 1.25 (s, 2H), 1.08 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, MeOD) δ 174.48, 159.60, 137.10, 107.15, 100.26, 45.23, 42.56, 38.87, 37.72, 35.53, 35.38, 32.20, 31.53, 31.43, 25.78, 23.05, 16.44, 15.95.

3.5. In Vitro Assay

pFastBac1-mouseGOAT and pGEX-GST-proGhrelin8His plasmid encoding for mouse proghrelin, fused to GST with TEV cleavage site to release proghrelin moiety, was a kind gift from the Brown and Goldstein laboratory [18]. The BL21Gold E. coli chemically competent cells were transformed with the pGEX-GST-proGhrelin8His plasmid and selected on agar plates with ampicillin. A few colonies were used to inoculate 50 mL LB, and cultures were grown overnight at 37 °C. The next morning, 10 mL of overnight culture was used to inoculate 1L LB. A total of 4 flasks with 1L LB each were inoculated with 10 mL of the overnight culture, and bacterial cultures were grown at 37 °C until they reached OD600 ~ 0.6. The cultures were chilled on ice for 30 min and then 0.25 mM of IPTG was added to each culture. The cultures were then moved back to a shaker set to 18 °C and incubated overnight. Cells were harvested and resuspended in 200 mL buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA and 0.5 mg/mL lysozyme. The cell suspension was sonicated, and cell debris was removed by centrifugation. The soluble fraction was passed through glutathione resin by gravity. The resin was washed with 75 mL of lysis buffer without lysozyme. The GST-proGhrelin8His protein was eluted with lysis buffer without lysozyme, supplemented with 15 mM reduced glutathione, GSH. About 50 mg of target protein, as evaluated by SDS-PAGE, was eluted. The eluate was supplemented with 1 mM DTT and about 7.5 mg of recombinant GST-TEV protease (see below) was added. The solution was incubated at 16 °C overnight to allow complete release of proghrelin8His from GST. Prior to Ni-NTA chromatography, 5 mM CaCl2 was added, and the solution was spun down at 4000× g for 10 min. After elution from Ni-NTA resin, protein solution was dialyzed against buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5, 50 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol and 0.01% CHAPS using 3 kDa cutoff membrane with 3 buffer exchanges. The protein was quantified by absorbance at A280 and qualified by SDS-PAGE.
Generation of GST-TEV protease. The pMHT vector [34] (gift from Dr. Arbing, UCLA) was linearized by PCR reaction with primers outside of MBP gene: forw- 5′ gcgaccatcctccaaaatcgggagaaagcttgtttaaggggccg 3′ and rev- 5′ caataacctagtataggggacatggttaatttctcctctttaatg 3′. The resulting linear plasmid was used to clone GST gene in-frame at 5′ of TEV gene by in vitro Gibson assembly. The GST gene was prepared by PCR amplification with primers: form 5′ atgtcccctatactaggttattg and rev 5′ cgattttggaggatggtcgc 3′ from pGEX-GST-proGhrelin8His plasmid as a template. The final bacterial expression vector, pGST-TEV was used for expression and purification of GST-TEV fusion protein. BL21Gold chemically competent E. coli cells were transformed with pGST-TEV plasmid and entire transformation mixture was used to inoculate 50 mL LB supplemented with kanamycin. Next day, 10 mL of the overnight culture was used to inoculate 1 L of LB. Four flasks with 1 L LB each were inoculated with 10 mL of the overnight culture, and bacterial cultures were grown at 37 °C till OD600 ~ 0.8. was reached. After adding 1 mM IPTG, culture was allowed to grow for 4 h, and cells were harvested by centrifugation. The cell pellet was resuspended in 200 mL lysis buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 0.5 mg/mL lysozyme and 1 mM DTT. Cell suspension after freeze–thaw cycle was sonicated and cellular debris was removed by centrifugation. The soluble fraction was bound to glutathione resin by gravity. The resin was washed with 50 mL washing buffer (lysis buffer without lysozyme and DTT) and fusion GST-TEV protein was eluted with 25 mL washing buffer supplemented with 15 mM reduced glutathione (GSH). The elution was fractionated into 5 fractions and after SDS-PAGE/Coomassie analysis, fractions containing most of the GST-TEV protein were combined and dialyzed against buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl and 50% glycerol using 3 kDa cutoff membrane with 3 buffer exchanges. The total yield was roughly 8 mg per 1 L bacterial culture.
The baculovirus expression of mouse GOAT. DH10Bac E. coli strain (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) was transformed with pFastBac1-mouseGOAT plasmid, and Bacmid DNA from 12 white colonies was analyzed by DNA sequencing and PCR reaction. All clones were transfected to sf9 cells and level of mGOAT expression was compared between clones from cells producing P2. The clone with the highest mGOAT expression level was used to produce P3. For membrane isolation, sf9 cells were seeded at 2–4 × 106 /mL in total 1 L volume of sf-900 serum-free medium (ThermoFisher) and infected with P3 virus. At day 2 post-infection, cells were harvested and resuspended in 40 mL of buffer containing 50 mM NaPi pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 100 μM bis (4-nitrophenyl) phosphate, 2.5 μg/mL aprotinin, 10 μg/mL leupeptin, 10 μg/mL pepstatin A. Cell suspension was briefly sonicated and cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 3000× g for 10 min. Membrane fraction was collected from supernatant by centrifugation at 100,000× g for 1 h. Membrane pellet was resuspended in storage buffer (50 mM NaPi pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl and 10% glycerol) and kept at −80 °C. Acyltransferase assay: The assay conditions included per 50 μL reaction: 50 μg of total sf9 membranes, various (for modality experiment) or fixed (for IC50) concentrations of recombinant proghrelin8His peptide and various concentrations of tested compound (for IC50), 100 μM palmitoyl CoA, 50 mM HEPES pH 7.0 and 1 μM [3H] octanoyl CoA (~5.5 dpm/fmol—American Radioactive Chemicals). After incubation of the reaction mixture at 37C for 10 min, tubes were placed on ice and 10 μL of 1M HCl was added to each tube. Following the addition of 740 μL of cold quench buffer (50 mM NaPi pH 7.4, 10 mM Imidazole, 150 mM NaCl, 100 μM bis (4-nitrophenyl) phosphate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 0.1% Triton), 0.2 mL of 50% Ni-NTA slurry was added to each reaction. Tubes were incubated at 4 °C for 1 h with rotation to capture proGhrl8His. After washing Ni resin with 40 mM Imidazole, all bound proghrelin8His was eluted with 250 mM Imidazole, and an amount of octanylated proghrelin was assessed with scintillation counting.

3.6. INS1-Cellular Assay

Generation of Recombinant Retrovirus for mGOAT Expression. The mouse GOAT cDNA with C-terminal HA tag was amplified from pcDNA3.1-mouseGOAT-HA vector (gift from Brown and Goldstein lab [2]) using the following primers: mGOAT_attb1 (forward primer) 5′-ggggacaagtttgtacaaaaaagcaggctaccatggattggctccagctc—3′(attb1 recombination site is in italics, 5′ of mGOAT coding sequence is in bold, and Kozak coding sequence is underlined) and mGOAT_attb2 (reverse primer) 5′-ggggaccactttgtacaagaaagctgggtctaagcgtaatctggaacatc -3′ (attb2 recombination site is in italics, 3′ of mGAOT-HA coding sequence is in bold, and stop codon is underlined). The PCR product was cloned into donor vector pDONR221 (ThermoFisher) with BP clonase according to manufacturer’s instructions. Positive clones were verified by DNA sequencing with M13F and M13R primers. The resulting entry plasmid pDONR221-mGOAT-HA was used to transfer mGOAT-HA cDNA to destination vector pBabe-puro (Addgene cat# 51070 [35]) using LR clonase according to manufacturer’s instructions. Positive clones were verified by DNA sequencing with pBABE-5 and pBABE-3 primers. The resulting plasmid, pBabe-puro-mGOAT-HA, was used to generate retrovirus. The retrovirus was packed in 293T PhoE (Phoenix-ECO AT0CC® CRL-3214™) cells and used to infect INS-1 cells. The stable INS/GOAT cells were selecting on 1 μg/mL puromycin and GOAT expression was confirmed with immunoblot of membrane fraction isolated from antibiotic resistant culture using anti-HA antibody.
Generation of Lentivirus for Expression of Ghrelin. The cDNA for mouse preproghrelin was subcloned from pcDNA3.1-preproghrelin (gift from Brown and Goldstein lab [18]) into pULTRA vector (Addgene cat# 24129 [36]) with XbaI and BamHI restriction enzymes. Using of these restriction sites for cloning will result in the creation of bi-cistronic expression of ghrelin along with EGFP to facilitate identification of positive cells by fluorescence. The above restriction sites were engineered via PCR reaction using the following primers: ghrl_pultra_forw 5′-taccgagctctctagaatgctgtcttcaggc-3′ (5′ of preproghrelin coding sequence is in bold; XbaI site is in italics) and ghrl_pultra_rev 5′-agcggccgcggatccttacttgtcagctggc -3′ (3′ of preproghrelin coding sequence is in bold, stop codon is underlined, and BamHI site is italics). The recombinant lentivirus encoding preproghrelin cDNA was packed in Lenti-X 293T cells (Takara cat# 632180) by co-transfection of pUltra-EGFP-mouse-preproghrelin, with packaging encoding plasmid pCMV ΔR8.2 (Addgene cat# 12263) and envelope encoding plasmid pCMV-VSV g (Addgene cat# 8454). The INS/GOAT cells were infected with recombinant lentivirus to generate INS/GOAT/GHRL cell line. After few passages, the population of cells with puromycin resistance and ~90% fluorescence was saved for cell-based assay.
Cellular assay. INS/GOAT/GHRL cell line was routinely cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% Pen/Strep, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.2 and 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol. Day 0: One 10 cm dish at full confluency was used to seed one 96-well plate. Day 1: Growth media was removed and cells were washed with PBS prior to adding fresh growth media as above but without 2-mercaptoethanol. The serial dilutions of tested compound at 50× concentration were prepared in vehicle containing growth media without 2-mercaptoethnol supplemented with 6% DMSO and were added to cells in duplicates. Day 2: 10 μL of growth media were removed from each well and amount of secreted acyl-ghrelin was measured with ELISA (Cayman cat# 10006307).

4. Conclusions

Ghrelin signaling continues to be an active area of basic biology research and drug discovery. The discovery of GOAT and its role in maturing ghrelin in the stomach provided an opportunity for pharmacological intervention without accessing the central nervous system. These efforts were largely empirical due to a lack of structural data for the system. However, we have learned a great deal. Peptidomimetic inhibitors that compete for substrate binding can perform well in vitro but, thus far, their utility in cell culture and in animals has been limited. The high-throughput screens developed in the private identified compounds uniformly appear to complete for binding at the co-enzyme site. Several of these molecules advanced through pre-clinical developments and into human trials as therapy for diabetes type II, Prader-Willi syndrome and alcohol use disorder. We developed a six-step synthesis of heterocyclic GOAT inhibitors based on a hybrid design that utilizes a piperidinyl ethyl linker and a late-stage oxadiazolopyridine, forming annulation. The potent activity of novel product 11 both in vitro and in cells indicates this approach has the potential to identify new GOAT inhibitors with increasingly refined properties.

5. Patents

Patrick G. Harran and Emily Murzinski (2020). Compositions and Methods for Treating Obesity. Provisional Patent Application 62/979,915. Filed 21 February 2020; Patrick G. Harran, Peter Tontonoz, David Strugatsky, Hui Ding, and Emily Murzinski (2017). Inhibitors of Ghrelin O-Acyl Transferase. Provisional Patent Application. Filed 20 December 2017.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.S.M., I.S., H.D., D.S., R.A.H., H.L., P.T. and P.G.H.; methodology, E.S.M., I.S., H.D., D.S., R.A.H., H.L., P.T. and P.G.H.; validation, E.S.M., I.S., H.D., D.S., R.A.H., H.L., P.T. and P.G.H.; formal analysis, E.S.M., I.S., H.D., D.S., R.A.H., H.L., P.T. and P.G.H.; investigation, E.S.M., I.S., H.D., D.S., R.A.H., H.L., P.T. and P.G.H.; resources, P.T. and P.G.H.; data curation, E.S.M., I.S., H.D., D.S., R.A.H., H.L., P.T. and P.G.H.; writing—original draft preparation, E.S.M., I.S., H.D., D.S., R.A.H., H.L., P.T. and P.G.H.; writing—review and editing, I.S., H.D. and P.G.H.; supervision, P.T. and P.G.H.; project administration, P.T. and P.G.H.; funding acquisition, P.T. and P.G.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by NIDDK, grant number R01DK100627.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not available.

Informed Consent Statement

Not available.

Data Availability Statement

Not available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kojima, M.; Hosoda, H.; Date, Y.; Nakazato, M.; Matsuo, H.; Kangawa, K. Ghrelin Is a Growth-Hormone-Releasing Acylated Peptide from Stomach. Nature 1999, 402, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, J.; Brown, M.S.; Liang, G.; Grishin, N.V.; Goldstein, J.L. Identification of the Acyltransferase That Octanoylates Ghrelin, an Appetite-Stimulating Peptide Hormone. Cell 2008, 132, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Masumoto, N.; Lanyon-Hogg, T.; Rodgers, U.R.; Konitsiotis, A.D.; Magee, A.I.; Tate, E.W. Membrane Bound O-Acyltransferases and Their Inhibitors. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2015, 43, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gutierrez, J.A.; Solenberg, P.J.; Perkins, D.R.; Willency, J.A.; Knierman, M.D.; Jin, Z.; Witcher, D.R.; Luo, S.; Onyia, J.E.; Hale, J.E. Ghrelin Octanoylation Mediated by an Orphan Lipid Transferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 6320–6325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Wortley, K.E.; del Rincon, J.-P.; Murray, J.D.; Garcia, K.; Iida, K.; Thorner, M.O.; Sleeman, M.W. Absence of Ghrelin Protects against Early-Onset Obesity. J. Clin. Invest. 2005, 115, 3573–3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wren, A.M.; Small, C.J.; Abbott, C.R.; Dhillo, W.S.; Seal, L.J.; Cohen, M.A.; Batterham, R.L.; Taheri, S.; Stanley, S.A.; Ghatei, M.A.; et al. Ghrelin Causes Hyperphagia and Obesity in Rats. Diabetes 2001, 50, 2540–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Dezaki, K.; Sone, H.; Koizumi, M.; Nakata, M.; Kakei, M.; Nagai, H.; Hosoda, H.; Kangawa, K.; Yada, T. Blockade of Pancreatic Islet-Derived Ghrelin Enhances Insulin Secretion to Prevent High-Fat Diet-Induced Glucose Intolerance. Diabetes 2006, 55, 3486–3493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kurashina, T.; Dezaki, K.; Yoshida, M.; Rita, R.S.; Ito, K.; Taguchi, M.; Miura, R.; Tominaga, M.; Ishibashi, S.; Kakei, M.; et al. The Beta-Cell GHSR and Downstream CAMP/TRPM2 Signaling Account for Insulinostatic and Glycemic Effects of Ghrelin. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cummings, D.E.; Purnell, J.Q.; Frayo, R.S.; Schmidova, K.; Wisse, B.E.; Weigle, D.S. A Preprandial Rise in Plasma Ghrelin Levels Suggests a Role in Meal Initiation in Humans. Diabetes 2001, 50, 1714–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Tschöp, M.; Wawarta, R.; Riepl, R.L.; Friedrich, S.; Bidlingmaier, M.; Landgraf, R.; Folwaczny, C. Post-Prandial Decrease of Circulating Human Ghrelin Levels. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2001, 24, RC19–RC21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Stengel, A.; Goebel, M.; Wang, L.; Taché, Y.; Sachs, G.; Lambrecht, N.W.G. Differential Distribution of Ghrelin-O-Acyltransferase (GOAT) Immunoreactive Cells in the Mouse and Rat Gastric Oxyntic Mucosa. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 392, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Romero, A.; Kirchner, H.; Heppner, K.; Pfluger, P.T.; Tschop, M.H.; Nogueiras, R. GOAT: The Master Switch for the Ghrelin System? Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2010, 163, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Taylor, M.S.; Ruch, T.R.; Hsiao, P.-Y.; Hwang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Dai, L.; Huang, C.R.L.; Berndsen, C.E.; Kim, M.-S.; Pandey, A.; et al. Architectural Organization of the Metabolic Regulatory Enzyme Ghrelin O-Acyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 32211–32228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Campaña, M.B.; Irudayanathan, F.J.; Davis, T.R.; McGovern-Gooch, K.R.; Loftus, R.; Ashkar, M.; Escoffery, N.; Navarro, M.; Sieburg, M.A.; Nangia, S.; et al. The Ghrelin O-Acyltransferase Structure Reveals a Catalytic Channel for Transmembrane Hormone Acylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 14166–14174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Iyer, M.R.; Wood, C.M.; Kunos, G. Recent Progress in the Discovery of Ghrelin O-Acyltransferase (GOAT) Inhibitors. RSC Med. Chem. 2020, 11, 1136–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Garner, A.L.; Janda, K.D. A Small Molecule Antagonist of Ghrelin O-Acyltransferase (GOAT). Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 7512–7514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Darling, J.E.; Zhao, F.; Loftus, R.J.; Patton, L.M.; Gibbs, R.A.; Hougland, J.L. Structure–Activity Analysis of Human Ghrelin O-Acyltransferase Reveals Chemical Determinants of Ghrelin Selectivity and Acyl Group Recognition. Biochemistry 2015, 54, 1100–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, J.; Zhao, T.-J.; Goldstein, J.L.; Brown, M.S. Inhibition of Ghrelin O-Acyltransferase (GOAT) by Octanoylated Pentapeptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 10750–10755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Barnett, B.P.; Hwang, Y.; Taylor, M.S.; Kirchner, H.; Pfluger, P.T.; Bernard, V.; Lin, Y.; Bowers, E.M.; Mukherjee, C.; Song, W.-J.; et al. Glucose and Weight Control in Mice with a Designed Ghrelin O-Acyltransferase Inhibitor. Science 2010, 330, 1689–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Galka, C.S.; Hembre, E.J.; Honigschmidt, N.A.; Keding, S.J.; Martinez-Grau, M.A.; Plaza, G.R.; Rubio, A.; Smith, D.L. Ghrelin O-Acyl Transferase Inhibitors. World Patent WO 2016/168225 A1, 20 October 2016. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yoneyama-Hirozane, M.; Deguchi, K.; Hirakawa, T.; Ishii, T.; Odani, T.; Matsui, J.; Nakano, Y.; Imahashi, K.; Takakura, N.; Chisaki, I.; et al. Identification and Characterization of a New Series of Ghrelin O-acyl transferase Inhibitors. SLAS Discov. Adv. Sci. Drug Discov. 2017, 23, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Godbout, C.; Trieselmann, T.; Vintonyak, V. Oxadiazolopyridine Derivatives for Use as Ghrelin O-acyl transferase (GOAT) Inhibitors. U.S. 2018/0037594 A1, 8 February 2018. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jensen, C.; Herold, P.; Brunner, H.R. Aliskiren: The First Renin Inhibitor for Clinical Treatment. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008, 7, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sebaugh, J.L. Guidelines for Accurate EC50/IC50 Estimation. Pharm. Stat. 2011, 10, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kuzmic, P. Program DYNAFIT for the Analysis of Enzyme Kinetic Data: Application to HIV Proteinase. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 237, 260–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yudin, A.K. Macrocycles: Lessons from the Distant Past, Recent Developments, and Future Directions. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 30–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Murzinski, E. Development of Potent, Small Molecule Inhibitors of Ghrelin O-Acyltransferase (GOAT). 2020. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9fq6b1r5 (accessed on 14 December 2021).
  28. Hollibaugh, R. Defining a Minimal Pharmacophore to Selectively Inhibit MBOAT4 (Ghrelin O-Acyl Transferase). PhD. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, June 2016. [Google Scholar]
  29. He, S.; Hong, Q.; Lai, Z.; Yang, D.X.; Ting, P.C.; Kuethe, J.T.; Cernak, T.A.; Dykstra, K.D.; Sperbeck, D.M.; Wu, Z.; et al. Discovery of a Potent and Selective DGAT1 Inhibitor with a Piperidinyl-Oxy-Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acid Moiety. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 1082–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Bennett, D.J.; Brnardic, E.J.; Han, Y.; Huang, C.; Liverton, N.J.; Meng, Z.; Rudd, M.T.; Stachel, S.J.; Tempest, P.; Wai, J.; et al. Piperidine Derivatives as Liver X Receptor B Agonists, Compositions, and Their Use. U.S. Patent 10,894,775, 19 January 2021. [Google Scholar]
  31. Genna, D.T.; Posner, G.H. Cyanocuprates Convert Carboxylic Acids Directly into Ketones. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5358–5361, (a)27 is commercially available for $20/gram from Combi-Blocks. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pagoria, P.F.; Zhang, M.-X.; Zuckerman, N.B.; DeHope, A.J.; Parrish, D.A. Synthesis and Characterization of Multicyclic Oxadiazoles and 1-Hydroxytetrazoles as Energetic Materials. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2017, 53, 760–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vasilev, L.S.; Sheremetev, A.B.; Khoa, N.K.; Demyanets, Z.K.; Dmitriev, D.E.; Dorokhov, V.A. Reactions of Cyanofurazans with β-Dicarbonyl Compounds. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2001, 50, 1280–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Blommel, P.G.; Fox, B.G. A Combined Approach to Improving Large-Scale Production of Tobacco Etch Virus Protease. Protein Expr. Purif. 2007, 55, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Greulich, H.; Kaplan, B.; Mertins, P.; Chen, T.-H.; Tanaka, K.E.; Yun, C.-H.; Zhang, X.; Lee, S.-H.; Cho, J.; Ambrogio, L.; et al. Functional Analysis of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Mutations in Lung Cancer Identifies Oncogenic Extracellular Domain Mutations of ERBB2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 14476–14481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lou, E.; Fujisawa, S.; Morozov, A.; Barlas, A.; Romin, Y.; Dogan, Y.; Gholami, S.; Moreira, A.L.; Manova-Todorova, K.; Moore, M.A.S. Tunneling Nanotubes Provide a Unique Conduit for Intercellular Transfer of Cellular Contents in Human Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33093. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 26 07599 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) GOAT-catalyzed octanoylation of pro-ghrelin is a critical part of ghrelin maturation. GOAT is weakly inhibited by its reaction product, acyl ghrelin (1), and more potently by analog 2, wherein Ser-3 is replaced by diaminopropionic acid (DAP). Systemic inhibition of GOAT is expected to reduce circulating acyl-ghrelin levels, leading to improved insulin response to glucose challenge. (B) GOAT inhibition can be achieved by targeting either the substrate or co-substrate site, or by targeting both sites with a “bisubstrate” mimic. (C–E) Known inhibitors of GOAT.
Figure 1. (A) GOAT-catalyzed octanoylation of pro-ghrelin is a critical part of ghrelin maturation. GOAT is weakly inhibited by its reaction product, acyl ghrelin (1), and more potently by analog 2, wherein Ser-3 is replaced by diaminopropionic acid (DAP). Systemic inhibition of GOAT is expected to reduce circulating acyl-ghrelin levels, leading to improved insulin response to glucose challenge. (B) GOAT inhibition can be achieved by targeting either the substrate or co-substrate site, or by targeting both sites with a “bisubstrate” mimic. (C–E) Known inhibitors of GOAT.
Molecules 26 07599 g001
Molecules 26 07599 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Ghrelin truncation peptide series and respective IC50 values. Enzyme activity was quantified using the method described by Yang et al. [18] (see Materials and Methods); (B) Macrocycles derived from the parent peptides and respective IC50 values; (C) Structural overlay of 9b (orange) against 8 (green), octanamide chains are indicated as line bonds for clarity; (D) In vitro inhibition of proghrelin octanoylation mediated by GOAT using the shown compounds. The experimental data were fit to a 4-parameter logistic model, (Bottom − Top)/(1 + (I/IC50)n) + Top [24] using DYNAFIT software [25]. The Top was defined as reaction conditions without inhibitor and the Bottom was defined as reaction conditions with full inhibition by 5 μM concentration of 2. Top and Bottom conditions were included in every experiment.
Figure 2. (A) Ghrelin truncation peptide series and respective IC50 values. Enzyme activity was quantified using the method described by Yang et al. [18] (see Materials and Methods); (B) Macrocycles derived from the parent peptides and respective IC50 values; (C) Structural overlay of 9b (orange) against 8 (green), octanamide chains are indicated as line bonds for clarity; (D) In vitro inhibition of proghrelin octanoylation mediated by GOAT using the shown compounds. The experimental data were fit to a 4-parameter logistic model, (Bottom − Top)/(1 + (I/IC50)n) + Top [24] using DYNAFIT software [25]. The Top was defined as reaction conditions without inhibitor and the Bottom was defined as reaction conditions with full inhibition by 5 μM concentration of 2. Top and Bottom conditions were included in every experiment.
Molecules 26 07599 g002
Molecules 26 07599 sch001 550
Scheme 1. 18 was prepared using the procedure described in ref. 30. (a) 19 (1 eq.), 20 (1.5 eq), CuI (0.1 eq), (PPh3)2PdCl2 (0.2 eq), Et3N (0.25 M), 80 °C, 51%; (b) Pd(OH)2 (20% on carbon) (0.3 eq.), EtOH (0.1 M), H2 atm.; (c) CH2Cl2 (0.04 M), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (10% v/v); (d) 24 (1.1 eq), HATU (1.1 eq.), DIPEA (3 eq.), DMF (0.2 M), 32% 25 over three steps, 1% 10 over three steps.
Scheme 1. 18 was prepared using the procedure described in ref. 30. (a) 19 (1 eq.), 20 (1.5 eq), CuI (0.1 eq), (PPh3)2PdCl2 (0.2 eq), Et3N (0.25 M), 80 °C, 51%; (b) Pd(OH)2 (20% on carbon) (0.3 eq.), EtOH (0.1 M), H2 atm.; (c) CH2Cl2 (0.04 M), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (10% v/v); (d) 24 (1.1 eq), HATU (1.1 eq.), DIPEA (3 eq.), DMF (0.2 M), 32% 25 over three steps, 1% 10 over three steps.
Molecules 26 07599 sch001
Molecules 26 07599 sch002 550
Scheme 2. (a) CuCN (5 eq.), Et2O (0.6 M), MeLi (1.6M in Et2O; 10 eq.), 0 °C; 27 (1 eq.), Et2O (0.2 M), 71%; (b) CH2Cl2 (0.07 M), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (10% v/v), 0 °C; (c) Boc-Ala-OSu (1.1 eq.), DIPEA (3.1 eq.), MeCN (0.2 M), 0 °C, 50% over two steps; (d) CH2Cl2 (0.07 M), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (10% v/v), 0 °C; (e) 30 (1 eq.), DIPEA (3 eq.), MeCN (0.2 M), 0 °C, 72% over two steps; (f) 18 (1 eq.), SnCl4 (2 eq.), toluene (0.2 M), reflux.
Scheme 2. (a) CuCN (5 eq.), Et2O (0.6 M), MeLi (1.6M in Et2O; 10 eq.), 0 °C; 27 (1 eq.), Et2O (0.2 M), 71%; (b) CH2Cl2 (0.07 M), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (10% v/v), 0 °C; (c) Boc-Ala-OSu (1.1 eq.), DIPEA (3.1 eq.), MeCN (0.2 M), 0 °C, 50% over two steps; (d) CH2Cl2 (0.07 M), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (10% v/v), 0 °C; (e) 30 (1 eq.), DIPEA (3 eq.), MeCN (0.2 M), 0 °C, 72% over two steps; (f) 18 (1 eq.), SnCl4 (2 eq.), toluene (0.2 M), reflux.
Molecules 26 07599 sch002
Molecules 26 07599 g003 550
Figure 3. (top) In vitro and cellular activities of heterocyclic analogues (see Materials and Methods for assay descriptions); (bottom) In vitro inhibition of proghrelin octanoylation mediated by GOAT using the shown compounds. The experimental data was fit to a 4-parameter logistic model, (Bottom − Top)/(1 + (I/IC50)n) + Top [24] using DYNAFIT software [25]. The Top was defined as reaction conditions without inhibitor and the Bottom was defined as reaction conditions with full inhibition by 5 μM concentration of 2. Top and Bottom conditions were included in every experiment.
Figure 3. (top) In vitro and cellular activities of heterocyclic analogues (see Materials and Methods for assay descriptions); (bottom) In vitro inhibition of proghrelin octanoylation mediated by GOAT using the shown compounds. The experimental data was fit to a 4-parameter logistic model, (Bottom − Top)/(1 + (I/IC50)n) + Top [24] using DYNAFIT software [25]. The Top was defined as reaction conditions without inhibitor and the Bottom was defined as reaction conditions with full inhibition by 5 μM concentration of 2. Top and Bottom conditions were included in every experiment.
Molecules 26 07599 g003
Molecules 26 07599 sch003 550
Scheme 3. Synthetic route towards 9A and 9B (see Materials and Methods for experimental detail).
Scheme 3. Synthetic route towards 9A and 9B (see Materials and Methods for experimental detail).
Molecules 26 07599 sch003
Molecules 26 07599 sch004 550
Scheme 4. Synthesis of starting material towards 17A and 17B (see Materials and Methods for experimental detail).
Scheme 4. Synthesis of starting material towards 17A and 17B (see Materials and Methods for experimental detail).
Molecules 26 07599 sch004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Murzinski, E.S.; Saha, I.; Ding, H.; Strugatsky, D.; Hollibaugh, R.A.; Liu, H.; Tontonoz, P.; Harran, P.G. In Search of Small Molecules That Selectively Inhibit MBOAT4. Molecules 2021, 26, 7599. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247599

AMA Style

Murzinski ES, Saha I, Ding H, Strugatsky D, Hollibaugh RA, Liu H, Tontonoz P, Harran PG. In Search of Small Molecules That Selectively Inhibit MBOAT4. Molecules. 2021; 26(24):7599. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247599

Chicago/Turabian Style

Murzinski, Emily S., Ishika Saha, Hui Ding, David Strugatsky, Ryan A. Hollibaugh, Haixia Liu, Peter Tontonoz, and Patrick G. Harran. 2021. "In Search of Small Molecules That Selectively Inhibit MBOAT4" Molecules 26, no. 24: 7599. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247599

APA Style

Murzinski, E. S., Saha, I., Ding, H., Strugatsky, D., Hollibaugh, R. A., Liu, H., Tontonoz, P., & Harran, P. G. (2021). In Search of Small Molecules That Selectively Inhibit MBOAT4. Molecules, 26(24), 7599. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26247599

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop