Next Article in Journal
Chemical Composition of Tomato Seed Flours, and Their Radical Scavenging, Anti-Inflammatory and Gut Microbiota Modulating Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Two Key Amino Acids Variant of α-l-arabinofuranosidase from Bacillus subtilis Str. 168 with Altered Activity for Selective Conversion Ginsenoside Rc to Rd
Previous Article in Journal
Dual Effect of Taxifolin on ZEB2 Cancer Signaling in HepG2 Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Betulinic Acid Restricts Human Bladder Cancer Cell Proliferation In Vitro by Inducing Caspase-Dependent Cell Death and Cell Cycle Arrest, and Decreasing Metastatic Potential
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Light-Emitting Diodes for Improving the Nutritional Quality and Bioactive Compound Levels of Some Crops and Medicinal Plants

1
Department of Crop Science, College of Sanghuh Life Science, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea
2
Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(5), 1477; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051477
Submission received: 15 February 2021 / Revised: 4 March 2021 / Accepted: 5 March 2021 / Published: 9 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Study on the Mechanism of Medicinal Plants on Diseases)

Abstract

:
Light is a key factor that affects phytochemical synthesis and accumulation in plants. Due to limitations of the environment or cultivated land, there is an urgent need to develop indoor cultivation systems to obtain higher yields with increased phytochemical concentrations using convenient light sources. Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have several advantages, including consumption of lesser power, longer half-life, higher efficacy, and wider variation in the spectral wavelength than traditional light sources; therefore, these devices are preferred for in vitro culture and indoor plant growth. Moreover, LED irradiation of seedlings enhances plant biomass, nutrient and secondary metabolite levels, and antioxidant properties. Specifically, red and blue LED irradiation exerts strong effects on photosynthesis, stomatal functioning, phototropism, photomorphogenesis, and photosynthetic pigment levels. Additionally, ex vitro plantlet development and acclimatization can be enhanced by regulating the spectral properties of LEDs. Applying an appropriate LED spectral wavelength significantly increases antioxidant enzyme activity in plants, thereby enhancing the cell defense system and providing protection from oxidative damage. Since different plant species respond differently to lighting in the cultivation environment, it is necessary to evaluate specific wavebands before large-scale LED application for controlled in vitro plant growth. This review focuses on the most recent advances and applications of LEDs for in vitro culture organogenesis. The mechanisms underlying the production of different phytochemicals, including phenolics, flavonoids, carotenoids, anthocyanins, and antioxidant enzymes, have also been discussed.

1. Introduction

Among the different environmental factors, light is the most important factor that affects plant gene expression, enzyme activity, growth, development, and nutritional composition [1,2,3]. Recent studies have reported the effects of light quality (spectral specificity) on phytochemical accumulation in plants [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Several studies on light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have reported improvement in the nutritional quality of plants grown under LED irradiation. For example, increased accumulation of primary secondary metabolites, starch, simple sugars, proteins, vitamin C, and phenolic compounds including anthocyanins has been observed in plants grown under LED irradiation [10,11,12]. Recently, LEDs have been increasingly applied in agro-farming and in vitro culture owing to their advantages over conventional light sources. For example, LEDs are more energy-efficient, have a longer life span, and exhibit higher spectral specificity than standard lamps (fluorescent [FL] lamps) [13]. Moreover, the application of monochromatic light is important in research centers [14]. FL light encompasses a wide range of wavelengths (350–750 nm) and is suitable as a light source for several plant species; however, it has certain disadvantages, including higher electricity consumption, more heat emission, and greater variation in radiation wavelengths than LEDs [15]. Comparatively, LEDs demonstrate lower heat emission and higher energy conversion efficiency than other conventional artificial light sources [13,16]. Another desirable characteristic of LEDs over other light systems is that they can be positioned close to plants and controlled to emit specific wavelengths [13]. Thus, the beneficial aspects of LEDs over FL lamps have recently led to their wide application in the field of agriculture for post-harvest uses, preservation, disease resistance, and development of in vitro culture systems [17].
Light is a primary factor that affects plant development, physiology, and cellular differentiation [18]. Environmental factors, including light spectrum types, are important signaling components of plant physiology and metabolite synthesis [19,20]. Photoreceptors present in plants and matching spectral attributes are the main factors that regulate plant morphogenesis and metabolite synthesis [21]. The application of artificial light in different plant species has been investigated in several previous studies to determine its effects on the stimulation of plant metabolite production and photosynthesis [22]. LED irradiation has been found to be effective in stimulating plant metabolite production after harvest and during development [23]. Previous studies have demonstrated the effective use of LEDs in in vitro growth and organogenesis of plants, including banana [24], strawberry [25], chrysanthemum [26], and potato [27].
Plants perceive light through photoreceptors, such as red light-sensitive phytochromes, blue light-sensitive phototropins, and cryptochromes, which regulate several specific physiological responses, including organogenesis and metabolite synthesis [28,29]. The success of in vitro plant regeneration and metabolite synthesis relies greatly on the spectral quality of light and photon efficiency of the light source [21]. According to Samuolienė et al. [5], a considerable challenge associated with tissue culture is to provide high quality light of controlled intensities in sufficient quantity for plant development. Numerous studies have reported the successful application of LEDs in in vitro shoot organogenesis and plant growth. For example, significantly improved biomass yield, increased shoot regeneration, and improved adaptability and survival rate of regenerated plants have been reported [30,31,32,33]. Improved secondary metabolite accumulation and in vitro root growth have been reported by Xu et al. [34] in Cunninghamia lanceolata and Nadeem et al. [35] in Ocimum basilicum under LED irradiation. Plant growth, development, and metabolite production are strongly affected by the light spectrum of the LEDs. A previous study suggested that the blue light spectrum was involved in morphogenesis, phototropism, the leaf photosynthetic process, and stomatal opening [36]. Red LEDs emit a spectrum very close to the maximum absorbance for both chlorophyll and phytochromes. The effects of light spectra on plant physiology vary among species, thereby causing significant variation in biomass yield and plant production.
The present review highlights the variation in in vitro organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis among different plant species grown under LED irradiation. Additionally, this review elucidates the effects of LED irradiation on secondary metabolite accumulation and antioxidant properties of plants. Finally, the effects of LED irradiation on the expression of genes related to the production of phenolic acids, flavonoids, carotenoids, and chlorophyll have been discussed.

2. Results

2.1. Effects of LED Irradiation on Antioxidant Enzymes

Light is an important factor that affects several biochemical pathways in plants during their growth and development. Antioxidant compounds, such as phenolic acids, vitamins, anthocyanins, carotenoids, and α-tocopherol, are widely affected by the duration of light exposure and spectral wavelength of light sources [37,38,39]. Spectral quality affects the antioxidant enzyme activity and antioxidant properties of plants [40]. A previous study reported the importance of light in antioxidant enzyme metabolism [41]. For instance, the combination of red and blue light at a ratio of 1:1 enhanced the activity of antioxidant enzymes, including catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX), in Carpesium triste Maxim [42]. Increase in the activity of antioxidant enzymes, such as CAT, was found to be related to the delay in the onset of leaf senescence in C. triste [42], wheat [43], pea [44], and banana [45] (Table 1). Numerous previous studies have shown the differential responses of antioxidant enzymes in plants grown in vitro under different light conditions. For instance, callus cultures of Cynoglossum officinale grown under dark conditions showed increased CAT activity, whereas those grown under blue and white light conditions showed reduced CAT activity [46]. According to Causin et al. [43], blue light plays an important role in preventing cell senescence and decreasing cellular oxidative damage by enhancing CAT activity in wheat plants. In another study, blue light strongly activated catalase isozyme 1 (CAT-1) in rye plants [47]. CAT-1 is known to eliminate photorespiratory H2O2 [47], indicating its positive association with plant antioxidant defense mechanisms. Differential effects of LED irradiation on in vitro shoot organogenesis and antioxidant enzyme activities and variations in reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels have been reported in different plant species [48]. A significant decrease in SOD activity has been observed during the initial stage of organogenesis in Curculigo orchioides grown under combined red and blue LED irradiation [49]. The highest SOD activity was observed after two weeks of red LED irradiation. Moreover, Franck et al. [50] demonstrated a close association between shoot bud formation and enhanced SOD activity during in vitro organogenesis of Prunus avium and strawberries grown under blue LED irradiation. In similar studies, enhanced SOD and CAT activities were observed during adventitious shoot formation in Gladiolus hybridus [51] and Albizia adorratissima [52] grown under blue LED irradiation. It has been reported that CAT plays an important role in shoot organogenesis, and enhanced CAT activity is associated with increased adventitious shoot formation in plants [52]. High CAT activity during shoot initiation is associated with H2O2 dismutation [53]. Additionally, Causin et al. [43] observed increased CAT activity and reduced cell senescence in wheat plants exposed to blue light.

2.2. Effects of LED Irradiation on In Vitro Organogenesis

LEDs have drawn considerable attention as suitable alternative light sources for the in vitro propagation, mass propagation, shoot regeneration, and root culture of various plant species. Due to technological advancement and flexibility of LED spectral wavelength, LEDs have been successfully applied for in vitro organogenesis of plant species (Table 2). Several studies have reported the effects of LED irradiation on the carbohydrate metabolism and micropropagation of plant species [101,102,103]. Many previous studies have demonstrated the varying in vitro shoot and root organogenesis-promoting effects of irradiation with LED combinations, depending on the various plant parts and species [104,105,106]. Blue and red LED irradiation was found to stimulate shoot organogenesis in potato [104] and vanilla [107] and enhance bulbet organogenesis in Lilium [108]. Increased shoot regeneration was observed in A. distichum irradiated with combined red and blue LEDs [109]. Other studies demonstrated the stimulatory role of monochromatic blue or red LED irradiation in shoot organogenesis [1,110,111]. Increased shoot elongation was observed in Oncidium [112], and blueberries [113,114] irradiated with red LED. In a similar study, shoot elongation was increased in sugarcane irradiated with blue and red LED combinations [110].
In several studies, LED irradiation of in vitro plants increased their biomass. For example, irradiation with blue and red LED combinations resulted in enhanced biomass during the in vitro culture of Achillea millefolium [115], Densribium [1], blueberries [114], sugarcane [110,116], and chrysanthemum [26]. In addition to biomass, chlorophyll content was increased in different plant species cultured under LED irradiation [24,42,117,118,119]. In similar studies, increased total carotenoid level was reported in shoot cultures irradiated with different LEDs [119,120,121]. Tuan et al. [120] observed elevated expression of carotenoid biosynthesis-associated PSY, ZDS, CHXB, and ZEP genes. LED irradiation of various cultured plants also increased in vitro adventitious root induction. For example, the adventitious root-promoting effects of LED irradiation were observed in strawberries [122], chrysanthemum [123], chestnuts [124], Oncidium [113], and C. lanceolata [34]. The effects of spectral differences in light quality on somatic embryo formation have been reported in Peucedanum japonium [125], Coffea canephora [126], Pinus densiflora [127], Pinus taeda, and Pinus elliottii [128]. However, somatic embryo formation and germination were observed on irradiation with different combinations and quantities of LEDs. Jung et al. [129] observed an increase in the polyphenol content of rice seedlings grown in vitro under irradiation with different LED combinations.
In several instances, increased bioactive compound production observed in plant species grown in vitro could be maintained under irradiation with different LEDs [35,46,130,131,132,133,134]. Additionally, increased total phenol and total flavonoid contents were observed in different plants irradiated with different LEDs [1,35,42,119,135]. Recently, increased phytochemical levels have been recorded in important crops and medicinal plants. For example, ascorbic and dehydroascorbic acids were observed in Lycopersicon esculentum cv. ‘House Momotaro’ & ‘Mini Carol’ [136], and myrcene and limonene were observed in Lippia rotundifolia Cham maintained under blue LED irradiation [137]. Irradiation with red and blue LED combinations enhanced phytochemical levels in Bacopa monnieri L. [138] and Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng [139]. Increased antioxidant activity was significantly correlated with enhanced phytochemical concentration in LED-irradiated plants. Moreover, a substantial increase in antioxidant enzymatic activity was observed in plants grown in vitro under irradiation with various LEDs. For instance, Gupta and Sahoo [80] observed an increase in APX activity in C. orchioides cultured under red LED irradiation. Similarly, enhanced POD activity was observed in C. orchioides irradiated with blue LEDs [80]. Additionally, changes in the antioxidant enzyme activity and polyphenol concentration were observed in LED-irradiated plants cultured in vitro [106,140,141], indicating a close association between LED irradiation and plant phytochemical composition and antioxidant activities.
Table 2. Effect of light emitting diodes on in vitro plant propagation.
Table 2. Effect of light emitting diodes on in vitro plant propagation.
Plant SpeciesType of LEDMetabolites/Enzyme/GeneBiological ActivityReferences
Lippia gracilis SchauerBlue-LEDTotal chlorophyll, total carotenoid, carvacrol, E-caryophylleneBioactive compound productionLazzarini et al. [117]
Brachypodium distachyon (L.)Red:Blue:White LEDPAL, F5H
Superoxide dismutase, Catalase
Gene expression,
antioxidant enzyme expression
Mamedes-Rodrigues et al. [141]
Hyptis marrubioides EplingWhite and Blue-LEDRutinBioactive compound productionPedroso et al. [130]
Cunninghamia lanceolataRed:Blue:Purple:Green (8:1:1:1) LEDPeroxidase, catalaseRoot growing,
antioxidant enzyme expression
Xu et al. [34]
Ocimum basilicum L.Red, Blue, White LEDTotal flavonoid, peonidin, cyaniding (Red LED), rosmarinic acid, eugenol (Blue LED), chicoric acid (White)Bioactive compound productionNadeem et al. [35]
Lycopersicon esculentum cv. ‘House Momotaro’ & ‘Mini Carol’ Blue LEDAscorbic acid, dehydroascorbic acidAntioxidationZushi et al. [136]
Boehmeria nivea cv. ‘Zhongsizhu 1′Red and Orange LEDTotal chlorophyll (Red),
malondialdehyde (+), superoxide dismutase, peroxidase (Orange)
Bioactive compound production, antioxidant enzyme expressionRehman et al. [118]
Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.)Blue LEDChlorogenic acid, gallic acid, protocatechuic acidBiomass increase,
Bioactive compound production
Szopa and Ekiert [131]
Bacopa monnieri L.Red and Blue LEDTriterpenoid saponin glycosidesBioactive compound productionWatcharatanon et al. [138]
Scutellaria baicalensis GeorgiBlue LEDTotal carotenoid, PSY, ZDS, CHXB, ZEPBioactive compound production,
gene expression
Tuan et al. [120]
Cnidium officinale MakinoRed and Blue (1:1) LEDTotal phenol, total flavonoid, ascorbate peroxidaseBioactive compound production, antioxidant enzyme exprssionAdil et al. [46]
GrapesBlue LEDChlorophyllphotosynthetic compound Poudel et al. [110]
Canavalia ensiformisRed and Blue (1:3) LEDTotal phenol, total chlorophyll, total carotenoid Biomass increase, callus induction, bioactive compound production, antioxidationSaldarriaga et al. [119]
Rhodiola imbricata EdgewBlue LEDSalidroside, total phenol, total flavonoidBioactive compound productionKapoor et al. [135]
Lepidium sativum L.White, Blue, Green LEDTotal phenol (White),
p-coumaric acid (Blue), superoxide dismutase, peroxidase (Green)
Bioactive compound production, antioxidant enzyme exprssionUllah et al. [132]
Solanum tuberosum cv. ‘Zhuanxinwu’Blue LEDAnthocyaninBioactive compound productionXu et al. [142]
Ajuga bracteosaBlue LEDTotal phenol, total flavonoidBioactive compound productionRukh et al. [133]
Vitis vinifera cv. “Manicure Finger”Blue LEDTotal chlorophyll, total carotenoidBioactive compound productionLi et al. [143]
Lippia rotundifolia ChamBlue LEDMyrcene, limoneneBioactive compound productionDe Hsie et al. [137]
Pfaffia glomerata accessions (Ac22, Ac43)Red and Blue (1:1) LEDAnthocyanin,
20-hydroxyecdysone, peroxidases, catalase
Bioactive compound production, antioxidant enzyme exprssionSilva et al. [140]
Lippia filifolia Mart. & SchauerRed, Blue LEDMalondialdehyde (-)Bioactive compound productionChaves et al. [134]
Drosera burmannii Vahl, Drosera indica L.Blue LEDPlumbaginBioactive compound productionBoonsnongcheep et al. [144]
PotatoRed and Blue LED-Shoot elongationEdesi et al. [104]
LiliumRed and Blue LED-Bulbet organogenesisLian et al. [108]
VanillaRed and Blue LED-Shoot organogenesisBello-Bello et al. [107]
A. distichumRed and Blue LED-Shoot regenerationLee et al. [109]
R. glutinosa,Red LED-Shoot elongationHahn et al. [22]
SugarcanBlue and Red LED-Shoot elongationSilva et al. [139]
A. milletoliumBlue and Red LED-Enhanced biomassAlvarenga et al. [115]
DensribiumBlue and Red LED-Enhanced biomassLin et al. [1]
Blue-berryBlue and Red LED-Enhanced biomassHung et al. [114]
CrysanthemumBlue and Red LED-Enhanced biomassKim et al. [26]
SugarcanBlue and Red LED-Enhanced biomassMaluta et al. [116]
Castanea crenataRed-LED-Shoot elongationPark and Kim et al. [145]
OncidiumRed-LED-Shoot elongationChung et al. [113]
Blue berryRed LED-Shoot elongationHung et al. [112,114]
BananaRed-LED-ChlorophyllDo Nascimento Vieira et al. [24]
C. orchioidesRed-LED, Blue-LEDAPX, POX Enzyme activityDutta G. and Sahoo [80]

2.3. Effects of LED Irradiation on Tocopherol Biosynthesis in Crops

Tocopherols, synthesized through the isopropenoid pathway, are associated with the antioxidant properties of green plants [146]. These phytochemicals play a key role in protecting the photosynthetic membranes and apparatus from high-intensity light stress [147]. A previous study showed direct interaction between photoreceptor activation and tocopherol content in plants [148]. A significant increase in ɣ-tocopherol content and the suppression of α-tocopherol content were reported in barley irradiated with red LEDs [81]. Moreover, yellow LED irradiation effectively enhanced tocopherol accumulation in apples [82], demonstrating the species-dependent effects of LED irradiation. Similar results were reported in basil, whereas combined irradiation with blue and red LEDs, compared with only blue LED irradiation, enhanced α-tocopherol content in parsley [53]. Koga et al. [81] proposed that the suppression of homogentisate phytyltransferase, an enzyme that regulates the total tocopherol content in plants, might lower the tocopherol concentration in blue LED-irradiated sprouts. Moreover, in another study, irradiation with blue LEDs at a lower dosage resulted in an increase in the total tocopherol content in beets [83]. Thus, it is possible that LED irradiation can interact with the enzymes involved in tocopherol biosynthesis pathways. However, in another study, irradiation with HPS lamps combined with red LEDs significantly enhanced α-tocopherol accumulation in parsley extracts [83], indicating that red or blue LED irradiation is solely insufficient to regulate tocopherol biosynthesis in plants.

2.4. Effects of LED Irradiation on Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Crops

Carotenoids, including β-carotene and lutein, are present in most green plants and green algae and are associated with light harvesting and the transfer of energy to the reaction center of photosystems [149,150]. They also deactivate ROS formed under extreme light stress to protect the photosynthetic apparatus [151]. Moreover, carotenoid consumption has been linked to several health benefits in humans, including heart disease and cancer prevention, and it has been reported to be closely associated with ophthalmic health [152,153,154,155]. Many previous studies have reported the effects of both spectral quality and light intensity on carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Among the different LEDs, red LED irradiation enhanced β-carotene accumulation in pea plants [84]. Other studies reported that red LED irradiation resulted in an increase in β-cryptoxanthin content in citrus fruits [156] and lycopene content in tomatoes [157]. The duration of LED irradiation affected total carotenoid content and carotenoid biosynthesis in the growing plants. Compared to combined red and blue LED irradiation, blue LED irradiation for a short duration significantly increased β-carotene and violaxanthin accumulation in broccoli microgreens [89]. In a similar study, BC levels in pea plants were increased after blue LED irradiation for a short duration [84]. However, β-carotene and lutein levels in buckwheat sprouts were decreased following blue LED irradiation, compared with white LED irradiation [120]. As shown in Table 1, the LED source markedly affected carotenoid accumulation and was significantly associated with gene expression during carotenoid biosynthesis in the plants. The variation in carotenoid content in the plants irradiated with LEDs could be attributed to the differential expression of genes associated with carotenoid synthesis. For instance, buckwheat sprouts grown under irradiation with different LEDs showed increased expression of FtPSY, FtLCYB, FtCHXB, FtCHXE, FtLCYe, and FtZEP genes, which are associated with carotenoid biosynthesis, following white LED irradiation [120]. In a similar study, Zhang et al. [88] observed the upregulation of the expression of carotenoid biosynthesis-associated genes, such as CitPSY, CitZDS, CitPDS, and CitLCY, in citrus species, indicating a differential stimulatory role of LED irradiation in the regulatory mechanism of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants.

2.5. Effects of LED Irradiation on Flavonoid Biosynthesis in Crops

Flavonoids are widely distributed phytochemicals found in plants and are involved in multiple mechanisms, including protection against pathogens and ultraviolet (UV) radiation, flower coloration, and male fertility [158,159,160]. Additionally, these phytochemical compounds are involved in plant coloration, protection of leaf cells from photooxidative damage [161], stress response, and other physiological activities [162,163]. Light is an important abiotic factor that affects flavonoid accumulation and flavonoid biosynthesis-related gene expression in plant species [164]. Numerous previous studies have reported the key role of LEDs in flavonoid biosynthesis in plants. Blue LED irradiation increased anthocyanin concentration in grapes [90]. Upregulation of the expression of VIMYBA1-2, VIMYBA2, and VvUFGT genes, which are associated with anthocyanin biosynthesis, was also observed. Similarly, Thwe et al. [91] observed increased anthocyanin accumulation in buckwheat grown under blue LED irradiation and wide variation in FtPAL, FtANS, and FtDFR expression in buckwheat sprouts. In another study, a positive correlation between anthocyanin accumulation and flavonoid synthesis-related gene expression, including that of 4-coumaryol CoA-ligase (4CL) and phenylalanine ammonia synthase, was observed in Cyclocarya paliurus grown under blue LED irradiation [57]. Park et al. [72] reported an increase in the levels of rosmaric acid, tilianin, and expression of genes encoding phenylpropanoid biosynthesis-related enzymes, such as cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H), chalcone isomerase (CHI), and RAS, in Acaulospora rugosa under white LED irradiation, compared with irradiation with other LEDs. Similarly, enhanced gallic acid and quercetin accumulation and decreased p-coumaric acid and epicatechin levels were observed in wheat sprouts grown under blue LED irradiation [49]. Irradiation with a combination of blue and red LEDs at a ratio of 1:4 resulted in an increased expression of genes encoding flavonoid synthesis-related enzymes, such as phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), chalcone synthase (CHS), CHI, and flavonol synthase, in Anoectochilus roxburghii, further resulting in increased flavonoid accumulation [60].

2.6. Effects of LED Irradiation on Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Crops

Anthocyanins are soluble flavonoids that are widely distributed in plants and are associated with seed dispersal, pollination, stress resistance, and flower coloration. They are widely used in the food industry for coloring purposes [165]. Additionally, these phytochemicals are known for their antioxidant properties, including protection of the photosynthetic apparatus and DNA from harmful radiation and cold stress, and they play key roles in drought resistance [166,167]. Previous studies have reported the effects of LED irradiation on anthocyanin accumulation in plants [58]. Irradiation with a red and far-red LED combination has been reported to increase total anthocyanin (TA) content in lettuce plants [92,93]. However, irradiation with a deep red LED alone reduced total anthocyanin content in mustard plants [94]. TA concentration was significantly increased in other vegetables, such as cabbage [95] and Chinese kale sprouts [168], following red LED irradiation. Moreover, irradiation with a combination of a red LED with HPS lamp resulted in higher TA accumulation in green vegetables than irradiation with red LEDs alone [169]. Green vegetables, such as lettuce and romaine baby leaves, have been reported to show higher TA content when grown under green LED irradiation than when grown under red LED irradiation [6,40]. Moreover, TA accumulation was higher in Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze ‘Zhonghuang 3′ grown under blue LED irradiation [62]. These results indicated that TA biosynthesis in plants depended on not only the light wavelength but also the plant species. Anthocyanin concentration was increased in apples grown under red LED irradiation [96]. According to this report, red LED irradiation upregulated the expression of MD-MYB10 and MdUFGT genes, which are related to anthocyanin biosynthesis [96]. Moreover, irradiation of grapes with both blue and red LEDs upregulated the expression of anthocyanin biosynthesis-related genes, such as MYB transcription factor genes [97]. In another study, the expression of anthocyanin synthesis-related genes, including V1MYBA1-2, VIMYBA2, and VvUFGT, was increased with the enhancement in anthocyanin accumulation in grape berries irradiated with blue LEDs [90].

2.7. Effects of LED Irradiation on Phenolic Acid Biosynthesis in Crops

Phenolic compounds are ubiquitous in most higher plants and are associated with plant defense systems against abiotic and biotic factors, including UV radiation, high temperature, excess light, pathogen attack, and wounding [170,171]. Phenolic compounds are formed via the shikimate pathway in plants. Phenylalanine, an intermediate compound formed in these pathways, is converted into phenolic compounds by PAL, which is widely regulated by light-responsive factors and ROS formed under excess light [142,172]. Some studies have reported the effects of LEDs on phenolic acid accumulation in plants. Among the different LEDs, irradiation with red LED was effective in increasing the total phenolic content (TPC) in basil [53]. A stimulatory effect of red LED irradiation on TPC in various vegetables, including radish, wheat, and lentil, was observed. Moreover, a positive effect of irradiation with red LEDs, combined with other LEDs on TPC in basil microgreens was observed. However, red LED irradiation exerted a negative effect on TPC in parsley microgreens [53]. In contrast, Qian et al. [95] and Brazaityte et al. [169] found that red LED irradiation did not affect TPC in Chinese kale sprouts and Brassica microgreens, respectively. A similar trend was also observed in lettuce leaves [40,173]. Blue LED irradiation resulted in an increase in TPC in growing Chinese kale sprouts [95]. Other studies have reported increased TPC in Chinese cabbage and lettuce irradiated with blue LEDs alone compared with those irradiated with red LEDs alone or a combination of red and blue LEDs [98], indicating that the effects of LEDs on TPC varied among plant species. Several studies have investigated the levels of phenolic compounds in plant species grown under LED irradiation [55,57,58,68,72,174,175]. Chung et al. [4] reported an increase in malonyldaidzin, malonyl genistin, salicylic acid, p-hydrobenzoic acid, and gentisic acid levels in Pachyrhizus erosus grown under red LED irradiation. An increased concentration of p-coumaric acid was observed in P. erosus grown under blue LED irradiation. The accumulation of phenolic compounds, such as p-coumaric, gallic, ferulic, and hydroxybenzoic acids, was increased in wheat sprouts irradiated with blue LEDs [99]. Several studies have shown an increase in antioxidant activity and phytochemical accumulation in plants irradiated with different LEDs [4,175,176].
Irradiation with blue LEDs triggered increased phenolic compound accumulation and phenolic compound biosynthesis-related gene expression [59,74,77]. Irradiation with red LEDs alone was also shown to enhance the concentrations of important phytochemicals in various plant species [65,69,70,73]. Additionally, irradiation with LED combinations at different ratios enhanced phytochemical contents in plant species [54,56,67,71,76,177,178,179]. The increase in phenolic compound content was positively correlated with the expression of TaPA1, TAPA2, TaC4H, TaCHI, TaCHS, and TaF3H genes; these genes are involved in phenolic compound synthesis through the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway [65]. The highest levels of select flavonoids (kaempferol, isoquercitrin, and quercetin) and enhanced relative expression of genes encoding key enzymes, such as PAL, 4CL, and CHS, were observed in Cyclocarya paliurus irradiated with blue LEDs [100].

3. Conclusions and Future Prospects

In this review, we aimed to provide updates on the innovative use of LEDs in improving nutritional quality of plants grown in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, in the present review, we summarized the expression patterns of various genes related to phytochemical biosynthesis in response to different LED spectral wavelengths. It is important to identify the appropriate light quality and intensity to increase the quantity and quality of important phytochemicals associated with nutrition and human health. It can be concluded from this overview of research that the flexibility of LED irradiation allows the enhancement of nutritional levels of vegetables and phytochemical contents of plant species. Moreover, irradiation with LED combinations at different ratios and combination of LEDs with normal light (FL) sources can enhance phytochemical content, biomass, and nutritional quality of vegetables and medicinal plants. However, detailed studies on the association between LEDs and their phytochemical accumulation-promoting effects as well as the underlying physiological and molecular mechanisms are required. We observed that different plant species respond differentially to various LED spectral wavelengths. Therefore, further research is required to understand the application of LEDs for the successful growth and mass propagation of plants.

Author Contributions

W.-S.J., B.K.G. and M.H.H. contributed by writing the manuscript. C.Y.Y., S.-H.K., and I.-M.C. contributed by editing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a BK21 FOUR (Fostering Outstanding Universities for Research, grant no. 4220201013822, team: Crop Genetic Resources Research Team for Future Human Resources Development in Sustainable Premium Agricultural Industry, Konkuk University), the National Research Foundation of Korea, Republic of Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funding from the KU research Professor program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lin, Y.; Li, J.; Li, B.; He, T.; Chun, Z. Effects of light quality on growth and development of protocorm–like bodies of Dendrobium officinale in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2011, 105, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Azmi, N.S.; Ahmad, R.; Ibrahim, R. Fluorescent light (FL), red led and blue led spectrums effects on in vitro shoots multiplication. J. Teknol. 2016, 78, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Manivannan, A.; Soundararajan, P.; Park, Y.G.; Wei, H.; Kim, S.H.; Jeong, B.R. Blue and red light-emitting diodes improve the growth and physiology of in vitro grown carnations ‘Green Beauty’ and ‘Purple Beauty’. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2017, 58, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chung, I.M.; Paudel, N.; Kim, S.H.; Yu, C.Y.; Ghimire, B.K. The Influence of Light Wavelength on Growth and Antioxidant Capacity in Pachyrhizus erosus (L.) Urban. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 296–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Samuolienė, G.; Brazaitytė, A.; Jankauskienė, J.; Viršilė, A.; Sirtautas, R.; Novičkovas, A.; Sakalauskienė, S.; Sakalauskaitė, J.; Duchovskis, P. LED irradiance level affects growth and nutritional quality of Brassica microgreens. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2013, 8, 1241–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Samuolienė, G.; Brazaitytė, A.; Sirtautas, R.; Viršilė, A.; Sakalauskaitė, J.; Sakalauskienė, S.; Duchovskis, P. LED illumination affects bioactive compounds in romaine baby leaf lettuce. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 3286–3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Braidot, E.; Petrussa, E.; Peresson, C.; Patui, S.; Bertolini, A.; Tubaro, F.; Wählby, U.; Coan, M.; Vianello, A.; Zancani, M. Low-intensity light cycles improve the quality of lamb’s lettuce (Valerianella olitoria L. Pollich) during storage at low temperature. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 90, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, X.; Guo, W.; Xue, X.; Wang, L.; Qiao, X. Growth and quality responses of ‘Green Oak Leaf’ lettuce as affected by monochromic or mixed radiation provided by fluorescent lamp (FL) and light-emitting diode (LED). Sci. Hortic. 2014, 172, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kopsell, D.A.; Sams, C.E.; Barickman, T.C.; Morrow, R.C. Sprouting broccoli accumulate higher concentrations of nutritionally important metabolites under narrow-band light-emitting diode lighting. JASHS 2014, 139, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Darko, E.; Heydarizadeh, P.; Schoefs, B.; Sabzalian, M.R. Photosynthesis under artificial light: The shift in primary and secondary metabolism. Philos Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 369, 20130243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Reis, A.; Kleinowski, A.M.; Klein, F.R.S.; Telles, R.T.; do Amarante, L.; Braga, E.J.B. Light quality on the in vitro growth and production of pigments in the genus Alternanthera. J. Crop. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 18, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bantis, F.; Ouzounis, T.; Radoglou, K. Artificial LED lighting enhances growth characteristics and total phenolic content of Ocimum basilicum, but variably affects transplant success. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 198, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Massa, G.D.; Kim, H.H.; Wheeler, R.M.; Mitchell, C.A. Plant Productivity in Response to LED Lighting. Hortscience 2008, 43, 1951–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gupta, S.D.; Jatothu, B. Fundamentals and applications of light emitting diodes (LEDs) in in vitro plant growth and morphogenesis. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2013, 7, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bello-Bello, J.J.; Perez-Sato, J.A.; Cruz-Cruz, C.A.; Martinez-Estrada, E. Light-emitting diodes: Progress in plant micropropagation. InTech 2017, 6, 93–103. [Google Scholar]
  16. Morrow, R.C. LED lighting in horticulture. HortScience 2008, 43, 1947–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. D’Souza, C.; Yuk, H.G.; Khoo, G.H.; Zhou, W. Application of Light-Emitting Diodes in Food Production, Postharvest Preservation, and Microbiological Food Safety. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2015, 14, 719–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Deng, M.; Qian, H.; Chen, L.; Sun, B.; Chang, J.; Miao, H.; Cai, C.; Wang, Q. Influence of pre-harvest red light irradiation on main phytochemicals and antioxidant activity of Chinese kale sprouts. Food Chem. 2017, 222, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chen, M.; Chory, J.; Fankhauser, C. Light signal transduction in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2004, 38, 87–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Samuolienė, G.; Brazaitytė, A.; Urbonavičiūtė, A.; Šabajevienė, G.; Duchovskis, P. The effect of red and blue light component on the growth and development of frigo strawberries. Zemdirb. Agric. 2010, 97, 99–104. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gupta, S.D.; Agarwal, A. Influence of LED lighting on in vitro plant regeneration and associated cellular redox balance. In Light Emitting Diodes for Agriculture; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 273–303. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hahn, E.J.; Kozai, T.; Paek, K.Y. Blue and red light-emitting diodes with or without sucrose and ventilation affect in vitro growth of Rehmannia glutinosa plantlets. J. Plant Biol. 2000, 43, 247–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Choi, H.G.; Moon, B.Y.; Kang, N.J. Effects of LED light on the production of strawberry during cultivation in a plastic greenhouse and in a growth chamber. Sci. Horticult. 2015, 189, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Do Nascimento Vieira, L.; de Freitas Fraga, H.P.; dos Anjos, K.G.; Puttkammer, C.C.; Scherer, R.F.; da Silva, D.A.; Guerra, M.P. Light-emitting diodes (LED) increase the stomata formation and chlorophyll content in Musa acuminata (AAA) ‘Nanicão Corupá’ in vitro plantlets. Theor. Exp. Plant Physiol. 2015, 27, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rocha, P.S.G.; Oliveira, R.P.; Scivittaro, W.B.; Santos, U.L. Diodos emissores de luz e concentrações de BAP na multiplicação in vitro de morangueiro. Ciênc. Rural 2010, 40, 1922–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kim, S.J.; Hahn, E.J.; Heo, J.W.; Paek, K.Y. Effects of LEDs on net photosynthetic rate, growth and leaf stomata of Chrysanthemum plantlets in vitro. Sci. Hortic. 2004, 101, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Seabrook, J.E. Light effects on the growth and morphogenesis of potato (Solanum tuberosum) in vitro: A review. Am. J. Potato Res. 2005, 82, 353–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Muneer, S.; Kim, E.J.; Park, J.S. Influence of green, red and blue light emitting diodes on multiprotein complex proteins and photosynthetic activity under different light intensities in lettuce leaves (Lactuca sativa L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 4657–4670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Franklin, K.A.; Whitelam, G.C. Light signals, phytochromes and cross-talk with other environmental cues. J. Exp. Biol. 2004, 55, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jao, R.C.; Lai, C.C.; Fang, W.; Chang, S.F. Effects of red light on the growth of Zantedeschia plantlets in vitro and tuber formation using light-emitting diodes. HortScience 2005, 40, 436–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Shin, K.S.; Murthy, H.N.; Heo, J.W.; Hahn, E.J.; Paek, K.Y. The effect of light quality on the growth and development of in vitro cultured Doritaenopsis plants. Acta Physiol. Plant 2008, 30, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, H.M.; Xu, Z.G.; Tang, C.M. Effect of light-emitting diodes on growth and morphogenesis of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plantlets in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Org. Cult. 2010, 103, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ramírez-Mosqueda, M.A.; Iglesias-Andreu, L.G.; Luna-Sánchez, I.J. Light quality affects growth and development of in vitro plantlet of Vanilla planifolia Jacks. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2017, 109, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, Y.; Liang, Y.; Yang, M. Effects of Composite LED Light on Root Growth and Antioxidant Capacity of Cunninghamia lanceolata Tissue Culture Seedlings. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nadeem, M.; Abbasi, B.H.; Younas, M.; Ahmad, W.; Zahir, A.; Hano, C. LED-enhanced biosynthesis of biologically active ingredients in callus cultures of Ocimum basilicum. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2019, 190, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Whitelam, G.; Halliday, K. Light and Plant Development; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  37. Stagnari, F.; Di Mattia, C.; Galieni, A.; Santarelli, V.; D’Egidio, S.; Pagnani, G.; Pisante, M. Light quantity and quality supplies sharply affect growth, morphological, physiological and quality traits of basil. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 122, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Taulavuori, K.; Hyöky, V.; Oksanen, J.; Taulavuori, E.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Species-specific differences in synthesis of flavonoids and phenolic acids under increasing periods of enhanced blue light. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 121, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Demotes-Mainard, S.; Péron, T.; Corot, A.; Bertheloot, J.; Le Gourrierec, J.; Pelleschi-Travier, S.; Crespel, L.; Morela, P.; Huché-Thélier, L.; Boumaza, R.; et al. Plant responses to red and far-red lights, applications in horticulture. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 121, 4–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Samuolienė, G.; Sirtautas, R.; Brazaitytė, A.; Duchovskis, P. LED lighting and seasonality effects antioxidant properties of baby leaf lettuce. Food Chem. 2012, 134, 1494–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Shohael, A.M.; Ali, M.B.; Yu, K.W.; Hahn, E.J.; Islam, R.; Paek, K.Y. Effect of light on oxidative stress, secondary metabolites and induction of antioxidant enzymes in Eleutherococcus senticosus somatic embryos in bioreactor. Process. Biochem. 2006, 41, 1176–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhao, J.; Thi, L.T.; Park, Y.G.; Jeong, B.R. Light quality affects growth and physiology of Carpesium triste Maxim. Cultured in vitro. Agriculture 2020, 10, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Causin, H.F.; Jauregui, R.N.; Barneix, A.J. The effect of light spectral quality on leaf senescence and oxidative stress in wheat. Plant Sci. 2006, 171, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pastori, G.M.; del Río, L.A. Natural senescence of pea leaves (an activated oxygen-mediated function for peroxisomes). Plant Physiol. 1997, 113, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Chen, J.; Li, F.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Yuan, D.; Jiang, Y. Exogenous procyanidin treatment delays senescence of harvested banana fruit by enhancing antioxidant responses and in vivo procyanidin content. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 2019, 158, 110999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Adil, M.; Ren, X.; Jeong, B.R. Light elicited growth, antioxidant enzymes activities and production of medicinal compounds in callus culture of Cnidium officinale Makino. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 196, 111509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Schmidt, M.; Grief, J.; Feierabend, J. Mode of translational activation of the catalase (cat1) mRNA of rye leaves (Secale cereale L.) and its control through blue light and reactive oxygen. Planta 2006, 223, 835–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gupta, S.D. Role of free radicals and antioxidants in in vitro morphogenesis. In Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidants in Higher Plants; Dutta Gupta, S., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011; pp. 229–247. [Google Scholar]
  49. Cuong, D.M.; Ha, T.W.; Park, C.H.; Kim, N.S.; Yeo, H.J.; Chun, S.W.; Kim, C.; Park, S.U. Effects of LED lights on expression of genes involved in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and accumulation of phenylpropanoids in wheat sprout. Agronomy 2019, 9, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Franck, T.; Kevers, C.; Gaspar, T. Protective enzymatic systems against activated oxygen species compared in normal and vitrified shoots of Prunus avium L. L. raised in vitro. Plant Growth Regul. 1995, 16, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dutta Gupta, S.; Datta, S. Antioxidant enzyme activities during in vitro morphogenesis of gladiolus and the effect of application of antioxidants on plant regeneration. Biol. Plant 2003, 47, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rajeswari, V.; Paliwal, K. Peroxidase and catalase changes during in vitro adventitious shoot organogenesis from hypocotyls of Albizia odoratissima L.f. (Benth). Acta Physiol. Plant 2008, 30, 825–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Samuolienė, G.; Brazaitytė, A.; Viršile, A.; Jankauskienė, J.; Sakalauskienė, S.; Duchovskis, P. Red light-dose or wavelength-dependent photoresponse of antioxidants in herb microgreens. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bian, Z.; Yang, Q.; Li, T.; Cheng, R.; Barnett, Y.; Lu, C. Study of the beneficial effects of green light on lettuce grown under short-term continuous red and blue light-emitting diodes. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 164, 226–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Nguyen, T.K.L.; Oh, M. Physiological and biochemical responses of green and red perilla to LED-based light. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 240–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Johkan, M.; Shoji, K.; Goto, F.; Hashida, S.N.; Yoshihara, T. Blue light-emitting diode light irradiation of seedlings improves seedling quality and growth after transplanting in red leaf lettuce. Hortscience 2010, 45, 1809–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Liu, H.; Chen, Y.; Hu, T.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, T.; Yu, H.; Kang, Y. The influence of light-emitting diodes on the phenolic compounds and antioxidant activities in pea sprouts. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 25, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Azad, M.O.K.; Adnan, M.; Son, J.; Choi, D.H.; Park, C.H. Effect of Artificial LED on the Growth, Anthocyanin, Chlorophyll and Total Phenolic Content of Buckwheat Seedling. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2020, 13, 10274–10277. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wilawan, N.; Ngamwonglumlert, L.; Devahastin, S.; Chiewchan, N. Changes in enzyme activities and amino acids and their relations with phenolic compounds contents in okra treated by LED lights of different colors. Food Bioprocess. Technol. 2019, 12, 1945–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gam, D.T.; Khoi, P.H.; Ngoc, P.B.; Linh, L.K.; Hung, N.K.; Anh, P.T.L.; Thu, N.T.; Hien, N.T.T.; Khanh, T.D.; Ha, C.H. LED Lights promote growth and flavonoid accumulation of Anoectochilus roxburghii and are linked to the enhanced expression of several related genes. Plants 2020, 9, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Park, C.H.; Park, Y.E.; Yeo, H.J.; Kim, J.K.; Park, S.U. Effects of Light-Emitting Diodes on the Accumulation of Phenolic Compounds and Glucosinolates in Brassica juncea Sprouts. Horticulturae 2020, 6, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zheng, C.; Ma, J.; Ma, C.; Shen, S.; Liu, Y.; Chen, L. Regulation of growth and flavonoid formation of tea plants (Camellia sinensis) by blue and green light. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 2408–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yoneda, Y.; Nakashima, H.; Miyasaka, J.; Ohdoi, K.; Shimizu, H. Impact of blue, red, and far-red light treatments on gene expression and steviol glycoside accumulation in Stevia rebaudiana. Phytochemistry 2017, 137, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ghaffari, Z.; Rahimmalek, M.; Sabzalian, M.R. Variation in the primary and secondary metabolites derived from the isoprenoid pathway in the Perovskia species in response to different wavelengths generated by light emitting diodes (LEDs). Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 140, 111592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cuong, D.M.; Jeon, J.; Morgan, A.M.; Kim, C.; Kim, J.K.; Lee, S.Y.; Park, S.U. Accumulation of charantin and expression of triterpenoid biosynthesis genes in bitter melon (Momordica charantia). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 7240–7249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Park, C.H.; Kim, N.S.; Park, J.S.; Lee, S.Y.; Lee, J.; Park, S.U. Effects of light-emitting diodes on the accumulation of glucosinolates and phenolic compounds in sprouting canola (Brassica napus L.). Foods 2019, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Zha, L.; Liu, W.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, C.; Shao, M. Regulation of ascorbate accumulation and metabolism in lettuce by the red: Blue ratio of continuous light using LEDs. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nam, T.G.; Kim, D.; Eom, S.H. Effects of light sources on major flavonoids and antioxidant activity in common buckwheat sprouts. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 27, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Sobhani Najafabadi, A.; Khanahmadi, M.; Ebrahimi, M.; Moradi, K.; Behroozi, P.; Noormohammadi, N. Effect of different quality of light on growth and production of secondary metabolites in adventitious root cultivation of Hypericum perforatum. Plant Signal. Behav. 2019, 14, 1640561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Tran, L.H.; Jung, S. Effects of light-emitting diode irradiation on growth characteristics and regulation of porphyrin biosynthesis in rice seedlings. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chiang, S.; Liang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liang, C. Effect of light-emitting diodes on the production of cordycepin, mannitol and adenosine in solid-state fermented rice by Cordyceps militaris. J. Food Composit. Anal. 2017, 60, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Park, W.T.; Yeo, S.K.; Sathasivam, R.; Park, J.S.; Kim, J.K.; Park, S.U. Influence of light-emitting diodes on phenylpropanoid biosynthetic gene expression and phenylpropanoid accumulation in Agastache rugose. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2020, 63, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hosseini, A.; Zare Mehrjerdi, M.; Aliniaeifard, S. Alteration of bioactive compounds in two varieties of basil (Ocimum basilicum) grown under different light spectra. J. Essent. Oil Bearing Plants 2018, 21, 913–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lopes, E.M.; Guimarães-Dias, F.; Gama, T.D.S.S.; Macedo, A.L.; Valverde, A.L.; de Moraes, M.C.; de Aguiar-Dias, A.C.A.; Bizzo, H.R.; Alves-Ferreira, M.; Tavares, E.S.; et al. Artemisia annua L. and photoresponse: From artemisinin accumulation, volatile profile and anatomical modifications to gene expression. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lee, M.J.; Son, K.H.; Oh, M.M. Increase in biomass and bioactive compound in lettuce under various ratios of red to far-red LED light supplemented with blue LED light. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2016, 57, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kim, Y.J.; Kim, H.M.; Kim, H.M.; Lee, H.R.; Jeong, B.R.; Lee, H.; Kim, H.; Hwang, S.J. Growth and phytochemicals of ice plant (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L.) as affected by various combined ratios of red and blue LEDs in a closed-type plant production system. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2020, 20, 100267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Nakai, A.; Tanaka, A.; Yoshihara, H.; Murai, K.; Watanabe, T.; Miyawaki, K. Blue LED light promotes indican accumulation and flowering in indigo plant, Polygonum tinctorium. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 155, 112774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ha, S.Y.; ⋅ Jung, J.Y.; Yang, J.K. Effect of Light-Emitting Diodes on Cordycepin Production in Submerged Culture of Paecilomyces japonica. J. Korean Wood Sci. Technol. 2020, 48, 548–561. [Google Scholar]
  79. Tian, M.; Gu, Q.; Zhu, M. The involvement of hydrogen peroxide and antioxidant enzymes in the process of shoot organogenesis of strawberry callus. Plant Sci. 2003, 165, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dutta Gupta, S.; Sahoo, T.K. Light emitting diode (LED)-induced alteration of oxidative events during in vitro shoot organogenesis of Curculigo orchioides Gaertn. Acta Physiol. Plant 2015, 37, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Koga, R.; Meng, T.; Nakamura, E.; Miura, C.; Irino, N.; Devkota, H.P.; Yahara, S.; Kondo, R. The effect of photo-irradiation on the growth and ingredient composition of young green barley (Hordeum vulgare). Agric. Sci. 2013, 4, 185–194. [Google Scholar]
  82. Kokaji, D.; Hribar, J.; Cigić, B.; Zlatić, E.; Demšar, L.; Sinkovič, L.; Šircelj, H.; Bizjak, G.; Vidrih, R. Influence of yellow light-emitting diodes at 590 nm on storage of apple, tomato and bell pepper fruit. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2016, 54, 228–235. [Google Scholar]
  83. Samuolienė, G.; Viršile, A.; Brazaitytė, A.; Jankauskienė, J.; Sakalauskienė, S.; Vaštakaite, V.; Novicˇkovas, A.; Viškeliene, A.; Sasnauskas, A.; Duchovskis, P. Blue light dosage affects carotenoids and tocopherols in microgreens. Food Chem. 2017, 228, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wu, M.C.; Hou, C.Y.; Jiang, C.M.; Wang, Y.T.; Wang, C.Y.; Chen, H.H.; Chang, H.M. A novel approach of LED light radiation improves the antioxidant activity of pea seedlings. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 1753–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ma, G.; Zhang, L.; Kato, M.; Yamawaki, K.; Kiriiwa, Y.; Yahata, M.; Ikoma, Y.; Matsumoto, H. Effect of the combination of ethylene and red LED light irradiation on carotenoid accumulation and carotenogenic gene expression in the flavedo of citrus fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 99, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Liu, X.Y.; Guo, S.R.; Chang, T.T.; Xu, Z.G.; Takafumi, T. Regulation of the growth and photosynthesis of cherry tomato seedlings by different light irradiations of light emitting diodes (LED). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 6169–6177. [Google Scholar]
  87. Tuan, P.A.; Thwe, A.A.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, Y.B.; Lee, S.; Park, S.U. Molecular characterization and the light—dark regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in sprouts of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.). Food Chem. 2013, 141, 3803–3812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Zhang, L.; Ma, G.; Yamawaki, K.; Ikoma, Y.; Matsumoto, H.; Yoshioka, T.; Ohta, S.; Kato, M. Effect of blue LED light intensity on carotenoid accumulation in citrus juice sacs. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 188, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Kopsell, D.A.; Sams, C.E. Increase in shoot tissue pigments, glucosinolates and mineral elements in sprouting broccoli after exposure to short-duration blue light from light emitting diodes. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2013, 138, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Rodyoung, A.; Masuda, Y.; Tomiyama, H.; Saito, T.; Okawa, K.; Ohara, H.; Kondo, S. Effects of light emitting diode irradiation at night on abscisic acid metabolism and anthocyanin synthesis in grapes in different growing seasons. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 79, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Thwe, A.A.; Kim, Y.B.; Li, X.; Seo, J.M.; Kim, S.J.; Suzuki, T.; Chung, S.O.; Park, S.U. Effects of light-emitting diodes on expression of phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes and accumulation of phenylpropanoids in Fagopyrum tataricum sprouts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 4839–4845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Li, Q.; Kubota, C. Effects of supplemental light quality on growth and phytochemicals of baby leaf lettuce. Env. Exp. Bot. 2009, 67, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Stutte, G.W.; Edney, S.; Skerritt, T. Photoregulation of bioprotectant content of red leaf lettuce with light-emitting diodes. HortScience 2009, 44, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Brazaitytė, A.; Sakalauskienė, S.; Viršilė, A.; Jankauskienė, J.; Samuolienė, G.; Sirtautas, R.; Vaštakaitė, V.; Miliaukienė, J.; Duchovskis, P.; Novičkovas, A.; et al. The effect of short-term red lighting on Brassicaceae microgreens grown indoors. Acta Hortic. 2016, 1123, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Qian, H.; Liu, T.; Deng, M.; Miao, H.; Cai, C.; Shen, W.; Wang, Q. Effects of light quality on main health-promoting compounds and antioxidant capacity of Chinese kale sprouts. Food Chem. 2016, 196, 1232–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lekkham, P.; Srilaong, V.; Pongprasert, N.; Kondo, S. Anthocyanin concentration and antioxidant activity in light-emitting diode (LED)-treated apples in a greenhouse environmental control system. Fruits 2016, 71, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Koes, R.; Verweij, W.; Quattrocchio, F. Flavonoids: A colorful model for the regulation and evolution of biochemical pathways. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Li, H.; Tang, C.; Xu, Z.; Liu, X. Effects of different light sources on the growth of non-heading Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestris L.). J. Agric. Sci. 2012, 4, 262–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Park, S.Y.; Lee, J.G.; Cho, H.S.; Seong, E.S.; Kim, H.Y.; Yu, C.Y.; Kim, J.K. Metabolite profiling approach for assessing the effects of colored light-emitting diode lighting on the adventitious roots of ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Mayer). Plant Omics 2013, 6, 224–230. [Google Scholar]
  100. Liu, Y.; Fang, S.; Yang, W.; Shang, X.; Fu, X. Light quality affects flavonoid production and related gene expression in Cyclocarya paliurus. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2018, 79, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ranwala, N.K.D.; Decoteau, D.R.; Ranwala, A.P.; Miller, W.B. Changes in soluble carbohydrates during phytochrome-regulated petiole elongation in watermelon seedlings. Plant Growth Reg. 2002, 38, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kowallik, W. Blue light effect on carbohydrate and protein metabolism. In Blue Light Responses: Phenomena and Occurrence in Plants and Microorganisms; Senger, H., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1987; Volume II, pp. 7–16. [Google Scholar]
  103. Lefsrud, M.G.; Kopsell, D.A.; Sams, C.E. Irradiance from distinct wave-length light-emitting diodes affect secondary metabolites in kale. HortScience 2008, 43, 2243–2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Edesi, J.; Kotkas, K.; Pirttilä, A.M.; Häggman, H. Does light spectral quality affect survival and regeneration of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) shoot tips after cryopreservation? Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2014, 119, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hung, C.D.; Hong, C.H.; Jung, H.B.; Kim, S.K.; Van Ket, N.; Nam, M.W.; Choi, D.H.; Lee, H.I. Growth and morphogenesis of encapsulated strawberry shoot tips under mixed LEDs. Sci. Hortic. 2015, 194, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Al-Mayabi, A.M.W. Effect of red and blue light emitting diodes “CRB-LED” on in vitro organogenesis of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Alshakr. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 32, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Bello-Bello, J.J.; Martínez-Estrada, E.; Caamal-Velázquez, J.H.; Morales-Ramos, V. Effect of LED light quality on in vitro shoot proliferation and growth of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia Andrews). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 15, 272–277. [Google Scholar]
  108. Lian, M.L.; Murthy, H.N.; Paek, K.Y. Effects of light emitting diodes (LEDs) on the in vitro induction and growth of bulblets of Lilium oriental hybrid ‘Pesaro’. Sci. Hortic. 2002, 94, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lee, N.N.; Choi, Y.E.; Moon, H.K. Effect of LEDs on shoot multiplication and rooting of rare plant Abeliophyllum distichum Nakai. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2014, 41, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Poudel, P.R.; Kataoka, I.; Mochioka, R. Effect of red-and blue-light-emitting diodes on growth and morphogenesis of grapes. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2008, 92, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wu, H.C.; Lin, C.C. Red light-emitting diode light irradiation improves root and leaf formation in difficult-to-propagate Protea cynaroides L. plantlets in vitro. HortScience 2012, 47, 1490–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Hung, C.D.; Hong, C.H.; Kim, S.K.; Lee, K.H.; Park, J.Y.; Dung, C.D.; Nam, M.W.; Choi, D.H.; Lee, H.I. In vitro proliferation and ex vitro rooting of microshoots of commercially important rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium ashei Reade) using spectral lights. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 211, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chung, J.P.; Huang, C.Y.; Dai, T.E. Spectral effects on embryogenesis and plantlet growth of Oncidium ‘Gower Ramsey’. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 124, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hung, C.D.; Hong, C.H.; Kim, S.K.; Lee, K.H.; Park, J.Y.; Nam, M.W.; Choi, D.H.; Lee, H.I. LED light for in vitro and ex vitro efficient growth of economically important highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Acta Physiol. Plant 2016, 38, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Alvarenga, I.C.A.; Pacheco, F.V.; Silva, S.T.; Bertolucci, S.K.V.; Pinto, J.E.B.P. In vitro culture of Achillea millefolium L.: Quality and intensity of light on growth and production of volatiles. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2015, 122, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Maluta, F.A.; Bordignon, S.R.; Rossi, M.L.; Ambrosano, G.M.B.; Rodrigues, P.H.V. In vitro culture of sugarcane exposed to different light sources. Pesqui Agropecu Bras. 2013, 48, 1303–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Lazzarini, L.E.S.; Bertolucci, S.K.V.; Pacheco, F.V.; dos Santos, J.; Silva, S.T.; de Carvalho, A.A.; Pinto, J.E.B.P. Quality and intensity of light affect lippia gracilis schauer plant growth and volatile compounds in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2018, 135, 367–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Rehman, M.; Fahad, S.; Saleem, M.; Hafeez, M.; Rahman, M.; Liu, F.; Deng, G. Red light optimized physiological traits and enhanced the growth of ramie (Boehmeria nivea L.). Photosynthetica 2020, 58, 922–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Saldarriaga, J.F.; Cruz, Y.; López, J.E. Preliminary study of the production of metabolites from in vitro cultures of C. ensiformis. BMC Biotechnol. 2020, 20, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Tuan, P.A.; Park, C.H.; Park, W.T.; Kim, Y.B.; Kim, Y.J.; Chung, S.O.; Kim, J.K.; Park, S.U. Expression levels of carotenoid biosynthetic genes and carotenoid production in the callus of Scutellaria baicalensis exposed to white, blue, and red light-emitting diodes. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2017, 60, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Miranda, N.A.; Xavier, A.; Otoni, W.C.; Gallo, R.; Gatti, K.C.; de Moura, L.C.; Souza, D.M.S.C.; Maggioni, J.H.; Santos, S.S.D.O. Quality and intensity of light in the in vitro development of microstumps of Eucalyptus urophylla in a photoautotrophic System. For. Sci. 2020, 66, 754–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Nhut, D.T.; Takamura, T.; Watanabe, H.; Okamoto, K.; Tanaka, M. Responses of strawberry plantlets cultured in vitro under superbright red and blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2003, 73, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kurilčik, A.; Miklušytė-Čanova, R.; Dapkūnienė, S.; Žilinskaitė, S.; Kurilčik, G.; Tamulaitis, G.; Duchovskis, P.; Žukauskas, A. In vitro culture of Chrysanthemum plantlets using light-emitting diodes. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2008, 3, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Park, S.Y.; Yeung, E.C.; Paek, K.Y. Endoreduplication in Phalaenopsis is affected by light quality from light-emitting diodes during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2010, 4, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chen, C.C.; Agrawal, D.C.; Lee, M.R.; Lee, R.J.; Kuo, C.L.; Wu, C.R.; Tsay, H.S.; Chang, H.C. Influence of LED light spectra on in vitro somatic embryogenesis and LC–MS analysis of chlorogenic acid and rutin in Peucedanum japonicum Thunb.: A medicinal herb. Bot. Stud. 2016, 57, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Mai, N.T.; Binh, P.T.; Gam, D.T.; Khoi, P.H.; Hung, N.K.; Ngoc, P.B.; Ha, C.H.; Thanh Binh, H.T. Effects of light emitting diodes—LED on regeneration ability of Coffea canephora mediated via somatic embryogenesis. Tap. Chi. Sinh. Hoc. 2016, 38, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Kim, Y.W.; Moon, H.K. Enhancement of somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in Japanese red pine (Pinus densiflora). Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2014, 8, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Merkle, S.A.; Montello, P.M.; Xia, X.; Upchurch, B.L.; Smith, D.R. Light quality treatments enhance somatic seedling production in three southern pine species. Tree Physiol. 2005, 26, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Jung, E.S.; Leea, S.; Limb, S.H.; Hac, S.H.; Liud, K.H.; Leea, C.H. Metabolite profiling of the short-term responses of rice leaves (Oryza sativa cv. Ilmi) cultivated under different LED lights and its correlations with antioxidant activities. Plant Sci. 2013, 210, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Pedroso, R.C.N.; Branquinho, N.A.A.; Hara, A.C.; Costa, A.C.; Silva, F.G.; Pimenta, L.P.; Silva, M.L.A.; Cunha, W.R.; Pauletti, P.M.; Januario, A.H. Impact of light quality on flavonoid production and growth of Hyptis marrubioides seedlings cultivated in vitro. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2017, 27, 466–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Szopa, A.; Ekiert, H. The importance of applied light quality on the production of lignans and phenolic acids in Schisandra chinensis (turcz.) baill. cultures in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2016, 127, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Ullah, M.A.; Tungmunnithum, D.; Garros, L.; Hano, C.; Abbasi, B.H. Monochromatic lights-induced trends in antioxidant and antidiabetic polyphenol accumulation in in vitro callus cultures of Lepidium sativum L. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 196, 111505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Rukh, G.; Ahmad, N.; Rab, A.; Ahmad, N.; Fazal, H.; Akbar, F.; Ullah, I.; Mukhtar, S.; Samad, N. Photo-dependent somatic embryogenesis from non-embryogenic calli and its polyphenolics content in high-valued medicinal plant of Ajuga bracteosa. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 190, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Chaves, I.; Byrdin, M.; Hoang, N.; van der Horst, T.J.; Batschauer, A.; Ahmad, M. The cryptochromes: Blue light photoreceptors in plants and animals. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2011, 62, 335–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kapoor, S.; Raghuvanshi, R.; Bhardwaj, P.; Sood, H.; Saxena, S.; Chaurasia, O.P. Influence of light quality on growth, secondary metabolites production and antioxidant activity in callus culture of Rhodiola imbricata edgew. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2018, 183, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Zushi, K.; Suehara, C.; Shirai, M. Effect of light intensity and wavelengths on ascorbic acid content and the antioxidant system in tomato fruit grown in vitro. Sci. Horticult. 2020, 274, 109673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. De Hsie, B.S.; Bueno, A.I.S.; Bertolucci, S.K.V.; de Carvalho, A.A.; da Cunha, S.H.B.; Martins, E.R.; Pinto, J.E.B.P. Study of the influence of wavelengths and intensities of LEDs on the growth, photosynthetic pigment, and volatile compounds production of Lippia rotundifolia cham in vitro. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 198, 111577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Watcharatanon, K.; Ingkaninan, K.; Putalun, W. Improved triterpenoid saponin glycosides accumulation in in vitro culture of Bacopa monnieri (L.) wettst with precursor feeding and LED light exposure. Industrial Crops Prod. 2019, 134, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Silva, M.M.A.; de Oliveira, A.L.B.; Oliveira-Filho, R.A.; Camara, T.; Willadino, L.; Gouveia-Neto, A. The effect of spectral light quality on in vitro culture of sugarcane. Acta Sci. Biol. Sci. 2016, 38, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Silva, T.D.; Batista, D.S.; Fortini, E.A.; de Castro, K.M.; Felipe, S.H.S.; Fernandes, A.M.; de Jesus Sousa, R.M.; Chagas, K.; da Silva, J.V.; de Freitas Correia, L.N.; et al. Blue and red light affects morphogenesis and 20-hydroxyecdisone content of in vitro Pfaffia glomerata accessions. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2020, 203, 111761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Mamedes-Rodrigues, T.; Batista, D.; Napoleão, T.; Cruz, A.; Fortini, E.; Nogueira, F.; Romanel, E.; Otoni, W. Lignin and cellulose synthesis and antioxidative defense mechanisms are affected by light quality in Brachypodium distachyon. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 33, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Xu, Z.; Rothstei, S.J. ROS-Induced anthocyanin production provides feedback protection by scavenging ROS and maintaining photosynthetic capacity in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal. Behav. 2018, 13, e1451708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Li, C.; Xu, Z.; Dong, R.; Chang, S.; Wang, L.; Khalil-Ur-Rehman, M.; Tao, J. An RNA-seq analysis of grape plantlets grown in vitro reveals different responses to blue, green, red LED light, and white fluorescent light. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Boonsnongcheep, P.; Sae-foo, W.; Banpakoat, K.; Channarong, S.; Chitsaithan, S.; Uafua, P.; Putha, W.; Kerdsiri, K.; Putalun, W. Artificial color light sources and precursor feeding enhance plumbagin production of the carnivorous plants Drosera burmannii and Drosera indica. J. Photochem. Photob. B Biol. 2019, 199, 111628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Park, S.Y.; Man-Jo Kim, M.J. Development of Zygotic Embryos and Seedlings is Affected by Radiation Spectral Compositions from Light Emitting Diode (LED) System in Chestnut (Castanea crenata S. et Z.). J. Korean For. Soc. 2010, 99, 750–754. [Google Scholar]
  146. DellaPenna, D.; Pogson, B.J. Vitamin synthesis in plants: Tocopherols and carotenoids. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 711–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Lichtenthaler, H.K. Biosynthesis, accumulation and emission of carotenoids, α-tocopherol, plastoquinone, and isoprene in leaves under high photosynthetic irradiance. Photosynth. Res. 2007, 92, 163–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Stange, C.; Flores, C. Carotenoids and photosynthesis—Regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis by photoreceptors. In Advances in Photosynthesis—Fundamental Aspects; Najafpour, M.M., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 77–96. [Google Scholar]
  149. Jahns, P.; Holzwarth, A.R. The role of the xanthophyll cycle and of lutein in photoprotection of photosystem II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1817, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Telfer, A. What is β-carotene doing in the photosystem II reaction centre? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 357, 1431–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Fu, W.; Guðmundsson, Ó.; Paglia, G.; Herjólfsson, G.; Andrésson, Ó.S.; Palsson, B.Ø.; Brynjólfsson, S. Enhancement of carotenoid biosynthesis in the green microalga Dunaliella salina with light-emitting diodes and adaptive laboratory evolution. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 2395–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Rafia, M.M.; Kanakasabaib, S.; Reyesa, M.D.; Brightb, J.J. Lycopene modulates growth and survival associated genes in prostate cancer. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2013, 24, 1724–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Tong, C.; Peng, C.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Yang, X.; Xu, P.; Li, J.; Delplancke, T.; Zhang, H.; Qi, H. Intravenous administration of lycopene, a tomato extract, protects against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Nutrients 2016, 8, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Song, B.; Liu, K.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, L.; Fang, H.; Li, Y.; Pei, L.; Xu, Y. Lycopene and risk of cardiovascular diseases: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Walk, A.M.; Khan, N.A.; Barnett, S.M.; Raine, L.B.; Kramer, A.F.; Cohen, N.J.; Moulton, C.J.; Renzi-Hammond, L.M.; Hammond, B.R.; Hillman, C.H. From neuro-pigments to neural efficiency: The relationship between retinal carotenoids and behavioral and neuroelectric indices of cognitive control in childhood. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2017, 118, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Ma, G.; Zhang, L.C.; Kato, M.; Yamawaki, K.; Asai, T.; Nishikawa, F.; Ikoma, Y.; Mat-sumoto, H.; Yamauchi, T.; Kamisako, T. Effect of electrostatic atomization on ascorbate metabolism in postharvest broccoli. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012, 74, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Xie, B.; Liu, H.; Song, S.; Sun, G.; Chen, R. Effects of light quality on the quality formation of tomato fruits. Adv. Biol. Sci. Res. 2016, 3, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  158. Mol, J.; Grotewold, E.; Koes, R. How genes paint flowers and seeds. Trends Plant Sci. 1998, 3, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Winkel-Shirley, B. Biosynthesis of flavonoids and effects of stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Bradshaw, H.D.; Schemske, D.W. Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature 2003, 426, 176–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Feild, T.S.; Lee, D.W.; Holbrook, N.M. Why leaves turn red in autumn. The role of anthocyanins in senescing leaves of red-osier dog wood. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 566–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Stafford, H.A. Flavonoid evolution: An enzymic approach. Plant Physiol. 1991, 96, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Pollastri, S.; Tattini, M. Flavonols:old compounds for old roles. Ann. Bot. 2011, 108, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Huché-Thélier, L.; Crespel, J.; Le Gourrierec, P.; Morel, S.; Soulaiman Sakr, L.; Leduc, N. Light signaling and plant responses to blue and UV radiations—Perspectives for applications in horticulture. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 121, 22–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Manhita, A.C.; Teixeira, D.M.; Costa, C.T. Application of sample disruption methods in the extraction of anthocyanins from solid or semi-solid vegetable samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1129, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Gould, K.S. Nature’s swiss army knife: The diverse protective roles of anthocyanins in leaves. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2004, 314–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  167. Chalker-Scott, L. Environmental significance of anthocyanins in plant stress response. Photochem. Photobiol. 1999, 70, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Mizuno, T.; Amaki, W.; Watanabe, H. Effects of Monochromatic Light Irradiation by LED on the Growth and Anthocyanin Contents in Leaves of Cabbage Seedlings. Acta Horticult. 2011, 907, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Brazaitytė, A.; Jankauskienė, J.; Novičkovas, A. The effects of supplementary short-term red LEDs lighting on nutritional quality of Perilla frutescens L. microgreens. Rural Dev. 2013, 6, 54–58. [Google Scholar]
  170. Dixon, R.A.; Paiva, N.L. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 1085–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Bennett, R.N.; Wallsgrove, R.M. Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms. New Phytol. 1994, 127, 617–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Zhang, Z.Z.; Li, X.X.; Chu, Y.N.; Zhang, M.X.; Wen, Y.Q.; Duan, C.Q.; Pan, Q.H. Three types of ultraviolet irradiation differentially promote expression of shikimate pathway genes and production of anthocyanins in grape berries. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 57, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Samuolienė, G.; Urbonavičiūtė, A.; Brazaitytė, A.; Šabajevienė, G.; Sakalauskaitė, J.; Duchovskis, P. The impact of LED illumination on antioxidant properties of sprouted seeds. Centr. Eur. J. Biol. 2011, 6, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Zhang, S.; Ma, J.; Zou, H.; Zhang, L.; Li, S.; Wang, Y. The combination of blue and red LED light improves growth and phenolic acid contents in Salvia miltiorrhiza bunge. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 158, 12959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Son, K.H.; Oh, M.M. Leaf shape, growth, and antioxidant phenolic compounds of two lettuce cultivars grown under various combinations of blue and red light-emitting diodes. Horticience 2013, 48, 988–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Chen, X.; Yang, Q.; Song, W.; Wang, L.; Guo, W.; Xue, X. Growth and nutritional properties of lettuce affected by different alternating intervals of red and blue LED irradiation. Sci. Horticult. 2017, 223, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Ha, S.; Jung, J.; Park, J.; Lee, D.; Choi, J.; Yang, J. Effect of light-emitting diodes on cordycepin production in submerged Cordyceps militaris cultures. J. Mushroom 2020, 18, 10–19. [Google Scholar]
  178. Nguyen, D.T.; Kitayama, M.; Lu, N.; Takagaki, M. Improving secondary metabolite accumulation, mineral content, and growth of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) by regulating light quality in a plant factory. J. Horticult. Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 95, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Pola, W.; Sugaya, S.; Photchanachai, S. Color development and phytochemical changes in mature green chili (Capsicum annuum L.) exposed to red and blue light-emitting diodes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Effect of light emitting diodes on secondary metabolites compositions and biological activity.
Table 1. Effect of light emitting diodes on secondary metabolites compositions and biological activity.
Plant SpeciesType of LEDSecondary Metabolites/
Enzyme/Gene
Biological ActivityReferences
Lactuca sativa var. crispa “Green Oak Leaf”Blue LEDCarotenoid and chlorophyllsBioactive compound productionChen et al. [8]
Lactuca sativa L. cv. ButterheadRed, Blue and Green (4:1:1) LEDLHCb, PsbAGene expressionBian et al. [54]
Perilla frutescens var. crispaRed LEDRosmarinic acid, caffeic acid Bioactive compound production,
biomass increase
Nguyen and Oh [55]
Lactuca sativa L. cv. Banchu Red FireBlueLEDPolyphenol and carotenoidBioactive compound production,
Johkan et al. [56]
Pisum sativum L.Blue LEDChlorogenic acidAntioxidationLiu et al. [57]
Lactuca sativa L.
var Lollo rosso
Red and Blue(1:5) LEDChlorogenic acidBioactive compound productionAzad et al. [58]
Abelmoschus esculentus L.Blue LEDPALGene expressionWilawan et al. [59]
Brassica alboglabra Bailey. cv. LvbaoRed and Blue (2:1) LEDAmino acidsBioactive compound productionZhang et al. [56]
Pachyrhizus erosus L.Blue LEDl-phenylalanineAntioxidationChung et al. [4]
Anoectochilus roxburghiiRed and Blue(8:2) LEDPAL, CHS, CHI, and FLS,Gene expressionGam et al. [60]
Brassica junceaBlue LED4-hydroxybenzoic acidBioactive compound productionPark et al. [61]
Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze ‘Zhonghuang 3′Blue LEDAnthocyanins, catechins,
CRY2/3, SPA, HY5
Bioactive compound production,
Gene expression
Zheng et al. [62]
Coriandrum sativum L.Red, Blue and Far red (81.5:12.5:6) LEDAscorbic acidBiomass increase,
Bioactive compound production
Nguyen et al. [55]
Stevia rebaudianaRed:Far red: Blue (5:6.1), LEDUGT85C2Gene expressionYoneda et al. [63]
Perovskia atriplicifoliaBlue LEDδ-3-CareneBioactive compound production Ghaffari et al. [64]
Momordica charantiaRed LEDCharantin, AACT, MVD, IDI,
FPS1, FPS2, CAS2
Bioactive compound production,
gene expression
Cuong et al. [65]
Brassica napus sproutsBlue LEDCaffeic acidBioactive compound productionPark et al. [66]
Lactuca sativa L.Red and Blue (1:3) LEDAscorbate, GMP, GME,
GGP, GGP, GLDH
Bioactive compound production,
gene expression
Zha et al. [67]
Fagopyrum esculentumBlue LEDRutin, orientinAntioxidationNam et al. [68]
Hypericum perforatumRed LEDHypericinBioactive compound productionSobhani Najafabadi et al. [69]
Oryza sativa cv. DongjinRed LEDPPO1Gene expressionTran and Jung [70]
Cordyceps militarisRed and Blue (1:1) LEDCordycepinBioactive compound productionChiang et al. [71]
Agastache rugosaWhite LEDRosmarinic acid, C4H, TAT, CHIBioactive compound production,
gene expression
Park et al. [72]
Ocimum basilicum purple varieties ‘Ardestan’Red LEDα-pineneBioactive compound productionHosseini et al. [73]
Artemisia annua L.Blue LEDADS, artemisininBioactive compound production,
gene expression
Lopes et al. [74]
Lactuca sativa ‘Sunmang’Red, Blue and Far red (2:8:1.4) LEDChlorogenic acidAntioxidationLee et al. [75]
Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L.Red and Blue (1:9) LEDMyo-inositiol, pinitolBioactive compound productionKim et al. [76]
Polygonum tinctorium
cv. senbon
Blue LEDIGS, BGLGene expressionNakai et al. [77]
Paecilomyces japonicaRed:Blue (3:7) LEDCordycepinBioactive compound productionHa et al. [78]
Carpesium triste MaximRed and Blue (1:1) LEDCAT, POD, SOD and APXEnzyme activityZhao et al. [42]
Cnidium officinaleBlue and White LEDCATEnzyme activityAdila et al. [46]
WheatBlue-lightCATEnzyme activityCausin et al. [43]
RyeBlue-lightCATEnzyme activitySchmidt et al. [47]
Prunus avium, StrawberryBlue-LEDSODEnzyme activityFranck et al. [50], Tian et al. [79]
Gladiolus hybridusBlue LEDSOD and CATEnzyme activityGupta Dutta and Datta [80]
Albizia adorratissimaBlue LEDSOD and CATEnzyme activityRajeswari and Paliwal [52]
BarleyRed-LEDɣ-tocopherolBioactive compound productionKoga et al. [81]
AppleYellow-LEDTocopherolBioactive compound productionKokaji et al. [82]
BasilRed-LEDα-tocopherolBioactive compound productionSamuoliene et al. [53]
Beet and parsleyBlue-LEDTocopherolBioactive compound productionSamuoliene et al. [83]
PeaRed-LEDb-careteneBioactive compound productionWu et al. [84]
Citrus fruitRed-LEDb-cryptoxanthinBioactive compound productionMa et al. [85]
TomatoRed-LEDLycopeneBioactive compound productionLiu et al. [86]
BuckwheatWhite-LEDCarotenoidBioactive compound productionTuan et al. [87]
CitrusBlue-LEDCitPSY, CitZDS, CitPDS, CitLCY,Gene expressionZhang et al. [88]
BroccoliShort duration of Blue-LEDBC and VIOBioactive compound productionKopsell and Sams [89]
Grape Blue-LEDAnthocyaninBioactive compound productionRodyoung et al. [90]
BuckwheatBlue-LEDAnthocyaninBioactive compound productionThwe et al. [91]
Wheat sproutBlue-LEDp-coumaric acid, epicatechinBioactive compound productionCuong et al. [49],
LettuceRed-LEDAnthocyaninBioactive compound productionLi and Kubota [92]; Stutte et al. [93]
MustardRed-LEDAnthocyaninBioactive compound productionBrazaityte et al. [94]
CabbageRed-LEDAnthocyaninBioactive compound productionQian et al. [95]
ApplesRed-LEDAnthocyaninBioactive compound productionLekkham et al. [96]
GrapeBlue LED and Red LEDMYB transcription factor genesGene expressionKoes et al. [97]
Grape Blue-LEDV1MYBA1-2, VIMYBA2 and VvUFGT increasedGene expressionRodyoung et al. [90]
BasilRED-LEDTPCBioactive compound productionSamueliene et al. [53]
Chinese kale sproutsBlue-LEDTPCBioactive compound productionQian et al. [95]
Chinese cabbage and lettuceBlue-LED and Red LEDTPCBioactive compound productionLi et al. [98]
Pachyrhizus erosusRED-LEDMalonyldaidzin, malonyl genistin, salicylic acid, p-hydrobenzoic acid and gentisic acidBioactive compound productionChung et al. [4]
Wheat sproutBlue-LEDp-coumaric acid, gallic acid, ferulic acid, hydroxybenzoic acidBioactive compound productionPark et al. [99]
Wheat sproutBlue-LEDTaPA1,2, TaC4H, TaHCI, 1, TaCHS and TaF3H genesGene expressionCuong et al. [49]
Cyclocarya paliurusBlue-LED.(kaempferol, isoquercitrin and quercetin
Phenylalanine ammonia lyase, PAL; 4-coumaroyl CoA-ligase, 4CL; and chalcone synthase, CHS
Bioactive compound production
gene expression
Liu et al. [100]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jung, W.-S.; Chung, I.-M.; Hwang, M.H.; Kim, S.-H.; Yu, C.Y.; Ghimire, B.K. Application of Light-Emitting Diodes for Improving the Nutritional Quality and Bioactive Compound Levels of Some Crops and Medicinal Plants. Molecules 2021, 26, 1477. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051477

AMA Style

Jung W-S, Chung I-M, Hwang MH, Kim S-H, Yu CY, Ghimire BK. Application of Light-Emitting Diodes for Improving the Nutritional Quality and Bioactive Compound Levels of Some Crops and Medicinal Plants. Molecules. 2021; 26(5):1477. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051477

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jung, Woo-Suk, Ill-Min Chung, Myeong Ha Hwang, Seung-Hyun Kim, Chang Yeon Yu, and Bimal Kumar Ghimire. 2021. "Application of Light-Emitting Diodes for Improving the Nutritional Quality and Bioactive Compound Levels of Some Crops and Medicinal Plants" Molecules 26, no. 5: 1477. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051477

APA Style

Jung, W. -S., Chung, I. -M., Hwang, M. H., Kim, S. -H., Yu, C. Y., & Ghimire, B. K. (2021). Application of Light-Emitting Diodes for Improving the Nutritional Quality and Bioactive Compound Levels of Some Crops and Medicinal Plants. Molecules, 26(5), 1477. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051477

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop