Next Article in Journal
Quantum Dot Sensitized Solar Cell: Photoanodes, Counter Electrodes, and Electrolytes
Previous Article in Journal
Inorganic Elements in Mytilus galloprovincialis Shells: Geographic Traceability by Multivariate Analysis of ICP-MS Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of New Efficient Hoveyda–Grubbs Catalysts Comprising an N→Ru Coordinate Bond in a Six-Membered Ring for the Synthesis of Natural Product-Like Cyclopenta[b]furo[2,3-c]pyrroles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Transformation of 3-(Furan-2-yl)-1,3-di(het)arylpropan-1-ones to Prop-2-en-1-ones via Oxidative Furan Dearomatization/2-Ene-1,4,7-triones Cyclization

by
Roman O. Shcherbakov
1,
Diana A. Eshmemet’eva
1,
Anton A. Merkushev
1,
Igor V. Trushkov
2,3 and
Maxim G. Uchuskin
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Perm State University, Bukireva St. 15, 614990 Perm, Russia
2
N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Pr. 47, 119334 Moscow, Russia
3
D. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Samory Mashela St. 1, 117997 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(9), 2637; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092637
Submission received: 12 April 2021 / Revised: 26 April 2021 / Accepted: 28 April 2021 / Published: 30 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Furans Transformations)

Abstract

:
The approach to 3-(furan-2-yl)-1,3-di(het)arylprop-2-en-1-ones based on the oxidative dearomatization of 3-(furan-2-yl)-1,3-di(het)arylpropan-1-ones followed by an unusual cyclization of the formed di(het)aryl-substituted 2-ene-1,4,7-triones has been developed. The cyclization step is related to the Paal–Knorr synthesis, but the furan ring formation is accompanied in this case by a formal shift of the double bond through the formation of a fully conjugated 4,7-hydroxy-2,4,6-trien-1-one system or its surrogate.

1. Introduction

Substituted furans play an important role in modern organic and medicinal chemistry. At first, the furan core is an integral part of diverse plant metabolites and, accordingly, a lot of them were isolated from various natural sources; some of them exhibit multifaceted biological activities. Thus, furopelargone B was isolated from several species of the Alpinia genus (Figure 1) [1,2,3]. The furan fatty acids are important natural compounds due to their health benefits and impact on inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases [4,5]. Brasilamide E, isolated from the plant endophytic fungus Paraconiothynium brasiliense, selectively inhibited the proliferation of the breast and gastric cancer cell lines [6]. Fraxinellone, a partially degraded limonoid isolated from several plants [7,8,9], exhibits antifertility, vascular relaxing, anti-inflammatory, insecticidal activities [10,11,12]. Secondly, there are approved drugs containing the furan ring. For example, ranitidine is a commonly used histamine H2-receptor antagonist, which helps to prevent and treat gastric acid-related conditions, including ulcers [13]. Furosemide is a potent loop diuretic that is used for edema secondary to congestive heart failure exacerbation, liver and kidney failure, and high blood pressure [14,15]. Moreover, due to their versatile reactivity, furans are intensively used in organic synthesis as universal building blocks for the preparation of various useful products, including natural compounds [16,17,18,19,20].
The development of methodologies for the synthesis of substituted furans is the focus of many research groups [21,22,23,24]. In 2013, Yin et al. described an original approach for the synthesis of substituted 4-(furan-2-yl)but-3-en-2-ones C based on the oxidative rearrangement of 4-(furan-2-yl)butan-2-ones A (Scheme 1) [25]. The process proceeds through the formation of a key spiro-intermediate B, the hydrolysis of which results in the formation of functionalized furans in moderate to good yields. The formation of intermediate B is driven by the presence of electron-withdrawing group (EWG) at the α-position to the ketone moiety, that facilitates its enolization and subsequent nucleophilic attack onto the activated furan nucleus.
Based on our experience on the use of furans dearomatization in the synthesis of various heterocycles [26,27,28,29,30,31], we assumed that the removal of EWG may lead to a switch of reactivity pattern via the crucial decrease of the enol A′ form contribution. As a result, the oxidation of oxoalkyl furans, which lack α-EWG-functionality, may lead to different products. To test this hypothesis, we studied the oxidation of 2-(2-furyl)-2-phenylethyl ketones 1 as convenient model substrates. With this goal, we synthesized a series of these starting compounds using Michael addition of 2-substituted furans to α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds [32]. Indeed, we found that the oxidation of substrates 1 followed by treatment with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) led to unsaturated ketones 3 through the intermediate formation of unsaturated 1,4,7-triketones 2. Herein, we report the results of our investigation.

2. Results and Discussions

We started this study by searching for optimal reaction conditions for oxidation of model furan 1a. Initially we screened a series of oxidants, commonly applied for performing related processes, and found that the use of N-bromosuccinimide (NBS)/pyridine system in aq. THF leads to the formation of (E)-2a with 77% yield while application of m-chloroperbenzoic acid (m-CPBA) afforded (Z)-2a [33] as the exclusive product in 87% yield (Scheme 2) [34,35]. Other oxidants (ceric ammonium nitrate, pyridinium chlorochromate, 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzoquinone, Oxone, NaClO2, MnO2, and Pb(OAc)4) led to similar results, but with a lower conversion of the starting compound 1a or in low yield and poor Z,E-ratio of triketone 2a.
It is noteworthy that enetriketones 2, containing several electrophilic and nucleophilic sites with different reactivity, are attractive objects for designing various transformations, including condensations, which could afford diverse alicyclic or heterocyclic products. We attempted to study the chemical behavior of triketone 2a under various conditions. Basic conditions were screened first. We found that the treatment of the starting (Z)-2a with pyridine in aq. THF leads to a quantitative isomerization to (E)-2a. On the other hand, we did not observe any conversion of formed (E)-2a. Similar results were achieved when we used PPh3 in toluene or 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine in DMF.
On the other hand, it is well known that aldol condensation, Paal–Knorr reaction and many other processes could be initiated by various Brønsted acids; therefore, we studied acid-catalyzed transformations of 2a. We found that the treatment of (Z)-2a with TFA in CH2Cl2 at room temperature unexpectedly leads to the rapid formation of furan 3a. Oppositely, (E)-2a transforms into furan 3a only in trace amounts under the same conditions. We believe that the geometry of the C=C bond and the mutual arrangement of carbonyl groups alter the reactivity dramatically. A wide range of tested Brønsted acids led to a similar result, but after the prolonged reaction time and with lower yield of the desired product 3a. Under the optimal reaction conditions, the product was obtained as a mixture of (Z)- and (E)-isomers in a ratio of ca 89:11 based on NMR analysis.
The plausible mechanism of this unusual transformation is presented in Scheme 3. We assumed that hydroxy group of enol D, which is presumably formed in an acidic media, attacks a suitably located carbonyl carbon with the formation of an intermediate 2,5-dihydrofuran-2-ol E, which then is converted into the desired product 3a via dehydration. The disclosed cyclodehydration is similar to the Paal–Knorr furan synthesis, wherein, however, saturated 1,4-dicarbonyl compounds are used as starting compounds. In our case the formation of the furan product proceeds through the cyclodehydration of unsaturated 1,4-diketone. Further water elimination leads to the product of the formal side chain oxidation, i.e., α,β-unsaturated ketone 3a [36,37].
Since we optimized both stages separately, we decided to realize a one-pot process. First, we treated the Michael adduct 1a with m-CPBA at 0 °C in CH2Cl2, then we added TFA to the reaction mixture at ambient temperature that led to the formation of the desired product with 90% yield (Scheme 4). Encouraged by this result, we studied the scope of this synthetic protocol. We found that the wide range of triketones, formed through the oxidation of the corresponding Michael adducts 1ap, could be involved into the discussed cyclization. Such substituents at aromatic rings as alkyl, methoxy, halogen, nitro had no significant influence on the reaction efficiency, and the desired products 3ae,hk,np were isolated in good to high yields. Moreover, we showed that the heterocyclic and naphthyl-containing Michael adducts 1f,g,l could also be converted into the corresponding products. Unfortunately, we failed to separate (Z)- and (E)-isomers of the resulting mixture using column chromatography, and in addition, we were unable to improve the ratio of isomers using the known methods of isomerization of alkenes.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded with a “Bruker Avance III HD 400” (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) (400 MHz for 1H and 100 MHz for 13C NMR) spectrometer at room temperature; the chemical shifts (δ) were measured in ppm with respect to the solvent (CDCl3, 1H: δ = 7.26 ppm, 13C: δ = 77.16 ppm; (D6) DMSO, 1H: δ = 2.50 ppm, 13C: δ = 39.52 ppm). Coupling constants (J) are given in Hertz (Hz). Splitting patterns of an apparent multiplets associated with an averaged coupling constants were designated as s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), q (quartet), m (multiplet), dd (doublet of doublets), and br (broadened). High resolution and accurate mass measurements were carried out using a micrOTOF-QTM ESI-TOF (electrospray ionization/time of flight, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) using ESI modes. GC/MS analysis was performed on an “Agilent 7890B” interfaced to an “Agilent 5977A” mass selective detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Melting points were determined with a ”Stuart SMP 30” (Cole-Parmer, Stone, Staffordshire, UK). Column chromatography was performed on silica gel Macherey Nagel (40–63 μm, Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co., Düren, Germany). All the reactions were carried out using freshly distilled and dry solvents from solvent stills. The NMR spectra for new compounds are available in the Supplementary Materials.
Starting 2-(3-oxoalkyl)furans 1 were synthesized according to the reported procedure [32]. CuBr2 (2.8 mg, 2.5 mol %) was added to a solution of corresponding chalcone (0.5 mmol) and 2-methylfuran (68 µL, 0.75 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (1.25 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature while controlling the reaction progress by TLC. Upon completion, the mixture was concentrated at reduced pressure. The product was isolated by column chromatography (silica gel, eluent—petroleum ether/CH2Cl2, gradient from 19:1 to 1:1).
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-1,3-diphenylpropan-1-one (1a) [32]. Yield 122 mg (84%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.23 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.54 (dd, 2J = 16.9 Hz, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.80 (dd, 2J = 16.9 Hz, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.80 (t, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.85 (d, 3J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, HFur), 5.91 (d, 3J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.20–7.24 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.29–7.35 (m, 4H, HAr), 7.43–7.47 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.53–7.57 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.94–7.96 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.6, 40.6, 43.9, 106.1, 106.6, 126.8, 128.0 (2C), 128.2 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 133.1, 137.3, 142.4, 151.2, 155.1, 197.8 ppm.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-3-phenyl-1-(4-methylphenyl)propan-1-one (1b) [32]. Yield 106 mg (70%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.21 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.40 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.50 (dd, 2J = 16.9 Hz, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.75 (dd, 2J = 16.9 Hz, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.77 (t, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.83 (d, 3J = 3.0 Hz, 1H, HFur), 5.89 (d, 3J = 3.0 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.20–7.25 (m, 3H, HAr), 7.29–7.33 (m, 4H, HAr), 7.84–7.86 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.7, 21.7, 40.6, 43.7, 106.1, 106.5, 126.8, 128.0 (2C), 128.4 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 129.4 (2C), 134.7, 142.5, 144.0, 151.2, 155.1, 197.4 ppm.
1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-3-phenylpropan-1-one (1c) [32]. Yield 114 mg (71%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.24 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.49 (dd, 2J = 16.7 Hz, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.75 (dd, 2J = 16.7 Hz, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.88 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.79 (t, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.85 (br s, 1H, HFur), 5.91 (br s, 1H, HFur), 6.94 (d, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.19–7.25 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.27–7.35 (m, 4H, HAr), 7.95 (d, 2H, 3J = 8.8 Hz, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.7, 40.7, 43.5, 55.6, 106.1, 106.5, 113.8 (2C), 126.8, 128.0 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 130.3, 130.5 (2C), 142.6, 151.1, 155.2, 163.6, 196.3 ppm.
1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-3-phenylpropan-1-one (1d) [32]. Yield 128 mg (79%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.22 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.50 (dd, 2J = 16.9 Hz, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.75 (dd, 2J = 16.9 Hz, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.77 (t, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.85 (d, 3J = 2.6 Hz, 1H, HFur), 5.89 (d, 3J = 2.6 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.20–7.23 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.28–7.33 (m, 4H, HAr), 7.41 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.87 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.6, 40.7, 43.8, 106.2, 106.7, 126.9, 128.0 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 129.0 (2C), 129.6 (2C), 135.6, 139.6, 142.2, 151.2, 154.8, 196.6 ppm.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenyl)-3-phenylpropan-1-one (1e) [32]. Yield 136 mg (81%), yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.21 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.55 (dd, 2J = 16.9 Hz, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.82 (dd, 2J = 16.9 Hz, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.74 (t, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.84 (d, 3J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, HFur), 5.88 (d, 3J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.22–7.23 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.28–7.31 (m, 4H, HAr), 8.05 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, HAr), 8.28 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.7, 40.7, 44.4, 106.2, 106.9, 123.9 (2C), 127.1, 127.9 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 129.2 (2C), 141.6, 141.8, 150.5, 151.4, 154.4, 196.6 ppm.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-1-(naphthalen-2-yl)-3-phenylpropan-1-one (1f). Yield 95 mg (56%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.22 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.65 (dd, 2J = 16.7 Hz, 3J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.92 (dd, 2J = 16.7 Hz, 3J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.84 (t, 3J = 7.1 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.84 (d, 3J = 2.6 Hz, 1H, HFur), 5.93 (d, 3J = 2.6 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.20–7.23 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.29–7.32 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.35–7.37 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.53–7.61 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.86–7.88 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.94–7.96 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.99–8.02 (m, 1H, HAr), 8.45 (s, 1H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.7, 40.9, 44.0, 106.2, 106.7, 124.1, 126.9 (2C), 127.9, 128.1 (2C), 128.5, 128.6, 128.7 (2C), 129.7, 129.9, 132.7, 134.6, 135.8, 142.5, 151.2, 155.1, 197.8 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C24H21O2+ [M + H]+ 341.1536, found 341.1538.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-3-phenyl-1-(thiophen-2-yl)propan-1-one (1g). Yield 110 mg (74%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.21 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.44 (dd, 2J = 16.2 Hz, 3J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.69 (dd, 2J = 16.2 Hz, 3J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.75 (t, 3J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.83 (d, 3J = 3.1 Hz, 1H, HFur), 5.91 (d, 3J = 3.1 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.08–7.10 (m, 1H, HTh), 7.18–7.22 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.29–7.32 (m, 4H, HAr), 7.59–7.60 (m, 1H, HTh), 7.70–7.71 (m, 1H, HTh) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 12.9, 40.2, 44.0, 105.4, 106.1, 126.2, 127.3 (2C), 127.4, 128.0 (2C), 131.2, 133.0, 141.4, 143.8, 150.6, 154.0, 189.9 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C18H17SO2+ [M + H]+ 297.0944, found 297.0940.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-1-phenyl-3-(4-methylphenyl)propan-1-one (1h) [32]. Yield 111 mg (73%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.22 (s, 3H CH3), 2.32 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.52 (dd, 2J = 16.9 Hz, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.78 (dd, 2J = 16.9 Hz, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.76 (t, 3J = 7.2 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.85 (d, 3J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, HFur), 5.90 (d, 3J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.12 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.22 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.43–7.46 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.53–7.57 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.94–7.96 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.7, 21.1, 40.3, 44.0, 106.1, 106.5, 127.9 (2C), 128.2 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 129.3 (2C), 133.1, 136.3, 137.3, 139.4, 151.1, 155.3, 197.9 ppm.
3-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-1-phenylpropan-1-one (1i) [32]. Yield 120 mg (75%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.22 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.51 (dd, 2J = 16.8 Hz, 3J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.72–3.77 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.77 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.73 (t, 3J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.83 (d, 3J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, HFur), 5.87 (d, 3J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.84 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.24 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.42–7.46 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.53–7.57 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.93–7.95 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.7, 39.8, 44.0, 55.3, 106.1, 106.4, 114.1 (2C), 128.2 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 129.0 (2C), 133.1, 134.4, 137.2, 151.1, 155.4, 158.5, 198.0 ppm.
3-(4-Bromophenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-1-phenylpropan-1-one (1j) [32]. Yield 157 mg (85%), orange oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.24 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.55 (dd, 2J = 17.2 Hz, 3J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.78 (dd, 2J = 17.2 Hz, 3J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.78 (t, 3J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.87 (d, 3J = 2.6 Hz, 1H, HFur), 5.93 (d, 3J = 2.6 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.23 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.43 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.1 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.45 (d, 3J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.56 (t, 3J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, HAr), 7.96 (d, 3J = 7.5 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.6, 39.9, 43.5, 106.1, 106.7, 120.6, 128.1 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 129.8 (2C), 131.6 (2C), 133.2, 136.9, 141.3, 151.3, 154.4, 197.3 ppm.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-1-phenylpropan-1-one (1k). Yield 134 mg (80%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.23 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.61 (dd, 2J = 17.3 Hz, 3J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.80 (dd, 2J = 17.3 Hz, 3J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.88 (t, 3J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.87 (d, 3J = 3.1 Hz, 1H, HFur), 5.96 (d, 3J = 3.1 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.43–7.47 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.49 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.55–7.58 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.93–7.94 (m, 2H, HAr), 8.14 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 12.9, 39.6, 42.6, 105.6, 106.6, 123.2 (2C), 127.5 (2C), 128.1 (2C), 128.3 (2C), 132.8, 136.1, 146.3, 149.2, 151.2, 152.6, 196.2 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C20H18NO4+ [M + H]+ 336.1230, found 336.1224.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-1-phenyl-3-(thiophen-2-yl)propan-1-one (1l). Yield 101 mg (68%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.23 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.62 (dd, 2J = 16.9 Hz, 3J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.77 (dd, 2J = 16.9 Hz, 3J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, CH2), 5.09 (t, 3J = 7.3 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.85 (d, 3J = 3.0 Hz 1H, HFur), 5.98 (d, 3J = 3.0 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.89–6.91 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.14 (d, 3J = 4.6 Hz, 1H, HTh), 7.43–7.47 (m, 2H, HAr+Th), 7.55 (t, 3J = 4.6 Hz, 1H, HTh), 7.94–7.96 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.7, 35.9, 44.8, 106.2, 106.7, 124.0, 124.9, 126.8, 128.3 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 133.3, 137.2, 145.9, 151.3, 154.3, 197.4 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C18H17SO2+ [M + H]+ 297.0944, found 297.0942.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-1-phenylpropan-1-one (1m) [38]. Yield 95 mg (89%), yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.24 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.04 (t, 3J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 3.32 (t, 3J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, CH2), 5.85 (d, 3J = 3.1 Hz, 1H, HFur), 5.92 (d, 3J = 3.1 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.45–7.47 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.55–7.56 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.96–7.98 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.4, 22.6, 37.2, 105.9, 106.0, 128.0 (2C), 128.5 (2C), 133.0, 136.9, 150.5, 152.9, 198.8 ppm.
1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)propan-1-one (1n) [32]. Yield 97 mg (53%), orange oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.21 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.56 (dd, 2J = 17.2 Hz, 3J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.73 (dd, 2J = 17.2 Hz, 3J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.86 (t, 3J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.86 (d, 3J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, HFur), 5.96 (d, 3J = 2.9 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.91 (d, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.47 (d, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.91 (d, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, HAr), 8.11 (d, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.6, 40.3, 42.7, 55.6, 106.3, 107.1, 113.9 (2C), 123.8 (2C), 129.0 (2C), 129.7, 130.4 (2C), 146.8, 150.0, 151.8, 153.4, 163.8, 195.3 ppm.
3-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenyl)propan-1-one (1o) [32]. Yield 148 mg (81%), orange oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.21 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.53 (dd, 2J = 16.9 Hz, 3J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.75–3.81 (m, 1H, CH2), 3.77 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.69 (t, 3J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, CH), 5.83–5.86 (m, 2H, HFur), 6.83 (d, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.23 (d, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, HAr), 8.05 (d, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, HAr), 8.27 (d, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.7, 39.9, 44.6, 55.3, 106.2, 106.7, 114.2 (2C), 123.9 (2C), 128.9 (2C), 129.2 (2C), 133.8, 141.6, 150.4, 151.3, 154.8, 158.7, 196.7 ppm.
1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)butan-1-one (1p). Yield 105 mg (80%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 1.30 (d, 3J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, CH3), 2.22 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.01 (dd, 2J = 16.4 Hz, 3J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.36 (dd, 2J = 16.4 Hz, 3J = 5.4 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.44–3.64 (m, 1H, CH), 5.82 (d, 3J = 3.0 Hz, 1H, HFur), 5.88 (d, 3J = 3.0 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.42 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.88 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.6, 19.1, 29.5, 44.6, 104.7, 105.9, 129.0 (2C), 129.7 (2C), 135.7, 139.6, 150.6, 157.3, 197.8 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C15H16ClO2+ [M + H]+ 263.0833, found 263.0835.

3.2. Synthesis of (Z)-1,3-diphenyloct-5-ene-1,4,7-trione (Z)-2a

To a solution of 3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-1,3-diphenylpropan-1-one 1a (145 mg, 0.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2.5 mL) was added m-CPBA (70% w/w, 148 mg, 0.6 mmol) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 1 h. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was poured into saturated solution of NaHCO3 (5 mL), extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 3 mL), washed with brine (3 × 1 mL), dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, eluent—petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, 5:1). Yield 133 mg (87%), pale yellow solid, mp = 133–135 °C (ethyl acetate); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 2.09 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.37 (dd, 2J = 18.1 Hz, 3J = 4.6 Hz, 1H, CH2), 3.95 (dd, 2J = 18.1 Hz, 3J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.56 (dd, 3J = 9.5 Hz, 3J = 4.6 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.46 (d, 3J = 12.0 Hz, 1H, =CH), 6.53 (d, 3J = 12.0 Hz, 1H, =CH), 7.28–7.31 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.36–7.37 (m, 4H, HAr), 7.50–7.54 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.62–7.66 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.98–8.00 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 28.9, 41.0, 52.2, 127.4, 127.9 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 129.9, 133.2, 136.2, 136.9, 142.0, 197.7, 198.4, 202.6 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C20H19O3+ [M + H]+ 307.1329, found 307.1328.

3.3. Synthesis of (E)-1,3-diphenyloct-5-ene-1,4,7-trione (E)-2a

To a solution of a 3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-1,3-diphenylpropan-1-one 1a (145 mg, 0.5 mmol) in THF/H2O (3:1, 2.5 mL) was added NBS (107 mg, 0.6 mmol) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 1 h. Then pyridine (81 µL, 1 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was allowed to room temperature and stirred for 3 h. Upon completion, the reaction mixture was poured into a mixture of ethyl acetate (5 mL) and aq. solution of Na2S2O3 (5 mL) with vigorous stirring. The organic layer was separated, dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, eluent—petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, 5:1). Yield 118 mg (77%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.30 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.25 (dd, 2J = 18.0 Hz, 3J = 3.7 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.07 (dd, 2J = 18.0 Hz, 3J = 10.0 Hz, 1H, CH2), 4.69 (dd, 3J = 10.0 Hz, 3J = 3.7 Hz, 1H, CH), 6.92 (s, 2H, =CH), 7.27–7.32 (m, 3H, HAr), 7.34–7.38 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.43–7.47 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.55–7.58 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.95–7.97 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 28.4, 42.9, 52.6, 128.2, 128.3 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 129.6 (2C), 133.5, 136.5, 136.6, 136.8, 137.6, 197.8, 198.2, 198.4 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C20H19O3+ [M + H]+ 307.1329, found 307.1328.

3.4. Isomerization of (Z)-2a to (E)-2a

To a solution of (Z)-1,3-diphenyloct-5-ene-1,4,7-trione (Z)-2a (153 mg, 0.5 mmol) in THF/H2O (3:1, 2.5 mL) was added pyridine (81 µL, 1 mmol) at rt. The reaction mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 3 h (TLC control). Upon completion, the reaction mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 3 mL), washed with saturated aq. solution of NH4Cl (3 × 1 mL), brine (3 × 1 mL), and dried with anhydrous Na2SO4. The resulted solution passed through thin pad of silica gel and concentrated in vacuo. Yield 151 mg (99%). All spectral data are consistent with those described above.

3.5. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-prop-2-en-1-ones 3

To a solution of 2-(3-oxoalk-1-enyl)furan 1 (0.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (3 mL) at 0 °C was added m-CPBA (70% w/w, 148 mg, 0.6 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at the same temperature for 1 h (TLC control) and then TFA (3.8 µL, 10 mol%) was added. The reaction mixture was allowed to room temperature and stirred overnight (TLC control). Upon completion, the reaction mixture was poured into saturated solution of NaHCO3 (5 mL), extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 2 mL), washed with saturated aqueous solution of NH4Cl (3 × 3 mL), dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, eluent—petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, 80:1).
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-1,3-diphenylprop-2-en-1-one (3a) was isolated as mixture of isomers in an 89:11 ratio. Yield 130 mg (90%), pale orange oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.43 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.07 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.10 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.29–7.30 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.33–7.35 (m, 3H, HAr), 7.40–7.42 (m, 3H, HAr), 7.46–7.48 (m, 1H, =CH), 7.93–7.95 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.4, 108.5, 115.9, 116.7, 127.3 (2C), 127.6, 127.7 (2C), 127.8 (2C), 128.5 (2C), 131.6, 136.3, 138.7, 143.2, 152.4, 154.7, 190.2 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C20H17O2+ [M + H]+ 289.1223, found 289.1228.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-3-phenyl-1-(4-methylphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (3b) was isolated as mixture of isomers in an 88:12 ratio. Yield 112 mg (74%), pale orange oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.39 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.42 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.06 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.07 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.20 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.27–7.30 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.33–7.34 (m, 3H, HAr), 7.40 (s, 1H, =CH), 7.85 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 14.1, 21.7, 109.2, 116.7, 117.2, 128.0 (2C), 128.2, 128.7 (2C), 129.1 (2C), 129.2 (2C), 136.9, 137.1, 143.1, 143.6, 153.2, 155.2, 190.5 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C21H19O2+ [M + H]+ 303.1380, found 303.1387.
1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-one (3c) was isolated as mixture of isomers in a 90:10 ratio. Yield 138 mg (87%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.42 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.05 (d, 3J = 3.5 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.07 (d, 3J = 3.5 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.89 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.28–7.30 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.33–7.34 (m, 3H, HAr), 7.38 (s, 1H, =CH), 7.94 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 14.1, 55.5, 109.1, 113.7 (2C), 116.8, 116.9, 128.0 (2C), 128.2, 129.2 (2C), 130.9 (2C), 132.4, 137.2, 143.1, 153.2, 155.1, 163.2, 189.6 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C21H19O3+ [M + H]+ 319.1329, found 319.1325.
1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-one (3d) was isolated as mixture of isomers in an 89:11 ratio. Yield 124 mg (77%), pale orange oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.43 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.07 (d, 3J = 3.4 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.11 (d, 3J = 3.4 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.27–7.28 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.33–7.34 (m, 3H, HAr), 7.35–7.37 (m, 3H, HAr), 7.42–7.44 (m, 1H, =CH), 7.85–7.87 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.4, 108.6, 115.2, 117.2, 127.4 (2C), 127.7, 128.0 (2C), 128.5 (2C), 129.2 (2C), 137.1, 138.0, 143.7, 144.7, 152.2, 154.9, 189.0 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C20H16ClO2+ [M + H]+ 323.0833, found 323.0830.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenyl)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-one (3e) was isolated as mixture of isomers in an 88:12 ratio. Yield 150 mg (90%), pale orange oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.45 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.11 (d, 3J = 3.4 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.18 (d, 3J = 3.4 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.27–7.28 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.33–7.35 (m, 4H, HAr+=CH), 8.00 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, HAr), 8.20 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.5, 109.0, 114.7, 118.5, 122.9 (2C), 127.5 (2C), 128.1, 128.5 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 135.7, 143.7, 145.1, 149.0, 151.9, 155.7, 188.7 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C20H16NO4+ [M + H]+ 334.1074, found 334.1075.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-1-(naphthalen-2-yl)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-one (3f) was isolated as mixture of isomers in an 89:11 ratio. Yield 159 mg (94%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.46 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.09 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.13 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.33 (br s, 5H, HAr+=CH), 7.52–7.57 (m, 3H, HAr), 7.84–7.86 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.94–7.96 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.98–8.01 (m, 1H, HAr), 8.49 (br s, 1H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.4, 108.5, 116.1, 116.8, 123.9, 125.9, 127.2, 127.3 (2C), 127.4, 127.5, 127.6, 128.5 (2C), 128.9, 129.3, 132.0, 134.7, 136.1, 136.3, 143.2, 152.5, 154.7, 190.1 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C24H19O2+ [M + H]+ 339.1380, found 339.1383.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-3-phenyl-1-(thiophen-2-yl)prop-2-en-1-one (3g) was isolated as mixture of isomers in a 94:6 ratio. Yield 123 mg (84%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 2.41 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.13 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.26 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.21–7.25 (m, 3H, HAr+Th), 7.31 (s, 1H, =CH), 7.35–7.40 (m, 3H, HAr+Th), 7.92–7.94 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.6, 109.5, 114.9, 117.5, 127.6 (2C), 127.9, 128.6, 128.7 (2C), 132.0, 134.3, 136.2, 143.0, 146.2, 151.9, 155.5, 181.2 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C18H15SO2+ [M + H]+ 295.0787, found 295.0792.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-1-phenyl-3-(4-methylphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (3h) was isolated as mixture of isomers in an 89:11 ratio. Yield 115 mg (76%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.37 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.42 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.07 (d, 3J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.13 (d, 3J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.15 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.18–7.20 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.40 (s, 1H, =CH), 7.41–7.43 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.47–7.51 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.96 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 7.8 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 14.1, 21.5, 109.2, 116.2, 117.5, 128.4 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 129.1 (2C), 132.3, 133.9, 138.1, 139.5, 144.2, 153.2, 155.3, 190.8 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C21H19O2+ [M + H]+ 303.1380, found 303.1370.
3-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-1-phenylprop-2-en-1-one (3i) was isolated as mixture of isomers in an 89:11 ratio. Yield 130 mg (82%), pale orange oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.42 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.81 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.08 (d, 3J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.15 (d, 3J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.87 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.24 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.36 (s, 1H, =CH), 7.40–7.42 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.46–7.50 (m, 1H, HAr), 7.93–7.95 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 14.1, 55.3, 109.2, 113.5 (2C), 116.4, 117.4, 128.4 (2C), 128.5 (2C), 128.94, 130.7 (2C), 132.3, 139.5, 143.8, 153.3, 155.3, 159.8, 191.1 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C21H19O3+ [M + H]+ 319.1329, found 319.1340.
3-(4-Bromophenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-1-phenylprop-2-en-1-one (3j) was isolated as mixture of isomers in a 91:9 ratio. Yield 155 mg (85%), pale orange oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.42 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.07–6.09 (m, 2H, HFur), 7.17 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.3 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.41–7.45 (m, 3H, HAr+=CH), 7.47–7.51 (m, 3H, HAr), 7.95 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.3 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 14.1, 109.4, 116.5, 117.6, 122.5, 128.5 (2C), 128.6 (2C), 130.9 (2C), 131.3 (2C), 132.6, 136.0, 139.3, 142.9, 152.6, 155.7, 190.4 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C20H16BrO2+ [M + H]+ 367.0328, found 367.0328.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-1-phenylprop-2-en-1-one (3k) was isolated as mixture of isomers in a 93:7 ratio. Yield 130 mg (78%), pale orange oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.44 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.02 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.10 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.45–7.48 (m, 4H, HAr+=CH), 7.53–7.54 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.95–7.97 (m, 2H, HAr), 8.23–8.25 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 14.1, 109.6, 116.4, 118.0, 123.5 (2C), 128.5 (2C), 128.7 (2C), 130.1 (2C), 133.0, 139.0, 142.2, 144.4, 147.8, 151.9, 156.3, 189.7 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C20H16NO4+ [M + H]+ 334.1074, found 334.1073.
3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-1-phenyl-3-(thiophen-2-yl)prop-2-en-1-one (3l) was isolated as mixture of isomers in a 64:36 ratio (A:B). Yield 106 mg (72%), orange oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 2.01 (s, 3H, CH3, B), 2.40 (s, 3H, CH3, A), 6.09 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur, B), 6.29 (d, 3J = 3.4 Hz, 1H, HFur, A), 6.48 (d, 3J = 3.4 Hz, 1H, HFur, A), 6.58 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur, B), 6.79 (s, 1H, =CH, B), 7.00 (dd, 3J = 5.1 Hz, 3J = 3.6 Hz, 1H, HTh, A), 7.10 (dd, 3J = 3.6 Hz, 4J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, HTh, A), 7.18 (s, 1H, =CH, A), 7.19 (dd, 3J = 5.1 Hz, 3J = 3.6 Hz, 1H, HTh, B), 7.42–7.44 (m, 2H, HAr, B), 7.46–7.48 (m, 2H, HAr, A), 7.51–7.53 (m, 1H, HAr, A), 7.54–7.55 (m, 1H, HTh, B), 7.56–7.57 (m, 1H, HAr, B), 7.58 (dd, 3J = 5.1, 4J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, HTh, A), 7.73 (dd, 3J = 5.1, 4J = 1.2 Hz, 1H, HTh, B), 7.79–7.82 (m, 2H, HAr, B), 7.83–7.85 (m, 2H, HAr, A) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.5 (A), 12.9 (B), 108.1 (B), 109.2 (A), 115.4 (B), 116.3 (A), 118.9 (A), 120.9 (B), 126.8 (A), 127.8 (A), 127.9 (2C, B), 128.0 (2C, A), 128.1 (B), 128.3 (2C, B), 128.5 (2C, A), 128.6 (B), 128.7 (B), 129.5 (A), 132.3 (B), 132.6 (A), 132.9 (B), 133.8 (A), 135.9 (A), 137.9 (B), 138.0 (A), 141.1 (B), 148.1 (B), 151.0 (A), 153.6 (B), 155.1 (A), 190.9 (A), 192.2 (B) ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C18H15SO2+ [M + H]+ 295.0787, found 295.0794.
(E)-3-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)-1-phenylprop-2-en-1-one (3m) [39]. Yield 80 mg (75%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.40 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.13 (d, 3J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.63 (d, 3J = 3.2 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.37 (d, 3J = 15.3 Hz, 1H, =CH), 7.46–7.51 (m, 2H, HAr), 7.52–7.56 (m, 2H, HAr+=CH), 8.02–8.04 (m, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.4, 108.7, 117.2, 117.5, 127.8 (2C), 127.9 (2C), 130.2, 131.9, 137.9, 149.9, 155.3, 189.3 ppm.
1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (3n) was isolated as mixture of isomers in a 95:5 ratio. Yield 140 mg (77%), yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.44 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.87 (s, 3H, OCH3), 5.99 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.08 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.93 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.46 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.51 (s, 1H, =CH), 7.96 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, HAr), 8.23 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.4, 54.9, 108.7, 113.2 (2C), 116.0, 116.7, 122.7 (2C), 129.3 (2C), 130.1 (2C), 131.2, 140.7, 143.9, 147.0, 151.2, 155.3, 162.9, 187.6 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C21H18NO5+ [M + H]+ 364.1179, found 364.1171.
3-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)-1-(4-nitrophenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (3o) was isolated as mixture of isomers in an 88:12 ratio. Yield 165 mg (91%), pale orange oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 2.43 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.79 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.11 (d, 3J = 3.4 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.23 (d, 3J = 3.4 Hz, 1H, HFur), 6.83 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.20 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.25 (s, 1H, =CH), 7.97 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, HAr), 8.18 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.8 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 13.4, 54.7, 108.9, 113.0 (2C), 114.9, 118.1, 122.8 (2C), 127.6, 128.7 (2C), 130.3 (2C), 143.9, 144.7, 149.0, 152.1, 155.5, 159.6, 189.1 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C21H18NO5+ [M + H]+ 364.1179, found 364.1178.
1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-(5-methylfuran-2-yl)but-2-en-1-one (3p) was isolated as mixture of isomers in a 95:5 ratio. Yield 105 mg (81%), pale yellow oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 2.38 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.44 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.32 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.04 (d, 3J = 3.3 Hz, 1H, HFur), 7.31 (s, 1H, =CH), 7.59 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, HAr), 7.97 (AA’BB’-system, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, HAr) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 13.5, 15.1, 109.4, 113.6, 115.4, 128.7 (2C), 129.5 (2C), 137.2, 137.9, 142.6, 152.3, 155.2, 188.7 ppm; HRMS (ESI) calcd. for C15H14ClO2+ [M + H]+ 261.0677, found 261.0675.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we reported the formal oxidation of 3-(furan-2-yl)-1,3-di(het)arylpropan-1-ones to the corresponding prop-2-en-1-ones based on the two-step procedure that includes the oxidation of starting furans followed by unusual acid-induced cyclization of (Z)-2-ene-1,4,7-triketones. The scope and limitations of the developed method were studied.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Copies of NMR spectra for novel compounds are available online.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.V.T. and M.G.U.; methodology, A.A.M. and M.G.U.; investigation, R.O.S., D.A.E., and A.A.M.; resources, M.G.U.; writing, I.V.T., and M.G.U.; supervision, M.G.U.; project administration, M.G.U.; funding acquisition, M.G.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 19-73-00093).

Acknowledgments

We thank Maksim Dmitriev (Perm State University) for the preparation of single-crystal X-ray data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Itokawa, H.; Yoshimoto, S.; Morita, H. Diterpenes from the Rhizomes of Alpinia-Formosana. Phytochemistry 1988, 27, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Itokawa, H.; Morita, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Iitaka, Y. Novel Sesquiterpenes from Alpinia-Intermedia Gagnep. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1987, 35, 2860–2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Itokawa, H.; Watanabe, K.; Morita, H.; Mihashi, S.; Iitaka, Y. A Novel Sesquiterpene Peroxide from Alpinia-Japonica (Thunb) Miq. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1985, 33, 2023–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Xu, L.; Sinclair, A.J.; Faiza, M.; Li, D.; Han, X.; Yin, H.; Wang, Y. Furan fatty acids—Beneficial or harmful to health? Prog. Lipid Res. 2017, 68, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Spiteller, G. Furan fatty acids: Occurrence, synthesis, and reactions. Are furan fatty acids responsible for the cardioprotective effects of a fish diet? Lipids 2005, 40, 755–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, L.; Chen, X.; Li, D.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Guo, L.; Cao, Y.; Che, Y. Bisabolane Sesquiterpenoids from the Plant Endophytic Fungus Paraconiothyrium brasiliense. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 746–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ruan, J.; Li, Z.; Yan, J.; Huang, P.; Yu, H.; Han, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, T. Bioactive Constituents from the Aerial Parts of Pluchea indica Less. Molecules 2018, 23, 2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bai, Y.Y.; Jin, X.; Jia, X.H.; Tang, W.Z.; Wang, X.J.; Zhao, Y.X. Two new apotirucallane-type isomeric triterpenoids from the root bark of Dictamnus dasycarpus with their anti-proliferative activity. Phytochem. Lett. 2014, 10, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, J.B.; Qu, W.; Wang, P.; Wu, F.H.; Wang, L.Y.; Liang, J.Y. Degraded limonoids and quinoline alkaloids from Dictamnus angustifolius G. Don ex Sweet. and their anti-platelet aggregation activity. Fitoterapia 2013, 90, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, C.S.; Won, C.; Yoo, H.; Yi, E.H.; Cho, Y.; Maeng, J.W.; Sung, S.H.; Ye, S.K.; Chung, M.H. Inhibition of double-stranded RNA-induced inducible nitric oxide synthase expression by fraxinellone and sauchinone in murine microglia. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2009, 32, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Sun, Y.; Qin, Y.; Gong, F.Y.; Wu, X.F.; Hua, Z.C.; Chen, T.; Xu, Q. Selective triggering of apoptosis of concanavalin A-activated T cells by fraxinellone for the treatment of T-cell-dependent hepatitis in mice. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2009, 77, 1717–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lu, M.; Wu, W.J.; Liu, H.X. Effects of fraxinellone on the midgut ultrastructural changes of Mythimna separata Walker. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2010, 98, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zeldis, J.B.; Friedman, L.S.; Isselbacher, K.J. Ranitidine: A new H2-receptor antagonist. N. Engl. J. Med. 1983, 309, 1368–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wargo, K.A.; Banta, W.M. A comprehensive review of the loop diuretics: Should furosemide be first line? Ann. Pharmacother. 2009, 43, 1836–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Benet, L.Z. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of furosemide in man: A review. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 1979, 7, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nejrotti, S.; Prandi, C. Gold Catalysis and Furans: A Powerful Match for Synthetic Connections. Synthesis 2021, 53, 1046–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Makarov, A.S.; Uchuskin, M.G.; Trushkov, I.V. Furan Oxidation Reactions in the Total Synthesis of Natural Products. Synthesis 2018, 50, 3059–3086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abaev, V.T.; Trushkov, I.V.; Uchuskin, M.G. The Butin reaction. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2017, 52, 973–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Reiser, O. Catalytic Conversion of Furans and Pyrroles to Natural Products and Analogues Utilizing Donor-Acceptor Substituted Cyclopropanes as Key Intermediates. Isr. J. Chem. 2016, 56, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Trushkov, I.V.; Uchuskin, M.G.; Butin, A.V. Furan’s Gambit: Electrophile-Attack-Triggered Sacrifice of Furan Rings for the Intramolecular Construction of Azaheterocycles. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 2015, 2999–3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, H.X.; Ji, F.; Chen, Y.; Gao, Y.; Wang, J.K.; Zhang, M.Z.; Liu, F.; Sha, Q. De Novo and Divergent Synthesis of Highly Functionalized Furans by Cascade Reactions of 2-Hydroxy-1,4-diones with Nucleophiles. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 5225–5229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barboza, A.A.; Neto, A.C.; Rosset, I.G.; Jardim, G.A.M.; Ferreira, M.A.B. Synthesis of 3-Carbonyl Trisubstituted Furans via Pd-Catalyzed Aerobic Cycloisomerization Reaction: Development and Mechanistic Studies. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 3923–3942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, S.; Song, M.; Li, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, T.; Wei, Z.; Lan, Y.; Tan, H. Synthesis of Heterobiaryl 4-Aryl Furans through a Base-Promoted Decarboxylative Propargylation/Cycloisomerization Annulation. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 8752–8757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hu, X.; Zhou, B.; Jin, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L. Bifunctional phosphine ligand-enabled gold-catalyzed direct cycloisomerization of alkynyl ketones to 2,5-disubstituted furans. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 7297–7300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yu, H.Y.; Zhong, W.Q.; He, T.Y.; Gu, W.X.; Yin, B.L. An entry to polysubstituted furans via the oxidative ring opening of furan ring employing NBS as an oxidant. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 1256–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zelina, E.Y.; Nevolina, T.A.; Skvortsov, D.A.; Trushkov, I.V.; Uchuskin, M.G. A Route to (Het)arene-Annulated Pyrrolo[1,2-d][1,4]diazepines via the Expanded Intramolecular Paal-Knorr Reaction: Nitro Group and Furan Ring as Equivalents of Amino Group and 1,4-Diketone. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 13707–13720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Makarov, A.S.; Uchuskin, M.G.; Hashmi, A.S.K. Intramolecular azavinyl carbene-triggered rearrangement of furans. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 8583–8588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Makarov, A.S.; Kekhvaeva, A.E.; Chalikidi, P.N.; Abaev, V.T.; Trushkov, I.V.; Uchuskin, M.G. A Simple Synthesis of Densely Substituted Benzofurans by Domino Reaction of 2-Hydroxybenzyl Alcohols with 2-Substituted Furans. Synthesis 2019, 51, 3747–3757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zelina, E.Y.; Nevolina, T.A.; Sorotskaja, L.N.; Skvortsov, D.A.; Trushkov, I.V.; Uchuskin, M.G. A General Synthetic Route to Isomeric Pyrrolo[1,2- x][1,4]diazepinones. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 11747–11757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Shpuntov, P.M.; Kolodina, A.A.; Uchuskin, M.G.; Abaev, V.T. Furan Ring Opening—Pyridine Ring Closure: An Efficient Approach towards 6H-Isochromeno[4,3-b]pyridin-6-ones from Readily Available Furans and Phthalaldehydic Acid Methyl Esters. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 2018, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Makarov, A.S.; Uchuskin, M.G.; Gevorgyan, V. Intramolecular Palladium-Catalyzed Oxidative Amination of Furans: Synthesis of Functionalized Indoles. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 14010–14021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fadeev, A.A.; Uchuskin, M.G.; Trushkov, I.V.; Makarov, A.S. Copper(II) bromide-catalyzed conjugate addition of furans to α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2018, 53, 1286–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. CCDC 2076614 (for (Z)-2a) Contains the Supplementary Crystallographic Data for This Paper. These Data Can Be Obtained Free of Charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via. Available online: www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures (accessed on 10 April 2021).
  34. Merkushev, A.A.; Makarov, A.S.; Shpuntov, P.M.; Abaev, V.T.; Trushkov, I.V.; Uchuskin, M.G. Oxidative Rearrangement of 2-(2-Aminobenzyl)furans: Synthesis of Functionalized Indoles and Carbazoles. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 2021, 1274–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Makarov, A.S.; Merkushev, A.A.; Uchuskin, M.G.; Trushkov, I.V. Oxidative Furan-to-Indole Rearrangement. Synthesis of 2-(2-Acylvinyl)indoles and Flinderole C Analogues. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 2192–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ernest, I.; Staněk, J. Zersetzung der Diazoketone mit Kupfer(II)-oxyd IX. Zur Kinetik der Cyclisierungsreaktion ungesättigter γ-Diketone. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1961, 26, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ernest, I.; Staněk, J. Zersetzung von diazoketonen mit kupfer(II)-oxyd V. Eine neue reaktion von aliphatischen ungesättigten γ-diketonen. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1959, 24, 530–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, H.C.; An, C.; Wu, G.; Li, G.X.; Huang, X.B.; Gao, W.X.; Ding, J.C.; Zhou, Y.B.; Liu, M.C.; Wu, H.Y. Transition-Metal-Free Highly Chemoselective and Stereoselective Reduction with Se/DMF/H2O System. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 5573–5577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shang, Y.; Jie, X.; Zhou, J.; Hu, P.; Huang, S.; Su, W. Pd-catalyzed C-H olefination of (hetero)arenes by using saturated ketones as an olefin source. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1299–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Some furan-based medicines and natural products.
Figure 1. Some furan-based medicines and natural products.
Molecules 26 02637 g001
Scheme 1. Previous approach and concept of this work.
Scheme 1. Previous approach and concept of this work.
Molecules 26 02637 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of (E)-2a, (Z)-2a and 3a.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of (E)-2a, (Z)-2a and 3a.
Molecules 26 02637 sch002
Scheme 3. The plausible mechanism of cyclodehydration of (Z)-2a with formation of 3a.
Scheme 3. The plausible mechanism of cyclodehydration of (Z)-2a with formation of 3a.
Molecules 26 02637 sch003
Scheme 4. The scope of the one-pot synthesis of furans 1.
Scheme 4. The scope of the one-pot synthesis of furans 1.
Molecules 26 02637 sch004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shcherbakov, R.O.; Eshmemet’eva, D.A.; Merkushev, A.A.; Trushkov, I.V.; Uchuskin, M.G. Transformation of 3-(Furan-2-yl)-1,3-di(het)arylpropan-1-ones to Prop-2-en-1-ones via Oxidative Furan Dearomatization/2-Ene-1,4,7-triones Cyclization. Molecules 2021, 26, 2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092637

AMA Style

Shcherbakov RO, Eshmemet’eva DA, Merkushev AA, Trushkov IV, Uchuskin MG. Transformation of 3-(Furan-2-yl)-1,3-di(het)arylpropan-1-ones to Prop-2-en-1-ones via Oxidative Furan Dearomatization/2-Ene-1,4,7-triones Cyclization. Molecules. 2021; 26(9):2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092637

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shcherbakov, Roman O., Diana A. Eshmemet’eva, Anton A. Merkushev, Igor V. Trushkov, and Maxim G. Uchuskin. 2021. "Transformation of 3-(Furan-2-yl)-1,3-di(het)arylpropan-1-ones to Prop-2-en-1-ones via Oxidative Furan Dearomatization/2-Ene-1,4,7-triones Cyclization" Molecules 26, no. 9: 2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092637

APA Style

Shcherbakov, R. O., Eshmemet’eva, D. A., Merkushev, A. A., Trushkov, I. V., & Uchuskin, M. G. (2021). Transformation of 3-(Furan-2-yl)-1,3-di(het)arylpropan-1-ones to Prop-2-en-1-ones via Oxidative Furan Dearomatization/2-Ene-1,4,7-triones Cyclization. Molecules, 26(9), 2637. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092637

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop