Next Article in Journal
Simultaneous Determination of As, Bi, Sb, Se, Te, Hg, Pb and Sn by Small-Sized Electrothermal Vaporization Capacitively Coupled Plasma Microtorch Optical Emission Spectrometry Using Direct Liquid Microsampling
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin on CFTR Levels in Primary Human Airway Epithelial Cells Grown at the Air-Liquid-Interface
Previous Article in Special Issue
Piroxicam Loading onto Mesoporous Silicas by Supercritical CO2 Impregnation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 9
10.3390/molecules26092640
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Supercritical Carbon Dioxide-Based Processes in Photocatalytic Applications

by
Paola Franco
1,
Olga Sacco
2,
Vincenzo Vaiano
1 and
Iolanda De Marco
1,3,*
1
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
2
Department of Chemistry and Biology “A. Zambelli”, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
3
Research Centre for Biomaterials BIONAM, University of Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(9), 2640; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092640
Submission received: 2 April 2021 / Revised: 25 April 2021 / Accepted: 28 April 2021 / Published: 30 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Conventional methods generally used to synthesize heterogeneous photocatalysts have some drawbacks, mainly the difficult control/preservation of catalysts’ morphology, size or structure, which strongly affect the photocatalytic activity. Supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2)-assisted techniques have recently been shown to be a promising approach to overcome these limitations, which are still a challenge. In addition, compared to traditional methods, these innovative techniques permit the synthesis of high-performance photocatalysts by reducing the use of toxic and polluting solvents and, consequently, the environmental impact of long-term catalyst preparation. Specifically, the versatility of scCO2 allows to prepare catalysts with different structures (e.g., nanoparticles or metal-loaded supports) by several supercritical processes for the photocatalytic degradation of various compounds. This is the first updated review on the use of scCO2-assisted techniques for photocatalytic applications. We hope this review provides useful information on different approaches and future perspectives.

1. Introduction

Techniques based on the use of supercritical fluids have been used for more than 50 years because of their physicochemical properties, which are intermediate between a gas and a liquid and are easily adjustable with changes in temperature and pressure. Among the different fluids that are used at supercritical conditions; i.e., at pressures and temperatures higher than the critical values, carbon dioxide is the most employed one, because of its mild critical conditions (Tc = 31.1 °C, Pc = 7.38 MPa), its recyclability, cheapness, and low toxicity. Moreover, considering that carbon dioxide is a gas at room temperature and pressure, solvent-free products can be obtained after the depressurization at ambient pressure. Techniques based on the use of supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) have been used as an alternative to different traditional processes such as extraction, micronization, impregnation, membrane and aerogel formation, electrospinning, electrospray and so on [1,2,3,4,5]. Considering the variety of techniques used, even the fields of application are among the most diverse, from pharmaceutical/biomedical [6,7,8] to food packaging [9,10], and from dye processing [11,12] to the catalytic field [13,14].
Focusing on the catalytic field, it is possible to note that from same perspective of using environmentally friendly processes, the interest of the scientific community in heterogeneous photocatalysis (HP) has grown considerably. HP is an advanced oxidation process in which the inexhaustibly abundant, clean, and safe solar energy is converted and stored through reactions involving electron transfer. HP is a versatile, efficient, relatively cheap, and environmentally benign technology for decomposing various biological, organic, and inorganic pollutants present in low concentrations within the soil, water, and air [15,16]. Its main advantages are: (1) it is a good substitute for conventional energy-intensive treatments, considering that it uses renewable sources of energy and solar energy; (2) differently from conventional treatments, which transfer pollutants from a medium to another, harmless products are formed due to the photocatalytic reaction; (3) it can be applied to aqueous, gaseous and soil treatments; (4) its reaction conditions are mild, the reaction time is modest, and a small amount of chemical reagents is required [17].
The materials generally employed in photocatalysis are semiconductors with a typical band structure, roughly characterized by a valence band, which is the highest energy band in which all electronic levels are occupied by electrons and a conduction band, which is the lowest energy band not occupied by electrons [18,19]. The energy intervals between the electronically populated valence band and the vacant conduction band, called band gaps, constitute forbidden energy intervals, which electrons cannot assume [20]. The semi-conductive photocatalysts generally used are titanium dioxide or titania (TiO2) [21,22,23], ZnO [24,25], WO3 [26,27], Fe2O3 [28,29], CeO2 [30,31], MoO3 [32,33], ZrO2 [34,35], SnO2 [36,37], CdS [38,39], and ZnS [40,41]. Up to now, semiconductor-based photocatalysts in various forms have been proposed, mainly as nanopowders [42,43,44,45,46,47,48] or aerogels [49,50,51,52,53,54], due to the high specific surface area of these materials, resulting in a very high contact between the semiconductor and the fluid to be treated and, consequently, the photocatalytic performance could be enhanced.
In recent years, the advantages of using processes based on the use of scCO2 have been exploited to obtain higher-performing photocatalysts for water and air purification. The environmental advantage resulting from the coupling of processes with a low environmental impact if compared to classical processes is undeniable. Indeed, several papers [55,56,57] have highlighted the potential of exploiting scCO2 in terms of catalytic and environmental performances mainly related to the replacement of hazardous, polluting and toxic organic solvents or reaction media.
To the best of our knowledge, no reviews have been published on the use of supercritical carbon dioxide-based techniques for obtaining photocatalysts. Therefore, the present review is organized by classifying the published papers according to the supercritical carbon dioxide-based process used to produce the photocatalyst. Indeed, different approaches have been investigated, such as supercritical deposition, supercritical antisolvent process to obtain nanoparticles, sol–gel reaction, supercritical drying, and others.

2. Supercritical Deposition of Nano-Scale Metal-Organic Precursors

Nanoparticles, nanorods, aerogels or thin films have been frequently used in photocatalysis because of the high surface-to-volume ratio of nanostructured materials. Metals and metal oxides can be dispersed as nanoparticles on both the external and the internal surface of support materials. Supercritical deposition has been attracting interest because of the peculiar properties of scCO2, such as solvent power adjustable with small variations in pressure and temperature, absence of liquid waste and solvent residue on the substrate, fast rates of deposition because of high mass transfer rates at supercritical conditions [58,59]. According to Watkins and McCarthy [60], it is possible to consider three subsequent steps (Figure 1):
  • The metal precursor is dissolved in scco2;
  • The metal precursor is adsorbed from the fluid phase to the support material or reacts with the surface of the support;
  • The adsorbed metal precursor is converted to its metal or metal oxide form.
Watkins and McCarthy [60] also highlighted the numerous advantages in the preparation of polymer/metal nanocomposites using this supercritical approach. Specifically, a key aspect is the ability of the scCO2 to swell the polymeric substrates that, combined with the high scCO2 diffusivity, leads to high penetration of organic/organometallic reagents solubilized in scCO2 into the polymer matrix. The degree of polymer swelling and diffusion/transport properties can be modulated by varying the temperature and pressure, which strongly influence the density and the solvent power of scCO2. However, the polymer constituting the support as well as the reaction product has to be insoluble/poorly-soluble in the supercritical fluid. In addition, the use of scCO2 offers an outstanding control of the composites’ morphology; e.g., it can allow the preservation of the porous structure of matrices, avoiding their collapse, or the spherical nanoparticle shape, with reduced sintering phenomena. Aiming at the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye, Horibe et al. [61] loaded TiO2 nanoparticles on/in nanostructured-carbon walls by the supercritical deposition of titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP), which was selected as the organometallic precursor. Specifically, two reactions were involved in the formation of TiO2: firstly, the decomposition of the precursor TTIP, followed by the dehydration of the intermediate obtained by the first stage. A better nucleation and growth of the nanoparticles on the carbon nanowalls surface occurred at 180 °C with respect to 100 °C, leading to the attainment of a support in which the TiO2 nanoparticles were homogeneously dispersed.
Similarly, Liu et al. [62] and Kashiwaya et al. [63] prepared photocatalysts by supercritical decomposition, to be applied for the photocatalytic removal of two dyes, methylene blue, and methyl orange. In particular, Liu et al. [62] proposed a novel method of “supercritical deposition assisted by liquid-crystal template” to prepare nanocomposites consisting of mesoporous silica SBA-15 coated with TiO2. Compared to the results obtained by coating the TiO2 on the surface of non-porous SBA-15 using a similar approach without template, mesoporous TiO2 coated SBA-15 showed a more uniform deposition and an improved degradation efficiency for azo dyes as well as phenol. In the study of Kashiwaya et al. [63], the scCO2 allowed to effectively impregnate nitrate nickel oxide (NiO) nanoparticles, starting from hexahydrate (Ni(NO3)2 6H2O) as the organometallic precursor, on the (101)-facet of the oriented TiO2 nanoparticles. In this way, heterostructure NiO/(101)-anatase-TiO2 nanoparticles were synthesized, characterized by good dispersion of NiO. A NiO loading equal to 0.25 wt% into the composites exhibited the best photocatalytic activity, which was much higher than that of the pure TiO2 photocatalyst. Moreover, it was proved that no changes occurred in the textural and morphological properties of the employed anatase-TiO2 nanoparticles after the supercritical deposition of NiO loadings.
Aiming at the production of high-performance nanocomposites, Sun et al. [64] dispersed the coupling system ZnO/NiO, in the form of nanoparticles, on ordered mesoporous alumina (OMA). The OMA supported-ZnO/NiO showed a higher photocatalytic activity for Congo Red decolorization under simulated sunlight irradiation not only with respect to ZnO/OMA and NiO/OMA composites, but also compared to OMA/ZnO/NiO composites synthesized by the conventional incipient wetness impregnation. These results revealed the potential of the supercritical deposition route to achieve an excellent dispersion of the metallic compounds on the selected support.
In Table 1, a summary of the studies focused on the production of composites by the supercritical deposition for photocatalytic applications is shown.

3. Supercritical Antisolvent Precipitation of Photocatalytic Nanoparticles

Up to now, the Supercritical AntiSolvent (SAS) precipitation was widely used to produce nanoparticles of different materials, including metal-based compounds to produce catalysts [66,67,68,69] and photocatalysts [42,43,44,45,46] with very high activity and selectivity performance for various reactions.
The SAS process is based on some fundamental prerequisites. Specifically, the scCO2 plays the role of the antisolvent with respect to the solute to be precipitated, whereas it has to be completely miscible with the selected liquid solvent. On the other hand, the solute to be nanonized has to be soluble in the liquid solvent and insoluble in the binary mixture solvent/antisolvent formed in the precipitation chamber during the process. In addition to the fast diffusion of scCO2 into the liquid solvent, the precipitation is thus caused by the supersaturation of the solute. Organometallic precursors of the desired oxides are generally dissolved in liquid solvents to prepare photocatalysts. Briefly, the liquid solution consisting in the solvent and the precursor is injected into the precipitator filled with the scCO2 at the selected temperature and pressure, leading to the attainment of nanoparticles. Then, the as-prepared precursor particles have to be usually calcined at high temperatures to produce the final oxide photocatalyst. Isopropanol, dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), ethanol and methanol are usually selected as the proper solvents for the precipitation of photocatalyst precursors [42,43,44,45,46].
A typical sketch of a generic SAS process is shown in Figure 2.
To date, the SAS technique was mainly employed to produce TiO2 nanoparticles, starting from titanium tetraisopropoxide as precursor [42,43,44]. Da Silva et al. [43] highlighted that SAS precipitation allows to produce photocatalyst nanoparticles with very high specific surface areas, up to 515 m2/g in the specific case of TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by the authors. Moreover, there was a correlation between the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 and its phase composition as well as because of synergism phenomena between different titania phases. In particular, the anatase-rutile ratio strongly affected the photodegradation of methylene blue and methyl orange: for this purpose, the sample composed of 7% rutile and 93% anatase emerged as the best one. SAS TiO2 samples were also superior compare to the commercial photocatalyst known as P25, which is a widely used TiO2 consisting of anatase and rutile phases. Similarly, Marin et al. [44] prepared TiO2 with a tailored anatase/rutile composition via SAS process, but the SAS-precipitated TiO2 was found to have a comparable activity with commercial TiO2 one for the photocatalytic splitting of water for the hydrogen production.
In another study [42], SAS-prepared nanocrystalline TiO2 revealed to be effective also in the photodegradation of a dye, namely Reactive Red 180 (RR 180), in water solutions, mainly due to the small particle size, the high surface area (surface area of 63.2 m2/g) and weak agglomeration of the produced powders.
However, generally speaking, the use of TiO2-based photocatalysts is limited by some critical issues, such as the deactivation caused by ions scavengers present in the solution to be treated and low degradation kinetics in solutions with high concentrations of the contaminant to be removed [70]. The superior photocatalytic activity of ZnO compared to TiO2 is well documented [24,71,72].
Recently, undoped ZnO and ZnO doped with Europium (Eu) were also synthesized via the SAS process [45,46]. Specifically, in the studies of Franco et al. [45,46], undoped ZnO nanoparticles precipitated by SAS were found to be effective in the photocatalytic degradation of both Crystal Violet dye and Eriochrome Black-T Azo dye, even to a greater extent than a TiO2 photocatalyst, in addition to ZnO prepared using traditional methods. This outcome was assured by the regular nanometric shape, the low particle size and a high exposed surface area of SAS-prepared ZnO. The authors also highlighted the importance of carefully selecting the proper conditions for the thermal treatment of the SAS-prepared precursor to preserve the nanoparticle morphology and size even in the final metal-oxide photocatalyst. Specifically, a calcination temperature equal to 500 °C (temperature range investigated: 300–600 °C) in addition to a slow heating rate equal 2 °C × min−1, for 2 h in air, was revealed to be the best choice to avoid sintering phenomena. In addition, spectroscopic studies proved that organic impurities, which are present in ZnO obtained from unprocessed ZnAc, completely disappeared after the supercritical processing in the SAS powders. This outcome could further explain the superior photocatalytic performance of SAS-prepared powders.
Aiming to increase the photocatalytic performance of SAS ZnO, a novel simultaneous precipitation of zinc acetate (ZnAc) and europium acetate (EuAc) via SAS process was also proposed by the authors to obtain Eu-doped ZnO [46]. Indeed, SAS Eu-doped ZnO ensured the highest photocatalytic efficiency in terms of discoloration and mineralization of the Eriochrome Black-T Azo dye. As a future prospect, it could be interesting to investigate the simultaneous precipitation of multiple metal precursors to produce doped-photocatalysts.
Two illustrative images obtained by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) are shown in Figure 3a,b, which show SAS Eu-ZnAc nanoparticles and SAS Eu-doped ZnO photocatalyst, respectively, obtained after the calcination of SAS Eu-ZnAc.
Table 2 shows a summary of the studies focused on the application of the SAS precipitation to prepare nanoparticulate photocatalysts.

4. Sol–Gel Reactions

Sol–gel reactions in scCO2 have been frequently used for the synthesis of metal/silicon oxides with different geometries on a nanometer scale [73]. In sol−gel processes, the sol is a colloidal suspension of nanometer-sized solid particles in a liquid phase; the gel is formed when the particles bond together forming a three-dimensional network. The use of scCO2 as the reaction media involves many advantages and has been used starting from 1996, when Tadros et al. [74], for the first time, synthesized anatase TiO2 microparticles (mean diameter 0.1–2.0 μm) using TTIP, an aqueous solution of a surfactant and scCO2. The pressure was fixed at 9.9 MPa, the temperature at 50 °C and the reaction time at 4 h. Subsequently, Reverchon et al. [75] hydrolyzed TTIP in scCO2 to obtain Ti(OH)4 nanoparticles with a mean particle size in the range 90–130 nm. The operating pressure ranged from 8 to 14 MPa, whereas the operating temperature ranged from 40 to 60 °C.
Jensen et al. [76] produced nanosized metal oxides through a supercritical seed enhanced crystallization, a modified sol–gel process in which scCO2 is the solvent and different seeding materials can be used. The process was developed at a pressure of 10 MPa, a temperature of 100 °C and considering a process time equal to 4 h. Depending on the seeding material, anatase TiO2 powder with a mean crystal size in the range 6.2–9.3 nm were obtained. The nanoparticles were used in a subsequent paper [77] to prepare titania nanocrystalline films through a modified sol–gel method. The photocatalytic activity of the films was determined under UV irradiation using stearic acid as a model compound.
Camarillo et al. [78] obtained titania nanofibers (undoped and doped with Cu) through a synthesis in scCO2 that was used for the photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide with water vapor. The nanofibers were produced using TTIP as precursor of Ti, Copper (II) acetylacetonate as precursor of Cu, and acetic acid as polymerizing agent. Carbon dioxide is pumped into the reactor that contained the previous materials up to the operating pressure (22–24 MPa) and temperature (40–80 °C). During the first three hours of the reaction the mixture is kept under stirring and, subsequently, the reaction is aged for 24 h under the same pressure and temperature conditions in the absence of stirring. The photocatalytic reduction of CO2 was conducted using the catalyst, obtaining methane and carbon monoxide as the only reaction products.

5. Sol–Gel Reactions and Supercritical Drying to Obtain Porous Structures

In some papers, after the sol–gel reaction, a supercritical drying is assessed (Figure 4), obtaining aerogels instead of xerogels since the last ones can suffer from severe shrinkage and loss of microstructure when dried by conventional evaporation.
Up to now, TiO2-based photocatalysts have been generally prepared by supercritical drying, mostly in form of aerogels [51,79,80,81,82,83]; however, other novel structures have also been proposed; e.g., nanowires [84], thin films [85], pillared clays [86] or beads [87].
Mumin et al. [84] synthesized anatase TiO2 nanowires through a sol–gel process in scCO2; the precursor of the oxide was TTIP, which was dissolved in acetic acid and put in contact with scCO2 at 41.4 MPa and 60 °C for 24 h under stirring and 5 days of aging (to complete the reaction). Then, a supercritical drying step was performed. The photocatalyst was, then, prepared by functionalizing TiO2 nanowires and linking covalently semiconductor quantum dots to the titania surface. The photocatalytic activities of the prepared catalysts have been evaluated under ultraviolet and visible light solar irradiation for the photodegradation of methylene blue (MB). In particular, among various proposed and tested samples, the best performance in terms of photodegradation of MB dye (approximately equal to 88%) were exhibited by the nanocomposites consisting in core-shell CdS-ZnS quantum dots linked with TiO2 nanowires. A remarkable aspect is the stability of this nanocomposite system over time; indeed, after three cycling tests, the loss in terms of photocatalytic activity was significantly reduced up to a value of about 10%. On the other hand, for the MB photodecomposition, Li et al. [49] proposed TiO2–WO3-Fe3+ aerogels prepared using milder conditions in the supercritical drying phase in terms of pressure, temperature and process time (as observable in Table 3), compared to those employed in the study of Mumin et al. [84]. This aspect can be advantageous from both an economic and production time point of view for the long-term industrial preparation of photocatalysts.
Aiming at improving the photocatalytic activity of catalysts, especially those based on TiO2, different approaches have been attempted, including the dispersion of an active species onto the support surface (in general, a noble metal such as Au [87] and Pt [88]), as well as the photocatalyst doping [89,90]. In particular, the doping of TiO2 is a promising route to overcome the main issues associated to its use in photocatalysis, including the wide band gap (3–3.2 eV) that requires ultraviolet irradiation for its photocatalytic activation, resulting in a very low energy efficiency under solar light, whose use is still today the main challenge and desired goal. Specifically, TiO2 was doped with both non-metal elements, such as nitrogen [89,91], and transition metal ions, such as Fe(III) [90], involving a final step of supercritical drying to remove the liquid solvent employed, while preserving the native porous structure of the aerogels. In addition to the doping, the use of bimetallic materials is also a valid route to improve the photocatalyst features and performance, as proven in the study of Lucky and Charpentier [91]. Specifically, the authors prepared N-doped ZrO2/TiO2 nanomaterials, observing that a small and proper amount of nitrogen and zirconia led to an increase in the specific surface area and inhibited the crystals’ growth, thus assuring a low degree of crystallinity in the samples. As a result, all the synthesized N-doped ZrO2/TiO2 samples exhibited a higher activity in photodegradation of methylene blue compared to commercial P25 TiO2.
Recently, a biopolymer-templating methodology has also been proposed in some papers [31,87]. Natural alginate is the most selected material as a templating agent for the preparation of metal oxide structures, since it allows to achieve very small particle size and/or very high specific surface area. This result is due to the fact that the transition metals are contained in the alginate once dried in the presence of supercritical CO2.
To date, TiO2–SiO2 composites involving supercritical drying and/or sol–gel reactions in scCO2 have also been widely proposed for various photocatalytic applications, including water splitting, degradation of benzene, phenol and methanol, oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or trichloroethylene [50,83,86,92,93,94]. In the studies of Cao [93,94], mesoporous titania–silica aerogels with an open-pore structure readily accessible to the reactant molecules have been obtained using scCO2; consequently, a great contact between the reactants and TiO2–SiO2 led to a high conversion. Specifically, the nanometric crystals of anatase TiO2 (i.e., Ti–O–Ti sites) were well-dispersed and well-anchored within/to the amorphous aerogel network (i.e., Si–O–Ti and Si–O–Si bonds). Furthermore, under similar reaction conditions, catalysts based on commercial TiO2 exhibited lower activity performance than titania–silica aerogels by supercritical ethanol drying.
The studies focused on the application of the sol–gel reaction and the supercritical drying in the photocatalytic field are summarized in Table 3.

6. Other Applications of Supercritical CO2 in Photocatalysis: From Supercritical Foaming to scCO2 as a Promising Reaction Medium

Supercritical CO2 has also been exploited in the photocatalytic field for other multiple purposes.
For example, before the sol–gel reaction, a supercritical pre-treatment has been conducted in some cases, aiming at the production of composite systems such as TiO2-coated carbon surface [98,99] or TiO2-coated zeolite surface [100]. In particular, this preliminary pretreatment consists in the supercritical impregnation of a plugging agent (such as paraffin [98,100]) into porous carbon or zeolite (i.e., the support for TiO2) to form sealed substrates. On the other hand, post-treatments under supercritical conditions can also be performed on photocatalysts. For example, Wang et al. [101] prepared mesostructured TiO2 thin films supported on silicon substrates by spin coating. The supercritical post-treatment of the thin films led to a remarkable improvement in the thermal stability of the mesoporous coatings without affecting the optical transparency or the integrity of samples. Indeed, the unidirectional contraction of the films and the pores collapsing were avoided in the case of the photocatalysts post-treated by scCO2. TiO2 thin films after supercritical processing also exhibited a very high photoactivity in the degradation of waste organic compounds.
Up to now, supercritical CO2 has been widely used for the attainment of catalysts characterized by different structures/morphologies. In this context, Zhang et al. [102] exploited the scCO2 to modify Ruthenium-coordinated metal−organic frameworks (MOFs), promoting the formation of a highly mesoporous and microporous structure. The supercritical processing resulted in a high porosity into composites that facilitated the mass transport, an enhanced capability to adsorption visible-light and, consequently, a higher photocatalytic activity for the hydrogen production compared to those of pure MOF and MOF functionalized with Ru. Marković et al. [103] suggested a novel approach to prepare floating photocatalysts for the degradation of textile dyes, namely C.I. Acid Orange 7 (AO7) and C.I. Basic Yellow 28 (BY28). This route consisted in the foaming of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) beads using scCO2, thus promoting the formation of a highly porous structure, subsequently loaded with TiO2 nanoparticles. A sustainable floatability of the photocatalyst based on PCL foams was observed for a long period of time.
Another interesting aspect is the use of scCO2 as a reaction medium [55], for example, in the thermal hydrolysis for the catalyst preparation [104,105,106,107]. In this context, Camarillo et al. [104] synthesized a Palladium-doped TiO2 photocatalyst via thermal hydrolysis assisted by supercritical CO2 as reaction medium, using two different TiO2 precursors (i.e., titanium tetraisopropoxide and diisopropoxititanium bis(acetylacetonate)) and palladium acetylacetonate. The main aim was to produce highly efficient photocatalysts for the reduction of CO2 to hydrocarbons, which will be used as more convenient fuels from both environmental and economic points of view, finally passing from a laboratory process to a commercial scale. The as-prepared photocatalysts showed improved properties, mainly higher surface area and absorbance of visible light, in addition to more efficient production of methane (up to 22 times), compared to those of commercial TiO2. Similar benefits in the photocatalytic reduction of CO2, employing TiO2-based catalysts prepared by scCO2, were also highlighted in other papers [47,106,107,108]. The exploit of scCO2 in the photoelectrochemical field has also been recently attempted [109,110]. Table 4 reports an overview of other scCO2 applications in photocatalysis.
An overview about the various applications of scCO2 in photocatalysis and the related advantages is shown in Table 5.

7. Conclusions

The versatility of the supercritical CO2 allows its application in photocatalytic fields for multiple purposes. Among them, the preparation of photocatalysts by scCO2-assisted processes was revealed to be a very promising route to assure high performance for different kinds of reactions. The supercritical techniques are useful to synthesize photocatalysts in various forms, from nanoparticles to aerogels, by preserving the native structure due to the absence of capillary pressure. Moreover, reduced use of toxic and polluting solvents, or even their total elimination, is involved during the supercritical processing, leading to a lower environmental impact involved in the long-term catalyst preparation. The attainment of solvent-free catalysts also avoids the presence of any poisons on their surface, which can cause catalyst deactivation. The photocatalysts prepared by supercritical processes generally exhibit a higher photoactivity compared to that of commercial catalysts. This improved performance is primarily due to a very high surface area of the materials, providing an excellent contact between the reactant molecules and the photocatalyst.
For future perspectives, it is interesting to exploit the use of supercritical technologies in the preparation of doped photocatalysts in all forms, which is still limited to a few studies. Indeed, in addition to the deposition of noble metals onto the support surface, the doping of photocatalysts is a promising route to improve further the catalyst performance. It is also worth investigating the development of novel catalyst structures, for example, using supercritical foaming to produce floating photocatalysts. The main challenge in photocatalysis is still to produce photocatalysts that have to be very active not only under UV irradiation but especially under visible light, also considering an economic point of view. The use of the supercritical CO2 as a reaction medium is also an interesting aspect; it is advisable to attempt to extend it to a wide variety of reactions. For various reasons, the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 involving the use of scCO2 as a reaction medium is very industrially attractive. Indeed, it is possible to re-use the CO2 captured from the industrial emissions as a feedstock for the photochemical production of fuels or reaction intermediates in large-scale plants, combining both environmental and economic benefits.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.F., O.S., V.V. and I.D.M.; methodology, P.F. and O.S.; writing—original draft preparation, P.F.; writing—review and editing, I.D.M.; supervision, V.V. and I.D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baldino, L.; Cardea, S.; Reverchon, E. Supercritical assisted electrospray: An improved micronization process. Polymers 2019, 11, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Baldino, L.; Cardea, S.; Scognamiglio, M.; Reverchon, E. A new tool to produce alginate-based aerogels for medical applications, by supercritical gel drying. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 146, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Campardelli, R.; Trucillo, P.; Reverchon, E. Supercritical assisted process for the efficient production of liposomes containing antibiotics for ocular delivery. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 25, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dos Santos, L.C.; Johner, J.C.F.; Scopel, E.; Pontes, P.V.A.; Ribeiro, A.P.B.; Zabot, G.L.; Batista, E.A.C.; Meireles, M.A.A.; Martínez, J. Integrated supercritical CO2 extraction and fractionation of passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims) by-products. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2021, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pajnik, J.; Lukić, I.; Dikić, J.; Asanin, J.; Gordic, M.; Misic, D.; Zizović, I.; Korzeniowska, M. Application of supercritical solvent impregnation for production of zeolite modified starch-chitosan polymers with antibacterial properties. Molecules 2020, 25, 4717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Franco, P.; De Marco, I. Eudragit: A novel carrier for controlled drug delivery in supercritical antisolvent coprecipitation. Polymers 2020, 12, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Tabernero, A.; Cardea, S. Supercritical carbon dioxide techniques for processing microbial exopolysaccharides used in biomedical applications. Mat. Sci. Eng. C 2020, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, C.H.; Hsieh, D.J.; Periasamy, S.; Chuang, C.T.; Tseng, F.W.; Kuo, J.C.; Tarng, Y.W. Regenerative porcine dermal collagen matrix developed by supercritical carbon dioxide extraction technology: Role in accelerated wound healing. Materialia 2020, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Belizón, M.; Fernández-Ponce, M.T.; Casas, L.; Mantell, C.; Martínez De La Ossa-Fernández, E.J. Supercritical impregnation of antioxidant mango polyphenols into a multilayer PET/PP food-grade film. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 25, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Franco, P.; Incarnato, L.; De Marco, I. Supercritical CO2 impregnation of α-tocopherol into PET/PP films for active packaging applications. J. CO2 Util. 2019, 34, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gong, D.; Jing, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, H.; Zheng, L. One-step supercritical CO2color matching of polyester with dye mixtures. J. CO2 Util. 2021, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Penthala, R.; Heo, G.; Kim, H.; Lee, I.Y.; Ko, E.H.; Son, Y.A. Synthesis of azo and anthraquinone dyes and dyeing of nylon-6,6 in supercritical carbon dioxide. J. CO2 Util. 2020, 38, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Costa, J.M.; Almeida Neto, A.F.D. Nanocatalysts deposition assisted by supercritical carbon dioxide technology: A review. Synth. Met. 2021, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Elmanovich, I.V.; Stakhanov, A.I.; Zefirov, V.V.; Pavlov, A.A.; Lokshin, B.V.; Gallyamov, M.O. Thermal oxidation of polypropylene catalyzed by manganese oxide aerogel in oxygen-enriched supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2020, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Papoulis, D. Halloysite based nanocomposites and photocatalysis: A Review. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 168, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ibhadon, A.O.; Fitzpatrick, P. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis: Recent Advances and Applications. Catalysts 2013, 3, 189–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kabra, K.; Chaudhary, R.; Sawhney, R.L. Treatment of hazardous organic and inorganic compounds through aqueous-phase photocatalysis: A review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 7683–7696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yong, X.; Schoonen, M.A. The absolute energy positions of conduction and valence bands of selected semiconducting minerals. Am. Mineral. 2000, 85, 543–556. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fox, M.A.; Dulay, M.T. Heterogeneous photocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 341–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Demeestere, K.; Dewulf, J.; Van Langenhove, H. Heterogeneous photocatalysis as an advanced oxidation process for the abatement of chlorinated, monocyclic aromatic and sulfurous volatile organic compounds in air: State of the art. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 37, 489–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fujishima, A.; Rao, T.N.; Tryk, D.A. Titanium dioxide photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 2000, 1, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nakata, K.; Fujishima, A. TiO2 photocatalysis: Design and applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 2012, 13, 169–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Schneider, J.; Matsuoka, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Zhang, J.; Horiuchi, Y.; Anpo, M.; Bahnemann, D.W. Understanding TiO2 photocatalysis: Mechanisms and materials. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9919–9986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vaiano, V.; Matarangolo, M.; Sacco, O. UV-LEDs floating-bed photoreactor for the removal of caffeine and paracetamol using ZnO supported on polystyrene pellets. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 350, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, T.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, H.; Zhu, Y. Significantly enhanced photocatalytic performance of ZnO via graphene hybridization and the mechanism study. Appl. Cat. B 2011, 101, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baeck, S.H.; Choi, K.S.; Jaramillo, T.F.; Stucky, G.D.; McFarland, E.W. Enhancement of photocatalytic and electrochromic properties of electrochemically fabricated mesoporous WO3 thin films. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 1269–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, D.; Ye, J. Hierarchical WO3 hollow shells: Dendrite, sphere, dumbbell, and their photocatalytic properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1922–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cao, S.W.; Zhu, Y.J. Hierarchically nanostructured α-Fe2O3 hollow spheres: Preparation, growth mechanism, photocatalytic property, and application in water treatment. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 6253–6257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mishra, M.; Chun, D.M. α-Fe2O3 as a photocatalytic material: A review. Appl. Cat. A 2015, 498, 126–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ji, P.; Zhang, J.; Chen, F.; Anpo, M. Study of adsorption and degradation of acid orange 7 on the surface of CeO2 under visible light irradiation. Appl. Cat. B 2009, 85, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Primo, A.; Marino, T.; Corma, A.; Molinari, R.; García, H. Efficient visible-light photocatalytic water splitting by minute amounts of gold supported on nanoparticulate CeO2 obtained by a biopolymer templating method. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6930–6933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chithambararaj, A.; Sanjini, N.S.; Velmathi, S.; Chandra Bose, A. Preparation of h-MoO3 and α-MoO3 nanocrystals: Comparative study on photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under visible light irradiation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 14761–14769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Szkoda, M.; Trzciński, K.; Nowak, A.P.; Gazda, M.; Sawczak, M.; Lisowska-Oleksiak, A. The effect of morphology and crystalline structure of Mo/MoO3 layers on photocatalytic degradation of water organic pollutants. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gionco, C.; Paganini, M.C.; Giamello, E.; Sacco, O.; Vaiano, V.; Sannino, D. Rare earth oxides in zirconium dioxide: How to turn a wide band gap metal oxide into a visible light active photocatalyst. J. Energy Chem. 2017, 26, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Jia, X.; Wang, J.; Chen, Z.; Xu, Y. Reactant effect on visible-light driven photocatalytic performance of sol–gel derived tetragonal ZrO2 nanoparticles. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 93, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Elango, G.; Roopan, S.M. Efficacy of SnO2 nanoparticles toward photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2016, 155, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Raziq, F.; Qu, Y.; Humayun, M.; Zada, A.; Yu, H.; Jing, L. Synthesis of SnO2/B-P codoped g-C3N4 nanocomposites as efficient cocatalyst-free visible-light photocatalysts for CO2 conversion and pollutant degradation. Appl. Cat. B 2017, 201, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, Y.; Zhao, W.; Xu, R.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, B. Synthesis of ultrathin CdS nanosheets as efficient visible-light-driven water splitting photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 9803–9805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhu, H.; Jiang, R.; Xiao, L.; Chang, Y.; Guan, Y.; Li, X.; Zeng, G. Photocatalytic decolorization and degradation of Congo Red on innovative crosslinked chitosan/nano-CdS composite catalyst under visible light irradiation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 169, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vaiano, V.; Sacco, O.; Sannino, D.; Ciambelli, P. Process intensification in the removal of organic pollutants from wastewater using innovative photocatalysts obtained coupling Zinc Sulfide based phosphors with nitrogen doped semiconductors. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 100, 208–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sharma, M.; Jain, T.; Singh, S.; Pandey, O.P. Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes under UV-Visible light using capped ZnS nanoparticles. Sol. Energy 2012, 86, 626–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tuncer, M.; Ozdemir, B. Photocatalytic activity of TiO2 powders synthesized by supercritical gas antisolvent method. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2014, 125, 608–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Da Silva, E.P.; Winkler, M.E.G.; Giufrida, W.M.; Cardozo-Filho, L.; Alonso, C.G.; Lopes, J.B.O.; Rubira, A.F.; Silva, R. Effect of phase composition on the photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide obtained from supercritical antisolvent. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 535, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Marin, R.P.; Ishikawa, S.; Bahruji, H.; Shaw, G.; Kondrat, S.A.; Miedziak, P.J.; Morgan, D.J.; Taylor, S.H.; Bartley, J.K.; Edwards, J.K.; et al. Supercritical antisolvent precipitation of TiO2 with tailored anatase/rutile composition for applications in redox catalysis and photocatalysis. Appl. Cat. A 2015, 504, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Franco, P.; Sacco, O.; De Marco, I.; Vaiano, V. Zinc oxide nanoparticles obtained by supercritical antisolvent precipitation for the photocatalytic degradation of crystal violet dye. Catalysts 2019, 9, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Franco, P.; Sacco, O.; De Marco, I.; Sannino, D.; Vaiano, V. Photocatalytic Degradation of Eriochrome Black-T Azo Dye Using Eu-Doped ZnO Prepared by Supercritical Antisolvent Precipitation Route: A Preliminary Investigation. Top. Catal. 2020, 63, 1193–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kaneco, S.; Kurimoto, H.; Shimizu, Y.; Ohta, K.; Mizuno, T. Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 using TiO2 powders in supercritical fluid CO2. Energy 1999, 24, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hirakawa, T.; Whitesell, J.K.; Fox, M.A. Effect of temperature and pressure in the photocatalytic oxidation of n-octanol on partially desilanized hydrophobic TiO2 suspended in aerated supercritical CO2. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 10213–10218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, H.; Sunol, S.G.; Sunol, A.K. Development of titanium-dioxide-based aerogel catalyst with tunable nanoporosity and photocatalytic activity. Nanotechnology 2012, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wu, C.-M.; Peng, R.; Dimitrijevic, N.M.; Rajh, T.; Koodali, R.T. Preparation of TiO2–SiO2 aperiodic mesoporous materials with controllable formation of tetrahedrally coordinated Ti4+ ions and their performance for photocatalytic hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dagan, G.; Tomkiewicz, M. Titanium dioxide aerogels for photocatalytic decontamination of aquatic environments. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 12651–12655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Parale, V.G.; Kim, T.; Lee, K.-Y.; Phadtare, V.D.; Dhavale, R.P.; Park, H.-H. Hydrophobic TiO2–SiO2 composite aerogels synthesized via in situ epoxy-ring opening polymerization and sol-gel process for enhanced degradation activity. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 4939–4946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Parale, V.G.; Kim, T.; Phadtare, V.D.; Yadav, H.M.; Park, H.-H. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of a mesoporous TiO2 aerogel decorated onto three-dimensional carbon foam. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 277, 424–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Parale, V.G.; Kim, T.; Phadtare, V.D.; Han, W.; Lee, K.-Y.; Choi, H.; Kim, Y.; Yadav, H.M.; Park, H.-H. SnO2 aerogel deposited onto polymer-derived carbon foam for environmental remediation. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 287, 110990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Leitner, W. Supercritical carbon dioxide as a green reaction medium for catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 746–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ramsey, E.; Qiubai, S.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Wei, G. Mini-Review: Green sustainable processes using supercritical fluid carbon dioxide. J. Environ. Sci. 2009, 21, 720–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Song, C. Global challenges and strategies for control, conversion and utilization of CO2 for sustainable development involving energy, catalysis, adsorption and chemical processing. Catal. Today 2006, 115, 2–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bozbağ, S.E.; Erkey, C. Supercritical deposition: Current status and perspectives for the preparation of supported metal nanostructures. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2015, 96, 298–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Barim, S.B.; Uzunlar, E.; Bozbag, S.E.; Erkey, C. Review-Supercritical Deposition: A Powerful Technique for Synthesis of Functional Materials for Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Watkins, J.J.; McCarthy, T.J. Polymer/Metal Nanocomposite Synthesis in Supercritical CO2. Chem. Mater. 1995, 7, 1991–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Horibe, T.; Kondo, H.; Ishikawa, K.; Kano, H.; Sekine, M.; Hiramatsu, M.; Hori, M. Supercritical fluid deposition of high-density nanoparticles of photocatalytic TiO2 on carbon nanowalls. Appl. Phys. Express 2013, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liu, C.; Lin, X.; Li, Y.; Xu, P.; Li, M.; Chen, F. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of mesoporous TiO2 coated SBA-15 nanocomposites fabricated through a novel approach: Supercritical deposition aided by liquid-crystal template. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 75, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kashiwaya, S.; Aymonier, C.; Majimel, J.; Olivier, C.; Klein, A.; Jaegermann, W.; Toupance, T. Supercritical CO2-assisted deposition of NiO on (101)-anatase-TiO2 for efficient facet engineered photocatalysts. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 18649–18658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sun, L.; Han, P.; Tang, S. Preparation of Ordered Mesoporous Alumina Supported-ZnO/NiO Nanocomposite Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Impregnation and Its Photocatalytic Performance. ChemNanoMat 2019, 5, 723–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chang, F.; Wang, G.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.; Yang, H.-J.; Hu, X. Synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles on mesoporous aluminosilicate Al-SBA-15 in supercritical CO2 for photocatalytic decolorization of methylene blue. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 3823–3829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Franco, P.; Martino, M.; Palma, V.; Scarpellini, A.; De Marco, I. Pt on SAS-CeO2 nanopowder as catalyst for the CO-WGS reaction. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2018, 43, 19965–19975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Marin, R.P.; Kondrat, S.A.; Davies, T.E.; Morgan, D.J.; Enache, D.I.; Combes, G.B.; Taylor, S.H.; Bartley, J.K.; Hutchings, G.J. Novel cobalt zinc oxide Fischer–Tropsch catalysts synthesised using supercritical anti-solvent precipitation. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 1970–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Jiang, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, M. Study on MnO x-FeO y composite oxide catalysts prepared by supercritical antisolvent process for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO x. J. Mater. Res. 2016, 31, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tang, Z.-R.; Edwards, J.K.; Bartley, J.K.; Taylor, S.H.; Carley, A.F.; Herzing, A.A.; Kiely, C.J.; Hutchings, G.J. Nanocrystalline cerium oxide produced by supercritical antisolvent precipitation as a support for high-activity gold catalysts. J. Catal. 2007, 249, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vaiano, V.; Matarangolo, M.; Sacco, O.; Sannino, D. Photocatalytic treatment of aqueous solutions at high dye concentration using praseodymium-doped ZnO catalysts. Appl. Cat. B 2017, 209, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ong, C.B.; Ng, L.Y.; Mohammad, A.W. A review of ZnO nanoparticles as solar photocatalysts: Synthesis, mechanisms and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 536–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Štrbac, D.; Aggelopoulos, C.A.; Štrbac, G.; Dimitropoulos, M.; Novaković, M.; Ivetić, T.; Yannopoulos, S.N. Photocatalytic degradation of Naproxen and methylene blue: Comparison between ZnO, TiO2 and their mixture. Process Saf. Environ. 2018, 113, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sui, R.; Charpentier, P. Synthesis of metal oxide nanostructures by direct sol-gel chemistry in supercritical fluids. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 3057–3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tadros, M.E.; Adkins, C.L.J.; Russick, E.M.; Youngman, M.P. Synthesis of titanium dioxide particles in supercritical CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 1996, 9, 172–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Reverchon, E.; Caputo, G.; Correra, S.; Cesti, P. Synthesis of titanium hydroxide nanoparticles in supercritical carbon dioxide on the pilot scale. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2003, 26, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jensen, H.; Joensen, K.D.; Iversen, S.B.; Søgaard, E.G. Low Temperature Synthesis of Metal Oxides by a Supercritical Seed Enhanced Crystallization (SSEC) Process. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 3348–3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Simonsen, M.E.; Jensen, H.; Li, Z.; Søgaard, E.G. Surface properties and photocatalytic activity of nanocrystalline titania films. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2008, 200, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Camarillo, R.; Rizaldos, D.; Jiménez, C.; Martínez, F.; Rincón, J. Enhancing the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 with undoped and Cu-doped TiO2 nanofibers synthesized in supercritical medium. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2019, 147, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. D’Elia, D.; Beauger, C.; Hochepied, J.F.; Rigacci, A.; Berger, M.H.; Keller, N.; Keller-Spitzer, V.; Suzuki, Y.; Valmalette, J.C.; Benabdesselam, M.; et al. Impact of three different TiO2 morphologies on hydrogen evolution by methanol assisted water splitting: Nanoparticles, nanotubes and aerogels. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2011, 36, 14360–14373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Chen, L.; Zhu, J.; Liu, Y.M.; Cao, Y.; Li, H.X.; He, H.Y.; Dai, W.L.; Fan, K.N. Photocatalytic activity of epoxide sol-gel derived titania transformed into nanocrystalline aerogel powders by supercritical drying. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2006, 255, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Boujday, S.; Wünsch, F.; Portes, P.; Bocquet, J.-F.; Colbeau-Justin, C. Photocatalytic and electronic properties of TiO2 powders elaborated by sol–gel route and supercritical drying. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2004, 83, 421–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lin, C.C.; Wei, T.Y.; Lee, K.T.; Lu, S.Y. Titania and Pt/titania aerogels as superior mesoporous structures for photocatalytic water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 12668–12674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kim, W.-I.; Suh, D.J.; Park, T.-J.; Hong, I.-K. Photocatalytic degradation of methanol on titania and titania–silica aerogels prepared by non-alkoxide sol–gel route. Top. Catal. 2007, 44, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mumin, M.A.; Moula, G.; Charpentier, P.A. Supercritical CO2 synthesized TiO2 nanowires covalently linked with core-shell CdS-ZnS quantum dots: Enhanced photocatalysis and stability. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 67767–67779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bartkova, H.; Kluson, P.; Bartek, L.; Drobek, M.; Cajthaml, T.; Krysa, J. Photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic properties of titanium (IV) oxide nanoparticulate layers. Thin Solid Films 2007, 515, 8455–8460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ding, Z.; Zhu, H.Y.; Lu, G.Q.; Greenfield, P.F. Photocatalytic properties of titania pillared clays by different drying methods. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1999, 209, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Buaki-Sogo, M.; Serra, M.; Primo, A.; Alvaro, M.; Garcia, H. Alginate as template in the preparation of active titania photocatalysts. ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Puskelova, J.; Baia, L.; Vulpoi, A.; Baia, M.; Antoniadou, M.; Dracopoulos, V.; Stathatos, E.; Gabor, K.; Pap, Z.; Danciu, V.; et al. Photocatalytic hydrogen production using TiO2-Pt aerogels. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 242, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sacco, O.; Vaiano, V.; Daniel, C.; Navarra, W.; Venditto, V. Removal of phenol in aqueous media by N-doped TiO2 based photocatalytic aerogels. Mat. Sci. Semicon. Proc. 2018, 80, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Popa, M.; Diamandescu, L.; Vasiliu, F.; Teodorescu, C.M.; Cosoveanu, V.; Baia, M.; Feder, M.; Baia, L.; Danciu, V. Synthesis, structural characterization, and photocatalytic properties of iron-doped TiO2 aerogels. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lucky, R.A.; Charpentier, P.A. N-doped ZrO2/TiO2 bimetallic materials synthesized in supercritical CO2: Morphology and photocatalytic activity. Appl. Cat. B 2010, 96, 516–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yoda, S.; Suh, D.J.; Sato, T. Adsorption and photocatalytic decomposition of benzene using silica-titania and titania aerogels: Effect of supercritical drying. J. Solgel Sci. Technol. 2001, 22, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Cao, S.; Yeung, K.L.; Yue, P.L. Preparation of freestanding and crack-free titania-silica aerogels and their performance for gas phase, photocatalytic oxidation of VOCs. Appl. Cat. B 2006, 68, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cao, S.; Yeung, K.L.; Yue, P.L. An investigation of trichloroethylene photocatalytic oxidation on mesoporous titania-silica aerogel catalysts. Appl. Cat. B 2007, 76, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Justh, N.; Mikula, G.J.; Bakos, L.P.; Nagy, B.; László, K.; Parditka, B.; Erdélyi, Z.; Takáts, V.; Mizsei, J.; Szilágyi, I.M. Photocatalytic properties of TiO2@polymer and TiO2@carbon aerogel composites prepared by atomic layer deposition. Carbon 2019, 147, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Sacco, O.; Vaiano, V.; Daniel, C.; Navarra, W.; Venditto, V. Highly robust and selective system for water pollutants removal: How to transform a traditional photocatalyst into a highly robust and selective system for water pollutants removal. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Kim, B.; Keum, Y.; Chen, Y.-P.; Oh, H.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Park, J. Stimuli-Responsive Ti-Organic Gels and Aerogels Derived from Ti-Oxo Clusters: Hierarchical Porosity and Photocatalytic Activity. Inorg. chem. 2019, 58, 15936–15941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Li, Y.; Ma, M.; Sun, S.; Wang, X.; Yan, W.; Ouyang, Y. Preparation and photocatalytic activity of TiO2–carbon surface composites by supercritical pretreatment and sol–gel process. Catal. Commun. 2008, 9, 1583–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zeng, M.-x.; Li, Y.-j.; Wei, C.; LI, L.-y. Photocatalytic activity and kinetics for acid yellow degradation over surface composites of TiO2-coated activated carbon under different photocatalytic conditions. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. 2013, 23, 1019–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. You-ji, L.; Wei, C. Photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B using nanocrystalline TiO2–zeolite surface composite catalysts: Effects of photocatalytic condition on degradation efficiency. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2011, 1, 802–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, K.; Yao, B.; Morris, M.A.; Holmes, J.D. Supercritical fluid processing of thermally stable mesoporous titania thin films with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 4825–4831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhang, F.; Zhang, B.; Feng, J.; Tan, X.; Liu, L.; Liu, L.; Han, B.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, J.; Tai, J. Highly mesoporous Ru-MIL-125-NH2 produced by supercritical fluid for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 4964–4970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Marković, D.; Milovanović, S.; Radovanović, Ž.; Zizovic, I.; Šaponjić, Z.; Radetić, M. Floating photocatalyst based on poly (ε-caprolactone) foam and TiO2 nanoparticles for removal of textile dyes. Fiber Polym. 2018, 19, 1219–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Camarillo, R.; Toston, S.; Martinez, F.; Jimenez, C.; Rincon, J. Enhancing the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 through engineering of catalysts with high pressure technology: Pd/TiO2 photocatalysts. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2017, 123, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Alonso, E.; Montequi, I.; Cocero, M. Effect of synthesis conditions on photocatalytic activity of TiO2 powders synthesized in supercritical CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2009, 49, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Rodríguez, V.; Camarillo, R.; Martínez, F.; Jiménez, C.; Rincón, J. CO2 photocatalytic reduction with CNT/TiO2 based nanocomposites prepared by high-pressure technology. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2020, 163, 104876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Camarillo, R.; Toston, S.; Martinez, F.; Jimenez, C.; Rincon, J. Preparation of TiO2-based catalysts with supercritical fluid technology: Characterization and photocatalytic activity in CO2 reduction. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2017, 92, 1710–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Grills, D.C.; Fujita, E. New directions for the photocatalytic reduction of CO2: Supramolecular, scCO2 or biphasic ionic liquid− scCO2 systems. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2709–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Chiu, W.-T.; Chen, C.-Y.; Chang, T.-F.M.; Tahara, Y.; Hashimoto, T.; Kurosu, H.; Sone, M. Fabrication and photocatalytic performance of Au/ZnO layered structure on silk textile for flexible device applications. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 253, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ren, Y.; Li, C.; Xu, Q.; Yan, J.; Li, Y.; Yuan, P.; Xia, H.; Niu, C.; Yang, X.; Jia, Y. Two-dimensional amorphous heterostructures of Ag/a-WO3-x for high-efficiency photocatalytic performance. Appl. Cat. B 2019, 245, 648–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Haldorai, Y.; Shim, J.-J. Supercritical fluid mediated synthesis of highly exfoliated graphene/ZnO composite for photocatalytic hydrogen production. Mater. Lett. 2014, 133, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 26 02640 g001 550
Figure 1. Sketch of supercritical deposition stages.
Figure 1. Sketch of supercritical deposition stages.
Molecules 26 02640 g001
Molecules 26 02640 g002 550
Figure 2. A schematic representation of a generic SAS process. P1, P2: pumps; S1: CO2 supply; S2: liquid solution supply; RB: refrigerating bath; PC: precipitation chamber; LS: liquid separator; MV: micrometric valve; BPV: back-pressure valve; R: rotameter.
Figure 2. A schematic representation of a generic SAS process. P1, P2: pumps; S1: CO2 supply; S2: liquid solution supply; RB: refrigerating bath; PC: precipitation chamber; LS: liquid separator; MV: micrometric valve; BPV: back-pressure valve; R: rotameter.
Molecules 26 02640 g002
Molecules 26 02640 g003 550
Figure 3. FESEM images of SAS nanoparticles of (a) Eu-ZnAc before thermal calcination and (b) Eu-ZnO after calcination step.
Figure 3. FESEM images of SAS nanoparticles of (a) Eu-ZnAc before thermal calcination and (b) Eu-ZnO after calcination step.
Molecules 26 02640 g003
Molecules 26 02640 g004 550
Figure 4. A sketch of sol–gel and supercritical drying stages.
Figure 4. A sketch of sol–gel and supercritical drying stages.
Molecules 26 02640 g004
Table
Table 1. Synthesis of photocatalysts by supercritical deposition. NPs = nanoparticles; MB = methylene blue; MO = methyl orange; RB = rhodamine B; TBOT= tetrabutyl orthotitanate; TTIP= titanium tetraisopropoxide; PPC = preparation chamber pressure; TPC = preparation chamber temperature; PS= deposition chamber pressure; TS= stage temperature; t= deposition period.
Table 1. Synthesis of photocatalysts by supercritical deposition. NPs = nanoparticles; MB = methylene blue; MO = methyl orange; RB = rhodamine B; TBOT= tetrabutyl orthotitanate; TTIP= titanium tetraisopropoxide; PPC = preparation chamber pressure; TPC = preparation chamber temperature; PS= deposition chamber pressure; TS= stage temperature; t= deposition period.
Metal Organic
Precursor		Metal OxideOperating
Conditions		Mean NPs DiameterPhotocatalytic
Application		ResultsRef.
TTIPTiO2PPC =11 MPa;
TPC =40 °C;
PS = 9 MPa;
TS = 100-180 °C;
t = 30 min		2.7 nmMB degradation40% of MB removal after 240 min[61]
Ti(OC(CH3)3)4TiO2/SBA-15-2.6–15.3 nmMB, MO, RB, and phenol degradationThe highest degradation efficiency with a TiO2 loading of 15 wt% and a calcination temperature of 400 °C[62]
Ni(NO3)2 · 6H2ONiOPPC =5 MPa;
PS = 22 MPa;
TS = 200 °C; t = 30 min		7 nmMB or MO
Degradation		0.25 wt% NiO–TiO2 showed the highest efficiency for both MB and MO degradation[63]
Zn(NO3)2 ·6H2O/ Ni(NO3)2 ·6H2OZnO/NiOPS = 20 MPa;
TS = 50 °C; t = 4 h		21 nmCongo Red
Degradation		About 97% of dye removal after 240 min; superior performance of catalysts prepared by supercritical deposition than those of commercial TiO2 and of composites prepared via incipient wetness impregnation[64]
TBOTTiO2PS = 20 MPa-MB degradationComplete MB discoloration after 80 min with scCO2- prepared catalyst; a superior efficiency than that of commercial TiO2[65]
Table
Table 2. Production of photocatalysts by SAS precipitation. CV = crystal violet; RR 180 = reactive red 180; EB = eriochrome black-T; MB = methylene blu; MO = methyl orange; titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP); P = operating pressure; T = operating temperature.
Table 2. Production of photocatalysts by SAS precipitation. CV = crystal violet; RR 180 = reactive red 180; EB = eriochrome black-T; MB = methylene blu; MO = methyl orange; titanium tetraisopropoxide (TTIP); P = operating pressure; T = operating temperature.
Metal Organic
Precursor		Metal
Oxide		Operating
Conditions		Mean Crystallite SizePhotocatalytic
Application		Band
Gap		ResultsRef.
TTIPTiO2P = 10-15 MPa;
T = 50-150 °C		13 nmRR 180 degradation-98% of dye removal after 45 min with TiO2 prepared at
15 MPa/150 °C		[42]
TTIPTiO2P = 25 MPa;
T = 60 °C		27 nmMB and MO
degradation		3.22 eVThe highest photodegradation with TiO2 consisted of 7 wt% of rutile and 93 wt% of anatase phase (98% discoloration in 90 min)[43]
TTIPTiO2P = 12 MPa;
T = 40 °C		13 nmWater splitting-Conversion% equal to 75% in 3 h; selectivity around 85% in all the time range studied[44]
Zn(CH3COO)2ZnOP = 15 MPa;
T = 40 °C		18 nmCV degradation3.10 eV500 °C as optimum calcination temperature to preserve the nanoparticle morphology; complete CV decolorization in 60 min[45]
Eu(CH3COO)3· H2O
Zn(CH3COO)2		Eu-ZnOP = 15 MPa;
T = 40 °C		15 nmEB degradation3.22 eVSuperior catalytic performance of SAS-prepared catalysts compared to those of commercial/traditional catalysts; complete discoloration after 240 min[46]
Table
Table 3. Synthesis of photocatalysts by sol–gel reaction and supercritical drying. SSA = specific surface area; RFCA = resorcinol-formaldehyde carbon aerogel; MB = methylene blue dye; MO = methyl orange dye; NPs= nanoparticles; RF= resorcinol-formaldehyde; SA: salicylic acid; s-PS = syndiotactic polystyrene; VOCs = volatile organic compounds; P = operating pressure; T = operating temperature; t= drying time.
Table 3. Synthesis of photocatalysts by sol–gel reaction and supercritical drying. SSA = specific surface area; RFCA = resorcinol-formaldehyde carbon aerogel; MB = methylene blue dye; MO = methyl orange dye; NPs= nanoparticles; RF= resorcinol-formaldehyde; SA: salicylic acid; s-PS = syndiotactic polystyrene; VOCs = volatile organic compounds; P = operating pressure; T = operating temperature; t= drying time.
PhotocatalystDrying
Conditions		Photocatalytic
Application		Band Gap
(eV)		SSA
(m2/g)		ResultsRef.
TiO2 aerogel-SA degradation-600About 98% of SA degradation in 900 min[51]
TiO2 aerogelP = 8 MPa;
T = 40 °C; t = 6 h		Phenol
degradation		3.03464 a; 100 bOptimum calcination temperature of 650 °C for the best photocatalytic performance (92% degradation yield); superior performance of scCO2- prepared samples than that of commercial TiO2[80]
TiO2 aerogelP = 8 MPa;
T = 37 °C; t = 4 h		Methanol assisted water splitting3.25600 a; 97 bHigher activity of scCO2- prepared samples than that of commercial TiO2[79]
TiO2 aerogelP = 10 MPa;
T = 50 °C		Phenol
degradation		-112 bscCO2- prepared aerogel 3 times more active than commercial TiO2[81]
TiO2 aerogelP = 8.27 MPa;
T = 35 °C		Water splitting-84.5 bH2 evolution rate 9.6 times higher with scCO2- prepared aerogel compared to that of commercial TiO2[82]
TiO2 nanowiresP = 41.4 MPa;
T = 60 °C; t = 24 h		MB degradation2.5-MB degradation efficiency equal to 88%; higher activity of scCO2- prepared samples than that of commercial one[84]
TiO2 layerP = 14 MPa;
T = 100 °C; t = 2 h		Stearic acid methyl ester decomposition-220 aComplete decomposition in about 22.5 h[85]
TiO2 pillared claysP = 20 MPa;
T = 50 °C; t = 3 h		Phenol degradation-254 aTotal degradation in less than 125 min[86]
N-doped TiO2 aerogelP = 20 MPa;
T = 40 °C; t = 4 h		Phenol degradation2.5280 a45% of degradation after 180 min[89]
Fe(III)-doped TiO2 aerogel-SA degradation-151 bTiO2- based aerogel with 1.8 at.% Fe(III) showed an apparent rate constant of SA degradation 6 times higher than commercial TiO2[90]
TiO2-Pt aerogelP = 9.5 MPa;
T = 40 °C		Ethanol reforming2.91-3.14600 a; 162 bThe highest H2 production rate (7.2 mmolH2 h-1 g-1) with 1%Pt and the smallest particles size[88]
TiO2–SiO2 aerogel-Water splitting3.42 715 aH2 production
in the range
0.73-1.35 mmol/gTiO2		[50]
TiO2–SiO2 aerogelP = 16 MPa;
T = 80-280 °C; t = 3 h		Benzene
decomposition		-967 aBenzene conversion up to 90% after 30 min[92]
TiO2–SiO2 aerogelP = 8.6 MPa;
T = 50 °C		VOCs oxidation-469 a; 306 bTiO2-SiO2 aerogel prepared by ethanol supercritical drying showed the highest removal efficiency (about 10%), also compared to commercial TiO2[93]
TiO2–SiO2 aerogelT = 50 °CTrichloroethylene
Oxidation		 469 a; 306 bTiO2-SiO2 aerogel prepared by ethanol supercritical drying showed the highest conversion (around 30%), also compared to that of commercial TiO2[94]
TiO2 aerogel;
TiO2–SiO2 aerogel		P = 11 MPa;
T = 60 °C		Degradation of methanol-150; 63598% conversion, almost double compared to commercial TiO2[83]
TiO2–SiO2 pillared claysP = 20 MPa;
T = 50 °C; t = 3 h		Phenol degradation-400 aLower activity of TiO2–SiO2 pillared clays compared to that of TiO2 pillared clays[86]
TiO2–RFCA-MO degradation-645More effective photocatalytic activity in the case of the TiO2–RFCA composites compared to the single materials[95]
TiO2–WO3-Fe3+ aerogelP = 11 MPa;
T = 42 °C; t = 8 h		MB degradation2.06379 a; 154 bAbout 90% and 70% of MB degradation after 12 h under UV or visible light, respectively[49]
ZnO/s-PSP = 20 MPa;
T = 40 °C; t = 4 h		Phenol degradation-276 aPhenol removal increased by increasing the pH of the solution; synergy between photocatalyst and PS-based support assured robustness, chemical stability, easy recovery after treatment, high removal efficiency and selectivity[96]
Au/TiO2 alginate beads-Water splitting-485–275 a; 187–136 bAu/TiO2 alginate beads are 8 times more active under solar light than commercial TiO2 with the same Au amount[87]
Au/CeO2 NPs dispersed on alginate aerogel-Water splitting-102Photocatalytic activity of Au/CeO2 NPs under visible light outperform that of standard WO3 even under UV irradiation.[31]
Ti-organic aerogel-Degradation
of various dyes		3.4-3.2688–350 bEffective stimuli-response of Ti-oxo-based materials[97]
N-doped ZrO2/TiO2-MB degradation-56-94N-doped samples show higher activity than undoped samples and commercial TiO2; the activity enhancement is higher in TiO2-based samples than Zr-modified ones[91]
TiO2/RF polymer aerogel;
TiO2/RF carbon aerogel		-MO degradation-232–870TiO2/RF carbon aerogel more active than TiO2/RF polymer aerogel in MO photodegradation[95]
a SSA evaluated before calcination; b SSA evaluated after calcination.
Table
Table 4. Other applications of scCO2 in photocatalysis. AO7= Acid Orange 7; BY28: Basic Yellow 28; CNT= carbon nanotubes; MO = methyl orange dye; MOFs= metal−organic frameworks; MB = methylene blue dye; RGO= reduced graphene oxide; SSA = specific surface area of the photocatalysts.
Table 4. Other applications of scCO2 in photocatalysis. AO7= Acid Orange 7; BY28: Basic Yellow 28; CNT= carbon nanotubes; MO = methyl orange dye; MOFs= metal−organic frameworks; MB = methylene blue dye; RGO= reduced graphene oxide; SSA = specific surface area of the photocatalysts.
PhotocatalystscCO2 UsePhotocatalytic
Application		SSA
(m2/g)		ResultsRef.
TiO2-coated
carbon surface		Supercritical pre-treatment before sol–gel reactionMB degradation378–487Optimal conditions for the fastest MB degradation rate: MB concentration of 20 mg/l at pH 6, catalyst content of 2.5 g/l[98]
TiO2-coated
carbon surface		Supercritical pre-treatment before sol–gel reactionDegradation of
acid yellow		325–575The degradation rate follows a pseudo-first order kinetics with the acid yellow concentration; it is proportional to the square root of the light intensity[99]
TiO2-coated
zeolite surface		Supercritical pre-treatment before sol–gel reactionDegradation of
Rhodamine B		103–267Optimal conditions for the fastest degradation rate: Rhodamine concentration of 2 mg/l at pH 10, catalyst content of 6 g/l[100]
TiO2-film supported
on silicon substrate		Supercritical post-treatmentDecomposition of
stearic acid		-High photocatalytic efficiency with scCO2-treated films (complete decomposition after 75 min)[101]
Ru-coordinated MOFsModification of
MOFs structure		Hydrogen production996–1257scCO2-modified MOFs exhibited a higher activity than those of the pure MOF and MOF loaded with Ru particles[102]
TiO2-loaded PCL foamsPCL foamingRemoval of textile dyes-Complete discoloration of AO7 and BY28 after 300 and 180 min, respectively[103]
Au/ZnO layered
structure on silk textile		Electroless plating and
cathodic deposition
of metal oxides on silk		Flexible wearable
device		-Issues related to conventional electroless plating overcome by sc-CO2: the silk was catalyzed without defects; adhesive property between silk and metalized-layer was enhanced[109]
Ag/WO3 nanosheetsSupercritical exfoliation
of WS2 nanosheets		Oxygen evolution
reactions		-Synergistic photocatalysis effect of Ag and amorphous WO3[110]
Pd-doped TiO2scCO2 as reaction medium for thermal hydrolysisReduction of CO2
to hydrocarbons		71–146Pd-TiO2 exhibited CH4 and CO production rates up to 22 and 2 times higher than those of commercial TiO2[104]
TiO2 powdersscCO2 as reaction medium for catalyst synthesisReduction of CO2
to formic acid		-Optimal irradiation time of 5 h for the maximum yield of formic acid; the amount of formic acid increased with pH, up to almost 15 µmol/gTiO2 in a solution with phosphoric acid (almost pH 2)[47]
CNT/TiO2 and
CNT/ Cu-dopedTiO2		scCO2 as reaction medium for thermal hydrolysisReduction of CO2
to hydrocarbons		150–216CNT/TiO2 composites showed CO and CH4 production rates (8.1 and 1.1 _µmol g−1 h−1, respectively) 4 and 15 times higher than those of commercial TiO2[106]
TiO2 powdersscCO2 as reaction medium for thermal hydrolysisReduction of CO2
to hydrocarbons		40–152TiO2 synthesis in supercritical medium resulted in a significant enhancement in the rate of CO2 catalytic conversion[107]
TiO2 powdersscCO2 as reaction medium for thermal hydrolysisMO oxidation113–350No effect of synthesis pressure on the activity of prepared TiO2; the increase of synthesis temperature from 200 °C to 300 °C led to an increase of crystalline quality and size, resulting in a higher activity[105]
RGO/ZnOSupercritical coating of RGO with ZnO, involving simultaneously “thermal decomposition of Zn(NO3)2 ·6H2O (i.e., ZnO precursor) + GO thermal reduction”Hydrogen production-ZnO/RGO composite exhibited a H2 production activity 4.5 times higher (289 µmol/g) than that of pure ZnO (61.5 µmol/g) in 2 h[111]
TiO2 powdersscCO2 as reaction medium for octanol oxidationOctanol oxidation50Possibility to improve yield and selectivity by modulating temperature or pressure; above the critical point, photooxidative degradation rate increased as scCO2 pressure decreased at 36°C[48]
Table
Table 5. A summary about the applications and the advantages of using scCO2 in photocatalysis.
Table 5. A summary about the applications and the advantages of using scCO2 in photocatalysis.
ApplicationsPROS
As a solvent for the deposition of semiconductors/active species on/in the support surface
  • Reduction or often complete elimination of the use of toxic organic solvents
  • Preserving of porous structure of the supports without collapse
  • High mass transfer
  • Good and homogeneous dispersion of the metal-based compounds
As a solvent/antisolvent/co-solute in
the production of particles-based powders
  • Reduction/elimination of the use of toxic organic solvents
  • Good control of particles’ morphology and size by modulating the operating conditions
  • Possibility to obtain very small size due to gas-like and liquid-like properties of scCO2
  • Very high surface area
  • Total removal of organic solvents from powder
Production of aerogels
  • Total removal of organic solvents
  • Porous structure is preserved, without collapse
  • Very high surface area
As a foaming agent
  • No toxic organic solvents are used
  • Possibility to control pores’ size by modulating the operating conditions
  • Very high surface area
  • Possibility to perform a one-step process “support foaming + deposition of organometallic precursors”
As a reaction medium
  • scCO2 is not flammable
  • scCO2 is easy to recycle on an industrial scale
  • scCO2 is less polluting than other solvents/reaction media
  • rapid and complete removal of scCO2 by depressurization, avoiding the contamination of products
  • Improvement in mass transfer
  • Possibility to optimize the efficiency/selectivity by tuning the operating conditions and, consequently, the scCO2 properties
  • Possibility to simultaneously perform also a supercritical coating/deposition, foaming, etc.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Franco, P.; Sacco, O.; Vaiano, V.; De Marco, I. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide-Based Processes in Photocatalytic Applications. Molecules 2021, 26, 2640. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092640

AMA Style

Franco P, Sacco O, Vaiano V, De Marco I. Supercritical Carbon Dioxide-Based Processes in Photocatalytic Applications. Molecules. 2021; 26(9):2640. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092640

Chicago/Turabian Style

Franco, Paola, Olga Sacco, Vincenzo Vaiano, and Iolanda De Marco. 2021. "Supercritical Carbon Dioxide-Based Processes in Photocatalytic Applications" Molecules 26, no. 9: 2640. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092640

APA Style

Franco, P., Sacco, O., Vaiano, V., & De Marco, I. (2021). Supercritical Carbon Dioxide-Based Processes in Photocatalytic Applications. Molecules, 26(9), 2640. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092640

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop