Next Article in Journal
Growth Inhibition and Apoptotic Effect of Pine Extract and Abietic Acid on MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells via Alteration of Multiple Gene Expressions Using In Vitro Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Optogenetic Dual-Switch System for Rewiring Metabolic Flux for Polyhydroxybutyrate Production
Previous Article in Journal
An Investigation towards Coupling Molecular Dynamics with Computational Fluid Dynamics for Modelling Polymer Pyrolysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Advances towards 4-Hydroxybutyrate Containing Polyhydroxyalkanoates Production for Biomedical Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 1
10.3390/molecules27010294
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biosynthesis of Poly-(3-hydroxybutyrate) under the Control of an Anaerobically Induced Promoter by Recombinant Escherichia coli from Sucrose

by
Fangting Wu
1,†,
Ying Zhou
2,†,
Wenyu Pei
1,
Yuhan Jiang
1,
Xiaohui Yan
3,* and
Hong Wu
1,*
1
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Conservation and Utilization of Animal Diversity, College of Life Sciences, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China
2
School of Chinese Materia Medica, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Component-Based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2022, 27(1), 294; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010294
Submission received: 14 December 2021 / Revised: 28 December 2021 / Accepted: 31 December 2021 / Published: 4 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Synthesis of Polymers and Polymer Precursors)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Poly-(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) is a polyester with biodegradable and biocompatible characteristics and has many potential applications. To reduce the raw material costs and microbial energy consumption during PHB production, cheaper carbon sources such as sucrose were evaluated for the synthesis of PHB under anaerobic conditions. In this study, metabolic network analysis was conducted to construct an optimized pathway for PHB production using sucrose as the sole carbon source and to guide the gene knockout to reduce the generation of mixed acid byproducts. The plasmid pMCS-sacC was constructed to utilize sucrose as a sole carbon source, and the cascaded promoter P3nirB was used to enhance PHB synthesis under anaerobic conditions. The mixed acid fermentation pathway was knocked out in Escherichia coli S17-1 to reduce the synthesis of byproducts. As a result, PHB yield was improved to 80% in 6.21 g/L cell dry weight by the resulted recombinant Escherichia coli in a 5 L bed fermentation, using sucrose as the sole carbon source under anaerobic conditions. As a result, the production costs of PHB will be significantly reduced.

1. Introduction

Global warming concerns and environmental problems, such as microplastics and non-degradable plastics, are necessitating the transition from petrochemical-dependent industries into biorefineries and the production of polymers from renewable biomass-based resources such as microbes [1,2]. Researchers have emphasized the need to produce biodegradable bio-based plastics including polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), polylatic acid (PLA), poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT), and so on, as a sustainable solution to the issues of plastic pollution and fuel depletion [3,4,5,6].
PHAs, as a family of biodegradable and biocompatible thermal polyesters, have attracted considerable attention to be developed as environmentally friendly bioplastics. The properties of PHAs are similar to those of conventional plastics [7]. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) is the most common and well-studied member among the PHAs [8,9], and the favorable properties of PHB have led to its development and utilization as a biodegradable material in many fields such as wrapping films, bags, and bottles [10,11]. PHB can accumulate in various microorganisms from the natural environment, including Alcaligenes, Bacillus, and Pseudomonas [12,13]. Benefiting from the well-characterized genome and the wide availability of tools for genetic manipulation, Escherichia coli expressing acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase (PhaA), acetoacetyl-CoA reductase (PhaB), and PHA synthase (PhaC) has been extensively studied for PHB production, particularly for high-cell-density cultivation in bioreactors [14,15,16,17]. Process optimization and metabolic engineering strategies have facilitated a deeper understanding of PHB production by recombinant E. coli from renewable carbon sources. However, the high costs of fermentation substrates and the remarkable energy consumption during the fermentation processes had impeded the application of PHB as a bio-based plastic [18,19].
Synthesis of PHB via recombinant E. coli strain has received extensive attention, and numerous studies attempted to reduce the production cost of PHB to promote its commercialization [20,21,22,23,24]. For example, by optimizing the metabolic pathways of PHB, an engineered E. coli can use crude glycerol as the sole carbon source to produce PHB and reach a PHB content of 65% dry cell weight after fermentation [20]. Moreover, construction of the sucrose utilization pathway in an engineered E. coli XL1-Blue strain resulted in the production of 38 wt.% PHB with 20 g/L sucrose as the sole carbon source [21]. In addition to expanding the repertoire of the widely available and low-cost substrates such as sucrose, xylose, and glycerol, many studies also aimed at reducing the energy consumption in the fermentation processes, by utilizing hypoxic conditions that are more conducive to the accumulation of PHB [22,23,24].
Current research interest in PHB production mainly focuses on the application of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology strategies to increase PHB contents at a relatively low cost [25,26]. If the host strain can utilize the cheap and abundant carbon sources, the cost of PHB production will be significantly reduced, which is eventually beneficial for the popularization of PHB. Sucrose is an inexpensive and readily available substrate in sugarcane molasses and can be used as an alternative carbon source to glucose in E. coli [27,28]. The ability of sucrose utilization in an E. coli strain depends on the β-fructofuranosidase system, which is secreted into the culture medium where it can break down sucrose into glucose and fructose. When an E. coli strain did not have such enzymes, it could not use sucrose as carbon source. In order to produce PHB from sucrose in E. coli strains lacking sacC, both sucrose utilization and PHB biosynthesis pathways needed to be established. A sucrose utilization pathway was constructed in E. coli by expressing the β-fructofuranosidase (SacC) from Mannheimia succiniciproducens MBEL 55E [29]. By introducing the sacC gene, E. coli could convert sucrose into glucose and fructose [21]. In this way, the recombinant strain becomes a cost-effective and sustainable host to produce PHB and other materials.
The minimal cell growth rate, when the dissolved oxygen level cannot match the demand of cell growth, can be resolved with the inclusion of air compressors and agitation, but these efforts incur high energy consumption and additional costs during the fermentation process. E. coli can grow under microaerobic or anaerobic conditions; therefore, it is important to find efficient promoters that could respond to oxygen limitation to control gene expression under anaerobic conditions [30]. Anaerobic promoters that are inducible under a low dissolved oxygen level, such as PadhE and Pvgb, could enhance PHB accumulation [31,32]. Indeed, PHB accumulation was increased by 18% under the control of the alcohol dehydrogenase promoter, PadhE [30]. The cascaded vgb promoter, P8vgb, improved PHB yield to more than 90% in recombinant E. coli under the low-aeration condition [33]. Furthermore, the bacterial cells are subjected to a low dissolved oxygen level and acidic byproducts. To overcome these challenges, E. coli strains with knocked out genes related to acid synthesis (for example, ackA-pta, poxB, and ldhA) have already been developed as a suitable host for PHB production under microaerobic conditions [34].
In this study, three E. coli strains (S17-1, DH5α, and Top10) were engineered to utilize sucrose as the sole carbon source using a β-galactosidase-expressing plasmid. Furthermore, the anaerobic promoter PnirB, which controls the expression of the nitrite reductase in E. coli, was selected to control the expression of the phaCAB operon in E. coli [35]. Their abilities to produce PHB under microaerobic conditions were compared. The genes involved in acid formation in E. coli were then knocked out in the most effective strain, and the anaerobic promoter PnirB was cascaded to enhance PHB production under microaerobic conditions. Findings from this study offer a deeper understanding of PHB production in E. coli with anaerobic promoter expression systems.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Metabolic Engineering Strategies for PHB Production from Sucrose

The β-fructofuranosidase can break down sucrose into glucose and fructose. By engineering the pathway of the β-fructofuranosidase system, recombinant E. coli and Ralstonia eutropha have already been successfully modified to synthesize PHB with sucrose as the sole carbon source [21,36]. In this study, the β-fructofuranosidase-encoding gene was expressed in three different E. coli strains: S17-1, DH5α, and Top10, to compare their ability to produce PHB from sucrose in flask culture (20 g/L sucrose). Three mutant strains were all established by introducing the pBHR68 plasmid and the pMCS-sacC plasmid into these three E. coli strains. The pBHR68 plasmid contains the phaCAB genes from R. eutropha and the pMCS-sacC plasmid harbors the β-fructofuranosidase-encoding gene (sacC) from M. succiniciproducens (Figure 1).
The concentrations of sucrose, glucose, and fructose were measured to determine sucrose utilization by the engineered pathway with the sacC gene in the flask culture. Sucrose was rapidly hydrolyzed into glucose and fructose initially, indicating that the sucrose utilization pathway had been successfully established in the host strains. The concentrations of remnant glucose were 3.40 ± 0.39 g/L (S17-1), 3.63 ± 0.23 g/L (DH5α), and 3.33± 0.48 g/L (Top10), while the concentrations of remnant fructose were 8.62 ± 0.68 g/L (S17-1), 8.55 ± 0.57 g/L (DH5α), and 8.79 ± 0.36 g/L (Top10) (Figure 2). The remnant fructose concentrations were relatively lower than that of glucose in all the three strains after cultivation. Thus, by expressing the sacC gene to hydrolyze sucrose, fructose was not utilized as efficiently as glucose in the recombinant E. coli strains (Figure 2A). This was consistent with the trend of sucrose utilization for the production of PHAs in a previous study [21]. During cultivation of the recombinant strain using sucrose, glucose was almost entirely utilized while fructose was not fully consumed.
To identify differences in PHB accumulation by the host strains, the CDW (cell dry weight) and intracellular PHB content were measured after cultivation for 48 h. E. coli S17-1, DH5α, and TOP10 harboring plasmids pBHR68 and pMCS-sacC were cultivated in minimal medium (MM medium) with added 20 g/L sucrose. Final CDW values were 1.51 ± 0.52 g/L (S17-1), 1.02 ± 0.27 g/L (DH5α), and 0.50 ± 0.02 g/L (Top10). All the three recombinant E. coli strains could accumulate more than 35% PHB. The final PHB contents (wt.%) were 56% (S17-1), 53% (DH5α), and 38% (Top10). Among them, the highest PHB content was achieved by the recombinant S17-1 strain, while the lowest content was observed in Top10 (Figure 2B). S17-1 (pBHR68 and pMCS-sacC) yielded a maximal PHB content of 0.85 g/L and was the most suitable host for PHB accumulation using sucrose as substrate. Utilization of sucrose by the recombinant strains could facilitate low-cost PHB production, which will increase economic competitiveness.

2.2. Genetically Modified Promoter PnirB under Anaerobic Condition

Microaerobic and anaerobic conditions were reported to reduce the costs for microbial production of PHB [37]. PnirB is the promoter controlling the expression of the first gene of the nir operon in E. coli induced in anaerobic conditions. In order to achieve high PHB content under microaerobic conditions in E. coli, the nirB promoter was used to control the PHB biosynthesis operon phaCAB.
Assembly of repeated Pvgb promoters was previously shown to create the strongest induction [33]; thus, this tandem repeat method was employed with the PnirB promoter to improve cell growth under oxygen-limitation conditions. The Gibson assembly technique was used to generate three plasmids harboring different numbers of tandem repeats of the nirB promoter (Table 1). The phaCAB gene cluster was activated by transcription initiation of the anaerobic promoters PnirB, P2nirB, and P3nirB to regulate PHB expression under anaerobic conditions (Figure 1). Comparison of the cascaded nirB promoters with the native promoter is shown in Figure 3. Differences in the sequence repeat may explain the likely variation in the ability of the promoters to induce downstream gene expression. Based on previous studies, PHB production is related to the transcription level of phaC [33]. The mRNA level of phaC was analyzed by RT-PCR as an indicator of phaCAB operon expression intensity. In recombinant E. coli with plasmid pBHR-P3nirB, the mRNA level of phaC was fivefold higher than that of the strain harboring the native promoter (Figure 3A). After cultivation for 24 h in anaerobic conditions, the efficacy of gene expression was improved with the increase in the repeat number of the promoter PnirB. In E. coli S17-1 harboring pBHR-P3nirB, the mRNA transcription level of phaC was the highest, indicating that this strain may produce the highest content of PHB under anaerobic conditions (Figure 3A). Under the control of promoter P3nirB, the transcription level of phaC was significantly increased (p < 0.001).
Consequently, pBHR-P3nirB was selected to test cell growth and PHB accumulation in the recombinant E. coli S17-1 under anaerobic conditions. Under the control of the native promoter, the CDW of E. coli S17-1 exceeded 1.23 g/L, and the PHB content in the cells was 51%. The E. coli S17-1 (pBHR-PnirB) strain accumulated 1.52 g/L CDW and contained over 41% PHB after cultivation for 48 h. In contrast, E. coli S17-1 (pBHR-P2nirB) grew to 1.63 g/L CDW and contained 65% PHB. Recombinant E. coli S17-1 harboring the plasmid pBHR-P3nirB (three tandem repeats of PnirB) grew to approximately 1.77 g/L CDW and contained 77% PHB (Figure 3B). Under the control of P3nirB, the recombinant strain yielded the highest quantity of PHB after 48 h in shake flasks. Thus, the newly constructed promoter P3nirB was used in further experiments to control the expression of the phaCAB operon in anaerobic conditions.

2.3. Disruption of the Mixed Acid Fermentation Pathway

During the past few decades, microbial production of PHB under oxygen-limited conditions has attracted considerable attention because of the reduction in fermentation costs. Under anaerobic conditions, E. coli undertakes mixed acid fermentation via a pathway that produces lactate, succinate, acetate, formate, and ethanol, which decrease the carbon flux into PHB accumulation (Figure 1). It was previously reported that disruption of the mixed acid fermentation pathway could increase PHB accumulation in E. coli [30]. To investigate the possibility of a synergistic effect, a series of mixed acid fermentation mutants—E. coli SA, E. coli SAP, and E. coli SAPL—were constructed (Table 1). Genes ackA-pta and poxB, related to the formation of acetate, and the gene ldhA, related to the formation of D-lactate from pyruvate, were knocked out in E. coli S17-1, to reduce the formation of byproducts.
Initially, the resulting recombinant strains were cultivated in the MM medium supplemented with 20 g/L glucose to produce PHB. After cultivation for 48 h, E. coli SA harboring plasmid pBHR-P3nirB reached a yield of 77% PHB. E. coli SAP (pBHR-P3nirB) grew better under anaerobic conditions, producing over 1.34 g/L CDW that contained 84% PHB, significantly higher than the 72% PHB produced by E. coli S17-1 (pBHR-P3nirB). PHB accumulated up to 87% of 1.90 g/L CDW in the E. coli SAPL ackA-pta, poxB, and ldhA deletion mutant (Table 2). E. coli SAPL harboring the plasmid pBHR-P3nirB showed the highest PHB content after cultivation compared with the wild-type and other mutant strains.
Next, the plasmid pMCS-sacC encoding β-fructofuranosidase was inserted into E. coli SAPL (pBHR-P3nirB). The resulting recombinant strain was then cultivated in the MM medium, with added 20 g/L sucrose as the carbon source, at 37 °C for 48 h; ampicillin and kanamycin were added to the medium to maintain the stability of the plasmids pBHR-P3nirB and pMCS-sacC. The sucrose was rapidly hydrolyzed, and the concentrations of glucose and fructose were observed during the cultivation. PHB accumulated up to 79%, and CDW reached 7.71 g/L in E. coli SAPL in MM medium sucrose in shake flasks (Table 3). These results indicated that E. coli SAPL (pBHR-P3nirB, pMCS-sacC) was more suitable and efficient for PHB production from sucrose as the carbon source under anaerobic culture conditions.

2.4. Production of PHB from Sucrose in Batch Fermentation

Since the recombinant E. coli SAPL strain harboring the plasmids pBHR-P3nirB and pMCS-sacC supported the highest production of PHB in flask cultures, it was used as the host strain for batch fermentation. E. coli SAPL (pBHR-P3nirB, pMCS-sacC) was cultured in a 5 L fermenter containing MM medium with 20 g/L sucrose. The sucrose was completely hydrolyzed into glucose and fructose, which could be efficiently used for cell growth as well as PHB production, similar to the flask cultures (see Supplementary Material). The host strain grew well by utilizing sucrose as a carbon source and resulting in a final CDW of 7.71 g/L. After cultivation for 48 h under anaerobic conditions, 81% of PHB was accumulated and the final concentration of PHB at the end of batch fermentation was 6.21 g/L (Figure 4). Cells of the fermentation strains were observed by SEM/TEM and were found to contain PHB inclusions (Figure 4), indicating that the sucrose pathway had been successfully constructed and P3nirB was suitable to control PHB expression under a low level of oxygen. Further experiments on the optimization of fermentation conditions to enhance PHA synthesis may be beneficial for the commercial production of PHB.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Bacterial Strains and Plasmids

All bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Three E. coli strains, S17-1, DH5α, and Top10, were selected as the host strains based on previous studies [21,33], to test their ability in PHB production from sucrose. E. coli is commonly used for genetic recombination, and the genes ackA-pta, poxB, and ldhA related to mixed acid fermentation were knocked out by the one-step disruption method [38]. The homologous sequence (39 bp) upstream and downstream of each target gene and the kanamycin resistance gene (Kan) as a selection marker flanked by FLP recognition target sites were amplified by PCR to replace the target fragment on the chromosome. The Kan gene was then eliminated with the help of plasmid pCP20 expressing the FLP recombinase. The resulting deletions were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Three mutant strains (E. coli SA, E. coli SAP, and E. coli SAPL) with one gene knockout individually or all three genes knocked out together were constructed in this study (Table 1).
Genes encoding PHB synthesis operon phaCAB from Ralstonia eutropha and SacC from M. succiniciproducens MBEL55E were cloned into plasmids pBHR68 and pBBR1MCS-2, respectively. The construction of plasmids included vector isolation, DNA amplification of genes, restriction enzyme digestion, and other molecular cloning procedures. The anaerobic promoter PnirB was cloned from the genomic DNA of E. coli extracted by the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The PCR program comprised an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min. The amplified sequence was tested for purity and size by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Genomic DNA was quantified with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer and used as the template to finish the promoter PCR. Cascaded promoter PnirB was obtained by the Gibson assembly technique.

3.2. Culture Medium and Growth Conditions

Luria–Bertani (LB) medium (pH 7.2), used for DNA manipulations and plasmid construction, contained (per liter) 10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, and 5 g NaCl. Strains were cultured in LB medium at pH 7.2 and 37 °C. When antibiotic selection was required during cultivation, ampicillin (100 μg/mL), kanamycin (50 μg/mL), or chloramphenicol (30 μg/mL) were added to the medium depending on the plasmids.
The MM medium was used for PHB production in flask cultures and batch fermentations. This medium (pH 6.8) contained (per liter) (NH4)2SO4 2.0 g, MgSO4 0.2 g, Na2HPO4·12H2O 9.65 g, KH2PO4 1.5 g, trace metal solution I 10 mL, and trace metal solution II 1 mL [39]. Trace metal solution contained FeSO4, CaCl2, ZnSO4·7H2O, MnSO4·4H2O, CuSO4·5H2O, and (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O and was sterilized separately. For PHB production, glucose (20 g/L) or sucrose (20 g/L) was added into the medium as the carbon source. Glucose was sterilized at 115 °C, and sucrose was sterilized using a 0.22 μm filter.
Seed cultures for flask fermentation were first prepared in LB medium incubated at 37 °C overnight in a rotary shaker at 200 rpm, and 1 mL of this overnight culture was then used to inoculate 100 mL MM medium. Aerobic growth was conducted using a 500 mL shake flask without baffles containing 100 mL culture medium under vigorous agitation at 50 rpm (Shanghai, China). Batch culture of the recombinant E. coli strains was performed at 37 °C in a 5 L fermenter (New Brunswick BioFlo310, MA, USA) containing 2 L MM medium plus 20 g/L sucrose. Anaerobic conditions were measured by dissolved oxygen electrodes during fermentation.

3.3. Real-Time Quantitative PCR

To study the induction effects of different promoters, calibration of the real-time quantitative PCR (RT-PCR) was performed based on a previously reported method [40]. Total RNA of E. coli was isolated, and cDNA was synthesized using an RNAprep pure Cell/Bacteria Kit and a FastQuant RT Kit. The RT-PCR assay for mRNA was performed with SuperReal PreMix (SYBR Green), using 16S rRNA (primers 16S-F: CACACTGGAACTGAGACAC and 16S-R: CTTCTTCTGCGGGTAACG) as the inner standard.

3.4. Electron Microscopy

PHB particles were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) after fermentation. For SEM, E. coli cells were collected and fixed with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde, then washed with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Next, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% ethanol were used to wash the fixed samples, and the samples were then further dehydrated using 2-methylpropan-2-ol mixed with ethanol (1:1). After treatment with pure 2-methylpropan-2-ol, the prepared sample was lyophilized and examined by SEM. For TEM, E. coli cells were pelleted by centrifugation, washed twice with PBS, and then mixed with a pre-cooled fixative solution at 4 °C overnight. After rinsing with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), the samples were fixed with a 1% osmium acid solution and dehydrated with graded ethanol solutions and acetone. The prepared sample was sliced using a Leica Ultracut S ultramicrotome and was visualized using a Talos F200X transmission electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

3.5. Analytical Procedures

Polymers were purified from the recombinant E. coli strains that were cultivated in MM supplemented with 20 g/L sucrose. Briefly, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000× g and 4 °C for 10 min and washed twice with distilled water. Cell dry weight (CDW) was measured after the cell pellets were lyophilized for more than 12 h. Methanolysis was performed by adding 2 mL CH3OH/H2SO4 with benzoic acid and 2 mL CHCl3 to the samples and incubating at 100 °C for 4 h. After cooling to room temperature and adding 1 mL ddH2O for stratification, the organic phase containing methyl-3-hydroxyalkanoates was analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) using a Spectra System P2000 (Thermo Separation, MA, USA) to measure the PHB content. GC was conducted using an HP-5 column (30 m, 0.25 mm) and a flame-ionization detector. Pure PHB was used as a standard sample for the GC based on a previous study [33].
To study the concentrations of sucrose, glucose, and fructose during batch fermentation, the culture supernatant was filtered through a 0.2 µm syringe filter and then analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; 1260 infinity series; Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) equipped with RID Detectors (G1362A, Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) and an Aminex HPX-87H ion-exclusion column operating at 37 °C. Sulfuric acid at a concentration of 0.005 N was used at flow rate of 1 mL/min as the mobile phase.

4. Conclusions

Engineering microbial host strains to produce PHAs in a more efficient and cheaper way is important for their application as an environmentally friendly alternative to traditional plastics. Considering the substrate and dependence of oxygen, development of recombinant E. coli strains to produce PHB from sucrose as the sole carbon source under anaerobic condition can reduce both source material costs and energy consumption [41,42,43]. All the substantial components, including cost for the raw materials, utilities, and waste disposal, should be taken into account while estimating the cost [44,45]. The cost of the carbon source was mainly related with the price of different feedstocks, which have been shown to account for approximately 40% of the total PHB production costs [45]. The use of cheap carbon sources such as sucrose instead of glucose contributes to the economic feasibility of the method. On the other hand, aeration during fermentation is a major contributing factor to the fermentation costs, and the energy consumed on aeration could be reduced by using the anaerobic promoters that drive the expression of key biosynthetic genes under anaerobic conditions [33,45]. Thus, the use of promoter P3nirB could reduce the energy spent on compressed air, and the cost on feedstocks could be reduced by the utilization of sucrose, which is much cheaper than glucose, as the carbon resource. In this study, plasmid pMCS-sacC was constructed to utilize sucrose through the expression of β-fructofuranosidase and the promoter P3nirB was used to control PHB synthesis under anaerobic conditions. The mixed acid fermentation pathway was knocked out in E. coli S17-1 to reduce the synthesis of byproducts, thus E. coli SAPL was obtained as the host strain.
In summary, the recombinant E. coli SAPL strain harboring plasmids pBHR-P3nirB and pMCS-sacC developed in this study could successfully utilize sucrose and produce 80% of PHB under anaerobic conditions. After cultivation for 48 h under anaerobic conditions, the amount of PHB at the end of batch fermentation reached 6.21 g/L, and the cost of substrate and energy was reduced. Findings from the study demonstrated that the sucrose utilization pathway could be constructed by expressing the sacC gene and that the cascaded anaerobic promoter P3nirB could enhance PHB accumulation under a low level of oxygen. Using microorganisms that are capable of sucrose utilization under anaerobic conditions will be useful for establishing a cost-effective process for the production of PHB and other value-added chemicals.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: Concentrations of glucose and fructose in batch fermentation for PHB production.

Author Contributions

Data curation and writing—original draft preparation, F.W. and Y.Z.; methodology, W.P.; validation, Y.J.; supervision, funding acquisition, and writing—review and editing, X.Y. and H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science and Technology Planning Project of Tianjin (18ZLZXZF00220) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872779).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the bacteria are available from the authors.

References

  1. Reichert, C.L.; Bugnicourt, E.; Coltelli, M.B.; Cinelli, P.; Lazzeri, A.; Canesi, I.; Braca, F.; Martinez, B.M.; Alonso, R.; Agostinis, L.; et al. Bio-Based Packaging: Materials, Modifications, Industrial Applications and Sustainability. Polymers 2020, 12, 1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Garrison, T.F.; Murawski, A.; Quirino, R.L. Bio-Based Polymers with Potential for Biodegradability. Polymers 2016, 8, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, M.; Wilkins, M.R. Recent advances in polyhydroxyalkanoate production: Feedstocks, strains and process developments. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 156, 691–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lambert, S.; Wagner, M. Environmental performance of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: The road ahead. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 6855–6871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Su, S.; Kopitzky, R.; Tolga, S.; Kabasci, S. Polylactide (PLA) and Its Blends with Poly(butylene succinate) (PBS): A Brief Review. Polymers 2019, 11, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Fu, Y.; Wu, G.; Bian, X.; Zeng, J.; Weng, Y. Biodegradation behavior of Poly(Butylene Adipate-Co-Terephthalate) (PBAT), Poly(Lactic Acid) (PLA), and their blend in freshwater with Sediment. Molecules 2020, 25, 3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, G.Q.; Jiang, X.R. Engineering bacteria for enhanced polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) biosynthesis. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2017, 2, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. McAdam, B.; Brennan Fournet, M.; McDonald, P.; Mojicevic, M. Production of Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and factors impacting its chemical and mechanical characteristics. Polymers 2020, 12, 2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Amadu, A.A.; Qiu, S.; Ge, S.; Addico, G.N.D.; Ameka, G.K.; Yu, Z.; Xia, W.; Abbew, A.W.; Shao, D.; Champagne, P.; et al. A review of biopolymer (Poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate) synthesis in microbes cultivated on wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 756, 143729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zheng, Y.; Chen, J.C.; Ma, Y.M.; Chen, G.Q. Engineering biosynthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) for diversity and cost reduction. Metab. Eng. 2020, 58, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hermann, D.R.; Lilek, D.; Daffert, C.; Fritz, I.; Weinberger, S.; Rumpler, V.; Herbinger, B.; Prohaska, K. In situ based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) for the fast and reproducible identification of PHB producers in cyanobacterial cultures. Analyst 2020, 145, 5242–5251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Urtuvia, V.; Villegas, P.; Gonzalez, M.; Seeger, M. Bacterial production of the biodegradable plastics polyhydroxyalkanoates. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 70, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mostafa, Y.S.; Alrumman, S.A.; Otaif, K.A.; Alamri, S.A.; Mostafa, M.S.; Sahlabji, T. Production and characterization of bioplastic by polyhydroxybutyrate accumulating erythrobacter aquimaris isolated from Mangrove Rhizosphere. Molecules 2020, 25, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Meng, D.C.; Chen, G.Q. Synthetic Biology of Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA). Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2018, 162, 147–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tang, X.; Chen, E.Y. Chemical synthesis of perfectly isotactic and high melting bacterial poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) from bio-sourced racemic cyclic diolide. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, S.H.; Kim, G.B.; Kim, H.U.; Park, S.J.; Choi, J.I. Enhanced production of poly3hydroxybutyrate (PHB) by expression of response regulator DR1558 in recombinant Escherichia coli. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 131, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lin, J.H.; Lee, M.C.; Sue, Y.S.; Liu, Y.C.; Li, S.Y. Cloning of phaCAB genes from thermophilic Caldimonas manganoxidans in Escherichia coli for poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 6419–6430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tan, D.; Wang, Y.; Tong, Y.; Chen, G.Q. Grand challenges for industrializing Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs). Trends Biotechnol. 2021, 39, 953–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bedade, D.K.; Edson, C.B.; Gross, R.A. Emergent approaches to efficient and sustainable Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production. Molecules 2021, 26, 3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ganesh, M.; Senthamarai, A.; Shanmughapriya, S.; Natarajaseenivasan, K. Effective production of low crystallinity Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) by recombinant E. coli strain JM109 using crude glycerol as sole carbon source. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 192, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sohn, Y.J.; Kim, H.T.; Baritugo, K.A.; Song, H.M.; Ryu, M.H.; Kang, K.H.; Jo, S.Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, Y.J.; Choi, J.I.; et al. Biosynthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoates from sucrose by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli strains. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 149, 593–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Takahashi, R.Y.U.; Castilho, N.A.S.; Silva, M.; Miotto, M.C.; Lima, A.O.S. Prospecting for Marine Bacteria for Polyhydroxyalkanoate production on low-cost substrates. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Inan, K.; Sal, F.A.; Rahman, A.; Putman, R.J.; Agblevor, F.A.; Miller, C.D. Microbubble assisted polyhydroxybutyrate production in Escherichia coli. BMC Res. Notes 2016, 9, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Izaguirre, J.K.; da Fonseca, M.M.R.; Fernandes, P.; Villaran, M.C.; Castanon, S.; Cesario, M.T. Upgrading the organic fraction of municipal solid waste to poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 290, 121785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schilling, C.; Badri, A.; Sieber, V.; Koffas, M.; Schmid, J. Metabolic engineering for production of functional polysaccharides. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2020, 66, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cardoso, L.O.B.; Karolski, B.; Gracioso, L.H.; do Nascimento, C.A.O.; Perpetuo, E.A. Increased P3HB accumulation capacity of methylorubrum sp. in response to discontinuous methanol addition. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 192, 846–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sabri, S.; Nielsen, L.K.; Vickers, C.E. Molecular control of sucrose utilization in Escherichia coli W, an efficient sucrose-utilizing strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Miranda De Sousa Dias, M.; Koller, M.; Puppi, D.; Morelli, A.; Chiellini, F.; Braunegg, G. Fed-Batch Synthesis of Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) from Sucrose and 4-hydroxybutyrate Precursors by Burkholderia sacchari Strain DSM 17165. Bioengineering 2017, 4, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Lee, J.W.; Choi, S.; Kim, J.M.; Lee, S.Y. Mannheimia succiniciproducens phosphotransferase system for sucrose utilization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 1699–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wei, X.X.; Zheng, W.T.; Hou, X.; Liang, J.; Li, Z.J. Metabolic Engineering of Escherichia coli for Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) Production under Microaerobic Condition. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 789315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Su, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Hou, Z.; Zhu, X.; Guo, X.; Ling, P. Improved poly-gamma-glutamic acid production by chromosomal integration of the Vitreoscilla hemoglobin gene (vgb) in Bacillus subtilis. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4733–4736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Membrillo-Hernandez, J.; Kwon, O.; De Wulf, P.; Finkel, S.E.; Lin, E.C. Regulation of adhE (encoding ethanol oxidoreductase) by the Fis protein in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 7390–7393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wu, H.; Wang, H.; Chen, J.; Chen, G.Q. Effects of cascaded vgb promoters on poly(hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) synthesis by recombinant Escherichia coli grown micro-aerobically. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 10013–10021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jian, J.; Zhang, S.Q.; Shi, Z.Y.; Wang, W.; Chen, G.Q.; Wu, Q. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates by Escherichia coli mutants with defected mixed acid fermentation pathways. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 2247–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Harborne, N.R.; Griffiths, L.; Busby, S.J.; Cole, J.A. Transcriptional control, translation and function of the products of the five open reading frames of the Escherichia coli nir operon. Mol. Microbiol. 1992, 6, 2805–2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Park, S.J.; Jang, Y.A.; Noh, W.; Oh, Y.H.; Lee, H.; David, Y.; Baylon, M.G.; Shin, J.; Yang, J.E.; Choi, S.Y.; et al. Metabolic engineering of Ralstonia eutropha for the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates from sucrose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015, 112, 638–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wei, X.X.; Shi, Z.Y.; Yuan, M.Q.; Chen, G.Q. Effect of anaerobic promoters on the microaerobic production of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) in recombinant Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Datsenko, K.A.; Wanner, B.L. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 6640–6645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wang, Y.; Wu, H.; Jiang, X.; Chen, G.Q. Engineering Escherichia coli for enhanced production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) in larger cellular space. Metab Eng 2014, 25, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sirohi, R.; Prakash Pandey, J.; Kumar Gaur, V.; Gnansounou, E.; Sindhu, R. Critical overview of biomass feedstocks as sustainable substrates for the production of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB). Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 311, 123536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Amaro, T.; Rosa, D.; Comi, G.; Iacumin, L. Prospects for the Use of Whey for Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Production. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Getachew, A.; Woldesenbet, F. Production of biodegradable plastic by polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) accumulating bacteria using low cost agricultural waste material. BMC Res. Notes 2016, 9, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kim, B.S. Production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) from inexpensive substrates. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2000, 27, 774–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kumar, L.R.; Kaur, R.; Tyagi, R.D.; Drogui, P. Identifying economical route for crude glycerol valorization: Biodiesel versus polyhydroxy-butyrate (PHB). Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 323, 124565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 00294 g001 550
Figure 1. The biosynthetic pathway of PHB with flux distribution in E. coli using sucrose as a sole carbon source.
Figure 1. The biosynthetic pathway of PHB with flux distribution in E. coli using sucrose as a sole carbon source.
Molecules 27 00294 g001
Molecules 27 00294 g002 550
Figure 2. Sugar concentrations, cell dry weight (CDW), and PHB content in the culture flasks of the recombinant E. coli strains. (A) Concentrations of sucrose, glucose, and fructose were measured to investigate the utilization of sucrose; (B) CDW and PHB contents in the three recombinant strains of E. coli using sucrose as a substrate after 48 h cultivation.
Figure 2. Sugar concentrations, cell dry weight (CDW), and PHB content in the culture flasks of the recombinant E. coli strains. (A) Concentrations of sucrose, glucose, and fructose were measured to investigate the utilization of sucrose; (B) CDW and PHB contents in the three recombinant strains of E. coli using sucrose as a substrate after 48 h cultivation.
Molecules 27 00294 g002
Molecules 27 00294 g003 550
Figure 3. Transcription levels of phaC and PHB contents under different promoters. (A) Total RNA of four strains with different plasmids were isolated and real-time PCR assays for mRNA were performed using16S rRNA as the internal standard. Statistical analysis was performed by an unpaired two-tailed t-test. * p < 0.05; *** p <  0.001; (B) Cell dry weight and PHB contents of four strains with different promoters. In the X-axis of (A) and (B), plasmid names were both used to represent the strain information. pBHR-PnirB represented E. coli S17-1 (pBHR-PnirB), pBHR-P2nirB represented E. coli S17-1 (pBHR-P2nirB), pBHR-P3nirB represented E. coli S17-1 (pBHR-P3nirB), and pBHR68P represented E. coli S17-1 (pBHR68). Data are the average of three parallel experiments.
Figure 3. Transcription levels of phaC and PHB contents under different promoters. (A) Total RNA of four strains with different plasmids were isolated and real-time PCR assays for mRNA were performed using16S rRNA as the internal standard. Statistical analysis was performed by an unpaired two-tailed t-test. * p < 0.05; *** p <  0.001; (B) Cell dry weight and PHB contents of four strains with different promoters. In the X-axis of (A) and (B), plasmid names were both used to represent the strain information. pBHR-PnirB represented E. coli S17-1 (pBHR-PnirB), pBHR-P2nirB represented E. coli S17-1 (pBHR-P2nirB), pBHR-P3nirB represented E. coli S17-1 (pBHR-P3nirB), and pBHR68P represented E. coli S17-1 (pBHR68). Data are the average of three parallel experiments.
Molecules 27 00294 g003
Molecules 27 00294 g004 550
Figure 4. Bacterial growth and PHB production by E. coli SAPL harboring plasmids pBHR-P3nirB, pMCS-sacC under anaerobic conditions. (A) SEM micrographs of recombination strain; (B) TEM micrographs of recombination strain; (C) CDW, PHB concentration, and PHB content of recombination strain cultivated in the MM medium containing sucrose as a carbon source at 37 °C for 48 h.
Figure 4. Bacterial growth and PHB production by E. coli SAPL harboring plasmids pBHR-P3nirB, pMCS-sacC under anaerobic conditions. (A) SEM micrographs of recombination strain; (B) TEM micrographs of recombination strain; (C) CDW, PHB concentration, and PHB content of recombination strain cultivated in the MM medium containing sucrose as a carbon source at 37 °C for 48 h.
Molecules 27 00294 g004
Table
Table 1. Escherichia coli strains and plasmids used in this study.
Table 1. Escherichia coli strains and plasmids used in this study.
ItemsDescriptionsReferences
Strains
E. coli S17-1recA pro hsdR RP4-2-Tc::Mu-Km::Tn7 integrated into the chromosome[33]
E. coli TOP10F-mcrAΔ(mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC)φ80lacZΔM15ΔlacX74 recA1araΔ139Δ(ara-leu)7697galUgalKrpsL(Starr)endA1 nupGIndustry MTA
E. coli DH 5αF-Φ80lacZΔM15Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169recA1endA1 hsdR17(rk−, mk+) phoA supE44 thi-1 gyrA96 relA1 λ-Industry MTA
E. coli SAE. coli S17-1 with the ackA-pta gene being knocked out This study
E. coli SAPE. coli S17-1 with the ackA-pta and poxB genes being knocked out This study
E. coli SAPLE. coli S17-1 with ackA-pta, poxB and ldhA genes being knocked outThis study
Plasmids
pBHR68A pBluescript II SK−derivative containing phbCAB operon from Ralstonia eutropha with native promoter, AmpR[33]
pBHR-PnirBpBHR68 with the phbCAB operon under the control of the nirB anaerobic promoterThis study
pBHR-P2nirBpBHR68 with the phbCAB operon under the control of the cascaded promoter 2nirBThis study
pBHR-P3nirBpBHR68 with the phbCAB operon under the control of the cascaded promoter 3nirBThis study
pBBR1MCS-2Broad-host-range plasmid, KanRIndustry MTA
pMCS-sacCpBBR1MCS-2 with the sacC gene from M. succiniciproducens MBEL55E, KanRThis study
Table
Table 2. Bacterial growth and PHB production by different E. coli strains harboring pBHR-P3nirB under an anaerobic condition.
Table 2. Bacterial growth and PHB production by different E. coli strains harboring pBHR-P3nirB under an anaerobic condition.
E. coli Strains aCDW (g/L) bPHB Concentration (g/L) bPHB Content (wt.%) b
E. coli S17-1 (pBHR-P3nirB)1.52 ± 0.161.09 ± 0.0772 ± 3
E. coli SA (pBHR-P3nirB)1.46 ± 0.101.12 ± 0.1277 ± 7
E. coli SAP (pBHR-P3nirB)1.34 ± 0.111.13 ± 0.1584 ± 5
E. coli SAPL (pBHR-P3nirB)1.90 ± 0.471.65 ± 0.3687 ± 3
a Cells were cultivated in MM medium containing 20 g/L glucose under an anaerobic condition for 48 h. b Data are expressed as M ± SD, in which M refers to mean and SD to standard deviation.
Table
Table 3. Bacterial growth and PHB production by E. coli SAPL (pBHR-P3nirB, pMCS-sacC) and E. coli S17-1 (pBHR68, pMCS-sacC) using sucrose as a carbon source under microaerobic conditions.
Table 3. Bacterial growth and PHB production by E. coli SAPL (pBHR-P3nirB, pMCS-sacC) and E. coli S17-1 (pBHR68, pMCS-sacC) using sucrose as a carbon source under microaerobic conditions.
E. coli Strains aCDW (g/L) bPHB Concentration (g/L) bPHB Content (wt.%) b
E. coli SAPL
(pBHR-P3nirB, pMCS-sacC)		1.71 ± 0.271.34 ± 0.2079 ± 6
E. coli S17-1
(pBHR68, pMCS-sacC)		1.57 ± 0.510.75 ± 0.1949 ± 8
a Cells were cultivated in the MM medium containing 20 g/L sucrose under an anaerobic condition for 48 h. b Data are expressed as M ± SD, in which M refers to mean and SD to standard deviation.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, F.; Zhou, Y.; Pei, W.; Jiang, Y.; Yan, X.; Wu, H. Biosynthesis of Poly-(3-hydroxybutyrate) under the Control of an Anaerobically Induced Promoter by Recombinant Escherichia coli from Sucrose. Molecules 2022, 27, 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010294

AMA Style

Wu F, Zhou Y, Pei W, Jiang Y, Yan X, Wu H. Biosynthesis of Poly-(3-hydroxybutyrate) under the Control of an Anaerobically Induced Promoter by Recombinant Escherichia coli from Sucrose. Molecules. 2022; 27(1):294. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010294

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Fangting, Ying Zhou, Wenyu Pei, Yuhan Jiang, Xiaohui Yan, and Hong Wu. 2022. "Biosynthesis of Poly-(3-hydroxybutyrate) under the Control of an Anaerobically Induced Promoter by Recombinant Escherichia coli from Sucrose" Molecules 27, no. 1: 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010294

APA Style

Wu, F., Zhou, Y., Pei, W., Jiang, Y., Yan, X., & Wu, H. (2022). Biosynthesis of Poly-(3-hydroxybutyrate) under the Control of an Anaerobically Induced Promoter by Recombinant Escherichia coli from Sucrose. Molecules, 27(1), 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010294

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop