Next Article in Journal
Discovery of Quinacrine as a Potent Topo II and Hsp90 Dual-Target Inhibitor, Repurposing for Cancer Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Newly Designed Quinazolinone Derivatives as Novel Tyrosinase Inhibitor: Synthesis, Inhibitory Activity, and Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

2-(Nitroaryl)-5-Substituted-1,3,4-Thiadiazole Derivatives with Antiprotozoal Activities: In Vitro and In Vivo Study

1
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran
2
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, International Campus, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran
3
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland
4
Faculty of Science, University of Basel, 4002 Basel, Switzerland
5
Drug Design and Development Research Center, The Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (TIPS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1417614411, Iran
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(17), 5559; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175559
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 22 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 29 August 2022

Abstract

:
Nitro-containing compounds are a well-known class of anti-infective agents, especially in the field of anti-parasitic drug discovery. HAT or sleeping sickness is a neglected tropical disease caused by a protozoan parasite, Trypanosoma brucei. Following the approval of fexinidazole as the first oral treatment for both stages of T. b. gambiense HAT, there is an increased interest in developing new nitro-containing compounds against parasitic diseases. In our previous projects, we synthesized several megazole derivatives that presented high activity against Leishmania major promastigotes. Here, we screened and evaluated their trypanocidal activity. Most of the compounds showed submicromolar IC50 against the BSF form of T. b. rhodesiense (STIB 900). To the best of our knowledge, compound 18c is one of the most potent nitro-containing agents reported against HAT in vitro. Compound 18g revealed an acceptable cure rate in the acute mouse model of HAT, accompanied with noteworthy in vitro activity against T. brucei, T. cruzi, and L. donovani. Taken together, these results suggest that these compounds are promising candidates to evaluate their pharmacokinetic and biological profiles in the future.

1. Introduction

Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), or sleeping sickness, is an insect-borne infection caused by a member of the Kinetoplastida order, Trypanosoma brucei. This parasite is transmitted by different species of the Tsetse fly (Glossina), which is found only in sub-Saharan Africa. Two subspecies of T. brucei typically cause disease in humans [1]. More than 97% of the reported cases are due to T. b. gambiense, which causes a chronic form of the disease and is mostly found in west and central Africa. T. b. rhodesiense (eastern and southern Africa) causes an acute and fast-progressing form of the disease [2,3]. HAT has two stages: the first stage (hemolymphatic stage) begins when the Tsetse fly injects metacyclic trypomastigotes into the host’s bloodstream. Trypomastigotes spread into other parts of the body via the bloodstream and cause fever, headache, and itching. T. brucei is one of the few pathogens that can cross the blood–brain barrier, so the second stage (meningo-encephalitic stage) begins when parasites cross the blood–brain barrier and enter the CNS [1,4,5]. The disease’s name implies that the patient’s sleep–wake cycle is disrupted, and other symptoms, such as hypertonicity and confusion can be seen in patients [1,6]. There are five registered drugs for the treatment of HAT. Pentamidine and suramin are used to treat the first stage of HAT and, because of their inability to cross the blood–brain barrier, they are not used in the second-stage treatment. Melarsoprol, eflornithine, and nifurtimox (Figure 1) are used to treat the second stage of the disease [1,7]. In 2009, the WHO approved NECT (nifurtimox–eflornithine combination therapy) as the first-choice treatment for the meningo-encephalitic stage of gambiense HAT with a 95–98% cure rate and less than 1% mortality. Fexinidazole (Figure 1) and acoziborole (SCYX-7158) are two molecules that can revolutionize HAT treatment [7]. Acoziborole is a benzoxaborole derivative that stems from a DNDi lead optimization project from Anacor (now part of Pfizer) chemical library [8]. Fexinidazole is a 5-nitroimidazole derivative developed by DNDi in collaboration with Sanofi [1,9]. Recently, fexinidazole was approved by the FDA as the first all-oral cure for both stages of gambiense HAT [9]. Fexinidazole has a lower cure rate than NECT (91% versus 95–98%), but the fact that it can be taken orally (for ten days) without hospitalization represents a big step forward in the treatment of HAT [10,11].
The use of nitro-compounds in the treatment of parasitic diseases dates back decades. Although some of the drugs in this group are used to treat a variety of bacterial and parasitic infections, due to issues such as mutagenicity and genotoxicity, the design and generation of new compounds have been limited [12]. However, they were regarded as potential drugs in recent years, e.g., delamanid and pretomanid as antituberculosis and fexinidazole as antitrypanosomal agents [9,13,14].
Natural and synthetic heterocyclic compounds, particularly the azole heterocycles, showed antiprotozoal activity [15,16]. Due to the straightforward synthetic approaches and easy ring functionalization, such scaffolds attract attention in the design of trypanocidal agents [17,18]. Antifungal azoles, such as posaconazole and ravuconazole, were repositioned as potential anti-trypanosomal agents in recent years. These drugs, however, did not meet expectations due to poor pharmacokinetic properties as well as cumbersome and costly chemical synthesis routes [19]. Therefore, there is still a demand for the design of more effective trypanocidal heterocyclic compounds with an optimal pharmacokinetic profile.
In recent years, several compounds containing the nitro group have been synthesized against HAT (Figure 2). In their structure, the nitro group is attached to different heterocyclic rings. Monocyclic and bicyclic imidazoles are more abundant than other nitro-heterocyclic compounds. In the field of monocyclic imidazoles, compounds 1a & 1b (IC50 = 0.16 and 0.10 µM, respectively) presented good activity against BSF forms of T. b. rhodesiense and demonstrated complete cures in acute infection and a chronic CNS mouse model of HAT [20]. 2-Nitroimidazole-linked quinoline derivative 2 presented an IC50 value of 1.29 µM against T. b. rhodesiense [21]. In the field of bicyclic imidazoles, the medium-throughput screening of a 900 compound nitroimidazole-based library identified oxidized nitroimidazothiazine derivative 3 with good metabolic stability and a 100% cure rate in an acute infection mouse model of HAT [22]. Fersing et al. described compounds 4a & 4b (IC50 = 0.04 and 0.07 µM, respectively) with trypanocidal activity. Compound 4b exhibited good pharmacokinetic properties and did not show genotoxicity in comet assay [23]. Jarrad et al. synthesized and evaluated several nitroimidazopyrazin-one derivatives with multi-antiparasitic activity. Among them, 5a is the most promising compound with an IC50 value of 0.22 µM against T. brucei brucei. Compound 5b (IC50 = 0.24 µM) displayed high apparent permeability across Caco-2 cells, but it was poorly soluble; to solve this problem, other nitroimidazopyrazin-one derivatives were synthesized, among which 6 was the most potent compound, exhibiting remarkable activity against T. b. brucei (IC50 = 2 nM) and other organisms (T. cruzi & M. tuberculosis) [24,25]. The presence of nifurtimox in NECT (nifurtimox–eflornithine combination therapy), introduced by the WHO for the treatment of HAT, has raised interest in synthesizing further nitrofuran compounds against HAT [10]. Trypanosoma brucei is an extracellular parasite, so selective uptake of molecules into trypanosomes can increase their trypanocidal activity and reduce their toxicity against human cells. Melamine-based compound 7 acts as a P2 transporter substrate of T. brucei and exhibited an IC50 value of 3 nM against trypomastigotes of T. brucei rhodesiense [26]. Bot et al. reported an IC50 value of 120 nM for compound 8 against the BSF form of T. brucei. Trypanocidal activity of 8 depends on type I nitroreductase, so the wild type of the parasite was more susceptible to 8 than parasites having reduced levels of the enzyme [27]. Zhou et al. synthesized and screened a class of 5-nitro-2-furancarboxylamides with great trypanocidal activity. The most promising, compound 9, presented an IC50 value of 2.4 nM against T. b. brucei and 2.9 nM against T. b. rhodesiense and showed very limited cross-resistance to nifurtimox-resistant cells and vice versa [28]. Compound 10 is a 5-nitro-2-furaldehyde derivative with adamantane moiety which exhibited an IC50 value of 75 nM against T. brucei [29]. The thiophene ring is less abundant than other rings in the structure of nitro-heterocyclic trypanocidal compounds. 5-Nitrothiophene oxime ether derivative 11 (MIC = 1 µg/mL) and organometallic compound 12 (IC50 = 0.44 µM) are examples of compounds with a thiophene ring that displayed trypanocidal activity [30,31].
In our previous works, we reported several megazole derivatives (a known nitroimidazole compound with broad-spectrum antiparasitic activity) that exhibited significant inhibitory activity against L. major promastigotes [32,33]. Here, we screened these compounds for their trypanocidal activity and cytotoxicity against L6 rat myoblast cells. Compounds presenting high trypanocidal activity in vitro and SI (selective index) were evaluated for in vivo studies in the STIB 900 acute mouse model of T. b. rhodesiense and in in vitro tests against T. cruzi and L. donovani.

2. Results

2.1. In Vitro Activity against T. b. rhodesiense

Antitrypanosomal activity of compounds was examined against the BSF form of T. b. rhodesiense (STIB 900), using melarsoprol as a reference control (Table 1). Cytotoxicity was examined in L6 rat myoblast cells with podophyllotoxin as a reference drug. The results are shown in Table 1. According to the TDR (Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization) criteria for antiparasitic activity, anti-HAT compounds are divided into three groups based on the their IC50 against BSF form of T. b. rhodesiense. Compounds with IC50 values of <0.5 µM, between 0.5 and 6.0 µM, or > 6.0 µM were identified as ‘active’, ‘moderately active’, or ‘inactive’, respectively, whereas an SI value of ≥100 is desired [34]. A total of 21 compounds were tested and six of them were considered as ‘active’ anti-HAT agents. Generally, nitroimidazole derivatives (18a–18g) presented lower IC50 values than their corresponding nitrofuran (16a–16g) and nitrothiophene (17a–17g) derivatives. By comparing the IC50 values of compounds in those which the ring attached to the nitro group is the same, it can be concluded that there is not a clear structure–activity relationship between compounds with different cyclic amines attached at the 5-position of the 1,3,4-thiadiazole nucleus, but it is obvious that compounds without any substitution on the nitrogen of the piperazine ring (16c, 17c, 18c) are the most potent, with IC50s of 0.060, 0.346, and 0.012 µM, respectively, in their series. The overall biological activity profile of the nitrofuran derivatives presented compound 16f containing a N-acetylpiperazine group and 16a with a piperidine ring (IC50 = 0.081 and 0.242 µM, respectively) as the most potent compounds after piperazine derivative 16c. Among the nitrothiophene derivatives, unsubstituted compound 17c was the most effective, followed by N-benzoylpiperazine and piperidine derivatives (17g and 17a) with IC50 values of 0.438 and 0.647 µM, respectively. Of the nitroimidazole derivatives, 18c presented strikingly more trypanocidal activity than other compounds. Replacing the hydrogen of the piperazine ring in compound 18c with a methyl (18d), phenyl (18e), acetyl (18f), or benzoyl (18g) group maintained the trypanocidal activity. The morpholine derivative (18b) (IC50 = 0.145 µM) exhibited acceptable trypanocidal activity. Compound 18a (IC50 = 0.510 µM), bearing a piperidine ring, was found to have minimal activity in the nitroimidazole series.
There is not a clear relationship between lipophilicity (clogP values) and trypanocidal activity (IC50 against T. b. rhodesiense) (Table 1). Cytotoxicity assays revealed that nitroimidazoles (SI = 572–11703) are less toxic than nitrothiophenes (SI = 5–349) and nitrofurans (SI = 4–31). With an IC50 of 0.012 µM and high selectivity (SI = 11703), 18c is one of the most potent nitro-group-containing compounds identified against the BSF form of Trypanosoma brucei to our knowledge. The most potent compounds with the lowest cytotoxicity (18c, 18g, 18f, 18b, 18d) were selected for further evaluation in the STIB 900 acute mouse model.

2.2. Inhibitory Effect of Selected Compounds on T. cruzi and L. donovani

Although all of the compounds had been tested against Leishmania major promastigotes in our previous works, to deeper evaluate the antitrypanosomatid potential of the selected nitroimidazole derivatives, their activity was measured against L. donovani axenic amastigotes and T. cruzi amastigotes (Table 2). Miltefosine and benznidazole were used as reference drugs. Compounds 18a and 18g were also tested against L. donovani intracellular amastigotes in peritoneal murine macrophages in a further assay. According to the TDR criteria for antiparasitic activity, all of the tested compounds were identified as ‘active’ agents (an IC50 of <4 µM and a SI of ≥50) against T. cruzi amastigotes. Furthermore, compounds 18a, 18b, and 18g were deemed to be ‘active’ agents (an IC50 of <1 µM and a SI of ≥20) against L. donovani amastigotes [34]. Compound 18c exhibited the highest antichagasic activity with an IC50 value of 0.125 µM, but its inhibitory activity was significantly decreased against L. donovani (IC50 = 3.23 µM). Compound 18a presented the lowest potential against T. cruzi, but it showed acceptable activity against both axenic and intracellular forms of L. donovani amastigotes (IC50 = 0.476 and 4.76 µM, respectively). In addition to a 100% cure rate in the mouse model of HAT, compound 18g showed submicromolar inhibitory activity against T. cruzi and L. donovani axenic and intracellular amastigotes (IC50 = 0.30, 0.188, and 0.225 µM, respectively), so overall, compound 18g displayed the best antiparasitic activity profile of all the compounds.

2.3. In Vivo Efficacy of the Selected Compounds

Based on the results shown in Table 3, nitroimidazole derivatives (18b, 18c, 18d, 18f, 18g) were further evaluated in the acute mouse model of HAT (Table 3). All of these compounds were administered at an intraperitoneal dose of 50 mg/kg/day for 4 days. Among them, compound 18g achieved a 100% cure rate until 60 days after infection. A total of three of the four mice treated with morpholine derivative 18b were cured and the parasite was not found in the blood of one mouse until day 60 of infection. Compound 18c, with the most in vitro potency, did not show the best in vivo results in the acute model of HAT. One mouse died on day six during the treatment with 18c and was excluded from the experimental group, whereas the three others survived and were parasitic negative. All of the mice treated with compound 18f survived 60 days, but one mouse was parasite positive. Compound 18d presented the least cure rate; a total of three mice were parasite positive and died between days 15 and 20, and one mouse survived.

2.4. Prediction of Pharmacokinetic Profile

The pharmacokinetic profile of the compounds was predicted by the SwissADME web-based tool and the results are shown in Table 4 [35]. The calculated drug-likeness values are a qualitative concept used to compare the chemical properties of compounds with approved drugs and the possibility of passing the drug development process. Bioavailability is one of the most important pharmacokinetic properties, described as the percentage of unchanged drug that reaches the systemic circulation. According to the Abbott bioavailability score, all of the compounds had an acceptable bioavailability score and a predicted high GI absorption. The water solubility of compounds was predicted by two topological methods on SwissADME, and most of the compounds were considered as soluble or moderately soluble agents. Lipophilicity is a chemical property that is expressed by log P. It is the logarithm of the ratio of the concentrations of a compound in water and octanol solvents at equilibrium. All compounds showed the approved amounts of predicted log P of less than 3.00 (an average of four log P amounts were presented based on different methods, including iLOGP, WLOGP, MLOGP, and SILICOS-IT). Prediction of BBB permeation of compounds indicated that none of them can penetrate the CNS.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry

Intermediates 14a–c were prepared from thiosemicarbazones 13a–c, according to reported previous procedures (Scheme 1). Diazotation of 14a–c in the presence of HCl and copper powder gave 15a–c, which reacted with different amines to afford target compounds 16a–g, 17a–g, and 18a–g (Scheme 1) [27,28,29]. (All reagents were purchased from Merck (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany))

3.2. Biological Assays

3.2.1. In Vitro Antiparasitic and L6 Cytotoxicity Assays

In vitro activity against the protozoan parasites T. b. rhodesiense, T.cruzi, L. donovani and cytotoxicity assessment against L6 cells were determined as reported previously [30,31]. The following strains, parasite forms, and positive controls were used: T. b. rhodesiense STIB 900 bloodstream forms, melarsoprol (received from WHO, Arsobal Sanofi); T.cruzi Tulahuen C2C4 intracellular amastigotes, benznidazole (received from DNDi synthesized by Epichem Pty Ltd., Murdoch, Australia); L. donovani MHOM-ET-67/L82 axenically grown amastigotes and intracellular amastigotes, miltefosine (Sigma M5571). L6 rat skeletal myoblasts (ATCC CRL-1458), podophyllotoxin (Sigma P4405).

3.2.2. In Vivo Trypanocidal Assay

The in vivo efficacy was determined in the T. b. rhodesiense STIB 900 acute mouse model that mimics the first stage of the disease as described earlier [15]. In vivo efficacy studies in mice were conducted at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Basel) (License number 2813), according to the rules and regulations for the protection of animal rights (“Tierschutzverordnung”) of the Swiss “Bundesamt für Veterinärwesen”. They were approved by the veterinary office of Canton Basel-Stadt, Switzerland.

4. Conclusions

In previous studies we assessed the antileishmanial activity of 5-nitroheterocycle-based 1,3,4-thiadiazoles, most of which were as active as the reference drug miltefosine [27,28]. In this study, we demonstrated that these compounds present noteworthy in vitro trypanocidal activity. Nitroimidazole derivatives with an amide bond in their structure (18f,18g) showed the best in vivo results accompanied by an acceptable selectivity index, and 18g can be considered as a multi-anti-parasitic agent. Although compound 18c showed extremely potent in vitro activity, it could not display the same potential in the acute mouse model of HAT. Predicted pharmacokinetic data revealed the inability of compounds to cross the blood–brain barrier; therefore, it would be necessary to design and synthesize new compounds with preferable ADME properties to be used in both stages of HAT. Finally, though these compounds have broad-spectrum antiparasitic activity, more research needs to investigate their mechanism of action and complete their mutagenicity and toxicity profile.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M., M.K. and A.F.; methodology, A.M., P.F. and M.K.; formal analysis, A.M. and M.K.; investigation, A.M., M.K. and A.F.; resources, M.K. and A.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M., Z.E. and M.K.; writing—review and editing, A.M., Z.E., P.M. and M.K.; visualization, A.M., M.K. and A.F.; supervision, M.K. and A.F.; project administration, M.K. and A.F.; funding acquisition, M.K. and A.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by Elite Researcher Grant Committee under award number [943604] from the National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD), Tehran, Iran. These studies were funded via a grant from the DNDi, who received financial support from the following donors for this work: the Department for International Development (DFID) of the United Kingdom, the German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ), Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), the Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs of France, the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation and Development, and a Swiss foundation. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

In vivo efficacy studies in mice were conducted at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Basel) (License number 2813) according to the rules and regulations for the protection of animal rights (“Tierschutzverordnung”) of the Swiss “Bundesamt für Veterinärwesen”. They were approved by the veterinary office of Canton Basel-Stadt, Switzerland.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Monica Cal, Tanja Naldi, and Guy Riccio for performing the in vitro and in vivo assays for Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors (AF).

References

  1. Büscher, P.; Cecchi, G.; Jamonneau, V.; Priotto, G. Human african trypanosomiasis. Lancet 2017, 390, 2397–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brun, R.; Blum, J.; Chappuis, F.; Burri, C. Human african trypanosomiasis. Lancet 2010, 375, 148–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Franco, J.R.; Cecchi, G.; Priotto, G.; Paone, M.; Diarra, A.; Grout, L.; Mattioli, R.C.; Argaw, D. Monitoring the elimination of human African trypanosomiasis: Update to 2014. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Masocha, W.; Kristensson, K. Passage of parasites across the blood-brain barrier. Virulence 2012, 3, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Parasites African Trypanosomiasis (also known as Sleeping Sickness), CDC-African Trypanosomiasis–Prevention & Control; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  6. Buguet, A.; Bourdon, L.; Bouteille, B.; Cespuglio, R.; Vincendeau, P.; Radomski, M.; Dumas, M. The duality of sleeping sickness: Focusing on sleep. Sleep Med. Rev. 2001, 5, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Field, M.C.; Horn, D.; Fairlamb, A.H.; Ferguson, M.A.; Gray, D.W.; Read, K.D.; De Rycker, M.; Torrie, L.S.; Wyatt, P.G.; Wyllie, S. Anti-trypanosomatid drug discovery: An ongoing challenge and a continuing need. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dickie, E.A.; Giordani, F.; Gould, M.K.; Mäser, P.; Burri, C.; Mottram, J.C.; Rao, S.P.; Barrett, M.P. New drugs for human African trypanosomiasis: A twenty first century success story. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2020, 5, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Deeks, E.D. Fexinidazole: First global approval. Drugs 2019, 79, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Priotto, G.; Kasparian, S.; Mutombo, W.; Ngouama, D.; Ghorashian, S.; Arnold, U.; Ghabri, S.; Baudin, E.; Buard, V.; Kazadi-Kyanza, S. Nifurtimox-eflornithine combination therapy for second-stage African Trypanosoma brucei gambiense trypanosomiasis: A multicentre, randomised, phase III, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2009, 374, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mesu, V.K.B.K.; Kalonji, W.M.; Bardonneau, C.; Mordt, O.V.; Tete, D.N.; Blesson, S.; Simon, F.; Delhomme, S.; Bernhard, S.; Mbembo, H.M. Oral fexinidazole for stage 1 or early stage 2 African Trypanosoma brucei gambiense trypanosomiasis: A prospective, multicentre, open-label, cohort study. Lancet Glob. Health 2021, 9, e999–e1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nepali, K.; Lee, H.-Y.; Liou, J.-P. Nitro-group-containing drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 62, 2851–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Blair, H.A.; Scott, L.J. Delamanid: A review of its use in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Drugs 2015, 75, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gils, T.; Lynen, L.; de Jong, B.C.; Van Deun, A.; Decroo, T. Pretomanid for tuberculosis: A systematic review. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 28, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tapia, R.A.; Carrasco, C.; Ojeda, S.; Salas, C.; Valderrama, J.A.; Morello, A.; Repetto, Y. Synthesis of indazol-4, 7-dione derivatives as potential trypanocidal agents. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2002, 39, 1093–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shiri, P. Novel hybrid molecules based on triazole-β-lactam as potential biological agents. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2021, 21, 536–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. de Oliveira Viana, J.; Monteiro, A.F.; Scotti, L.; Scotti, M.T. The azoles in pharmacochemistry: Perspectives on the synthesis of new compounds and chemoinformatic contributions. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 4702–4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shiri, P.; Amani, A.M.; Mayer-Gall, T. A recent overview on the synthesis of 1, 4, 5-trisubstituted 1, 2, 3-triazoles. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2021, 17, 1600–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Vita, D.; Moraca, F.; Zamperini, C.; Pandolfi, F.; Di Santo, R.; Matheeussen, A.; Maes, L.; Tortorella, S.; Scipione, L. In vitro screening of 2-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)-1-phenylethanol derivatives as antiprotozoal agents and docking studies on Trypanosoma cruzi CYP51. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 113, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Trunz, B.B.; Jędrysiak, R.; Tweats, D.; Brun, R.; Kaiser, M.; Suwiński, J.; Torreele, E. 1-Aryl-4-nitro-1H-imidazoles, a new promising series for the treatment of human African trypanosomiasis. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 1524–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Papadopoulou, M.V.; Bloomer, W.D.; Rosenzweig, H.S.; Kaiser, M. The antitrypanosomal and antitubercular activity of some nitro (triazole/imidazole)-based aromatic amines. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 138, 1106–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thompson, A.M.; Marshall, A.J.; Maes, L.; Yarlett, N.; Bacchi, C.J.; Gaukel, E.; Wring, S.A.; Launay, D.; Braillard, S.; Chatelain, E. Assessment of a pretomanid analogue library for African trypanosomiasis: Hit-to-lead studies on 6-substituted 2-nitro-6,7-dihydro-5H-imidazo [2,1-b][1,3] thiazine 8-oxides. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fersing, C.; Boudot, C.; Castera-Ducros, C.; Pinault, E.; Hutter, S.; Paoli-Lombardo, R.; Primas, N.; Pedron, J.; Seguy, L.; Bourgeade-Delmas, S. 8-Alkynyl-3-nitroimidazopyridines display potent antitrypanosomal activity against both T. b. brucei and cruzi. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 202, 112558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jarrad, A.M.; Ang, C.W.; Debnath, A.; Hahn, H.J.; Woods, K.; Tan, L.; Sykes, M.L.; Jones, A.J.; Pelingon, R.; Butler, M.S. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of 2-nitroimidazopyrazin-one/-es with antitubercular and antiparasitic activity. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 11349–11371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ang, C.W.; Tan, L.; Sykes, M.L.; AbuGharbiyeh, N.; Debnath, A.; Reid, J.C.; West, N.P.; Avery, V.M.; Cooper, M.A.; Blaskovich, M.A. Antitubercular and antiparasitic 2-nitroimidazopyrazinones with improved potency and solubility. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 15726–15751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Stewart, M.L.; Bueno, G.J.; Baliani, A.; Klenke, B.; Brun, R.; Brock, J.M.; Gilbert, I.H.; Barrett, M.P. Trypanocidal activity of melamine-based nitroheterocycles. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1733–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bot, C.; Hall, B.S.; Álvarez, G.; Di Maio, R.; González, M.; Cerecetto, H.; Wilkinson, S.R. Evaluating 5-nitrofurans as trypanocidal agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 1638–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, L.; Stewart, G.; Rideau, E.; Westwood, N.J.; Smith, T.K. A class of 5-nitro-2-furancarboxylamides with potent trypanocidal activity against Trypanosoma brucei in vitro. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 796–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Foscolos, A.-S.; Papanastasiou, I.; Foscolos, G.B.; Tsotinis, A.; Kellici, T.F.; Mavromoustakos, T.; Taylor, M.C.; Kelly, J.M. New hydrazones of 5-nitro-2-furaldehyde with adamantanealkanohydrazides: Synthesis and in vitro trypanocidal activity. MedChemComm 2016, 7, 1229–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Delmas, F.; Gasquet, M.; Timon-David, P.; Madadi, N.; Vanelle, P.; Vaille, A.; Maldonado, J. Synthesis and in vitro anti-protozoan activity of new 5-nitrothiophene oxime ether derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 28, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Toro, P.; Suazo, C.; Acuña, A.; Fuentealba, M.; Artigas, V.; Arancibia, R.; Olea-Azar, C.; Moncada, M.; Wilkinson, S.; Klahn, A.H. Cyrhetrenylaniline and new organometallic phenylimines derived from 4-and 5-nitrothiophene: Synthesis, characterization, X-Ray structures, electrochemistry and in vitro anti-T. brucei activity. J. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 862, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Foroumadi, A.; Pournourmohammadi, S.; Soltani, F.; Asgharian-Rezaee, M.; Dabiri, S.; Kharazmi, A.; Shafiee, A. Synthesis and in vitro leishmanicidal activity of 2-(5-nitro-2-furyl) and 2-(5-nitro-2-thienyl)-5-substituted-1,3,4-thiadiazoles. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 1983–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Foroumadi, A.; Emami, S.; Pournourmohammadi, S.; Kharazmi, A.; Shafiee, A. Synthesis and in vitro leishmanicidal activity of 2-(1-methyl-5-nitro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-5-substituted-1,3,4-thiadiazole derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 40, 1346–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nwaka, S.; Ramirez, B.; Brun, R.; Maes, L.; Douglas, F.; Ridley, R. Advancing drug innovation for neglected diseases—Criteria for lead progression. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2009, 3, e440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Daina, A.; Michielin, O.; Zoete, V. SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Structure of nitro-containing drugs used in the treatment of HAT.
Figure 1. Structure of nitro-containing drugs used in the treatment of HAT.
Molecules 27 05559 g001
Figure 2. Nitro-containing compounds with antitrypanosomal activity against T. brucei.
Figure 2. Nitro-containing compounds with antitrypanosomal activity against T. brucei.
Molecules 27 05559 g002
Scheme 1. Synthesis pathway to megazol derivatives.
Scheme 1. Synthesis pathway to megazol derivatives.
Molecules 27 05559 sch001
Table 1. Antitrypanosomal activity of the synthesized compounds.
Table 1. Antitrypanosomal activity of the synthesized compounds.
Molecules 27 05559 i001
CompoundZT. b. rhodesiense a
IC50 (µM) e
Cytotox. L6 b
IC50 (µM) e
SI cclogP d
16aCH20.2422.49102.19
16bO0.9145.6761.34
16cNH0.0601.06181.04
16dNCH30.2411.3661.13
16eNPh0.5406.43122.48
16fNCOCH30.0812.49310.90
16gNCOPh0.3481.5642.07
17aCH20.647225.773492.68
17bO1.176>301.54>2561.82
17cNH0.3466.38181.51
17dNCH31.15340.78351.58
17eNPh11.76356.5052.95
17fNCOCH31.889225.431191.35
17gNCOPh0.43851.011162.49
18aCH20.510>306>6001.25
18bO0.145265.3818300.40
18cNH0.012140.43117030.16
18dNCH30.142>290.45>20450.30
18eNPh0.285162.935721.59
18fNCOCH30.089>267>30000.08
18gNCOPh0.037191.1751671.33
Melarsoprol-0.0049.62400-
Podophyllotoxin--0.006--
a T. b. rhodesiense, strain STIB 900 trypomastigotes; b Cytotoxicity in the host L6 cells; c Selectivity index (SI) is the ratio: IC50 in L6 cells/IC50 in T. b. rhodesiense; d Predicted by Swiss ADME; e The IC50 values are the means of two independent assays, individual measurements differed by less than 50%.
Table 2. In vitro activity of selected compounds against T. cruzi and L. donovani.
Table 2. In vitro activity of selected compounds against T. cruzi and L. donovani.
CompoundZT. cruzi a
IC50 (µM) d
SI bL. donovani Axenic Amastigotes c
IC50 (µM) d
SI bL. donovani
Intracellular Amastigotes c
IC50 (µM) d
18aCH20.897>3420.476>6434.76
18bO0.2949030.445597-
18cNH0.12511233.2343-
18dNCH30.462629---
18fNCOCH30.468>571---
18gNCOPh0.3006380.18810170.225
Benznidazole-1.43----
Miltefosine---0.359-1.84
a T. cruzi, strain Tulahuen C4 amastigotes; b Selectivity index (SI) is the ratio: IC50 in L6 cells/IC50 in each parasite; c L. donovani, strain MHOM-ET-67/L82 axenically grown amastigotes; d The IC50 values are the means of two independent assays, individual measurements differed by less than 50%.
Table 3. Efficacy of selected compounds in the treatment of an acute mouse model of HAT (STIB 900).
Table 3. Efficacy of selected compounds in the treatment of an acute mouse model of HAT (STIB 900).
CompoundDose
(Days × mg/kg)
Route aCured/InfectedMean Survival Days (MSD)
Control b--0/47.75
18b4 × 50 i.p3/4>60
18c4 × 50 i.p3/3>60
18d4 × 50 i.p1/4>27.75
18f4 × 50 i.p3/4>60
18g4 × 50 i.p4/4>60
a i.p. = intraperitoneal; b Negative control: mice were infected, but not treated.
Table 4. Swiss ADME pharmacokinetics prediction for the compounds (data were obtained from http://www.swissadme.ch (accessed on 28 November 2021)).
Table 4. Swiss ADME pharmacokinetics prediction for the compounds (data were obtained from http://www.swissadme.ch (accessed on 28 November 2021)).
CompoundBioavailability ScoreSolubilityPSA (Å2)Drug Likeness
16a0.55Soluble116.22Yes
16b0.55Soluble125.45Yes
16c0.55Soluble128.25Yes
16d0.55Soluble119.46Yes
16e0.55Moderately soluble119.46Yes
16f0.55Soluble136.53Yes
16g0.55Moderately soluble136.53Yes
17a0.55Soluble131.32Yes
17b0.55Soluble140.55No
17c0.55Soluble143.35No
17d0.55Soluble134.56Yes
17e0.55Moderately soluble134.56Yes
17f0.55Soluble151.63No
17g0.55Moderately soluble151.63No
18a0.55Soluble120.90Yes
18b0.55Soluble130.13Yes
18c0.55Very soluble132.93Yes
18d0.55Soluble124.14Yes
18e0.55Soluble124.14Yes
18f0.55Soluble141.21No
18g0.55Soluble141.21No
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mousavi, A.; Foroumadi, P.; Emamgholipour, Z.; Mäser, P.; Kaiser, M.; Foroumadi, A. 2-(Nitroaryl)-5-Substituted-1,3,4-Thiadiazole Derivatives with Antiprotozoal Activities: In Vitro and In Vivo Study. Molecules 2022, 27, 5559. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175559

AMA Style

Mousavi A, Foroumadi P, Emamgholipour Z, Mäser P, Kaiser M, Foroumadi A. 2-(Nitroaryl)-5-Substituted-1,3,4-Thiadiazole Derivatives with Antiprotozoal Activities: In Vitro and In Vivo Study. Molecules. 2022; 27(17):5559. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175559

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mousavi, Alireza, Parham Foroumadi, Zahra Emamgholipour, Pascal Mäser, Marcel Kaiser, and Alireza Foroumadi. 2022. "2-(Nitroaryl)-5-Substituted-1,3,4-Thiadiazole Derivatives with Antiprotozoal Activities: In Vitro and In Vivo Study" Molecules 27, no. 17: 5559. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175559

APA Style

Mousavi, A., Foroumadi, P., Emamgholipour, Z., Mäser, P., Kaiser, M., & Foroumadi, A. (2022). 2-(Nitroaryl)-5-Substituted-1,3,4-Thiadiazole Derivatives with Antiprotozoal Activities: In Vitro and In Vivo Study. Molecules, 27(17), 5559. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27175559

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop