Next Article in Journal
A Literature Review of Artocarpus lacucha Focusing on the Phytochemical Constituents and Pharmacological Properties of the Plant
Next Article in Special Issue
Photoelectron Properties and Organic Molecules Photodegradation Activity of Titania Nanotubes with CuxO Nanoparticles Heat Treated in Air and Argon
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Approaches Using Green Technologies for Apple By-Product Valorisation as A New Perspective into the History of the Apple
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nanocomposite of Nickel Nanoparticles-Impregnated Biochar from Palm Leaves as Highly Active and Magnetic Photocatalyst for Methyl Violet Photocatalytic Oxidation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

MXene-Based Photocatalysts in Degradation of Organic and Pharmaceutical Pollutants

by
Siavash Iravani
1,* and
Rajender S. Varma
2,*
1
Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 81746-73461, Iran
2
Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Czech Advanced Technology and Research Institute, Palacký University in Olomouc, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71 Olomouc, Czech Republic
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(20), 6939; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27206939
Submission received: 27 September 2022 / Revised: 7 October 2022 / Accepted: 12 October 2022 / Published: 16 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanocomposites as a Promising Type of Photocatalyst)

Abstract

:
These days, explorations have focused on designing two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials with useful (photo)catalytic and environmental applications. Among them, MXene-based composites have garnered great attention owing to their unique optical, mechanical, thermal, chemical, and electronic properties. Various MXene-based photocatalysts have been inventively constructed for a variety of photocatalytic applications ranging from pollutant degradation to hydrogen evolution. They can be applied as co-catalysts in combination with assorted common photocatalysts such as metal sulfide, metal oxides, metal–organic frameworks, graphene, and graphitic carbon nitride to enhance the function of photocatalytic removal of organic/pharmaceutical pollutants, nitrogen fixation, photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, and carbon dioxide conversion, among others. High electrical conductivity, robust photothermal effects, large surface area, hydrophilicity, and abundant surface functional groups of MXenes render them as attractive candidates for photocatalytic removal of pollutants as well as improvement of photocatalytic performance of semiconductor catalysts. Herein, the most recent developments in photocatalytic degradation of organic and pharmaceutical pollutants using MXene-based composites are deliberated, with a focus on important challenges and future perspectives; techniques for fabrication of these photocatalysts are also covered.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials have been broadly explored by researchers for their unique catalytic and biomedical applications [1,2,3,4,5]. Among them, MXene-based composites have received immense attention owing to their attractive physicochemical features [6,7,8]. MXenes (with a typical formula of Mn+1XnTx, n = 1–3) have been widely synthesized using a variety of bottom–up and top–down strategies [9,10,11,12], including acid etching, chemical vapor deposition, electrochemical etching, molten salts etching, hydrothermal method, solvothermal techniques, ball-Milling, ultrasonic synthesis, pyrolysis approaches, among others [13,14,15,16,17]. However, several aspects pertaining to the application of non-/less-toxic agents, the optimal environmentally benign conditions, the improvement of stability/structural defects, the oxidation of MXenes, delamination methods, and the elimination of Al etching by-products ought to be further explored [18,19,20,21,22,23]. MXene-based structures with a large surface area, surface controllable chemical characteristics, regular planar structures, unique optical/thermal features, hydrophilicity, excellent metal conductivity, and abundant derivatives have been widely studied for photocatalytic degradation of pollutants (Figure 1) [24,25,26,27,28]. They have shown excellent potential for eliminating pollutants through interfacial chemical transformation and sorption, along with catalytic removal and photocatalytic degradation capabilities [29,30].
MXenes with high conductivity and unique lamellar nanostructures can enhance the photo-electrocatalytic capabilities of composites as co-catalysts [31,32]. Among MXenes, titanium carbide (Ti3C2Tx) with promising photocatalytic performance, flexible structure, electronic features, and semimetal nature has been broadly studied for environmental applications, especially photocatalytic degradation of hazardous pollutants (Table 1) [33]. MXenes with surface functional groups such as F, OH, and O are capable of strong interaction with other semiconductors to generate efficient heterojunctions. MXenes (Ti3C2) successfully adsorb the hazardous pollutants and organic dyes, providing effective adsorbents for the removal of dyes from wastewaters [28,34]; their layered and porous structures facilitate their adsorption and storage capabilities [19,35]. Several hybrid structures have been constructed from MXenes for photocatalytic purposes [36,37]. For instance, rice crust-like hybrid structures were constructed from zinc oxide (ZnO) and MXene (Ti3C2Tx) with excellent photocatalytic performance, showing large surface area, Schottky barrier generation, and ideal band alignment. Besides, these hybrid photocatalysts showed excellent recyclability and stability [36]. Herein, the most recent developments pertaining to the photocatalytic degradation of organic and pharmaceutical pollutants are deliberated, with a focus on important challenges and future perspectives; important techniques for synthesis of these photocatalysts are also covered.

2. Techniques for the Synthesis of MXene-Based Photocatalysts

Several techniques have been introduced for synthesizing a variety of MXene-based (nano)photocatalysts, including electrostatic self-assembly, calcination processes, hydrothermal treatment, mechanical/ultrasonic mixing, solvothermal treatment, etc. [49,50]. Among them, mechanical/ultrasonic mixing techniques have the advantage of simplicity when preparing MXenes; robust mechanical stirring and/or high-power ultrasonic vibration has been typically applied for retaining the intimate contact between MXenes and photocatalysts [49]. In one study, hydrogels of Ti3C2Tx were prepared through the stirring of MXenes and graphene oxide colloidal solutions with Eosin Y solution for 0.5 h; after that the mixtures were kept at 70 °C with the protection of N2 gas [51]. In another study, cadmium sulfide (CdS)/MXene (Ti3C2) composites were synthesized using an electrostatic self-assembly technique. Accordingly, MXene nanosheets and CdS nanowires were well-combined using electrostatic attraction, and the nanowires were successfully distributed on MXene nanosheets [52]. Notably, hydrothermal and solvothermal methods have been broadly applied for producing MXene-based composites. For instance, an in situ metal organic framework (MOF)-derived technique was deployed for synthesizing Co-Co layered double hydroxide/Ti3C2TX nanosheets with photocatalytic potentials using a solvothermal method [53]. Besides this, Ti3C2/Bi2WO6 composites were synthesized using electrostatic attraction and a hydrothermal method; these composites exhibited efficient photocatalytic performance with enhanced CO2 adsorption potential [54].
In etching techniques, a variety of etchants can be applied for fabricating MXenes, including hydrogen fluoride (HF), lithium fluoride (LiF) plus HF, zinc chloride (ZnCl2), etc. Different MXenes could be obtained by adjusting the concentration and duration of the etching process [55,56]. For instance, the replacement reaction method was deployed for synthesizing Zn-based MAX and Cl-terminated MXenes using ZnCl2 Lewis acidic molten salt. However, several challenging issues ought to be considered regarding higher temperature, poor crystallinity, purity requirements, and high energy consumption [57]. In addition, several chemical vapor deposition techniques have been reported for controlled manufacturing of MXene epitaxial films with multilayers [58]. In one study, 2D ultrathin α-Mo2C crystals with a large surface area were synthesized through a chemical vapor deposition technique, exhibiting high quality with defect-free structures [59]. Besides this, 2D Mo2C was directly synthesized on grown graphene (in situ) deploying a one-step copper-catalyzed chemical vapor deposition technique [60]. Despite the advantages of chemical vapor deposition techniques such as the fabrication of MXenes with low impurity and defects, low yield of production and complex treatment pathways are some of their crucial drawbacks; with additional modifications, these techniques can be further improved [61].

3. Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic and Pharmaceutical Pollutants

Photocatalysis is considered a relatively safer and low-cost strategy for the elimination of hazardous pollutants [37,62,63]. In this context, MXenes with distinctive lamellar structures and remarkable conductivity can be applied as nano-adsorbents to remediate environmentally toxic pollutants, and also as co-catalysts for improving photocatalytic degradation potential of the other composites in their photocatalytic performances [13,64]; several studies have focused on photocatalytic degradation of dyes, heavy metals, and pharmaceutical pollutants. For instance, MXene/TiO2 nanocomposites were constructed for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants [65]. In one study, MXene (Ti3C2) nanosheets decorated with copper sulfide (CuS) particles were fabricated using a hydrothermal treatment technique to enhance the catalytic persulfate activation under light, showing excellent reactivity for rapid elimination of Orange II; the CuS@MXene composites exhibited high stability even after 4 cycles of reusability evaluation [66]. The dosage of persulfate and initial pH of solution were the chief parameters affecting the elimination rate of pollutant; 1O2 was the primary reactive species for removing Orange II using the nanocomposite [66].
After the formation of magnetic heterojunctions of α-Fe2O3/ZnFe2O4 through a simple hydrothermal fabrication technique, the photocatalyst was prepared utilizing MXenes as co-catalysts through ultrasonic-assisted self-assembly to disperse obtained magnetic heterojunctions on the surface of MXene (Ti3C2) (Figure 2) [67]. These photocatalysts exhibited improved photocatalytic activity in elimination of rhodamine B and toxic Cr (VI) in water with reusability and high conductivity advantages [67]. In another study, MXene (Ti3C2)/MoS2 nanocomposites with a specific surface area were prepared via a hydrothermal approach, showing efficient photocatalytic organic pollutant degradation [68]. These MXene-based nanophotocatalysts with excellent removal of methyl orange pollutants exhibited improved optical absorption potential. Notably, the incorporation of MXenes with MoS2 nanosheets could improve the photocurrent response and reduce the electrochemical impedance, causing an improvement in electron transfer of excited semiconductors along with an inhibition in charge recombination [68].
The hybridization strategies can help to enhance the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of MXenes and their derivatives [16]. Several studies have focused on hybridization of MXenes with other materials, including graphene and its derivatives, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), polymers (cellulose or chitosan), carbon nanotubes, carbon dots, etc. [69,70,71]. MXenes hybridized with graphene and their derivatives have been studied due to their fascinating properties. In one study, graphene oxide-based nanofiltration membranes intercalated with TiO2 nanomaterials were prepared by the in situ oxidation of MXene nanosheets; ensued composites could remove the organic dyes with high efficiency (~97%) [72]. In addition, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) and TiO2 were attached to the graphene layers, and then were applied for synthesizing photocatalysts using MXenes (Ti3C2) via a simple calcination process (in situ); these photocatalysts had excellent degradation potential for pharmaceutical and organic pollutants under visible light irradiation, including tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, rhodamine B, and bisphenol A [73]. Notably, these stable and reusable photocatalysts had improved visible light adsorption and photo-generated carrier separation. The visible light photocatalytic degradation rate was significantly improved, because of the synergist effects and robust interactions among g-C3N4, graphene, and TiO2 for the separation and accumulation of g-C3N4 electrons with superb reduction potential and TiO2 holes with remarkable oxidation ability, thus making them as promising candidates for pharmaceutical degradation/elimination [73]. Xu et al. [74] constructed MXene@Fe3O4@chitosan composites using an ultrasonic self-assembly technique for removing Congo red (Figure 3); chitosan with adsorption capacity of 620.22 mg·g−1 was deployed for improving the adsorption capacity. Accordingly, the adsorption surveyed Langmuir isotherm model, and the related kinetics were detected to mainly follow the quasi-secondary rate kinetics. Notably, it was revealed that adsorption was endothermic, entropy-driven, and based on the thermos-dynamically spontaneous process. The magnetic nanocomposites exhibited significant adsorption capacity under neutral or weakly acidic conditions; however, under alkaline conditions, they displayed very low adsorption capacity [74].
Structures constructed from MXene (Ti3C2)/O-doped g-C3N4 Schottky-junction were reported through an in situ electrostatic assembly of negatively charged MXenes and positively charged O-doped g-C3N4 nanosheets. The obtained photocatalysts exhibited enhanced hydrogen evolution and photocatalytic activity due to the synergy between the compounds as well as the formation of a Schottky-junction [75]. In one study, ternary Ti3C2Tx/Ti3AlC2@Ag composite photocatalysts were fabricated for catalytic degradation of methylene blue, Rhodamine B, and methylene orange, with an efficiency of 99.7%, 98.9% and 99.3%, respectively (Figure 4) [76]. Synergistic effects could be obtained between Ag nanomaterials and partial etched Ti3C2Tx/Ti3AlC2 nanosheets, which were illustrated by transference of the photogenerated carriers and the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS); these effects could additionally enhance the catalytic degradation performance [76].
MXene-based nanocomposites fabricated via catalytic chemical vapor deposition were hybridized with carbon nanotubes for photocatalytic removal of Rhodamine B, wherein the photocatalyst degradation efficiency for pure MXenes and MXene-carbon nanotube composites were found to be 60% and 75%, respectively. The hybrid composites exhibited good degradation efficiency for pollutants in successive cycles [77]. In addition, MXene-based composites comprising multi-layered MXene (Ti3C2) nanosheets and transition metal oxide nanomaterials, i.e., zinc oxide, bismuth molybdate and tin dioxide, were introduced for the catalytic removal of pollutants with high adsorption capacity towards methylene blue [78]. Accordingly, 150 mg L−1 of high concentration methylene blue solution and 20 mg L−1 of 4-chlorophenol solution were totally eliminated by adsorption and photocatalysis using these MXene-based photocatalysts for 4 h under visible light irradiation. Studies on mechanisms revealed that hydroxyl and superoxide free radicals were reactive species in the degradation procedure; coupling transition metal oxide and MXene inhibited the recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs [78]. These MXene-based nanocomposites with synergistic removal of pollutants and strong adsorption thus offer themselves as promising photocatalysts for environmental pollution control.
The design of heterostructures can improve the catalytic performance of MXene-based photocatalysts, because of the triggered interfacial electron transfer [64]. In one study, the chimeric ZnO nanosheets with suitable carrier mobility were created on the accordion-shaped surface of MXenes (Nb2C and V2C) to obtain hierarchical ZnO/MXene heterostructures as photocatalysts for degradation of dyes [79]. These structures with good stability exhibited improved photocatalytic activity for degrading methylene blue; the degradation rate for ZnO/Nb2C was ~62.62% and for ZnO/V2C was found to be ~99.53, after UV irradiation within 120 min. The degradation rate endured at 58.6% and 97.3%, respectively, after 4 cycles, while it was only 22.0% for pure ZnO. This is because of the formed ZnO/MXene hierarchical structures with uniform active sites on their surfaces and porous structures, which prevented the aggregation of ZnO or MXenes. Notably, the heterostructures between ZnO and MXenes could abridge the carrier transfer pathway, facilitating the transfer of photo-generated electrons from the conduction band of ZnO to the conduction band of MXenes, and enhancing the efficiency of photocatalytic degradation [79]. This strategy can improve the catalytic activity of other 2D photocatalytic structures, paving a way for designing efficient photocatalysts. Sun et al. [80] developed MXene (Ti3C2)-bridged Ag/Ag3PO4 hybrid composites with Ti3C2 content-dependent photocatalytic performance for the degradation of MO and Cr(VI) reduction under visible light irradiation; the highest MO degradation efficiency could be obtained with 3 wt% Ti3C2 content after irradiation for 1 h. The mechanistic studies revealed that improved photocatalytic performance was associated with the synergetic effects that originated from Ag, Ag3PO4, and MXenes, enhancing visible light absorption and promoting separation and transfer of photo-generated electron–hole pairs [80].
Photocatalytic removal of pollutants of pharmaceutical origin and industrial wastes has been explored using MXene-based composites. For instance, MXene-Ti3C2/MoS2 composites fabricated through a hydrothermal treatment technique were deployed for the photocatalytic removal of ranitidine and reduction of nitrosamine dimethylamine generation potential under visible light irradiation [81]. A heterojunction could be detected between MoS2 and MXene, facilitating the separation of electron–hole pairs and charge transfer to improve photocatalytic activity. These composites demonstrated superior photocatalytic activity within ~60 min; the highest ranitidine degradation (~88.4%) and mineralization (~73.58%) efficiency, and the lowest nitrosamine dimethylamine formation potential of only ~2.01%. Mechanism studies revealed that active species such as •O2 radicals, h+ and •OH radicals were responsible for degrading ranitidine, and •OH radicals were the chief active species that were responsible for photocatalytic performance [81]. Kumar et al. [82] developed MXene (Ti3C2) coupled g-C3N4 nanosheets based on plasmonic photocatalysts with good reusability (up to 3 cycles) for removal of pharmaceutical pollutants (cefixime) under visible light irradiation (Figure 5). After the optimization process, the photocatalysts containing 3 wt% MXenes could efficiently remove (~64.69%) cefixime under visible light exposure within 105 min. Mechanistic studies revealed that the presence of gold (Au) nanomaterials and MXenes in these nanocomposites could facilitate the outstanding charge carrier separation and increase the number of active sites, because of the generation of interfacial contact with g-C3N4 nanosheets. In addition, the plasmonic influence of Au nanomaterials improved the absorption of light photons, which could enhance the photocatalytic activity of these nanocomposites. Nanosheets of g-C3N4 were employed as semiconducting photocatalysts to efficiently harvest energy from visible light. Besides this, MXene nanosheets functioned as superb electron sinks and provided improved surface areas for the adsorption of hazardous pollutants; the application of MXenes as co-catalysts in these nanocomposites facilitated the interfacial separation of charge carriers due to their excellent metallic conductivity and their abundant functional groups [82].
The Z-scheme heterojunction-based photocatalyst has advantages of excellent electron–hole pairs separation efficiency, robust redox potential, and a broad light response range; the significant power of oxidization and reduction makes the Z-scheme heterojunction suitable for degradation of pollutants in water [83,84,85]. In one study, a Z-scheme heterojunction of g-C3N4/MXene (Ti3C2)/MoSe2 was developed to achieve effective visible light-induced removal of enoxacin within 60 min [86]. Accordingly, MXene-stimulated interface electron separation could play an important role on degradation with high efficiency. Furthermore, MXene as a suitable mediator between g-C3N4 and MoSe2 could effectively transfer the electron and inhibit its recombination. Notably, a Schottky-junction could be generated between MXene (the conductor) and g-C3N4/MoSe2 (the semiconductor) to improve electron trapping; the trapped electron could stimulate the active species generation to enhance performance. During degradation, most commonly produced reactive species were O2 and photogenerated electrons. The prepared photocatalyst exhibited promising degradation potential for other pollutants, including norfloxacin (~80%), moxifloxacin (~100%), ofloxacin (~100%), gatifloxacin (~65%), levofloxacin (~100%), and ciprofloxacin (~80%) [86]. Cao et al. [87] synthesized g-C3N4/TiO2@Ti3C2 photocatalysts for effective visible light degradation of pollutants such as MO, revealing higher degradation rates with improved photocatalytic performance owing to the Z-type heterojunctions in the nanocomposites. It is because of the close interaction among the multilayer MXenes, perforated g-C3N4 flake with a large specific surface area, and oxidation-generated TiO2 promoting the separation of photocatalytic carriers and catalytic reactions [87]. MXenes can highly improve the catalytic performance and stability of materials such as Ag3PO4 due to the abundant surface hydrophilic functional groups forming robust interfacial contact with Ag3PO4, facilitating the separation of carriers [88]. Additional radical OH formation is also stimulated by the strong redox reactivity of surface Ti sites promoting multiple electron reduction reactions. In one study, a Schottky-junction generated at Ag3PO4-MXene (Ti3C2) interface suitably transferred electrons to the surface of the MXene by a built-in electrical field (Figure 6). The prepared composites displayed high photocatalytic degradation capabilities towards organic pollutants such as 2,4-dinitrophenol. The photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride was also maintained at ~68.4%, even after 8 successive cycles of reuse [88].
MXenes and MOFs have been hybridized for the photocatalytic degradation of pollutants. Long et al. [89] designed MXene (Ti3C2)/NH2-MIL-88B(Fe) composites with a photocatalytic removal potential (>90%) towards methylene blue (50 ppm) within 30 min, along with the elimination of ~83.41% Rhodamine B (25 ppm) and 44.26% MO (20 ppm) within 120 min. The use of MXenes could help to prevent the agglomeration of MOFs and enhance the effective area of the composite material, acting as a photo-generated electron trap in the photocatalytic procedure for improving the charge separation efficiency of MOFs. The main mechanisms for dye removal entailed adsorption performance and the Schottky knot synergistic Fenton effect [89]. Since MXenes (Ti3C2) typically cannot be directly applied for a photocatalysis process and this matter may restrict their additional photocatalytic applications (especially in water), the proposed hybridization strategy using MOFs can help to improve their properties and functionalities. Another hybrid MXene-based photocatalyst was introduced using NiCo2S4 and MXene [90]. The photocatalyst with great photostability in 5 repetitive runs exhibited efficient degradation of rhodamine B (~100%) under visible light irradiation within 20 min. It was revealed that rhodamine B was primarily oxidized into non-toxic products such as H2O, CO2, and a few inorganic species, offering new opportunities for wastewater management with advantages of environmentally benign properties, cost-effectiveness, and the formation of non-toxic by-products [90].

4. Conclusions and Perspectives

MXene-based composites have attracted much attention as photocatalysts to degrade pollutants owing to their unique optical/thermal features, hydrophilicity, large surface area, surface controllable chemical properties, high chemical stability, regular planar architectures, high metal conductivity, and abundant derivatives. However, rapid recombination of photo-generated carriers typically may lead to a reduction in their photocatalytic functions. Designing a heterostructure can effectively improve the photocatalytic activities of MXene-based composites, because of the stimulated interfacial electron transfer. Notably, hybridization of MXenes with other materials such as MOFs, graphene, and polymers can help to improve their photocatalytic properties. In addition, MXenes with unique lamellar structures and excellent conductivity have been deployed as co-catalysts for enhancing the photocatalytic degradation capabilities of composites. Several aspects need to be systematically studied, including finding the functional groups’ orientation on their surfaces. With advancements in photocatalysis and nanotechnology, MXenes and their derivatives with unique structural and physicochemical properties along with their biocompatibility, robust electrochemistry, and hydrophilicity can be employed as multifunctional candidates in novel environmental clean-up technologies for detection, mitigation, and elimination of various hazardous contaminants and organic/inorganic pollutants from environmental matrices; finding suitable techniques for improving the properties and functionality of MXene-based (nano)photocatalysts is one of the most important challenges ahead. More analytical and feasibility studies are still needed to move from laboratory-stage experiments to large/industrial-scale remediation of pollutants using MXenes. In addition, since Ti3C2Tx is the most studied MXene for photocatalytic applications, it is suggested that future studies move towards the design of novel photocatalysts using other types of MXenes. The stability of MXenes still needs additional adjustments using suitable functionalization and/or post-production optimization processes. Large-scale production of MXene-based photocatalysts is another crucial challenging issue; finding optimal reaction/synthesis conditions (pH, temperature, pressure, etc.) with advantages of simplicity, cost-effectiveness, eco-friendly properties, and repeatability can help move towards large-scale and commercial production of these photocatalysts.

Author Contributions

S.I. and R.S.V.: conceptualization; and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ihsanullah, I. MXenes (two-dimensional metal carbides) as emerging nanomaterials for water purification: Progress, challenges and prospects. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 388, 124340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tang, W.; Dong, Z.; Zhang, R.; Yi, X.; Yang, K.; Jin, M.; Yuan, C.; Xiao, Z.; Liu, Z.; Cheng, L. Multifunctional Two-Dimensional Core–Shell MXene@Gold Nanocomposites for Enhanced Photo–Radio Combined Therapy in the Second Biological Window. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Murugan, C.; Sharma, V.; Murugan, R.K.; Malaimegu, G.; Sundaramurthy, A. Two-dimensional cancer theranostic nanomaterials: Synthesis, surface functionalization and applications in photothermal therapy. J. Control. Release 2019, 299, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shafiee, A.; Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. Graphene and graphene oxide with anticancer applications: Challenges and future perspectives. MedComm 2022, 3, e118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shafiei, N.; Nasrollahzadeh, M.; Iravani, S. Green Synthesis of Silica and Silicon Nanoparticles and Their Biomedical and Catalytic Applications. Comments Inorg. Chem. 2021, 41, 317–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ji, Y.; Luo, Y. New mechanism for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 on the anatase TiO2(101) surface: The essential role of oxygen vacancy. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 15896–15902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yang, C.; Tan, Q.; Li, Q.; Zhou, J.; Fan, J.; Li, B.; Sun, J.; Lv, K. 2D/2D Ti3C2 MXene/g-C3N4 nanosheets heterojunction for high efficient CO2 reduction photocatalyst: Dual effects of urea. Appl. Catal. B 2020, 268, 118738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rhouati, A.; Berkani, M.; Vasseghian, Y.; Golzadeh, N. MXene-based electrochemical sensors for detection of environmental pollutants: A comprehensive review. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Feng, X.; Yu, Z.; Sun, Y.; Long, R.; Shan, M.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J. Review MXenes as a new type of nanomaterial for environmental applications in the photocatalytic degradation of water pollutants. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 7321–7343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iravani, P.; Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. MXene-Chitosan Composites and Their Biomedical Potentials. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. MXenes and MXene-based materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Recent advances. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 2906–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. MXenes for Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis: Recent Advances and Current Challenges. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 7, 1900–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sreedhar, A.; Noh, J.-S. Recent advances in partially and completely derived 2D Ti3C2 MXene based TiO2 nanocomposites towards photocatalytic applications: A review. Sol. Energy 2021, 222, 48–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abbasi, Z.; Feizi, S.; Taghipour, E.; Ghadam, P. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using aqueous extract of dried Juglans regia green husk and examination of its biological properties. Green Process. Synth. 2017, 6, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Iravani, S. MXenes and MXene-based (nano)structures: A perspective on greener synthesis and biomedical prospects. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 24144–24156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. MXenes in photomedicine: Advances and prospects. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 7336–7350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rahman, U.U.; Humayun, M.; Ghani, U.; Usman, M.; Ullah, H.; Khan, A.; El-Metwaly, N.M.; Khan, A. MXenes as Emerging Materials: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications. Molecules 2022, 27, 4909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shuck, C.E.; Ventura-Martinez, K.; Goad, A.; Uzun, S.; Shekhirev, M.; Gogotsi, Y. Safe Synthesis of MAX and MXene: Guidelines to Reduce Risk During Synthesis. ACS Chem. Health Saf. 2021, 28, 326–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, Y.; Meng, X.; Dall’Agnese, Y.; Dall’Agnese, C.; Duan, S.; Gao, Y.; Chen, G.; Wang, X.-F. 2D MXenes as co-catalysts in photocatalysis: Synthetic methods. Nano Micro. Lett. 2019, 11, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Wei, Y.; Zhang, P.; Soomro, R.A.; Zhu, Q.; Xu, B. Advances in the Synthesis of 2D MXenes. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2103148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wu, Q.; Li, N.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Wu, J.; Jia, G.; Ji, F.; Fang, X.; Chen, F.; Cui, X. Ultrasensitive and Selective Determination of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Using Multifunctional Ultrathin Amino-Functionalized Ti3C2-MXene Nanosheets. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 3354–3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wyatt, B.C.; Rosenkranz, A.; Anasori, B. 2D MXenes: Tunable Mechanical and Tribological Properties. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2007973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. MXenes in Cancer Nanotheranostics. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. You, Z.; Liao, Y.; Li, X.; Fan, J.; Xiang, Q. State-of-the-art recent progress in MXene-based photocatalysts: A comprehensive review. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 9463–9504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kuang, P.; Low, J.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J.; Fan, J. MXene-based photocatalysts. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2020, 56, 18–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Im, J.K.; Sohn, E.J.; Kim, S.; Jang, M.; Son, A.; Zoh, K.-D.; Yoon, Y. Review of MXene-based nanocomposites for photocatalysis. Chemosphere 2021, 270, 129478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Khatami, M.; Iravani, P.; Jamalipour Soufi, G.; Iravani, S. MXenes for antimicrobial and antiviral applications: Recent advances. Mater. Technol. Adv. Perform. Mater. 2022, 37, 1890–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khatami, M.; Iravani, S. MXenes and MXene-based Materials for the Removal of Water Pollutants: Challenges and Opportunities. Comments Inorg. Chem. 2021, 41, 213–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, S.; Bilal, M.; Adeel, M.; Barceló, D.; Iqbal, H.M.N. MXene-based designer nanomaterials and their exploitation to mitigate hazardous pollutants from environmental matrices. Chemosphere 2021, 283, 131293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bai, X.; Hou, S.; Wang, X.; Hao, D.; Sun, B.; Jia, T.; Shi, R.; Ni, B.-J. Mechanism of surface and interface engineering under diverse dimensional combinations: The construction of efficient nanostructured MXene-based photocatalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 5028–5049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wojciechowski, T.; Rozmysłowska-Wojciechowska, A.; Matyszczak, G.; Wrzecionek, M.; Olszyna, A.; Peter, A.; Mihaly-Cozmuta, A.; Nicula, C.; Mihaly-Cozmuta, L.; Podsiadło, S.; et al. Ti2C MXene Modified with Ceramic Oxide and Noble Metal Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Morphostructural Properties, and High Photocatalytic Activity. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 7602–7614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Makola, L.C.; Moeno, S.; Ouma, C.N.M.; Sharma, A.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Dlamini, L.N. Facile fabrication of a metal-free 2D–2D Nb2CTx@g-C3N4 MXene-based Schottky-heterojunction with the potential application in photocatalytic processes. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022, 916, 165459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sun, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wu, Q.; Zhu, M.; Huang, H.; Liu, Y.; Shao, M.; Kang, Z. A photoactive process cascaded electrocatalysis for enhanced methanol oxidation over Pt-MXene-TiO2 composite. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 2683–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hasija, V.; Raizada, P.; Sudhaik, A.; Sharma, K.; Kumar, A.; Singh, P.; Jonnalagadda, S.B.; Thakur, V.K. Recent advances in noble metal free doped graphitic carbon nitride based nanohybrids for photocatalysis of organic contaminants in water: A review. Appl. Mater. Today 2019, 15, 494–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Soni, V.; Singh, P.; Phan Quang, H.H.; Parwaz Khan, A.A.; Bajpai, A.; Van Le, Q.; Thakur, V.K.; Thakur, S.; Nguyen, V.-H.; Raizada, P. Emerging architecture titanium carbide (Ti3C2Tx) MXene based photocatalyst toward degradation of hazardous pollutants: Recent progress and perspectives. Chemosphere 2022, 293, 133541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hoai Ta, Q.T.; Tran, N.M.; Noh, J.-S. Rice crust-like ZnO/Ti3C2Tx MXene hybrid structures for improved photocatalytic activity. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1140. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ihsanullah, I. MXenes as next-generation materials for the photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceuticals in water. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tu, W.; Liu, Y.; Chen, M.; Zhou, Y.; Xie, Z.; Ma, L.; Li, L.; Yang, B. Carbon nitride coupled with Ti3C2-Mxene derived amorphous Ti-peroxo heterojunction for photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B and tetracycline. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 640, 128448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, T.; Li, L.; Geng, X.; Yang, C.; Zhang, X.; Lin, X.; Lv, P.; Mu, Y.; Huang, S. Heterostructured MXene-derived oxides as superior photocatalysts for MB degradation. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 919, 165629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cui, C.; Guo, R.; Ren, E.; Xiao, H.; Lai, X.; Qin, Q.; Jiang, S.; Shen, H.; Zhou, M.; Qin, W. Facile hydrothermal synthesis of rod-like Nb2O5/Nb2CTx composites for visible-light driven photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Environ. Res. 2021, 193, 110587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shahzad, A.; Rasool, K.; Nawaz, M.; Miran, W.; Jang, J.; Moztahida, M.; Mahmoud, K.A.; Lee, D.S. Heterostructural TiO2/Ti3C2Tx (MXene) for photocatalytic degradation of antiepileptic drug carbamazepine. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 349, 748–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Iqbal, M.A.; Ali, S.I.; Amin, F.; Tariq, A.; Iqbal, M.Z.; Rizwan, S. La- and Mn-Codoped Bismuth Ferrite/Ti3C2 MXene Composites for Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Congo Red Dye. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 8661–8668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Zhong, Q.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Ghasemi, J.B.; Zhang, G. Ti3C2 MXene/Ag2ZnGeO4 Schottky heterojunctions with enhanced photocatalytic performances: Efficient charge separation and mechanism studies. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 278, 119560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, W.; Wu, B.; Yao, Q.; Dong, G.; Zuo, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z. A MXene-based multiple catalyst for highly efficient photocatalytic removal of nitrate. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 58149–58160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jang, J.; Shahzad, A.; Woo, S.H.; Lee, D.S. Magnetic Ti3C2Tx (Mxene) for diclofenac degradation via the ultraviolet/chlorine advanced oxidation process. Environ. Res. 2020, 182, 108990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Liu, N.; Lu, N.; Yu, H.; Chen, S.; Quan, X. Efficient day-night photocatalysis performance of 2D/2D Ti3C2/Porous g-C3N4 nanolayers composite and its application in the degradation of organic pollutants. Chemosphere 2020, 246, 125760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cao, Y.; Fang, Y.; Lei, X.; Tan, B.; Hu, X.; Liu, B.; Chen, Q. Fabrication of novel CuFe2O4/MXene hierarchical heterostructures for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of sulfonamides under visible light. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 387, 122021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wu, S.; Su, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, M. In-situ growing Bi/BiOCl microspheres on Ti3C2 nanosheets for upgrading visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 520, 146339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, W.Y.; Hood, Z.D.; Zhang, X.Y.; Ivanov, I.N.; Bao, Z.H.; Su, T.M.; Jin, M.Z.; Bai, L.; Wang, X.W.; Zhang, R.B.; et al. Construction of 2D BiVO4-CdS-Ti3C2Tx heterostructures for enhanced photo-redox activities. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 3496–3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhong, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G. Two-dimensional MXene-based and MXene-derived photocatalysts: Recent developments and perspectives. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 409, 128099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, Y.; Xie, X.Q.; Xin, X.; Tang, Z.R.; Xu, Y.J. Ti3C2Tx-based three-dimensional hydrogel by a graphene oxide-assisted self-convergence process for enhanced photoredox catalysis. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, J.Y.; Li, Y.H.; Zhang, F.; Tang, Z.R.; Xu, Y.J. Visible-light-driven integrated organic synthesis and hydrogen evolution over 1D/2D CdS-Ti3C2Tx MXene composites. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 269, 118783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, W.; Han, B.; Xie, Y.; Liang, S.; Deng, H.; Lin, Z. Ultrathin Co-Co LDHs nanosheets assembled vertically on MXene: 3D nanoarrays for boosted visible-light-driven CO2 reduction. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 391, 123519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cao, S.W.; Shen, B.J.; Tong, T.; Fu, J.W.; Yu, J.G. 2D/2D Heterojunction of ultrathin MXene/Bi2WO6 nanosheets for improved photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1800136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Anasori, B.; Lukatskaya, M.R.; Gogotsi, Y. 2D metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes) for energy storage. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 16098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nan, J.; Guo, X.; Xiao, J.; Li, X.; Chen, W.; Wu, W.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Wu, M.; Wang, G. Nanoengineering of 2D MXene-based materials for energy storage applications. Small 2021, 17, 1902085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, M.; Lu, J.; Luo, K.; Li, Y.; Chang, K.; Chen, K.; Zhou, J.; Rosen, J.; Hultman, L.; Eklund, P.; et al. Element Replacement Approach by Reaction with Lewis Acidic Molten Salts to Synthesize Nanolaminated MAX Phases and MXenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 4730–4737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Salim, O.; Mahmoud, K.A.; Pant, K.K.; Joshi, R.K. Introduction to MXenes: Synthesis and characteristics. Mater. Today Chem. 2019, 14, 100191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xu, C.; Wang, L.; Liu, Z.; Chen, L.; Guo, J.; Kang, N.; Ma, X.-L.; Cheng, H.-M.; Ren, W. Large-area high-quality 2D ultrathin Mo2C superconducting crystals. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 1135–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Geng, D.; Zhao, X.; Chen, Z.; Sun, W.; Fu, W.; Chen, J.; Liu, W.; Zhou, W.; Loh, K.P. Direct synthesis of large-area 2D Mo2C on in situ grown graphene. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sharma, S.K.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, G.; Vo, D.-V.N.; García-Peñas, A.; Moradi, O.; Sillanpää, M. MXenes based nano-heterojunctions and composites for advanced photocatalytic environmental detoxification and energy conversion: A review. Chemosphere 2022, 291, 132923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Velempini, T.; Prabakaran, E.; Pillay, K. Recent developments in the use of metal oxides for photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceutical pollutants in water—A review. Mater. Today Chem. 2021, 19, 100380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Siwal, S.S.; Sheoran, K.; Mishra, K.; Kaur, H.; Saini, A.K.; Saini, V.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Nezhad, H.Y.; Thakur, V.K. Novel synthesis methods and applications of MXene-based nanomaterials (MBNs) for hazardous pollutants degradation: Future perspectives. Chemosphere 2022, 293, 133542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Assad, H.; Fatma, I.; Kumar, A.; Kaya, S.; Vo, D.-V.N.; Al-Gheethi, A.; Sharma, A. An overview of MXene-Based nanomaterials and their potential applications towards hazardous pollutant adsorption. Chemosphere 2022, 298, 134221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Biswal, L.; Mohanty, R.; Nayak, S.; Parida, K. Review on MXene/TiO2 nanohybrids for photocatalytic hydrogen production and pollutant degradations. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, Q.; Mei, Y.; Zhou, R.; Komarneni, S.; Ma, J. Persulfate activation of CuS@Ti3C2-based MXene with Bi-active centers toward Orange II removal under visible light. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 648, 129315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, H.; Li, M.; Zhu, C.; Tang, Q.; Kang, P.; Cao, J. Preparation of magnetic α-Fe2O3/ZnFe2O4@Ti3C2 MXene with excellent photocatalytic performance. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yao, Z.; Sun, H.; Sui, H.; Liu, X. 2D/2D Heterojunction of R-scheme Ti3C2 MXene/MoS2 Nanosheets for Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhang, Y.-Z.; El-Demellawi, J.K.; Jiang, Q.; Ge, G.; Liang, H.; Lee, K.; Dong, X.; Alshareef, H.N. MXene hydrogels: Fundamentals and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 7229–7251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yang, Y.; Cao, Z.; He, P.; Shi, L.; Ding, G.; Wang, R.; Sun, J. Ti3C2Tx MXene-graphene composite films for wearable strain sensors featured with high sensitivity and large range of linear response. Nano Energy 2019, 66, 104134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mostafavi, E.; Iravani, S. MXene-Graphene Composites: A Perspective on Biomedical Potentials. Nano Micro Lett. 2022, 14, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Han, R.; Wu, P. High-performance graphene oxide nanofiltration membrane with continuous nanochannels prepared by the in situ oxidation of MXene. J. Mater. Chem 2019, 7, 6475–6481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wu, Z.; Liang, Y.; Yuan, X.; Zou, D.; Fang, J.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, J.; Yang, H.; Xiao, Z. MXene Ti3C2 derived Z–scheme photocatalyst of graphene layers anchored TiO2/g–C3N4 for visible light photocatalytic degradation of refractory organic pollutants. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 394, 124921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xu, J.; Zeng, G.; Lin, Q.; Gu, Y.; Wang, X.; Feng, Z.; Sengupta, A. Application of 3D magnetic nanocomposites: MXene-supported Fe3O4@CS nanospheres for highly efficient adsorption and separation of dyes. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 822, 153544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lin, P.; Shen, J.; Yu, X.; Liu, Q.; Li, D.; Tang, H. Construction of Ti3C2 MXene/O-doped g-C3N4 2D-2D Schottky-junction for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 24656–24663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lv, Y.; Wang, K.; Li, D.; Li, P.; Chen, X.; Han, W. Rare Ag nanoparticles loading induced surface-enhanced pollutant adsorption and photocatalytic degradation on Ti3C2Tx MXene-based nanosheets. Chem. Phys. 2022, 560, 111591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Thirumal, V.; Yuvakkumar, R.; Kumar, P.S.; Ravi, G.; Keerthana, S.P.; Velauthapillai, D. Facile single-step synthesis of MXene@CNTs hybrid nanocomposite by CVD method to remove hazardous pollutants. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Zhang, L.; Ma, P.; Dai, L.; Bu, Z.; Li, X.; Yu, W.; Cao, Y.; Guan, J. Removal of pollutants via synergy of adsorption and photocatalysis over MXene-based nanocomposites. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2022, 10, 100285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhou, W.; Yu, B.; Zhu, J.; Li, K.; Tian, S. Hierarchical ZnO/MXene (Nb2C and V2C) heterostructure with efficient electron transfer for enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 590, 153095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sun, B.; Tao, F.; Huang, Z.; Yan, W.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, G. Ti3C2 MXene-bridged Ag/Ag3PO4 hybrids toward enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 535, 147354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zou, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, J.; Lv, W.; Qiu, L.; Zhang, Z. Photocatalytic degradation of ranitidine and reduction of nitrosamine dimethylamine formation potential over MXene–Ti3C2/MoS2 under visible light irradiation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 413, 125424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kumar, A.; Majithia, P.; Choudhary, P.; Mabbett, I.; Kuehnel, M.; Pitchaimuthu, S.; Krishnan, V. MXene coupled graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets based plasmonic photocatalysts for removal of pharmaceutical pollutant. Chemosphere 2022, 136297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lai, Y.-J.; Lee, D.-J. Pollutant degradation with mediator Z-scheme heterojunction photocatalyst in water: A review. Chemosphere 2021, 282, 131059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Stelo, F.; Kublik, N.; Ullah, S.; Wender, H. Recent advances in Bi2MoO6 based Z-scheme heterojunctions for photocatalytic degradation of pollutants. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 829, 154591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, G.; Wang, Z.; Wu, J. Construction of a Z-scheme heterojunction for high-efficiency visible-light-driven photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 4359–4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zhou, Y.; Yu, M.; Zhan, R.; Wang, X.; Peng, G.; Niu, J. Ti3C2 MXene-induced interface electron separation in g-C3N4/Ti3C2 MXene/MoSe2 Z-scheme heterojunction for enhancing visible light-irradiated enoxacin degradation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 275, 119194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Cao, Z.; Su, J.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, M.; Fan, B.; Shao, G.; Wang, H.; Xu, H.; et al. High-energy ball milling assisted one-step preparation of g-C3N4/TiO2@Ti3C2 composites for effective visible light degradation of pollutants. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 889, 161771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cai, T.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Dong, W.; Chen, H.; Yi, X.; Yuan, J.; Xia, X.; Liu, C.; et al. Ag3PO4/Ti3C2 MXene interface materials as a Schottky catalyst with enhanced photocatalytic activities and anti-photocorrosion performance. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 239, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Long, R.; Yu, Z.; Tan, Q.; Feng, X.; Zhu, X.; Li, X.; Wang, P. Ti3C2 MXene/NH2-MIL-88B(Fe): Research on the adsorption kinetics and photocatalytic performance of an efficient integrated photocatalytic adsorbent. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 570, 151244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Vigneshwaran, S.; Park, C.M.; Meenakshi, S. Designed fabrication of sulfide-rich bi-metallic-assembled MXene layered sheets with dramatically enhanced photocatalytic performance for Rhodamine B removal. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 258, 118003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. MXenes with unique properties for photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceuticals and organic pollutants.
Figure 1. MXenes with unique properties for photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceuticals and organic pollutants.
Molecules 27 06939 g001
Figure 2. (A) The preparative process of magnetic α-Fe2O3/ZnFe2O4@MXene (Ti3C2) composites, with (B) mechanism of rhodamine B and toxic Cr (VI) photocatalytic removal in water. Adapted from Ref. [67] with permission. Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Figure 2. (A) The preparative process of magnetic α-Fe2O3/ZnFe2O4@MXene (Ti3C2) composites, with (B) mechanism of rhodamine B and toxic Cr (VI) photocatalytic removal in water. Adapted from Ref. [67] with permission. Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Molecules 27 06939 g002
Figure 3. (A) The preparative process for MXene@Fe3O4@chitosan (CS) magnetic nanocomposites, with related adsorption mechanism (B). LiF: lithium fluoride. Adapted from Ref. [74] with permission. Copyright 2022 Elsevier.
Figure 3. (A) The preparative process for MXene@Fe3O4@chitosan (CS) magnetic nanocomposites, with related adsorption mechanism (B). LiF: lithium fluoride. Adapted from Ref. [74] with permission. Copyright 2022 Elsevier.
Molecules 27 06939 g003
Figure 4. (A) The preparative process of ternary Ti3C2Tx/Ti3AlC2@Ag composites for the photocatalytic degradation of pollutants. (B) ROS and photodegradation reaction mechanisms. MB: methylene blue; RhB: Rhodamine B; MO: methylene orange. Adapted from Ref. [76] with permission. Copyright 2022 Elsevier.
Figure 4. (A) The preparative process of ternary Ti3C2Tx/Ti3AlC2@Ag composites for the photocatalytic degradation of pollutants. (B) ROS and photodegradation reaction mechanisms. MB: methylene blue; RhB: Rhodamine B; MO: methylene orange. Adapted from Ref. [76] with permission. Copyright 2022 Elsevier.
Molecules 27 06939 g004
Figure 5. (A) The preparative process of Au nanomaterial-decorated g-C3N4/MXene (AGM) nanocomposites. (B) The photocatalytic decomposition mechanism for pharmaceutical pollutant (cefixime) using the designed nanocomposites under visible light illumination. GCN: g-C3N4; SPR: surface plasmon resonance. Adapted from Ref. [82] with permission. Copyright 2022 Elsevier.
Figure 5. (A) The preparative process of Au nanomaterial-decorated g-C3N4/MXene (AGM) nanocomposites. (B) The photocatalytic decomposition mechanism for pharmaceutical pollutant (cefixime) using the designed nanocomposites under visible light illumination. GCN: g-C3N4; SPR: surface plasmon resonance. Adapted from Ref. [82] with permission. Copyright 2022 Elsevier.
Molecules 27 06939 g005
Figure 6. The possible mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants along with photo-corrosion inhibition of Ag3PO4/MXene (Ti3C2) Schottky catalysts. Adapted from Ref. [88] with permission. Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Figure 6. The possible mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants along with photo-corrosion inhibition of Ag3PO4/MXene (Ti3C2) Schottky catalysts. Adapted from Ref. [88] with permission. Copyright 2018 Elsevier.
Molecules 27 06939 g006
Table 1. Some selected MXene-based composites with photocatalytic degradation performance towards organic and pharmaceutical pollutants.
Table 1. Some selected MXene-based composites with photocatalytic degradation performance towards organic and pharmaceutical pollutants.
MXene-Based PhotocatalystsPollutantsAdvantages/PropertiesRefs.
Carbon nitride coupled with Ti3C2-Mxene derived amorphous titanium (Ti)-peroxo heterojunctionRhodamine B and tetracycline
-
High reusability and stability
-
Superb photocatalytic degradation efficiency over Rhodamine B (~97.22%) and tetracycline (~86.34%) under visible light irradiation (λ > 420 nm), within 60 min
[38]
Carbon/Ti-based oxide nanocomposites/MXenes (Ti3C2Tx)Methylene blue
-
Significant removal of methylene blue (~90%) under visible light illumination, within 1 h.
-
Narrowed band-gap with suitable electronic conductivity
-
Large specific surface area
-
Excellent efficiency of charge separation with improved absorption capabilities
[39]
Rod-like Nb2O5/Nb2CTx compositesRhodamine B and tetracycline
-
High photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B (~98.5%, 120 min) and tetracycline (~91.2%, 180 min) under visible light irradiation
-
High photoactivity and cycle stability
[40]
TiO2/Ti3C2TxCarbamazepine
-
High photocatalytic degradation of carbamazepine (~98.67%) under UV light irradiation
-
•OH and •O2 attacked the carbamazepine molecule during the photocatalytic degradation
[41]
Lanthanum (La)- and manganese (Mn)-co-doped bismuth ferrite/MXene (Ti3C2) compositesCongo red
-
Fast degradation of organic dye molecules
-
~92–93% degradation of dye pollutant
[42]
MXene (Ti3C2)/Ag2ZnGeO4 Schottky heterojunctionsAcid red 1
-
Enhanced visible light photocatalytic performance
-
Improved formation of superoxide radicals as the chief active species
-
Efficient charge separation
[43]
MXene-based catalysts (TiO2/Ti3C2) modified with silver (Ag) particlesNitrate
-
The photoelectron density as well as the carrier separation of the catalysts could be improved by applying Ag particles
-
The rate of nitrate elimination ~96.1%; the selectivity towards nitrogen was ~92.6%
-
High photocatalytic removal efficiency (~89%) towards nitrate, even after 5 cycles
[44]
Magnetic-Ti3C2TXDiclofenac
-
Enhanced degradation of diclofenac due to the formation of active radicals, including the hydroxyl radical and reactive chlorine species
-
Excellent stability and photodegradation efficiency during seven consecutive degradation reaction cycles
[45]
Ti3C2/g-C3N4Phenol
-
98% phenol removal efficiency
-
32.1% phenol could be degraded under dark conditions owing to the capability of MXenes in storing additional photo-generated electrons under light irradiation and releasing them when exposed to electron acceptors in dark conditions
[46]
CuFe2O4/Ti3C2Sulfamethazine
-
The synergistic degradation effects under visible light
-
The breaking of S–N bonds could be detected; the oxidation of aniline and deamination were dominated by attacking •OH
[47]
Bismuth/bismuth oxychloride (Bi/BiOCl) microspheres/Ti3C2Ciprofloxacin
-
Excellent reusability in the 5 cycles of ciprofloxacin degradation
-
High photocatalytic performance
[48]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iravani, S.; Varma, R.S. MXene-Based Photocatalysts in Degradation of Organic and Pharmaceutical Pollutants. Molecules 2022, 27, 6939. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27206939

AMA Style

Iravani S, Varma RS. MXene-Based Photocatalysts in Degradation of Organic and Pharmaceutical Pollutants. Molecules. 2022; 27(20):6939. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27206939

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iravani, Siavash, and Rajender S. Varma. 2022. "MXene-Based Photocatalysts in Degradation of Organic and Pharmaceutical Pollutants" Molecules 27, no. 20: 6939. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27206939

APA Style

Iravani, S., & Varma, R. S. (2022). MXene-Based Photocatalysts in Degradation of Organic and Pharmaceutical Pollutants. Molecules, 27(20), 6939. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27206939

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop