Next Article in Journal
Development of an Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Hydroxylated Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Animal-Derived Food
Next Article in Special Issue
Dinuclear Lanthanide Compound as a Promising Luminescent Probe for Al3+ Ions
Previous Article in Journal
Dark Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium) Anthocyanins Suppressed ERK1/2-Akt/mTOR Cell Signaling and Oxidative Stress: Implications for TNBC Growth and Invasion
Previous Article in Special Issue
MOF-808 as a Highly Active Catalyst for the Diastereoselective Reduction of Substituted Cyclohexanones
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 21
10.3390/molecules27217246
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fast Assembly of Metal Organic Framework UiO-66 in Acid-Base Tunable Deep Eutectic Solvent for the Acetalization of Benzaldehyde and Methanol

by
Lifang Chen
*,
Xiangzhu Ye
,
Ting Zhang
,
Hao Qin
,
Hongye Cheng
and
Zhiwen Qi
*
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Meilong Road 130, Shanghai 200237, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(21), 7246; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217246
Submission received: 28 September 2022 / Revised: 16 October 2022 / Accepted: 20 October 2022 / Published: 25 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hybrid MOFs for Catalytic Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted extensive attention owing to their robust stability and facile functionalization. However, they are generally prepared in common volatile solvents within a long reaction time. Here, we introduced environmentally friendly, cheap, and acid-based tunable deep eutectic solvents (DESs) formed from 2-methyl imidazole (MIm) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) which significantly accelerated the assembly of zirconium-based MOF (UiO-66) without any aggressive additives. PTSA in acidic DES and ZrOCl2 preliminarily formed Zr(IV) oxo organic acid framework, whereas basic DES completely dissolved the ligand of UiO-66. The strong hydrogen bond effect of PTSA and MIm efficiently accelerated the linker exchange between zirconium oxo organic coordination in acidic DES and benzenedicarboxylate linker in weak basic DES within a reaction time of 2 h at 50 °C. Thus, UiO-66 was quickly assembled with small particle sizes and used as an excellent catalyst for the acetalization of benzaldehyde and methanol. Therefore, the developed synthesis approach provides a new green strategy to quickly prepare and design various structures of metal-based compounds under mild reaction conditions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) with organic inorganic hybrid compositions, high surface areas, and versatile porous structures have gained extensive attention in gas adsorption and storage [1,2], separation [3], drug delivery [4,5], and catalysis [6,7,8]. Particularly, they possess steric characters of active metal sites and adjustable pore sizes, facilitating accessibility and transport of catalytic substrates and products [9,10,11,12]. With the advantages of homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts, they exhibit high activity, selectivity, and stability for a series of catalytic processes. Among them, zirconium-based MOFs have the potential for applications owing to their excellent stability and facile functionalization [13]. Generally, they are synthesized through conventional solvothermal methods with a long reaction time and high reaction temperature [14,15]. Extensive efforts have been focused on accelerating their formation, such as the addition of aggressive additives [16,17], microwave [18], and mechanochemical milling [19], which are energy intensive and complex due to product contamination and impurity removal. In contrast, environmentally benign approaches with low energy and much shorter times to prepare Zr-based MOFs are desirable.
Ionic liquids (ILs), as green solvents, are widely used in the synthesis of metal oxides, and MOFs due to their unique properties [20,21,22,23]. They have many advantages, such as acting as both solvent and structure direction agent with tunable hydrophilic and hydrophobic property, dissolving organic and inorganic precursors, thermal stability, environmental benignity, and so on [24]. For example, Zhang et. al. found the second component can promote the formation of MOFs in ILs [25,26]. Recently, they have also reported that aprotic IL 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride as solvent could significantly accelerate the room-temperature formation of Zr-based MOFs with the help of acetic acid within only a half hour [27]. We also previously prepared manganese-based oxides catalysts under the assistance of ILs with efficient catalytic activity for selective oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural [20,21]. However, ILs with complex preparation procedures, low biodegradability, and high cost have limited their practical applications.
Accordingly, as environmentally friendly, cheap, and acid-based tunable solvents, deep eutectic solvents (DESs) with the advantages of ILs are continuously emerging as analogous ILs [28,29,30,31]. Composed of a hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA, e.g., quaternary ammonium or phosphonium salt) and a hydrogen bond donor (HBD, e.g., organic acid or alcohol), DESs can greatly decrease freezing points relative to individual components due to the formation of hydrogen bonds between the resultants. They have been reported as reaction media for many inorganic metals, metal oxides, metal chalcogenides, metal phosphate, organic carbonides and nitrides [32,33,34]. However, very few examples of MOFs prepared from DESs using general synthetic approach have been reported, and only zeolitic imidazolate framework using DES formed from 2-methyl imidazole (MIm) and tetrabutylammonium bromide has been proposed [35]. Owing to their environmental benignancy, facile preparation, and low cost, it is attractive to utilize DESs as solvents to prepare MOFs under mild conditions.
Based on this motivation, for the first time, we contribute a green MOF preparation strategy in acid-based tunable DES environment formed from MIm and p-toluene sulfonic acid (PTSA). The tuned acidic and basic DESs can significantly accelerate the assembly of zirconium-based metal–organic framework (University of Oslo, UiO-66) with high yield under mild conditions without any aggressive additives. The MOF demonstrated high catalytic activity for the acetalization of benzaldehyde and methanol.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Hydrated zirconyl nitrate (ZrOCl2·8H2O), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), MIm, and PTSA were purchased from Adamas Reagent Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China. Terephthalic acid (H2BDC) anhydrous methanol, and benzaldehyde were obtained from Aladdin Industrial Corp. Shanghai, China.

2.2. Synthesis, Characterization, and Calculation of DESs

All DESs were prepared by heating appropriate mixture of MIm and PTSA with specific molar ratio [3MIm:PTSA] and [MIm:2PTSA] at 50 °C with continual stirring. Then mixture of MIm and PTSA with a homogeneous colorless solution by observation meant the formation of DES.
For the synthesis of UiO-66-DES, 1 mmol H2BDC was dissolved in 8.7 g of basic DES [3MIm:PTSA] and 1 mmol ZrOCl2·8H2O was dissolved in 9.4 g of acidic DES [MIm:2PTSA] at 50 °C. Then, the above two solutions were mixed and stirred at 50 °C for 2 h. The precipitate was collected by centrifugation, washed by de-ionized water three times, and dried under vacuum at 60 °C for 24 h.
As for UiO-66-DMF, 1 mmol H2BDC and 1 mmol ZrOCl2·8H2O were dissolved in 50 mL DMF. The mixed solution was then transferred to a 100 mL Teflon-lined autoclave and heated at 50 °C for desired time in a convection oven. The precipitate was collected by centrifugation, washed by de-ionized water three times, and dried under vacuum at 60 °C for 24 h. The product was then weighed to determine the yield of UiO-66, which was percent yield of experimental UiO-66 yield to the theoretical UiO-66 yield based on the calculation of initial reagents at a given reaction time.
The interaction between involved molecules and molecules or ions was calculated by a conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RSs). The interaction energies and σ-potentials were calculated based on COSMOtherm 2022 (Version 22.0.0). The geometrical optimization of involved species was conducted by Gaussian 09 E.01 software package to form COSMO files, which were imported to COSMO-RS to calculate interaction energies.
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer Frontier™ spectrometer, range of 4000–400 cm−1 with 4 cm−1 step. Thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA) was performed on a PerkinElmer TGA-8000 with heating rate of 4 °C min−1 from 30 °C to 800 °C in flowing air of 200 mL·min−1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) data was collected on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer, using nickel-filtered CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54187 Å) in Bragg-Brentano geometry (U = 30 kV, I = 10 mA). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to determine the freezing points of MIm-PTSA mixture (Pyris Diamond DSC, Waltham, MA, USA). The morphology was analyzed on a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JEOLJSM-6700F). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) image and particle size distribution of the sample was obtained on a JEOL JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope (TEM). The particle size distribution was evaluated more than 200 particles from the measurement of the TEM images. 1H NMR spectra were collected on a Bruker Advance III 400 NMR spectrometer, 400 MHz in DMSO. The pH of the aqueous MIm-PTSA mixture (0.01 mol·L−1 in water) was measured by Mettler Toledo FE-20 pH meter at 25 °C. The specific surface area of the samples was analyzed based on BET method using a Micromeritics ASAP2460 instrument, at 77 K.

2.3. Acetalization Experiments

The prepared UiO-66 catalysts were activated prior to catalytic test by drying the catalyst in vacuum at 300 °C for 3 h. 50 mg of catalyst, 3 mL methanol (74 mmol), 0.12 g of benzaldehydes (1.1 mmol) were added to a 10 mL sealed glass bottle. The reaction mixture was then stirred at 500 rpm at room temperature for 1 h. Reaction conversion was monitored by taking aliquots from the reaction mixture at different time intervals and analyzed by Agilent 7890 GC with a flame ionization detector and PEG-20 m column. The reaction and analysis of biomass feedstocks with methanol was performed under the same conditions above.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fast Assembly of UiO-66

DESs with much low freezing points compared with each individual component, it is important to study the interaction of MIm and PTSA. Thus COSMO-RS, a statistical thermodynamics model based on quantum chemistry calculations, was employed to investigate the interaction effect between MIm and PTSA, as shown in Figure 1. Three regions are divided by hydrogen bond (HB) threshold of σ = ±0.0084 e/Å2. A molecule with σ-potential in the regions of σ < −0.0084, −0.0084 < σ < 0.0084, and σ > 0.0084 e/Å2 indicates its HBD, nonpolar, and HBA abilities, respectively. HBA and HBD abilities are the ability to form hydrogen bond involving electrostatic attraction, where a hydrogen is covalently bound to a more electronegative donor atom or group, namely HBD. On the other hand, the hydrogen acceptor is an electronegative atom of an adjacent molecule (HBA), containing a lone pair involved in the hydrogen bond. The deeper the red or blue color is, the stronger the HBA or HBD ability is. σ-Profile of MIm is broadly distributed in both polar regions, suggesting its strong HBA and HBD abilities. For PTSA, it also has a strong HBD ability, while the only peak in the HBA region and close to the non-polar region reflects its weak HBA ability. The analysis can also be confirmed by another important descriptor, σ-surface. As a result, MIm and PTSA are supposed to have a strong affinity each other through hydrogen bonds, and thus form DES through the decrease in freezing point.
Besides the interaction between MIm and PTSA, the interaction energy between PTSA and MIm cation or PTS anion is considered and displayed in Figure 2a. The HB interaction between PTSA and PTS cation is dominant among three major interaction energies including misfit, HB and van der Waals (vdW) interaction energies. The higher HB interaction energy between PTSA and PTS anion indicating the stronger HB ability significantly decreases freezing point of [MIm:2PTSA].
As for the interaction between MIm and MIm cation or PTS anion (Figure 2b), the HB interaction energy between MIm and MIm cation is close to that between MIm and PTS anion, which suggests that MIm can simultaneously interact with MIm cation and PTS anion. In addition, the vdW interaction and misfit energies between MIm and PTS anion are higher than those between MIm and MIm cation. Taken all in consideration, the PTS anion possesses strong interaction with MIm and PTSA, and it requires excess MIm to form DES [3MIm:PTSA] by the conjunct HB interaction between MIm and MIm cation as well.
The formation process of UiO-66-DES within acid-base tunable DESs formed from MIm and PTSA is described in Scheme 1. The σ-surfaces of MIm, PTSA, [3MIm:PTSA], [MIm:2PTSA] in the scheme represent the actual molecular arrangement. Specifically, strong Brønsted acidic DES [MIm:2PTSA] (mole ratio) with pH = 1.8 is obtained, while weak basic DES [3MIm:PTSA] with pH = 7.4 is acquired in Table S1, Supporting Information. The freezing points of [MIm:2PTSA] and [3MIm:PTSA] are 16.0 °C and 39.0 °C, respectively, which are much lower than that of the pure individual components (142 °C for MIm and 103 °C for PTSA). The tuned acid-base properties have also been demonstrated in our previous work for imidazole-PTSA based DESs [36,37].
Herein, the weak basic [3MIm:PTSA] can completely dissolve the ligand (H2BDC) of UiO-66, and the strong acidic [MIm/2PTSA] can dissolve metal precursor ZrOCl2. The precursors were separately dissolved in acidic and basic DES solutions, and the mixture was just stirred under mild temperature (50 °C) for 2 h to produce UiO-66. Therefore, the tuned acid-based DESs can accelerate the formation of zirconium based MOF and high yield of MOF is obtained in a short reaction time in comparison with conventional solvothermal method [38,39].
UiO-66 with a formula Zr6O4(OH)4(BDC)6 has gained attractive applications in various fields owing to its superior thermal and chemical stability. Here the UiO-66 was synthesized in acid-base tunable DES based on MIm and PTSA. As the reaction time is shortened to 2 h, the relative intensities of the X-ray diffraction (XRD) peak of the solid product prepared in DES agree well with those of the reported UiO-66 and simulated one in Figure 3 [38,39]. In the contrast, the conventional solvothermal synthesis demands long reaction time to get good crystallinity of the MOF. When the UiO-66 was prepared in DMF with prolonged solvothermal time from 24 to 144 h, the intensities of the diffraction peaks gradually increase, which imply the UiO-66 synthesized in DMF requires long reaction time.
Generally, UiO-66 has a cubic structure with Fm-3m space group based on Zr oxo-clusters and BDC ligands [38]. The UiO-66 synthesized in DES (UiO-66-DES) has a unit cell of 20.810 Å and UiO-66-DMF synthesized in DMF with reaction time of 144 h has a unit cell of 20.717 Å, which are similar to the reported UiO-66. Average crystal sizes are also obtained according to Scherrer equation by measuring (111) diffraction peak at 2θ of about 7.3° in the XRD patterns. The UiO-66-DES and UiO-66-DMF have average crystal sizes of 64.2 and 58.5 nm, respectively. On basis of Ostwald ripening, a longer reaction time can efficiently improve crystallinity and yield of product, resulting in larger particle sizes [40]. Herein, UiO-66-DES has better crystallinity with larger crystal sizes within a shorter reaction time of 2 h, which indicates that acid-base tunable DES can accelerate the formation of the UiO-66.
Obviously, tuned acidic and basic DESs as solvents of metal precursor and organic ligand, respectively, significantly enhance the formation rate of UiO-66 compared with conventional organic solvent DMF. The yield of UiO-66-DES achieves the maximum of 87.5% after 2 h reaction time and is far higher than that of UiO-66-DMF with only 60.0% at 100 h (Figure S1). The results demonstrate that UiO-66-DES synthesized in DES exhibits high crystallinity and obtains high yield in a short reaction time. Furthermore, functionalized UiO-66 (UiO-66-NH2) and UiO-67 with extended phenyl linker (biphenyl-4,4′-dicarboxylate) can also be synthesized in the acid-base tunable DES with reaction time of 2 and 4 h, respectively, which are in well accord with previous works (Figures S2 and S3) [7,38].

3.2. Characterization of UiO-66

The fast formation of UiO-66-DES was further confirmed by FT-IR and Figure 4 shows FT-IR spectra of the two synthesized UiO-66. The bands at 1581 cm−1 and 1400 cm−1 can be attributed to ν(OCO) asymmetric and symmetric stretching of coordination modes, respectively [38]. The small band at 1506 cm−1 is due to C=C vibration of benzene ring in H2BDC ligands. Notably, the disappeared band at 1640–1670 cm−1 clearly shows the absence of DMF in the framework of UiO-66-DES, while DMF can be observed in UiO-66-DMF. Additionally, the band at around 1106 cm−1 presents the stretching vibration of Zr-O single bond in the framework. At lower frequencies, the OH and C-H bending modes are mixed with Zr-O vibration bands at 746 and 668 cm−1. The received information on H2BDC ligands, coordination modes, and Zr-O vibration by FT-IR analysis demonstrates that the UiO-66 framework can be easily and quickly synthesized in acid-based tunable DES.
The porosity of UiO-66-DES was studied through N2 adsorption/desorption analysis, which describes a Type I isotherm in nature with a narrow H2 hysteresis loop based on IUPAC classifications (Figure 5), the high crystallinity and the packing of crystal particles with micropores and mesopores (Figure 5, inset). The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area of UiO-66-DES is 1146 m2·g−1, similar to previously reported results (1187 m2·g−1) via solvothermal process [38].
FE-SEM can be used to observe the morphology of the performed sample and the UiO-66-DES exhibits nanoparticle aggregates (Figure 6a), indicating the formation of small nanocrystals within a low reaction temperature and short reaction time of 2 h under the assistance of DES, rather than common octahedral shapes [41]. The TEM images (Figure 6b,c) show that the prepared UiO-66-DES is composed of small MOF nanoparticles, which also evidences the formation of mesopores. The UiO-66-DES nanoparticles have a size distribution of about 65 ± 25 nm (Figure 6d), which agree well with the average crystal size (64.2 nm) calculated from the Scherrer equation through the (111) diffraction peak of the XRD pattern (Figure 3).
It is reported that morphologies and crystal sizes of prepared UiO-66 strongly depend on precursors, additives, and synthesis methods [42]. Especially, the use of ZrOCl2·8H2O as the precursor can lead to aggregation of small MOF nanoparticles, which has been confirmed by very weak XRD patterns [43]. In this work, ZrOCl2·8H2O acted as precursor results in high crystallinity and small sizes of the UiO-66-DES (Figure 3 and Figure 6d). Moreover, the formation rate of the UiO-66-DES is significantly accelerated by the addition of the tuned acid-base DESs. PTSA in acidic [MIm:2PTSA] acts as a modulator to have a competition with H2BDC ligand for coordination sites on Zr-oxo clusters. MIm in basic [3MIm:PTSA] plays as a base to remove the proton of the carboxylic acid ligands, thus accelerating crystal nucleation and growth [44]. The DES can be selectively attached to the surface of the MOF, stabilizing the UiO-66 and restricting their growth, and thus small particle sizes are obtained.
Furthermore, the thermal and mass loss behaviors (TG-DTA) curved in Figure 7 demonstrate the UiO-66-DES is crystalline rather than amorphous structure. The reason is that the solvent loss and endothermic peak temperature of amorphous UiO-66 are far gentler and lower than those of crystalline one [45]. In general, crystalline UiO-66 has a distinct endothermic peak higher than 500 °C, while amorphous one has one strong endothermic peak lower than 300 °C and another wide endothermic peak from 400 °C. The strong endothermic peak at low temperature can be relevant to the composition transformation of high-density phase of amorphous UiO-66. Moreover, there is an evident endothermic peak at about 350 °C if excess linkers, unbound H2BDC molecules are resided in the pores of the material [39,45]. In this work, the UiO-66-DES has a distinct endothermic peak above 500 °C, demonstrating the crystalline structure in accord with XRD results. The curve shows two separate steps, which are attributed to the loss of residual solvent during heating to 300 °C and the subsequent decomposition of the linkers above 450 °C. The residual product at the end of TGA analysis is crystalline ZrO2 [39].

3.3. Formation Process of UiO-66

After verifying the significant effect of acid-base tunable DESs on the assembly of zirconium-based MOF (UiO-66-DES), the formation process was considered and revealed. The 1H NMR spectra of acidic DES, the addition of ZrOCl2, and the mixture after centrifugation, as shown in Figure 8. For the acidic DES, it is well known that the sulfonic acid group in PTSA as an electron-pair donor can form intermolecular hydrogen bond with imidazolium ring of MIm, resulting in down-field chemical shift (δ) at 13.94 ppm [46]. The PTSA of the DES may have similar effect to acetic acid, which can modulate linker H2BDC at the coordination sites of zirconium ion [27,41].
When ZrOCl2 was added into acidic DES [MIm:2PTSA], the typical peak of the H-N(1) atom in MIm at 6.16 ppm shifts to 5.59 ppm indicative of the formation of hydrogen bond between the acidic DES and ZrOCl2, which assists the coordination of ZrOCl2 to form polymeric hydroxide [27]. After the zirconium hydroxide nucleation by centrifugation of mixed ZrOCl2 and DES, the δ hydrogen of the H-N(1) atom in MIm is recovered. These results further clarify the coordination between ZrOCl2 and acidic DES, which has been supported by the coordination of ZrOCl2 and carboxylic acids (CH3COOH and HCOOH) [27].
The hydrogen bond effect is confirmed by FTIR (Figure S4), where absorption bands are similar except for different intensities for [3MIm:PTSA], [MIm:2PTSA], and [4MIm:3PTSA]. For PTSA and DESs, the peaks at 1004, 1031, and 1118 cm−1 are ascribed to –S=O groups. The stretching vibration of –S-OH at 863 cm−1 in pure PTSA, shifting to 916 cm−1 in [4MIm:3PTSA] and [MIm:2PTSA], is due to the formed hydrogen bond between –SO3H groups of PTSA and N-H groups of MIm [47]. In addition, the appearance of new peaks at 1960 cm−1 in [3MIm:PTSA], 2212 cm−1 in [MIm:PTSA], and 1932 cm−1 in [4MIm:PTSA] also demonstrates the N-H···O hydrogen bond of the DESs [48]. Furthermore, the enhanced intensities between 2500 and 3200 cm−1 show the strong interaction between and MIm and PTSA. Among them, the peak at 2919 cm−1 is attributable to the O-H···O hydrogen bond in DES [49].
Besides the 1H NMR spectra, FT-IR spectra in Figure 9 also support the coordination. The –OH groups of acidic DES at about 3435 cm−1 weakens and redshifts to 3482 cm−1 after the addition of ZrOCl2 into the DES, which indicates a weakened hydrogen bond induced from –SO3H groups in DES owing to coordination between ZrOCl2 and PTSA of DES. Moreover, the appearance of new should peaks at 897 and 1106 cm−1 beside the stretching vibration (863 cm−1) of –S-OH attributing to –Zr-OH and Zr-O vibrations also assists the coordination of ZrOCl2 and acidic DES [50].
The aforementioned analysis shows that PTSA in acidic DES and ZrOCl2 preliminarily forms Zr(IV) oxo organic acid framework. With the addition of mixed H2BDC linker and basic DES, the strong hydrogen bond effect between PTSA and MIm can accelerate the exchange of H2BDC and PTSA in Zr(IV) oxo organic acid framework [51]. This process has also been demonstrated by the acceleration of CH3COOH and HCOOH in ionic liquid for the formation of metal organic framework [27,50,51].
Thus, the formation process of UiO-66 nanoparticles using tuned acidic and basic DESs is figured out (Scheme 2). Firstly, the dissolved ZrOCl2·8H2O in acidic DES quickly produces polymeric hydroxide Zr4(OH)12 via hydrolysis and dehydration (Scheme 2I) [27]. The Zr4(OH)12 combing with the modulator PTSA in acidic DES forms Zr oxo organic acid coordination through hydrogen bonding confirmed by 1H NMR spectra in Figure 8 (Scheme 2II). Then, the fast linker exchange between PTSA in acidic DES and H2BDC linker in basic DES occurs at the zirconium sites of the coordination [52].
The existed strong interaction (hydrogen bond) between PTSA and MIm greatly accelerates the linker exchange rate under mixed weak basic environment. In other words, MIm can promote the coordination between the linkers and zirconium oxo organic acid framework through its strong interaction with PTSA and increase the deprotonation rate of H2BDC linker. Consequently, the reaction between negatively charged BDC linker and zirconyl organic cation is facilitated, and the MOF cluster is produced rapidly in the weak basic DES at mild temperature (Scheme 2III). Finally, the MOF clusters bridged by carboxylate groups from BDC linker leads to formation of the UiO-66-DES.

3.4. Benzaldehyde Acetalization with Methanol

The UiO-66-DES nanoparticles should have a large number of open zirconium sites, which may be highly active for some Lewis acid catalyzed reactions [53,54,55]. Acetalization is a typical synthetic protection for carbonyl group in ketones and aldehydes, which can be catalyzed by Lewis acidity [53]. Here the UiO-66-DES with open Lewis acid sites were used to evaluate benzaldehyde acetalization with methanol at room temperature (Table 1). In the absence of a catalyst, the reaction gives a 2% conversion (Table 1, entry 1), demonstrating weak proton acid catalyzed reaction with mixture acidity (pH 5.7). ZrOCl2, ZrCl4, and conventional ZnCl2 as homogeneous Lewis acid proton carrier show higher conversions (Table 1, entries 5–7). Additionally, the free ligand H2BDC with Brønsted protons is able to convert 13% of benzaldehyde, lower than those of Lewis acid catalysts demonstrating the Lewis acid catalyzed process (Table 1, entry 8).
Notably, UiO-66-DES achieves a conversion of 94%, far higher than those of homogeneous catalysts. For comparison, UiO-66-DMF is also evaluated and affords a competitive conversion (93%). Possessing the same linker H2BDC, Al and Cr based MOFs, Al2(BDC)3 and Cr(BDC), exhibit mild catalytic activities for the acetalization process (Table 1, entries 9, 10) [56,57]. In addition, Cu3(BTC)2 and Fe(BTC) with different linker (BTC=1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate) also have been compared and show high catalytic activity within a long reaction time of 24 h (Table 1, entries 11, 12) [56]. These Lewis acid-based MOFs with open Lewis acid sites with various metal ions provide appropriate catalytic activities, however all lower than UiO-66-DES. Therefore, UiO-66-DES nanoparticles with small particles sizes possessing a large amount of open zirconium catalytic sites exhibits high catalytic activity for the acetalization of benzaldehyde with methanol.
Besides benzaldehyde, furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, as very important biomass feedstocks, were tested to further verify the Lewis acid catalyzed acetalization reactions (Table S2). 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural can be acetalized with 93% conversion and the selected aldehydes are acetalized to their corresponding acetals with high aldehyde conversion. The high catalytic efficiency of UiO-66-DES is originated from open zirconium Lewis acid sites and small nanosizes, facilitating the mass transfer and accessibility of substrates to active sites.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we offered a rapid synthetic route to produce UiO-66 nanoparticles using tuned acidic and basic DESs, which was formed from the same hydrogen bond donor and hydrogen bond acceptor, as solvent without any aggressive additives under facile reaction conditions. The formation mechanism of the UiO-66 in the acid-base tunable DES has been systemically investigated and proposed. Furthermore, the prepared UiO-66 with small nanosized diameters and a large amount of open zirconium Lewis acid sites facilitated the mass transfer and accessibility of substrates to active sites. Thus, it exhibited improved catalytic activity for benzaldehyde, furfural, and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural acetalizations with methanol. Therefore, the fast synthesized method has the potential to prepare versatile MOFs with various functions and pore diameters and metal oxides in acid-based tunable DESs under mild conditions for other attractive applications, especially in separation, gas adsorption, and storage applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27217246/s1, Figure S1. Formation rate of UiO-66 in DES and DMF; Figure S2. XRD patterns of simulated and synthesized UiO-66-NH2, and the crystal structure of UiO-66-NH2; Figure S3. XRD patterns of simulated and synthesized UiO-67, and the crystal structure of UiO-67; Figure S4. (a) FT-IR spectra of MIm, PTSA, and [Mim:2PTSA]; (b) FT-IR spectra of [4Mim:3PTSA], [3Mim:PTSA], and [Mim:2PTSA]; Table S1. pH for the aqueous solutions (0.01 mol/L) of MIm-PTSA mixtures with different molar ratios (20 °C) and corresponding melting point; Table S2. The catalytic performance of UiO-66-DES in the acetalization of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural with methanol.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C.; methodology, H.Q.; software, H.Q.; validation, X.Y. and T.Z.; formal analysis, H.C.; investigation, T.Z.; resources, T.Z.; data curation, X.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, X.Y. and T.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.C.; visualization, H.C.; supervision, Z.Q.; project administration, Z.Q.; funding acquisition, L.C. and Z.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the project of Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (19ZR1412500), National Natural Science Foundation of China (22278134), and 111 Project (B08021). This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

Abbreviations

DESdeep eutectic solvent
MOFmetal–organic framework
UiO-66Zr6O4(OH)4(BDC)6
ILionic liquid
HBhydrogen bond
HBDhydrogen bond donor
HBAhydrogen bond acceptor
DMFN,N-dimethylformamide
MIm2-methyl imidazole
PTSAp-toluenesulfonic acid
H2BDCterephthalic acid
BTC1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate
XRDX-ray diffraction

References

  1. Rowsell, J.L.C.; Yaghi, O.M. Strategies for hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4670–4679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, B.; Xie, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Li, J. Applications of metal–organic frameworks for green energy and environment: New advances in adsorptive gas separation, storage and removal. Green Energy Environ. 2018, 3, 191–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. González-Rodríguez, G.; Taima-Mancera, I.; Lago, A.B.; Ayala, J.H.; Pasán, J.; Pino, V. Mixed functionalization of organic ligands in UiO-66: A tool to design metal-organic frameworks for tailored microextraction. Molecules 2019, 24, 3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Horcajada, P.; Chalati, T.; Serre, C.; Gillet, B.; Sebrie, C.; Baati, T.; Eubank, J.F.; Heurtaux, D.; Clayette, P.; Kreuz, C.; et al. Porous metal–organic-framework nanoscale carriers as a potential platform for drug delivery and imaging. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhuang, J.; Kuo, C.-H.; Chou, L.-Y.; Liu, D.-Y.; Weerapana, E.; Tsung, C.-K. Optimized metal-organic-framework nanospheres for drug delivery: Evaluation of small-molecule encapsulation. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 2812–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zheng, H.; Chen, Z.; Huang, C.; Gao, L.; Dong, T.; Hu, J. Hollow CdS nanotubes with ZIF-8 as co-catalyst for enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 606, 1882–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vahabi, A.H.; Norouzi, F.; Sheibani, E.; Rahimi-Nasrabadi, M. Functionalized Zr-UiO-67 metal-organic frameworks: Structural landscape and application. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 445, 214050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jiao, L.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, H.-L.; Xu, Q. Metal–organic frameworks as platforms for catalytic applications. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1703663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, J.-M.; He, C.-T.; Liu, Y.; Liao, P.-Q.; Zhou, D.-D.; Zhang, J.-P.; Chen, X.-M. A metal–organic framework with a pore size/shape suitable for strong binding and close packing of methane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 4674–4678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kang, Y.-S.; Lu, Y.; Chen, K.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, P.; Sun, W.-Y. Metal–organic frameworks with catalytic centers: From synthesis to catalytic application. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 378, 262–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yuan, S.; Feng, L.; Wang, K.C.; Pang, J.; Bosch, M.; Lollar, C.; Sun, Y.; Qin, J.; Yang, X.; Zhang, P.; et al. Stable metal–organic frameworks: Design, synthesis, and applications. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Liang, Z.; Qu, C.; Xia, D.; Zou, R.; Xu, Q. Atomically dispersed metal sites in MOF-based materials for electrocatalytic and photocatalytic energy conversion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 9604–9633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Taima-Mancera, I.; González-Rodríguez, G.; Pasán, J.; Ayala, J.H.; Ruiz-Pérez, C.; Afonso, A.M.; Lago, A.B.; Pino, V. Influence of ligand functionalization of UiO-66-based metal-organic frameworks when used as sorbents in dispersive solid-phase analytical microextraction for different aqueous organic pollutants. Molecules 2018, 23, 2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zhao, Q.; Yuan, W.; Liang, J.; Li, J. Synthesis and hydrogen storage studies of metal−organic framework UiO-66. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energ. 2013, 38, 13104–13109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, X.-G.; Cheng, Q.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, X.-Z. Controlled nucleation and controlled growth for size predicable synthesis of nanoscale metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): A general and scalable approach. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 7836–7840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Decker, G.E.; Stillman, Z.; Attia, L.; Fromen, C.A.; Bloch, E.D. Controlling size, defectiveness, and fluorescence in nanoparticle UiO-66 through water and ligand modulation. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 4831–4839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. DeStefano, M.R.; Islamoglu, T.; Garibay, S.J.; Hupp, J.T. Room-temperature synthesis of UiO-66 and thermal modulation of densities of defect sites. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 1357–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Gao, W.; Zhang, L.; Liu, W.; Lu, J.; Wanga, Z.; Denga, Y.-J. Microwave-assisted synthesis of UIO-66 and its adsorption performance towards dyes. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 2014, 16, 7037–7042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, Y.-H.; Lo, W.-S.; Kuo, Y.-W.; Chen, W.-J.; Lin, C.-H.; Shieh, F.-K. Green and rapid synthesis of zirconium metal–organic frameworks via mechanochemistry: UiO-66 analog nanocrystals obtained in one hundred seconds. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 5818–5821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zou, N.; Lin, X.; Li, M.; Li, L.; Ye, C.; Chen, J.; Qiu, T. Ionic liquid@ amphiphilic silica nanoparticles: Novel catalysts for converting waste cooking oil to biodiesel. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 18054–18061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, P.; Wu, T.; Han, B. Preparation of catalytic materials using ionic liquids as the media and functional components. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6810–6827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Chen, L.; Zhou, T.; Chen, L.; Ye, Y.; Qi, Z.; Freund, H.; Sundmacher, K. Selective oxidation of cyclohexanol to cyclohexanone in the ionic liquid1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 9354–9356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Zhu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Chen, L.; Cheng, H.; Qi, Z. Ionic-liquid-controlled two-dimensional monolayer Bi2MoO6 and its adsorption of azo molecules. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1, 5083–5091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Petkovic, M.; Seddon, K.R.; Rebelo, L.P.N.; Pereira, C.S. Ionic liquids: A pathway to environmental acceptability. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 1383–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Peng, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Han, B.; Xue, Z.; Yang, G. Surfactant-directed assembly of mesoporous metal–organic framework nanoplates in ionic liquids. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8688–8690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, C.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, J.; Peng, L.; Kang, X.; Han, B.; Wu, T.; Sang, X.; Ma, X. Gas promotes the crystallization of nano-sized metal–organic frameworks in ionic liquid. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 11445–11448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sang, X.; Zhang, J.; Xiang, J.; Cui, J.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, J.; Wu, Z.; Li, Z.; Mo, G.; Xu, Y.; et al. Ionic liquid accelerates the crystallization of Zr-based metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Qin, L.; Li, J.; Cheng, H.; Chen, L.; Qi, Z.; Yuan, W. Association extraction for vitamin E recovery from deodorizer distillate by in situ formation of deep eutectic solvent. AIChE J. 2017, 63, 2212–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, L.; Xiong, Y.; Qin, H.; Qi, Z. Advances of ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents in green processes of biomass-derived 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. ChemSusChem 2022, 15, e202102635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qin, H.; Hu, X.; Wang, J.; Cheng, H.; Chen, L.; Qi, Z. Overview of acidic deep eutectic solvents on synthesis, properties and applications. Green Energy Environ. 2020, 5, 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cheng, H.; Qi, Z. Application of deep eutectic solvents for hard-to-separate liquid systems. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 274, 119027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wagle, D.V.; Zhao, H.; Baker, G.A. Deep eutectic solvents: Sustainable media for nanoscale and functional materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2299–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, L.; Zhang, T.; Cheng, H.; Richards, R.; Qi, Z. A microwave assisted ionic liquid route to prepare bivalent Mn5O8 nanoplates for 5-hydroxymethylfurfural oxidation. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 17902–17914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chen, L.; Lou, F.; Cheng, H.; Qi, Z. Uniform heterostructured MnOx/MnCO3/Fe2O3 nanocomposites assembled in an ionic liquid for highly selective oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 12050–12063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, L.; Chen, L.; Fang, Y.; Wang, A.; Chen, C.; Yan, Z. Facile synthesis of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) by forming imidazole-based deep eutectic solvent. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 2018, 268, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qin, H.; Song, Z.; Zeng, Q.; Cheng, H.; Chen, L.; Qi, Z. Bifunctional imidazole-PTSA deep eutectic solvent for synthesizing long-chain ester IBIBE in reactive extraction. AIChE J. 2019, 65, 675–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Qin, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Cheng, H.; Chen, L.; Zhang, B.; Qi, Z. Efficient Knoevenagel condensation catalyzed by imidazole-based halogen-free deep eutectic solvent at room temperature. Green Energy Environ. 2020, 5, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cavka, J.H.; Jakobsen, S.; Olsbye, U.; Guillou, N.; Lamberti, C.; Bordiga, S.; Lillerud, K.P. A new zirconium inorganic building brick forming metal organic frameworks with exceptional stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13850–13851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shearer, G.C.; Chavan, S.; Ethiraj, J.; Vitillo, J.G.; Svelle, S.; Olsbye, U.; Lamberti, C.; Bordiga, S.; Lillerud, K.P. Tuned to perfection: Ironing out the defects in metal–organic framework UiO-66. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 4068–4071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ma, Y.; Zhang, T.; Chen, L.; Cheng, H.; Qi, Z. Self-developed fabrication of manganese oxides microtubes with efficient catalytic performance for the selective oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 13122–13132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schaate, A.; Roy, P.; Godt, A.; Lippke, J.; Waltz, F.; Wiebcke, M.; Behrens, P. Modulated synthesis of Zr-based metal-organic frameworks: From nano to single crystals. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 6643–6651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Taddei, M.; Dümbgen, K.C.; Bokhoven, J.A.; Ranocchiari, M. Aging of the reaction mixture as a tool to modulate the crystallite size of UiO-66 into the low nanometer range. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 6411–6414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hao, L.; Li, X.; Hurlock, M.J.; Tu, X.; Zhang, Q. Hierarchically porous UiO-66: Facile synthesis, characterization and application. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 11817–11820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, C.; Chen, L.; Qi, Z. One-pot synthesis of gold nanoparticles embedded in silica for cyclohexane oxidation. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 1123–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yang, F.; Li, W.; Tang, B. Facile synthesis of amorphous UiO-66 (Zr-MOF) for supercapacitor application. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018, 733, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Agarwalla, H.; Jana, K.; Maity, A.; Kesharwani, M.K.; Ganguly, B.; Das, A. Hydrogen bonding interaction between active methylene hydrogen atoms and an anion as a binding motif for anion recognition: Experimental studies and theoretical rationalization. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2014, 118, 2656–2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ding, L.; Yang, W.; Chen, L.; Cheng, H.; Qi, Z. Fabrication of spinel CoMn2O4 hollow spheres for highly selective aerobic oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-diformylfuran. Catal. Today 2020, 347, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dai, Y.; Witkamp, G.-J.; Verpoorte, R.; Choi, Y.H. Tailoring properties of natural deep eutectic solvents with water to facilitate their applications. Food. Chem. 2015, 187, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chwaleba, D.; Ilczyszyn, M.M.; Ilczyszyn, M.; Ciunik, Z. Glycine–methanesulfonic acid (1:1) and glycine–p-toluenesulfonic acid (1:1) crystals: Comparison of structures, hydrogen bonds, and vibrations. J. Mol. Struct. 2007, 831, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, L.; Mo, F.; Cheng, H.; Qi, Z. Brønsted acidic deep eutectic solvent based on imidazole and p-toluenesulfonic acid intensified Prins condensation of styrene with formaldehyde. Chem. Lett. 2021, 50, 1194–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lee, J.; Ka, D.; Jung, H.; Cho, K.; Jin, Y.; Kim, M. UiO-66-NH2 and zeolite-templated carbon composites for the degradation and adsorption of nerve agents. Molecules 2021, 26, 3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Karagiaridi, O.; Bury, W.; Mondloch, J.E.; Hupp, J.T.; Farha, O.K. Solvent-assisted linker exchange: An alternative to the de novo synthesis of unattainable metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 4530–4540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Arrozi, U.S.F.; Wijaya, H.W.; Patah, A.; Permana, Y. Efficient acetalization of benzaldehydes using UiO-66 and UiO-67: Substrates accessibility or Lewis acidity of zirconium. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2015, 506, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Caratelli, C.; Hajek, J.; Cirujano, F.G.; Waroquier, M.; Xamena, F.X.L.; Speybroeck, V.V. Nature of active sites on UiO-66 and beneficial influence of water in the catalysis of Fischer esterification. J. Catal. 2017, 352, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Vermoortele, F.; Bueken, B.; Bars, G.L.; Voorde, B.V.; Vandichel, M.; Houthoofd, K.; Vimont, A.; Daturi, M.; Waroquier, M.; Speybroeck, V.V.; et al. Synthesis modulation as a tool to increase the catalytic activity of metal–organic frameworks: The unique case of UiO-66(Zr). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 11465–11468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Alvaro, M.; Garciaa, H. Metal organic frameworks as solid acid catalysts for acetalization of aldehydes with methanol. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 3022–3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Herbst, A.; Khutia, A.; Janiak, C. Brønsted instead of lewis acidity in functionalized mil-101cr mofs for efficient heterogeneous (nano-MOF) catalysis in the condensation reaction of aldehydes with alcohols. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 7319–7333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 07246 g001 550
Figure 1. σ-Profiles of 2-methyl imidazole and p-toluenesulfonic acid.
Figure 1. σ-Profiles of 2-methyl imidazole and p-toluenesulfonic acid.
Molecules 27 07246 g001
Molecules 27 07246 g002 550
Figure 2. Interaction energies: (a) between PTSA and MIm cation or PTS anion; and (b) between MIm and MIm cation or PTS anion.
Figure 2. Interaction energies: (a) between PTSA and MIm cation or PTS anion; and (b) between MIm and MIm cation or PTS anion.
Molecules 27 07246 g002
Molecules 27 07246 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation process of UiO-66-DES.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the preparation process of UiO-66-DES.
Molecules 27 07246 sch001
Molecules 27 07246 g003 550
Figure 3. XRD patterns of simulated UiO-66 and the UiO-66 synthesized in DMF with different reaction time and in DES with reaction time of 2 h.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of simulated UiO-66 and the UiO-66 synthesized in DMF with different reaction time and in DES with reaction time of 2 h.
Molecules 27 07246 g003
Molecules 27 07246 g004 550
Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of UiO-66-DES and UiO-66-DMF.
Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of UiO-66-DES and UiO-66-DMF.
Molecules 27 07246 g004
Molecules 27 07246 g005 550
Figure 5. N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms of UiO-66-DES at 77 K. The inset is the corresponding BJH pore size distribution profiles.
Figure 5. N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms of UiO-66-DES at 77 K. The inset is the corresponding BJH pore size distribution profiles.
Molecules 27 07246 g005
Molecules 27 07246 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) SEM image, (b,c) TEM images; and (d) particle size distribution of UiO-66-DES.
Figure 6. (a) SEM image, (b,c) TEM images; and (d) particle size distribution of UiO-66-DES.
Molecules 27 07246 g006
Molecules 27 07246 g007 550
Figure 7. TG-DTA curves of UiO-66-DES.
Figure 7. TG-DTA curves of UiO-66-DES.
Molecules 27 07246 g007
Molecules 27 07246 g008 550
Figure 8. 1H NMR spectra of acidic DES and acidic DES within ZrOCl2.
Figure 8. 1H NMR spectra of acidic DES and acidic DES within ZrOCl2.
Molecules 27 07246 g008
Molecules 27 07246 g009 550
Figure 9. FT-IR spectra of acidic DES and acidic DES within ZrOCl2.
Figure 9. FT-IR spectra of acidic DES and acidic DES within ZrOCl2.
Molecules 27 07246 g009
Molecules 27 07246 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Formation process of the UiO-66 in acid base tunable DES.
Scheme 2. Formation process of the UiO-66 in acid base tunable DES.
Molecules 27 07246 sch002
Table
Table 1. Catalytic performance of benzaldehyde acetalization and methanol over various MOFs and Lewis acid catalyst a.
Table 1. Catalytic performance of benzaldehyde acetalization and methanol over various MOFs and Lewis acid catalyst a.
Molecules 27 07246 i001
EntryCatalystsTime (h)Conversion (%)Reference
1none12This work
2UiO-66-DES194This work
3UiO-66-DMF193This work
4UiO-66191[52]
5ZrOCl2 b129This work
6ZrCl4155[53]
7ZnCl21; 2440; 39[53]
8H2BDC113This work
9Al2(BDC)32466[56]
10Cr(BDC)1.573[57]
11Cu3(BTC)22; 2463; 88[56]
12Fe(BTC)2; 2449; 71[56]
a Reaction conditions: 50 mg of catalyst, 3 mL methanol (74 mmol), and 0.12 g of benzaldehydes at room temperature for 1 h. b The amount of ZrOCl2 was 0.070 g.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, L.; Ye, X.; Zhang, T.; Qin, H.; Cheng, H.; Qi, Z. Fast Assembly of Metal Organic Framework UiO-66 in Acid-Base Tunable Deep Eutectic Solvent for the Acetalization of Benzaldehyde and Methanol. Molecules 2022, 27, 7246. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217246

AMA Style

Chen L, Ye X, Zhang T, Qin H, Cheng H, Qi Z. Fast Assembly of Metal Organic Framework UiO-66 in Acid-Base Tunable Deep Eutectic Solvent for the Acetalization of Benzaldehyde and Methanol. Molecules. 2022; 27(21):7246. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217246

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Lifang, Xiangzhu Ye, Ting Zhang, Hao Qin, Hongye Cheng, and Zhiwen Qi. 2022. "Fast Assembly of Metal Organic Framework UiO-66 in Acid-Base Tunable Deep Eutectic Solvent for the Acetalization of Benzaldehyde and Methanol" Molecules 27, no. 21: 7246. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217246

APA Style

Chen, L., Ye, X., Zhang, T., Qin, H., Cheng, H., & Qi, Z. (2022). Fast Assembly of Metal Organic Framework UiO-66 in Acid-Base Tunable Deep Eutectic Solvent for the Acetalization of Benzaldehyde and Methanol. Molecules, 27(21), 7246. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27217246

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop