Next Article in Journal
Silica Nanospheres Coated Silver Islands as an Effective Opto-Plasmonic SERS Active Platform for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Prostate Cancer Biomarkers
Next Article in Special Issue
DBU Promoted Polysubstituted Arene Formation via a Michael Addition/Cyclization/Elimination Cascade Reaction
Previous Article in Journal
The Chemical Signatures of Water Extract of Zingiber officinale Rosc
Previous Article in Special Issue
Construction of Non-Biaryl Atropisomeric Amide Scaffolds Bearing a C–N Axis via Enantioselective Catalysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of N-C Axially Chiral N-(2,6-Disubstituted-phenyl)sulfonamides through Chiral Pd-Catalyzed N-Allylation

1
Department of Applied Chemistry (Japanese Association of Bio-Intelligence for Well-Being), Shibaura Institute of Technology, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Kohto-ku, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan
2
Graduate School of Engineering and Science, Shibaura Institute of Technology, 307 Fukasaku, Minuma-ku, Saitama 337-8570, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(22), 7819; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27227819
Submission received: 14 October 2022 / Revised: 6 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 November 2022 / Published: 13 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Atroposelective Synthesis of Novel Axially Chiral Molecules)

Abstract

:
Recently, catalytic enantioselective syntheses of N-C axially chiral compounds have been reported by many groups. Most N-C axially chiral compounds prepared through a catalytic asymmetric reaction possess carboxamide or nitrogen-containing aromatic heterocycle skeletons. On the other hand, although N-C axially chiral sulfonamide derivatives are known, their catalytic enantioselective synthesis is relatively underexplored. We found that the reaction (Tsuji–Trost allylation) of allyl acetate with secondary sulfonamides bearing a 2-arylethynyl-6-methylphenyl group on the nitrogen atom proceeds with good enantioselectivity (up to 92% ee) in the presence of (S,S)-Trost ligand-(allyl-PdCl)2 catalyst, affording rotationally stable N-C axially chiral N-allylated sulfonamides. Furthermore, the absolute stereochemistry of the major enantiomer was determined by X-ray single crystal structural analysis and the origin of the enantioselectivity was considered.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Atropisomers (N-C axially chiral compounds), owing to the rotational restriction around an N-C single bond, have recently attracted much attention [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. In 2002 and 2005, we reported the enantioselective syntheses of ortho-tert-butyl anilides IA and IB through chiral Pd-catalyzed N-allylation (Tsuji–Trost allylation) and N-arylation (Buchwald–Hartwig amination), respectively (Scheme 1a) [8,9]. The N-allylation reaction shown in Scheme 1a was the first example of the catalytic asymmetric synthesis of N-C axially chiral compounds [8], although the enantioselectivity was by no means satisfactory. The enantioselectivity was significantly improved by using N-arylation instead of N-allylation, and N-arylated anilide products IB were obtained in 88–96% ee [9]. In 2010, as the first catalytic asymmetric synthesis of non-amide type N-C axially chiral compounds, we succeeded in the enantioselective construction of N-(ortho-tert-butylphenyl)-2-arylindoles II through chiral Pd(II)-catalyzed 5-endo-hydroaminocyclization of 2-alkynyl aniline derivatives (Scheme 1b) [10]. Since the publication of the reactions shown in Scheme 1a,b, N-C axially chiral compounds have been widely accepted as new target molecules for catalytic asymmetric reactions, and more than 130 original papers on their catalytic enantioselective syntheses have been published to date [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Most N-C axially chiral compounds, which have been prepared through catalytic asymmetric reactions, are carboxamide derivatives such as I or nitrogen-containing aromatic heterocycles such as II.
On the other hand, although N-C axially chiral sulfonamides are also known [11,12,13,14], their catalytic asymmetric synthesis was not reported until recently. Since some N-C axially chiral sulfonamides are pharmaceutically attractive compounds, their catalytic asymmetric synthesis is meaningful from the viewpoint of not only synthetic organic chemistry, but also medicinal chemistry. In 2019, we and Zhao et al. independently reported the catalytic asymmetric synthesis of N-C axially chiral sulfonamides IIIA and IIIB through N-allylation with a chiral Pd catalyst and a chiral organic base, respectively (Scheme 1c,d) [15,16]. The products in Scheme 1c (our reaction) were N-(ortho-mono-tert-butylphenyl)sulfonamides IIIA, which are rotationally somewhat unstable, while the products in Scheme 1d (Zhao’s reaction) were N-(2,6-disubstituted-phenyl)sulfonamides IIIB, which are rotationally relatively stable. Subsequently, other groups also succeeded in the catalytic enantioselective synthesis of N-(ortho-mono-tert-butylphenyl) and N-(2,6-disubstituted-phenyl)sulfonamides through similar or other asymmetric reactions [17,18,19,20,21,22]. We were curious about whether our method via chiral Pd-catalyzed N-allylation can also be applied to the enantioselective synthesis of N-(2,6-disubstituted-phenyl)sulfonamides.
In this article, we report the catalytic enantioselective synthesis of N-C axially chiral N-(2,6-disubstituted-phenyl)sulfonamides through the chiral Pd-catalyzed N-allylation of secondary sulfonamides (Scheme 2). It was found that N-allylation with N-(2-arylethynyl-6-methylphenyl)sulfonamides proceeded with good enantioselectivity in the presence of (S,S)-Trost ligand-(allyl-PdCl)2 to give rotationally stable N-C axially chiral sulfonamides in a reasonable yield. Furthermore, the absolute stereochemistry of the major enantiomer was determined and the origin of the enantioselectivity was rationally explained.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Survey of 2,6-Disubstituents on N-Aryl Group

It is well known that in an allylation using a chiral π-allyl-Pd catalyst, the asymmetric induction on a nucleophile is more difficult than that on an allyl group because a nucleophile approaches from the opposite site of the Pd atom possessing a chiral ligand (Scheme 2) [23,24,25,26]. Trost ligands are demonstrated to provide the effective chiral circumstance for a highly asymmetric induction on a prochiral nucleophile [27,28,29]. Indeed, in the Pd-catalyzed N-allylation with N-(ortho-tert-butylphenyl)sulfonamides (Scheme 1c), the use of other chiral ligands other than Trost ligands caused a significant decrease in enantioselectivity [15,30,31,32]. Hence, we explored the N-allylation of secondary sulfonamides 1 bearing various 2,6-disubstituted-phenyl groups in the presence of Trost ligand-Pd catalysts (screening of 2,6-disubstituents, Table 1).
The reaction of allyl acetate with the anion species prepared from 4-tosyl amide 1a–i and NaH (1 equiv) in THF was conducted for 5–27 h at −20 °C in the presence of (S,S)-Trost ligand (4.4 mol%) and (allyl-Pd-Cl)2 (2.2 mol%). In the N-allylation of 2-tert-butyl-6-methylphenyl derivative 1a, the chemical yield and enantioselectivity (58%, 10% ee) were significantly lowered in comparison with those (quant, 73% ee) of the ortho-mono-tert-butylphenyl derivative (Entry 1). The reaction of 2-iodo-6-phenyl derivative 1b did not proceed smoothly to give N-allylation product 2b with a poor yield (10%) and low enantioselectivity (43% ee, Entry 2). Although the reaction of 2-bromo-6-phenyl derivative 1c gave the product 2c with a high yield (97%), the enantioselectivity was low (38%, Entry 3). With 2-iodo-6-methyl derivative 1d and 2-methyl-6-stylyl derivative 1e, the products 2d and 2e were obtained with high yields (94% and 91%) and moderate enantioselectivity (65% ee, Entries 4 and 5). After further screening of the ortho-substituents, it was found that N-allylation with ortho-tolylethynyl derivatives 1f–i gave relatively good results (82%- quant, 72–86% ee, Entries 6–9), In particular, with 2-methyl-6-tolylethynyl derivative 1i, a maximum enantioselectivity (86% ee) was observed (Entry 9). Attempts were made to improve the enantioselectivity using other Trost ligands possessing a cyclohexyl skeleton. However, a decrease in the enantioselectivity or chemical yield was observed (Entries 10 and 11).

2.2. Survey of Alkynyl Substituents

Subsequently, under the same conditions, alkynyl substituents of N-(2-ethynyl-6-methylphenyl)-4-toluenesulfonylamide substrate, which gave the best result in Table 1, were explored (Table 2). Similar to 4-tolylethynyl derivative 1i, the reaction with (4-methoxylphenyl)ethynyl and phenylethynyl derivatives 1j and 1k also gave N-allylated products 2j and 2k with high yields (98 and 92%) and good enantioselectivities (88 and 89% ee, Entries 2 and 3). On the other hand, in the reaction with trimethylsilylethynyl and hexynyl derivatives 1l and 1m, a considerable decrease in the enantioselectivity was observed. In these cases, the products 2l and 2m were obtained in 75 and 77% ee, respectively (Entries 4 and 5).

2.3. Survey of Sulfonyl Substituents

The substituent effect on the sulfonyl group was further explored by using N-(2-arylethynyl-6-methylphenyl)sulfonamide substrates (Table 3).
The present reactions proceeded smoothly regardless of the electronic effect of the para-substituent on the benzenesulfonyl group, affording N-allylation products 2nq with high yields (88%–quant) and good enantioselectivities (85–92% ee, Entries 2–5). With benzenesulfonyl amides 1o,p bearing an electron-withdrawing substituent such as a nitro group, a slight increase in enantioselectivity was observed (89 and 92% ee, Entries 3 and 4). The reaction of methanesulfonyl amides 1r also gave the product 2r with a good enantioselectivity (87% ee, Entry 6). On the other hand, in the reaction with bulky 2,4,6-trimethylphenylsulfone amide 1s, the enantioselectivity was considerably lowered (63% ee, Entry 7).

2.4. Absolute Stereochemistry and Origin of Enantioselectivity

The absolute stereochemistry of the major enantiomer was determined to be (P)-configuration by X-ray single crystal structural analysis of 2o (Figure 1) with the flack parameter 0.02(6) [33,34]. Although the absolute stereochemistries of other ortho-ethynyl sulfonamides 2f–s were not determined exactly, the major enantiomers of 2f–s (+61.5–196.7°), which have large positive [α]D values such as 2o (+201°), were also predicted to possess the (P)-configuration (only methanesulfonamide 2r showed a small positive [α]D value = +7.7°). Moreover, in the previously reported reaction of N-(ortho-mono-tert-butylphenyl)sulfonamides using (S,S)-Trost ligand (Scheme 1c), since the N-allylated products IIIA possessing (P)-configuration were obtained as the major enantiomer, the ethynyl group is expected to act as a bulky substituent in a similar way to the tert-butyl group.
The (P)-selectivity in the present reaction may be rationalized on the basis of a working model proposed by Trost (Figure 2) [35,36]. Among four possible transition states TS-AD in the reaction with (S,S)-Trost ligand, TS-B and TS-C should be significantly destabilized because of the strong steric repulsion between the ortho-ethynyl or ortho-methyl group and Ph (wall) group (green color) on the phosphorus atom. TS-D may also not be favorable, due to the steric repulsion between the ortho-ethynyl group and Ph (wall) group (blue color). As a result, the reaction preferentially proceeds via TS-A, leading to (P)-2 as a major enantiomer. In other 2,6-disubstituted phenyl derivatives 1a-e except for ortho-ethynyl derivatives, the reaction may proceed via TS-D as well as TS-A, resulting in the decrease in the enantioselectivity. Since a linear ortho-arylethynyl group brings about the considerable steric interaction with Ph (wall) groups (blue color) on the back side in TS-D, the reaction via TS-D may be disfavored, resulting in a good enantioselectivity. With a substrate 1s bearing a bulky sulfonyl group (R1 = 2,4,6-Me3C4H2), the destabilization in TS-A may be caused by the steric repulsion between the Ph (wall) group on the front side and R1 substituent, leading to the decrease in the enantioselectivity (Table 3, Entry 7).

2.5. Rotational Stability of Sulfonamide Products

The rotational barriers of N-(ortho-mono-tert-butylphenyl)sulfonamide derivatives IIIAr and IIIAs, which were previously reported, were 25.2 and 25.5 kcal mol−1 at 298 K, respectively (Figure 3), and the ee of IIIAr and IIIAs decreased gradually at rt in CCl4 (t1/2 at 298K = 1.9 and 3.6 days). On the other hand, in N-(2-arylethynyl-6-methylphenyl)sulfonamide products 2r and 2i, the decrease in the ee was not observed even after standing for a few days at rt in CCl4. The barrier values of 2r and 2i were evaluated to be 28.3 and 28.7 kcal mol−1 at 333 K, which are ca. 3 kcal mol−1 higher than those of IIIAr and IIIAs.
In N-allyl-N-(2-(4-tolyl)ethynyl)phenyl sulfonamide 3 bearing no methyl group at the other ortho-position, the enantiomers could not be separated through a chiral HPLC method because of the rotationally unstable structure. Indeed, two allylic hydrogens (Ha and Hb) in III and 2 were detected as nonequivalent signals in the 1H NMR, while those in 3 showed an equivalent NMR signal, which suggests the quick rotation around the N-Ar bond at the NMR time scale (Supplementary Materials).

2.6. Application to Enantioselective Double N-Allylation

Since N-allyl-N-(2,6-disubstituted-phenyl)sulfonamide products 2 were revealed to be rotationally stable at rt, we further investigated the enantioselective construction of two N-C chiral axes through a double N-allylation with bis-sulfonamide substrate (Scheme 3). In the presence of an achiral Pd catalyst, the double N-allylation with N-(2-bromo-6-tolylethynylphenyl)bis-sulfonamide 4 proceeds smoothly to give a 1:1 mixture of diastereomeric double allylation products chiral-5 and meso-5 (82% yield). The stereochemistry of both diastereomers was determined by chiral HPLC method. That is, the HPLC of one diastereomer (chiral-5) using a CHIRALPAK AD-H column gave two peaks corresponding to enantiomers, while for the other diastereomer (meso-5), the enantiomer separation by chiral HPLC was not observed. No isomerization between chiral-5 and meso-5 was detected even after standing for a several days at rt.
Subsequently, the enantioselective double N-allylation with 4 was conducted at −20 °C in the presence of (S,S)-Trost ligand-Pd catalyst. In this case, the double N-allylated products chiral-5 and meso-5 were obtained in a diastereomer ratio of 3.1:1 (88% yield). After the removal of meso-5 via MPLC separation, the optical purity of the obtained chiral-5 was found to be 99% ee. Since no the diastereoselectivity was observed at all under the achiral reaction conditions, it is obvious that the chiral axis constructed in the first N-allylation does not influence asymmetric induction in the second N-allylation (the stereoselectivity is only determined by the chiral catalyst).
The significantly high optical purity of double N-allylation product chiral-5 in comparison with mono-N-allylation products 2 (for example, 2g: 72% ee, Entry 7 in Table 1) can be rationally explained on the basis of the Horeau principle [37,38,39]. The product distributions (the enantiomeric excess and diastereomer ratio) in double asymmetric reactions are represented in Equations A and B (Scheme 4). When the ee (72% ee, x = 0.86) of 2-bromo-6-arylethynyl derivative 2g is used as the value (x) for the first asymmetric induction in Scheme 3, the ee of chiral-5 and the diastereomer ratio were calculated to be 95% and 3.2, respectively, which are similar to the experimental values (99% ee and dr = 3.1). Thus, it was revealed that bis-sulfonamide bearing two N-C chiral axes is obtained in a high optical purity through an asymmetric double N-allylation.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

Melting points were uncorrected. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a 400 MHz spectrometer. In 1H and 13C NMR spectra, chemical shifts were expressed in δ (ppm) downfield from CHCl3 (7.26 ppm) and CDCl3 (77.0 ppm), respectively. HRMS were recorded on a double-focusing magnetic sector mass spectrometer using electron impact ionization. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel (75–150 μm). Medium-pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC) was performed on a 25 × 4 cm i.d. prepacked column (silica gel, 10 μm) with a UV detector. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed on a 25 × 0.4 cm i.d. chiral column with a UV detector. Optical rotations were measured in CHCl3 or MeOH on JASCO P-1020 Polarimeter at λ = 589 nm. [α]D values are reported at 25 °C in degree·cm2·g–1 with concentrations reported in g/100 mL.

3.2. Synthesis of Substrates 1 and Asymmetric N-Allylation with 1

N-(2-tert-Butyl-6-methylphenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (1a). Under N2 atmosphere, to 2-tert-butyl-6-methylaniline (488 mg, 3.0 mmol, commercially available) and pyridine (0.36 mL, 4.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (4.0 mL) was added 4-tosyl chloride (631 mg, 3.3 mmol), and then the mixture was stirred for 22 h at 0 °C–rt. The mixture was poured into water and extracted with AcOEt. The AcOEt extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. Hexane was added to the residue and the mixture was filtered in vacuo. After washing the residue with hexane, 1a was obtained (417 mg, 44%). 1a: white solid; mp 157–160 °C; IR (neat) 3268, 1323, 1155 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.68 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.34 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.27 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.14 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.00 (1H, d, J = 7.1 Hz), 6.30 (1H, s), 2.43 (3H, s), 1.91 (3H, s), 1.43 (9H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 148.6, 143.2, 138.9, 138.6, 132.3, 129.4, 129.0, 127.4, 127.0, 126.4, 36.1, 32.4, 21.5, 20.1; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 340; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C18H23NNaO2S 340.1347; Found 340.1347.
N-((2-Iodo-4-methyl-6-phenyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (1b). Under N2 atmosphere, to phenylboronic acid (438 mg, 3.6 mmol) and potassium carbonate (1.66 g, 12.0 mmol) in H2O (10 mL) were added bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) chloride (107 mg, 0.15 mmol) and 2,6-diiodo-4-methylaniline (1.04 g, 2.9 mmol). The mixture was stirred for 3 h at rt. The mixture was poured into water and extracted with AcOEt. The AcOEt extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 150) gave 2-iodo-4-methyl-6-phenyl aniline (358 mg, 40%). Under N2 atmosphere, to 2-iodo-4-methyl-6-phenylaniline (610 mg, 2.0 mmol) and pyridine (0.24 mL, 3.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (6.0 mL) was added 4-tosyl chloride (414 mg, 2.2 mmol), and then the mixture was stirred for 22 h at 0 °C–rt. The mixture was poured into water and extracted with AcOEt. The AcOEt extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 120 and then 5) gave 1b (428 mg, 47%). 1b: white solid; mp 135–136 °C; IR (neat) 3258, 1331, 1155 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.67 (1H, m), 7.26 (2H, dt, J = 8.5, 1.9 Hz), 7.19–7.22 (3H, m), 7.14–7.17 (2H, m), 7.06 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.01 (2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.42 (1H, s), 2.37 (3H, s), 2.31 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.0, 141.8, 139.6, 139.5, 137.2, 132.6, 132.0, 129.2, 128.8, 128.0, 127.2, 127.0, 102.1, 21.5, 20.4; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 486; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C20H18INNaO2S 486.0001; Found 485.9972.
N-((2-Bromo-4-methyl-6-phenyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (1c). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1c was prepared from 2-bromo-4-methyl-6-phenylaniline (318 mg, 1.2 mmol, commercially available) and 4-tosyl chloride (280 mg, 1.4 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 18 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 50 and then 3) gave 1c (213 mg, 42%). 1c: white solid; mp 149–152 °C; IR (neat) 3250, 1337, 1163 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.38 (1H, dd, J = 1.9, 1.0 Hz), 7.29 (2H, dt, J = 8.4, 1.9 Hz), 7.21–7.24 (5H, m), 7.06 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.03 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 6.42 (1H, s), 2.37 (3H, s), 2.33 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.1, 142.5, 139.3, 139.2, 137.0, 132.7, 131.7, 129.2, 129.04, 128.97, 128.0, 127.1, 124.6, 21.5, 20.7; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 440; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C20H1881BrNNaO2S 440.0119; Found 440.0102.
N-(2-Iodo-4,6-dimethylphenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (1d). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1d was prepared from 2-iodo-4,6-dimethylaniline (494 mg, 2.0 mmol, commercially available) and 4-tosyl chloride (419 mg, 2.2 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 17 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 10 and then 3) gave 1d (804 mg, quant). 1d: White solid; mp 161–163 °C; IR (neat) 3275, 1331, 1157 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.56 (2H, dt, J = 8.1, 1.9 Hz), 7.37 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.23 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.04 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 6.14 (1H, s), 2.45 (3H, s), 2.42 (3H, s), 2.24 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.9, 139.4, 139.3, 137.5, 137.2, 133.2, 132.7, 129.5, 127.9, 100.2, 21.6, 20.7, 20.3; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 424; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C15H16127INNaO2S 423.9844; Found 423.9816.
(E)-N-(2,4-Dimethyl-6-styrylphenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (1e). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1e was prepared from 2,4-dimethyl-6-styrylaniline (218 mg, 1.0 mmol) [40] and 4-tosyl chloride (279 mg, 1.5 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 22 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 5) gave 1e (323 mg, 88%). 1e: white solid; mp 150–152 °C; IR (neat) 3242, 1325, 1157 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.61 (2H, dt, J = 8.1, 1.9 Hz), 7.21–7.30 (4H, m), 7.16 (2H, dd, J = 8.1, 1.9 Hz), 7.06 (2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.99 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz), 6.83 (1H, d, J = 16.6 Hz), 6.74 (1H, d, J = 16.6 Hz), 6.30 (1H, s), 2.33 (3H, s), 2.30 (3H, s), 2.18 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.6, 138.8, 137.9, 137.4, 137.0, 136.3, 131.3, 129.9, 129.6, 129.2, 128.3, 127.6, 127.1, 126.6, 124.3, 124.2, 21.3, 21.1, 19.0; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 400; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C23H23NNaO2S 400.1347; Found 400.1330.
N-(2-Iodo-4-methyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl])-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (1f). Under N2 atmosphere, to 2,6-diiodo-4-methylaniline (1.08 g, 3.0 mmol, commercially available), copper iodide(I) (11.4 mg, 0.060 mol) and bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II)dichloride (42 mg, 0.060 mmol) in triethylamine (15 mL) was added 4-ethynyltoluene (384 mg, 3.3 mmol), and then the mixture was stirred for 19 h at rt. The mixture was poured into 2N HCl aqueous solution and extracted with AcOEt. The AcOEt extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. Purification of residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 200) gave 2-iodo-4-methyl-6-(4-tolylethynyl)aniline (454 mg, 44%). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1f was prepared from 2-iodo-4-methyl-6-(4-tolylethynyl)aniline (355 mg, 1.0 mmol) and 4-tosyl chloride (211 mg, 1.1 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 24 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20 and then 5) gave 1f (181 mg, 35%). 1f: White solid; mp 208–211 °C; IR (neat) 3231, 2216, 1337, 1165 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.66 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.62 (2H, dt, J = 8.1, 1.9 Hz), 7.22–7.28 (3H, m), 7.12 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.08 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 6.49 (1H, s), 2.37 (3H, s), 2.28 (3H, s), 2.25 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.6, 140.7, 139.1, 138.9, 137.6, 135.9, 133.6, 131.6, 129.5, 128.9, 127.6, 123.5, 119.3, 99.8, 94.8, 85.0, 21.6, 21.5, 20.3; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 524; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C23H20127INNaO2S 524.0157; Found 524.0130.
N-(2-Bromo-4-methyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (1g). Under N2 atmosphere, to 2-bromo-4-methyl-6-iodoaniline (469 mg, 1.5 mmol, commercially available), copper iodide(I) (5.7 mg, 0.030 mmol) and bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride (21 mg 0.030 mmol) in triethylamine (7.5 mL) was added 4-ethynyltoluene (192 mg, 1.7 mmol), and then the mixture was stirred for 22 h at rt. The mixture was poured into 2N HCl aqueous solution and extracted with AcOEt. The AcOEt extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. Purification of residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 30) gave 2-bromo-4-methyl-6-(4-tolylethynyl)aniline (353 mg, 78%). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1g was prepared from 2-bromo-4-methyl-6-(4-tolylethynyl)aniline (903 mg, 3.0 mmol) and 4-tosyl chloride (636 mg, 3.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 24 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20 and then 3) gave 1g (618 mg, 45%). 1g: white solid; mp 191–197 °C; IR (neat) 3229, 2218, 1339, 1165 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.65 (2H, dt, J = 8.5, 1.9 Hz), 7.37 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.26–7.28 (3H, m), 7.09–7.13 (4H, m), 6.43 (1H, s), 2.37 (3H, s), 2.30 (3H, s), 2.27 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.6, 138.92, 138.85, 137.6, 134.0, 132.8, 132.7, 131.7, 129.5, 128.9, 127.5, 124.5, 123.5, 119.4, 95.0, 85.0, 21.6, 21.5, 20.6; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 478; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C23H2081BrNNaO2S 478.0275; Found 478.0249.
N-(2-Chloro-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (1h). Under N2 atmosphere, to 2-chloro-6-iodoaniline (507 mg, 2.0 mmol, commercially available), copper iodide(I) (7.5 mg, 0.040 mmol) and bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride (29 mg, 0.041 mol) in triethylamine (10 mL) was added 4-ethynyltoluene (255 mg, 2.2 mmol), and then the mixture was stirred for 19 h at rt. The mixture was poured into 2N HCl aqueous solution and extracted with AcOEt. The AcOEt extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. Purification of residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 30) gave 2-chloro-6-(4-tolylethynyl)aniline (398 mg, 82%). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1h was prepared from 2-chloro-6-(4-tolylethynyl)aniline (214 mg, 0.9 mmol) and 4-tosyl chloride (189 mg, 1.0 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 24 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 30 and then 5) gave 1h (121 mg, 34%). 1h: white solid; mp 192–193 °C; IR (neat) 3229, 2209, 1337, 1165 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.67 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.40 (1H, dd, J = 7.6, 1.4 Hz), 7.36 (1H, dd, J = 8.1, 1.4 Hz), 7.30 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.10–7.19 (5H, m), 6.52 (1H, s), 2.38 (3H, s), 2.29 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.7, 139.1, 137.4, 134.2, 133.3, 131.7, 131.3, 130.2, 129.5, 129.0, 128.0, 127.4, 124.7, 119.2, 95.7, 84.5, 21.6, 21.5; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 418; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C22H1835ClNNaO2S 418.0645; Found 418.0615.
N-(2,4-Dimethyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (1i). Under N2 atmosphere, to 2,4-dimethyl-6-iodoaniline (494 mg, 2.0 mmol, commercially available), copper iodide(I) (7.6 mg, 0.040 mmol) and bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride (28 mg, 0.040 mmol) in triethylamine (10 mL) was added 4-ethynyltoluene (254 mg, 2.2 mmol), and then the mixture was stirred for 19 h at rt. The mixture was poured into 2N HCl aqueous solution and extracted with AcOEt. The AcOEt extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. Purification of residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 15) gave 2-bromo-4-methyl-6-(4-tolylethynyl)aniline (468 mg, 99%). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1i was prepared from 2,4-dimethyl-6-(4-tolylethynyl)aniline (708 mg, 3.0 mmol) and 4-tosyl chloride (629 mg, 3.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 27 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 15 and then 5) gave 1i (918 mg, 78%). 1i: white solid; mp 149–152 °C; IR (neat) 3248, 2205, 1331, 1163 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.50 (2H, dt, J = 8.5, 1.9 Hz), 7.11–7.16 (4H, m), 7.06 (1H, s), 7.03 (1H, s), 6.99 (2H, d, J = 8.1), 6.44 (1H, s), 2.51 (3H, s), 2.38 (3H, s), 2.27 (3H, s), 2.23 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.3, 138.6, 137.9, 136.9, 136.5, 132.7, 132.3, 131.3, 130.4, 129.3, 128.9, 127.4, 121.5, 119.4, 94.0, 84.8, 21.5, 21.4, 20.7, 19.4; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 412; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C24H23NNaO2S 412.1347; Found 412.1332.
N-(2-((4-Methoxyphenyl)ethynyl)-4,6-dimethylphenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (1j). Under N2 atmosphere, to 2,4-dimethyl-6-iodoaniline (619 mg, 2.5 mmol, commercially available), copper iodide(I) (10 mg, 0.053 mmol) and bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride (35 mg, 0.050 mmol) in triethylamine (10 mL) was added 4-ethynylanisole (363 mg, 2.7 mmol), and then the mixture was stirred for 17 h at rt. The mixture was poured into 2N HCl aqueous solution and extracted with AcOEt. The AcOEt extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. Purification of residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 30) gave 2,4-dimerthyl-6-((4-tmethoxyphenyl)ethynyl)aniline (402 mg, 64%). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1j was prepared from 2,4-dimethyl-6-((4-methoxyphenyl)ethynyl)aniline (402 mg, 1.6 mmol) and 4-tosyl chloride (336 mg, 1.8 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 19 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 10 and then 5) gave 1j (384 mg, 59%). 1j: white solid; mp 149–150 °C; IR (neat) 3264, 2203, 1329, 1157 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.50 (2H, dt, J = 8.5, 1.9 Hz), 7.19 (2H, dt, J = 9.0, 2.4 Hz), 7.05 (1H, s), 7.01 (1H, s), 7.00 (2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.84 (2H, dt, J = 9.0, 2.4 Hz), 6.41 (1H, s), 3.84 (3H, s), 2.49 (3H, s), 2.27 (3H, s), 2.25 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 159.7, 143.4, 137.9, 136.9, 136.6, 132.9, 132.6, 132.3, 130.3, 129.3, 127.5, 121.6, 114.7, 113.8, 93.9, 84.2, 55.3, 21.5, 20.7, 19.5; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 428; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C24H23NNaO3S 428.1296; Found 428.1282.
N-(2,4-Dimethyl-6-(phenylethynyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (1k). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1k was prepared from 2,4-dimethyl-6-(4-phenyl)ethynyl)aniline (379 mg, 1.7 mmol, commercially available) and 4-tosyl chloride (357 mg, 1.9 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 22 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20 and then 10) gave racemic 1k (582 mg, 90%). white solid; mp 186–188 °C; IR (neat) 3241, 2212, 1331, 1165 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.51 (2H, dt, J = 8.1, 2.4 Hz), 7.24–7.34 (5H, m), 7.08 (1H, s), 7.05 (1H, s), 6.98 (2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.42 (1H, s), 2.51 (3H, s), 2.28 (3H, s), 2.22 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.4, 138.0, 137.0, 136.6, 132.9, 132.4, 131.4, 130.5, 129.3, 128.5, 128.1, 127.4, 122.6, 121.3, 93.7, 85.5, 21.4, 20.7, 19.4; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 398; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C23H21NNaO2S 398.1191; Found 398.1179.
N-(2,4-Dimethyl-6-((trimethylsilyl)ethynyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (1l). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1l was prepared from 2,4-dimethyl-6-(4-trimethylsilyl)ethynyl)aniline (434 mg, 2.0 mmol) [41] and 4-tosyl chloride (419 mg, 2.2 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 22 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20 and then 5) gave 1l (587 mg, 79%). 1l: white solid; mp 112–113 °C; IR (neat) 3225, 2158, 1335, 1165 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.47 (2H, dt, J = 8.5, 1.9 Hz), 7.17 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.05 (1H, s), 6.98 (1H, s), 6.37 (1H, s), 2.47 (3H, s), 2.40 (3H, s), 2.24 (3H, s), 0.13 (9H, m); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.4, 137.3, 136.6, 136.4, 133.2, 132.8, 130.7, 129.3, 127.8, 120.9, 100.6, 99.6, 21.6, 20.7, 19.5, −0.17; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 394; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C20H25NNaO2S28Si 394.1273; Found 394.1257.
N-(2-(Hex-1-yn-1-yl)-4,6-dimethylphenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (1m). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1m was prepared from 2,4-dimethyl-6-(2-hex-1-yn-1-yl)aniline (363 mg, 1.8 mmol, commercially available) and 4-tosyl chloride (378 mg, 2.0 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 26 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 50 and then 30) gave 1m (498 mg, 78%). 1m: orange solid; mp 71–73 °C; IR (neat) 3233, 2228, 1333, 1165 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.50 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.18 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.00 (1H, s), 6.89 (1H, s), 6.32 (1H, s), 2.47 (3H, s), 2.39 (3H, s), 2.23 (3H, s), 2.06 (2H, t, J = 6.6 Hz), 1.28–1.41 (4H, m), 0.91 (3H, t, J = 7.1 Hz); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.3, 137.5, 136.8, 136.7, 132.4, 132.1, 130.3, 129.1, 127.6, 121.8, 95.2, 76.4, 30.5, 22.0, 21.5, 20.7, 19.5, 19.1, 13.6; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 378; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C21H25NNaO2S 378.1504; Found 378.1475.
N-(2,4-Dimethyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-4-methoxybenzenesulfonamide (1n). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1n was prepared from 2,4-dimethyl-6-(4-tolylethynyl)aniline (401 mg, 1.7 mmol) and 4-methoxybenzenesulfonyl chloride (386 mg, 1.9 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 20 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20 and then 5) gave 1n (536 mg, 78%). 1n: white solid; mp 162–163 °C; IR (neat) 3239, 2207, 1335, 1155 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.53 (2H, dt, J = 9.0, 2.0 Hz), 7.18 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.12 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.06 (1H, s), 7.02 (1H, s), 6.66 (2H, dt, J = 9.0, 2.0 Hz), 6.41 (1H, s), 3.66 (3H, s), 2.50 (3H, s), 2.37 (3H, s), 2.27 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 162.8, 138.7, 137.9, 136.9, 132.7, 132.4, 131.4, 131.1, 130.4, 129.6, 129.0, 121.5, 119.5, 113.8, 93.9, 84.9, 55.3, 21.5, 20.7, 19.4; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 428; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C24H23NNaO3S 428.1296; Found 428.1270.
N-(2,4-Dimethyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-4-nitrobenzenesulfonamide (1o). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1a, 1o was prepared from 2,4-dimethyl-6-(4-tolylethynyl)aniline (489 mg, 2.1 mmol) and 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl chloride (507 mg, 2.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 22 h at 0 °C–rt. Hexane was added to the residue and the mixture was filtered in vacuo. After washing the residue by hexane, 1o was obtained (400 mg, 46%). 1o: yellow solid; mp 203–204 °C; IR (neat) 3242, 2209, 1522, 1341, 1167 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.95 (2H, dt, J = 9.0, 2.0 Hz), 7.76 (2H, dt, J = 9.0, 2.0 Hz), 7.05–7.11 (3H, m), 7.03–7.05 (3H, m), 6.53 (1H, s), 2.54 (3H, s), 2.38 (3H, s), 2.30 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 149.8, 145.2, 139.4, 138.5, 138.0, 133.0, 131.2, 131.1, 130.7, 129.2, 128.7, 123.8, 121.6, 118.8, 94.3, 84.7, 21.5, 20.8, 19.4; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 443; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C23H20N2NaO4S 443.1042; Found 443.1015.
N-(2,4-Dimethyl-6-(phenylethynyl)phenyl)-4-nitrobenzenesulfonamide (1p). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1p was prepared from 2,4-dimethyl-6-(phenylethynyl)aniline (426 mg, 1.9 mmol) and 4-nitrobenzenesulfonyl chloride (488 mg, 2.2 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 5 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 5) gave 1p (575 mg, 73%). 1p: white solid; mp 201–203 °C; IR (neat) 3231, 1522, 1344, 1167 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.95 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.77 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.29–7.38 (3H, m), 7.13–7.16 (3H, m), 7.06 (1H, s), 6.53 (1H, s), 2.54 (3H, s), 2.31 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 149.8, 145.2, 138.6, 138.1, 133.2, 131.23, 131.18, 130.8, 129.1, 128.7, 128.5, 123.8, 121.9, 121.5, 94.0, 85.3, 20.8, 19.4; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 429; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C22H18N2NaO4S 429.0885; Found 429.0869.
N-(2,4-dimethyl-6-(phenylethynyl)phenyl)benzenesulfonamide (1q). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1q was prepared from 2,4-dimethyl-6-(phenylethynyl)aniline (289 mg, 1.3 mmol) and benzenesulfonyl chloride (255 mg, 1.4 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 18 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 15 and then 10) gave 1q (417 mg, 88%). 1q: white solid; mp 154–155 °C; IR (neat) 3248, 2211, 1327, 1159 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.62–7.64 (2H, m), 7.20–7.41 (8H, m), 7.08 (1H, s), 7.04 (1H, s), 6.48 (1H, s), 2.50 (3H, s), 2.28 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 139.3, 137.9, 137.1, 132.9, 132.7, 132.2, 131.5, 130.4, 128.6, 128.5, 128.2, 127.5, 122.4, 121.4, 93.9, 85.3, 20.7, 19.4; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 384; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C22H19NNaO2S 384.1034; Found 384.1011.
N-(2,4-Dimethyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)methanesulfonamide (1r). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1r was prepared from 2,4-dimethyl-6-(4-tolylethynyl)aniline (457 mg, 1.9 mmol) and methanesulfonyl chloride (253 mg, 2.2 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 23 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20 and then 5) gave 1r (430 mg, 71%). 1r: white solid; mp 171–177 °C; IR (neat) 3246, 2199, 1316, 1157 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.42 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.24 (1H, s), 7.19 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.09 (1H, s), 6.35 (1H, s), 3.08 (3H, s), 2.47 (3H, s), 2.39 (3H, s), 2.32 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 139.3, 138.5, 137.6, 133.0, 132.2, 131.3, 130.7, 129.4, 121.4, 119.0, 95.0, 85.7, 40.5, 21.5, 20.7, 19.3; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 336; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C18H19NNaO2S 336.1034; Found 336.1017.
N-(2,4-Dimethyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-2,4,6-trimethylbenzenesulfonamide (1s). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 1r was prepared from 2,4-dimethyl-6-(4-tolylethynyl)aniline (339 mg, 1.4 mmol) and 2,4,6-trimethylbenzenesulfonyl chloride (313 mg, 1.4 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 16 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 30 and then 20) gave 1s (443 mg, 74%). 1s: white solid; mp 161–162 °C; IR (neat) 3277, 2207, 1323, 1161 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.18 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.12 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.09 (1H, s), 7.03 (1H, s), 6.70 (2H, s), 6.43 (1H, s), 2.38 (3H, s), 2.36 (6H, s), 2.34 (3H, s), 2.27 (3H, s), 2.17 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 141.9, 139.2, 138.6, 137.9, 137.0, 135.2, 132.6, 132.4, 131.9, 131.4, 130.7, 128.8, 122.1, 119.6, 93.6, 84.8, 23.5, 21.5, 20.8, 20.7, 19.2; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 440; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C26H27NNaO2S 440.1660; Found 440.1674.
N-Allyl-N-[(2-bromo-4-methyl-6-phenyl)phenyl]-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (2c). Under N2 atmosphere, to 1c (125 mg, 0.3 mmol) in THF (2.5 mL) was added NaH (60% assay, 12 mg, 0.3 mmol) at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 20 min at −20 °C. (Allyl-Pd-Cl)2 (2.5 mg, 0.0068 mmol), (S,S)-Trost ligand (10.5 mg, 0.0133 mmol) and allyl acetate (98 μL, 0.9 mmol) in THF (2.0 mL) were added to the reaction mixture, and then the mixture was stirred for 10 h at −20 °C. The mixture was poured into 1N HCl solution and extracted with AcOEt. The AcOEt extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 10) gave 2c (133 mg, 97%). The ee (38% ee) of 2c was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALCEL OD-3) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 15% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2c (major); tR = 8.0 min, (-)-2c (minor); tR = 9.5 min). 2c: white solid; mp 113–115 °C (38% ee); IR (neat) 1333, 1150 cm−1; [α]D = +18.6° (38% ee, CHCl3, c = 1.00); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.52 (2H, dt, J = 8.6, 1.9 Hz), 7.32–7.45 (6H, m), 7.17 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.07 (1H, d, J = 2.9 Hz), 5.68 (1H, ddt, J = 17.1, 10.0, 7.1 Hz), 5.08 (1H, dd, J = 17.1, 1.4 Hz), 5.01 (1H, dd, J = 10.2, 1.4 Hz), 4.19 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 7.1 Hz), 3.96 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 7.1 Hz), 2.40 (3H, s), 2.35 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 146.2, 142.9, 139.6, 139.4, 137.6, 133.7, 133.6, 132.5, 131.7, 129.5, 129.0, 128.0, 127.6, 127.4, 125.9, 119.1, 53.6, 21.4, 20.6; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 480; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C23H2281BrNNaO2S 480.0432; Found 480.0417.
N-Allyl-N-(2-(tert-butyl)-6-methylphenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (2a). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2a was prepared from 1a (96 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 21 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 30) gave 2a (62 mg, 58%). The ee (10% ee) of 2a was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALPAK AS-H) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 15% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (-)-2a (major); tR = 12.8 min, (+)-2a (minor); tR = 8.7 min). 2a: white solid; mp 105–107 °C (10% ee); IR (neat) 1339, 1159 cm−1; [α]D = −5.2° (10% ee, CHCl3, c = 0.83); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.63 (2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.44–7.46 (1H, m), 7.29 (2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.17 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.87 (1H, dd, J = 7.6, 0.9 Hz), 5.66 (1H, dddd, J = 16.6, 10.4, 7.6, 6.2 Hz), 5.21 (1H, dd, J = 16.6, 1.4 Hz), 5.04 (1H, dd, J = 10.4, 1.4 Hz), 4.50 (1H, ddt, J = 13.2, 6.2, 1.4 Hz), 4.14 (1H, dd, J = 13.2, 7.6 Hz), 2.43 (3H, s), 1.55 (9H, s), 1.47 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 151.7, 143.2, 138.9, 137.3, 133.7, 131.5, 129.5, 128.7, 128.6, 127.9, 127.7, 119.3, 53.8, 37.2, 33.3, 21.5, 19.4; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 380; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C21H27NNaO2S 380.1660; Found 380.1641.
N-Allyl-N-((2-iodo-4-methyl-6-phenyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (2b). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2b was prepared from 1b (93 mg, 0.2 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 27 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 10) gave 2b (10 mg, 10%). The ee (43% ee) of 2b was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALCEL OD-3) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 15% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2b (major); tR = 9.0 min, (-)-2b (minor); tR = 10.0 min). 2b: colorless oil; IR (neat) 1344, 1157 cm−1; [α]D = +32.8° (48% ee, CHCl3, c = 1.01); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.76 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.53 (2H, d, 8.1 Hz), 7.28–7.36 (5H, m), 7.16 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.07 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 5.77 (1H, ddt, J = 17.1, 10.0, 7.1 Hz), 5.14 (1H, dd, J = 17.1, 1.4 Hz), 5.04 (1H, dd, J = 10.0, 1.4 Hz), 4.26 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 6.9 Hz), 3.99 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 7.1 Hz), 2.40 (3H, s), 2.32 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 145.7, 142.9, 140.5, 139.7, 139.6, 137.9, 137.3, 132.7, 129.4, 129.0, 128.1, 127.43, 127.38, 119.1, 102.5, 54.0, 21.4, 20.3; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M +Na]+ 526; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C23H22127INNaO2S 526.0314; Found 526.0294.
N-Allyl-N-(2-iodo-4,6-dimethylphenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (2d). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2d was prepared from 1d (120 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 6 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 5) gave 2d (124 mg, 94%). The ee (65% ee) of 2d was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALCEL OD-3) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 3% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2d (major); tR = 11.1min, (-)-2d (minor); tR = 10.5 min). 2d: white solid; mp 67–69 °C (65% ee); IR (neat) 1343, 1159 cm−1; [α]D = +40.9° (65% ee, CHCl3, c = 1.00); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.74 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.50 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.29 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.01 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 5.97 (1H, m), 5.02–5.08 (2H, m), 4.32 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 6.6 Hz), 4.12 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 7.8 Hz), 2.42 (3H, s), 2.28 (3H, s), 2.23 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.3, 141.8, 139.8, 138.7, 138.3, 137.5, 132.8, 132.1, 129.4, 128.0, 119.3, 101.1, 53.6, 21.5, 20.5, 20.3; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 464; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C18H20127INNaO2S 464.0157; Found 464.0128.
(E)-N-Allyl-N-(2,4-dimethyl-6-styrylphenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (2e). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2e was prepared from 1e (113 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 23 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 5) gave 2e (114 mg, 91%). The ee (65% ee) of 2e was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALCEL OD-3) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 15% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2e (major); tR = 7.6 min, (-)-2e (minor); tR = 6.7 min). 2e: white oil; IR (neat) 1343, 1157 cm−1; [α]D = +132.8° (65% ee, CHCl3, c = 1.01); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.74 (2H, dd, J = 8.5, 1.9 Hz), 7.32 (1H, s), 7.20–7.27 (5H, m), 6.99–7.04 (3H, m), 6.86 (1H, d, J = 16.1 Hz), 6.50 (1H, d, J = 16.1 Hz), 5.90 (1H, dddd, J = 16.6, 10.0, 7.6, 6.2 Hz), 4.99–5.04 (2H, m), 4.32 (1H, ddt, J = 14.8, 6.2, 1.0 Hz), 3.97 (1H, dd, J = 14.8, 7.6 Hz), 2.39 (3H, s), 2.35 (3H, s), 2.30 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.4, 140.5, 138.2, 138.1, 137.0, 136.5, 133.8, 132.8, 131.6, 129.9, 129.7, 128.4, 127.6, 127.5, 126.5, 125.2, 124.2, 119.2, 54.4, 21.4, 21.2, 19.6; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 440; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C26H27NNaO2S 440.1660; Found 440.1648.
N-Allyl-N-(2-iodo-4-methyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (2f). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2f was prepared from 1f (94 mg, 0.19 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 5 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 10) gave 2f (84 mg, 82%). The ee (73% ee) of 2f was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALCEL OD-3) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 3% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2f (major); tR = 24.1 min, (-)-2f (minor); tR = 27.7 min). 2f: colorless oil; IR (neat) 2205, 1344, 1157 cm−1; [α]D = +71.1° (74% ee, CHCl3, c = 0.83); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.74 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.72 (1H, m), 7.28 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz),7.04–7.08 (6H, m), 6.12 (1H, dddd, J = 16.1, 10.0, 8.1, 6.2 Hz), 5.10 (1H, d, J = 17.1 Hz), 5.03 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 4.48 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 6.2 Hz), 4.38 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 8.1 Hz), 2.35 (3H, s), 2.28 (3H, s), 2.10 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.2, 140.8, 139.63, 139.58, 138.7, 138.0, 134.2, 132.8, 131.3, 129.3, 128.7, 128.0, 125.2, 119.3, 119.2, 105.2, 94.5, 85.9, 53.1, 21.5, 21.2, 20.2; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 564; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C26H24INNaO2S 564.0470; Found 564.0442.
N-Allyl-N-(2-bromo-4-methyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (2g). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2g was prepared from 1g (91 mg, 0.2 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 7 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 5) gave 2g (101 mg, quant). The ee (72% ee) of 2g was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALCEL OD-3) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 5% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2g (major); tR = 16.0 min, (-)-2g (minor); tR = 13.5 min). 2g: white oil; IR (neat) 2212, 1343, 1155 cm−1; [α]D = +61.5° (69% ee, CHCl3, c = 0.68); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.77 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.42 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz), 7.27 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz), 7.07–7.12 (6H, m), 6.06 (1H, dddd, J = 17.1, 10.0, 7.6, 6.6 Hz), 5.08 (1H, dd, J = 17.1, 1.0 Hz), 5.02 (1H, dd, J = 10.0, 1.0 Hz), 4.40 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 6.6 Hz), 4.36 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 7.6 Hz), 2.36 (3H, s), 2.31 (3H, s), 2.15 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.1, 139.5, 138.7, 138.0, 136.4, 134.1, 133.0, 132.8, 131.3, 129.2, 128.7, 127.8, 127.4, 126.5, 119.3, 119.0, 94.6, 85.9, 52.9, 21.4, 21.2, 20.5; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 518; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C26H2481BrNNaO2S 518.0588; Found 518.0592.
N-Allyl-N-(2-chloro-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (2h). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2h was prepared from 1h (119 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 5 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 10) gave 2h (124 mg, 95%). The ee (79% ee) of 2h was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALPAK AS-H) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 15% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2h (major); tR = 24.7 min, (-)-2h (minor); tR = 18.6 min). 2h: yellow solid; mp 101–104 °C (76% ee); IR (neat) 2224, 1346, 1155 cm−1; [α]D = +103.8° (76% ee, CHCl3, c = 1.00); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.78 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.40–7.44 (2H, m), 7.23 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.09–7.16 (6H, m), 6.01 (1H, ddt, J = 17.1, 10.0, 7.1 Hz), 5.05 (1H, d, J = 17.1 Hz), 5.01 (2H, d, J = 6.6 Hz), 4.01 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 2.36 (3H, s), 2.19 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.2, 138.9, 138.0, 137.6, 137.2, 132.8, 131.7, 131.5, 130.2, 129.3, 129.0, 128.8, 127.9, 127.4, 119.3, 119.1, 95.1, 85.8, 52.8, 21.5, 21.3; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 458; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C25H2235ClNNaO2S 458.0958; Found 458.0951.
N-Allyl-N-(2,4-dimethyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (2i). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2i was prepared from 1i (117 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 6 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20) gave 2i (109 mg, 88%). The ee (86% ee) of 2i was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALPAK AD-H) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 15% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2i (major); tR = 9.9 min, (-)-2i (minor); tR = 12.1 min). 2i: yellow oil; IR (neat) 2205, 1341, 1155 cm−1; [α]D = +180.7° (80% ee, CHCl3, c = 1.01); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.71 (2H, dt, J = 8.5, 1.9 Hz), 7.14 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz), 7.02–7.07 (5H, m), 6.95 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 5.98 (1H, dddd, J = 17.2, 10.4, 8.5, 5.7 Hz), 5.07 (1H, dd, J = 17.2, 1.4 Hz), 5.04 (1H, d, J = 10.4 Hz), 4.48 (1H, ddt, J = 14.2, 5.7, 1.4 Hz), 4.25 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 8.5 Hz), 2.45 (3H, s), 2.35 (3H, s), 2.30 (3H, s), 2.08 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.0, 141.2, 138.3, 137.83, 137.78, 136.2, 133.2, 132.2, 131.8, 131.1, 129.3, 128.6, 127.8, 123.3, 119.7, 119.0, 93.3, 86.8, 53.0, 21.4, 21.2, 20.8, 19.6; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 452; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C27H27NNaO2S 452.1660; Found 452.1631.
N-Allyl-N-(2-((4-methoxyphenyl)ethynyl)-4,6-dimethylphenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (2j). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2j was prepared from 1j (122 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 23 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20) gave 2j (131 mg, 98%). The ee (88% ee) of 2j was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALPAK AD-H) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 15% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2j (major); tR = 17.7 min, (-)-2j (minor); tR = 23.6 min). 2j: white solid; mp 78–80 °C (87% ee); IR (neat) 2211, 1341, 1159 cm−1; [α]D = +193.3° (87% ee, CHCl3, c = 1.00); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.72 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.13 (1H, s), 7.06 (1H, s), 7.05 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.00 (2H, dt, J = 8.5, 1.9 Hz), 6.77 (2H, dt, J = 8.5, 2.8 Hz), 5.98 (1H, dddd, J = 18.0, 10.4, 8.5, 5.7 Hz), 5.07 (1H, d, J = 18.0 Hz), 5.04 (1H, d, J = 10.4 Hz), 4.47 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 5.7 Hz), 4.25 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 8.5 Hz), 3.81 (3H, s), 2.44 (3H, s), 2.29 (3H, s), 2.11 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 159.4, 142.9, 141.1, 137.9, 137.7, 136.0, 133.1, 132.6, 131.9, 131.6, 129.2, 127.7, 123.4, 118.9, 114.9, 113.5, 93.2, 86.1, 55.2, 52.9, 21.2, 20.7, 19.5; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 468; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C27H27NNaO3S 468.1609; Found 468.1615.
N-Allyl-N-(2,4-dimethyl-6-(phenylethynyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (2k). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2j was prepared from 1j (113 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 21 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20) gave 2j (114 mg, 92%). The ee (89% ee) of 2j was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALPAK AD-H) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 15% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2k (major); tR = 11.8 min, (-)-2k (minor); tR = 16.4 min). 2k: white solid; mp 87–89 °C (90% ee); IR (neat) 1339, 1155 cm−1; [α]D = +196.7° (90% ee, CHCl3, c = 0.79); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.73 (2H, dt, J = 8.5, 1.9 Hz), 7.23–7.29 (3H, m), 7.16 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz), 7.06–7.09 (3H, m), 7.03 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 6.00 (1H, dddd, J = 17.1, 10.0, 8.5, 5.7 Hz), 5.09 (1H, d, J = 17.1 Hz), 5.07 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 4.51 (1H, ddt, J = 14.2, 5.7, 1.4 Hz), 4.28 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 8.5 Hz), 2.46 (3H, s), 2.31 (3H, s), 2.07 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.0, 141.2, 137.8, 136.2, 133.1, 132.3, 131.9, 131.1, 129.3, 128.1, 127.8, 127.7, 123.1, 122.7, 119.0, 93.0, 87.3, 53.0, 21.1, 20.7, 19.5; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 438; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C26H25NNaO2S 438.1504; Found 438.1484.
N-Allyl-N-(2,4-dimethyl-6-((trimethylsilyl)ethynyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (2l). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2l was prepared from 1l (112 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 9 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 5) gave 2l (86 mg, 70%). The ee (75% ee) of 2l was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALPAK AD-H) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 15% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2l (major); tR = 5.3 min, (-)-2l (minor); tR = 6.1 min). 2l: yellow oil; IR (neat) 2153, 1344, 1159 cm−1; [α]D = +129.7° (75% ee, CHCl3, c = 0.83); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.68 (2H, dt, J = 8.5, 1.9 Hz), 7.25 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.10 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.05 (1H, m), 5.93 (1H, dddd, J = 17.1, 10.0, 8.1, 5.7 Hz), 5.04 (1H, dt, J = 17.1, 1.4 Hz), 5.01 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 4.34 (1H, ddt, J = 14.7, 5.7, 1.4 Hz), 4.18 (1H, dd, J = 14.7, 8.1 Hz), 2.41 (3H, s), 2.36 (3H, s), 2.26 (3H, s), 0.02–0.03 (9H, m); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 142.8, 141.0, 138.1, 137.7, 136.3, 133.3, 132.6, 129.4, 128.1, 123.3, 118.8, 102.7, 98.4, 52.8, 21.6, 20.7, 19.6, −0.38; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 434; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C23H29NNaO2S28Si 434.1586; Found 434.1560.
N-Allyl-N-(2-(hex-1-yn-1-yl)-4,6-dimethylphenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (2m). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2m was prepared from 1m (107 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 25 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20) gave 2m (114 mg, 96%). The ee (77% ee) of 2m was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALPAK AS-H) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 15% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2m (major); tR = 8.5 min, (-)-2m (minor); tR = 6.6 min). 2m: yellow oil; IR (neat) 2230, 1344, 1159 cm−1; [α]D = +110.6° (77% ee, CHCl3, c = 0.87); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.71 (2H, dt, J = 8.5, 1.9 Hz), 7.26 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.00 (1H, s), 6.99 (1H, s), 5.91 (1H, dddd, J = 17.1, 10.0, 8.5, 5.7 Hz), 4.99–5.05 (2H, m), 4.40 (1H, ddt, J =14.2, 5.7, 1.0 Hz), 4.12 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 8.5 Hz), 2.41 (3H, s), 2.40 (3H, s), 2.25 (3H, s), 1.80–1.92 (2H, m), 1.19–1.34 (4H, m), 0.87 (3H, t, J = 7.1 Hz); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 142.6, 141.0, 138.3, 137.6, 136.1, 133.3, 131.9, 131.5, 129.1, 128.0, 123.7, 118.7, 94.4, 78.2, 52.9, 30.4, 22.0, 21.4, 20.7, 19.6, 18.9, 13.5; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 418; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C24H29NNaO2S 418.1817; Found 418.1843.
N-Allyl-N-(2,4-dimethyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-4-methoxybenzenesulfonamide (2n). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2n was prepared from 1n (122 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 22 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20 and then 10) gave 2n (117 mg, 88%). The ee (85% ee) of 2n was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALPAK AS-H) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 5% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2n (major); tR = 29.5 min, (-)-2j (minor); tR = 24.9 min). 2n: white solid; mp 124–132 °C (84% ee); IR (neat) 2207, 1344, 1150 cm−1; [α]D = +194.8° (84% ee, CHCl3, c = 0.99); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.75 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.13 (1H, s), 7.07 (1H, s), 7.05 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 6.97 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 6.68 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 5.97 (1H, dddd, J = 17.1, 10.0, 8.5, 5.7 Hz), 5.07 (1H, d, J = 18.5 Hz), 5.04 (1H, d, J = 10.4 Hz), 4.46 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 5.7 Hz), 4.24 (1H, dd, J = 14.5, 8.1 Hz), 3.52 (3H, s), 2.44 (3H, s), 2.35 (3H, s), 2.30 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 162.4, 141.3, 138.3, 137.8, 136.3, 133.3, 132.5, 132.2, 131.8, 131.1, 129.9, 128.7, 123.3, 119.8, 119.0, 113.8, 93.2, 86.9, 55.0, 53.0, 21.5, 20.8, 19.6; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 468; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C27H27NNaO3S 468.1609; Found 468.1581.
N-Allyl-N-(2,4-dimethyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-4-nitrobenzenesulfonamide (2o). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2o was prepared from 1o (126 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 6 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 10) gave 2o (137 mg, quant). The ee (89% ee) of 2o was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALCEL OD-3) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 15% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2o (major); tR = 9.9 min, (-)-2o (minor); tR = 8.0 min). 2o: yellow solid; mp 102–104 °C (97% ee); IR (neat) 2209, 1524, 1344, 1159 cm−1; [α]D = +201.0° (97% ee, CHCl3, c = 0.59); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.96 (2H, dd, J = 6.9, 2.4 Hz), 7.91 (2H, dd, J = 6.9, 2.4 Hz), 7.11 (1H, s), 7.10 (1H, s), 6.99 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 6.86 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 5.98 (1H, dddd, J = 17.1, 10.0, 8.5, 5.7 Hz), 5.13 (1H, d, J = 17.1 Hz), 5.11 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 4.54 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 5.7 Hz), 4.27 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 8.5 Hz), 2.46 (3H, s), 2.33 (3H, s), 2.31 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 149.3, 146.3, 141.2, 139.4, 138.5, 135.5, 132.5, 132.4, 131.8, 130.7, 128.9, 128.8, 123.8, 122.8, 120.0, 118.9, 93.5, 86.6, 53.5, 21.4, 20.8, 19.6; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 483; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C26H24N2NaO4S 483.1355; Found 483.1346.
N-Allyl-N-(2,4-dimethyl-6-(phenylethynyl)phenyl)-4-nitrobenzenesulfonamide (2p). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2p was prepared from 1p (122 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 7 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20) gave 2p (132 mg, 98%). The ee (92% ee) of 2p was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALCEL OD-3) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 15% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2p (major); tR = 13.1 min, (-)-2p (minor); tR = 9.9 min). 2p: yellow oil; IR (neat) 1520, 1344, 1165 cm−1; [α]D = +193.1° (90% ee, CHCl3, c = 1.07); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.98 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.93 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.27–7.29 (1H, m), 7.21 (2H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.13 (1H, s), 7.12 (1H, s), 6.98 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 5.98 (1H, dddd, J = 16.6, 9.5, 7.1, 5.2 Hz), 5.14 (1H, d, J = 17.1 Hz), 5.11 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 4.56 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 5.7 Hz), 4.28 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 8.5 Hz), 2.46 (3H, s), 2.32 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 149.2, 146.3, 141.2, 138.5, 135.4, 132.7, 132.3, 131.9, 130.7, 128.9, 128.8, 128.2, 123.8, 122.6, 121.9, 119.9, 93.2, 87.1, 53.5, 20.7, 19.5; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 469; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C25H22N2NaO4S 469.1198; Found 469.1170.
N-Allyl-N-(2,4-dimethyl-6-(phenylethynyl)phenyl)benzenesulfonamide (2q). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2q was prepared from 1q (108 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 7 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 10) gave 2q (127 mg, quant). The ee (86% ee) of 2q was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALPAK AD-H) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 15% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2q (major); tR = 9.1 min, (-)-2q (minor); tR = 10.3 min). 2q: yellow oil; IR (neat) 1343, 1157 cm−1; [α]D = +172.1° (85% ee, CHCl3, c = 0.97); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.84–7.86 (2H, m), 7.22–7.31 (6H, m), 7.17 (1H, d, J = 1.9 Hz), 7.07–7.10 (3H, m), 6.00 (1H, dddd, J = 17.1, 10.4, 8.5, 5.7 Hz), 5.09 (1H, dd, J = 17.1, 1.4 Hz), 5.05 (1H, d, J = 10.4 Hz), 4.51 (1H, ddt, J = 14.2, 5.7, 1.4 Hz), 4.29 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 8.5 Hz), 2.43 (3H, s), 2.31 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 141.0, 140.7, 137.9, 136.0, 133.0, 132.4, 132.2, 131.8, 131.3, 128.6, 128.2, 127.9, 127.7, 123.3, 122.6, 119.1, 93.1, 87.3, 53.2, 20.7, 19.5; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 424; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C25H23NNaO2S 424.1347; Found 424.1347.
N-Allyl-N-(2,4-dimethyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)methanesulfonamide (2r). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2r was prepared from 1r (94 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 6 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20) gave 2r (83 mg, 78%). The ee (87% ee) of 2r was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALPACK AS-H) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 5% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2r (major); tR = 32.9 min, (-)-2r (minor); tR = 27.9 min). 2r: yellow oil; IR (neat) 2207, 1335, 1150 cm−1; [α]D = +7.7° (84% ee, CHCl3, c = 0.57); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.39 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.25 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 7.19 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.08 (1H, d, J = 1.4 Hz), 6.00 (1H, dddd, J = 17.1, 10.0, 8.1, 5.7 Hz), 5.14 (1H, dd, J = 17.1, 1.0 Hz), 5.09 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 4.40 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 5.7 Hz), 4.34 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 8.1 Hz), 3.13 (3H, s), 2.39 (6H, s), 2.31 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 140.9, 139.1, 138.2, 136.2, 133.1, 132.5, 131.8, 131.1, 129.4, 123.1, 119.5, 119.3, 93.8, 87.3, 53.7, 41.0, 21.5, 20.8, 19.4; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 376; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C21H23NNaO2S 376.1347; Found 376.1342.
N-Allyl-N-(2,4-dimethyl-6-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-2,4,6-trimethylbenzenesulfonamide (2s). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 2s was prepared from 1s (125 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 23 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 30) gave 2s (117 mg, 85%). The ee (63% ee) of 2s was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALCEL OD-3) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 1% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (+)-2s (major); tR = 13.2 min, (-)-2s (minor); tR = 10.1 min). 2s: white solid; mp 171–172 °C (62% ee); IR (neat) 2212, 1337, 1155 cm−1; [α]D = +155.4° (62% ee, CHCl3, c = 1.00); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.14 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz), 7.05–7.08 (3H, m), 7.02 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 6.73 (2H, s), 6.00 (1H, dddd, J = 17.1, 10.0, 8.5, 5.7 Hz), 5.07 (1H, dd, J = 17.1, 1.4 Hz), 5.04 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz), 4.63 (1H, ddt, J = 14.2, 5.7, 1.4 Hz), 4.42 (1H, dd, J = 14.2, 8.5 Hz), 2.44 (6H, s), 2.40 (3H, s), 2.36 (3H, s), 2.29 (3H, s), 2.09 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 141.5, 141.1, 139.5, 138.3, 137.7, 136.0, 135.8, 133.3, 132.2, 132.1, 131.6, 131.1, 128.7, 124.4, 119.9, 119.0, 93.2, 86.6, 53.1, 24.2, 21.5, 20.8, 20.7, 19.6; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 480; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C29H31NNaO2S 480.1973; Found 480.1960.
N-(2-(p-Tolylethynyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (6). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 6 was prepared from 2-(4-tolylethynyl)-4methylaniline (558 mg, 2.7 mmol, commercially available) and 4-tosyl chloride (567 mg, 3.0 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 1 h at 0 °C–rt. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20) gave 6 (835 mg, 86%). 6: white solid; mp 126–128 °C; IR (neat) 3239, 2212, 1335, 1159 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.68 (2H, dd, J = 6.6, 1.9 Hz), 7.63 (1H, dd, J = 8.5, 0.9 Hz), 7.35–7.38 (3H, m), 7.24–7.30 (2H, m), 7.20 (2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.17 (2H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.06 (1H, td, J = 7.6, 0.9 Hz), 2.40 (3H, s), 2.33 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 144.0, 139.3, 137.3, 135.9, 131.8, 131.4, 129.5, 129.4, 129.3, 127.2, 124.5, 120.2, 118.8, 114.8, 96.3, 83.0, 21.6, 21.5; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 384; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C22H19NNaO2S 384.1034; Found 384.1063.
N-Allyl-N-(2-(p-tolylethynyl)phenyl)-4-methylbenzenesulfonamide (3). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 2c, 3 was prepared from 6 (109 mg, 0.3 mmol). The reaction was conducted for 20 h at −20 °C. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 20) gave 3 (150 mg, quant). 3: white solid; mp 66–69 °C; IR (neat) 2214, 1344, 1159 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.64 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.48 (1H, m), 7.27–7.34 (3H, m), 7.09–7.17 (6H, m), 5.87 (1H, ddt, J = 17.1, 10.0, 6.6 Hz), 5.10 (1H, dd, J = 17.1, 0.9 Hz), 5.05 (1H, dd, J = 10.0, 0.9 Hz), 4.38 (2H, d, J = 6.6 Hz), 2.38 (3H, s), 2.23 (3H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 143.1, 139.6, 138.7, 137.1, 133.28, 133.26, 132.4, 131.3, 129.4, 128.9, 128.6, 128.0, 127.6, 123.8, 119.7, 118.6, 94.4, 85.7, 53.1, 21.5, 21.3; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 424; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C25H23NNaO2S 424.1347; Found 424.1374.
N,N-Bis(2-bromo-4-methyl-6-(4-tolylethynyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-disulfonamide (4). In accordance with the experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1b, 4 was prepared from 2-bromo-4methyl-6-(4-tolylethynyl)aniline (1.694 g, 5.6 mmol) and benzene-1,3-disulfonyl chloride (704 mg, 2.6 mmol). Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 15 and then 5) gave 4 (266 mg, 13%). 4: yellow solid; mp 268−270 °C; IR (neat) 3246, 2211, 1346, 1161 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO) δ: 10.23 (2H, s), 8.07 (1H, s), 7.84 (2H, d, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.44–7.48 (3H, m), 7.38 (2H, s), 7.30 (4H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.20 (4H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 2.32 (6H, s), 2.27 (6H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, (CD3)2SO) δ: 143.2, 139.6, 138.9, 133.8, 132.9, 132.5, 131.5, 130.3, 130.1, 129.2, 126.0, 124.7, 124.6, 119.1, 94.0, 86.2, 21.2, 19.9; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 827; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C38H30Br2N2NaO4S2 826.98705; Found: 826.98759.
N,N-Diallyl-N,N-bis(2-bromo-4-methyl-6-(4-tolylethynyl)phenyl)benzene-1,3-disulfonamide (chiral-5 and meso-5). Under N2 atmosphere, to 4 (241 mg, 0.3 mmol) in THF (2.5 mL) was added NaH (60% assay, 24 mg, 0.6 mmol) at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred for 20 min at −20 °C. (Allyl-Pd-Cl)2 (4.8 mg, 0.044 mmol), (S,S)-Trost ligand (21 mg, 0.088 mmol) and allyl acetate (194 μL, 1.8 mmol) in THF (1.5 mL) were added to the reaction mixture, and then the mixture was stirred for 21 h at −20 °C. The mixture was poured into 1N HCl solution and extracted with AcOEt. The AcOEt extracts were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated to dryness. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (hexane/AcOEt = 10) gave the mixture of chiral-5 and meso-5 (232 mg, 88%). The ratio (3.1:1) of chiral-5 and meso-5 was determined by 1H NMR. MPLC of the mixture gave chiral-5 (147 mg, less polar) and meso-5 (45 mg, more polar). The ee (99% ee) of chiral-5 was determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral column (CHIRALPAK AD-H) (25 cm × 0.46 cm i.d.; 10% i-PrOH in hexane; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min; (–)-chiral-5 (major); tR = 14.1 min, (+)-chiral-5 (minor); tR = 17.0 min). chiral-5: white solid; mp 93–95 °C (99% ee), 89−94 °C (racemate); [α]D25 = −18.8 (99% ee, CHCl3, c 1.00); IR (neat) 2212, 1354, 1088 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.44 (1H, t, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.78 (2H, dd, J = 7.3, 1.2 Hz), 7.40 (2H, d, J = 1.2 Hz), 7.28 (2H, d, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.06–7.20 (9H, m), 6.00 (2H, ddt, J = 17.1, 9.8, 7.0 Hz), 5.08 (2H, dd, J = 17.1, 1.2 Hz), 5.03 (2H, dd, J = 9.8, 1.2 Hz), 4.36 (2H, dd, J = 14.0, 7.3 Hz), 4.30 (2H, dd, J = 15.9, 6.7 Hz), 2.34 (6H, s), 2.31 (6H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 141.9, 140.0, 139.1, 136.0, 134.2, 133.0, 132.3, 131.5, 131.4, 129.3, 129.0, 127.4, 127.0, 126.7, 119.7, 118.9, 95.0, 85.8, 53.3, 21.6, 20,6; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 907; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C44H38Br2N2NaO4S2 907.04965; Found: 907.04749. meso-5: white solid; mp 89−94 °C; IR (neat) 2211, 1348, 1159 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 8.38 (1H, s), 7.76 (2H, dd, J = 7.9, 1.8 Hz), 7.41 (2H, d, J = 1.2 Hz), 7.28 (2H, d, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.07–7.17 (9H, m), 6.01 (2H, ddt, J = 17.1, 9.8, 6.7 Hz), 5.08 (2H, d, J = 17.1 Hz), 5.03 (2H, d, J = 9.8 Hz), 4.34 (4H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 2.34 (6H, s), 2.31 (6H, s); 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 141.8, 140.0, 139.1, 135.9, 134.2, 133.0, 132.3, 131.4, 129.3, 129.0, 127.5, 126.9, 126.8, 119.7, 118.9, 95.0, 85.7, 53.3, 21.6, 20,6; MS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ 907; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C44H38Br2N2NaO4S2 907.04965; Found: 907.04712.

3.3. X-ray Single Crystal Structural Analysis

The single crystal X-ray structures were determined by a Bruker D8 Quest with MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) generated at 50 kV and 1 mA. The crystal was coated by paratone-N oil and measured at 100 K. The SHELXT program was used for solving the structures [42]. Refinement and further calculations were carried out using SHELXL [43]. The chiral crystal (P)-2o (CCDC 2210583) shows the correct absolute structure and the flack parameter is 0.02(6). These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html (accessed on 1 October 2022).

4. Conclusions

We found that the N-allylation of secondary sulfonamides bearing a 2-ethynyl-6-methylphenyl group on the nitrogen atom proceeds with good enantioselectivity in the presence of (S,S)-Trost ligand-(allyl-PdCl)2 catalyst, giving optically active N-C axially chiral N-allylated sulfonamides with good yields. The N-C axially chiral sulfonamide products were also revealed to possess relatively high rotational barriers and can be handled without a decrease in the ee at room temperature. Furthermore, the absolute stereochemistry of the major enantiomer was determined by X-ray single crystal structural analysis and the origin of the enantioselectivity was rationally explained on the basis of a working model by Trost. In addition, the double N-allylation with bis-sulfonamide substrate gave a N-allylated product with two N-C chiral axes in a high optical purity.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27227819/s1: Copies of NMR chart for a new compound 1a–s, 2a–s and 3–6, chiral HPLC chart for the determination of ee in 2a–s and 5, data for the evaluation of rotational barriers in 2i and 2r, and CheckCIF results of compound 2o.

Author Contributions

Synthesis and characterizations, T.T., S.F., R.K., C.N. and Y.K.; single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis, G.J.R. and A.H.; writing—review and editing, O.K., G.J.R. and A.H.; supervision and project administration, O.K.; funding acquisition, O.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number C 20K06945.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Alkorta, I.; Elguero, J.; Roussel, C.; Vanthuyne, N.; Piras, P. Atropisomerism and Axial Chirality in Heteroaromatic Compounds. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 2012, 105, 1–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Takahashi, I.; Suzuki, Y.; Kitagawa, O. Asymmetric Synthesis of Atropisomeric Compounds with an N–C Chiral Axis. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2014, 46, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kitagawa, O. Chiral Pd-Catalyzed Enantioselective Syntheses of Various N-C Axially Chiral Compounds and Their Synthetic Application. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wu, Y.-J.; Liao, G.; Shi, B.-F. Stereoselective construction of atropisomers featuring a C–N chiral axis. Green Synth. Catal. 2022, 3, 117–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sweet, J.S.; Knipe, P.C. Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of C-N Atropisomeric Heterobiaryls. Synthesis 2022, 54, 2119–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rodriguez-Salamanca, P.R.; Fernández, R.; Hornillos, V.; Lassaletta, J.M. Asymmetric Synthesis of Axially Chiral C-N Atropisomers. Chem. Eur. J. 2022, 28, e202104442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mei, G.-J.; Koay, W.-L.; Guan, C.-Y.; Lu, Y. Atropisomers beyond the C–C axial chirality: Advances in catalytic asymmetric synthesis. Chem 2022, 8, 1855–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kitagawa, O.; Kohriyama, M.; Taguchi, T. Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis of Optically Active Atropisomeric Anilides through Enantioselective N-Allylation with Chiral Pd-tol-BINAP Catalyst. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 8682–8684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kitagawa, O.; Takahashi, M.; Yoshikawa, M.; Taguchi, T. Efficient Synthesis of Optically Active Atropisomeric Anilides through Catalytic Asymmetric N-Arylation Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3676–3677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ototake, N.; Morimoto, Y.; Mokuya, A.; Fukaya, H.; Shida, Y.; Kitagawa, O. Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of Atropisomeric Indoles Having an N-C Chiral Axis. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 6752–6755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Deur, C.; Agrawal, A.K.; Baum, H.; Booth, J.; Bove, S.; Brieland, J.; Bunker, A.; Connolly, C.; Cornicelli, J.; Dumin, J.; et al. N-(6,7-dichloro-2,3-dioxo-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoxalin-5-yl)-N-alkylsulfonamides as peripherally restricted N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists for the treatment of pain. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 4599–4603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, P.; Lanza, T.J., Jr.; Chioda, M.; Jones, C.; Chobanian, H.R.; Guo, Y.; Chang, L.; Kelly, T.M.; Kan, Y.; Palyha, O.; et al. Discovery of Benzodiazepine Sulfonamide-Based Bombesin Receptor Subtype 3 Agonists and Their Unusual Chirality. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 933–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yoneda, T.; Tabata, H.; Nakagomi, J.; Tasaka, T.; Oshitari, T.; Takahashi, H.; Natsugari, H. N-Benzoyl- and N-Sulfonyl-1,5-benzodiazepines: Comparison of Their Atropisomeric and Conformational Properties. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 5717–5727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Farand, J.; Mai, N.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Newby, Z.E.; Veldhuizen, J.V.; Loyer-Drew, J.; Venkataramani, C.; Guerreo, J.; Kwon, A.; Li, N.; et al. Selectivity switch between FAK and Pyk2: Macrocyclization of FAK inhibitors improves Pyk2 potency. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 5926–5930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kikuchi, Y.; Nakamura, C.; Matsuoka, M.; Asami, R.; Kitagawa, O. Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of N–C Axially Chiral Sulfonamides through Chiral Palladium-Catalyzed N-Allylation. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 8112–8120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lu, S.; Ng, S.V.H.; Lovato, K.; Ong, J.-Y.; Poh, S.B.; Ng, X.Q.; Kürti, L.; Zhao, Y. Practical access to axially chiral sulfonamides and biaryl amino phenols via organocatalytic atroposelective N-alkylation. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Li, D.; Wang, S.; Ge, S.; Dong, S.; Feng, X. Asymmetric Synthesis of Axially Chiral Anilides via Organocatalytic Atroposelective N-Acylation. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 5331–5336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ong, J.-Y.; Ng, X.-Q.; Lu, S.; Zhao, Y. Isothiourea-Catalyzed Atroposelective N-Acylation of Sulfonamides. Org. Lett. 2020, 22, 6447–6451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gao, Z.; Yan, C.-X.; Qian, J.; Yang, H.; Zhou, P.; Zhang, J.; Jiang, G. Enantioselective Synthesis of Axially Chiral Sulfonamides via Atroposelective Hydroamination of Allenes. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 6931–6938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xiao, X.; Lu, Y.-J.; Tian, H.-Y.; Zhou, H.-J.; Li, J.-W.; Yao, Y.-P.; Ke, M.; Chen, F.-E. Organocatalytic atroposelective N-alkylation: Divergent synthesis of axially chiral sulfonamides and biaryl amino phenols. Org. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 2830–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, P.; Huang, Y.; Jing, J.; Wang, F.; Li, X. Rhodium(III)-Catalyzed Atroposelective Synthesis of C–N Axially Chiral Naphthylamines and Variants via C–H Activation. Org. Lett. 2022, 24, 2531–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Qin, J.; Zhou, T.; Zhou, T.; Tang, L.; Zuo, H.; Yu, H.; Wu, G.; Wu, Y.; Liao, R.-Z.; Zhong, F. Catalytic Atroposelective Electrophilic Amination of Indoles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 60, e2022205159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sawamura, M.; Nagata, H.; Sakamoto, H.; Ito, Y. Chiral phosphine ligands modified by crown ethers: An application to palladium-catalyzed asymmetric allylation of .beta.-diketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 2586–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Trost, B.M.; Van Vranken, D.L. Asymmetric Transition Metal-Catalyzed Allylic Alkylations. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 395–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Williams, J.M. The Ups and Downs of Allylpalladium Complexes in Catalysis. Synlett 1996, 1996, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Trost, B.M.; Crawley, M.L. Asymmetric transition-metal-catalyzed allylic alkylations: Applications in total synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2921–2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Trost, B.M. Metal Catalyzed Allylic Alkylation: Its Development in the Trost Laboratories. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 5708–5733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Kitagawa, O.; Yotsumoto, K.; Kohriyama, M.; Dobashi, Y.; Taguchi, T. Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of vicinal diamine derivatives through enantioselective N-allylation using chiral π-allyl Pd-catalyst. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3605–3607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Snell, R.H.; Durbin, M.J.; Woodward, R.L.; Willis, M.C. Catalytic Enantioselective Desymmetrisation as a Tool for the Synthesis of Hodgkinsine and Hodgkinsine B. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 16754–16764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Terauchi, J.; Curran, D.P. N-Allylation of anilides with chiral palladium catalysts: The first catalytic asymmetric synthesis of axially chiral anilides. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2003, 14, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Y.; Feng, X.; Du, H. Asymmetric synthesis of axially chiral anilides by Pd-catalyzed allylic substitutions with P/olefin ligands. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Luo, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, W.; Peng, Y.; Wang, C.; Yu, T.; Cheng, S.; Li, J.; He, Y.; Gan, C.; et al. Inherently Chiral 6,7-Diphenyldibenzo[e,g][1,4]diazocine: Enantioselective Synthesis and Application as a Ligand Platform. CCS Chem. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Flack, H.D.; Bernardinelli, G. Reporting and evaluating absolute-structure and absolute-configuration determinations. J. Appl. Cryst. 2000, 33, 1143–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Flack, H.D. Absolute-structure determination: Past, present and future. Chimia 2014, 68, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Trost, B.M.; Machacek, M.R.; Aponick, A. Predicting the stereochemistry of diphenylphosphino benzoic acid (DPPBA)-based palladium-catalyzed asymmetric allylic alkylation reactions: A working model. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 38, 747–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Butts, C.P.; Filali, E.; Lloyd-Jones, G.C.; Norrby, P.-O.; Sale, D.A.; Schramm, Y. Structure-Based Rationale for Selectivity in the Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation of Cycloalkenyl Esters Employing the Trost ‘Standard Ligand’ (TSL): Isolation, Analysis and Alkylation of the Monomeric form of the Cationic η3-Cyclohexenyl Complex [(η3-c-C6H9)Pd(TSL)]+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9945–9957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Harned, A.M. From determination of enantiopurity to the construction of complex molecules: The Horeau principle and its application in synthesis. Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 3797–3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Z.-S.; Xie, P.-P.; Hua, Y.; Wu, C.; Ma, Y.; Chen, J.; Cheng, H.-G.; Hong, X.; Zhou, Q. An axial-to-axial chirality transfer strategy for atroposelective construction of C–N axial chirality. Chem 2021, 7, 1917–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, P.; Wang, X.-M.; Xu, Q.; Guo, C.-Q.; Wang, P.; Lu, C.-J.; Liu, R.-R. Enantioselective Synthesis of Atropisomeric Biaryls by Pd-Catalyzed Asymmetric Buchwald–Hartwig Amination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 21718–21722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Barmettler, P.; Hensen, H.-J. Acid-Catalyzed [3,3]-Sigmatropic Rearrangements of N-Propargylanilines. Helv. Chim. Acta 1990, 73, 1515–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ezquerra, J.; Pedregal, C.; Lamas, C.; Barluenga, J.; Pérez, M.; Garcia-Martin, M.A.; González, J.M. Efficient Reagents for the Synthesis of 5-, 7-, and 5,7-Substituted Indoles Starting from Aromatic Amines: Scope and Limitations. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 5804–5812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT-Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Adv. 2015, A71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C Struct. Chem. 2015, C71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Scheme 1. Catalytic enantioselective synthesis of various N-C axially chiral compounds IIII.
Scheme 1. Catalytic enantioselective synthesis of various N-C axially chiral compounds IIII.
Molecules 27 07819 sch001
Scheme 2. Catalytic enantioselective synthesis of N-C axially chiral N-(2,6-disubstituted-phenyl)sulfonamides 2 though chiral Pd-catalyzed N-allylation.
Scheme 2. Catalytic enantioselective synthesis of N-C axially chiral N-(2,6-disubstituted-phenyl)sulfonamides 2 though chiral Pd-catalyzed N-allylation.
Molecules 27 07819 sch002
Figure 1. X-ray single crystal structure of 2o (major enantiomer).
Figure 1. X-ray single crystal structure of 2o (major enantiomer).
Molecules 27 07819 g001
Figure 2. Origin of enantioselectivity in N-allylation with (S,S)-Trost ligand.
Figure 2. Origin of enantioselectivity in N-allylation with (S,S)-Trost ligand.
Molecules 27 07819 g002
Figure 3. Rotational stability of several sulfonamides bearing ortho-substituents.
Figure 3. Rotational stability of several sulfonamides bearing ortho-substituents.
Molecules 27 07819 g003
Scheme 3. Enantioselective double N-allylation with bis-sulfonamide substrate 4.
Scheme 3. Enantioselective double N-allylation with bis-sulfonamide substrate 4.
Molecules 27 07819 sch003
Scheme 4. Product distribution based on Horeau principle in double asymmetric reaction.
Scheme 4. Product distribution based on Horeau principle in double asymmetric reaction.
Molecules 27 07819 sch004
Table 1. Enantioselective N-allylation of secondary sulfonamides 1 bearing various 2,6-disubstituted-phenyl groups.
Table 1. Enantioselective N-allylation of secondary sulfonamides 1 bearing various 2,6-disubstituted-phenyl groups.
Molecules 27 07819 i001
Entry1R1R2R3Time (h)2Yield (%)ee (%)
11at-BuMeH212a5810
21bIC6H5Me272b1043
31cBrC6H5Me102c9738
41dIMeMe62d9465
51eMe(E)-PhCH=CHMe242e9165
61fI4-MeC6H4-C≡CMe52f8273
71gBr4-MeC6H4-C≡CMe72gquant72
81hCl4-MeC6H4-C≡CH52h9579
91iMe4-MeC6H4-C≡CMe62i8886
10 a1iMe4-MeC6H4-C≡CMe62i7972
11 b1iMe4-MeC6H4-C≡CMe62i6987
a (S,S)-DACH Trost ligand was used. b (S,S)-DACH naphthyl Trost ligand was used.
Table 2. Substituent effect on alkynyl group in enantioselective N-allylation.
Table 2. Substituent effect on alkynyl group in enantioselective N-allylation.
Molecules 27 07819 i002
Entry1RTime (h)2Yield (%)ee (%)
11i4-MeC6H462i8886
21j4-MeOC6H4232j9888
31kC6H5212k9289
41lMe3Si92l7075
51mCH3(CH2)3252m9677
Table 3. Substituent effect on sulfonyl group in enantioselective N-allylation.
Table 3. Substituent effect on sulfonyl group in enantioselective N-allylation.
Molecules 27 07819 i003
Entry1R1R2Time (h)2Yield (%)ee (%)
11i4-MeC6H4Me62i8886
21n4-MeOC6H4Me222n8885
31o4-NO2C6H4Me62oquant89
41p4-NO2C6H4H72p9892
51qC6H5H72qquant86
61rMeMe62r7887
71s2,4,6-Me3C6H2Me232s8563
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fukasawa, S.; Toyoda, T.; Kasahara, R.; Nakamura, C.; Kikuchi, Y.; Hori, A.; Richards, G.J.; Kitagawa, O. Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of N-C Axially Chiral N-(2,6-Disubstituted-phenyl)sulfonamides through Chiral Pd-Catalyzed N-Allylation. Molecules 2022, 27, 7819. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27227819

AMA Style

Fukasawa S, Toyoda T, Kasahara R, Nakamura C, Kikuchi Y, Hori A, Richards GJ, Kitagawa O. Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of N-C Axially Chiral N-(2,6-Disubstituted-phenyl)sulfonamides through Chiral Pd-Catalyzed N-Allylation. Molecules. 2022; 27(22):7819. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27227819

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fukasawa, Sota, Tatsuya Toyoda, Ryohei Kasahara, Chisato Nakamura, Yuuki Kikuchi, Akiko Hori, Gary J. Richards, and Osamu Kitagawa. 2022. "Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of N-C Axially Chiral N-(2,6-Disubstituted-phenyl)sulfonamides through Chiral Pd-Catalyzed N-Allylation" Molecules 27, no. 22: 7819. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27227819

APA Style

Fukasawa, S., Toyoda, T., Kasahara, R., Nakamura, C., Kikuchi, Y., Hori, A., Richards, G. J., & Kitagawa, O. (2022). Catalytic Enantioselective Synthesis of N-C Axially Chiral N-(2,6-Disubstituted-phenyl)sulfonamides through Chiral Pd-Catalyzed N-Allylation. Molecules, 27(22), 7819. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27227819

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop