Next Article in Journal
Identification of Antidiabetic Compounds from the Aqueous Extract of Sclerocarya birrea Leaves
Previous Article in Journal
pH as a Key Factor for the Quality Assurance of the Preparation of Gastrodiae Rhizoma Formula Granules
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 22
10.3390/molecules27228093
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biotechnology and In Vitro Culture as an Alternative System for Secondary Metabolite Production

by
Marouane Mohaddab
1,
Younes El Goumi
2,
Monica Gallo
3,*,
Domenico Montesano
4,
Gokhan Zengin
5,
Abdelhakim Bouyahya
6,* and
Malika Fakiri
1
1
Laboratory of Agrifood and Health, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Hassan First University of Settat, BP 577, Settat 26000, Morocco
2
Polyyvalent Team in R&D, Higher School of Technology of Fkih Ben Salah, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, USMS, Beni Mellal 23000, Morocco
3
Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples Federico II, via Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
4
Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy
5
Department of Biology, Science Faculty, Selcuk University, Konya 42130, Turkey
6
Laboratory of Human Pathologies Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10106, Morocco
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(22), 8093; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228093
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 15 November 2022 / Accepted: 16 November 2022 / Published: 21 November 2022
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Medicinal plants are rich sources of bioactive compounds widely used as medicaments, food additives, perfumes, and agrochemicals. These secondary compounds are produced under stress conditions to carry out physiological tasks in plants. Secondary metabolites have a complex chemical structure with pharmacological properties. The widespread use of these metabolites in a lot of industrial sectors has raised the need to increase the production of secondary metabolites. Biotechnological methods of cell culture allow the conservation of plants, as well as the improvement of metabolite biosynthesis and the possibility to modify the synthesis pathways. The objective of this review is to outline the applications of different in vitro culture systems with previously reported relevant examples for the optimal production of plant-derived secondary metabolites.

1. Introduction

Plants can synthesize chemical compounds either as primary or secondary metabolites according to their biosynthetic pathways and their functions. The primary metabolites ensure the vital function of the plant. However, the process of secondary metabolites is not directly involved in plant growth and development. Even so, they have major roles in interactions with the environment as a means of defense and adaptation to environmental conditions [1].
The biosynthesis of secondary metabolites is based on geographical area, genetics, climate, and environmental conditions [2]. Under plant growth conditions, many secondary metabolites are amassed in distinct sites (vacuoles, specialized glands, trichomes, and sometimes only during certain developmental stages) to enable functional flexibility under the impact of environmental factors without influencing the cellular and physiological developmental pathways [3]. Indeed, these substances have high values for humans as pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, and cosmetics, making them targets for metabolic engineering [4]. Phytochemical investigations have identified an arsenal of secondary metabolites such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, nitrogen compounds, and terpenes [5,6].
The therapeutic effects of plants have been known since time immemorial [7]. These molecules, which are made by plants, are now utilized by the pharmaceutical industry from used vegetable raw materials [8,9]. While secondary metabolites exhibit various biological properties [10,11,12,13], their distribution is very limited compared to primary metabolites. Many of these compounds occur in very low quantities in nature [14,15], necessitating massive harvesting. This over-harvesting can threaten the biodiversity of the plants from which these secondary metabolites originate.
Biotechnological approaches can be considered a key and powerful substitute in the production of secondary metabolites coming from medicinal plants to support industrial production and reduce the overexploitation of natural resources [16]. However, cell, tissue, and plant organ culture techniques have been used for the production of these natural substances [17]. In this regard, effort has been made towards optimizing the culture conditions for the production of secondary metabolites, as well as manipulating the synthesis of these phytoconstituents through the application of different technological approaches including cell line selection, elicitation, and precursor feeding [18]. These efforts have been carried out to increase secondary metabolite production to meet the demand of the pharmaceutical industry and to conserve natural sources [18,19,20,21,22].
Several extraction methods can be applied, depending on the physicochemical nature of these compounds of interest [23]. These methods can be conventional or modern. Conventional methods are generally based on the extraction potential of the different solvents used before applying heat to them and/or mixing the solvents to obtain bioactive compounds, such as Soxhlet extraction, maceration, and hydrodistillation [24,25,26], while modern extraction techniques allow for shorter extraction time and reduced solvent consumption [27]. New extraction methods, including ultrasonic-assisted extraction [28,29,30], supercritical fluid extraction [29,30,31], and accelerated solvent extraction [32], are fast and efficient for extracting chemicals from plant matrices. In addition, in situ extraction is considered an efficient method to recover secondary metabolites; moreover, it allows both to improve the yield of the product and to orient the secondary metabolite pathway’s in vitro culture system [33,34,35]. As the results revealed, the use of perfluorodecalin in the in situ extraction system improved the performance of the cells’ culture as well as increased the production of targeted molecules [36,37]. The choice of an appropriate extraction method should be an essential consideration depending on the study objective, as the process of the extraction may fully influence the chemical composition and therefore the biological activity of the extract [38].
Plant extracts constitute a mixture of bioactive or phytochemical compounds of several polarities, and their separation is an important challenge that leads to identification and characterization processes [39]. In general, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography (GC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) or nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) are widely used to characterize and quantify secondary metabolites in plant extracts.
For a long time, herbal treatments have been widely used for primary healthcare needs. Through time, and with progress in the field of pharmacopy, synthetic drugs have gradually started to be used instead of natural drugs, regardless of the side effects of the synthetic components [40]. Moreover, these natural products have lower hydrophobicity and higher stereochemical content than synthetic products [41]. Structural features of natural compounds can be effectively incorporated into synthetic drugs to increase chemical diversity, and molecular complicity is an important feature for drugs [42], as molecular complexity has been correlated with biological activity [43]. Indeed, in recent years, approval of synthetic drugs has declined substantially [40,43]. So far, many successes have been registered in the discovery of new active molecules in natural compounds. Some of these molecules have become medicines or new paths of inspiration in finding new ones [44]. On the other hand, medicinal plants and their natural products are still the best pharmaceutical lead and offer an opportunity to discover new structures effective in a variety of human diseases [38,44]. However, such property may threaten the biodiversity of these medicinal plants due to overexploitation and unsustainable harvesting techniques [45].
In addition, plant biotechnology has offered alternative ways to access and explore this chemical diversity through different in vitro culture techniques to produce natural products for the pharmaceutical industries [46,47,48]. The cell culture technique can be used as a platform for the production of high-value secondary compounds [46,48,49,50]. Different biotechnology approaches represent a beneficial alternative for the production of secondary metabolites under highly controlled conditions [51,52]. Therefore, in vitro culture techniques such as plant organ culture provide plant material as a source of natural products [38]. Multiple strategies using cell culture systems have been widely studied in the context of improving the production and manipulating the flow of the biosynthesis of desired secondary metabolites [46,53].
Plant cell and tissue culture offer an opportunity for the propagation of plants as well as the production of phytochemicals [54]. Many plant species can be regenerated in vitro through several approaches started by explants. Any part of the plant, such as meristems, nodes, leaves, stems, roots, buds, embryos, etc., can be used for a limitless multiplication of a plant and the production of bioactive compounds under sterile conditions [48,55,56,57]. Due to its various advantages, in vitro culture has been used as a powerful strategy for the production of secondary metabolites [22,58]. In this review, we highlight biotechnological approaches as promising strategies for the synthesis and improve secondary metabolites in medicinal plants.

2. Plant Secondary Metabolites

Plant Secondary metabolites (PSMs) are low-weight molecules synthesized by the plant to protect itself against potential enemies, including pathogens and herbivore attacks. Even abiotic factors can affect the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites [59,60].
Due to their excellent biological activity, PSMs have been broadly used for centuries as an important resource for traditional medicine, perfumes, and industrial raw materials [61]. Subsequently, they have been widely applied as valuable compounds such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and bio-pesticides [4,51,61,62]. PSMs have contributed greatly to the importance and commercial values of plants [63].
Phytochemical studies have identified an arsenal of secondary compounds such as flavonoids, phenols, nitrogen compounds, and terpenes [5,6]. The more detailed biosynthetic pathways of these metabolites are beyond the scope of this review. Thus, a preview of the various biosynthetic pathways is represented in Figure 1.

3. Micropropagation as a Tool for the Production of Secondary Metabolites

Micropropagation is the reproduction of plants in vitro which leads to the multiplication of genetically identical copies of the parent plant asexually. Micropropagation offers the possibility of producing a limitless number of plants. Currently, this technique is applied for clone selection and rapid biomass production in several organizations or establishments for the large-scale production of higher plants.
In vitro propagation has become a crucial method for the mass production of medicinal plants and various protocols of the micropropagation of numerous medicinal species that have been successfully achieved either by organogenesis [64,65,66,67,68] or by somatic embryogenesis [69,70,71]. The micropropagation of many medicinal species has been revealed to be similar and with a little variation in their phytochemical content [72].
Organogenesis is a micropropagation way that consists in the development of organs derived from cells or tissues. Plant regeneration through organogenesis involves specifically the induction and development of a shoot from an explant which is then transferred to a different medium for root induction [73]. Several studies have demonstrated that a successful application of organogenesis on medicinal plants can be achieved by the correct establishment of the medium components and the selection of an adequate explant under highly controlled conditions (Table 1).
Somatic cells can produce somatic embryos, which are similar to zygotic embryos, through a process called somatic embryogenesis. These somatic embryos can be developed into seedlings in an appropriate medium [81]. Plant regeneration via embryogenesis occurs in two steps: the callus is grown on an auxin-rich embryogenic induction medium, sometimes combined with cytokinins, and is then transferred to an auxin-free medium, which results in the formation of mature embryos [82]. The embryonic-like structure can be produced either directly on the explant or indirectly from the callus or cell suspension culture (Table 2). This technique has also allowed genetic, morphological, and physiological manipulations to be performed [83].
Micropropagation could be an attractive commercial activity for the production of high-quality plants and offers advantages over conventional propagation practices [88]. Thus, in vitro propagation is a sustainable alternative to the large-scale production of medicinal species with economic value. Castilho et al. [80] allowed the use of an automated micropropagation system using bioreactors for industrial plant propagation as a possible way to reduce micropropagation costs [89]. This can provide a means of supplying plant material capable of providing plant material that is able to produce phytocompounds [19,38,48,90] throughout the year without seasonal constraints [16].

4. The Importance of Cell and Suspension Culture in the Production of Plant Secondary Metabolites

The evolution of biotechnology, in particular plant cell culture methods, should provide new means for the commercialization of plants and their chemical compounds. These new technologies will expand and enhance the use of plants as valuable resources of pharmaceutical compounds. Plant cell cultures have attracted considerable interest in the industrialization of secondary metabolite production [91,92].
In vitro production of secondary metabolites requires the aggregation of cell biomass for the synthesis of secondary metabolites [93]. Under in vitro conditions, plant cells that induce callus formation through a high concentration of auxins or with the coordination of auxin and cytokinin are frequently used [46]. Subsequently, callus can be used to develop a suspension culture for the production of secondary metabolites [20,22,94]. In addition, the immobilization of the cell system of hairy root plants is an efficient technique to produce relevant bioactive compounds [34,35].
Plant cells, as defense mechanisms, produce secondary metabolites [16]. In this light, the strategy to improve the synthesis of secondary metabolites, elicitation, is through the application of agents that trigger the defense response. Hence, there have been several authors who have illustrated the application of elicitors to enhance the production of secondary metabolites [95,96,97,98,99]. Similarly, plant growth regulators are known for their ability to regulate the production of secondary metabolites [100,101,102]. Several studies confirmed that phytohormones increase the production of secondary metabolites [101,103,104] (Table 3).
The in vitro culture of a Fritillaria unibracteata bulb by [120] confirmed that the growth rate of the in vitro culture was faster than under natural conditions. The alkaloid and microelement content of the in vitro cultured bulbs were higher compared to the wild bulbs. Moreover, for the in vitro culture of Clinacanthus nutans leaves, [121] remarked that the phenolic content and antioxidant activities were improved. Moreover, fungal elicitors have been used to improve the production of secondary metabolites in Hybanthusenneaspermus [122]. Furthermore, a cell suspension culture inclusion of α-Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) and Kinetin (KIN) from Eysenhardtiaplatycarpa showed a significant biomass accumulation, as well as the dichloromethane extracts of the suspension which contains phenolic components and flavonoids with remarkable antifungal activity [112]. Phyllanthusol A was produced by callus culture in MS medium with NAA and BA [115]. Indeed, [117] remarked that callus can accumulate the same secondary metabolites (53 metabolites were identified) produced in the leaves (47 compounds in leaf extracts) of Rosmarinus officinalis.

5. Bioreactors: System for Large-Scale Production

The synthesis of secondary metabolites through in vitro culture has led to the concept of bioreactors for the large-scale production of natural compounds in recent years [50,123,124]. Moreover, bioreactors are autonomous systems that have a sterile environment, control, and which provide homogeneous culture conditions in terms of pH, aeration and temperature, and agitation, as well as liquid and air inlet and outlet channels for the massive multiplication of cells, tissues, or somatic embryos [125,126]. Reviews published [127,128,129] contain schematics of different types of bioreactors. Therefore, Bioreactors are engineered systems that can support the biological condition and aim of the realization of aerobic or anaerobic biochemical processes. This means that bioreactors can replace the conventional methods of in vitro culture [130,131].
Bioreactor culture has led to the production of many products such as shikonin, a rich reddish-purple pigment used in lipsticks [132], ginsenosides used as additives and bleaching substances [53,133], paclitaxel (as well as the anti-cancer drug) [134], and in food applications [135]. In addition, bioreactor production has been reported by several authors [136,137,138,139,140,141,142].
Panax Ginseng suspension culture in the bioreactor enhanced biomass accumulation as well as ginsenosides (5.4 mg/g) [136]. Similarly, ginseng culture treated with salicylic acid led to an accumulation in total phenolic (62%), flavonoids (88%), and ascorbic acid (55%) [142]. Somatic embryos can be grown in bioreactors as a source of raw materials since they can accumulate secondary metabolites [141]. The cultivation of adventitious roots of Hypericum perforatum in a bubble bioreactor containing MS half-strength medium with 0.1 mg/L Kn and 1 mg/L IBA accumulated total phenolics (35.01 mg/g DW), flavonoids (0.97 mg/g DW), and hypericin (1.389 mg/g DW) [143]. The highest production of flavonoids from Gynuraprocumbens was obtained in the temporary immersion bioreactors under the combined treatment of 15 min immersion frequency every 12 h in MS medium with IAA and BA [144]. In vitro shoot culture of Verbena officinalis was grown in temporary immersion bioreactors complemented with 4.92 µM IBA and produced large amounts of biomass with increased levels of essential oils [128,137]. Single-use bioreactors are suitable systems to increase and control the microenvironment culture. In this approach, the hairy root culture of Ringeragraeca, supported by the WAVE 25 bioreactor system, exhibited a strong increase in fresh biomass (more than 800%) and a very high yield of naphthoquinone (Wierzchowski). Moreover, the culture of the cambial meristematic cells of O. basilicum in wave-mixed disposable bioreactors was shown to produce the highest yield of triterpenoids (oleanolic acid = 3.02 ± 0.76 mg/(l × d) and ursolic acid = 4.79 ± 0.48 mg/(l × d)), 1.75-times higher than the shake [130].
Thus, bioreactors could improve the efficiency of the process for more valuable plant-derived products and lead to a new wave of industrial production.

6. Elicitation of In Vitro Products

The use of substances that trigger the defense response of plants and cells in vitro culture is considered an excellent biotechnological method for the production of secondary compounds [16,145]. An elicitor is defined as a factor or element that, once introduced or modified in an in vitro culture, increases the biosynthetic capacity of secondary metabolites [98]. Generally, there are two types of elicitors: biotic and abiotic. Both of them have been well detailed in several reviews [56,95,98,146,147,148,149,150].
Adding an eliciting agent can improve the production of the secondary metabolites of medicinal plants by in vitro culture. Many fields can use this approach, which allows the production of high-value bioactive compounds such as pharmaceuticals, food, and cosmetics [151]. The quantity and quality of the obtained metabolites can be greatly influenced by various parameters such as the nature of the elicitor, its concentration, and the exposure time, Table 4 [152,153,154,155,156,157,158].
Abiotic elicitors have wide effects on the production of secondary metabolites [159]. For example, Chavan et al. [160] reported that the application of jasmonic acid (75 µM) in callus cultures in Salacia chinensis improved the total phenolic, flavonoid, and mangiferin contents for the same application, which revealed the highest antioxidant potential. Moreover, Mahendran et al. [161] documented that Gymnemasylvestre cell suspension culture with 20 μM sodium nitroprusside treatments revealed the highest accumulation of deacylgymnic acid and XVII gymnemic acid. Furthermore, the cultivation of Carum copticum under salt stress enhanced the phenolic content accumulation and antioxidant activity [162]. Similarly, elicitation with nanoparticles could enhance the production of the secondary metabolites of Fagonia indica in callus cultures [163]. In the suspension culture of Lonicera japonica Thun, a combination of 200 μM methyl jasmonate, 50 μM salicylic acid, and 2 h d-1 Ultraviolet B radiation, improved the synthesis of the chlorogenic acids and showed a high antioxidant capacity compared to untreated control and field-grown buds [164]. Açıkgöz, [165] demonstrated the stimulatory effects of CdCl2 and AgNO3 on the accumulation of bioactive components in Ocimum basilicum cell suspension cultures.
Biological substances such as polysaccharides and microbial compounds can be used as biotic elicitors [159]. In the callus cultures of Lepidium sativum, the application of chitosan (250 mg/L) increased the concentration of lepidin and total phenolic compounds by 19.87 times compared to the control value [166]. Elicitation by chitosan in Silybum marianum cell suspension increased the production of silymarin and revealed high antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities [167]. Furthermore, Farhadi et al.’s [168] cell suspension culture of Corylus avellana with a fungal elicitor application enhanced the biosynthesis of paclitaxel. Treatment with an aqueous extract of Spirulina platensis increased the production of linalool in Lavandula officinalis [169]. Yeast extract increased chicoric and rosmarinic acid content in suspension cultures of Ocimum basilicum [165]. Salehi et al. [170] reported the positive effects of fungal elicitors on paclitaxel production in the cell suspension culture of Corylus avellana. Moreover, [171] reported that introducing elicitors from endophytic fungi (Chaetomium sp.) into a culture of adventitious roots of Panax ginseng had a significant increase in ginsenosides (56.29 mg/g) relative to the controls (17.56 mg/g).
Further studies on the elicitation of hairy root cultures [172,173,174,175,176] highlighted the potential to produce higher amounts of secondary metabolites. Hashemi and Naghavi [172] demonstrated elicitation in the hairy root culture of Papverorientale with methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid, which resulted in the regulation of the expression of genes in the morphine pathway; moreover, the elicitation of methyl jasmonate (MJ) improved the synthesis of thebaine (3.08 mg/g), morphine (5.38 mg/g) and codeine (2.57 mg/g). Moreover, the results demonstrated that the elicitation by chitosan (200 mg/L) in the hairy culture of Psammosilenetunicoides a produced a 4.55-fold increase in total saponin accumulation for nine days, and that the yields of quillaic acid, gypsogenin, and gypsogenin-3-O-β-D-glucuronopyranoside were significantly increased after the chitosan treatments.
Table
Table 4. Some application of abiotic and biotic elicitors in the production of plant secondary metabolites.
Table 4. Some application of abiotic and biotic elicitors in the production of plant secondary metabolites.
Plant Species Elicitor Factor Culture System Product Key Findings References
Abiotic elicitors
Chelidonium majusMethyl jasmonate (MJ)
Salicylic acid (SA)		Cell suspension cultureChelidonine, sanguinarineElicitation stimulated the expression of genes in the benzophenanthridine alkaloid biosynthetic pathway.[177]
OcimumbasilicumCopper oxide (CuO)Callus cultureRosmarinic acid, chicoric acid, eugenolElicitation by nanoparticles stimulated the biosynthesis of the secondary metabolite.[178]
OcimumbasilicumSalicylic acid (SA) + light regimesCallus cultureRosmarinic acid, chicoricacid, cyanidin, peonidinContinuous light with SA increased the content of phenolic compounds and flavonoids, also antioxidant activity.[178]
Coelogyne ovalisSalicylic acid (SA)Tissue cultureFlavonoids, anthocyanins, phenolic compoundsElicitation stimulates chalcone synthase expression and secondary metabolites production.[179]
Papaver orientaleMethyl jasmonate (MJ), salicylic acid (SA)Hairy
root culture		Thebaine, morphine, codeineExpression of morphinan biosynthetic genes was significantly upregulated with MJ and SA.
MJ and SA elicitation enhanced thebaine, morphine, and codeine biosynthesis.		[172]
Crocus sativusUltrasonic wavesCell suspension cultureSafranal, crocinUltrasonic treatment acted as an effective mechanical stimulus on the production of secondary metabolites in suspension cultures.[180]
GymnemasylvestreSodium nitroprusside (SNP)Cell suspension cultureDeacylgymnemic acid, gymnemagenin, gymnemic acid XVIISignificant improvement in the content of gymnemic acids in cell suspension cultures of G. sylvestre.[161]
Momordica charantiaSilver nanoparticles (AgNPs)Cell suspension cultureHydroxybenzoic, hydroxycinnamicThe significant increase in bioactive compounds as well as pharmacological activities was enhanced by the application of elicitation.[181]
Biotic elicitors
Corylus avellanaChaetommiuglobosumCell suspension culturesPaclitaxelIncreased extracellular portion of paclitaxel (44.0%).[170]
Bletilla striataByssochlamys spectabilisTissue cultureTotal phenolic contentIncreased total phenolic compounds.[182]
Panax ginsengAspergillus nigerAdventitious root cultureGinsenosidesA. Niger triggered the defense response of plants and enhanced the accumulation of nitric oxide (NO), SA, and JA.
Significantly upregulated the gene expression of terpenoid biosynthesis.		[183]
Panax ginsengAlternaria panaxAdventitious root cultureGinsenosidesNitric oxide (NO), putrescine (Put), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are involved in regulating ginsenoside synthesis in fungal elicitor-treated Adventitious root of P. ginseng.[184]
TrichosanthescucumerinaChitosanCallus and suspension cultureBryonolic acidCallus and suspension cultures presented higher levels of Bryonolic acid than the natural roots ones.[185]
PsammosilenetunicoidesChitosanHairy
root culture		Quillaic acid, gypsogenin, gypsogenin 3-O-β-D-glucuronopyranosideChitosan elicitor promotes triterpenoid saponin biosynthesis by enhancing antioxidant activities and differential gene expression.[175]
Iberis amaraChitosanCell suspension cultureTotal phenol, flavonoid, flavonol, anthocyaninChitosan elicitor promotes phenolic compounds’ biosynthesis without genetic modifications in medicinal herbs.[186]
Plumbago zeylanicaChitosan and yeast extractRoot callusPlumbaginIncrease of 12.08-fold plumbagin content compared to control.[187]

7. Conclusions and Perspectives

Medicinal plants represent an impressive reservoir of bioactive compounds with several pharmacological properties. Biotechnological approaches and in vitro culture constitute a precious, sustainable, and ecological alternative for the production of these bioactive compounds to reduce the use of chemically synthetic compounds while decreasing the overexploitation of natural resources. In this respect, the synthesis of secondary metabolites by in vitro culture has experienced several successes in a variety of culture systems. The industrial production of secondary metabolites is not totally developed because of the low yields of the compounds targeted. Furthermore, the biosynthetic pathways of secondary metabolites are not fully characterized, nor is the epigenetic control of the biosynthesis of these compounds in long-term culture [188]. However, further studies are required to comprehend the biosynthetic pathways and the epigenetic mechanisms that regulate the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites to guarantee targeted production with a high and stable yield of the secondary compounds wanted.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Harborne, J.B. Classes and Functions of Secondary Products from Plants. Chem. Plants 1999, 26, 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aboukhalid, K.; Lamiri, A.; Agacka-Moldoch, M.; Doroszewska, T.; Douaik, A.; Bakha, M.; Casanova, J.; Tomi, F.; Machon, N.; Faiz, C.A. Chemical Polymorphism of Origanum Compactum Grown in All Natural Habitats in Morocco. Chem. Biodivers. 2016, 13, 1126–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, W.-C.; Bao, H.-Y.; Liu, Y.-Y.; Nie, Y.-Y.; Yang, J.-M.; Hong, P.-Z.; Zhang, Y. Depsidone Derivatives and a Cyclopeptide Produced by Marine Fungus Aspergillus unguis under Chemical Induction and by Its Plasma Induced Mutant. Molecules 2018, 23, 2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Nasri, H.; Baradaran, A.; Shirzad, H.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M. New Concepts in Nutraceuticals as Alternative for Pharmaceuticals. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2014, 5, 1487. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Elazzouzi, H.; Soro, A.; Elhilali, F.; Bentayeb, A.; El Belghiti, M.A.; Zair, T. Phytochemical Study of Anacyclus pyrethrum (L.) of Middle Atlas (Morocco), and in Vitro Study of Antibacterial Activity of Pyrethrum. Adv. Nat. Appl. Sci. 2014, 8, 131–141. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kikowska, M.; Thiem, B.; Szopa, A.; Ekiert, H. Accumulation of Valuable Secondary Metabolites: Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids in Different in Vitro Systems of Shoot Cultures of the Endangered Plant Species-Eryngium alpinum L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020, 141, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gurib-Fakim, A. Medicinal Plants: Traditions of Yesterday and Drugs of Tomorrow. Mol. Asp. Med. 2006, 27, 1–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Isah, T. Anticancer Alkaloids from Trees: Development into Drugs. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2016, 10, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Park, S.-Y.; Paek, K.-Y. Bioreactor Culture of Shoots and Somatic Embryos of Medicinal Plants for Production of Bioactive Compounds. Prod. Biomass Bioact. Compd. Using Bioreact. Technol. 2014, 3, 337–368. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bourgaud, F.; Gravot, A.; Milesi, S.; Gontier, E. Production of Plant Secondary Metabolites: A Historical Perspective. Plant Sci. 2001, 161, 839–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bouyahya, A.; Abrini, J.; Bakri, Y.; Dakka, N. Essential Oils as Anticancer Agents: News on Mode of Action. Phytothérapie 2016, 146, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bouyahya, A.; Guaouguaou, F.-E.; El Omari, N.; El Menyiy, N.; Balahbib, A.; El-Shazly, M.; Bakri, Y. Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Properties of Moroccan Medicinal Plants: Phytochemistry, in Vitro and in Vivo Investigations, Mechanism Insights, Clinical Evidences and Perspectives. J. Pharm. Anal. 2021, 12, 35–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bouyahya, A.; El Omari, N.; Elmenyiy, N.; Guaouguaou, F.-E.; Balahbib, A.; Belmehdi, O.; Salhi, N.; Imtara, H.; Mrabti, H.N.; El-Shazly, M. Moroccan Antidiabetic Medicinal Plants: Ethnobotanical Studies, Phytochemical Bioactive Compounds, Preclinical Investigations, Toxicological Validations and Clinical Evidences; Challenges, Guidance and Perspectives for Future Management of Diabetes Worldwide. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 115, 147–254. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bulugahapitiya, V.P. Plants Based Natural Products; University of Ruhuna: Fribourg, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, Q.-W.; Lin, L.-G.; Ye, W.-C. Techniques for Extraction and Isolation of Natural Products: A Comprehensive Review. Chin. Med. 2018, 13, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Isah, T.; Umar, S.; Mujib, A.; Sharma, M.P.; Rajasekharan, P.E.; Zafar, N.; Frukh, A. Secondary Metabolism of Pharmaceuticals in the Plant in Vitro Cultures: Strategies, Approaches, and Limitations to Achieving Higher Yield. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2018, 132, 239–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nalawade, S.M.; Tsay, H.-S. In Vitro Propagation of Some Important Chinese Medicinal Plants and Their Sustainable Usage. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2004, 40, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gaosheng, H.; Jingming, J. Production of Useful Secondary Metabolites through Regulation of Biosynthetic Pathway in Cell and Tissue Suspension Culture of Medicinal Plants. Recent Adv. Plant Vitr. Cult. 2012, 10, 53038. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gonçalves, S.; Romano, A. Production of Plant Secondary Metabolites by Using Biotechnological Tools. In Secondary Metabolites—Sources and Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 81–99. [Google Scholar]
  20. Guerriero, G.; Berni, R.; Muñoz-Sanchez, J.A.; Apone, F.; Abdel-Salam, E.M.; Qahtan, A.A.; Alatar, A.A.; Cantini, C.; Cai, G.; Hausman, J.-F. Production of Plant Secondary Metabolites: Examples, Tips and Suggestions for Biotechnologists. Genes 2018, 9, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Mulabagal, V.; Tsay, H.-S. Plant Cell Cultures-an Alternative and Efficient Source for the Production of Biologically Important Secondary Metabolites. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. 2004, 2, 29–48. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yue, W.; Ming, Q.; Lin, B.; Rahman, K.; Zheng, C.-J.; Han, T.; Qin, L. Medicinal Plant Cell Suspension Cultures: Pharmaceutical Applications and High-Yielding Strategies for the Desired Secondary Metabolites. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 36, 215–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yahya, N.A.; Attan, N.; Wahab, R.A. An Overview of Cosmeceutically Relevant Plant Extracts and Strategies for Extraction of Plant-Based Bioactive Compounds. Food Bioprod. Process. 2018, 112, 69–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Azmir, J.; Zaidul, I.S.M.; Rahman, M.M.; Sharif, K.M.; Mohamed, A.; Sahena, F.; Jahurul, M.H.A.; Ghafoor, K.; Norulaini, N.A.N.; Omar, A.K.M. Techniques for Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Plant Materials: A Review. J. Food Eng. 2013, 117, 426–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Azwanida, N.N. A Review on the Extraction Methods Use in Medicinal Plants, Principle, Strength and Limitation. Med. Aromat Plants 2015, 4, 1000196. [Google Scholar]
  26. Belwal, T.; Ezzat, S.M.; Rastrelli, L.; Bhatt, I.D.; Daglia, M.; Baldi, A.; Devkota, H.P.; Orhan, I.E.; Patra, J.K.; Das, G. A Critical Analysis of Extraction Techniques Used for Botanicals: Trends, Priorities, Industrial Uses and Optimization Strategies. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2018, 100, 82–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jovanović, A.A.; DJordjević, V.B.; Zdunić, G.M.; Pljevljakušić, D.S.; Šavikin, K.P.; Godjevac, D.M.; Bugarski, B.M. Optimization of the Extraction Process of Polyphenols from Thymus serpyllum L. Herb Using Maceration, Heat-and Ultrasound-Assisted Techniques. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 179, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Dzah, C.S.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wen, C.; Zhang, J.; Chen, G.; Ma, H. The Effects of Ultrasound Assisted Extraction on Yield, Antioxidant, Anticancer and Antimicrobial Activity of Polyphenol Extracts: A Review. Food Biosci. 2020, 35, 100547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Haloui, I.; Meniai, A.-H. Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Essential Oil from Algerian Argan (Argania spinosa L.) Seeds and Yield Optimization. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 12912–12919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Meireles, M.A.A. Supercritical Extraction from Solid: Process Design Data (2001–2003). Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2003, 7, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Souza, M.A.; Guzatti, J.G.; Martello, R.H.; Schindler, M.S.; Calisto, J.F.; Morgan, L.V.; Aguiar, G.P.; Locateli, G.; Scapinello, J.; Müller, L.G. Supercritical CO2 Extraction of Aloysia Gratissima Leaves and Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory Activity. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2020, 159, 104753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rahmalia, W.; Fabre, J.-F.; Mouloungui, Z. Effects of Cyclohexane/Acetone Ratio on Bixin Extraction Yield by Accelerated Solvent Extraction Method. Procedia Chem. 2015, 14, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Halder, M.; Sarkar, S.; Jha, S. Elicitation: A Biotechnological Tool for Enhanced Production of Secondary Metabolites in Hairy Root Cultures. Eng. Life Sci. 2019, 19, 880–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kawka, M.; Bubko, I.; Koronkiewicz, M.; Gruber-Bzura, B.; Graikou, K.; Chinou, I.; Jeziorek, M.; Pietrosiuk, A.; Syklowska-Baranek, K. Polyurethane Foam Rafts Supported in Vitro Cultures of Rindera Graeca Roots for Enhanced Production of Rinderol, Potent Proapoptotic Naphthoquinone Compound. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 23, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nowak, B.; Kawka, M.; Wierzchowski, K.; Syklowska-Baranek, K.; Pilarek, M. MTMS-Based Aerogel Constructs for Immobilization of Plant Hairy Roots: Effects on Proliferation of Rindera Graeca Biomass and Extracellular Secretion of Naphthoquinones. J. Funct. Biomater. 2021, 12, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Syklowska-Baranek, K.; Rymaszewski, W.; Gawel, M.; Rokicki, P.; Pilarek, M.; Grech-Baran, M.; Hennig, J.; Pietrosiuk, A. Comparison of Elicitor-Based Effects on Metabolic Responses of Taxus× Media Hairy Roots in Perfluorodecalin-Supported Two-Phase Culture System. Plant Cell Rep. 2019, 38, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Syklowska-Baranek, K.; Pilarek, M.; Cichosz, M.; Pietrosiuk, A. Liquid Perfluorodecalin Application for in Situ Extraction and Enhanced Naphthoquinones Production in Arnebia Euchroma Cell Suspension Cultures. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 172, 2618–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Atanasov, A.G.; Waltenberger, B.; Pferschy-Wenzig, E.-M.; Linder, T.; Wawrosch, C.; Uhrin, P.; Temml, V.; Wang, L.; Schwaiger, S.; Heiss, E.H. Discovery and Resupply of Pharmacologically Active Plant-Derived Natural Products: A Review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1582–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Oladimeji, A.V.; Valan, M.F. HPLC Techniques for Phytochemistry. IJCS 2020, 8, 2590–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nisar, B.; Sultan, A.; Rubab, S.L. Comparison of Medicinally Important Natural Products versus Synthetic Drugs-a Short Commentary. Nat. Prod. Chem. Res 2018, 6, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stratton, C.F.; Newman, D.J.; Tan, D.S. Cheminformatic Comparison of Approved Drugs from Natural Product versus Synthetic Origins. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 4802–4807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Hann, M.M.; Leach, A.R.; Harper, G. Molecular Complexity and Its Impact on the Probability of Finding Leads for Drug Discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 856–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Selzer, P.; Roth, H.-J.; Ertl, P.; Schuffenhauer, A. Complex Molecules: Do They Add Value? Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs from 1981 to 2014. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 629–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Cordell, G.A. Sustainable Medicines and Global Health Care. Planta Med. 2011, 77, 1129–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Efferth, T. Biotechnology Applications of Plant Callus Cultures. Engineering 2019, 5, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lautie, E.; Russo, O.; Ducrot, P.; Boutin, J.A. Unraveling Plant Natural Chemical Diversity for Drug Discovery Purposes. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ochoa-Villarreal, M.; Howat, S.; Hong, S.; Jang, M.O.; Jin, Y.-W.; Lee, E.-K.; Loake, G.J. Plant Cell Culture Strategies for the Production of Natural Products. BMB Rep. 2016, 49, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Chandran, H.; Meena, M.; Barupal, T.; Sharma, K. Plant Tissue Culture as a Perpetual Source for Production of Industrially Important Bioactive Compounds. Biotechnol. Rep. 2020, 26, e00450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Eibl, R.; Meier, P.; Stutz, I.; Schildberger, D.; Hühn, T.; Eibl, D. Plant Cell Culture Technology in the Cosmetics and Food Industries: Current State and Future Trends. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 8661–8675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Alamgir, A.N.M. Cultivation of Herbal Drugs, Biotechnology, and in Vitro Production of Secondary Metabolites, High-Value Medicinal Plants, Herbal Wealth, and Herbal Trade. In Therapeutic Use of Medicinal Plants and Their Extracts: Volume 1; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 379–452. [Google Scholar]
  52. Tasheva, K.; Kosturkova, G. Role of Biotechnology for Protection of Endangered Medicinal Plants. In Environmental Biotechnology—New Approaches and Prospective Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2013; pp. 235–238. [Google Scholar]
  53. Vanisree, M.; Lee, C.-Y.; Lo, S.-F.; Nalawade, S.M.; Lin, C.Y.; Tsay, H.-S. Studies on the Production of Some Important Secondary Metabolites from Medicinal Plants by Plant Tissue Cultures. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin 2004, 45, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sood, H. Production of Medicinal Compounds from Endangered and Commercially Important Medicinal Plants through Cell and Tissue Culture Technology for Herbal Industry. In Bioactive Compounds in Nutraceutical and Functional Food for Good Human Health; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  55. Davoodi, A.; Khoshvishkaie, E.; Azadbakht, M. Plant Cells Technology as an Effective Biotechnological Approach for High Scale Production of Pharmaceutical Natural Compounds; A Meta-Analysis Study. Pharm. Biomed. Res. 2019, 5, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Karuppusamy, S. A Review on Trends in Production of Secondary Metabolites from Higher Plants by in Vitro Tissue, Organ and Cell Cultures. J. Med. Plants Res. 2009, 3, 1222–1239. [Google Scholar]
  57. Rao, S.R.; Ravishankar, G.A. Plant Cell Cultures: Chemical Factories of Secondary Metabolites. Biotechnol. Adv. 2002, 20, 101–153. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  58. Kolewe, M.E.; Gaurav, V.; Roberts, S.C. Pharmaceutically Active Natural Product Synthesis and Supply via Plant Cell Culture Technology. Mol. Pharm. 2008, 5, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Khare, S.; Singh, N.B.; Singh, A.; Hussain, I.; Niharika, K.; Yadav, V.; Bano, C.; Yadav, R.K.; Amist, N. Plant Secondary Metabolites Synthesis and Their Regulations under Biotic and Abiotic Constraints. J. Plant Biol. 2020, 63, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Olivoto, T.; Nardino, M.; Carvalho, I.R.; Follmann, D.N.; Szareski, V.J.; Ferrari, M.; de Pelegrin, A.J.; de Souza, V.Q. Plant Secondary Metabolites and Its Dynamical Systems of Induction in Response to Environmental Factors: A Review. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2017, 12, 71–84. [Google Scholar]
  61. Balandrin, M.F.; Klocke, J.A. Medicinal, Aromatic, and Industrial Materials from Plants. In Medicinal and Aromatic Plants I; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1988; pp. 3–36. [Google Scholar]
  62. Phillipson, J.D. Plants as source of valuable products. In Secondary Products from Plant Tissue Culture; Charlwood, B.V., Rhodes, M.J.C., Eds.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1990; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  63. Santos-Sánchez, N.F.; Salas-Coronado, R.; Hernández-Carlos, B.; Villanueva-Cañongo, C. Shikimic Acid Pathway in Biosynthesis of Phenolic Compounds. In Plant Physiological Aspects of Phenolic Compounds; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  64. Arumugam, G.; Sinniah, U.R.; Swamy, M.K.; Lynch, P.T. Micropropagation and Essential Oil Characterization of Plectranthus Amboinicus (Lour.) Sprengel, an Aromatic Medicinal Plant. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2020, 56, 491–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Galán-Ávila, A.; García-Fortea, E.; Prohens, J.; Herraiz, F.J. Development of a Direct in Vitro Plant Regeneration Protocol From Cannabis sativa L. Seedling Explants: Developmental Morphology of Shoot Regeneration and Ploidy Level of Regenerated Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Singh, D.K.; Nirwan, S.; Babbar, S.B. Micropropagation of Anacyclus Pyrethrum and Chemical Profiling of the Regenerated Plants for Pellitorine, the Active Principle. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2015, 122, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sottile, F.; Giuggioli, N.R.; Marinoni, D.T.; Peano, C.; Del Signore, M.B. Selection and Micropropagation of Valuable Caper Genotypes. Hortic. Sci. 2020, 47, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wróbel, T.; Dreger, M.; Wielgus, K.; Slomski, R. Modified Nodal Cuttings and Shoot Tips Protocol for Rapid Regeneration of Cannabis sativa L. J. Nat. Fibers 2020, 19, 536–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bayarmaa, G.-A.; Lee, N.N.; Kang, H.D.; Oyuntsetseg, B.; Moon, H.K. Micropropagation of the Mongolian Medicinal Plant Zygophyllum Potaninii via Somatic Embryogenesis. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2018, 12, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bertero, V.G.; Beznec, A.; Faccio, P.; Auteri, M.; Arteaga, M.; Bonafede, M.; Bossio, E. High-Efficiency Direct Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration from Leaf Base Explants of “Peperina” (Minthostachys Verticillata). Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2020, 56, 915–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lema-Rumińska, J.; Kulus, D.; Tymoszuk, A.; Varejão, J.M.; Bahcevandziev, K. Profile of Secondary Metabolites and Genetic Stability Analysis in New Lines of Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench Micropropagated via Somatic Embryogenesis. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 142, 111851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yamada, Y.; Shoyama, Y.; Nishioka, I.; Kohda, H.; Namera, A.; Okamoto, T. Clonal Micropropagation of Gentiana Scabra Bunge Var. Buergeri Maxim. and Examination of the Homogeneity Concerning the Gentiopicroside Content. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1991, 39, 204–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Siahsar, B.; Rahimi, M.; Tavassoli, A.; Raissi, A. Application of Biotechnology in Production of Medicinal Plants. Am. Eurasian J. Agric Environ. Sci. 2011, 11, 439–444. [Google Scholar]
  74. Zahid, N.A.; Jaafar, H.Z.; Hakiman, M. Micropropagation of Ginger (Zingiber Officinale Roscoe)‘Bentong’and Evaluation of Its Secondary Metabolites and Antioxidant Activities Compared with the Conventionally Propagated Plant. Plants 2021, 10, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Al Khateeb, W.; Kanaan, R.; El-Elimat, T.; Alu’datt, M.; Lahham, J.; El-Oqlah, A. In Vitro Propagation, Genetic Stability, and Secondary Metabolite Analysis of Wild Lavender (Lavandula Coronopifolia Poir.). Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2017, 58, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Devrnja, N.; Krstić-Milošević, D.; Janošević, D.; Tešević, V.; Vinterhalter, B.; Savić, J.; Ćalić, D. In Vitro Cultivation of Tansy (Tanacetum vulgare L.): A Tool for the Production of Potent Pharmaceutical Agents. Protoplasma 2021, 258, 587–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lata, H.; Chandra, S.; Techen, N.; Khan, I.A.; ElSohly, M.A. In Vitro Mass Propagation of Cannabis sativa L.: A Protocol Refinement Using Novel Aromatic Cytokinin Meta-Topolin and the Assessment of Eco-Physiological, Biochemical and Genetic Fidelity of Micropropagated Plants. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2016, 3, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Muraseva, D.S.; Kostikova, V.A. In Vitro Propagation of Spiraea Betulifolia Subsp. Aemiliana (Rosaceae) and Comparative Analysis of Phenolic Compounds of Microclones and Intact Plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2021, 144, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Erişen, S.; Kurt-Gür, G.; Servi, H. In Vitro Propagation of Salvia sclarea L. by Meta-Topolin, and Assessment of Genetic Stability and Secondary Metabolite Profiling of Micropropagated Plants. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 157, 112892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Castilho, C.V.; Leitão, S.G.; Silva, V.D.; Miranda, C.d.O.; Santos, M.C.d.S.; Bizzo, H.R.; da Silva, N.C. In Vitro Propagation of a Carvacrol-Producing Type of Lippia Origanoides Kunth: A Promising Oregano-like Herb. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 130, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zimmerman, J.L. Somatic Embryogenesis: A Model for Early Development in Higher Plants. Plant Cell 1993, 5, 1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Razdan, M.K. Introduction To Plant Tissue Culture, 2/E; Oxford and IBH Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  83. Sharma, S.; Rathi, N.; Kamal, B.; Pundir, D.; Kaur, B.; Arya, S. Conservation of Biodiversity of Highly Important Medicinal Plants of India through Tissue Culture Technology-a Review. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2010, 1, 827–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sharma, R.K.; Khajuria, A.K. Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration in Ferula Jaeschkeana Vatke: A Threatened Medicinal Herb. Vegetos 2020, 33, 658–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Soliman, H.I.; Abo-El-Hasan, F.M.; Ayman, S.; Mabrouk, Y.M. Influence of Plant Growth Regulators on Somatic Embryogenesis Induction in Seriphidium Herba-Album. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 3, 264401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Kulus, D.; Tymoszuk, A. Induction of Callogenesis, Organogenesis, and Embryogenesis in Non-Meristematic Explants of Bleeding Heart and Evaluation of Chemical Diversity of Key Metabolites from Callus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bhusare, B.P.; John, C.K.; Bhatt, V.P.; Nikam, T.D. Induction of Somatic Embryogenesis in Leaf and Root Explants of Digitalis Lanata Ehrh.: Direct and Indirect Method. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 130, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Debnath, M.; Malik, C.P.; Bisen, P.S. Micropropagation: A Tool for the Production of High Quality Plant-Based Medicines. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2006, 7, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Paek, K.Y.; Chakrabarty, D.; Hahn, E.J. Application of Bioreactor Systems for Large Scale Production of Horticultural and Medicinal Plants. In Liquid Culture Systems for In Vitro Plant Propagation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 95–116. [Google Scholar]
  90. Espinosa-Leal, C.A.; Puente-Garza, C.A.; García-Lara, S. In Vitro Plant Tissue Culture: Means for Production of Biological Active Compounds. Planta 2018, 248, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. DiCosmo, F.; Misawa, M. Plant Cell and Tissue Culture: Alternatives for Metabolite Production. Biotechnol. Adv. 1995, 13, 425–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Georgiev, M.I.; Weber, J.; Maciuk, A. Bioprocessing of Plant Cell Cultures for Mass Production of Targeted Compounds. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 83, 809–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Murthy, H.N.; Lee, E.-J.; Paek, K.-Y. Production of Secondary Metabolites from Cell and Organ Cultures: Strategies and Approaches for Biomass Improvement and Metabolite Accumulation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2014, 118, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wu, C.-F.; Karioti, A.; Rohr, D.; Bilia, A.R.; Efferth, T. Production of Rosmarinic Acid and Salvianolic Acid B from Callus Culture of Salvia Miltiorrhiza with Cytotoxicity towards Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells. Food Chem. 2016, 201, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Akula, R.; Ravishankar, G.A. Influence of Abiotic Stress Signals on Secondary Metabolites in Plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1720–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Anusha, T.S.; Joseph, M.V.; Elyas, K.K. Callus Induction and Elicitation of Total Phenolics in Callus Cell Suspension Culture of Celastrus Paniculatus–Willd, an Endangered Medicinal Plant in India. Pharmacogn. J. 2016, 8, 471–475. [Google Scholar]
  97. Khan, T.; Khan, T.; Hano, C.; Abbasi, B.H. Effects of Chitosan and Salicylic Acid on the Production of Pharmacologically Attractive Secondary Metabolites in Callus Cultures of Fagonia Indica. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 129, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Namdeo, A.G. Plant Cell Elicitation for Production of Secondary Metabolites: A Review. Pharm. Rev. 2007, 1, 69–79. [Google Scholar]
  99. Sharma, M.; Ahuja, A.; Gupta, R.; Mallubhotla, S. Enhanced Bacoside Production in Shoot Cultures of Bacopa Monnieri under the Influence of Abiotic Elicitors. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 745–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Dörnenburg, H.; Knorr, D. Strategies for the Improvement of Secondary Metabolite Production in Plant Cell Cultures. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1995, 17, 674–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jamwal, K.; Bhattacharya, S.; Puri, S. Plant Growth Regulator Mediated Consequences of Secondary Metabolites in Medicinal Plants. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2018, 9, 26–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Monfort, L.E.F.; Bertolucci, S.K.V.; Lima, A.F.; de Carvalho, A.A.; Mohammed, A.; Blank, A.F.; Pinto, J.E.B.P. Effects of Plant Growth Regulators, Different Culture Media and Strength MS on Production of Volatile Fraction Composition in Shoot Cultures of Ocimum Basilicum. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 116, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Azeez, H.A.; Ibrahim, K.M. Hypericum Triquetrifolium Callus Cultures a Potential Source of Phenolics and Flavonoids. JZS-Part A Spec. Issue 2014, 16, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Karalija, E.; Paric, A. The Effect of BA and IBA on the Secondary Metabolite Production by Shoot Culture of Thymus vulgaris L. Biol. Nyssana 2011, 2, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  105. Sánchez-Ramos, M.; Alvarez, L.; Romero-Estrada, A.; Bernabé-Antonio, A.; Marquina-Bahena, S.; Cruz-Sosa, F. Establishment of a Cell Suspension Culture of Ageratina Pichinchensis (Kunth) for the Improved Production of Anti-Inflammatory Compounds. Plants 2020, 9, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Bulchandani, N.; Shekhawat, G.S. Salicylic Acid Mediated up Regulation of Carvone Biosynthesis during Growth Phase in Cell Suspension Cultures of Anethum Graveolens. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Ardianto, C.; Khotib, J.; Purwanto, D.A.; Muslihatin, W. Production of the Secondary Metabolite Catechin by in Vitro Cultures of Camellia sinensis L. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2020, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kianersi, F.; Abdollahi, M.R.; Mirzaie-asl, A.; Dastan, D.; Rasheed, F. Biosynthesis of Rutin Changes in Capparis Spinosa Due to Altered Expression of Its Pathway Genes under Elicitors’ Supplementation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2020, 141, 619–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ali, A.; Mohammad, S.; Khan, M.A.; Raja, N.I.; Arif, M.; Kamil, A.; Mashwani, Z.-R. Silver Nanoparticles Elicited in Vitro Callus Cultures for Accumulation of Biomass and Secondary Metabolites in Caralluma Tuberculata. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2019, 47, 715–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Roat, C.; Ramawat, K.G. Elicitor-Induced Accumulation of Stilbenes in Cell Suspension Cultures of Cayratia trifolia (L.) Domin. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2009, 3, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Abd Alhady, M.R.A.A.; Abo El-Fadl, R.E.-S.; Hegazi, G.A.E.-M.; Desoukey, S.Y. In Vitro Production of Some Secondary Metabolites from Cupressus Sempervirens. J. Adv. Biomed. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 3, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Bernabé-Antonio, A.; Sánchez-Sánchez, A.; Romero-Estrada, A.; Meza-Contreras, J.C.; Silva-Guzmán, J.A.; Fuentes-Talavera, F.J.; Hurtado-Díaz, I.; Alvarez, L.; Cruz-Sosa, F. Establishment of a Cell Suspension Culture of Eysenhardtia Platycarpa: Phytochemical Screening of Extracts and Evaluation of Antifungal Activity. Plants 2021, 10, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. El-Ashry, A.A.E.-L.; Gabr, A.M.M.; Arafa, N.M.; El-Bahr, M.K. Rutin Accumulation in Gardenia Calli Cultures as a Response to Phenyl Alanine and Salicylic Acid. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2019, 43, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Chodisetti, B.; Rao, K.; Gandi, S.; Giri, A. Gymnemic Acid Enhancement in the Suspension Cultures of Gymnema Sylvestre by Using the Signaling Molecules—Methyl Jasmonate and Salicylic Acid. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2015, 51, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Duangporn, P.; Siripong, P. Effect of Auxin and Cytokinin on Phyllanthusol A Production by Callus Cultures of Phyllanthus Acidus Skeels. Am.-Eurasian J Agric Env. Sci 2009, 5, 258–263. [Google Scholar]
  116. Arya, D.; Patni, V.; Kant, U. In Vitro Propagation and Quercetin Quantification in Callus Cultures of Rasna (Pluchea Lanceolata Oliver & Hiern.). Indian J. Biotechnol. 2008, 7, 383–387. [Google Scholar]
  117. Pérez-Mendoza, M.B.; Llorens-Escobar, L.; Vanegas-Espinoza, P.E.; Cifuentes, A.; Ibáñez, E.; Villar-Martínez, A.A.D. Chemical Characterization of Leaves and Calli Extracts of Rosmarinus Officinalis by UHPLC-MS. Electrophoresis 2020, 41, 1776–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Açıkgöz, M.A. Effects of Sorbitol on the Production of Phenolic Compounds and Terpenoids in the Cell Suspension Cultures of Ocimum basilicum L. Biologia 2021, 76, 395–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Najhah, M.Y.; Jaafar, H.Z.; Nakasha, J.J.; Hakiman, M. Shoot Multiplication and Callus Induction of Labisia Pumila Var. Alata as Influenced by Different Plant Growth Regulators Treatments and Its Polyphenolic Activities Compared with the Wild Plant. Molecules 2021, 26, 3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Gao, S.L.; Zhu, D.N.; Cai, Z.H.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, D.R. Organ Culture of a Precious Chinese Medicinal Plant–Fritillaria Unibracteata. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1999, 59, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Haida, Z.; Nakasha, J.J.; Hakiman, M. In Vitro Responses of Plant Growth Factors on Growth, Yield, Phenolics Content and Antioxidant Activities of Clinacanthus Nutans (Sabah Snake Grass). Plants 2020, 9, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Velayutham, P.; Karthi, C. GC-MS Profile of in Vivo, in Vitro and Fungal Elicited in Vitro Leaves of Hybanthus enneaspermus (L.) F. Muell. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 7, 260–267. [Google Scholar]
  123. Panda, A.K.; Mishra, S.; Bisaria, V.S.; Bhojwani, S.S. Plant Cell Reactors—A Perspective. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1989, 11, 386–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Tanaka, H. Technological Problems in Cultivation of Plant Cells at High Density. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2000, 67, 775–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Pilarek, M.; Sobieszuk, P.; Wierzchowski, K.; Dąbkowska, K. Impact of Operating Parameters on Values of a Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient in a Single-Use Bioreactor with Wave-Induced Agitation. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2018, 136, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Stiles, A.R.; Liu, C.-Z. Hairy Root Culture: Bioreactor Design and Process Intensification. Biotechnol. Hairy Root Syst. 2013, 134, 91–114. [Google Scholar]
  127. Eibl, R.; Eibl, D. Design of Bioreactors Suitable for Plant Cell and Tissue Cultures. Phytochem. Rev. 2008, 7, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Eibl-Schindler, R.; Löffelholz, C.; Eibl, D. Single-Use Bioreactors: An Overview. Single-Use Technol. Biopharm. Manuf. 2011, 4, 145–158. [Google Scholar]
  129. Mamun, N.H.; Egertsdotter, U.; Aidun, C.K. Bioreactor Technology for Clonal Propagation of Plants and Metabolite Production. Front. Biol. 2015, 10, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Mehring, A.; Haffelder, J.; Chodorski, J.; Stiefelmaier, J.; Strieth, D.; Ulber, R. Establishment and Triterpenoid Production of Ocimum Basilicum Cambial Meristematic Cells. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2020, 143, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Valdiani, A.; Hansen, O.K.; Nielsen, U.B.; Johannsen, V.K.; Shariat, M.; Georgiev, M.I.; Omidvar, V.; Ebrahimi, M.; Tavakoli Dinanai, E.; Abiri, R. Bioreactor-Based Advances in Plant Tissue and Cell Culture: Challenges and Prospects. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2019, 39, 20–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Kreis, W.; Baron, D.; Stoll, G. Biotechnologie Der Arzneistoffe: Grundlagen Und Anwendungen; Deutscher Apotheker Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  133. Hibino, K.; Ushiyama, K. Commercial Production of Ginseng by Plant Tissue Culture Technology. In Plant Cell and Tissue Culture for the Production of Food Ingredients; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1999; pp. 215–224. [Google Scholar]
  134. Wink, M.; Alfermann, A.W.; Franke, R.; Wetterauer, B.; Distl, M.; Windhövel, J.; Krohn, O.; Fuss, E.; Garden, H.; Mohagheghzadeh, A. Sustainable Bioproduction of Phytochemicals by Plant in Vitro Cultures: Anticancer Agents. Plant Genet. Resour. 2005, 3, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ritala, A.; Heiniö, R.; Häkkinen, S.T.; Lille, M.; Hyytiäinen-Pabst, T.; Rischer, H. Tailoring Sensory Properties of Plant Cell Cultures for Food Use. Food Res. Int. 2022, 157, 111440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Jeong, C.S.; Murthy, H.N.; Hahn, E.J.; Lee, H.L.; Paek, K.Y. Inoculum Size and Auxin Concentration Influence the Growth of Adventitious Roots and Accumulation of Ginsenosides in Suspension Cultures of Ginseng (Panax Ginseng CA Meyer). Acta Physiol. Plant. 2009, 31, 219–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kokotkiewicz, A.; Zabiegala, B.; Kubica, P.; Szopa, A.; Bucinski, A.; Ekiert, H.; Luczkiewicz, M. Accumulation of Volatile Constituents in Agar and Bioreactor Shoot Cultures of Verbena officinalis L. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2021, 144, 671–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Saadah, I.N.; Kristanti, A.N.; Hardjo, P.H.; Manuhara, Y.S.W. Shoots Culture of Gynura Procumbens (Lour.) Merr. in Balloon-Type Bubble-Bioreactor Influenced by Sucrose Concentration and Inoculums Density. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2019, 18, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Savitha, B.C.; Thimmaraju, R.; Bhagyalakshmi, N.; Ravishankar, G.A. Different Biotic and Abiotic Elicitors Influence Betalain Production in Hairy Root Cultures of Beta Vulgaris in Shake-Flask and Bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2006, 41, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Suresh, B.; Thimmaraju, R.; Bhagyalakshmi, N.; Ravishankar, G.A. Polyamine and Methyl Jasmonate-Influenced Enhancement of Betalaine Production in Hairy Root Cultures of Beta Vulgaris Grown in a Bubble Column Reactor and Studies on Efflux of Pigments. Process Biochem. 2004, 39, 2091–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Shohael, A.M.; Chakrabarty, D.; Yu, K.W.; Hahn, E.J.; Paek, K.Y. Application of Bioreactor System for Large-Scale Production of Eleutherococcus Sessiliflorus Somatic Embryos in an Air-Lift Bioreactor and Production of Eleutherosides. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 120, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Ali, M.B.; Hahn, E.-J.; Paek, K.-Y. Methyl Jasmonate and Salicylic Acid Induced Oxidative Stress and Accumulation of Phenolics in Panax Ginseng Bioreactor Root Suspension Cultures. Molecules 2007, 12, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Cui, X.-H.; Chakrabarty, D.; Lee, E.-J.; Paek, K.-Y. Production of Adventitious Roots and Secondary Metabolites by Hypericum perforatum L. in a Bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4708–4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Pramita, A.D.; Kristanti, A.N.; Utami, E.S.W.; Manuhara, Y.S.W. Production of Biomass and Flavonoid of Gynura Procumbens (Lour.) Merr Shoots Culture in Temporary Immersion System. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 639–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Ramirez-Estrada, K.; Vidal-Limon, H.; Hidalgo, D.; Moyano, E.; Golenioswki, M.; Cusidó, R.M.; Palazon, J. Elicitation, an Effective Strategy for the Biotechnological Production of Bioactive High-Added Value Compounds in Plant Cell Factories. Molecules 2016, 21, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Chamkhi, I.; Benali, T.; Aanniz, T.; Elmenyiy, N.; Guaouguaou, F.-E.; El Omari, N.; El-Shazly, M.; Zengin, G.; Bouyahya, A. Plant-Microbial Interaction: The Mechanism and the Application of Microbial Elicitor Induced Secondary Metabolites Biosynthesis in Medicinal Plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 269–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Gorelick, J.; Bernstein, N. Elicitation: An Underutilized Tool in the Development of Medicinal Plants as a Source of Therapeutic Secondary Metabolites. Adv. Agron. 2014, 124, 201–230. [Google Scholar]
  148. Malook, S.U.; Maqbool, S.; Hafeez, M.; Karunarathna, S.C.; Suwannarach, N. Molecular and Biochemical Mechanisms of Elicitors in Pest Resistance. Life. 2022, 12, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Saha, S.; Pal, D. Elicitor Signal Transduction Leading to the Production of Plant Secondary Metabolites. In Bioactive Natural Products for Pharmaceutical Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  150. Thakur, M.; Bhattacharya, S.; Khosla, P.K.; Puri, S. Improving Production of Plant Secondary Metabolites through Biotic and Abiotic Elicitation. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants 2019, 12, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Bhaskar, R.; Xavier, L.S.E.; Udayakumaran, G.; Kumar, D.S.; Venkatesh, R.; Nagella, P. Biotic Elicitors: A Boon for the In Vitro Production of Plant Secondary Metabolites. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2021, 5, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ahmad, N.; Rab, A.; Ahmad, N. Light-Induced Biochemical Variations in Secondary Metabolite Production and Antioxidant Activity in Callus Cultures of Stevia Rebaudiana (Bert). J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2016, 154, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Al-Khayri, J.M.; Naik, P.M. Elicitor-Induced Production of Biomass and Pharmaceutical Phenolic Compounds in Cell Suspension Culture of Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). Molecules 2020, 25, 4669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Allah Shoja, A.; Ganjeali, A. Stimulation of Phenolic Compounds Accumulation and Antioxidant Activity in In Vitro Culture of Salvia Tebesana Bunge in Response to Nano-TiO2 and Methyl Jasmonate Elicitors. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2021, 149, 423–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Giri, C.C.; Zaheer, M. Chemical Elicitors versus Secondary Metabolite Production in Vitro Using Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cultures: Recent Trends and a Sky Eye View Appraisal. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2016, 126, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kamarul Zaman, M.A.; Azzeme, A.M.; Ramle, I.K.; Normanshah, N.; Ramli, S.N.; Shaharuddin, N.A.; Ahmad, S.; Abdullah, S.N.A. Induction, Multiplication, and Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity of Polyalthia Bullata Callus, a Woody Medicinal Plant. Plants 2020, 9, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Kapoor, S.; Raghuvanshi, R.; Bhardwaj, P.; Sood, H.; Saxena, S.; Chaurasia, O.P. Influence of Light Quality on Growth, Secondary Metabolites Production and Antioxidant Activity in Callus Culture of Rhodiola Imbricata Edgew. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 2018, 183, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Lamaoui, M.; Chakhchar, A.; Benlaouane, R.; El Kharrassi, Y.; Farissi, M.; Wahbi, S.; El Modafar, C. Uprising the Antioxidant Power of Argania spinosa L. Callus through Abiotic Elicitation. Comptes Rendus Biol. 2019, 342, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Naik, P.M.; Al-Khayri, J.M. Abiotic and Biotic Elicitors–Role in Secondary Metabolites Production through in Vitro Culture of Medicinal Plants. In Abiotic Biot. Stress Plants Recent Adv. Future Perspectives; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016; pp. 247–277. [Google Scholar]
  160. Chavan, J.J.; Kshirsagar, P.R.; Jadhav, S.G.; Nalavade, V.M.; Gurme, S.T.; Pai, S.R. Elicitor-Mediated Enhancement of Biomass, Polyphenols, Mangiferin Production and Antioxidant Activities in Callus Cultures of Salacia chinensis L. 3 Biotech 2021, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Mahendran, G.; Iqbal, Z.; Kumar, D.; Verma, S.K.; Rout, P.K.; ur Rahman, L. Enhanced Gymnemic Acids Production in Cell Suspension Cultures of Gymnema Sylvestre (Retz.) R. Br. Ex Sm. through Elicitation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 162, 113234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Razavizadeh, R.; Adabavazeh, F.; Komatsu, S. Chitosan Effects on the Elevation of Essential Oils and Antioxidant Activity of Carum copticum L. Seedlings and Callus Cultures under in Vitro Salt Stress. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Khan, A.U.; Khan, T.; Khan, M.A.; Nadhman, A.; Aasim, M.; Khan, N.Z.; Ali, W.; Nazir, N.; Zahoor, M. Iron-Doped Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles-Triggered Elicitation of Important Phenolic Compounds in Cell Cultures of Fagonia Indica. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2021, 147, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Du, L.; Li, D.; Zhang, J.; Du, J.; Luo, Q.; Xiong, J. Elicitation of Lonicera Japonica Thunb Suspension Cell for Enhancement of Secondary Metabolites and Antioxidant Activity. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 156, 112877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Açıkgöz, M.A. Establishment of Cell Suspension Cultures of Ocimum basilicum L. and Enhanced Production of Pharmaceutical Active Ingredients. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 148, 112278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Bakhtiari, M.A.; Golkar, P. The Effects of Callus Elicitation on Lepidine, Phenolic Content, and Antioxidant Activity of Lepidium Sativum L.: Chitosan and Gibberellic Acid. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 3, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Shah, M.; Jan, H.; Drouet, S.; Tungmunnithum, D.; Shirazi, J.H.; Hano, C.; Abbasi, B.H. Chitosan Elicitation Impacts Flavonolignan Biosynthesis in Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn Cell Suspension and Enhances Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Cell Extracts. Molecules 2021, 26, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Farhadi, S.; Moieni, A.; Safaie, N.; Sabet, M.S.; Salehi, M. Fungal Cell Wall and Methyl-β–Cyclodextrin Synergistically Enhance Paclitaxel Biosynthesis and Secretion in Corylus Avellana Cell Suspension Culture. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  169. El Sherif, F.; Albotnoor, N.; Yap, Y.-K.; Meligy, A.; Khattab, S. Enhanced Bioactive Compounds Composition in Lavandula Officinalis In-Vitro Plantlets Using NaCl and Moringa Oleifera, Aloe Vera and Spirulina Platensis Extracts. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 157, 112890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Salehi, B.; Ata, S.; Kumar, N.V.A.; Sharopov, F.; Ramírez-Alarcón, K.; Ruiz-Ortega, A.; Ayatollahi, S.A.; Fokou, P.V.T.; Kobarfard, F.; Zakaria, A.; et al. Antidiabetic Potential of Medicinal Plants and Their Active Components. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Xu, X.; Liang, W.; Yao, L.; Paek, K.-Y.; Wang, J.; Gao, W. Production of Ginsenoside by Chaetomium Sp. and Its Effect on Enhancing the Contents of Ginsenosides in Panax Ginseng Adventitious Roots. Biochem. Eng. J. 2021, 174, 108100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Hashemi, S.M.; Naghavi, M.R. Production and Gene Expression of Morphinan Alkaloids in Hairy Root Culture of Papaver orientale L. Using Abiotic Elicitors. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2016, 125, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Malarz, J.; Michalska, K.; Yudina, Y.V.; Stojakowska, A. Hairy Root Cultures as a Source of Polyphenolic Antioxidants: Flavonoids, Stilbenoids and Hydrolyzable Tannins. Plants 2022, 11, 1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Markoski, M.M.; Garavaglia, J.; Oliveira, A.; Olivaes, J.; Marcadenti, A. Molecular Properties of Red Wine Compounds and Cardiometabolic Benefits. Nutr. Metab. Insights 2016, 9, NMI-S32909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Qiu, H.; Su, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z. Chitosan Elicitation of Saponin Accumulation in Psammosilene Tunicoides Hairy Roots by Modulating Antioxidant Activity, Nitric Oxide Production and Differential Gene Expression. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 166, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Sharma, A.R.; Gajurel, G.; Ahmed, I.; Roedel, K.; Medina-Bolivar, F. Induction of the Prenylated Stilbenoids Arachidin-1 and Arachidin-3 and Their Semi-Preparative Separation and Purification from Hairy Root Cultures of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Molecules 2022, 27, 6118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Hashemi, S.M.; Naghavi, M.R.; Ghorbani, M.; Priyanatha, C.; Zandi, P. Effects of Abiotic Elicitors on Expression and Accumulation of Three Candidate Benzophenanthridine Alkaloids in Cultured Greater Celandine Cells. Molecules 2021, 26, 1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Nazir, S.; Jan, H.; Zaman, G.; Ahmed, N.; Drouet, S.; Hano, C.; Abbasi, B.H. Synergistic Effects of Salicylic Acid and Light Stress on Bioactive Metabolites in Basil Callus Cultures. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 102176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Singh, N.; Kumaria, S. Deciphering the Role of Stress Elicitors on the Differential Modulation of Chalcone Synthase Gene and Subsequent Production of Secondary Metabolites in Micropropagated Coelogyne Ovalis Lindl., a Therapeutically Important Medicinal Orchid. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 140, 336–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Taherkhani, T.; Asghari Zakaria, R.; Omidi, M.; Zare, N. Effect of Ultrasonic Waves on Crocin and Safranal Content and Expression of Their Controlling Genes in Suspension Culture of Saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Chung, I.-M.; Rekha, K.; Rajakumar, G.; Thiruvengadam, M. Elicitation of Silver Nanoparticles Enhanced the Secondary Metabolites and Pharmacological Activities in Cell Suspension Cultures of Bitter Gourd. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Chen, J.; Li, L.; Tian, P.; Xiang, W.; Lu, X.; Huang, R.; Li, L. Fungal Endophytes from Medicinal Plant Bletilla Striata (Thunb.) Reichb. F. Promote the Host Plant Growth and Phenolic Accumulation. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 143, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Li, J.; Liu, S.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Liu, D.; Li, J.; Gao, W. Fungal Elicitors Enhance Ginsenosides Biosynthesis, Expression of Functional Genes as Well as Signal Molecules Accumulation in Adventitious Roots of Panax Ginseng CA Mey. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 239, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Hao, Y.-J.; An, X.-L.; Sun, H.-D.; Piao, X.-C.; Gao, R.; Lian, M.-L. Ginsenoside Synthesis of Adventitious Roots in Panax Ginseng Is Promoted by Fungal Suspension Homogenate of Alternaria Panax and Regulated by Several Signaling Molecules. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 150, 112414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Lertphadungkit, P.; Suksiriworapong, J.; Satitpatipan, V.; Sirikantaramas, S.; Wongrakpanich, A.; Bunsupa, S. Enhanced Production of Bryonolic Acid in Trichosanthes cucumerina L.(Thai Cultivar) Cell Cultures by Elicitors and Their Biological Activities. Plants 2020, 9, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Taghizadeh, M.; Nekonan, M.S.; Setorki, M. Enhancement Production of Phenolic Compounds in The Cell Suspension Culture of Iberis amara L.: The Effect of Chitosan Elicitation. Res. Sq. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Singh, T.; Sharma, U.; Agrawal, V. Isolation and Optimization of Plumbagin Production in Root Callus of Plumbago zeylanica L. Augmented with Chitosan and Yeast Extract. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 151, 112446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Brzycki, C.M.; Young, E.M.; Roberts, S.C. Secondary Metabolite Production in Plant Cell Culture: A New Epigenetic Frontier. Explor. Plant Cells Prod. Compd. Interest 2021, 1, 1–37. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 27 08093 g001 550
Figure 1. Principal biosynthetic pathways of major secondary metabolite plants’ classes.
Figure 1. Principal biosynthetic pathways of major secondary metabolite plants’ classes.
Molecules 27 08093 g001
Table
Table 1. Micropropagation of medicinal plants by organogenesis methods.
Table 1. Micropropagation of medicinal plants by organogenesis methods.
Plant Explant Source Shoot Multiplication Rooting Phytochemical Analysis Key Findings References
MS MediumPhytohormoneMS MediumPhytohormone
Zingiber officinale RoscoeRhizome sproutedbudsolidZeatin (10 µM)solidNAA (7.5 µM)Flavonoids and
phenolic acids		The total content of phytochemical components is not very different from those of conventionally propagated plants.[74]
PlectranthusamboinicusAxillarybudssemi-solidBAP (0.4 mg/L)semi-solidWithout PGRCarvacrol
γ-Terpinene		Essential oil yield was improved with a higher quantity of chemical compounds in vitro cultures. The in vitro regeneration was chemically true to the parent plant type.[64]
Lavandula coronopifoliaShoot tipssolidBA (0.5 mg/L)solidIBA (10 mg/L)Caffeic acid androsmarinic acidMicropropagation was regenerated from plants with genetic fidelity to the parent plant.
A remarkable difference in the chemical profiles of the in vitro culture and the wild-type plants.		[75]
Tanacetum vulgareShoot tipssolidwithout PGRliquid half-strengthWithout PGRMonoterpenes
Sesquiterpene
Chlorogenic acid
3,5-O-Dicaffeoylquinic acid		Spontaneously rooted seedlings at the time of propagation.
Terpenes are the most abundant in essential oils.
In vitro grown roots are richest in 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid.		[76]
Cannabis sativaNodal segmentssolidmT (2 µM)solidmT (2 µM)CannabinoidsRooting was performed on the same propagation medium.
Auxin was not necessary for root induction.
cannabinoid level in the micropropagated plants is comparable to the mother plant.
In vitro propagated plants are identical to the mother plant.		[77]
EryngiumalpinumShootssolidBAP, IAA, and GA3 (each 1.0 mg/L)____Phenolic acids and flavonoidsThe solid MS medium with BAP, IAA, and GA3 (each 1.0 mg/L) is the optimal system for micropropagation and accumulation of phenolic acids and flavonoids.
An important variability in phytochemicals between the intact plant and different in vitro culture.		[6]
Spiraeabetulifoliasubsp. aemilianaAxillarybudssolidS1 = BAP (1.0 μM)
S2 = (BAP 5.0 μM) + (NAA 1.0 μM)		half-strengthS1 = S2= IBA (0.1 µM)Phenolic acids and flavonoidsMany differences in chemical profile between in vitro culture and intact plants.
Interpopulation genotypic differences in the activity of morphogenic processes have been identified in S. betulifolia in vitro culture.		[78]
Salvia sclareaNodal segmentssolidmT (2.0 mg/L) + IAA (0.2 mg/L)solidNAA (1.0 mg/L)A multitude of secondary metabolitesHigh genetic stability of micropropagated plants.
N-alkanes, tetradecanal, octadecanal, and hentriacontane are the major components from micropropagated plants.
PGRs have caused variability in the content of secondary metabolite.		[79]
LippiaoriganoidesNodal segmentssolidKIN (4.6 μM)solidKIN (2.3 μM)Myrcene, p-cymene, γ-terpinene, linalool, thymol, carvacrol and (E)-caryophyllene.The presence of PGR changed the chemical profile of the volatile organic compound.[80]
Murashige and Skoog (MS), 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), α-Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), Benzyl adenine (BA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), Indol-3-butytic acid (IBA), Gibberellic acid (GA3), Kinetin (Kin), meta-Topolin (mT), plant growth regulator (PGR).
Table
Table 2. Micropropagation of medicinal plants by somatic embryogenesis (SE).
Table 2. Micropropagation of medicinal plants by somatic embryogenesis (SE).
FamilyPlantExplant SourcePhytohormone (mg/L) for Induction SEBasal
Medium		Somatic
Embryogenesis		References
DirectIndirect
ApiaceaeFerulajaeschkeanaPetiole2,4-D (4.0)MS-X[84]
AsteraceaeSeriphidiumherba-albumLeaves2,4-D (1.5) + BA (0.5)MS-X[85]
FumariaceaeLamprocapnosspectabilisLeaves2,4-D (0.5) + BA (0.5)½ MS-X[86]
PetiolesPIC (1.0) + BA (0.5)
PlantaginaceaeDigitalislanataLeaves2,4-D (1.0) + Kin (1.0)MS-X [87]
IBA (2.0) + Kin (2.0)X-
RootIBA (2.0) + Kin (2.0)X-
Murashige and Skoog (MS), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), Benzyl adenine (BA), Indol-3-butytic acid (IBA), Kinetin (Kin), Picloram (PIC).
Table
Table 3. List of some applications of cell and suspension culture in the production of secondary metabolites.
Table 3. List of some applications of cell and suspension culture in the production of secondary metabolites.
Plant Species Active Ingredient Culture Condition (MS Medium) Culture Type References
AgeratinapichinchensisArtemesinolNAA + KINSuspension[105]
Anethum graveolensCarvoneBA + NAA + SASuspension[106]
Camellia sinensisCatechinBAP + 2,4-D + Ph (phenylalanine)Callus[107]
Capparis spinosaRutinB5 medium + 2,4-D + BAP + MeJA + SACallus[108]
CarallumatuberculataTotal phenolicsMS + 2,4-D + BAP + AgNPs(silver nanoparticles)Callus[109]
Total flavonoid
Cayratia trifoliataStilbenesNAA + KN + MeJASuspension[110]
Cupressus sempervirensRutinQuercitrinBA + NAA + GA3Callus[111]
EysenhardtiaplatycarpaTotal phenolicsNAA + KINSuspension[112]
GardeniajasminoidesRutinTDZCallus[113]
GymnemasylvestreGymnemic acid2,4-D + BA + MeJASuspension[114]
Phyllanthus acidusPhyllanthusolNAA + BACallus[115]
PluchealanceolataQuercetinNAA + BAPCallus[116]
Rosmarinus officinalisFlavonoid2,4-D + BAPCallus[117]
Terpenoids
OcimumbasilicumRosmarinic acidKIN + NAA + SorbitolSuspension[118]
Chicoric acid
Rutin
Linalool
Methyl chavicol
Labisia pumilaTotal phenolics2,4-D + ZeaCallus[119]
Total flavonoid
Murashige and Skoog (MS), Gamborg’s (B5), 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), α-Naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), Benzyl adenine (BA), Kinetin (Kin), Gibberellic acid (GA3), Thidiazuron (TDZ), Zeatin (Zea), MeJA (methyl jasmonate), SA (Salicylic acid).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohaddab, M.; El Goumi, Y.; Gallo, M.; Montesano, D.; Zengin, G.; Bouyahya, A.; Fakiri, M. Biotechnology and In Vitro Culture as an Alternative System for Secondary Metabolite Production. Molecules 2022, 27, 8093. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228093

AMA Style

Mohaddab M, El Goumi Y, Gallo M, Montesano D, Zengin G, Bouyahya A, Fakiri M. Biotechnology and In Vitro Culture as an Alternative System for Secondary Metabolite Production. Molecules. 2022; 27(22):8093. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228093

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohaddab, Marouane, Younes El Goumi, Monica Gallo, Domenico Montesano, Gokhan Zengin, Abdelhakim Bouyahya, and Malika Fakiri. 2022. "Biotechnology and In Vitro Culture as an Alternative System for Secondary Metabolite Production" Molecules 27, no. 22: 8093. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228093

APA Style

Mohaddab, M., El Goumi, Y., Gallo, M., Montesano, D., Zengin, G., Bouyahya, A., & Fakiri, M. (2022). Biotechnology and In Vitro Culture as an Alternative System for Secondary Metabolite Production. Molecules, 27(22), 8093. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228093

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop