Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Dendrobium officinale Flower Anthocyanin and Extended Lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans
Next Article in Special Issue
Rapid Analysis of Aristolochic Acids and Aristolactams in Houttuyniae Herba by LC–MS/MS
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Celeriac Pulp Maceration by Rhizopus sp. Pectinase on Juice Quality
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemical Profiling and Quantification of Potential Bioactive Components in Gandouling Pill by Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Diode Array Detector/Quadruple-Qrbitrap Mass Spectrometry
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Development and Validation of a UPLC-MS/MS Method for the Quantification of Components in the Ancient Classical Chinese Medicine Formula of Guyinjian

Molecules 2022, 27(23), 8611; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238611
by Nan Ge 1, Zhineng Li 1, Le Yang 2, Guangli Yan 1, Aihua Zhang 1, Xiwu Zhang 1, Xiuhong Wu 1, Hui Sun 1, Dan Li 3 and Xijun Wang 1,2,4,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Molecules 2022, 27(23), 8611; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238611
Submission received: 15 October 2022 / Revised: 27 November 2022 / Accepted: 3 December 2022 / Published: 6 December 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1-Figure 1 would be better removed.

2-Why is the Material Method section before the conclusion and discussion section? It should be corrected.

3-It would be better if it was called UPLC-MS/MS Method instead of UPLC-QQQ-MS Method in the title.

4-Ethical approval number and information should be written.

5-English should be revised.

6-There are some grammatical errors, they should be corrected.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

1-Ethical approval number has not been written or ethical approval has not been obtained, it should be obtained.

2-The material method section should be placed after the introduction, not done.

Reviewer 2 Report

All the remarks raised are taken into consideration so I give a favorable opinion for the publication of this interesting work.

Back to TopTop