Development and Validation of a UPLC-MS/MS Method for the Quantification of Components in the Ancient Classical Chinese Medicine Formula of Guyinjian
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
1-Figure 1 would be better removed.
2-Why is the Material Method section before the conclusion and discussion section? It should be corrected.
3-It would be better if it was called UPLC-MS/MS Method instead of UPLC-QQQ-MS Method in the title.
4-Ethical approval number and information should be written.
5-English should be revised.
6-There are some grammatical errors, they should be corrected.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
1-Ethical approval number has not been written or ethical approval has not been obtained, it should be obtained.
2-The material method section should be placed after the introduction, not done.
Reviewer 2 Report
All the remarks raised are taken into consideration so I give a favorable opinion for the publication of this interesting work.