Next Article in Journal
Biocatalytic System Made of 3D Chitin, Silica Nanopowder and Horseradish Peroxidase for the Removal of 17α-Ethinylestradiol: Determination of Process Efficiency and Degradation Mechanism
Next Article in Special Issue
Microwave-Assisted Conversion of Carbohydrates
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis, Characterization, Biological Evaluation and DNA Interaction Studies of 4-Aminophenol Derivatives: Theoretical and Experimental Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Zn Doping Effect on the Performance of Fe-Based Catalysts for the Hydrogenation of CO2 to Light Hydrocarbons
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules27041353
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in C5 and C6 Sugar Alcohol Synthesis by Hydrogenation of Monosaccharides and Cellulose Hydrolytic Hydrogenation over Non-Noble Metal Catalysts

by
Elena Redina
1,*,
Olga Tkachenko
1 and
Tapio Salmi
2
1
N.D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 47 Leninsky Prospect, 119991 Moscow, Russia
2
Johan Gadolin Process Chemistry Centre, Abo Akademi University, FI-20500 Turku, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(4), 1353; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041353
Submission received: 12 January 2022 / Revised: 3 February 2022 / Accepted: 15 February 2022 / Published: 17 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Catalysis by Hybrid Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A new reality of the 21st century is the transition to a new type of economy and energy concepts characterized by the replacement of existing petrochemical routes to a bio-based circular economy. The needs for new strategies in obtaining basic products from bio-based resources with minimum CO2 traces has become mandatory. In this review, recent trends in the conversion of biomass-derived molecules, such as simple monomeric sugars and cellulose, to industrially important C5 and C6 sugar alcohols on heterogeneous catalysts based on non-noble metals are discussed focusing on the influence of catalyst structures and reaction conditions used on the substrate conversion and product selectivity. The challenges and prominent ideas are suggested for the further development of catalytic hydrogenation of naturally abundant carbohydrates to value-added chemicals on non-noble metal catalysts.

1. Introduction

Over the past 10 years, green chemistry has become not just a fashionable area of research, but a new reality. The transition from the traditional fossil-based economy and petrochemical technologies to a new era of bio-based circular economy is encouraged by the reduction in an over-dependency on fossil resources and minimization of the impact on the environment. The new type of bio-based chemical technology implies the replacement of petroleum-derived chemicals by bioavailable platform substances. In the period 2004–2017, the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) and EU-funded project RoadToBio have defined top value-added chemicals from biomass. Among the top 12 platform molecules, polyalcohols such as sorbitol, xylitol, and arabinitol were listed [1]. These alcohols are the hydrogenation products of corresponding C6 and C5 sugars. Thus, for instance, sorbitol is a product of glucose hydrogenation or cellulose hydrolytic hydrogenation, while xylitol and arabinitol are obtained by hydrogenation of xylose and arabinose.
C5 and C6 sugar alcohols are considered as perspective building blocks and important synthons in organic synthesis obtained from cellulose or hemicelluloses [2,3,4]. Sorbitol can be consumed not only directly as a sugar substitute or in cosmetics but also in the synthesis of tetrahydrofuran derivatives and glycols (Figure 1). Sorbitol represents a substrate for isosorbide production at low cost. Isosorbide has been shown to be a very effective monomer in copolymerization with PET in order to increase the temperature resistance of polymer products, for example, plastic bottles [5]. Xylitol and arabinitol are usually used as sweeteners instead of sugar. Xylitol has antibacterial effects against streptococci bacteria; thus, it reduces dental plaque, and it might be protective against tooth decay and actively used in toothpastes. These sugars can also be important substrates in the production of glycols [6] as well in the synthesis of hydroxyfuranes—the building blocks in pharmaceutical industry [7] (Figure 2).
Catalytic hydrogenation of C5 and C6 sugars is usually performed over supported and unsupported noble mono- and bimetallic nanoparticles (Pt, Ru, Pd) [8,9,10]. However, the reaction requires harsh conditions (elevated temperatures and/or hydrogen pressure) even with noble-based metal catalysts. Najarnezhadmashhadi et al. showed that Ru nanoparticles (NPs) supported on aluminum foam can be effectively used in the hydrogenation of glucose, arabinose, and galactose in continuous mode at 110 °C and a hydrogen pressure of 20 atm [11]. Xylitol, arabinitol, sorbitol, mannitol, and galactitol were obtained by the hydrogenation of corresponding sugars over Ru/MWCNT at 110 °C and hydrogen pressure of 30 atm [12]. Simakova et al. also used Ru/C for the hydrogenation of arabinose and galactose and showed the structure sensitivity of this reaction. The highest activity was obtained over the catalyst with Ru NPs of mean size ca. 3 nm at 110 °C and a hydrogen pressure of 20 atm [13].
Homogeneous hydrogenation of sugars over noble-metal complexes requires harsh conditions as well [14,15]. However, homogeneous hydrogenation creates an opportunity in asymmetric hydrogenation and the formation of pure products with high stereoselectivity. Recently, Tindal et al. showed that complex [RuCl2(benzene)]2 with (S) or (R) -DTBM-SEGPHOS allowed stereoselective hydrogenation of different ketoses with quantitative yield, yet the reaction was performed at 100 °C and a hydrogen pressure of 60 atm [16].
The need for rather harsh conditions for sugar hydrogenation to corresponding alcohols even in the presence of catalysts based on noble metals has oriented the research towards the replacement of noble metals with non-noble ones, assuming the possibility that under such conditions, the catalysts with base metals would also be active. The transition from noble-metal-based catalysts to highly available and cost-effective catalytic systems with base metals will make the industrially important sugar hydrogenation process more popular, affordable, and economical. However, developing new catalysts based on non-noble metals with high activity, selectivity, and stability remains a big issue for scientists. In this review, we want to address the advances in C5 and C6 sugar hydrogenation and cellulose hydrolytic hydrogenation on non-noble metal catalysts in the last decade.

2. Hydrogenation of Glucose to Sorbitol

Glucose is the most abundant monosaccharide which is formed by plants and algae during photosynthesis. Moreover, glucose is the structural link of cellulose, which consists of a linear chain of several hundreds to many thousands of β(1→4) linked D-glucose units and, thus, known to be the most common carbohydrate and natural polymer, accounting almost 50% of all carbon in biosphere (Figure 3) [17].
Glucose contains six carbon atoms and an aldehyde group; therefore, it is attributed to aldohexoses. It can be easily obtained by cellulose hydrolysis by enzymatic or chemical processing with the use of mineral acids or solid acid catalysts [18]. Glucose molecule can exist in an open-chain (acyclic) as well as cyclic forms, which in turn can be six-membered (α- or β-pyranose form) and five-membered (α- or β-furanose form); β-glucopyranose is the predominant form in the solution (Figure 3).
Glucose hydrogenation to sorbitol in aqueous solution is a well-studied reaction realized on an industrial scale (700.000 tones/year) on a finely dispersed Raney Ni catalyst in batch mode [19]. Despite the excellent catalytic properties and low cost of Raney Ni, the major problem is its deactivation because of leaching of Ni species into reaction mixture; thus, an additional product purification procedure is required [20]. Therefore, researchers have tried different modifications of Raney Ni as well as the development of novel catalysts based on easily accessible non-noble metals [21,22].
Ni containing unsupported bi-metallic nanoparticles have been shown to be active catalysts for D-glucose to D-sorbitol hydrogenation (Table 1). Amorphous Ni-Co (1:1) nanoparticles prepared by mechanochemical synthesis and reduced with NaBH4 were able to provide almost complete glucose conversion to D-sorbitol with the yield exceeding 96% after 4 h in water at a temperature only 90 °C and 30 atm of hydrogen pressure [23]. Monometallic Ni and Co nanoparticles were less active in the reaction. The glucose conversion on Ni was 77%, while on Co NPs, the conversion reached only 26%, but the selectivity to D-sorbitol was 99% in both experiments. It is important to note that according to XPS spectra, Ni and Co in bimetallic nanoparticles were mostly in a metallic state with a small partial negative charge on Ni; boron impurities were also observed in XPS spectra. The authors claimed that the partial negative charge on Ni in Ni-Co bimetallic catalyst along with smaller sizes of Ni-Co NPs were responsible for their higher catalytic activity in glucose hydrogenation compared to monometallic Ni and Co catalysts. The calculated activation energy (Ea) for Ni-Co (1:1) nanoparticles appeared to be 48.9 kJ mol−1 and changed within ± 0.01 kJ mol−1 with an increase or decrease in the Co concentration in Ni-Co NPs (Ni:Co=2:1 and Ni:Co=1:2). The authors suggested that these facts indicated that the active species for hydrogenation were the same for the samples with higher and lower Co content, possibly Niδ-, where hydrogen activation could proceed [23].
Guo et al. showed that Ni-B amorphous alloy with uniform particles (Figure 4) prepared by a reduction of nickel hydrazine complex Ni(N2H4)22+ with BH4− in aqueous solution (Equation (1)) induced by ultrasound provided glucose hydrogenation with the conversion of 85% after 2 h of reaction at 120 °C and P(H2) = 40 atm [24].
[Ni(N2H4)2]Cl2 + BH4− + 2H2O → Ni0 + BO2− + 2N2H4 + 2Cl− + 2H2
According to TPR-H2 data and XPS analysis of Ni-B alloy, the formation of Ni0 due to strong back-electron donation from B together with the presence of only one adsorbing site on the catalyst surface were responsible for the rather high activity of Ni-B nano-alloy in glucose hydrogenation. Raney Ni was considerably less active, and glucose conversion reached only 38% under the same reaction conditions.
Another type of Ni unsupported NPs obtained through hydrazine hydrate Ni complexes was reported by Singh et al. [25]. Thermally stable unsupported crystalline mesoporous Ni/NiO catalyst was prepared by a nucleation-reduction method with the mixture of NaBH4 and hydrazine hydrate. The phase structure of the catalysts was confirmed by XRD (Figure 5). Ni/NiO NPs with a size of 11–24 nm provided D-glucose hydrogenation to D-sorbitol with conversion up to 95% and a selectivity of 88% in water at 130 °C. and hydrogen pressure of 50 atm; the other product was D-mannitol, obtained with the selectivity of 12% (Table 1). The activation energy was calculated to be 16 kJ mol−1, and it was four times lower than that on Raney Ni, while the stability of Ni/NiO catalyst was greatly enhanced [25]. Interestingly, Silvester et al. showed that supported 5%Ni/Al2O3 catalyst prepared by a precipitation-reduction method with hydrazine hydrate enabled D-glucose conversion of only 60% with selectivity to D-sorbitol reaching 80% at 130 °C and P (H2) = 30 atm after 4 h of reaction with the substrate-to-Ni ratio close to that used by Guo for Ni-B nanoalloy [24,26].
Supported catalyst 5%Cu/Al2O3 prepared by the same method was even less active under the conditions used; thus, the glucose conversion was only 45% with a selectivity to D-sorbitol of 89% [26]. A slightly higher D-glucose conversion of 80% with the D-sorbitol selectivity of 87% was observed on the reduced Cu-Ni-Al hydrotalcite precursor (Ni1.85Cu1Al1.15) at 130 °C and P(H2) = 30 atm in water after 3 h of reaction, but under a low substrate-to-metal ratio of 0.03 mol/g. The presence of Ni0 and Cu0 was also shown to be responsible for the increase in the D-glucose conversion to D-sorbitol [27].
Fu et al. prepared Fe-Ni bimetallic nanocatalyst supported on carbon black (CB) (Figure 6) [28]. The presence of Ni0 and Fe0 in alloy NPs was critical to obtain D-sorbitol from D-glucose in good yields. It was shown that on monometallic Ni/CB, the dominant pathway was glucose hydrogenation, while on Fe/CB, glucose isomerization to fructose was observed. The combination of Fe and Ni with the weight ratio 1:1 enabled to achieve high activity and selectivity to D-sorbitol whilst increasing the catalyst stability compared to that of Ni/CB. 8%Fe-8%Ni/CB catalyst provided a D-glucose conversion of 71% with a selectivity to D-sorbitol of 70% at 140 °C and H2 pressure of 40 atm after 6 h of reaction. It should be noted that Ni leaching to water medium and growth of particle size were responsible for the deactivation of bimetallic sample, but it was less pronounced than for Ni/CB (Figure 7) [28].

3. Fructose Hydrogenation

Fructose is a ketonic simple C6 sugar found in many plants, root vegetables, and honey, where it is often bonded to glucose to form the disaccharide sucrose. Mannitol obtained by fructose hydrogenation is usually used as a low-calorie sweetener, and it has also found an application as a vasodilator in hypertension treatment in mannitol hexanitrate form [37].
As a glucose molecule, fructose is present in solution in the form of five- and six-membered cyclic hemiketals: α– and β- D(L)-fructopyranose, α– and β-D(L)-fructofuranose. Heinen et al. suggested that the fructofuranose forms are more reactive than the fructopyranose forms in hydrogenation reactions (Figure 8) [38]. It was reported that different tautomeric forms of fructose have different adsorption strengths on the surfaces of hydrogenation catalysts, as well as hydrogenation rates [39]. According to the theory and DFT calculations, fructose hydrogenation over Cu and Ni catalysts proceeds through the hydrogenation of cyclic forms, but not by hydrogenation of the acyclic form. Moreover, in fructose hydrogenation, β-fructose molecules are converted to mannitol, while α-fructose molecules give sorbitol as the hydrogenation product. The pyranose form probably plays a minor role in the hydrogenation [29]. It should also be noted that fructose can also be isomerized to glucose in the presence of basic and acid sites [40,41]. Therefore, the main problem in the hydrogenation of fructose is the selectivity; besides mannitol, sorbitol is the second reaction product formed in a parallel reaction.
Catalysts with non-noble metals are actively used in fructose hydrogenation. On the reduced hydrotalcite-like magnetic catalyst with a composition Ni4.63Cu1Al1.82Fe0.79 and particle size of 11–14 nm, the mannitol and sorbitol yields were 57% and 43%, respectively, at complete fructose conversion under 110 °C and P(H2) 30 atm, but at a low substrate-to-catalyst ratio of 0.03 mol/g [30]. The author observed that with an increase in the reduction temperature of hydrotalcite catalyst, the fraction of Ni0 and Cu0 catalyst grew, which in turn led to higher fructose conversion, while the selectivity to mannitol and sorbitol remained unchanged.
A much better selectivity of D-fructose hydrogenation to D-mannitol was observed by Zelin et al. over supported bimetallic CuNi nanoparticles. The use of 5%Cu-7%Ni/SiO2 catalyst allowed the attainment of almost full D-fructose conversion with a selectivity to D-mannitol of 73% at 100 °C and P(H2) = 40 atm after 2 h of reaction [31]. CuNi alloy nanoparticles were more active and stable in D-fructose hydrogenation than monometallic Cu/SiO2 and Ni/SiO2 samples (Figure 9). It was proved by a number of methods (XPS, TPR-H2, TPD-H2) that the Ni surface in the Cu-Ni/SiO2 catalyst was modified by dilution with Cu, thus forming strong interaction between Cu0 and Ni0 phases. Despite the decline of the catalyst from cycle to cycle because of carbon residues, it can be regenerated in H2 at 500 °C without any change in the selectivity to D-mannitol.
Nevertheless, a rather simple catalytic system Cu/SiO2 can be effectively applied in the hydrogenation of fructose. Copper catalysts favour more selective hydrogenation of fructose to mannitol than Ni-containing samples [39]. It was assumed that on small Cu0 NPs, fructose preferably adsorbs in β-fructofuranose form, hydrogenation of which led to mannitol with a high selectivity [42,43]. Zelin and co-workers proposed 11%Cu/SiO2 catalysts with highly dispersed metallic Cu NPs of 3 nm for fructose hydrogenation in a water–ethanol mixture [42]. The yield of D-mannitol of 78% at complete D-fructose conversion was achieved in 6 h at 100 °C and P(H2) = 40 atm. The catalyst 11%Cu/SiO2 with the mean Cu NPs size of 32 nm allowed only 32% D-fructose conversion and D-mannitol selectivity as low as 68%. The obtained catalysts were not stable and deactivated because of copper leaching [42]. Recently, Upare et al. prepared a series of Cu-SiO2 nanocomposites by a precipitation-deposition method with the use of colloidal silica and Cu(NO3)2 ·3H2O. This method enables the obtainment of catalysts with high Cu loadings (up to 80%) and high specific surface areas (100–400 m2/g) [29]. The obtained catalysts with Cu content 60-80% wt. allow full D-fructose conversion and D-mannitol selectivity up to 84% in 1-butanol solvent at 120 °C and P(H2) = 35 atm after 10 h of reaction. The authors showed that the hydrogenation of fructose was catalyzed by Cu metallic sites. It should be pointed out that no Cu leaching was observed during the reaction in 1-butanol, while the use of water as a solvent led to Cu leaching as well as a significant amount of the fructose degradation and/or condensation products formed as by-products on the catalyst surface. However, decline in the activity was noticed on the most active 80%Cu-SiO2 catalyst when its recycling, which was ascribed to the partial copper oxidation to Cu+ as well as fructose, strongly chemisorbed on the catalyst surface. Regeneration of the catalyst in H2 at 290 °C completely restored the initial activity of the catalyst, and it could show stable work for at least six cycles [29].

4. Hydrogenation of Other C5 and C6 Sugars

The top-12 biobased molecules also include xylitol and arabinitol, which can be obtained via the hydrogenation of xylose and arabinose (Figure 10 and Figure 11). These C5 sugars are the products of hemicellulose hydrolysis [1,22,44].
A few examples concerning the hydrogenation of xylose and arabinose have been reported on non-noble-based catalysts. The presence of metallic Ni in the catalysts is the main requirement in achieving of sugar alcohols with good yields [32,36]. Thus, the reduction of Ni precursor to Ni0 and its stabilization is the main challenge in the preparation of catalysts for sugar hydrogenation. Morales et al. noted that Ni-containing mixed oxides can be used as precursors for the preparation of catalytic systems containing Ni0 [32]. A series of Nd1-xCexAl0.162Ni0.838O3 (x = 0.0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.7) mixed oxides was used as precursors to prepare Ni reduced catalysts for the catalytic hydrogenation of xylose to xylitol. It should be noted that Nd was used as a stabilizer of the reduced catalysts in aqueous reaction medium. The mixed oxide catalyst Nd1Al0.162Ni0.838O3 containing 20% wt. of Ni showed the highest xylose conversion of 70% at 100 °C and P (H2) = 25 atm after 6 h of reaction in water. Unfortunately, the xylitol selectivity reached only 53% due to side reactions including isomerization on acid sites and retro-aldol reaction. Nevertheless, the catalyst showed stable work and no Ni leaching was observed.
The importance of the presence of Ni0 to achieve a high hydrogenation activity was reported by Yamaguchi et al. [35]. It was shown that the combination of nano-Ni2P and hydrotalcite (HT) support Mg6Al2CO3(OH)16∙4(H2O) played a key role in the high catalytic performance of the catalyst, due to nano-Ni2P activating H2, while HT acts as an electron donor to Ni and also can serve as activator of the xylose C-O group. According to XPS and EXAFS data, Ni in the catalyst was in Ni0 state and remained unchanged after the reaction. The nano-Ni2P/HT catalyst (0.91% wt. of Ni) allowed full xylose conversion with xylitol yield >99% after 2 h of reaction in water at 100 °C and hydrogen pressure of 20 atm. The catalyst showed stable work for at least five runs with a negligible drop in conversion, less than 6%. The authors have also shown that nano-Ni2P/HT catalyst was also active in disaccharide hydrogenation, i.e., maltose was effectively converted to maltitol [45].
Recently, Sadier et al. reported that supported Ni-Fe nanoalloy exhibited excellent activity and stability in xylose hydrogenation to xylitol [34]. The catalyst 26%Ni-16%Fe/SiO2 (Ni:Fe = 62:38 at.) prepared by deposition-precipitation method (DPU) allowed complete xylose conversion with xylitol selectivity of 98% in 4 h already at 80 °C and hydrogen pressure of 20 atm. The catalyst was shown to be stable for at least 3 runs, while monometallic 40%Ni/SiO2 lost its activity even after the first cycle. The deactivation of monometallic Ni catalyst was caused by the formation of layered Ni(OH)2 or phyllosilicate phase during the reaction, which was proved by XRD. At the same time, the formation of layered Ni(OH)2 or phyllosilicate was observed to be negligible in the spent Ni-Fe/SiO2 sample. It seems that expanded Fe-rich shell in Ni-Fe alloy blocks the total conversion of the particles to phyllosilicate seen for Ni; therefore, Ni-Fe catalysts showed stable work.
Interestingly, Co/SiO2 catalyst was shown to be very active and selective in xylose hydrogenation to xylitol [33]. Xylitol conversion over the reduced 10%Co/SiO2 prepared by convenient incipient wetness impregnation method (IWI) reached 99% in 2 h with xylitol selectivity of 90% at 140 °C and P (H2) = 50 atm. However, the catalyst deactivated from run to run and conversion fell to 58% after four cycles, while the selectivity to xylitol remained 100%. The deactivation was caused by Co leaching and carbonaceous species deposition on the catalyst surface.
Continuous-flow hydrogenation of sugars is of high interest due to it being able to help to overcome the selectivity problem and make the process more suitable for industrial application [46,47,48]. Scholz et al. used hydrotalcite-derived Cu6-xNixAl2 catalysts for the transfer hydrogenation, which is very unusual for sugar hydrogenation, of a number of substrates, i.e., glucose, fructose, xylose, and arabinose, in a flow regime [36]. The best performance was achieved on Cu3Ni3Al2 catalyst using 1,4-butanediol as a hydrogen donor. Glucose conversion up to 90% with selectivity to sorbitol of 70% was achieved in 11 min at 150 °C in 1,4-butanedion, and γ-butyrolactone was mainly formed from 1,4-butanediol releasing two equivalents of hydrogen. Notably, g-butyrolactone is also among the 12 top-valued bio-derived molecules, which makes the overall process more appealing. Under the same conditions, xylitol and arabitol were obtained with selectivity up to 73% at xylose and arabinose conversion reached 85 and 90%, respectively. The authors account the superiority of this catalyst to the metallic phase formation and optimal interaction between copper and nickel in intermetallic compound. The prepared catalysts showed stable work in 50 h, despite a small drop in activity in the first 5 h of reaction due to adsorption of by-products and catalyst sintering. It should be added, that Molybdenum-promoted Raney nickel was also shown to be active and stable under continuous-flow hydrogenation conditions using 1,4-butanediol as a hydrogen donor [49]. Thus, glucose was completely converted to sorbitol with a selectivity of 90% (the other product was mannitol) at 130 °C and a spatial velocity of 0.04 min−1. Moreover, the conversion and product selectivity remained stable for at least 100 h.

5. Hydrolytic Cellulose Hydrogenation to Hexitols

Sugar alcohols such as sorbitol and mannitol can be obtained directly through one-pot process of hydrolytic hydrogenation of cellulose in water. The main challenge in such a process is a chemocatalytic cleavage of β-1,4-glycosidic bonds in the polymer chain of cellulose to form sugar monomers, which is subsequently hydrogenated to sugar alcohol. Thus, the process includes two successive steps: hydrolysis and hydrogenation. Therefore, catalytic systems should comprise both acid sites for hydrolysis and metal sites for hydrogen activation. Besides the excellent hydrogenation activity, the catalyst should have a higher activation barrier for the dehydrogenation and hydrogenolysis of hexitols than desorption energy of hexitols to favor hexitol desorption rather than their further undesired transformation [50] (Figure 12).
Many works are devoted to different combination of Ru-based catalysts and mineral acids or Ru catalysts supported on the carrier with acid sites [51,52], while data on hydrolytic hydrogenation over the catalysts with non-noble metal are rarely reported. In the literature on cellulose conversion to hexitols conducted on catalysts with base metals, Ni-containing catalysts were mostly studied [53] (Table 2). It should be noted that the main challenge in hydrolytic hydrogenation of cellulose is the selectivity because the acid sites on catalyst or acids used as co-catalyst induce the retro-aldol reaction of intermediate glucose and fructose giving rise to glycol aldehyde or 1,3-dihydroxyacetone [52]. Moreover, the formation of hexitols from cellulose require the use of much higher temperatures (>200 °C) than hydrogenation of monosaccharides because of the need to induce the rate-limiting cellulose hydrolysis step [53]. The high crystallinity of cellulose is a big issue in its processing. Therefore, different ways of cellulose treatment are used before the reaction, i.e., ball-milling, acid treatment, or the use of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC).
Ni NPs supported on zeolites seem to be the most evident catalytic system that combine both hydrogenation activity and acid function. Nickel multiply-twinned particles (Ni MTPs) imbedded onto ZSM-5 provided cellulose conversion as high as 94% with hexitols selectivity of 67% after 2.5 h of reaction at 240 °C and a hydrogen pressure of 40 atm [54]. The authors suggested that Ni NPs with a mean particle size of 18 nm and multiple twinned structure with exposed Ni (1 1 1) plain and Niδ+ species are the active sites for sugar adsorption and hydrogen activation. In contrast to ZSM-5 with strong acid sites, Ni MTPs/ZSM-5 catalyst possessed acidic sites of medium strength, which result in supressed dehydrogenation activity of the catalyst and good yield of sorbitol and mannitol [54,56]. However, the catalyst was not stable. Hydrogenation of cellobiose, a glucose dimer connected by 1,4-β-glycosidic bond, over the catalyst 40%Ni MTPs/ZSM-5 of the same structure proceeded to complete substrate conversion and the selectivity to sorbitol and mannitol reached 82% after 6 h of reaction at 240 °C and hydrogen pressure of 40 atm [50]. It was shown that the use Al2O3 and SiO2 instead of ZSM-5 resulted in a lower selectivity to hexitols. Acid-base pairs on the surface of Al2O3 and SiO2 resulted in higher dehydrogenation activity of Ni supported catalysts and caused undesirable retro-aldol reaction.
Zhang et al. used cellulose not only as a substrate in hydrolytic hydrogenation reaction but also for the synthesis of mesoporous ZSM-5 zeolite, which was used as a support for a Ni catalyst [55]. Ni supported on nano crystalline cellulose templated ZSM-5 (NCC-ZSM-5) with a surface area of 430–480 m2/g and mesoporous structure with pore volume = 0.8–0.9 cm3/g was able to convert microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) to sorbitol and mannitol with a selectivity of 60% and 87% of cellulose conversion after 2.5 h of reaction under hydrogen pressure as high as 40 atm and a temperature of 240 °C. The presence of strong acid sites, high specific surface area, optimal mesopore structure with a high accessibility of acid sites and favourable Ni NPs size (25–27 nm) were responsible for the high performance of Ni/NCC-ZSM-5 catalyst. Catalyst deactivation was observed both at high and low conversions, which was attributed to Ni particle agglomeration and damage of the ZSM-5 mesopore structure.
Ni nanoparticles supported on carbonaceous materials represent an alternative catalytic system for cellulose hydrolytic hydrogenation. It was shown that such a convenient catalyst as Ni supported on carbon black or mesoporous carbon was extremely effective in the hydrolytic hydrogenation of cellulose to sorbitol and mannitol [59,60]. The catalyst 50%Ni/C afforded cellulose conversion of 90% with selectivity to hexitols of 71% already at 210 °C and P(H2) = 50 atm after 6 h of reaction. Interestingly, the higher the Ni content, the better the catalyst stability, because of the growth of Ni nanoparticles. After 2 h of reaction, the Ni NPs size in 50%Ni/C increased from 11 to 28 nm and remained unchanged until the reaction was finished. However, the catalyst gradually lost activity because of Ni oxidation with the formation of the outermost layer of Ni(OH)2.
An unusual strategy in the development of a catalytic system for cellulose hydrolytic hydrogenation was proposed by Van de Vyver et al. [57,58]. The authors noted the very limited accessibility of the active catalytic sites, especially for porous catalysts, for cellulose molecule. The authors used the concept of high accessibility of Ni NPs supported on the tips of carbon nanofibers (CNF), which entangled around the water-insoluble cellulose matrix. The catalytic system Ni/CNF/Al2O3 was prepared by catalytic vapour deposition (CVD) of methane onto Ni/Al2O3 sample with subsequent calcination and reduction at 500 °C. This method led to the formation of rather big Ni NPs with a size almost equal to a carbon fibre diameter of 60–100 nm, even for the sample with 3 % wt. of Ni. The conversion of ball-milled cellulose (at 190 °C for 24 h) over 3%Ni/CNF/Al2O3 was 92% with selectivity to sorbitol and mannitol 61% after 4 h at 230 °C and H2 pressure of 60 atm. The temperature of the reaction could be significantly lowered to 190 °C. However, 88% cellulose conversion with 63% selectivity to hexitols was obtained only after 24 h of reaction. The authors concluded that cellulose hydrolysis can be catalysed by both H+ ions reversibly formed in situ in hot water [64] and Brønsted acid sites on the Al2O3 support. The 3%Ni/CNF/Al2O3 catalyst showed good stability and could be reused for at least three experiments. To enhance the acidity of the Ni/CNF catalysts and better anchor Ni NPs on carbon nanofibers, CNF grown on Ni/Al2O3 was treated in HNO3 at 110 °C for 1 h [58]. The acid-treated CNF was used as the support for Ni NPs deposited by impregnation technique. Thus, acid-treated Ni/CNF with a Ni content of 7.5% wt. afforded cellulose conversion of 93% with an extremely high selectivity to hexitols reaching 82% at 190 °C and H2 pressure of 60 atm in 24 h of reaction. The authors noted that high activity of 7.5%Ni/CNF was attributed to the optimal balance between exposed Ni surface atoms (n Ni) and acid sites (n A), which should be 0.7 < n A/n Ni < 1.1. At lower n A/n Ni ratio, the sugar alcohols become more susceptible for C-C bond hydrogenolysis, while at higher n A/n Ni values it is more likely that the glucose formed is subjected to side acid-catalyzed degradation (retro-aldol reaction) rather than being hydrogenated to sorbitol and mannitol.
Metal phosphides were also reported to be active in cellulose hydrolytic hydrogenation. Nickel phosphide phase Ni2P supported on active carbon possessed the required bifunctionality combining acid and hydrogenation sites [61,62]. 16%Ni2P/AC afforded complete cellulose conversion with the selectivity to sorbitol and mannitol 48% and 5%, respectively, at 225 °C under a hydrogen pressure of 60 atm after 1.5 h of the reaction [61]. The authors showed that the catalyst activity and selectivity significantly depended on the Ni/P ratio, i.e., the ratio of exposed hydrogenation sites and acid catalytic centres. However, the catalyst was unstable under hydrothermal conditions, and significant phosphorus leaching was observed. The formation of Ni phosphide phase (Ni2P) was essential for direct cellulose conversion to sorbitol with a high yield. Yang et al. demonstrated that during the reaction, crystalline Ni2P phase transformed to a highly dispersed amorphous Ni phosphide (ANP) [62]. Thus, a high activity of the 10%Ni-3.2%P/AC catalyst was attributed to ANP formation. Cellulose hydrolytic hydrogenation over 10%Ni-3.2%P/AC catalyst proceeded with conversion of 90% and selectivity to sorbitol as high as 68% at 230 °C and P (H2) = 40 atm already in 0.7 h of reaction. The catalyst had a low reusability because of phosphorus leached in form of H3PO4, which in turn caused catalyst structure transformation from ANP to Ni crystallites of approximately 30 nm. Liu et.at. used zirconium phosphate Zr(HPO4)2·H2O (ZrP) as a support for Ni NPs in hydrolytic cellulose hydrogenation [63]. The activity and selectivity of the catalysts was tuned by adjusting the P/Zr ratio. For Ni/ZrPx with P/Zr ≥ 2 a higher total acid content was determined than that with P/Zr ≤ 1.5. The best performance was observed for Ni supported on Zr phosphate with P/Zr ratio of 2 (ZrP2). For the 20%/ZrP2 catalyst, the sorbitol yield reached 60% at 200 °C and H2 pressure of 50 atm in 5 h. Moreover, this catalyst was rather stable. Only a slight decrease in sorbitol yield (ca. 3%) was observed after three experiments, which accounted for negligible Ni leaching during the reaction.
Interestingly, Ni supported on niobium phosphate afforded direct one-pot conversion of cellulose to value-added isosorbide [65]. This is a first example on non-noble catalyst active in complex three-step cellulose conversion to isosorbide; other studies have been devoted to Ru/C catalysts combined with acids as co-catalysts or Ru supported on solid acids [66]. The catalytic processing of cellulose to sorbitol includes hydrolysis, hydrogenation and dehydration reactions (Figure 13). The presence of both Lewis (L) and Brønsted (B) acid sites together with hydrogenation sites enabled 70%Ni/NbOPO4 bifunctional catalyst provide full cellulose conversion with isosorbide yield of 47% at 200 °C and H2 pressure of 30 atm in water after 24 h of reaction. More importantly, the catalyst was stable for at least five experiments without any loss of activity [65].

6. Conclusions

The green route in biomass conversion is still a new-born field with many challenges. The replacement of existing catalysts based on noble metals (Ru, Pd, Pt) with non-noble ones is one of the fundamental problems that restricts the implementation of new green strategies in chemical technology. We hope that this review can help in analysing the current state of art in the hydrogenation of bio-available molecules such as simple sugar and readily available cellulosic feedstock in the production of value-added sugar alcohols and their derivatives in the presence of non-noble metal catalysts.
Ni and Cu-containing mono-and bimetallic catalysts represent a prominent alternative to catalytic systems based on noble metals in the hydrogenation of sugars. Moreover, direct hydrolytic hydrogenation of cellulose to sugar alcohols such as sorbitol and mannitol or even value-added isosorbide can be performed on non-noble Ni-containing catalysts. However, the main challenge in obtaining active and selective catalysts for the hydrogenation of both monosaccharides and cellulose to sugar alcohols is the formation and stabilisation of the active components in metallic form. As was shown, Ni0 and Cu0 are believed to be the active sites for hydrogen activation and sugar adsorption predominantly in cyclic form. Stabilisation of the active components in metallic form can be achieved by the formation of bimetallic nanoalloys or specific phases such as phosphides or hydrotalcite derived mixed oxides (with their subsequent reduction). The choice of a support for well-dispersed nanoparticles also plays an important role in catalytic hydrogenation. Besides the stabilisation function for nanoparticles, the support can also provide the active sites for the substrate adsorption and additional acid/base centres, which can tune the selectivity of the process. In most cases, even if the catalysts are highly active and selective in hydrogenation, they are not stable under hydrothermal reaction conditions as the reaction is performed in water. Leaching of the active component as well as its oxidation or inactive hydroxide formation (for instance, Ni(OH)2) causing gradual loss in the catalyst activity are the main problems. Thus, the reusability problem has not yet been completely solved.
The development of new strategies and new types of catalytic systems for sugar hydrogenation and cellulose hydrolytic hydrogenation are of great interest and represent a large field for further investigation, especially in view of sustainable and eco-friendly catalytic processes. For example, zeolite-supported Ni catalysts showed good performance for cellulose transformation to sorbitol. However, the catalyst was not stable because of Ni leaching and the agglomeration of Ni nanoparticles during the reaction. The use of Ni-MOF catalysts can be an effective way in both Ni stabilization as well as providing optimal balance between the hydrogenation and acid sites to achieve high selectivity in hexitol formation. Performing the hydrogenation reactions in a flow regime can also be important, not only in view of making the process more convenient for large-scale realization, but also in enhancing the selectivity in the obtainment of sugar alcohols, inhibiting consecutive side reactions. Rapid heating under microwave irradiation can significantly reduce the reaction time, which can also lead to an increase in the selectivity of sugar alcohol formation and reduce the influence of the reaction conditions on the catalyst structures, making them more durable.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation E.R.; editing, O.T.; review and editing, project administration, T.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (project no. 13.2251.21.0070).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the reported data were taken from the published materials referenced below.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Werpy, T.A.; Holladay, J.E.; White, J.F. Top Value Added Chemicals From Biomass: I. Results of Screening for Potential Candidates from Sugars and Synthesis Gas; PNNL-14808; Northwest National Lab. (PNNL): Richland, WA, USA, 2004; p. 926125. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sánchez-Bastardo, N.; Delidovich, I.; Alonso, E. From Biomass to Sugar Alcohols: Purification of Wheat Bran Hydrolysates Using Boronic Acid Carriers Followed by Hydrogenation of Sugars over Ru/H-ZSM-5. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 11930–11938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kohli, K.; Prajapati, R.; Sharma, B. Bio-Based Chemicals from Renewable Biomass for Integrated Biorefineries. Energies 2019, 12, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Galán, G.; Martín, M.; Grossmann, I.E. Integrated Renewable Production of Sorbitol and Xylitol from Switchgrass. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 5558–5573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Besson, M.; Gallezot, P.; Pinel, C. Conversion of Biomass into Chemicals over Metal Catalysts. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1827–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Van der Waal, J.C. Process for Preparing Ethylene Glycol from a Carbohydrate. U.S. Patent 10,131,600, 20 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. Shing, T.K.M.; So, K.H.; Kwok, W.S. Carbocyclization of Carbohydrates: Diastereoselective Synthesis of (+)-Gabosine F, (−)-Gabosine O, and (+)-4- Epi -Gabosine O. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5070–5073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Romero, A.; Nieto-Márquez, A.; Alonso, E. Bimetallic Ru:Ni/MCM-48 Catalysts for the Effective Hydrogenation of d -Glucose into Sorbitol. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2017, 529, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bonnin, I.; Méreau, R.; Tassaing, T.; Jérôme, F.; De Oliveira Vigier, K. Hydrogenation of Sugars to Sugar Alcohols in the Presence of a Recyclable Ru/Al2O3 Catalyst Commercially Available. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 9240–9247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gromov, N.V.; Medvedeva, T.B.; Taran, O.P.; Timofeeva, M.N.; Said-Aizpuru, O.; Panchenko, V.N.; Gerasimov, E.Y.; Kozhevnikov, I.V.; Parmon, V.N. The Main Factors Affecting the Catalytic Properties of Ru/Cs-HPA Systems in One-Pot Hydrolysis-Hydrogenation of Cellulose to Sorbitol. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2020, 595, 117489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Najarnezhadmashhadi, A.; Eränen, K.; Engblom, S.; Aho, A.; Murzin, D.; Salmi, T. Continuous Hydrogenation of Monomeric Sugars and Binary Sugar Mixtures on a Ruthenium Catalyst Supported by Carbon-Coated Open-Cell Aluminum Foam. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 13450–13459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, X.-J.; Li, H.-W.; Bin, W.; Dou, B.-J.; Chen, D.-S.; Cheng, X.-P.; Li, M.; Wang, H.-Y.; Chen, K.-Q.; Jin, L.-Q.; et al. Efficient Synthesis of Sugar Alcohols under Mild Conditions Using a Novel Sugar-Selective Hydrogenation Catalyst Based on Ruthenium Valence Regulation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 12393–12399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Simakova, I.L.; Demidova, Y.S.; Murzina, E.V.; Aho, A.; Murzin, D.Y. Structure Sensitivity in Catalytic Hydrogenation of Galactose and Arabinose over Ru/C Catalysts. Catal. Lett. 2016, 146, 1291–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kolarić, S.; Šunjić, V. Comparative Study of Homogeneous Hydrogenation of D-Glucose and d-Mannose Catalyzed by Water Soluble [Ru(Tri(m-Sulfophenyl) Phosphine)] Complex. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 1996, 110, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hameršak, Z.; Pavlović, N.; Delić, V.; Šunjić, V. Regio- and Stereo-Selectivity in Homogeneous Catalytic Hydrogenation of 2,5-Diketo-d-Threo-Hexonic Acid. Carbohydr. Res. 1997, 302, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tindall, D.J.; Mader, S.; Kindler, A.; Rominger, F.; Hashmi, A.S.K.; Schaub, T. Selective and Scalable Synthesis of Sugar Alcohols by Homogeneous Asymmetric Hydrogenation of Unprotected Ketoses. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 721–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Nishiyama, Y.; Langan, P.; Chanzy, H. Crystal Structure and Hydrogen-Bonding System in Cellulose Iβ from Synchrotron X-Ray and Neutron Fiber Diffraction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9074–9082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, Y.-B.; Fu, Y. Hydrolysis of Cellulose to Glucose by Solid Acid Catalysts. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mikkola, J.-P.; Vainio, H.; Salmi, T.; Sjöholm, R.; Ollonqvist, T.; Väyrynen, J. Deactivation Kinetics of Mo-Supported Raney Ni Catalyst in the Hydrogenation of Xylose to Xylitol. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2000, 196, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lazaridis, P.A.; Karakoulia, S.; Delimitis, A.; Coman, S.M.; Parvulescu, V.I.; Triantafyllidis, K.S. D-Glucose Hydrogenation/Hydrogenolysis Reactions on Noble Metal (Ru, Pt)/Activated Carbon Supported Catalysts. Catal. Today 2015, 257, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rodiansono, R.; Astuti, M.D.; Mujiyanti, D.R.; Santoso, U.T. Selective Hydrogenation of Sucrose into Sugar Alcohols over Supported Raney Nickel-Based Catalysts. Indones. J. Chem. 2019, 19, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Esteban, J.; Yustos, P.; Ladero, M. Catalytic Processes from Biomass-Derived Hexoses and Pentoses: A Recent Literature Overview. Catalysts 2018, 8, 637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Dong, Q.; Huang, Y.; Yang, H.; Pei, J.; Li, K.; Yuan, M.; Xiao, W.; Ni, W.; Hou, Z. The Catalytic Hydrogenation of Biomass Platform Molecules by Ni–Co Nanoalloy Catalysts. Top. Catal. 2017, 60, 666–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guo, J.; Hou, Y.; Yang, C.; Wang, Y.; He, H.; Li, W. Preparation of Ni–B Amorphous Alloy Catalyst from Nickel Hydrazine Complex with Ultrasonic Assistance. Catal. Commun. 2011, 16, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Singh, H.; Rai, A.; Yadav, R.; Sinha, A.K. Glucose Hydrogenation to Sorbitol over Unsupported Mesoporous Ni/NiO Catalyst. Mol. Catal. 2018, 451, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Silvester, L.; Ramos, F.; Thuriot-Roukos, J.; Heyte, S.; Araque, M.; Paul, S.; Wojcieszak, R. Fully Integrated High-Throughput Methodology for the Study of Ni- and Cu-Supported Catalysts for Glucose Hydrogenation. Catal. Today 2019, 338, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, J.; Wu, S.; Liu, Y.; Li, B. Hydrogenation of Glucose over Reduced Ni/Cu/Al Hydrotalcite Precursors. Catal. Commun. 2013, 35, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fu, Y.; Ding, L.; Singleton, M.L.; Idrissi, H.; Hermans, S. Synergistic Effects Altering Reaction Pathways: The Case of Glucose Hydrogenation over Fe-Ni Catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 288, 119997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Upare, P.P.; Hwang, Y.K.; Kim, J.C.; Lee, J.H.; Kwak, S.K.; Hwang, D.W. A Robust and Highly Selective Catalytic System of Copper–Silica Nanocomposite and 1-Butanol in Fructose Hydrogenation to Mannitol. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 5050–5057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, J.; Xu, S.; Wu, S.; Liu, Y. Hydrogenation of Fructose over Magnetic Catalyst Derived from Hydrotalcite Precursor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013, 99, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zelin, J.; Regenhardt, S.A.; Meyer, C.I.; Duarte, H.A.; Sebastian, V.; Marchi, A.J. Selective Aqueous-Phase Hydrogenation of D-Fructose into D-Mannitol Using a Highly Efficient and Reusable Cu-Ni/SiO2 Catalyst. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2019, 206, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Morales, R.; Campos, C.H.; Fierro, J.L.G.; Fraga, M.A.; Pecchi, G. Stable Reduced Ni Catalysts for Xylose Hydrogenation in Aqueous Medium. Catal. Today 2018, 310, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Audemar, M.; Ramdani, W.; Junhui, T.; Raluca Ifrim, A.; Ungureanu, A.; Jérôme, F.; Royer, S.; Oliveira Vigier, K. Selective Hydrogenation of Xylose to Xylitol over Co/SiO2 Catalysts. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 1973–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sadier, A.; Shi, D.; Mamede, A.-S.; Paul, S.; Marceau, E.; Wojcieszak, R. Selective Aqueous Phase Hydrogenation of Xylose to Xylitol over SiO2-Supported Ni and Ni-Fe Catalysts: Benefits of Promotion by Fe. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 298, 120564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yamaguchi, S.; Mizugaki, T.; Mitsudome, T. Efficient D-Xylose Hydrogenation to D-Xylitol over a Hydrotalcite-Supported Nickel Phosphide Nanoparticle Catalyst. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 2021, 3327–3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Scholz, D.; Aellig, C.; Mondelli, C.; Pérez-Ramírez, J. Continuous Transfer Hydrogenation of Sugars to Alditols with Bioderived Donors over Cu-Ni-Al Catalysts. ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 1551–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ghoreishi, S.M.; Shahrestani, R.G. Innovative Strategies for Engineering Mannitol Production. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 20, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Heinen, A.W.; Peters, J.A.; van Bekkum, H. Hydrogenation of Fructose on Ru/C Catalysts. Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 328, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kuusisto, J.; Mikkola, J.-P.; Casal, P.P.; Karhu, H.; Väyrynen, J.; Salmi, T. Kinetics of the Catalytic Hydrogenation of D-Fructose over a CuO-ZnO Catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 115, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vieira, J.L.; Almeida-Trapp, M.; Mithöfer, A.; Plass, W.; Gallo, J.M.R. Rationalizing the Conversion of Glucose and Xylose Catalyzed by a Combination of Lewis and Brønsted Acids. Catal. Today 2020, 344, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lee, G.; Jeong, Y.; Takagaki, A.; Jung, J.C. Sonication Assisted Rehydration of Hydrotalcite Catalyst for Isomerization of Glucose to Fructose. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2014, 393, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zelin, J.; Meyer, C.I.; Regenhardt, S.A.; Sebastian, V.; Garetto, T.F.; Marchi, A.J. Selective Liquid-Phase Hydrogenation of Fructose to d-Mannitol over Copper-Supported Metallic Nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 319, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ruddlesden, J.F.; Stewart, A.; Thompson, D.J.; Whelan, R. Diastereoselective Control in Ketose Hydrogenations with Supported Copper and Nickel Catalysts. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1981, 72, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sifontes Herrera, V.A.; Saleem, F.; Kusema, B.; Eränen, K.; Salmi, T. Hydrogenation of L-Arabinose and d-Galactose Mixtures Over a Heterogeneous Ru/C Catalyst. Top. Catal. 2012, 55, 550–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yamaguchi, S.; Fujita, S.; Nakajima, K.; Yamazoe, S.; Yamasaki, J.; Mizugaki, T.; Mitsudome, T. Support-Boosted Nickel Phosphide Nanoalloy Catalysis in the Selective Hydrogenation of Maltose to Maltitol. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 6347–6354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sifontes Herrera, V.A.; Rivero Mendoza, D.E.; Leino, A.-R.; Mikkola, J.-P.; Zolotukhin, A.; Eränen, K.; Salmi, T. Sugar Hydrogenation in Continuous Reactors: From Catalyst Particles towards Structured Catalysts. Chem. Eng. Processing-Process Intensif. 2016, 109, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Eisenbeis, C.; Guettel, R.; Kunz, U.; Turek, T. Monolith Loop Reactor for Hydrogenation of Glucose. Catal. Today 2009, 147, S342–S346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Najarnezhadmashhadi, A.; Wärnå, J.; Eränen, K.; Trajano, H.L.; Murzin, D.; Salmi, T. Modelling of Kinetics, Mass Transfer and Flow Pattern on Open Foam Structures in Tubular Reactors: Hydrogenation of Arabinose and Galactose on Ruthenium Catalyst. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2021, 233, 116385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. García, B.; Orozco-Saumell, A.; López Granados, M.; Moreno, J.; Iglesias, J. Catalytic Transfer Hydrogenation of Glucose to Sorbitol with Raney Ni Catalysts Using Biomass-Derived Diols as Hydrogen Donors. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 14857–14867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liang, G.; He, L.; Cheng, H.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, F. The Hydrogenation/Dehydrogenation Activity of Supported Ni Catalysts and Their Effect on Hexitols Selectivity in Hydrolytic Hydrogenation of Cellulose. J. Catal. 2014, 309, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xin, H.; Hu, X.; Cai, C.; Wang, H.; Zhu, C.; Li, S.; Xiu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Q.; Ma, L. Catalytic Production of Oxygenated and Hydrocarbon Chemicals From Cellulose Hydrogenolysis in Aqueous Phase. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Manaenkov, O.V.; Kislitsa, O.V.; Matveeva, V.G.; Sulman, E.M.; Sulman, M.G.; Bronstein, L.M. Cellulose Conversion Into Hexitols and Glycols in Water: Recent Advances in Catalyst Development. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, Y.; Liao, Y.; Cao, X.; Wang, T.; Ma, L.; Long, J.; Liu, Q.; Xua, Y. Advances in Hexitol and Ethylene Glycol Production by One-Pot Hydrolytic Hydrogenation and Hydrogenolysis of Cellulose. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 74, 148–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liang, G.; He, L.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, C.; Li, X.; Fujita, S.; Zhang, B.; Arai, M.; Zhao, F. ZSM-5-Supported Multiply-Twinned Nickel Particles: Formation, Surface Properties, and High Catalytic Performance in Hydrolytic Hydrogenation of Cellulose. J. Catal. 2015, 325, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, C.; Yu, Y.; Lan, M.; Wei, X.; Ying, Z.; Liu, T.; Liang, G.; et al. Synthesis of Ni/Mesoporous ZSM-5 for Direct Catalytic Conversion of Cellulose to Hexitols: Modulating the Pore Structure and Acidic Sites via a Nanocrystalline Cellulose Template. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 3315–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liang, G.; Cheng, H.; Li, W.; He, L.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, F. Selective Conversion of Microcrystalline Cellulose into Hexitols on Nickel Particles Encapsulated within ZSM-5 Zeolite. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Van de Vyver, S.; Geboers, J.; Dusselier, M.; Schepers, H.; Vosch, T.; Zhang, L.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Jacobs, P.A.; Sels, B.F. Selective Bifunctional Catalytic Conversion of Cellulose over Reshaped Ni Particles at the Tip of Carbon Nanofibers. ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 698–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Van de Vyver, S.; Geboers, J.; Schutyser, W.; Dusselier, M.; Eloy, P.; Dornez, E.; Seo, J.W.; Courtin, C.M.; Gaigneaux, E.M.; Jacobs, P.A.; et al. Tuning the Acid/Metal Balance of Carbon Nanofiber-Supported Nickel Catalysts for Hydrolytic Hydrogenation of Cellulose. ChemSusChem 2012, 5, 1549–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Pang, J.; Wang, A.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, T. Catalytic Conversion of Cellulose to Hexitols with Mesoporous Carbon Supported Ni-Based Bimetallic Catalysts. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kobayashi, H.; Hosaka, Y.; Hara, K.; Feng, B.; Hirosaki, Y.; Fukuoka, A. Control of Selectivity, Activity and Durability of Simple Supported Nickel Catalysts for Hydrolytic Hydrogenation of Cellulose. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ding, L.-N.; Wang, A.-Q.; Zheng, M.-Y.; Zhang, T. Selective Transformation of Cellulose into Sorbitol by Using a Bifunctional Nickel Phosphide Catalyst. ChemSusChem 2010, 3, 818–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yang, P.; Kobayashi, H.; Hara, K.; Fukuoka, A. Phase Change of Nickel Phosphide Catalysts in the Conversion of Cellulose into Sorbitol. ChemSusChem 2012, 5, 920–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, X.; Liu, X.; Li, N.; Ma, P.; Zhang, Y. Direct Synthesis of Hexitols from Microcrystalline Cellulose and Birch over Zirconium(iv) Phosphate Supported Nickel Catalysts and the Mechanism Study. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 1353–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Luo, C.; Wang, S.; Liu, H. Cellulose Conversion into Polyols Catalyzed by Reversibly Formed Acids and Supported Ruthenium Clusters in Hot Water. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7636–7639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. He, M.; Guo, J.; Wang, X.; Song, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, H.; Li, C. Direct Conversion of Cellulose into Isosorbide over Ni Doped NbOPO4 Catalysts in Water. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 10292–10299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bonnin, I.; Mereau, R.; Tassaing, T.; De Oliveira Vigier, K. One-Pot Synthesis of Isosorbide from Cellulose or Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Challenge? Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2020, 16, 1713–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 27 01353 g001 550
Figure 1. Value-added chemicals from sorbitol.
Figure 1. Value-added chemicals from sorbitol.
Molecules 27 01353 g001
Molecules 27 01353 g002 550
Figure 2. Value-added chemicals from xylitol.
Figure 2. Value-added chemicals from xylitol.
Molecules 27 01353 g002
Molecules 27 01353 g003 550
Figure 3. Different tautomeric and diastereomeric forms of glucose and structural fragment of cellulose.
Figure 3. Different tautomeric and diastereomeric forms of glucose and structural fragment of cellulose.
Molecules 27 01353 g003
Molecules 27 01353 g004 550
Figure 4. TEM images of Ni-B amorphous alloy prepared by conventional NaBH4 reduction (a) and by chemical reduction of nickel hydrazine complex Ni(N2H4)22+ by BH4− with use of ultrasound (b) (reprinted from Publication [24] with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 4. TEM images of Ni-B amorphous alloy prepared by conventional NaBH4 reduction (a) and by chemical reduction of nickel hydrazine complex Ni(N2H4)22+ by BH4− with use of ultrasound (b) (reprinted from Publication [24] with permission from Elsevier).
Molecules 27 01353 g004
Molecules 27 01353 g005 550
Figure 5. XRD patterns of (a) before calcination mesoporous Ni/NiO, (b) after calcined mesoporous Ni/NiO catalyst (c) reduced mesoporous Ni/NiO catalyst and (d) used mesoporous Ni/NiO catalyst (reprinted from Publication [25] with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 5. XRD patterns of (a) before calcination mesoporous Ni/NiO, (b) after calcined mesoporous Ni/NiO catalyst (c) reduced mesoporous Ni/NiO catalyst and (d) used mesoporous Ni/NiO catalyst (reprinted from Publication [25] with permission from Elsevier).
Molecules 27 01353 g005
Molecules 27 01353 g006 550
Figure 6. TEM image of 8%Fe-8%Ni/CB catalysts and particle size distribution (reprinted from Publication [28] with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 6. TEM image of 8%Fe-8%Ni/CB catalysts and particle size distribution (reprinted from Publication [28] with permission from Elsevier).
Molecules 27 01353 g006
Molecules 27 01353 g007 550
Figure 7. Glucose conversion (X glucose) and sorbitol selectivity (Φ sorbitol) over fresh and spent catalysts. Reaction conditions: 60 mg catalyst, 0.5 g glucose, 100 mL H2O, T = 120 °C, p (H2) = 30 bar, 120 min and stirring speed of 1700 rpm (reprinted from Publication [28] with permission from Elsevier).
Figure 7. Glucose conversion (X glucose) and sorbitol selectivity (Φ sorbitol) over fresh and spent catalysts. Reaction conditions: 60 mg catalyst, 0.5 g glucose, 100 mL H2O, T = 120 °C, p (H2) = 30 bar, 120 min and stirring speed of 1700 rpm (reprinted from Publication [28] with permission from Elsevier).
Molecules 27 01353 g007
Molecules 27 01353 g008 550
Figure 8. Different tautomeric forms of fructose and corresponding alcohols.
Figure 8. Different tautomeric forms of fructose and corresponding alcohols.
Molecules 27 01353 g008
Molecules 27 01353 g009 550
Figure 9. Performance of monometallic Cu/SiO2, Ni/SiO2 and bimetallic Cu-Ni/SiO2 catalysts in fructose hydrogenation to mannitol at 100 °C and P(H2) = 40 atm after 2 h of reaction in water [30].
Figure 9. Performance of monometallic Cu/SiO2, Ni/SiO2 and bimetallic Cu-Ni/SiO2 catalysts in fructose hydrogenation to mannitol at 100 °C and P(H2) = 40 atm after 2 h of reaction in water [30].
Molecules 27 01353 g009
Molecules 27 01353 g010 550
Figure 10. Different tautomeric and diastereomeric forms of arabinose and corresponding alcohol.
Figure 10. Different tautomeric and diastereomeric forms of arabinose and corresponding alcohol.
Molecules 27 01353 g010
Molecules 27 01353 g011 550
Figure 11. Different tautomeric and diastereomeric forms of xylose and corresponding alcohol.
Figure 11. Different tautomeric and diastereomeric forms of xylose and corresponding alcohol.
Molecules 27 01353 g011
Molecules 27 01353 g012 550
Figure 12. Hydrolytic hydrogenation of cellulose to hexitols and C2-C3 glycols.
Figure 12. Hydrolytic hydrogenation of cellulose to hexitols and C2-C3 glycols.
Molecules 27 01353 g012
Molecules 27 01353 g013 550
Figure 13. Direct conversion of cellulose to isosorbide.
Figure 13. Direct conversion of cellulose to isosorbide.
Molecules 27 01353 g013
Table
Table 1. Hydrogenation of C5-C6 sugars over the catalysts with non-noble metals.
Table 1. Hydrogenation of C5-C6 sugars over the catalysts with non-noble metals.
CatalystRegimeSubstrateProductt, °CP (H2), AtmTime, hSolventSub/MetX, %S, %Refs.
Ni-Co nanoalloy (1:1)BatchD-glucoseD-sorbitol90304H2O0.14 mol/g9799[23]
Ni-BBatchD-glucoseD-sorbitol120402H2O0.3 mol/g85n.d.[24]
Ni/NiO
Mesopore Catalyst		BatchD-glucoseD-sorbitol13050n.d.H2O0.13 mol/g9588[25]
5%Ni/Al2O3
(Ni0)		BatchD-glucoseD-sorbitol130304H2O19.6 mol/mol (0.34 mol/g Ni)6080[26]
5%Cu/SiO2
(Cu0)		BatchD-glucoseD-sorbitol130304H2O19.6 mol/mol4589[22]
Ni1.85Cu1Al1.15BatchD-glucoseD-sorbitol120303H2O0.03 mol/g8087[27]
8%Fe-8%Ni/CBBatchD-glucoseD-sorbitol140306H2O16.5 mol/mol7170[28]
80%Cu/SiO2BatchD-fructoseD-mannitol12035101-butanol2.2 mol/mol>9983[29]
Ni4.63Cu1Al1.82Fe0.79BatchD-fructoseD-mannitol110302H2O0.03 mol/g>9957[30]
5%Cu-7%Ni/SiO2 BatchD-fructoseD-mannitol100402H2O8.3 mol/mol>9973[31]
D-sorbitol24
11%Cu/SiO2BatchD-fructoseD-mannitol100406H2O9.5 mol/mol9575[29]
D-sorbitol22
9%Ni/SiO2BatchD-fructoseD-mannitol100406H2O10.5 mol/mol5555[29]
Nd1Al0.162Ni0.838O3 (20% wt Ni)BatchD-xyloseD-xylitol100256H2O9.8 mol/mol7053[32]
10%Co/SiO2BatchD-xyloseD-xylitol140502H2O78.5 mol/mol>9990[33]
26%Ni-16%Fe/SiO2 BatchD-xyloseD-xylitol80204H2O10.6 mol/mol>9998[34]
Ni2P/HT
(0.91% wt. of Ni)		BatchD-xyloseD-xylitol100202H2O16 mol/mol>99>99[35]
Cu3Ni3Al2Flowglucosesorbitol150hydrogen donor 1,4-butanediol0.19H2O6-45 mol/g·min8770[36]
fructosemannitol/sorbitol8570/19
xylosexylitol8571
arabinosearabinitol9073
Table
Table 2. Hydrolytic hydrogenation of cellulose over the catalysts with nonnoble metals.
Table 2. Hydrolytic hydrogenation of cellulose over the catalysts with nonnoble metals.
CatalystSubstrateProductT, °CP (H2), AtmTime, hSolventsub/catX, %S, %Refs.
Ni MTPs/ZSM-5CelluloseSorbitol + Mannitol240402.5H2O0.3 g/100 mg9467[54]
Ni/ZSM-5 (Ni 40 % wt.)CellobioseSorbitol + Mannitol240404H2O0.2 g/100 mg>9982[50]
Ni/Al2O3>9929
Ni/SiO2>9944
Ni/NCC-ZSM-5 nanocrystalline cellulose-templated mesoporous ZSM-5Microcrystalline Cellulose (MCC)Sorbitol + Mannitol240402.5H2O0.1 g/50 mg8768[55]
17%Ni/ZSM-5Microcrystalline Cellulose (MCC)Sorbitol + Mannitol240402.5H2O0.2 g/100 mg8767[56]
40%Ni/ZSM-58657
40%Ni/Al2O38516
40%Ni/SiO28419
3%Ni/CNF/Al2O3Ball-Milled Cellulose at 190 °C for 24 hSorbitol + Mannitol230604H2O1 g/500 mg9261[57]
3%Ni/CNF/Al2O319060248863
7.5%Ni/CNF HNO3 treated (Ni surface atom 26.9 μmol/g cat)Ball-Milled Cellulose at 190 °C for 24 hSorbitol + Mannitol1906024H2O1 g/500 mg9382[58]
2.6%Ni/CNF HNO3 treated (Ni surface atom 8.1 μmol/g cat)9154
1%Ir-5%Ni/MCMicrocrystalline Cellulose (MCC)Sorbitol + Mannitol245600.5H2O0.5 g/150 mg>9958[59]
1%Rh-5%Ni/MC>9960
20%Ni/MC8551
20%Ni/AC6232
50%Ni/CBall-Milled CelluloseSorbitol + Mannitol210506H2O0.3 g/50 mg9071[60]
16%Ni2P/ACCelluloseSorbitol225601.5H2O0.5 g/150 mg>9948[61]
10%Ni-3.2%P/AC (Ni2P)Ball-Milled Cellulose Sorbitol230400.7H2O0.162 g/50 mg9068[62]
20%Ni/ZrP2CelluloseSorbitol200505H2O0.05 g/50 mg 61% yield[63]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Redina, E.; Tkachenko, O.; Salmi, T. Recent Advances in C5 and C6 Sugar Alcohol Synthesis by Hydrogenation of Monosaccharides and Cellulose Hydrolytic Hydrogenation over Non-Noble Metal Catalysts. Molecules 2022, 27, 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041353

AMA Style

Redina E, Tkachenko O, Salmi T. Recent Advances in C5 and C6 Sugar Alcohol Synthesis by Hydrogenation of Monosaccharides and Cellulose Hydrolytic Hydrogenation over Non-Noble Metal Catalysts. Molecules. 2022; 27(4):1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041353

Chicago/Turabian Style

Redina, Elena, Olga Tkachenko, and Tapio Salmi. 2022. "Recent Advances in C5 and C6 Sugar Alcohol Synthesis by Hydrogenation of Monosaccharides and Cellulose Hydrolytic Hydrogenation over Non-Noble Metal Catalysts" Molecules 27, no. 4: 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041353

APA Style

Redina, E., Tkachenko, O., & Salmi, T. (2022). Recent Advances in C5 and C6 Sugar Alcohol Synthesis by Hydrogenation of Monosaccharides and Cellulose Hydrolytic Hydrogenation over Non-Noble Metal Catalysts. Molecules, 27(4), 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27041353

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop