Next Article in Journal
Systematic Study on Nonlinear Optical Chromophores with Improved Electro-Optic Activity by Introducing 3,5-Bis(trifluoromethyl)benzene Derivative Isolation Groups into the Bridge
Next Article in Special Issue
Physicochemical Properties of Plasma-Activated Water and Its Control Effects on the Quality of Strawberries
Previous Article in Journal
Isomeric Activity Cliffs—A Case Study for Fluorine Substitution of Aminergic G Protein-Coupled Receptor Ligands
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crystallization and Structural Properties of Oleogel-Based Margarine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome Investigation and Functional Annotation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum YW11 Revealing Streptin and Ruminococcin-A as Potent Nutritive Bacteriocins against Gut Symbiotic Pathogens

1
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health, Beijing Engineering and Technology Research Center of Food Additives, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
2
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar 25100, Pakistan
3
Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Central Punjab, Lahore 54590, Pakistan
4
Department of Biotechnology, University of Malakand, Chakdara 18800, Pakistan
5
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Al-Leith University College, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24831, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Public Health, Health Sciences College Al-Leith, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah al-Mukarramah 24382, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
8
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, The Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
9
Centre of Biomedical Sciences Research (CBSR), Deanship of Scientific Research, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(2), 491; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020491
Submission received: 19 October 2022 / Revised: 22 December 2022 / Accepted: 23 December 2022 / Published: 4 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Chemistry in Asia)

Abstract

:
All nutrient-rich feed and food environments, as well as animal and human mucosae, include lactic acid bacteria known as Lactobacillus plantarum. This study reveals an advanced analysis to study the interaction of probiotics with the gastrointestinal environment, irritable bowel disease, and immune responses along with the analysis of the secondary metabolites’ characteristics of Lp YW11. Whole genome sequencing of Lp YW11 revealed 2297 genes and 1078 functional categories of which 223 relate to carbohydrate metabolism, 21 against stress response, and the remaining 834 are involved in different cellular and metabolic pathways. Moreover, it was found that Lp YW11 consists of carbohydrate-active enzymes, which mainly contribute to 37 glycoside hydrolase and 28 glycosyltransferase enzyme coding genes. The probiotics obtained from the BACTIBASE database (streptin and Ruminococcin-A bacteriocins) were docked with virulent proteins (cdt, spvB, stxB, and ymt) of Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Yersinia, respectively. These bacteria are the main pathogenic gut microbes that play a key role in causing various gastrointestinal diseases. The molecular docking, dynamics, and immune simulation analysis in this study predicted streptin and Ruminococcin-A as potent nutritive bacteriocins against gut symbiotic pathogens.

1. Introduction

From the genus Lactobacillus, Lactiplantibacillus is among the top-researched bacterial species. It has been shown to have probiotic and health-promoting benefits and has been accorded the GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status [1]. Due to their capacity to create lactic acid, these bacterial species have been used in food for a long time [2,3]. The most prevalent lactic acid-producing bacterial species in nature, Lactiplantibacillus, can be obtained from a broad range of sources, including plant matter, fermented foods (such as yogurt, pickles, cheese), meat products, fruit juice, the gastrointestinal tract of both humans and animals, and wine [4]. Currently, a variety of LAB strains are widely utilized in the food fermentation process and have many uses in medicine, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare. A growing body of research suggests that these bacteria may have health advantages in a variety of intestinal illnesses, including inflammatory bowel disease, due to their demonstrated anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, immune-modulating, and ability to control gut flora activities [5,6,7,8,9]. The probiotic characteristics of these strains are principally responsible for all these activities.
Due to their potential to have health-promoting benefits, probiotics, and products containing them have received a lot of scientific attention [3]. Probiotics are bioactive preparations with substantial concentrations of beneficial natural microorganisms that improve both health and life quality [10]. Human probiotics accounted for more than 90% of the global market in 2021. By 2026, the probiotics market may be worth $3.5 billion globally [11]. Streptococcus, Bifidobacterium, and enteric bacteria are used as probiotics in food or feed supplements, and “Live biotherapeutic products (LBP)” or “Microecologics for therapeutic application” use enteric bacteria [12,13].
Indirectly improving gut barrier function and directly competing with pathogens to provide antimicrobial effects are the main mechanisms by which these bacteria promote health [14]. Cell surface constituents of lactobacilli, such as adhesion molecules, proteins, and polysaccharides [15], influence the adherence of lactobacilli to the intestinal mucosa, and these associations may enhance bacterial colonization and host interactions while inhibiting pathogen attachment [16]. Additionally, by causing inhibitors of proinflammatory cytokine production, the anti-inflammatory actions can aid in reducing the host’s local and systemic inflammatory response [10,17]. However, several environmental challenges, including temperature, pH, bile, osmotic, and oxidative stress, are experienced by lactobacilli during the fermentation processes.
In contrast to enterotoxigenic species, invasive bacteria damage the host’s epithelial architecture severely. Histological signs of this damage include mucosal ulceration and inflammatory response in the lamina propria. Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, invasive E. coli, and Yersinia are the main pathogens in this group. Although enteric viruses also infiltrate intestinal epithelial cells, they produce much less mucosal damage than invasive bacterial infections do. The natural protective barrier provided by bacteriocins shields LAB from harmful environmental factors and pressures [18]. Additionally, these molecules function as a protective barrier against biofilm development and are essential in cell recognition, attachment to the gut wall, interactions with the immune cells, disruption of pathogen adherence, and contact with cells [19,20]. Bacteriocins have also been linked to probiotics’ immunomodulatory, anticancer, antioxidant, antibacterial, and cholesterol-lowering activities because they have different physiological properties and serve as prebiotics [20,21].
In the food and fermentation industries, bacteriocins can be used as a bio-thickener to increase food viscosity, flavor, and rheological properties. In the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries, bacteriocins can also be used as a bio-flocculant and bio-absorbent due to their good stability, emulsifying capabilities, and biocompatibility [22]. Due to their ability to produce antimicrobial substances, particularly bacteriocins with antimicrobial activity, lactobacilli can also function as natural bio-preservatives [23]. These substances help probiotics survive longer by preventing the growth of pathogenic or hazardous microbes [24]. One of the most significant members of the lactobacilli, formerly known as Lactobacillus plantarum, has been used extensively as a probiotic. It possesses important probiotic properties, such as immunomodulatory, antioxidant [25], cholesterol-lowering ability, effective nitrate degrading ability, and antimicrobial activity [25,26].
The current study investigates the functional annotation of the genomic components of the Lp YW11. The whole genome annotation was conducted with RAST leading to the genomic comparison with other strains of L. plantarum via analyzing the ancestral relationship of YW-11. The YW-11 strain was further analyzed for the synthesis and effect of potent bacteriocins on the virulent factors of various gut bacteria via docking analysis. The immune simulations were also determined through C-ImmSimm to analyze the immunomodulatory response of the bacteriocins.

2. Results

2.1. Genomic Characteristics and Functional Annotation of Lp YW 11

Lp YW11 genome consists of 3,181,760 base pairs, with 44.7% GC content, 231 subsystems, and 3065 genes. The genes present in the genome of Lp YW11 further comprised 26% sub-system and 74% non-subsystem coverage genes. The subsystem coverage contained 786 genes a total of which 732 genes were characterized and 36 were hypothetical. Similarly, a non-subsystem coverage was comprised of 2297 in a total of which 1196 genes were predicted, and 1101 genes were hypothetical. The total categories of the subsystem were 1078 of which 223 were carbohydrates; 105 were Cofactors, Vitamins, Prosthetic Groups, and Pigments; 46 were cell wall and capsule; 39 were virulence, disease, and defense; 6 were potassium metabolism; 15 were miscellaneous, 9 phages, and plasmid components; 35 membrane transport systems; 5 iron acquisition and metabolism systems; 39 RNA metabolism; 87 nucleosides and nucleotide systems; 134 protein metabolism; 4 cell division and cell cycle; 15 regulation and cell signaling; 4 secondary metabolisms; 48 DNA metabolism; 32 fatty acid biosynthesis; 6 dormancy and sporulation; 16 respiration; 21 stress response; 168 amino acid derivatives; 3 Sulphur metabolism; and 12 phosphorus metabolism (Figure 1). The features of the subsystem along with their functions are described in Table S1.
The KEGG pathways of the whole genome for the synthesis of essential biomolecules and secondary metabolites, especially exopolysaccharides (EPS), are shown in Figure S2.

2.2. Phage Site Prediction

Two significant phage hits were discovered by PHASTER that will increase the genetic variety and provide access to genomic variation as bacteria evolve. The two significant hits were against previously identified phage sections of viruses and other bacterial species (Table S2).
Figure 2 displays the graphical depiction of the phage areas found by PHASTER in the whole genome of Lp YW11 versus two significant hits. The Lp YW11 genome did not include any clustered regularly interspaced short repeats (CRISPRs), according to CRISPRFinder.

2.3. Interpretation of Transporter Proteins

39 proteins were identified as possible transporters from an analysis of the Lp YW11 genome, which may aid in several signaling pathways (Table S3). By tracking signal peptides, the signaling of transporter proteins was investigated. TAT, LIPO, and CS signals given by amino acids at a particular cleavage site were used to predict the predominance of signal peptides (Table S3). All the anticipated transporter proteins in the Lp YW11 genome are found extracellularly, or in the cytoplasm, according to an analysis of their cellular and subcellular localization (Table 1).

2.4. Carbohydrate Active Enzyme

The genetic, primary, and biochemical information on carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZy) that debase, modify, or create glycosidic linkages is examined using the carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZy) data collection. In the genome of Lp YW11, the CAZy database projected the presence of five primary groups of carbohydrates: glycoside hydrolases, glycosyl transferases, carbohydrate esterase, auxiliary enzymes, and carbohydrate-binding modules (Figure 3). The genome of Lp YW11 contains 82 CAZy genes, of which the glycoside hydrolase family and glycosyltransferase family of enzymes contribute approximately 37 and 28 genes, respectively. This indicates that Lp YW11 is critical for having strong probiotic activity and controlling the immune system against various pathogens (Table S4). The identified genes for the coding of carbohydrate coding enzymes were further annotated by dbCAN which analyzed HMMER, DIAMOND, and CGC regions in the whole genome of Lp YW11 (Table S5).

2.5. EPS-Producing Genes in Lp YW11

In the genome of Lp YW11, antiSMASH predicted four key regions that create EPS, namely region 1 (cyclic lactone autoinducer), region 2 (terpene), region 3 (T3PKS), and region 4 (Ripp similar) (Figure 4). Comparative EPS-producing areas of and other Lactiplantibacillus plantarum genomes are shown in Figure 5.

2.6. Interaction of EPS-Producing Genes

The 43 identified genes involved in the production of EPS were analyzed for their functioning regarding immune response generation and enhanced improvement in intestinal bowel diseases. The string network of 43 identified genes in the production of EPS is shown in Figure 6. The pathways involved in immune stress response and improvement in intestinal bowel diseases are D-alanine metabolism, folate biosynthesis, fatty acid biosynthesis, one carbon pool by folate, glycerophospholipid metabolism, peptidoglycan biosynthesis, biotin metabolism, pyrimidine metabolism, amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, purine metabolism and aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis (Figure S1). These pathways are involved in immune stress response and IBD improvement at gene and nucleotide levels. Any change in the micro-genetic level causes abrupt changes in the production of the essential enzyme that ultimately causes alterations in the whole metabolic pathways.

2.7. Comparative Genome Analysis

Genome collinearity analysis may help in identifying and understanding genetic differences between analyzed and reference genomes due to inversion, transposition, and other phenomena, as well as exhibiting the insertion, excision, and other details of sequences. It was observed that Lp YW11 had a high collinearity relationship with HC-2, LLY-606, pc-26, TMW, and WLPL04 strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (Figure 7) (Table S6).
Further, the multiply aligned genomes of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum showed the alignment of EPS-producing, transporter, and regulatory genes have been shown in Figure 8A, which corresponds to the enhanced capabilities of Lp YW11 as compared to other strains. The phylogenetic tree of Lp YW11 was constructed based on sequence similarity with HC-2, LLY-606, pc-26, TMW, and WLPL04 strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum genomes which showed the least close relationship with the genomes of comparison has been shown in Figure 8B.

2.8. Molecular Modelling

With a QMEAN Z-Score of 0.724, 0.785, 0.760, and 0.876 independently, the trRosetta predicted the tertiary design of cdt, spvB, stxB, and ymt with 81%, 96%, 81%, and 9% grouping personalities. The protein structure had a higher certainty expectation, as shown by the scoring list and other pertinent criteria. The trRosetta-determined quality rating was within both the ideal and standard range. As a result, the building met quality standards and was important for the use of docking studies and other objectives. Figure 9 shows the projected tertiary construction of cdt, spvB, stxB, and ymt.
The trRosetta anticipated the tertiary design of streptin and Ruminococcin-A with a QMEAN Z-Score of 0.196 and 0.214, respectively (Figure 10).

2.8.1. Interactome Prediction

The results of building the interactome of the proteins cdt, spvB, stxB, and ymt revealed that the proteins of interest associate with various other proteins, many of which are restricted to the nucleus, plasma membrane, and others of which are located in extracellular space. Following the creation of the interactome using STRING on the web device, only the relationships with the highest levels of certainty were chosen for further analysis in this review, and associations with medium and low levels of certainty were ignored (Figure 11).

2.8.2. Molecular Docking and Dynamic Simulations

The streptin and ruminococcin-affinity A’s for the gut bacterial pathogenic genes cdt, spvB, stxB, and ymt were examined using HDock. Streptin’s strongest interaction energies were −216.97 with cdt (Figure 12A), −221.42 with spvB (Figure 12B), −179.47 with stxB (Figure 12C), and −122.43 with ymt (Figure 12D). Similar to this, the best binding scores for Ruminococcin-A with cdt, spvB, stxB, and ymt were −223.05 for cdt, −233.62 for spvB, −182.05 for stxB, and −270.65 for ymt (Figure 12E–H).
The stability of the docked complexes was predicted by the molecular simulation run using iMODs, as illustrated in Figure 13 and Figure 14, based on field force. The bacteriocins and pathogenic genes interacted most steadily on 500 ns, according to the analysis of the docked complex’s deformability potential. The estimated B-factor supported this prediction, and the eigenvalues showed how much energy was needed to deform the complex with little variation. Little to no confusing interactions were expected from the docked complex’s covariance and elastic maps.

2.8.3. Immune Simulations

The developed vaccine received a fantastic immunological response from C-ImmSim. Figures S3 and S4 show the immune cell population for each consecutive injection day, including B-cell, PLB, and Th-cell populations These figures show that throughout the bacteriocins, active and resting memory B cells along with the IgM isotypes are continuously produced and replicate exponentially. IgM + IgG isotypes, as well as isolated IgM and IgG1 isotypes, increase exponentially in the PLB graph during the first week of probiotic use. The Th-cell graph demonstrates the dynamic presentation of MHC-II molecules in the first five days after absorption.

3. Discussion

Since many Lactiplantibacillus plantarum have a long history of use in food due to the lactic corrosive delivering bacterium, there is growing interest in it. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum is one of the most extensively studied bacterial species belonging to the class Lactobacillus with demonstrated probiotic and well-being advancing impacts and has been “by and large perceived as protected” (GRAS) status. Numerous studies have shown that they are capable of enhancing important medical benefits, such as suppressing the growth of microorganisms by demonstrating immunomodulatory effects, directing stomach greenery, altering the gastrointestinal microbiota, improving resistance, advancing processing, safeguarding gastric mucosa, and treating gastrointestinal contaminations, incendiary entrails infections, and unfavorably susceptible diseases [27]
According to a genome-wide investigation of Lp YW11, the genome is 3,181,760 bp in size, with 26% of its genes covered by subsystems and 74% by non-subsystem genes. The genes involved in sub-system coverage are involved in the creation of beneficial metabolites as well as numerous metabolic pathways. By taking into account two significant phage areas against viruses and other bacterial species, the genetic diversity in Lp YW11 was examined. Potential transporter proteins that were engaged in multiple signaling pathways were searched for in the Lp YW11 genome. The TAT, LIPO, and CS signals, which were provided by particular amino acids at a particular cleavage location, were used to predict the signal peptide. The projected transporter proteins’ cellular and subcellular locations were also examined, and the results demonstrated that all transporter proteins were found extracellularly. The glycoside hydrolase and glycosyltransferase families of carbohydrate-active enzymes, which are largely contributed to by the genome of Lp YW11, are crucial for significant probiotic activity and the control of the immune response to a variety of pathogens.
The current study also indicates the prediction of exopolysaccharide areas, including terpene, T3PKS, and RiPP-like regions, in the genome of Lp YW11. The abundance of EPS production in our query sequence was shown by comparing the Lp YW11 with other bacterial species such as enterococcus, bacillus cereus, and halobacillus. The 43 EPS-producing genes were further examined for their role in immune response pathways, protein-protein interactions, and their improvement of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) via STRING network creation. The STRING analysis revealed several pathways, including those involved in purine, biotin, pyrimidine, folate, and peptidoglycan metabolism as well as immune response and IBD improvement.
With the Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains HC-2, LLY-606, pc-26, TMW, and WLPL04, a comparative genomic analysis of Lp YW11 was conducted. Concerning comparator genomes, the Lp YW11 displayed the highest collinearity and least ancestral relationship. These in-depth interpretations offer opportunities to modify or redesign this strain to combine its properties in the human body. In the gastrointestinal tract of humans, some pathogenic bacteria are causing various pathogenic diseases. These bacteria mainly include Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Yersinia which are highly resistant to modern antibiotics. Probiotics-producing bacteria are of great interest to overcome this problem. In the current study, we have discussed two bacteriocins secreted by YW-11 retrieved from BACTIBASE i.e., streptin and Ruminococcin-A. These bacteriocins were analyzed against the virulent genes i.e., cdt, spvB, stxB, and ymt of Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Yersinia, respectively.
The docking scores, molecular simulations, and immune simulations have shown that the probiotics produced by Lp YW-11 are safe to use against drug-resistant pathogenic gut bacteria and have enhanced nutritive properties. In addition, the usage of Lp YW11 in modern food products can be improved by using its current metabolic and biochemical pathways to identify and direct similar strains as potential probiotics in foods and beverages.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strain and Culture Condition

Previously isolated Lactiplantibacillus plantarum YW11 (Lp YW11), available on GenBank with ID number: CP035031.1, was kept in frozen (−9 °C) stocks of MRS broth that had been provided with 20% (v/v) glycerol. The strains were identified using different tests such as the gram reaction, cell morphology, and catalase assays. The 16S rDNA sequencing analysis and the API 50 CHL test (bio-Merieux, Craponne, France) were used to identify the strains [28,29,30,31,32,33,34].

4.2. DNA Extraction and Whole Genome Sequencing

The Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit from Promega was used to extract genomic DNA, and the TBS-380 fluorometer from Turner Bio Systems Inc., (Sunnyvale, CA, USA), was used to measure the amount of DNA. For additional examination, high-quality DNA (OD260/280 = 1.8–2.0, >20 ug) was employed. Using the NEXTflexTM Rapid DNA-Seq Kit, Illumina sequencing libraries were created from the sheared fragments. Using the NEXTflexTM Rapid DNA-Seq Kit, Illumina sequencing libraries were created from the sheared fragments. Briefly, end-repair and phosphorylation of the 5′ prime ends came first. The 3′ ends were then capped with an A-tail and ligated to sequencing adapters. The last stage was utilizing PCR to enrich the adapters-ligated products. On an Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform, the generated libraries were used for paired-end Illumina sequencing (2150 bp). Single Molecule Real-Time (SMRT) technology and Illumina sequencing platforms were used to complete the full genome sequence of the chosen strain (Lp YW11), which has the accession number (GCA 004028295.1) [35]. The complexity of the genome was evaluated using the Illumina data. The Qiagen DNA extraction kit was used to isolate the genomic DNA following the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.3. Genomic Investigation

Rapid annotation of using subsystem technology (RAST) (https://rast.nmpdr.org/) accessed on 10 October 2022, foresaw the utilitarian comment of qualities connected with various cell and metabolic pathways. The PHASTER web server (https://phaster.ca/) accessed on 10 October 2022, predicted the prophage regions in the L. plantarum YW-11 genome. CRISPRFinder (available at https://bioinformaticshome.com/devices/DNA-successioninvestigation/portrayals/CRISPRFinder.html) accessed on 12 October 2022 identified clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats.
Further, the arrangement comparability search was performed by NCBI BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) accessed on 15 October 2022. The Transporter Classification Database (TCDB) was utilized to examine possible carriers from Lp 13-3 (https://tcdb.org/) accessed on 16 October 2022 which were oppressed for their flagging abilities by Signal Peptide (SignalP 5.0) (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?SignalP-5.0) accessed on 17 October 2022.

4.4. Genome Comparison

The Seed Viewer of RAST (https://rast.nmpdr.org/) accessed on 19 October 2022 was used to compare the collinearity of the Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains YW11, HC-2, LLY-606, pc-26, TMW, and WLPL04. MAUVE Alignment (http://darlinglab.org/mauve/mauve.html) accessed on 20 October 2022, which primarily evaluates the evolutionary history of comparative genomes, conducted the multiple genome alignment of the genes. Additionally, CV-Tree (http://cvtree.online/v3/cvtree/) accessed on 22 October 2022 created a phylogenetic analysis utilizing the neighbor-joining method for comparative genome analysis.

4.5. Functional Annotation

Glycoside hydrolases (GHs) are sugar dynamic chemicals (CAZy), which were anticipated by the CAZy data collection (http://www.cazy.org/) accessed on 23 October 2022 and further defined by the DbCAN meta server (https://bcb.unl.edu/dbCAN2/) accessed on 24 October 2022. To anticipate any antibiotic-resistant genes in the L. plantarum YW-11 genome, the identification of antibiotic resistance factors CARD (Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database) (http://arpcard.mcmaster.ca/) accessed on 25 October 2022 was also conducted. STRING predicted the cryptoscopic protein-protein connections of annotated gene-creating properties.

4.6. Bacteriocin Production

PathogenFinder (http://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/PathogenFinder/) accessed on 26 October 2022 was used to examine the bacterial pathogenicity and determine if L. plantarum YW-11 was a pathogen or not. The BACTIBASE database was used to screen the nucleotide sequence of L. plantrum YW-11. The antiSMASH bacterial variation was used to analyze the exopolysaccharide biosynthesis quality clusters throughout L. plantarum YW-11’s whole genome (https://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org/#!/begin) accessed on 27 October 2022.

4.7. Molecular Modelling

The virulent factors of four main pathogenic gut bacteria were analyzed from VFDB. The targeted pathogenic gut bacteria were Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella enterica, Shigella dysenteriae, and Yersinia pestis along with their virulent genes, i.,e., cdt, spvB, stxB, and ymt, respectively. Regarding bacteriocins, two main bacteriocins of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum were retrieved from BACTIBASE, namely, streptin and Ruminococcin-A. All retrieved sequences, i.e., of virulent genes and bacteriocins were modeled using trRosetta.

4.8. Interactome Prediction of Pathogenic genes of Gut Bacteria

The interactome for the proteins cdt, spvB, stxB, and ymt was predicted using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING), which provides a database of known and anticipated protein interactions for 2 million proteins. We were able to identify the structure, interactome, and functions of proteins from Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella enterica, Shigella dysenteriae, and Yersinia pestis that interact with other proteins using our web tool.

4.9. Molecular Docking and Dynamic Simulations

HDock is capable of anticipating the preferred orientation in which two molecules will bind to form a stable compound. After that, scoring formulas can be used to calculate the binding affinity or the strength of a molecule’s connection to another. To see the docking, Pymol 3D Molecular Structure was employed. For the simulations of the docked complexes, the online web program iMODS was used.

4.10. Immune Simulations

On the C-ImmSim server (http://kraken.iac.rm.cnr.it/C-IMMSIM/) accessed on 30 October 2022, the sequence was performed to confirm the immunological response elicited by the vaccine design. Based on specifics such as injection timing, the server delivers immunological activity against bacteriocins or any medicine. It displays the bacteriocin response of B and T lymphocytes and predicts the bacteriocin response of immunoglobulins and immunocomplexes.

5. Conclusions

The current study predicted the exopolysaccharides of Lp YW11, including terpene, T3PKS, and RiPP-like regions. The abundance of EPS production in the genome was further validated by comparing the information with other bacterial species such as enterococcus, bacillus cereus, and halobacillus. Among the identified bacteriocins, two (streptin and Ruminococcin-A) were further analyzed for their probiotic role through docking with virulent proteins of pathogenic bacterial species. The docking, molecular dynamics, and immune simulation analysis showed that both the bacteriocins are potent inhibitors of the target bacterial pathogens and help the human host elicit a strong immune response against the pathogenic bacteria. These findings elucidate that these bacteriocins can be utilized in food safety approaches, and the Lp YW11 producing these bacteriocins can be used in food starter cultures.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28020491/s1. Table S1: Genome-wide annotation of YW-11 by RAST; Table S2: Phage Site Prediction; Table S3: Predicted Transporter Proteins and interpretation of their signal peptide. Table S4: Interpretation of Carbohydrate Active Enzymes; Table S5: Annotation of Carbohydrate Active Enzymes previously predicted by CAZy; Table S6: Collinearity Analysis of Similar Genomes of Lactobacillus plantrum; Figure S1: Pathways involved in the immune stress response and intestinal bowel disease improvement. (A). Fatty acid biosynthesis (B). One carbon pool by Folate (C). Peptidoglycan Biosynthesis (D). Pyruvate metabolism (E). D-alanine metabolism (F). Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism (G). Biotin metabolism (H). Pyrimidine metabolism (I). Folate biosynthesis (J). Aminoacyl tRNA Biosynthesis. Figure S2: KEGG pathway for the synthesis of secondary metabolites and carbohydrates. Figure S3: Immunomodulatory response after streptin dosage. Figure S4: Immunomodulatory response after Ruminococcin-A dosage.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.A. and Y.Z.; methodology, T.A., M.N., A.S., S.I.M., M.S.M. and U.A.; software, M.S., M.Y.S., A.A.K., A.S.D. and M.A.; validation, M.S., M.Y.S., A.A.A., A.S.D. and M.A.; formal analysis, M.Y.S., A.S.D., A.A.A. and A.S.A.; investigation, T.A., M.N., A.S., S.I.M., M.S.M. and U.A.; resources, Y.Z.; data curation, T.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.N., S.I.M., M.S.M., U.A. and T.A.; writing—review and editing, A.S. and T.A.; visualization, A.S.D.; supervision, Y.Z.; project administration, T.A.; funding acquisition, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFE0131800) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31871823).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Deanship of Scientific Research Taif University for funding this research work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sarwar, A.; Aziz, T.; Din, J.; Khalid, A.; Rahman, T.; Daudzai, Z. Pros of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Microbiology: A Review. Biomed. Lett. 2018, 4, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aziz, T.; Sarwar, A.; Naveed, M.; Shahzad, M.; Aqib Shabbir, M.; Anas, S.D.; ud Din, J.; Ali Khan, A.; Sumaira, N.; Haiyang, C.; et al. Bio-Molecular Analysis of Selected food derived Lactiplantibacillus strains for CLA Production Reveals possibly a complex mechanism. Food Res. Int. 2022, 154, 111031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jeong, J.J.; Park, H.J.; Cha, M.G.; Park, E.; Won, S.M.; Ganesan, R.; Gupta, H.; Gebru, Y.A.; Sharma, S.P.; Lee, S.B.; et al. The Lactobacillus as a Probiotic: Focusing on Liver Diseases. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stefanovic, E.; Fitzgerald, G.; McAuliffe, O. Advances in the genomics and metabolomics of dairy lactobacilli: A review. Food Microbiol. 2017, 61, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yonekura, S.; Okamoto, Y.; Okawa, T.; Hisamitsu, M.; Chazono, H.; Kobayashi, K.; Sakurai, D.; Horiguchi, S.; Hanazawa, T. Effects of daily intake of Lactobacillus paracasei strain KW3110 on Japanese cedar pollinosis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2009, 30, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Z.; Lv, J.; Pan, L.; Zhang, Y. Roles, and applications of probiotic Lactobacillus strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 8135–8143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kwon, H.K.; Lee, C.G.; So, J.S.; Chae, C.S.; Hwang, J.S.; Sahoo, A.; Nam, J.H.; Rhee, J.H.; Hwang, K.C.; Im, S.H. Generation of regulatory dendritic cells and CD4+Foxp3+ T cells by probiotics administration suppresses immune disorders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 2159–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hojsak, I.; Snovak, N.; Abdovic, S.; Szajewska, H.; Misak, Z.; Kolacek, S. Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections in children who attend day care centers: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 29, 312–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Joo, H.M.; Hyun, Y.J.; Myoung, K.S.; Ahn, Y.T.; Lee, J.H.; Huh, C.S.; Han, M.J.; Kim, D.H. Lactobacillus johnsonii HY7042 ameliorates Gardnerella vaginalis-induced vaginosis by killing Gardnerella vaginalis and inhibiting NF-κB activation. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2011, 11, 1758–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Denkova, Z.; Krastanov, A. Development of New Products: Probiotics and Probiotic Foods; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012; Available online: www.intechopen.com (accessed on 29 October 2022).
  11. Wang, Y.; Liang, Q.; Lu, B.; Shen, H.; Liu, S.; Shi, Y.; Leptihn, S.; Li, H.; Wei, J.; Liu, C.; et al. Whole-genome analysis of probiotic product isolates reveals the presence of genes related to antimicrobial resistance, virulence factors, and toxic metabolites, posing potential health risks. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Peng, X.; Ed-Dra, A.; Yue, M. Whole genome sequencing for the risk assessment of probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 3, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Surve, S.; Shinde, D.B.; Kulkarni, R. Isolation, characterization, and comparative genomics of potentially probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strains from Indian foods. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ng, S.; Hart, A.; Kamm, M.; Stagg, A.; Knight, S. CMechanisms of action of probiotics: Recent advances. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2009, 15, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sengupta, R.; Altermann, E.; Anderson, R.C.; McNabb, W.C.; Moughan, P.J.; Roy, N.C. The role of cell surface architecture of lactobacilli in host-microbe interactions in the gastrointestinal tract. Mediators Inflamm. 2013, 2013, 237921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Velez, M.P.; Keersmaecker, D.S.C.; Vanderleyden, J. Adherence factors of Lactobacillus in the human gastrointestinal tract. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 276, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Hörmannsperger, G.; Haller, D. Molecular crosstalk of probiotic bacteria with the intestinal immune system: Clinical relevance in the context of inflammatory bowel disease. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 300, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ramchandran, L.; Shah, N.P. Effect of exopolysaccharides on the proteolytic and Angiotensin-I converting enzyme-inhibitory activities and textural and rheological properties of low-fat yogurt during refrigerated storage. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 895–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Rajoka, M.S.R.; Wu, Y.; Mehwish, H.M.; Bansal, H.; Zhao, L. Lactobacillus exopolysaccharides: New perspectives on engineering strategies, physiochemical functions, and immunomodulatory effects on host health. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 103, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oleksy, M.; Klewicka, E. Exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus sp.: Biosynthesis and applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 11, 450–462. [Google Scholar]
  21. Angelin, J.; Kavitha, M. Exopolysaccharides from probiotic bacteria and their health potential. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 853–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fei, Y.T.; Liu, D.M.; Luo, T.H.; Chen, G.; Wu, H.; Li, L.; Yu, Y.G. Molecular characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum DMDL 9010, a strain with efficient nitrite degradation capacity. PLoS ONE 2014, 25, e113792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, D.M.; Guo, J.; Zeng, X.A.; Sun, D.W.; Brennan, C.S.; Zhou, Q.X.; Jin, S.Z. The probiotic role of Lactobacillus plantarum in reducing risks associated with cardiovascular disease. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 52, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saenz, Y.; Rojo-Bezares, B.; Navarro, L.; Díez, L.; Somalo, S.; Zarazaga, Z.; Torres, C. Genetic diversity of the pln locus among oenological Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 134, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Seddik, H.A.; Bendali, F.; Gancel, F.; Fliss, I.; Spano, G.; Drider, D. Lactobacillus plantarum and Its Probiotic and Food Potentialities. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2017, 9, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Devi, S.M.; Halami, P.M. Genetic variation of pln loci among probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum group strains with antioxidant and cholesterol-lowering ability. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2019, 11, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Aziz, T.; Naveed, M.; Sarwar, A.; Makhdoom, S.I.; Mughal, M.S.; Ali, U.; Yang, Z.; Shahzad, M.; Sameeh, M.Y.; Alruways, M.W.; et al. Functional Annotation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 13-3 as a Potential Starter Probiotic Involved in the Food Safety of Fermented Products. Molecules 2022, 27, 5399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vries, M.; Vaughan, E.E.; Kleerebezem, M.; Vos, W. Lactobacillus plantarum-survival, functional and potential probiotic properties in the human intestinal tract. Int. Dairy J. 2006, 16, 1018–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aziz, T.; Sarwar, A.; ud Din, J.; Al Dalali, S.; Ali Khan, A.; Din, Z.U.; Yang, Z. Biotransformation of linoleic acid into different metabolites by food derived Lactobacillus plantarum 12-3 and in silico characterization of relevant reactions. Food Res. Int. 2021, 147, 110470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aziz, T.; Sarwar, A.; Fahim, M.; Al Dalali, S.; Din, Z.U.; ud Din, J.; Xin, Z.; Jian, Z.; Pacheco Fill, T.; Yang, Z. In silico characterization of linoleic acid biotransformation to rumenic acid in food derived Lactobacillus plantarum YW11. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2020, 7, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Aziz, T.; Sarwar, A.; Fahim, M.; Din, J.U.; Al-Dalali, S.; Din, Z.U.; Ali Khan, A.; Jian, Z.; Yang, Z. Dose-dependent Production of Linoleic Acid Analogues in food derived Lactobacillus plantarum K25 and in silico Characterization of Relevant Reactions. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2020, 67, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Aziz, T.; Sarwar, A.; Fahim, M.; Al-Dalali, S.; Din, Z.U.; ud Din, J.; Fill, P.T.; Yang, Z. Conversion of linoleic acid to different fatty acid metabolites by Lactobacillus plantaraum 13-3 and in silico characterization of the prominent reactions. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2020, 65, 4879–4884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yunyun, J.; Jian, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Wen, Z.; Zhijian, Y.; Chao, C.; Yang, Z. Complete genome sequencing of exopolysaccharide-producing Lactobacillus plantarum K25 provides genetic evidence for the probiotic functionality and cold endurance capacity of the strain. Bioscience 2018, 82, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, J.; Zhao, X.; Tian, Z.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Z. Characterization of an exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus plantarum YW11 isolated from Tibet Kefir. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 10, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Churro, C.; Pereira, P.; Vasconcelos, V.; Valério, E. Species-specific real-time PCR cell number quantification of the bloom-forming cyanobacterium Planktothrix agardhii. Arch Microbiol. 2012, 194, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Subsystem coverage and distribution of Lp YW11 genome by RAST.
Figure 1. Subsystem coverage and distribution of Lp YW11 genome by RAST.
Molecules 28 00491 g001
Figure 2. PHASTER’s prediction of phage sites (A) Complete genome prediction of Lp YW11 with phage areas in the lactoplantibacillus plantarum genome (B) Expanded view of the genome with phage sites.
Figure 2. PHASTER’s prediction of phage sites (A) Complete genome prediction of Lp YW11 with phage areas in the lactoplantibacillus plantarum genome (B) Expanded view of the genome with phage sites.
Molecules 28 00491 g002
Figure 3. The prediction of the glycoside hydrolase family, glycosyltransferase family, carbohydrate esterase family, auxiliary esterase family, and carbohydrate-binding module family by the CAZy database.
Figure 3. The prediction of the glycoside hydrolase family, glycosyltransferase family, carbohydrate esterase family, auxiliary esterase family, and carbohydrate-binding module family by the CAZy database.
Molecules 28 00491 g003
Figure 4. Shows the Lp YW11 genome’s EPS-producing sites. Core biosynthetic genes are represented by the colors red, pink, green, blue, and grey. Regulatory genes are represented by the color green (Other genes). (A) The autoinducer cyclic lactone (B) terpene (C) T3PKS (D) RiPP likes.
Figure 4. Shows the Lp YW11 genome’s EPS-producing sites. Core biosynthetic genes are represented by the colors red, pink, green, blue, and grey. Regulatory genes are represented by the color green (Other genes). (A) The autoinducer cyclic lactone (B) terpene (C) T3PKS (D) RiPP likes.
Molecules 28 00491 g004
Figure 5. Prediction of Exopolysaccharides (EPS) in red by antiSMASH along with the genomic comparison of Lp YW11 with other strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum.
Figure 5. Prediction of Exopolysaccharides (EPS) in red by antiSMASH along with the genomic comparison of Lp YW11 with other strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum.
Molecules 28 00491 g005
Figure 6. STRING network of 43 genes involved in EPS production that causes immune stress response and intestinal bowel disease improvement.
Figure 6. STRING network of 43 genes involved in EPS production that causes immune stress response and intestinal bowel disease improvement.
Molecules 28 00491 g006
Figure 7. Collinearity relationship of YW-11 with (A) WLPL04, (B). TMW, (C) pc-26 and (D) HC-2, strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum using SEED Viewer of RAST.
Figure 7. Collinearity relationship of YW-11 with (A) WLPL04, (B). TMW, (C) pc-26 and (D) HC-2, strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum using SEED Viewer of RAST.
Molecules 28 00491 g007
Figure 8. (A) Collinearity relationship of Lp YW11 with HC-2, LLY-606, pc-26, TMW, and WLPL04 showing aligned EPS-producing genes (Pink), transporter genes (Blue), regulatory genes (Green). (B) Phylogenetic Analysis of Lp YW11 with HC-2, LLY-606, pc-26, TMW and WLPL04.
Figure 8. (A) Collinearity relationship of Lp YW11 with HC-2, LLY-606, pc-26, TMW, and WLPL04 showing aligned EPS-producing genes (Pink), transporter genes (Blue), regulatory genes (Green). (B) Phylogenetic Analysis of Lp YW11 with HC-2, LLY-606, pc-26, TMW and WLPL04.
Molecules 28 00491 g008
Figure 9. 3-D structure prediction of the virulent genes of gut bacteria via trRossetta. (A) cdt, (B) spvB, (C) stxB, and (D) ymt.
Figure 9. 3-D structure prediction of the virulent genes of gut bacteria via trRossetta. (A) cdt, (B) spvB, (C) stxB, and (D) ymt.
Molecules 28 00491 g009
Figure 10. 3-D modeled structures of bacteriocins via trRosetta (A) Streptin (B) Ruminococcin-A.
Figure 10. 3-D modeled structures of bacteriocins via trRosetta (A) Streptin (B) Ruminococcin-A.
Molecules 28 00491 g010
Figure 11. Interactome prediction through STRING. (A) ctd (B) spvB (C) stxB and (D) ymt.
Figure 11. Interactome prediction through STRING. (A) ctd (B) spvB (C) stxB and (D) ymt.
Molecules 28 00491 g011
Figure 12. Visualized docked complexes by Pymol of streptin with (A) cdt (B) spvB (C) stxB (D) ymt and of Ruminococcin-A with (E) cdt (F) spvB (G) stxB (H) ymt.
Figure 12. Visualized docked complexes by Pymol of streptin with (A) cdt (B) spvB (C) stxB (D) ymt and of Ruminococcin-A with (E) cdt (F) spvB (G) stxB (H) ymt.
Molecules 28 00491 g012
Figure 13. Shows a simulation of molecular dynamics of the best docked complex of streptin with spvB. (A) Deformability of the complex; (B) B-Factor graph, the plot indicates a comparative PDB plot, but there are no validated structures of our molecules on PDB; (C) Elastic Network (Grey matter indicates stiffer region); (D) Covariance Map: correlated (red), uncorrelated (white), or anti-correlated (blue) motions; (E) The eigenvalue plot illustrates the minimum energy required to deform the complex; (F) Variance individual variance (purple) and cumulative variance (green).
Figure 13. Shows a simulation of molecular dynamics of the best docked complex of streptin with spvB. (A) Deformability of the complex; (B) B-Factor graph, the plot indicates a comparative PDB plot, but there are no validated structures of our molecules on PDB; (C) Elastic Network (Grey matter indicates stiffer region); (D) Covariance Map: correlated (red), uncorrelated (white), or anti-correlated (blue) motions; (E) The eigenvalue plot illustrates the minimum energy required to deform the complex; (F) Variance individual variance (purple) and cumulative variance (green).
Molecules 28 00491 g013
Figure 14. Shows a simulation of molecular dynamics of the best-docked complex of Ruminococ-cin-A with ymt. (A). Deformability of the complex; (B). B-Factor graph, the plot indicates a comparative PDB plot, but there are no validated structures of our molecules on PDB; (C). Elastic Network (Grey matter indicates stiffer region); (D). Covariance Map: correlated (red), uncorrelated (white), or anti-correlated (blue) motions; (E). Variance individual variance (purple) and cumulative variance (green); (F). The eigenvalue plot illustrates the minimum energy required to deform the complex.
Figure 14. Shows a simulation of molecular dynamics of the best-docked complex of Ruminococ-cin-A with ymt. (A). Deformability of the complex; (B). B-Factor graph, the plot indicates a comparative PDB plot, but there are no validated structures of our molecules on PDB; (C). Elastic Network (Grey matter indicates stiffer region); (D). Covariance Map: correlated (red), uncorrelated (white), or anti-correlated (blue) motions; (E). Variance individual variance (purple) and cumulative variance (green); (F). The eigenvalue plot illustrates the minimum energy required to deform the complex.
Molecules 28 00491 g014
Table 1. Interpretation of cellular and sub-cellular localization through CELLO of predicted transporter proteins by TCDB.
Table 1. Interpretation of cellular and sub-cellular localization through CELLO of predicted transporter proteins by TCDB.
TCDB ID Protein NameCELLO
Q13U92Putative membrane-anchored cell sub-family proteinExtracellular
WP_060331514.1autotransporter-associated beta structure proteinExtracellular
CAH35630.1putative outer membrane proteinExtracellular
Q79FV6PE-PGRS FAMILY PROTEINExtracellular
Q86IX4Nsp1_C domain-containing proteinExtracellular
WP_010035418.1FG-GAP repeat proteinExtracellular
B1Z6U1Filamentous haemagglutinin family proteinExtracellular
B3FNS7Trimeric autotransporter adhesin proteinExtracellular
XP_021194905.1papilin isoform X5Extracellular
Q86AS3EGF-like domain-containing proteinExtracellular
P46531.4Neurogenic locus notch homolog proteinExtracellular
A2VEC9.2SCO-spondin proteinExtracellular
P06620.1Ice nucleation proteinExtracellular
G0SBQ3.1Nucleoporin NSP1Extracellular
B0FXJ3Ice nucleation proteinExtracellular
WP_057332199.1 PE family protein Extracellular
L7VCL1PE-PGRS family proteinExtracellular
P10079Fibropellin-1Extracellular
Q03650Cysteine-rich, acidic integral membrane proteinExtracellular
G0SAK3Nucleoporin NUP145Extracellular
WP_084871275.1carbohydrate-binding domain proteinExtracellular
O00468AgrinExtracellular
D3KYQ3Macronuclear nucleoporin proteinExtracellular
L7V457PE-PGRS family proteinExtracellular
A7SCE9Predicted protein (Fragment)Extracellular
P37198Nuclear pore glycoproteinExtracellular
E1ZJE6Putative uncharacterized proteinExtracellular
WP_010044366.1hypothetical proteinExtracellular
P35658Nuclear pore complex proteinExtracellular
Q749L8Cytochrome cExtracellular
WP_010044253.1hypothetical proteinExtracellular
AVM72784.1magnetosome membrane-specific proteinExtracellular
A8CG34Nuclear envelope pore membrane proteinExtracellular
A6NF01.2Putative nuclear envelope pore membrane proteinExtracellular
P71187TrbL proteinExtracellular
Q8H384Cadmium selective transporter proteinExtracellular
A3M3H0Adhesin Ata autotransporterExtracellular
MBC7395593.1flagellar hook-length control proteinExtracellular
XP_003062523.1predicted proteinExtracellular
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aziz, T.; Naveed, M.; Makhdoom, S.I.; Ali, U.; Mughal, M.S.; Sarwar, A.; Khan, A.A.; Zhennai, Y.; Sameeh, M.Y.; Dablool, A.S.; et al. Genome Investigation and Functional Annotation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum YW11 Revealing Streptin and Ruminococcin-A as Potent Nutritive Bacteriocins against Gut Symbiotic Pathogens. Molecules 2023, 28, 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020491

AMA Style

Aziz T, Naveed M, Makhdoom SI, Ali U, Mughal MS, Sarwar A, Khan AA, Zhennai Y, Sameeh MY, Dablool AS, et al. Genome Investigation and Functional Annotation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum YW11 Revealing Streptin and Ruminococcin-A as Potent Nutritive Bacteriocins against Gut Symbiotic Pathogens. Molecules. 2023; 28(2):491. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020491

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aziz, Tariq, Muhammad Naveed, Syeda Izma Makhdoom, Urooj Ali, Muhammad Saad Mughal, Abid Sarwar, Ayaz Ali Khan, Yang Zhennai, Manal Y. Sameeh, Anas S. Dablool, and et al. 2023. "Genome Investigation and Functional Annotation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum YW11 Revealing Streptin and Ruminococcin-A as Potent Nutritive Bacteriocins against Gut Symbiotic Pathogens" Molecules 28, no. 2: 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020491

APA Style

Aziz, T., Naveed, M., Makhdoom, S. I., Ali, U., Mughal, M. S., Sarwar, A., Khan, A. A., Zhennai, Y., Sameeh, M. Y., Dablool, A. S., Alharbi, A. A., Shahzad, M., Alamri, A. S., & Alhomrani, M. (2023). Genome Investigation and Functional Annotation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum YW11 Revealing Streptin and Ruminococcin-A as Potent Nutritive Bacteriocins against Gut Symbiotic Pathogens. Molecules, 28(2), 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020491

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop