Next Article in Journal
2-Phenethylamines in Medicinal Chemistry: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Mnx+ Substitution to Improve Na3V2(PO4)2F3-Based Electrodes for Sodium-Ion Battery Cathode
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular-Composition Analysis of Glass Chemical Composition Based on Time-Series and Clustering Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tailoring the Hollow Structure within CoSn(OH)6 Nanocubes for Advanced Supercapacitors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Selectivity of Oxygen Evolution Reaction on Carbon Cloth-Supported δ-MnO2 Nanosheets in Electrolysis of Real Seawater

1
College of Chemical Engineering, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266042, China
2
South African Institute for Advanced Materials Chemistry, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa
3
College of Biological, Chemical Science and Engineering, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(2), 854; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020854
Submission received: 12 December 2022 / Revised: 4 January 2023 / Accepted: 10 January 2023 / Published: 14 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy-Relevant Advanced Materials)

Abstract

:
Electrolysis of seawater using solar and wind energy is a promising technology for hydrogen production which is not affected by the shortage of freshwater resources. However, the competition of chlorine evolution reactions and oxygen evolution reactions on the anode is a major obstacle in the upscaling of seawater electrolyzers for hydrogen production and energy storage, which require chlorine-inhibited oxygen evolution electrodes to become commercially viable. In this study, such an electrode was prepared by growing δ-MnO2 nanosheet arrays on the carbon cloth surface. The selectivity of the newly prepared anode towards the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) was 66.3% after 30 min of electrolyzer operation. The insertion of Fe, Co and Ni ions into MnO2 nanosheets resulted in an increased number of trivalent Mn atoms, which had a negative effect on the OER selectivity. Good tolerance of MnO2/CC electrodes to chlorine evolution in seawater electrolysis indicates its suitability for upscaling this important energy conversion and storage technology.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen, one of the most promising alternatives to fossil fuels, has recently attracted tremendous attention due to its high energy density, renewability and environmental friendliness [1,2,3]. Currently, hydrogen production using water electrolysis utilizes fresh water, which limits its applicability in arid regions. The electrochemical splitting of pure water requires substantial electrical input energy, since the resistance of pure water is 18 MΩ cm. In contrast, seawater is up to six orders of magnitude lower (RSeawater = 20 Ω cm) which, viewed from the perspective of conductivity, in principle allows energy-efficient splitting of water [4]. Seawater resources account for about 96.5% of water on the planet and can be regarded as an infinite resource compared with fresh water [5]. The use of seawater instead of fresh water for electrolytic hydrogen production can play an important role in energy crisis alleviation, while conserving freshwater resources. Due to the complex composition of seawater, its electrolysis is still a major challenge for large-scale hydrogen production [6]. Specifically, seawater is rich in electrochemically active Cl, which undergoes the chlorine evolution reaction (ClER) competing with the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on the anode [7]. Concurrently, free chlorine and hypochlorous acid generated during Cl oxidation can corrode the electrode, resulting in poor performance of the electrolyzer [8]. ClER has a higher thermodynamic potential than that of OER, and their potential difference increases with rising pH [9], reaching 490 mV in an alkaline media [10]. Many electrocatalysts were developed to prevent hypochlorite formation during seawater electrolysis, such as S-doped Ni/Fe hydroxide [11], amorphous nickel-iron phosphide (NiFeP) hollow sphere CoFeSx [12] and Ag-doped NiFeLDH [13]. At present, concentrated KOH solution is used as an electrolyte for water electrolysis, which causes additional expense and environmental problems [14]. Using natural seawater as the electrolyte will greatly reduce the cost of large-scale hydrogen production [15]. Therefore, it is of great significance to develop a chlorine-inhibited oxygen evolution electrode, capable of operating in seawater as an electrolyte.
Among recently reported anodic catalysts for seawater electrolysis, manganese dioxide has a combination of relatively high catalytic activity and oxygen evolution selectivity. For instance, Sang et al. reported that doped γ-MnO2 has high oxygen evolution selectivity. However, the active material was supported on IrO2 containing titanium plate and the catalytic performance was controlled by IrO2 and γ-MnO2 [16]. While similar electrodes were also reported by Vos et al. [17], high cost and scarcity of IrO2 significantly impedes its large-scale application in water electrolysis, requiring the development of novel non-noble metal catalysts. Recently, it was reported that binder-free three-dimensional electrodes exhibit significant electrochemical activity due to their high conductivity [18]. A binder-free MnO2-based composite electrode demonstrated good energy storage performance in capacitors [19] and was also used to enhance OER in alkaline media [20]. However, no binder-free manganese dioxide-based materials were studied as highly selective OER electrodes in seawater electrolysis.
In this study, δ-MnO2 arrays were hydrothermally synthesized on a highly conductive carbon cloth (MnO2/CC) to be used as an anode in seawater electrolysis. Iodometric titration was used here to determine the selectivity of OER. After calculating the current contribution of Cl oxidation, the selectivity of OER was obtained by subtracting the current of Cl oxidation from the total oxidation current. To explore the most real OER properties in seawater, real seawater was used as an electrolyte to study its related electrochemical properties, which is different from the synthesized seawater used by most researchers. In addition, the effects of transition metals, such as Fe, Co and Ni. doped MnO2 on OER selectivity were also investigated in this work.

2. Results and Discussions

The XRD diffraction pattern of MnO2/CC shown in Figure 1a contains four diffraction peaks corresponding to (001), (002), (110) and (020) crystal planes of δ-MnO2 (PDF # 80-1098), confirming its formation on the CC surface. Figure 1b demonstrates uniform surface coverage with δ-MnO2 layer which, according to zoom-in SEM images shown in Figure 1c,d comprises 3D-interconnected nanosheets ca. 30 nm thick.
C, Mn and O elements were detected in the survey XPS spectrum of MnO2/CC (Figure S3). The Mn 2p XPS spectra presented in Figure 1e exhibit two peaks at binding energies 643.0 and 654.9 eV, corresponding to spin orbitals of Mn 2p3/2 and Mn 2p1/2, respectively [21]. The peaks at 641.86 and 653.57 eV are attributed to the Mn(II) on the surface of MnO2/CC, and the peaks at 643.14 and 654.82 eV to the Mn (III). Corresponding binding energies are listed in Table S1. The O 1s XPS spectrum could be fitted into three peaks, corresponding to interlayer oxygen (Mn-O-Mn), adsorbed OH (Mn-OH) and bound water (-H2O) [22]. According to the integral area of these fitted peaks, the proportion of Mn-O-Mn, Mn-OH and H2O is 51.50%, 24.57% and 23.93% respectively (Supporting Information S14).
Figure 2a demonstrates OER polarization curves of MnO2/CC and CC in real seawater electrolysis, where CC exhibits limited OER catalytic activity, possibly due to metal impurities and some functional groups on its surface. The current response of MnO2/CC was higher than that of CC, indicating a positive effect of the MnO2 coating. At a current density of 10 mA cm−2, the ORE overpotential on the MnO2/CC electrode reached 815 mV and its Tafel slope-295 mV/dec, higher than previously reported values obtained in synthetic seawater [23,24,25]. Increased electrode polarization in seawater may be caused by much lower concentration of OH than that in synthetic analogs, prepared using KOH electrolyte which can accelerate OER reaction kinetics [14]. Additionally, as shown in Figure S4, Ca2+ and Mg2+ present in seawater produce white precipitates on the electrode, covering much of its active surface sites and reducing electrolysis efficiency. The seawater used in this study contained 0.5 mol L−1 of Cl which participated in the ClER competing with the OER on the anode. As shown in Figure S5, chlorine participates in the following anodic reactions: 2Cl→Cl2 + 2e at pH 0~3, Cl + H2O→HClO + H+ + 2e at pH 3~7.5 and Cl + 2OH→ClO + H2O + 2e at pH > 7.5. Released chlorine can also poison the anode, greatly reducing its electrocatalytic performance.
The OER selectivity of X-MnO2/CC under real seawater electrolysis conditions was determined by analyzing concentrations of ClO in the anodic and absorption solutions collected before and after electrolysis (Figure 2c). As shown in Video S1, plenty of bubbles are released from the electrode surface and no particles dislocated from it, proving good structural stability of the electrode at high current densities. In Video S2, the gas absorption device containing 1 M NaOH, which can react with chlorine according to the equation 2NaOH + Cl2 = NaCl + NaClO + H2O, slowly releases the gas delivered from the anode, which improves accuracy of the OER selectivity calculation. The color changes during the titration of the initial anodic and absorption solutions, and those collected after 30 min of electrolysis at 100 mA are shown in Figure 2d–h. Initially, the anodic solution was colorless and transparent (Figure 2d), becoming yellow-brown after the addition of the KI solution (Figure 2e), due to the oxidation to iodine by ClO (2KI + 2H+→2K+ + 2HI; 2HI + ClO→I2 + Cl + H2O). With the addition of Na2S2O3, the yellow-brown color gradually faded and transformed to light yellow (I2 + 2Na2S2O3→2NaCl + Na2S4O6). At that point, exact determination of the titration end point was aided by the addition of the starch solution making the color change more obvious. As shown in Figure 2g, the color turned dark blue, indicating the presence of remaining iodine (nI2 + (C6H10O5)6n = (C18H30O5I)2n). Na2S2O3 dropwise addition was continued until the solution became colorless and transparent (Figure 2h), at which point the volume of consumed Na2S2O3 for the oxidation of Cl to ClO was ascertained. The solution collected in the absorption compartment was similarly titrated until its color was consistent with that of the anodic solution. The selectivity of oxygen evolution over MnO2/CC was calculated to be 66.3%, by subtracting the quantity of electricity used for oxidizing Cl from the total electricity consumed during the 30 min experiment. The MnO2/CC electrode maintained its original physical appearance, indicating its strong resistance to chlorine evolution and possible applicability as an anode in seawater electrolysis processes.
In an attempt to improve the OER selectivity of MnO2/CC, ions of transition metals such as Fe, Co and Ni were intercalated into MnO2/CC using the procedure we developed previously [20]. According to Figure 3a,b, after the metal intercalation, the morphology of Fe-MnO2/CC was similar to that of MnO2/CC. The crystalline structure of Fe-MnO2/CC also has not changed, and its XRD pattern still contained characteristics of δ-MnO2 (Figure 3c). The transmission electron microscope (TEM) image (Figure 3d) shows that Fe-MnO2 formed on CC is a uniform thin layer structure, implying that more active sites can form on the surface. The lattice fringe with plane spacings of 0.680 and 0.232 nm corresponds to the (001) and (222) planes of MnO2 respectively (Figure 3e). Fe atoms embedded in MnO2 nanosheets were detected by EDS (Figure 3f) and their even distribution is evident in the elemental mapping image shown in Figure 3j, which, alongside Mn and O mappings of Figure 3h,i, represents the STEM-observed area displayed in Figure 3g. The optimal ion exchange time of 1 h was established by measuring OER selectivity of different Fe-MnO2/CC samples, as shown in Figures S7 and S8 and Tables S3–S8. Using the same synthesis method and 1 h ion exchange time, Co-MnO2/CC and Ni-MnO2/CC samples were also prepared to study the effect of different transition metal ions on the OER selectivity.
OER polarization curves (Figure 4a) of Fe-MnO2/CC, Co-MnO2/CC, Ni-MnO2/CC and MnO2/CC, recorded in seawater, demonstrate that the introduction of transition metal ions in MnO2 nanosheets has no positive effect on their electrocatalytic activity towards OER. Overpotentials of Fe-MnO2/CC, Co-MnO2/CC and Ni-MnO2/CC electrodes at 50 and 100 mA cm−2, shown in Figure 4b, are slightly higher than that of MnO2/CC and corresponding Tafel curve slope values (Figure 4c) are also increased. At 66.3%, the OER selectivity of MnO2/CC was the highest among all samples (Figure S9 and Tables S9–S14), consistent with polarization curve results. The 3D interconnected nanosheet structure remains unchanged after electrochemical testing (Figure S10). In addition, the Tafel slope measured in real seawater electrolyte is obviously higher than the normal value obtained in 1M KOH (Figure 2b and Figure 4c). It was reported that the relationship between Tafel slope, overpotential and current density can be expressed by the following equation: dlog (j)/d η = 2.303 RT/α nF, showing that Tafel slope is inversely proportional to charge transfer coefficient (α), namely the catalyst with high charge transfer ability has a small Tafel slope. Compared with 1M KOH electrolyte, the adsorption of pollutants, such as microorganisms, bacteria and small particles, in real seawater on the catalyst surface leads to degradation of catalytic performance and hinders the catalytic reaction, resulting in a larger Tafel slope [26].
To explain the negative effect of Fe, Co and Ni on the OER selectivity of MnO2/CC in seawater electrolysis, XPS was used to analyze chemical states of X-MnO2/CC materials. The survey XPS spectrum (Figure S11) contains characteristic peaks of Fe, Co and Ni. Two peaks at 711.9 and 724.5 eV, corresponding to the Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2 signals of Fe3+, with a spin energy interval of 12.6 eV, are visible in the Fe 2p XPS spectrum shown in Figure S12a [27]. Similarly, there are two peaks at 781.4 and 796.4 eV in the Co2p spectrum (Figure S12b), corresponding to Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2 signals of Co2+ [28]. The Ni 2P XPS spectrum indicates the presence of Ni2+ in Ni-MnO2/CC [29]. As shown in these high resolution XPS spectra, the valence state of metal cations did not change, indicating that there was no redox reaction in the intercalation process. At the same time, it also confirms that metal ions are successfully embedded in manganese dioxide.
Fitted Mn 2p XPS spectra of Fe-MnO2/CC, Co-MnO2/CC and Ni-MnO2/CC are shown in Figure 5a–c, indicating Mn valences +three and +four [30], whose peak positions are listed in Table S2. After cation intercalation, no peaks of other Mn species are found, which indicates that MnO2 is retained, but the valence state of Mn fluctuates. Since Mn4+ prevailed in MnO2/CC (Figure 1e), it can be assumed that the introduction of transition metal ions altered the valence state of Mn. According to Figure 5d, Mn4+ and Mn3+ accounted for 57.84% and 42.16% of the initial MnO2, respectively. After the transition metal introduction, the content percentages of Mn4+ and Mn3+ changed significantly, especially in Co-MnO2/CC, where that of Mn4+ dropped to 39.46%, and that of Mn3+ increased to 60.57%. This can be explained by the gradual reduction of Mn4+ to Mn3+ to balance the charges of high valence transition metal ions.
The charge state of corresponding O atoms also changes with the transition of the Mn electron structure. According to Figure S13, high resolution O 1S XPS spectra recorded after the metal ions’ introduction into MnO2 can be fitted into three peaks, corresponding to interlayer oxygen (Mn-O-Mn), adsorbed OH (Mn-OH) and bound water (-H2O). As shown in Figure S14, embedded metal ions alter the content of Mn-OH and other oxygen species, increasing the oxygen vacancy concentration in X-MnO2/CC samples.
The rate-determining step in the mechanism of OER catalysis by manganese oxide is the transition from Mn=O to the MnOOH intermediate (Figure 6a) [31,32]. While it was assumed that Mn3+ enhances the adsorption of -OH on the MnO2 surface and promotes the formation of the Mn=O intermediate, thus advancing the OER, the current study results can be explained using alternative considerations. The solution pH affects chlorine evolution according to the following equations [33,34,35]:
S-OH2 + →S-OH + H+,
S-OHad + Cl→HOCl + e,
HOCl + HCl→Cl2 + H2O,
S-OH→S-O + H+,
where S represents the surface of MnO2, reaction two is the rate-determining step and the mechanism of chlorine evolution can be characterized by reaction one. As shown in Figure 6b, Mn adsorbs H2O to form the Mn−OHad intermediate, then adsorbs chloride ions to form Mn−(H)OCl, which subsequently desorbs from the MnO2 surface and continues to react with chloride ions in the solution to form Cl2. The presence of Mn3+ enhances the adsorption of −OH on the manganese oxide surface to form the intermediate Mn−OHad, which reaction Mn−OHad + Cl→Mn−(H)OCl becomes the rate-determining step, greatly accelerating the chlorine evolution process as a result of Fe, Co and Ni introduction in MnO2. According to fitted XPS spectra, the content of Mn3+ in MnO2 increases in the order of MnO2/CC < Ni-MnO2/CC < Fe-MnO2/CC < Co-MnO2/CC. For these materials, the kinetics of chlorine evolution gradually increased, resulting in the reduction of the OER selectivity. While the OER selectivity of MnO2/CC in real seawater electrolysis needs improvement, it is not likely to be achievable by the introduction of transition metal ions.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Pretreatment of Carbon Cloth

CC piece with dimensions of 4 × 6 cm was placed in a PTFE lined autoclave (instrument model, Company, City, state abbreviation if USA, Country) (TKH−100 mL, Xi’an Taikang Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Xi’an, China) into which 50 mL of 65% nitric acid solution was added. The autoclave was heated at 120 °C for 8 h. Pretreated CC was rinsed with deionized water and dried in an oven at 60 °C.

3.2. Preparation of MnO2/CC

1 mmol (0.16 g) of KMnO4 was dissolved in 50 mL of deionized water and transferred into the PTFE lined autoclave. A 2 × 3 cm piece of pretreated CC was placed in the autoclave, followed by heating at 120 °C for 3 h. The obtained sample was rinsed thoroughly with deionized water and dried in an oven at 60 °C. The sample was labeled as MnO2/CC.

3.3. Preparation of X-MnO2/CC (X = Fe, Co, Ni)

0.8 mmol of the salt containing Fe, Co or Ni was dissolved in 50 mL of deionized water and MnO2/CC was immersed in the obtained solution for 1 h. The sample was rinsed in deionized water 3 times and dried in an oven at 60 °C. The obtained material was labelled as X-MnO2/CC (X = Fe, Co, Ni).

3.4. OER Selectivity Investigation

Constant current at 100 mA cm−2 was applied to a three-electrode cell for 30 min, where real seawater was used as an electrolyte, platinum mesh as a counter electrode, and saturated Hg/HgO as a reference electrode. After the initial experiment, 10 mL of the anodic solution was collected and 15 mL of 0.5 M KI was added to it to observe the color change. The discoloration pointed to the presence of hypochlorous acid in the anodic solution, whose concentration was titrated using 0.02 M sodium thiosulfate until light yellow in color and then with 1% starch solution until the color disappeared. The volume of added sodium thiosulfate solution was used to calculate the hypochlorite concentration according to the following equation: nOCl = (VThio·CThio)/Vsample·Vtotal.
nOCl: the amount of hypochlorite; VThio: the volume of sodium thiosulfate consumed during the titration; CThio: the molarity of a substance of sodium thiosulfate; Vsample: the volume of anodic fluid to be titrated; Vtotal: the total volume of solution in the anode region.

3.5. Physical Characterizations

Scanning electron microscope (SEM, ULTRA plus, Carl Zeiss, Germany) was used to characterize the morphology, and X-ray diffraction (XRD, XD−3A, Shimadzu, Japan) was used to analyze the crystal structure and composition of the prepared materials (angle range: 5–90°, scanning rate: 5° min−1). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, VG Escalab210, VG Scientific, Britain) was carried out to analyze the electronic structure and composition of the prepared materials.

3.6. Electrochemical Characterizations

The electrochemical performance of the samples was evaluated using a standard three-electrode cell connected to CHI 760E electrochemical workstation (Shanghai Chenhua Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). In the three-electrode cell, X-MnO2/CC (size: 1 × 1 cm) was used as the working electrode, graphite rod as the counter electrode and Hg/HgO as the reference electrode. For comparison, two different electrolytes, 1M KOH and real seawater, were used. Before the test, the sample was scanned by cyclic voltammetry until the curves could overlap with each other to remove the impurities that might exist on the electrode surface and expose the active sites. The CV sweep speed is 50 mV/s, and the voltage range is −1~0.2 V (vs. Hg/HgO). Linear scanning voltammetry (LSV) of 90% iR compensated OER were measured at a scanning rate of 5 mV/s. The obtained potential is calibrated to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) via the following equation: ERHE = EHg/HgO + 0.059 × pH + 0.098. The overpotential (η) of OER is calculated by using the following formula: η (V) = ERHE − 1.23 V. The polarization curve was redrawn as the relationship between η and logarithmic current density (J) to calculate the Tafel slopes via the Tafel equation: η = b log j + a, where j is the current density and b is the Tafel slope. To estimate the electrochemical active surface area, the specific capacitance of the electric double layer was measured by cyclic voltammetry measured at different scanning rates and in the range from −0.2 V to −0.1 V (vs. Hg/HgO). The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was obtained at a current density of 10 mA cm−2 in a frequency range of 0.01 Hz–100 kHz.

4. Conclusions

A series of MnO2 nanosheets were successfully synthesized onto the carbon cloth via a facile hydrothermal method as the anodes for seawater electrolysis. Using real seawater as the electrolyte, the selectivity of the MnO2/CC electrode for oxygen evolution was 66.3%. By studying the structure of MnO2/CC electrodes doping with transitional metallic cations, it was found that Mn3+ in MnO2 can enhance the adsorption of -OH on the surface of MnO2 to form Mn-OHad, thus speeding up the rate-determining step of Mn-OHad + Cl→ Mn-(H)OCl during the chlorine evolution processes, which has adverse effects on oxygen evolution reaction. Therefore, increasing the content of Mn (+4) in MnO2 is an effective way to improve the OER selectivity of MnO2 for seawater electrolysis. At the same time, MnO2/CC exhibits good tolerance to chlorine evolution reaction, indicating its promising potential as the anode for seawater electrolysis. This work provides a reference for studying the competition between chlorine evolution reaction and oxygen evolution reaction in seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28020854/s1, Figure S1: MnO2/CC; Figure S2: Real seawater collection site; Figure S3: XPS full spectra of MnO2/CC; Figure S4: White precipitates are produced at the cathode during electrolysis of seawater; Figure S5: The Pourbaix diagram of an aqueous saline electrolyte [36]; Figure S6: Constant current electrolysis experiment at the end of MnO2/CC; Figure S7: V-t curve of Fe-MnO2/CC sample with intercalation time of 1 h, 10 h and 18 h at constant current of 100 mA; Figure S8: Fe-MnO2/CC oxygen evolution selectivity histogram at different intercalation times; Figure S9: V-t curves of Fe-MnO2/CC, Co-MnO2/CC, Ni-MnO2/CC samples at constant current of 100 mA; Figure S10: (a) SEM image of MnO2/CC after electrochemical test; (b) SEM image of Fe-MnO2/CC after electrochemical test; Figure S11: (a) XPS full spectra of Fe-MnO2/CC; (b) XPS full spectra of Co-MnO2/CC; (c) XPS full spectra of Ni-MnO2/CC; Figure S12: (a)High resolution Fe 2p XPS spectra of Fe-MnO2/CC; (b) High resolution Co 2p XPS spectra of Co-MnO2/CC; (c)High resolution Ni 2p XPS spectra of Ni-MnO2/CC; Figure S13: (a)High resolution O 1S XPS spectra of Fe-MnO2/CC; (b) High resolution O 1S XPS spectra of Co-MnO2/CC; (c)High resolution O 1S XPS spectra of Ni-MnO2/CC; Figure S14: The contents of Mn-O-Mn, Mn-OH and H2O in MnO2/CC, Fe-MnO2/CC, Co-MnO2/CC and Ni-MnO2/CC; Table S1: Binding energy corresponding to Mn(III), Mn(IV) peak positions in MnO2/CC Mn2P high-resolution XPS spectra; Table S2: Binding energy corresponding to Mn(Ⅲ), Mn(IV) peak positions in Fe-MnO2/CC, Co-MnO2/CC and Ni-MnO2/CC Mn2P high-resolution XPS spectra; Table S3: Titration results of solution in tail gas absorption zone after constant current electrolytic seawater test. (Fe-MnO2/CC-1 h); Table S4: Titration results of anodic solution after constant current electrolytic seawater test. (Fe-MnO2/CC-1 h); Table S5: Titration results of solution in tail gas absorption zone after constant current electrolytic seawater test. (Fe-MnO2/CC-10 h); Table S6: Titration results of anodic solution after constant current electrolytic seawater test. (Fe-MnO2/CC-10 h); Table S7: Titration results of solution in tail gas absorption zone after constant current electrolytic seawater test. (Fe-MnO2/CC-18 h); Table S8: Titration results of anodic solution after constant current electrolytic seawater test. (Fe-MnO2/CC-18 h); Table S9: Titration results of solution in tail gas absorption zone after constant current electrolytic seawater test. (MnO2/CC); Table S10: Titration results of anodic solution after constant current electrolytic seawater test. (MnO2/CC); Table S11: Titration results of solution in tail gas absorption zone after constant current electrolytic seawater test. (Co-MnO2/CC-1 h); Table S12: Titration results of anodic solution after constant current electrolytic seawater test. (Co-MnO2/CC-1 h); Table S13: Titration results of solution in tail gas absorption zone after constant current electrolytic seawater test. (Ni-MnO2/CC-1 h); Table S14: Titration results of anodic solution after constant current electrolytic seawater test. (Ni-MnO2/CC-1 h); Video S1: Constant current electrolytic seawater anode area; Video S2: Constant current electrolytic seawater tail gas absorption area.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.W.; methodology, H.Y.; validation, H.Y.; data curation, H.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Y.; writing—review and editing, S.J. and V.L.; supervision, X.W.; funding acquisition, R.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the open experimental project of Shandong Peninsula Engineering Research Center of Comprehensive Brine Utilization (No. 2018 LS017) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China (ZR2020MB024).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

References

  1. Roger, I.; Shipman, M.A.; Symes, M.D. Earth-abundant catalysts for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2017, 1, 0003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yan, Y.; Xia, B.Y.; Zhao, B.; Wang, X. A review on noble-metal-free bifunctional heterogeneous catalysts for overall electrochemical water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 17587–17603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Han, L.; Dong, S.; Wang, E. Transition-Metal (Co, Ni, and Fe)-Based Electrocatalysts for the Water Oxidation Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 9266–9291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chatenet, M.; Pollet, B.G.; Dekel, D.R.; Dionigi, F.; Deseure, J.; Millet, P.; Braatz, R.D.; Bazant, M.Z.; Eikerling, M.; Staffell, I.; et al. Water electrolysis: From textbook knowledge to the latest scientific strategies and industrial developments. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 4583–4762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Urban, J.J. Emerging Scientific and Engineering Opportunities within the Water-Energy Nexus. Joule 2017, 1, 665–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Jiang, S.; Suo, H.; Zhang, T.; Liao, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Lai, W. Recent Advances in Seawater Electrolysis. Catalysts 2022, 12, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yu, L.; Zhu, Q.; Song, S.; McElhenny, B.; Wang, D.; Wu, C.; Qin, Z.; Bao, J.; Yu, Y.; Chen, S.; et al. Non-noble metal-nitride based electrocatalysts for high-performance alkaline seawater electrolysis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kuang, Y.; Kenney, M.J.; Meng, Y.; Hung, W.H.; Liu, Y.; Huang, J.E.; Prasanna, R.; Li, P.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; et al. Solar-driven, highly sustained splitting of seawater into hydrogen and oxygen fuels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 6624–6629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Song, H.J.; Yoon, H.; Ju, B.; Lee, D.-Y.; Kim, D.-W. Electrocatalytic Selective Oxygen Evolution of Carbon-Coated Na2Co1–xFexP2O7 Nanoparticles for Alkaline Seawater Electrolysis. ACS Catal. 2019, 10, 702–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dionigi, F.; Reier, T.; Pawolek, Z.; Gliech, M.; Strasser, P. Design Criteria, Operating Conditions, and Nickel-Iron Hydroxide Catalyst Materials for Selective Seawater Electrolysis. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 962–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, L.; Wu, L.; McElhenny, B.; Song, S.; Luo, D.; Zhang, F.; Yu, Y.; Chen, S.; Ren, Z. Ultrafast room-temperature synthesis of porous S-doped Ni/Fe (oxy)hydroxide electrodes for oxygen evolution catalysis in seawater splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 3439–3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Shi, H.; Luo, J.; Wang, L.; Liang, J.; Li, S.; Yang, L.-M.; Wang, T.; Huang, Y. Breaking the scaling relations of oxygen evolution reaction on amorphous NiFeP nanostructures with enhanced activity for overall seawater splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 1208, 302, 120862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, S.; Ren, S.; Gao, R.-T.; Liu, X.; Wang, L. Atomically embedded Ag on transition metal hydroxides triggers the lattice oxygen towards sustained seawater electrolysis. Nano Energy 2022, 98, 107212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lu, J.; Li, C.; Wang, H.; Ji, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, R. How to get to best oxygen evolution behavior from the electrolysis practice of the seawater. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 12936–12943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, H.; Xu, X.; Song, Y.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Designing High-Valence Metal Sites for Electrochemical Water Splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2009779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sang, S.; Meng, H.; Shi, Y.; Yu, H.; Fan, Z.; Sun, D. Preparation of oxygen evolution anode for electrolytic seawater. Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society Surface Engineering Branch. In Proceedings of the 7th National Surface Engineering Academic Conference and the 2nd Surface Engineering Youth Academic Forum, Wuhan, China, 10 October 2008; pp. 327–330. [Google Scholar]
  17. Vos, J.G.; Wezendonk, T.A.; Jeremiasse, A.W.; Koper, M.T.M. MnOx/IrOx as Selective Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalyst in Acidic Chloride Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 10270–10281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ma, X.; Wang, Z.N.; Wang, Z.H.; Cui, M.Q.; Wang, H.; Ren, J.W.; Karimzadeh, S. Adjusting grain boundary within NiCo2O4 rod arrays by phosphating reaction for efficient hydrogen production. Nanotechnology 2022, 33, 245604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, J.; Jiang, J.; Cheng, C.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Gong, H.; Fan, H.J. Co3O4 Nanowire@MnO2 ultrathin nanosheet core/shell arrays: A new class of high-performance pseudocapacitive materials. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 2076–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, J.; Wang, H.; Sun, Y.; Wang, X.; Song, X.; Wang, R. Charge state manipulation induced through cation intercalation into MnO2 sheet arrays for efficient water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 417, 127894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yan, J.; Wang, H.; Ji, S.; Pollet, B.G.; Wang, R. Achieving highly practical capacitance of MnO2 by using chain-like CoB alloy as support. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 7813–7820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, Z.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Ma, X.; Ren, J.; Wang, R. Heterostructured Mn clusters/N-doped carbon foams enhancing the polysulfides immobilization and catalytic conversion. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022, 924, 166514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pickrahn, K.L.; Park, S.W.; Gorlin, Y.; Lee, H.-B.-R.; Jaramillo, T.F.; Bent, S.F. Active MnOx Electrocatalysts Prepared by Atomic Layer Deposition for Oxygen Evolution and Oxygen Reduction Reactions. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 1269–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, X.; Ji, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Linkov, V.; Wang, R. Porous hetero-structured nickel oxide/nickel phosphide nanosheets as bifunctional electrocatalyst for hydrogen production via urea electrolysis. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 615, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wu, Y.; Wang, H.; Ji, S.; Pollet, B.G.; Wang, X.Y.; Wang, R.F. Engineered porous Ni2P-nanoparticle/Ni2P-nanosheet arrays via the Kirkendall effect and Ostwald ripening towards efficient overall water splitting. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 2098–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ul Haq, T.; Mansour, S.; Haik, Y. Electronic and Structural Modification of Mn3O4 Nanosheets for Selective and Sustained Seawater Oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 20443–20454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wu, Y.; Wang, H.; Ji, S.; Tian, X.; Li, G.; Wang, X.; Wang, R. Ultrastable NiFeOOH/NiFe/Ni electrocatalysts prepared by in-situ electro-oxidation for oxygen evolution reaction at large current density. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 564, 150440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, F.; Wang, H.; Ji, S.; Linkov, V.; Wang, R. Core-shell structured Ni3S2@Co(OH)2 nano-wires grown on Ni foam as binder-free electrode for asymmetric supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 345, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Lv, X.; Lu, J.; Wang, H. Using hetero-structured Co(OH)2/NiS sheets to assemble an array electrode with high charge store capacity. J. Nanopart. Res. 2021, 23, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ding, J.; Ji, S.; Wang, H.; Brett, D.J.L.; Pollet, B.G.; Wang, R.F. MnO/N-Doped Mesoporous Carbon as Advanced Oxygen Reduction Reaction Electrocatalyst for Zinc-Air Batteries. Chem. A Eur. J. 2019, 25, 2868–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cho, K.H.; Park, S.; Seo, H.; Choi, S.; Lee, M.Y.; Ko, C.; Nam, K.T. Capturing Manganese Oxide Intermediates in Electrochemical Water Oxidation at Neutral pH by In Situ Raman Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 4673–4681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Su, H.Y.; Gorlin, Y.; Man, I.C.; Calle-Vallejo, F.; Norskov, J.K.; Jaramillo, T.F.; Rossmeisl, J. Identifying active surface phases for metal oxide electrocatalysts: A study of manganese oxide bi-functional catalysts for oxygen reduction and water oxidation catalysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 14010–14022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hepel, T.; Pollak, F.H.; O’Grady, W.E. Chlorine evolution and reduction processes at oriented single-crystal RuO electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1986, 133, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Denton, D.A.; Harrison, J.A.; Knowles, R.I. Chlorine evolution and reduction on RuO2/TiO2 electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 1979, 24, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Trasatti, S. Electrocatalysis in the anodic evolution of oxygen and chlorine. Electrochim. Acta 1984, 29, 1503–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tong, W.; Forster, M.; Dionigi, F.; Dresp, S.; Sadeghi Erami, R.; Strasser, P.; Cowan, A.J.; Farràs, P. Electrolysis of low-grade and saline surface water. Nat. Energy 2020, 5, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) XRD pattern of MnO2/CC; (bd) SEM images of MnO2/CC; (e) XPS of Mn 2p of MnO2/CC; (f) O 1s of MnO2/CC.
Figure 1. (a) XRD pattern of MnO2/CC; (bd) SEM images of MnO2/CC; (e) XPS of Mn 2p of MnO2/CC; (f) O 1s of MnO2/CC.
Molecules 28 00854 g001
Figure 2. (a) OER polarization curves of CC and MnO2/CC catalysts in real seawater electrolyte; (b) Tafel slope; (c) potential vs. time at the current of 100 mA; (dh) corresponding color changes during the titration.
Figure 2. (a) OER polarization curves of CC and MnO2/CC catalysts in real seawater electrolyte; (b) Tafel slope; (c) potential vs. time at the current of 100 mA; (dh) corresponding color changes during the titration.
Molecules 28 00854 g002
Figure 3. (a,b) SEM images of Fe-MnO2/CC; (c) XRD pattern of Fe-MnO2/CC; (d,e) TEM images of Fe-MnO2/CC; (f) EDS of Fe-MnO2/CC; (g) STEM image of Fe-MnO2/CC; (h) Mn elemental mapping of Fe-MnO2/CC; (i) O elemental mapping of Fe-MnO2/CC; (j) Fe elemental mapping of Fe-MnO2/CC.
Figure 3. (a,b) SEM images of Fe-MnO2/CC; (c) XRD pattern of Fe-MnO2/CC; (d,e) TEM images of Fe-MnO2/CC; (f) EDS of Fe-MnO2/CC; (g) STEM image of Fe-MnO2/CC; (h) Mn elemental mapping of Fe-MnO2/CC; (i) O elemental mapping of Fe-MnO2/CC; (j) Fe elemental mapping of Fe-MnO2/CC.
Molecules 28 00854 g003
Figure 4. (a) OER polarization curves of Fe-MnO2/CC, Co-MnO2/CC, Ni-MnO2/CC and MnO2/CC in real seawater electrolyte; (b) Overpotentials required for these electrodes to reach current densities of 50 and 100 mA cm−2; (c) Tafel curves with slope values; (d) OER selectivity values.
Figure 4. (a) OER polarization curves of Fe-MnO2/CC, Co-MnO2/CC, Ni-MnO2/CC and MnO2/CC in real seawater electrolyte; (b) Overpotentials required for these electrodes to reach current densities of 50 and 100 mA cm−2; (c) Tafel curves with slope values; (d) OER selectivity values.
Molecules 28 00854 g004
Figure 5. (a) High resolution Mn 2p XPS spectra of Fe-MnO2/CC; (b) High resolution Mn 2p XPS spectra of Co-MnO2/CC; (c) High resolution Mn 2p XPS spectra of Ni-MnO2/CC; (d) Histograms of Mn3+ and Mn4+ in MnO2/CC, Fe-MnO2/CC, Co-MnO2/CC and Ni-MnO2/CC.
Figure 5. (a) High resolution Mn 2p XPS spectra of Fe-MnO2/CC; (b) High resolution Mn 2p XPS spectra of Co-MnO2/CC; (c) High resolution Mn 2p XPS spectra of Ni-MnO2/CC; (d) Histograms of Mn3+ and Mn4+ in MnO2/CC, Fe-MnO2/CC, Co-MnO2/CC and Ni-MnO2/CC.
Molecules 28 00854 g005
Figure 6. (a) Mechanism of OER catalysis by MnO2; (b) mechanism of ClER catalysis by MnO2.
Figure 6. (a) Mechanism of OER catalysis by MnO2; (b) mechanism of ClER catalysis by MnO2.
Molecules 28 00854 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, H.; Wang, X.; Linkov, V.; Ji, S.; Wang, R. Selectivity of Oxygen Evolution Reaction on Carbon Cloth-Supported δ-MnO2 Nanosheets in Electrolysis of Real Seawater. Molecules 2023, 28, 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020854

AMA Style

Yan H, Wang X, Linkov V, Ji S, Wang R. Selectivity of Oxygen Evolution Reaction on Carbon Cloth-Supported δ-MnO2 Nanosheets in Electrolysis of Real Seawater. Molecules. 2023; 28(2):854. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020854

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Haofeng, Xuyun Wang, Vladimir Linkov, Shan Ji, and Rongfang Wang. 2023. "Selectivity of Oxygen Evolution Reaction on Carbon Cloth-Supported δ-MnO2 Nanosheets in Electrolysis of Real Seawater" Molecules 28, no. 2: 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020854

APA Style

Yan, H., Wang, X., Linkov, V., Ji, S., & Wang, R. (2023). Selectivity of Oxygen Evolution Reaction on Carbon Cloth-Supported δ-MnO2 Nanosheets in Electrolysis of Real Seawater. Molecules, 28(2), 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020854

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop