Next Article in Journal
Cytotoxic Indole Diterpenoids from a Sphagneticola trilobata-Derived Fungus Aspergillus sp. PQJ-1
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrochemiluminescence Sensor Based on CeO2 Nanocrystalline for Hg2+ Detection in Environmental Samples
Previous Article in Journal
Production of Gypenoside XVII from Ginsenoside Rb1 by Enzymatic Transformation and Their Anti-Inflammatory Activity In Vitro and In Vivo
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Electrochemical Sensor Based on a Porous Biochar/Cuprous Oxide (BC/Cu2O) Composite for the Determination of Hg(II)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficient Adsorption and Electrochemical Detection of Cd2+ with a Ternary MgZnFe-Layered Double Hydroxides Engineered Porous Biochar Composite

Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, School of Agriculture, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(20), 7002; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28207002
Submission received: 14 August 2023 / Revised: 4 October 2023 / Accepted: 6 October 2023 / Published: 10 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Functional Materials in Analysis and Detection)

Abstract

:
Their unique layered structure, large specific surface area, good stability, high negative charge density between layers, and customizable composition give layered double hydroxides (LDHs) excellent adsorption and detection performance for heavy metal ions (HMIs). However, their easy aggregation and low electrical conductivity limit the practical application of untreated LDHs. In this work, a ternary MgZnFe-LDHs engineered porous biochar (MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC) heterojunction was proposed as a sensing and adsorption material for the effective detection and removal of Cd2+ from wastewater. The growth of MgZnFe-LDHs in the PBC pores not only reduces the accumulation of MgZnFe-LDHs, but also improves the electrical conductivity of the composite. The synergistic effect between MgZnFe-LDHs and PBC enables the composite to achieve a maximum adsorption capacity of up to 293.4 mg/g for Cd2+ in wastewater. Meanwhile, the MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC-based electrochemical sensor shows excellent detection performance for Cd2+, presenting a wide linear range (0.01 ng/L–1 mg/L), low detection limit (3.0 pg/L), good selectivity, and stability. The results indicate that MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC would be a potential material for detecting and removing Cd2+ from wastewater.

1. Introduction

Cd2+ is a heavy metal ion (HMI) with high and persistent toxicity, that poses a major threat to the human body and ecological health [1]. Therefore, it is of great importance to achieve its efficient detection and removal. So far, many technologies have been developed to detect HMIs, including atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS), ultraviolet spectrophotometry (UV-VIS), inductively coupled plasma (ICP), fluorescence, and electrochemical sensors [2,3,4]. Electrochemical sensing has attracted the attention of researchers because it offers irreplaceable advantages such as ease of use, ease of miniaturization, low cost, and high sensitivity, which enable the in situ detection of HMIs [5]. On the other hand, various removal technologies such as chemical precipitation, membrane separation, ultrafiltration, and adsorption, have been rapidly developed to remove HMIs [6,7]. Among these removal technologies, adsorption stands out due to its unique advantages: ease of use, remarkable adsorption effect, and wide range of applications [8]. Both the electrochemical sensing and adsorption for HMIs mainly depend on the properties of the materials used to make them function. Therefore, there is an urgent need for suitable functional materials that are inexpensive, easy to fabricate, and highly adsorptive.
Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) are well-known two-dimensional (2D) materials that possess unique properties and have received increasing attention in environmental applications, especially in the adsorption of HMIs [9]. LDHs as host–guest layered materials consist of a positively charged layer with metallic cations and charge-balanced anions in the interstices of the layer due to electrostatic attraction [10]. Their large specific surface area, high chemical stability, flexible composition, low price, and large amount of -OH on the surface make LDHs promising HMI adsorption materials [11]. However, due to their high charge density and large specific surface area, LDHs can easily accumulate, resulting in most adsorption active sites being covered, which greatly reduces their adsorption performance. To solve this problem, embedding LDHs in porous materials is an effective method to improve the agglomeration phenomenon. For example, Xu et al. [12] reported the use of etched nickel foam (NF) with a 3D open-pore structure as a carrier to facilitate the uniformly distributed NiCo-LDHs nanowire arrays. This approach effectively overcame the reunification phenomenon and exposed more adsorption sites.
Biochar (BC) is a by-product of biomass pyrolysis, which has the advantage of possessing abundant surface functional groups that are widely used for the adsorption of HMIs [13]. Moreover, the surface activity and surface structure of BC could be effectively modulated with KOH. Alkali activation could develop an ordered pore structure, abundant active sites, and a large specific surface area, which is advantageous for loading large amounts of LDHs to prevent their aggregation and effectively improve their adsorption performance [14]. On the other hand, the activated porous BC with high conductivity enables rapid electron transport [15]. Based on the above analysis, it is expected that the embedding of LDHs into the pores of BC will yield a promising bifunctional material with good adsorption and sensing properties for HMIs.
Herein, a ternary MgZnFe-LDHs engineered PBC composite was proposed for the simultaneous detection and removal of Cd2+ with high toxicity. In this composite system, ternary LDHs were chosen as adsorbents mainly due to their abundant adsorption sites and stronger adsorption capacity than binary LDHs. PBC was used as a carrier substance to reduce the aggregation of MgZnFe-LDHs, while improving the specific surface area, surface active functional sites, and electronic conductivity of the composite. Benefiting from the synergistic effect between MgZnFe-LDHs and porous PBC, the proposed MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC composite showed excellent electrochemical sensing of Cd2+ and facilitated the process of Cd2+ removal in aqueous solution.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Morphological Characterizations

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of BC, MgZnFe-LDHs, and MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC was performed to study their morphology. From Figure 1A, it can be seen that the untreated BC has a massive structure with a flat surface, while a large number of pores can be observed on the PBC surface (Figure 1B), indicating that the activation process is responsible for the pore formation and effectively increases the specific surface area. For MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC (Figure 1C), it can be seen that the MgZnFe-LDHs particles are well embedded in the pores of PBC, which greatly reduces the accumulation of MgZnFe-LDHs. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC is shown in Figure 1D. It can be clearly seen that the MgZnFe-LDHs particles are trapped in the pores of the PBC.
The structural characterization of BC and MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC was determined by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD). As shown in Figure 2, BC is dominated by two broadband diffraction peaks at 2θ = 22.9° and 43.5°, which can be attributed to the turbostratic carbon crystallites of biomass pyrolysis. After modification with MgZnFe-LDHs on PBC, a typical structure of the hydrotalcite compound is revealed with sharp reflection peaks at 11.6° (003), 23.4° (006), 36.3° (009), and 59.1° (110) [16]. All the above results show that the composite of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC was successfully synthesized.
The surface area and the pore structure of the synthesized pristine BC and PBC were investigated by performing a N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm at 77 K. As shown in Figure 3, the pristine BC sample is a typical type Ⅱ curve, demonstrating the presence of macropores. Compared with pristine BC, the BET surface area of BC increases obviously after the activation of KOH. The specific surface area of PBC is 552 m2·g−1, which is much higher than that of the pristine BC (7 m2·g−1). This phenomenon is attributed to the porous structure of PBC, which was induced via KOH etching during pyrolysis and the evaporation of volatile matter from the raw material. This result indicates that the activation of KOH promotes the development of pore structure and increases the effective surface area of BC.

2.2. Adsorption Studies

2.2.1. Adsorption Isotherms

The adsorption isotherm of Cd2+ on MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC was determined by mixing 0.25 g of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC with 25 mL of Cd2+ solutions of different concentrations ranging from 30 to 600 mg/L in 50 mL digestion vessels. The adsorption capacities (Qe, mg·g−1) were calculated using the initial concentration (C0, mg·L−1) of Cd2+ and the equilibrium concentration (Ce), as well as the mass of the adsorbent (g). Equation (1) is as follows [17]:
Q e = C 0 C e V m
As shown in Figure 4A, the adsorption capacity increased from 30 mg/g to 300 mg/g when the concentration of the initial solution increased from 30 mg/L to 600 mg/L. The increased adsorption capacity of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC is caused by the increased mass transfer of Cd2+ between the aqueous solution and MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC at higher Cd2+ concentrations of the solution. The models of Langmuir [18], Freundlich [19], and Dubinin–Radushkevich [20] were used to fit the experimental data (Figure 4B,C):
Q e = Q m K L C e 1 + K L C e
Q e = K F C e 1 n
I n Q e = I n Q m β ε 2
where, KL (L/mg) is the Langmuir constant, and KF ((mg/g) (L/mg)1/n) is the Freundlich constant. V (L) and m (g) represent the volume of the Cd2+ solution and the mass of the MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC, respectively. 1/n is the adsorption strength, which determines the nonlinear degree of the adsorption isotherms. ε represents the Polanyi potential, which can be expressed as follows:
ε = R T I n ( 1 + 1 C e )
T and R stand for the Kelvin temperature (K) and the ideal gas constant, respectively. The activity coefficient β (mol2·J−2) is related to the adsorption energy (E), which can be expressed as follows:
E = 1 2 β
In general, the numerical value of E can be used to gain insight into the adsorption mechanism. A value below 8 (kJ/mol) may indicate physical adsorption; when E is between 8 and 16 kJ/mol, it indicates ion exchange; and chemical adsorption has been observed at an E value above 16 (kJ/mol).
According to Table 1, the high correlation coefficients (R2) demonstrate the agreement between the theoretical models and the experimental data. The R2 values are 0.98, 0.85, and 0.51 for the Langmuir, Freundlich, and Dubinin–Radushkevich models, respectively, indicating that Cd2+ adsorption fits the Langmuir model better than the Freundlich and Dubinin–Radushkevich models. The fit of the adsorption data to the Langmuir model indicates that the Cd2+ adsorption can be considered a monolayer reaction. The maximum Cd2+ adsorption capacity of MgZnFe-LDHs/BC is 290.3 mg/g, which is higher than that of MgFe-LDHs, ZnFe-LDHs, MgZnFe-LDHs, MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC, and other adsorbents (Table 2).
The value of the Freundlich parameter 1/n is 0.2397 and ranges from 0 to 1, indicating favorable adsorption. The value of E determined by the Dubinin–Radushkevich model is 2.26 kJ/mol at the experimental temperatures, indicating a process of physical adsorption. However, a very low R2 value (0.51) indicates that the experimental data is poorly fitted to the Dubinin–Radushkevich adsorption isotherm. Therefore, the values obtained may be outside the confidence interval [21].
Table 2. Comparison of adsorption capacities with other forms of adsorbent material reported in the literature for Cd2+.
Table 2. Comparison of adsorption capacities with other forms of adsorbent material reported in the literature for Cd2+.
AdsorbentsAdsorption Capacity (mg/g)Ref.
CS a/MgAl-LDH140.8[22]
Fe/Mn-BMBCs b138.2[23]
HA c/MgAl-LDH155.3[24]
Fe3O4@NiAl-LDH@guargum258[25]
MgFe-LDHs183This work
MgFe-LDHs129.4This work
MgZnFe-LDHs256.6This work
MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC290.3This work
Note: a: chitosan; b: binary metal oxide-ball-milled biochar; c: humic acid.

2.2.2. Adsorption Kinetics

To determine the adsorption rates and the appropriate contact times (0–1440 min) for the removal of Cd2+, the adsorption kinetics of the MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC were studied by mixing 0.25 g of the MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC with 25 mL of Cd2+ solutions of 300 mg·L−1. As shown in Figure 5, the adsorption capacity of Cd2+ onto MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC increases rapidly within the first 360 min, and then gradually transitions to equilibrium. The initial rapid phase is due to the numerous adsorption sites on the MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC exterior, which are associated with a high concentration of Cd2+ in the solution. With time, the adsorption sites of Cd2+ on the MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC spread from the surface to the holes, and the free Cd2+ can further react with these active sites. Therefore, the adsorption results of Cd2+ decreased relatively slowly after the equilibrium point.
To further determine the adsorption behavior of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC toward Cd2+, the experimental data were fitted to the pseudo first-order (PFO) [26] and the pseudo-second-order (PSO) [27] models. The models were formulated as follows (Figure 5):
Pseudo-first order model:
Q t = Q e ( 1 e k 1 t )
Pseudo-second order model:
t Q t = 1 k 1 Q e 2 + t Q e Q e
where, Qt (mg/g) represents the adsorption capacity of Cd2+ at time t (min). k1 (min−1) and k2 (g/(mg/min)) are the equilibrium rate constants of the PFO and PSO models, respectively. The parameters of the two kinetic models are listed in Table 3. The coefficient of determination (R2) values of the pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order models for MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC are 0.8847 and 0.9662, respectively. Therefore, the pseudo-second-order model might be more suitable for representing the adsorption kinetic equilibrium than pseudo-first-order model, demonstrating that the adsorption process is mainly caused by chemical adsorption.
To determine the adsorption mechanisms, the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic (XPS) analyses of the surface chemical properties before and after adsorption were examined. The wide-scan spectra of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC before and after Cd2+ adsorption are shown in Figure 6A. Comparison of the XPS spectra of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC before and after adsorption shows that the Cd 3d peak appears in the XPS pattern after the adsorption of Cd2+ by MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC (Figure 6B). The O1s peak of MgZnFe-LDHs/BC consists of three distinct peaks at 533.07, 531.50, and 529.42 eV, indicating -OH, C-O, and C=O peaks, respectively [28] (Figure 6C). After the adsorption of Cd2+ by MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC, the peak areas’ C-O and -OH decreases, and the peak positions shift from 531.50 eV and 533.07 eV to 531.33 eV and 532.53 eV, respectively. This phenomenon might be due to the fact that the electron-deficient metal cation reduces the density of the electron clouds -OH and -COOH around the O atom and generates Cd-O [29,30]. The primary binding site on MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC is a functional group containing oxygen, which is involved in immobilizing heavy metal ions. XPS spectra with high-resolution of C1s are illustrated in Figure 6D. The C1s peaks of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC can be classified as 284.83 eV, 286.71 eV, and 289.19 eV, representing C=C/C-C, C-O, and COOH, which are advantageous for surface complexation with Cd [31]. After Cd2+ adsorption, the C-O peaks of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC are slightly shifted to 286.6 eV, and the C=C/C-C peaks are shifted to 289.79 eV. Moreover, the C-O content decreases from 6.71% to 5.11%, while the C=O content increases from 16.83% to 22.82%. Therefore, we can reasonably assume that C-OH is oxidized to C=O due to the reaction between C-OH and Cd2+ during the adsorption of Cd2+ by MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC.

2.3. Electrochemical Characterizations

The electron transport behavior of various electrodes was investigated using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) (Figure 7). In general, the semicircle in the high-frequency region corresponds to the charge transfer resistance (Rct), which can be estimated from the diameter of the semicircle. It can be seen that the semicircle diameter of MgZnFe-LDHs/GCE (curve b, 1076.3 Ω) is larger than that of a bare glassy carbon electrode (GCE) (curve a, 735.4 Ω), indicating that the electron transport performance of MgZnFe-LDHs is poor, which is consistent with previous reports [32]. In contrast, PBC/GCE has an Rct value of 102.7 Ω (curve c), which is due to the excellent electrical conductivity of PBC. For MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE (curve d), the Rct value (281.8 Ω) is between MgZnFe-LDHs/GCE and PBC/GCE, indicating that the combination with BC can effectively improve the conductivity of MgZnFe-LDHs, which makes MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC a potential electrode modification material.
To determine the effective surface area (Aeff) of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE, cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed in a 0.1 M KCl solution containing 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− at various scan rates. The results in Figure 8A show that the peak current gradually increases with the increase of the scan rate. At the same time, a significant linear correlation is observed between the peak current and the square root of the scan rate (v1/2) (R2 = 0.99, Figure 8B). The Aeff of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE is calculated to be 0.115 cm2 according to the Randles–Sevcik equation [33] (Equation (6)). The large surface area indicates that more adsorption sites can be exposed, so more Cd2+ can be enriched on the MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE surface, which gives it an excellent detection performance for Cd2+.
I p = 2.69 × 10 5 n 3 2 A eff D 0 1 2 c 0 v 1 2
where, Ip is the anodic peak current, n represents the electron-transfer number, and Aeff stands for the effective surface area of the electrode. D0 and c0 refer to the diffusion coefficient and the concentration of [Fe(CN)6]3−/4−, respectively.

2.4. Electrochemical Behaviors of Cd2+ on Various Electrodes

The electrochemical responses of various modified electrodes for 1.0 mg/L Cd2+ were studied via differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry (DPASV) in 0.1 M ABS. As can be seen in Figure 9, there is a negligible stripping peak on the bare GCE (curve a). However, significant stripping peaks of Cd2+ at about −0.76 V are found on the GCE modified with LDHs, indicating that these LDHs have excellent adsorption properties for Cd2+. Among them, the response current on MgZnFe-LDHs/GCE (curve d) is much stronger than on MgFe-LDHs/GCE (curve b) and ZnFe-LDHs/GCE (curve c), which is mainly due to the fact that more defects on the ternary LDHs’ surface expose more active sites. Similarly, a clear stripping peak with a large response current is observed on PBC/GCE (curve e), which is due to the excellent electrical conductivity and large surface area of PBC. The combination of MnZnFe-LDHs and PBC (curve f) further increases the response current, which is due to the synergistic effect between the outstanding electrical conductivity of BC and the satisfactory Cd2+ adsorption performance of MnZnFe-LDHs. Hence, MnZnFe-LDHs/PBC is selected as the optimal electrode modification material to construct a Cd2+ electrochemical platform.

2.5. Optimization of Experimental Parameters

In order to find the optimal conditions, a number of parameters such as the deposition potential, deposition time, and pH of ABS were studied.
Considering that the pH of ABS has a great influence on the reaction current of Cd2+, the pH was optimized from 3.5 to 4.5. The result in Figure 10A shows that the peak current gradually increases when the pH is increased from 3.5 to 4.5. This phenomenon could be attributed to the protonation of the hydrophilic groups on the MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE surface [34] when the pH is lower than 4.5, which leads to a decrease in the Cd2+ adsorption sites. At a pH above 4.5, the peak current gradually decreases, which is attributed to the fact that Cd2+ undergoes hydrolysis at pHs above 4.5 [35], leading to a decrease in free Cd2+. Accordingly, 4.5 is used as the optimum pH for the following experiment.
The study of the influence of the deposition potential is shown in Figure 10B. It can be clearly seen that the peak current of Cd2+ increases with the negative shift of deposition potential from −0.8 V to −1.0 V. This is due to the fact that Cd2+ can be more completely deposited when the potential is shifted negatively [36]. However, the peak current starts to decrease when the deposition potential shifts further down, which could be caused by hydrogen evolution when the potential is too negative [37]. Therefore, −1.0 V is used as the deposition potential for the following experiment.
Figure 10C shows the effect of deposition time on the detection of Cd2+. As shown, the current response of Cd2+ increases significantly with the increase of deposition time from 150 to 240 s, indicating that more Cd2+ is deposited on the MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE surface. However, when the deposition time is longer than 240 s, the trend of current change is particularly slow, and gradually flattens. The phenomenon could be due to the fact that all adsorption sites for Cd2+ on the MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE surface are occupied [38]. Therefore, 240 s was chosen as the optimum deposition time for the experiment.

2.6. Electrochemical Detection of Cd2+ with MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE

The electrochemical sensing performance of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE with regard to Cd2+ was investigated via DPASV under optimized conditions. The results in Figure 11A show that the peak current of Cd2+ at −0.76 V increases with the addition of Cd2+. Moreover, there is a good linear relationship between the peak current and Cd2+ concentration in the range of 0.01 ng/L to 1 mg/L (Figure 11B). The regression equation is expressed as I = 0.087c + 4.058 (R2= 0.99). Accordingly, the detection limit (LOD) of the Cd2+ sensor is calculated to be 3.0 pg/L (S/N = 3), which is much lower than the approved Cd2+ concentration for drinking water (1300 μg/L).

2.7. Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Selectivity

First, a MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE was used to detect 1.0 mg/L Cd2+ twelve times consecutively to investigate the repeatability of the proposed sensor. The relative standard deviation (RSD) of the twelve measurement results is 2.30% (Figure 12A), demonstrating the excellent repeatability of the MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE. In addition, seven parallel MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCEs were used to detect 1.0 mg/L Cd2+ under the same conditions to investigate the reproducibility. Figure 12B shows that the current response of the seven modified electrodes is nearly flat with an RSD of 2.16%, indicating the excellent reproducibility of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE for Cd2+.
The selectivity of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE toward Cd2+ was also investigated. Several common interfering ions were each added to a 1.0 mg/L Cd2+ solution. The current response was measured via the DPASV method using MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE. As shown in Figure 12C, at 50 mg/L, various interfering ions such as Hg2+, Pb2+, Zn2+, K+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Na+, Cl, and NO3, were insignificant on the response current of the 1.0 mg/L Cd2+, demonstrating the excellent selectivity of the electrochemical sensor based on MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE for Cd2+.

2.8. Practical Application

To verify the practicality of this sensor, MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE was used to detect Cd2+ in a paddy water sample, collected from Jiangxi Agricultural University (Nanchang, China). The collected paddy water was first filtered with a 0.45 µm filter membrane, and then diluted with 0.1 M ABS. Then, a Cd2+ standard solution with different concentrations was added to the treated paddy water samples, and a recovery study was carried out to investigate the sensing ability of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE for Cd2+ in real samples. As shown in Table 4, the good recovery (98.80–104.0%) and RSD (2.2–3.9%) indicate the satisfactory practical capability of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE in Cd2+ detection.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Reagents and Instruments

Rape stalks were obtained from Jiangxi Agricultural University. Mg(NO3)2, Zn(NO3)2, Fe(NO3)3, Cd(NO3)2, NaOH, and Na2CO3 were purchased from Beijing Chemical Industry CO., Ltd. 0.1 M acetate buffer solution (ABS) was prepared with 0.1 M NaAc and HAc. All reagents and solvents were used directly without further purification.
Surface morphology was determined using Sigma 300 SEM (Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan). XRD patterns were examined in a range between 5° and 85° using a Rigaku Smart Lab X-ray diffractometer (Smartlab SE, Tokyo, Japan). XPS measurements were performed using a Thermo Fischer ESCALAB Xi+ X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (Alα hν = 1486.6 eV). All electrochemical measurements were performed on a CHI760E electrochemical workstation with platinum sheet as the counter electrode, saturated calomel electrode (SCE) as the reference electrode, and various working electrodes. Differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry (DPASV) was employed as the detection technique. The adsorption and detection process of Cd2+ is listed in Scheme 1.

3.2. Preparation of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC

The MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC composite was prepared using a simple co-precipitation method. In this process, the activated PBC was prepared using a previous method [39]. BC from rape stalks was prepared via slow pyrolysis of the starting material under N2 protection. The surface of the rape stalks was cleaned and washed several times with distilled water to remove dust and some inorganic impurities. Then, the dried rape stalks were impregnated with KOH and dried in an electric oven. The resulting product was placed in a tube furnace, and heat-treated for 2 h under an N2 atmosphere at a rate of 5 °C· min−1 at 800 °C. After cooling to room temperature, 1 mol/L HCl was added to the residue for 1 h followed by filtration and washing to neutrality. After drying at 80 °C for 8 h, PBC was obtained.
MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC were synthesized via the co-precipitation method. BC, Mg(NO3)2, Zn(NO3)2, and Fe(NO3)3 were dissolved in 100 mL of deionized water with the molar ratio of bivalent metals to trivalent metals (Mg2+ + Zn2+/Fe3+) fixed at 2 and Mg2+ to Zn2+ at 3. Then, 100 mL of mixed alkaline solution of 0.85 M NaOH and 0.32 M Na2CO3 was added to the above solution. Then, the mixed solution was stirred for 4 h and aged for 20 h. The temperature was maintained at 70 °C. Finally, the product was washed three times with ultrapure water and dried at 60 °C. In addition, MgZnFe-LDHs were prepared via the same procedure without PBC. MgFe-LDHs and ZnFe-LDHs were synthesized without Zn2+ and Mg2+, respectively.

3.3. Preparation of Modified Electrode

First, the glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was polished with 0.05 mm and 0.3 mm alumina slurry. Then, it was ultrasonically cleaned with absolute alcohol and distilled water. Then, 5.0 μL of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC dispersion (1 mg/mL) was dropped on the GCE surface and dried in a room to obtain MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE. MgZnFe-LDHs/GCE and BC/GCE were prepared using a similar method by replacing MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC with MgZnFe-LDHs and PBC.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a low-cost but practical MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC composite was proposed for sensitive electrochemical detection and the adsorption removal of Cd2+. The growth of MgZnFe-LDHs in the pores of PBC significantly reduces the accumulation of MgZnFe-LDHs. The MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC composite has a large specific surface area, abundant interlayer anions and surface hydroxyl groups, which provide ample space for Cd2+ adsorption. The maximum adsorption capacity can reach 293.4 mg/g. For the electrochemical sensing of Cd2+, the MgZnFe-LDHs with their excellent Cd2+ enrichment performance combined with BC with its good electrical conductivity endow the electrochemical Cd2+ sensor with a low detection limit (3.0 pg/L), good reproducibility, stability, and selectivity. All in all, the synergistic effect between MgZnFe-LDHs and PBC makes MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC a promising material for the simultaneous electrochemical detection and removal of Cd2+.

Author Contributions

Methodology, Y.Y.; Software, W.Y.; Formal analysis, S.L. and G.H.; Investigation, W.Y.; Resources, S.L. and L.W.; Data curation, L.W.; Writing—original draft, Y.Y.; Writing—review & editing, Y.Y.; Visualization, Y.G.; Supervision, Y.G. and G.H.; Project administration, G.H.; Funding acquisition, G.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We are grateful to the National Key Research and Development Project of China (2016YFD0300208) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41661070) for their financial support of this work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sacara, A.-M.; Pitzalis, F.; Salis, A.; Turdean, G.L.; Muresan, L.M. Glassy carbon electrodes modified with ordered mesoporous silica for the electrochemical detection of cadmium ions. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 1410–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yao, Y.; Wu, H.; Ping, J. Simultaneous determination of Cd(II) and Pb(II) ions in honey and milk samples using a single-walled carbon nanohorns modified screen-printed electrochemical sensor. Food Chem. 2019, 274, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pourbasheer, E.; Morsali, S.; Azari, Z.; Karimi, M.A.; Ganjali, M.R. Design of a novel optical sensor for determination of trace amounts of copper by uv–visible spectrophotometry in real samples. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 32, 4110–4117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, W.; Hu, X.; Li, Q.; Shi, Y.; Zhai, X.; Xu, Y.; Li, Z.; Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Shi, J.; et al. Copper nanoclusters @ nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots-based ratiometric fluorescence probe for lead(II) ions detection in porphyra. Food Chem. 2020, 320, 126623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, W.; Liu, C.; Liu, F.; Zou, X.; Xu, Y.; Xu, X. A smart-phone-based electrochemical platform with programmable solid-state-microwave flow digestion for determination of heavy metals in liquid food. Food Chem. 2020, 303, 125378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Badmus, S.O.; Oyehan, T.A.; Saleh, T.A. Enhanced efficiency of polyamide membranes by incorporating cyclodextrin-graphene oxide for water purification. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 340, 116991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hashem, A.; Fletcher, A.J.; Younis, H.; Mauof, H.; Abou-Okeil, A. Adsorption of Pb(II) ions from contaminated water by 1,2,3,4-butanetetracarboxylic acid-modified microcrystalline cellulose: Isotherms, kinetics, and thermodynamic studies. Int. J. Boil. Macromol. 2020, 164, 3193–3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Su, X.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Song, W.; Li, X.; Yan, L. Enhanced adsorption of aqueous Pb(II) and Cu(II) by biochar loaded with layered double hydroxide: Crucial role of mineral precipitation. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 357, 119083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kazeem, T.S.; Zubair, M.; Daud, M.; Al-Harthi, M.A. Enhanced Removal of Eriochrome Black T Using Graphene/NiMgAl-Layered Hydroxides: Isotherm, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Studies. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2020, 45, 7175–7189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rohit, R.C.; Jagadale, A.D.; Shinde, S.K.; Kim, D.-Y. A review on electrodeposited layered double hydroxides for energy and environmental applications. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 27, 102275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, X.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, J.; Gan, T.; Xiao, Z. Aqueous Cr (VI) removal performance of an invasive plant-derived biochar modified by Mg/Al-layered double hydroxides. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 2023, 53, 100700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xing, J.; Du, J.; Zhang, X.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, T.; Xu, C. A Ni-P@NiCo LDH core–shell nanorod-decorated nickel foam with enhanced areal specific capacitance for high-performance supercapacitors. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 10064–10072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Huang, Y.X.; Liu, C.M.; Qin, L.T.; Xie, M.Q.; Xu, Z.J.; Yu, Y.K. Efficient Adsorption Capacity of MgFe-Layered Double Hydroxide Loaded on Pomelo Peel Biochar for Cd(II) from Aqueous Solutions: Adsorption Behaviour and Mechanism. Molecules 2023, 28, 4538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zou, J.; Liu, J.; Yu, Q.; Gao, Y.; Chen, S.; Huang, X.; Hu, D.; Liu, S.; Lu, L. Facile Synthesis of Nitrogen Self-Doped Porous Carbon Derived from Cicada Shell via KOH Activation for Simultaneous Detection and Removal of Cu2+. Molecules 2022, 27, 4516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhu, X.; Liu, B.; Chen, S.; Wu, L.; Yang, J.; Liang, S.; Xiao, K.; Hu, J.; Hou, H. Ultrasensitive and Simultaneous Electrochemical Determination of Pb2+ and Cd2+ Based on Biomass Derived Lotus Root-Like Hierarchical Porous Carbon/Bismuth Composite. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 87505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Matusik, J.; Rybka, K. Removal of chromates and sulphates by Mg/Fe LDH and heterostructured LDH/halloysite materials: Efficiency, selectivity, and stability of adsorbents in single and multi-element systems. Materials 2019, 12, 1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Senol, Z.M.; Şimşek, S. Insights into Effective Adsorption of Lead ions from Aqueous Solutions by Using Chitosan-Bentonite Composite Beads. J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 30, 3677–3687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Foo, K.Y.; Hameed, B.H. Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, Q.; Liao, B.; Lin, L.; Qiu, W.; Song, Z. Adsorption of Cu(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solutions by ferromanganese binary oxide–biochar composites. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 615, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Parmanbek, N.; Sütekin, D.S.; Barsbay, M.; Mashentseva, A.A.; Zheltov, D.A.; Aimanova, N.A.; Jakupova, Z.Y.; Zdorovets, M.V. Hybrid PET Track-Etched Membranes Grafted by Well-Defined Poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) Brushes and Loaded with Silver Nanoparticles for the Removal of As(III). Polymers 2022, 14, 4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mashentseva, A.A.; Aimanova, N.A.; Parmanbek, N.; Temirgaziyev, B.S.; Barsbay, M.; Zdorovets, M.V. Serratula coronata L. Mediated Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles and Their Application for the Removal of Alizarin Yellow R by Photocatalytic Degradation and Adsorption. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lyu, F.; Yu, H.; Hou, T.; Yan, L.; Zhang, X.; Du, B. Efficient and fast removal of Pb2+ and Cd2+ from an aqueous solution using a chitosan/Mg-Al-layered double hydroxide nanocomposite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 539, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Qu, J.; Che, N.; Niu, G.; Liu, L.; Li, C.; Liu, Y. Iron/manganese binary metal oxide-biochar nano-composites with high adsorption capacities of Cd2+: Preparation and adsorption mechanisms. J. Water Process Eng. 2023, 51, 103332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shi, M.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Song, Y.R.; Xu, M.M.; Li, J.; Yao, L.W. A novel heat-treated humic acid/MgAl-layered double hydroxide composite for efficient removal of cadmium: Fabrication, performance and mechanisms. Appl. Clay Sci. 2020, 187, 105482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shan, R.; Yan, L.; Yang, K.; Hao, Y.; Du, B. Adsorption of Cd (II) by Mg-Al-CO3 and magnetic Fe3O4/Mg-Al-CO3 layered double hydroxides: Kinetic, isothermal, thermodynamic and mechanistic studies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 299, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, Z.Y.; Chen, X.X.; Yuan, B.L.; Fu, M.L. A facile foaming-polymerization strategy to prepare 3D MnO2 modified biochar-based porous hydrogels for efficient removal of Cd(II) and Pb(II). Chemosphere 2020, 239, 124745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Blanchard, G.; Maunaye, M.; Martin, G. Removal of heavy metals from waters by means of natural zeolites. Water Res. 1984, 18, 1501–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cai, F.; Wang, Q.; Chen, X.; Qiu, W.; Zhan, F.; Gao, F.; Wang, Q. Selective binding of Pb2+ with manganese-terephthalic acid MOF/SWCNTs: Theoretical modeling, experimental study and electroanalytical application. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 98, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guan, D.-X.; Ren, C.; Wang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Li, W. Characterization of Lead Uptake by Nano-Sized Hydroxyapatite: A Molecular Scale Perspective. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2018, 2, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, W.; Hu, J.; Yu, Y.; Ma, D.; Gong, W.; Qiu, H.; Hu, Z.; Gao, H.-W. Facile preparation of sulfonated biochar for highly efficient removal of toxic Pb(II) and Cd(II) from wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 750, 141545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yu, S.; Wei, D.; Shi, L.; Ai, Y.; Zhang, P.; Wang, X. Three-dimensional graphene/titanium dioxide composite for enhanced U(VI) capture: Insights from batch experiments, XPS spectroscopy and DFT calculation. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 251, 975–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Guan, X.; Yuan, X.; Zhao, Y.; Bai, J.; Li, Y.; Cao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xiong, T. Adsorption behaviors and mechanisms of Fe/Mg layered double hydroxide loaded on bentonite on Cd (II) and Pb (II) removal. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 612, 572–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chen, T.-W.; Kumar, J.V.; Chen, S.M.; Mutharani, B.; Karthik, R.; Nagarajan, E.R.; Muthuraj, V. Rational construction of novel rose petals-like yttrium molybdate nanosheets: A Janus catalyst for the detection and degradation of cardioselective β-blocker agent acebutolol. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 359, 1472–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Awual, M.R.; Khraisheh, M.; Alharthi, N.H.; Luqman, M.; Islam, A.; Rezaul Karim, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Khaleque, M.A. Efficient detection and adsorption of cadmium(II) ions using innovative nano-composite materials. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 343, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lu, M.; Deng, Y.; Luo, Y.; Lv, J.; Li, T.; Xu, J.; Chen, S.-W.; Wang, J. Graphene Aerogel–Metal–Organic Framework-Based Electrochemical Method for Simultaneous Detection of Multiple Heavy-Metal Ions. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 888–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cui, L.; Wu, J.; Ju, H. Nitrogen-doped porous carbon derived from metal-organic gel for electrochemi cal analysis of heavy-metal ion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 16210–16216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yu, L.Y.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, B.R.; Xu, Q.; Xu, Q.; Hu, X.Y. Electrochemical sensor construction based on nafion/calcium lignosulphonate functionalized porous graphene nanocomposite and its application for simultaneous detection of trace Pb2+ and Cd2+. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 259, 540–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ma, Y.; Wang, Y.C.; Xie, D.H.; Gu, Y.; Zhu, X.L.; Zhang, H.M.; Wang, G.Z.; Zhang, Y.X.; Zhao, H.J. Hierarchical MgFe-layered double hydroxide microsphere/graphene composite for simultaneous electrochemical determination of trace Pb(II) and Cd(II). Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 347, 953–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zou, J.; Qian, W.; Li, Y.; Yu, Q.; Yu, Y.; Chen, S.; Qu, F.; Gao, Y.; Lu, L. Multilayer activated biochar/UiO-66-NH2 film as intelligent sensing platform for ultra-sensitive electrochemical detection of Pb2+ and Hg2+. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 569, 151006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM of (A) pristine BC, (B) PBC, (C) MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC, and (D) TEM of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC.
Figure 1. SEM of (A) pristine BC, (B) PBC, (C) MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC, and (D) TEM of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC.
Molecules 28 07002 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of PBC and MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of PBC and MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC.
Molecules 28 07002 g002
Figure 3. (A) Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms and (B) pore size distributions of pristine BC and PBC.
Figure 3. (A) Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms and (B) pore size distributions of pristine BC and PBC.
Molecules 28 07002 g003
Figure 4. (A) Effect of initial Cd2+ concentration on Cd2+ adsorption; fitted (B) Langmuir and Freundlich, and (C) Dubinin–Radushkevich adsorption isotherms for Cd2+ on MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC.
Figure 4. (A) Effect of initial Cd2+ concentration on Cd2+ adsorption; fitted (B) Langmuir and Freundlich, and (C) Dubinin–Radushkevich adsorption isotherms for Cd2+ on MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC.
Molecules 28 07002 g004
Figure 5. Adsorption capacity of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC toward Cd2+ at different times.
Figure 5. Adsorption capacity of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC toward Cd2+ at different times.
Molecules 28 07002 g005
Figure 6. XPS spectra for MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC before and after Cd2+ uptake: (A) survey, (B) Cd 3d, (C) O 1s, and (D) C 1s.
Figure 6. XPS spectra for MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC before and after Cd2+ uptake: (A) survey, (B) Cd 3d, (C) O 1s, and (D) C 1s.
Molecules 28 07002 g006
Figure 7. EIS of bare GCE (curve a), MgZnFe-LDHs/GCE (curve b), PBC/GCE (curve c), and MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE (curve d).
Figure 7. EIS of bare GCE (curve a), MgZnFe-LDHs/GCE (curve b), PBC/GCE (curve c), and MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE (curve d).
Molecules 28 07002 g007
Figure 8. (A) CV curves of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE in 0.1 M KCl solution with 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− at different scan rates; (B) the linear relationship between the peak current and v1/2.
Figure 8. (A) CV curves of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE in 0.1 M KCl solution with 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− at different scan rates; (B) the linear relationship between the peak current and v1/2.
Molecules 28 07002 g008
Figure 9. DPASV of 1 mg/L Cd2+ on bare GCE (curve a), MgFe-LDHs/GCE (curve b), ZnFe-LDHs/GCE (curve c), MgZnFe-LDHs/GCE (curve d), PBC/GCE (curve e), and MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE (curve f) in ABS (pH = 4.5).
Figure 9. DPASV of 1 mg/L Cd2+ on bare GCE (curve a), MgFe-LDHs/GCE (curve b), ZnFe-LDHs/GCE (curve c), MgZnFe-LDHs/GCE (curve d), PBC/GCE (curve e), and MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE (curve f) in ABS (pH = 4.5).
Molecules 28 07002 g009
Figure 10. Influence of (A) pH value of ABS, (B) deposition potential, and (C) deposition time on the stripping peak current of Cd2+ on the MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE.
Figure 10. Influence of (A) pH value of ABS, (B) deposition potential, and (C) deposition time on the stripping peak current of Cd2+ on the MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE.
Molecules 28 07002 g010
Figure 11. (A) DPASV curves of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE in ABS (pH = 4.5) with different Cd2+ concentrations; (B) linear relationship between peak current and Cd2+ concentration.
Figure 11. (A) DPASV curves of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE in ABS (pH = 4.5) with different Cd2+ concentrations; (B) linear relationship between peak current and Cd2+ concentration.
Molecules 28 07002 g011
Figure 12. (A) Twelve consecutive measurement results of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE versus 1.0 mg/L Cd2+; (B) current response of seven independent MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCEs versus 1.0 mg/L Cd2+; (C) current response of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE versus 1.0 mg/L Cd2+ in the presence of 50-fold concerted interferers.
Figure 12. (A) Twelve consecutive measurement results of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE versus 1.0 mg/L Cd2+; (B) current response of seven independent MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCEs versus 1.0 mg/L Cd2+; (C) current response of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC/GCE versus 1.0 mg/L Cd2+ in the presence of 50-fold concerted interferers.
Molecules 28 07002 g012
Scheme 1. Preparation of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC composite and its application for the adsorption and detection of Cd2+ in aqueous solution.
Scheme 1. Preparation of MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC composite and its application for the adsorption and detection of Cd2+ in aqueous solution.
Molecules 28 07002 sch001
Table 1. Adsorption parameters of Cd2+ on MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC material determined by Langmuir, Freundlich, and Dubinin–Radushkevich models.
Table 1. Adsorption parameters of Cd2+ on MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC material determined by Langmuir, Freundlich, and Dubinin–Radushkevich models.
LangmuirFreundlichDubinin–RadushKevich
qe (mg/g)K1 (L/mg)R21/nKL (mg/g)R2β (mol2·J−2)R2
290.30.12840.98110.239784.420.8463−0.097440.5126
Table 3. Adsorption kinetics parameters for the adsorption of Cd2+ onto MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC.
Table 3. Adsorption kinetics parameters for the adsorption of Cd2+ onto MgZnFe-LDHs/PBC.
Pseudo First-Order ModelPseudo Second-Order Model
qe, Exp (mg/g)k1 (min−1)R2qe (mg/g)k2 (g/mg·min)R2qe (mg/g)
293.40.02730.8847268.60.0001370.9662290.8
Table 4. Recoveries of trace Pb2+ in local paddy water sample (n = 3).
Table 4. Recoveries of trace Pb2+ in local paddy water sample (n = 3).
SampleAdded (μg·L−1)Found (μg·L−1)RSD (%)Recovery (%)
10---
20.050.051 ± 0.004102.03.9
30.500.52 ± 0.017104.03.4
45.004.94 ± 0.2698.802.2
550.0049.68 ± 1.4999.362.8
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, Y.; Yang, W.; Li, S.; Gao, Y.; Wang, L.; Huang, G. Efficient Adsorption and Electrochemical Detection of Cd2+ with a Ternary MgZnFe-Layered Double Hydroxides Engineered Porous Biochar Composite. Molecules 2023, 28, 7002. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28207002

AMA Style

Yu Y, Yang W, Li S, Gao Y, Wang L, Huang G. Efficient Adsorption and Electrochemical Detection of Cd2+ with a Ternary MgZnFe-Layered Double Hydroxides Engineered Porous Biochar Composite. Molecules. 2023; 28(20):7002. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28207002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Yongfang, Wenting Yang, Shujuan Li, Yansha Gao, Linyu Wang, and Guoqin Huang. 2023. "Efficient Adsorption and Electrochemical Detection of Cd2+ with a Ternary MgZnFe-Layered Double Hydroxides Engineered Porous Biochar Composite" Molecules 28, no. 20: 7002. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28207002

APA Style

Yu, Y., Yang, W., Li, S., Gao, Y., Wang, L., & Huang, G. (2023). Efficient Adsorption and Electrochemical Detection of Cd2+ with a Ternary MgZnFe-Layered Double Hydroxides Engineered Porous Biochar Composite. Molecules, 28(20), 7002. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28207002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop