Next Article in Journal
Thermodynamics Investigation and Artificial Neural Network Prediction of Energy, Exergy, and Hydrogen Production from a Solar Thermochemical Plant Using a Polymer Membrane Electrolyzer
Next Article in Special Issue
Artemisia vestita: A Folk Medicine with Hidden Herbal Fortune
Previous Article in Journal
Removal of Tetracycline Hydrochloride by Photocatalysis Using Electrospun PAN Nanofibrous Membranes Coated with g-C3N4/Ti3C2/Ag3PO4
Previous Article in Special Issue
Functionalized Sulfur-Containing Heterocyclic Analogs Induce Sub-G1 Arrest and Apoptotic Cell Death of Laryngeal Carcinoma In Vitro
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effects of Allelopathic Compounds Identified in Medicago sativa L. Seedling Exudate against Escherichia coli

1
Institute for Plant Biology, TU Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
2
Pharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
3
Department of Chemical Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany
4
Pharmaceutical Microbiology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(6), 2645; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062645
Submission received: 19 February 2023 / Revised: 10 March 2023 / Accepted: 11 March 2023 / Published: 14 March 2023

Abstract

:
In this study, the allelopathic properties of Medicago sativa L. (alfalfa) seedling exudates on the germination of seeds of various species were investigated. The compounds responsible for the allelopathic effects of alfalfa were identified and characterized by employing liquid chromatography ion mobility high-resolution mass spectrometry. Crude exudates inhibited the germination of seeds of all various plant species tested. Overall, nine compounds in alfalfa were identified and quantified. The most predominant compounds were a hyperoside representing a flavonoid glucoside, the non-proteinogenic amino acid canavanine, and two dipeptides, identified as H-Glu-Tyr-OH and H-Phe-Glu-OH. The latter corresponds to the first finding that dipeptides are exuded from alfalfa seedlings. In addition, the antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of alfalfa exudate and its identified compounds were elucidated. Both hyperoside and canavanine revealed the best antibacterial activity with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values that ranged from 8 to 32 and 32 to 256 µg/mL, respectively. Regarding the antibiofilm action, hyperoside and canavanine caused a decline in the percentage of E. coli isolates that possessed a strong and moderate biofilm-forming potential from 68.42% to 21.05% and 31.58%, respectively. Studies on their inhibiting effects exhibit that these major substances are predominantly responsible for the allelopathic and antimicrobial effects of the crude exudates.

1. Introduction

In the course of germination, seeds release various compounds, e.g., coumarins or quinones, which influence the germination, growth, and development of plants growing in the vicinity denoted as allelochemicals [1,2,3]. In addition, these substances might also influence the microbiome, either by the exuded substances inhibiting pathogens and microorganisms that exhibit negative effects for the seedling [4] or by the substances stimulating beneficial bacteria for the seedling [5,6,7,8]
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plants are known to release various allelopathic substances into the soil [9,10,11,12]. Surprisingly, some of these compounds are autotoxic, which means that the plants themselves are impaired by them [13,14,15]. In the case of alfalfa, the allelochemicals are released either from leaves or from the roots [9,13,16,17,18] and include saponins and various isoflavonoids, e.g., medicarpin, 4-methoxymedicarpin, sativan and 5-methoxysativan [14,19,20,21].
Furthermore, seedlings release various flavonoids, such as hyperoside, luteolin, luteolin-7-glucoside, and chrysoeriol [22]. Apart from these phenolic compounds, the exudation of various nitrogen-containing compounds has also been reported for alfalfa seedlings [7,23]. In this context, we consider that these compounds might exhibit a major role in the nodulation process. In this sense, trigonelline and stachydrine from Medicago spp. induce nod gene expression [7], while the isoflavonoid-derivative medicarpin and the phytoestrogen coumestrol are antagonists of nod gene expression [17].
In addition, canavanine, which also is exuded from germinating alfalfa seeds, affects the population biology of Bacillus cereus UW85 [23]. Furthermore, flavonoid signals from alfalfa seedlings induce the transcription of nodulation (nod) genes in Rhizobium meliloti [5,24,25]. However, recently, Compton et al. 2020 [22] reported that the symbiotic bacteria S. meliloti is not attracted to any flavonoids identified in alfalfa exudates. Thus, these studies contradict previous investigations.
As a consequence of the absenteeism of any relevance of the flavanoids for nodulation, their significance in alfalfa seedling exudates has to be scrutinized. It seems reasonable to assume a putative function as allelochemical. Accordingly, this work aims to investigate the allelochemical potential of the compounds exuded from alfalfa seedlings (Medicago sativa) and to estimate their impact on the germination of other species. Special emphasis is placed on the verification of an allelopathic function of relevant substances by analysing the impact of Medicago sativa seedling exudates on the germination of various seeds.
Employing liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry, the related compounds were identified by comparison with an MS/MS library. Subsequently, seven of these compounds were analyzed concerning their putative allelopathic effects. Finally, the antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of the alfalfa exudate and its identified compounds were evaluated against Escherichia coli.
This bacterium can persist on, enter into and colonize the internal tissues of plants leading to severe food-borne ailments. There are major threats for food safety due to contamination with bacterial pathogens, such as E. coli [26]. Apart from the direct influence on human health, there are massive economic losses owing to contaminated food products, which affect many individuals, growers, workers, and distributors [27].
It has to be emphasized that the outcome of this study also entails high relevance for practical applications since allelochemicals have been described to exhibit beneficial implications for sustainable agriculture as alternative herbicides or antimicrobials [28,29].

2. Results

2.1. Co-Cultivation of Alfalfa Seed with Barley: Impact on Germination and Growth

In order to approve the allelopathic properties of seedling exudates from Medicago sativa L., barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) seeds were germinated and grown together with alfalfa seeds in the same petri dishes. This co-cultivation strongly impaired the germination and growth of barley (Figure 1):
  • The germination of barley seeds and the subsequent seedling development was massively retarded. The related delay corresponded to up to three days in comparison to the controls.
  • The number of germinated seeds was much lower compared to the controls.
  • The root and shoot development was significantly reduced in comparison to the controls.

2.2. Allelopathic Effect of Alfalfa Seed Exudates on Various Plant Species

To further analyze the allelopathic potential of M. sativa seedlings, a corresponding exudate, i.e., the water, in which the alfalfa seeds had been imbibed for 24 h, was employed. This liquid was used to test the imbibition of seeds of various plant species. Alfalfa seedling exudate significantly suppressed the seedling growth of all tested plants (Figure 2). These data are not suitable to confirm whether the alfalfa seed extracts inhibit germination, if they simply retard it or, alternatively, if the extract is toxic and the seeds died.
Yet, the latter option of seed death can be excluded, since a transfer of seeds that had been incubated for one week with the root exudates into fresh water resulted in a normal rate of germination. Apart from that, the validation of the allelopathic action does not require differentiation between an inherent inhibition or massive retardation of the germination. Accordingly, no further studies on this topic employing the basic seed extract were performed. The focus of this study was to identify the substances that are responsible for the observed allelopathic effects.

2.3. Identification of the Substances Responsible for the Allelopathic Effect in Alfalfa Seeds Exudates

To identify the phytochemical constituents of alfalfa seed exudates, which are responsible for the observed allelopathic effects, the related extract was fractionated by reversed-phase HPLC equipped with a diode array detector. Astonishingly, in the related chromatograms, only three main compounds could be detected. In order to enhance the sensitivity and to perceive substances with no or very low UV absorbance, the detection was extended by utilizing a mass spectrometric detector. Moreover, this approach also generates essential data for the identification of the corresponding substances.
Using electrospray ionization and high-resolution mass spectrometry in positive and negative ion mode, overall, eleven predominant compounds were detected (Figure 3a,b). By comparing the retention times with authentic standards and their mass spectrometric data with a comprehensive MS/MS library, these substances were unequivocally identified (Table 1 and Figure 4), i.e., as three flavonoid glucosides (hyperoside (Figures S1 and S13, isoquercetin (Figures S2 and S14) and luteoloside (Figures S4 and S15)) as well as five nitrogenous compounds (canavanine (Figure S8), stachydrine (Figure S9), trigonelline (Figure S10) and two dipeptides (H-Glu-Tyr-OH and H-Phe-Glu-OH (Figures S11 and S12)); further details of the structure elucidation are mentioned in the Supplementary Materials).
Apart from these eight predominant compounds, several minor components were detected e.g., diosmetin (Figures S6, S16 and S17) and an irisolidone isomer (Figures S7 and S18); the related data are also listed in the Supplementary Materials.

2.4. Allelopathic Effect of Pure Main Components of the Alfalfa Seed Exudates

To estimate the allelopathic potential of the various constituents of alfalfa, the seven major compounds were purchased and tested for their impact on the germination and seedling development of barley. In the case of H-Glu-Tyr-OH (4), H-Phe-Glu-OH (5), quercetin-3-O-xyloside (8), and irisolidone (11), they were not available commercially in the required amounts, and thus no related tests were performed with these compounds.
When the seven individual compounds were applied in the same concentration (150 μg/mL; except for luteoloside, which was employed at 20 μg/mL), five of them caused a significant reduction in seedling growth (Figure 5), only stachydrine and trigonelline did not hamper seedling development. The highest and most pronounced allelopathic effect was recorded when canavanine was applied in more or less the same concentration as present in the exudates.
However, we have to consider that the concentration of the other allelopathic compounds in the exudates may strongly vary, i.e., the concentration of hyperoside in the exudate was more than 1000 µg/mL, whereas that of all the other substances was ten to fifty time lower (Table 2). When the barley seeds were imbibed with water containing hyperoside in half the concentration (500 µg/mL) present in the exudate, the seeds did not germinate at all (Figure 6), and even a concentration of 20% (200 µg/mL) present in the exudate caused massive retardation in seedling development (Figure 6). Accordingly, it can be deduced that the massive inhibition of seedling development by alfalfa seed exudates is mainly due to the action of hyperoside and canavanine.
In addition to the overall retardation of seedling development, a further aspect has to be mentioned, i.e., root growth. Whereas most of the substances may reduce the overall seedling development, canavanine also reduces root development (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Thus, when evaluating the allelopathic potential of a particular substance, especially with respect to the long-term effects, this feature has to be appropriately considered.
One of the most unexpected results concerns a potential autotoxicity of the seedling extracts: when alfalfa seeds were incubated in media containing seedling alfalfa seed exudates, the germination, and growth of the seedling were also significantly retarded in comparison to the control. However, when the seeds were subsequently transferred into the water, germination started, and the seedlings developed normally. Thus, as already mentioned for the seedlings of other species, the exudate is not toxic in stricto sensu but inhibits or suppresses regular seedling development.
Yet, in this context, it has to be noted that, after the transfer of seeds in water, many of the developing seedlings became infected with microbes, whereas under normal conditions, i.e., when the seeds germinated, and in the presence of the exudates, no microbial growth was determined. This suggests that the biological relevance of the related substance—perhaps in addition to their allelopathic effect—might also be due to the prevention of microbial attacks. In this context, the total seedling exudate and its related compounds were tested against bacterial pathogens, such as E. coli.

2.5. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effects of the Alfalfa Seedling Exudate and Its Identified Compounds against Escherichia coli

2.5.1. Sensitivity of E. coli Isolates to the Tested Compounds

The total seedling exudate and its compounds exposed antibacterial activity toward E. coli isolates using the agar well-diffusion method as there were inhibition zones around the formed wells. Table 3 shows the values of the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the total extract and its isolated compounds. Interestingly, hyperoside revealed the best antibacterial activity with MIC values ranging from 8 to 32 µg/mL. This was followed by canavanine (32 to 256 µg/mL) and trigonelline (128 to 256 µg/mL). After that, both luteoloside and the total extract revealed MIC values of 256 to 512 µg/mL. Stachydrine hydrochloride and diosmetin had the highest MIC values of 1024 to 2048 µg/mL.

2.5.2. Antibiofilm Action

Hyperoside and canavanine exposed the highest antibiofilm action toward the biofilm-forming E. coli isolates. They caused a decline in the percentage of E. coli isolates that possessed a strong and moderate biofilm-forming potential from 68.42% to 21.05% and 31.58%, respectively (Table 4).

2.5.3. Count of Colony-Forming Units per Millilitre (CFU/mL)

As hyperoside and canavanine showed the best antibiofilm action, the count of CFU/mL was recorded before and after treatment (Figure 7).

3. Discussion

In this study, the allelopathic properties of Medicago sativa seed exudates on the germination of different seeds were investigated. The compounds responsible for the allelopathic effects of M. sativa were analyzed employing liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry. The crude exudates inhibited the germination of seeds of all various plant species tested. Overall, eleven compounds in alfalfa were identified and quantified.
The most predominant compounds were a flavonoid glucoside, identified as hyperoside and non-proteinogenic amino acid canavanine. The results verified that both substances exuded from the alfalfa seeds were predominantly responsible for the allelopathic effect determined for the crude exudates. In this context, it has to be considered that allelopathy comprises a wide array of interactions between plants.
A corresponding inhibition of competitive plants could be realized either directly, e.g., by inhibiting the germination and growth of potential competitors, or by indirect impacts, e.g., by affecting the microbiome, nutrient availability, and the character of the soil [1]. Alternatively, the compounds exuded from the soils may also be relevant to protect the plants against pathogens that might infest the roots of the seedling. In the next topics, these coherences are discussed for the main compounds exhibiting the major allelopathic effects, i.e., the hyperoside and canavanine exuded from alfalfa seeds.

3.1. Hyperoside and Other Flavonoids

As outlined, alfalfa seedlings exude high amounts of hyperoside during the germination as well as various minor flavonoids (e.g., isoquercetin, luteoloside, diosmetin, and irisolidone). The most significant allelopathic effect was attributed to hyperoside—also denoted as quercetin-galactoside. It is well-known that quercetin and its derivatives completely inhibit the growth of Arabidopsis thaliana at lower concentrations [30]. Moreover, quercetin (10−5 M) is known to be significantly autotoxic and to inhibit alfalfa seed germination [31].
Fernández-Aparicio et al., (2021) [32] reported that quercetin showed inhibition of the radicle growth of Phelipanche ramose, while apigenin was inactive due to the presence of two ortho-free-hydroxy groups of the C ring, such as catechol. High concentrations of quercetin and rutin have been shown to inhibit the seed germination of various plant species by impairing respiration and ATP levels in embryogenic cells via substrate oxidation or phosphate-uptake inhibition, which may uncouple oxidative phosphorylation [31,33]. Additionally, treatment with rutin was shown to drastically reduce the protein content of Arabidopsis cells [34].
Apart from these allelopathic effects, flavonoids are also involved in the signaling of alfalfa seedlings to induce the transcription of nodulation (nod) genes in Rhizobium meliloti [5,25,35]. However, recently, Compton et al., 2020 [22] reported that the symbiotic bacteria S. meliloti is not attracted to any flavonoids identified in alfalfa exudates. Thus, these studies contradict previous investigations, and consequently—if the flavanoids do not exhibit any relevance concerning the nodulation—their significance for alfalfa seedlings has to be due to their allelochemical effect by inhibiting the growth of the neighboring plants.
In addition, other works showed the inhibition role of P. aeruginosa biofilm by hyperoside [36]. In the current study, hyperoside had MIC values that ranged from 8 to 32 µg/mL and the highest antibiofilm activity toward the biofilm-forming E. coli isolates. Its impact on the viability of the bacterial cells was elucidated via counting the number of CFU/mL of the cells embedded in the biofilm before and after treatment, and the compound revealed a decrease in the count of CFU/mL. Accordingly, the significance of hyperoside in the seed exudates may also be attributed to the protective role against pathogen attack.

3.2. Canavanine

L-Canavanine has already been reported as one of the main allelochemicals of jack beans, which strongly inhibits plant growth [37]. The authors also reported that the main mechanism of the allelopathic activity of L-canavanine is related to the suppression of the arginine metabolism in the plant. However, Krasuska et al., (2016) [38] showed that the toxicity of canavanine in tomato roots (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is due to alterations in the RNS, ROS, and auxin levels. This effect was not reversible when the seedling was supplemented with arginine (no recovery effect). In addition, L-canavanine at 10 μM suppressed the division of lettuce protoplasts, which was more severe than that of cyanamide [39]. Apart from that, L-canavanine is also described as a natural insecticide. Due to its analogous structure to L-arginine, in most animals, it is falsely loaded to L-arginine-t-RNA since the arginyl-t-RNA synthase does not differentiate between canavanine and arginine. As a consequence, canavanine is incorporated into proteins, resulting in protein malfunctions [40,41].
As already mentioned, plant seeds often exude compounds that impact the population and fitness of the soil microorganism living in the vicinity of the seedlings [42,43]. Our results showed that canavanine sulfate had antibiofilm action toward the biofilm-forming E. coli isolates and revealed a decrease in the count of CFU/mL. In this context, it is worth mentioning that canavanine, which is also exuded from germinating alfalfa seeds, is known to affect the population biology of Bacillus cereus UW85 [23,44] and, thereby, to increase the chance of the survival of the seed.
Such coherences were also postulated by Mardani-Korrani et al. (2021) [45] who reported that L-canavanine is exuded from the root of hairy vetch. The authors postulated that canavanine is responsible for altering the soil microbial community and, thus, increases the chance of survival of the vetch seedlings. However, a detailed study by Mardani-Korrani et al. (2021) [45] unveiled that canavanine may either inhibit or stimulate the growth of microorganisms, whereas the bacteria Firmicutes and Actinobacteria became more abundant in soils after the application of canavanine, Proteobacteria, and Acidobacteria populations decreased.
In addition, Barron and Weaks, (1977) [46] reported a canavanine-mediated enhancement of growth in several isolates of Pythium spp. The underlying mechanism of action appears to be the same as reported for the toxic effect of canavanine in insects, i.e., it is falsely incorporated into the microbial proteins [47]. On the other sits, canavanine might be tolerated by other microorganisms and used as a nitrogen source to synthesize other amino acids in the same manner as in the case of the seed beetle Caryedes brasiliensis, which reveals the most highly discriminatory arginine-tRNA ligase [48].
Up to now, it is unclear whether the presence of canavanine enhances microbial growth or if the absence of a potential microbicide is the reason for increased microbial attacks. L-canavanine likely influences the interaction of plant seedlings with surrounding organisms in the soil, including soil microbial communities by limiting or stimulating the growth of selected bacteria. However, we still do not know if soil bacteria may use canavanine as a source of nitrogen.
Furthermore, there is also the possibility that the presence of canavanine may increase the population of soil microorganisms that are capable of utilizing canavanine, which might limit the growth of some competing species [49] and, thereby, act as the typical indirect allelopathic compound. Altogether, canavanine may only be consumed by specific taxa, and it may act as an inhibitor for others. Furthermore, canavanine is also known to be toxic to other plants [37] and, thus, exhibits a direct allelopathic effect. Finally, it might also act as a nitrogen source for other plants.
In conclusion, apart from the allelopathic effect, canavanine clearly also exhibits antimicrobial as well as insecticidal effects. As a consequence, the biological significance of this compound cannot be evaluated by only estimating its allelopathic potential but must also consider its other ecological functions—a typical problem in defining the significance of a natural compound that exhibits various functions. This issue becomes even more complex when considering that canavanine has positive as well as negative effects on the growth of microorganisms. Such ambivalent effects are also known for flavonoids exuded from seeds or roots (see above).

3.3. Uptake of the Allelochemicals

In general, allelochemicals might be exported from vital tissues, and depending on the physico-chemical properties, they are either released by passive diffusion or an active exudation by the means of transporters. In this context, allelochemicals, such as coumarins, alkaloids, and phenols, are leached out by simple diffusion across the biomembranes [48]. In contrast, amino acids, such as canavanine, dipeptides, trigonelline, stachydrine and flavonoid glycoside compounds, are unable to simply diffuse across the lipophilic zone of bio-membranes due to their high water solubility. Accordingly, their exudation from alfalfa seedlings requires a carrier, i.e., for their transfer through and across any membrane, transporters are required [50,51,52].
Since any inhibitory effect of an allelochemical requires its uptake, the same coherences also account for their uptake (i.e., the import of polar compounds, such as amino acids and glucosides), which necessitates carriers that can catalyse the membrane transfer. In this context, studies with Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants atlht1 and ataap1 provided molecular evidence that amino acid transporters facilitate the uptake of amino acids into roots [53,54,55].
In addition to amino acids, more complex organic N sources may also be imported by the same mechanism [56]. In addition, Komarova et al., (2008) [57] reported novel evidence that the use of organic forms of N is not restricted to amino acids, and di- and tripeptides should be considered as a potentially important N sources as well. The author showed that AtPTR1 and AtPTR5 transporters facilitate the transport of dipeptides with high affinity, which are localized at the plasma membrane.
Whereas most of the flavonoid aglycones, such as quercetin, reveal a logP of around 2, which expounds their inherent ability to diffuse passively across biomembranes, their glucosidic derivatives are not capable of such diffusion [58,59,60].
Even when the logP on some flavonoid glycoside is in the range between −1 and 3, according to the “rule of five”, they cannot cross membranes [59]. Thus, a corresponding import of flavonoidal allelochemicals also requires an appropriate carrier. In contrast, flavonol glycosides can only be transported via ABCC transporters as observed in related in vitro experiments [61,62]. In addition, ABCC transporters are also responsible for transporting flavones and isoflavones into the vacuole [61,63].
Recent studies on the root uptake of organic compounds have shown that allelochemicals exuded into the rhizosphere by plant roots could be absorbed by neighboring plants and translocated into the shoots [2,50,64]. In the case of poisonous specialized metabolites, such as pyrrolizidine alkaloids, this could create massive problems for related plant-derived commodities [50,65,66]. However, it could be argued that the uptake of substances may also imply positive effects, such as acting as protective agents. However, up to now, although this aspect might be particularly interesting for intercropping systems—no sound data on this issue were available.

3.4. Beneficial Implications of Allelochemicals for Agriculture

Novel bio-inspired strategies are aimed to replace synthetic herbicides with natural compounds that also inhibit efficiently weed growth [42,67,68,69,70,71]. In this context, allelopathic compounds seem to be the best candidates. As various allelochemicals that inhibit the growth of neighbouring plants are known to be exuded from many legumes, it is suggested to employ them as subsidiary crops: they could either be used as cover crops or in intercropping systems [70,72,73]. However, any living or dead mulch for weed management effective enough to suppress weeds will also hamper the growth of the crop plants and their yield.
Therefore, research on the employment of allelochemicals has to be focused on balancing the inhibitory effect on weeds and the undesired negative impacts on crop plants; this also accounts for the related effects in the subsequent years [73]. Allelopathic approaches to regulate weed growth include crop rotation, intercropping, cover cropping as living or dead mulches, green manuring, and the use of allelochemical-based bioherbicides [70].
In this context, alfalfa can be included in the previous approaches as a prospective and alternative material for friendly environmental weed management to reduce the dependence on synthetic herbicides. Xuan et al., (2005) [68] showed that alfalfa leaf pellets significantly inhibited the germination and growth of four weed species in rice paddies. Furthermore, the paddy field experiment suggested that the dose of 1–2 tons ha−1 of alfalfa pellets could control more weed species without any rice plant injury [67,68].
In contrast, aqueous extract and crude powder of Medicago sativa demonstrated inhibitory effects on the seed germination, growth, and nutrient uptake of Lycopersicon esculentum [74]. Weisberger et al., (2019) [75] conducted a meta-analysis across studies involving simple and more diverse crop rotations. They found that diversifying crop rotations, often involving allelopathic crops, such as wheat, oat, corn, alfalfa, and sunflower, reduced weed density by 49% compared to simple sequences, while no significant effects were observed on weed biomass.

3.5. Antimicrobial Activity of Allelochemicals against Pathogenic Bacteria

It is essential to investigate novel antimicrobials against multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates. Here, hyperoside had MIC values that ranged from 8 to 32 µg/mL, and this was followed by canavanine (32 to 256 µg/mL). Previous research revealed that hyperoside has antibacterial activity in addition to various other biological potentials, such as anticancer and antioxidant activities [76]. A biofilm is an important virulence factor of E. coli pathogenic bacteria. Thus, antibiofilm agents have gained the attention of researchers as a therapeutic trend against biofilm-forming bacteria [76]. In the current study, hyperoside and canavanine had the highest antibiofilm action toward the biofilm-forming E. coli isolates.
Previous research reported that canavanine affects quorum sensing, which is important for biofilm formation [44]. In addition, a previous research article reported the antibiofilm potential of hyperoside [36]. Their impact on the viability of the bacterial cells was elucidated by counting the number of CFU/mL of the cells embedded in the biofilm before and after treatment, and both compounds revealed a decrease in the CFU/mL. This method was chosen as the most accurate, cheapest, and simplest technique that could be used to test the bacterial viability in biofilm after treatment with various compounds [77].
Thus, we can conclude that both hyperoside and canavanine allelochemicals are promising antibacterial and antibiofilm compounds that require further future clinical elucidation.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals

All solvents used were of HPLC grade and supplied by Fisher Scientific. Canavanine sulfate salt, quercetin-3-glucoside, quercetin dihydrate, hyperoside, luteoloside, stachydrine (hydrochloride), trigonelline chloride, diosmetin, H-Glu-Tyr-OH and H-Phe-Glu-OH standards were purchased from the Sigma-Aldrich (Munich, Germany), Thermo scientific, Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany), Chemodex (St. Gallen, Switzerland), Cayman (Düsseldorf, Germany) and Adipogen life sciences (San Diego, CA, USA) companies.

4.2. Co-Cultivation of Barley Seed with Alfalfa Seed

Medicago sativa L and barley (Hordeum vulgare, L. Poaceae, Sprieβ korngerste, Donath Mühle, Bad Wörishofen, Germany) seeds were surface-sterilized with sodium hypochlorite (0.3%) and rinsed with distilled sterilized water. The seeds were arranged over wetted tissues in petri dishes for germination in the same container under controlled conditions with temperatures ranging from 19 to 22 °C and day/night cycles of 16/8 h. Germination was recorded over 14 days. The experiment was repeated three times.

4.3. Preparation of Medicago sativa Seed Exudate

Forty grams seeds of alfalfa were soaked in 500 mL of dist. water for 24 h under aeration. The seed exudate was collected and stored at −20 °C for further experiments.

4.4. Evaluation of Allelopathic Effects of Alfalfa Seedling Exudate on Germination

To study the allelopathic effects of alfalfa seedling exudate, different seeds of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), radish (Raphanus sativus L.), mung bean (Vigna radiata L.), flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) and broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) were purchased from a local garden center (Reformhaus, Braunschweig, Germany). Thirty seeds of each species were soaked in 50 mL of alfalfa seedling exudate under aeration. After 24 h, the seeds were arranged in petri-dishes lined with two discs of tissues misted with alfalfa seedling exudate for germination under controlled conditions with the temperature ranging from 19 to 22 °C and day/night cycles of 16/8 h, and distilled water was used as a control treatment. Germination was recorded after 10 days at the end of the experiment.

4.5. HPLC Analysis of Alfalfa Exudate

Fifty milliliters of alfalfa seedling exudate was freeze-dried, and the residue was dissolved in one milliliter of 80% methanol for HPLC analysis. HPLC was performed using a ReproSil phoenix C18 column (3 μm particle size, L × I.D. 100 mm × 4.6 mm) applying a binary gradient, starting with 85% A, 15% B for 5 min. After 15 min, the ratio was 70% A, 30% B; subsequently, the ratio was changed as follows: 29 min: 50% A, 50% B; 34 min: 20% A, 80% B; 35 min: 20% A, 80% B; 37 min: 85% A, 15% B; and 47 min: 85% A, 15% B using A: aqueous formic acid (1%) and B: acetonitrile formic acid (1%). The flow rate was 0.8 mL/min, and the injection volume was 10 μL. For detection, a photodiode array (PDA) detector was applied at 254, 280, and 350 nm.

4.6. Compounds Identification and Quantification Using LC-MS

To identify and quantify the composition of the alfalfa seedling exudate, high-resolution UPLCMS analysis was performed using a Bruker TimsTOFPro mass spectrometer, equipped with an Apollo II Elektrospray source. For UHPLC, a Dionex Ultimate3000RS from Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany was used for the separation, containing an autosampler, binary high gradient pump, column oven, 6-port-column-switching-option, and DAD-detector.
The column used for the separation: Aquity UPLC CSH Phenyl-Hexyl; 1.7 µm; 2.1 × 50 mm, from Waters, column temperature: 40 °C, UV spectra recording: 190—600 nm, and injection volume: 2 µL. Solvents: A: Water with 0.1% formic acid, B: Acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid, flow rate: 500 µL/min. Used gradient: 0 min 0% B, 2 min 0% B, 10 min 5% B, 30 min 30% B, 50 min 100% B, and 55 min 100% B. After this wash, the column with 100% B, and then return to the starting conditions with 0% B. The overall run time was 60 min. MS conditions: within the first 0.3 min of the run, a mixture of low-concentration Tune-Mix and sodium formate was infused as calibrant to the system (for internal calibration and mobility calibration).
Calibrations were performed in Data Analysis (internal and mobility calibration—Calibration Mode HPC for mass, linear for mobility). MS Acquisition Parameter (adapted from the method, delivered with the device control system Otof-control v6.2 from Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA): source type: ESI, scan range: 20–1000 m/z, ion polarity: positive/(negative), capillary voltage: 4500 V, nebulizer pressure: 2.2 bar, dry heater: 220 °C, dry gas: 10.0 l/min. PASEF/TIMS: TIMS ramp time: 100 ms, spectra rate: 9.52 Hz, number of PASEF MSMS scans: 2, total cycle time: 0.53 s. Mobility: 1/K0 scanned from 0.45 to 1.20 V*S/cm2.
The concentrations employed for the calibration curves ranged from 50 µg/mL to 200 mg/mL. For reliable identification and quantification, authentic reference substances were applied.

4.7. Allelopathic Effect of Pure Main Components of the Alfalfa Seed Exudates

Hyperoside, canavanine, trigonelline, stachydrine, isoquercetin, luteoloside and diosmetin were tested for allelopathic effects on barley seeds. Barley seeds were immersed in an aqueous solution at a concentration of 150 μg/mL (except for luteoloside, which was employed at 20 μg/mL). After 24 h, the seeds were arranged in Petri dishes lined with two tissues misted with an aqueous solution of different compounds for germination under controlled conditions with temperatures ranging from 19 to 22 °C and day/night cycles of 16/8 h. The shoot length was recorded after 10 days at the end of the experiment. In addition, barley seeds were immersed in hyperoside aqueous solution at concentrations of 200 and 500 μg/mL and canavanine at 60, 100 and 200 μg/mL. The shoot and root lengths were recorded after 10 days at the end of the experiment.

4.8. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effects of the Alfalfa Seedling Exudate and Its Identified Compounds against Escherichia coli

4.8.1. Bacteria

Nineteen E. coli isolates were used in the current study. They were clinical isolates obtained from the Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University. These bacterial isolates were multidrug-resistant, and their resistance profile is shown in Table S1.

4.8.2. Antibacterial Action

The susceptibility of E. coli isolates to the total extract and its isolated compounds was revealed by the agar well-diffusion method [78]. Briefly, after spreading the bacterial suspensions on the Muller–Hinton agar plates, cups were made, and the tested compounds, in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) with concentrations of 1000 µg/mL, were poured into the cups. A positive control (ciprofloxacin) and a negative control (DMSO) were incorporated.

4.8.3. Determination of MICs

The MIC values were recorded using the broth microdilution method [79] in 96-well plates. The tested compounds were two-fold serially diluted using Muller–Hinton broth in the wells of the microtitration plates, and the bacterial suspensions were then added. The tested plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C, and the MIC values were recorded as the minimum concentration of the compound that inhibited the bacterial growth.

4.8.4. Antibiofilm Action

The influence of the tested compounds was revealed on the capacity of biofilm formation by E. coli isolates (at their 0.5 MIC values) using a crystal violet assay [80,81]. The optical density (OD) values were elucidated at 490 nm by a microtitration plate reader. The capacity of the biofilm formation was revealed, and it was grouped into four groups as follows: non-biofilm, weak, moderate, and strong biofilm formation [82].

4.8.5. Colony-Forming Units (CFU/mL) Count

After allowing the isolates to form biofilms in the wells of the microtitration plates, they were thoroughly washed using phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and they were scraped off the wells after adding 200 μL PBS. They were then mixed well and diluted. About 100 μL of the suspension was inoculated into Muller–Hinton agar plates, which were then incubated overnight at 37 °C. After incubation, the CFU/mL count was recorded [83].

4.9. Statistical Analyses

Each experiment was performed in triplicate, and the data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Quantitative data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significant differences between the obtained data were determined using Tukey’s test, with p < 0.05 implying statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v20.0 from SPSS Inc. (Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

5. Conclusions

The most active allelopathic compounds exuded from alfalfa seeds were hyperoside and canavanine, which were predominantly responsible for the inhibition of germination by crude exudates. Allelopathic effects could be due to a wide array of effects. Accordingly, apart from the inhibition of germination, their allelopathic action may also be due to affecting the microbiome, the nutrient availability, and the character of the soil. A related study on these putative effects is pending. Furthermore, the compounds exuded into the soil may also be relevant to protect the plants against pathogens, which might infest the roots of the seedling.
Special emphasis has to be placed on the antimicrobial activity of allelochemicals against pathogenic bacteria, e.g., E. coli, which opens the intriguing possibility to study the effects of allelopathic compounds, i.e., hyperoside and canavanine, as promising antibacterial and antibiofilm candidates that require further future clinical elucidation.
Overall, the allelopathic properties of the alfalfa-derived flavonoids, as well as canavanine, suggest their high potential as bioherbicides, which could be employed in organic farming.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28062645/s1, Figures S1–S18: MS/MS spectra. Table S1. Resistance profile of the tested isolates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A.; Methodology, S.A., U.B., D.S. and E.E.; Resources, D.S.; Software, S.A, U.B. and E.E.; Writing—original draft, S.A.; Writing—review and editing, S.A, U.B., E.E. and D.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Funds of Technische Universität Braunschweig.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research is acknowledged for the fellowship support of Sara Abouzeid. The authors thank Mark Brönstrup (Department of Chemical Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany) for generous support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Inderjit Wardle, D.A.; Karban, R.; Callaway, R.M. The ecosystem and evolutionary contexts of allelopathy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Selmar, D.; Abouzeid, S.; Radwan, A.; Hijazin, T.; Yahyazadeh, M.; Lewerenz, L.; Nowak, M.; Kleinwächter, M. Horizontal Natural Product Transfer: A Novel Attribution in Allelopathy. In Co-Evolution of Secondary Metabolites, 1st ed.; Mérillon, J.-M., Ramawat, K.G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–11. ISBN 978-3-319-76887-8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheng, F.; Cheng, Z. Research Progress on the use of Plant Allelopathy in Agriculture and the Physiological and Ecological Mechanisms of Allelopathy. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Bowen, G.D. The toxicity of legume seed diffusates toward rhizobia and other bacteria. Plant Soil 1961, 15, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dharmatilake, A.J.; Bauer, W.D. Chemotaxis of Rhizobium meliloti towards Nodulation Gene-Inducing Compounds from Alfalfa Roots. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 1153–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Barbour, W.M.; Hattermann, D.R.; Stacey, G. Chemotaxis of Bradyrhizobium japonicum to soybean exudates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57, 2635–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Phillips, D.A.; Joseph, C.M.; Maxwell, C.A. Trigonelline and Stachydrine Released from Alfalfa Seeds Activate NodD2 Protein in Rhizobium meliloti. Plant Physiol. 1992, 99, 1526–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Phillips, D.A. Flavonoids: Plant Signals to Soil Microbes. In Phenolic Metabolism in Plants; Imprint; Stafford, H.A., Ibrahim, R.K., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1992; pp. 201–231. ISBN 978-1-4613-6517-4. [Google Scholar]
  9. Abdul-Rahman, A.A.; Habib, S.A. Allelopathic effect of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) on bladygrass (Imperata cylindrica). J. Chem. Ecol. 1989, 15, 2289–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ells, J.E.; McSay, A.E. Allelopathic Effects of Alfalfa Plant Residues on Emergence and Growth of Cucumber Seedlings. Hort. Sci. 1991, 26, 368–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Miller, D.A. Allelopathic effects of alfalfa. J. Chem. Ecol. 1983, 9, 1059–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Phillips, D.A.; Wery, J.; Joseph, C.M.; Jones, A.D.; Teuber, L.R. Release of Flavonoids and Betaines from Seeds of Seven Medicago Species. Crop Sci. 1995, 35, 805–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chon, S.-U.; Choi, S.-K.; Jung, S.; Jang, H.-G.; Pyo, B.-S.; Kim, S.-M. Effects of alfalfa leaf extracts and phenolic allelochemicals on early seedling growth and root morphology of alfalfa and barnyard grass. Crop Prot. 2002, 21, 1077–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dornbos, D.L.; Spencer, G.F.; Miller, R.W. Medicarpin Delays Alfalfa Seed Germination and Seedling Growth. Crop Sci. 1990, 30, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, X.-Y.; Shi, S.-L.; Li, X.-L.; Li, C.-N.; Zhang, C.-M.; A, Y.; Kang, W.-J.; Yin, G.-L. Effects of Autotoxicity on Alfalfa (Medicago sativa): Seed Germination, Oxidative Damage and Lipid Peroxidation of Seedlings. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nielsen, K.F.; Woods, W.B.; Cuddy, T.F. The influence of the extract of some crops and soil residues on germination and growth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1960, 40, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dakora, F.D.; Joseph, C.M.; Phillips, D.A. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Root Exudates Contain Isoflavonoids in the Presence of Rhizobium meliloti. Plant Physiol. 1993, 101, 819–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hall, M.H.; Henderlong, P.R. Alfalfa Autotoxic Fraction Characterization and Initial Separation. Crop Sci. 1989, 29, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Peters, N.K.; Long, S.R. Alfalfa Root Exudates and Compounds which Promote or Inhibit Induction of Rhizobium meliloti Nodulation Genes. Plant Physiol. 1988, 88, 396–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Oleszek, W.; Jurzysta, M. The allelopathic potential of alfalfa root medicagenic acid glycosides and their fate in soil environments. Plant Soil 1987, 98, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Leoni, F.; Hazrati, H.; Fomsgaard, I.S.; Moonen, A.-C.; Kudsk, P. Determination of the Effect of Co-cultivation on the Production and Root Exudation of Flavonoids in Four Legume Species Using LC-MS/MS Analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 9208–9219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Compton, K.K.; Hildreth, S.B.; Helm, R.F.; Scharf, B.E. An Updated Perspective on Sinorhizobium meliloti Chemotaxis to Alfalfa Flavonoids. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 581482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Emmert, E.A.; Milner, J.L.; Lee, J.C.; Pulvermacher, K.L.; Olivares, H.A.; Clardy, J.; Handelsman, J. Effect of canavanine from alfalfa seeds on the population biology of bacillus cereus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 4683–4688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Hartwig, U.A.; Maxwell, C.A.; Joseph, C.M.; Phillips, D.A. Interactions among Flavonoid nod Gene Inducers Released from Alfalfa Seeds and Roots. Plant Physiol. 1989, 91, 1138–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Maxwell, C.A.; Hartwig, U.A.; Joseph, C.M.; Phillips, D.A. A Chalcone and Two Related Flavonoids Released from Alfalfa Roots Induce nod Genes of Rhizobium meliloti. Plant Physiol. 1989, 91, 842–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Elisha, I.L.; Botha, F.S.; McGaw, L.J.; Eloff, J.N. The antibacterial activity of extracts of nine plant species with good activity against Escherichia coli against five other bacteria and cytotoxicity of extracts. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Melotto, M.; Panchal, S.; Roy, D. Plant innate immunity against human bacterial pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Inderjit Dakshini, K.M.M.; Einhellig, F.A. (Eds.) Allelopathy: Organisms, Processes, and Applications: Symposium Papers; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1995; ISBN 9780841230613. [Google Scholar]
  29. Macías, F.A.; Molinillo, J.M.G.; Varela, R.M.; Galindo, J.C.G. Allelopathy—A natural alternative for weed control. Pest Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 327–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Parvez, M.M.; Tomita-Yokotani, K.; Fujii, Y.; Konishi, T.; Iwashina, T. Effects of quercetin and its seven derivatives on the growth of Arabidopsis thaliana and Neurospora crassa. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2004, 32, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ghimire, B.K.; Ghimire, B.; Yu, C.Y.; Chung, I.-M. Allelopathic and Autotoxic Effects of Medicago sativa-Derived Allelochemicals. Plants 2019, 8, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Fernández-Aparicio, M.; Masi, M.; Cimmino, A.; Vilariño, S.; Evidente, A. Allelopathic Effect of Quercetin, a Flavonoid from Fagopyrum esculentum Roots in the Radicle Growth of Phelipanche ramosa: Quercetin Natural and Semisynthetic Analogues Were Used for a Structure-Activity Relationship Investigation. Plants 2021, 10, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Takahashi, L.; Sert, M.A.; Kelmer-Bracht, A.M.; Bracht, A.; Ishii-Iwamoto, E.L. Effects of rutin and quercetin on mitochondrial metabolism and on ATP levels in germinating tissues of Glycine max. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1998, 36, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hussain, M.I.; Reigosa Roger, M. Plant secondary metabolite rutin affects the photosynthesis and excitation energy flux responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Allelopath. J. 2016, 38, 215–228. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hartwig, U.A.; Maxwell, C.A.; Joseph, C.M.; Phillips, D.A. Chrysoeriol and Luteolin Released from Alfalfa Seeds Induce nod Genes in Rhizobium meliloti. Plant Physiol. 1990, 92, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Sun, Y.; Sun, F.; Feng, W.; Qiu, X.; Liu, Y.; Yang, B.; Chen, Y.; Xia, P. Hyperoside inhibits biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017, 14, 1647–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Nakajima, N.; Hiradate, S.; Fujii, Y. Plant growth inhibitory activity of L-canavanine and its mode of action. J. Chem. Ecol. 2001, 27, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Krasuska, U.; Andrzejczak, O.; Staszek, P.; Borucki, W.; Gniazdowska, A. Toxicity of canavanine in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) roots is due to alterations in RNS, ROS and auxin levels. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 103, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sasamoto, H.; Mardani, H.; Sasamoto, Y.; Wasano, N.; Murashige-Baba, T.; Sato, T.; Hasegawa, A.; Fujii, Y. Evaluation of canavanine as an allelochemical in etiolated seedlings of Vicia villosa Roth: Protoplast co-culture method with digital image analysis. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2019, 55, 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bence, A.K.; Crooks, P.A. The mechanism of L-canavanine cytotoxicity: Arginyl tRNA synthetase as a novel target for anticancer drug discovery. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2003, 18, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mitri, C.; Soustelle, L.; Framery, B.; Bockaert, J.; Parmentier, M.-L.; Grau, Y. Plant insecticide L-canavanine repels Drosophila via the insect orphan GPCR DmX. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7, e1000147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Scavo, A.; Abbate, C.; Mauromicale, G. Plant allelochemicals: Agronomic, nutritional and ecological relevance in the soil system. Plant Soil 2019, 442, 23–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nelson, E.B. The seed microbiome: Origins, interactions, and impacts. Plant Soil 2018, 422, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Keshavan, N.D.; Chowdhary, P.K.; Haines, D.C.; González, J.E. L-Canavanine made by Medicago sativa interferes with quorum sensing in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 8427–8436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Mardani-Korrani, H.; Nakayasu, M.; Yamazaki, S.; Aoki, Y.; Kaida, R.; Motobayashi, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Ohkama-Ohtsu, N.; Oikawa, Y.; Sugiyama, A.; et al. L-Canavanine, a Root Exudate From Hairy Vetch (Vicia villosa) Drastically Affecting the Soil Microbial Community and Metabolite Pathways. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 701796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Barron, J.A.; Weaks, T.E. The effects of the amino acid canavanine on Pythium. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1977, 11, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rosenthal, G.A.; Lambert, J.; Hoffmann, D. Canavanine incorporation into the antibacterial proteins of the fly, Phormia terranovae (Diptera), and its effect on biological activity. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 9768–9771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rosenthal, G.A.; Hughes, C.G.; Janzen, D.H. L-Canavanine, a Dietary Nitrogen Source for the Seed Predator Caryedes brasiliensis (Bruchidae). Science 1982, 217, 353–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Berg, J.M.; Tymoczko, J.L.; Stryer, L. Biochemistry, 5th ed.; Freeman, W.H., Ed.; NCBI: New York, NY, USA; Bethesda: Rockville, MD, USA, 2002; ISBN 9780716730514.
  50. Selmar, D.; Radwan, A.; Hijazin, T.; Abouzeid, S.; Yahyazadeh, M.; Lewerenz, L.; Kleinwächter, M.; Nowak, M. Horizontal Natural Product Transfer: Intriguing Insights into a Newly Discovered Phenomenon. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 8740–8745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pucker, B.; Selmar, D. Biochemistry and Molecular Basis of Intracellular Flavonoid Transport in Plants. Plants 2022, 11, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tegeder, M.; Rentsch, D. Uptake and partitioning of amino acids and peptides. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 997–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hirner, B.; Fischer, W.N.; Rentsch, D.; Kwart, M.; Frommer, W.B. Developmental control of H+/amino acid permease gene expression during seed development of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 1998, 14, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lee, Y.-H.; Tegeder, M. Selective expression of a novel high-affinity transport system for acidic and neutral amino acids in the tapetum cells of Arabidopsis flowers. Plant J. 2004, 40, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Svennerstam, H.; Ganeteg, U.; Bellini, C.; Näsholm, T. Comprehensive screening of Arabidopsis mutants suggests the lysine histidine transporter 1 to be involved in plant uptake of amino acids. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1853–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Paungfoo-Lonhienne, C.; Lonhienne, T.G.A.; Rentsch, D.; Robinson, N.; Christie, M.; Webb, R.I.; Gamage, H.K.; Carroll, B.J.; Schenk, P.M.; Schmidt, S. Plants can use protein as a nitrogen source without assistance from other organisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 4524–4529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Komarova, N.Y.; Thor, K.; Gubler, A.; Meier, S.; Dietrich, D.; Weichert, A.; Suter Grotemeyer, M.; Tegeder, M.; Rentsch, D. AtPTR1 and AtPTR5 transport dipeptides in planta. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 856–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Cronin, M.T.D.; Livingstone, D.J. Predicting Chemical Toxicity and Fate; Taylor & Francis: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; ISBN 9780203642627. [Google Scholar]
  59. Trapp, S.; Legind, C. Uptake of Organic Contaminants from Soil into Vegetables and Fruits; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 369–408. ISBN 978-90-481-9756-9. [Google Scholar]
  60. Rothwell, J.A.; Day, A.J.; Morgan, M.R.A. Experimental Determination of Octanol−Water Partition Coefficients of Quercetin and Related Flavonoids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 4355–4360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Behrens, C.E.; Smith, K.E.; Iancu, C.V.; Choe, J.-Y.; Dean, J.V. Transport of Anthocyanins and other Flavonoids by the Arabidopsis ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter AtABCC2. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Frangne, N.; Eggmann, T.; Koblischke, C.; Weissenböck, G.; Martinoia, E.; Klein, M. Flavone Glucoside Uptake into Barley Mesophyll and Arabidopsis Cell Culture Vacuoles. Energization Occurs by H+-Antiport and ATP-Binding Cassette-Type Mechanisms. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128, 726–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Klein, M.; Martinoia, E.; Hoffmann-Thoma, G.; Weissenböck, G. The ABC-like vacuolar transporter for rye mesophyll flavone glucuronides is not species-specific. Phytochemistry 2001, 56, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hazrati, H.; Fomsgaard, I.S.; Kudsk, P. Root-Exuded Benzoxazinoids: Uptake and Translocation in Neighboring Plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 10609–10617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Schramm, S.; Köhler, N.; Rozhon, W. Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids: Biosynthesis, Biological Activities and Occurrence in Crop Plants. Molecules 2019, 24, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Nowak, M.; Wittke, C.; Lederer, I.; Klier, B.; Kleinwächter, M.; Selmar, D. Interspecific transfer of pyrrolizidine alkaloids: An unconsidered source of contaminations of phytopharmaceuticals and plant derived commodities. Food Chem. 2016, 213, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Xuan, T.D.; Tsuzuki, E.; Uematsu, H.; Terao, H. Weed control with alfalfa pellets in transplanting rice. Weed Biol. Manag. 2001, 1, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xuan, T.D.; Shinkichi, T.; Khanh, T.D.; Chung, I.M. Biological control of weeds and plant pathogens in paddy rice by exploiting plant allelopathy: An overview. Crop Protection 2005, 24, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Puig, C.G.; Gonçalves, R.F.; Valentão, P.; Andrade, P.B.; Reigosa, M.J.; Pedrol, N. The Consistency Between Phytotoxic Effects and the Dynamics of Allelochemicals Release from Eucalyptus globulus Leaves Used as Bioherbicide Green Manure. J. Chem. Ecol. 2018, 44, 658–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Scavo, A.; Mauromicale, G. Crop Allelopathy for Sustainable Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Knowing the Present with a View to the Future. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zubair, H.M.; Pratley, J.E.; Sandral, G.A.; Humphries, A. Allelopathic interference of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) genotypes to annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10265-017-0921-9 (accessed on 23 September 2022).
  72. Amossé, C.; Jeuffroy, M.-H.; Celette, F.; David, C. Relay-intercropped forage legumes help to control weeds in organic grain production. Eur. J. Agron. 2013, 49, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Teasdale, J.R. Contribution of Cover Crops to Weed Management in Sustainable Agricultural Systems. J. Prod. Agric. 1996, 9, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. El-Darier, S.M.; Zein El-Dien, M.H. Biological activity of Medicago sativa L. (alfalfa) residues on germination efficiency, growth and nutrient uptake of Lycopersicon esculentum L. (tomato) seedlings. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 2011, 5, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Weisberger, D.; Nichols, V.; Liebman, M. Does diversifying crop rotations suppress weeds? A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0219847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Wang, Q.; Wei, H.-C.; Zhou, S.-J.; Li, Y.; Zheng, T.-T.; Zhou, C.-Z.; Wan, X.-H. Hyperoside: A review on its sources, biological activities, and molecular mechanisms. Phytother. Res. 2022, 36, 2779–2802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Roy, R.; Tiwari, M.; Donelli, G.; Tiwari, V. Strategies for combating bacterial biofilms: A focus on anti-biofilm agents and their mechanisms of action. Virulence 2018, 9, 522–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Mastoor, S.; Nazim, F.; Rizwan-Ul-Hasan, S.; Ahmed, K.; Khan, S.; Ali, S.N.; Abidi, S.H. Analysis of the Antimicrobial and Anti-Biofilm Activity of Natural Compounds and Their Analogues against Staphylococcus aureus Isolates. Molecules 2022, 27, 6874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. El-Aasr, M.; Nohara, T.; Ikeda, T.; Abu-Risha, S.E.; Elekhnawy, E.; Tawfik, H.O.; Shoeib, N.; Attia, G. LC-MS/MS metabolomics profiling of Glechoma hederacea L. methanolic extract; in vitro antimicrobial and in vivo with in silico wound healing studies on Staphylococcus aureus infected rat skin wound. Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 9, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Latka, A.; Drulis-Kawa, Z. Advantages and limitations of microtiter biofilm assays in the model of antibiofilm activity of Klebsiella phage KP34 and its depolymerase. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Attallah, N.G.M.; Al-Fakhrany, O.M.; Elekhnawy, E.; Hussein, I.A.; Shaldam, M.A.; Altwaijry, N.; Alqahtani, M.J.; Negm, W.A. Anti-Biofilm and Antibacterial Activities of Cycas media R. Br Secondary Metabolites: In Silico, In Vitro, and In Vivo Approaches. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Abdel Bar, F.M.; Alossaimi, M.A.; Elekhnawy, E.; Alzeer, M.A.A.; Abo Kamer, A.; Moglad, E.; ElNaggar, M.H. Anti-Quorum Sensing and Anti-Biofilm Activity of Pelargonium × hortorum Root Extract against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Combinatorial Effect of Catechin and Gallic Acid. Molecules 2022, 27, 7841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Elekhnawy, E.; Negm, W.A.; El-Aasr, M.; Kamer, A.A.; Alqarni, M.; Batiha, G.E.-S.; Obaidullah, A.J.; Fawzy, H.M. Histological assessment, anti-quorum sensing, and anti-biofilm activities of Dioon spinulosum extract: In vitro and in vivo approach. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Co-cultivation of alfalfa seed with barley for two weeks. The germination of barley was massively retarded. The delay accounts for about three days in comparison to the controls. In addition, the root and shoot development was significantly reduced in comparison to the controls after 14 days. The experiment was repeated three times.
Figure 1. Co-cultivation of alfalfa seed with barley for two weeks. The germination of barley was massively retarded. The delay accounts for about three days in comparison to the controls. In addition, the root and shoot development was significantly reduced in comparison to the controls after 14 days. The experiment was repeated three times.
Molecules 28 02645 g001
Figure 2. Allelopathic effects of alfalfa seed exudates on various plant species after 10 days. Alfalfa seedling exudate significantly suppressed the seedling growth of all tested plants.
Figure 2. Allelopathic effects of alfalfa seed exudates on various plant species after 10 days. Alfalfa seedling exudate significantly suppressed the seedling growth of all tested plants.
Molecules 28 02645 g002
Figure 3. LC-MS base peak chromatogram (BPC) in: (a) positive ion mode. (b) Negative ion mode of the seedling alfalfa exudate. The peak numbers correspond to the identified compounds listed in Table 1.
Figure 3. LC-MS base peak chromatogram (BPC) in: (a) positive ion mode. (b) Negative ion mode of the seedling alfalfa exudate. The peak numbers correspond to the identified compounds listed in Table 1.
Molecules 28 02645 g003
Figure 4. Structure of the main compounds identified through LC–MS/MS in negative mode and positive ESI ion mode.
Figure 4. Structure of the main compounds identified through LC–MS/MS in negative mode and positive ESI ion mode.
Molecules 28 02645 g004
Figure 5. Lengths of the shoots and roots of barley seedlings after treatment with the pure main components of the alfalfa seed exudates after 10 days at a concentration of 150 μg/mL (except for luteoloside, which was employed at 20 μg/mL). Different lowercase letters on the top of the column for each treatment indicate significant differences with p < 0.05 using Tukey’s test. The mean value corresponds to the average value of forty seedlings. The error bar corresponds to the standard deviation.
Figure 5. Lengths of the shoots and roots of barley seedlings after treatment with the pure main components of the alfalfa seed exudates after 10 days at a concentration of 150 μg/mL (except for luteoloside, which was employed at 20 μg/mL). Different lowercase letters on the top of the column for each treatment indicate significant differences with p < 0.05 using Tukey’s test. The mean value corresponds to the average value of forty seedlings. The error bar corresponds to the standard deviation.
Molecules 28 02645 g005
Figure 6. (a) Allelopathic effect of canavanine at different concentrations (60, 100, and 200 μg/mL). (b) Allelopathic effect of hyperoside at different concentrations (200 and 500 μg/mL) after 10 days.
Figure 6. (a) Allelopathic effect of canavanine at different concentrations (60, 100, and 200 μg/mL). (b) Allelopathic effect of hyperoside at different concentrations (200 and 500 μg/mL) after 10 days.
Molecules 28 02645 g006
Figure 7. Effects of (A) hyperoside and (B) canavanine on the count of CFU/mL of the biofilm-forming bacterial cells.
Figure 7. Effects of (A) hyperoside and (B) canavanine on the count of CFU/mL of the biofilm-forming bacterial cells.
Molecules 28 02645 g007
Table 1. Characterization by UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS of the compounds present in the alfalfa exudates.
Table 1. Characterization by UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS of the compounds present in the alfalfa exudates.
#NameRt. (min)CCSm/z Meas,
[M + H]+
Molecular FormulaMS/MS
Fragments
  • Nitrogenous compounds
1Canavanine0.29134.6177.09781C5H12N4O376, 72, 61, 56, 44
2Trigonelline0.41122.3138.05495C7H7NO2138, 92, 78, 65, 51, 39
3Stachydrine0.5126.6144.101905C7H13NO2144, 102, 84, 72, 58, 44
4H-Glu-Tyr-OH 2.1171.9311.12306C14H18N2O6311, 248, 202, 182, 165, 147, 136, 123, 103, 91, 84
5H-Phe-Glu-OH5.6169.4295.1285C14H18N2O5295, 233, 186, 166, 149, 120, 103, 84
  • Flavonols and Flavonol glycosides
6Quercetin 3-galactoside
(hyperoside)
17.26205465.1022C21H20O12465, 303, 257, 229, 153, 85
7Quercetin 3-O-glucoside
(isoquercetin)
17.58 206.9465.10222C21H20O12465, 303, 257, 229, 153, 85
8Quercetin 3-O-xyloside18182435.05743C20H18O11435, 303, 257, 229,153
  • Flavones and flavones glycosides
9Luteoloside18.0211.5449.2856C21H20O11449, 287, 258, 153
10Diosmetin isomer18.8167.9301.07006C16H12O6301, 286, 269, 258, 229, 213, 184, 153, 124, 96
  • Isoflavone
11Irisolidone isomer21.5172.5315.08569C17H14O6315, 300, 272, 257, 229, 167, 148, 133
Table 2. The concentration of compounds present in the alfalfa seedling exudates.
Table 2. The concentration of compounds present in the alfalfa seedling exudates.
CompoundConcentration (µg/mL)
Canavanine160.9
Trigonelline54.1
Stachydrine70.9
Hyperoside1134
Isoquercetin29.9
Luteoloside1.26
Diosmetin11.4
H-Glu-Tyr-OH275
H-Phe-Glu-OH14.9
Table 3. Minimum inhibitory concentration values of the total extract and its isolated compounds.
Table 3. Minimum inhibitory concentration values of the total extract and its isolated compounds.
Isolate CodeMIC Values (µg/mL)
Total ExudateCanavanine LuteolosideHyperosideStachydrine DiosmetinTrigonelline
E1512256256810241024128
E2512128256810242048128
E32562562561610241024128
E4256128256820481024256
E5512325123210241024256
E6512645121610241024128
E7512645123210242048256
E85122562561620481024128
E9256256256820481024128
E10256322561610242048128
E11256645123210241024128
E12512642561610241024256
E13512325123220481024256
E1425664512820482048128
E155121285121610241024128
E162561285123210242048256
E172562562563210241024256
E182561282563210241024128
E19256642561610241024256
Table 4. Impact of the tested compounds on the biofilm of E. coli isolates.
Table 4. Impact of the tested compounds on the biofilm of E. coli isolates.
Biofilm Formation AbilityCount of E. coli Isolates before TreatmentCount of E. coli Isolates after Treatment with
Total ExudateCanavanine LuteolosideHyperosideStachydrineDiosmetinTrigonelline
None forming23434222
Weak 469411565
Moderate 76363766
Strong 64361556
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abouzeid, S.; Beutling, U.; Elekhnawy, E.; Selmar, D. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effects of Allelopathic Compounds Identified in Medicago sativa L. Seedling Exudate against Escherichia coli. Molecules 2023, 28, 2645. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062645

AMA Style

Abouzeid S, Beutling U, Elekhnawy E, Selmar D. Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effects of Allelopathic Compounds Identified in Medicago sativa L. Seedling Exudate against Escherichia coli. Molecules. 2023; 28(6):2645. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062645

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abouzeid, Sara, Ulrike Beutling, Engy Elekhnawy, and Dirk Selmar. 2023. "Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effects of Allelopathic Compounds Identified in Medicago sativa L. Seedling Exudate against Escherichia coli" Molecules 28, no. 6: 2645. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062645

APA Style

Abouzeid, S., Beutling, U., Elekhnawy, E., & Selmar, D. (2023). Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effects of Allelopathic Compounds Identified in Medicago sativa L. Seedling Exudate against Escherichia coli. Molecules, 28(6), 2645. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062645

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop