Next Article in Journal
Monitoring the Release of Methylglyoxal (MGO) from Honey and Honey-Based Formulations
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of Beef Coming from Different European Countries through Stable Isotope (H, C, N, and S) Ratio Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 28
Issue 6
10.3390/molecules28062857
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antifungal Action of Herbal Plants’ Glycolic Extracts against Candida Species

by
Vanessa Marques Meccatti
1,
Lana Ferreira Santos
1,
Lara Steffany de Carvalho
1,
Clara Bulhões Souza
1,
Cláudio Antonio Talge Carvalho
2,
Maria Cristina Marcucci
1,
Amjad Abu Hasna
2,* and
Luciane Dias de Oliveira
1
1
Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (ICT-UNESP), São José dos Campos 12245-000, SP, Brazil
2
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (ICT-UNESP), São José dos Campos 12245-000, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(6), 2857; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062857
Submission received: 14 February 2023 / Revised: 2 March 2023 / Accepted: 7 March 2023 / Published: 22 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Candida spp. cause fungal infection that affects patients’ oral health. This study aimed to evaluate the isolated and synergistic antifungal effect of Rosa centifolia L., Curcuma longa L., Rosmarinus officinalis L., and Punica granatum L. glycolic extracts against Candida albicans, Candida dubliniensis, Candida tropicalis, and Candida krusei planktonic and biofilm forms. The plant extracts were chemically characterized and the main compounds were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-DAD) analysis. The minimum inhibitory and minimum fungicidal concentrations of the extracts were determined, and antibiofilm activity was evaluated by MTT assay. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests, and by Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s tests, considering a significance level of 5%. The main compounds identified in each of the extracts were: p-coumaric acid (2153.22 μg/100 mL) in the rosemary extract, gallotannins (4318.31 μg/100 mL) in the pomegranate extract, quercetin derivatives (3316.50 μg/100 mL) in the extract of white roses, and curcumin (135.09 μg/100 mL) in the turmeric extract. The combination of R. centifolia and C. longa glycolic extracts was effective against C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, and C. tropicalis biofilms over different periods (p < 0.05). The combination of R. officinalis and P. granatum glycolic extracts was effective against C. albicans and C. krusei biofilms after 30 min, and against C. tropicalis after 24 h, with all combinations showing an average reduction of 50% in cell viability (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the combined plant extracts have antifungal and antibiofilm action against Candida spp. in different concentrations and times of action.

1. Introduction

Fungal infection (mycosis) ranges from superficial, or subcutaneous, to life-threatening systemic infections, it affects immunosuppressed patients, such as acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and cancer patients [1], it also effects patients hospitalized with COVID-19, that have an increased risk of co-infection with opportunistic pathogens, as the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is endowed with strategies to deregulate immune mechanisms [2]. Several oral conditions were reported in COVID-19 patients, including fungal infections like oral thrush (oral candidiasis), particularly among those who already had a predisposing condition, and were treated with antibiotics [3]. Furthermore, Candida spp., especially Candida albicans, have a role in primary and secondary endodontic infections, acting as co-pathogens with bacteria [4], and in periodontal infections [5], in which sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine solution have limited antifungal activity [6].
Besides, oral candidiasis is a fungal infection of the oral cavity, caused by Candida albicans and other Candida species [7]. Candida albicans is responsible for 95% of oral candidiasis cases, it has a remarkable repertoire of virulence factors that facilitate its transition from a commensal to a pathogenic state, it has a high capacity for adhesion, biofilm formation, and antibody degradation [8]. The dimorphism is the essence of the pathogenesis of this species [9]. Candida dubliniensis is the most common non-albicans species detected in isolates from oral cancer patients [10], and Candida tropicalis is a species that has a high capacity for adhesion and biofilm formation [11]. Candida dubliniensis and C. tropicalis are non-albicans species that display a considerable increase in the oral cavity of elderly patients [12], making the oral health maintenance a challenge especially in dentures-wearing elderly patients. Candida krusei is yet another emerging fungal nosocomial pathogen, primarily found in the immunocompromised and those with hematological malignancies [13].
The increased use of fluconazole and other antifungal agents, has resulted in the emergence of more resistant strains of Candida species [14], highlighting the need to investigate new alternative therapeutics with antifungal action [15,16,17,18]. Rosa centifolia L. (R. centifolia), or hundred-leaved rose or Shatapatri or Taruni (Rosaceae family), is a perennial plant available throughout India [19], it has antifungal effects against C. albicans and C. tropicalis [20]. Curcuma longa L. (C. longa), or turmeric (Zingiberaceae family), is a flowering plant [21] that has antifungal effects against C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis [15,22]. Rosmarinus officinalis L. (R. officinalis), or rosemary (Lamiaceae family), is an ancient shrub originating from the Mediterranean region [23], it has antifungal action against C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. glabrata, C.krusei, and C. tropicalis in vitro, and in Galleria mellonella model studies [17,18,24]. Punica granatum L. (P. granatum), or pomegranate (Lythraceae family, Punicoideae subfamily), is widely used as an alternative medicine [25], it is effective against Candida spp. [26].
The positive outcomes of the above-cited studies encouraged us to investigate the combined effect of these herbal extracts, as this may increase the treatment efficacy and reduce microbial resistance possibility [27]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the antifungal effects of C. longa, R. centifolia, R. officinalis, and P. granatum glycolic extracts against the planktonic and biofilm forms of C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei. The null hypothesis is that, C. longa, R. centifolia, R. officinalis, and P. granatum glycolic extracts have no antifungal action against Candida spp.

2. Results

2.1. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analyses of Plant Extracts

2.1.1. Rosmarinus officinalis L. Glycolic Extract

Gallotannins of 414.92 and 243.29 μg/100 mL were found at 11.09 and 13.05 min, respectively. Such compounds were quantified from the standard curve of gallic acid. Besides, chlorogenic acid of 126.99 μg/100 mL was found at 12.64 min, and p-coumaric acid of 2153.22 μg/100 mL at 14.83 min (Table 1).

2.1.2. Punica granatum L. Glycolic Extract

Eight different gallotannins were identified, expressed as gallic acid, totaling a concentration of 4318.31 μg/100 mL of the glycolic extract. In addition, a compound of medium polarity was identified, which could be quercetin or kaempferol, at a concentration of 5233.16 μg/100 mL at 32.5 min (Table 2).

2.1.3. Rosa centifolia L. Glycolic Extract

Gallic acid of 946.6 μg/100 mL was found at 11.09 min, gallotannins of 628.1 and 648.6 μg/100 mL were found at 12.94 and 14.73 min, respectively, p-coumaric acid of 591.5 μg/100 mL was found at 15.75 min, and quercetin derivatives 3316.50 μg/100 mL were found at 37.71 min (Table 3).

2.1.4. Curcuma longa L. Glycolic Extract

Curcumin of 135.09 μg/100 mL was found at 24.68 min (Table 4).

2.2. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Fungicidal Concentration (MFC)

MIC and MFC values of the R. centifolia, C. longa, R. officinalis, and P. granatum glycolic extracts varied from 12.5 to 50 mg/mL, as shown in Table 1 and Table 2. The C. longa glycolic extract did not produce a fungicidal effect against C. krusei at the tested concentration (Table 5 and Table 6).

2.3. Combined Extracts’ Synergistic Effects

The combination of C. longa and R. centifolia glycolic extracts showed additive values for all tested Candida spp., as calculated by the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index (Table 5). The combination of R. officinalis and P. granatum glycolic extracts showed additive values for all tested Candida spp., as calculated by the FIC index (Table 6).

2.4. Antibiofilm Activity

2.4.1. C. albicans Biofilms

Rosa centifolia and C. longa glycolic extracts, and their combination, were effective against C. albicans biofilms after 5 min, 30 min, and 24 h, with a statistically significant difference with the control group (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 1A). Differently, only R. officinalis glycolic extract, R. officinalis 12.5 + P. granatum 6.2, and R. officinalis 12.5 + P. granatum 3.1, were effective against C. albicans biofilms after 30 min, with a statistically significant difference with the control group (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 1B).

2.4.2. C. dubliniensis Biofilms

Rosa centifolia and C. longa glycolic extracts, and their combination, were effective against C. dubliniensis biofilms after 5 min and 30 min, however, only C. longa glycolic extract was effective after 24 h, all these comparisons had a statistically significant difference with the control group (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 2A). Besides, only R. officinalis 25 + P. granatum 6.2, and R. officinalis 25 + P. granatum 3.1 were effective against C. dubliniensis biofilms after 24 h, with a statistically significant difference with the control group (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 2B).

2.4.3. C. tropicalis Biofilms

Rcentifolia and C. longa glycolic extracts, and their combination, were effective against C. tropicalis biofilms after 24 h, however, after 30 min only their combination, and after 5 min only the R. centifolia glycolic extract were effective, with a statistically significant difference with the control group (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 3A). Besides, R. officinalis and P. granatum glycolic extracts, and all their combinations, were effective against C. tropicalis biofilms after 24 h, with a statistically significant difference with the control group (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 3B).

2.4.4. C. krusei Biofilms

R centifolia and C. longa glycolic extracts, and their combination, were not effective against C. krusei biofilms (p > 0.05) (Figure 4A). Conversely, R. officinalis and P. granatum glycolic extracts, and their combination, were effective against C. krusei biofilms after 30 min, being all statistically equal (p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 4B).

3. Discussion

Herbal medicines are increasingly used as alternative therapeutic agents [16,28,29]. The synergism of herbal medicines was described as a successful alternative to improve their antimicrobial action [30], to combat multi-drug resistant microorganisms [31]. This study was carried out to investigate the isolated and combined effects of R. centifolia + C. longa and R. officinalis + P. granatum glycolic extracts, against C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei. In this study, the isolated and combined extracts, in different concentrations, were effective against the tested Candida spp., therefore, the null hypothesis of this study was rejected.
Meccatti et al. (2021) [18], evaluated the chemical and biological properties of R. officinalis glycolic extract, and identified a derivative of chlorogenic acid at 12.61 min. In the present study, the same compound was also identified, with a similar retention time (12.64 min). Besides, in another study [32], the same extract was analyzed by HPLC/DAD under similar chromatographic conditions, and p-coumaric acid of 1.37 mg/100 g, a derivative of cinnamic acid, was found at 13.94 min, similarly, p-coumaric acid of 2153.22 µg/100 mL was identified in the present study, at 14.83 min. Gallotannins expressed in gallic acid were also identified at 11.09 and 13.05 min, in the same mentioned study, gallic acid was also identified in the R. officinalis extract at 6.65 min.
Several phytocompounds identified in R. officinalis extracts and essential oils have pharmacological activities, and the concentration of these molecules varies according to the specimen and region of the plant. The most reported phytocompounds include carnosic acid, rosmarinic acid, and chlorogenic acid [24]. The chlorogenic acid, identified in our study, has antioxidant, antibacterial, and antifungal (against Candida) action [33,34], as it reduces cell viability, increases the potential for mitochondrial depolarization and production of reactive oxygen species, and causes DNA fragmentation in fluconazole-resistant Candida species [35].
In the present study, several gallotannins expressed in gallic acid were identified in the P. granatum extract, totaling a concentration of 4318.30 μg/100 mL, in addition, another compound, of medium polarity, of 5233.16 μg/100 mL, was identified at 32.5 min, which could be quercetin or kaempferol. In a study on phytochemical analysis of methanolic extracts of P. granatum peel, analyzed by HPLC [36], gallic acid of 7.89 mg/mL at 14.94 min, quercetin of 20.22 mg/mL at 20.32 min, p-coumaric acid 19.85 mg/mL at 12.32 min, and cinnamic acid of 31.69 mg/mL at 16.21 min, were identified. The different components, in comparison with the present study, may be explained by the different vehicle used in the other study. Gallic acid and polyphenols, such as tannins, prove the antifungal action of the P. granatum extract [37].
In the present study, a quercetin derivative, gallic acid, p-coumaric acid, and gallotannins were identified. In another study [38], chlorogenic acid and gallic acid were identified, which is in agreement with our study. Still, the present study seems to be a pioneer in identifying p-coumaric acid (591.5 μg/100 mL) in the R. centifolia glycolic extract.
It is well-known that curcumin is the main phytocompound of C. longa. Still, the literature contains several studies on the application of curcumin as a promising photosensitizer to be applied in photodynamic therapy, including against Candida spp. [15]. In the present study, curcumin of 135.09 μg/100 mL was identified at 24.68 min. For Sabir et al. (2021) [39], curcumin, as 3202.9 µg/g of the dry weight of the ethanolic extract of the rhizome, was identified at 35 min.
In the microbiological analyses, it was found that the MIC and MFC values of the R. centifolia, C. longa, R. officinalis, and P. granatum glycolic extracts varied between 12.5–50 mg/mL, furthermore, it was noticed that lower concentrations (12.5 mg/mL) of the P. granatum glycolic extract were as effective as the greater concentrations of the other extracts. In the literature, the antifungal action of the four tested extracts was proven against diverse Candida spp. in different study models [15,18,23,26].
R centifolia was tested at 200 mg/mL against diverse oral microbes, using the inhibition zone test, and it was found to be effective against S. mutans, C. albicans, and C. tropicalis [20]. In the present study, R. centifolia glycolic extract at 50 mg/mL was also effective against C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, and C. tropicalis after 5 min, 30 min, and 24 h.
C longa methanolic and ethanolic extracts were effective against C. albicans at 5–100 mg/mL after 24 h, evaluated by agar disc diffusion method [40], differently, C. longa alcoholic extract at 200 mg/mL was tested as an endodontic irrigant, and was not as effective as sodium hypochlorite after 24 h [41], the same alcoholic extract was effective against C. albicans in four different dilutions [42]. In more recent studies, the antifungal effect of C. longa was shown to be as effective as nystatin [15,43].
In the present study, when R. centifolia and C. longa glycolic extracts were combined, it was found that the MIC of each extract was reduced by a factor of two. The additive effect resulting from this combination of the extracts, against C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei, as FIX index, was between 0.5 and 1.0. In biofilms, the combined treatment presented the best results after 30 min against C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, and C. tropicalis, however, it was not active against C. krusei, as C. krusei is characterized by resistance against fluconazole in more than 95% of clinical and veterinary isolates [44]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that has evaluated the synergistic effect of R. centifolia and C. longa glycolic extracts, making the results of this study pioneering. In the literature, the combined effect of turmeric oil with antifungal drugs was analyzed against C. albicans and Trichophyton mentagrophytes, this combination increased the drugs’ antifungal activity [45].
Rosmarinus officinalis essential oil and methanolic extract were introduced in the literature as effective antibacterial and antifungal agents [46,47,48]. Furthermore, it was indicated as being a prophylactic antifungal agent at 6.25 mg/mL for 72 h and 12.5 mg/mL for 24 h, in a Galleria mellonella model study [17]. In the present study, R. officinalis glycolic extract was effective against C. albicans biofilms after 30 min, and against C. dubliniensis biofilms after 24 h, at 50 mg/mL. P. granatum has also been reported to be an effective antibacterial and antifungal agent [49,50], and especially against resistant strains [51]. In the present study, it was effective at 25 mg/mL only against C. tropicalis, after 24 h, and against C. krusei after 30 min.
Interestingly, the combination of R. officinalis and P. granatum glycolic extracts reduced the MIC by up to a factor of eight. One additive combination was found to have activity against C. krusei, three against C. albicans, and four against the other non-albicans species. In the study by Abu El-Wafa et al. [52], some plant extracts, isolated and in combination with antibiotics, were tested, including R. officinalis and P. granatum, it was found that the rosemary and pomegranate extracts together showed synergism (FIC index < 0.5) with the antibiotics (piperacillin, ceftazidime, imipenem, gentamicin, or levofloxacin), in which the plant extracts significantly reduced the MIC values against a clinical strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
It was found in the present study, that C. albicans biofilms suffered a significant reduction when the isolated R. officinalis extract, and the combinations R. officinalis 12.5 + P. granatum 6.2 and R. officinalis 12.5 + P. granatum 3.1, were applied. Furthermore, the combination R. officinalis 25 + P. granatum 12.5 was effective against C. krusei. For Abu El-Wafa et al. (2020) [52], the combination of rosemary, pomegranate, and antibiotic, achieved up to 99.6% eradication of a P. aeruginosa biofilm, presenting the best results when compared to any other monotherapy evaluated in the study.
Further, R. officinalis extract, and the combinations R. officinalis 25 + P. granatum 3.1 and R. officinalis 25 + P. granatum 6.2, promoted significant reductions in C. dubliniensis biofilms after 24 h. It seems like that a prolonged contact with C. dubliniensis biofilms resulted in the highest percentages of biofilm reduction. A significant reduction in C. tropicalis biofilms was also observed with all tested groups after 24 h. Similarly, in another study, the prolonged time of incubation enabled the red propolis to interfere in the formation of the biofilms of C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. dubliniensis [53].
The present work has presented important findings on the antifungal action and chemical compositions of plant extracts, revealing different additive combinations with exploitable potential for the formulation of new antifungal compounds as endodontic irrigant, intracanal medication, mouthwash, or toothpaste components. We also characterized and quantified chemical compounds such as chlorogenic acid, quercetin, gallic acid, p-coumaric acid, and curcumin in the glycolic extracts. For future analyses, we envision the possibility of developing several compounds to treat and aid in the fight against oral candidiasis, such as the development of a plant-based ointment, that presents substantivity for application on the affected mucous membranes, or even the development of a disinfectant solution for dental prostheses, that would be soaked for 30 min a day as an adjuvant method of cleaning.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plants Extracts

Four extracts were obtained: C. longa rhizomes (Seiva Brazilis, SP, Brazil), R. centifolia flowers, R. officinalis leaves, and P. granatum bark (Mapric®, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). All extracts were not manipulated in our laboratory; however, they were obtained commercially with reports and specifications from the manufactures. The extracts were formulated at a concentration of 20% (200 mg of the extract powder) and were diluted in 1 mL of propylene glycol (Mapric®, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). The use of plant parts in the present study complies with international, national, and/or institutional guidelines.

4.2. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analyses of Plant Extracts

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to characterize and quantify the contents of markers in the natural extracts. The analysis was carried out in a high-efficiency liquid chromatograph, with a diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD) and an automatic injector, model D-7000 Merck-Hitachi (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The chromatographic conditions were, mobile phase: water–formic acid solution (PA, Merck), diluted in the ratio of 95:5 (solvent A), and methanol HPLC grade Merck (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, solvent B). The flow was 1 mL/min, and a linear gradient, starting with 0% B, ending with 70% B, in a 50 min run time. The detection wavelengths were 280 and 340 nm [54].

4.3. Construction of Standard Curves

The stock solutions of the standards referring to the main identified compounds were prepared in methanol, at different concentrations. A standard curve was constructed using these solutions. Aliquots of these solutions were filtered through 0.45 µm membrane filters (Millipore, Thermo Fisher Scientific, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) for HPLC analysis. The straight-line equation of each of the calibration curves was used to confirm and quantify the compounds found in the plant extracts. Quantification was performed using standards with the same ultraviolet spectrum.

4.4. Inoculum Preparation

The reference strains (ATCC, American Type Culture Collection, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil) of C. albicans ATCC 18804, C. dubliniensis ATCC MYA 646, C. tropicalis ATCC 13803, and C. krusei ATCC 6258 were used in this study. They were grown in Sabouraud Dextrose (SD) Agar (Kasvi, São José dos Pinhais, PR, Brazil) at 37 °C for 24 h, then supplemented with chloramphenicol 50 mg/L (Union Química, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil). Standardized inoculum of each strain was prepared and adjusted using a spectrophotometer (Micronal B-582, Micronal, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) at 530 nm and an optical density of 0.284, in a concentration of 1 × 106 yeast cells per milliliter, as detailed in a previous study [15].

4.5. Minimum Inhibitory (MIC) and Minimum Fungicidal (MFC) Concentrations

A microdilution method was used, according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) documents M27–S4, to determine the minimum inhibitory (MIC) and minimum fungicidal (MFC) concentrations of the glycolic extracts for each fungal strain. In different 96-well microplates (TPP, Trasadingen, Switzerland) for each fungal strain, 100 µL/well of RPMI 1640 (INLAB, São Paulo, Brazil), with glutamine, without bicarbonate and with phenol red indicator, was added. Next, 200 µL of one of the glycolic extracts was added in the first well, where 10 serial dilutions were carried out. Then, 100 µL/well of the respective fungal inoculum was added. The microplates were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C. The MIC of each glycolic extract was determined, by eye, in the first well without turbidity after the well with apparent microbial growth. In addition, analyses of the vehicle (propylene glycol) were performed to verify if it interferes with the antimicrobial action of plant glycolic extracts. To determine the MFC, the contents of the well where the MIC was determined and the previous well were seeded onto SD agar (Kasvi, São José dos Pinhais, PR, Brazil). After incubation (37 °C/48 h), the MFC was determined as the lowest concentration of the glycolic extract that inhibited total microorganism growth.

4.6. Combined Extracts’ Synergistic Effects

The chessboard technique was used, according to Moreno et al. [55], with modifications, this method is based on the microdilution method of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Concentrations of each glycolic extract were prepared, starting with MIC (MIC, MIC/2, MIC/4, MIC/8, MIC/16, MIC/32, and MIC/64). For this purpose, a serial dilution of the first glycolic extract (R. centifolia or R. officinalis) was carried out along the x-axis (horizontal) of the microplate. The dilution of the second glycolic extract (C. longa or P. granatum) was carried out separately and added to the y-axis (vertical) of the microplate. In this way, control of concentrations was maintained. Saline solution and culture medium were used as control groups. Finally, 100 µL of standardized inoculum (1 × 106 cells/mL) of each strain was added, totaling 200 µL/well.
The microplates were incubated at 37 °C/48 h, for further visual reading. To evaluate the synergistic effect of the glycolic extracts, the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index was adopted, which classifies the combinations as synergistic, additive, indifferent, or antagonistic. The FIC index was calculated using the formula:
FIC index = FIC1st + FIC2nd = (MIC of the 1st extract in combination/MIC of the 1st extract alone) + (MIC of the 2nd extract in combination/MIC of the 2nd extract alone).
The combination was considered synergistic when FIC ≤ 0.5, additive when FIC > 0.5 and ≤1.0, indifferent when FIC > 1 and ≤4, and antagonist when FIC > 4.0. The same formula was used to calculate the fractional fungicide concentration index (FFC), using MFC values instead of MIC [55].

4.7. Antibiofilm Activity by MTT Assay

Based on the studies by Meccatti et al. [18] and de Sá Assis et al. [54], the inoculum was standardized in a spectrophotometer to obtain 107 cells/mL. Subsequently, 200 µL/well of fungal inoculum was added to microplates and incubated for 90 min at 37 °C, to permit initial adhesion of fungal cells to the well. Then, the supernatant was discarded and BHI (Brain Heart Infusion—Kasvi, São José dos Pinhais, PR, Brazil) broth was added. Incubation continued for 48 h for biofilm formation, with the culture medium being changed after 24 h of incubation.
After biofilm formation, MIC values of sole extracts and additive concentrations of the combined extracts were applied for 5 min, 30 min, and 24 h. Culture medium was used as a negative control. Each experimental group consisted of n = 10. After the exposure period, saline solution was added and this was discarded to wash the wells and eliminate non-adherent cells that suffered from the treatment and detached from the bottom of the well. Then, 100 µL of MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Brazil) was added in each well and the plate was incubated in the dark at 37 °C for 1 h. Then, the MTT solution was removed and 100 µL of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was added. The plates were again incubated at 37 °C for 10 min and agitated in a shaker, under constant agitation, for 10 min. The optical densities (OD) were obtained using a microplate reader at 570 nm, and the OD obtained were converted into percentage of the metabolic activity of the fungal cells.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed by normality tests: Shapiro–Wilk, Kolmogorov–Smirnov and D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus, and for homogeneity using the Bioestat 5.0 software. Normal data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test, otherwise, by the Kruskal–Wallis test and Dunn’s test. The GraphPad Prism 5.0 program was used, considering a significance level of 5%.

5. Conclusions

The main phytochemical compounds in the extracts were identified and quantified, and the present study is a pioneer in reporting the presence of gallotannins and p-coumaric acid in the R. centifolia extract.
The combined plant extracts showed antifungal and antibiofilm action against Candida spp., and in some protocols, such as the application of R. officinalis and P. granatum for 30 min against C. krusei, and 24 h against C. tropicalis, average reductions of 50% in biofilm were found.
Such results bring to light the possibility of developing compounds for the treatment of, and to aid in the fight against, oral candidiasis, such as the development of a vegetable-based ointment that presents substantivity for application on the affected mucous membranes, or even the development of a disinfectant solution for dental prostheses. New pharmacodynamic studies, to standardize combinations, and animal studies, must be performed to advance product development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: V.M.M., L.F.S., L.S.d.C., C.B.S., C.A.T.C., M.C.M., A.A.H. and L.D.d.O.; methodology: V.M.M., L.F.S., L.S.d.C., C.B.S., C.A.T.C., M.C.M., A.A.H. and L.D.d.O.; formal analysis and investigation: V.M.M., L.F.S., L.S.d.C., C.B.S., C.A.T.C., M.C.M., A.A.H. and L.D.d.O.; writing—original draft preparation: V.M.M., L.F.S., L.S.d.C. and C.B.S.; writing—review and editing: C.A.T.C., M.C.M., A.A.H. and L.D.d.O.; Funding acquisition: C.A.T.C., M.C.M., A.A.H. and L.D.d.O.; laboratory resources: V.M.M., L.F.S., L.S.d.C., C.B.S., C.A.T.C., M.C.M., A.A.H. and L.D.d.O.; supervision: C.A.T.C., M.C.M., A.A.H. and L.D.d.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation, FAPESP (2019/27161-0). We thank the Institutional Scientific Initiation Scholarship Program of the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (PIBIC-CNPq) for their financial support through scholarships (n 5344), and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for their financial support through master scholarships.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author, [email protected].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors deny any conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

The samples of this study are available upon request from the corresponding author, [email protected].

References

  1. Köhler, J.R.; Hube, B.; Puccia, R.; Casadevall, A.; Perfect, J.R. Fungi that Infect Humans. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cimolai, N. The Complexity of Co-Infections in the Era of COVID-19. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 2021, 3, 1502–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Riad, A.; Gomaa, E.; Hockova, B.; Klugar, M. Oral candidiasis of COVID-19 patients: Case report and review of evidence. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2021, 20, 1580–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Alberti, A.; Corbella, S.; Taschieri, S.; Francetti, L.; Fakhruddin, K.S.; Samaranayake, L.P. Fungal species in endodontic infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0255003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Suresh Unniachan, A.; Krishnavilasom Jayakumari, N.; Sethuraman, S. Association between Candida species and periodontal disease: A systematic review. Curr. Med. Mycol. 2020, 6, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Oncu, A.; Celikten, B.; Aydın, B.; Amasya, G.; Açık, L.; Sevimay, F.S. Comparative evaluation of the antifungal efficacy of sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine, and silver nanoparticles against Candida albicans. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2022, 85, 3755–3760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Taylor, M.; Brizuela, M.; Raja, A. Oral Candidiasis. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  8. Vila, T.; Sultan, A.S.; Montelongo-Jauregui, D.; Jabra-Rizk, M.A. Oral candidiasis: A disease of opportunity. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shapiro, R.S.; Uppuluri, P.; Zaas, A.K.; Collins, C.; Senn, H.; Perfect, J.R.; Heitman, J.; Cowen, L.E. Hsp90 orchestrates temperature-dependent Candida albicans morphogenesis via Ras1-PKA signaling. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mäkinen, A.; Nawaz, A.; Mäkitie, A.; Meurman, J.H. Role of Non-Albicans Candida and Candida Albicans in Oral Squamous Cell Cancer Patients. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2018, 76, 2564–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Negri, M.; Martins, M.; Henriques, M.; Svidzinski, T.I.E.; Azeredo, J.; Oliveira, R. Examination of potential virulence factors of Candida tropicalis clinical isolates from hospitalized patients. Mycopathologia 2010, 169, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Benito-Cruz, B.; Aranda-Romo, S.; López-Esqueda, F.J.; de la Rosa-García, E.; Rosas-Hernández, R.; Sánchez-Vargas, L.O. Oral Candida isolates and fluconazole susceptibility patterns in older Mexican women. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2016, 65, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hautala, T.; Ikäheimo, I.; Husu, H.; Säily, M.; Siitonen, T.; Koistinen, P.; Vuopio-Varkila, J.; Koskela, M.; Kujala, P. A cluster of Candida krusei infections in a haematological unit. BMC Infect. Dis. 2007, 7, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Polke, M.; Hube, B.; Jacobsen, I.D. Candida survival strategies. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 91, 139–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Marques Meccatti, V.; de Souza Moura, L.; Guerra Pinto, J.; Ferreira-Strixino, J.; Abu Hasna, A.; Alves Figueiredo-Godoi, L.M.; Campos Junqueira, J.; Marcucci, M.C.; de Paula Ramos, L.; Carvalho, C.A.T.; et al. Curcuma longa L. Extract and Photodynamic Therapy are Effective against Candida spp. and Do Not Show Toxicity In Vivo. Int. J. Dent. 2022, 2022, 5837864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Domingues, N.; de Paula Ramos, L.; Pereira, L.M.; do Rosário Estevam Dos Santos, P.B.; Scorzoni, L.; Pereira, T.C.; Abu Hasna, A.; Carvalho, C.A.T.; de Oliveira, L.D. Antimicrobial action of four herbal plants over mixed-species biofilms of Candida albicans with four different microorganisms. Aust. Endod. J. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Meccatti, V.M.; Figueiredo-Godoi, L.M.A.; Pereira, T.C.; de Lima, P.M.N.; Abu Hasna, A.; Senna, L.B.; Marcucci, M.C.; Junqueira, J.C.; de Oliveira, L.D. The biocompatibility and antifungal effect of Rosmarinus officinalis against Candida albicans in Galleria mellonella model. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 15611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meccatti, V.M.; Oliveira, J.R.D.; Figueira, L.W.; Lagareiro Netto, A.A.; Zamarioli, L.S.; Marcucci, M.C.; Camargo, S.E.A.; Carvalho, C.A.T.; Oliveira, L.D.D. Rosmarinus officinalis L. (rosemary) extract has antibiofilm effect similar to the antifungal nystatin on Candida samples. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2021, 93, e20190366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kumar, R.; Nair, V.; Singh, S.; Gupta, Y.K. In vivo antiarthritic activity of Rosa centifolia L. flower extract. Ayu 2015, 36, 341–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gauniyal, P.; Vir Singh Teotia, U. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity and Phytochemical Screening of Twenty Medicinal Plants against Oral Microbes. Int. J. Multidiscip. Curr. Res. 2015, 3, 427–436. [Google Scholar]
  21. Priyadarsini, K.I. The chemistry of curcumin: From extraction to therapeutic agent. Molecules 2014, 19, 20091–20112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Meccatti, V.M.; Moura, L.d.S.; Figueiredo-Godoi, L.M.A.; Junqueira, J.C.; Ribeiro, M.C.M.; de Oliveira, L.D. Alternative therapies in dentistry: Antibiofilm action of Curcuma longa extract associated or not with Photodynamic Therapy against Candida spp. RSD 2022, 11, e40711326813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. González-Trujano, M.E.; Peña, E.I.; Martínez, A.L.; Moreno, J.; Guevara-Fefer, P.; Déciga-Campos, M.; López-Muñoz, F.J. Evaluation of the antinociceptive effect of Rosmarinus officinalis L. using three different experimental models in rodents. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 111, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. de Oliveira, J.R.; Camargo, S.E.A.; de Oliveira, L.D. Rosmarinus officinalis L. (rosemary) as therapeutic and prophylactic agent. J. Biomed. Sci. 2019, 26, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Saeed, M.; Naveed, M.; BiBi, J.; Kamboh, A.A.; Arain, M.A.; Shah, Q.A.; Alagawany, M.; El-Hack, M.E.A.; Abdel-Latif, M.A.; Yatoo, M.I.; et al. The promising pharmacological effects and therapeutic/medicinal applications of Punica granatum L. (pomegranate) as a functional food in humans and animals. Recent Pat. Inflamm. Allergy Drug Discov. 2018, 12, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Anibal, P.C.; Peixoto, I.T.A.; Foglio, M.A.; Höfling, J.F. Antifungal activity of the ethanolic extracts of Punica granatum L. and evaluation of the morphological and structural modifications of its compounds upon the cells of Candida spp. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2013, 44, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Azevedo, M.M.; Teixeira-Santos, R.; Silva, A.P.; Cruz, L.; Ricardo, E.; Pina-Vaz, C.; Rodrigues, A.G. The effect of antibacterial and non-antibacterial compounds alone or associated with antifugals upon fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dos Santos Liberato, S.F.; da Cruz Vegian, M.R.; Abu Hasna, A.; de Alvarenga, J.A.; Dos Santos, J.G.; Tini, Í.R.P.; Amêndola, I.; Junqueira, J.C.; de Oliveira, L.D. Antibiofilm action of Persea americana glycolic extract over Acinetobacter baumannii and absence of toxicity in Galleria mellonella. J. Complement. Integr. Med. 2021, 19, 905–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-Abdullah, A.; Edris, S.; Abu Hasna, A.; de Carvalho, L.S.; Al-Nahlawi, T. The Effect of Aloe vera and Chlorhexidine as Disinfectants on the Success of Selective Caries Removal Technique: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Dent. 2022, 2022, 9474677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Betoni, J.E.C.; Mantovani, R.P.; Barbosa, L.N.; Di Stasi, L.C.; Fernandes Junior, A. Synergism between plant extract and antimicrobial drugs used on Staphylococcus aureus diseases. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2006, 101, 387–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bekka-Hadji, F.; Bombarda, I.; Djoudi, F.; Bakour, S.; Touati, A. Chemical Composition and Synergistic Potential of Mentha pulegium L. and Artemisia herba alba Asso. Essential Oils and Antibiotic against Multi-Drug Resistant Bacteria. Molecules 2022, 27, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bianchin, M.; Pereira, D.; Almeida, J.d.F.; de Moura, C.; Pinheiro, R.S.; Heldt, L.F.S.; Haminiuk, C.W.I.; Carpes, S.T. Antioxidant properties of lyophilized rosemary and sage extracts and its effect to prevent lipid oxidation in poultry pátê. Molecules 2020, 25, 5160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. de Lima, M.E.; Ceolin Colpo, A.Z.; Maya-López, M.; Rangel-López, E.; Becerril-Chávez, H.; Galván-Arzate, S.; Villeda-Hernández, J.; Sánchez-Chapul, L.; Túnez, I.; Folmer, V.; et al. Comparing the Effects of Chlorogenic Acid and Ilex paraguariensis Extracts on Different Markers of Brain Alterations in Rats Subjected to Chronic Restraint Stress. Neurotox. Res. 2019, 35, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gong, X.X.; Su, X.S.; Zhan, K.; Zhao, G.Q. The protective effect of chlorogenic acid on bovine mammary epithelial cells and neutrophil function. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 10089–10097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Rocha da Silva, C.; Sá, L.G.d.A.V.; Dos Santos, E.V.; Ferreira, T.L.; Coutinho, T.d.N.P.; Moreira, L.E.A.; de Sousa Campos, R.; de Andrade, C.R.; Barbosa da Silva, W.M.; de Sá Carneiro, I.; et al. Evaluation of the antifungal effect of chlorogenic acid against strains of Candida spp. resistant to fluconazole: Apoptosis induction and in silico analysis of the possible mechanisms of action. J. Med. Microbiol. 2022, 71, 001526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yassin, M.T.; Mostafa, A.A.-F.; Al Askar, A.A. In Vitro Evaluation of Biological Activities and Phytochemical Analysis of Different Solvent Extracts of Punica granatum L. (Pomegranate) Peels. Plants 2021, 10, 2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hsu, H.; Sheth, C.C.; Veses, V. Herbal Extracts with Antifungal Activity against Candida albicans: A Systematic Review. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2021, 21, 90–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dubois, C.; Plainfossé, H.; Delcroix, M.; Trinel, M.; Verger-Dubois, G.; Azoulay, S.; Burger, P.; Fernandez, X. Anti-Aging Potential of a Rosa centifolia Stem Extract with Focus on Phytochemical Composition by Bioguided Fractionation. Chem. Biodivers. 2022, 19, e202200158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sabir, S.M.; Zeb, A.; Mahmood, M.; Abbas, S.R.; Ahmad, Z.; Iqbal, N. Phytochemical analysis and biological activities of ethanolic extract of Curcuma longa rhizome. Braz. J. Biol. 2021, 81, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Samadi, F.M.; Suhail, S.; Sonam, M.; Sharma, N.; Singh, S.; Gupta, S.; Dobhal, A.; Pradhan, H. Antifungal efficacy of herbs. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 2019, 9, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dedhia, J.; Mukharjee, E.; Luke, A.M.; Mathew, S.; Pawar, A.M. Efficacy of Andrographis paniculata compared to Azadirachta indica, Curcuma longa, and sodium hypochlorite when used as root canal irrigants against Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus: An in vitro antimicrobial study. J. Conserv. Dent. 2018, 21, 642–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Murugesh, J.; Annigeri, R.G.; Mangala, G.K.; Mythily, P.H.; Chandrakala, J. Evaluation of the antifungal efficacy of different concentrations of Curcuma longa on Candida albicans: An in vitro study. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2019, 23, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Geraldi, A.; Wardana, A.P.; Aminah, N.S.; Kristanti, A.N.; Sadila, A.Y.; Wijaya, N.H.; Wijaya, M.R.A.; Diningrum, N.I.D.; Hajar, V.R.; Manuhara, Y.S.W. Tropical Medicinal Plant Extracts from Indonesia as Antifungal Agents against Candida Albicans. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 2022, 27, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gómez-Gaviria, M.; Mora-Montes, H.M. Current Aspects in the Biology, Pathogeny, and Treatment of Candida krusei, a Neglected Fungal Pathogen. Infect. Drug Resist. 2020, 13, 1673–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Singh, M.; Lee, K.E.; Kumar, P.; Kang, S.G. Curcuma Turmeric Oil Enhanced Anti-Dermatophytic Drug Activity Against Candida albicans and Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2021, 18, 1494–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Fu, Y.; Zu, Y.; Chen, L.; Shi, X.; Wang, Z.; Sun, S.; Efferth, T. Antimicrobial activity of clove and rosemary essential oils alone and in combination. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 989–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Höfling, J.F.; Anibal, P.C.; Obando-Pereda, G.A.; Peixoto, I.A.T.; Furletti, V.F.; Foglio, M.A.; Gonçalves, R.B. Antimicrobial potential of some plant extracts against Candida species. Braz. J. Biol. 2010, 70, 1065–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Qabaha, K.I. Antimicrobial and free radical scavenging activities of five Palestinian medicinal plants. Afr. J. Tradit. Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 10, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Bakkiyaraj, D.; Nandhini, J.R.; Malathy, B.; Pandian, S.K. The anti-biofilm potential of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) extract against human bacterial and fungal pathogens. Biofouling 2013, 29, 929–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Souza, J.A.S.; Alves, M.M.; Barbosa, D.B.; Lopes, M.M.; Pinto, E.; Figueiral, M.H.; Delbem, A.C.B.; Mira, N.P. Study of the activity of Punica granatum-mediated silver nanoparticles against Candida albicans and Candida glabrata, alone or in combination with azoles or polyenes. Med. Mycol. 2020, 58, 564–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jayan, L.; Priyadharsini, N.; Ramya, R.; Rajkumar, K. Evaluation of antifungal activity of mint, pomegranate and coriander on fluconazole-resistant Candida glabrata. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2020, 24, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Abu El-Wafa, W.M.; Ahmed, R.H.; Ramadan, M.A.-H. Synergistic effects of pomegranate and rosemary extracts in combination with antibiotics against antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020, 51, 1079–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sokolonski, A.R.; Fonseca, M.S.; Machado, B.A.S.; Deegan, K.R.; Araújo, R.P.C.; Umsza-Guez, M.A.; Meyer, R.; Portela, R.W. Activity of antifungal drugs and Brazilian red and green propolis extracted with different methodologies against oral isolates of Candida spp. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2021, 21, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. de Sá Assis, M.A.; de Paula Ramos, L.; Abu Hasna, A.; de Queiroz, T.S.; Pereira, T.C.; Nagai de Lima, P.M.; Berretta, A.A.; Marcucci, M.C.; Talge Carvalho, C.A.; de Oliveira, L.D. Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Effect of Brazilian Green Propolis Aqueous Extract against Dental Anaerobic Bacteria. Molecules 2022, 27, 8128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Moreno, M.A.; Zampini, I.C.; Isla, M.I. Antifungal, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity of bi-herbal mixtures with medicinal plants from Argentinean highlands. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 253, 112642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 28 02857 g001 550
Figure 1. C. albicans biofilm load reduction after treatment with R. centifolia, C. longa, R. officinalis, and P. granatum glycolic extracts, and their combinations, for 5 min, 30 min, and 24 h. Legend: Different upper-case letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Figure 1. C. albicans biofilm load reduction after treatment with R. centifolia, C. longa, R. officinalis, and P. granatum glycolic extracts, and their combinations, for 5 min, 30 min, and 24 h. Legend: Different upper-case letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Molecules 28 02857 g001
Molecules 28 02857 g002 550
Figure 2. C. dubliniensis biofilm load reduction after treatment with R. centifolia, C. longa, R. officinalis, and P. granatum glycolic extracts, and their combinations, for 5 min, 30 min, and 24 h. Legend: Different upper-case letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Figure 2. C. dubliniensis biofilm load reduction after treatment with R. centifolia, C. longa, R. officinalis, and P. granatum glycolic extracts, and their combinations, for 5 min, 30 min, and 24 h. Legend: Different upper-case letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Molecules 28 02857 g002
Molecules 28 02857 g003 550
Figure 3. C. tropicalis biofilm load reduction after treatment with R. centifolia, C. longa, R. officinalis, and P. granatum glycolic extracts, and their combinations, for 5 min, 30 min, and 24 h. Legend: Different upper-case letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Figure 3. C. tropicalis biofilm load reduction after treatment with R. centifolia, C. longa, R. officinalis, and P. granatum glycolic extracts, and their combinations, for 5 min, 30 min, and 24 h. Legend: Different upper-case letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Molecules 28 02857 g003
Molecules 28 02857 g004 550
Figure 4. C. krusei biofilm load reduction after treatment with R. centifolia, C. longa, R. officinalis, and P. granatum glycolic extracts, and their combinations, for 5 min, 30 min, and 24 h. Legend: Different upper-case letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Figure 4. C. krusei biofilm load reduction after treatment with R. centifolia, C. longa, R. officinalis, and P. granatum glycolic extracts, and their combinations, for 5 min, 30 min, and 24 h. Legend: Different upper-case letters indicate a statistically significant difference.
Molecules 28 02857 g004
Table
Table 1. Rosmarinus officinalis L. glycolic extract characterization.
Table 1. Rosmarinus officinalis L. glycolic extract characterization.
Retention Time (min)Compound NameQuantity (μg/100 mL)
11.09gallotannin *414.92
13.05gallotannin *243.29
12.64chlorogenic acid126.99
14.83p-coumaric acid **2153.22
* The same ultraviolet spectrum as gallic acid, with different retention time. Expressed as gallic acid. ** The same ultraviolet spectrum as p-coumaric acid, with different retention time. Expressed as p-coumaric acid.
Table
Table 2. Punica granatum L. glycolic extract characterization.
Table 2. Punica granatum L. glycolic extract characterization.
Retention Time (min)Compound NameQuantity (μg/100 mL)
11.07gallotannin * 122.3
12.84gallotannin *936.3
14.81gallotannin *955.1
17.11gallotannin *825.7
18.55gallotannin *405.9
20.21gallotannin * 94.4
25.49gallotannin * 386.8
32.5quercetin or kaempferol **
(medium polarity)		5233.16
* The same ultraviolet spectrum as gallic acid, with different retention time. Expressed as gallic acid. ** The same ultraviolet spectrum as quercetin, with different retention time. Expressed as quercetin.
Table
Table 3. Rosa centifolia L. glycolic extract characterization.
Table 3. Rosa centifolia L. glycolic extract characterization.
Retention Time (min)Compound NameQuantity (μg/100 mL)
11.09gallic acid946.6
12.94gal *628.1
14.73gal *648.6
15.75p-coumaric acid **591.5
37.71derivative of quercetin ***3316.50
* The same ultraviolet spectrum as gallic acid, with different retention time. Expressed as gallic acid. ** The same ultraviolet spectrum as p-coumaric acid, with different retention time. Expressed as p-coumaric acid. *** The same ultraviolet spectrum as quercetin, with different retention time. Expressed as quercetin.
Table
Table 4. Curcuma longa L. glycolic extract characterization.
Table 4. Curcuma longa L. glycolic extract characterization.
Retention Time (min)Compound NameQuantity (μg/100 mL)
24.68curcumin135.09
Table
Table 5. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) values in mg/mL, in addition to the combined effect of R. centifolia and C. longa glycolic extracts, against Candida spp.
Table 5. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) values in mg/mL, in addition to the combined effect of R. centifolia and C. longa glycolic extracts, against Candida spp.
Candida spp.Isolated Extract MIC and MFC Value (mg/mL)Combined Concentrations (mg/mL)FIC IndexReduction in MICEffect
R. centifoliaC. longaR. centifoliaC. longaR. centifoliaC. longa
C. albicans505025251.002×2×Add
C. dubliniensis505025251.002×2×Add
C. tropicalis255012.5251.002×2×Add
C. krusei505025251.002×2×Add
12.5250.752×4×Add
Legend: Add: additive effect. FIC index = FIC1st + FIC2nd = (MIC of the 1st extract in combination/MIC of the 1st extract alone) + (MIC of the 2nd extract in combination/MIC of the 2nd extract alone). The results were interpreted as synergistic (≤0.5), additive (>0.5 and ≤1.0), indifferent (>1.0 and <4.0), or antagonist effect (≥4.0) (Moreno et al., 2020).
Table
Table 6. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) values in mg/mL, in addition to the combined effect of R. officinalis and P. granatum glycolic extracts, against Candida spp.
Table 6. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) values in mg/mL, in addition to the combined effect of R. officinalis and P. granatum glycolic extracts, against Candida spp.
Candida spp.Isolated Extract MIC and MFC Value (mg/mL)Combined Concentrations (mg/mL)FIC IndexReduction in MICEffect
R. officinalisP. granatumR. officinalisP. granatumR. officinalisP. granatum
C. albicans2512.512.56.20.92×2×Add
6.26.20.64×2×Add
12.53.10.72×4×Add
C. dubliniensis50252512.51.02×2×Add
12.512.50.74×2×Add
256.20.72×4×Add
253.10.62×8×Add
C. tropicalis50252512.51.02×2×Add
12.512.50.74×2×Add
256.20.72×4×Add
253.10.62×8×Add
C. krusei50252512.51.02×2×Add
Legend: Add: additive effect. FIC index = FIC1st + FIC2nd = (MIC of the 1st extract in combination/MIC of the 1st extract alone) + (MIC of the 2nd extract in combination/MIC of the 2nd extract alone). The results were interpreted as synergistic (≤0.5), additive (>0.5 and ≤1.0), indifferent (>1.0 and <4.0) or antagonist effect (≥4.0) (Moreno et al., 2020).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meccatti, V.M.; Santos, L.F.; de Carvalho, L.S.; Souza, C.B.; Carvalho, C.A.T.; Marcucci, M.C.; Abu Hasna, A.; de Oliveira, L.D. Antifungal Action of Herbal Plants’ Glycolic Extracts against Candida Species. Molecules 2023, 28, 2857. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062857

AMA Style

Meccatti VM, Santos LF, de Carvalho LS, Souza CB, Carvalho CAT, Marcucci MC, Abu Hasna A, de Oliveira LD. Antifungal Action of Herbal Plants’ Glycolic Extracts against Candida Species. Molecules. 2023; 28(6):2857. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062857

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meccatti, Vanessa Marques, Lana Ferreira Santos, Lara Steffany de Carvalho, Clara Bulhões Souza, Cláudio Antonio Talge Carvalho, Maria Cristina Marcucci, Amjad Abu Hasna, and Luciane Dias de Oliveira. 2023. "Antifungal Action of Herbal Plants’ Glycolic Extracts against Candida Species" Molecules 28, no. 6: 2857. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062857

APA Style

Meccatti, V. M., Santos, L. F., de Carvalho, L. S., Souza, C. B., Carvalho, C. A. T., Marcucci, M. C., Abu Hasna, A., & de Oliveira, L. D. (2023). Antifungal Action of Herbal Plants’ Glycolic Extracts against Candida Species. Molecules, 28(6), 2857. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28062857

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop