Next Article in Journal
Hydrated Metal Vanadate Heterostructures as Cathode Materials for Stable Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries
Next Article in Special Issue
Design, Synthesis, and Anticancer and Antibacterial Activities of Quinoline-5-Sulfonamides
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Synthesis Method of Dumbbell-like (Gd1−xTbx)2O(CO3)2·H2O Phosphor for Latent Fingerprint
Previous Article in Special Issue
Morpholine, Piperazine, and Piperidine Derivatives as Antidiabetic Agents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Quinazoline Derivatives as Highly Effective A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists

Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172—LilNCog—Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, F-59000 Lille, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2024, 29(16), 3847; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163847
Submission received: 11 July 2024 / Revised: 31 July 2024 / Accepted: 5 August 2024 / Published: 14 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heterocycles in Medicinal Chemistry III)

Abstract

:
The adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) has been identified as a therapeutic target for treating neurodegenerative diseases and cancer. In recent years, we have highlighted the 2-aminoquinazoline heterocycle as an promising scaffold for designing new A2AR antagonists, exemplified by 6-bromo-4-(furan-2-yl)quinazolin-2-amine 1 (Ki (hA2AR) = 20 nM). Here, we report the synthesis of new 2-aminoquinazoline derivatives with substitutions at the C6- and C7-positions, and the introduction of aminoalkyl chains containing tertiary amines at the C2-position to enhance antagonist activity and solubility properties. Compound 5m showed a high affinity for hA2AR with a Ki value of 5 nM and demonstrated antagonist activity with an IC50 of 6 µM in a cyclic AMP assay. Introducing aminopentylpiperidine and 4-[(piperidin-1-yl)methyl]aniline substituents maintained the binding affinities (9x, Ki = 21 nM; 10d, Ki = 15 nM) and functional antagonist activities (9x, IC50 = 9 µM; 10d, IC50 = 5 µM) of the synthesized compounds while improving solubility. This study provides insights into the future development of A2AR antagonists for therapeutic applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Adenosine A2A receptors (A2AR) are membrane proteins that belong to the G protein-coupled adenosine receptor family, which includes four receptor subtypes: A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 [1]. Extracellular adenosine acts as the endogenous agonist for all adenosine receptors exerting diverse functions throughout the body [2]. Adenosine has a high affinity for A2A receptors (Ki (hA2AR) = 310 nM), and their activation leads to an increase in intracellular cAMP levels [3]. This rise in cAMP activates protein kinase A (PKA), which in turn phosphorylates the cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB). A2ARs are highly expressed in the central nervous system, specifically in neurons, microglia, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes [4,5]. Their presence is well documented in the dendritic spines and postsynaptic regions of the basal ganglia. These receptors are also prominently located in presynaptic regions, where they modulate the release of neurotransmitters such as glutamate, acetylcholine, GABA, and noradrenaline [6,7]. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a link between caffeine consumption, a non-selective A2A receptor antagonist, and a reduced risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases [8,9,10,11,12]. New selective and potent A2AR antagonists were initially developed for neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease (HD), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) [13,14,15,16]. In AD, the selective blockade of A2ARs reduces memory impairment associated with amyloid burden and the development of Tau pathology [17]. Improvements are associated with a reduction in lesions and related neuroinflammation. Caffeine-treated cells and animal models have demonstrated a decrease in Tau protein phosphorylation [8,18,19]. The development of A2AR antagonists has led to the approval of istradefylline (Figure 1), a xanthine-like compound similar to caffeine, in Japan, Korea, and the USA as an adjunct therapy for PD in combination with levodopa [20]. Unfortunately, the development of other antagonists, such as ZM-241385, vipadenant, or preladenant (Figure 1), has often been discontinued due to insufficient efficacy associated with poor pharmacokinetic properties or toxic side effects [21]. In recent years, A2AR has emerged as a drug target for cancer immunotherapy, with its signaling identified as a novel immune checkpoint pathway. Studies have demonstrated that A2ARs are over-expressed and exert immunosuppressive effects in the tumor microenvironment [22,23,24]. Some antagonists, such as etrumadenant (AB928), have shown significant antitumor effects in B16-F10 melanoma or AT3-OVA tumor models [25]. EXS21546 (pyrazolopyrimidine derivative, structure not disclosed) [26], developed by Evotec and Exscientia, reduces the viable fraction of tumor cells and increases the fraction and relative number of viable CD8+T cells in models using malignant pleural effusions [27]. This research has led to the discovery of novel A2AR antagonist structures, with some antagonists initially developed for neurodegenerative diseases being repurposed for cancer therapy [28].
Our team previously identified 6-bromo-4-(furan-2-yl)quinazolin-2-amine (compound 1) as a new quinazoline hit compound with high affinity for the adenosine A2A receptor (Ki (hA2AR) = 20 nM), as described in R. Bolteau et al. [29]. Co-crystallization of compound 1 bound to A2AR (PDB code: 8DU3) highlighted key interactions, including hydrogen bonds between the 2-aminoquinazoline ring and Asn253, Glu169 and water molecules, π-stacking interactions with Phe168, and hydrophobic interactions between the furan ring and His278 and Trp246 (Figure 2). Structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies focused on quinazoline’s 4-position revealed that 2-furanyl and 4-fluorophenyl rings are most compatible with the steric bulk of substituents. Building on these promising results, we report here the synthesis of new 2-aminoquinazolines derivatives with substitution at the C6- and C7-positions and the introduction of substituents containing hindered tertiary amines on the nitrogen at the C2-position to enhance antagonist activity and solubility properties. We have investigated their binding affinities and antagonist activities to establish a comprehensive SAR.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The synthesis of compounds 5ap is outlined in Scheme 1. First, quinazolinediones 2ah were obtained by heating commercially available anthranilic acid derivatives with urea until they melted [29]. Then, a chlorination reaction was performed by refluxing the mixture in POCl3 with a catalytic amount of 2,6-lutidine to afford 2,4-dichloroquinazolines 3ah [30]. A regioselective Suzuki reaction was then achieved at the 4-position with appropriate arylboronic acids under controlled conditions to provide 2-chloroquinazolines 4ap [31]. Even though chlorine in position 4 is more reactive than bromine in position 6, the Suzuki reaction on compound 3a is not completely selective and yields di-arylated compounds 4i and 4j. Finally, 2-aminoquinazoline derivatives 5ap were synthesized either directly through nucleophilic substitution by refluxing in a sealed tube with a saturated solution of ammonia in methanol or via the introduction of 4-methoxybenzylamine followed by a debenzylation step in TFA [32].
Substituted 2-aminoquinazoline derivatives 9ax and 10ad were prepared as described in Scheme 2. The synthesis started with the substitution of potassium phthalimide using a large excess of the appropriate dibromoalkane in the presence of tetra-n-butylammonium bromide as a catalyst in DMF, providing bromine derivatives 6ac. Tertiary alkylamines 7ak were then synthesized via nucleophilic substitution with the corresponding amines in the presence of triethylamine in refluxing acetone with moderate yields. Hydrazinolysis allowed access to the primary alkylamines 8ak, which were condensed with 2-chloroquinazolines 4c, 4m, 4q, and 4r to afford the corresponding 2-aminoalkylquinazoline derivatives 9ax. Finally, aromatic amines were introduced by a Buchwald reaction, yielding the corresponding 2-aminoarylquinazolines 10ad [33].

2.2. Structure—Affinity Relationship Studies

Previously, binding studies of molecules on the hA2A receptor were conducted using a competitive radioligand displacement assay using [3H]-ZM241385. However, radioligand binding (RB) assays are associated with high operating costs and significant health risks [34]. Consequently, these assays have been progressively replaced by fluorescence polarization (FP) assays for discovering new GPCR ligands and determining their binding affinities [35,36,37]. The binding affinities of quinazoline derivatives 5ap for the hA2A receptor were subsequently determined using an FP assay using MRS7416 as the fluorescent probe [38]. The FP assay was developed in a 384-well plate format and yields Ki values comparable to those obtained from the RB assay. For instance, the Ki values of compounds 1 and 5c were determined to be 20 ± 5 and 22 ± 7 nM using RB assay. Similarly, the FP assay quantified these values at 23 ± 7 and 45 ± 7 nM, respectively. As previously described, introducing a 2-furan moiety at the C4-position of the quinazoline, compared to a phenyl or a p-fluorophenyl group, resulted in the best binding affinities (Table 1). These results confirm that furan is the optimal heterocyclic substituent for aromatic hydrophobic interactions with Trp246 and His250, as well as for completing the hydrogen bonding network between furan oxygen and Asn253.

2.2.1. Modulations at the C6-Position

Modulations at the C6-position were then performed. Replacing the bromine with small susbtituents, such as a methyl or chlorine group, maintained the affinity within the same order of magnitude (5c, Ki = 45 nM; 5h, Ki = 28 nM) as reference compound 1 (Ki = 23 nM). In contrast, larger substituents like phenyl or p-fluorophenyl significantly reduced or nearly abolished affinity (5i, Ki > 10 µM; 5j, Ki = 318 nM). Interestingly, substitution with a small methoxy or fluorine group also completely abolished affinity (5f and 5g, Ki > 10 µM). These results clearly indicate that small hydrophobic motifs such as methyl, chlorine, or bromine are most suitable for interacting with the hydrophobic pocket formed by Ala59, Ala63, Val84, and His278.

2.2.2. Modulations at the C7-Position

Modifications were also introduced at the C7-position to investigate potential differences compared to the C6-position. Regardless of the substituent at the C4-position, the introduction of the optimal substituents such as bromine (5k), chlorine (5p), or methyl groups (5m) at the C7-position results in binding affinities comparable to those observed for the corresponding C6-substituted molecules. Interestingly, the C7 methyl-substituted compound 5m exhibits an even higher affinity than its C-6 counterpart 5c (Ki = 45 nM) and reference compound 1 (Ki = 23 nM), rendering it a highly potent ligand for A2AR (Ki = 5 nM). Docking studies reveal that compound 5m superimposes perfectly with compound 1 co-crystallized with the hA2A receptor, forming the same network of hydrogen bonds. Focusing on the interactions involving the methyl group at the C7-position, it displays close van der Waals contacts with a hydrophobic pocket formed by Ala63, Ile66, and Ile274, improving binding affinity compared to brominated analogues (Figure 3). Taken together, these results show that the affinity of our compounds is mediated via the amine function of 2-aminoquinazoline and the furan ring, the same as for a number of antagonists described in the literature, such as ZM-241385, vipadenant, and preladenant. On the other hand, the binding mode of our molecules remains original, since very few of these ligands interact strongly by van der Waals contacts with the large hydrophobic pocket constituted by Ala59, Ala63, Ile66, Val84, and Ile274.

2.2.3. Antagonist Activity

The functional activity of compounds with binding affinities below 70 nM were assessed using the Ultra Lance cAMP assay to measure the inhibition of hA2A receptor-stimulated release of cAMP in HEK cells. The CGS21680 agonist was used at its EC80 concentration as recommended by the manufacturer. Inactive compound 5g served as a negative control, while ZM-241385, with an IC50 of 0.1 µM, served as a positive control. This result was consistent with our previously obtained data [29]. Surprisingly, only compounds 5m and 5p, bearing a 7-methyl or 7-chloro substitution, demonstrated antagonist activities with half inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of 6 and 8 µM, respectively (Table 1). The other compounds showed no activity at concentrations above 30 µM. The discrepancy between the binding affinity results and the antagonist activities may be explained by the different binding modes of the molecules compared with ZM-241385, the reference selective A2A adenosine antagonist (Figure 4). ZM-241385 shows the same interaction network as compound 5m through the position of its primary amine and furan, but it also interacts with the top of the binding pocket. Indeed, the phenolic hydroxyl group of ZM-241385 forms a hydrogen bond with an ordered water molecule, while the phenyl ring engages hydrophobic interactions with His264, Leu267, and Met270. However, ZM-241385 does not interact with the hydrophobic pocket occupied by the substituted phenyl groups of quinazoline derivatives. In order to improve the antagonistic potency of these molecules, we considered introducing larger substituents, similar to those found on preladenant and ZM-241385 [39,40,41]. It is known that increasing the size and volume of GPCR ligands can promote a switch to full antagonist activity [42].

2.2.4. Introduction of Amino Substituents at the C2-Position

To facilitate synthesis, a structure–activity relationship study was conducted on 2-amino-substituted quinazoline derivatives containing a phenyl group at the C4-position and no substituents at the C6- and C7-positions (Table 2) with compound 11 as the reference compound [28]. The introduction of 2-pyridine, benzylpiperidine, or benzylamine derivatives, as well as the ZM-241385 substituent 4-(2-aminoethyl)phenol, resulted in compounds with low (9a, Ki = 1.1 µM and 9f, Ki = 1.4 µM) or no affinity (9c, 9d, and 9e, Ki > 10 µM) for the hA2A receptor. Subsequently, we investigated the introduction of aminoalkyl chains, varying both the spacer length and the nature of the tertiary amine. Initially, we studied the incorporation of a piperidine moiety separated from the 2-aminoquinazoline heterocycle by alkyl chains ranging from two to seven carbon atoms. Optimal binding activities were observed with spacer lengths of five and six carbon atoms (9j, Ki = 294 nM; 9t, Ki = 233 nM), whereas further elongation reduced affinity (9u, Ki = 834 nM). The chemical nature of the tertiary amine was then investigated. Replacing piperidine either with more polar six-membered ring analogues such as morpholine (9k, Ki = 674 nM) or piperazine (9m, Ki = 687 nM) and its derivatives (9l, Ki = 790 nM; 9n, Ki = 1218 nM), or with a more constrained analogue such as pyrrolidine (9o, Ki = 519 nM), significantly reduced affinity. However, piperidine could be replaced without loss of affinity by a less hydrophobic tertiary amine like diethylamine (9p, Ki = 310 nM) or more hydrophobic ones like tetrahydroisoquinoline (9q, Ki = 297 nM). The introduction of a more hydrophobic and sterically hindered benzylpiperidine reduced affinity to the micromolar range (9r, Ki = 0.927 µM). Finally, the primary amine analogue of 9j (9s, Ki > 10 µM) lost all binding affinity. These findings show that while the presence of a tertiary amine is crucial for affinity, hydrophobicity and steric hindrance are tolerated to some extent. Interestingly, replacing the aminopentylpiperidine chain (9j, Ki = 294 nM) with a constrained equivalent 4-[(piperidin-1-yl)methyl]aniline, maintaining a similar linear length of five carbons, significantly increased binding affinity toward the hA2A receptor (9b, Ki = 52 nM). This result reinforces the conclusion that an optimum spacer length is required and that the nature of the spacer, whether linear alkyl or more rigid aromatic, does not adversely affect binding affinity.
Both aminopentylpiperidine and 4-[(piperidin-1-yl)methyl]aniline groups were then introduced into 6- and 7-substituted 4-(furan-2-yl)quinazolin-2-amine derivatives, which exhibited the best binding activities (Table 3). Regardless of the chain type, compounds showed binding affinities around 60 nM for the 6-methyl-substituted derivatives (9w, Ki = 61 nM; 10c, Ki = 65 nM) and between 15 and 20 nM for their 7-methyl counterparts (9x, Ki = 21 nM; 10d, Ki = 15 nM).
Docking studies were carried out to better understand the slight loss of affinity observed in compounds 9x and 10d following the introduction of these chains (Figure 5). Both compounds occupy the binding site similarly, with the aminoquinazoline ring shifting approximately 1.5 Å from its position in compound 5m, resulting in a loss of interactions within the hydrogen bonding network. This loss is compensated by an increase in hydrophobic interactions through the piperidine motif, which is situated near Leu267 and Tyr271. These findings suggest that the introduction of hindered tertiary amines, such as diethylamine (9p), piperidine (9j), or tetrahydroisoquinoline (9q), enhances affinity more effectively than the introduction of a highly polar primary amine (9s). Surprisingly, the bromo derivative 9v completely lost its affinity for the receptor. This suggests that the presence of a bulky bromine at C6-position prevents the molecule from correctly binding to the active site due to a steric clash with Val84.
The hypothesis that increasing the size and volume of molecules to mimic the reference A2A adenosine antagonists can enhance their antagonistic activities is not strongly supported by the findings. Although introducing a piperidine-containing chain slightly improved the antagonistic activity of compounds 9w and 10c, which IC50 around 10 µM compared with the 6-methyl-2-aminoquinazoline 5c (IC50 > 30 µM), this improvement was not consistent for compounds 9x (IC50 = 9 µM) and 10d (IC50 = 5 µM). These compounds maintained their antagonistic activities close to the micromolar range, similar to compound 5m (IC50 = 6 µM). Incorporating a tertiary amine functional group that can be protonated at physiological pH (7.4) can significantly enhance compound solubility. While 2-aminoquinazolines 1, 5c, and 5m exhibit low (<200 µM) or moderate (<1 mM) solubilities, the introduction of piperidine chains increases their solubility to concentrations ranging from 2 to 14 mM. These results confirm that substitutions at the C2-position substitutions in quinazolines are beneficial, maintaining both affinity and activity, while also enhancing solubility.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry

Chemicals and solvents were obtained from commercial sources and used without further purification unless otherwise noted. Reactions were monitored by TLC performed on Macherey–Nagel Alugram® Sil 60/UV254 sheets (thickness 0.2 mm, Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany). Purification of products was carried out by recrystallization or column chromatography. Column chromatography was carried out using Macherey–Nagel silica gel (230–400 mesh, Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany). Melting points were determined on a Büchi SMP-20 capillary apparatus (Büchi SARL, Villebon sur Yvette, France) and are uncorrected. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DRX 300 spectrometer (Division Biospin, Wissembourg, France) operating at 300 MHz for 1H and 75 MHz for 13C). Chemical shifts are expressed in ppm relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS). Chemical shifts are reported as position (δ in ppm), multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, p = pentet, dd = double doublet, br = broad, and m = multiplet), coupling constant (J in Hz), relative integral, and assignment. Mass spectra of compounds 2ah, 3ah, 4aq, 6ac, 7ak, and 8ak were recorded to unit accuracy with a LCMS (Waters Alliance Micromass ZQ 2000, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) with UV detection (PDA), an electrospray mode (ESI), and a Waters XBridge C18 column (5 μm particle size column, dimensions 50 mm × 4.6 mm, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). A gradient starting from 98% H2O/formate buffer 5 mM (pH 3.8) and reaching 100% CH3CN/formate buffer 5 mM (pH 3.8) within 4 min at a flow rate of 2 mL/min was used followed by a return to the starting conditions within 1 min. Mass spectra of compounds 5ap, 9ax, and 10ad were recorded with decimal precision using a Waters AcQuity UPLC I-Class with UV detection (PDA) and an electrospray mode (ESI) (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). UPLC-MS Waters system was equipped with a UPLC I SMP MGR-FTN sample manager, an ACQUITY UPLC I-Class eK photodiode array detector (210–400 nm), and an ACQUITY QDa (Performance) detector (scan 50–1250) (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). Acquity BEH C18 column (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters) was used. The injection volume was 0.5 μL. A mixture of water and acetonitrile was used as mobile phase in gradient elution. The pH of the mobile phase was adjusted with HCOOH and NH4OH to form a buffer solution at pH 3.8. The analysis time was 5 min (at a flow rate of 600 μL/min), 10 min (at a flow rate of 600 μL/min), or 30 min (at a flow rate of 600 μL/min). Unless otherwise specified, the purity of evaluated compounds was judged to be >95% as determined by UPLC-UV-MS system.
NMR and LC-MS spectra of compounds 5ap, 9ax and 10ad are provided as supplementary materials (Figure S1).
General procedure for synthesis of compounds 2ah. The formation of quinazolinediones was carried out according to published procedures [29]. To a round-bottom flask were added the corresponding anthranilic acid (1.0 eq.) and urea (10.0 eq.). The mixture was stirred and heated at 160 °C overnight. Solid was cooled to 50 °C, and a 1M NaOH solution was added to dissolve the solid. The solution was filtered, filtrate was acidified with a 6M HCl solution up to acid pH and filtered again. Solid was washed with methanol to afford the corresponding quinazolinedione.
6-Bromoquinazoline-2,4-(1H,3H)-dione (2a). Yield: 8.9 g, 80%; yellow solid; m.p. > 300 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 11.44 (br s, 1H), 11.27 (br s, 1H), 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 7.80 (dd, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.13 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 239, 241 [M − H].
6-Methylquinazoline-2,4-(1H,3H)-dione (2b). Yield: 8.5 g, 73%; white solid; m.p. > 300 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 11.20–11.17 (m, 2H), 7.68 (d, 1H, J = 1.5 Hz), 7.43 (dd, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.10 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 175 [M − H].
6-Methoxyquinazoline-2,4-(1H,3H)-dione (2c). Yield: 5.1 g, 89%; yellow solid; m.p. > 300 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 11.16–11.14 (m, 2H), 7.32 (d, 1H, J = 2.9 Hz), 7.43 (dd, 1H, J = 2.9 Hz, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.13 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz), 3.78 (s, 3H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 191 [M − H].
6-Fluoroquinazoline-2,4-(1H,3H)-dione (2d). Yield: 8.9 g, 77%; yellow solid; m.p. > 300 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 11.20–11.18 (m, 2H), 7.68 (d, 1H, J = 1.5 Hz), 7.43 (dd, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.10 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 179 [M − H].
6-Chloroquinazoline-2,4-(1H,3H)-dione (2e). Yield: 10.0 g, 87%; yellow solid; m.p. > 300 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 11.28 (m, 2H), 7.79 (d, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz), 7.67 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.19 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 196, 198 [M − H].
7-Bromoquinazoline-2,4-(1H,3H)-dione (2f). Yield: 9.1 g, 82%; yellow solid; m.p. > 300 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 11.40 (br s, 1H), 11.25 (br s, 1H), 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 7.80 (dd, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.13 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 239, 241 [M − H].
7-Methylquinazoline-2,4-(1H,3H)-dione (2g). Yield: 5.0 g, 86%; white solid; m.p. > 300 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 11.33–11.29 (m, 2H), 7.68 (d, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz), 7.43 (dd, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.10 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 175 [M − H].
7-Chloroquinazoline-2,4-(1H,3H)-dione (2h). Yield: 10.0 g, 87%; yellow solid; m.p. > 300 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 11.41 (s, 1H), 11.26 (s, 1H), 7.87 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.21 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.17 (d, 1H, J = 1.6 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 196, 198 [M − H].
General procedure for synthesis of compounds 3ah. The formation of dichloroquinazolines was carried out according to published procedures [30]. To a solution of the corresponding quinazolinedione (1.0 eq.) in POCl3 (10.0 eq.) was added 2,6-lutidine (1.0 eq.). The solution was stirred and heated at reflux overnight. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in chloroform, and the solution was stirred for 5 min. Ice was added, and aqueous layer was extracted three times with chloroform. Combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. Crude product was purified by flash chromatography (cyclohexane/acetone (10/0 to 9/1)) to afford the corresponding dichloroquinazoline.
6-Bromo-2,4-dichloroquinazoline (3a). Yield: 2.4 g, 41%; white solid; m.p. 153 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.45 (d, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 8.08 (dd, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz J = 9.0 Hz), 7.91 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 277, 279, 281 [M + H]+.
2,4-Dichloro-6-methylquinazoline (3b). Yield: 2.4 g, 40%; white solid; m.p. 135–138 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.05 (m, 1H), 8.02 (dd, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.94 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz), 2.54 (s, 3H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 213, 215 [M + H]+.
2,4-Dichloro-6-methoxyquinazoline (3c). Yield: 850 mg, 18%; yellow solid; m.p. 170–171 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.98 (d, 1H, J = 9.3 Hz), 7.80 (dd, 1H, J = 2.9 Hz, J = 9.2 Hz), 7.47 (d, 1H, J = 2.9 Hz), 3.99 (s, 3H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 229, 231 [M + H]+.
2,4-Dichloro-6-fluoroquinazoline (3d). Yield: 2.4 g, 40%; yellow solid; m.p. 136–137 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.08 (m, 2H), 8.15 (m, 1H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 217, 219 [M + H]+.
2,4-Dichloro-6-chloroquinazoline (3e). Yield: 1.7 g, 29%; yellow solid; m.p. 126–128 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.08 (m, 2H), 8.15 (m, 1H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 233, 235 [M + H]+.
7-Bromo-2,4-dichloroquinazoline (3f). Yield: 2.0 g, 35%; white solid; m.p. 189–191 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.36 (d, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz), 8.23 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 8.05 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz, J = 8.9 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 277, 279, 281 [M + H]+.
2,4-Dichloro-7-methylquinazoline (3g). Yield: 2.0 g, 54%; white solid; m.p. 142 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.15 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.80–7.77 (m, 1H), 7.60–7.55 (m, 1H), 2.64 (s, 3H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 213, 215 [M + H]+.
2,4-Dichloro-7-chloroquinazoline (3h). Yield: 1.3 g, 23%; yellow solid; m.p. 130–132 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.25 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz), 7.47 (dd, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, J = 8.6 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 233, 235 [M + H]+.
General procedure for synthesis of compounds 4aq.
The formation of dichloroquinazolines was carried out according to published procedures [31]. To a tube were added the corresponding dichloroquinazoline derivatives (1.0 eq.), K2CO3 (2.0 eq.), and triphenylphosphine (0.04 eq.) and the corresponding boronic acid (1.2 eq.) in dioxane/water (4/1). The solution was degassed for 5 min with a nitrogen flow, and then palladium diacetate (0.02 eq.) was added, and the tube was sealed. The mixture was stirred and heated at 40 °C overnight. The solution was cooled to room temperature and hydrolyzed with water. Aqueous layer was extracted three times with EtOAc. Combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. Crude product was purified by flash chromatography (cyclohexane/EtOAc (10/0 to 9/1)) to afford compounds 4ap.
6-Bromo-2-chloro-4-(4-fluorophenyl)quinazoline (4a). Yield: 214 mg, 35%; white solid; m.p. 197–198 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.26 (d, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 8.04 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.83 (m, 2H), 7.32 (m, 2H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 339, 341, 343 [M + H]+.
6-Bromo-2-chloro-4-phenylquinazoline (4b). Yield: 811 mg, 47%; white solid; m.p. 160–162 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.25 (dd, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz, J = 9.0 Hz), 8.17 (d, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz), 8.02 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.82 (m, 2H), 6.67 (m, 3H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 319, 321, 322 [M + H]+.
2-Chloro-4-(furan-2-yl)-6-methylquinazoline (4c). Yield: 840 mg, 73%; yellow solid; m.p. 124 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.59 (m, 1H), 8.23 (dd, 1H, J = 0.6 Hz, J = 1.7 Hz), 7.90 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.85 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.71 (dd, 1H, J = 0.6 Hz, J = 3.7 Hz), 6.88 (dd, 1H, J = 1.7 Hz, J = 3.7 Hz), 2.56 (s, 3H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 245, 247 [M + H]+.
2-Chloro-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-methylquinazoline (4d). Yield: 1.2 g, 68%; white solid; m.p. 211–213 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.97 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.82 (m, 4H), 7.30 (m, 2H), 2.55 (s, 3H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 273, 275 [M + H]+.
2-Chloro-6-methyl-4-phenylquinazoline (4e). Yield: 300 mg, 63%; white solid; m.p. 154–155 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.81 (m, 5H), 7.65 (m, 2H), 6.50 (1H), 2.48 (s, 3H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 255, 257 [M + H]+.
2-Chloro-4-(furan-2-yl)-6-methoxyquinazoline (4f). Yield: 470 mg, 83%; green solid. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.22 (m, 1H), 7.91 (dd, 1H, J = 0.6 Hz, J = 1.7 Hz), 7.83 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.66 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.56 (dd, 1H, J = 0.6 Hz, J = 3.7 Hz), 6.73 (dd, 1H, J = 1.7 Hz, J = 3.7 Hz), 4.02 (s, 3H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 261, 263 [M + H]+.
2-Chloro-4-(furan-2-yl)-6-fluoroquinazoline (4g). Yield: 248 mg, 54%; yellow solid. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.64 (dd, 1H, J = 2.9 Hz, J = 9.8 Hz), 8.02 (dd, 1H, J = 5.4 Hz, J = 9.4 Hz), 7.85 (dd, 1H, J = 0.9 Hz, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.72 (m, 2H), 6.74 (dd, 1H, J = 1.6 Hz, J = 3.6 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 249, 251 [M + H]+.
2-Chloro-4-(furan-2-yl)-6-chloroquinazoline (4h). Yield: 250 mg, 44%; yellow solid; 209–211 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.98 (dd, 1H, J = 0.5 Hz, J = 2.2 Hz), 7.93 (dd, 1H, J = 0.5 Hz, J = 9.1 Hz), 7.87 (m, 2H), 7.74 (dd, 1H, J = 0.8 Hz, J = 3.6 Hz), 6.74 (dd, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, J = 3.7 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 265, 267, 269 [M + H]+.
2-Chloro-4,6-diphenylquinazoline (4i). Yield: 212 mg, 62%; yellow solid; m.p. 168–170 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.32 (m, 2H), 8.24 (m, 1H), 7.89–7.86 (m, 2H), 7.65–7.62 (m, 5H), 7.54–7.44 (m, 4H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 317, 319 [M + H]+.
2-Chloro-4,6-bis(4-fluorophenyl)quinazoline (4j). Yield: 787 mg, 62%; yellow solid; m.p. 185 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.34 (m, 2H), 7.49 (m, 2H), 7.81 (m, 2H), 7.97 (m, 2H), 8.12 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz), 8.18 (d, 1H, J = 1.7 Hz), 8.40 (dd, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz, 8.8 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 353, 355 [M + H]+.
7-Bromo-2-chloro-4-(2-furan)quinazoline (4k). Yield: 200 mg, 18%; yellow solid; m.p. 129–131 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 9.14 (d, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz), 8.00 (dd, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.89 (m, 2H), 7.75 (dd, 1H, J = 0.8 Hz, J = 3.6 Hz), 6.74 (dd, 1H, J = 1.6 Hz, J = 3.6 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 309, 311, 313 [M + H]+.
7-Bromo-2-chloro-4-(4-fluorophenyl)quinazoline (4l). Yield: 204 mg, 31%; white solid; m.p. 197–198 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.26 (d, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz), 8.04 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.83 (m, 2H), 7.32 (m, 2H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 339, 341, 343 [M + H]+.
2-Chloro-4-(furan-2-yl)-7-methylquinazoline (4m). Yield: 140 mg, 50%; yellow solid; m.p. 184–186 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.82 (d, 1H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.83 (m, 1H), 7.76 (m, 1H), 7.67 (d, 1H, J = 3.7 Hz), 7.52 (dd, 1H, J = 1.4 Hz, J = 8.7 Hz), 6.72 (dd, 1H, J = 1.5 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz), 2.62 (s, 3H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 245, 247 [M + H]+.
2-Chloro-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-7-methylquinazoline (4n). Yield: 300 mg, 78%; white solid; m.p. 161–163 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.00 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.86–7.79 (m, 3H), 7.50–7.45 (m, 1H), 7.34–7.25 (m, 2H), 2.64 (s, 3H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 273, 275 [M + H]+.
2-Chloro-4-phenyl-7-methylquinazoline (4o). Yield: 300 mg, 78%; white solid; m.p. 256–258 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.00 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.86–7.79 (m, 3H), 7.50–7.45 (m, 1H), 7.34–7.25 (m, 2H), 2.64 (s, 3H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 273, 275 [M + H]+.
2-Chloro-4-(furan-2-yl)-7-chloroquinazoline (4p). Yield: 200 mg, 44%; yellow solid; 133–135 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.92 (d, 1H, J = 9.2 Hz), 7.96 (d, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz), 7.85 (m, 1H), 7.74 (d, 1H, J = 3.8 Hz), 7.64 (dd, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz, J = 9.2 Hz), 6.73 (dd, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, J = 3.6 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 265, 267, 269 [M + H]+.
The formation of 2-chloro-4-phenylquinazoline (4q) and 6-bromo-2-chloro-4-(furan-2-yl)quinazoline (4r) was carried out according to published procedures [43].
General procedure for synthesis of compounds 5ad, 5il, 5no.
To a tube was added the corresponding chloroquinazoline in MeOH solution saturated with ammonia and the tube was immediately sealed. The solution was stirred at reflux overnight. The solution was cooled to room temperature and solid was filtered. Crude product was purified by flash chromatography (cyclohexane/EtOAc (5/5)) to afford the corresponding aminoquinazoline.
2-Amino-6-bromo-4-(4-fluorophenyl)quinazoline (5a). Yield: 28 mg, 15%; yellow solid; m.p. 200–203 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.81 (m, 5H), 7.44 (m, 3H), 7.17 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 168.4 (C), 165.2 (C), 161.9 (C), 160.5 (C), 151.9 (C), 137.2 (CH), 133.2 (CH), 132.3 (CH), 132.2 (CH), 129.1 (CH), 127.8 (CH), 118.9 (CH), 116.1 (CH), 114.3 (C). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 317.9, 319.9 [M + H]+.
2-Amino-6-bromo-4-phenylquinazoline (5b). Yield: 50 mg, 20%; yellow solid; m.p. 204–207 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.81 (dd, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.75 (d, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz), 7.68 (m, 2H), 7.60 (m, 3H), 7.46 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.09 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 169.2 (C), 160.9 (C), 152.5 (C), 137.0 (CH), 136.86 (CH), 130.4 (C), 129.7 (CH), 129.1 (2 CH), 129.0 (CH), 128.2 (2 CH), 118.9 (C), 113.9 (C). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 299.9, 301.9 [M + H]+.
4-(Furan-2-yl)-6-methylquinazolin-2-amine (5c). Yield: 30 mg, 38%; yellow solid; m.p. 157–159 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.25 (m, 1H), 8.09 (m, 1H), 7.56 (dd, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.42–7.38 (m, 2H), 6.80 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz), 6.71 (s, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 165.0 (C), 160.7 (C), 157.6 (C), 157.2 (C), 151.4 (C), 140.9 (CH), 136.7 (CH), 130.6 (CH), 130.1 (C), 120.7 (CH), 120.4 (CH), 117.5 (CH), 26.3 (CH3). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 226.2 [M + H]+.
2-Amino-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-methylquinazoline (5d). Yield: 37 mg, 10%; yellow solid; m.p. 180–182 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.70 (m, 2H), 7.53 (m, 1H), 7.44 (m, 4H), 6.78 (s, 2H, NH2), 3.07 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 168.1 (C), 164.1 (C), 161.6 (C), 160.2 (C), 152.1 (C), 136.2 (CH), 134.0 (CH), 132.1 (2 CH), 131.6 (C), 125.8 (CH), 117.6 (C), 115.2 (2 CH), 21.3 (CH3). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 254.0 [M + H]+.
4,6-Di(4-fluorophenyl)quinazolin-2-amine (5i). Yield: 12 mg, 46%; white solid; m.p. 239–241 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.32–8.29 (m, 2H), 8.21–8.11 (m, 3H), 8.06–8.02 (m, 2H), 8.01–7.66 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 169.0 (C), 165.1 (C), 161.5 (C), 160.7 (C), 160.6 (C), 153.2 (CH), 136.6 (C), 133.8 (C), 133.3 (C), 132.3 (C), 129.1 (2 CH), 126.5 (CH), 124.6 (CH), 117.8 (C), 116.4 (CH), 116.1 (2 CH), 115.8 (2 CH). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 334.2 [M + H]+.
4,6-Diphenylquinazolin-2-amine (5j). Yield: 12 mg, 32%; yellow solid; m.p. 214–216 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.28–8.03 (m, 3H), 7.94–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.77–7.60 (m, 4H), 7.59–7.38 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 154.5 (C), 139.8 (C), 138.5 (C), 137.0 (C), 135.0 (C), 132.4 (CH), 130.0 (CH), 129.3 (CH), 129.1 (2 CH), 128.8 (2 CH), 127.3 (2 CH), 126.7 (2 CH), 119.1 (CH), 117.5 (C). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 298.1 [M + H]+.
7-bromo-4-(furan-2-yl)quinazolin-2-amine (5k). Yield: 29 mg, 21%; yellow solid; m.p. 193–195 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.97 (d, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz), 7.80 (dd, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.74–7.71 (m, 2H), 7.57 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.32–7.29 (m, 2H), 5.53 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 169.1 (C), 165.1 (C), 163.0 (C), 159.2 (C), 137.6 (C), 132.6 (CH), 132.1 (2 CH), 131.6 (CH), 129.3 (CH), 127.4 (C), 119.4 (C), 116.3 (CH), 116.1 (CH). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 290.1, 292.1 [M + H]+.
2-Amino-7-bromo-4-(4-fluorophenyl)quinazoline (5l). Yield: 35 mg, 13%; yellow solid; m.p. 211–213 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.97 (d, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz), 7.80 (dd, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.74–7.71 (m, 2H), 7.57 (d, 1H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.32–7.29 (m, 2H), 5.53 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 169.1 (C), 165.1 (C), 163.0 (C), 159.2 (C), 137.6 (C), 132.6 (CH), 132.1 (2 CH), 131.6 (CH), 129.3 (CH), 127.4 (C), 119.4 (C), 116.3 (CH), 116.1 (CH). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 318.0, 320.1 [M + H]+.
4-(4-Fluorophenyl)-7-methylquinazolin-2-amine (5n). Yield: 121 mg, 65%; white solid; m.p. 161 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.76–7.69 (m, 3H), 7.47–7.44 (m, 1H), 7.27–7.22 (m, 2H), 7.09 (dd, 1H, J = 1.4 Hz, J = 8.5 Hz), 5.22 (br s, 2H), 2.53 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 168.9 (C), 165.4 (C), 162.1 (C), 159.6 (C), 153.5 (C), 145.1 (C), 131.6 (CH), 131.5 (CH), 126.9 (CH), 125.5 (CH), 125.1 (CH), 116.7 (C), 115.8 (CH), 115.5 (CH), 22.2 (CH3). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 254.3 [M + H]+.
7-Methyl-4-phenylquinazolin-2-amine (5o). Yield: 121 mg, 65%; white solid; m.p. 160–162 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.76–7.69 (m, 3H), 7.47–7.44 (m, 1H), 7.27–7.22 (m, 2H), 7.09 (dd, 1H, J = 1.4 Hz, J = 8.5 Hz), 5.22 (br s, 2H), 2.53 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 168.9 (C), 165.4 (C), 162.1 (C), 159.6 (C), 153.5 (C), 145.1 (C), 131.6 (CH), 131.5 (CH), 126.9 (CH), 125.5 (CH), 125.1 (CH), 116.7 (C), 115.8 (CH), 115.5 (CH), 22.2 (CH3). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 236.3 [M + H]+.
General procedure for synthesis of compounds 5eh, 5m, 5p.
To a round-bottom flask were added 2-chloroquinazoline derivative (1.0 eq.), DIPEA (3.0 eq.), and 4-methoxybenzylamine (2.0 eq.) in dioxane. The mixture was stirred and heated at reflux overnight. The solution was cooled to room temperature and hydrolyzed with water. Aqueous layer was extracted three times with EtOAc. Combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. These intermediates were not isolated, and the next step was carried out without any further purification. Crude product was dissolved in TFA (10 mL), and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 72 h. A saturated aqueous solution of sodium bicarbonate was added up to alkaline pH. Aqueous layer was extracted three times with EtOAc. Combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. Crude product was purified by flash chromatography (DCM/MeOH (9/1)) to afford the corresponding aminoquinazoline.
6-Methyl-4-phenylquinazolin-2-amine (5e). Yield: 27 mg, 41%; yellow solid; m.p. 190–192 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.81 (m, 1H), 7.76 (m, 2H), 7.65 (m, 5H), 2.39 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 174.5 (C), 159.3 (C), 155.8 (C), 138.6 (CH), 136.1 (C), 134.9 (C), 131.5 (CH), 130.1 (2 CH), 129.1 (CH), 127.8 (2 CH), 119.4 (CH), 117.1 (C), 21.2 (CH3). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 236.3 [M + H]+.
4-(Furan-2-yl)-6-methoxyquinazolin-2-amine (5f). Yield: 45 mg, 56%; yellow solid; m.p. 169–171 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.09 (dd, 1H, J = 0.8 Hz, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.83 (m, 1H), 7.43 (m, 3H), 6.80 (dd, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz), 6.62 (s, 2H), 3.86 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 159.8 (C), 155.2 (C), 154.8 (C), 152.5 (C), 150.4 (C), 146.6 (CH), 127.6 (CH), 126.4 (CH), 116.0 (C), 115.4 (CH), 112.8 (CH), 104.9 (CH), 55.7 (CH3). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 242.2 [M + H]+.
6-Fluoro-4-(furan-2-yl)quinazolin-2-amine (5g). Yield: 45 mg, 46%; yellow solid; m.p. 181–183 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.23 (dd, 1H, J = 2.9 Hz, J = 10.4 Hz), 8.11 (m, 1H), 7.69–7.62 (m, 1H), 7.54 (m, 1H), 7.46 (m, 1H), 6.82 (m, 1H), 6.80 (s, 2H, NH2). 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 160.5 (C), 158.9 (C), 156.1 (C), 155.8 (C), 152.3 (C), 151.7 (CH), 147.1 (CH), 128.5 (CH), 124.1 (C), 115.9 (CH), 112.9 (CH), 110.3 (CH). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 230.2 [M + H]+.
6-Chloro-4-(furan-2-yl)quinazolin-2-amine (5h). Yield: 45 mg, 46%; yellow solid; m.p. 184–186 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.51 (d, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 8.15 (dd, 1H, J = 0.8 Hz, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.73 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5 Hz, J = 9.2 Hz), 7.47 (m, 2H), 6.97 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.82 (dd, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz). 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 160.8 (C), 155.8 (C), 153.1 (C), 152.4 (C), 147.4 (CH), 134.5 (C), 128.8 (CH), 126.5 (CH), 125.6 (CH), 116.3 (C), 116.2 (CH), 113.0 (CH). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 246.2, 248.2 [M + H]+.
4-(furan-2-yl)-7-methylquinazolin-2-amine (5m). Yield: 21 mg, 13%; yellow solid; m.p. 235–237 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.38 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz), 8.07 (m, 1H), 7.39 (dd, 1H, J = 0.7 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz), 7.27 (m, 1H), 7.10 (dd, 1H, J = 1.5 Hz, J = 8.7 Hz), 6.79 (dd, 1H, J = 1.7 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz), 6.74 (s, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 168.44 (C), 165.19 (C), 161.91 (C), 160.50 (C), 151.98 (C), 137.23 (CH), 133.24 (CH), 132.27 (CH), 132.15 (CH), 129.10, 127.84 (CH), 118.9 (CH), 116.07 (CH), 114.25 (C). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 226.3 [M + H]+.
7-Chloro-4-(furan-2-yl)quinazolin-2-amine (5p). Yield: 45 mg, 46%; yellow solid; m.p. 181–183 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.53 (d, 1H, J = 9.1 Hz), 8.11 (dd, 1H, J = 0.8 Hz, J = 1.7 Hz), 7.48 (d, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz), 7.45 (dd, 1H, J = 0.8 Hz, J = 3.6 Hz), 7.28 (dd, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.03 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.82 (dd, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz). 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 161.2 (C), 156.7 (C), 155.2 (C), 152.2 (C), 147.2 (C), 138.9 (CH), 129.0 (CH), 124.5 (CH), 123.2 (CH), 116.3 (C), 114.6 (CH), 113.0 (CH). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 246.2, 248.2 [M + H]+.
General procedure for synthesis of compounds 6ac. To a suspension of dibromoalkane derivatives (5.1 eq.) in DMF (50 mL) with tetra-n-butylammonium bromide (1%) potassium phthalimide (1.0 eq.) was slowly added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 100 °C overnight, concentrated in vacuo, hydrolyzed with water, and extracted three times with diethyl ether. Combined organic layers were washed with K2CO3 0.5 M solution, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. Product was precipitated in PE at 0 °C to afford compounds 6ac after filtration.
2-(5-Bromopentyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (6a). Yield: 9.0 g, 51%; white solid; m.p. 60–62 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.89–7.85 (m, 2H), 7.74–7.68 (m, 2H), 3.69 (t, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.38 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.74 (m, 4H), 1.45–1.35 (m, 2H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 296, 298 [M + H]+.
2-(6-Bromohexyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (6b). Yield: 3.9 g, 47%; white solid; m.p. 55–57 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.87–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.75–7.69 (m, 2H), 3.69 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.40 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 1.86 (m, 2H), 1.70 (m, 2H), 1.54–1.45 (m, 2H), 1.42–1.32 (m, 2H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 310, 312 [M + H]+.
2-(7-Bromoheptyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (6c). Yield: 708 mg, 58%; white solid; m.p. 52–54 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.87–7.80 (m, 2H), 7.74–7.67 (m, 2H), 3.67 (t, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.39 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 1.84 (m, 2H), 1.70–1.65 (m, 2H), 1.44–1.33 (m, 6H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 324, 326 [M + H]+.
General procedure for synthesis of compounds 7ak. To a solution of bromoisoindoline-1,3-dione derivatives (1.0 eq.) in acetonitrile (30 mL) was added the corresponding amine (1.2 eq.) and Et3N (1.2 eq.). The reaction mixture was stirred at reflux overnight, cooled to room temperature, hydrolyzed with water, and acidified with HCl 1 N solution and extracted with EtOAc. Aqueous layer was alkalized with NaOH 0.5 M solution and then extracted three times with EtOAc. Combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. Oil was suspended in PE to obtain a solid, which was filtered to afford the corresponding protected amine.
2-(4-(Piperidin-1-yl)butyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (7a). Yield: 1.6 g, 97%; white solid; m.p. 82–84 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.82–7.80 (m, 2H), 7.70–7.67 (m, 2H), 3.68 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 2.32–2.26 (m, 6H), 1.66 (m, 2H), 1.56–1.46 (m, 6H), 1.39 (m, 2H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 287 [M + H]+.
2-(4-(Piperidin-1-yl)pentyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (7b). Yield: 1.3 g, 79%; white solid; m.p. 72–76 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.85–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.73–7.69 (m, 2H), 3.68 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 2.38–2.27 (m, 6H), 1.69 (m, 2H), 1.64–1.51 (m, 4H), 1.44–1.31 (m, 6H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 301 [M + H]+.
2-(5-Morpholinopentyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (7c). Yield: 1.7 g, 56%; white solid; m.p. 66–68 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.86–7.83 (m, 2H), 7.73–7.70 (m, 2H), 3.72–3.67 (m, 6H), 2.44–2.41 (m, 4H), 2.32 (t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 1.71 (m, 2H), 1.54 (m, 2H), 1.37 (m, 2H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 303 [M + H]+.
2-(5-(4-Methylpiperazin-1-yl)pentyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (7d). Yield: 800 mg, 38%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.86–7.83 (m, 2H), 7.74–7.70 (m, 2H), 3.68 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.01 (t, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz), 2.26 (m, 8H), 2.10 (s, 3H), 1.71–1.64 (m, 2H), 1.62–1.51 (m, 2H), 1.43–1.33 (m, 2H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 317 [M + H]+.
Tert-butyl 4-(5-(1,3-dioxoisoindolin-2-yl)pentyl)piperazine-1-carboxylate (7e). Yield: 3.0 g, 55%; white solid. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.89–7.82 (m, 2H), 7.76–7.69 (m, 2H), 3.70 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.45 (m, 4H), 2.39 (m, 6H), 1.76–1.66 (m, 2H), 1.60–1.55 (m, 2H), 1.47 (s, 9H, (CH3)3), 1.40–1.37 (m, 2H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 402 [M + H]+.
2-(5-(Pyrrolidin-1-yl)pentyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (7f). Yield: 630 mg, 54%; white solid; m.p. 58–60 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.86–7.83 (m, 2H), 7.72–7.70 (m, 2H), 3.69 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 2.50–2.46 (m, 4H), 2.45–2.40 (m, 2H), 1.82–1.74 (m, 4H), 1.73–1.66 (m, 2H), 1.62–1.51 (m, 2H), 1.43–1.33 (m, 2H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 287 [M + H]+.
2-(5-(Diethylamino)pentyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (7g). Yield: 670 mg, 60%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.86–7.83 (m, 2H), 7.73–7.70 (m, 2H), 3.69 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 2.51 (q, 4H, J = 7.3 Hz), 2.40 (t, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.70 (m, 2H), 1.55–1.45 (m, 2H), 1.39–1.29 (m, 2H), 1.15 (t, 6H, J = 7.8 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 289 [M + H]+.
2-(5-(3,4-Dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)pentyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (7h). Yield: 1.2 g, 34%; white solid; m.p. 74–76 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.86–7.83 (m, 2H), 7.73–7.70 (m, 2H), 7.13–7.00 (m, 4H), 3.71 (t, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 3.61 (s, 2H), 2.89 (t, 2H, J = 5.9 Hz), 2.71 (t, 2H, J = 6.0 Hz), 2.50 (t, 2H, J = 7.7 Hz), 1.79–1.61 (m, 4H), 1.47–1.37 (m, 2H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 349 [M + H]+.
2-(5-(4-Benzylpiperidin-1-yl)pentyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (7i). Yield: 410 mg, 31%; white solid; m.p. 60–62 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.86–7.84 (m, 2H), 7.73–7.70 (m, 2H), 6.94–6.92 (m, 5H), 3.72 (t, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 3.07 (m, 3H), 2.63–2.50 (m, 8H), 2.29 (m, 2H), 1.35–1.10 (m, 6H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 392 [M + H]+.
2-(4-(Piperidin-1-yl)hexyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (7j). Yield: 1.3 g, 41%; white solid; m.p. 59–61 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.87–7.81 (m, 2H), 7.74–7.68 (m, 2H), 3.68 (t, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.10 (m, 2H), 2.35 (m, 4H), 2.29–2.24 (m, 2H), 1.73–1.63 (m, 2H), 1.61–1.54 (m, 4H), 1.51–1.32 (m, 6H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 316 [M + H]+.
2-(4-(Piperidin-1-yl)heptyl)isoindoline-1,3-dione (7k). Yield: 687 mg, 57%; white solid; m.p. 56–58 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.86–7.81 (m, 2H), 7.74–7.69 (m, 2H), 3.67 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 2.35 (m, 4H), 2.28–2.23 (m, 2H), 1.69–1.19 (m, 16H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 330 [M + H]+.
General procedure for synthesis of compounds 8ak. A mixture of protected amine derivatives (1.0 eq.) in EtOH (85 mL) with hydrazine hydrate (2.5 eq.) was heated at reflux for 3 h, cooled to room temperature, and then phthalhydrazide was filtered off. Filtrate was concentrated in vacuo, suspended in chloroform, and phthalhydrazide was filtered again. Filtrate was then washed with water, dried over MgSO4, and evaporated in vacuo to afford the corresponding amine.
4-(Piperidin-1-yl)butan-1-amine (8a). Yield: 1.4 g, 90%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 2.71 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 2.44 (br m, 2H), 2.28 (t, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz), 1.61–1.38 (m, 14H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 157 [M + H]+.
5-(Piperidin-1-yl)pentane-1-amine (8b). Yield: 1.4 g, 90%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 2.66 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 2.34 (m, 4H), 2.25 (t, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz), 1.59–1.48 (m, 6H), 1.45–1.39 (m, 6H), 1.33–1.26 (m, 2H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 171 [M + H]+.
5-Morpholinopentan-1-amine (8c). Yield: 808 mg, 83%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 3.72 (t, 4H, J = 4.5 Hz), 2.72–2.68 (m, 2H), 2.45–2.42 (m, 4H), 2.34 (t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 1.56–1.42 (m, 4H), 1.39–1.29 (m, 4H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 173 [M + H]+.
5-(4-Methylpiperazin-1-yl)pentan-1-amine (8d). Yield: 390 mg, 83%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 2.60–2.56 (m, 2H), 2.35 (m, 6H), 2.25–2.20 (m, 3H), 2.18 (s, 3H), 1.45–1.31 (m, 5H), 1.27–1.17 (m, 4H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 186 [M + H]+.
Tert-butyl 4-(5-aminopentyl)piperazine-1-carboxylate (8e). Yield: 730 mg, 72%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 3.70 (t, 4H, J = 5.1 Hz), 2.71 (t, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz), 2.39–2.30 (m, 6H), 1.97 (m, 3H), 1.59–1.48 (m, 3H), 1.46 (s, 9H, (CH3)3), 1.36–1.31 (m, 2H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 272 [M + H]+.
5-(Pyrrolidin-1-yl)pentan-1-amine (8f). Yield: 265 mg, 81%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 2.69 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 2.53–2.50 (m, 4H), 2.46 (t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 2.19 (m, 2H), 1.85–1.76 (m, 4H), 1.59–1.29 (m, 6H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 157 [M + H]+.
N1,N1-Diethylpentane-1,5-diamine (8g). Yield: 272 mg, 90%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 3.60 (m, 2H), 2.75 (m, 2H), 2.52 (t, 4H, J = 7.3 Hz), 2.40 (t, 2H, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.54–1.39 (m, 4H), 1.33–1.25 (m, 2H), 1.05 (t, 6H, J = 7.5 Hz). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 159 [M + H]+.
5-(3,4-Dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)pentan-1-amine (8h). Yield: 132 mg, 70%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.14–7.06 (m, 4H), 3.61 (m, 2H), 2.88 (t, 2H, J = 5.9 Hz), 2.71 (t, 2H J = 6.0 Hz), 2.50 (t, 2H, J = 7.7 Hz), 2.46 (t, 2H, J = 7.1 Hz), 1.79–1.61 (m, 4H), 1.47–1.37 (m, 4H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 219 [M + H]+.
5-(4-Benzylpiperidin-1-yl)pentan-1-amine (8i). Yield: 260 mg, 97%; limpid oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.16 (m, 5H), 6.84–6.75 (m, 2H), 3.10 (m, 3H), 2.60–2.50 (m, 8H), 2.29 (m, 2H), 1.39–1.10 (m, 6H), 0.80 (m, 2H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 261 [M + H]+.
6-(Piperidin-1-yl)hexan-1-amine (8j). Yield: 476 mg, 65%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 2.62 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 2.36 (m, 4H), 2.30–2.25 (m, 2H), 1.59 (m, 4H), 1.52–1.42 (m, 6H), 1.36–1.25 (m, 6H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 185 [M + H]+.
7-(Piperidin-1-yl)heptan-1-amine (8k). Yield: 300 mg, 78%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 2.64 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.34 (m, 4H), 2.26–2.21 (m, 2H), 1.59–1.17 (m, 18H). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 199 [M + H]+.
General procedure for synthesis of compounds 9ax. A mixture of 2-chloroquinazoline (1.0 eq.), the corresponding amine (3.0 eq.), and DIPEA (3.0 eq.) in dioxane was stirred at reflux overnight. After cooling to room temperature, mixture was hydrolyzed with water and extracted three times with EtOAc. Combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. Oil was purified by flash chromatography (DCM/MeOH (10/0 to 9/1)) to afford the corresponding quinazoline.
N-(1-Benzylpiperidin-4-yl)4-phenylquinazolin-2-amine (9a). Yield: 395 mg, 67%; orange oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.82–7.80 (m, 1H), 7.76–7.64 (m, 4H), 7.59–7.53 (m, 3H), 7.41–7.25 (m, 5H), 7.22–7.12 (m, 1H), 5.32 (br s, 1H), 4.22–4.07 (m, 1H), 3.58 (s, 2H), 2.95–2.84 (m, 2H), 2.37–2.24 (m, 2H), 2.23–2.11 (m, 2H), 1.74–1.58 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 170.0 (C), 158.4 (C), 153.5 (C), 138.4 (C), 137.5 (C), 133.7 (CH), 129.6 (CH), 129.5 (2 CH), 129.2 (2 CH), 128.5 (2 CH), 128.2 (2 CH), 127.5 (CH), 127.0 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 122.2 (CH), 118.5 (C), 63.3 (CH), 52.3 (2 CH2), 47.8 (CH2), 32.4 (2 CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 395.3 [M + H]+.
4-Phenyl-N-(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)quinazolin-2-amine (9b). Yield: 320 mg, 82%; white solid; m.p. 245 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.63–8.58 (m, 1H), 7.85 (m, 1H), 7.77–7.63 (m, 5H), 7.59–7.53 (m, 3H), 7.43 (m, 1H), 7.23–7.17 (m, 2H), 6.42 (br s, 1H), 4.96 (d, 2H, J = 5.5 Hz). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 165.5 (C), 153.9 (C), 153.4 (C), 148.3 (C), 144.3 (CH), 132.7 (CH), 131.9 (CH), 129.0 (CH), 125.0 (CH), 124.8 (2 CH), 123.7 (2 CH), 122.8 (CH), 121.4 (C), 117.8 (CH), 117.4 (CH), 116.7 (CH), 113.9 (C), 42.1 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 313.2 [M + H]+.
N-Benzyl-4-phenylquinazolin-2-amine (9c). Yield: 210 mg, 54%; yellow solid; m.p. 254 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.88–7.82 (m, 1H), 7.76–7.68 (m, 4H), 7.60–7.52 (m, 3H), 7.51–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.41–7.26 (m, 3H), 7.24–7.17 (m, 1H), 5.68 (m, 1H), 4.85 (d, 2H, J = 5.8 Hz). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 170.1 (C), 158.9 (C), 153.4 (C), 139.4 (C), 137.5 (C), 133.7 (CH), 129.7 (CH), 129.6 (2 CH), 128.6 (2 CH), 128.5 (2 CH), 127.7 (2 CH), 127.5 (CH), 127.2 (CH), 126.2 (CH), 122.5 (CH), 118.7 (C), 45.7 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 312.2 [M + H]+.
4-(((4-Phenylquinazolin-2-yl)amino)methyl)benzonitrile (9d). Yield: 302 mg, 72%; white solid; m.p. 273 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.86–7.83 (m, 1H), 7.75–7.60 (m, 6H), 7.59–7.51 (m, 5H), 7.23 (ddd, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz, J = 6.2 Hz, J = 8.2 Hz), 5.87 (br s, 1H), 4.88 (d, 2H, J = 6.2 Hz). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 165.9 (C), 153.8 (C), 140.7 (C), 132.4 (C), 129.3 (C), 127.6 (2 CH), 125.5 (CH), 125.4 (CH), 124.9 (2 CH), 123.9 (2 CH), 123.4 (2 CH), 122.9 (CH), 121.3 (C), 118.3 (CH), 114.3 (CH), 114.0 (C), 106.1 (C), 40.2 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 337.2 [M + H]+.
N-(4-Methoxybenzyl)-4-phenylquinazolin-2-amine (9e). Yield: 323 mg, 76%; yellow solid; m.p. 246 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.92 (br s, 1H), 7.74–7.63 (m, 4H), 7.62–7.49 (m, 4H), 7.38–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.18 (ddd, 1H, J = 1.2 Hz, J = 6.9 Hz, J = 8.2 Hz), 6.90–6.83 (m, 2H), 4.56 (d, 2H, J = 6.3 Hz), 3.70 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 169.7 (C), 159.4 (C), 158.5 (CH), 153.4 (C), 137.5 (C), 134.3 (CH), 132.7 (C), 130.2 (2 CH), 129.9 (2 CH), 129.2 (2 CH), 128.9 (2 CH), 127.6 (CH), 126.2 (C), 122.6 (CH), 118.1 (C), 114.1 (CH), 55.6 (CH3), 44.1 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 342.2 [M + H]+.
4-(2-((4-Phenylquinazolin-2-yl)amino)ethyl)phenol (9f). Yield: 323 mg, 76%; white solid; m.p. 263 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.86–7.80 (m, 1H), 7.76–7.64 (m, 4H), 7.59–7.53 (m, 3H), 7.19 (ddd, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, J = 6.1 Hz, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.10–7.05 (m, 2H), 6.76–6.70 (m, 2H), 5.45 (br s, 1H), 3.84 (q, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz), 2.93 (t, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 170.4 (C), 158.7 (C), 154.8 (C), 153.0 (C), 137.2 (C), 134.1 (CH), 130.5 (CH), 129.89 (2 CH), 129.8 (CH), 129.6 (2 CH), 128.5 (2 CH), 127.6 (CH), 125.6 (C), 122.5 (CH), 118.4 (C), 115.5 (2 CH), 43.2 (CH2), 34.9 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 342.2 [M + H]+.
4-Phenyl-N-(2-(piperidin-1-yl)ethyl)quinazolin-2-amine (9g). Yield: 80 mg, 21%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.79–7.77 (m, 1H), 7.72–7.69 (m, 2H), 7.67–7.65 (m, 2H), 7.56–7.53 (m, 3H), 7.17–7.12 (m, 1H), 5.93 (br m, 1H), 3.67 (m, 2H, J = 5.7 Hz), 2.60 (t, 2H, J = 6.12 Hz), 2.45 (m, 4H), 1.63–1.56 (m, 4H), 1.48–1.45 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 170.0 (C), 159.0 (C), 153.5 (C), 137.6 (C), 133.6 (CH), 129.6 (CH), 129.5 (2 CH), 128.5 (2 CH), 127.5 (CH), 126.0 (CH), 122.1 (CH), 118.4 (C), 57.6 (CH2), 54.4 (2 CH2), 38.4 (CH2), 25.9 (2 CH2), 24.5 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 333.0 [M + H]+.
4-Phenyl-N-(3-(piperidin-1-yl)propyl)quinazolin-2-amine hydrochloride (9h). Yield: 60 mg, 21%; beige solid; m.p. 202 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 10.26 (br s), 7.7–7.68 (m, 4H), 7.59–7.54 (m, 5H), 7.20 (br t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 3.51–3.33 (m, 4H), 3.1 (m, 2H), 2.84 (m, 2H), 2.06 (m, 2H), 1.77–1.66 (m, 5H), 1.37 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm): 169.7 (C), 159.3 (C), 153.3 (C), 137.4 (C), 134.3 (CH), 130.2 (CH), 129.8 (2 CH), 128.9 (2 CH), 127.5 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 122.7 (CH), 118.0 (C), 54.5 (CH2), 52.4 (2 CH2), 38.7 (CH2), 23.7 (CH2), 22.8 (2 CH2), 21.9 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 347.0 [M + H]+.
4-Phenyl-N-(4-(piperidin-1-yl)butyl)quinazolin-2-amine (9i). Yield: 163 mg, 54%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.82 (m, 1H), 7.70–7.67 (m, 3H) 7.56 (m, 3H), 7.19 (m, 2H), 5.55 (br m, 1H), 3.66 (m, 2H), 3.01 (m, 2H), 2.02–1.26 (m, 14H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 170.4 (C), 158.9 (C), 153.4 (C), 137.4 (C), 133.9 (CH), 129.8(CH), 129.6 (2 CH), 128.5 (2 CH), 127.6 (CH), 125.9 (CH), 122.5 (CH), 118.5 (C), 57.2 (CH2), 53.1 (2 CH2), 40.3 (CH2), 27.3 (CH2), 22.7 (2 CH2), 22.3 (2 CH2), 20.9 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 361.3 [M + H]+.
4-Phenyl-N-(5-(piperidin-1-yl)pentyl)quinazolin-2-amine (9j). Yield: 170 mg, 56%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.78 (m, 1H), 7.77–7.68 (m, 2H) 7.67–7.65 (m, 2H), 7.55–7.53 (m, 3H), 7.18–7.12 (m, 1H), 5.55 (br t, 1H, J = 5.6 Hz), 3.60 (m, 2H), 2.39 (m, 3H), 2.32 (t, 2H, J = 7.4 Hz), 1.73–1.66 (m, 2H), 1.64–1.54 (m, 5H), 1.49–1.26 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 169.9 (C), 159.1 (C), 153.4 (C), 137.5 (C), 133.7 (CH), 129.6 (CH), 129.5 (2 CH), 128.4 (2 CH), 127.5 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 122.2 (CH), 118.4 (C), 59.3 (CH2), 54.6 (2 CH2), 41.4 (CH2), 29.6 (CH2), 26.5 (CH2), 25.8 (2 CH2), 25.1 (2 CH2), 24.4 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 375.0 [M + H]+.
N-(5-Morpholinopentyl)-4-phenylquinazolin-2-amine (9k). Yield: 163 mg, 54%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.81–7.78 (m, 1H), 7.73–7.65 (m, 4H), 7.57–7.52 (m, 3H), 7.16 (m, 1H), 5.36–5.32 (m, 1H), 3.72 (t, 4H, J = 4.6 Hz), 3.60 (m, 2H), 2.45–2.42 (m, 4H), 2.38–2.33 (m, 2H), 1.71 (m, 2H), 1.63–1.42 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 170.0 (C), 159.1 (C), 153.4 (C), 137.5 (C), 133.7 (CH), 129.6 (C), 129.5 (2 CH), 128.5 (2 CH), 127.5 (C), 126.1 (C), 122.3 (C), 118.4 (C), 66.9 (2 CH2), 59.0 (CH2), 53.7 (2 CH2), 41.4 (CH2), 29.5 (CH2), 26.2 (CH2), 24.8 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 377.2 [M + H]+.
N-(5-(4-Methylpiperazin-1-yl)pentyl)-4-phenylquinazolin-2-amine (9l). Yield: 386 mg, 55%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.80–7.77 (m, 1H), 7.71–7.65 (m, 4H), 7.54–7.51 (m, 3H), 7.17–7.12 (m, 1H), 5.35 (m, 1H), 3.58 (m, 2H), 2.46 (m, 7H), 2.38–2.33 (m, 3H), 2.28 (s, 3H), 1.75–1.65 (m, 2H), 1.62–1.52 (m, 2H), 1.50–1.40 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 169.93 (C), 159.1 (C), 153.4 (C), 137.5 (C), 133.7 (CH), 129.6 (CH), 129.5 (2 CH), 128.5 (2 CH), 127.5 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 122.2 (CH), 118.4 (C), 58.6 (CH2), 55.1 (2 CH2), 53.2 (2 CH2), 46.0 (CH3), 41.4 (CH2), 29.5 (CH2), 26.6 (CH2), 24.9 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 390.3 [M + H]+.
4-Phenyl-N-[5-(piperazin-1-yl)pentyl]quinazolin-2-amine (9m). Yield: 155 mg, 56%; orange oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.78 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.70–7.64 (m, 4H), 7.52 (t, 3H, J = 3.2 Hz), 7.14 (quintuplet, 1H, J = 4.1 Hz), 5.32 (t, 1H, J = 5.4 Hz), 3.58 (quadruplet, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz), 2.90 (t, 4H, J = 4.9 Hz), 2.45–2.33 (m + t, 7H, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.70 (quintuplet, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.59–1.42 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 170.1 (C), 159.2 (C), 153.5 (C), 153.5 (C), 137.6 (C), 133.8 (CH), 129.7 (CH), 129.6 (2 CH), 128.6 (2 CH), 127.6 (CH), 126.2 (CH), 122.3 (CH), 118.6 (C), 59.3 (CH2), 54.5 (2 CH2), 46.1 (2 CH2), 41.5 (CH2), 29.7 (CH2), 26.5 (CH2), 25.1 (CH2).LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 376.4 [M + H]+.
Tert-butyl 4-{5-[(4-phenylquinazolin-2-yl)amino]pentyl}piperazine-1-carboxylate (9n). Yield: 81 mg, 41%; orange oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.79 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.70–7.65 (m, 4H), 7.54–7.52 (m + t, 3H, J = 3.2 Hz), 7.15 (quintuplet, 1H, J = 4.1 Hz), 5.30 (m, 1H), 3.59 (quadruplet, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz), 3.42 (t, 4H, J = 5.0 Hz), 2.38–2.32 (m, 6H), 1.75–1.68 (m, 2H), 1.59–1.45 (m, 13H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 170.1 (C), 159.2 (C), 154.9 (C), 153.5 (C), 137.6 (C), 133.8 (CH), 129.8 (CH), 129.6 (2 CH), 128.6 (2 CH), 127.6 (CH), 126.2 (CH), 122.3 (CH), 118.6 (C), 79.7 (C), 58.7 (CH2), 53.2 (2 CH2), 41.5 (3 CH2), 29.7 (CH2), 28.6 ((CH3)3), 26.7 (CH2), 25.0 (CH2).LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 476.4 [M + H]+.
4-Phenyl-N-(5-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)pentyl)quinazolin-2-amine (9o). Yield: 107 mg, 49%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.80–7.78 (m, 1H), 7.71–7.65 (m, 4H), 7.55–7.52 (m, 3H), 7.17–7.12 (m, 1H), 5.36 (m, 1H), 3.59 (m, 2H), 2.55–2.53 (m, 4H), 2.52–2.46 (m, 2H), 1.82–1.78 (m, 4H), 1.73–1.69 (m, 2H), 1.66–1.58 (m, 2H), 1.52–1.45 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 169.9 (C), 159.0 (C), 153.4 (C), 137.2 (C), 134.1 (CH), 129.9 (CH), 129.6 (2 CH), 128.5 (2 CH), 127.7 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 122.6 (CH), 119.2 (CH) 55.5 (CH2), 53.5 (2 CH2), 40.9 (CH2), 28.9 (CH2), 25.3 (CH2), 24.1 (CH2), 23.4 (2 CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 361.2 [M + H]+.
N1,N1-Diethyl-N5-(4-phenylquinazolin-2-yl)pentane-1,5-diamine (9p). Yield: 103 mg, 45%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.81–7.78 (m, 1H), 7.71–7.65 (m, 4H), 7.56–7.52 (m, 3H), 7.18–7.12 (m, 1H), 5.35 (m, 1H), 3.59 (m, 2H), 2.55 (q, 4H, J = 7.34 Hz), 2.48–2.43 (m, 2H), 1.71 (m, 2H), 1.59–1.40 (m, 4H), 1.03 (t, 6H, J = 7.40 Hz). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 169.9 (C), 159.1 (C), 153.5 (C), 137.5 (C), 133.7 (CH), 129.6 (CH), 129.5 (2 CH), 128.4 (2 CH), 127.5 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 122.2 (CH), 118.4 (C), 52.7 (CH2), 46.8 (2 CH3), 41.5 (CH2), 29.6 (CH2), 26.6 (CH2), 25.1 (CH2), 11.5 (2 CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 363.2 [M + H]+.
N-(5-(3,4-Dihydroisoquinolin-2(1H)-yl)pentyl)-4-phenylquinazolin-2-amine (9q). Yield: 44 mg, 36%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.82–7.79 (m, 1H), 7.72–7.66 (m, 4H), 7.56–7.53 (m, 3H), 7.19–7.09 (m, 4H), 7.03–7.00 (m, 1H), 5.35–5.32 (m, 1H), 3.65–3.59 (m, 4H), 2.91 (t, 2H, J = 5.6 Hz), 2.73 (t, 2H, J = 5.7 Hz), 2.56–2.52 (m, 2H), 1.78–1.65 (m, 4H), 1.57–1.27 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 170.03 (C), 158.9 (C), 153.4 (C), 137.4 (C), 133.8 (C), 130.0 (C), 129.6 (CH), 129.6 (2 CH), 128.6 (CH), 128.5 (2 CH), 128.3 (CH), 128.2 (CH), 128.1 (CH), 127.9 (CH), 127.8 (CH), 127.7 (CH), 122.7 (CH), 118.2 (C), 56.8 (CH2), 54.4 (CH2), 50.0 (CH2), 41.2 (CH2), 29.4 (CH2), 26.9 (CH2), 25.6 (CH2), 24.6 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 423.4 [M + H]+.
N-(5-(4-Benzylpiperidin-1-yl)pentyl)-4-phenylquinazolin-2-amine (9r). Yield: 80 mg, 50%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.81–7.78 (m, 1H), 7.72–7.65 (m, 4H), 7.55–7.53 (m, 3H), 7.30–7.12 (m, 6H), 5.38 (m, 1H), 3.58 (m, 2H), 2.94–2.90 (m, 2H), 2.53 (d, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 2.35–2.30 (m, 2H), 1.90–1.81 (m, 2H), 1.72–1.65 (m, 2H), 1.61–1.51 (m, 4H), 1.49–1.39 (m, 3H), 1.36–1.27 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 169.9 (C), 159.1 (C), 153.5 (C), 140.7 (C), 137.5 (C), 133.7 (CH), 129.6 (CH), 129.5 (2 CH), 129.1 (2 CH), 128.5 (2 CH), 128.1 (2 CH), 127.5 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 125.8 (CH), 122.2 (CH), 118.4 (C), 59.0 (CH2), 54.0 (2 CH2), 43.2 (CH2), 41.4 (2 CH2), 38.0 (CH2), 32.1 (CH2), 29.6 (CH2), 26.7 (CH), 25.1 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 465.3 [M + H]+.
N1-(4-phenylquinazolin-2-yl)pentane-1,5-diamine (9s). Yield: 50 mg, 39%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.79–7.76 (m, 1H), 7.71–7.65 (m, 4H), 7.56–7.53 (m, 3H), 7.18–7.12 (m, 1H), 5.53 (m, 1H), 3.60 (m, 2H), 2.69–2.65 (m, 2H), 2.46 (m, 2H), 1.74–1.70 (m, 2H), 1.54–1.53 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 170.0 (C), 159.0 (C), 153.4 (C), 137.5 (C), 133.8 (CH), 129.7 (CH), 129.5 (2 CH), 128.5 (2 CH), 127.5 (CH), 126.0 (CH), 122.2 (CH), 118.4 (C), 41.7 (CH2), 41.1 (CH2), 32.5 (CH2), 29.2 (CH2), 24.0 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 307.2 [M + H]+.
4-Phenyl-N-(6-(piperidin-1-yl)hexyl)quinazolin-2-amine (9t). Yield: 163 mg, 54%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.80–7.77 (m, 1H), 7.71–7.64 (m, 4H), 7.54–7.52 (m, 3H), 7.17–7.11 (m, 1H), 5.37 (m, 1H), 3.57 (m, 2H), 2.37 (m, 4H), 2.31–2.26 (m, 2H), 1.72–1.63 (m, 2H), 1.63–1.55 (m, 4H), 1.52–1.32 (m, 8H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 169.9 (C), 159.1 (C), 153.5 (C), 137.5 (C), 133.6 (CH), 129.6 (CH), 129.5 (2 CH), 128.5 (2 CH), 127.5 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 122.1 (CH), 118.4 (C), 59.5 (CH2), 54.6 (2 CH2), 41.5 (CH2), 29.6 (CH2), 27.5 (CH2), 26.9 (CH2), 26.8 (CH2), 25.9 (2 CH2), 24.5 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 390.3 [M + H]+.
4-Phenyl-N-(7-(piperidin-1-yl)heptyl)quinazolin-2-amine (9u). Yield: 150 mg, 75%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.81–7.78 (m, 1H), 7.72–7.65 (m, 4H), 7.56–7.52 (m, 3H), 7.18–7.12 (m, 1H), 5.31 (m, 1H), 3.58 (m, 2H), 2.39 (m, 4H), 2.33–2.28 (m, 2H), 1.70–1.65 (m, 2H), 1.63–1.57 (m, 4H), 1.55–1.49 (m, 2H), 1.47–1.39 (m, 4H), 1.36–1.26 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 169.9 (C), 159.0 (C), 153.4 (C), 137.5 (C), 133.7 (CH), 129.6 (CH), 129.5 (2 CH), 128.5 (2 CH), 127.5 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 122.2 (CH), 118.4 (C), 59.4 (CH2), 54.5 (2 CH2), 41.5 (CH2), 29.6 (CH2), 29.3 (CH2), 27.6 (CH2), 26.9 (CH2), 26.5 (CH2), 25.6 (2 CH2), 24.2 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 403.3 [M + H]+.
6-Bromo-4-(furan-2-yl)-N-[5-(piperidin-1-yl)pentyl]quinazolin-2-amine (9v). Yield: 85 mg, 39%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.77 (d, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz), 7.79 (dd, 1H, J = 0.8 Hz, J = 1.7 Hz), 7.72 (dd, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.48 (d, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.44 (d, 1H, J = 3.3 Hz), 6.67 (dd, 1H, J = 1.7 Hz, J = 3.4 Hz), 5.37 (t, 1H, J = 5.6 Hz, NH), 5.37 (t, 2H, J = 6.2 Hz), 2.90–2.84 (m, 3H), 1.99–1.94 (m, 5H), 1.77–1.70 (m, 4H), 1.55–1.44 (m, 4H), 1.27–1.22 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 159.1 (C), 155.8 (C), 152.8 (C), 145.8 (C), 136.9 (C), 129.1 (CH), 128.0 (CH), 117.7 (CH), 115.8 (C), 115.5 (2 CH), 112.3 (CH), 57.5 (2 CH2), 53.3 (CH2), 41.0 (CH2), 29.1 (CH2), 24.3 (CH2), 23.5 (CH2), 22.8 (CH2), 22.4 (2 CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 443.3, 445.2 [M + H]+.
4-(furan-2-yl)-6-methyl-N-[5-(piperidin-1-yl)pentyl]quinazolin-2-amine (9w). Yield: 20 mg, 14%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, (CD3)2CO, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.42 (m, 1H), 7.96 (dd, 1H, J = 0.8 Hz, J = 1.8 Hz), 7.53 (m, 1H), 7.47 (m, 1H), 7.41 (d, 1H, J = 3.2 Hz), 6.74 (dd, 1H, J = 1.9 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz), 6.33 (t, 1H, J = 5.4 Hz), 3.55 (q, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 2.46 (s, 3H), 2.28 (m, 6H), 1.72 (m, 2H), 1.55–1.39 (m, 11H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, (CD3)2CO, δ ppm, J Hz): 159.2 (2 C), 155.6 (C), 153.0 (C), 145.6 (CH), 135.3 (C), 131.6 (CH), 126.1 (CH), 125.3 (C), 116.2 (CH), 114.6 (CH), 111.9 (CH), 59.0 (CH2), 54.5 (CH2), 41.1 (CH2), 29.3 (CH2), 26.6 (CH2), 26.0 (CH2), 24.7 (2 CH2), 24.5 (2 CH2), 20.6 (CH3). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 379.3 [M + H]+.
4-(furan-2-yl)-7-methyl-N-[5-(piperidin-1-yl)pentyl]quinazolin-2-amine (9x). Yield: 20 mg, 14%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.43 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.73 (d, 1H, J = 1.5 Hz), 7.42 (m, 1H), 7.34 (d, 1H, J = 3.4 Hz), 7.07 (dd, 1H, J = 1.7 Hz, J = 8.7 Hz), 6.36 (dd, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, J = 3.4 Hz), 5.26 (t, 1H, J = 5.8 Hz), 3.55 (q, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 2.40 (m, 9H), 1.65 (m, 9H), 1.44 (m, 5H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm, J Hz): 159.2 (C), 156.4 (2 C), 154.2(C), 145.2 (C), 144.5 (CH), 126.5 (CH), 125.3 (CH), 124.9 (CH), 115.2 (C), 114.9 (CH), 112.1 (CH), 58.0 (CH2), 53.6 (CH2), 41.1 (CH2), 29.3 (CH2), 24.5 (CH2), 24.3 (CH2), 23.6 (2 CH2), 22.9 (2 CH2), 22.0 (CH3). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 379.4 [M + H]+.
General procedure for synthesis of compounds 10ad. The formation of quinazoline derivatives was carried out according to published procedures [32]. In a tube were added 2-chloroquinazoline (1.0 eq.), BINAP (0.1 eq.), the corresponding amine (1.0 eq.), Cs2CO3 (3.0 eq.), and palladium diacetate (5%) in 4 mL of anhydrous dioxane. The mixture reaction was degassed for 5 min with a nitrogen flow, and the tube was sealed. The reaction was heated overnight at 130 °C. The mixture was then hydrolyzed with water and extracted three times with EtOAc. Combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. Crude was purified using flash chromatography (DCM/MeOH (10/0 to 9/1)) to afford the corresponding quinazoline.
4-Phenyl-N-(4-(pyridine-2-yl)quinazolin-2-amine (10a). Yield: 249 mg, 67%; brown solid; m.p. 287 °C. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 10.00 (br s, 1H), 8.68–8.63 (m, 1H), 8.34 (ddd, 1H, J = 0.8 Hz, J = 1.9 Hz, J = 4.8 Hz), 7.92–7.76 (m, 6H), 7.68–7.61 (m, 3H), 7.47–7.40 (m, 1H), 7.04 (ddd, 1H, J = 0.9 Hz, J = 4.9 Hz, J = 6.5 Hz). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 170.3 (C), 155.0 (C), 152.6 (C), 152.1 (C), 146.4 (CH), 138.9 (CH), 136.9 (C), 134.1 (2 CH), 130.1 (CH), 129.9 (2 CH), 128.6 (CH), 127.5 (CH), 127.0 (CH), 124.5 (CH), 119.5 (C), 117.5 (CH), 113.3 (CH). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 299.2 [M + H]+.
4-Phenyl-N-(4-(piperidin-1-ylmethyl)phenyl)quinazolin-2-amine (10b). Yield: 150 mg, 71%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6, δ ppm, J Hz): 7.91–7.89 (m, 1H), 7.85–7.72 (m, 6H), 7.59–7.57 (m, 3H), 7.43 (m, 1H), 7.36–7.26 (m, 3H), 3.53 (s, 2H), 2.45 (m, 4H), 1.64–1.59 (m, 4H), 1.47–1.45 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, δ ppm): 170.1 (C), 156.1 (C), 152.8 (C), 138.9 (C), 137.2 (C), 133.9 (CH), 130.1 (CH), 129.9 (CH), 129.8 (CH), 129.6 (2 CH), 128.6 (2 CH), 127.4 (CH), 126.9 (CH), 123.6 (CH), 122.6 (C), 119.1 (C), 118.49 (2 CH), 63.2 (CH2), 54.2 (2 CH2), 25.7 (2 CH2), 24.3 (CH2). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 395.2 [M + H]+.
4-(furan-2-yl)-6-methyl-N-{4-[(piperidin-1-yl)methyl]phenyl}quinazolin-2-amine (10c). Yield: 25 mg, 19%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, (CD3)2CO, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.71 (s, 1H, NH), 8.52 (m, 1H), 8.03 (m, 3H), 7.66 (m, 2H), 7.50 (dd, 1H, J = 0.8 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz), 7.30 (m, 2H), 6.79 (dd, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz), 3.43 (s, 2H), 2.51 (s, 3H), 2.38 (m, 4H), 1.56 (m, 4H), 1.43 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, (CD3)2CO, δ ppm, J Hz): 156.4 (C), 155.6 (C), 153.2 (C), 152.2 (C), 146.0 (C), 139.8 (CH), 135.8 (C), 133.4 (2 CH), 132.1 (C), 129.1 (CH), 126.6 (CH), 125.4 (CH), 118.3 (2 CH), 116.9 (C), 115.4 (CH), 112.2 (CH), 63.1 (CH2), 54.2 (2 CH2), 26.0 (2 CH2), 24.3 (CH2), 20.7 (CH3). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 399.4 [M + H]+.
4-(furan-2-yl)-7-methyl-N-{4-[(piperidin-1-yl)methyl]phenyl}quinazolin-2-amine (10d). Yield: 30 mg, 12%; yellow oil. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD, δ ppm, J Hz): 8.56 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz), 8.44 (s, 1H, NH), 8.00 (m, 2H), 7.90 (d, 1H, J = 1.2 Hz), 7.51 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz), 7.45 (m, 3H), 7.20 (dd, 1H, J = 1.5 Hz, J = 8.8 Hz), 6.73 (dd, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, J = 3.6 Hz), 4.24 (s, 2H), 3.20 (m, 3H), 2.48 (s, 3H), 1.80 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD, δ ppm, J Hz): 156.3 (C), 155.9 (C), 153.3 (C), 153.1 (C), 145.9 (C), 144.9 (CH), 142.4 (C), 131.5 (2 CH), 126.3 (C), 126.1 (CH), 125.2 (CH), 121.4 (CH), 118.7 (2 CH), 115.6 (C), 115.0 (CH), 111.9 (CH), 60.1 (CH2), 52.2 (2 CH2), 22.7 (2 CH2), 21.4 (CH2), 20.7 (CH3). LC-MS (ESI) m/z found: 399.4 [M + H]+.

3.2. Biology

3.2.1. Materials

Adenosine deaminase was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) (Ref: 10102105001). ZM-241385 and CGS-21680 were purchased from MedChem Express (Sollentuna, Sweden, Ref: HY-19532 and HY-13201A). The synthesis of MRS7416 is described in the article by Duroux et al. [38].

3.2.2. Cell Culture and Membrane Preparation

For cell culture and membrane preparation, we were inspired by the protocol described in the article by Kecskes et al. [44]. HEK293T cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin (100 µg/mL), and streptomycin (100 U/mL) and incubated at 5% CO2 and 37 °C. Cells were transfected with ADORA2A plasmid using LipoD293 transfection reagent (SigmaGen, Frederick, MD, USA). Then, 48 h after transfection, cells were lysed with 500 µL of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2 supplemented with protease inhibitors) per 10 cm dish, transferred to a 15 mL conical tube, and incubated for 30 min on ice. The suspension was homogenized with a Branson sonifier with an output of 2 and duty cycle of 50% for 20 s and then was subcellular fractionated to recover the membrane-rich fraction. First, centrifugation at 750 RCF was performed to pellet the nuclei and cell debris, the resultant supernatant was centrifuged at 10,000 RCF for 10 min to pellet the microsomes, and finally the supernatant was centrifuged at 100,000 RCF for 1 h to precipitate the membranes. All the centrifugation steps were performed at 4 °C. The resultant pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer supplemented with 3 U/mL adenosine deaminase and homogenized by brief sonication. The suspension was divided into small aliquots to prevent several freeze–thaw cycles and stored at −80 °C until the binding experiments. The protein concentration was measured using the Bradford assay and adjusted to 9 mg/mL.

3.2.3. FP Binding Assay

Assays were performed in Greiner 384-well black clear-bottom plates. The binding buffer used contained 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 10 mM MgCl2. Competition assays were performed with 2 µL of MRS7416 (final concentration was 10 nM), 2 µL of competitor (final concentration 10 µM–0.1 nM), and 16 µL of A2AR membranes, diluted in buffer solution (final concentration 0.8 mg/mL) in the binding buffer for a total volume of 20 µL. The plate was incubated at 30 °C for 10 min. Fluorescence polarization was read on Clariostar Plus microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany) at λex = 480 nm and λem = 520 nm. Data analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism Software, version 8.3.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and Ki values were calculated using the Cheng–Prusoff equation. The KD (KD = 2 nM) for A2AR membrane preparation was obtained by a kinetic on/off experiment. Displacement reference curves were performed with ZM241385 in accordance with the literature. All compounds were tested in three independent experiments, in duplicate.

3.2.4. cAMP Assay

cAMP assays were conducted using the Lance Ultra cAMP Detection kit (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) in 384-well plates. Stimulation buffer containing 1X Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS), 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 0.1% BSA stabilizer, and 0.5 mM IBMX was prepared. A cAMP standard curve was prepared at 4x the desired final concentration in stimulation buffer, and 10 μL was added to the assay plate. Serial dilutions of compounds were also prepared at 4x the desired final concentration (30 µM–10 nM) in stimulation buffer, and 2.5 μL was added to the assay plate. Following the instructions in the Lance Ultra cAMP Detection kit, a single concentration of the agonist CGS21680, corresponding to the EC80, was prepared at 4x the desired final concentration (4.5 µM) in stimulation buffer. Then, 2.5 µL of this solution was added to the assay plate. The cells were detached by versene action, prepared at a concentration of 5.105 cells per mL in stimulation buffer, and 5 μL was added to each well, except wells containing the cAMP standard curve. After incubating for 30 min at room temperature, Eu-cAMP tracer and uLIGHT-anti-cAMP working solutions were added per the manufacturer’s instructions. After 1 h of incubation at room temperature, the TR-FRET signal (ex 337 nm) was read on a Varioskan Lux multimode plate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Asnières-sur-Seine, France). The TR-FRET signal (665 nm) was converted to fmol cAMP by interpolating from the standard cAMP curve. Fmol cAMP was plotted against the log of compound concentration, and data were fit to a three-parameter logistic curve to generate IC50 values (GraphPad Prism, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). All compounds were tested in three independent experiments, in duplicate.

3.3. Molecular Docking

Molecular modelling studies were performed using AutoDock Vina software, using A2A receptor co-crystallized structure of compound 1 (PDB: 8DU3) as described in R. Bolteau et al. [29]. Data analysis was performed with the UCSF ChimeraX software, version 1.6.1.

4. Conclusions

A new series of A2AR antagonists based on the quinazoline scaffold has been designed and synthesized. Structure–affinity relationship studies on compound 1 (Ki (hA2AR) = 20 nM) at the C6- and C7-positions led to the identification of a highly potent hit compound, 5m, with an impressive affinity of 5 nM for hA2AR. Functional activity assays confirmed the antagonistic effect of 5m, demonstrating a half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 6 µM.
The introduction of aminopentylpiperidine and 4-[(piperidin-1-yl)methyl]aniline chains preserved the binding affinities of the 2-amino-substituted quinazolines (9w, Ki = 61 nM; 9x, Ki = 21 nM; 10c, Ki = 65 nM; 10d, Ki = 15 nM). These modulations also maintained antagonistic activities close to the micromolar range for compounds 9x (IC50 = 9 µM) and 10d (IC50 = 5 µM), similar to compound 5m (IC50 = 6 µM), while improving their solubility. These findings underscore the beneficial effects of C2-position substitutions in quinazolines.
These quinazoline derivatives demonstrated significant potential as potent A2AR antagonists with favorable physicochemical properties. Future studies will focus on testing the most promising compounds in various cell models to assess their applicability in treating neurodegenerative diseases and cancer.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29163847/s1, Figure S1: LC-MS and NMR spectra of compounds 5ap, 9ax and 10ad; Figure S2: Dose-response curve of ZM241385; Figure S3: FP competition binding experiments with compound 1 and some final compounds; Figure S4: cAMP assay of compounds 5m, 9w, 9x, 10c, 10d.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Y., N.L. and P.M.; performance of experiments and preparation of results, A.L., R.D. (Romain Duroux), R.B., R.D. (Robin Dufossez), S.H.-T., M.F., M.C. and M.L.; analysis of data and their interpretation, A.L., R.D. (Romain Duroux), R.B., R.D. (Robin Dufossez), S.R., S.H.-T., M.L., S.Y., N.L. and P.M.; writing, A.L., R.D. (Robin Dufossez), N.L. and P.M.; supervision, S.Y., N.L. and P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Inserm and the University of Lille. Amélie Laversin, Raphaël Bolteau and Romain Duroux are recipients of a fellowship from the University of Lille.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data were provided in this manuscript and supplementary information section.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Kenneth Jacobson and Balaram Pradhan (NIH) for the provision of the MRS7416 probe. The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the Region Hauts-de-France (France), the Ministère de la Jeunesse, de l’Education Nationale et de la Recherche (MJENR), and the Fonds Européens de Développement Régional (FEDER) for funds allowed for the 300 MHz NMR facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

A2AR, A2A adenosine receptor; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; PD, Parkinson’s disease; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; RB, radioligand binding; FP, fluorescence polarization; IC50, inhibitory concentration; Ki, inhibitory constant; SAR, structure–activity relationship; GABA, acid gamma-aminobutyrique; PDB, protein database; BINAP, 2,2′-bis(diphenylphosphino)-1,1′-binaphthyl; DCM, dichloromethane; TBABr, tetrabutylammonium bromide; DIPEA, N,N-diisopropylethylamine; DMF, N,N-dimethylformamide; IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-méthylxanthine; FBS, fetal bovine serum; DMEM, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle medium; RCF, relative centrifugal force; HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid; KD, equilibrium dissociation constant; PE, petroleum ether; TFA, trifluoroacetic acid.

References

  1. Gessi, S.; Merighi, S.; Varani, K.; Borea, P.A. Adenosine Receptors in Health and Disease. Adv. Pharmacol. 2011, 61, 41–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sheth, S.; Brito, R.; Mukherjea, D.; Rybak, L.P.; Ramkumar, V. Adenosine Receptors: Expression, Function and Regulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 2024–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fredholm, B.B.; IJzerman, A.P.; Jacobson, K.A.; Linden, J.; Müller, C.E. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXI. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors—An Update. Pharmacol. Rev. 2011, 63, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Melani, A.; Cipriani, S.; Vannucchi, M.G.; Nosi, D.; Donati, C.; Bruni, P.; Giovannini, M.G.; Pedata, F. Selective Adenosine A2a Receptor Antagonism Reduces JNK Activation in Oligodendrocytes after Cerebral Ischaemia. Brain J. Neurol. 2009, 132 Pt 6, 1480–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, X.X.; Nomura, T.; Aihara, H.; Nishizaki, T. Adenosine Enhances Glial Glutamate Efflux via A2a Adenosine Receptors. Life Sci. 2001, 68, 1343–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rebola, N.; Rodrigues, R.J.; Oliveira, C.R.; Cunha, R.A. Different Roles of Adenosine A1, A2A and A3 Receptors in Controlling Kainate-Induced Toxicity in Cortical Cultured Neurons. Neurochem. Int. 2005, 47, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lopes, L.V.; Cunha, R.A.; Kull, B.; Fredholm, B.B.; Ribeiro, J.A. Adenosine A(2A) Receptor Facilitation of Hippocampal Synaptic Transmission Is Dependent on Tonic A(1) Receptor Inhibition. Neuroscience 2002, 112, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Laurent, C.; Eddarkaoui, S.; Derisbourg, M.; Leboucher, A.; Demeyer, D.; Carrier, S.; Schneider, M.; Hamdane, M.; Müller, C.E.; Buée, L.; et al. Beneficial Effects of Caffeine in a Transgenic Model of Alzheimer’s Disease-like Tau Pathology. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35, 2079–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Dall’Igna, O.P.; Fett, P.; Gomes, M.W.; Souza, D.O.; Cunha, R.A.; Lara, D.R. Caffeine and Adenosine A2a Receptor Antagonists Prevent β-Amyloid (25–35)-Induced Cognitive Deficits in Mice. Exp. Neurol. 2007, 203, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arendash, G.W.; Schleif, W.; Rezai-Zadeh, K.; Jackson, E.K.; Zacharia, L.C.; Cracchiolo, J.R.; Shippy, D.; Tan, J. Caffeine Protects Alzheimer’s Mice against Cognitive Impairment and Reduces Brain β-Amyloid Production. Neuroscience 2006, 142, 941–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dall’lgna, O.P.; Porciúncula, L.O.; Souza, D.O.; Cunha, R.A.; Lara, D.R. Neuroprotection by Caffeine and Adenosine A 2A Receptor Blockade of β-Amyloid Neurotoxicity: Special Report. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2003, 138, 1207–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kalda, A.; Yu, L.; Oztas, E.; Chen, J.-F. Novel Neuroprotection by Caffeine and Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonists in Animal Models of Parkinson’s Disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 2006, 248, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Merighi, S.; Borea, P.A.; Varani, K.; Vincenzi, F.; Jacobson, K.A.; Gessi, S. A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Curr. Med. Chem. 2022, 29, 4138–4151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Popoli, P.; Blum, D.; Martire, A.; Ledent, C.; Ceruti, S.; Abbracchio, M.P. Functions, Dysfunctions and Possible Therapeutic Relevance of Adenosine A2A Receptors in Huntington’s Disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 2007, 81, 331–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jazayeri, A.; Andrews, S.P.; Marshall, F.H. Structurally Enabled Discovery of Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonists. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kolahdouzan, M.; Hamadeh, M.J. The Neuroprotective Effects of Caffeine in Neurodegenerative Diseases. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2017, 23, 272–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Laurent, C.; Burnouf, S.; Ferry, B.; Batalha, V.L.; Coelho, J.E.; Baqi, Y.; Malik, E.; Marciniak, E.; Parrot, S.; Van der Jeugd, A.; et al. A2A Adenosine Receptor Deletion Is Protective in a Mouse Model of Tauopathy. Mol. Psychiatry 2016, 21, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Flaten, V.; Laurent, C.; Coelho, J.E.; Sandau, U.; Batalha, V.L.; Burnouf, S.; Hamdane, M.; Humez, S.; Boison, D.; Lopes, L.V.; et al. From Epidemiology to Pathophysiology: What about Caffeine in Alzheimer’s Disease? Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014, 42, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Currais, A.; Kato, K.; Canuet, L.; Ishii, R.; Tanaka, T.; Takeda, M.; Soriano, S. Caffeine Modulates Tau Phosphorylation and Affects Akt Signaling in Postmitotic Neurons. J. Mol. Neurosci. MN 2011, 43, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jenner, P. Istradefylline, a Novel Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonist, for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2005, 14, 729–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Preti, D.; Baraldi, P.G.; Moorman, A.R.; Borea, P.A.; Varani, K. History and Perspectives of A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists as Potential Therapeutic Agents. Med. Res. Rev. 2015, 35, 790–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yu, F.; Zhu, C.; Xie, Q.; Wang, Y. Adenosine A 2A Receptor Antagonists for Cancer Immunotherapy: Miniperspective. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 12196–12212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, C.; Wang, K.; Wang, H. Adenosine in Cancer Immunotherapy: Taking off on a New Plane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Rev. Cancer 2023, 1878, 189005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sun, C.; Wang, B.; Hao, S. Adenosine-A2A Receptor Pathway in Cancer Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 837230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Beatty, J.; Debien, L.; Jeffrey, J.; Leleti, M.; Mandal, D.; Miles, D.; Powers, J.; Rosen, B.; Thomas-Tran, R.; Sharif, E. Azolopyrimidine for the Treatment of Cancer-Related Disorders. 26 July 2018. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2018136700 (accessed on 10 June 2024).
  26. Bell, A.S.; Schreyer, A.M.; Versluys, S. Pyrazolopyrimidine Compounds as Adenosine Receptor Antagonists. 12 December 2019. Available online: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2019233994 (accessed on 27 June 2024).
  27. Payne, A.; Fons, P.; Alt, I.; van Ham, J.; Taubert, C.; Bell, A.; Versluys, S.; Bertrand, F.; Visentin, V.; Mirey, E.; et al. Abstract 1731: EXS21546, a Non-CNS Penetrant A2AR-Selective Antagonist for Anti-Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2021, 81 (Suppl. S13), 1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Müller, C.E.; Jacobson, K.A. Recent Developments in Adenosine Receptor Ligands and Their Potential as Novel Drugs. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1808, 1290–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Van Horn, K.S.; Zhu, X.; Pandharkar, T.; Yang, S.; Vesely, B.; Vanaerschot, M.; Dujardin, J.-C.; Rijal, S.; Kyle, D.E.; Wang, M.Z.; et al. Antileishmanial Activity of a Series of N2,N4-Disubstituted Quinazoline-2,4-Diamines. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 5141–5156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yoo, E.; Salunke, D.B.; Sil, D.; Guo, X.; Salyer, A.C.D.; Hermanson, A.R.; Kumar, M.; Malladi, S.S.; Balakrishna, R.; Thompson, W.H.; et al. Determinants of Activity at Human Toll-like Receptors 7 and 8: Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship (QSAR) of Diverse Heterocyclic Scaffolds. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 7955–7970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Coombs, G.; Sak, M.H.; Miller, S.J. Peptide-Catalyzed Fragment Couplings That Form Axially Chiral Non-C2-Symmetric Biaryls. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 2875–2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Okano, M.; Mito, J.; Maruyama, Y.; Masuda, H.; Niwa, T.; Nakagawa, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Matsuura, A. Discovery and Structure–Activity Relationships of 4-Aminoquinazoline Derivatives, a Novel Class of Opioid Receptor like-1 (ORL1) Antagonists. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 119–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Han, J.; Kaspersen, S.J.; Nervik, S.; Nørsett, K.G.; Sundby, E.; Hoff, B.H. Chiral 6-Aryl-Furo[2,3-d]Pyrimidin-4-Amines as EGFR Inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 119, 278–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zwier, J.M.; Roux, T.; Cottet, M.; Durroux, T.; Douzon, S.; Bdioui, S.; Gregor, N.; Bourrier, E.; Oueslati, N.; Nicolas, L.; et al. A Fluorescent Ligand-Binding Alternative Using Tag-Lite® Technology. J. Biomol. Screen. 2010, 15, 1248–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Huwiler, K.G.; De Rosier, T.; Hanson, B.; Vogel, K.W. A Fluorescence Anisotropy Assay for the Muscarinic M1 G-Protein-Coupled Receptor. ASSAY Drug Dev. Technol. 2010, 8, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cornelius, P.; Lee, E.; Lin, W.; Wang, R.; Werner, W.; Brown, J.A.; Stuhmeier, F.; Boyd, J.G.; McClure, K. Design, Synthesis, and Pharmacology of Fluorescently Labeled Analogs of Serotonin: Application to Screening of the 5-HT2C Receptor. SLAS Discov. 2009, 14, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lea, W.A.; Simeonov, A. Fluorescence Polarization Assays in Small Molecule Screening. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2011, 6, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Duroux, R.; Ciancetta, A.; Mannes, P.; Yu, J.; Boyapati, S.; Gizewski, E.; Yous, S.; Ciruela, F.; Auchampach, J.A.; Gao, Z.-G.; et al. Bitopic Fluorescent Antagonists of the A 2A Adenosine Receptor Based on Pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5-c]Pyrimidin-5-Amine Functionalized Congeners. MedChemComm 2017, 8, 1659–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hodgson, R.A.; Bertorelli, R.; Varty, G.B.; Lachowicz, J.E.; Forlani, A.; Fredduzzi, S.; Cohen-Williams, M.E.; Higgins, G.A.; Impagnatiello, F.; Nicolussi, E.; et al. Characterization of the Potent and Highly Selective A2A Receptor Antagonists Preladenant and SCH 412348 [7-[2-[4-2,4-Difluorophenyl]-1-Piperazinyl]Ethyl]-2-(2-Furanyl)-7H-Pyrazolo[4,3-e][1,2,4]Triazolo[1,5-c]Pyrimidin-5-Amine] in Rodent Models of Movement Disorders and Depression. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009, 330, 294–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gillespie, R.J.; Bamford, S.J.; Botting, R.; Comer, M.; Denny, S.; Gaur, S.; Griffin, M.; Jordan, A.M.; Knight, A.R.; Lerpiniere, J.; et al. Antagonists of the Human A2A Adenosine Receptor. 4. Design, Synthesis, and Preclinical Evaluation of 7-Aryltriazolo[4,5-d]Pyrimidines. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Federico, S.; Paoletta, S.; Cheong, S.L.; Pastorin, G.; Cacciari, B.; Stragliotto, S.; Klotz, K.N.; Siegel, J.; Gao, Z.-G.; Jacobson, K.A.; et al. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of a New Series of 1,2,4-Triazolo[1,5-a]-1,3,5-Triazines as Human A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists with Improved Water Solubility. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 877–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Taylor, J.B.; Triggle, D.J. Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry II; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bolteau, R.; Duroux, R.; Laversin, A.; Vreulz, B.; Shiriaeva, A.; Stauch, B.; Han, G.W.; Cherezov, V.; Renault, N.; Barczyk, A.; et al. High Ligand Efficiency Quinazoline Compounds as Novel A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 241, 114620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kecskés, M.; Kumar, T.S.; Yoo, L.; Gao, Z.-G.; Jacobson, K.A. Novel Alexa Fluor-488 Labeled Antagonist of the A2A Adenosine Receptor: Application to a Fluorescence Polarization-Based Receptor Binding Assay. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010, 80, 506–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structures of A2AR antagonists.
Figure 1. Structures of A2AR antagonists.
Molecules 29 03847 g001
Figure 2. Co-crystallized structure of compound 1 bound to the hA2A receptor (PDB code: 8DU3).
Figure 2. Co-crystallized structure of compound 1 bound to the hA2A receptor (PDB code: 8DU3).
Molecules 29 03847 g002
Scheme 1. Synthesis of derivatives 5ap.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of derivatives 5ap.
Molecules 29 03847 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of derivatives 9ax and 10ad.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of derivatives 9ax and 10ad.
Molecules 29 03847 sch002
Figure 3. Predicted binding mode of the new hit 5m (pink) within the co-crystallized structure of compound 1 (cyan) bound to the hA2A receptor (PDB code: 8DU3).
Figure 3. Predicted binding mode of the new hit 5m (pink) within the co-crystallized structure of compound 1 (cyan) bound to the hA2A receptor (PDB code: 8DU3).
Molecules 29 03847 g003
Figure 4. Predicted binding mode of the new hit 5m (pink) within the co-crystallized structure of ZM-241385 (cyan) bound to the hA2A receptor (PDB code: 3EML).
Figure 4. Predicted binding mode of the new hit 5m (pink) within the co-crystallized structure of ZM-241385 (cyan) bound to the hA2A receptor (PDB code: 3EML).
Molecules 29 03847 g004
Figure 5. Predicted binding mode of (A) 5m (pink) and 9x (cyan) and (B) 5m (pink) and 10d (orange) within the hA2A receptor (PDB code: 8DU3).
Figure 5. Predicted binding mode of (A) 5m (pink) and 9x (cyan) and (B) 5m (pink) and 10d (orange) within the hA2A receptor (PDB code: 8DU3).
Molecules 29 03847 g005
Table 1. Modulations at the C4-, C6-, and C7-positions of quinazoline scaffold.
Table 1. Modulations at the C4-, C6-, and C7-positions of quinazoline scaffold.
Molecules 29 03847 i001
CompoundRArhA2AAR
(Ki nM) a
cAMP Assay
IC50 (µM) b
ZM-241385 3 ± 10.1 ± 0.02
16-Br2-furane23 ± 7>30
5a6-Br4-fluorophenyl220 ± 64n.d.
5b6-BrPhenyl92 ± 17n.d.
5c6-CH32-furane45 ± 7>30
5d6-CH34-fluorophenyl283 ± 74n.d.
5e6-CH3Phenyl83 ± 4n.d.
5f6-OMe2-furane>10,000n.d.
5g6-F2-furane>10,000>30
5h6-Cl2-furane28 ± 8>30
5i6-(4-fluorophenyl)4-fluorophenyl>10,000n.d.
5j6-phenylPhenyl318 ± 23n.d.
5k7-Br2-furane28 ± 9>30
5l7-Br4-fluorophenyl150 ± 27n.d.
5m7-CH32-furane5 ± 26 ± 1
5n7-CH34-fluorophenyl73 ± 9n.d.
5o7-CH3Phenyl45 ± 6>30
5p7-Cl2-furane20 ± 18 ± 6
a Ki values were determined from nonlinear analysis of competition curves using MRS7416 as fluorescent probe and are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments, in duplicate. Dose-response curve of ZM241385 was provided in Figure S2. FP competition binding curves were provided in Figure S3. b Ultra LANCE cAMP assay, data are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments, in duplicate. n.d.: not determined. Some cAMP assay curves were provided in Figure S4.
Table 2. Modulations at the C2-position of quinazoline scaffold.
Table 2. Modulations at the C2-position of quinazoline scaffold.
Molecules 29 03847 i002
Cpd.nR1hA2AAR
(Ki nM) a
Cpd.nR1hA2AAR
(Ki nM) a
11 [43]0H203 ± 569j5Piperidine294 ± 37
10a02-pyridine>10,0009k5Morpholine674 ± 96
9a04-benzylpiperidine1110 ± 4129l5Methylpiperazine790 ± 126
10b04-(piperidin-1-ylmethyl)benzene52 ± 169m5Piperazine687 ± 192
9b12-pyridine>10,0009n5Boc-piperazine1218 ± 385
9c1Phenyl>10,0009o5Pyrrolidine519 ± 44
9d14-benzonitrile>10,0009p5Diethylamine310 ± 107
9e14-methoxyphenyl>10,0009q5Tetrahydroisoquinoline297 ± 86
9f24-phenol1453 ± 4059r54-benzylpiperidine927 ± 146
9g2Piperidine1781 ± 3159s5NH2>10,000
9h3Piperidine1335 ± 4829t6Piperidine233 ± 68
9i4Piperidine469 ± 839u7Piperidine834 ± 91
a Ki values were determined from nonlinear analysis of competition curves using MRS7416 as fluorescent probe and are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments, in duplicate. FP competition binding curves were provided in Figure S3.
Table 3. Modulations at the C2-position and solubility properties of 4-(furan-2-yl)quinazolin-2-amine derivatives.
Table 3. Modulations at the C2-position and solubility properties of 4-(furan-2-yl)quinazolin-2-amine derivatives.
Molecules 29 03847 i003
Cpd.R1R2hA2AAR
(Ki nM) a
cAMP Assay
IC50 (µM) b
Solubility (mM) c
16-BrH23 ± 7>300.15
9v6-Br(CH2)5-piperidine>10,000n.d.14.15
5c6-CH3H45 ± 7>300.10
9w6-CH3(CH2)5-piperidine61 ± 1514 ± 22.15
10c6-CH34-[(piperidin-1-yl)methyl]benzene65 ± 2112 ± 210.3
5m7-CH3H5 ± 26 ± 10.8
9x7-CH3(CH2)5-piperidine21 ± 29 ± 512.0
10d7-CH34-[(piperidin-1-yl)methyl]benzene15 ± 25 ± 13.0
a Ki values were determined from nonlinear analysis of competition curves using MRS7416 as fluorescent probe and are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments, in duplicate. Dose-response curve of ZM241385 was provided in Figure S2. FP competition binding curves were provided in Figure S3. b Ultra LANCE cAMP assay, data are expressed as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments, in duplicate. Some cAMP assay curves were provided in Figure S4. c Solubility measured in PBS pH 7.4 starting from a 4 mg/mL solution in DMSO. n.d.: not determined.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Laversin, A.; Dufossez, R.; Bolteau, R.; Duroux, R.; Ravez, S.; Hernandez-Tapia, S.; Fossart, M.; Coevoet, M.; Liberelle, M.; Yous, S.; et al. Novel Quinazoline Derivatives as Highly Effective A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists. Molecules 2024, 29, 3847. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163847

AMA Style

Laversin A, Dufossez R, Bolteau R, Duroux R, Ravez S, Hernandez-Tapia S, Fossart M, Coevoet M, Liberelle M, Yous S, et al. Novel Quinazoline Derivatives as Highly Effective A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists. Molecules. 2024; 29(16):3847. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163847

Chicago/Turabian Style

Laversin, Amélie, Robin Dufossez, Raphaël Bolteau, Romain Duroux, Séverine Ravez, Sergio Hernandez-Tapia, Martin Fossart, Mathilde Coevoet, Maxime Liberelle, Saïd Yous, and et al. 2024. "Novel Quinazoline Derivatives as Highly Effective A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists" Molecules 29, no. 16: 3847. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163847

APA Style

Laversin, A., Dufossez, R., Bolteau, R., Duroux, R., Ravez, S., Hernandez-Tapia, S., Fossart, M., Coevoet, M., Liberelle, M., Yous, S., Lebègue, N., & Melnyk, P. (2024). Novel Quinazoline Derivatives as Highly Effective A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists. Molecules, 29(16), 3847. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163847

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop