Next Article in Journal
Computational and Experimental Comparison of Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Prepared by Different Functional Monomers—Quantitative Parameters Defined Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Recycled Jute Non-Woven Material Coated with Polyaniline/TiO2 Nanocomposite for Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Water
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolomic Analysis of Carotenoids Biosynthesis by Sphingopyxis sp. USTB-05
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Characterization of Pullulan-Based Packaging Paper for Fruit Preservation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Study for the Sorption and Diffusion of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide into Polyetherimide

by
Wei-Heng Huang
1,†,
Pei-Hua Chen
2,3,†,
Chin-Wen Chen
4,*,
Chie-Shaan Su
5,
Muoi Tang
1,
Jung-Chin Tsai
6,
Yan-Ping Chen
7 and
Feng-Huei Lin
2
1
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Chinese Culture University, Taipei 111396, Taiwan
2
Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106319, Taiwan
3
Department of Orthopedics, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City 235041, Taiwan
4
Department of Molecular Science and Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan
5
Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106344, Taiwan
6
Department of Chemical Engineering, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City 243303, Taiwan
7
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106319, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2024, 29(17), 4233; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174233
Submission received: 30 July 2024 / Revised: 22 August 2024 / Accepted: 30 August 2024 / Published: 6 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Composites: Chemical Synthesis and Applications)

Abstract

:
Supercritical carbon dioxide (SCCO2) is a non-toxic and environmentally friendly fluid and has been used in polymerization reactions, processing, foaming, and plasticizing of polymers. Exploring the behavior and data of SCCO2 sorption and dissolution in polymers provides essential information for polymer applications. This study investigated the sorption and diffusion of SCCO2 into polyetherimide (PEI). The sorption and desorption processes of SCCO2 in PEI samples were measured in the temperature range from 40 to 60 °C, the pressure range from 20 to 40 MPa, and the sorption time from 0.25 to 52 h. This study used the ex situ gravimetric method under different operating conditions and applied the Fickian diffusion model to determine the mass diffusivity of SCCO2 during sorption and desorption processes into and out of PEI. The equilibrium mass gain fraction of SCCO2 into PEI was reported from 9.0 wt% (at 60 °C and 20 MPa) to 12.8 wt% (at 40 °C and 40 MPa). The sorption amount increased with the increasing SCCO2 pressure and decreased with the increasing SCCO2 temperature. This study showed the crossover phenomenon of equilibrium mass gain fraction isotherms with respect to SCCO2 density. Changes in the sorption mechanism in PEI were observed when the SCCO2 density was at approximately 840 kg/m3. This study qualitatively performed FTIR analysis during the SCCO2 desorption process. A CO2 antisymmetric stretching mode was observed near a wavenumber of 2340 cm−1. A comparison of loss modulus measurements of pure and SCCO2-treated PEI specimens showed the shifting of loss maxima. This result showed that the plasticization of PEI was achieved through the sorption process of SCCO2.

1. Introduction

Studying the sorption behavior of gas or penetrant in synthetic polymers is of great importance for fundamental research and technological applications and has been discussed in recent reviews [1,2,3,4]. Many important developments exist in applying polymer materials with low- or high-pressure carbon dioxide (CO2), as described below. Polymer-containing materials have been used in zero-emission pathways for CO2 capture or CO2 transport chain, where gas sorption, selectivity, and polymer modification are interesting topics [5,6]. Regarding material processing, the sorption of supercritical CO2 (SCCO2) into polymers is of great importance for the surface modification or foaming of substrates. SCCO2 has widely been used in the above processing of polymer materials due to its good diffusion coefficient, low viscosity, and safety considerations [7,8]. Modifiers are injected into the polymer substrate through sorption of SCCO2, which is the first step to be considered when controlling polymer properties such as surface grafting. Foaming and surface modification of polymers using SCCO2 as the blowing agent or as a green solvent for reaction medium to produce medical or biocompatible value-added products have recently been reviewed [9,10], where SCCO2 solubility data are essentially needed. Surface graft polymerization is an example of minimizing protein fouling in protein recovery application [11] or enhancing the hydrophilicity of versatile commodity polymers [12]. Processing polymeric materials requires information on the phase equilibrium and transport properties of SCCO2 in the polymer matrix. The polymer modification strategy as an oxygenator in extracorporeal respiratory circulation or grafting hydrophilic 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) monomer onto polyacrylonitrile (PAN) polymer substrate to obtain ultrafiltration biomedical materials requires information on the sorption and diffusion between SCCO2 and polymers [10,13,14].
The sorption and transport of SCCO2 in polymers was recently studied theoretically by Ricci et al. [15]. Experimental studies for the sorption amounts and diffusion coefficients of SCCO2 in various polymer substrates have been reported in the literature [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. The recent literature shows that the availability of thermodynamic and transport properties (e.g., solubility and diffusivity) of SCCO2–polymer mixtures is limited [15], and more experimental data on various polymer systems are still needed. The gravimetric technique is the most common method used to measure the amount and rate of SCCO2 sorption into polymers. The gravimetric method records the rate of weight change in a polymer sample after soaking in SCCO2 at a given temperature, pressure, and sorption time. The Fickian mass transfer model then analyzes the recorded data to evaluate the diffusivity of SCCO2 into or out from the polymer or copolymer membrane samples [24,25]. The results of these fundamental studies supply essential information for SCCO2-assisted polymer processing, as shown in a previous review article [26]. Fundamental data on the sorption and desorption diffusivities of SCCO2 in many unstudied polymers, copolymers, or polymer blend systems are still needed. These data can enable new applications of polymer modification to produce value-added products such as drug delivery foams and films, biomedical devices, and biodegradable materials in tissue engineering [4].
In this study, we report the experimental measurement results for the sorption and diffusion of SCCO2 into polyetherimide (PEI). PEI is an amorphous thermoplastic polymer with chemical stability and ductile properties for various applications. It has been illustrated that PEI is a candidate for biomedical usage, such as intraocular lenses, biosensors, or neuroprostheses [27]. The PEI backbone can be modified through wet chemistry to prepare membranes for artificial organs. Feng et al. [28] have presented using SCCO2/ethanol co-foaming technology to fabricate PEI bead foams with three-dimensional geometry for special engineering plastic materials in high-tech industries. The production of PEI nanofoams has been presented by Aher et al. [29] using SCCO2 as the blowing agent. They studied the sorption of SCCO2 at 20 MPa into the commercially available PEI sheets. The diffusion coefficients at 0 °C and room temperature (23 °C) were experimentally determined. The equilibrium concentration of SCCO2 absorbed in PEI has also been studied by Zhou et al. [30] at pressures from 6 to 10 MPa. They conducted the SCCO2 saturation study in PEI before fabricating the PEI nanofoams with high strength, toughness, and good thermal resistivity. A process map for the foaming temperature and absorbed SCCO2 concentration was developed.
This study aimed to investigate the novel sorption and diffusion of SCCO2 in PEI using the ex situ gravimetric method within a pressure and temperature range (pressure studied at 20, 30, and 40 MPa; temperature studied at 40, 50, and 60 °C). The mass diffusivities were evaluated based on the Fickian diffusion model using experimentally measured data under various experimental conditions. The effects of temperature and pressure on the sorption mass gain fractions and sorption diffusivities are discussed. The equilibrium sorption mass gain fractions depended on the density of SCCO2, where the crossover phenomenon of the absorption isotherms was determined and explained. The desorption behavior of SCCO2 from PEI was analyzed through Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, demonstrating the antisymmetric stretching mode of CO2 trapped in PEI at different desorption times. The plasticization effect of PEI by absorbed SCCO2 was examined using loss modulus measurements, where the measured results of loss maxima were illustrated. These basic data provide helpful information for future applications of PEI, such as being a prime candidate for medical tools [27,31] with good biocompatibility and becoming an integral component of interior panels, electrical enclosures, and aerospace industry [9] due to its flame retardancy and weight reduction potential.

2. Results

2.1. Determination of the Sorption and Desorption Diffusivities of SCCO2 in PEI

For the sorption experiments in this study, we used the ex situ gravimetric method, and the detailed description of the experimental apparatus and procedures is shown in Section 3.2. In the experiments, we measured the desorption mass gain fraction (Md), determined the sorption mass gain fraction (Ms) and the equilibrium sorption mass gain fraction (M) at specific operation conditions. Figure 1 presents the plot of the desorption mass gain fraction Md against the square root of desorption time td, where the sorption experiments were performed at 60 °C, 30 MPa, and various sorption time parameters ts. The different desorption lines shown in Figure 1 were obtained from different PEI sample sheets during the experiments. Detailed experimental procedures are described in Section 3.2, Apparatus and procedures. It is stated in Section 3.3, Data analysis method, that the linear relations between Md with the square root of the desorption time (td)1/2, as represented by Equation (5), demonstrated that the Fickian diffusion model [32] was suitable to fit the experimental data at a short desorption interval. The mass gain fraction of SCCO2 (Ms) absorbed into the PEI sample at the specific sorption time ts parameter was determined as the intercept by extrapolating each desorption line to zero desorption time. This extrapolation method is described in Section 3.2, Apparatus and procedures.
By repeating the desorption experiments using the ex situ gravimetric method under different operating temperatures, pressures, and various sorption time parameters, the sorption mass gain fractions (Ms) under specific sorption conditions were obtained. Figure 2 shows the results at 60 °C and three sorption isobars at 20, 30, and 40 MPa, respectively. For PEI samples with a thickness of 0.6 mm, the SCCO2 sorption amount leveled off after reaching equilibrium around 50 h under all experimental conditions. The leveled-off point yielded experimental data for the equilibrium mass gain fraction, M. The regression results of the sorption curves for each isobar were satisfactory and are displayed in Figure 2.
The M values were determined by plateauing the isobaric Ms data, and these values support the necessary information for further polymer processing, such as foaming or grafting. This study also obtained similar experimental results for three isobars at 40 and 50 °C, respectively. All these experimental data were used to evaluate the sorption diffusivity Ds and desorption diffusivity Dd for long sorption time and short desorption time, respectively. A linear plot method was employed to determine the diffusivity data described in Equations (4) and (5) in Section 3.3. Table 1 lists the diffusivity results for SCCO2 sorption and desorption in PEI for three isobars at 40, 50, and 60 °C, respectively. The density data listed in Table 1 for pure CO2 were retrieved from the NIST database [33]. It can be observed from Table 1 that at the lowest temperature and highest pressure of 40 °C and 40 MPa, the highest sorption mass gain fraction of SCCO2 in PEI is 12.8 wt%. The M values measured in this study are consistent with values reported in the literature [29], which reported that M for PEI was approximately 10 wt% at 20 MPa and 45 °C.
Figure 3 shows a graphical representation of the equilibrium sorption mass gain fraction (M) for three isotherms at different pressures, including all experimental data in this study. The equilibrium sorption mass gain fraction at a constant temperature increased with the increasing pressure. Taking the 60 °C isotherm as an example, M of 7.9 wt% was obtained at a low pressure of 13.5 MPa, and M of 14.1 wt% was obtained at a high pressure of 58.3 MPa. Figure 3 also indicates that M decreased with increasing temperature at constant pressure. The literature mentions that the spectroscopic results showed that CO2 has specific interactions with various polymers. This interaction has exothermic properties, resulting in reduced solubility of CO2 in the polymer at higher temperatures under isobaric conditions [20,34,35,36]. The same trend was found in the literature on SCCO2 sorption in polycarbonate (PC) and polysulfone (PSF) [24,25], as well as poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) [37]. Compared with the experimental results in the literature, the M values of polycarbonate (PC) polymer were relatively higher than those of polysulfone (PSF) [24,25] and PEI. Under the same temperature and pressure conditions, the M values of PEI measured in this study are close to those of PSF. The interactions between CO2 and functional groups in various polymer matrices may be responsible for these findings. The interaction between CO2 and the carbonyl groups of PC increased the amount of CO2 absorbed in the polymer, as described in the literature, where this interaction has been studied using experimental or theoretical methods [38,39,40,41,42,43].

2.2. The Sorption Mechanism of SCCO2 in PEI

Furthermore, Figure 4 shows a plot of M versus SCCO2 density for the three isotherms in this study, where concave upward curves were observed. The continuous curves in Figure 4 were obtained by optimal regression of the experimental results. The crossover phenomena is observed in Figure 4. According to the previous literature studies [44,45], the change in the slope of the isotherm shown in Figure 4 may indicate that the PEI polymer has been plasticized. Figure 4 also shows the crossover point with a SCCO2 density of approximately 840 kg/m3. At lower densities below the crossover point, the solubility of SCCO2 in PEI decreased with increasing temperature. SCCO2 solubility increased with temperature when the density was above the crossover point. When the SCCO2 density exceeds 840 kg/m3, the 40 and 50 °C isotherms are close to each other, but the 50 °C data are still slightly higher than the 40 °C data. The same concave upward curves of SCCO2 solubility isotherms were also found in previous studies for polymers of PC and poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET) [24,44].
Crossover phenomena show the transfer of sorption mechanisms in polymers of different density states. Gas sorption in polymers has been discussed and reviewed through various physical and mathematical models [46,47,48,49]. Experimentally measured gas sorption and desorption data in polymers can be interpreted based on these theoretical considerations. In the lower-density region of SCCO2, the CO2 molecular sorption model was dominated by the solubility of CO2 in the glassy state of the polymer. The density or solvent power was higher for SCCO2 at lower temperatures, leading to a larger equilibrium sorption mass gain fraction (M). When the SCCO2 density exceeded the crossover point or the penetration concentration [44] where the glass transition occurred, the mobility of the polymer chains increased to a higher degree due to the greater sorption of SCCO2. With increasing temperature, more plasticization effects existed in higher density regions, as shown in Figure 4. Similar crossover behavior was also expressed in the literature on SCCO2 sorption in PC and PET [24,44]. In the lower-density region, it is assumed that dual-mode absorption was appropriate for the mass transfer mechanism, where SCCO2 was absorbed up to the second layer of the polymer substrate. At higher densities beyond the crossover point, the polymer may transit from a glassy to a rubbery state, producing a Fickian diffusion pattern. However, the crossover density value depends on the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the various polymers. PET had a crossover density of approximately 400 kg/m3 and a Tg of approximately 75 °C [44,50], while PC had a crossover density of approximately 680 kg/m3 and a Tg of approximately 150 °C [21,51,52]. The measured Tg of the PEI sample used in this study was approximately 217 °C, consistent with the literature data [53]. Due to the higher Tg, PEI reasonably corresponded to a higher crossover density of 840 kg/m3.

2.3. Comparison of SCCO2 Diffusivities in Various Polymers

According to Equation (5) presented in Section 3.3, the desorption diffusivity Dd was evaluated from the linear slope values from the plots of (Md/Ms) against (td)1/2. The plot of Dd against M is shown in Figure 5 for three temperatures with the experimental data obtained in this study. The continuous curve in Figure 5 was obtained by optimal regression of the experimental results. It is observed from Figure 5 that the desorption diffusivities increased significantly with increasing equilibrium SCCO2 mass gain fraction in the PEI polymer substrate. Under the conditions of 40 °C and 40 MPa, the Dd of SCCO2 in the PEI matrix was 1.47 × 10−11 m2/s, in which the sorption mass gain fraction of SCCO2 was 12.8 wt%. The Dd measured in this study at 60 °C and 13.5 MPa was 0.23 × 10−11 m2/s, in which the sorption mass gain fraction of SCCO2 was 7.9 wt%. This trend is in agreement with the results of the literature on SCCO2 desorption in PVC, PC, and PSF polymers [24,25,37].
As given in Table 1, Ds values increased with temperature but had relatively little dependence on pressure. The largest Ds value was 0.30 × 10−11 m2/s at 60 °C and 20 MPa. Sorption at higher temperatures accelerated CO2 molecules to fill into the sites of the polymer substrate with higher kinetic energy and, therefore, increased Ds. Due to higher polymer chain mobility at higher temperatures, the driving force of mass transfer would rise, and the drag force for the motion of CO2 molecules in the polymer would decrease.
PEI exhibited the lowest sorption and desorption diffusivities compared to PC and PSF, which may be due to the physical properties of these polymers. The glass transition temperature of PEI is up to 217 °C [53], which is higher than 150 °C for PC [21,51,52] and 185 to 187 °C for PSF [54,55]. Studies have also found that the yield strength of PEI was 100 to 110 MPa (room temperature) [56,57]. The yield strengths of PC and PSF were approximately 65 MPa and 75 MPa, respectively [58,59]. It can also be observed from Table 1 that the Dd values were greater than Ds, and other polymers of PSF and PC also showed a similar trend [24,25]. During the sorption process, dissolved CO2 must overcome the interaction forces between polymer chains. The desorption process was carried out under atmospheric pressure; there was a significant pressure drop, and the polymer matrix has also been plasticized during the sorption process. This is the reason why Dd is larger than Ds for PC, PSF, and PEI polymers. However, Muth et al. [37] reported that Ds values were larger than Dd for PVC polymer. This might be due to the fact that PVC has relatively smaller yield strength (about 45 MPa) and lower Tg (about 82 °C) [60], which was favorable for gas sorption.

2.4. Plasticization Effect for the Sorption of SCCO2 in PEI

Plasticization refers to changes in a given polymer’s thermal or mechanical properties, including a decrease in its stiffness and a decrease in its glass transition temperature. Polymer processing using SCCO2 allows for control of polymer properties such as viscosity and plasticity. In the above discussion of the sorption and desorption diffusivities of CO2 in PC, PSF, and PEI, the plasticization effect of absorbed CO2 explains the differences in diffusivity values. During the sorption process, the polymer matrix initially existed in a state of entangled bonds. CO2 required a stronger driving force for mass transfer to overcome the greater resistance due to the lower mobility of the polymer chains. During desorption, the polymer matrix was swollen and plasticized by CO2 to have higher chain mobility. CO2 molecules experienced less resistance, thereby increasing the desorption rate of CO2 from the polymer matrix. The existence of CO2 in PEI was qualitatively investigated in this study by examining the characteristic FTIR spectra. Figure 6 compares the FTIR spectra of untreated PEI and PEI desorbed for 24 h after SCCO2 sorption treatment for 12 h at 20 MPa and 40 °C. The trapped CO2 within the PEI specimen can be observed from the spectra with the CO2 bending mode (ν2) near 660 cm−1 and the antisymmetric stretching mode (ν3) near 2340 cm−1.
Figure 7 shows the antisymmetric stretching pattern (ν3) around 2340 cm−1 for trapped CO2 in PEI specimens at different desorption times. Spectra (a) and (i) represent FTIR results for pure gaseous CO2 and PEI, respectively. As shown in spectra (b) to (d), the bands appear to have very broad widths over the desorption interval of 120 s to 4 h. As the desorption time increased, the decrease in transmission bandwidth indicated the desorption of CO2 from PEI. The IR transmittance shows that CO2 still existed in the PEI substrate 72 h after being discharged from the high-pressure cell, and the peak in the spectrum (g) still appeared near the wavenumber at 2340 cm−1. The phenomena in Figure 7 qualitatively shows that CO2 remained in PEI after various desorption times.
The SEM images of the untreated PEI and the SCCO2-treated PEI (under the process condition of 40 °C, 20 MPa, and sorption time for 12 h) are presented in Figure 8. Compared to the untreated PEI in Figure 8a, microstructure change and surface deformation were observed for SCCO2-treated PEI in Figure 8b. This morphology change also qualitatively implies the plasticization effect during the sorption and desorption of SCCO2 in PEI.
Figure 9 shows loss modulus curves of (a) untreated PEI, (b) PEI after sorption in SCCO2 at 20 MPa and 40 °C for 12 h, and (c) PEI under previous SCCO2-treated conditions that had been depressurized in the atmosphere for more than one month. The maximum loss modulus of untreated PEI was 233 °C, while that of treated PEI was 227 °C. This shift in loss maxima was attributed to the plasticization of the PEI substrate with the increase in polymer chain mobility. This result also corresponds to the fact that Dd was greater than Ds for SCCO2 in PEI. Moreover, when the SCCO2-treated PEI was depressurized for over one month, the maximum loss modulus returned to 232 °C, nearly the same as untreated PEI. It indicated that SCCO2 left no residual in PEI after a long time of depressurization and would have little effect on PEI’s properties.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Material

Polyetherimide (PEI, CAS registry number 61128-46-9, molecular formula (C37H24N2O6)n, melt index 9 g/10 min (at 337 °C, 6.6 kg), density 1.27 g/cm3, glass transition temperature 217 °C) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, UNI-ONWARD Corp., New Taipei City, Taiwan. The structure of PEI is shown in Figure 10. PEI was hot pressed at 240 °C and then cut into dimensions of 40 mm × 10 mm. The membrane sample with a thickness of 0.6 mm for experimental sorption measurements and the membrane samples with a thickness of 0.2 mm were used for FTIR and loss modulus experiments. CO2 was purchased from San-Fu Chemical Company, Taiwan, with a certified purity greater than 99.8%. All chemicals were used as received.

3.2. Apparatus and Procedures

The experimental equipment is shown in Figure 11. The CO2 was stored in the cylinder and compressed to the operating pressure by a syringe pump (ISCO, model 100DX, ISCO, Lincoln, NE, USA). The PEI specimen was weighed using a digital balance (Mettler AE200, Greifensee, Switzerland, sensitivity 0.1 mg) prior to putting it into a stainless steel high-pressure cell with an inner diameter of 5/8 inch and capacity of 10 cm3. The high-pressure cell was maintained at a desired temperature using a constant temperature bath (ISCO, SFX2-10).
At the beginning of the ex situ gravimetric experiment, the original PEI specimen was weighed using a digital balance to record its initial weight, M0. The high-pressure cell was purged with pure CO2 to remove any air inside. Then, with the outlet valve closed, pressurized CO2 from the ISCO injection pump was charged into the high-pressure equilibrium cell. The equilibrium cell reached the preset equilibrium pressure within 10 s.
The pressure and temperature in the cell were dynamically controlled throughout the sorption experiments. After a certain period of sorption time, the cell was depressurized, and the specimen was rapidly taken onto the digital balance at room temperature under atmospheric pressure. The originally dissolved CO2 in the PEI specimen was desorbed as pressure was released. The PEI specimen’s weight was recorded by the digital balance as a function of time. Normally, it takes 30 s during the depressurization process before the digital balance records the first data. At desorption time td, the weight of the PEI membrane was M. The mass gain fraction was calculated by
Mass   gain   fraction   ( wt % ) = M M 0 M 0 × 100 %
During the desorption process, the weight of the PEI sample was measured at every 10-s interval for at least 120 s. These measurement procedures were similar to those in the previous literature, where the ex situ gravimetric method was applied [24,25]. A PEI sample sheet was used only once at a specific sorption temperature, pressure, and sorption time. A number of PEI sample sheets were prepared and used in this study. The weight of the PEI sample decreased with the prolongation of desorption time, and the mass gain fraction curve showed a linear decreasing trend with the square root of desorption time within the first 100 s. A schematic sorption and desorption diagram is shown in Figure 12.
It is presented in Figure 12 that at a sorption or soaking time ts, the mass gain fraction of the PEI specimen owing to the sorption of CO2 was Ms. In the desorption process, the mass gain fraction decreased with the extension of desorption time and became Md at a certain desorption time td. For an initial desorption time of about 100 s, the reduction in mass gain fraction is almost a linear function of the square root of the desorption time td, as shown by the graph inserted in Figure 12. The Ms value was determined by extrapolating the linear portion of the initial desorption curve to zero desorption time, as shown by the point Ms (with the symbol Δ) in the graph inserted in Figure 12. At a long enough sorption time, the mass gain fraction reached its saturation value M corresponded to the equilibrium mass gain fraction of SCCO2 at the given experimental temperature, pressure, and sorption time. These data were then utilized to calculate sorption and desorption diffusivities of SCCO2 in polymer. A FTIR spectrometer (Digilab FTS-3000, Burladingen, Germany) at room temperature and atmospheric pressure with a resolution of 2 cm−1 was used to analyze the transmittance bands of CO2 in the PEI specimen. A loss modulus analysis (TA instruments DMA2980, New Castle, DE, USA) was used to determine the shifting of loss maxima for pure and SCCO2-treated PEI specimens.

3.3. Data Analysis Method

The analyses of sorption and desorption of SCCO2 in polymer have been presented in the previous literature [14,23,24,25], based on the mathematical model investigated by Fick. According to the one-dimension Fickian diffusion model, the governing equation for the mass transfer of SCCO2 in a plane sheet polymer is
C t = D 2 C X 2
where C is the CO2 concentration in PEI, and the CO2 diffusivity D is assumed to be constant at a specific temperature and pressure. The solution to Equation (2) is based on the assumption of semi-infinite or one-dimensional sheets in most cases. According to the literature, for thin flat membrane geometries, the thickness-to-length ratio should be less than 0.16 [20,21]. The ratio in this study was 0.06, which is suitable for applying the one-dimensional solution of Equation (2) without considering the edge effect. Applying the approach of Laplace transform with proper boundary conditions, the solution of Equation (2) is [32]
M s M = 1 8 π 2 n = 0 1 2 n + 1 2 e x p [ 2 n + 1 2 π 2 D s t s l 2 ]
where l is the thickness of the PEI sample membrane, Ds is the sorption diffusivity, Ms and M are the sorption mass gain fraction at sorption time ts and the equilibrium sorption mass gain fraction, respectively. For a long sorption process, Equation (3) is simplified as
M s M = 1 8 π 2 e x p [ π 2 D s t s l 2 ]
The sorption diffusivity Ds can thus be evaluated by plotting of ln [1 − (Ms/M)] against ts/l2.
Equation (2) can also be used to solve the desorption process for a thin flat film polymer. After simplifying the solution to a short desorption time td, the mass gain fraction of desorption Md is expressed by
M d M s = 4 l D d t d π
where Dd is the diffusivity for desorption. As mentioned above, the Ms value is determined by extrapolating the linear portion of the short-time desorption curve to zero desorption time. The short time period desorption diffusivity Dd can also be obtained from data plotting the desorption mass gain fraction (Md/Ms) versus (td)1/2.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the sorption and diffusion experiments of SCCO2 in 0.6 mm thick PEI membrane samples were conducted in the temperature and pressure ranges of 40 to 60 °C and 20 to 40 MPa, respectively. A high-pressure equilibrium cell and the ISCO units were used in this study. The sorption amounts under different operating conditions were determined using an ex situ gravimetric method. The sorption and desorption diffusivities were evaluated using the Fickian diffusion model. The equilibrium sorption mass gain fraction depended on the process conditions and reached the value of 12.8 wt% at 40 °C and 40 MPa. The sorption diffusivity increased with temperature and was slightly pressure-dependent. Due to the plasticization effect, the desorption diffusivity was greater than the sorption diffusivity in PEI. The plot of sorption mass gain fractions at isotherms against SCCO2 density showed a crossover point at the SCCO2 density of approximately 840 kg/m3. The result indicated changes in the mass transfer mechanism at the crossover point. This study compared the crossover densities of different polymers and derived the dependence of the glass transition temperatures and yield strengths of different polymer substrates. The desorption of CO2 from PEI was also qualitatively studied using FTIR spectroscopy, and a decrease in absorbed CO2 in the PEI polymer was observed with increasing desorption time. This study examined the shift in the loss modulus maxima and the SEM images of SCCO2-treated PEI, which was indicative of plasticization on PEI induced by SCCO2 sorption.

Author Contributions

W.-H.H.: data curation, writing—original draft. P.-H.C.: conceptualization, validation, writing—original draft. C.-W.C.: methodology, investigation, validation, supervision, funding acquisition. C.-S.S.: investigation, validation, supervision. M.T.: funding acquisition, conceptualization, supervision, writing—editing. J.-C.T.: validation. Y.-P.C.: supervision, writing—review and editing. F.-H.L.: investigation, validation. W.-H.H. and P.-H.C. contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan (NSTC 113-2221-E-027-002), and the University System of Taipei Joint Research Program of USTP-NTUT-NTOU-113-04.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Mensitieri, G.; Scherillo, G.; La Manna, P.; Musto, P. Sorption thermodynamics of CO2, H2O, and CH3OH in a glassy polyetherimide: A molecular perspective. Membranes 2019, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Galizia, M.; Chi, W.S.; Smith, Z.P.; Merkel, T.C.; Baker, R.W.; Freeman, B.D. 50th Anniversary perspective: Polymers and mixed matrix membranes for gas and vapor separation: A review and prospective opportunities. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 7809–7843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Edebali, S. (Ed.) Advanced Sorption Process Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Machado, N.D.; Mosquera, J.E.; Raquel, E.; Martini, R.E.; Goňi, M.L.; Nicol’as, A.; Gaňán, N.A. Supercritical CO2-assisted impregnation/deposition of polymeric materials with pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and biomedical applications: A review (2015–2021). J. Supercrit. Fluids 2022, 191, 105763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sattari, A.; Ramazani, A.; Aghahosseini, H.; Aroua, M.K. The application of polymer containing materials in CO2 capturing via absorption and adsorption methods. J. CO2 Util. 2021, 48, 101526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ansaloni, L.; Alcock, B.; Peters, T.A. Effects of CO2 on polymeric materials in the CO2 transport chain: A review. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 2020, 94, 102930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kang, X.; Mao, L.; Shi, J.; Liu, Y.; Zha, B.; Xu, J.; Yuzhou Jiang, Y.; Lichtfouse, E.; Jin, H.; Guo, L. Supercritical carbon dioxide systems for sustainable and efcient dissolution of solutes: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2024, 22, 815–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Prasad, S.K.; Sangwai, J.S.; Byun, H.-S. A review of the supercritical CO2 fluid applications for improved oil and gas production and associated carbon storage. J. CO2 Util. 2023, 72, 102479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sarver, J.A.; Kiran, E. Foaming of polymers with carbon dioxide—The year-in-review—2019. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2021, 173, 105166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Neděla, O.; Slepčka, P.; Švorčík, V. Surface modification of polymer substrates for biomedical applications. Materials 2017, 10, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khongnakorn, W.; Bootluck, W.; Jutaporn, P. Surface modification of FO membrane by plasma-grafting polymerization to minimize protein fouling. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 38, 101633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Z.; Song, L.; Dai, X.; Yang, G.; Han, B.; Xu, J. Grafting of methyl methylacrylate onto isotactic polypropylene film using supercritical CO2 as a swelling agent. Polymer 2002, 43, 1183–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. He, T.; He, J.; Wang, Z.; Cui, Z. Modification strategies to improve the membrane hemocompatibility in extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO). Adv. Compos. Mater. 2021, 4, 847–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, P.-H.; Iun, C.-P.; Tsai, J.-C.; Tang, M. Grafting of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate onto polyacrylonitrile using supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2022, 186, 105589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ricci, E.; De Angelis, M.G.; Minelli, M. A comprehensive theoretical framework for the sub and supercritical sorption and transport of CO2 in polymers. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 435, 135013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, D.; Cai, Z.; Huang, X.; Wang, L. Study on the dissolution and diffusion of supercritical carbon dioxide in polystyrene melts based on adsorption and diffusion mechanism. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 1971–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Goñi, M.L.; Gañán, N.A.; Martini, R.E.; Strumia, M.C. Mass transfer kinetics and diffusion coefficient estimation of bioinsecticide terpene ketones in LDPE films obtained by supercritical CO2-assisted impregnation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 45558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, Z.; Zhang, G.; Shi, X.; Yang, Q.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Fan, X. Microcellular foaming of poly(phenylene sulfide)/poly(ether sulfones) blends using supercritical carbon dioxide. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 42634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Burges, S.; Kriegel, R.M.; Koros, W.J. Carbon dioxide sorption and transport in amorphous poly(ethylene furanoate). Macromolecules 2015, 48, 2184–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lin, S.; Yang, J.; Yan, J.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, B. Sorption and diffusion of supercritical carbon dioxide in a biodegradable polymer. J. Macromol. Sci. Phys. 2010, 49, 286–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, J.J.; Zhao, Y.P.; Yang, B. Investigation of sorption and diffusion of supercritical carbon dioxide in polycarbonate. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 109, 1661–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pantoula, M.; Panayitou, C. Sorption and swelling in glassy polymer/carbon dioxide systems: Part I. Sorption. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2006, 37, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Duarte, A.R.C.; Martins, C.; Coimbra, P.; Gil, M.H.M.; de Sousa, H.C.; Duarte, C.M.M. Sorption and diffusion of dense carbon dioxide in a biocompatible polymer. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2006, 38, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tang, M.; Du, T.B.; Chen, Y.P. Sorption and diffusion of supercritical carbon dioxide in polycarbonate. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2004, 28, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tang, M.; Huang, Y.C.; Chen, Y.P. Sorption and diffusion of supercritical carbon dioxide into polysulfone. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 94, 474–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tomasko, D.L.; Li, H.; Liu, D.; Han, X.; Wingert, M.J.; Lee, L.J.; Koelling, K.W. A review of CO2 applications in the processing of polymers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 6431–6456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Seifert, B.; Mihanetzis, G.; Groth, T.; Albrecht, W.; Richau, K.; Missirlis, Y.; Paul, D.; von Sengbrusch, G. Polyetherimide: A new membrane-forming polymer for biomedical applications. Artif. Organs 2002, 26, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Feng, D.; Li, L.; Wang, Q. Fabrication of three-dimensional polyetherimide bead foams via supercritical CO2/ethanol cofoaming technology. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 4072–4081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aher, B.; Olson, N.M.; Kumar, V. Production of bulk solid-state PEI nanofoams using supercritical CO2. J. Mater. Res. 2013, 28, 2366–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, C.; Vaccaro, N.; Sundarram, S.S.; Li, W. Fabrication and characterization of polyetherimide nanofoams using supercritical CO2. J. Cell. Plast. 2012, 48, 239–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, W.; Ma, J.; Wang, D.; Wang, P.; Zhao, J.; Wenzheng Wu, W.; Song, W. Performance modulation and 3D printing parameters optimization of implantable medical tricalcium-silicate/polyetherimide composite. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 10679–10687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Crank, J. Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  33. NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69. Available online: https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C124389 (accessed on 20 August 2024).
  34. Brantley, N.H.; Kazarian, S.G.; Eckert, C.A. In situ FTIR measurement of carbon dioxide sorption into poly(ethylene terephthalate) at elevated pressures. J. Apply. Polym. Sci. 2000, 77, 764–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kazarian, S.G.; Vincent, M.F.; Bright, F.V.; Liotta, C.L.; Eckert, C.A. Specific inter-molecular interaction of carbon dioxide with polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1729–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nelson, M.R.; Borkman, R.F. Ab initio calculations on CO2 binding to carbonyl groups. J. Phys. Chem. 1998, 102, 7860–7863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Muth, O.; Hirth, T.; Vogel, H. Investigation of sorption and diffusion of supercritical carbon dioxide into poly(vinyl chloride). J. Supercrit. Fluids 2001, 19, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bos, A.; Punt, I.G.M.; Wessling, M. CO2-induced plasticization phenomena in glassy polymers. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 155, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shieh, Y.T.; Su, J.H.; Manivannan, G.; Lee, P.H.C.; Sawan, S.P.; Spall, W.D. Interaction of supercritical carbon dioxide with polymers. II. Amorphous polymers J. Apply. Polym. Sci. 1996, 59, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, J.; Wang, M.; Hao, J.; Fujita, S.-I.; Arai, M.; Wu, Z.; Zhao, F. Theoretical study on interaction between CO2 and carbonyl compounds: Influence of CO2 on infrared spectroscopy and activity of C=O. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2010, 54, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yuan, Y.; Teja, A.S. Quantification of specific interactions between CO2 and the carbonyl group in polymers via ATR-FTIR measurements. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2011, 56, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Petrovic, B.; Gorbounov, M.; Soltani, S.M. Influence of surface modification on selective CO2 adsorption: A technical review on mechanisms and methods. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021, 312, 110751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gabrienko, A.A.; Ewing, A.V.; Andrey, M.; Chibiryaev, A.M.; Alexander, M.; Agafontsev, A.M.; Konstantin, A.; Dubkov, K.A.; Kazarian, S.G. New insights into the mechanism of interaction between CO2 and polymers from thermodynamic parameters obtained by in situ ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 6465–6475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. von Schnitzler, J.; Eggers, R. Mass transfer in polymers in a supercritical CO2-atmosphere. J. Supercrit. Fluids 1999, 16, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pierleon, D.; Minelli, M.; Scherillo, G.; Mensitieri, G.; Loianno, W.; Bonavolonta, F.; Doghieri, F. Analysis of a polystyrene—Toluene system through “dynamic” sorption tests: Glass transition and retrograde vitrification. J. Phys. Chem. B 2017, 121, 9969–9981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kim, J.; Kim, K.H.; Ryu, Y.; Cha, S.W. Modeling and experiment for the diffusion coefficient of subcritical carbon dioxide in poly(methyl methacrylate) to predict gas sorption and desorption. Polymers 2022, 14, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kiran, E.; Sarver, J.A.; Hassler, J.C. Solubility and diffusivity of CO2 and N2 in polymers and polymer swelling, glass transition, melting, and crystallization at high pressure: A critical review and perspectives on experimental methods, data, and modeling. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2022, 185, 105378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Minelli, M.; Sarti, G.C. 110th Anniversary: Gas and vapor sorption in glassy polymeric membranes-critical review of different physical and mathematical models. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 341–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, L.; Corriou, J.-P.; Castel, C.; Favre, E. Transport of gases in glassy polymers under transient conditions: Limit-behavior investigations of dual-mode sorption theory. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 1089–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Silva, E.; Fedel, M.; Deflorian, F.; Cotting, F.; Lins, V. Properties of post-consumer polyethylene terephthalate coating mechanically deposited on mild steels. Coatings 2019, 9, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Song, P.; Trivedi, A.R.; Siviour, C.R. Mechanical response of four polycarbonates at a wide range of strain rates and temperatures. Polym. Test. 2023, 121, 107986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Palczynski, K.; Wilke, A.; Paeschke, M.; Dzubiella, J. Molecular modeling of polycarbonate materials: Glass transition and mechanical properties. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2017, 1, 043804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, T.; Lu, W.; Chen, Z.; Liu, Z.; Kim, S.H.; Donovan, B.; Warzoha, R.J.; et al. High-temperature polymers with record-high breakdown strength enabled by rationally designed chain-packing behavior in blends. Matter 2021, 4, 2448–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Murakami, K.; Kudo, H. Gamma-rays irradiation effects on polysulfone at high temperature. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2007, 265, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mushtaq, A.; Mukhtar, H.B.; Shariff, A.M. Effect of Glass Transition Temperature in Enhanced Polymeric Blend Membranes. Procedia Eng. 2016, 148, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, K.-Y.; Ye, L.; Yan, C. Fracture Behavior of Polyetherimide (PEI) and Interlaminar Fracture of CF/PEI Laminates at Elevated Temperatures. Polym. Compos. 2005, 26, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sun, Z.; Li, Y.Q.; Huang, P.; Cao, H.-J.; Zeng, W.; Li, J.; Li, F.; Sun, B.-G.; Shi, H.-Q.; Zhou, Z.-L.; et al. Temperature-dependent mechanical properties of polyetherimide composites reinforced by graphene oxide-coated short carbon fibers. Compos. Struct. 2021, 270, 114075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cao, K.; Ma, X.; Zhang, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Tensile behavior of polycarbonate over a wide range of strain rates. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2010, 527, 4056–4061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chukov, D.; Nematulloev, S.; Zadorozhnyy, M.; Victor Tcherdyntsev, V.; Stepashkin, A.; Zherebtsov, D. Structure, mechanical and thermal properties of polyphenylene sulfide and polysulfone impregnated carbon fiber composites. Polymers 2019, 11, 684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xie, X.-L.; Liu, Q.-X.; Li, R.K.-Y.; Zhou, X.-P.; Qing-Xin Zhang, Q.-X.; Yu, Z.-Z.; Mai, Y.-W. Rheological and mechanical properties of PVC/CaCO3 nanocomposites prepared by in situ polymerization. Polymer 2004, 45, 6665–6673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Plot of the desorption mass gain fraction (Md) against the square root of the desorption time (td)1/2 for PEI, where the sorption experiments were performed at 60 °C, 30 MPa, and various sorption time parameters ts from 15 min to 52 h.
Figure 1. Plot of the desorption mass gain fraction (Md) against the square root of the desorption time (td)1/2 for PEI, where the sorption experiments were performed at 60 °C, 30 MPa, and various sorption time parameters ts from 15 min to 52 h.
Molecules 29 04233 g001
Figure 2. The mass gain fractions of PEI at 60 °C and various pressures: , 20 MPa; , 30 MPa; , 40 MPa. The curves were obtained by regression on the experimental data.
Figure 2. The mass gain fractions of PEI at 60 °C and various pressures: , 20 MPa; , 30 MPa; , 40 MPa. The curves were obtained by regression on the experimental data.
Molecules 29 04233 g002
Figure 3. Plot of the equilibrium sorption mass gain fraction of SCCO2 (M) against pressure at various temperatures: , 40 °C; , 50 °C; , 60 °C.
Figure 3. Plot of the equilibrium sorption mass gain fraction of SCCO2 (M) against pressure at various temperatures: , 40 °C; , 50 °C; , 60 °C.
Molecules 29 04233 g003
Figure 4. Plot of the equilibrium sorption mass gain fraction of SCCO2 (M) against SCCO2 density at various temperatures: , 40 °C; , 50 °C; , 60 °C.
Figure 4. Plot of the equilibrium sorption mass gain fraction of SCCO2 (M) against SCCO2 density at various temperatures: , 40 °C; , 50 °C; , 60 °C.
Molecules 29 04233 g004
Figure 5. Plot of desorption diffusivity (Dd) versus SCCO2 equilibrium mass gain fraction at various temperatures: , 40 °C; , 50 °C; , 60 °C.
Figure 5. Plot of desorption diffusivity (Dd) versus SCCO2 equilibrium mass gain fraction at various temperatures: , 40 °C; , 50 °C; , 60 °C.
Molecules 29 04233 g005
Figure 6. FTIR spectra for the antisymmetric stretching mode (ν3) for: (a) untreated PEI; and (b) the SCCO2-treated PEI after 24 h of desorption. (The sorption process was operated at 20 MPa, 40 °C for 12 h. The green symbols represent wavenumbers at 2340 cm−1 and 660 cm−1, respectively.).
Figure 6. FTIR spectra for the antisymmetric stretching mode (ν3) for: (a) untreated PEI; and (b) the SCCO2-treated PEI after 24 h of desorption. (The sorption process was operated at 20 MPa, 40 °C for 12 h. The green symbols represent wavenumbers at 2340 cm−1 and 660 cm−1, respectively.).
Molecules 29 04233 g006
Figure 7. FTIR spectra for the antisymmetric stretching mode (ν3) of CO2 for (a) gaseous CO2; (i) untreated PEI; and the CO2 entrapped within PEI film after various desorption times of (b) 120 s; (c) 1 h; (d) 4 h; (e) 24 h; (f) 48 h; (g) 72 h; and (h) 96 h. (The sorption process was operated at 20 MPa, 40 °C for 12 h).
Figure 7. FTIR spectra for the antisymmetric stretching mode (ν3) of CO2 for (a) gaseous CO2; (i) untreated PEI; and the CO2 entrapped within PEI film after various desorption times of (b) 120 s; (c) 1 h; (d) 4 h; (e) 24 h; (f) 48 h; (g) 72 h; and (h) 96 h. (The sorption process was operated at 20 MPa, 40 °C for 12 h).
Molecules 29 04233 g007
Figure 8. The SEM images of (a) untreated PEI and (b) SCCO2-treated PEI at 40 °C, 20 MPa, and sorption time of 12 h.
Figure 8. The SEM images of (a) untreated PEI and (b) SCCO2-treated PEI at 40 °C, 20 MPa, and sorption time of 12 h.
Molecules 29 04233 g008
Figure 9. Loss modulus as a function of the temperature of PEI for: (a) untreated; (b) treated with SCCO2 at 20 MPa and 40 °C for 12 h; (c) more than one month of desorption with the same treated conditions as (b).
Figure 9. Loss modulus as a function of the temperature of PEI for: (a) untreated; (b) treated with SCCO2 at 20 MPa and 40 °C for 12 h; (c) more than one month of desorption with the same treated conditions as (b).
Molecules 29 04233 g009
Figure 10. The structure of polyetherimide (PEI).
Figure 10. The structure of polyetherimide (PEI).
Molecules 29 04233 g010
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of the experiment apparatus. 1. CO2 gas cylinder; 2. check valve; 3. high pressure syringe pump; 4. temperature and pressure controller; 5. needle valve; 6. high pressure equilibrium cell; 7. constant temperature bath; 8. temperature indicator; 9. pressure indicator; 10. needle valve.
Figure 11. Schematic diagram of the experiment apparatus. 1. CO2 gas cylinder; 2. check valve; 3. high pressure syringe pump; 4. temperature and pressure controller; 5. needle valve; 6. high pressure equilibrium cell; 7. constant temperature bath; 8. temperature indicator; 9. pressure indicator; 10. needle valve.
Molecules 29 04233 g011
Figure 12. Schematic illustration for the sorption (―) and desorption (― ‒ ‒ ―) profiles. The inserted graph shows that the mass gain fraction decreased linearly with the square root of the initial desorption time.
Figure 12. Schematic illustration for the sorption (―) and desorption (― ‒ ‒ ―) profiles. The inserted graph shows that the mass gain fraction decreased linearly with the square root of the initial desorption time.
Molecules 29 04233 g012
Table 1. Experimental results of SCCO2 density, equilibrium sorption mass gain fraction (M), desorption diffusivity (Dd), and sorption diffusivity (Ds) at various temperatures and pressures.
Table 1. Experimental results of SCCO2 density, equilibrium sorption mass gain fraction (M), desorption diffusivity (Dd), and sorption diffusivity (Ds) at various temperatures and pressures.
Pressure (MPa)Temperature (°C)SCCO2 Density (kg/m3)M
(wt%)
Dd
(10−11m2/s)
Ds
(10−11m2/s)
2040839.810.51.180.13
2050784.39.80.640.18
2060723.79.00.400.30
3040909.911.71.020.11
3050870.410.80.790.24
3060829.710.30.710.22
4040956.112.81.470.12
4050923.312.01.200.12
4060890.111.00.610.26
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, W.-H.; Chen, P.-H.; Chen, C.-W.; Su, C.-S.; Tang, M.; Tsai, J.-C.; Chen, Y.-P.; Lin, F.-H. Experimental Study for the Sorption and Diffusion of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide into Polyetherimide. Molecules 2024, 29, 4233. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174233

AMA Style

Huang W-H, Chen P-H, Chen C-W, Su C-S, Tang M, Tsai J-C, Chen Y-P, Lin F-H. Experimental Study for the Sorption and Diffusion of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide into Polyetherimide. Molecules. 2024; 29(17):4233. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174233

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Wei-Heng, Pei-Hua Chen, Chin-Wen Chen, Chie-Shaan Su, Muoi Tang, Jung-Chin Tsai, Yan-Ping Chen, and Feng-Huei Lin. 2024. "Experimental Study for the Sorption and Diffusion of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide into Polyetherimide" Molecules 29, no. 17: 4233. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174233

APA Style

Huang, W. -H., Chen, P. -H., Chen, C. -W., Su, C. -S., Tang, M., Tsai, J. -C., Chen, Y. -P., & Lin, F. -H. (2024). Experimental Study for the Sorption and Diffusion of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide into Polyetherimide. Molecules, 29(17), 4233. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29174233

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop