Next Article in Journal
Targeting CBP and p300: Emerging Anticancer Agents
Next Article in Special Issue
Tripodal Quinone-Cyanine G-Quadruplex Ligands as Novel Photosensitizers on Photoinduced Cancer Cell Death
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting pKa Values of Para-Substituted Aniline Radical Cations vs. Stable Anilinium Ions in Aqueous Media
Previous Article in Special Issue
Saikosaponin A Recovers Impaired Filaggrin Levels in Inflamed Skin by Downregulating the Expression of FRA1 and c-Jun
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Progress in Regulating the Activity of Enzymes with Photoswitchable Inhibitors

1
Key Laboratory of Photochemical Conversion and Optoelectronic Materials, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2
School of Future Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Molecules 2024, 29(19), 4523; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194523
Submission received: 12 August 2024 / Revised: 19 September 2024 / Accepted: 20 September 2024 / Published: 24 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Biology in Asia)

Abstract

:
Photoregulation of biomolecules has become crucial tools in chemical biology, because light enables access under mild conditions and with delicate spatiotemporal control. The control of enzyme activity in a reversible way is a challenge. To achieve it, a facile approach is to use photoswitchable inhibitors. This review highlights recent progress in photoswitchable inhibitors based on azobenzenes units. The progress suggests that the incorporation of an azobenzene unit to a known inhibitor is an effective method for preparing a photoswitchable inhibitor, and with these photoswitchable inhibitors, the activity of enzymes can be regulated by optical control, which is valuable in both basic science and therapeutic applications.

1. Introduction

The activity of an enzyme plays an important role in many physiological, pathological, and pharmacological processes, and the abnormal activity of an enzyme is directly related to various cancers [1,2,3,4,5]. The inhibition of enzymes activity is often performed with their corresponding inhibitors. However, the limitation of many inhibitors is that they cannot control the location and duration of their inhibitory activity. Thus, strategies for targeting the activity of an enzyme are of great interest for both therapeutic and basic science applications [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
Light is unsurpassed in its ability to control biological systems with high spatial and temporal resolution in a non-invasive manner. Furthermore, light wavelength and intensity can be precisely regulated and does not cause contamination of the sample [14]. Recently, photopharmacology that combines photochemistry and pharmacology has grown considerably and shows its advantages in living systems [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. By functionalizing biomolecules with molecular photoswitches, light-sensitive and switchable biomolecules can be obtained. These photoswitchable biomolecules are introduced into some important biological processes to regulate fast and reversibly biological activities. This approach has been used to photoregulate a multitude of important biological processes, including DNA/RNA [22,23,24,25], proteins [26,27,28], enzymes [29,30,31], ion channels [32,33,34], transporters [35,36,37], receptors [38,39,40], and others [41,42,43,44]. This review summarizes recent progress in the development of photoswitchable inhibitors for enzymes activity regulation, specifically the use of azobenzenes as photoswitch scaffolds. The irreversible regulation, photoswitchable inhibitors based on other photoswitch scaffold or photoswitchable inhibitors used for photoregulation of other biological processes are beyond the scope of this review.

2. Design Strategy of the Photoswitchable Inhibitor and Its Regulation Mechanism

The activity of enzymes is affected by enzyme inhibitors, and the properties of inhibitors depend on their structures and conformation. A candidate photoswitchable inhibitor shall have some characteristics, (1) easy switching between on and off states upon irradiation with a given wavelength, (2) significant difference in inhibition effect between on and off states, and (3) facile preparation.
Azobenzene (Scheme 1) has been widely utilized as a photoswitch due to its easy accessibility, small size, and good optical properties [45,46]. In response to different irradiations, azobenzene isomerization between trans- and cis-configurations is accompanied by large, reversible changes in molecular geometry and polarity, resulting in distinct pharmacological properties [47]. Therefore, incorporating an azobenzene unit into a known inhibitor to produce a photoswitchable inhibitor is a simple and efficient method.
Generally, there are two mechanisms (Scheme 2) for regulating the activity of enzymes with photoswitchable inhibitors. One is the “trans-on” mechanism, in which the trans of a photoswtichable inhibitor shows strong inhibition due to the strong interaction between inhibitor and target. Upon irradiation, the trans converts into its cis, and the cis exhibits weakened or relieved inhibition, since there is no or a slight interaction between inhibitor and target owing to a distinguished change in configuration. The other is the “cis-on” mechanism, in which trans exhibits weak inhibition due to its structure mismatching a target. The inhibition is, however, significantly increased when trans converts into cis upon irradiation. For practical application, the latter is desired, because it can be initially inactive and active after light-triggering. For ideal applications of photopharmacology, initially inactive molecules should be instantly and dramatically activated by photoirradiation to exert their biological effects.

3. Photoregulating Activity of Enzymes

3.1. Trans-On Inhibitors

Carbonic anhydrases are involved in various physiological and pathological processes and are regarded as important therapeutic targets, since they are overexpressed in many diseases, such as obesity, cancer, and epilepsy [48]. Aggarwal and co-workers [49] reported a trans-on photoswitchable inhibitor for the in situ photoregulation of carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity. A photoswitchable inhibitor P1 (Scheme 3) was designed by the introduction of acetazolamide (CA inhibitor) into an azobenzene derivative. In the trans, t-P1 is a linear shape that benefited from occupying the CA active site and interacting with Zn2+ via benzenesulfonamide, resulting in the inhibition of enzyme activity. Upon irradiation with 365 nm light, the t-P1 isomerized to its cis, c-P1. The c-P1 exited the active site due to the change in the steric profile, resulting in the restoration of enzyme activity. The c-P1 can revert back to the t-P1 through thermal relaxation or via photoirradiation with 460 nm light, thereby inhibiting enzyme activity again. In the photostationary state (PPS), 93% c-P1 (at PPS 365 nm) and 70% t-P1 (at PPS 460 nm) were obtained, respectively.
The inhibitory activity of P1 with bCA was determined using the p-nitrophenyl acetate (NPA) hydrolysis assay [50]. The inhibitory effect showed that t-P1 was five-fold more potent than the c-P1, with IC50 values of 293 nM and 1.46 µM, respectively. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of P1 on the CO2 hydration activity of bCA was analyzed by using bromothymol blue as a pH indicator [51]. The kinetics of the change in the pH values demonstrated that the rate of CO2 hydration reaction decreased significantly when bCA was incubated with t-P1, indicating enzyme inhibition. When the bCA was incubated with c-P1, the rate of CO2 hydrolysis increased, indicating a weaker inhibitory effect.
The feasibility of P1 to modulate the activity of cytosolic CAII in living cells was performed in HeLa cells. Cytosolic CAII serves as a driving force in cytosolic pH regulation [48]. The cells were incubated with a solution of d-P1 (>98% trans isomer in the dark, which was irradiated with 365 and 460 nm light to generate c-P1 and t-P1, respectively) and pHrodo Red AM (pH indicator that displays an increased fluorescence at a lower pH) for 30 min at 37 °C. As shown in Figure 1, cells treated with d-P1 and t-P1 displayed fluorescence values much higher than those of non-treated cells (control) and c-P1-treated cells. The corresponding pH values for these cells were 6.91 (d-P1), 6.85 (t-P1), 7.62 (control), and 7.50 (c-P1). Both pH values of d-P1-treated cells and t-P1-treated cells are very close to acetazolamide (6.89) at the same concentration. The results indicated that t-P1 showed more potential in pH regulation and CA inhibition compared to c-P1.
The same research group subsequently reported [52] another photoswitchable inhibitor, P2 (Scheme 4), for CA activity regulation. The fluorinated azobenzenesulfonamide P2 has some advantages of visible light isomerization and a more stable cis configuration. Upon irradiation with 520 nm, t-P2 converted into cis with 87% of c-P2 at PPS520 nm. Isomerization from cis to trans can subsequently be achieved with 410 nm light irradiation and with 82% of t-P2 at PPS410 nm.
Docking studies suggested that c-P2 could not show any favorable interaction with Zn2+ in the active site, which made it bind more weakly than t-P2. The inhibitory effect of trans and cis of P2 on the CO2 hydration activity of bCA was measured by tracking changes in the solution pH using the stopped flow method [53]. The apparent Ki values for t-P2 and c-P2 were calculated to be 36 ± 2 and 164 ± 8 nM, respectively. The results demonstrated t-P2’s great ability to inhibit CA enzymatic activity.
The real-time inhibition of cytosolic CA by t-P2 was studied by the investigation of the rate of change of intracellular pH. It is known that the inhibition of cytoplasmic CA reduces the rate of intracellular acidification [54,55]. HeLa cells were loaded with pHrodo and incubated with 25 μM t-P2, c-P2, or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for the control. c-P2 treated cells showed a similar rate of change in pH to the DMSO-treated control cells. The t-P2 treated cells, however, displayed a slower rate of change in pH, which demonstrated inhibition of the cytosolic CA.
In vivo evaluation of the regulation of enzyme activity by P2 was carried out in zebrafish (wild-type embryos were collected and transferred into standard embryo media and sorted by developmental stage). It has reported that the inhibition of CA by inhibitors resulted in small otoliths, an irregular jaw, enlarged heart and yolk sac, and impaired locomotion [56,57]. As shown in Figure 2, the zebrafish treated with t-P2 showed multiple morphological abnormalities, including failure to form a swim bladder, pectoral fin defects, and cardiac edema (Figure 2A), while the zebrafish treated with the same concentration of c-P2 developed normally. Furthermore, the zebrafish treated with t-P2 showed poor locomotion (Figure 2B) and had hollow and underdeveloped otoliths (Figure 2C), while c-P2-treated zebrafish exhibited normal locomotive behavior and normally developed otoliths (100%, n = 30).
Interfering with mitosis is a potential cancer therapy strategy. Nusrat Mafy and co-workers [58] developed a photoswitchable inhibitor for regulating the activity of centromere-associated protein E (CENP-E), a mitotic kinesin required for chromosome transportation. P3 (Scheme 5) was designed based on GSK923295 [59], a CENP-E inhibitor. Replacing the core imidazopyridine ring in GSK923295 with azopyrazole provided photoswitchable inhibitor P3. Reversible trans-cis photoisomerization of P3 was achieved upon irradiation with 365 nm and 510 nm light, respectively, with 93% of c-P3 at PSS365nm and 86% of t-P3 at PSS510 nm.
GSK923295 is a selective CENP-E inhibitor and locks CENP-E by blocking inorganic phosphate release in its adenosine triphosphatease (ATPase) cycle [60,61]. The inhibitory effects of P3 on ATPase activity showed large different IC50 values at PSS510nm (14 μM) and at PSS365nm (120 μM), which demonstrated that t-P3 displayed ~10-fold inhibition activity as compared to c-P3. The similar results were obtained when P3 was used for the inhibition of CENP-E activity in living cells. The inhibitory mechanism indicated that P3 blocked CENP-E at the rigor state in living cells and could perturb chromosome congression in a photoswitchable manner.
Photocontrollable mitotic interference was demonstrated by using P3-mediated chromosome congression in LLC-PK1 cells. As shown in Figure 3, the misaligned polar chromosomes, which were induced by pretreatment with P3, gradually moved toward the equatorial plane upon irradiation with 365 nm light (t-P3). Subsequently, for irradiation with 510 nm light (c-P3), the movement was ceased, and a portion of the misaligned chromosomes moved to the spindle poles. According to reports [59,62], GSK923295 induced frequent misalignment of chromosomes at the spindle poles; therefore, the obtained results demonstrated the inhibition of CENP-E by P3 at PSS510nm. The direction of the chromosome movement changed repeatedly in the subsequent light irradiation cycle.
REarranged during Transfection (RET) is a kinase belonging to the receptor tyrosine kinase family. Dysregulation of RET activity leads to several human cancers [63]. Xu and co-workers [64] reported a photoswitchable DFG-out kinase inhibitor (D: aspartic acid; F: phenylalanine; G: glycine), using RET as a model target. Photoswitchable inhibitor P4 (Scheme 6) was designed by employing the known inhibitor Ponatinib [65] as a template. Docking studies suggested that the c-P4 would not be tolerated in the active site, while the t-P4 would serve as the active inhibitor.
Irradiation with 365 nm light afforded trans→cis isomerization with 97% of c-P4 at PPS365nm. The reverse reaction was achieved when exposed to blue light (460 nm), yielding 64% of t-P4 at PPS460nm. Inhibitory studies showed that t-P4 was 17-fold more potent than c-P4, with IC50 values of 3 nM and 50 nM, respectively. In vitro evaluation of P4 was carried out by using nanobioluminescece resonance energy transfer (NanoBRET ™) determination of target engagement (TE) intracellular kinase in HEK293 cells, in which the IC50 values for t-P4 and c-P4 are 25 nM and 282 nM, respectively.
Carboxylesterases (CES) are serine esterases from the alpha/beta-fold hydrolase family and can activate or deactivate therapeutics and affect the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of the metabolized drugs by hydrolyzing ester and amide bonds of xenobiotics. Dwyer and co-workers [66] synthesized a class of arylazopyrazole urea-based photoswitchable inhibitors for human carboxylesterases 1 (CES1) and 2 (CES2). Among them, P5 (Scheme 7) is the most promising candidate. P5 was designed by modification of triazole ureas, serine hydrolase inhibitors [67], with photoswitchable arylazopyrazole. P5 exhibited excellent conversion after 5 min of irradiation at room temperature, and 95% of c-P5 was obtained at PSS365nm. The thermal relaxation of cis→trans was measured over time at 37 °C, and good thermal stability of c-P5 was observed (t1/2 = 60 h).
Inhibitory studies were performed by employing CES1 as model, since CES1 is the best-studied xenobiotic ester hydrolytic enzyme in the human carboxylesterase family. CES1 inhibitory activity of t-P5 and c-P5 was measured using gel-based competition experiments [68] with a synthesized fluorescent probe. HepG2 cell lysate was treated with different concentrations of t-P5, followed by treatment with the fluorescent probe, the CES1 band fluorescence signal was quantified, and IC50 values were calculated. It showed that t-P5 was 7.4-fold more potent than c-P5, with IC50 values of 13 nM and 96 nM, respectively. Further study was conducted on live HepG2 cells. Cells were treated with t-P5 and irradiated with 365 nm light for 5 min, then incubated for 4 h. Cells were lysed and treated with the fluorescent probe. The in situ treatment displayed a 5.1-fold difference in IC50 values of t-P5 (5.0 nM) and c-P5 (25.4 nM).
The evaluation of photoswitchable inhibitor P5 in regulating CES1 activity was conducted by measuring the CES-catalyzed hydrolysis of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). MMF is a known substrate of CES1 and an immunosuppressant that is widely applied to prevent organ transplant rejection and to treat Crohn’s disease [69]. It was found that t-P5 inhibited CES1-mediated hydrolysis of MMF, and the half-life (t1/2) of MMF was increased to 79 min, whereas the t1/2 of MMF was decreased to 44 min with the c-P5-treated samples, which was nearly identical to the value obtained in the DMSO-treated samples (t1/2 = 43 min).
The mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase c-Jun N-terminal kinase 3 (JNK3) is one of the key signaling enzymes in the cellular stress response and has been targeted for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease [70]. Reynders and co-workers [71] developed a class of light-activated JNK3 inhibitors. Among them, inhibitor P6 (Scheme 8) shows the most promising candidate for the inhibition of JNK3. P6 was obtained by replacing the diarylamide motif of the known covalent inhibitor [72] with a diazocine photoswitch bearing an electrophilic acrylamide moiety that targets cysteines neighboring the ATP-binding site. Unlike other azobenzenes, c-P6 is thermally stable. Molecular docking suggested that both c-P6 and t-P6 could bind to the ATP pocket of JNK3, but only the metastable t-P6 could reach and covalently bind to Cys154.
The inhibition of P6 to JNK3 was determined through measuring the phosphorylation of the immobilized kinase substrate activating transcription factor 2 (ATF-2) at different inhibitor concentrations. c-P6 exhibited a weak inhibition to JNK3 (IC50 = 646 nM) but showed much stronger inhibition at all tested concentrations after pulse irradiation with 390 nm light (IC50 = 21.4 nM). It is worth noting that, once isomerization and potential covalent attachment took place, inhibition with t-P6 was found to be irreversible, probably because binding to the ATP binding site was too tight to pull the pyridinylimidazole from the active site.

3.2. Cis-On Inhibitors

Protein arginine deiminases (PADs) are cysteine hydrolases that mediate the conversion of arginine to citrulline [73]. Mondal and co-workers [74] developed a series of cis-on photoswitchable inhibitors for PAD2. Among them, P7 (Scheme 9) is the most promising candidate for the inhibition of PAD2. P7 was designed by modification of a second-generation PAD inhibitor, BB-Cl-amidine [75,76], with an azobenzene unit. Photoisomerization of t-P7 and c-P7 could be achieved by irradiation with 350 nm and 450 nm light, respectively, and more than 80% of c-P7 was obtained at PPS350nm.
The inhibition of t-P7 and c-P7 to PAD2 was performed by the competitive activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) assay. It was found that the potency was increased by 10-fold upon excitation to the c-P7. The IC50 value of t-P7 is >100 μM, whereas the IC50 value of c-P7 is 9.1 μM. The increased potency upon photoisomerization is most likely due to enhanced binding to the PAD2 active site.
The inhibition of P7 to PAD2 in cells was performed by evaluation the ability of P7 to inhibit histone H3 citrullination in HEK293T/PAD2-overexpressing cells [77,78]. t-P7 exhibited no inhibition to histone H3 citrullination even at 100 μM, while c-P7 inhibited citrullination in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4), which suggested that P7 could be photoactivated to inhibit histone H3 citrullination in HEK293T/PAD2 cells.
Scheiner and co-workers [79] constructed a class of photoswitchable inhibitors for the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE); among which, P8 exhibited the most outstanding performance. P8 (Scheme 10) was constructed by combining a known AChE inhibitor tacrine [80,81] and azobenzene with a C4 aliphatic alkyl chain. A binding model of t-P8 in a complex with tcAChE [82] showed that the linker length of the photoswitchable moiety to tacrine has influence not only on the biological interaction but also on the physicochemical properties. Photoisomerization of P8 could be achieved by irradiation at 365 nm and 455 nm, respectively, and 63% of c-P8 at PPS365nm and 80% of t-P8 at PPS455nm were obtained.
The inhibitory activity of both c-P8 and t-P8 against hAChE was evaluated, in which an 8.4-fold increase in activity was observed with c-P8 (IC50 = 4.06 nM, t-P8: IC50 = 34.1 nM). Additionally, both isomers showed selectivity towards hAChE, but c-P8 had better selectivity with a factor of 70 than t-P8 with a factor of 19.
For insight into Alzheimer’s disease, the same research group [83] has recently prepared a class of photoswitchable butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) inhibitors and applied them to Alzheimer’s disease in mouse model. P9 (Scheme 11) was prepared by conjugation of a hBChE inhibitor [84,85] with azobenzene. Photoisomerization of P9 was carried out by irradiation at 365 nm and 455 nm, respectively, and 81% c-P9 at PPS365nm and 82% t-P9 at PPS455nm were obtained.
The inhibition of P9 to hBChE was in the nanomolar range and showed a 10-fold difference in the IC50 values between c-P9 (IC50 = 44.5 nM) and t-P9 (IC50 = 424 nM). Docking studies explained the differences of the two isomers in the association step of the carbamylation and the less favorable Kc of t-P9 over c-P9 and suggested that t-P9 is unable to conformationally adapt to the binding pocket.
It is reported that prolonged duration of the inhibition of BChE directly correlates to neuroprotective effects in vivo upon chronic administration [86]. Inhibitor P9 was administered intraperitoneally into mice to study the difference in an anti-amnesic model in vivo. As shown in Figure 5, c-P9 was effective in the 0.1–0.3 mg/kg dose range in attenuating the Aβ25–35-induced alternation deficit. c-P9 allowed a complete recovery at a dosage of 0.3 mg/kg, whereas t-P9 showed no effect at all.
Matera and co-workers [87] designed a photoswitchable inhibitor for photoregulating the human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). P10 (Scheme 12) was obtained by modification of the inhibitor methotrexate (MTX) [88,89] with an azo unit. Docking studies showed that c-P10 bound to the active site of the target enzyme in a mode that strictly mimics the orientation and conformation adopted by MTX in its crystallographic pose. In contrast, t-P10 displayed a set of binding poses that barely overlapped with MTX. Photoisomerization of cis- and trans-P10 could be achieved by irradiation with 375 nm and 460 nm, respectively, and 75% of c-P10 was obtained at PPS375 nm.
Inhibition of two isomers to DHFR was assessed firstly by the investigation of P10 to inhibit the purified target enzyme using a colorimetric assay. MTX was tested as the positive control. As shown in Figure 6a, significant differences between the two isomers were observed. cis-P10 exhibited much stronger inhibiting DHFR activity than t-P10 at the same concentration. A remarkable difference in IC50 values determined for c-P10 (6 nM) and t-P10 (34 µM) was obtained. Similar results were observed in cells. As shown in Figure 6b, c-P10 exhibited significantly lower viability in HeLa cells than t-P10.
In vivo evaluation of P10 to DHFR was performed in zebrafish. Since DHFR inhibitors disrupt folate metabolism, they have a high impact at the early stages of animal development. Zebrafish fertilized eggs were incubated within 5 h post-fertilization (hpf) in UV-purified water containing t-P10 or c-P10. Embryos treated with MTX showed a low viability (Figure 7a). Three abnormalities (deficient iridiophore ocular pigmentation, an abnormal volume of the cardiac cavity, and tail angle deviations) were observed in MTX-treated, t-P10-treated, and c-P10-treated zebrafishes (Figure 7b). c-P10 exhibited high toxicity and produced comparable developmental abnormalities at 72 hpf, together with a high rate of mortality at 96 hpf. In contrast, t-P10 showed a low toxicity, and no observable abnormality at 72 hpf and no mortality at 96 hpf were observed (Figure 7c).
Inhibitor P10 was also employed by Mashita and co-workers [90] for photoregulating Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase (eDHFR) activity. The IC50 values determined for t-10 and c-P10 were 45 ± 4 nM and 3.2 ± 0.4 nM, respectively.
Kobauri and co-workers [91] evaluated different structure-based approaches for photopharmacology with eDHFR as a case study. P11 (Scheme 13), a representative of a series of synthesized compounds, was obtained by the modification of trimethoprim, one of the eDHFR inhibitors [92,93] with an azobenzene unit.
Photoisomerization of t-P11 and c-P11 was carried out with 365 nm and 420 nm/in the dark, respectively, and 79% of c-P11 at PPS365nm and 89% of t-P11 at PPS420nm were obtained. The light-dependent potency showed that both isomers exhibited strong inhibition, with a two-fold increase in IC50 when c-P11 was irradiated with 365 nm light.
The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway is essential for regulating various cellular processes, and the dysregulation of PI3K leads to human cancers [94]. Zhang and co-workers [95] developed a photoswitchable PI3K inhibitor based on a 4-methylquinazoline derivative [96,97]. P12 (Scheme 14), synthesized by conjugating the 4-methylquinazoline derivative and azobenzene, exhibited photoisomerization of cis- and trans-P12 upon irradiation with 365 nm and 520 nm, respectively, and 90% of c-P12 was obtained at PPS365nm.
A PI3Kα activity inhibition assay showed that c-P12 exhibited stronger inhibition than t-P12 at the same concentration, and approximately three-fold more potency was observed for the c-P12 (IC50 = 5.24 nM) compared to t-P12 (IC50 = 17.70 nM). Cellular photo-regulating of PI3K activity was evaluated with P12 performed in HGC-27 cells that harbor the PI3KCA mutation and have an overactive PI3K pathway. Western blotting analysis showed that both t-P12 and c-P12 inhibited the phosphorylation of AKT (p-AKT, S473, and T308) and S6 in a dose-dependent manner. c-P12 suppressed p-AKT (S473 and T308) and S6 more potently than t-P12. The activity transformation could be achieved with photoswitchable P12 upon 365 nm and 520 nm alternating irradiation.
Apoptosis induced by P12 was detected by flow cytometry using Annexin V as a probe. As shown in Figure 8a, both t-P12 and c-P12 dose-dependently promoted apoptosis in HGC-27 cells. The apoptotic ratios of the t-P12-treated group were significantly lower than those of the c-P12 at concentrations of 0.08 µM and 0.04 μM. Furthermore, the colony formation assay exhibited that both t-P12 and c-P12 reduced the number of colonies significantly in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 8b). Compared to t-P12, c-P12 showed stronger inhibitory activity against HGC-27 colony formation.

4. Conclusions and Outlook

Photopharmacology endows therapeutics with light addressability; this, in turn, allows for improved spatial and temporal selectivity in drug action, which provides a new concept and strategy for therapy [98,99]. The idea of photopharmacology was demonstrated as early as 1969 [100], but it is only recently that photopharmacology has shown its potential in future therapeutic applications. Photoregulating activity has been demonstrated in a range of live cell and animal models [101,102,103], and translationally promising results have been reported in the area of vision restoration [104,105,106].
Currently, photoswitchable agents for photopharmacology are mainly based on organic photochromic compounds. In addition to azobenzenes [107,108], photochromic spiropyrans [109], fulgimides [110], and diarylethenes [111] are also employed as photoswitches for the photomodulation of biological properties. These systems have their own advantages and disadvantages, for example, azobenzenes and spiropyrans are easily obtained and have large conformation changes after irradiation but show low photochemical reversibility and poor thermal stability; fulgide/fulgimides and diarylethenes show high photochemical reversibility and good thermal stability but small conformation change and difficult synthesis. Therefore, the development of novel photoswitches, as well as their convenient synthesis methods, is a key task in this field [112,113,114].
In this review, recent advances in azobenzene-based photoswitchable inhibitors for regulating enzyme activity have been summarized. As an optical switching unit, azobenzenes are the largest and most-studied photoswitching molecules in biology [115,116,117,118,119] because of easy accessibility and the large conformation change before and after irradiation. However, the deficiency of azobenzene-based photoswitchable agents is also obvious, as mentioned above. In addition, a short absorption wavelength (≤600 nm) is also a key factor limiting its practical use due to insufficient penetration depth. Major developments in the design of photoswitchable inhibitors are needed to fulfill all the prerequisites for pharmacotherapy [120,121,122,123]. In particular, photoswitches could be photoisomerized in both directions with light in the therapeutic window (650–1200 nm) with good thermal stability of both isomers. To obtain the near-infrared (NIR) irradiation wavelength, two/multiphoton absorption photoswitchable agents are desired [124,125,126]. The quantum yield of photoisomerization should be as high as possible, and the difference in the affinity for the target between the active and inactive form must be significant (>100-fold). Other requirements in the design of photoswitchable inhibitors include water solubility, low toxicity, metabolic stability, and not interfering with the activity of other biological molecules. It is a long and winding road from the design of photoswitchable agents to clinical application, but with more and more study and outcomes [127,128,129,130,131], it could be expected that this area will make further progress and be applied in clinics in the future.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Scott, J.I.; Deng, Q.; Vendrell, M. Near-infrared fluorescent probes for the detection of cancer-associated proteases. ACS Chem. Biol. 2021, 16, 1304–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Muir, R.K.; Guerra, M.; Bogyo, M.M. Activity-based diagnostics: Recent advances in the development of probes for use with diverse detection modalities. ACS Chem. Biol. 2022, 17, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, J.; Chai, X.; He, X.-P.; Kim, H.-J.; Yoon, J.; Tian, H. Fluorogenic probes for disease-relevant enzymes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 683–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, H.-W.; Chen, L.; Xu, C.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.-B.; Tan, W. Recent progresses in small-molecule enzymatic fluorescent probes for cancer imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 7140–7180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hanash, S. Disease proteomics. Nature 2003, 422, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Juvekar, V.; Lee, H.W.; Kim, H.M. Two-photon fluorescent probes for detecting enzyme activities in live tissues. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021, 4, 2957–2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Frank, J.A.; Yushchenko, D.A.; Hodson, D.J.; Lipstein, N.; Nagpal, J.; Rutter, G.A.; Rhee, J.-S.; Gottschalk, A.; Brose, N.; Schultz, C.; et al. Photoswitchable diacylglycerols enable optical control of protein kinase C. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016, 12, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Albert, L.; Xu, J.; Wan, R.; Srinivasan, V.; Dou, Y.; Vázquez, O. Controlled inhibition of methyltransferases using photoswitchable peptidomimetics: Towards an epigenetic regulation of leukemia. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 4612–4618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. DuBay, K.H.; Iwan, K.; Osorio-Planes, L.; Geissler, P.L.; Groll, M.; Trauner, D.; Broichhagen, J. A predictive approach for the optical control of carbonic anhydrase II activity. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018, 13, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Parks, F.C.; Liu, Y.; Debnath, S.; Stutsman, S.R.; Raghavachari, K.; Flood, A.H. Allosteric control of photofoldamers for selecting between anion regulation and double-to-single helix switching. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 17711–17723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mogaki, R.; Okuro, K.; Aida, T. Adhesive photoswitch: Selective photochemical modulation of enzymes under physiological conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 29, 10072–10078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hu, T.; Zheng, G.; Xue, D.; Zhao, S.; Li, F.; Zhou, F.; Zhao, F.; Xie, L.; Tian, C.; Hua, T.; et al. Rational remodeling of atypical scaffolds for the design of photoswitchable cannabinoid receptor tools. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 13752–13765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, F.; Timm, K.A.; Arndt, K.M.; Woolley, G.A. Photocontrol of coiled-coil proteins in living cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3943–3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mayer, G.; Heckel, A. Biologically active molecules with a “light switch”. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4900–4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Szymański, W.; Beierle, J.M.; Kistemaker, H.A.V.; Velema, W.A.; Feringa, B.L. Reversible photocontrol of biological systems by the incorporation of molecular photoswitches. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 6114–6178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kounde, C.S.; Tate, E.W. Photoactive bifunctional degraders: Precision tools to regulate protein stability. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 15483–15493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Velema, W.A.; Szymanski, W.; Feringa, B.L. Photopharmacology: Beyond proof of principle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 2178–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fleming, C.L.; Grøtli, M.; Andreasson, J. On-command regulation of kinase activity using photonic stimuli. ChemPhotoChem 2019, 3, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Morstein, J.; Hill, R.Z.; Novak, A.J.E.; Feng, S.; Norman, D.D.; Donthamsetti, P.C.; Frank, J.A.; Harayama, T.; Williams, B.M.; Parrill, A.L.; et al. Optical control of sphingosine-1-phosphate formation and function. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2019, 15, 623–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Leippe, P.; Koehler Leman, J.; Traune, D. Specificity and speed: Tethered photopharmacology. Biochemistry 2017, 56, 5214–5220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lichtenegger, M.; Tiapko, O.; Svobodova, B.; Stockner, T.; Glasnov, T.N.; Schreibmayer, W.; Platzer, D.; de la Cruz, G.G.; Krenn, S.; Schober, R.; et al. An optically controlled probe identifies lipid-gating fenestrations within the TRPC3 channel. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018, 14, 396–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ramos-Soriano, J.; Carmen Galan, M. Photoresponsive control of G-quadruplex DNA systems. JACS Au 2021, 1, 1516–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lubbe, A.S.; Liu, Q.; Smith, S.J.; Willem de Vries, J.; Kistemaker, J.C.M.; de Vries, A.H.; Faustino, I.; Meng, Z.; Szymanski, W.; Herrmann, A.; et al. Photoswitching of DNA hybridization using a molecular motor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 5069–5076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, Z.; Zhang, L. Photoregulation between small DNAs and reversible photochromic molecules. Biomater. Sci. 2019, 7, 4944–4962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Berdnikova, D.V. Photoswitches for controllable RNA binding: A future approach in the RNA-targeting therapy. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 10819–10826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, F.; Zarrine-Afsar, A.; Sameer Al-Abdul-Wahid, M.; Scott Prosser, R.; Davidson, A.R.; Andrew Woolley, G. Structure-based approach to the photocontrol of protein folding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2283–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Beharry, A.A.; Chen, T.; Sameer Al-Abdul-Wahid, M.; Samanta, S.; Davidov, K.; Sadovski, O.; Ali, A.M.; Chen, S.B.; Scott Prosser, R.; Sun Chan, H.; et al. Quantitative analysis of the effects of photoswitchable distance constraints on the structure of a globular protein. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 6421–6431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Preuke, N.; Moormann, W.; Bamberg, K.; Lipfert, M.; Herges, R.; Sonnichsen, F.D. Visible-light-driven photocontrol of the Trp-cage protein fold by a diazocine cross-linker. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020, 18, 2650–2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Y.; Erdmann, F.; Fischer, G. Augmented photoswitching modulates immune signaling. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 724–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Velema, W.A.; Hansen, M.J.; Lerch, M.M.; Driessen, A.J.M.; Szymanski, W.; Feringa, B.L. Ciprofloxacin–photoswitch conjugates: A facile strategy for photopharmacology. Bioconjug. Chem. 2015, 26, 2592–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Blanco, B.; Palasis, K.A.; Adwal, A.; Callen, D.F.; Abell, A.D. Azobenzene-containing photoswitchable proteasome inhibitors with selective activity and cellular toxicity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017, 25, 5050–5054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rennhack, A.; Grahn, E.; Benjamin Kaupp, U.; Berger, T.K. Photocontrol of the Hv1 proton channel. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 2952–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lin, W.-C.; Kramer, R.H. Light-switchable ion channels and receptors for optogenetic interrogation of neuronal signaling. Bioconjug. Chem. 2018, 29, 861–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, W.-Z.; Huang, L.-B.; Zheng, S.-P.; Moulin, E.; Gavat, O.; Barboiu, M.; Giuseppone, N. Light-driven molecular motors boost the selective transport of alkali metal ions through phospholipid bilayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 15653–15660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mostyn, S.N.; Sarker, S.; Muthuraman, P.; Raja, A.; Shimmon, S.; Rawling, T.; Cioffi, C.L.; Vandenberg, R.J. Photoswitchable ORG25543 congener enables optical control of glycine transporter 2. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 1250–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cheng, B.; Shchepakin, D.; Kavanaugh, M.P.; Trauner, D. Photoswitchable inhibitor of a glutamate transporter. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2017, 8, 1668–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cheng, B.; Morstein, J.; Ladefoged, L.K.; Maesen, J.B.; Schiott, B.; Sinning, S.; Trauner, D. A photoswitchable inhibitor of the human serotonin transporter. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Westphal, M.V.; Schafroth, M.A.; Sarott, R.C.; Imhof, M.A.; Bold, C.P.; Leippe, P.; Dhopeshwarkar, A.; Grandner, J.M.; Katritch, V.; Mackie, K.; et al. Synthesis of photoswitchable Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol derivatives enables optical control of cannabinoid receptor 1 signaling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 18206–18212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Agnetta, L.; Kauk, M.; Canizal, M.C.A.; Messerer, R.; Holzgrabe, U.; Hoffmann, C.; Decker, M. A photoswitchable dualsteric ligand controlling receptor efficacy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 7282–7287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Carroll, E.C.; Berlin, S.; Levitz, J.; Kienzler, M.A.; Yuan, Z.; Madsen, D.; Larsen, D.S.; Isacoff, E.Y. Two-photon brightness of azobenzene photoswitches designed for glutamate receptor optogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E776–E785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dai, X.; Dong, X.; Liu, Z.; Liu, G.; Liu, Y. Controllable singlet oxygen generation in water based on cyclodextrin secondary assembly for targeted photodynamic therapy. Biomacromolecules 2020, 21, 5369–5379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Weber, T.; Chandrasekaran, V.; Stamer, I.; Thygesen, M.B.; Terfort, A.; Lindhorst, T.K. Switching of bacterial adhesion to a glycosylated surface by reversible reorientation of the carbohydrate ligand. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 14583–14586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Möckl, L.; Müller, A.; Bräuchle, C.; Lindhorst, T.K. Switching first contact: Photocontrol of E. coli adhesion to human cells. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 1254–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Prestel, A.; Möller, H.M. Spatio-temporal control of cellular uptake achieved by photoswitchable cell-penetrating peptides. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 701–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Broichhagen, J.; Frank, J.A.; Trauner, D. A roadmap to success in photopharmacology. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 1947–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Paoletti, P.; Ellis-Davies, G.C.R.; Mourot, A. Optical control of neuronal ion channels and receptors. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2019, 20, 514–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bandara, H.M.D.; Burdette, S.C. Photoisomerization in different classes of azobenzene. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1809–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Supuran, C.T. Carbonic anhydrases: Novel therapeuticapplications for inhibitors and activators. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2008, 7, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Aggarwal, K.; Banik, M.; Medellin, B.; Que, E.L. In situ photoregulation of carbonic anhydrase activity using azobenzenesulfonamides. Biochemistry 2019, 58, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bourais, I.; Maliki, S.; Mohammadi, H.; Amine, A. Investigation of sulfonamides inhibition of carbonic anhydrase enzyme using multiphotometric and electrochemical techniques. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2017, 96, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Del Prete, S.; De Luca, V.; Scozzafava, A.; Carginale, V.; Supuran, C.T.; Capasso, C. Biochemical properties of a new alpha-carbonic anhydrase from the human pathogenic bacterium, Vibrio cholera. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2014, 29, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Aggarwal, K.; Kuka, T.P.; Banik, M.; Medellin, B.P.; Ngo, C.Q.; Xie, D.; Fernandes, Y.; Dangerfield, T.L.; Ye, E.; Bouley, B.; et al. Visible light mediated bidirectional control over carbonic anhydrase activity in cells and in vivo using azobenzenesulfonamides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 14522–14531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Khalifah, R.G. The carbon dioxide hydration activity of carbonic anhydrase. I. Stop-flow kinetic studies on the native human isoenzymes B and C. J. Biol. Chem. 1971, 246, 2561–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rasmussen, J.K.; Boedtkjer, E. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors modify intracellular pH transients and contractions of rat middle cerebral arteries during CO2/HCO3 fluctuations. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2018, 38, 492–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mizumori, M.; Meyerowitz, J.; Takeuchi, T.; Lim, S.; Lee, P.; Supuran, C.T.; Guth, P.H.; Engel, E.; Kaunitz, J.D.; Akiba, Y. Epithelial carbonic anhydrases facilitate PCO2 and pH regulation in rat duodenal mucosa. J. Physiol. 2006, 573, 827–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Matsumoto, H.; Fujiwara, S.; Miyagi, H.; Nakamura, N.; Shiga, Y.; Ohta, T.; Tsuzuki, M. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors induce developmental toxicity during zebrafish embryogenesis, especially in the inner ear. Mar. Biotechnol. 2017, 19, 430–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Aspatwar, A.; Becker, H.M.; Parvathaneni, N.K.; Hammaren, M.; Svorjova, A.; Barker, H.; Supuran, C.T.; Dubois, L.; Lambin, P.; Parikka, M.; et al. Nitroimidazole-based inhibitors DTP338 and DTP348 are safe for zebrafish embryos and efficiently inhibit the activity of human CA IX in Xenopusoocytes. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2018, 33, 1064–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nusrat Mafy, N.; Matsuo, K.; Hiruma, S.; Uehara, R.; Tamaoki, N. Photoswitchable CENP-E inhibitor enabling the dynamic control of chromosome movement and mitotic progression. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1763–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wood, K.W.; Lad, L.; Luo, L.; Qian, X.; Knight, S.D.; Nevins, N.; Brejc, K.; Sutton, D.; Gilmartin, A.G.; Chua, P.R.; et al. Antitumor activity of an allosteric inhibitor of centromere-associated protein-E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 5839–5844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Qian, X.; McDonald, A.; Zhou, H.-J.; Adams, N.D.; Parrish, C.A.; Duffy, K.J.; Fitch, D.M.; Tedesco, R.; Ashcraft, L.W.; Yao, B.; et al. Discovery of the first potent and selective inhibitor of centromere-associated protein E: GSK923295. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chung, V.; Heath, E.I.; Schelman, W.R.; Johnson, B.M.; Kirby, L.C.; Lynch, K.M.; Botbyl, J.D.; Lampkin, T.A.; Holen, K.D. First-time-in-human study of GSK923295, a novel antimitotic inhibitor of centromere-associated protein E (CENP-E), in patients with refractory cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2012, 69, 733–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wood, K.W.; Sakowicz, R.; Goldstein, L.S.; Cleveland, D.W. CENP-E is a plus end-directed kinetochore motor required for metaphase chromosome alignment. Cell 1997, 91, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mulligan, L.M. RET revisited: Expanding the oncogenic portfolio. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2014, 14, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Xu, Y.; Gao, C.; Haversen, L.; Lundback, T.; Andreasson, J.; Grøtli, M. Design and development of a photoswitchable DFG-out kinase inhibitor. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 10043–10046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mologni, L.; Redaelli, S.; Morandi, A.; Plaza-Menacho, I.; Gambacorti-Passerini, C. Ponatinib is a potent inhibitor of wild-type and drug-resistant gatekeeper mutant RET kinase. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2013, 377, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dwyer, B.G.; Wang, C.; Abegg, D.; Racioppo, B.; Qiu, N.; Zhao, Z.; Pechalrieu, D.; Shuster, A.; Hoch, D.G.; Adibekian, A. Chemoproteomics-enabled de novo discovery of photoswitchable carboxylesterase inhibitors for optically controlled drug metabolism. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 3071–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Adibekian, A.; Martin, B.R.; Chang, J.W.; Hsu, K.L.; Tsuboi, K.; Bachovchin, D.A.; Speers, A.E.; Brown, S.J.; Spicer, T.; Fernandez-Vega, V.; et al. Confirming target engagement for reversible inhibitors in vivo by kinetically tuned activity-based probes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10345–10348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wang, C.; Abegg, D.; Dwyer, B.G.; Adibekian, A. Discovery and evaluation of new activity-based probes for serine hydrolases. ChemBioChem 2019, 20, 2212–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fukami, T.; Kariya, M.; Kurokawa, T.; Iida, A.; Nakajima, M. Comparison of substrate specificity among human arylacetamide deacetylase and carboxylesterases. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 78, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Coffey, E.T. Nuclear and cytosolic JNK signalling in neurons. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2014, 15, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Reynders, M.; Chaikuad, A.; Berger, B.-T.; Bauer, K.; Koch, P.; Laufer, S.; Knapp, S.; Trauner, D. Controlling the covalent reactivity of a kinase inhibitor with light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 20178–20183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Muth, F.; El-Gokha, A.; Ansideri, F.; Eitel, M.; Döring, E.; Sievers-Engler, A.; Lange, A.; Boeckler, F.M.; Lämmerhofer, M.; Koch, P.; et al. Tri- and tetrasubstituted pyridinylimidazoles as covalent inhibitors of c-Jun N-terminal kinase 3. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 594–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fuhrmann, J.; Clancy, K.W.; Thompson, P.R. Chemical biology of protein arginine modifications in epigenetic regulation. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 5413–5461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Mondal, S.; Parelkar, S.S.; Nagar, M.; Thompson, P.R. Photochemical control of protein arginine deiminase (PAD) activity. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018, 13, 1057–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Knight, J.S.; Subramanian, V.; O’Dell, A.A.; Yalavarthi, S.; Zhao, W.; Smith, C.K.; Hodgin, J.B.; Thompson, P.R.; Kaplan, M.J. Peptidylarginine deiminase inhibition disrupts NET formation and protects against kidney, skin and vascular disease in lupus-prone MRL/lpr mice. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 74, 2199–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kawalkowska, J.; Quirke, A.-M.; Ghari, F.; Davis, S.; Subramanian, V.; Thompson, P.R.; Williams, R.O.; Fischer, R.; La Thangue, N.B.; Venables, P.J. Abrogation of collageninduced arthritis by a peptidyl arginine deiminase inhibitor is associated with modulation of T cell-mediated immune responses. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lewallen, D.M.; Bicker, K.L.; Subramanian, V.; Clancy, K.W.; Slade, D.J.; Martell, J.; Dreyton, C.J.; Sokolove, J.; Weerapana, E.; Thompson, P.R. Chemical proteomic platform to identify citrullinated proteins. ACS Chem. Biol. 2015, 10, 2520–2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lewallen, D.M.; Bicker, K.L.; Madoux, F.; Chase, P.; Anguish, L.; Coonrod, S.; Hodder, P.; Thompson, P.R. A FluoPol-ABPP PAD2 high-throughput screen identifies the first calcium site inhibitor targeting the PADs. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 913–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Scheiner, M.; Sink, A.; Spatz, P.; Endres, E.; Decker, M. Photopharmacology on acetylcholinesterase: Novel photoswitchable inhibitors with improved pharmacological profiles. ChemPhotoChem 2021, 5, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Broichhagen, J.; Jurastow, I.; Iwan, K.; Kummer, W.; Trauner, D. Optical control of acetylcholinesterase with a tacrine switch. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7657–7660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chen, X.; Wehle, S.; Kuzmanovic, N.; Merget, B.; Holzgrabe, U.; König, B.; Sotriffer, C.A.; Decker, M. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors with photoswitchable inhibition of β-amyloid aggregation. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2014, 5, 377–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Rydberg, E.H.; Brumshtein, B.; Greenblatt, H.M.; Wong, D.M.; Shaya, D.; Williams, L.D.; Carlier, P.R.; Pang, Y.P.; Silman, I.; Sussman, J.L. Complexes of Alkylene-linked Tacrine dimers with Torpedo californica acetylcholinesterase: Binding of Bis (5)-tacrine produces a dramatic rearrangement in the active-site gorge. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5491–5500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Scheiner, M.; Sink, A.; Hoffmann, M.; Vrigneau, C.; Endres, E.; Carles, A.; sotriffer, C.; Maurice, T.; Decker, M. Photoswitchable pseudoirreversible butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors allow optical control of inhibition in vitro and enable restoration of cognition in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model upon irradiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 3279–3284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Darras, F.H.; Kling, B.; Heilmann, J.; Decker, M. Neuroprotective tri- and tetracyclic BChE inhibitors releasing reversible inhibitors upon carbamate transfer. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 914–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sawatzky, E.; Al-Momani, E.; Kobayashi, R.; Higuchi, T.; Samnick, S.; Decker, M. A novel way to radiolabel human butyrylcholinesterase for positron emission tomography through irreversible transfer of the radiolabeled moiety. ChemMedChem 2016, 11, 1540–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hoffmann, M.; Stiller, C.; Endres, E.; Scheiner, M.; Gunesch, S.; Sotriffer, C.; Maurice, T.; Decker, M. Highly selective butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors with tunable duration of action by chemical modification of transferable carbamate units exhibit pronounced neuroprotective effect in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 9116–9140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Matera, C.; Gomila, A.M.J.; Camarero, N.; Libergoli, M.; Soler, C.; Gorostiza, P. Photoswitchable antimetabolite for targeted photoactivated chemotherapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 15764–15773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Miller, L.W.; Sable, J.; Goelet, P.; Sheetz, M.P.; Cornish, V.W. Methotrexate conjugates: A molecular in vivo protein tag. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1672–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Miller, L.W.; Cai, Y.; Sheetz, M.P.; Cornish, V.W. In vivo protein labeling with trimethoprim conjugates: A flexible chemical tag. Nat. Methods 2005, 2, 255–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mashita, T.; Kowada, T.; Takahashi, H.; Matsui, T.; Mizukami, S. Light-wavelength-based quantitative control of dihydrofolate reductase activity by using a photochromic isostere of an inhibitor. ChemBioChem 2019, 20, 1382–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kobauri, P.; Galenkamp, N.S.; Schulte, A.M.; de Vries, J.; Simeth, N.A.; Maglia, G.; Thallmair, S.; Kolarski, D.; Szymanski, W.; Feringa, B.L. Hypothesis-driven, structure-based design in photopharmacology: The case of eDHFR inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 4798–4817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Crellin, E.; Mansfield, K.E.; Leyrat, C.; Nitsch, D.; Douglas, I.J.; Root, A.; Williamson, E.; Smeeth, L.; Tomlinson, L.A. Trimethoprim use for urinary tract infection and risk of adverse outcomes in older patients: Cohort study. BMJ 2018, 360, k341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Bennett, B.C.; Wan, Q.; Ahmad, M.F.; Langan, P.; Dealwis, C.G. X-Ray structure of the ternary MTX·NADPH complex of the anthrax dihydrofolate reductase: A pharmacophore for dual-site inhibitor design. J. Struct. Biol. 2009, 166, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yuan, T.L.; Cantley, L.C. PI3K pathway alterations in cancer: Variations on a theme. Oncogene 2008, 27, 5497–5510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhang, Y.; Peng, S.; Lin, S.; Ji, M.; Du, T.; Chen, X.; Xu, H. Discovery of a novel photoswitchable PI3K inhibitor toward optically-controlled anticancer activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2022, 72, 116975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Lin, S.; Jin, J.; Liu, Y.; Tian, H.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, R.; Zhang, J.; Wang, M.; Du, T.; Ji, M.; et al. Discovery of 4-Methylquinazoline Based PI3K Inhibitors for the Potential Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 8873–8879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lin, S.; Wang, C.; Ji, M.; Wu, D.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, K.; Dong, Y.; Jin, J.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J.; et al. Discovery and optimization of 2-amino-4-methylquinazoline derivatives as highly potent phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors for cancer treatment. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 6087–6109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Shchelik, I.S.; Tomio, A.; Gademann, K. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of light-activated antibiotics. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 681–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Weston, C.E.; Krämer, A.; Colin, F.; Yildiz, Ö.; Baud, M.G.J.; Meyer-Almes, F.-J.; Fuchter, M.J. Toward photopharmacological antimicrobial chemotherapy using photoswitchable amidohydrolase inhibitors. ACS Infect. Dis. 2017, 3, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bieth, J.; Vratsanos, S.M.; Wassermann, N.; Erlanger, B.F. Photoregulation of biological activity by photocromic reagents, II. Inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1969, 64, 1103–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Quandt, G.; Höfner, G.; Pabel, J.; Dine, J.; Eder, M.; Wanner, K.T. First photoswitchable neurotransmitter transporter inhibitor: Light-induced control of γ-aminobutyric acid transporter 1 (GAT1) activity in mouse brain. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 6809–6821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Hüll, K.; Morstein, J.; Trauner, D. In vivo photopharmacology. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 10710–10747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ogasawara, S. Duration control of protein expression in vivo by light-mediated reversible activation of translation. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Tochitsky, I.; Kienzler, M.A.; Isacoff, E.; Kramer, R.H. Restoring vision to the blind with chemical photoswitches. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 10748–10773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Tochitsky, I.; Helft, Z.; Meseguer, V.; Fletcher, R.B.; Vessey, K.A.; Telias, M.; Denlinger, B.; Malis, J.; Fletcher, E.L.; Kramer, R.H. How azobenzene photoswitches restore visual responses to the blind retina. Neuron 2016, 92, 100–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Tochitsky, I.; Trautman, J.; Gallerani, N.; Malis, J.G.; Kramer, R.H. Restoring visual function to the blind retina with a potent, safe and long-lasting photoswitch. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kobauri, P.; Dekker, F.J.; Szymanski, W.; Feringa, B.L. Rational design in photopharmacology with molecular photoswitches. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202300681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lerch, M.M.; Hansen, M.J.; van Dam, G.M.; Szymanski, W.; Feringa, B.L. Emerging targets in photopharmacology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 10978–10999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ozhogin, I.V.; Zolotukhin, P.V.; Makarova, N.I.; Rostovtseva, I.A.; Pugachev, A.D.; Kozlenko, A.S.; Belanova, A.A.; Borodkin, G.S.; Dorogan, I.V.; Metelitsa, A.V. Meta-stable state photoacid containing β-estradiol fragment with photomodulated biological activity and anti-cancer stem cells properties. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2024, 257, 112964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lachmann, D.; Lahmy, R.; König, B. Fulgimides as light-activated tools in biological investigations. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2019, 5018–5024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wilson, D.; Branda, N.R. Turning “on” and “off” a pyridoxal 5′-phosphate mimic using light. Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 5527–5530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Leistner, A.-L.; Pianowski, Z.L. Smart photochromic materials triggered with visible light. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 2022, e202101271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kienzler, M.A.; Isacoff, E.Y. Precise modulation of neuronal activity with synthetic photoswitchable ligands. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2017, 45, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Adak, S.; Lal Maity, M.; Bandyopadhyay, S. Photoresponsive small molecule enzyme mimics. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 35361–35370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Morstein, J.; Impastato, A.C.; Trauner, D. Photoswitchable lipids. ChemBioChem 2021, 22, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Hu, H.-G.; Chen, P.-G.; Wang, G.; Wu, J.-J.; Zhang, B.-D.; Li, W.-H.; Davis, R.L.; Li, Y.-M. Regulation of immune activation by optical control of TLR1/2 heterodimerization. ChemBioChem 2020, 21, 1150–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Tsai, Y.-H.; Essig, S.; James, J.R.; Lang, K.; Chin, J.W. Selective, rapid and optically switchable regulation of protein function in live mammalian cells. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Velema, W.A.; van der Toorn, M.; Szymanski, W.; Feringa, B.L. Design, synthesis, and inhibitory activity of potent, photoswitchable mast cell activation inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 4456–4464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Velema, W.A.; van der Berg, J.P.; Hansen, M.J.; Szymanski, W.; Driessen, A.J.M.; Feringa, B.L. Optical control of antibacterial activity. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 924–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Schoenberger, M.; Damijonaitis, A.; Zhang, Z.; Nagel, D.; Trauner, D. Development of a new photochromic ion channel blocker via azologization of fomocaine. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2014, 5, 514–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Morstein, J.; Awale, M.; Reymond, J.L.; Trauner, D. Mapping the azolog space enables the optical control of new biological targets. ACS Cent. Sci. 2019, 5, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Hinnah, K.; Willems, S.; Morstein, J.; Heering, J.; Hartrampf, F.W.W.; Broichhagen, J.; Leippe, P.; Merk, D.; Trauner, D. Photohormones enable optical control of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ(PPARγ). J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 10908–10920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Willems, S.; Morstein, J.; Hinnah, K.; Trauner, D.; Merk, D. A photohormone for light-dependent control of PPARα in live cells. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 10393–10402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Izquierdo-Serra, M.; Gascón-Moya, M.; Hirtz, J.J.; Pittolo, S.; Poskanzer, K.E.; Ferrer, E.; Alibés, R.; Busqué, F.; Yuste, R.; Hernando, J.; et al. Two-photon neuronal and astrocytic stimulation with azobenzene-based photoswitches. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 8693–8701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Jia, S.; Sletten, E.M. Spatiotemporal control of biology: Synthetic photochemistry toolbox with far-red and near-infrared light. ACS Chem. Biol. 2022, 17, 3255–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sortino, R.; Cunquero, M.; Castro-Olvera, G.; Gelabert, R.; Moreno, M.; Riefolo, F.; Matera, C.; Fernàndez-Castillo, N.; Agnetta, L.; Decker, M.; et al. Three-photon infrared stimulation of endogenous neuroreceptors in vivo. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202311181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Dong, M.; Babalhavaeji, A.; Collins, C.V.; Jarrah, K.; Sadovski, O.; Dai, Q.; Andrew Woolley, G. Near-infrared photoswitching of azobenzenes under physiological conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13483–13486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Samanta, S.; Babalhavaeji, A.; Dong, M.; Woolley, G.A. Photoswitching of ortho-substituted azonium ions by red light in whole blood. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 14127–14130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Volaric, J.; Szymanski, W.; Simeth, N.A.; Feringa, B.L. Molecular photoswitches in aqueous environments. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 12377–12449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Welleman, I.M.; Hoorens, M.W.H.; Feringa, B.L.; Boersma, H.H.; Szymanski, W. Photoresponsive molecular tools for emerging applications of light in medicine. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 11672–11691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Fuchter, M.J. On the promise of photopharmacology using photoswitches: A medicinal chemist’s perspective. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 11436–11447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Photoisomerization of azobenzene. hν1 and hν2 stand for light to switch; kbT stands for thermal relaxation.
Scheme 1. Photoisomerization of azobenzene. hν1 and hν2 stand for light to switch; kbT stands for thermal relaxation.
Molecules 29 04523 sch001
Scheme 2. Diagram of photoswitchable inhibitors with trans-on and cis-on mechanisms, respectively.
Scheme 2. Diagram of photoswitchable inhibitors with trans-on and cis-on mechanisms, respectively.
Molecules 29 04523 sch002
Scheme 3. Photoisomerization of P1 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Scheme 3. Photoisomerization of P1 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Molecules 29 04523 sch003
Figure 1. (A) Fluorescence imaging of pHrodo Red (green) as a result of different intracellular pH values of HeLa cells with different isomers of P1 for 30 min. Blue fluorescence corresponds to a Hoechst stain. Scale bars are 100 μm. (B) Absolute pH values were calculated on the basis of a calibration curve and were reported as the mean of individual cells from three wells (N = 3; each replicate contains data from ~100 cells). Data represent mean values ± the standard deviation. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (p = 0.05; one-way analysis of variance). Reproduced with permission from [49]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.
Figure 1. (A) Fluorescence imaging of pHrodo Red (green) as a result of different intracellular pH values of HeLa cells with different isomers of P1 for 30 min. Blue fluorescence corresponds to a Hoechst stain. Scale bars are 100 μm. (B) Absolute pH values were calculated on the basis of a calibration curve and were reported as the mean of individual cells from three wells (N = 3; each replicate contains data from ~100 cells). Data represent mean values ± the standard deviation. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (p = 0.05; one-way analysis of variance). Reproduced with permission from [49]. Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 04523 g001
Scheme 4. Photoisomerization of P2.
Scheme 4. Photoisomerization of P2.
Molecules 29 04523 sch004
Figure 2. The morphological appearance (A), swimming behavior (B), and otolith development (C) of zebrafish in the absence (vehicle) and presence of t-P2 and c-P2. The data represent the mean values ± the standard deviation. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (*** p < 0.0001). Scale bars represent 500 and 50 μm for (A,C), respectively. Reproduced with permission from [52]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Figure 2. The morphological appearance (A), swimming behavior (B), and otolith development (C) of zebrafish in the absence (vehicle) and presence of t-P2 and c-P2. The data represent the mean values ± the standard deviation. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences (*** p < 0.0001). Scale bars represent 500 and 50 μm for (A,C), respectively. Reproduced with permission from [52]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 04523 g002
Scheme 5. Photoisomerization of P3 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Scheme 5. Photoisomerization of P3 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Molecules 29 04523 sch005
Figure 3. (a) Live imaging of mitotic chromosomes in a P3-treated LLC-PK1 cell under alternating 365 nm (red) and 510 nm (blue) light irradiation. White arrows: misaligned chromosomes; magenta arrow: aligned chromosomes. (b) A kymograph of mitotic chromosome movement along the cell division axis. The misaligned chromosomes are highlighted and tracked by lines with different colors. Vertical bars, 5 μm. Horizontal bar, 5 min. Reproduced with permission from [58]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Figure 3. (a) Live imaging of mitotic chromosomes in a P3-treated LLC-PK1 cell under alternating 365 nm (red) and 510 nm (blue) light irradiation. White arrows: misaligned chromosomes; magenta arrow: aligned chromosomes. (b) A kymograph of mitotic chromosome movement along the cell division axis. The misaligned chromosomes are highlighted and tracked by lines with different colors. Vertical bars, 5 μm. Horizontal bar, 5 min. Reproduced with permission from [58]. Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 04523 g003
Scheme 6. Photoisomerization of P4 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Scheme 6. Photoisomerization of P4 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Molecules 29 04523 sch006
Scheme 7. Photoisomerization of P5 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Scheme 7. Photoisomerization of P5 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Molecules 29 04523 sch007
Scheme 8. Photoisomerization of P6 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Scheme 8. Photoisomerization of P6 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Molecules 29 04523 sch008
Scheme 9. Photoisomerization of P7 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Scheme 9. Photoisomerization of P7 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Molecules 29 04523 sch009
Figure 4. Inhibition of histone H3 citrullination in HEK293T/PAD2 cells by P7. Inhibitor concentrations [I] are given under each lane of the Western blot image. Citrullinated H3 (H3 Cit) and H3 are shown in red and green, respectively. The quantification of each band yielded the H3 Cit/H3 ratio, from which the % relative H3 citrullination was calculated. Reproduced with permission from [74]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Figure 4. Inhibition of histone H3 citrullination in HEK293T/PAD2 cells by P7. Inhibitor concentrations [I] are given under each lane of the Western blot image. Citrullinated H3 (H3 Cit) and H3 are shown in red and green, respectively. The quantification of each band yielded the H3 Cit/H3 ratio, from which the % relative H3 citrullination was calculated. Reproduced with permission from [74]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 04523 g004
Scheme 10. Photoisomerization of P8 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Scheme 10. Photoisomerization of P8 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Molecules 29 04523 sch010
Scheme 11. Photoisomerization of P9 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Scheme 11. Photoisomerization of P9 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Molecules 29 04523 sch011
Figure 5. Effects of both t-P9 (PSS455nm) and c-P9 (PSS365nm) on Aβ25–35-induced spontaneous alternation deficits with an anti-amnesic murine AD model. Mice received Aβ25–35 (9 nmol icv) or vehicle solution (3 μL icv) on day 1 and inhibitor P9 in the 0.3–1 mg/kg ip dose range 30 min before the YMT session on day 8. Data show means ± SEM of n = 12 per group. ANOVA: F(5,64) = 55.937, p = 0.0001. ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 vs. (V/V)-treated group and ## p < 0.01 vs. (Aβ25–35/V)-treated group, Dunnett’s post hoc test. Aβ25–35, amyloid-β25–35; icv, intracerebroventricular; ip, intraperitoneal; V, vehicle. Reproduced with permission from [83]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5. Effects of both t-P9 (PSS455nm) and c-P9 (PSS365nm) on Aβ25–35-induced spontaneous alternation deficits with an anti-amnesic murine AD model. Mice received Aβ25–35 (9 nmol icv) or vehicle solution (3 μL icv) on day 1 and inhibitor P9 in the 0.3–1 mg/kg ip dose range 30 min before the YMT session on day 8. Data show means ± SEM of n = 12 per group. ANOVA: F(5,64) = 55.937, p = 0.0001. ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 vs. (V/V)-treated group and ## p < 0.01 vs. (Aβ25–35/V)-treated group, Dunnett’s post hoc test. Aβ25–35, amyloid-β25–35; icv, intracerebroventricular; ip, intraperitoneal; V, vehicle. Reproduced with permission from [83]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 04523 g005
Scheme 12. Photoisomerization of P10 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Scheme 12. Photoisomerization of P10 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Molecules 29 04523 sch012
Figure 6. (a) Inhibition of DHFR activity at 1 nM, 10 nM, and 100 nM of t-P10 (black) and c-P10 (violet). Data are means of at least three independent experiments in triplicate or quadruplicate ± SEM. Adjusted p–value (*) ≤ 0.05. (b) HeLa cell viability assay at different concentrations of MTX, c-P10, and t-P10. Data are means of at least three independent experiments in triplicate or quadruplicate ± SEM. Adjusted p-value (****) ≤ 0.0001. Reproduced with permission from [87]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Figure 6. (a) Inhibition of DHFR activity at 1 nM, 10 nM, and 100 nM of t-P10 (black) and c-P10 (violet). Data are means of at least three independent experiments in triplicate or quadruplicate ± SEM. Adjusted p–value (*) ≤ 0.05. (b) HeLa cell viability assay at different concentrations of MTX, c-P10, and t-P10. Data are means of at least three independent experiments in triplicate or quadruplicate ± SEM. Adjusted p-value (****) ≤ 0.0001. Reproduced with permission from [87]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 04523 g006
Figure 7. Effects of t-P10 and c-P10 (obtained by external pre-irradiation with 375 nm light) on zebrafish development, viability, and mortality. (a,c) Anatomical profiles of zebrafish at 72 hpf after treatment with vehicle (DMSO 2%), MTX (200 μM), c-P10 (200 μM), and t-P10 (200 μM). The graph shows the percentage of zebrafish treated vs. the treatment group, superimposing the number of abnormal larvae dead zebrafish (black and yellow checkered sections) onto the number of viable embryos (checkered sections) and onto the total number of fertilized embryos (whole columns). (b) Illustrative pictures of individual larvae from each treatment group at 72 hpf. (d) Mortality of zebrafish at 96 hpf after treatment with vehicle (DMSO 2%), MTX (200 μM), c-P10 (200 μM), and t-P10 (200 μM). The graph shows the percentage of zebrafish treated vs. the treatment group, superimposing the number of dead zebrafish (black and red checkered sections) onto the number of viable embryos (checkered sections) and onto the total number of fertilized embryos (whole columns). Reproduced with permission from [87]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Figure 7. Effects of t-P10 and c-P10 (obtained by external pre-irradiation with 375 nm light) on zebrafish development, viability, and mortality. (a,c) Anatomical profiles of zebrafish at 72 hpf after treatment with vehicle (DMSO 2%), MTX (200 μM), c-P10 (200 μM), and t-P10 (200 μM). The graph shows the percentage of zebrafish treated vs. the treatment group, superimposing the number of abnormal larvae dead zebrafish (black and yellow checkered sections) onto the number of viable embryos (checkered sections) and onto the total number of fertilized embryos (whole columns). (b) Illustrative pictures of individual larvae from each treatment group at 72 hpf. (d) Mortality of zebrafish at 96 hpf after treatment with vehicle (DMSO 2%), MTX (200 μM), c-P10 (200 μM), and t-P10 (200 μM). The graph shows the percentage of zebrafish treated vs. the treatment group, superimposing the number of dead zebrafish (black and red checkered sections) onto the number of viable embryos (checkered sections) and onto the total number of fertilized embryos (whole columns). Reproduced with permission from [87]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Molecules 29 04523 g007
Scheme 13. Photoisomerization of P11 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Scheme 13. Photoisomerization of P11 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Molecules 29 04523 sch013
Scheme 14. Photoisomerization of P12 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Scheme 14. Photoisomerization of P12 and the corresponding parent inhibitor.
Molecules 29 04523 sch014
Figure 8. (a) Apoptosis analysis of HGC-27 cells by flow cytometry with t-P12 and c-P12. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 3 for each group), one-way ANOVA analysis, **** p < 0.0001 between indicated groups. (b) Colony formation assay of HGC-27 cells with t-P12 and c-P12, ** p < 0.01 between indicated groups. Reproduced with permission from [95]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier.
Figure 8. (a) Apoptosis analysis of HGC-27 cells by flow cytometry with t-P12 and c-P12. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 3 for each group), one-way ANOVA analysis, **** p < 0.0001 between indicated groups. (b) Colony formation assay of HGC-27 cells with t-P12 and c-P12, ** p < 0.01 between indicated groups. Reproduced with permission from [95]. Copyright 2022 Elsevier.
Molecules 29 04523 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y. Recent Progress in Regulating the Activity of Enzymes with Photoswitchable Inhibitors. Molecules 2024, 29, 4523. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194523

AMA Style

Chen Y. Recent Progress in Regulating the Activity of Enzymes with Photoswitchable Inhibitors. Molecules. 2024; 29(19):4523. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194523

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Yi. 2024. "Recent Progress in Regulating the Activity of Enzymes with Photoswitchable Inhibitors" Molecules 29, no. 19: 4523. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194523

APA Style

Chen, Y. (2024). Recent Progress in Regulating the Activity of Enzymes with Photoswitchable Inhibitors. Molecules, 29(19), 4523. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194523

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop