Next Article in Journal
DFT Studies of Dimethylaminophenyl-Substituted Phthalocyanine and Its Silver Complexes
Next Article in Special Issue
In Situ Hybridization Strategy Constructs Heterogeneous Interfaces to Form Electronically Modulated MoS2/FeS2 as the Anode for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Storage
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Composition Variation in Essential Oil and Their Correlation with Climate Factors in Chinese Prickly Ash Peels (Zanthoxylum armatum DC.) from Different Habitats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Construction of Single-Atom Catalysts for N, O Synergistic Coordination and Application to Electrocatalytic O2 Reduction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Controllable La Deficiency Engineering within Perovskite Oxides for Enhanced Overall Water Splitting

College of Physics and Information Engineering, Shanxi Normal University, No. 339 Taiyu Road, Xiaodian District, Taiyuan 030031, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2024, 29(6), 1342; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061342
Submission received: 3 March 2024 / Revised: 15 March 2024 / Accepted: 15 March 2024 / Published: 18 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2D Nanosheets and Their Nanohybrids)

Abstract

:
Recently, perovskite (ABO3) nanomaterials have been widely explored as a class of versatile electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reactions (OER) due to their remarkable compositional flexibility and structural tunability, but their poor electrical conductivity hinders hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) activity and further limits the large-scale application of perovskite oxide in overall water splitting (OWS). In this study, hollow-nanotube-structure LaxCo0.4Fe0.6O3−δ (x = 1.0, 0.9, and 0.8) perovskites with superior HER/OER activity were synthesized on nickel-iron alloy foam (denoted LaxCoFe/NFF) using hydrothermal with a subsequent calcination strategy. Among them, La0.9CoFe/NFF not only exhibited extraordinary HER electrocatalytic performance (160.5 mV@10 mA cm−2 and 241.0 mV@100 mA cm−2) and stability (20 h@10 mA cm−2), but also displayed significant OER electrocatalytic activity (234.7 mV@10 mA cm−2 and 296.1 mV@100 mA cm−2) and durability (20 h@10 mA cm−2), outperforming many recently reported HER/OER perovskite catalysts. The increase in oxygen vacancies caused by the introduction of La deficiency leads to the expansion of the lattice, which greatly accelerates the HER/OER process of La0.9CoFe/NFF. Additionally, the naturally porous skeleton can prevent catalysts from aggregating as well as delay the corrosion and dissolution of catalysts in the electrolyte under high applied potentials. Furthermore, the assembled two-electrode configuration, utilizing La0.9CoFe/NFF (cathode and anode) electrodes, only requires a low cell voltage of 1.573 V at 10 mA cm−2 for robust alkaline OWS, accompanied by remarkable durability over 20 h. This work provides inspiration for the design and preparation of high-performance and stable bifunctional perovskite electrocatalysts for OWS.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Due to the rapid consumption of fossil fuels, associated with the consequent environmental problems, intense efforts have been devoted to exploring clean and renewable energy sources as alternatives [1,2]. Hydrogen as a clean renewable energy source is rising as a star since it possesses numerous superiorities, such as a high calorific value, abundant reserves, and carbon–free emissions in energy storage and conversion [3]. Nevertheless, the conventional industrial production of hydrogen suffers from the depletion of fossil fuel sources and the emissions of carbon dioxide gas [4]. Fortunately, electrochemical water splitting has been widely investigated due to its high purity, low energy consumption, and environmental friendliness. It is composed of two half–cell reactions: the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in the cathode and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in the anode. As is well known, common electrolyzers are generally assembled based on rare precious metals, such as RuO2/IrO2 for OER and Pt-based materials for HER, while their high cost, low abundance, and poor stability severely impede their commercial application [5,6,7]. Therefore, the development of bifunctional alternatives with low cost, high activity, and long stability is urgently needed.
In the past decade, extensive efforts have been dedicated to exploiting diverse low-cost, reliable, and high-efficient electrocatalysts for overall water splitting, including transition metal phosphides [8,9], chalcogenides [10,11], hydroxides [12,13], oxides [14,15], etc. Among various materials, perovskite oxide with the general formula of ABO3, where A represents a rare-earth or alkaline earth element and B indicates a transition metal ion, has emerged as a promising alternative to precious metal-based catalysts due to their compositional flexibility, antioxidative features, and structural tunability [16,17]. Most recently, some strategies, including defect engineering, elemental doping/substituting, and morphology regulation, have been explored to improve intrinsic catalytic activity. Ideally, the cations at the A and B sites in perovskite oxide are equal to 1, and within a certain deviation range, the perovskite lattice structure can still remain stable due to the high structural tolerance [18]. Previous studies have suggested that engineering A–site deficiency may effectively increase the concentration of the O–site vacancy and modify the electronic structure of B–site cations (eg occupancy) based on the electrical neutrality principle, leading to a change in the physicochemical properties of perovskites and ultimately enhancing OER and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalytic activity [19,20,21]. Specifically, the formation of oxygen vacancies is always accompanied by a change in the eg orbital filling of B–site transition metal. The eg orbital is closely related to the strength of surface anion adsorbate binding, which has a significant influence on the adsorption/desorption properties of intermediates. In addition, the degree of O–site vacancy formation is associated with the covalency between the transition metal 3d bands and the oxygen 2p band, with more covalent systems indicating higher O–site vacancy concentrations for enhanced electrocatalytic activities [21]. In addition, the selective and functional substitution of the B–site in ABO3 is also an effective strategy to facilitate OER performance for water splitting [22,23,24]. In particular, LaFeO3 is reported as one of the most widely used parent oxides in the perovskite family for applications such as sensors and OER electrocatalysts. All Fe atoms in LaFeO3 are located at octahedral sites and the substitution of Fe ions play a vital role in changing Fe-O bonding strength for enhancing the electrocatalytic performances [25,26,27]. Although the above practices have effectively improved the catalytic performances of LaFeO3 perovskites, their catalytic activities are still limited by relatively poor conductivity, severely uncontrolled agglomeration, and extremely low specific surface area due to the conventional sol–gel synthesis process [28,29,30]. At the same time, their HER activity in alkaline media is rarely studied previously.
Furthermore, three-dimensional (3D) self–supported electrodes with high porosity have drawn much attention due to their porous interconnected networks, which could provide fast charge and mass transfer via abundant electron/ion pathways during the electrochemical process [31]. At the same time, in situ growth electrocatalysts on macroporous metal foam would endow catalysts with high specific area, excellent electrical conductivity, and numerous inner voids, which would be beneficial to electrolyte permeation and bubble release, hence resulting in the improvement of catalytic activity and mechanical stability [32,33,34,35]. Additionally, the naturally porous skeleton can prevent catalysts from aggregating as well as delay the corrosion and dissolution of catalysts in the electrolyte under high applied potentials [36]. Nevertheless, the majority of currently reported perovskite oxide catalysts are unself–supported powder–like structures, which seriously limits their catalytic performance. Thus, it is necessary to develop self–supported perovskite oxides on the conductive substrate with excellent electronic conductivity to enhance their intrinsic catalytic activities towards overall water splitting.
Inspired by the above findings, we propose an effective strategy to significantly enhance the HER and OER electrocatalytic performances of LaFeO3 for overall water splitting by simply engineering A–site deficiency and B–site cation substitution. Hollow nanotube-like perovskite oxides LaxCo0.4Fe0.6O3−δ (x = 1.0, 0.9, and 0.8, denoted as LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, and La0.8CoFe/NFF) were prepared in situ vertically grown on nickel-iron alloy foam (NFF) through mild hydrothermal treatment followed by air annealing. To the best of our knowledge, A–site–deficient perovskites have rarely before been reported as efficient HER catalysts in alkaline media. It was found that La0.9CoFe/NFF revealed better HER/OER activity, which could be attributed to the abundant surface oxygen vacancies. More significantly, the assembled two-electrode electrolyzer with La0.9CoFe/NFF (cathode and anode) exhibited outstanding catalytic performance and good durability towards overall water splitting (1.573 V @10 mA·cm−2 for 20 h).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structural and Surface Morphology Characterization of Catalysts

The new LaxCoFe/NFF catalyst was obtained according to the synthetic route shown in Figure 1a. Perovskite catalysts obtained by conventional synthesis methods have quite low intrinsic electronic conductivities and small specific surface areas, which lead to low catalytic activity, thus limiting their usage. Therefore, in order to improve the performance of the perovskite materials in water splitting, the hydrothermal synthesis method was employed to prepare perovskite catalysts. First, the precursor was synthesized by hydrothermal reaction at 160 °C for 8 h. Subsequently, the hollow nanotube–structured LaxCoFe/NFF catalyst was obtained by calcination at 600 °C for 3 h in an air atmosphere. The crystal structures of the resultant LaxCoFe/NFF were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD). To eliminate the influence of substrate diffraction peaks, the samples were scraped from the substrate by ultrasound treatment. As shown in Figure 1b, the crystal structures of LaxCo0.4Fe0.6O3−δ were investigated by XRD and demonstrated that except for diffraction peaks at 30.3° and 35.4°, which correspond to Fe3O4 impurities, all other diffraction peaks agree well with LaCoFe standard diffraction peaks (PDF#44-0361, denoted by the ICDD, the International Centre of Diffraction Data). These diffraction peaks reveal an orthorhombic perovskite structure with a space group of Pnma. This reveals that the orthorhombic structure of perovskites can be stabilized even when introducing an A–site deficiency. Additionally, as shown in the enlarged XRD pattern from 32° to 34° (Figure 1c), the main diffraction peaks of the LaxCoFe catalyst after the introduction of A–site deficiency shifted to a lower angle, which indicates the lattice expansion of catalysts. Furthermore, the particle sizes of the catalysts were obtained by the Scherrer formula based on the main peak of the (112) plane, while the corresponding crystallite sizes of LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, and La0.8CoFe/NFF were 12.75, 13.36, and 13.78 nm, respectively [23]. This phenomenon can be attributed to the effect of A–site deficiency, where the average grain size shows a positive correlation with changes in A–site content.
The scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of the as–synthesized LaxCoFe/NFF hollow nanotube are presented in Figure 1d–k and Figure 2. Figure 1d shows the SEM image of the broken perovskite nanotube, which clearly shows the hollow structure. Moreover, Figure 1g displays a high–magnification image of the hollow nanotube surface, revealing numerous uniformly distributed and smooth surface nanoparticles (with diameters ranging between 20 and 50 nm). The structures of La0.9CoFe/NFF and La0.8CoFe/NFF, maintained as hollow nanotubes, can be observed to evolve with the increasing A–site defects, as shown in Figure 1e,h,f,i. The hollow structure of the nanotubes contributes to a large specific surface area, which is advantageous to promote electron transport through the abundant active sites and then improve the catalytic performance. Nanotubes with a hollow structure can provide a large specific surface area. In addition, the EDS spectra of LaCoFe/NFF and La0.9CoFe/NFF shown in Figure 1j,k indicate that all elements are evenly well distributed.
To further characterize the morphology and crystal structure of LaxCoFe, TEM measurement was also adopted. As shown in Figure 2a,d, it can be observed that small particles agglomerated together after high–temperature sintering. Further, HRTEM studies were carried out on LaCoFe and La0.9CoFe to understand the nature of the particles. Specifically, as shown in Figure 2b,e, the lattice fringe analysis of the sample displays the interplane spacing of 0.274 and 0.194 nm, corresponding to (112) and (220) of LaCoFe, which further confirms the XRD result, indicating that LaCo0.4Fe0.6O3 was successfully synthesized. The obvious set of diffraction rings can be revealed from selected area electron diffraction, being assigned to the (112) and (220) planes of LaCoFe, confirming the polycrystalline nature of the LaCoFe nanoparticles (Figure 2c,f).

2.2. Characterization of Surface Valence States of Catalysts

After gaining significant insights into the structural and morphological aspects of the catalyst, the surface chemical states and compositions of the as–prepared samples were further identified by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The XPS survey spectra in Figure S1 suggest the coexistence of La, Co, Fe, and O elements in LaxCoFe/NFF, which coincides well with the EDS element mapping analysis. Specifically, in the La 3d spectra (Figure 3a), each spectrum is illustrated by two doublet peaks in the 832–840 eV and 848–856 eV regions, corresponding to the La 3d5/2 and La 3d3/2 orbitals, respectively. Within the two doublet peak regions, the main peak located at the lower binding energy side is attributed to La3+, and the peak at the higher binding energy site belongs to their satellite peaks. The difference in the binding energy (∆) between the La 3d5/2 and La 3d3/2 main peaks corresponds to the spin–orbit coupling of La. Further, the ∆ value of La in all three materials is in the range of 16.5–17.5 eV. The positions and ∆ values of the La 3d5/2 and La 3d3/2 binding energy peaks are significantly distinctive of La in the +3 oxidation state [37,38,39].
Figure 3b illustrates the Co 2p XPS spectrum. Two peaks were observed at 780 eV and 795 eV, which correspond to Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2, respectively. Both the Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2 orbitals could be deconvoluted into Co3+, Co2+, and satellite peaks. The Co2+ and Co3+ ratios of those catalysts can be estimated through the relative peak areas, which correspond to Co2+/Co3+ results of 1.44 for LaCoFe/NFF, 1.22 for La0.9CoFe/NFF, and 1.71 for La0.8CoFe/NFF [23]. The average valence states of Co in LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, and La0.8CoFe/NFF were 2.41, 2.45, and 2.36, respectively, which were obtained from the respective ratios. At the same time, under the assumption that Co3+ (eg = 1) goes out to the low spin state and Co2+ (eg = 2) is in the high spin state, the eg occupancies of LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, and La0.8CoFe/NFF can be obtained as 1.59, 1.54, and 1.63, respectively. Thus, the eg of La0.9CoFe/NFF is the closest to 1.2 (perovskites with the optimal eg ≈ 1.2 show landmark intrinsic OER activity compared with IrO2 according to previous studies) [23,25]. The XPS spectra of Fe 2p were also presented. In Figure 3c, the Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2 peaks could be presented for all of the LaxCoFe/NFF compounds due to spin-orbit doublet splitting [40,41]. In the spectra, both the Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2 peaks could be deconvoluted into two separate peaks of Fe3+ and Fe2+, with a higher energy of Fe3+ compared to Fe2+. Additionally, a pair of satellite peaks exist in the range of 717.6–718.2 eV and 731.4–732.6 eV [42]. As shown in Figure 3d, the O 1s spectra of all the LaxCoFe/NFF perovskite catalysts can be resolved into four peaks corresponding to lattice oxygen species (O2−), highly oxidative oxygen species ( O 2 2 /O2), hydroxyl groups or oxygen (−OH/O2), and adsorbed molecular water (H2O), respectively [43]. In addition, oxygen vacancies can be easily introduced into the material, which helps to modify the B–O bond and the surface configuration, promoting the performance of OER. All related peak positions are also listed in Supplementary Materials: Table S1.
Figure 3e summarizes the surface atomic composition of these different oxygen-related species. Previous studies suggested that the relative content of O 2 2 /O2 species is associated with surface oxygen vacancies. The content of O 2 2 /O2 is calculated to be 51% for the La0.9CoFe/NFF catalysts, which is higher than that of the LaCoFe/NFF (45%) and La0.8CoFe/NFF (40%) [44]. This demonstrates that the introduction of La deficiency could contribute to generating more oxygen vacancies in the catalysts, which is beneficial to the enhancement of HER/OER activity [45]. Based on the above–mentioned analyses, it can be concluded that more rich oxygen vacancies can be generated in the La0.9CoFe/NFF catalysts. These vacancies serve as the active sites for perovskite–based catalysts in the processes of HER/OER, thereby contributing to enhanced catalytic activities [43].

2.3. Electrocatalytic Performance for HER in Alkaline

The electrocatalytic activities of HER and OER were evaluated using LaxCoFe/NFF directly as working electrodes in a 1 M KOH electrolyte with iR correction. The carbon rod and Hg/HgO were used as the counter and reference electrodes, respectively. Firstly, the LSV polarization curves of LaCoFe/NFF for HER/OER under different hydrothermal temperatures and ratios of Co/Fe were studied. The sample exhibited the best HER/OER performance at 160 °C (Figure S2), and the optimal molar ratio of Co/Fe is 4:6 (Figure S3). Additionally, the LSV curves of LaCoFe synthetized on NF (denoted as LaCoFe/NF) with the same production are compared with LaCoFe/NFF, as shown in Figure S4. LaCoFe/NFF displayed better HER/OER performance than LaCoFe/NF. The HER performance of NFF and LaxCoFe/NFF was displayed in Figure 4a. Specifically, an overpotential of 160.5 mV is achieved for La0.9CoFe/NFF at 10 mA cm−2 current density, which is superior to the 190.5 mV for LaCoFe/NFF, 174.9 mV for La0.8CoFe/NFF, and 240.1 mV for NFF, indicating that La0.9CoFe/NFF displays the optimal HER activity among the LaxCoFe/NFF samples. The HER electrocatalytic kinetics of the developed electrocatalysts were further evaluated using Tafel plots. Obviously, La0.9CoFe/NFF possessed the smallest Tafel slope of 80.8 mV dec−1, which was apparently lower than that of LaCoFe/NFF (93.4 mV dec−1), La0.8CoFe/NFF (111.4 mV dec−1), and NFF (146.3 mV dec−1), suggesting that La0.9CoFe/NFF had the faster reaction rate and kinetics (Figure 4b). In respect of the low overpotential and Tafel slope, La0.9CoFe/NFF is superior to most reported perovskite oxide–based HER electrocatalysts, as depicted in Figure 4c and Table S2. EIS was tested to further understand the charge-transfer kinetics of the catalysts. Figure 4d reveals that the Rct value of La0.9CoFe/NFF (2.81 Ω) is much smaller than those of LaCoFe/NFF (2.93 Ω), La0.8CoFe/NFF (4.02 Ω) and NFF (14.21 Ω), proving faster charge transfer and more facile kinetics during HER.
To further evaluate HER activity, the electrochemical double–layer capacitance (Cdl) was estimated by the cyclic voltammogram (CV) curves of the as–fabricated electrocatalysts (Figure S5). As depicted in Figure 4e, the Cdl values of La0.9CoFe/NFF were 78.1 mF·cm−2, which was higher than those of LaCoFe/NFF (39.9 mF·cm−2), La0.8CoFe/NFF (3.9 mF·cm−2), and NFF (0.5 mF·cm−2). This indicates that the La0.9CoFe/NFF hollow nanotubes possess the maximum electrochemically active surface area (ECSA) (Figure S6). Furthermore, to obtain a certain idea of the intrinsic catalytic activity, the turnover frequency (TOF) was further calculated. As shown in Figures S7 and S8, La0.9CoFe/NFF exhibits a significant TOF value of 0.64 s−1 (η = 200 mV), which is 3.8 and 4.6 times higher than those of LaCoFe/NFF (0.17 s−1) and La0.8CoFe/NFF (0.14 s−1), respectively, indicating the outstanding intrinsic activity of La0.9CoFe/NFF. In addition, the LSV curves of La0.9CoFe/NFF measured before and after 1000 CV cycling tests almost overlap, which corroborates the remarkable long–term HER stability. At the same time, La0.9CoFe/NFF displays negligible attenuation using the chronoamperometry test under a constant current density of 10 mA·cm−2 for 20 h (Figure 4f). Additionally, Figure S9 depicts the chronopotentiometry tests performed for potential at a current density of −10 mA cm−2 for 20 h in 1 M KOH electrolyte, further suggesting its excellent HER activity and exceptional durability. The radar charts show the comparison for the overpotential (η100 and η200), Tafel slop, Cdl and Rct as presented in Figure 4g–i, where the larger area of the closed loop for La0.9CoFe/NFF means better comprehensive catalytic performance. In addition, the specific surface area of the samples was analyzed based on the N2 adsorption–desorption experiment by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. As expected, the BET surface area of La0.9CoFe/NFF (8.3 m2/g) is found to be higher than that of LaCoFe/NFF (6.3 m2/g) and La0.8CoFe/NFF (6.6 m2/g) (Figure S10a–c). Likewise, Figure S10d displayed the specific activity (SA, normalized by real oxide surface area obtained from BET results) of LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, and La0.8CoFe/NFF at an overpotential of 200 mV. Distinctly, La0.9CoFe/NFF still possessed the highest value among all samples. Based on the above characterization results, La0.9CoFe/NFF hollow nanotubes exhibited outstanding HER performance, which is mainly attributed to the enhanced oxygen vacancy, faster charge transfer, and higher ECSA. Moreover, the morphology and composition of the La0.9CoFe/NFF after the stability test were observed through SEM and XPS (Figures S11 and S12). They remained insignificant changes after HER stability, further demonstrating the robust operational stability of La0.9CoFe/NFF.

2.4. Electrocatalytic Performance for OER and OWS in Alkaline

Analogously, the OER catalytic performance of the as–fabricated electrocatalysts in a 1 M KOH solution was also measured. The LSV curves show that La0.9CoFe/NFF requires an overpotential of 296.1 mV to reach 100 mA cm−2, lower than LaCoFe/NFF (321.4 mV), La0.8CoFe/NFF (334 mV), and NFF (387.5 mV) (Figure 5a). The Tafel curves of LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, and La0.8CoFe/NFF and NFF are shown in Figure 5b. The Tafel slope of La0.9CoFe/NFF (59.1 mV dec−1) considerably outperforms those of LaCoFe/NFF (61.6 mV dec−1), La0.8CoFe/NFF (96.3 mV dec−1) and NFF (71.1 mV dec−1), revealing the significantly accelerated catalytic reaction kinetics of La0.9CoFe/NFF. In Figure 5c, La0.9CoFe/NFF possesses the lowest Rct of about 1.69 Ω among the control catalysts (LaCoFe/NFF: 1.91 Ω, La0.8CoFe/NFF: 2.19 Ω, NFF: 3.48 Ω). It indicates that La0.9CoFe/NFF exhibited a smaller charge transfer resistance and faster charge transport ability. By analyzing the CV curves at different scan rates, the ECSA was estimated using the Cdl to evaluate the inherent activity of the electrocatalysts (Figure S13). The La0.9CoFe/NFF catalyst exhibits larger Cdl and ECSA (33.6 mF·cm−2, 840 cm2) than those of LaCoFe/NFF (10.3 mF·cm−2, 257.5 cm2), La0.8CoFe/NFF (11.1 mF·cm−2, 277.5 cm2) and NFF (2.6 mF·cm−2, 65 cm2), as shown in Figure 5d and Figure S14. It reflects that more active sites exist in La0.9CoFe/NFF to promote its OER activity. As shown in Figure S15, the La0.9CoFe/NFF electrode has the largest TOF value of 0.88 s−1 (η = 300 mV), which shows that there is an approximately 3, 8, and 14 times increment for La0.9CoFe/NFF compared to the LaCoFe/NFF, La0.8CoFe/NFF, and NFF, respectively, implying better intrinsic activity. Moreover, the La0.9CoFe/NFF shows an outstanding SA value of 2.93 mA cm−2 (η = 270 mV), which is 1.99 and 1.04 times higher than those of LaCoFe/NFF (1.47 mA cm−2) and La0.8CoFe/NFF (2.82 mA cm−2), respectively, indicating the excellent intrinsic activity of La0.9CoFe/NFF for OER (Figure S16). To demonstrate its excellent superiority for OER, the performance of La0.9CoFe/NFF is comparable with other perovskite electrocatalysts reported in the literature (Table S3).
Stable durability and high current density tolerance are remarkable characteristics in practical scenarios. Figure 5e displays a multi–current OER process that ranges from 50 mA cm−2 to 250 mA cm−2 and back to 50 mA cm−2, whereas there is no evident voltage decay, reflecting the fact that the great majority of active sites on La0.9CoFe/NFF were maintained after a vigorous bubble release process, thus confirming superior tolerance for the high current density of the La0.9CoFe/NFF electrode in industrial applications. Figure 5f illustrates that the LSV curve displayed no obvious decay in the OER activity of La0.9CoFe/NFF after 1000 CV cycles, and the catalytic activity can be retained with a negligible decrease for at least 20 h of constant overpotentials of 234.7 mV. Similarly, Figure S7 depicts the chronopotentiometry tests performed for potential at a current density of 10 mA cm−2 for 20 h in 1 M KOH electrolyte. The SEM images (Figure S18) and XPS spectra (Figure S19) after the OER stability test also indicated almost no change for the catalyst.
Inspired by the remarkable OER and HER activity (La0.9CoFe/NFF), a home–made two-electrode system was assembled with La0.9CoFe/NFF serving as the cathode and anode, respectively, as schematically represented in Figure 5g. The NFF||NFF electrolyzer achieved a current density of 10 mA cm−2 at 1.807 V, while the La0.9CoFe/NFF||La0.9CoFe/NFF electrolyzer achieved the same at only 1.573 V in Figure 5h. Moreover, the long-term stability test of La0.9CoFe/NFF||La0.9CoFe/NFF at 10 mA·cm−2 for 20 h was also conducted with small potential loss, which is superior to that of NFF||NFF (Figure 5i). This OWS activity also exceeds that of most HER/OER bifunctional perovskite electrocatalysts (Figure 5j and Table S4), suggesting a wide range of industrial application prospects in electrochemical OWS.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials

Nickel foam (NF) and nickel-iron alloy foam (NFF) were obtained from KunShan Kunag Xun Electronics Co., Ltd (Suzhou, China,). Acetone, hydrochloric acid, anhydrous ethanol, potassium hydroxide, lanthanum nitrate hexahydrate (La(NO3)3·6H2O), cobaltous nitrate hexahydrate (Co(NO3)2·6H2O), iron nitrate nonahydrate (Fe(NO3)3·9H2O), citric acid (CA), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt dihydrate (EDTA-2Na) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd(Shanghai, China). All chemicals were of analytical grade and directly used without further treatments. Deionized (DI) water with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm−1 used in all experiments was purified through a Millipore system.

3.2. Preparation of LaxCoFe/NFF Catalyst

In a typical procedure, NFF (2 × 3 cm) was cleaned by acetone and hydrochloric acid (3.0 M) to remove the surface oxides and impurities, then rinsed with DI water and alcohol. The stoichiometric amounts of La(NO3)3·6H2O, Co(NO3)2·6H2O and Fe(NO3)3·9H2O were dissolved in 30 mL DI water. Then, certain amounts of EDTA–2Na and CA were added to the metal precursor solution, which are used as the complexing agents. The molar ratio of EDTA–2Na, CA, and total metal ions was 1:2.5:1. Later, transfer the above solution to a 50 mL Teflon–lined autoclave with NFF for 8 h at 160 °C to prepare the precursor. The obtained precursor was annealed at 600 °C for 3 h in air with a ramping rate of 2.5 °C min−1. At last, the samples were cooled to room temperature in the furnace to obtain the LaxCoFe/NFF perovskite catalysts, named LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, and La0.8CoFe/NFF, respectively.

3.3. Characterization

The morphology of all samples was investigated by field–emission scanning electron microscopy (FE–SEM, Hitachi, SU–8010, Tokyo, Japan) and high–resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR–TEM, JEM–2100, 200 kV, Tokyo, Japan) with X-ray energy–dispersive spectroscopy. The crystal diffraction patterns of samples were recorded by an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Bruker D8–Advance, Hsinchu, Taiwan) equipped with a Cu Kα radiation source (λ =1.5418 Å). The particle size was calculated by the Scherrer equation, D = /(B cos θ), where B is the full width at half-maximum height of the peaks, K is the spherical shape factor (0.89), and D is the linear dimension of the particle. The surface composition and valence state of the samples were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Kratos Axis Ultra DLD, Manchester, UK). The nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms were carried out by the ASAP 2460 automatic volumetric sorption analyzer(Norcross, GA, USA) at 77 K. The specific surface area and the corresponding pore size distribution of catalysts were investigated by utilizing the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method.

3.4. Electrochemical Measurements

All electrochemical data tests were performed using an electrochemical workstation (CHI 760E, CH Instruments, Shanghai, China) with a three–electrode cell configuration. The obtained catalysts on NFF (or NF), a mercury oxide electrode (Hg/HgO) and a carbon rod (4 mm in diameter) were directly used as the working electrode, the reference electrode, and the counter electrode, respectively. All electrochemical measurements were conducted under the same conditions in 1.0 M KOH. Before the linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) tests, the working electrodes were activated by using the cyclic voltammetry (CV) test at a scanning rate of 100 mV s−1 for a period of time. Then, LSV measurements for OER were conducted at a potential ranging from 0.0 to 1.0 V (vs. Hg/HgO) at a scanning rate of 1 mV s−1 in an O2 saturated 1.0 M KOH. LSV measurements for HER were conducted at a potential ranging from −1.5 to −1 V (vs. Hg/HgO) at a scanning rate of 1 mV s−1 in an O2 saturated 1.0 M KOH. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) experiments were performed in the frequency range from 100 KHz to 1 Hz with an amplitude potential of 5 mV. When the signals of the working electrodes stabilized after scanning several times, the data were collected. The stability test was implemented using the chronopotentiometric method (j–t) at certain potentials and multi–current step measurements without adding electrolyte midway. All the potentials with regard to Hg/HgO reported in this work were converted to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) according to the following equation: E (RHE) = E (vs. Hg/HgO) + 0.059 × pH+ 0.098. All of the above measurements were corrected by manual iR compensation using the current and the solution resistance. The electrochemical double-layer capacitance (Cdl) of catalysts was measured by performing CV in the non-faradaic potential range of 0.57 to 0.67 V vs. RHE (HER) and 1.12 to 1.26 V vs. RHE (OER) at different scanning rates (v) of 20 to 140 mV s−1, followed by the extraction of the slope from the resulting |jajc|/2 versus v plots, where ja and jc represent the anodic and cathodic current densities at 0.62 V vs. RHE (HER) and 1.19 V vs. RHE (OER).

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have successfully synthesized hollow–nanotube LaxCo0.4Fe0.6O3−δ (x = 1.0, 0.9, and 0.8) perovskite on nickel–iron alloy foam substrate (denoted LaxCoFe/NFF) by hydrothermal process and subsequent calcination strategy. With the introduction of La deficiency into LaCoFe/NFF, the optimal La0.9CoFe/NFF electrode displays excellent bifunctional electrocatalytic activities towards HER and OER, along with robust long–term stability. The increase in oxygen vacancies caused by the introduction of La deficiency greatly accelerated the HER/OER process of La0.9CoFe/NFF. Furthermore, a two–electrode cell employing La0.9CoFe/NFF as both anode and cathode for OWS was also constructed, where only an ultralow cell voltage of 1.573 V is required to drive the current density of 10 mA·cm−2, accompanied by excellent durability. This work opens a new avenue for designing low–cost perovskite oxides with hollow nanotubes and developing highly active bifunctional electrocatalysts based on the perovskite transition metal oxides for both OER and HER applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29061342/s1, Figure S1: Overall XPS survey spectra of LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF and La0.8CoFe/NFF; Figure S2: LSV curves of LaCoFe/NFF catalysts with different hydrothermal temperature in 1 M KOH solution for (a) HER and (b) OER; Figure S3: LSV curves of various catalysts with different Co/Fe ratio in 1 M KOH solution for (a) HER and (b) OER; Figure S4: LSV curves of LaCoFe/NF and LaCoFe/NFF in 1 M KOH solution for (a) HER and (b) OER; Figure S5: Cyclic voltammetry (CVs) curves for HER in a non-faradic current region (potential window at 0.57–0.67 V (vs. RHE)) at different scan rates (20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120 and 140 mV s−1) of (a) NFF, (b) LaCoFe/NFF, (c) La0.9CoFe/NFF and (d) La0.8CoFe/NFF; Figure S6: Electrochemical active area (ECSA) of HER; Figure S7: Reduction peaks recorded at 0.2 V s−1. (a) NFF; (b) LaCoFe/NFF; (c) La0.9CoFe/NFF; (d) La0.8CoFe/NFF; Figure S8: (a) The potential dependent TOF curves of the NFF, LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF and La0.8CoFe/NFF; (b) TOF values at the overpotential of 200 mV of the corresponding samples; Figure S9: Chronopotentiometry test for 20 h at −10 mA cm−2 of electrocatalysts; Figure S10: BET surface area calculations from the N2 absorption-desorption isotherms. (a) LaCoFe/NFF, (b) La0.9CoFe/NFF and (c) La0.8CoFe/NFF; (d) Specific activity of LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF and La0.8CoFe/NFF recorded at an overpotential of 200 mV; Figure S11: SEM images of La0.9CoFe/NFF after HER long-term tests in 1 M KOH; Figure S12: XPS spectra of (a) La 3d, (b) Co 2p (c) Fe 2p and (d) O 1s of La0.9CoFe/NFF after HER tests in 1M KOH; Figure S13: Cyclic voltammetry (CVs) curves for OER in a non-faradic current region (potential window at 1.12–1.26 V (vs. RHE)) at different scan rates (20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 120 and 140 mV s−1) of (a) NFF, (b) LaCoFe/NFF, (c) La0.9CoFe/NFF and (d) La0.8CoFe/NFF; Figure S14: Electrochemical active area (ECSA) of OER; Figure S15: (a) The potential dependent TOF curves of the NFF, LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF and La0.8CoFe/NFF; (b) TOF values at the overpotential of 300 mV of the corresponding samples; Figure S16: Specific activity of LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF and La0.8CoFe/NFF recorded at an overpotential of 270 mV; Figure S17: Chronopotentiometry test for 20 h at 10 mA cm−2 of electrocatalysts; Figure S18. SEM images of La0.9CoFe/NFF after OER long-term tests in 1 M KOH; Figure S19: XPS spectra of (a) La 3d, (b) Co 2p (c) Fe 2p and (d) O 1s of La0.9CoFe/NFF after long-term OER tests in 1M KOH; Table S1: XPS Peak Positions (Binding Energy, eV) Obtained for All the LaxCoFe/NFF catalysts; Table S2: Comparison of HER performance of La0.9CoFe/NFF with other perovskite electrocatalysts reported previously; Table S3: Comparison of OER performance of La0.9CoFe/NFF with other perovskite electrocatalysts reported previously; Table S4: Comparison of Cell voltage of La0.9CoFe/NFF||La0.9CoFe/NFF with perovskite electrocatalysts reported previously. References are cited from [46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57].

Author Contributions

X.X.: methodology, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft, conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration; K.G.: methodology, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft; X.Y.: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11974229), Applied and Basic Research Program of Shanxi Province (No. 20210302123327) and Innovation Project of Graduate Education in Shanxi Province (No. 2022Y500).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ji, D.; Liu, C.; Yao, Y.; Luo, L.; Wang, W.; Chen, Z. Cerium substitution in LaCoO3 perovskite oxide as bifunctional electrocatalysts for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 9952–9959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Y.-Q.; Tao, H.-B.; Chen, Z.; Li, M.; Sun, Y.-F.; Hua, B.; Luo, J.-L. In situ grown cobalt phosphide (CoP) on perovskite nanofibers as an optimized trifunctional electrocatalyst for Zn–air batteries and overall water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 26607–26617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ashraf, S.; Liu, Y.; Wei, H.; Shen, R.; Zhang, H.; Wu, X.; Mehdi, S.; Liu, T.; Li, B. Bimetallic Nanoalloy Catalysts for Green Energy Production: Advances in Synthesis Routes and Characterization Techniques. Small 2023, 19, e2303031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bu, Y.; Kim, S.; Kwon, O.; Zhong, Q.; Kim, G. A Composite Catalyst Based on Perovskites for Overall Water Splitting in Alkaline Conditions. ChemElectroChem 2019, 6, 1520–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, W.; Xu, X.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Recent Progress in Metal–Organic Frameworks for Applications in Electrocatalytic and Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1600371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sun, H.; Xu, X.; Kim, H.; Shao, Z.; Jung, W. Advanced electrocatalysts with unusual active sites for electrochemical water splitting. InfoMat 2024, 6, e12494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ledendecker, M.; Krick Calderon, S.; Papp, C.; Steinruck, H.P.; Antonietti, M.; Shalom, M. The synthesis of nanostructured Ni5P4 films and their use as a non–noble bifunctional electrocatalyst for full water splitting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 12361–12365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, M.-X.; Ma, Y.; Xiao, B.; Zhou, Y.-N.; Yu, W.-L.; Zhai, X.-J.; Lv, R.-Q.; Chai, Y.-M.; Dong, B. S, Fe dual doped and precisely regulated CoP porous nanoneedle arrays for efficient hydrogen evolution at 3 A cm−2. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 470, 144081–144092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Guo, X.; Li, M.; Qiu, L.; Tian, F.; He, L.; Geng, S.; Liu, Y.; Song, Y.; Yang, W.; Yu, Y. Engineering electron redistribution of bimetallic phosphates with CeO2 enables high–performance overall water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 453, 139796–139805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iffelsberger, C.; Pumera, M. High resolution electrochemical additive manufacturing of microstructured active materials: Case study of MoSx as a catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 22072–22081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, Z.; Xu, B.; Li, Z.; Ren, J.; Mei, H.; Liu, Z.; Xie, D.; Zhang, H.; Dai, F.; Wang, R.; et al. Accurately Regulating the Electronic Structure of NixSey@NC Core–Shell Nanohybrids through Controllable Selenization of a Ni–MOF for pH–Universal Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Small 2020, 16, e2004231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, J.; Hou, Y.; Liu, P.; Xu, B.; Zhang, H.; Guo, J. Interface engineering of porous Co(OH)2/La(OH)3@Cu nanowire heterostructures for high efficiency hydrogen evolution and overall water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 4355–4364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xiong, G.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, F.; Liu, X.; Yang, L.; Liu, Q.; Sang, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, X.; et al. Rapid Synthesis of Various Electrocatalysts on Ni Foam Using a Universal and Facile Induction Heating Method for Efficient Water Splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2009580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, J.; Hu, J.; Liang, C.; Chang, L.; Du, Y.; Han, X.; Sun, J.; Xu, P. Surface reconstruction of phosphorus–doped cobalt molybdate microarrays in electrochemical water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 137094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qi, J.; Liu, H.; Feng, M.; Xu, H.; Liu, H.; Wang, C.; Wang, A.; Lü, W. Enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction in Sr doped BiFeO3 by achieving the coexistence of ferroelectricity and ferromagnetism at room temperature. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 53, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, X.; Wang, W.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Recent Advances in Novel Nanostructuring Methods of Perovskite Electrocatalysts for Energy–Related Applications. Small Methods 2018, 2, 1800071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karki, S.B.; Hona, R.K.; Yu, M.; Ramezanipour, F. Enhancement of Electrocatalytic Activity as a Function of Structural Order in Perovskite Oxides. ACS Catal. 2022, 12, 10333–10337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, X.; Pan, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Shi, C.; Guan, D.; Ge, L.; Hu, Z.; Chin, Y.; Lin, H.; Chen, C.; et al. New Undisputed Evidence and Strategy for Enhanced Lattice–Oxygen Participation of Perovskite Electrocatalyst through Cation Deficiency Manipulation. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2200530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, J.; Wang, F.; Qi, X.; Yang, H.; Peng, B.; Xu, L.; Xiao, Z.; Hou, X.; Liang, T. A simple strategy to construct cobalt oxide-based high–efficiency electrocatalysts with oxygen vacancies and heterojunctions. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 326, 134979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sun, J.; Guo, N.; Shao, Z.; Huang, K.; Li, Y.; He, F.; Wang, Q. A Facile Strategy to Construct Amorphous Spinel-Based Electrocatalysts with Massive Oxygen Vacancies Using Ionic Liquid Dopant. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1800980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, H.; Ding, X.; Wang, L.; Ding, D.; Zhang, S.; Yuan, G. Cation deficiency design: A simple and efficient strategy for promoting oxygen evolution reaction activity of perovskite electrocatalyst. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 259, 1004–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Suntivich, J.; May, K.J.; Gasteiger, H.A.; Goodenough, J.B.; Horn, Y.S. A Perovskite Oxide Optimized for Oxygen Evolution Catalysis from Molecular Orbital Principles. Science 2011, 9, 1381–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yao, H.; Zheng, Y.; Yue, S.; Hu, S.; Yuan, W.; Guo, X. B–site substitution in NaCo1−2xFexNixF3 perovskites for efficient oxygen evolution. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2023, 10, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Duan, Y.; Sun, S.; Xi, S.; Ren, X.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, G.; Yang, H.; Du, Y.; Xu, Z.J. Tailoring the Co 3d–O 2p Covalency in LaCoO3 by Fe Substitution to Promote Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 10534–10541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ashok, A.; Kumar, A.; Bhosale, R.R.; Almomani, F.; Malik, S.S.; Suslov, S.; Tarlochan, F. Combustion synthesis of bifunctional LaMO3 (M = Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) perovskites for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline Media. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 809, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qiu, C.; Wang, L.; Chen, R.; Zhang, J.; Ding, J.; Zhang, J.; Wan, H.; Guan, G. Insight of the State for Deliberately Introduced A-Site Defect in Nanofibrous LaFeO3 for Boosting Artificial Photosynthesis of CH3OH. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 56945–56956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. She, S.; Yu, J.; Tang, W.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Sunarso, J.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Systematic Study of Oxygen Evolution Activity and Stability on La1–xSrxFeO3−δ Perovskite Electrocatalysts in Alkaline Media. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 11715–11721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yuan, R.-H.; He, Y.; He, W.; Ni, M.; Leung, M.K.H. Bifunctional electrocatalytic activity of La0.8Sr0.2MnO3–based perovskite with the A–site deficiency for oxygen reduction and evolution reactions in alkaline media. Appl. Energy 2019, 251, 113406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, C.-F.; King, G.; Dickerson, R.M.; Papin, P.A.; Gupta, S.; Kellogg, W.R.; Wu, G. Oxygen-deficient BaTiO3−x perovskite as an efficient bifunctional oxygen electrocatalyst. Nano. Energy 2015, 13, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, T.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Su, Z.; Zhao, C. Vertical Growth of Porous Perovskite Nanoarrays on Nickel Foam for Efficient Oxygen Evolution Reaction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 4863–4870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, Y.; Cui, F.; Zhao, Y.; Lian, J.; Bao, J.; Liu, T.; Li, H. 3D hierarchical CMF/MoSe2 composite foam as highly efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 263, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, X.; Liu, X.; Zhang, C.; Wang, R.; Wei, G.; Yang, T.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Gao, S. A corrosion–etching strategy for fabricating RuO2 coupled with defective NiFeZn(OH)x for a highly efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 20453–20463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, R.-L.; Feng, J.-J.; Yao, Y.-Q.; Fang, K.-M.; Zhang, L.; Yin, Z.-Z.; Wang, A.-J. Straw–like phosphorus–doped Co2MnO4 nanoneedle arrays supported on nickel foam for high-efficiency hydrogen evolution reaction in wide pH range of electrolytes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 548, 149280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, J.; Wu, J.; Liu, Y.; Hu, X.; Geng, D. Assemblage of Perovskite LaNiO3 Connected with In Situ Grown Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanotubes as High-Performance Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Phys. Status Solidi A 2018, 215, 1800380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, W.; Yang, Y.; Huan, D.; Wang, L.; Shi, N.; Xie, Y.; Xia, C.; Peng, R.; Lu, Y. An excellent OER electrocatalyst of cubic SrCoO3−δ prepared by a simple F–doping strategy. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 12538–12546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhou, Q.; Xu, C.; Hou, J.; Ma, W.; Jian, T.; Yan, S.; Liu, H. Duplex Interpenetrating-Phase FeNiZn and FeNi3 Heterostructure with Low-Gibbs Free Energy Interface Coupling for Highly Efficient Overall Water Splitting. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023, 15, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bindu, G.H.; Kammara, V.; Srilekha, P.; Swetha, K.; Laxmi, Y.K.; Veerasomaiah, P.; Vithal, M. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic studies of LaAl0.5Fe0.5O3, LaAl0.5Cr0.5O3 and LaCr0.5Fe0.5O3. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1273, 134220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Natile, M.M.; Poletto, F.; Galenda, A.; Glisenti, A.; Montini, T.; De Rogatis, L.; Fornasiero, P. La0.6Sr0.4Co1−yFeyO3−δ Perovskites: Influence of the Co/Fe Atomic Ratio on Properties and Catalytic Activity toward Alcohol Steam–Reforming. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 2314–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, X.; Yu, T.; Guan, J.; Yu, Z.; Li, Z.; Zou, Z. Increasing the Oxygen Vacancy Density on the TiO2 Surface by La–Doping for Dye–Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 18396–18400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ramana, C.V.; Bandi, M.; N Nair, A.; Manciu, F.S.; Sreenivasan, S.; Shutthanandan, V. Electronic Structure, Chemical Bonding, and Electrocatalytic Activity of Ba(Fe0.7Ta0.3)O3−δ Compounds. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 1313–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, R.; Zhang, Y.; Duan, L.; Zhao, X. Effect of Fe2+/Fe3+ ratio on photocatalytic activities of Zn1−xFexO nanoparticles fabricated by the auto combustion method. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Z.; Tan, S.; Xiong, Y.; Wei, J. Effect of B sites on the catalytic activities for perovskite oxides La.6Sr.4CoxFe1−xO3−δ as metal-air batteries catalysts. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2018, 28, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Jia, L.; Jiang, H.; Huang, M.; Toghan, A. Nitrogen–doped Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O6−δ perovskite as an efficient and stable catalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Mater. Today Energy 2021, 20, 100695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yi, Y.; Wu, Q.; Li, J.; Yao, W.; Cui, C. Phase–Segregated SrCo0.8Fe0.5−xO3−δ/FexOy Heterostructured Catalyst Promotes Alkaline Oxygen Evolution Reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 17439–17449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, X.; Dai, J.; Zhou, C.; Guan, D.; Wu, X.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Engineering Charge Redistribution within Perovskite Oxides for Synergistically Enhanced Overall Water Splitting. ACS Mater. Lett. 2021, 3, 1258–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hui, J.; Yan, C.; Shi, Y.; Yang, Z. Rare-earth metal multicomponent perovskite as a electrocatalyst for water splitting. Mater. Lett. 2023, 332, 133532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Junita, J.; Jayalakshmi, D.; Rodney, J.D. Combustion–derived BaNiO3 nanoparticles as a potential bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 14287–14298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Karki, S.B.; Andriotis, A.N.; Menon, M.; Ramezanipour, F. Enhancement of Electrocatalytic Activity for both Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution Reactions of a Perovskite Oxide. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126, 20011–20019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Junita, J.; Jayalakshmi, D.; Rodney, J.D. Effect of annealing temperature on the bifunctional electrocatalytic properties of strontium nickelate (SrNiO3) nanoparticles for efficient overall water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 30602–30612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, Y.-N.; Wang, F.-G.; Zhen, Y.-N.; Nan, J.; Dong, B.; Chai, Y.-M. Crystal facet engineering of perovskite cobaltite with optimized electronic regulation for water splitting. Sci. China Mater. 2022, 65, 2665–2674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rana, A.K.; Jeong, M.H.; Noh, Y.I.; Park, H.; Baik, J.M.; Choi, K.J. Phase–Tuned MoS2 and Its Hybridization with Perovskite Oxide as Bifunctional Catalyst: A Rationale for Highly Stable and Efficient Water Splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 18248–18260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sarmad, Q.; Khan, U.M.; Baig, M.M.; Hassan, M.; Butt, F.A.; Khoja, A.H.; Liaquat, R.; Khan, Z.S.; Anwar, M.; Muhammed Ali, S.A. Praseodymium–doped Sr2TiFeO6−δ double perovskite as a bi-functional electrocatalyst for hydrogen production through water splitting. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wu, X.; Yu, J.; Yang, G.; Liu, H.; Zhou, W.; Shao, Z. Perovskite oxide/carbon nanotube hybrid bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 286, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yu, J.; Wu, X.; Guan, D.; Hu, Z.; Weng, S.-C.; Sun, H.; Song, Y.; Ran, R.; Zhou, W.; Ni, M.; et al. Monoclinic SrIrO3: An Easily Synthesized Conductive Perovskite Oxide with Outstanding Performance for Overall Water Splitting in Alkaline Solution. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 4509–4517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. He, B.; Tan, K.; Gong, Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, H.; Zhao, L. Coupling amorphous cobalt hydroxide nanoflakes on Sr2Fe1.5Mo0.5O5+δ perovskite nanofibers to induce bifunctionality for water splitting. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 9048–9057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Jin, C.; Li, C.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Yang, R.; Liu, M. Enhanced overall water electrolysis on a bifunctional perovskite oxide through interfacial engineering. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 318, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Tang, L.; Chen, Z.; Zuo, F.; Hua, B.; Zhou, H.; Li, M.; Li, J.; Sun, Y. Enhancing perovskite electrocatalysis through synergistic functionalization of B–site cation for efficient water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 401, 126082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the synthesis process of the LaxCoFe/NFF catalyst; (b) XRD patterns of the LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, and La0.8CoFe/NFF; (c) enlargement of LaxCoFe/NFF; SEM images of products obtained at different stages: (d,g) LaCoFe/NFF, (e,h) La0.9CoFe/NFF, and (f,i) La0.8CoFe/NFF; elemental mapping of La, Co, Fe, and O for (j) LaCoFe/NFF and (k) La0.9CoFe/NFF.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the synthesis process of the LaxCoFe/NFF catalyst; (b) XRD patterns of the LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, and La0.8CoFe/NFF; (c) enlargement of LaxCoFe/NFF; SEM images of products obtained at different stages: (d,g) LaCoFe/NFF, (e,h) La0.9CoFe/NFF, and (f,i) La0.8CoFe/NFF; elemental mapping of La, Co, Fe, and O for (j) LaCoFe/NFF and (k) La0.9CoFe/NFF.
Molecules 29 01342 g001
Figure 2. TEM images of (a) LaCoFe, (d) La0.9CoFe; HRTEM of (b) LaCoFe, (e) La0.9CoFe; and SAED of (c) LaCoFe, (f) La0.9CoFe.
Figure 2. TEM images of (a) LaCoFe, (d) La0.9CoFe; HRTEM of (b) LaCoFe, (e) La0.9CoFe; and SAED of (c) LaCoFe, (f) La0.9CoFe.
Molecules 29 01342 g002
Figure 3. XPS spectra of (a) La 3d; (b) Co 2p; (c) Fe 2p; (d) O 1s spectrum from LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, and La0.8CoFe/NFF, respectively, and (e) surface O atomic composition from XPS of LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, and La0.8CoFe/NFF.
Figure 3. XPS spectra of (a) La 3d; (b) Co 2p; (c) Fe 2p; (d) O 1s spectrum from LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, and La0.8CoFe/NFF, respectively, and (e) surface O atomic composition from XPS of LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, and La0.8CoFe/NFF.
Molecules 29 01342 g003
Figure 4. HER performance of the as–prepared catalysts for (a) polarization curves; (b) Tafel plots of the corresponding samples; (c) comparisons of the HER performances with regard to kinetics and at an overpotential of 10 mA cm−2 for LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, La0.8CoFe/NFF with perovskite electrocatalysts reported previously; (d) nyquist plots of the corresponding samples; (e) Cdl of the corresponding samples; (f) HER polarization curves of La0.9CoFe/NFF before and after 1000 cyclic voltammetry scanning, and the chronoamperometric curve at overpotential of 160.5 mV and comparison of Cdl, overpotential (η100 and η200), Rct, and Tafel slope of (g) LaCoFe/NFF, (h) La0.9CoFe/NFF, (i) La0.8CoFe/NFF.
Figure 4. HER performance of the as–prepared catalysts for (a) polarization curves; (b) Tafel plots of the corresponding samples; (c) comparisons of the HER performances with regard to kinetics and at an overpotential of 10 mA cm−2 for LaCoFe/NFF, La0.9CoFe/NFF, La0.8CoFe/NFF with perovskite electrocatalysts reported previously; (d) nyquist plots of the corresponding samples; (e) Cdl of the corresponding samples; (f) HER polarization curves of La0.9CoFe/NFF before and after 1000 cyclic voltammetry scanning, and the chronoamperometric curve at overpotential of 160.5 mV and comparison of Cdl, overpotential (η100 and η200), Rct, and Tafel slope of (g) LaCoFe/NFF, (h) La0.9CoFe/NFF, (i) La0.8CoFe/NFF.
Molecules 29 01342 g004
Figure 5. OER performance of the as-prepared catalysts for (a) polarization curves; (b) Tafel plots; (c) nyquist plots of the corresponding samples; (d) Cdl value of the corresponding catalysts at a specific potential; (e) the multi-current process of La0.9CoFe/NFF (50–250 mA cm−2); (f) OER polarization curves of La0.9CoFe/NFF before and after 1000 cyclic voltammetry scanning, and the chronoamperometric curve at overpotential of 234.7 mV; (g) schematic diagram of the overall water electrolysis cell; (h) overall water splitting performance of La0.9CoFe/NFF||La0.9CoFe/NFF electrolyzer and NFF||NFF electrolyzer; (i) chronoamperometric test of overall electrochemical water splitting on La0.9CoFe/NFF||La0.9CoFe/NFF electrolyzer (at 1.573 V) and NFF||NFF electrolyzer (at 1.807 V) and (j) comparison of La0.9CoFe/NFF||La0.9CoFe/NFF with other bifunctional perovskite electrocatalysts.
Figure 5. OER performance of the as-prepared catalysts for (a) polarization curves; (b) Tafel plots; (c) nyquist plots of the corresponding samples; (d) Cdl value of the corresponding catalysts at a specific potential; (e) the multi-current process of La0.9CoFe/NFF (50–250 mA cm−2); (f) OER polarization curves of La0.9CoFe/NFF before and after 1000 cyclic voltammetry scanning, and the chronoamperometric curve at overpotential of 234.7 mV; (g) schematic diagram of the overall water electrolysis cell; (h) overall water splitting performance of La0.9CoFe/NFF||La0.9CoFe/NFF electrolyzer and NFF||NFF electrolyzer; (i) chronoamperometric test of overall electrochemical water splitting on La0.9CoFe/NFF||La0.9CoFe/NFF electrolyzer (at 1.573 V) and NFF||NFF electrolyzer (at 1.807 V) and (j) comparison of La0.9CoFe/NFF||La0.9CoFe/NFF with other bifunctional perovskite electrocatalysts.
Molecules 29 01342 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, X.; Guo, K.; Yu, X. Controllable La Deficiency Engineering within Perovskite Oxides for Enhanced Overall Water Splitting. Molecules 2024, 29, 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061342

AMA Style

Xu X, Guo K, Yu X. Controllable La Deficiency Engineering within Perovskite Oxides for Enhanced Overall Water Splitting. Molecules. 2024; 29(6):1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Xiaohu, Kaiwei Guo, and Xinyue Yu. 2024. "Controllable La Deficiency Engineering within Perovskite Oxides for Enhanced Overall Water Splitting" Molecules 29, no. 6: 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061342

APA Style

Xu, X., Guo, K., & Yu, X. (2024). Controllable La Deficiency Engineering within Perovskite Oxides for Enhanced Overall Water Splitting. Molecules, 29(6), 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29061342

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop