Next Article in Journal
The Ocean’s Pharmacy: Health Discoveries in Marine Algae
Next Article in Special Issue
Unveiling the Low-Lying Spin States of [Fe3S4] Clusters via the Extended Broken-Symmetry Method
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Glycosylation-Modified DPPA-1 Compounds as Innovative PD-1/PD-L1 Blockers: Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pd:In-Doped TiO2 as a Bifunctional Catalyst for the Photoelectrochemical Oxidation of Paracetamol and Simultaneous Green Hydrogen Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Construction of TiO2/CuPc Heterojunctions for the Efficient Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 with Water

1
Academic Affairs Office, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161006, China
2
College of Pharmacy, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161006, China
3
College of Pathology, Qiqihar Medical University, Qiqihar 161006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(8), 1899; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081899
Submission received: 22 March 2024 / Revised: 17 April 2024 / Accepted: 18 April 2024 / Published: 22 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photocatalytic Materials and Photocatalytic Reactions)

Abstract

:
Utilizing solar energy for photocatalytic CO2 reduction is an attractive research field because of its convenience, safety, and practicality. The selection of an appropriate photocatalyst is the key to achieve efficient CO2 reduction. Herein, we report the synthesis of TiO2/CuPc heterojunctions by compositing CuPc with TiO2 microspheres via a hydroxyl-induced self-assembly process. The experimental investigations demonstrated that the optimal TiO2/0.5CuPc photocatalyst exhibited a significantly enhanced CO2 photoreduction rate up to 32.4 μmol·g−1·h−1 under 300 W xenon lamp irradiation, which was 3.7 times that of the TiO2 microspheres alone. The results of photoelectrochemical experiments indicated that the construction of the heterojunctions by introducing CuPc effectively promoted the separation and transport of photogenerated carriers, thus enhancing the catalytic effect of the photocatalyst.

1. Introduction

The extensive exploitation of fossil fuels has dramatically increased the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, which has led to a global greenhouse effect that is worsening year by year and poses a serious threat to the survival of humankind [1,2]. Photocatalytic CO2 reduction technology is an ideal way to mitigate the greenhouse effect due to its advantages, including mild operating conditions, low energy consumption, and the absence of secondary pollution [3,4,5]. The characteristics of the photocatalyst are generally considered to be among the most important factors determining the efficiency of photocatalytic CO2 conversion. The development of an effective photocatalyst has therefore gained continuous attention.
Currently, various photocatalytic materials with enhanced CO2 conversion effects have been developed [6,7,8,9,10]. Among them, titanium dioxide (TiO2), a promising semiconductor material, has a wide range of applications in photocatalysis due to its unusual electronic and optical properties [11,12,13,14]. For this reason, it has received extensive research and attention. However, it still suffers a low CO2 reduction efficiency, primarily due to the photogenerated electron-hole pairs being prone to recombination and the substantially wide bandgap (3.2 eV). So far, various strategies have been developed to enhance the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 for CO2 reduction, including the introduction of surface defects [15], the doping of heteroatoms [16], and the construction of heterojunctions [17]. Previous studies have successfully demonstrated that the construction of heterojunctions with narrow bandgap semiconductors is a reliable way to improve the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 [18,19]. For example, Ejaz Hussain et al. synthesized Au@TiO2/CdS hybrid catalysts through hydrothermal reactions and found that Au@TiO2/CdS was the most active catalyst, producing 19.15 mmol·g−1·h−1 of hydrogen under sunlight [20]. Dai et al. successfully prepared TiO2/CuS nanocomposites with cauliflower-like protrusions using a simple one-step hydrothermal method with the assistance of 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) [21]. Their experimental results showed that the TiO2/CuS nanocomposites exhibited a better photocatalytic performance compared to TiO2 and CuS controls. Yin et al. synthesized visible-light-responsive Ag3PO4/OH/TiO2 catalysts through the in situ growth of Ag3PO4 on the surface of TiO2 with alkali treatment [22]. The introduction of Ag3PO4 effectively improved the light absorption ability of the photocatalysts, which enabled the catalysts to achieve a 90% degradation of RhB under visible light. Although the above approaches effectively improved the photocatalytic activity of TiO2, it is still inefficient in photocatalytic CO2 reduction because of its lack of catalytic sites.
Very recently, several studies have found that metal phthalocyanines (MPcs) can be used to construct efficient heterojunction photocatalysts with TiO2 due to their suitable energy band structure and metal active center unit [23,24]. On the one hand, the porphyrin rings in metal phthalocyanines, analogous to chlorophylls, are widely used as photosensitizers to effectively improve the light absorption of photocatalysts. On the other hand, the central metal of metal phthalocyanines can provide efficient active sites for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. For example, Altuğ Mert Sevim found that the photocatalytic degradation performance of a composite photocatalyst for 4-chlorophenol under visible-light irradiation was greatly enhanced through the introduction of metal phthalocyanine into TiO2 [25]. It was also reported by Fei that FePc/TiO2 catalysts demonstrated good photocatalytic activity for the degradation of organic contaminants [26]. Makoto Endo reported the synthesis of ZnPc/TiO2 hybrid nanomaterials and evaluated their photocatalytic reduction of CO2 [27]. It was found that modification of the TiO2 with ZnPc could indeed improve its CO2 photoconversion performance. The above examples successfully suggest that the construction of heterojunctions using metal phthalocyanines and TiO2 for the efficient conversion of CO2 is a reasonable design.
In this work, we successfully synthesized a series of TiO2 microspheres loaded with different amounts of CuPc. The unique selective absorption for CuPc in the range of 500~800 nm can effectively solve the defect of poor visible-light utilization of TiO2, resulting in heterojunctions with enhanced light absorption capabilities. It was found that the developed TiO2/0.5CuPc photocatalyst exhibited increased CO2 reduction activity compared to pristine TiO2. This enhancement of the photoactivity was attributed to the construction of heterojunctions, which promote the efficient separation of photogenerated charges, as demonstrated in the photoelectrochemical experiments. Moreover, the photocatalytic CO2 conversion process was investigated through in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Catalyst Characterization

The crystal structure and composition of the as-synthesized samples were investigated using X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD). Typical XRD patterns depict the crystal structures of pure TiO2, CuPc, and TiO2/0.5CuPc composites in Figure 1a. The TiO2 sample exhibited seven characteristic diffraction peaks at 25.3°, 37.9°, 48.0°, 54.1°, 55.1°, 62.8°, and 68.7°, assigned to the (101), (004), (200), (105), (211), (204), and (116) crystal planes, respectively. These diffraction peaks could be indexed to the anatase TiO2 crystal structure (JCPDS NO. 21-1272). In addition, it can be seen that the intensity of the characteristic diffraction peaks of TiO2 was slightly reduced after the introduction of CuPc, which might be attributed to the fact that the characteristic peaks of TiO2 were suppressed by the coated CuPc [28,29]. However, no significant new peaks attributed to CuPc appeared in the XRD spectrum of TiO2/0.5CuPc compared to that of TiO2, indicating the low loading content of CuPc. The chemical structures of TiO2 and TiO2/xCuPc were further analyzed using FTIR spectroscopy. As shown in Figure 1b, the broader absorption peak located in the range of 400–800 cm−1 can be attributed to the stretching vibration of Ti-O and Ti-O-Ti [30]. In contrast, the successful loading of CuPc onto TiO2 can be identified by the characteristic peaks (1464, 1504, and 1728 cm−1), which correspond to the phthalocyanine backbone and the central metal and ligand of CuPc [31]. As shown in Figure 1c, it was obvious that multiple peaks corresponding to the phthalocyanine backbone vibrations appeared in the TiO2 samples after modification with CuPc. In addition, the intensity of the vibrational peak of the TiO2 surface hydroxyl group located at 1640 cm−1 was significantly weaker after CuPc modification (the marked area), suggesting that CuPc interacted with the surface hydroxyl group (Figure 1b). The TEM images of the TiO2 and TiO2/0.5CuPc heterojunction are shown in Figure 1d,e. Obviously, the TiO2 exhibited a spherical structure with a partially hollow core (Figure 1d). Many microspheres were clustered together and therefore exhibited poor dispersibility. It can be seen from Figure 1e that the CuPc modification did not affect the morphology of the TiO2 microspheres and uniformly covered the surface of the TiO2. In addition, as can be seen from Figure 1f, the color of the TiO2 sample changed from light yellow to blue after loading with CuPc, indicating that the CuPc had been successfully loaded onto the surface of the TiO2.
Raman spectroscopy was utilized to further investigate the structures of TiO2 and TiO2/xCuPc. As expected, the Raman spectra prove that the TiO2 microspheres exhibited an anatase phase (Figure 2a). The characteristic peaks at 146, 396, 516, and 637 cm−1 are assigned to the Eg(1), B1g, A1g, and Eg(3) lattice vibration modes of the anatase phase, respectively [32]. The Raman spectra of TiO2/xCuPc show both TiO2 and CuPc characteristic peaks, indicating that the TiO2/xCuPc heterojunctions were successfully synthesized. It was observed that the intensity of the characteristic peaks of CuPc gradually increased with the increase in the amount of CuPc modification, while the intensity of the characteristic peaks of TiO2 gradually decreased. In addition, the Raman vibration peak at 1523 cm−1 (the tensile of C-N-C bridge bonds in the CuPc) was shifted towards the long-wave-number direction after the formation of TiO2/xCuPc heterojunctions, which may have been due to the occurrence of a self-assembly of CuPc on the TiO2 surface (Figure 2b) [33,34].
Figure 3 shows the UV-Vis DRS reflectance spectra of TiO2, CuPc, and TiO2/xCuPc. The absorption edge of the TiO2 sample was observed at approximately 420 nm. However, the TiO2/xCuPc heterojunctions exhibited strong light absorption in the visible region of 500~800 nm, which can be attributed to the resulting Q-band electron transition of CuPc from its highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to its lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) [35]. In addition, it can also be seen that the absorption intensity gradually increased as the amount of CuPc increased.
The optical band gap of a catalyst can be calculated from its light absorption spectra according to the equation αhv = A(hvEg)n/2, where α, h, ν, A, and Eg represent the absorption coefficient, Planck constant, light frequency, proportionality, and band gap energy, respectively. For TiO2 and CuPc, the values of n are 1 and 4, respectively. Based on the above equation, the calculated Eg values for TiO2 and CuPc are 2.98 and 1.68 eV, respectively (Figure 4a,b). To further investigate the band structures of TiO2 and CuPc, Mott–Schottky curves were obtained. A positive slope of the Mott–Schottky plot would indicate that TiO2 is an n-type semiconductor, while a negative slope of the Mott–Schottky plot would indicate that CuPc is a p-type semiconductor. As shown in Figure 4c,d, the flat band potentials of TiO2 and CuPc were determined to be −0.59 V and 0.92 V vs. Ag/AgCl, respectively. According to the formula E(RHE) = E(Ag/AgCl) + 0.197 + 0.059 pH, we could deduce that the conduction band potential (ECB) of TiO2 and the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy level of CuPc were approximately 0.01 and 1.52 V vs. RHE, respectively. According to the empirical equation Eg = EVB − ECB, the valence band potential (EVB) of TiO2 and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy level of CuPc were calculated to be 2.99 and −0.16 V vs. RHE, respectively. In addition, ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) was also performed to determine the valence band energy (EVB) of TiO2 and CuPc (Figure 4e,f). The incident photon energy (hv) of the helium I source was 21.22 eV [36,37]. By subtracting the width of the peak from the excitation energy (21.22 eV), the valence band maximum of TiO2 and the HOMO energy of CuPc were calculated to be 7.52 and 5.98 eV, respectively, on the absolute vacuum scale (AVS). According to the reference standard, 0 V for the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE) is equal to 4.44 eV on the vacuum level. Therefore, the EVB (versus RHE) value of TiO2 and the HOMO energy of CuPc were calculated to be 3.08 and 1.54 V, respectively. That is, the conduction band energy (ECB) of TiO2 and the LUMO energy of CuPc were 0.10 and −0.14 V, respectively. These results are consistent with those found in the Mott–Schottky plot calculations.
Photoelectrochemical experiments were applied to reveal the charge transfer kinetics of the heterojunctions. As shown in Figure 5a, the photocurrent density of TiO2/0.5CuPc was higher than that of TiO2, which indicates that the formation of a heterojunction can indeed effectively inhibit the recombination and further promote the separation of photogeneration carriers. The separation efficiency of photogeneration charges in the heterojunctions was further verified using the impedance spectroscopy spectra (EIS) (Figure 5b). It is obvious that the arc radius in the Nyquist plot of TiO2/0.5CuPc is much smaller than that of the TiO2 plot, suggesting that the charge transfer resistance in the heterojunction was reduced and facilitated rapid carrier separation and transfer. As shown in the inset of Figure 5b, the arc radius of TiO2/0.5CuPc was similarly smaller than TiO2 in the high-frequency region, suggesting better conductivity and proving the lower recombination rate of the carriers.

2.2. Photocatalytic Performance and Reaction Mechanism

The photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance of the TiO2 and TiO2/xCoPc was tested under 300 W Xe lamp illumination. As shown in Figure 6, the reduction products CH4 and CO were detected. The sample of TiO2 exhibited a low CO2 reduction activity with a production rate of 8.7 μmol·g−1·h−1 for CO. However, integration with CuPc significantly enhanced the photocatalytic activity of TiO2. It was noticed that the photocatalytic performance of the TiO2/xCoPc heterojunctions first increased and then decreased with the increase in CuPc loading. The higher the CuPc loading, the more severe the agglomeration of CuPc units at the TiO2 surface, thus leading to a decrease in photocatalytic activity [38]. The maximum CO production performance rate of 32.4 μmol·g−1·h−1 was attained with the TiO2/0.5CoPc heterojunction, which was 3.7 times higher than that of the TiO2 microspheres. In addition, the yield of CH4 was almost negligible, which indicates that the TiO2/0.5CoPc heterojunction has high selectivity for CO2 reduction to CO.
The mechanism of the CO2 reduction process was investigated using electrochemical reduction measurements in different gas-bubbled systems. As shown in Figure 7a,b, it was obvious that the onset potential of TiO2/0.5CoPc heterojunction was lower than that of the TiO2 microspheres in both N2-saturated and CO2-saturated electrolytes. Furthermore, the onset potential of the heterojunction in the CO2-saturated electrolyte was lower than that in the N2-saturated electrolyte, suggesting that the CuPc modification was more favorable for CO2 activation [39].
The intermediates in CO2 conversion were explored using in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform spectroscopy (Figure 8). The absorption peaks located at 1338, 1386, and 1617 cm−1 are ascribed to bidentate carbonates (b-CO32−), and the peaks at 1395, 1507, 1522, 1560, and 1576 cm−1 belong to monodentate carbonate (m-CO32−) [40]. Bands at 1418, 1437, 1636, and 1652 cm−1 can also be observed, which can be assigned to the HCO3 groups. The absorption peak at 2077 cm−1 is attributable to CO. In addition, with the increase in irradiation time, it can be seen that a peak of the COO radical at 1624 cm−1 and a peak of COOH* at 1733 cm−1 began to appear [41], and the peak intensity increased gradually. These results indicate that this photocatalytic reaction for the reduction of CO2 was carried out efficiently. It is worth noting that the formation of the important intermediate COOH* is generally considered to be a rate-limiting step during the photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to CO. It is obvious that the peak intensity of COOH* in the TiO2/0.5CoPc heterojunction was stronger compared to that of TiO2 at the same light irradiation time, which indicates the better activity of the TiO2/0.5CoPc heterojunction for the photocatalytic conversion of CO2.
Based on the above discussions, a mechanism of charge transfer and separation to promote CO2 conversion is proposed (Figure 9). First, the TiO2 and CuPc absorbed enough light of different wavelengths for electron transition under the 300 W Xe lamp irradiation to generate photogenerated carriers (e/h+ pairs). Because of the well-matched energy levels of TiO2 and CuPc, the photogenerated electrons generated through the excitation of TiO2 were transferred to the HOMO energy level of CuPc and recombined with the holes of CuPc. As a result, the remaining holes in the TiO2 valence band could be used for the oxidation of H2O to O2, while the separated electrons in the LUMO energy level of CuPc were transferred to coordinated central metal ions for the CO2 reduction reaction. Based on the in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) results, the possible CO2 reduction pathways are as follows:
CO2 (g) → CO2*
CO2 + H+ + e → COOH*
COOH* + H+ + e → CO* + H2O
CO* → CO

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

All of the chemical reagents were purchased from Aladdin Chemical Reagents Limited and were of analytical grade and used without further purification: titanium sulfate (Ti(SO4)2, 99%), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, 99.5%), copper(II) phthalocyanine (CuPc, 97%), ethanol (C2H5OH, 99.99%), and sodium sulfate anhydrous (Na2SO4, 99%). Deionized water was used throughout.

3.2. Synthesis of TiO2 Microspheres

The TiO2 microspheres were synthesized through a simple hydrothermal method. At first, Ti(SO4)2 (0.2400 g, 1 mmol) and EDTA (1.4612 g, 5 mmol) were dissolved in 30 mL of deionized water under stirring. After that, the solution was transferred into an autoclave and was treated at 180 °C for 8 h in a temperature-controlled oven. The resulting product was filtered and washed with deionized water. Finally, the obtained solid was dried in an oven at 60 °C overnight.

3.3. Synthesis of TiO2/CuPc Heterojunction

The TiO2/CuPc heterojunctions were prepared using a hydroxyl-induced self-assembly process based on the reported method [35]. In a typical experiment, 40 mg of TiO2 microspheres was dispersed in 25 mL of ethanol and sonicated for 30 min, noted as Solution A. Various amounts of CuPc powder were then dispersed in 25 mL of ethanol and sonicated for 30 min, noted as Solution B. Solution A and B were then mixed and sonicated for another 30 min. Afterwards, the above solution was evaporated in a water bath at 75 °C under magnetic stirring. After drying at 80 °C for 4 h in an oven, TiO2/xCuPc heterojunctions (where x = 0.1, 0.5, 1, or 2) were obtained, with x representing the mass ratio percentage of CuPc to TiO2. For example, weighing 40 mg of TiO2 microspheres required the addition of 0.2 mg of CuPc, resulting in a mass percentage of CuPc to TiO2 of 0.5%, noted as TiO2/0.5CuPc. Similarly, if 0.04 mg, 0.4 mg, and 0.8 mg amounts of CuPc were added, respectively, we obtained TiO2/0.1CuPc, TiO2/1CuPc, and TiO2/2CuPc.

3.4. Characterization

The morphology and structure of each samples were characterized by using transmission electron microscopy (JEOL, JEM-F200, Tokyo, Japan) with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. X-ray powder diffraction analysis was recorded under ambient conditions with a Shimadzu XRD-6000 diffractor (Kyoto, Japan) with Cu K radiation (0.15405 nm) at 40 kV and 40 mA. Raman spectra of the samples were measured using a Renishaw inVia Reflex spectrometer system (λ = 532 nm) (London, UK). Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded using a Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS50 (Waltham, MA, USA), with KBr as the diluent. UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded with a Shimadzu UV2700 spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan), using BaSO4 as the reference. The electrochemical studies were detected on an H-type cell using an electrochemical workstation (IVIUM V13806, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) measurements were performed on ESCALAB 250Xi (Waltham, MA, USA) with an unfiltered HeI (21.22 eV) gas discharge lamp and a total instrumental energy resolution of 100 meV. In situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) measurements were performed by using the Nicolet iS50 Fourier-transform spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an MCT diffuse reflectance accessory.

3.5. Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction

Photocatalytic CO2 reduction was conducted in a 100 mL quartz cell reactor equipped with a 300 W xenon lamp (PLSSXE300UV, PerfectLight, Beijing, China) as the light source. In detail, 10 mg of the photocatalyst and 10 mL of deionized water were added to the 100 mL quartz cell reactor. High-purity CO2 gas (99.9%) was passed through the water and then into the reaction setup to reach an ambient pressure. The photocatalysts were allowed to equilibrate in the CO2/H2O system for 20 min under stirring, and were then irradiated with the 300 W xenon lamp. The amounts of CO and CH4 that evolved were determined using a gas chromatograph (Techcomp GC-7900, Shanghai, China) equipped with both TCD and FID detectors. The production rates of CO and CH4 were calculated according to the standard curve.

3.6. Photoelectrochemical Measurements

The film electrode was fabricated as follows: firstly, 10 mg of the sample, 0.1 mL of Nafion, and 0.9 mL of ethanol were mixed into a slurry thoroughly. Then, the slurry was coated onto the FTO glass electrode (1.0 cm × 1.0 cm). Lastly, the coated electrode was dried at 60 °C for 30 min. Photoelectrochemical (PEC) measurements were carried out using the IVIUM V13806 electrochemical workstation with a traditional three-electrode system. The as-prepared sample films were used as working electrodes in the sealed quartz cell. A platinum plate (99.9%) and a saturated KCl Ag/AgCl electrode were used as the counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively. A 0.2 mol·L−1 Na2SO4 solution was used as the electrolyte (pH = 6.8). PEC experiments were performed in a quartz cell using a 300 W xenon lamp as the illumination source. Mott–Schottky plots were implemented at frequencies of 1000 Hz. All of the experiments were performed at room temperature (about 25 ± 3 °C).

3.7. Electrochemical Reduction Measurements

Electrochemical reduction measurements were carried out in a traditional three-electrode system. The working electrode was a 0.3 cm diameter glassy carbon (GC) electrode, a saturated KCl Ag/AgCl electrode was used as the reference electrode, and a Pt sheet was used as the counter electrode. Five milligrams of each different sample mixed with 20 μL of a 5 wt % Nafion ionomer was dissolved in 0.18 mL of an aqueous ethanol solution. The catalyst ink was scanned with ultrasound for 30 min, and a suitable mass of the ink was uniformly dropped onto the clean GC electrode surface and dried in air. An IVIUM V13806 electrochemical workstation was employed to test the electrochemical activity and stability of the series of catalysts. High-purity N2 or CO2 (99.999%) were employed to bubble through the electrolyte to keep the gas saturated in the EC experiment. At the beginning, electrode potentials were cycled between two potential limits until perfectly overlapping; afterward, the I–V curves were obtained. For the electrolytes in the tests, 1 mol·L−1 Na2SO4 was used. The scan rate of the linear sweep voltammetry was 50 mV/s. All of the experiments were performed at room temperature (about 25 ± 3 °C).

3.8. In-Situ Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Fourier Transform Spectroscopy (DRIFTS)

In situ DRIFTS measurements were performed using a Nicolet iS50 Fourier-Transform Spectrometer equipped with an MCT diffuse reflectance accessory. Each spectrum was recorded at a resolution of 4 cm−1 by averaging 16 scans. The samples were compressed and stored in a custom-fabricated infrared reaction chamber sealed with a ZnSe window. Before measurement, each catalyst was purged with nitrogen at 170 °C for 3 h to remove any surface-adsorbed impurities. The samples were then cooled to room temperature and the background spectra were collected. Subsequently, a mixture of carbon dioxide and water vapor was introduced into the reaction chamber until the adsorption reached equilibrium. The samples were then swept with nitrogen to remove the unadsorbed gases. Subsequently, FT-IR spectra were collected at different irradiation intervals under 300 W xenon lamp irradiation.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study successfully demonstrates the construction of TiO2/CuPc heterojunctions that significantly enhance CO2’s photoreduction to CO. Benefiting from the complementary light-absorbing properties of CuPc and TiO2, combined with the superior photogenerated charge separation efficiency, the developed TiO2/0.5CuPc photocatalyst exhibited a better photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance than that of pristine TiO2. In addition, the presence of the metal Cu center in CuPc further acted as a catalytic site, enhancing the CO2 reduction process. These findings not only highlight a facile strategy for enhancing TiO2 photocatalyst activity but also pave the way for future advancements in photocatalytic technology for environmental remediation and the sustainable conversion of greenhouse gases into valuable resources.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z. and G.W.; methodology, J.W. and S.F.; software, P.H. and C.L.; validation, J.L.; formal analysis, H.Z.; data curation, J.W.; writing—original draft preparation, G.W.; writing—review and editing, H.Z.; supervision, P.H.; project administration, H.Z. and G.W.; funding acquisition, H.Z. and G.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Qiqihar city Science and Technology Programme of Joint Guidance Project (Grant No. LSFGG-2022034) and the Science and Technology Research Project of the Heilongjiang Provincial Department of Education (Grant No. 2020-KYYWF-0006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, X.D.; Tang, Y.J.; Han, H.Y.; Chen, Z.L. Evolution Characteristics and Main Influencing Factors of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Chinese Cities from 2005 to 2020. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chang, Y.F.; Huang, B.N. Factors Leading to Increased Carbon Dioxide Emissions of the Apec Countries: The Lmdi Decomposition Analysis. Singap. Econ. Rev. 2023, 68, 2195–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, Y.Z.; Zhao, L.; Zeng, X.H.; Xiao, F.; Fang, W.; Du, X.; He, X.; Wang, D.H.; Li, W.X.; Chen, H. Efficient photocatalytic reduction of CO2 by improving adsorption activation and carrier utilization rate through N-vacancy g-C3N4 hollow microtubule. Mater. Today Energy 2023, 31, 101211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, N.X.; Chen, Y.M.; Xu, Q.Q.; Mu, W.H. Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CO using nickel(II)-bipyridine complexes with different substituent groups as catalysts. J. CO2 Util. 2023, 68, 102385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, P.; Ba, X.H.; Zhang, X.W.; Gao, H.Y.; Han, M.Y.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, L.M.; Diao, X.M.; Wang, G. Direct Z-scheme heterojunction of PCN-222/CsPbBr3 for boosting photocatalytic CO2 reduction to HCOOH. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 457, 141248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ezugwu, C.I.; Ghosh, S.; Bera, S.; Faraldos, M.; Mosquera, M.E.G.; Rosal, R. Bimetallic metal-organic frameworks for efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic CO2 reduction and H2 generation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 308, 122868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jia, X.M.; Sun, H.Y.; Lin, H.L.; Cao, J.; Hu, C.; Chen, S.F. In-depth insight into the mechanism on photocatalytic selective CO2 reduction coupled with tetracycline oxidation over BiO1−xBr/g-C3N4. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 614, 156017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lu, S.W.; Liao, W.R.; Chen, W.H.; Yang, M.Q.; Zhu, S.Y.; Liang, S.J. Elemental sulfur supported on ultrathin titanic acid nanosheets for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CH4. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 614, 156224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tan, L.; Li, Y.R.; Lv, Q.; Gan, Y.Y.; Fang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Wu, L.Z.; Fang, Y.X. Development of soluble UiO-66 to improve photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Catal. Today 2023, 410, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, L.; Zeng, X.H.; Wang, D.H.; Zhang, H.J.; Li, W.X.; Fang, W.; Huang, Z.H.; Chen, H. In-plane graphene incorporated borocarbonitride: Directional utilization of disorder charge via micro π-conjugated heterointerface for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Carbon 2023, 203, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alkanad, K.; Hezam, A.; Al-Zaqri, N.; Bajiri, M.A.; Alnaggar, G.; Drmosh, Q.A.; Almukhlifi, H.A.; Krishnappagowda, L.N. One-Step Hydrothermal Synthesis of Anatase TiO2 Nanotubes for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 38686–38699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bao, X.L.; Zhang, M.H.; Wang, Z.Y.; Dai, D.J.; Wang, P.; Cheng, H.F.; Liu, Y.Y.; Zheng, Z.K.; Dai, Y.; Huang, B.B. Molten-salt assisted synthesis of Cu clusters modified TiO2 with oxygen vacancies for efficient photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CO. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 445, 136718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Park, Y.H.; Kim, D.; Hiragond, C.B.; Lee, J.; Jung, J.W.; Cho, C.H.; In, I.; In, S.I. Phase-controlled 1T/2H-MoS2 interaction with reduced TiO2 for highly stable photocatalytic CO2 reduction into CO. J. CO2 Util. 2023, 67, 102324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gong, H.; Xing, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, S. Functionalized Linear Conjugated Polymer/TiO2 Heterojunctions for Significantly Enhancing Photocatalytic H2 Evolution. Molecules 2024, 29, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Qian, X.Z.; Yang, W.Y.; Gao, S.; Xiao, J.; Basu, S.; Yoshimura, A.; Shi, Y.F.; Meunier, V.; Li, Q. Highly Selective, Defect-Induced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Acetaldehyde by the Nb-Doped TiO2 Nanotube Array under Simulated Solar Illumination. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 55982–55993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Olowoyo, J.O.; Kumar, M.; Singhal, N.; Jain, S.L.; Babalola, J.O.; Vorontsov, A.V.; Kumar, U. Engineering and modeling the effect of Mg doping in TiO2 for enhanced photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to fuels. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 3686–3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, J.; Wang, J.; Zhao, W.J.; Wang, G.H.; Wang, K.; Wu, X.H.; Li, J.M. 0D/1D Cu2−xS/TiO2 S-scheme heterojunction with enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance via surface plasmon resonance induced photothermal effects. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 613, 156083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feng, H.G.; Zhang, C.M.; Luo, M.H.; Hu, Y.C.; Dong, Z.B.; Xue, S.L.; Chu, P.K. A dual S-scheme TiO2@In2Se3@Ag3PO4 heterojunction for efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 16303–16313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rehman, Z.U.; Bilal, M.; Hou, J.H.; Butt, F.K.; Ahmad, J.; Ali, S.; Hussain, A. Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Using TiO2-Based Photocatalysts and TiO2 Z-Scheme Heterojunction Composites: A Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rafiq, K.; Sabir, M.; Abid, M.Z.; Jalil, M.; Nadeem, M.A.; Iqbal, S.; Rauf, A.; Hussain, E. Tuning of TiO2/CdS Hybrid Semiconductor with Au Cocatalysts: State-of-the-Art Design for Sunlight-Driven H2 Generation from Water Splitting. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 4625–4636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, S.; Qin, C.; Niu, L.; Wang, J.; Sun, J.; Dai, L. Strategies for preparing TiO2/CuS nanocomposites with cauliflower-like protrusions for photocatalytic water purification. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 10594–10602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, X.; Yuan, S.; Geng, M.; Sun, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, A.; Yin, G. Combination of alkali treatment and Ag3PO4 loading effectively improves the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanoflowers. New J. Chem. 2024, 48, 6789–6795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Keshipour, S.; Mohammad-Alizadeh, S. Nickel phthalocyanine@graphene oxide/TiO2 as an efficient degradation catalyst of formic acid toward hydrogen production. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, Y.G.; Yang, M.R.; Tian, Z.M.; Luo, N.D.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H.H.; Zhou, A.N.; Xiong, S.X. Assembly of Copper Phthalocyanine on TiO2 Nanorod Arrays as Co-catalyst for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sevim, A.M. Synthesis and characterization of Zn and Co monocarboxy-phthalocyanines and investigation of their photocatalytic efficiency as TiO2 composites. J. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 832, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fei, J.W.; Han, Z.B.; Deng, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhao, J.; Wang, C.H.; Zhao, X.M. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of iron phthalocyanine/TiO2 heterostructure at joint fibrous interfaces. Colloid Surf. A 2021, 625, 126901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Endo, M.; Ochiai, T.; Nagata, M. Photoreduction of Carbon Dioxide By the Zinc Phthalocyanine Immobilized Titanium Dioxide. ECS Meet. Abstr. 2016, 230, 3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Noor, S.; Waseem, M.; Rashid, U.; Anis-ur-Rehman, M.; Rehman, W.; Mahmood, K. Fabrication of NiO coated SiO2 and SiO2 coated NiO for the removal of Pb2+ ions. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2014, 25, 819–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, J.Y.; Xu, R.K.; Deng, K.Y. Coatings of Fe/Al hydroxides inhibited acidification of kaolinite and an alfisol subsoil through electrical double-layer interaction and physical blocking. Soil Sci. 2014, 179, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liccardo, L.; Bordin, M.; Sheverdyaeva, P.M.; Belli, M.; Moras, P.; Vomiero, A.; Moretti, E. Surface Defect Engineering in Colored TiO2 Hollow Spheres Toward Efficient Photocatalysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2212486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, M.Y.; Shao, C.L.; Guo, Z.C.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Mu, J.B.; Cao, T.P.; Liu, Y.C. Hierarchical Nanostructures of Copper(II) Phthalocyanine on Electrospun TiO2 Nanofibers: Controllable Solvothermal-Fabrication and Enhanced Visible Photocatalytic Properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2011, 3, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. He, B.W.; Wang, Z.L.; Xiao, P.; Chen, T.; Yu, J.G.; Zhang, L.Y. Cooperative Coupling of H2O Production and Organic Synthesis over a Floatable Polystyrene-Sphere-Supported TiO2/Bi2O3 S-Scheme Photocatalyst. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2203225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tackley, D.R.; Dent, G.; Smith, W.E. IR and Raman assignments for zinc phthalocyanine from DFT calculations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000, 2, 3949–3955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, H.; Bian, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, S.; Li, Z.; Jiang, N.; Kozlova, E.; Hua, X.; Jing, L. Controllable synthesis of CuPc/N-rich doped (001) TiO2 S-scheme nanosheet heterojunctions for efficiently wide-visible light-driven CO2 reduction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 623, 157066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, J.W.; Bian, J.; Li, J.D.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Li, Z.J.; Qu, Y.; Bai, L.L.; Yang, Z.D.; Jing, L.Q. Efficiently photocatalytic conversion of CO2 on ultrathin metal phthalocyanine/g-C3N4 heterojunctions by promoting charge transfer and CO2 activation. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2020, 277, 119199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Boruah, B.; Gupta, R.; Modak, J.M.; Madras, G. Novel insights into the properties of AgBiO3 photocatalyst and its application in immobilized state for 4-nitrophenol degradation and bacteria inactivation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2019, 373, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ding, M.; Xiao, R.; Zhao, C.; Bukhvalov, D.; Chen, Z.; Xu, H.; Tang, H.; Xu, J.; Yang, X. Evidencing interfacial charge transfer in 2D CdS/2D MXene Schottky heterojunctions toward high-efficiency photocatalytic hydrogen production. Solar Rrl 2021, 5, 2000414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Prajapati, P.K.; Kumar, A.; Jain, S.L. First photocatalytic synthesis of cyclic carbonates from CO2 and epoxides using CoPc/TiO2 hybrid under mild conditions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 7799–7809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, Z.L.; Bian, J.; Zhao, L.; Wu, H.J.; Xu, S.; Sun, L.; Li, Z.J.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Jing, L.Q. Construction of 2D Zn-MOF/BiVO4 S-scheme heterojunction for efficient photocatalytic CO2 conversion under visible light irradiation. Chin. J. Catal. 2022, 43, 1331–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, H.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Y.; Li, R.; Zhang, J.; Peng, T. An effective Z-scheme hybrid photocatalyst based on zinc porphyrin derivative and anatase titanium dioxide microsphere for carbon dioxide reduction. Mater. Today Sustain. 2022, 19, 100164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, L.N.; Ji, B.A.; Zhang, X.F.; Bai, L.L.; Qu, Y.; Li, Z.J.; Jing, L.Q. Construction of Ultrathin S-Scheme Heterojunctions of Single Ni Atom Immobilized Ti-MOF and BiVO4 for CO2 Photoconversion of nearly 100% to CO by Pure Water. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2205303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of TiO2, CuPc, and TiO2/0.5CuPc. FTIR spectra at (b) 400–4000 cm−1 and (c) 1450–1750 cm−1 of TiO2, CuPc, and TiO2/xCuPc. TEM images of (d) TiO2 and (e) TiO2/0.5CuPc. (f) Photographs of TiO2 and TiO2/0.5CuPc.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of TiO2, CuPc, and TiO2/0.5CuPc. FTIR spectra at (b) 400–4000 cm−1 and (c) 1450–1750 cm−1 of TiO2, CuPc, and TiO2/xCuPc. TEM images of (d) TiO2 and (e) TiO2/0.5CuPc. (f) Photographs of TiO2 and TiO2/0.5CuPc.
Molecules 29 01899 g001
Figure 2. (a) Raman spectra and (b) partially magnified Raman spectra of TiO2, CuPc, and TiO2/xCuPc.
Figure 2. (a) Raman spectra and (b) partially magnified Raman spectra of TiO2, CuPc, and TiO2/xCuPc.
Molecules 29 01899 g002
Figure 3. UV-vis DRS reflectance spectra of TiO2, CuPc, and TiO2/xCuPc.
Figure 3. UV-vis DRS reflectance spectra of TiO2, CuPc, and TiO2/xCuPc.
Molecules 29 01899 g003
Figure 4. (a) Plot of (αhv)1/2 versus (hv) for the band gap energy of TiO2 and (b) plot of (αhv)2 versus (hv) for the band gap energy of CuPc. Mott–Schottky plots of (c) TiO2 and (d) CuPc. UPS spectra of (e) TiO2 and (f) CuPc.
Figure 4. (a) Plot of (αhv)1/2 versus (hv) for the band gap energy of TiO2 and (b) plot of (αhv)2 versus (hv) for the band gap energy of CuPc. Mott–Schottky plots of (c) TiO2 and (d) CuPc. UPS spectra of (e) TiO2 and (f) CuPc.
Molecules 29 01899 g004
Figure 5. (a) Transient photocurrent responses and (b) EIS Nyquist plots of TiO2 and TiO2/0.5CuPc.
Figure 5. (a) Transient photocurrent responses and (b) EIS Nyquist plots of TiO2 and TiO2/0.5CuPc.
Molecules 29 01899 g005
Figure 6. Photocatalytic activities for CO2 reduction of the TiO2 and TiO2/0.5CuPc heterojunction.
Figure 6. Photocatalytic activities for CO2 reduction of the TiO2 and TiO2/0.5CuPc heterojunction.
Molecules 29 01899 g006
Figure 7. Electrochemical reduction curves of the TiO2 and TiO2/0.5CuPc heterojunction in (a) a N2-bubbled system and (b) a CO2-bubbled system, respectively.
Figure 7. Electrochemical reduction curves of the TiO2 and TiO2/0.5CuPc heterojunction in (a) a N2-bubbled system and (b) a CO2-bubbled system, respectively.
Molecules 29 01899 g007
Figure 8. The in situ DRIFT spectra of (a) TiO2 and (b) the TiO2/0.5CuPc heterojunction at different light irradiation intervals.
Figure 8. The in situ DRIFT spectra of (a) TiO2 and (b) the TiO2/0.5CuPc heterojunction at different light irradiation intervals.
Molecules 29 01899 g008
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of the proposed photocatalytic CO2 reduction mechanism of the TiO2/0.5CuPc heterojunction.
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of the proposed photocatalytic CO2 reduction mechanism of the TiO2/0.5CuPc heterojunction.
Molecules 29 01899 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.; Fu, S.; Hou, P.; Liu, J.; Li, C.; Zhang, H.; Wang, G. Construction of TiO2/CuPc Heterojunctions for the Efficient Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 with Water. Molecules 2024, 29, 1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081899

AMA Style

Wang J, Fu S, Hou P, Liu J, Li C, Zhang H, Wang G. Construction of TiO2/CuPc Heterojunctions for the Efficient Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 with Water. Molecules. 2024; 29(8):1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081899

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jun, Shuang Fu, Peng Hou, Jun Liu, Chao Li, Hongguang Zhang, and Guowei Wang. 2024. "Construction of TiO2/CuPc Heterojunctions for the Efficient Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 with Water" Molecules 29, no. 8: 1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081899

APA Style

Wang, J., Fu, S., Hou, P., Liu, J., Li, C., Zhang, H., & Wang, G. (2024). Construction of TiO2/CuPc Heterojunctions for the Efficient Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 with Water. Molecules, 29(8), 1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081899

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop