Next Article in Journal
Rapid and Efficient Synthesis of Succinated Thiol Compounds via Maleic Anhydride Derivatization
Previous Article in Journal
Current State-of-the-Art and Perspectives in the Design and Application of Vitrimeric Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Aggregachromic Fluorogenic Asymmetric Cyanine Probes for Sensitive Detection of Heparin and Protamine

by
Anton Kostadinov
1,
Aleksey Vasilev
2,3,
Stanislav Baluschev
1,4 and
Katharina Landfester
1,*
1
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, 55128 Mainz, Germany
2
Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Sofia “Saint Kliment Ohridski”, 1 James Bourchier Blvd., 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria
3
Laboratory of Functional and Nanostructured Polymers, Institute of Polymers, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Akad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl.103A, 1113 Sofa, Bulgaria
4
Faculty of Physics, University of Sofia “Saint Kliment Ohridski”, 5 James Bourchier Blvd., 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(3), 570; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030570
Submission received: 19 December 2024 / Revised: 19 January 2025 / Accepted: 23 January 2025 / Published: 27 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Analytical Chemistry)

Abstract

:
The precise and fast detection of heparin, the most widely used anticoagulant, remains a significant challenge for assessing its use in a clinical setting. In this work, we adapt a well-established asymmetric cyanine fluorogenic platform for the purpose of ultrasensitive heparin detection in the presence of common interferant chemical species. Three analogous fluorescence probes are synthesized in order to optimize for the number of binding moieties. Their interaction with heparin is studied using steady-state absorption, fluorescence, and circular dichroism spectroscopy. The obtained probes exhibit a highly sensitive “turn-on” fluorescence response to heparin, with a LOD in the 10–25 nM range, well within practical requirement, as well as a visible colorimetric change. The heparin–probe complex is also employed as a sensitive detection platform for protamine, both in the “turn-off” fluorescence and ratiometric detection schemes.

1. Introduction

Heparin is a linear glycosaminoglycan, which consists primarily of trisulfated disaccharide repeating units, and has the highest negative charge density among all known biopolymers. Heparin plays a role in the regulation of several biological processes, including cell growth and regulation, blood clotting, and inflammation [1]. It exhibits high binding affinity towards antithrombin, resulting in enhanced inhibition of the activity of thrombin and other clotting factors. Thus, heparin is employed as an anticoagulant drug in both prophylactic and therapeutic applications [2,3]. For the prevention of thrombosis during surgery and for postoperative and long-term care, the recommended heparin dosages are 2–8 IU/mL (17–67 μM) and 0.2–1.2 IU/mL (1.7–10 μM), respectively. [4] Dosages exceeding the therapeutic window could induce complications such as thrombocytopenia and hemorrhaging [5,6]. In order for safe heparin levels in the blood to be maintained, the fast and reliable detection of heparin concentration is crucial.
Numerous analytical methodologies for the detection and quantification of heparin were developed based on various strategies, including electrochemical methods [7], colorimetric assay [8,9,10,11,12], surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy [13,14,15], capillary electrophoresis [16], and amperometric [17] and fluorescence methods [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Several of the reported fluorescence detection methods rely on a “turn off” signal-response, which may often prove unreliable due to possible quenching by interfering compounds, normally present in the analyzed sample. In order to obtain better selectivity, a “turn on” method of detection would be advantageous [28,29,30].
In this article, we report the synthesis and study of the photophysical properties of newly developed asymmetric monomethine cyanine dyes—molecular sensors for the visible detection of heparin. The new dyes are characterized by negligible intrinsic fluorescence, high binding affinity, and significant fluorescence enhancement in the presence of heparin as well. In the absence of a binding target, both segments of the probe conjugated system exhibit a degree of rotational freedom with respect to each other via their connecting single bond. In this state, when light absorption occurs, excited state electron energy is expended primarily by means of a non-radiative torsional relaxation, thus low fluorescence intensity is observed.
Taking into consideration the exceptionally high negative charge density of heparin, we designed our sensor by functionalizing one or both segments of a thiazole orange (TO) fluorophore with butyl-trimethylammonium moieties (Figure 1). In this way, we hope to induce aggregation on the surface of the heparin molecule. Additionally, by providing one or two cationic functions, we succeed in enhancing the water solubility of the molecules and reducing their self-aggregation in aqueous solutions of the neat dyes. The introduction of a trifluoromethyl group into the chromophore should provide a red shift in the long-wavelength maximum compared to TO, ensuring a visible difference between the free and bound states of the new molecular sensors. For more significant bioaggregation properties, the introduction of a trifluoromethyl group into the chromophore, on the other hand, aims to increase the hydrophobicity of the chromophore part itself.
Regarding fluorescence, we expected that, in the presence of heparin, the ammo-nium groups of the molecular sensor bind to the negatively charged sulfate groups of heparin due to Coulombic attraction. Thus, the possibility for intramolecular rotation could be limited, and excited state electrons decay mainly by means of fluorescence emission. As a result, a significant fluorescence enhancement should be observed, allowing for the sensitive detection and quantification of heparin in a model solution (Figure 2).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Photophysical Properties

Changes in the absorption spectra of each probe were observed upon titration with heparin (Figure 3). The observed hypsochromic shift in the absorption maxima of the fluorescent probes, as well as the large Stokes shift in probes 1 and 3 (146 nm), are definitely indicative of the formation of molecular H-aggregates in the presence of heparin. In the proximity of the highly negatively charged heparin backbone, electrostatic repulsion between the anionic probes is partially compensated, allowing the probes to aggregate into dimers or further, into oligomers.
Additionally, in all dyes from the series, a hypochromic shift in the absorption band of unbound probes in solution occurs, corresponding linearly to the concentration of added heparin. For the purpose of molecular recognition based on aggregachromism, chromophores with low self-aggregation in solution are considered most suitable.
As can be seen in Figure 4 and Figure S5, the lowest intensity signal for the presence of initial H-aggregates in TE buffer is characterized by probe 2, which has two positive charges in the molecule and one butyl-trimethylammonium ion bound to the nitrogen of the benzothiazole. In this probe (2), the decrease in the intensity of the chromophore is the most significant, and the characteristic peak for trifluoromethyl analog 3 H-aggregate is not observed. In the case of probe 1 (Figure 3), with increasing heparin concentration, the signal for the monomeric dye remains the least changed in comparison to 2 and 3, which surprisingly suggests a weaker interaction with heparin. Regarding the UV-VIS absorption analysis of heparin in a model system, the most contrasting picture is with probe 2 (Figure 3), which in our opinion makes it the best visual sensor in the current series.
A well-known characteristic of the TO fluorophore is its intrinsic low fluorescence quantum yield, owing to the possibility for nonemissive torsional relaxation of its singlet excited state. Specifically, when the molecular rotor action of the fluorophore is restricted, a corresponding increase in photoluminescence is observed. This property can be seen translated to the emission spectra of probes 13 shown in Figure 4. Each probe exhibits very weak intrinsic emission and, upon titration with heparin, a linearly proportional increase in emission intensity is measured within a range of heparin concentrations.

2.2. Circular Dichroism Properties of Heparin–Probe Aggregates

A common feature of various chromophore aggregates is the emergence of an electronic circular dichroism (CD) signal, otherwise absent in solutions of free dye molecules. Such signal correlates with the molecules in the aggregate arranging into a chiral formation. In the case of probe 1, as seen in Figure 5, a strong negative Cotton effect (CE) is recorded at longer wavelengths, as well as a weaker, positive CE that corresponds to the absorption maximum of the probe–heparin complex. Using the exciton chirality rule, the sense of chirality of the aggregate could be inferred [31,32]. A longer wavelength negative CE, followed by a shorter-wavelength positive CE, is indicative of a left-handed helical arrangement of the probe molecules along the heparin backbone. In the case of probe 2, as seen in Figure 5, no significant electronic CD signal emerges upon the addition of heparin to the probe solution. Taking into consideration the difference in the photoluminescence spectrum of probe 2 (Figure 4), compared to the other two probes, namely the lower Stokes shift, it could be reasoned that the molecules of probe 2 appear to form distinct, nonchiral aggregates in the proximity of heparin.
A weak electronic CD signal Is elicited upon the addition of heparin to a solution of probe 3 (Figure 5). The recorded spectrum represents a multiple CE curve, with a first broad positive CE band centered around 505 nm, followed by a negative CE band, corresponding to the absorption maximum of the probe–heparin complex, as well as a weak positive band, peaking at 438 nm. The observed signals indicate the formation of a right-handed helical aggregate being formed along the heparin backbone.

2.3. Heparin Quantification

Each of the studied probes exhibits a different range of heparin concentrations, suitable for heparin detection and quantification with the widest range being provided by probe 2: 0–11.27 µM (Figure 6). The highest degree of fluorescence enhancement at the upper end of their linear signal–response range exhibited probe 3: 33.0-fold; followed by probe 2: 23.5-fold; and probe 1: 21.6-fold. Limit of detection (LOD) was determined using the following formula:
LOD = 3.3 × σ/S,
where σ is the standard deviation obtained from 20 blank measurements; and the factor S represents the slope of the calibration curve.
The selective detection and quantification of heparin in biological samples could potentially be hindered in the presence of structurally similar interferants, namely other sulfated glycosaminoglycans, e.g., chondroitin sulfate and hyaluronic acid. (Figure 7).
To assess the selectivity of probes 13 in regard to heparin detection, the degree of fluorescence enhancement of each probe was measured when titrated with ChS, HA, and various chemical species commonly present in biological samples (Figure 8).

2.4. Protamine Quantification

Heparin overdose is associated with many adverse and potentially life-threatening side effects. In order to reduce the activity of heparin in patients, protamine, being the only clinically approved antidote to heparin, is administered. The highly cationic nature of protamine facilitates electrostatic binding to heparin with exceptional affinity, forming a complex and thereby inactivating it. Considering the clinical importance of protamine, its accurate dosing is crucial for neutralizing excess amounts of heparin in patients. Upon introducing protamine to a solution of fluorescence probe and heparin, the absorption spectrum of the probe–heparin complex gradually reverses into that of the unbound probe, indicating competitive displacement of the probe by protamine from the heparin scaffold (Figure 9A). The two distinct absorption maxima of unbound probe in solution and probe–heparin complex allow for ratiometric quantification of added protamine, as shown on Figure 9B. This detection scheme is characterized by a linear signal–response range of 0–2.0 µM and a protamine LOD of 0.37 nM for probe 2. Moreover, a reduction in the emission Intensity of the probe–heparin complex is observed, linearly corresponding to the amount of added protamine (Figure 9C).

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials and Methods

All chemicals and reagents were obtained from commercial sources and used without further purification unless otherwise stated. 1,4-diiodobutane was purchased from AlfaAesar (Karlsruhe, Germany). 4-chloro-7-trifluoromethylquinoine was purchased from BLDpharm (Shanghai, China). Heparin (199 IU/mg) was purchased from Thermo Fischer Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA). Protamine sulfate and hyaluronic acid sodium were purchased from Sigma (Taufkirchen, Germany).
1H-NMR spectra and 13C-NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker Avance 500 MHz spectrometer in DMSO-d6 (Bruker, Hanau, Germany). 19F-NMR spectra were measured on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz spectrometer in DMSO-d6 (Bruker, Hanau, Germany). Melting points were determined using an SMP40 melting point apparatus (Stuart Scientific, Redhill, UK). MALDI-TOF measurements were performed on a Bruker rapifleX MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker, Hanau, Germany). Absorption and fluorescence spectra were obtained on a Duetta Bio Fluorescence and Absorbance Spectrometer (HORIBA, Kyoto, Japan). Circular dichroism spectra were obtained on a JASCO-1500 circular dichroism spectrometer (Jasco, Pfungstadt, Germany).

3.2. Synthesis of Compounds

Probes 13 and their synthetic intermediates have been prepared by following the procedure represented in Scheme 1.
2-((7-(trifluoromethyl)-1-(4-(trimethylammonium)butyl)quinolin-4(1H)-ylidene)methyl)-3-(4-(trimethylammonium)butyl)benzo[d]thiazol-3-ium iodide (1):
Intermediate compounds 4 (1.00 g, 1.93 mmol) and 6 (1.16 g, 1.93 mmol) were dissolved in a 10 mL mixture of equal volumes of ethanol and dichloromethane. DIPEA (0.74 mL, 4.25 mmol) was added dropwise. The obtained precipitate was concentrated under reduced pressure. Filtration and washing with cold ethanol yielded the product in the form of a red powder (510 mg, 28.0%). Melting point > 250 °C. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6), δ (TMS, ppm): 9.02–9.00 (d, 1H), 8.65–8.64 (d, 1H), 8.33 (s, 1H), 8.10–8.09 (d, 1H), 7.95–7.93 (d, 1H), 7.89–7.87 (d, 1H), 7.64–7.61 (t, 1H), 7.47–7.44 (t, 1H), 7.41–7.39 (d, 1H), 6.94 (s, 1H), 4.71–4.67 (t, 4H), 3.38–3.31 (m, 4H), 3.02 (s, 18 H), 1.98–1.92 (m, 2H), 1.79–1.73 (m, 6 H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, ppm), δ (TMS, ppm): 161.32, 148.33, 145.68, 140.23, 137.49, 133.07, 132.75, 129.07, 128.55, 127.00, 125.77, 124.81, 123.71, 122.56, 115.91, 114.01, 109.22, 89.35, 65.23, 65.10, 53.83, 52.85 ((-N+(CH3)3)2), 45.99, 26.17, 24.49, 20.03, 19.98. 19F-NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6), δ (TMS, ppm): 61.11. MS (MALDI-TOF): calculated for C32H44F3N4S, m/z: 573.3239; found, 573.2336.
2-((1-ethyl-7-(trifluoromethyl)quinolin-4(1H)-ylidene)methyl)-3-(4-(trimethylammonium)butyl)benzo[d]thiazol-3-ium iodide (2):
Intermediate compounds 4 (669 mg, 1.29 mmol) and 7 (500 mg, 1.29 mmol) were dissolved in a 10 mL mixture of equal volumes of ethanol and dichloromethane. DIPEA (491 µL, 2.84 mmol) was added dropwise. The obtained precipitate was concentrated under reduced pressure. Filtration and washing with cold ethanol yielded the product in the form of a red powder (419 mg, 43.6%). Melting point > 250 °C. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6), δ (TMS, ppm): 9.05–9.03 (d, 1H), 8.71–8.70 (d, 1H), 8.42 (s, 1H), 8.16–8.14 (d, 1H), 8.01–7.99 (d, 1H), 7.93–7.91 (d, 1H), 7.71–7.67 (t, 1H), 7.53–7.50 (t, 1H), 7.48–7.47 (d, 1H), 6.99 (s, 1H), 4.76–4.71 (m, 4 H), 3.43–3.40 (t, 2H), 3.08 (s, 9H), 1.99–1.96 (m, 2H), 1.85–1.79 (m, 2H), 1.49–1.46 (t, 3H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, ppm), δ (TMS, ppm): 161.14, 148.36, 145.40, 140.26, 137.31, 133.09, 132.76, 128.99, 128.43, 127.01, 125.65, 124.77, 123.70, 122.49, 116.02, 113.88, 109.47, 89.12, 65.25, 52.86 (-N+(CH3)3), 49.96, 45.89, 24.47, 20.00, 15.13. 19F-NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6), δ (TMS, ppm): 61.22. MS (MALDI-TOF): calculated for C27H32F3N3S, m/z: 487.3084; found, 487.2269.
3-ethyl-2-((1-ethyl-7-(trifluoromethyl)quinolin-4(1H)-ylidene)methyl)benzo[d]thiazol-3-ium iodide (3)
Intermediate compounds 5 (398 mg, 1.30 mmol) and 7 (503 mg, 1.30 mmol) were dissolved in a 10 mL mixture of equal volumes of ethanol and dichloromethane. DIPEA (494 µL, 2.86 mmol) was added dropwise. The obtained precipitate was concentrated under reduced pressure. Filtration and washing with cold ethanol yielded the product in the form of a red powder (354 mg, 51.3%). Melting point > 250 °C. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6), δ (TMS, ppm): 9.04–9.02 (d, 1H), 8.67–8.65 (d, 1H), 8.38 (s, 1H), 8.14–8.12 (d, 1H), 7.99–7.97 (d, 1H), 7.88–7.87 (d, 1H), 7.69–7.66 (t, 1H), 7.51–7.48 (t, 1H), 7.43–7.41 (d, 1H), 7.01 (s, 1H), 4.77–4.69 (m, 4H), 1.48–1.45 (t, 3H), 1.42–1.39 (t, 3H). 13C-NMR (125 MHz, ppm), δ (TMS, ppm): 160.79, 148.20, 145.16, 139.91, 137.26, 133.03, 132.71, 129.05, 128.30, 126.98, 125.59, 124.90, 123.63, 122.43, 115.83, 113.76, 109.24, 88.96, 49.86, 41.98, 15.06, 12.94. 19F-NMR (376 MHz, DMSO-d6), δ (TMS, ppm): 61.27. MS (MALDI-TOF): calculated for C22H20F3N2S, m/z: 401.1299; found, 401.2010.

3.3. Heparin Sensing

Stock solutions of heparin, chondroitin sulfate (ChS), and hyaluronic acid (HA) were prepared with a concentration of 750 µM in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4). The protamine stock solution used had a concentration of 100 µM, prepared in the same buffer. Titration was performed by adding stock solutions of the respective biopolymer in 3 µL increments, into a 10 mm quartz cuvette, containing 3 mL, 20 µM dye solution with continuous gentle stirring. Calculations of the molarity of heparin and ChS solutions were performed using the mass of their main disaccharide repeat unit: 665 g/mol for heparin and 500 g/mol for ChS.

3.4. Protamine Sensing

A stock solution of protamine with a concentration of 100 µM was prepared in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4). Titration was performed by adding the stock solution in 6 µL increments, to a 10 mm quartz cuvette, containing 3 mL 20 µM dye solution and 7.56 µM (1 IU/mL) heparin.

4. Conclusions

In this work, three novel fluorescence probes were designed, synthesized, and employed for the ultrasensitive detection and quantification of heparin and protamine within a clinically relevant range of concentrations. All three fluorescent probes exhibited heparin LOD in the nanomolar range. An inverse correlation between the number of cationic binding moieties and heparin LOD was observed. In addition, electronic circular dichroism measurements revealed a divergence in the chiral sense of the aggregates that the studied probes form in proximity of the heparin backbone. Among the probes in this work, probe 2 exhibited a superior linear detection range for heparin, as well as insensitivity towards a variety of interfering chemical species, commonly present in clinical samples. The probe offers several desirable sensing modalities, rivaling and even surpassing in their characteristics those of several other sensing platforms currently present in the published literature.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30030570/s1. Table S1: Spectral characteristics of probes 13 in presence of heparin. Figures S1–S3: Excitation spectra of probes 13 (20 µM) before and after addition of 1 IU/mL Hep in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4). Figure S4: Emission intensity of probes 1–3 at increasing concentration, in presence of 2 IU/mL Hep in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4). Figure S5: Absorption spectra of 10 µM TE buffer solution of probe 1 neat, and in presence of dsDNA, RNA, or heparin. Figures S6–S8: 1H-NMR spectra of compounds 13 in DMSO-d6.; Figures S9–S11: 13C-NMR spectra of compounds 13 in DMSO-d6. Figures S12–S14: 19F-NMR spectra of compounds 1–3 in DMSO-d6. Figures S15–S17: MALDI-TOF spectra of probes 13.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V. and S.B.; methodology, A.K. and A.V.; validation, A.V. and S.B.; investigation, A.K.; data curation, A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K.; writing—review and editing, S.B. and K.L.; supervision, S.B. and K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union-NextGenerationEU through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria, grant number BG-RRP-2.004-0008-C01.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Guo, J.; Amemiya, S. Voltammetric Heparin-Selective Electrode Based on Thin Liquid Membrane with Conducting Polymer-Modified Solid Support. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 6893–6902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gemene, K.L.; Meyerhoff, M.E. Reversible Detection of Heparin and other Polyanions by Pulsed Chronopotentiometric Polymer Membrane Electrode. Anal. Chem. 2010, 80, 1612–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Linhardt, R.J. 2003 Claude S. Hudson Award Address in Carbohydrate Chemistry. Heparin: Structure and Activity. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 2551–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ginsberg, J.S. Management of Venous Thromboembolism. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996, 335, 1816–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Warkentin, T.E.; Levine, M.N.; Hirsh, J.; Horsewood, P.; Roberts, R.S.; Gent, M.; Kelton, J.G. Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Treated with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin or Unfractionated Heparin. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 332, 1330–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Girolami, B.; Girolami, A. Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Review. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2006, 32, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Meng, F.; Liang, W.; Sun, H.; Wu, L.; Hong, X.; Miao, P. A Peptide-Based Electrochemical Biosensor for Facile Measurement of Whole-Blood Heparin. ChemElectroChem 2017, 4, 472–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fu, X.; Chen, L.; Li, J.; Lin, M.; You, H.; Wang, W. Label-free Colorimetric Sensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of Heparin Based on Color Quenching of Gold Nanorods by Graphene Oxide. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 34, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Qu, F.; Liu, Y.; Lao, H.; Wang, Y.; You, J. Colorimetric Detection of Heparin with High Sensitivity Based on the Aggregation of Gold Nanoparticles Induced by Polymer Nanoparticles. New J. Chem. 2017, 41, 10592–10597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, L.; Liao, H.; Feng, L.; Wang, M.; Fu, W. Accelerating the Peroxidase-like Activity of Gold Nanoclusters at Neutral pH for Colorimetric Detection of Heparin and Heparinase Activity. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 6247–6252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Chen, Q.; Li, X.; Wang, R.; Zeng, F.; Zhai, J.; Xie, X. Rapid Equilibrated Colorimetric Detection of Protamine and Heparin: Recognition at the Nanoscale Liquid-Liquid Interface. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 10390–10394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fu, X.; Chen, L.; Li, J. Ultrasensitive Colorimetric Detection of Heparin Based on Self-Assembly of Gold Nanoparticles on Graphene Oxide. Analyst 2012, 137, 3653–3658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Qu, G.; Zhang, G.; Wu, Z.; Shen, A.; Wang, J.; Hu, J. A “Turn-off” SERS Assay of Heparin with High Selectivity Based on Heparin-Peptide Complex and Raman Labelled Gold Nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 60, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Fu, X.; Chen, L.; Ding, Y. Highly Sensitive Surface-enhanced Raman Scattering Sensing of Heparin Based on Antiaggregation of Functionalized Silver Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 11059–11065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nguyen, T.A.; Do, A.N.K.; Lo, T.N.H.; Park, I.; Vo, K.Q. Single-step Controlled Synthesis of Flower-like Gold Nanoparticles Stabilized by Chitosan for Sensitive Detection of Heparin Using a Surface-enhanced Raman Scattering Method. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 34831–34842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Patel, R.; Narkowicz, C.; Hutchinson, J.; Hilder, E.; Jacobson, G. A Simple Capillary Electrophoresis Method for the Rapid Separation and Determination of Intact Low Molecular Weight and Unfractionated Heparins. J. Pharm. Biom. Anal. 2008, 46, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Qi, H.; Zhang, L.; Yang, L.; Yu, P.; Mao, L. Anion-exchange-based Amperometric Assay for Heparin Using Polyimidazolium as Synthetic Receptor. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 3439–3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mehta, P.K.; Lee, H.; Lee, K.-H. Highly Sensitive Ratiometric Detection of Heparin and its Oversulfated Chondroitin Sulfate Contaminant by Fluorescent Peptidyl Probe. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 97, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, J.; Liu, G.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y. Turn-on Fluorescence Sensor for the Detection of Heparin Based on Rhodamine B-modified Polyethyleneimine-graphene oxide complex. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 64, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yukawa, H.; Watanabe, M.; Kaji, N.; Okamoto, Y.; Tokeshi, M.; Miyamoto, Y.; Noguchi, H.; Baba, Y.; Hayashi, S. Monitoring Transplanted Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells Combined with Heparin in the Liver by Fluorescence Imaging Using Quantum Dots. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 2177–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sun, W.; Bandmann, H.; Schrader, T. A Fluorescent Polymeric Heparin Sensor. Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 7701–7707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zheng, J.; Ye, T.; Chen, J.; Xu, L.; Ji, X.; Yang, C.; He, Z. Highly Emissive Fluorescence Detection of Heparin Based on Aggregation-Induced Emission of a Tetraphenylethene Derivative. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 90, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pang, S.; Liu, S.; Su, X. A Fluorescence Assay for the Trace Detection of Protamine and Heparin. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 25857–25862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cao, Y.; Shi, S.; Wang, L.; Yao, J.; Yao, T. Ultrasensitive Fluorescence Detection of Heparin Based on Quantum Dots and a Functional Ruthenium Polypiridyl Complex. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 55, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pandey, S.; Jha, P.; Singh, P. An Ultrasensitive and Selective Method for Visual Detection of Heparin in 100% Human Plasma. Talanta 2023, 253, 124040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jiang, R.; Zhao, S.; Chen, L.; Zhao, M.; Qi, W.; Fu, W.; Hu, L.; Zhang, Y. Fluorescence Detection of Protamine, Heparin and Heparinase II Based on a Novel AIE Molecule with Four Carboxyl. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 156, 1153–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gao, Y.; Wei, K.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Hu, J. A Facile Four-armed AIE Fluorescent Sensor for Heparin and Protamine. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 277, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ding, Y.; Li, X.; Li, T.; Zhu, W.; Xie, Y. α-Monoacylated and α,α‘- and α,β‘-Diacylated Dipyrrins as Highly Sensitive Fluorescence “Turn-on” Zn2+ Probes. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 5328–5338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yan, D.; He, Y.; Ge, Y.; Song, G. Fluorescence “Turn on-off” Detection of Heparin and Heparinase I Based on the Near-infrared Emission Polyethyleneimine Capped Ag2S Quantum Dots. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 240, 863–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jun, M.E.; Roy, B.; Ahn, K.H. “Turn-on” Fluorescent Sensing with “Reactive” Probes. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 7583–7601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Berova, N.; Gargiulo, D.; Derguini, F.; Nakanishi, K.; Harada, N. Unique Ultraviolet-vis Absorption and Circular Dichroic Exciton-Split Biscyanine Dye: Origin and Nature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4769–4775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Boiadjiev, S.E.; Lightner, D.A. Exciton Chirality. (A) Origins of and (B) Applications from Strongly Fluorescent Dipyrrinone Chromophores. Monatsch. Chem. 2005, 136, 489–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of fluorogenic probes with varying number of cationic binding moieties.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of fluorogenic probes with varying number of cationic binding moieties.
Molecules 30 00570 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of dye–heparin–protamine binding interaction.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of dye–heparin–protamine binding interaction.
Molecules 30 00570 g002
Figure 3. UV-vis spectra of probes 13 (20 µM), respectively, upon titration with heparin in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4).
Figure 3. UV-vis spectra of probes 13 (20 µM), respectively, upon titration with heparin in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4).
Molecules 30 00570 g003
Figure 4. Photoluminescence spectra of probes 1–3 (20 µM), respectively, upon titration with heparin solution in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4). Excitation wavelength for probe 1 and 2: 466 nm; for probe 3: 461 nm.
Figure 4. Photoluminescence spectra of probes 1–3 (20 µM), respectively, upon titration with heparin solution in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH 7.4). Excitation wavelength for probe 1 and 2: 466 nm; for probe 3: 461 nm.
Molecules 30 00570 g004
Figure 5. CD spectra of probes 13 (20 µM) at increasing concentrations of heparin in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4).
Figure 5. CD spectra of probes 13 (20 µM) at increasing concentrations of heparin in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4).
Molecules 30 00570 g005
Figure 6. Increase of fluorescence intensity of probes 13 (20 µM), at their respective emission maxima, with increasing concentration of heparin in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4). Red line represents best fit of calibration curve for signal–response of each probe, obtained by linear regression.
Figure 6. Increase of fluorescence intensity of probes 13 (20 µM), at their respective emission maxima, with increasing concentration of heparin in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4). Red line represents best fit of calibration curve for signal–response of each probe, obtained by linear regression.
Molecules 30 00570 g006
Figure 7. Main disaccharide repeat units of heparin, chondroitin-4-sulfate, and hyaluronic acid.
Figure 7. Main disaccharide repeat units of heparin, chondroitin-4-sulfate, and hyaluronic acid.
Molecules 30 00570 g007
Figure 8. Fluorescence emission intensity of probes 13 (20 µM) at their respective emission maxima, in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4), in presence of heparin, ChS, HA, sodium citrate, sodium acetate, sodium sulfate, and dextrose at 10 µM concentrations.
Figure 8. Fluorescence emission intensity of probes 13 (20 µM) at their respective emission maxima, in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4), in presence of heparin, ChS, HA, sodium citrate, sodium acetate, sodium sulfate, and dextrose at 10 µM concentrations.
Molecules 30 00570 g008
Figure 9. (A) UV-Vis spectra of probe 2 (20 µM) heparin complex (1.5 IU/mL) upon titration with protamine in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4); (B) ratiometric response in absorption of probe 2 (20 µM) heparin complex (1.5 IU/mL) upon titration with protamine in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4); (C) change in fluorescence intensity of probe 2 upon addition of increasing concentrations of protamine in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4).
Figure 9. (A) UV-Vis spectra of probe 2 (20 µM) heparin complex (1.5 IU/mL) upon titration with protamine in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4); (B) ratiometric response in absorption of probe 2 (20 µM) heparin complex (1.5 IU/mL) upon titration with protamine in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4); (C) change in fluorescence intensity of probe 2 upon addition of increasing concentrations of protamine in Tris-HCl buffer (10 mM, pH = 7.4).
Molecules 30 00570 g009
Scheme 1. Synthetic route for preparation of fluorogenic heparin probes 1, 2, and 3.
Scheme 1. Synthetic route for preparation of fluorogenic heparin probes 1, 2, and 3.
Molecules 30 00570 sch001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kostadinov, A.; Vasilev, A.; Baluschev, S.; Landfester, K. Aggregachromic Fluorogenic Asymmetric Cyanine Probes for Sensitive Detection of Heparin and Protamine. Molecules 2025, 30, 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030570

AMA Style

Kostadinov A, Vasilev A, Baluschev S, Landfester K. Aggregachromic Fluorogenic Asymmetric Cyanine Probes for Sensitive Detection of Heparin and Protamine. Molecules. 2025; 30(3):570. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030570

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kostadinov, Anton, Aleksey Vasilev, Stanislav Baluschev, and Katharina Landfester. 2025. "Aggregachromic Fluorogenic Asymmetric Cyanine Probes for Sensitive Detection of Heparin and Protamine" Molecules 30, no. 3: 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030570

APA Style

Kostadinov, A., Vasilev, A., Baluschev, S., & Landfester, K. (2025). Aggregachromic Fluorogenic Asymmetric Cyanine Probes for Sensitive Detection of Heparin and Protamine. Molecules, 30(3), 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030570

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop