Next Article in Journal
Impact of Bioactive Ingredients on the Fecal Excretion of Aflatoxin B1 and Ochratoxin A in Wistar Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Roles of Post-Translational Modifications of Transcription Factors Involved in Breast Cancer Hypoxia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Luminescent Lanthanide Infinite Coordination Polymers for Ratiometric Sensing Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Environmental Engineering Study Case: Constructing Cataluminescence Sensors Based on Octahedral Nanocomposites for Isovaleraldehyde Detection

1
Anhui Institute of Urban and Rural Green Development and Urban Renewal, College of Environment and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
2
Environmental Materials and Pollution Control Laboratory, Hefei Institute of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(3), 646; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030646 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 December 2024 / Revised: 25 January 2025 / Accepted: 27 January 2025 / Published: 1 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano-Functional Materials for Sensor Applications—2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
Isovaleraldehyde is an important chemical raw material for the production of flavors, which is volatile and flammable and poses a health risk to humans. It is, therefore, essential to develop a rapid assay for the identification of isovaleraldehyde. In this study, octahedral NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites were successfully fabricated for the rapid detection of isovaleraldehyde. The prepared NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites were characterized by SEM, XRD, FTIR, and XPS to analyze the material properties. The effects of temperature, carrier gas flow rate, selectivity, and stability on the cataluminescence performance of this sensor were investigated. The results showed that NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites have excellent selectivity to isovaleraldehyde with response and recovery times of 6 and 8 s, respectively. A linear relationship was found between the CTL signal and isovaleraldehyde concentration Y = 9.56X − 23.3 (R2 = 0.99) over the concentration range of 13.66 to 437.22 ppm with a detection limit of 2.44 ppm. The relative deviation RSD = 4.18% for multiple tests of the sensor indicates good stability and longevity. Mechanistic studies have shown that the heterojunction formed by NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites has the advantage of improving CTL sensing performance. This study may advance the application of cataluminescence sensors in the detection of isovaleraldehyde.

1. Introduction

Volatile organic compounds (VOC) constitute a class of organic compounds that readily evaporate at an ambient temperature and pressure, and they are significant contributors to air pollution, posing detrimental effects on both human health and the environment and, in recent years, their detection has received widespread attention [1,2]. Among them, isovaleraldehyde is mainly used as an industrial raw material for the production of flavors, fragrances, and other organic chemicals [3], and it is important to note that vapor may form explosive mixtures with air. This means that exposure to open flames or high heat may cause combustion or an explosion. In high concentrations, it shows an irritating odor, which is irritating to the skin and respiratory system. Prolonged exposure to isovaleraldehyde vapor may cause dizziness, headache, nausea, and vomiting [4]. Developing a highly sensitive, simple, and rapid method to detect isovaleraldehyde is therefore important.
The contemporary methods with the capability to detect isovaleraldehyde gas include high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography (GC), and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), amongst others. Quantitative analysis of isovaleraldehyde in Japanese sake was reported by using high-performance liquid chromatography by Masayuki Takahashi et al. [5]. GC-MS was used to separate and characterize the volatile compounds in shochu by Yukio Osafune et al. [6]. While these methodologies offer accurate detection of isovaleraldehyde, they are not without their limitations, such as the large size of the detection instruments, cumbersome procedures, and prolonged detection times, which are detrimental to rapid detection [7,8]. In 1976, Breysse et al. discovered a weak luminescence during the catalytic oxidation of CO on the surface of ThO2 [9]. This phenomenon was named cataluminescence (CTL). Subsequently, in the 1990s, Nakagawa et al. reported a CTL sensor for the detection of alcohols and ketones using γ-Al2O3 as catalytic material [10,11]. The principle of the CTL sensor is that the CTL phenomenon occurs when the substance to be measured comes into contact with the CTL material, and the target substance is detected by the light signal generated by the CTL reaction [12,13]. In recent years, CTL sensors have been widely developed and applied in the field of VOC monitoring due to their advantages of low cost, compact and convenient use, high sensitivity, and good stability [14,15]. Construction of a CTL sensor system for acetone vapor detection was conducted by Shi G et al. [16]. An In2S3 CTL sensor was developed for the detection of ammonium sulfide by Cai P et al. [17].
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), which are porous structural compounds assembled through the coordination of metal ions or clusters with organic ligands, exhibit substantial potential across various domains due to their distinctive structural attributes [18,19]. Due to their well-defined geometry, large specific surface area, and stability [20,21], MOF materials are widely used in the fields of absorption [22], photocatalysis [23,24], and advanced oxidation [25]. With the deeper exploration of sensor research, MOF materials are gradually being explored and applied to the field of CTL [26,27]. Huang X et al. added UIO-66 material to a CTL sensor to detect acetone vapor, resulting in a 25-fold enhancement of the CTL signal [28]. Li Q et al. synthesized a Ce(IV)-MOF and utilized it for the development of a highly sensitive H2S gas sensor, which shows promising applications in H2S detection [29]. The incorporation of MOF materials in the development process of CTL sensors has significantly enhanced the CTL performance of the sensors.
MIL-Fe53(C8H4FeO5) is a class of MOFs synthesized from iron(III) cations and 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate, characterized by a three-dimensional network or secondary building units comprising hexagonal FeO6 chains and dicarboxylate anions [30]. MIL-Fe53 is chemically stable and is made up of less toxic metal centers compared to other MOFs and has, therefore, received a great deal of attention [30]. Sun Y H et al. have successfully fabricated an electrochemical sensor based on MIL-Fe53, demonstrating its efficacy in the detection of fluosilazole, thereby highlighting its potential applications in the sensing of this specific compound [31]. NiCo2O4 is a p-type oxide semiconductor that exhibits several advantageous properties, including its low cost, environmental friendliness, structural stability, and abundant electroactive sites. Consequently, NiCo2O4 is used for the monitoring of volatile organic compounds. Wu J et al. have fabricated a gas sensor based on NiCo2O4 nanocomposite material, which exhibits efficacy in the detection of hydrogen sulfide [32]. However, NiCo2O4, as a p-type oxide semiconductor, has a response rate that is generally lower compared to the majority of n-type semiconductors. In pursuit of enhanced performance for CTL sensors, it is imperative to identify methods capable of optimizing their sensing characteristics. A substantial specific surface area and a stable structure are advantageous traits in this regard. Kim S H et al. combined NiCo2O4 and Pd to improve the sensitivity of the sensor against H2 [33]. Ghanbarian M et al. developed MIL-53 (Cr-Fe)/Ag/CNT ternary nanocomposites for the preparation of gas sensors [34].
Therefore, this study is aimed at combining the advantages of NiCo2O4 and MIL-Fe53 to improve CTL’s performance. The successful synthesis of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites was achieved for the purpose of preparing a CTL sensor for the detection of isovaleraldehyde gas. A comprehensive study of the effects of reaction temperature, carrier gas flow rate, selectivity, and stability on CTL performance and sensor sensing characteristics was carried out. The potential CTL mechanism is also discussed.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Material

The morphology of the synthesized materials was studied on a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Figure 1A–C shows the SEM images of MIL-Fe53, NiCo2O4, and the nanocomposites, respectively. As depicted in Figure 1A, it can be observed that MIL-Fe53 has an octahedral bipyramidal morphology with an average diameter of 12 µm and a uniform distribution, and such a smooth surface endows MIL-Fe53 with a larger specific surface area. As depicted in Figure 1B, it is observable that NiCo2O4 consists of external nanoparticles forming a sea urchin-like structure, which is in line with descriptions of the spinel structure in the literature, indicating that the structure of NiCo2O4 is not damaged during the calcination process. Figure 1C shows that the nanocomposites consist of octahedral MIL-Fe53 and NiCo2O4 particles attached to their surface, and the organometallic skeleton of the MOF is not disrupted after the material is composited. The regular octahedral morphology and smooth surface of MIL-Fe53 provide more attachment sites for NiCo2O4 and also facilitate the formation of heterostructures between MOF materials and metal oxides. The NiCo2O4, which is integrated onto the surface of MIL-Fe53 octahedra, forms a robust nanocomposite material that enhances the stability of the material. Concurrently, the surface roughness of the material is increased, providing favorable conditions for the adsorption of target substances during the reaction process.
The composition and crystal structure of the nanocomposite material were determined by using X-ray diffraction (XRD), with the experimental results depicted in Figure 2. Figure 2A shows the XRD patterns of NiCo2O4, MIL-Fe53, and NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites. The diffraction peaks at 2θ values of 18.93°, 31.15°, 36.7°, 44.63°, 55.73°, 59.11°, and 64.96° correspond to the (111), (220), (311), (222), (400), (511), and (440) crystal planes of NiCo2O4 in the nanocomposite material, respectively, which are in agreement with the JCPDS No. 73−1702 card. For MIL-Fe53 in nanocomposites, XRD shows diffraction peaks at 2θ = 11.1°, 16.3°, 17.7°, 18.1°, and 22.3°, which is in agreement with the MIL-Fe53 reported in the literature [35]. It can be observed from Figure 2A that there are obvious diffraction peaks of the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites. Figure 2B demonstrates the Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR) spectra of the single material and the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite material. The characteristic peak at position 1655 cm−1 corresponds to the bending vibration of the N-H group in the amide feedstock. The presence of a dicarboxylic acid linker in MIL-Fe53 was indicated by the detection of typical symmetric and asymmetric vibrations of -COOH at peaks of 1385 cm−1 and 1535 cm−1 [36], respectively. The characteristic peaks observed at 1010 cm−1 and 748 cm−1 are attributed to the bending vibrations of the hydroxyl group -OH and the benzene ring C-H in the organic linkers [37], respectively. Indeed, the absorption peak situated at 538 cm−1 is indicative of the stretching vibration of the Fe-O bond, which is a distinctive functional group within the structure of MIL-Fe53. This vibrational mode is characteristic of the metal–oxygen interaction within the framework [38]. The absorption peaks at the low wavenumbers of 552 cm−1 and 650 cm−1 are attributed to the stretching vibrations of Ni-O and Co-O in NiCo2O4, which are indicative of the metal–oxygen bonds within the spinel structure of NiCo2O4 [39]. NiCo2O4 exhibits a C-O stretching vibration absorption peak within the range of 1000 cm−1 to 650 cm−1, which can be associated with the vibrational modes of the carbon–oxygen bonds in the structure. Additionally, an absorption peak at 1633 cm−1 is observed, which can be attributed to the bending vibration of water molecules in the interlayer of Ni(OH)2. This peak is likely a result of the interaction between NiCl2·6H2O and water molecules during the preparation of NiCo2O4, where part of the NiCl2·6H2O binds with water molecules, leading to the formation of this characteristic peak.
In order to investigate the porosity of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites, the adsorption-desorption of N2 was used to obtain the adsorption and desorption isotherms. The specific surface area and pore size distribution of the samples were calculated according to the Barret-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) model, and the specific surface area of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites was 138.246 m2/g. As can be seen in Figure 3A, the nanocomposites exhibit type-II isotherm characteristics, reflecting the physical adsorption process of porous adsorbents. The ability of rapid physisorption of N2 when the relative pressure is in the range of 0 to 0.01 proves that a large number of pores exist in the nanocomposites, and the N2 adsorption at higher relative pressures is related to the presence of mesopores within the nanocomposites, and the rapid rise is mainly due to the formation of mesopores between the particles. Combined with Figure 3B, it can be seen that the pore sizes of the nanocomposites are mainly distributed in the range of 1–10 nm, probably due to the accumulation between NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 particles, which ultimately forms a mesoporous structure.
The elemental composition and changes of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites before and after the reaction were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization. Figure 4A presents the full XPS spectra of the nanocomposite material before and after the reaction. It can be observed that the elements before and after the reaction still correspond to their respective orbitals, indicating the presence of elements Fe, Co, Ni, and O in the nanocomposite material, as well as C, which is adsorbed from the carrier gas. The XPS spectrum of O1s in Figure 4B shows that the oxygen in the material is mainly dominated by the lattice oxygen (OL) at 532.2 eV and the oxygen vacancy (OV) at 531.5 eV before the reaction. After the reaction, it can be clearly seen that the peak position of OL remains unchanged, but the peak area increases and the OV is shifted to the right from 531.5 to 530.1 eV, with an increasing peak area. This is because before the start of the reaction, the carrier gas was just passed into the reaction chamber due to the heating rod temperature not reaching the appropriate reaction temperature, resulting in the reaction of dissociated oxygen content being relatively small, the number of oxygen vacancies is insufficient, and the OL content obtained by reduction is naturally less; when the temperature rises to the appropriate reaction temperature of the material, the dissociation of oxygen accelerates, the content of oxygen vacancies rises, and the whole process of the redox reaction is accelerated, and the content of the OL also rises accordingly. The results of the XPS show that the accelerated formation of oxygen species can accelerate the efficiency of the CTL reaction from the inside. The XPS fine maps of Fe 2p, Co 2p, and Ni 2p before and after the reaction are shown in Figure 4C, Figure 4D, and Figure 4E, respectively, from which it can be seen that the positions of the characteristic peaks before and after the reaction are basically unchanged, indicating that there is no major change in the materials before and after the reaction, which reflects the effect of the nanocomposites as catalysts in the CTL reaction.

2.2. CTL Performance Study of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53

The influence of the incorporation of MIL-Fe53 on the CTL signal of NiCo2O4 has been investigated. Figure 5A shows the response signal intensities for CTL of isovaleraldehyde by a single NiCo2O4 material and NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites; the red line is the signal of a single NiCo2O4 material, and the black line is the signal of the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite material. It is evident from the figure that the CTL signal strength of the nanocomposite sensor is very significantly improved compared to NiCo2O4, which indicates that the MIL-Fe53 component in the nanocomposite material really improves the performance of the sensor. In order to be able to better study the CTL properties of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite sensors, the effects of the reaction temperature and carrier gas flow rate on the CTL performance of the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite sensors have been explored.
Figure 5B shows the CTL signal intensity and signal-to-noise ratio of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites for isovaleraldehyde at different temperatures. The temperature range tested in the experiment was from 162 °C to 250 °C. Within the temperature range from 162 °C to 250 °C, the overall CTL signal, represented by the black line, increases with the rising temperature. Specifically, the signal increases gradually within the range from 162 °C to 194 °C and more rapidly within the range from 194 °C to 250 °C. The signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of the red line increased with the temperature within the range of 162 °C to 234 °C, decreased with the temperature within the range of 234 °C to 250 °C, and reached a maximum value of 31 at 234 °C. Combining the CTL signal and the S/N ratio, it can be seen that the peak intensity of the CTL signal and the signal-to-noise ratio of the nanocomposites reach relatively high values at 234 °C. Therefore, 234 °C was selected as the optimum control temperature.
Figure 5C presents the CTL signal intensity and S/N of the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites under various carrier gas flow rates. The range of carrier gas flow rates tested in the experiment was from 100 mL/min to 450 mL/min. It was observed that the CTL signal and S/N ratio increased with the increase in the carrier gas flow rate when it was between 100 mL/min and 300 mL/min. This enhancement may be attributed to the fact that a slower flow rate could lead to the dilution of isovaleraldehyde concentration upon entering the reaction chamber, consequently resulting in a lower CTL signal. Within the range of 300 mL/min to 450 mL/min, the CTL signal and S/N decreased with the increase in carrier gas flow rate. This decrease is attributed to the rapid flow rate leading to a shortened contact time between isovaleraldehyde and the sensor upon entry into the reaction chamber, thereby affecting the signal intensity. At a carrier gas flow rate of 300 mL/min, both the CTL intensity and S/N ratio reached their maxima, which is why 300 mL/min was selected as the optimal control flow rate.
Based on the aforementioned studies, the optimal laboratory control conditions of 234 °C and 300 mL/min were established, and under these conditions, the CTL characteristics of the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites-based CTL sensor in the analysis of isovaleraldehyde were investigated. Figure 6A shows the intensity of the CTL signals of the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite sensor for different volatile organic compounds under optimum control conditions. It can be seen that the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite sensor has the highest CTL signal for isovaleraldehyde and basically no signal for other organics, such as toluene and formaldehyde, except for trichloromethane and xylenes, which have a weak signal response. This proves that the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite prepared in this experiment has high selectivity to isovaleraldehyde and is an excellent CTL sensing material for isovaleraldehyde. Figure 6B shows the CTL response characteristics of the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite sensor to isovaleraldehyde under optimal control conditions. Upon the introduction of isovaleraldehyde into the reaction chamber facilitated by the carrier gas, the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite sensor responded rapidly, and the CTL signal increased to reach the maximum value with a response time of 6 s, and when the isovaleraldehyde was completely reacted, the CTL signal began to return to the initial state, with a recovery time of 8 s. The response and recovery time of the sensor for CTL against isovaleraldehyde is excellent, which reflects the advantages of the fast response of the CTL sensor.
In order to elucidate the relationship between the catalytic signals of the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite sensor and the concentration of the analyte, a systematic investigation is warranted. Isovaleraldehyde gas was injected through different concentrations (13.66, 54.65, 109.31, 218.61, and 437.22 ppm) under optimal control conditions. As depicted in Figure 7A, distinct colored lines represent the CTL signals corresponding to varying concentrations of isopentanal. It is observed that with the increment of isopentanal concentration, there is a marked escalation in the CTL intensity. Figure 7B illustrates the fitted linear relationship between the isovaleraldehyde concentration and CTL signal intensity; the fitted equation in the concentration range of 13.66–437.22 ppm is Y = 9.56X − 23.3 (R2 = 0.99), from which it can be seen that the CTL signal of the sensor has a good and positive correlation to the concentration of isovaleraldehyde. The detection limit of the isovaleraldehyde concentration was calculated using Equation (1).
D = 3 N × Q I
In this context, Q denotes the minimum analyte concentration within the detection range; N signifies the response noise at the minimum analyte concentration; and I corresponds to the response signal value associated with the minimum analyte concentration within the detection range. The calculated detection limit is determined to be 2.44 ppm. In addition, the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 sensor is compared to some reports. It is noted that since there is rarely a report about isovaleraldehyde gas sensors, the reported sensors for detecting aldehyde (hexanal) gas, which is similar to isovaleraldehyde, are employed for comparison. For example, Janfaza et al. reported a sensor based on MIP-MWCNTs, which showed a response/recovery time of 300/200 s with a detection limit of 10 ppm [40]. Yao et al. prepared a MnO2/Ti3C2Tx-based sensor for detecting aldehyde, which exhibited a response/recovery time of 138/318 s with a detection limit of 20 ppm [41]. It can be seen that the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 sensor presented here displays high performances, including short response/recovery times and a low detecting limit.
Furthermore, the stability of the CTL signal is an essential parameter for the evaluation of sensor performance. From Figure 7C, it can be seen that the CTL signals obtained from 10 consecutive tests in 600 s time are all around 5500, and the results show that the CTL signal strength of the isovaleraldehyde sensor is relatively stable, indicating that the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite has good stability. For seven days after the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite sensors were prepared, the sensor signal levels to isovaleraldehyde were repeatedly tested each day under the same control conditions. Figure 7D shows the CTL signal intensity under the best working conditions in one week. It can be seen that the fluctuation of the sensor signal intensity measured in 7 days is small, the reproducibility is good, and the relative deviation (RSD = 4.18%) of repeated tests under the same conditions over a period of 7 days is less than 5%. These data indicate that the catalytic sensor maintains good stability and service life under continuous operating conditions, which meets the practical application requirements for sensors.

2.3. Possible CTL Mechanisms

It is considered that the combination of MIL-Fe53 and NiCo2O4 enhances the conductivity and improves its electronic structure. The molecular activity of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 is activated when a certain temperature threshold is reached on the surface of the ceramic heating line. Isovaleraldehyde enters the reaction chamber through the carrier gas and contacts the CTL sensor. Oxygen in the carrier gas will be firstly adsorbed on the surface of the nanocomposite to form O2 (ads) in the adsorbed state (Equation (2)), and then O2 will gain electrons from the conduction band of the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite to become O2 (Equation (3)) in the adsorbed state and O (Equation (4)) [42]. An electron depletion layer will be formed on the surface of the material, and the nanocomposite exhibits a highly active state. The MIL-Fe53 provides attachment sites for NiCo2O4 to enable more channels for the transfer of free electrons and accelerate the catalytic efficiency. Then comes the oxidation stage of isovaleraldehyde, where the first three reactions are more and more intense, the activated NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite material is in contact with isovaleraldehyde molecules, and the chemisorbed O on the surface of the material will undergo oxidation with isovaleraldehyde molecules to generate CO2 and H2O (Equation (5)). The CO2 generated by the reaction is the excited state intermediate carbon dioxide (CO2*), which is accompanied by the return of the intermediate to the ground state (Equation (6)), releasing the light signal hν [43]. This weak light will be detected by the BPCL instrument and ultimately converted into a signal received by the sensor. The flowchart of the whole reaction process is shown in Figure 8.
O 2 ( gas ) O 2 ( ads )
O 2 ( ads ) + e O 2 ( ads )
O 2 ( a d s ) + e 2 O ( a d s )
C 5 H 10 O + 7 O 5 C O 2 * + 5 H 2 O + 7 e
C O 2 * C O 2 + h ν
During the CTL reaction, NiCo2O4 grows on the surface of MIL-Fe53 to form a heterojunction, and this heterojunction can achieve spatial separation of electrons and holes on the surface of the sensing material, which generates strongly oxidizing and reducing holes and electrons on the surface of the heterojunction and participates in the catalytic reaction of isovalerylaldehyde, which has a better catalytic effect than that of the ordinary free electrons. Although the construction of heterojunctions hinders the electron–hole nanocomposites to some extent, the material is prompted to form more electron–hole pairs [44,45], which improves the conversion efficiency of carriers and accelerates the reaction process. The forbidden bands (Eg) of MIL-Fe53 and NiCo2O4 were obtained by UV spectrophotometry and DFT theoretical calculations as 6.0 eV and 4.8 eV [46]. Based on the CTL response characteristics of isovaleraldehyde with the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites, the CTL response mechanism of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 to isovaleraldehyde is inferred, as shown in Figure 9. After isovaleraldehyde enters the reaction chamber through the carrier gas, the nanostructures on the surface of the nanocomposites adsorb isovaleraldehyde on the surface of the ceramic heating rod and, at the same time, excite the generated electrons (e) to be transferred from the MIL-Fe53 conduction band (CB) to the NiCo2O4 CB [47], and the generated holes (h+) on the NiCo2O4 valence band (VB) will jump to the MIL-Fe53 VB, so that e and h+ are located on NiCo2O4 and MIL-Fe53, respectively, to realize the effective separation of e and h+. When MIL-Fe53 is added, the Fermi energy level difference (Efn − Efp) [48,49] between NiCo2O4 and MIL-Fe53 increases, and more strong oxidizing h+ and strong reducing e will be generated on the surface of the heterojunction formed by NiCo2O4 and MIL-Fe53 [50,51], which directly or indirectly participates in the CTL reaction of isovaleraldehyde, and it can effectively improve the CTL ability of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemical Reagents

The chemical reagents used in this study include the following: ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O; 99.0%; Beijing Wokai Biotechnology Co., Beijing, China); N-methylacetamide (C3H7NO; 99.5%; Beijing Wokai Biotechnology Co., Beijing, China); terephthalic acid (C8H6O4; 99.0%; Beijing Wokai Biotechnology Co., Beijing, China); anhydrous methanol (CH4O; 99.5%; Xilong Science Co., Shantou, China); cobalt chloride hexahydrate (CoCl2·6H2O; 99.0%; Xilong Science Co., Shantou, China); nickel chloride hexahydrate (NiCl2·6H2O; 98.0%; Xilong Science Co., Shantou, China); urea CH4N2O; 99.0%; Beijing Wokai Biotechnology Co.); and anhydrous ethanol (C2H6O, 99.5%, Zhengzhou Yibang Industry Co., Zhengzhou, China).

3.2. Instrumentation

The analytical instruments used during this study are as follows: A BPCL weak luminescence meter (BPCL-1; Guangzhou Microluminescence Science and Technology Co., Guangzhou, China); X-ray diffractometer (X’pertPRO MPD. Panalytical; Almelo, The Netherlands); scanning electron microscope (AURIGA; ZEISS, Jena, Germany); Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (NEXUS-870; ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA); and X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (ESCALAB 250; ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA).

3.3. Synthesis of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53

NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites were synthesized by the hydrothermal method. In the first step, NiCo2O4 monomer material was synthesized first. A solution was prepared by dissolving 1 mmol of NiCl2·6H2O and 2 mmol of CoCl2·6H2O in a mixture of 20 mL of ultrapure water and 20 mL of ethanol and then adding 15 mmol of urea and stirring it until dissolved. It was then transferred to an autoclave and reacted for 12 h at 120 °C, with centrifugal washing and drying for 24 h at 60 °C. Afterward, crushing and annealing took place at 350 °C for 3 h to obtain a black NiCo2O4 powder. In the second step, the NiCo2O4 monomer material was compounded with MIL-Fe53. The prepared 1 mmol of NiCo2O4 was added to 110 mL of DMF and treated with ultrasonication. Then, 4 mmol of FeCl3·6H2O and 5 mmol of H2BDC were added, stirred until dissolved and loaded into an autoclave. Then, the reaction mixture was subjected to a thermal treatment at 150 °C for a duration of 12 h, followed by cooling to room temperature, and then centrifuged and washed and dried at 60 °C for 12 h, and finally, the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 powder was obtained.

3.4. CTL Sensing Measurements

The three-dimensional morphological architecture of the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite throughout its synthesis and the schematic depiction of the Ultra-Weak Luminescence Analyzer (BPCL) detection setup are delineated in Figure 10. The study design involved attaching a needle-like NiCo2O4 to octahedral MIL-Fe53 to form a nanocomposite material and then attaching the nanocomposite material to a ceramic heating rod. Within the quartz reaction chamber, isovaleraldehyde molecules were transported by the carrier gas stream and came into contact with the NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite material. This interaction subsequently triggers a reaction and leads to the emission of CTL. Finally, the CTL signal hν was detected by the BPCL instrument and converted into data for analysis.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a CTL sensor based on an octahedral NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite was successfully developed for the rapid detection of isovaleraldehyde. The SEM, XRD, and FTIR et al. characterization results show that NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites were successfully synthesized, retaining the organometallic skeleton of a MOF. The influence of temperature and carrier gas flow rate on the CTL intensity of the nanocomposite sensor indicates that under the controlled conditions of 234 °C and 300 mL/min, the CTL signal intensity and S/N ratio are at their highest. Under optimal conditions, the nanocomposite sensors exhibited excellent selectivity and response characteristics to isovaleraldehyde, with a response time of 6 s and a recovery time of 8 s. Within the concentration range of 13.66 to 437.22 ppm, a good linear relationship was observed between the isovaleraldehyde concentration and CTL signal intensity, with the fitted linear equation of Y = 9.56X − 2.30 (R2 = 0.99) and a detection limit of 2.44 ppm. The relative deviation (RSD = 4.18%) of the sensor for multiple tests was less than 5%, which indicates that the sensor has good stability and service life. NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites showed significant CTL signal enhancement over single NiCo2O4. The mechanism was explored, and the results showed that the heterojunction formed by the addition of MIL-Fe53 and the nanocomposites of NiCo2O4 played an important role in the CTL reaction, and according to the XPS results, the increase in oxygen vacancies improved the efficiency of the CTL reaction. In conclusion, this study developed a NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposite sensor for the rapid detection of trace isovaleraldehyde, which is expected to be useful in future environmental monitoring and industrial production. It also expanded the material exploration in the field of CTL, and it is expected to develop more CTL sensors for monitoring VOC through the nanocomposite composites of different materials in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.S.; methodology, B.S., M.C., G.S., Y.W., L.B., M.Y. and S.Z.; software, B.S., M.C. and G.S.; validation, B.S. and S.Z.; formal analysis, M.C., G.S., Y.W., Q.Z. and M.Y.; investigation, M.C. and G.S.; resources, B.S. and S.Z.; data curation, B.S.; writing—original draft preparation, B.S., M.C. and L.B.; writing—review and editing, B.S., L.B. and Q.Z.; visualization, B.S. and Y.W.; supervision, B.S. and S.Z.; project administration, B.S. and Q.Z.; funding acquisition, B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are especially grateful to the 2022 Provincial Quality Engineering Project for Higher Education Institutions of Anhui Province (2022jyxm276, 2022jyxm296).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Liu, R.; Wu, H.; Shi, J.; Xu, X.; Zhao, D.; Ng, Y.H.; Zhang, M.; Liu, S.; Ding, H. Recent progress on catalysts for catalytic oxidation of volatile organic compounds: A review. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2022, 12, 6945–6991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shellaiah, M.; Sun, K.W. Inorganic-Diverse Nanostructured Materials for Volatile Organic Compound Sensing. Sensors 2021, 21, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ohrmann, E.; Chandrasekaran, V.; Hölscher, B.; Kraft, P. On the Structure–Odor Correlation of Muguet Aldehydes: Synthesis of 3-(4’-Isobutyl-2’-methylphenyl)propanal (Nympheal) and Four Novel Derivatives from a Hagemann’s Ester. Helv. Chim. Acta 2023, 106, e202300040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, B.; Ma, M. Research on heating temperature control method of VOC gas sensor and development of new sensor module. Eng. Res. Express 2025, 7, 015410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Takahashi, M.; Akamatsu, F.; Isogai, A.; Lin, C.-C.; Kamimoto, M.; Fujita, A. Rapid quantification of isovaleraldehyde in sake by HPLC with post-column fluorescent derivatisation. J. Inst. Brew. 2024, 130, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Osafune, Y.; Toshida, K.; Han, J.; Isogai, A.; Mukai, N. Characterisation and threshold measurement of aroma compounds contributing to the quality of Honkaku shochu and Awamori. J. Inst. Brew. 2020, 126, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shen, Y.; Tissot, A.; Serre, C. Recent progress on MOF-based optical sensors for VOC sensing. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 13978–14007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Liao, C.; Shi, J.; Zhang, M.; Dalapati, R.; Tian, Q.; Chen, S.; Wang, C.; Zang, L. Optical chemosensors for the gas phase detection of aldehydes: Mechanism, material design, and application. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 6213–6245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Breysse, M.; Claudel, B.; Faure, L.; Guenin, M.; Williams, R.J.J.; Wolkenstein, T. Chemiluminescence during the catalysis of carbon monoxide oxidation on a thoria surface. J. Catal. 1976, 45, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nakagawa, M. A new chemiluminescence-based sensor for discriminating and determining constituents in mixed gases. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1995, 29, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nakagawa, M.; Kawabata, S.; Nishiyama, K.; Utsonomiya, K.; Yamamoto, I.; Wada, T.; Yamashita, Y.; Yamashita, N. Analytical detection system of mixed odor vapors using chemiluminescence-based gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1996, 34, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meng, F.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, R.; Li, G. Cataluminescence sensor for highly sensitive and selective detection of iso-butanol. Talanta 2019, 194, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Ban, Z.; Jiang, L.; Tang, S. Synthesis of Mesoporous SiO2 Nanomicrospheres for the Efficient Cataluminescence Sensing of Isobutyraldehyde. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 19056–19064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xiong, S.; Song, H.; Hu, J.; Xie, X.; Zhang, L.; Su, Y.; Lv, Y. Heterothermic Cataluminescence Sensor System for Efficient Determination of Aldehyde Molecules. Anal. Chem. 2024, 96, 11239–11246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, J.; Li, K.; Tang, J.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Q.; Gong, Q.; An, T.; Zhang, R. Morphology-dependent gas-sensing sensitivity of γ-Al2O3 for methacrolein. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 418, 136323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shi, G.; He, Y.; Luo, Q.; Li, B.; Zhang, C. Portable device for acetone detection based on cataluminescence sensor utilizing wireless communication technique. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 257, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cai, P.; Song, H.; Lv, Y. Hierarchical spheres In2S3-based cataluminescence sensor for ammonium sulfide. Microchem. J. 2018, 138, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Z.; Lou, Y.; Guo, C.; Jia, Q.; Song, Y.; Tian, J.-Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, M.; He, L.; Du, M. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) based chemosensors/biosensors for analysis of food contaminants. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 118, 569–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shellaiah, M.; Sun, K.-W. Progress in Metal-Organic Frameworks Facilitated Mercury Detection and Removal. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pal, T.K. Metal–organic framework (MOF)-based fluorescence “turn-on” sensors. Mater. Chem. Front. 2023, 7, 405–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mohanty, B.; Kumari, S.; Yadav, P.; Kanoo, P.; Chakraborty, A. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and MOF composites based biosensors. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 519, 216102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, X.; Qiao, J.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, F.; Tian, X.; Wang, Z.; Wu, L.; Liu, W.; Liu, J. Carbon-Based MOF Derivatives: Emerging Efficient Electromagnetic Wave Absorption Agents. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, B.; Cao, X.; Wen, J.; Guo, S.; Duan, X.; Zhang, X.-M. Integration of Plasmonic materials with MOFs/MOF-derived materials for Photocatalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 518, 216113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, L.; Wang, X.-S.; Liu, T.-F.; Ye, J. Titanium-Based MOF Materials: From Crystal Engineering to Photocatalysis. Small Methods 2020, 4, 2000486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, X.; Wu, D.; Hua, T.; Lan, X.; Han, S.; Cheng, J.; Du, K.-S.; Hu, Y.; Chen, Y. Micro/macrostructure and multicomponent design of catalysts by MOF-derived strategy: Opportunities for the application of nanomaterials-based advanced oxidation processes in wastewater treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 804, 150096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, S.; Sun, B.; Su, Z.; Hong, G.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Pan, Q.; Sun, J. Lanthanide-MOFs as multifunctional luminescent sensors. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 3259–3266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Su, Y.; Pu, S.; Zhang, L.; Lv, Y. A novel Ln-MOF-based cataluminescence sensor for detection of propionaldehyde. Microchem. J. 2024, 201, 110564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, X.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Liu, R.; Lv, Y. Highly efficient cataluminescence gas sensor for acetone vapor based on UIO-66 metal-organic frameworks as preconcentrator. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 312, 127952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Q.; Sun, M.; Zhang, L.; Song, H.; Lv, Y. A novel Ce(IV)-MOF-based cataluminescence sensor for detection of hydrogen sulfide. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 362, 131746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tran, H.V.; Dang, H.T.M.; Tran, L.T.; Van Tran, C.; Huynh, C.D. Metal-Organic Framework MIL-53(Fe): Synthesis, Electrochemical Characterization, and Application in Development of a Novel and Sensitive Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Cadmium Ions in Aqueous Solutions. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2020, 2020, 6279278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, Y.-H.; Yang, L.; Ji, X.-X.; Wang, Y.-Z.; Liu, Y.-L.; Fu, Y.; Ye, F. Efficient detection of flusilazole by an electrochemical sensor derived from MOF MIL-53(Fe) for food safety. Food Chem. 2024, 440, 138244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wu, J.; Yang, Y.; Yu, H.; Dong, X.; Wang, T. Ultra-efficient room-temperature H2S gas sensor based on NiCo2O4/r-GO nanocomposites. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 10501–10508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, S.-H.; Yun, K.-S. Room-temperature hydrogen gas sensor composed of palladium thin film deposited on NiCo2O4 nanoneedle forest. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 376, 132958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ghanbarian, M.; Zeinali, S.; Mostafavi, A. A novel MIL-53(Cr-Fe)/Ag/CNT nanocomposite based resistive sensor for sensing of volatile organic compounds. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 267, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yılmaz, E.; Sert, E.; Atalay, F.S. Synthesis, characterization of a metal organic framework: MIL-53 (Fe) and adsorption mechanisms of methyl red onto MIL-53 (Fe). J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2016, 65, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, N.; Wang, J.; Wu, J.; Li, Z.; Huang, W.; Zheng, Y.; Lei, J.; Zhang, X.; Tang, L. Magnetic Fe3O4@MIL-53(Fe) nanocomposites derived from MIL-53(Fe) for the photocatalytic degradation of ibuprofen under visible light irradiation. Mater. Res. Bull. 2020, 132, 111000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Araya, T.; Jia, M.; Yang, J.; Zhao, P.; Cai, K.; Ma, W.; Huang, Y. Resin modified MIL-53 (Fe) MOF for improvement of photocatalytic performance. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 203, 768–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Panda, R.; Rahut, S.; Basu, J.K. Preparation of a Fe2O3/MIL-53(Fe) composite by partial thermal decomposition of MIL-53(Fe) nanorods and their photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 80981–80985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rani, B.J.; Yuvakkumar, R.; Ravi, G.; Hong, S.I.; Velauthapillai, D.; Guduru, R.K.; Thambidurai, M.; Dang, C.; Al-onazi, W.A.; Al-Mohaimeed, A.M. Electrochemical water splitting exploration of MnCo2O4, NiCo2O4 cobaltites. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 17679–17692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Janfaza, S.; Banan Nojavani, M.; Nikkhah, M.; Alizadeh, T.; Esfandiar, A.; Ganjali, M.R. A selective chemiresistive sensor for the cancer-related volatile organic compound hexanal by using molecularly imprinted polymers and multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yao, Y.; Li, Z.; Han, Y.; Xie, L.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, Z. Fabrication and Characterization of a MnO2/Ti3C2Tx Based Gas Sensor for Highly Sensitive and Selective Detection of Lung Cancer Marker Hexanal. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 139029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sinsermsuksakul, P.; Sun, L.; Lee, S.W.; Park, H.H.; Kim, S.B.; Yang, C.; Gordon, R.G. Overcoming Efficiency Limitations of SnS-Based Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 1400496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhen, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zuo, W. A 1,2-propylene oxide sensor utilizing cataluminescence on CeO2 nanoparticles. Luminescence 2014, 29, 1183–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ramakrishna Reddy, K.T.; Koteswara Reddy, N.; Miles, R.W. Photovoltaic properties of SnS based solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2006, 90, 3041–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Feng, J.; Li, X.; Zhu, G.; Wang, Q.J. Emerging High-Performance SnS/CdS Nanoflower Heterojunction for Ultrafast Photonics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 43098–43105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Arulanantham, A.M.S.; Valanarasu, S.; Kathalingam, A.; Shkir, M.; Kim, H.-S. Influence of substrate temperature on the SnS absorber thin films and SnS/CdS heterostructure prepared through aerosol assisted nebulizer spray pyrolysis. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 6, 026412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, Y.; Wang, F.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Flahaut, E.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Xu, Y.; Shi, Y.; et al. Planar carbon nanotube–graphene hybrid films for high-performance broadband photodetectors. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lim, D.; Suh, H.; Suryawanshi, M.; Song, G.Y.; Cho, J.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Jang, J.H.; Jeon, C.-W.; Cho, A.; Ahn, S.; et al. Kinetically Controlled Growth of Phase-Pure SnS Absorbers for Thin Film Solar Cells: Achieving Efficiency Near 3% with Long-Term Stability Using an SnS/CdS Heterojunction. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ai, J.; Lei, Y.; Yang, S.; Lai, C.; Xu, Q. SnS nanoparticles anchored on Ti3C2 nanosheets matrix via electrostatic attraction method as novel anode for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 357, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, Y.; Guo, B.; Hu, L.; Xu, Q.; Li, Y.; Liu, D.; Xu, M. Synthesis of SnS nanoparticle-modified MXene (Ti3C2Tx) composites for enhanced sodium storage. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 732, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yuan, F.; Huang, Y.; Qian, J.; Rahman, M.M.; Ajayan, P.M.; Sun, D. Free-standing SnS/carbonized cellulose film as durable anode for lithium-ion batteries. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 255, 117400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A) The SEM images of MIL-Fe53, (B) NiCo2O4, and (C) NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53.
Figure 1. (A) The SEM images of MIL-Fe53, (B) NiCo2O4, and (C) NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53.
Molecules 30 00646 g001
Figure 2. (A) XRD patterns of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites; (B) FTIR spectra of NiCo2O4, MIL-Fe53, and NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53.
Figure 2. (A) XRD patterns of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites; (B) FTIR spectra of NiCo2O4, MIL-Fe53, and NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53.
Molecules 30 00646 g002
Figure 3. (A) Adsorption isotherms of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites; (B) pore size analysis plots of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites.
Figure 3. (A) Adsorption isotherms of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites; (B) pore size analysis plots of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites.
Molecules 30 00646 g003
Figure 4. (A) XPS curves of fresh and used reaction NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53; (B) high-resolution scan of O 1 s; (C) high-resolution scan of Fe 2p; (D) high-resolution scan of Co 2p; and (E) high-resolution scan of Ni 2p.
Figure 4. (A) XPS curves of fresh and used reaction NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53; (B) high-resolution scan of O 1 s; (C) high-resolution scan of Fe 2p; (D) high-resolution scan of Co 2p; and (E) high-resolution scan of Ni 2p.
Molecules 30 00646 g004
Figure 5. (A) CTL signal intensities of NiCo2O4, NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 against isovaleraldehyde; (B) effect of working temperature on CTL signal intensity and S/N (concentration: 156.16 ppm; flow rate: 350 mL/min); (C) effect of carrier gas flow rate on CTL signal intensity and S/N (concentration: 156.16 ppm; temperature: 220 °C).
Figure 5. (A) CTL signal intensities of NiCo2O4, NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 against isovaleraldehyde; (B) effect of working temperature on CTL signal intensity and S/N (concentration: 156.16 ppm; flow rate: 350 mL/min); (C) effect of carrier gas flow rate on CTL signal intensity and S/N (concentration: 156.16 ppm; temperature: 220 °C).
Molecules 30 00646 g005
Figure 6. (A) CTL response of the sensor to different compounds (temperature: 234 °C; flow rate: 300mL/min); (B) characterization of the response of the isovaleraldehyde sensor.
Figure 6. (A) CTL response of the sensor to different compounds (temperature: 234 °C; flow rate: 300mL/min); (B) characterization of the response of the isovaleraldehyde sensor.
Molecules 30 00646 g006
Figure 7. (A) CTL intensities corresponding to different concentrations of isovaleraldehyde; (B) curve of isovaleraldehyde concentration versus signal intensity; (C) signal intensity of 10 tests of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 sensor over 600s; and (D) signal intensity of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 sensor tested over seven days.
Figure 7. (A) CTL intensities corresponding to different concentrations of isovaleraldehyde; (B) curve of isovaleraldehyde concentration versus signal intensity; (C) signal intensity of 10 tests of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 sensor over 600s; and (D) signal intensity of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 sensor tested over seven days.
Molecules 30 00646 g007
Figure 8. Reaction mechanism diagram of cataluminescence.
Figure 8. Reaction mechanism diagram of cataluminescence.
Molecules 30 00646 g008
Figure 9. Mechanism of heterojunctions in NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites.
Figure 9. Mechanism of heterojunctions in NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 nanocomposites.
Molecules 30 00646 g009
Figure 10. Diagram of the synthesized structure of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 and schematic diagram of the BPCL sensing device.
Figure 10. Diagram of the synthesized structure of NiCo2O4/MIL-Fe53 and schematic diagram of the BPCL sensing device.
Molecules 30 00646 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, B.; Cai, M.; Shi, G.; Wang, Y.; Bao, L.; Zhao, Q.; Yi, M.; Zhu, S. An Environmental Engineering Study Case: Constructing Cataluminescence Sensors Based on Octahedral Nanocomposites for Isovaleraldehyde Detection. Molecules 2025, 30, 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030646

AMA Style

Sun B, Cai M, Shi G, Wang Y, Bao L, Zhao Q, Yi M, Zhu S. An Environmental Engineering Study Case: Constructing Cataluminescence Sensors Based on Octahedral Nanocomposites for Isovaleraldehyde Detection. Molecules. 2025; 30(3):646. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030646

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Bai, Mao Cai, Guoji Shi, Yun Wang, Lining Bao, Qiang Zhao, Mingjian Yi, and Shuguang Zhu. 2025. "An Environmental Engineering Study Case: Constructing Cataluminescence Sensors Based on Octahedral Nanocomposites for Isovaleraldehyde Detection" Molecules 30, no. 3: 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030646

APA Style

Sun, B., Cai, M., Shi, G., Wang, Y., Bao, L., Zhao, Q., Yi, M., & Zhu, S. (2025). An Environmental Engineering Study Case: Constructing Cataluminescence Sensors Based on Octahedral Nanocomposites for Isovaleraldehyde Detection. Molecules, 30(3), 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30030646

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop