Next Article in Journal
Thermodynamic Aspects and Reprogramming Cellular Energy Metabolism during the Fibrosis Process
Next Article in Special Issue
Physiological and Pathological Roles of CaMKII-PP1 Signaling in the Brain
Previous Article in Journal
Cortisol Awakening Response, Internalizing Symptoms, and Life Satisfaction in Emerging Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
Site-Directed Mutagenesis of the Fibronectin Domains in Insulin Receptor-Related Receptor
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 18
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms18122543
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Protein Kinase Targets in Breast Cancer

by
Marilina García-Aranda
1 and
Maximino Redondo
1,2,*
1
Biochemistry Department, Hospital Costa del Sol, REDISSEC, Carretera de Cádiz km, 187, 29600 Marbella, Málaga, Spain
2
Biochemistry Department, Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Málaga, Bulevar Louis Pasteur 32, 29010 Málaga, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18(12), 2543; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18122543
Submission received: 29 September 2017 / Revised: 20 November 2017 / Accepted: 22 November 2017 / Published: 27 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kinase Signal Transduction 2017)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
With 1.67 million new cases and 522,000 deaths in the year 2012, breast cancer is the most common type of diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer death in women around the world. Despite the success of screening programs and the development of adjuvant therapies, a significant percentage of breast cancer patients will suffer a metastatic disease that, to this day, remains incurable and justifies the research of new therapies to improve their life expectancy. Among the new therapies that have been developed in recent years, the emergence of targeted therapies has been a milestone in the fight against cancer. Over the past decade, many studies have shown a causal role of protein kinase dysregulations or mutations in different human diseases, including cancer. Along these lines, cancer research has demonstrated a key role of many protein kinases during human tumorigenesis and cancer progression, turning these molecules into valid candidates for new targeted therapies. The subsequent discovery and introduction in 2001 of the kinase inhibitor imatinib, as a targeted treatment for chronic myelogenous leukemia, revolutionized cancer genetic pathways research, and lead to the development of multiple small-molecule kinase inhibitors against various malignancies, including breast cancer. In this review, we analyze studies published to date about novel small-molecule kinase inhibitors and evaluate if they would be useful to develop new treatment strategies for breast cancer patients.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

1.1. Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide [1].
Although, nowadays, most breast cancers are diagnosed early enough to be successfully treated with surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or a combination thereof, a significant percentage of patients will not respond to these treatments and end up with metastatic disease to bone, lung, liver, brain [2], or other body organs, ultimately causing a patient’s death [3], which justifies the search of new therapeutic strategies.

Targeted Therapies

Among the new treatments developed in recent years, targeted therapies have been a milestone in fighting cancer, because, contrary to non-specific cytotoxic agents against dividing cells, these therapies are based on the use of drugs, or other substances, especially designed to interfere with molecules related with tumor growth and progression.
Over the past decade, many studies have shown a causal role of protein kinase dysregulations or mutations in different human disorders, including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, atherosclerosis, stroke, and inflammatory diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease) [4], which made them particularly sensitive to appropriate protein kinase inhibitors.
Along these lines, cancer research has proven that multiple protein kinases play an important role during human tumorigenesis and cancer progression, turning these molecules into valid candidates for the development of new targeted therapies, and finally leading to the discovery and introduction in 2001 of imatinib as treatment for chronic myelogenous leukemia. This discovery revolutionized research in genetic pathways that are related to tumor proliferation and improved our knowledge of various protein kinases with a crucial role in different types of cancer, which eventually led to the development of several small-molecule kinase inhibitors against different malignancies, including breast cancer.

1.2. Protein Kinases

1.2.1. Protein Kinases Classification

Human protein kinases (PK) constitute a large family of enzymes, known as the human kinome, which are encoded by about 1.7% of all human genes [5]. According to the hydroxy-amino-acid target that these enzymes phosphorylate in their substrates, members of protein kinase superfamily have been classically classified into two main groups: Serine-Threonine kinases, which phosphorylate serine or threonine amino acids, and Tyrosine kinases (TKs), which phosphorylate tyrosine amino acids. A third group, consisting on dual-specificity protein kinases has also been proposed, as they are able to phosphorylate both tyrosine and serine/threonine residues [6].
The first protein kinases to be identified were tyrosine kinases, which have been well described. According to their location in the cell, tyrosine kinases are classified into:
  • Transmembrane receptor kinases, with a ligand-binding extracellular domain and a catalytic intracellular kinase domain.
  • Non-receptor tyrosine kinases, lacking the transmembrane domains and located in the cytosol, nucleus, or the inner surface of plasma membrane [4].
Protein kinases are also classified regarding catalytic domain sequence comparisons into eight main families: AGC (A, G and C protein kinases), CAMK (Ca2+/CAM-dependent protein kinases), CK1 (casein kinase 1), CMGC (CDK, cyclin-dependent kinases; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinases; GSK3, glycose synthase kinase-3; CLK, cdc2-like kinases), RGC (receptor guanylate cyclase), STE (homologues of yeast sterile 7, 11, 20 kinases), TKs (tyrosine kinases), and TKL (tyrosine kinases-like protein kinases). This classification also includes many atypical kinases that are lacking sequence similarity to the conserved eukaryotic protein kinase catalytic domain [4] (Figure 1).

1.2.2. Protein Kinases Function

Along with phosphatases, protein kinases are included in the phosphorus transferases group, enzymes that catalyze the reversible transfer of phosphate between their substrates Figure 2.
The activation of a surface kinase receptor by its ligand, or other stimulus, generally entails the activation of non-receptor kinases cascade reactions, which results in the translation of extracellular and intracellular signals throughout the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Thereby, the activation of genes and the cellular response is controlled through the coordinated, but independent, work of protein kinases, phosphatases, and the phosphorylation status of their substrate proteins.
The phosphorylation processes can induce conformational changes in the substrate protein, resulting in the disruption or creation of protein-protein interaction surfaces. These conformational changes condition protein activity, cellular location, or association with other proteins [7]. The importance of protein post-translational modifications that are catalyzed by these enzymes becomes apparent when considering that although protein kinase genes in most eukaryotes constitute up to only 2% of the genome, protein kinases can phosphorylate more than 30% of cellular proteins [8]. Actually, since the first characterization of protein kinase activity in the 1950s [9], these enzymes have been shown to regulate molecular pathways that are essential for most cellular processes, including proliferation, metabolism, migration, survival, and apoptosis.
An uncontrolled kinase activity, as a result of activating mutations or the loss of inhibitory mediators, for example, is commonly found in human cancer [10], leading to cellular proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis inhibition [11]. In this respect, different kinases [12] have been considered to be oncogenic, as their transforming activity can determine the survival and proliferation of cancer cells [13].

1.2.3. Small Molecule Kinase Inhibitors

Small molecule inhibitors have become a valuable tool in the development of targeted therapies against cancer, as they are highly selective and effective against specific protein kinases [14], and they present a more favorable side effect profile than conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy [15]. So much so, that in recent years over 130 kinase-specific inhibitors have been in phase 1–3 clinical trials [16], and a number of them have been approved for clinical use.
Protein kinases present a core, which is common to all protein kinases, which is required for catalytic activity. This core contains a conserved structure and sequence incorporating a glycine-rich N-terminal ATP-binding pocket and a central conserved aspartic acid residue [17,18]. For this reason, tyrosine kinase inhibitors are designed as non-peptide anilino-quinazoline compounds, homologous of the adenosine trisphosphate (ATP), with the ability to compete for the ATP-binding domain of the cytoplasmic catalytic kinase domain [19]. As a result, these molecules prevent kinase phosphorylation and the subsequent downstream signal transduction pathways activation, which finally leads to an enhanced apoptosis and a decreased cellular proliferation [11].
Since the design of highly selective small molecules with valid pharmaceutical properties is based on the presence of mutated or over-expressed kinases [20], and given that these enzymes’ catalytic core is highly conserved, one of the major challenges in the design of small kinase inhibitors is to prevent a given substance from exerting its action on another kinase (Table 1).
However, the great challenge in the development of effective kinase inhibitors lies in the complexity of kinome dynamics, since kinase networks are well interrelated and the inhibition of one kinase can be bypassed by the activation of alternate kinases. As a result, cells become resistant to single agents [12] and the use of kinase inhibitors in combined therapies with other drugs is needed [22].

2. Protein Kinase Targets for Breast Cancer Treatment

2.1. Breast Cancer Clinical Classification and Standard of Care

Thanks to the Human Genome Project and to the deep sequencing of breast cancer genome and transcriptome, this heterogeneous disease, which may be a reflection of distinct etiologic pathways [23], has been clinically classified into at least four major molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer (HER2-enriched, luminal A, luminal B and basal-like) [23,24], with different prognosis and treatment response [20,23,25].

2.1.1. HER2-Enriched

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched mammary tumors have been extensively studied and are well described. Together with HER1 (EGFR/ErbB-1), HER3 (ErbB-3), and HER4 (ErbB-4), HER2 (ErbB2/neu) is a member of the ErbB membrane tyrosine kinase receptors family, tightly related to the transcription of signaling pathways leading to cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis inhibition [11,19].
HER2 is constitutively activated in approximately 20–30% of breast cancers [11,12]. As HER2 overexpression is widely known to dysregulate cell proliferation in the aggressive HER2-positive breast cancers, this protein constitutes an important therapeutic target for patients with this cancer subtype [26].
The approved therapy for HER2-driven breast cancer is the humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin) that binds to and blocks the extracellular domain of HER2. Although trastuzumab has dramatically improved the outcome for patients with this type of cancer, resistance development is a recurrent problem that has motivated the search of alternative therapies targeting this tyrosine kinase receptor. In this regard, the use of small kinase inhibitors like lapatinib/Tykeb, neratinib [27], gefitinib [11], or afatinib [28] have shown preclinical and clinical evidence in the treatment of HER2-enriched tumors (Table 2).

2.1.2. Hormone Receptor Positive (Luminal-A, Luminal-B)

Both luminal-A and luminal-B breast cancer subtypes, which account for up to 75% of breast tumor cases [36,37,38], are hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive), and, therefore, they express estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and/or estrogen-responsive and ER-dependent gene products [39].
In luminal-A and luminal-B breast cancers, the estrogen hormone (17β-estradiol) plays a major role during different hallmarks of cancer [36], including apoptosis regulation, cell proliferation, and the expression of growth factors and their receptors [40]. For these reasons, luminal-A and luminal-B breast carcinomas are, theoretically, sensitive to hormone-targeted treatments. Indeed, endocrine therapy has a proven effectiveness of approximately 50–60% [36,41], being Tamoxifen (TMX, Nolvadex) the most common drug used in clinical practice over the past decades as first-line treatment in pre- and post-menopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer [42]. However, although this competitive ER-receptor antagonist has shown a significant reduction of recurrence (40–50%), and the risk of death from breast cancer (30–35%) [36], the existence of an important number of cases with natural or acquired resistance to tamoxifen along with long-term toxicities [39] has motivated the search for new approaches for HER2-enriched breast cancer patients (Table 3).
These novel compounds have demonstrated superior efficacy, reduced incidence of endometrial cancer, reduced blood clot formation, as well as a prolonged disease-free survival [40] time to recurrence and time to distant recurrence when compared to tamoxifen [44,45], representing the recommended standard therapy for post-menopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer nowadays [43,44].
Despite these positive effects, aromatase inhibitors also induce increased bone loss, bone pain [40], and a significant percentage of patients (range 30% to 65%) present primary or secondary resistance to them [45], which are reasons that have justified the continued search of alternatives to hormone-therapies.
The mechanism by which ER-positive breast cancers become estrogen independent to long-term estrogen deprivation and start to grow is under intense study and remains poorly understood. Findings in this regard include the deregulation of components of the ER pathway itself, alterations in cell cycle and cell survival signaling molecules, and the activation of alternative signaling pathways that promote the resistance to endocrine therapies [38]. Studies carried out in this area show an association between ER-α expression and the activity of several kinases and phosphatases [37,38,46,47,48]. Many protein kinase-encoding genes also appear to be altered in ER-positive breast tumors [41,49], which has opened the possibility of developing treatment strategies for these tumors that are based on the targeted inhibition of altered kinases.

2.1.3. Basal-Like

In contrast with HER2 and ER-positive breast carcinomas, basal-like breast tumors are characterized by a gene-expression profile that is similar to that of the basal-myoepithelial layer of the normal breast along, with the absence of HER2 overexpression and the absence or low levels of estrogen receptor expression [50].
The triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype, which constitutes approximately 80% of the basal-like tumors, accounts for approximately 10–15% of breast carcinomas, and is characterized by the lack of expression of both hormone receptors (estrogen and progesterone) and HER2-receptor over-expression [51]. For these reasons, both TNBC and basal-like breast cancers usually lead to an aggressive disease, with a high probability of metastasis [50], and with poor prognosis, which is due, in part, to the absence of an existing effective targeted therapy.

2.2. Altered Protein Kinases in Breast Cancer

The characterization of each breast cancer subtype has usually been associated to the identification of mutated or altered kinases [41]. Indeed, as each breast cancer subtype can present a unique expression profile of protein kinases that can be targeted by small molecule kinase inhibitors [20,49], the way to address each type of breast tumor must be different, therefore becoming necessary to carry out a previous study of each patient in order to choose the most appropriate treatment.
Understanding the role of protein kinases during different hallmarks of breast cancer is not an easy task due to the complexity of the interconnections between different routes. Indeed, tumor cells can respond to anti-tumor treatments and become resistant through feedback and crosstalk between different signaling pathways, usually involving protein kinases that are common to different breast cancer subtypes. Therefore, approximately 20% of all breast carcinomas will overexpress HER2 receptor and 40–50% of these will also be ER-positive [41]. These ER/HER2-positive tumors are more likely to develop resistance to tamoxifen and present ligand-independent activation of ER-signaling [41]. Likewise, secondary resistance to aromatase inhibitors also occurs after a switch from dependence on ER signaling to growth factor-mediated pathways, like HER2 dependence [45].
The most relevant results obtained in the protein kinase target search for breast cancer treatment are presented below.

2.2.1. PI3K/Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway

Multiple research studies are currently focused on the potential use of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt (protein kinase B)/mammalian (or mechanistic) target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway as a new target against cancer.
PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway hyperactivation has been implicated in breast cancer tumorigenesis and resistance to endocrine therapy in ER-positive carcinomas [52] and trastuzumab in HER2-positive carcinomas [53]. Besides, since PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway activation has also been related to cell proliferation, survival, adhesion, migration, invasion, altered metabolism, deregulated apoptosis, angiogenesis [54,55], anoikis [56], as well as to breast cancer progression and response to therapy [55,57], this pathway has become one of the main targets to restore the sensitivity of resistant breast tumors.
The biological significance of this complex pathway has been thoroughly investigated and extensively reviewed (Table 4).

2.2.2. Phosphatase and Tensin Homologue (PTEN)

The phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN), which is a phosphoinositide that can inhibit cellular proliferation, survival, and growth by inactivating PI3K-dependent signaling [64], is one of the most frequently disrupted tumor suppressors in human cancer [65] (Table 5).
Interestingly, some studies about the effect of PTEN expression on HER2-enriched breast carcinomas show contradictory results. In this regard, although some studies show that reduced levels of PTEN do not correlate with a high Ki-67 index value, cellular proliferation inhibition, nor Akt phosphorylation control [72], additional research show that PTEN expression correlates to longer overall survival [73]. Studies also show that PTEN inactivation can indirectly promote PI3K de-regulation and help maintain advanced HER2-positive breast cancer disease [60], which is associated with poor clinical outcome [74] and accelerated breast cancer progression [60]. The cause of these contradictory results seems to be due to the lack of standardization of PTEN status determination [75], making it necessary for additional investigations in this respect.
Although PTEN status apparently makes no significant differences in the clinical outcome of TNBC patients [74], these malignancies show a tumor protein p53 deficiency [76,77] and a low PTEN expression [74,76,78], which is also associated with early-onset breast cancer, late stage and high levels of IGFBP2 (insulin like growth factor binding protein 2) [71].

2.2.3. PDK1

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/phosphatidylinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDPK1, PDK1) is a master kinase key for the activation of Akt and many other AGC kinases, with an important role during the activation of cancer cell proliferation and survival pathways [79] (Table 6).

2.2.4. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK, MAPK/ERK, Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK) pathways comprise a module of three conserved and sequentially activated protein kinases. MAPK has a significant role during the transduction of extracellular signals to different pathways regulating fundamental processes, such as cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, development, transformation, migration, or death [81,82,83]. Under normal conditions, MAPK is tightly regulated by phosphatases and bidirectional communication with other pathways, such as Akt/mTOR pathway [84].
Different MAPKs, such as extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK)1/2, ERK3/4, ERK5, ERK7/8, Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)1/2/3 and the p38 isoforms α/β/γ (ERK6)/δ, have been characterized in mammals [82]. Pathways involving ERK-1 and -2 are amongst the most relevant to malignant breast cancer behavior [85] and cross-talk between ER-α and MAPK signaling pathways has also been pointed to as key oncogenic axis responsible for the development of estrogen-independent growth of breast cancer cells that are initially ER-α positive and hormone sensitive [37].
Though recent studies have evidenced that breast carcinomas frequently contain an increased proportion of cells with the activated form of MAPK [86], the precise relationship between MAPK activation and tumor proliferation, apoptosis, degree of invasiveness, and disease free and overall survival is still under study [86]. Indeed, although de-regulation of MAPK signaling can lead to the development and progression of cancer [82], recent evidence indicates that the MAPK/ERK signaling node can also function as a tumor suppressor [84], which justifies additional research in this regard (Table 7).

2.2.5. Cell Cycle Proteins or Mitotic Kinases

Mitotic kinases, including CDK (cyclin-dependent kinase), Aurora (AURK), Polo-like (PLK) and NIMA (Never In Mitosis)-related kinase families play an important role as regulators of cell division and cytokinesis and their dysregulation has been related to tumorigenesis [90,91] (Table 8).

Cyclin-Dependent Kinases (CDK)

Mammalian cell cycle is tightly regulated by cyclins and their associated cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) [92], a family of serine/threonine kinases whose dysregulation has been found in a majority of human cancers [92,108,109], accelerating cell division and malignant transformation [110].

Aurora Kinases

Aurora kinases constitute a collection of highly conserved serine/threonine kinases that control the accurate and equal segregation of genomic material during mitosis [91]. Three aurora kinase members have been identified in mammals: Aurora kinase A (AURKA), aurora kinase B (AURKB, an important mitotic kinase involved in chromosome segregation and cytokinesis [111]), and aurora kinase C (AURKC), whose over-expression has been related in a greater or lesser degree to many types of malignancies, including breast cancer [91].
Although the role of AURKC during carcinogenesis is still unclear, the effects of AURKA over-expression have been well described. In this respect, it has been suggested that constitutive activation of Raf-oncogenic signaling induces the stabilization and accumulation of AURKA [96]. Nuclear accumulation of AURKA has an oncogenic role [112], as it is related to breast cancer progression through the development of centrosome amplification, chromosome instability [37], and transition from epithelial to a highly invasive mesenchymal phenotype [96]. In this regard, although there are studies showing that there is no difference between AURKA expression in primary metastatic breast carcinomas when compared to control cases [113], AURKA expression levels have been proposed as a useful prognostic marker for patients with ER-positive, normal-like, and luminal A or B-type breast cancer tumors [114].

Polo-Like Kinase 1 (PLK1)

Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) is a serine/threonine protein kinase that plays an important role in the initiation, maintenance, completion of mitosis [102], and maintenance of genomic stability [103]. PLK1 over-expression has been related to human cancer, which is usually associated with poor prognosis [102].

NIMA (Never in Mitosis)-Related Kinases

This polymorphic family of kinases belongs to the “Other” kinase group, and includes NIMA-related kinase 2 (NEK2), which is a serine/threonine kinase that is involved in the regulation of centrosome duplication and spindle assembly during mitosis [106].

2.2.6. Sphingosine Kinases

Sphingosine kinase (SK, SphK) isozymes are a class of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK) that catalyze the phosphorylation of sphingosine into sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P). Different sphingolipid metabolites are second lipid messengers that are involved in diverse cellular processes, including migration, proliferation, and apoptosis, having been identified as biomarkers in different types of cancer by promoting angiogenesis and tumorigenesis [115].
Over-expression of sphingosine kinase 1 (SK1), which has been causally associated with breast cancer progression and resistance to drug therapies [116,117,118], is predictive of poor prognosis in human breast cancer [119] (Table 9).

2.3. Targeted Studies

Main altered protein kinase pathways and kinase targets for breast cancer treatment are presented below (Figure 3).

2.3.1. PI3K/Akt/mTOR Targeting Studies

Preclinical and clinical evidence shows that a combination of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors plus endocrine or trastuzumab therapy improves the clinical outcome in the treatment of ER-positive or HER2-enriched breast cancer patients, respectively [52,53]. Indeed, the proven efficacy of different protein kinases targeted activation or inhibition during ER-positive breast cancer sensitization to endocrine therapies [37,38,46,54,57,120,121,122] has led to the development of several substances, including the mTOR allosteric inhibitors rapamycin/sirolimus and the rapamycin synthetic analogs, or rapalogs, everolimus, temsirolimus, and deforolimus (Table 10).
Even though phase III trial results performed with temsirolimus in combination with letrozole [129] were not satisfactory, two clinical studies, the randomized phase II TAMRAD, and the randomized phase III BOLERO-2 trials have confirmed that a combination of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus plus tamoxifen or the aromatase inhibitor exemestane, respectively, significantly improves the clinical benefit rate, the progression-free survival, and the overall survival of ER-positive, HER2-negative postmenopausal patients, with advanced breast cancer refractory to letrozole or anastrozole [130,131]. Everolimus and trastuzumab combined therapy in metastatic HER2-enriched breast cancer patients who progressed on trastuzumab-based therapy has also been investigated in clinical trials, with positive results [132]. In spite of these encouraging results, it is not still known if the addition of everolimus to existing hormone therapy would be enough to reverse the acquired resistance [133], and whether the toxic effects of such combinations might limit the practical use of these therapeutic strategies [134].
Although the development of Akt-specific and isoform-selective inhibitors based on this kinase catalytic domain has been predicted to be difficult due to high sequence homologies [55] and mechanism-based toxicities derived from targeting the inactive Akt conformation [135], several Akt inhibitors [55,136] and three generations of PI3K inhibitors are currently in the development phase [136] with promising results. (Table 11 and Table 12).
In contrast with the positive results that were obtained with mTOR inhibitors mentioned above, and despite the important roles that Akt and PI3K activation play in breast cancer progression, no Akt or PI3K inhibitors have been approved for oncologic use yet [55]. This is in part due to the fact that the antitumor activity of PI3K inhibitors as single agents are quite limited as a result of feedback regulation and crosstalk with other signaling pathways [153].

2.3.2. PTEN Pathway Targeting Studies

PTEN study’s findings offer a new approach for the development of a targeted therapy of PTEN-deficient breast carcinomas [67] and several substances, such as quercetin, that can increase PTEN levels [154], are currently under study [55]. Interestingly, PTEN restoration also sensitizes breast cancer cells to PI3K-inhibitors [155], as PTEN is in close relation with the PI3K/Akt/mTOR protein kinases acting as a PI3K antagonist by de-phosphorylating the PIP2/3 membrane docking sites for Akt and blocking the membrane recruitment that leads to Akt activation [58] (Figure 2).
Studies show that ER-α can induce PTEN down-regulation through PI3K activation [156] (Figure 2). As PTEN down-regulation correlates with PI3K pathway activation, leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation [67,157] and endocrine resistance [46], PI3K [158] or Akt [55] inhibition in combination with PTEN activation [157] and endocrine therapies would be useful approaches for ER-positive carcinomas with PTEN deficiency treatment [46].
It has also been shown that although adjuvant trastuzumab is beneficial for HER2-positive breast cancer patients, independently of tumor PTEN status [74,159], restoration of endogenous PTEN expression leads to marked HER2-enriched disease regression [60]. However, PTEN loss, which seems to be caused by autophagy defects [160], has been shown to correlate with a significant response to trastuzumab in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer patients [161], while patients with advanced breast cancer will show a poor response [55,162,163], which justifies additional research in this regard.
Studies in both in vitro and in vivo models, also show that the combined use of HER2 and PI3K inhibitors in PTEN-deficient HER2-positive breast tumors is effective to reduce PI3K/Akt signaling and growth of cancer cells [164]. The continued use of trastuzumab in this type of carcinomas also induces the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), transforming HER2-positive to triple negative cells, and increasing the frequency of cancer stem cells and metastasis risk [165]. These transformed cells show an increased sensitivity to isothiocyanate sulforaphane compared to parental cells, which justifies the application of different treatment in these cases [165].
Finally, in vitro studies show that PI3K small-molecule inhibitors reduce the growth of dysregulated PTEN TNBC tumors [166,167], especially when combined with other drugs that are commonly used to treat advanced TNBC, like docetaxel [166].

2.3.3. PDK1 Pathway Targeting Studies

Recent preclinical studies focused on PDK1 as target for breast cancer treatment show that PDK1 inhibition leads to increased anoikis and apoptosis [168], correlating more closely to antitumor activity, with minimal toxicity in xenograft models, than Akt inhibition [79]. PDK1 silencing also appears to show a synergic antitumor activity with paclitaxel [79], and to increase the sensitivity to multiple ER-α antagonists, including tamoxifen [169]. A laboratory study has also reported that the use of PDK-inhibitors with trastuzumab can reverse the trastuzumab-resistant phenotype in HER2-positive breast cancer cells [170], which justifies further studies in this regard.

MAPK Pathway Targeting Studies

Targeted assays against different MAPK/ERK pathway components have been recently done with variable results when used in different solid tumors [84].
As MAPK over-expression is usually found on TNBC cells, leading to tumor development and progression, and stimulating cancer stem-like cell expansion, the targeted inhibition of this protein kinase has been proposed as a novel therapeutic option for the treatment of triple negative and HR-negative breast cancer [87,88,89]. In this regard, it must be highlighted that as progesterone, androgens, and estradiol stimulate cell proliferation by means of mechanisms involving MAPK activation, strategies used for hormone dependent breast cancer treatment may lead to an increased MAPK activation and cell proliferation [86]. Recent studies have also showed that tunicamycin synergistically enhances the antitumoral effects of paclitaxel, increasing breast cancer cell apoptosis via paclitaxel-induced elevation of AKT and MAPK pathways inhibition [171].

2.3.4. Cell Cycle Proteins Pathway Targeting Studies

Both cyclins and CDKs have been targeted to treat different malignancies, including breast cancer, by means of small molecules, peptides, immunotherapy, and other inhibitors [108]. In this regard, supplementation with pharmacological CDK inhibitors alone or in combination with selective antiestrogens have shown prevention of ER-α activation and control over deregulated cell cycle [110]. The role of the novel, oral, reversible CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib as a potential target in ER-positive breast cancers has recently been validated in a preclinical and phase I/II clinical trial [92] (Table 13).
Both Aurora kinase A and B have been suggested as treatment targets in aromatase inhibitors-resistant cells, as therapies targeting both ER and Aurora kinases appear to be a potent strategy for overcoming aromatase inhibitors resistance in breast cancer [172]. Additional studies in xenografts also show that AURKA over-expression enhances mTOR activity under metabolic stress, suppressing autophagy [99] and increasing ER-positive breast cancer progression through EMT activation and CD44+/CD24low/− cell-surface antigens genesis [37]. As a result of such studies, the effect of different substances, like the potent AURKA inhibitor alisertib, has been studied on PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, demonstrating their ability to induce in vitro inhibition of this metabolic route and promote cellular apoptosis and autophagy [173]. Among these findings, mTOR inhibition by rapamycin has been shown to sensitize AURKA-overexpressing breast cancer cells to metabolic stress-induced cell death [99]. AURKA knockdown studies also show that this protein kinase is essential for the growth of tamoxifen-resistant cells, and that its inhibition re-sensitizes tamoxifen-resistant cells to tamoxifen treatment [98].
Along with a reduction of cyclin—A expression, alisertib [174] also reduces centrosome amplification promoted by AURKA, since Cyclin-A/Cdk2 kinase activity mediates AURKA-induced centrosome amplification [174].
In vitro studies carried out with TNBC cell lines showed that alisertib is a potent pro-autophagic [173], anti-proliferative, and pro-apoptotic agent [175]. Further phase II trials of alisertib demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of breast cancer patients [176] via modulation of p38 MAPK/Akt/mTOR pathway [173]. Other different substances, such as resveratrol [177], midostaurin [178], AKI603 [179], ENMD-2076 [180] or the pan-AURKA inhibitor danusertib hydrochloride (PHA-739358) [173] are currently under in vitro and clinical study to assess their safety and activity [176,181] in TNBC or resistant breast cancer tumors treatment (Table 13).
Nowadays, a number of PLK1-inhibitors are under investigation for their use as targeted therapies against cancer [102]. The potential use of NEK2 inhibition as a targeted treatment against different types of malignancies is also under study, with promising expectations [106,182,183,184,185], as in vitro NEK2 inhibition induce breast cancer cells aneuploidy and cell cycle arrest, especially in TNBC [107].

2.3.5. Sphingosine Kinase Pathway Targeting Studies

Exogenous administration of S1P apparently increases the cytotoxic potential of chemotherapy drugs docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide against breast cancer metastatic cell lines [189]. The use of SK1 antagonists, which inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis in different human cancer cell lines, also have radio-sensitizing effects on TNBC cell lines, increasing the anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects that are induced by ionizing radiation [190]. SK inhibition also induces apoptosis and reduces cell proliferation in both in vivo and in vitro TNBC models [118].
mTOR inhibitor everolimus significantly inhibits SK1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression, suppressing tumor growth, VEGF expression and tumor vasculature in xenograft models [191] (Table 14).

3. Discussion

Numerous studies have highlighted the role of aberrant protein kinases during breast carcinogenesis, cancer progression and resistance acquisition (Table 15).
Although basic research studies targeting these proteins have had satisfactory results in the hope of resulting in a new treatment in the fight against cancer, the development of new therapies based on the activation or inhibition of oncogenic protein kinases is facing numerous difficulties.
On one hand, developing new drugs that selectively act on a specific enzyme is a tough challenge, as studies show that due to the conserved kinase structure, many small molecules exhibit a high degree of promiscuity and bind to multiple kinases [192], which makes it necessary for any new substance to present a high selectivity profile. In this regard, protein crystal structures, computational molecular modeling, and docking studies have become of vital importance during the process of new kinase drug design [19] to avoid undesired effects during therapeutic use.
On the other hand, there is a rich downstream and upstream network from aberrant protein kinases that include other kinases, which are understudied and untargeted by chemical probes [12]. Crosstalk between proteins involving different kinase pathways would promote drug resistance development because of alternate kinase activation [193], which have led to the intensive study of multi-kinase inhibitors [194]. In addition to this, recent studies have shown a close relationship between microRNAs (miRNAs) activity and different protein kinase pathways, which can have an oncogenic role [69,195,196,197]. This relationship is also focus of research.
Given the above, and despite the toxic effects that may occur, combination therapy is considered the best therapeutic strategy to enhance treatment efficacy, as the use of single kinase inhibitors have only demonstrated modest clinical benefits [155,198] (Table 16).
Last, but not least, the existing heterogeneity at the kinome level across histological and within breast cancer subtypes [89] are a great impediment to apply these therapies in a generalized way to all breast cancer patients, requiring a thorough preliminary study and selection of patients that would benefit from these treatments. In this respect, precision medicine appears as a promising medical tool, since, in contrast to strategies developed for average patients, this emerging approach uses individual variability in genes, environment or patients’ lifestyle as a basis for a customized healthcare. Genomic tumor screenings, big data analytics [207], and patients’ virtual or digital models with probabilistic outputs [208], among other models, may help to predict which treatment and prevention strategies will work in each breast cancer patient and provide a valuable clinical decision support.

Acknowledgments

This research was partially supported by grants from Junta de Andalucía (16/0298) and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Dikshit, R.; Eser, S.; Mathers, C.; Rebelo, M.; Parkin, D.M.; Forman, D.; Bray, F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in globocan 2012. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 136, E359–E386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Berman, A.T.; Thukral, A.D.; Hwang, W.T.; Solin, L.J.; Vapiwala, N. Incidence and patterns of distant metastases for patients with early-stage breast cancer after breast conservation treatment. Clin. Breast Cancer 2013, 13, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Scully, O.J.; Bay, B.-H.; Yip, G.; Yu, Y. Breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Genom.-Proteom. 2012, 9, 311–320. [Google Scholar]
  4. Shchemelinin, I.; Sefc, L.; Necas, E. Protein kinases, their function and implication in cancer and other diseases. Folia Biol. (Praha) 2006, 52, 81–100. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Manning, G.; Whyte, D.B.; Martinez, R.; Hunter, T.; Sudarsanam, S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 2002, 298, 1912–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lindberg, R.A.; Quinn, A.M.; Hunter, T. Dual-specificity protein kinases: Will any hydroxyl do? Trends Biochem. Sci. 1992, 17, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cheng, H.C.; Qi, R.Z.; Paudel, H.; Zhu, H.J. Regulation and function of protein kinases and phosphatases. Enzyme Res. 2011, 2011, 794089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ubersax, J.A.; Ferrell, J.E., Jr. Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 530–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Roskoski, R., Jr. A historical overview of protein kinases and their targeted small molecule inhibitors. Pharmacol. Res. 2015, 100, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kondapalli, L.; Soltani, K.; Lacouture, M.E. The promise of molecular targeted therapies: Protein kinase inhibitors in the treatment of cutaneous malignancies. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2005, 53, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Segovia-Mendoza, M.; Gonzalez-Gonzalez, M.E.; Barrera, D.; Diaz, L.; Garcia-Becerra, R. Efficacy and mechanism of action of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib, lapatinib and neratinib in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: Preclinical and clinical evidence. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015, 5, 2531–2561. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Midland, A.A.; Whittle, M.C.; Duncan, J.S.; Abell, A.N.; Nakamura, K.; Zawistowski, J.S.; Carey, L.A.; Earp, H.S., 3rd; Graves, L.M.; Gomez, S.M.; et al. Defining the expressed breast cancer kinome. Cell Res. 2012, 22, 620–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, J.; Yang, P.L.; Gray, N.S. Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fleuren, E.D.; Zhang, L.; Wu, J.; Daly, R.J. The kinome “at large” in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shah, N.P.; Tran, C.; Lee, F.Y.; Chen, P.; Norris, D.; Sawyers, C.L. Overriding imatinib resistance with a novel ABL kinase inhibitor. Science 2004, 305, 399–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Walker, I.; Newell, H. Do molecularly targeted agents in oncology have reduced attrition rates? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 15–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Knighton, D.R.; Zheng, J.H.; Ten Eyck, L.F.; Ashford, V.A.; Xuong, N.H.; Taylor, S.S.; Sowadski, J.M. Crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase. Science 1991, 253, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Cohen, P. Protein kinases—The major drug targets of the twenty-first century? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2002, 1, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Schroeder, R.L.; Stevens, C.L.; Sridhar, J. Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors of Erbb2/HER2/Neu in the treatment of aggressive breast cancer. Molecules 2014, 19, 15196–15212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Miller, S.M.; Goulet, D.R.; Johnson, G.L. Targeting the breast cancer kinome. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017, 232, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Berman, H.M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T.N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I.N.; Bourne, P.E. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Krop, I.E. Lessons from breast cancer trials of HER2-kinase inhibitors. Lancet Oncol. 2016, 17, 267–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tamimi, R.M.; Colditz, G.A.; Hazra, A.; Baer, H.J.; Hankinson, S.E.; Rosner, B.; Marotti, J.; Connolly, J.L.; Schnitt, S.J.; Collins, L.C. Traditional breast cancer risk factors in relation to molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2012, 131, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sorlie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Parker, J.; Hastie, T.; Marron, J.S.; Nobel, A.; Deng, S.; Johnsen, H.; Pesich, R.; Geisler, S.; et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 8418–8423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Holliday, D.L.; Speirs, V. Choosing the right cell line for Breast Cancer Res.earch. Breast Cancer Res. 2011, 13, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Burstein, H.J.; Sun, Y.; Dirix, L.Y.; Jiang, Z.; Paridaens, R.; Tan, A.R.; Awada, A.; Ranade, A.; Jiao, S.; Schwartz, G.; et al. Neratinib, an irreversible Erbb receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced erbb2-positive breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 1301–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Prove, A.; Dirix, L. Neratinib for the treatment of breast cancer. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2016, 17, 2243–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhang, X.; Munster, P.N. New protein kinase inhibitors in breast cancer: Afatinib and neratinib. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2014, 15, 1277–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. FDA. FDA Approval for Lapatinib Ditosylate. 2007. Available online: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/drugs/fda-lapatinib (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  30. FDA. FDA Approval for Trastuzumab. 2006. Available online: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/drugs/fda-trastuzumab#Anchor-Breast (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  31. DRUGBANK. Trastuzumab. 2017. Available online: https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00072 (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  32. FDA. FDA Approves Neratinib for Extended Adjuvant Treatment of Early Stage HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. 2017. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/informationondrugs/approveddrugs/ucm567259.htm (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  33. FDA. FDA Approves Targeted Therapy for First-Line Treatment of Patients with a Type of Metastatic Lung Cancer. Available online: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm454678.htm (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  34. FDA. Fda Approval for Gefitinib. 2015. Available online: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/drugs/fda-gefitinib (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  35. Boehringer-Ingelheim. Giotrif® (afatinib) Approved in Europe for Patients with Egfr Mutation Positive Lung Cancer. 2013. Available online: https://www.boehringer-ingelheim.com/press-release/giotrif-afatinib-approved-europe-patients-egfr-mutation-positive-lung-cancer (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  36. Zhang, X.; Zhang, B.; Liu, J.; Liu, J.; Li, C.; Dong, W.; Fang, S.; Li, M.; Song, B.; Tang, B.; et al. Mechanisms of gefitinib-mediated reversal of tamoxifen resistance in MCF-7 breast cancer cells by inducing ERα re-expression. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 7835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Opyrchal, M.; Salisbury, J.L.; Zhang, S.; McCubrey, J.; Hawse, J.; Goetz, M.P.; Lomberk, G.A.; Haddad, T.; Degnim, A.; Lange, C.; et al. Aurora-a mitotic kinase induces endocrine resistance through down-regulation of ERα expression in initially ERα+ breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hasson, S.P.; Rubinek, T.; Ryvo, L.; Wolf, I. Endocrine resistance in breast cancer: Focus on the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway. Breast Care 2013, 8, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chang, M. Tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. Biomol. Ther. 2012, 20, 256–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cepa, M.; Correia-da-Silva, G.; da Silva, E.J.; Roleira, F.M.; Borges, M.; Teixeira, N.A. New steroidal aromatase inhibitors: Suppression of estrogen-dependent breast cancer cell proliferation and induction of cell death. BMC Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bruce, M.C.; McAllister, D.; Murphy, L.C. The kinome associated with estrogen receptor-positive status in human breast cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2014, 21, R357–R370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Carlson, R.W.; Henderson, I.C. Sequential hormonal therapy for metastatic breast cancer after adjuvant tamoxifen or anastrozole. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2003, 80, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nabholtz, J.M.; Reese, D.M. Third-generation aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2001, 8, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jonat, W.; Hilpert, F.; Maass, N. The use of aromatase inhibitors in adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2005, 56 (Suppl. 1), 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kazi, A.A.; Gilani, R.A.; Schech, A.J.; Chumsri, S.; Sabnis, G.; Shah, P.; Goloubeva, O.; Kronsberg, S.; Brodie, A.H. Nonhypoxic regulation and role of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in aromatase inhibitor resistant breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2014, 16, R15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fu, X.; Creighton, C.J.; Biswal, N.C.; Kumar, V.; Shea, M.; Herrera, S.; Contreras, A.; Gutierrez, C.; Wang, T.; Nanda, S.; et al. Overcoming endocrine resistance due to reduced pten levels in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer by co-targeting mammalian target of rapamycin, protein kinase b, or mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. Breast Cancer Res. 2014, 16, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Linderholm, B.K.; Hellborg, H.; Johansson, U.; Skoog, L.; Lehtio, J. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and downstream p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase are possible candidate markers of intrinsic resistance to adjuvant endocrine treatment in steroid receptor positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 125, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Hiscox, S.; Barnfather, P.; Hayes, E.; Bramble, P.; Christensen, J.; Nicholson, R.I.; Barrett-Lee, P. Inhibition of focal adhesion kinase suppresses the adverse phenotype of endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells and improves endocrine response in endocrine-sensitive cells. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 125, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Agarwal, D.; Qi, Y.; Jiang, T.; Liu, X.; Shi, W.; Wali, V.B.; Turk, B.; Ross, J.S.; Fraser Symmans, W.; Pusztai, L.; et al. Characterization of DNA variants in the human kinome in breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Foulkes, W.D.; Smith, I.E.; Reis-Filho, J.S. Triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 1938–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Dawood, S. Triple-negative breast cancer: Epidemiology and management options. Drugs 2010, 70, 2247–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ciruelos Gil, E.M. Targeting the PI3K/Akt/mtor pathway in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2014, 40, 862–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Acevedo-Gadea, C.; Hatzis, C.; Chung, G.; Fishbach, N.; Lezon-Geyda, K.; Zelterman, D.; DiGiovanna, M.P.; Harris, L.; Abu-Khalaf, M.M. Sirolimus and trastuzumab combination therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after progression on prior trastuzumab therapy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2015, 150, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Burris, H.A., 3rd. Overcoming acquired resistance to anticancer therapy: Focus on the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2013, 71, 829–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Nitulescu, G.M.; Margina, D.; Juzenas, P.; Peng, Q.; Olaru, O.T.; Saloustros, E.; Fenga, C.; Spandidos, D.; Libra, M.; Tsatsakis, A.M. Akt inhibitors in cancer treatment: The long journey from drug discovery to clinical use (review). Int. J. Oncol. 2016, 48, 869–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Luey, B.C.; May, F.E. Insulin-like growth factors are essential to prevent anoikis in oestrogen-responsive breast cancer cells: Importance of the type i igf receptor and PI3-kinase/akt pathway. Mol. Cancer 2016, 15, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhu, S.; Cao, Y.; Ye, Z.; Yin, Y.; Zhu, X. Electrochemical assay of the relationship between the inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway and estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 9593–9596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Teitell, M.A. The tcl1 family of oncoproteins: Co-activators of transformation. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, 640–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Baselga, J. Targeting the phosphoinositide-3 (PI3) kinase pathway in breast cancer. Oncologist 2011, 16 (Suppl. 1), 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ebbesen, S.H.; Scaltriti, M.; Bialucha, C.U.; Morse, N.; Kastenhuber, E.R.; Wen, H.Y.; Dow, L.E.; Baselga, J.; Lowe, S.W. Pten loss promotes mapk pathway dependency in HER2/Neu breast carcinomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 3030–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Wang, L.L.; Hao, S.; Zhang, S.; Guo, L.J.; Hu, C.Y.; Zhang, G.; Gao, B.; Zhao, J.J.; Jiang, Y.; Tian, W.G.; et al. PTEN/PI3K/Akt protein expression is related to clinicopathologic features and prognosis in breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastases. Hum. Pathol. 2016, 61, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Altomare, D.A.; Testa, J.R. Perturbations of the Akt signaling pathway in human cancer. Oncogene 2005, 24, 7455–7464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Vicier, C.; Dieci, M.V.; Arnedos, M.; Delaloge, S.; Viens, P.; Andre, F. Clinical development of mtor inhibitors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2014, 16, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Leslie, N.R.; Downes, C.P. Pten function: How normal cells control it and tumour cells lose it. Biochem. J. 2004, 382, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Dillon, L.M.; Miller, T.W. Therapeutic targeting of cancers with loss of pten function. Curr. Drug Targets 2014, 15, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Burnett, J.P.; Korkaya, H.; Ouzounova, M.D.; Jiang, H.; Conley, S.J.; Newman, B.W.; Sun, L.; Connarn, J.N.; Chen, C.S.; Zhang, N.; et al. Trastuzumab resistance induces emt to transform HER2+ PTEN− to a triple negative breast cancer that requires unique treatment options. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chiang, K.C.; Chen, H.Y.; Hsu, S.Y.; Pang, J.H.; Wang, S.Y.; Hsu, J.T.; Yeh, T.S.; Chen, L.W.; Kuo, S.F.; Sun, C.C.; et al. Pten insufficiency modulates ER+ breast cancer cell cycle progression and increases cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2015, 9, 4631–4638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lebok, P.; Kopperschmidt, V.; Kluth, M.; Hube-Magg, C.; Ozden, C.; Taskin, B.; Hussein, K.; Mittenzwei, A.; Lebeau, A.; Witzel, I.; et al. Partial PTEN deletion is linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wu, Z.H.; Tao, Z.H.; Zhang, J.; Li, T.; Ni, C.; Xie, J.; Zhang, J.F.; Hu, X.C. miRNA-21 induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition and gemcitabine resistance via the PTEN/Akt pathway in breast cancer. Tumour Biol. J. Inter. Soc. Oncodev. Biol. Med. 2016, 37, 7245–7254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zhong, T.; Xu, F.; Xu, J.; Liu, L.; Chen, Y. Aldo-keto reductase 1C3 (AKR1C3) is associated with the doxorubicin resistance in human breast cancer via pten loss. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2015, 69, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Dean, S.J.; Perks, C.M.; Holly, J.M.; Bhoo-Pathy, N.; Looi, L.M.; Mohammed, N.A.; Mun, K.S.; Teo, S.H.; Koobotse, M.O.; Yip, C.H.; et al. Loss of pten expression is associated with IGFBP2 expression, younger age, and late stage in triple-negative breast cancer. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2014, 141, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lin Fde, M.; Bacchi, C.E.; Baracat, E.C.; Carvalho, F.M. Loss of pten expression and Akt activation in HER2-positive breast carcinomas. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2014, 36, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Okutur, K.; Bassulu, N.; Dalar, L.; Aydin, K.; Bozkurt, M.; Pilanci, K.N.; Dogusoy, G.B.; Tecimer, C.; Mandel, N.M.; Demir, G. Predictive and prognostic significance of p27, Akt, PTEN and PI3K expression in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2015, 16, 2645–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Stern, H.M.; Gardner, H.; Burzykowski, T.; Elatre, W.; O’Brien, C.; Lackner, M.R.; Pestano, G.A.; Santiago, A.; Villalobos, I.; Eiermann, W.; et al. PTEN loss is associated with worse outcome in HER2-amplified breast cancer patients but is not associated with trastuzumab resistance. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 2065–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Nuciforo, P.G.; Aura, C.; Holmes, E.; Prudkin, L.; Jimenez, J.; Martinez, P.; Ameels, H.; de la Pena, L.; Ellis, C.; Eidtmann, H.; et al. Benefit to neoadjuvant anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies in HER2-positive primary breast cancer is independent of phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted from chromosome 10 (PTEN) status. Ann. Oncol. 2015, 26, 1494–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Li, X.; Wang, Q.; Fu, L.; Liu, M.; Yu, X. [Expression of PTEN, p53 and EGFR in the molecular subtypes of breast carcinoma and the correlation among them]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2015, 40, 973–978. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Liu, J.C.; Voisin, V.; Wang, S.; Wang, D.Y.; Jones, R.A.; Datti, A.; Uehling, D.; Al-awar, R.; Egan, S.E.; Bader, G.D.; et al. Combined deletion of pten and p53 in mammary epithelium accelerates triple-negative breast cancer with dependency on EEF2K. EMBO Mol. Med. 2014, 6, 1542–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Jones, N.; Bonnet, F.; Sfar, S.; Lafitte, M.; Lafon, D.; Sierankowski, G.; Brouste, V.; Banneau, G.; Tunon de Lara, C.; Debled, M.; et al. Comprehensive analysis of pten status in breast carcinomas. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 133, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Meuillet, E.J.; Zuohe, S.; Lemos, R.; Ihle, N.; Kingston, J.; Watkins, R.; Moses, S.A.; Zhang, S.; Du-Cuny, L.; Herbst, R.; et al. Molecular pharmacology and antitumor activity of PHT-427, a novel Akt/phosphatidylinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 pleckstrin homology domain inhibitor. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 706–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Maurer, M.; Su, T.; Saal, L.H.; Koujak, S.; Hopkins, B.D.; Barkley, C.R.; Wu, J.; Nandula, S.; Dutta, B.; Xie, Y.; et al. 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 potentiates upstream lesions on the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway in breast carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 6299–6306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Morrison, D.K. Map kinase pathways. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Dhillon, A.S.; Hagan, S.; Rath, O.; Kolch, W. MAP kinase signalling pathways in cancer. Oncogene 2007, 26, 3279–3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhang, W.; Liu, H.T. MAPK signal pathways in the regulation of cell proliferation in mammalian cells. Cell Res. 2002, 12, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Burotto, M.; Chiou, V.L.; Lee, J.M.; Kohn, E.C. The mapk pathway across different malignancies: A new perspective. Cancer 2014, 120, 3446–3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Milde-Langosch, K.; Bamberger, A.M.; Rieck, G.; Grund, D.; Hemminger, G.; Muller, V.; Loning, T. Expression and prognostic relevance of activated extracellular-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) in breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2005, 92, 2206–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Santen, R.J.; Song, R.X.; McPherson, R.; Kumar, R.; Adam, L.; Jeng, M.H.; Yue, W. The role of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase in breast cancer. J. Steroid. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 80, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Qi, X.; Yin, N.; Ma, S.; Lepp, A.; Tang, J.; Jing, W.; Johnson, B.; Dwinell, M.B.; Chitambar, C.R.; Chen, G. P38γ MAPK is a therapeutic target for triple-negative breast cancer by stimulation of cancer stem-like cell expansion. Stem Cells 2015, 33, 2738–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Chen, L.; Mayer, J.A.; Krisko, T.I.; Speers, C.W.; Wang, T.; Hilsenbeck, S.G.; Brown, P.H. Inhibition of the p38 kinase suppresses the proliferation of human ER-negative breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 8853–8861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Al-Ejeh, F.; Miranda, M.; Shi, W.; Simpson, P.T.; Song, S.; Vargas, A.C.; Saunus, J.M.; Smart, C.E.; Mariasegaram, M.; Wiegmans, A.P.; et al. Kinome profiling reveals breast cancer heterogeneity and identifies targeted therapeutic opportunities for triple negative breast cancer. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 3145–3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Nigg, E.A. Mitotic kinases as regulators of cell division and its checkpoints. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Dar, A.A.; Goff, L.W.; Majid, S.; Berlin, J.; El-Rifai, W. Aurora kinase inhibitors—Rising stars in cancer therapeutics? Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 268–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Finn, R.S.; Aleshin, A.; Slamon, D.J. Targeting the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res. 2016, 18, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Mayer, E.L. Targeting breast cancer with cdk inhibitors. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 17, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wang, L.H.; Xiang, J.; Yan, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yue, C.F.; Xu, J.; Zheng, F.M.; Chen, J.N.; Kang, Z.; et al. The mitotic kinase aurora-a induces mammary cell migration and breast cancer metastasis by activating the cofilin-f-actin pathway. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 9118–9128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Siggelkow, W.; Boehm, D.; Gebhard, S.; Battista, M.; Sicking, I.; Lebrecht, A.; Solbach, C.; Hellwig, B.; Rahnenfuhrer, J.; Koelbl, H.; et al. Expression of aurora kinase a is associated with metastasis-free survival in node-negative breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2012, 12, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. D’Assoro, A.B.; Liu, T.; Quatraro, C.; Amato, A.; Opyrchal, M.; Leontovich, A.; Ikeda, Y.; Ohmine, S.; Lingle, W.; Suman, V.; et al. The mitotic kinase aurora—A promotes distant metastases by inducing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in ERα+ breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2014, 33, 599–610. [Google Scholar]
  97. Zou, Z.; Yuan, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Long, Z.; Chen, J.; Tang, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, S.; Xu, J.; Yan, M.; et al. Aurora kinase a inhibition-induced autophagy triggers drug resistance in breast cancer cells. Autophagy 2012, 8, 1798–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Thrane, S.; Pedersen, A.M.; Thomsen, M.B.; Kirkegaard, T.; Rasmussen, B.B.; Duun-Henriksen, A.K.; Laenkholm, A.V.; Bak, M.; Lykkesfeldt, A.E.; Yde, C.W. A kinase inhibitor screen identifies Mcl-1 and aurora kinase a as novel treatment targets in antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2015, 34, 4199–4210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Xu, L.Z.; Long, Z.J.; Peng, F.; Liu, Y.; Xu, J.; Wang, C.; Jiang, L.; Guo, T.; Kamran, M.; Li, S.S.; et al. Aurora kinase a suppresses metabolic stress-induced autophagic cell death by activating mtor signaling in breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 7498–7511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Larsen, S.L.; Yde, C.W.; Laenkholm, A.V.; Rasmussen, B.B.; Duun-Henriksen, A.K.; Bak, M.; Lykkesfeldt, A.E.; Kirkegaard, T. Aurora kinase b is important for antiestrogen resistant cell growth and a potential biomarker for tamoxifen resistant breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Chang, S.S.; Yamaguchi, H.; Xia, W.; Lim, S.O.; Khotskaya, Y.; Wu, Y.; Chang, W.C.; Liu, Q.; Hung, M.C. Aurora a kinase activates yap signaling in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogene 2016, 36, 1265–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Liu, Z.; Sun, Q.; Wang, X. Plk1, a potential target for cancer therapy. Transl. Oncol. 2017, 10, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Strebhardt, K.; Ullrich, A. Targeting polo-like kinase 1 for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wierer, M.; Verde, G.; Pisano, P.; Molina, H.; Font-Mateu, J.; di Croce, L.; Beato, M. PLK1 signaling in breast cancer cells cooperates with estrogen receptor-dependent gene transcription. Cell Rep. 2013, 3, 2021–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Bhola, N.E.; Jansen, V.M.; Bafna, S.; Giltnane, J.M.; Balko, J.M.; Estrada, M.V.; Meszoely, I.; Mayer, I.; Abramson, V.; Ye, F.; et al. Kinome-wide functional screen identifies role of PLK1 in hormone-independent, er-positive breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zeng, Y.R.; Han, Z.D.; Wang, C.; Cai, C.; Huang, Y.Q.; Luo, H.W.; Liu, Z.Z.; Zhuo, Y.J.; Dai, Q.S.; Zhao, H.B.; et al. Overexpression of NIMA-related kinase 2 is associated with progression and poor prognosis of prostate cancer. BMC Urol. 2015, 15, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Cappello, P.; Blaser, H.; Gorrini, C.; Lin, D.C.; Elia, A.J.; Wakeham, A.; Haider, S.; Boutros, P.C.; Mason, J.M.; Miller, N.A.; et al. Role of NEK2 on centrosome duplication and aneuploidy in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2014, 33, 2375–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Zhou, Q. Targeting cyclin-dependent kinases in ovarian cancer. Cancer Investig. 2017, 35, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Santo, L.; Siu, K.T.; Raje, N. Targeting cyclin-dependent kinases and cell cycle progression in human cancers. Semin. Oncol. 2015, 42, 788–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Wesierska-Gadek, J.; Mauritz, M. Why (multi)targeting of cyclin-dependent kinases is a promising therapeutic option for hormone-positive breast cancer and beyond. Future Med. Chem. 2016, 8, 55–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Gully, C.P.; Zhang, F.; Chen, J.; Yeung, J.A.; Velazquez-Torres, G.; Wang, E.; Yeung, S.C.; Lee, M.H. Antineoplastic effects of an aurora b kinase inhibitor in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Ferchichi, I.; Sassi Hannachi, S.; Baccar, A.; Marrakchi Triki, R.; Cremet, J.Y.; Ben Romdhane, K.; Prigent, C.; Ben Ammar El Gaaied, A. Assessment of aurora a kinase expression in breast cancer: A tool for early diagnosis? Dis. Mark. 2013, 34, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Tokes, A.M.; Szasz, A.M.; Geszti, F.; Lukacs, L.V.; Kenessey, I.; Turanyi, E.; Meggyeshazi, N.; Molnar, I.A.; Fillinger, J.; Soltesz, I.; et al. Expression of proliferation markers Ki67, cyclin a, geminin and aurora-kinase a in primary breast carcinomas and corresponding distant metastases. J. Clin. Pathol. 2015, 68, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Weier, H.U.; Mao, J.H. Meta-analysis of aurora kinase a (aurka) expression data reveals a significant correlation between increased aurka expression and distant metastases in human ER-positive breast cancers. J. Data Min. Genom. Proteom. 2013, 4, 127. [Google Scholar]
  115. Maceyka, M.; Payne, S.G.; Milstien, S.; Spiegel, S. Sphingosine kinase, sphingosine-1-phosphate, and apoptosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1585, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Yagoub, D.; Wilkins, M.R.; Lay, A.J.; Kaczorowski, D.C.; Hatoum, D.; Bajan, S.; Hutvagner, G.; Lai, J.H.; Wu, W.; Martiniello-Wilks, R.; et al. Sphingosine kinase 1 isoform-specific interactions in breast cancer. Mol. Endocrinol. 2014, 28, 1899–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Tsuchida, J.; Nagahashi, M.; Takabe, K.; Wakai, T. Clinical impact of sphingosine-1-phosphate in breast cancer. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017, 2017, 2076239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Antoon, J.W.; White, M.D.; Driver, J.L.; Burow, M.E.; Beckman, B.S. Sphingosine kinase isoforms as a therapeutic target in endocrine therapy resistant luminal and basal-A breast cancer. Exp. Biol. Med. 2012, 237, 832–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Zhu, Y.J.; You, H.; Tan, J.X.; Li, F.; Qiu, Z.; Li, H.Z.; Huang, H.Y.; Zheng, K.; Ren, G.S. Overexpression of sphingosine kinase 1 is predictive of poor prognosis in human breast cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Plaza-Menacho, I.; Morandi, A.; Robertson, D.; Pancholi, S.; Drury, S.; Dowsett, M.; Martin, L.A.; Isacke, C.M. Targeting the receptor tyrosine kinase ret sensitizes breast cancer cells to tamoxifen treatment and reveals a role for ret in endocrine resistance. Oncogene 2010, 29, 4648–4657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Johnson, N.; Bentley, J.; Wang, L.Z.; Newell, D.R.; Robson, C.N.; Shapiro, G.I.; Curtin, N.J. Pre-clinical evaluation of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and 1 inhibition in anti-estrogen-sensitive and resistant breast cancer cells. Br. J. Cancer 2010, 102, 342–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Chen, I.C.; Hsiao, L.P.; Huang, I.W.; Yu, H.C.; Yeh, L.C.; Lin, C.H.; Wei-Wu Chen, T.; Cheng, A.L.; Lu, Y.S. Phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase inhibitors, buparlisib and alpelisib, sensitize estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells to tamoxifen. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. FDA. FDA Approves Rapamune to Treat Lam, a Very Rare Lung Disease. 2015. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm448523.htm (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  124. FDA. Everolimus (Afinitor). 2016. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/informationondrugs/approveddrugs/ucm488028.htm (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  125. FDA. Afinitor Approval. 2009. Available online: https://www.drugs.com/history/afinitor.html (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  126. FDA. FDA Approval for Temsirolimus. 2007. Available online: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/drugs/fda-temsirolimus (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  127. FDA. Ridaforolimus Approval Status. 2012. Available online: https://www.drugs.com/history/ridaforolimus.html (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  128. adisinsight.springer.com. Sapanisertib-Takeda Oncology. 2017. Available online: http://adisinsight.springer.com/drugs/800030541 (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  129. Wolff, A.C.; Lazar, A.A.; Bondarenko, I.; Garin, A.M.; Brincat, S.; Chow, L.; Sun, Y.; Neskovic-Konstantinovic, Z.; Guimaraes, R.C.; Fumoleau, P.; et al. Randomized phase iii placebo-controlled trial of letrozole plus oral temsirolimus as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Beaver, J.A.; Park, B.H. The bolero-2 trial: The addition of everolimus to exemestane in the treatment of postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. Future Oncol. 2012, 8, 651–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Bachelot, T.; Bourgier, C.; Cropet, C.; Ray-Coquard, I.; Ferrero, J.M.; Freyer, G.; Abadie-Lacourtoisie, S.; Eymard, J.C.; Debled, M.; Spaeth, D.; et al. Randomized phase ii trial of everolimus in combination with tamoxifen in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer with prior exposure to aromatase inhibitors: A gineco study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 2718–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Andre, F.; O’Regan, R.; Ozguroglu, M.; Toi, M.; Xu, B.; Jerusalem, G.; Masuda, N.; Wilks, S.; Arena, F.; Isaacs, C.; et al. Everolimus for women with trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive, advanced breast cancer (bolero-3): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Santa-Maria, C.A.; Gradishar, W.J. Changing treatment paradigms in metastatic breast cancer: Lessons learned. JAMA Oncol. 2015, 1, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Yardley, D.A. Adverse event management of mtor inhibitors during treatment of hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: Considerations for oncologists. Clin. Breast Cancer 2014, 14, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Saura, C.; Roda, D.; Rosello, S.; Oliveira, M.; Macarulla, T.; Perez-Fidalgo, J.A.; Morales-Barrera, R.; Sanchis-Garcia, J.M.; Musib, L.; Budha, N.; et al. A first-in-human phase I study of the ATP-competitive AKT inhibitor ipatasertib demonstrates robust and safe targeting of AKT in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Porta, C.; Paglino, C.; Mosca, A. Targeting PI3K/Akt/mtor signaling in cancer. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. INSTITUTE, N.C. PI3K-β Inhibitor GSK2636771. 2017. Available online: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-drug?cdrid=715683 (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  138. Hu, Y.; Guo, R.; Wei, J.; Zhou, Y.; Ji, W.; Liu, J.; Zhi, X.; Zhang, J. Effects of PI3k inhibitor NVP-BKM120 on overcoming drug resistance and eliminating cancer stem cells in human breast cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Zhang, M.; Zhou, Y.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, J. [Effects of NVP-BKM120 on the triple-negative breast cancer cell]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2015, 95, 3308–3312. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  140. Saura, C.; Lin, N.; Ciruelos, E.; Maurer, M.; Lluch, A.; Gavilá, J.; Winer, E.; Baselga, J.; Rodón, J. Abstract ot2-3-06: A Phase II, Non-Randomized, Multicenter, Exploratory Trial of Single Agent BKM120 in Patients with Triple-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer; AACR: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  141. Terwogt, J.M.; Mandjes, I.A.; Sindermann, H.; Beijnen, J.H.; ten Bokkel Huinink, W.W. Phase II trial of topically applied miltefosine solution in patients with skin-metastasized breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 1999, 79, 1158–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Smorenburg, C.H.; Seynaeve, C.; Bontenbal, M.; Planting, A.S.; Sindermann, H.; Verweij, J. Phase ii study of miltefosine 6% solution as topical treatment of skin metastases in breast cancer patients. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2000, 11, 825–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Leonard, R.; Hardy, J.; van Tienhoven, G.; Houston, S.; Simmonds, P.; David, M.; Mansi, J. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of 6% miltefosine solution, a topical chemotherapy in cutaneous metastases from breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2001, 19, 4150–4159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Leighl, N.B.; Dent, S.; Clemons, M.; Vandenberg, T.A.; Tozer, R.; Warr, D.G.; Crump, R.M.; Hedley, D.; Pond, G.R.; Dancey, J.E.; et al. A phase 2 study of perifosine in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2008, 108, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Block, M.; Grundker, C.; Fister, S.; Kubin, J.; Wilkens, L.; Mueller, M.D.; Hemmerlein, B.; Emons, G.; Gunthert, A.R. Inhibition of the Akt/mtor and Erbb pathways by gefitinib, perifosine and analogs of gonadotropin-releasing hormone I and II to overcome tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2012, 41, 1845–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Lin, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Q.; Li, J.; Zhang, P.; Zhao, M.; Li, X. Perifosine downregulates MDR1 gene expression and reverses multidrug-resistant phenotype by inhibiting PI3K/Akt/NF-βb signaling pathway in a human breast cancer cell line. Neoplasma 2012, 59, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Ribas, R.; Pancholi, S.; Guest, S.K.; Marangoni, E.; Gao, Q.; Thuleau, A.; Simigdala, N.; Polanska, U.M.; Campbell, H.; Rani, A.; et al. Akt antagonist azd5363 influences estrogen receptor function in endocrine-resistant breast cancer and synergizes with fulvestrant (ici182780) in vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14, 2035–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Kim, S.-B.; Dent, R.; Im, S.-A.; Espié, M.; Blau, S.; Tan, A.R.; Isakoff, S.J.; Oliveira, M.; Saura, C.; Wongchenko, M.J. Ipatasertib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (lotus): A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 1360–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Wisinski, K.B.; Tevaarwerk, A.J.; Burkard, M.E.; Rampurwala, M.; Eickhoff, J.; Bell, M.C.; Kolesar, J.M.; Flynn, C.; Liu, G. Phase i study of an akt inhibitor (MK-2206) combined with lapatinib in adult solid tumors followed by dose expansion in advanced HER2+ breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 2659–2667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Ma, C.X.; Sanchez, C.; Gao, F.; Crowder, R.; Naughton, M.; Pluard, T.; Creekmore, A.; Guo, Z.; Hoog, J.; Lockhart, A.C.; et al. A phase i study of the Akt inhibitor MK-2206 in combination with hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 2650–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Ma, C.X.; Suman, V.; Goetz, M.P.; Northfelt, D.; Burkard, M.E.; Ademuyiwa, F.; Naughton, M.; Margenthaler, J.; Aft, R.; Gray, R.; et al. A phase II trial of neoadjuvant MK-2206, an Akt inhibitor, with anastrozole in clinical stage II or III PIK3ca-mutant er-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 6823–6832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Stottrup, C.; Tsang, T.; Chin, Y.R. Upregulation of Akt3 confers resistance to the Akt inhibitor MK2206 in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2016, 15, 1964–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Ma, C.X. The PI3K pathway as a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Am. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2015, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Li, S.Z.; Qiao, S.F.; Zhang, J.H.; Li, K. Quercetin increase the chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells to doxorubicin via PTEN/Akt pathway. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2015, 15, 1185–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Ren, Y.; Zhou, X.; Qi, Y.; Li, G.; Mei, M.; Yao, Z. Pten activation sensitizes breast cancer to PI3-kinase inhibitor through the β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 28, 943–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Noh, E.M.; Lee, Y.R.; Chay, K.O.; Chung, E.Y.; Jung, S.H.; Kim, J.S.; Youn, H.J. Estrogen receptor α induces down-regulation of pten through PI3-kinase activation in breast cancer cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2011, 4, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  157. Carracedo, A.; Pandolfi, P.P. The PTEN-PI3K pathway: Of feedbacks and cross-talks. Oncogene 2008, 27, 5527–5541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Maggi, L.B., Jr.; Weber, J.D. Targeting pten-defined breast cancers with a one-two punch. Breast Cancer Res. 2015, 17, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Kocar, M.; Bozkurtlar, E.; Telli, F.; Serdar Turhal, N.; Kaya, H.; Kocar, H.; Yumuk, F. PTEN loss is not associated with trastuzumab resistance in metastatic breast cancer. J. BUON 2014, 19, 900–905. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  160. Ning, L.; Guo-Chun, Z.; Sheng-Li, A.; Xue-Rui, L.; Kun, W.; Jian, Z.; Chong-Yang, R.; Ling-Zhu, W.; Hai-Tong, L. Inhibition of autophagy induced by PTEN loss promotes intrinsic Breast Cancer Resistance to trastuzumab therapy. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 5445–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Perez, E.A.; Dueck, A.C.; McCullough, A.E.; Chen, B.; Geiger, X.J.; Jenkins, R.B.; Lingle, W.L.; Davidson, N.E.; Martino, S.; Kaufman, P.A.; et al. Impact of pten protein expression on benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer in the north central cancer treatment group n9831 trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 2115–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Du, Y.; Yin, W.; Lu, J. The predictive role of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss, phosphoinositol-3 (PI3) kinase (PIK3ca) mutation, and PI3K pathway activation in sensitivity to trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2013, 29, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Koo, D.H.; Lee, H.J.; Ahn, J.H.; Yoon, D.H.; Kim, S.B.; Gong, G.; Son, B.H.; Ahn, S.H.; Jung, K.H. Tau and PTEN status as predictive markers for response to trastuzumab and paclitaxel in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 2015, 36, 5865–5871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Wang, Q.; Liu, P.; Spangle, J.M.; Von, T.; Roberts, T.M.; Lin, N.U.; Krop, I.E.; Winer, E.P.; Zhao, J.J. PI3K-p110α mediates resistance to HER2-targeted therapy in HER2+, PTEN-deficient breast cancers. Oncogene 2016, 35, 3607–3612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Sun, L.; Burnett, J.; Gasparyan, M.; Xu, F.; Jiang, H.; Lin, C.C.; Myers, I.; Korkaya, H.; Liu, Y.; Connarn, J.; et al. Novel cancer stem cell targets during epithelial to mesenchymal transition in PTEN-deficient trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 51408–51422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Hancox, U.; Cosulich, S.; Hanson, L.; Trigwell, C.; Lenaghan, C.; Ellston, R.; Dry, H.; Crafter, C.; Barlaam, B.; Fitzek, M.; et al. Inhibition of PI3kβ signaling with azd8186 inhibits growth of PTEN-deficient breast and prostate tumors alone and in combination with docetaxel. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Hosford, S.R.; Dillon, L.M.; Bouley, S.J.; Rosati, R.; Yang, W.; Chen, V.S.; Demidenko, E.; Morra, R.P., Jr.; Miller, T.W. Combined inhibition of both p110α and p110β isoforms of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is required for sustained therapeutic effect in PTEN-deficient, er+ breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 2795–2805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Gagliardi, P.A.; di Blasio, L.; Orso, F.; Seano, G.; Sessa, R.; Taverna, D.; Bussolino, F.; Primo, L. 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 controls breast tumor growth in a kinase-dependent but Akt-independent manner. Neoplasia 2012, 14, 719–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Iorns, E.; Lord, C.J.; Ashworth, A. Parallel rnai and compound screens identify the PDK1 pathway as a target for tamoxifen sensitization. Biochem. J. 2009, 417, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Tseng, P.H.; Wang, Y.C.; Weng, S.C.; Weng, J.R.; Chen, C.S.; Brueggemeier, R.W.; Shapiro, C.L.; Chen, C.Y.; Dunn, S.E.; Pollak, M.; et al. Overcoming trastuzumab resistance in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells by using a novel celecoxib-derived phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1 inhibitor. Mol. Pharmacol. 2006, 70, 1534–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Huang, S.; Wang, D.; Zhang, S.; Huang, X.; Wang, D.; Ijaz, M.; Shi, Y. Tunicamycin potentiates paclitaxel-induced apoptosis through inhibition of PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways in breast cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2017, 80, 685–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Hole, S.; Pedersen, A.M.; Lykkesfeldt, A.E.; Yde, C.W. Aurora kinase a and b as new treatment targets in aromatase inhibitor-resistant breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2015, 149, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Li, J.P.; Yang, Y.X.; Liu, Q.L.; Pan, S.T.; He, Z.X.; Zhang, X.; Yang, T.; Chen, X.W.; Wang, D.; Qiu, J.X.; et al. The investigational aurora kinase a inhibitor alisertib (mln8237) induces cell cycle G2/M arrest, apoptosis, and autophagy via p38 MAPK and Akt/mtor signaling pathways in human breast cancer cells. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2015, 9, 1627–1652. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  174. Leontovich, A.A.; Salisbury, J.L.; Veroux, M.; Tallarita, T.; Billadeau, D.; McCubrey, J.; Ingle, J.; Galanis, E.; D’Assoro, A.B. Inhibition of CDK2 activity decreases aurora-a kinase centrosomal localization and prevents centrosome amplification in breast cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2013, 29, 1785–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Tentler, J.J.; Ionkina, A.A.; Tan, A.C.; Newton, T.P.; Pitts, T.M.; Glogowska, M.J.; Kabos, P.; Sartorius, C.A.; Sullivan, K.D.; Espinosa, J.M.; et al. P53 family members regulate phenotypic response to aurora kinase a inhibition in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14, 1117–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Melichar, B.; Adenis, A.; Lockhart, A.C.; Bennouna, J.; Dees, E.C.; Kayaleh, O.; Obermannova, R.; DeMichele, A.; Zatloukal, P.; Zhang, B.; et al. Safety and activity of alisertib, an investigational aurora kinase a inhibitor, in patients with breast cancer, small-cell lung cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma, and gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma: A five-arm phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 16, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  177. Medina-Aguilar, R.; Marchat, L.A.; Arechaga Ocampo, E.; Gariglio, P.; Garcia Mena, J.; Villegas Sepulveda, N.; Martinez Castillo, M.; Lopez-Camarillo, C. Resveratrol inhibits cell cycle progression by targeting aurora kinase a and polo-like kinase 1 in breast cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2016, 35, 3696–3704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Kawai, M.; Nakashima, A.; Kamada, S.; Kikkawa, U. Midostaurin preferentially attenuates proliferation of triple-negative breast cancer cell lines through inhibition of aurora kinase family. J. Biomed. Sci. 2015, 22, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Zheng, F.M.; Long, Z.J.; Hou, Z.J.; Luo, Y.; Xu, L.Z.; Xia, J.L.; Lai, X.J.; Liu, J.W.; Wang, X.; Kamran, M.; et al. A novel small molecule aurora kinase inhibitor attenuates breast tumor-initiating cells and overcomes drug resistance. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 1991–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Diamond, J.R.; Eckhardt, S.G.; Tan, A.C.; Newton, T.P.; Selby, H.M.; Brunkow, K.L.; Kachaeva, M.I.; Varella-Garcia, M.; Pitts, T.M.; Bray, M.R.; et al. Predictive biomarkers of sensitivity to the aurora and angiogenic kinase inhibitor enmd-2076 in preclinical breast cancer models. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Cicenas, J. The aurora kinase inhibitors in cancer research and therapy. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 142, 1995–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Park, S.J.; Jo, D.S.; Jo, S.Y.; Shin, D.W.; Shim, S.; Jo, Y.K.; Shin, J.H.; Ha, Y.J.; Jeong, S.Y.; Hwang, J.J.; et al. Inhibition of never in mitosis a (nima)-related kinase-4 reduces survivin expression and sensitizes cancer cells to trail-induced cell death. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 65957–65967. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  183. Wang, Y.; Shen, H.; Yin, Q.; Zhang, T.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, W.; Niu, Y. Effect of nima-related kinase 2b on the sensitivity of breast cancer to paclitaxel in vitro and vivo. Tumour Biol. 2017, 39, 1010428317699754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Zhao, D.; Han, W.; Liu, X.; Cui, D.; Chen, Y. Deguelin inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of human non-small cell lung cancer cells by regulating nima-related kinase 2. Thorac. Cancer 2017, 8, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Zhao, D.; Han, W.; Liu, X.; Cui, D.; Chen, Y. Microrna-128 promotes apoptosis in lung cancer by directly targeting nima-related kinase 2. Thorac. Cancer 2017, 8, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. FDA. Palbociclib (IBRANCE). 2017. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/InformationOnDrugs/ApprovedDrugs/ucm549978.htm (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  187. Niu, H.; Manfredi, M.; Ecsedy, J.A. Scientific Rationale Supporting the Clinical Development Strategy for the Investigational Aurora a Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib in Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2015, 5, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. FDA. Midostaurin. 2017. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/InformationOnDrugs/ApprovedDrugs/ucm555756.htm (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  189. Sultan, A.; Ling, B.; Zhang, H.; Ma, B.; Michel, D.; Alcorn, J.; Yang, J. Synergistic effect between sphingosine-1-phosphate and chemotherapy drugs against human brain-metastasized breast cancer MDA-MB-361 cells. J. Cancer 2013, 4, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Marvaso, G.; Barone, A.; Amodio, N.; Raimondi, L.; Agosti, V.; Altomare, E.; Scotti, V.; Lombardi, A.; Bianco, R.; Bianco, C.; et al. Sphingosine analog fingolimod (fty720) increases radiation sensitivity of human breast cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2014, 15, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Alshaker, H.; Wang, Q.; Bohler, T.; Mills, R.; Winkler, M.; Arafat, T.; Kawano, Y.; Pchejetski, D. Combination of rad001 (everolimus) and docetaxel reduces prostate and breast cancer cell VEGF production and tumour vascularisation independently of sphingosine-kinase-1. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Tse, A.; Verkhivker, G.M. Molecular determinants underlying binding specificities of the ABL kinase inhibitors: Combining alanine scanning of binding hot spots with network analysis of residue interactions and coevolution. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Arteaga, C.L.; Sliwkowski, M.X.; Osborne, C.K.; Perez, E.A.; Puglisi, F.; Gianni, L. Treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: Current status and future perspectives. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 9, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Garuti, L.; Roberti, M.; Bottegoni, G. Multi-kinase inhibitors. Curr. Med. Chem. 2015, 22, 695–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Antoon, J.W.; Nitzchke, A.M.; Martin, E.C.; Rhodes, L.V.; Nam, S.; Wadsworth, S.; Salvo, V.A.; Elliott, S.; Collins-Burow, B.; Nephew, K.P.; et al. Inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase alters microrna expression and reverses epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Int. J. Oncol. 2013, 42, 1139–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Shen, H.; Wang, D.; Li, L.; Yang, S.; Chen, X.; Zhou, S.; Zhong, S.; Zhao, J.; Tang, J. Mir-222 promotes drug-resistance of breast cancer cells to adriamycin via modulation of PTEN/Akt/foxo1 pathway. Gene 2017, 596, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Shen, H.; Li, L.; Yang, S.; Wang, D.; Zhong, S.; Zhao, J.; Tang, J. MicroRNA-29a contributes to drug-resistance of breast cancer cells to adriamycin through PTEN/Akt/GSK3Β signaling pathway. Gene 2016, 593, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Redondo, M.; Garcíaaranda, G.; Roldan, M.J.; Callejón, G.; Serrano, A.; Jiménez, E.; Téllez, T. Downregulation of clusterin mediates sensitivity to protein kinase inhibitors in breast cancer cells. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2015, 26, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Ma, C.X.; Luo, J.; Naughton, M.; Ademuyiwa, F.; Suresh, R.; Griffith, M.; Griffith, O.L.; Skidmore, Z.L.; Spies, N.C.; Ramu, A.; et al. A phase i trial of BKM120 (buparlisib) in combination with fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 1583–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. GlaxoSmithKline. A Phase I/IIA, First Time in Human, Study of GSK2636771 in Subjects with Advanced Solid Tumors with Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN) Deficiency. 2017. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT01458067 (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  201. Jansen, V.M.; Bhola, N.E.; Bauer, J.A.; Formisano, L.; Lee, K.M.; Hutchinson, K.E.; Witkiewicz, A.K.; Moore, P.D.; Estrada, M.V.; Sanchez, V.; et al. Kinome-wide RNA interference screen reveals a role for PDK1 in acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition in er-positive breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 2488–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Patnaik, A.; Haluska, P.; Tolcher, A.W.; Erlichman, C.; Papadopoulos, K.P.; Lensing, J.L.; Beeram, M.; Molina, J.R.; Rasco, D.W.; Arcos, R.R.; et al. A first-in-human phase I study of the oral p38 MAPK inhibitor, ralimetinib (ly2228820 dimesylate), in patients with advanced cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 1095–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Brufsky, A.; Kim, S.-B.; Velu, T.J.; Garcia Saenz, J.A.; Tan-Chiu, E.; Sohn, J.; Dirix, L.Y.; Vanasek, J.; Borms, M.V.; Mingorance, J.I.D. Cobimetinib C+ paclitaxel P as first-line treatment in patients (PTS) with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): Updated results and biomarker data from the phase 2 colet study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Iwata, H.; Im, S.-A.; Masuda, N.; Im, Y.-H.; Inoue, K.; Rai, Y.; Nakamura, R.; Kim, J.H.; Hoffman, J.T.; Zhang, K. PALOMA-3: Phase III trial of fulvestrant with or without palbociclib in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-Negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on prior endocrine therapy-safety and efficacy in asian patients. J. Glob. Oncol. 2017, 3, 289–303. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  205. Alliance Foundation Trials, L. Randomized, Open Label, Clinical Study of the Targeted Therapy, Palbociclib, to Treat Metastatic Breast Cancer (Patina). 2017. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02947685 (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  206. MayoClinic. Alisertib and Fulvestrant in Treating Patients with Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer that Is Metastatic or Locally Advanced and Cannot Be Removed by Surgery. 2017. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02219789 (accessed on 23 November 2017).
  207. Leff, D.R.; Yang, G.-Z. Big data for precision medicine. Engineering 2015, 1, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Brown, S.A. Principles for developing patient avatars in precision and systems medicine. Front. Genet. 2015, 6, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 18 02543 g001 550
Figure 1. Proposed phylogeny general outline for the kinase superfamily [5]. The phylogenetic tree of human kinome, depicts the relationship between different members of protein kinase-superfamily based on homologies in their catalytic domains.
Figure 1. Proposed phylogeny general outline for the kinase superfamily [5]. The phylogenetic tree of human kinome, depicts the relationship between different members of protein kinase-superfamily based on homologies in their catalytic domains.
Ijms 18 02543 g001
Ijms 18 02543 g002 550
Figure 2. Via phosphorylation, protein kinases chemically transfer γ-phosphate from ATP (or GTP) to a targeted amino acid with a free hydroxyl group from its protein substrate. Protein phosphatases catalyze the opposite reaction, transferring the phosphate from a phosphoprotein to a water molecule.
Figure 2. Via phosphorylation, protein kinases chemically transfer γ-phosphate from ATP (or GTP) to a targeted amino acid with a free hydroxyl group from its protein substrate. Protein phosphatases catalyze the opposite reaction, transferring the phosphate from a phosphoprotein to a water molecule.
Ijms 18 02543 g002
Ijms 18 02543 g003 550
Figure 3. Main altered protein kinase pathways in breast cancer. (→: Activation; T: Inhibition).
Figure 3. Main altered protein kinase pathways in breast cancer. (→: Activation; T: Inhibition).
Ijms 18 02543 g003
Table
Table 1. Proposed structures for the main protein kinase family groups.
Table 1. Proposed structures for the main protein kinase family groups.
Kinase GroupCrystal StructurePDB ID
AGC Ijms 18 02543 i0011MRV
Crystal structure of an inactive Akt2 kinase domain
CAMK Ijms 18 02543 i0021KWP
Crystal structure of MAPKAPK2
CK1 Ijms 18 02543 i0032RSV
Solution structure of human full-length vaccinia related kinase 1 (VRK1)
CMGC Ijms 18 02543 i0044YC3
CDK1/CyclinB1/CKS2 Apo
STE Ijms 18 02543 i0053W8Q
Structure of the Human Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase 1 (MEK1)
TK Ijms 18 02543 i0062A91
Crystal structure of ErbB2 domains 1–3
TKL Ijms 18 02543 i0071IAS
Cytoplasmic domain of unphosphorylated type I TGF-β receptor crystalized without FKBP12
Images adapted from: The Protein Data Bank [21]. www.rcsb.org.
Table
Table 2. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) inhibitors.
Table 2. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) inhibitors.
DrugApproval StatusStructureAdapted from
Trastuzumab (Herceptin)Approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer in combination with letrozole [29] and as part of a treatment regimen containing doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel for the adjuvant treatment of women with node-positive, HER2-overexpressing breast cancer [30]. Ijms 18 02543 i008www.drugbank.ca/drugs [31]
Lapatinib (Tykeb)Approved in 2010 by the FDA, for the treatment of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer in combination with Letrozole [29]. Ijms 18 02543 i009PubChem CID: 208908
Neratinib (NERLYNX)Approved in 2017 by the FDA for the extended adjuvant treatment of adult patients with early stage of HER2-overexpressed breast cancer, to follow adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy [32]. Ijms 18 02543 i010PubChem CID: 9915743
Gefitinib (Iressa)Approved by the FDA as first-line treatment of patients with a type of metastatic lung cancer [33] and for non-small cell lung cancer patients who are currently benefiting, or have previously benefited, from gefitinib treatment [34]. Ijms 18 02543 i011PubChem CID: 123631
Afatinib (Giotrif)Approved by the European Commision for patients with EGFR mutation positive lung cancer [35]. Ijms 18 02543 i012PubChem CID: 10184653
Table
Table 3. Endocrine therapies for Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer treatment.
Table 3. Endocrine therapies for Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer treatment.
DrugTargetApproval Status
Tamoxifen (TMX, Novaldex)Selective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorFirst line treatment in pre- and post-menopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer [42]
Non steroidal: Anastrozole, letrozoleAromatase InhibitorStandard therapy for post-menopausal women with ER+ breast cancer [43,44]
Steroidal: Exemestane
Table
Table 4. Altered phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/ rapamycin (mTOR) pathway kinases and significance in breast cancer.
Table 4. Altered phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/ rapamycin (mTOR) pathway kinases and significance in breast cancer.
Kinase/GroupFunctionSignificance in Breast Cancer
KINASE: PI3K
GROUP: Atypical		Converts phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate, PI(4,5)P2, to phosphatidylinositol triphosphate PI(3,4,5,)P3, which acts as a docking phospholipid site for the membrane localization of other kinases including Akt [58].
Transmits growth factor signals from receptor tyrosine kinases to down-stream mediators.		Mutations in the lipid kinase family PI3K are frequently found in breast cancer [55], occurring in up to 25% of breast cancers [59], in over 70% ER-positive breast cancer (up to 45% of luminal A and 29% of luminal B breast cancers) [38] and in 25% of HER2-positive tumors [59].
KINASE: Akt (Protein kinase B or PKB)
GROUP: AGC		This serine/threonine protein kinases are one of the down-stream mediators of PI3Ks that, in turn, activates a series of other down-stream effectors that promote cellular proliferation and survival [60].Akt over-expression is frequently observed in breast cancer [55], and has been related to lower survival rates [61].
Specifically, Akt2 isoform over-expression correlates with ER-negative and HER2-positive breast carcinomas [62], acting as a survival and anti-apoptotic factor [62] leading to enhanced tumorigenesis and metastasis.
Along with the increased activity of the Akt1 isoform, which has been found in up to 40% of breast carcinomas [62], dysregulated Akt3 isoform has also been related with increased aggressiveness and poor prognosis of steroid hormone-insensitive breast carcinomas [55,62].
KINASE: mTOR
GROUP: Atypical PI3K-related protein kinase family (PIKK).		This serine/threonine protein kinase is found in two structurally and functionally distinct complexes (mTORC1 and mTORC2 holoenzymes). Responsible of Akt phosphorylation and activation. Directly or indirectly regulates the phosphorylation of at least 800 proteins.mTOR activation or increased activity has been frequently found in breast cancer and has been related to resistance to trastuzumab, endocrine therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy [63].
Table
Table 5. Phosphatase and Tensin Homologue (PTEN) alterations and significance in breast cancer.
Table 5. Phosphatase and Tensin Homologue (PTEN) alterations and significance in breast cancer.
PhosphataseFunctionSignificance in Breast Cancer
PTENTumor suppressor which inactivates PI3K-dependent signaling [64].Mutated or lost in up to 44% [38,66] breast cancer patients [67]. PTEN deficiency correlates with poor prognosis [60,68], chemoresistance [69,70] and increased cell growth [67]. Low PTEN expression in TNBC is associated with early-onset breast cancer and late stage [71].
Table
Table 6. PDK1 alterations and significance in breast cancer.
Table 6. PDK1 alterations and significance in breast cancer.
Kinase/GroupFunctionSignificance in Breast Cancer
KINASE: PDK1
GROUP: AGC kinases		Master kinase key for the activation of Akt and other AGC kinases.PDK1 alteration is a critical component of oncogenic PI3K signaling in breast cancer [80].
Table
Table 7. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway (MAPK) alterations and significance in breast cancer.
Table 7. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway (MAPK) alterations and significance in breast cancer.
Kinase/GroupFunctionSignificance in Breast Cancer
KINASE: MAPK
GROUP: CMGC		This serine/threonine kinase controls the transduction of extracellular signals to pathways related to cell growth, proliferation, differentiation, development, transformation, migration or death [81,82,83].Involved in malignant breast cancer behavior [85]. Breast carcinomas frequently contain an increased proportion of cells with the activated form of MAPK [86]. Development of estrogen-independent growth of initially ER-α positive and hormone sensitive breast cancer cells [37]. MAPK over-expression is usually found on TNBC cells, leading to tumor development and progression and stimulating cancer stem-like cell expansion [87,88,89].
Table
Table 8. Cell cycle proteins alterations and significance in breast cancer.
Table 8. Cell cycle proteins alterations and significance in breast cancer.
Kinase/GroupFunctionSignificance in Breast Cancer
KINASE: CDK
GROUP: CMGC kinases		Cell cycle regulation [92].Suggested to play a role in hormone receptor positive breast cancer [93].
KINASE: Aurora Kinases
GROUP: AUR branch, near AGC group		Control the accurate and equal segregation of genomic material during mitosis [91].Over-expressed in breast cancer and other malignancies [91]. AURKA (Aurora Kinase A) over-expression promotes tumor formation [94,95], EMT (epithelial to mesenchymal transition) activation [96], metastasis [94,95,97], drug resistance [37,97,98], endocrine resistance [37,96], autophagic cell death resistance, enhanced breast cancer cell survival when exposed to metabolic stress [99] and a worse prognosis in ER-positive [95,96,100] and TNBC breast carcinomas [101]. AURKA signaling is highly correlated to TNBC [37,101]. Aurora kinase B is associated with reduced disease-free and overall survival of patients who have received tamoxifen as first-line adjuvant endocrine treatment, and has been suggested as a driving factor of antiestrogen resistant breast cancer cell models’ growth and as a biomarker for reduced benefit of tamoxifen treatment [100].
KINASE: PLK1
GROUP: Other kinases		Initiation, maintenance, completion of mitosis [102]. Maintenance of genomic stability [103].PLK1 signaling cooperates with estrogen receptor-dependent transcription [104]. Related to hormone-independent, ER-positive breast cancer [105].
KINASE: NEK2
GROUP: Other kinases		Involved in the regulation of centrosome duplication and spindle assembly during mitosis [106].Related to cell growth and aneuploidy in breast cancer cells [107].
Table
Table 9. Sphingosine kinases alterations and significance in breast cancer.
Table 9. Sphingosine kinases alterations and significance in breast cancer.
Kinase/GroupFunctionSignificance in Breast Cancer
KINASE: SK
GROUP: AGC		These serine/threonine kinases catalyze sphingosine into sphingosine-1-phosphatase phosphorylation.Associated with breast cancer progression and resistance to drug therapies [116,117,118]. Predictive of poor prognosis in human breast cancer [119].
Table
Table 10. mTOR Inhibitors.
Table 10. mTOR Inhibitors.
DrugApproval StatusStructureAdapted from
Rapamycin/SirolimusApproved by the FDA to treat lymphangioleiomyomatosis [123]. Ijms 18 02543 i013PubChem CID: 5284616
Everolimus (Afinitor)Approved by the FDA for the treatment of adult patients with progressive, well-differentiated non-functional, neuroendocrine tumors of gastrointestinal or lung origin with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic disease [124], advanced HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, advanced renal cell carcinomas, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma and renal angiomyolipomas associated with tuberous sclerosis [125]. Ijms 18 02543 i014PubChem CID: 6442177
TemsirolimusApproved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and under study for other types of malignancies including breast cancer [126]. Ijms 18 02543 i015PubChem CID: 6918289
DeforolimusInvestigational oral mTOR inhibitor in development for the treatment of metastatic soft-tissue or bone sarcomas [127]. Ijms 18 02543 i016PubChem CID: 102284657
Sapanisertib (1224844-38-5, HY-13328, INK-128, MLN-0128, TAK-228)mTOR small molecule inhibitor in phase II clinical trials for breast cancer, endometrial cancer, glioblastoma, neuroendocrine tumors, renal cell carcinoma, soft sarcoma and thyroid cancer [128] Ijms 18 02543 i017PubChem CID: 45375953
Table
Table 11. PI3K inhibitors.
Table 11. PI3K inhibitors.
DrugApproval StatusEvidencesStructureAdapted from
GSK2636771Under studyPotential antineoplastic activity resulting in tumor cell apoptosis and growth inhibition in PI3K β-expressing and/or PTEN-driven tumor cells [137]. Ijms 18 02543 i018PubChem CID: 56949517
Buparlisib (NVP-BKM120, 944396) Under studyPartially overcomes multidrug resistance phenotype in chemoresistant breast cancer cells [138]. Significantly inhibits TNBC cell lines proliferation [139]. Phase II trial of single agent BKM120 in patients with TNBC metastatic breast cancer [140]. Ijms 18 02543 i019PubChem CID: 16654980
Table
Table 12. Akt inhibitors.
Table 12. Akt inhibitors.
DrugApproval StatusEvidencesStructureAdapted from
Miltefonsine (Impavido)FDA approved tropical disease leishmaniasis treatmentHas proven to be effective and tolerable as a local treatment for cutaneous metastasis from breast cancer [141,142,143]. Ijms 18 02543 i020PubChem CID: 3599
Perifosine (KRX-0401)Under studyAlthough no objective responses were seen in the phase II trial tested on a group of pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients [144], it has recently been suggested that Perifosine can restore the sensitivity to tamoxifen [145] and reverse the P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance in vitro [146], so further research is needed. Ijms 18 02543 i021PubChem CID: 148177
AZD5363AZD5363 is undergoing clinical assays phase I and II [55].This pan-Akt catalytic inhibitor has been shown to decrease the proliferation of resistant breast ER-positive cancer cell lines, to re-sensitize model breast cancer cells to tamoxifen [147] and to enhance the antitumor activity of docetaxel, lapatinib and Trastuzumab in breast cancer xenografts [55]. Ijms 18 02543 i022PubChem CID: 25227436
Ipatasertib (GDC-0068)Under studyThis novel selective ATP-competitive small molecule inhibitor has proven to preferentially target the active phosphorylated Akt isoform and to have antitumor activity in solid tumors with activation of Akt [135]. The combination of ipatasertib plus paclitaxel has been studied in a phase II trial as first-line therapy for metastatic TNBC with positive results [148]. Ijms 18 02543 i023PubChem CID: 124652937
MK-2206Under studyIn accordance with preclinical data, the phase I clinical trial concluded that the combination of this allosteric pan-Akt inhibitor with the HER2-targeted drug lapatinib may be a promising approach to overcome resistance to treatment [149].
Despite the positive results of phase I trial testing MK-2206 in combination with anastrozole [150], phase II trial has concluded that the combined treatment of MK-2206 with hormonal therapy (anastrozole) in PIK3CA-mutant, ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer patients does not provide clinical benefit [151]. A recent study has shown that breast cancer cells can acquire resistance to MK2206 through the over-expression of Akt3 [152]. Apparently, this chemoresistance can be reversed by the inhibition of Akt3 [152] which should be taken into consideration during MK2206 phase II neoadjuvant trials.		 Ijms 18 02543 i024PubChem CID: 24964624
Table
Table 13. Cell Cycle Proteins Inhibitors.
Table 13. Cell Cycle Proteins Inhibitors.
DrugTargetApproval StatusStructureAdapted from
PalbociclibCDK4/6FDA approved for the treatment of hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as initial endocrine based therapy in postmenopausal women [186]. Ijms 18 02543 i025PubChem CID: 5330286
AlisertibAURKBeing evaluated in multiple clinical trials in both solid cancers (neuroblastoma, small cell lung cancer, neuroendocrine prostate cancer, atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors, and breast cancer among others) and heme-lymphatic malignancies [187]. Ijms 18 02543 i026PubChem CID: 24771867
ResveratrolAURKA, PLKUnder study [177]. Ijms 18 02543 i027PubChem CID: 445154
Midostaurin (PCK412)AURKACurrently approved by the FDA for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia, who are FLT3 mutation-positive, in combination with standard cytarabine and daunorubicin induction and cytarabine consolidation [188]. Ijms 18 02543 i028PubChem CID: 9829523
ENMD-2076AURKUnder study [180]. Ijms 18 02543 i029PubChem CID: 16041424
Danusertib AURKUnder study [173]. Ijms 18 02543 i030PubChem CID: 11442891
Table
Table 14. Sphingosine kinase inhibitors.
Table 14. Sphingosine kinase inhibitors.
DrugTargetApproval StatusStructureAdapted from
Sphingosine kinase inhibitor (SK inhibitor, 1177741-83-1)SKInvestigational Ijms 18 02543 i031PubChem CID: 16760659
Table
Table 15. Altered expression of kinases in different breast cancer subtypes.
Table 15. Altered expression of kinases in different breast cancer subtypes.
Breast Cancer SubtypeAltered KinaseReferences
HER2-EnrichedHER2[26]
PI3K/Akt/mTOR[53]
PI3K[59]
mTOR[63]
PTEN[60]
PDK[170]
Estrogen Receptor-Negative
HER2-Enriched		Akt[62]
Estrogen Receptor-Positive
HER2-Negative		mTOR[125]
Hormone Receptor-PositivePI3K/Akt/mTOR[52]
PI3K[38]
Akt[55,62]
mTOR[63]
PDPK1[169]
MAPK[37]
AURK[37,95,96,100]
CDK[93]
PLK1[104]
Basal-LikePTEN[71]
MAPK[87,88,89]
AURK[37,101]
SK[118]
Table
Table 16. Combination therapy strategy with protein kinases for breast cancer treatment.
Table 16. Combination therapy strategy with protein kinases for breast cancer treatment.
Targeted KinaseCombined withBreast Cancer Patients That Would BenefitTrials
PI3KHormonal therapyER-positive, metastaticPhase I trial of buparlisib in combination with fulvestrant [199]
mTOR Hormonal therapyER-positive, HER2-negative, metastaticPhase II trial of everolimus in combination with tamoxifen [131]
Aromatase InhibitorER-positive, metastaticPhase III trial of everolimus in combination with exemestane [130]
TrastuzumabTrastuzumab-resistant and taxane-pretreated, HER2-positive, metastaticPhase III trial of everolimus in combination with trastuzumab plus vinorelbine [132]
AktChemotherapyTNBCPhase II trial of ipatasertib plus paclitaxel [148]
PTENPI3K InhibitorTNBC with PTEN deficiencyPhase I/IIa study of GSK2636771 [200]
PDK1TrastuzumabHER2-enrichedPreclinical study in combination with [170]
ChemotherapyBreast cancer patientsPreclinical study in combination with with paclitaxel [79]
Hormonal therapyER-positivePreclinical study in combination with tamoxifen [169]
CDK4/6 inhibitorsResistant to CDK4/6 inhibitors Preclinical study in combination with ribociclib [201]
MAPKHormonal therapyER-positive, metastaticPhase I study of p38 MAPK inhibitor, ralimetinib, in combination with tamoxifen [202]
ChemotherapyAdvanced TNBCPhase II study of MEK inhibitor, cobimetinib, in combination with paclitaxel [203]
CDKHormonal therapyER-positive, HER2-negative, metastaticPhase III trial of fulvestrant in combination with palbociclib [204]
Anti-HER2 plus endocrine therapyER-positive, HER2-positive, metastaticOngoing clinical trial with palbociclib [205]
AURKHormonal therapyER-positive, metastatic or locally advancedOngoing clinical trial of alisertib and fulvestrant [206]
Small kinase inhibitorMetastatic TNBCOngoing clinical trial of alisertib and sapanisertib [137]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

García-Aranda, M.; Redondo, M. Protein Kinase Targets in Breast Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2543. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18122543

AMA Style

García-Aranda M, Redondo M. Protein Kinase Targets in Breast Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017; 18(12):2543. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18122543

Chicago/Turabian Style

García-Aranda, Marilina, and Maximino Redondo. 2017. "Protein Kinase Targets in Breast Cancer" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18, no. 12: 2543. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18122543

APA Style

García-Aranda, M., & Redondo, M. (2017). Protein Kinase Targets in Breast Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(12), 2543. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18122543

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop