Next Article in Journal
Probing Downstream Olive Biophenol Secoiridoids
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Features Distinguish Gastric Cancer Subtypes
Previous Article in Journal
Cancer Vaccine Immunotherapy with RNA-Loaded Liposomes
Previous Article in Special Issue
What’s New in Gastric Cancer: The Therapeutic Implications of Molecular Classifications and Future Perspectives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Molecular Mechanisms of H. pylori-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks

Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Pediatric Research Institute, 1400 Barbara Jordan Blvd. R1800, Austin, TX 78723, USA
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(10), 2891; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102891
Submission received: 16 August 2018 / Revised: 11 September 2018 / Accepted: 21 September 2018 / Published: 23 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Features Distinguishing Gastric Cancer Subtypes)

Abstract

:
Infections contribute to carcinogenesis through inflammation-related mechanisms. H. pylori infection is a significant risk factor for gastric carcinogenesis. However, the molecular mechanism by which H. pylori infection contributes to carcinogenesis has not been fully elucidated. H. pylori-associated chronic inflammation is linked to genomic instability via reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS). In this article, we summarize the current knowledge of H. pylori-induced double strand breaks (DSBs). Furthermore, we provide mechanistic insight into how processing of oxidative DNA damage via base excision repair (BER) leads to DSBs. We review recent studies on how H. pylori infection triggers NF-κB/inducible NO synthase (iNOS) versus NF-κB/nucleotide excision repair (NER) axis-mediated DSBs to drive genomic instability. This review discusses current research findings that are related to mechanisms of DSBs and repair during H. pylori infection.
Keywords:
H. pylori; RONS; BER; DSBs; NF-κB; NER

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Infection contributes to 20% of cancer worldwide [1]. H. pylori infection is one of the most common risk factors for gastric carcinogenesis [2]. More than 50% of the human population is infected with H. pylori, but few develop gastric cancer [3]. Several studies have shown that H. pylori infection causes chronic inflammation with different degrees of pathological severity, including chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers that eventually cause gastric adenocarcinoma, and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma [4,5,6]. Chronic gastritis that is associated with H. pylori infection is the first and early stage of inflammation. When accompanied by gastric epithelial cell injury, it may contribute to gastric cancer development [7,8,9]. H. pylori virulence factors that contribute to host-pathogen interaction have been characterized, which increase the risk of gastric cancer pathogenesis [4,10]. These virulence factors enhance the severity of the mucosal inflammatory response, which may largely be responsible for the virulence factor-associated increased risk of gastric cancer [10].
H. pylori causes chronic gastritis and contributes to genotoxic activity [11,12]. However, the molecular mechanisms by which H. pylori promotes genotoxic activity and the host response to genotoxic factors to drive gastric carcinogenesis require more study. Based on the current knowledge, H. pylori infection induces a genotoxic effect via two potential mechanisms. First, H. pylori infection enhances the infiltration of immune cells, including neutrophils and macrophages, to produce reactive oxygen species and nitrogen species (RONS) [13]. RONS can cause DNA base damage that leads to single strand breaks (SSBs) and the enhanced expression of oncogenes [14,15,16]. Alternatively, RONS activate the oxidant-sensitive transcription factor NF-κB, which induces the expression of oncogenes and cell-cycle regulators [17,18]. Activated NF-κB is translocated to the nucleus and it forms a protein complex with NER proteins (XPG and XPF) to cleave the promoter regions of the genes and cause double strand breaks (DSBs) that impact gene expression [11].

2. H. pylori Induces Inflammation-Dependent DNA Damage

Chronic inflammation is estimated to contribute to approximately 25% of human cancers [19]. Gastric inflammation in H. pylori infection may be induced via two different mechanisms. The first mechanism is initiated via physical contact between the pathogen and the host epithelial cells, producing direct cell damage or enhancing the ability of epithelial cells to release pro-inflammatory mediators (Figure 1). The second mechanism is likely promoted by H. pylori virulence factors (e.g., CagA, VacA) that may target the potential cell signaling pathways to stimulate immune responses. Interestingly, the H. pylori CagA positive strain enhances chemokine activation, such as IL-8, a potent neutrophil-activating chemotactic cytokine or chemokine [20,21]. Furthermore, chemokines that are released from infected gastric epithelial cells can stimulate neutrophil infiltration and T lymphocytes to enhance RONS-mediated gastritis [22,23]. Overall, H. pylori-mediated gastric inflammation is associated with humoral and cell-mediated immune cells.

3. H. pylori Induces Base Excision Repair (BER) Intermediate-Dependent Double Strand Breaks (DSBs)

Chronic inflammatory conditions induce immune and epithelial cells to release RONS, which are capable of causing DNA damage and persistent cellular proliferation [27]. In addition, RONS accumulation may result in proto-oncogene activation, chromosomal aberrations, and DNA mutations [28,29]. There is considerable evidence that H. pylori itself induces genomic instability and epigenetic alteration in the host genome. However, there is little experimental evidence to provide mechanistic insight into how oxidative DNA damage leads to DSBs and how oxidative-damaged DNA processed via BER (Figure 1), which is thought to be the primary repair pathway against oxidative DNA damage [30]. The mechanism of H. pylori-induced host genomic instability remains poorly understood.
BER is crucial for maintaining genomic stability to prevent carcinogenesis [31,32,33,34]. BER is a major DNA repair pathway that removes the majority of oxidative and alkylating DNA damage without affecting the double helix DNA structure [30,35,36]. BER is the primary repair pathway of RONS-induced DNA damage during inflammation that occurs during H. pylori infection [37] (Table 1). Tight coordination of the different steps in BER is necessary to avoid genomic instability [38]. BER is initiated by the recognition and excision of the damaged base by specific DNA glycosylases. For example, the best characterized 8oxoG DNA lesions paired with cytosine are recognized and excised by bifunctional OGG1 glycosylase [39,40,41,42]. Subsequently, OGG1 remains bound to its abasic site (AP) and its turnover is stimulated by apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease1 (APE1) [43,44]. After AP site processing and end-remodeling, the single-nucleotide gap is filled by Pol β, and the nick is sealed by DNA ligase I to complete repair [45,46]. H. pylori can alter DNA repair gene expression and/or interfere with DNA repair activity [26,47,48]. Ding et al. reported live H. pylori upregulated APE1 expression in cultured gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines (AGS) and gastric epithelial cells that were isolated from uninfected human subjects [49]. Overexpressed APE1 likely interacts with other redox proteins to suppress ROS production [50]. In addition, Taller et al. show that coculture of H. pylori with gastric cancer cell lines induces DSBs in a contact-dependent manner [12]. DSBs in those cell lines lead to the activation of the ATM-dependent DNA damage response. H. pylori-induced DSBs likely cause chromosomal aberrations, such as deletions, insertions, and translocations, which are a major cause of the loss of heterozygosity.
Repair of oxidative DNA damage is critical for suppression of inflammation-associated carcinogenesis. However, host BER insufficiency caused by genetic polymorphism or loss of repair capacity likely exacerbates RONS-mediated DNA damage and cancer development [51,52,53] (Table 1). In addition, altered function of BER proteins causes aberrant function, including the processing of H. pylori-induced oxidative DNA damage that leads to SSBs [54] and mutation [47,48]. In vivo studies have shown that H. pylori infection in an OGG1 knockout mouse model enhances accumulation of 8oxoG DNA lesions and promotes resistance to inflammation [55,56,57]. In addition, loss of DNA glycosylase, such as MYH and alkyladenine DNA glycosylase (AAG), causes the accumulation of oxidative DNA damage lesions and promotes inflammation-associated tumor development [37,58,59]. H. pylori infection activates other BER proteins, such as PARP1 and enhances the inflammatory response, suggesting that the bacterium modulates the host PARP1 status to drive inflammation-associated gastric cancer [60]. However, cell culture experiments have shown that OGG1 downregulation in gastric epithelial cells decreases the formation of AP sites and suppress DSBs formation [26]. However, silencing of APE1 as part of the BER machinery failed to cause a significant level of H. pylori-induced DSBs [11].
DSBs are the principle cytotoxic lesions generated by H. pylori infection. DSBs can be caused by the accumulation of unrepaired BER intermediates in DNA replication independently and/or arise when DNA replication forks encounter BER intermediates including DNA SSBs [70,71]. Few studies have shown that accumulation of AP sites in H. pylori-infected human gastric epithelial cells leads to DSBs [26]. Toller et al. [12] reported that a direct bacterium-host interaction is a prerequisite to DSBs, rather than the release of DNA-damaging components. Overall, these results suggest that DSB formation is mediated by BER intermediates that are generated from a direct response of the host-bacterium interaction (Figure 1).

4. NF-κB-iNOS Axis-Dependent DSB Formation

H. pylori infection induces DNA damage in gastric epithelial cells [24]. Contact-dependent interactions between H. pylori bacteria and gastric epithelial cells activate intracellular signaling events that have further downstream effects via activation of the transcription factor NF-κB [72]. NF-κB activation is effected through a series of phosphorylation and transactivation events, triggering a downstream signaling pathway that contributes to gastric inflammation in H. pylori-infected individuals [73,74]. H. pylori-mediated NF-κB activation leads to the upregulated expression of a variety of inflammatory mediators, including IL-8 [75], and regulates genes that govern the innate and adaptive immune response [76,77]. However, aberrant NF-κB activation has been reported to function as a tumor promoter in inflammation-associated cancer [78,79].
Moreover, the host response to H. pylori infection enhances NF-κB activation in immune and epithelial cells, resulting in inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) [80,81,82,83,84]. iNOS is an inflammatory mediator that causes the production of nitric oxide (NO) by immune cells, such as macrophages, linking chronic inflammation and tumorigenesis [85,86,87]. iNOS is expressed in response to bacterial endotoxins and cytokines and leads to NO production that enhances carcinogenesis [88]. iNOS-mediated NO induces oxidized DNA and leads to mutations associated with the infection [89,90] and DSBs [91]. Furthermore, NO has a biphasic effect on NF-κB to exert both pro- and anti-inflammatory actions. Although the ability of NO to directly damage DNA has been studied to a limited degree [92], its role in promoting potentially mutagenic changes in DNA has received far less attention. NO prevents NF-κB transactivation via the stabilization of IκBα [93] and nitrosate, a specific cysteine residue on the p50 subunit of NF-κB that reduces its DNA-binding capacity [94,95]. Few studies have shown that NF-κB plays a significant role in inhibition of pathogen-induced apoptosis in immune cells [96], suggesting that NF-κB may play a pro-inflammatory role to induce persistent macrophage activation. Other studies have shown that DNA repair proteins that are involved in BER and SSBs (PARP1) interact with NF-κB to facilitate the interactions with DNA to promote the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and enhance the activity of iNOS [97,98,99].
iNOS-mediated NO enhances inactivation of DNA repair enzymes that eventually contribute to genomic instability, leading to cancer development [86]. NO can nitrosylate thiol and tyrosine residues of the DNA repair proteins, causing loss of their function [100,101]. Thus, determining the effect of iNOS-generated NO on DNA repair proteins is scientifically important to uncover the impact of H. pylori-triggered iNOS-mediated DNA repair defects (Figure 1). Few studies have shown that DNA repair proteins are vulnerable to oxidative damage from NO because of their active sites, such as sulphydryl, tyrosine, and phenol side chains [102]. DNA repair enzymes, such as MGMT, FpyG, and PARP may be inactivated by NO-mediated nitrosylation of the cysteine-rich residues of the active site [103,104]. The integrity of the genome may be challenged during exposure to high concentrations of NO by direct oxidative damage to DNA and by inhibiting the DNA repair capacity of the enzyme (Table 1).

5. NF-κB-Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) Axis-Dependent DSB Formation

H. pylori infection increases NF-κB activation to promote the inflammatory immune response [105]. NF-κB modulates many DNA repair genes to facilitate repair and generate DNA DSBs [106,107]. Endonucleases XPF and XPG are critical components of NER that are responsible for excising the damaged DNA strand to remove the DNA lesion. The endonuclease XPG cuts the DNA strand approximately 5–6 nucleotides downstream of 3′ of the DNA damage site. In addition, the ERCC1-XPF protein complex performs an incision of the DNA strand 20–22 nucleotides upstream of the 5′ end of the DNA [108,109]. Although these two endonucleases are recruited and form complexes with NF-κB to make preincision complexes, proper assembly of all the factors seems to be required for dual incision at the promoter region of a given gene. XPF/XPG-mediated DSBs amplify NF-κB target inflammatory gene expression and promote host cell survival [11]. The NF-κB complex in XPG and XPF in the formation of the active DSBs at the chromatin region of the genome likely promotes a hub that controls gene expression (Figure 1). Furthermore, the expression level of XPG is significantly associated with an H. pylori-positive sample [110] (Table 1). However, silencing XPG strongly reduced the DSBs upon H. pylori infection, suggesting that NER-dependent DSBs contribute to genomic instability during infection. H. pylori infection modulates NER and enhances the interaction with NF-κB, likely providing a molecular basis for insights into how H. pylori infection induces transcription-associated DSBs (Figure 1).

6. H. pylori Impairs DSBs Repair

DSBs can be repaired via two major repair pathways [111,112]. Homologous recombination (HR) requires sequence homology of extensive DNA regions from an undamaged sister chromatid or homologous chromosomes. In contrast, nonhomologous DNA end-joining (NHEJ) occurs throughout the cell cycles and is processed without any sequence homology or few end homology sequences. H. pylori-induced DSBs are likely recognized by the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex [113,114], which is recognized and processed the DNA ends, resulting in the activation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase (ATM) [115,116]. ATM is a major DNA damage response sensor of DSBs. It directly binds to the damaged DNA and phosphorylates target proteins, including H2AX protein at serine 139 of the histone (γH2AX) to mark DSBs sites [116,117,118,119]. Alternatively, ATM is involved in mediating the NF-κB response to DSBs [120].
In the NHEJ pathway, DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) and Ku proteins play key roles in mediation of incompatible DNA ends. DNA-PK may function as a DNA damage sensor or scaffolding to assemble repair proteins including Ku proteins to bind the two ends of the break together. Then, ligase IV/XRCC4/XLF carries out the ligation reaction [121] to complete NHEJ repair. However, H. pylori causes an increase in Ku70/80, which may indicate that NHEJ-mediated repair contributes to genomic instability [69]. Recent evidence has shown that altered DNA-PK and Ku70/80 are associated with pathological processes in different types of cancer [122]. Moreover, Ku70 and DNA-PK are expressed in H. pylori-associated gastritis, intestinal metaplasia and gastric adenoma tissues [68]. Furthermore, Lim et al. [123] showed that activated NF-κB-Cox2 axis plays a significant role in enhancing the expression of KU70/80. In contrast, the loss of Ku proteins leads to an accumulation of DNA damage that eventually causes cell death in gastric epithelial cells [124].
Our previous study shows that DSBs significantly increase in the G1 stage of the cell cycle after H. pylori infection [26], suggesting that NHEJ repair might be involved in promotion of error-prone repair. When DSBs are generated during the S phase at DNA replication forks or after replication in the G2 phase of the cell cycle, HR may contribute to genome integrity (Figure 1). Few studies have shown that NF-κB interacts with HR proteins (e.g., CtIP-BRCA1 complexes) to stabilize BRCA1 and stimulate HR-mediated repair [125] Activation of multiple molecular targets by NF-κB enhances rapid activation of HR and may permit the accelerated proliferation of cells. However, H. pylori infection-mediated activation of the NF-κB/NER axis causes defects in HR that reduce the ability of DSB repair [11]. H. pylori infection modulates DSB repair efficiency to exacerbate genomic instability and facilitate gastric carcinogenesis.

7. Summary

H. pylori infection is a contributing factor for gastric cancer. This review highlights how H. pylori-associated DNA base damage in infected host cells is likely processed via BER to generate DSBs. In addition, this review provides a comprehensive overview of how H. pylori-associated DSBs are induced via the NF-κB/NER axis and NF-κB/iNOS axis, influencing DNA repair gene expression and enhancing genomic instability and carcinogenesis (Figure 1). Several studies have shown that H. pylori induces DSB and promotes gastric carcinogenesis. Host BER, NER, and NHEJ genetic variants could modify the process of carcinogenesis in H. pylori infected hosts. Alteration of the activity of enzymes that function in DNA repair as a result of genetic mutation could significantly impact gastric cancer risk. Other studies are needed to uncover the associations of the BER, NER and NHEJ genetic variants with increased susceptibility to gastric cancer in H. pylori-infected hosts. In addition, many questions remain regarding the mechanism of DSB formation and how breaks are processed via the NHEJ or HR pathways. Does H. pylori infection decrease tumor latency for carriers of BER variant genotypes? Future studies will likely explore how H. pylori manipulates host DNA repair genetics and how NHEJ processes DSBs. Therefore, the relevant DNA repair of the host genetics and H. pylori infection status of the host should be considered in studies of gastric cancer susceptibility in the future.

Funding

D.K. was supported by the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH/National Cancer Institute (NCI)) K01 CA154854 and start-up funds from The University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Stephanie D. Scott for editing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kuper, H.; Adami, H.O.; Trichopoulos, D. Infections as a major preventable cause of human cancer. J. Int. Med. 2000, 248, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. De Martel, C.; Forman, D.; Plummer, M. Gastric cancer: Epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterol. Clin. 2013, 42, 219–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Peek, R.M., Jr.; Blaser, M.J. Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinomas. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Covacci, A.; Telford, J.L.; Del Giudice, G.; Parsonnet, J.; Rappuoli, R. Helicobacter pylori virulence and genetic geography. Science 1999, 284, 1328–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Montecucco, C.; Rappuoli, R. Living dangerously: How Helicobacter pylori survives in the human stomach. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Monack, D.M.; Mueller, A.; Falkow, S. Persistent bacterial infections: The interface of the pathogen and the host immune system. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 747–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Correa, P. Human gastric carcinogenesis: A multistep and multifactorial process—First american cancer society award lecture on cancer epidemiology and prevention. Cancer Res. 1992, 52, 6735–6740. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Ohnishi, N.; Yuasa, H.; Tanaka, S.; Sawa, H.; Miura, M.; Matsui, A.; Higashi, H.; Musashi, M.; Iwabuchi, K.; Suzuki, M.; et al. Transgenic expression of Helicobacter pylori CagA induces gastrointestinal and hematopoietic neoplasms in mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 1003–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Smoot, D.T.; Wynn, Z.; Elliott, T.B.; Allen, C.R.; Mekasha, G.; Naab, T.; Ashktorab, H. Effects of Helicobacter pylori on proliferation of gastric epithelial cells in vitro. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1999, 94, 1508–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dubreuil, J.D.; Giudice, G.D.; Rappuoli, R. Helicobacter pylori interactions with host serum and extracellular matrix proteins: Potential role in the infectious process. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hartung, M.L.; Gruber, D.C.; Koch, K.N.; Gruter, L.; Rehrauer, H.; Tegtmeyer, N.; Backert, S.; Muller, A. H. Pylori-induced DNA strand breaks are introduced by nucleotide excision repair endonucleases and promote NF-κB target gene expression. Cell Rep. 2015, 13, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Toller, I.M.; Neelsen, K.J.; Steger, M.; Hartung, M.L.; Hottiger, M.O.; Stucki, M.; Kalali, B.; Gerhard, M.; Sartori, A.A.; Lopes, M.; et al. Carcinogenic bacterial pathogen Helicobacter pylori triggers DNA double-strand breaks and a DNA damage response in its host cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 14944–14949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Suzuki, M.; Miura, S.; Mori, M.; Kai, A.; Suzuki, H.; Fukumura, D.; Suematsu, M.; Tsuchiya, M. Rebamipide, a novel antiulcer agent, attenuates Helicobacter pylori induced gastric mucosal cell injury associated with neutrophil derived oxidants. Gut 1994, 35, 1375–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cerutti, P.A. Oxy-radicals and cancer. Lancet 1994, 344, 862–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Feig, D.I.; Reid, T.M.; Loeb, L.A. Reactive oxygen species in tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 1994, 54, 1890s–1894s. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Schreck, R.R. Tumor suppressor gene (Rb and p53) mutations in osteosarcoma. Ped. Hematol. Oncol. 1992, 9, ix–x. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. D’Angio, C.T.; Finkelstein, J.N. Oxygen regulation of gene expression: A study in opposites. Mol. Genet. MeTable 2000, 71, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Adler, V.; Yin, Z.; Tew, K.D.; Ronai, Z. Role of redox potential and reactive oxygen species in stress signaling. Oncogene 1999, 18, 6104–6111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Kawanishi, S.; Ohnishi, S.; Ma, N.; Hiraku, Y.; Murata, M. Crosstalk between DNA damage and inflammation in the multiple steps of carcinogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Eck, M.; Schmausser, B.; Scheller, K.; Toksoy, A.; Kraus, M.; Menzel, T.; Muller-Hermelink, H.K.; Gillitzer, R. CXC chemokines Groα/IL-8 and IP-10/MIG in Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2000, 122, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Watanabe, N.; Shimada, T.; Ohtsuka, Y.; Hiraishi, H.; Terano, A. Proinflammatory cytokines and Helicobacter pylori stimulate CC-chemokine expression in gastric epithelial cells. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1997, 48, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Nozawa, Y.; Nishihara, K.; Peek, R.M.; Nakano, M.; Uji, T.; Ajioka, H.; Matsuura, N.; Miyake, H. Identification of a signaling cascade for interleukin-8 production by Helicobacter pylori in human gastric epithelial cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2002, 64, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Naito, Y.; Yoshikawa, T. Molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in Helicobacter pylori-induced inflammation and oxidative stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2002, 33, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Obst, B.; Wagner, S.; Sewing, K.F.; Beil, W. Helicobacter pylori causes DNA damage in gastric epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis 2000, 21, 1111–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hanada, K.; Uchida, T.; Tsukamoto, Y.; Watada, M.; Yamaguchi, N.; Yamamoto, K.; Shiota, S.; Moriyama, M.; Graham, D.Y.; Yamaoka, Y. Helicobacter pylori infection introduces DNA double-strand breaks in host cells. Infect. Immun. 2014, 82, 4182–4189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kidane, D.; Murphy, D.L.; Sweasy, J.B. Accumulation of abasic sites induces genomic instability in normal human gastric epithelial cells during Helicobacter pylori infection. Oncogenesis 2014, 3, e128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Perryman, S.V.; Sylvester, K.G. Repair and regeneration: Opportunities for carcinogenesis from tissue stem cells. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2006, 10, 292–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Floyd, R.A. Role of oxygen free radicals in carcinogenesis and brain ischemia. FASEB J. 1990, 4, 2587–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Du, M.Q.; Carmichael, P.L.; Phillips, D.H. Induction of activating mutations in the human c-Ha-ras-1 proto-oncogene by oxygen free radicals. Mol Carcinog 1994, 11, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dianov, G.L.; Hubscher, U. Mammalian base excision repair: The forgotten archangel. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 3483–3490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Al-Tassan, N.; Chmiel, N.H.; Maynard, J.; Fleming, N.; Livingston, A.L.; Williams, G.T.; Hodges, A.K.; Davies, D.R.; David, S.S.; Sampson, J.R.; et al. Inherited variants of MYH associated with somatic g:C → t:A mutations in colorectal tumors. Nat. Genet. 2002, 30, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Farrington, S.M.; Tenesa, A.; Barnetson, R.; Wiltshire, A.; Prendergast, J.; Porteous, M.; Campbell, H.; Dunlop, M.G. Germline susceptibility to colorectal cancer due to base-excision repair gene defects. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005, 77, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Mahjabeen, I.; Masood, N.; Baig, R.M.; Sabir, M.; Inayat, U.; Malik, F.A.; Kayani, M.A. Novel mutations of OGG1 base excision repair pathway gene in laryngeal cancer patients. Fam. Cancer 2012, 11, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shinmura, K.; Tao, H.; Goto, M.; Igarashi, H.; Taniguchi, T.; Maekawa, M.; Takezaki, T.; Sugimura, H. Inactivating mutations of the human base excision repair gene NEIL1 in gastric cancer. Carcinogenesis 2004, 25, 2311–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kim, Y.J.; Wilson, D.M., 3rd. Overview of base excision repair biochemistry. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2012, 5, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wallace, S.S.; Murphy, D.L.; Sweasy, J.B. Base excision repair and cancer. Cancer Lett. 2012, 327, 73–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Meira, L.B.; Bugni, J.M.; Green, S.L.; Lee, C.W.; Pang, B.; Borenshtein, D.; Rickman, B.H.; Rogers, A.B.; Moroski-Erkul, C.A.; McFaline, J.L.; et al. DNA damage induced by chronic inflammation contributes to colon carcinogenesis in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 118, 2516–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Allinson, S.L.; Sleeth, K.M.; Matthewman, G.E.; Dianov, G.L. Orchestration of base excision repair by controlling the rates of enzymatic activities. DNA Repair 2004, 3, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Radicella, J.P.; Dherin, C.; Desmaze, C.; Fox, M.S.; Boiteux, S. Cloning and characterization of hOGG1, a human homolog of the OGG1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 8010–8015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Aburatani, H.; Hippo, Y.; Ishida, T.; Takashima, R.; Matsuba, C.; Kodama, T.; Takao, M.; Yasui, A.; Yamamoto, K.; Asano, M. Cloning and characterization of mammalian 8-hydroxyguanine-specific DNA glycosylase/apurinic, apyrimidinic lyase, a functional mutm homologue. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 2151–2156. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Fortini, P.; Parlanti, E.; Sidorkina, O.M.; Laval, J.; Dogliotti, E. The type of DNA glycosylase determines the base excision repair pathway in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 15230–15236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nishimura, S. Involvement of mammalian OGG1 (MMH) in excision of the 8-hydroxyguanine residue in DNA. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2002, 32, 813–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mokkapati, S.K.; Wiederhold, L.; Hazra, T.K.; Mitra, S. Stimulation of DNA glycosylase activity of OGG1 by NEIL1: Functional collaboration between two human DNA glycosylases. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 11596–11604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sidorenko, V.S.; Nevinsky, G.A.; Zharkov, D.O. Mechanism of interaction between human 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase and ap endonuclease. DNA Repair 2007, 6, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fortini, P.; Pascucci, B.; Parlanti, E.; D’Errico, M.; Simonelli, V.; Dogliotti, E. The base excision repair: Mechanisms and its relevance for cancer susceptibility. Biochimie 2003, 85, 1053–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Robertson, A.B.; Klungland, A.; Rognes, T.; Leiros, I. DNA repair in mammalian cells: Base excision repair: The long and short of it. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66, 981–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Park, D.I.; Park, S.H.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, J.W.; Cho, Y.K.; Kim, H.J.; Sohn, C.I.; Jeon, W.K.; Kim, B.I.; Cho, E.Y.; et al. Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on the expression of DNA mismatch repair protein. Helicobacter 2005, 10, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kim, J.J.; Tao, H.; Carloni, E.; Leung, W.K.; Graham, D.Y.; Sepulveda, A.R. Helicobacter pylori impairs DNA mismatch repair in gastric epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 2002, 123, 542–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ding, S.Z.; O’Hara, A.M.; Denning, T.L.; Dirden-Kramer, B.; Mifflin, R.C.; Reyes, V.E.; Ryan, K.A.; Elliott, S.N.; Izumi, T.; Boldogh, I.; et al. Helicobacter pylori and h2o2 increase ap endonuclease-1/redox factor-1 expression in human gastric epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 2004, 127, 845–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Den Hartog, G.; Chattopadhyay, R.; Ablack, A.; Hall, E.H.; Butcher, L.D.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Eckmann, L.; Harris, P.R.; Das, S.; Ernst, P.B.; et al. Regulation of Rac1 and reactive oxygen species production in response to infection of gastrointestinal epithelia. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Teoule, R.; Bert, C.; Bonicel, A. Thymine fragment damage retained in the DNA polynucleotide chain after gamma irradiation in aerated solutions. II. Radiat. Res. 1977, 72, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Altieri, F.; Grillo, C.; Maceroni, M.; Chichiarelli, S. DNA damage and repair: From molecular mechanisms to health implications. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2008, 10, 891–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Grollman, A.P.; Moriya, M. Mutagenesis by 8-oxoguanine: An enemy within. Trends Genet. 1993, 9, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cooke, M.S.; Evans, M.D.; Dizdaroglu, M.; Lunec, J. Oxidative DNA damage: Mechanisms, mutation, and disease. FASEB J. 2003, 17, 1195–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Klungland, A.; Rosewell, I.; Hollenbach, S.; Larsen, E.; Daly, G.; Epe, B.; Seeberg, E.; Lindahl, T.; Barnes, D.E. Accumulation of premutagenic DNA lesions in mice defective in removal of oxidative base damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 13300–13305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Minowa, O.; Arai, T.; Hirano, M.; Monden, Y.; Nakai, S.; Fukuda, M.; Itoh, M.; Takano, H.; Hippou, Y.; Aburatani, H.; et al. Mmh/Ogg1 gene inactivation results in accumulation of 8-hydroxyguanine in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 4156–4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Touati, E.; Michel, V.; Thiberge, J.M.; Ave, P.; Huerre, M.; Bourgade, F.; Klungland, A.; Labigne, A. Deficiency in OGG1 protects against inflammation and mutagenic effects associated with H. pylori infection in mouse. Helicobacter 2006, 11, 494–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Cheadle, J.P.; Dolwani, S.; Sampson, J.R. Inherited defects in the DNA glycosylase MYH cause multiple colorectal adenoma and carcinoma. Carcinogenesis 2003, 24, 1281–1282; author reply 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sakamoto, K.; Tominaga, Y.; Yamauchi, K.; Nakatsu, Y.; Sakumi, K.; Yoshiyama, K.; Egashira, A.; Kura, S.; Yao, T.; Tsuneyoshi, M.; et al. Mutyh-null mice are susceptible to spontaneous and oxidative stress induced intestinal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 6599–6604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Nossa, C.W.; Blanke, S.R. Helicobacter pylori activation of PARP-1: Usurping a versatile regulator of host cellular health. Gut Microbes 2010, 1, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Mabley, J.G.; Pacher, P.; Deb, A.; Wallace, R.; Elder, R.H.; Szabo, C. Potential role for 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase in regulating inflammation. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 290–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bhattacharyya, A.; Chattopadhyay, R.; Burnette, B.R.; Cross, J.V.; Mitra, S.; Ernst, P.B.; Bhakat, K.K.; Crowe, S.E. Acetylation of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease-1 regulates Helicobacter pylori-mediated gastric epithelial cell apoptosis. Gastroenterology 2009, 136, 2258–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. O’Hara, A.M.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Mifflin, R.C.; Smith, M.F.; Ryan, K.A.; Scott, K.G.; Naganuma, M.; Casola, A.; Izumi, T.; Mitra, S.; et al. Interleukin-8 induction by helicobacter pylori in gastric epithelial cells is dependent on apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease-1/redox factor-1. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 7990–7999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, P.; Tang, J.T.; Peng, Y.S.; Chen, X.Y.; Zhang, Y.J.; Fang, J.Y. Xrcc1 downregulated through promoter hypermethylation is involved in human gastric carcinogenesis. J. Dig. Dis. 2010, 11, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cannan, W.J.; Rashid, I.; Tomkinson, A.E.; Wallace, S.S.; Pederson, D.S. The human ligase iiialpha-xrcc1 protein complex performs DNA nick repair after transient unwrapping of nucleosomal DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 5227–5238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Koeppel, M.; Garcia-Alcalde, F.; Glowinski, F.; Schlaermann, P.; Meyer, T.F. Helicobacter pylori infection causes characteristic DNA damage patterns in human cells. Cell Rep. 2015, 11, 1703–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Klungland, A.; Hoss, M.; Gunz, D.; Constantinou, A.; Clarkson, S.G.; Doetsch, P.W.; Bolton, P.H.; Wood, R.D.; Lindahl, T. Base excision repair of oxidative DNA damage activated by XPG protein. Mol. Cell 1999, 3, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lee, H.S.; Choe, G.; Park, K.U.; Park, D.J.; Yang, H.K.; Lee, B.L.; Kim, W.H. Altered expression of DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) during gastric carcinogenesis and its clinical implications on gastric cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2007, 31, 859–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Bae, M.; Lim, J.W.; Kim, H. Oxidative DNA damage response in Helicobacter pylori-infected mongolian gerbils. J. Cancer Prev. 2013, 18, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Khanna, K.K.; Jackson, S.P. DNA double-strand breaks: Signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat. Genet. 2001, 27, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Mills, K.D.; Ferguson, D.O.; Alt, F.W. The role of DNA breaks in genomic instability and tumorigenesis. Immunol. Rev. 2003, 194, 77–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Maeda, S.; Yoshida, H.; Ogura, K.; Mitsuno, Y.; Hirata, Y.; Yamaji, Y.; Akanuma, M.; Shiratori, Y.; Omata, M. H. Pylori activates NF-κB through a signaling pathway involving IκB kinases, NF-κB -inducing kinase, TRAF2, and TRAF6 in gastric cancer cells. Gastroenterology 2000, 119, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bhattacharyya, A.; Pathak, S.; Kundu, M.; Basu, J. Mitogen-activated protein kinases regulate mycobacterium avium-induced tumor necrosis factor-α release from macrophages. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2002, 34, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hayden, M.S.; Ghosh, S. Shared principles in NF-κB signaling. Cell 2008, 132, 344–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. De Luca, A.; Iaquinto, G. Helicobacter pylori and gastric diseases: A dangerous association. Cancer Lett. 2004, 213, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Lamb, A.; Chen, L.F. The many roads traveled by Helicobacter pylori to NF-κB activation. Gut Microbes 2010, 1, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Orlowski, R.Z.; Baldwin, A.S., Jr. NF-κB as a therapeutic target in cancer. Trends Mol. Med. 2002, 8, 385–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pikarsky, E.; Porat, R.M.; Stein, I.; Abramovitch, R.; Amit, S.; Kasem, S.; Gutkovich-Pyest, E.; Urieli-Shoval, S.; Galun, E.; Ben-Neriah, Y. NF-κB functions as a tumour promoter in inflammation-associated cancer. Nature 2004, 431, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Oussaief, L.; Ramirez, V.; Hippocrate, A.; Arbach, H.; Cochet, C.; Proust, A.; Raphael, M.; Khelifa, R.; Joab, I. NF-κB-mediated modulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase activity controls induction of the epstein-barr virus productive cycle by transforming growth factor β1. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 6502–6512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Viala, J.; Chaput, C.; Boneca, I.G.; Cardona, A.; Girardin, S.E.; Moran, A.P.; Athman, R.; Memet, S.; Huerre, M.R.; Coyle, A.J.; et al. Nod1 responds to peptidoglycan delivered by the Helicobacter pylori cag pathogenicity island. Nat. Immunol. 2004, 5, 1166–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Brandt, S.; Kwok, T.; Hartig, R.; Konig, W.; Backert, S. NF-κB activation and potentiation of proinflammatory responses by the Helicobacter pylori caga protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 9300–9305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Geem, D.; Medina-Contreras, O.; Kim, W.; Huang, C.S.; Denning, T.L. Isolation and characterization of dendritic cells and macrophages from the mouse intestine. J. Vis. Exp. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Geller, D.A.; Di Silvio, M.; Nussler, A.K.; Wang, S.C.; Shapiro, R.A.; Simmons, R.L.; Billiar, T.R. Nitric oxide synthase expression is induced in hepatocytes in vivo during hepatic inflammation. J. Surg. Res. 1993, 55, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Nussler, A.K.; Geller, D.A.; Sweetland, M.A.; Di Silvio, M.; Billiar, T.R.; Madariaga, J.B.; Simmons, R.L.; Lancaster, J.R., Jr. Induction of nitric oxide synthesis and its reactions in cultured human and rat hepatocytes stimulated with cytokines plus LPS. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993, 194, 826–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Lowenstein, C.J.; Padalko, E. iNOS (NOS2) at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 2865–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Choudhari, S.K.; Chaudhary, M.; Bagde, S.; Gadbail, A.R.; Joshi, V. Nitric oxide and cancer: A review. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2013, 11, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Thomsen, L.L.; Lawton, F.G.; Knowles, R.G.; Beesley, J.E.; Riveros-Moreno, V.; Moncada, S. Nitric oxide synthase activity in human gynecological cancer. Cancer Res. 1994, 54, 1352–1354. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Rieder, G.; Hofmann, J.A.; Hatz, R.A.; Stolte, M.; Enders, G.A. Up-regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase in Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis may represent an increased risk factor to develop gastric carcinoma of the intestinal type. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2003, 293, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Touati, E.; Michel, V.; Thiberge, J.M.; Wuscher, N.; Huerre, M.; Labigne, A. Chronic Helicobacter pylori infections induce gastric mutations in mice. Gastroenterology 2003, 124, 1408–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wink, D.A.; Kasprzak, K.S.; Maragos, C.M.; Elespuru, R.K.; Misra, M.; Dunams, T.M.; Cebula, T.A.; Koch, W.H.; Andrews, A.W.; Allen, J.S.; et al. DNA deaminating ability and genotoxicity of nitric oxide and its progenitors. Science 1991, 254, 1001–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Baydoun, H.H.; Cherian, M.A.; Green, P.; Ratner, L. Inducible nitric oxide synthase mediates DNA double strand breaks in human T-cell leukemia virus type 1-induced leukemia/lymphoma. Retrovirology 2015, 12, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Nguyen, T.; Brunson, D.; Crespi, C.L.; Penman, B.W.; Wishnok, J.S.; Tannenbaum, S.R. DNA damage and mutation in human cells exposed to nitric oxide in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 3030–3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Peng, H.B.; Libby, P.; Liao, J.K. Induction and stabilization of IκBα by nitric oxide mediates inhibition of NF-κB. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 14214–14219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Matthews, J.R.; Botting, C.H.; Panico, M.; Morris, H.R.; Hay, R.T. Inhibition of NF-κB DNA binding by nitric oxide. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996, 24, 2236–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Schroeder, R.A.; Punzalan, C.; Kuo, P.C. Endotoxin-mediated S-nitrosylation of p50 alters NF-κB -dependent gene transcription in ANA-1 murine macrophages. J. Immunol. 1999, 162, 4101–4108. [Google Scholar]
  96. Park, J.M.; Greten, F.R.; Wong, A.; Westrick, R.J.; Arthur, J.S.; Otsu, K.; Hoffmann, A.; Montminy, M.; Karin, M. Signaling pathways and genes that inhibit pathogen-induced macrophage apoptosis—CREB and NF-κB as key regulators. Immunity 2005, 23, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Hassa, P.O.; Covic, M.; Hasan, S.; Imhof, R.; Hottiger, M.O. The enzymatic and DNA binding activity of PARP-1 are not required for NF-κB coactivator function. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 45588–45597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Ullrich, O.; Diestel, A.; Eyupoglu, I.Y.; Nitsch, R. Regulation of microglial expression of integrins by poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Wang, J.; Hao, L.; Wang, Y.; Qin, W.; Wang, X.; Zhao, T.; Liu, Y.; Sheng, L.; Du, Y.; Zhang, M.; et al. Inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase and inducible nitric oxide synthase protects against ischemic myocardial damage by reduction of apoptosis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 11, 1768–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Ischiropoulos, H.; Zhu, L.; Beckman, J.S. Peroxynitrite formation from macrophage-derived nitric oxide. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1992, 298, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kong, S.K.; Yim, M.B.; Stadtman, E.R.; Chock, P.B. Peroxynitrite disables the tyrosine phosphorylation regulatory mechanism: Lymphocyte-specific tyrosine kinase fails to phosphorylate nitrated cdc2(6-20)NH2 peptide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 3377–3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Starke, D.W.; Chen, Y.; Bapna, C.P.; Lesnefsky, E.J.; Mieyal, J.J. Sensitivity of protein sulfhydryl repair enzymes to oxidative stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1997, 23, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wink, D.A.; Laval, J. The Fpg protein, a DNA repair enzyme, is inhibited by the biomediator nitric oxide in vitro and in vivo. Carcinogenesis 1994, 15, 2125–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. O’Connor, T.R.; Graves, R.J.; de Murcia, G.; Castaing, B.; Laval, J. Fpg protein of escherichia coli is a zinc finger protein whose cysteine residues have a structural and/or functional role. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 9063–9070. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Telford, J.L.; Covacci, A.; Rappuoli, R.; Chiara, P. Immunobiology of helicobacter pylori infection. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 1997, 9, 498–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Le May, N.; Fradin, D.; Iltis, I.; Bougneres, P.; Egly, J.M. XPG and XPF endonucleases trigger chromatin looping and DNA demethylation for accurate expression of activated genes. Mol. Cell 2012, 47, 622–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Le May, N.; Mota-Fernandes, D.; Velez-Cruz, R.; Iltis, I.; Biard, D.; Egly, J.M. NER factors are recruited to active promoters and facilitate chromatin modification for transcription in the absence of exogenous genotoxic attack. Mol. Cell 2010, 38, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Leibeling, D.; Laspe, P.; Emmert, S. Nucleotide excision repair and cancer. J. Mol. Histol. 2006, 37, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Friedberg, E.C. How nucleotide excision repair protects against cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2001, 1, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Deng, N.; Liu, J.W.; Sun, L.P.; Xu, Q.; Duan, Z.P.; Dong, N.N.; Yuan, Y. Expression of XPG protein in the development, progression and prognosis of gastric cancer. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Ivanov, E.L.; Haber, J.E. DNA repair: Rad alert. Curr. Biol. 1997, 7, R492–R495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kanaar, R.; Hoeijmakers, J.H. Recombination and joining: Different means to the same ends. Genes Funct. 1997, 1, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Matsuura, S.; Tauchi, H.; Nakamura, A.; Kondo, N.; Sakamoto, S.; Endo, S.; Smeets, D.; Solder, B.; Belohradsky, B.H.; Der Kaloustian, V.M.; et al. Positional cloning of the gene for Nijmegen breakage syndrome. Nat. Genet. 1998, 19, 179–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Carney, J.P.; Maser, R.S.; Olivares, H.; Davis, E.M.; Le Beau, M.; Yates, J.R., 3rd; Hays, L.; Morgan, W.F.; Petrini, J.H. The hmre11/hrad50 protein complex and nijmegen breakage syndrome: Linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Cell 1998, 93, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Stracker, T.H.; Petrini, J.H. The mre11 complex: Starting from the ends. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Shiloh, Y.; Lehmann, A.R. Maintaining integrity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 6, 923–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Bakkenist, C.J.; Kastan, M.B. Phosphatases join kinases in DNA-damage response pathways. Trends Cell Biol. 2004, 14, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Dupre, A.; Boyer-Chatenet, L.; Gautier, J. Two-step activation of ATM by DNA and the Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1 complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Burma, S.; Chen, B.P.; Murphy, M.; Kurimasa, A.; Chen, D.J. ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breaks. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 42462–42467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Li, N.; Banin, S.; Ouyang, H.; Li, G.C.; Courtois, G.; Shiloh, Y.; Karin, M.; Rotman, G. ATM is required for IκB kinase (IKKk) activation in response to DNA double strand breaks. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 8898–8903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Ahnesorg, P.; Smith, P.; Jackson, S.P. XLF interacts with the XRCC4-DNA ligase IV complex to promote DNA nonhomologous end-joining. Cell 2006, 124, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Abe, T.; Ishiai, M.; Hosono, Y.; Yoshimura, A.; Tada, S.; Adachi, N.; Koyama, H.; Takata, M.; Takeda, S.; Enomoto, T.; et al. Ku70/80, DNA-PKcs, and artemis are essential for the rapid induction of apoptosis after massive DSB formation. Cell. Signal. 2008, 20, 1978–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Lim, J.W.; Kim, H.; Kim, K.H. Expression of Ku70 and Ku80 mediated by NF-κB and cyclooxygenase-2 is related to proliferation of human gastric cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 46093–46100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Song, J.Y.; Lim, J.W.; Kim, H.; Morio, T.; Kim, K.H. Oxidative stress induces nuclear loss of DNA repair proteins Ku70 and Ku80 and apoptosis in pancreatic acinar AR42J cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 36676–36687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Volcic, M.; Karl, S.; Baumann, B.; Salles, D.; Daniel, P.; Fulda, S.; Wiesmuller, L. NF-κB regulates DNA double-strand break repair in conjunction with BRCA1–CtIP complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Molecular mechanisms of H. pylori-induced double strand breaks (DSBs). Schematic representation of how H. pylori induces DSBs. H. pylori infection causes DNA damage in gastric epithelial cells [24]. H. pylori-host cell interaction is a prerequisite for DSBs [25] (top panel). Persistence of the host-bacterium interaction leads to chronic inflammation and the release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, which contribute to oxidative DNA damage that is processed via base excision repair (BER) pathways (bottom panel). Processing oxidative DNA damage by DNA glycosylase (e.g., OGG1, NEIL1, etc.) contributes to accumulation of apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites that are eventually converted to DSBs [26]. In addition, some cytokines (e.g., TNF-α) inhibit BER proteins to exacerbate genomic instability. The second pathway associated with H. pylori-mediated NF-κB activation leads to formation of a protein complex with nucleotide excision repair proteins (XPF and XPG), cleaves the promoter regions, and alters gene expression [11] including HR DNA repair proteins (Rad51). Alternatively, NF-κB/iNOS-mediated NO production leads to DNA damage and/or inhibits DNA repair proteins (AAG) that likely impact BER and cause DSBs. Note that solid arrow and dot arrow shows activation and alternative avenue for the down stream events respectively; T bar shows inhibition or suppression of protein activity or gene expression.
Figure 1. Molecular mechanisms of H. pylori-induced double strand breaks (DSBs). Schematic representation of how H. pylori induces DSBs. H. pylori infection causes DNA damage in gastric epithelial cells [24]. H. pylori-host cell interaction is a prerequisite for DSBs [25] (top panel). Persistence of the host-bacterium interaction leads to chronic inflammation and the release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, which contribute to oxidative DNA damage that is processed via base excision repair (BER) pathways (bottom panel). Processing oxidative DNA damage by DNA glycosylase (e.g., OGG1, NEIL1, etc.) contributes to accumulation of apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites that are eventually converted to DSBs [26]. In addition, some cytokines (e.g., TNF-α) inhibit BER proteins to exacerbate genomic instability. The second pathway associated with H. pylori-mediated NF-κB activation leads to formation of a protein complex with nucleotide excision repair proteins (XPF and XPG), cleaves the promoter regions, and alters gene expression [11] including HR DNA repair proteins (Rad51). Alternatively, NF-κB/iNOS-mediated NO production leads to DNA damage and/or inhibits DNA repair proteins (AAG) that likely impact BER and cause DSBs. Note that solid arrow and dot arrow shows activation and alternative avenue for the down stream events respectively; T bar shows inhibition or suppression of protein activity or gene expression.
Ijms 19 02891 g001
Table 1. Interplay between H. pylori and relevant DNA repair gene products.
Table 1. Interplay between H. pylori and relevant DNA repair gene products.
GeneRole of Gene ProductsInterplay between H. pylori & GeneReferences
BER
OGG1removes 8oxoG and FapyG DNA lesionsabsence causes increased mutation frequency, fewer DSBs and decreased inflammation[26,55,61]
NEIL1removes 8oxoG and Tg lesionsdecreases mRNA in tumor; unknown role during infection[34]
APE1acts as a negative regulator of ROS and enhances chemokine releaseenhances the expression of mRNA and protein[49,62,63]
POLBremoves 5′-dRP group and adds a single nucleotide baseinfection does not affect gene expression and protein level[26]
XRCC1scaffold protein enhance ligationdownregulated via promoter hypermethylation[64,65]
NER
XPGcuts the 3′ of the DNA damage site; forms complex with NF-κB and promotes target gene expressionmoderates change in gene expression[11,66,67]
XPFforms complex with NF-κB & promotes targeted gene expressionmoderates change in gene expression[11,66]
XPArecognition bulk DNA adductincreases IL-8 cytokine expression[11,66]
NHEJ
DNA-PKincreases cellular proliferation & facilitates NHEJ (nonhomologous DNA end-joining) repairenhances activity and expression[68]
Ku70/80protects DNA DSB ends and prevents cell deathdecreases protein level[69]
DNA ligase IVcompletes NHEJ repair by sealing DNA DSB regionsknock-down enhances DSBs[11]
XRCC4scaffold to hold DNA DSBs ends to enhance ligationknock-down promotes DNA DSBs[11]
HR
NBS1DNA DSB end processing/DDRdecreases expression and may impair DNA end processing and DDR[66]
Rad51strand exchange and enhances DSB repairdecreases gene expression; however, infection does not increase DSBs[25]
RPA1ssDNA binding and DDRdownregulates mRNA[66]
Mre11DSB end processing and DDRdecreases expression and impairs end processing and DDR[66]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kidane, D. Molecular Mechanisms of H. pylori-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102891

AMA Style

Kidane D. Molecular Mechanisms of H. pylori-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(10):2891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102891

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kidane, Dawit. 2018. "Molecular Mechanisms of H. pylori-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 10: 2891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102891

APA Style

Kidane, D. (2018). Molecular Mechanisms of H. pylori-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(10), 2891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102891

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop