Next Article in Journal
Prostanoid EP2 Receptors Are Up-Regulated in Human Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Key Anti-Proliferative Target for Treprostinil in Smooth Muscle Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Emerging Role of Purine Metabolizing Enzymes in Brain Function and Tumors
Previous Article in Journal
The Efficacy of Amifostine against Multiple-Dose Doxorubicin-Induced Toxicity in Rats
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of UDP-Activated Purinergic Receptor P2Y6 Involved in Japanese Flounder Paralichthys olivaceus Innate Immunity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

ATP as a Pathophysiologic Mediator of Bacteria-Host Crosstalk in the Gastrointestinal Tract

by
Akie Inami
1,
Hiroshi Kiyono
1,2,3,4,5 and
Yosuke Kurashima
1,2,3,5,6,7,*
1
Department of Mucosal Immunology, IMSUT Distinguished Professor Unit, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
2
International Research and Development Center for Mucosal Vaccines, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan
3
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, CU-UCSD Center for Mucosal Immunology, Allergy and Vaccines, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093-0956, USA
4
Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
5
Mucosal Immunology and Allergy Therapeutics, Institute for Global Prominent Research, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
6
Department of Mucosal Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
7
Department of Innovative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8670, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(8), 2371; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082371
Submission received: 10 July 2018 / Revised: 2 August 2018 / Accepted: 6 August 2018 / Published: 12 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Purinergic Signalling in Cancer and Inflammation)

Abstract

:
Extracellular nucleotides, such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP), are released from host cells including nerve termini, immune cells, injured or dead cells, and the commensal bacteria that reside in the gut lumen. Extracellular ATP interacts with the host through purinergic receptors, and promotes intercellular and bacteria-host communication to maintain the tissue homeostasis. However, the release of massive concentrations of ATP into extracellular compartments initiates acute and chronic inflammatory responses through the activation of immunocompetent cells (e.g., T cells, macrophages, and mast cells). In this review, we focus on the functions of ATP as a pathophysiologic mediator that is required for the induction and resolution of inflammation and inter-species communication.

Graphical Abstract

1. ATP as an Inter-Species Messenger

Although adenosine-5′-triphosphate (ATP) is generated intracellularly through glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle, it also functions in the extracellular compartment [1,2]. The action of extracellular ATP (eATP) in the mammalian intestine was first described in 1934 [3], and it is now known that eATP released from nerve termini, immune cells, injured or damaged cells, and some commensal bacteria plays important roles in inter-species communications [4,5,6]. Several eATP release pathways, including the constitutive secretory pathway, the activation of P2Y receptor (one of purinergic receptors)-mediated Ca2+-regulated exocytosis, P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) channels, and conductive release through pannexin 1 (Panx1) and connexin (Conx) membrane hemichannels, were previously reviewed [1,2,7,8,9]. In the gut, eATP is released from activated immune cells and injured or damaged epithelial cells [10,11,12]. For example, chemotactic mediators, such as interleukin 8 (IL-8), leukotriene B4, and the complement product C5a, prompt the release of eATP from neutrophils, and thus, enhance their migratory ability in a paracrine and autocrine manner [13,14]. Similar autocrine signaling systems were identified in macrophages [15]. In humans, the stimulation of formyl-peptide, Fcγ, IL-8, complement C5a, and leukotriene B4 receptors on neutrophils leads to the release eATP through Panx1 channels [14]. In T-cells, activation of the T-cell receptor and the cluster of differentiation 28 (CD28) co-stimulatory receptor promotes Panx1-induced eATP secretion [16,17]. In addition to these hemichannel-dependent eATP release pathways in various cells types, a unique eATP-amplifying system is present in mast cells. Once mast cells are stimulated by allergens or eATP, they release eATP, which is amplified through the activities of ecto-adenylate kinase and ATP synthase even though ATP is concurrently metabolized to ADP, AMP, and adenosine by ecto-nucleotidases [18].
In addition, commensal bacteria are another major source of eATP. The levels of eATP increase dramatically as bacteria exit the stationary phase [19], peak around the end of the log-phase of growth, and decrease again as they approach stationary phase [20]. In the small intestine, ATP derived from commensal bacteria restricts the immunoglobulin A (IgA) response directed against them by limiting the number of follicular helper T (Tfh) cells, which regulates the maturation and activation of mucosal IgA antibody production; disruption of ATP signaling increases the number of Tfh cells in the gut [6]. This finding indicates that bacterial eATP influences the host mucosal immune system and subsequently regulates the bacterial community, thus promoting a proficient gut ecosystem [6] (Figure 1). In this regard, Iwase and colleagues reported that Enterococcus gallinarum, a vancomycin-resistant Gram-positive coccus isolated from mice and humans, secretes ATP [21]. These authors subsequently identified seven additional eATP-secreting enterococcal species and determined that glycolysis is the most important pathway for bacterial ATP secretion [22]. Their studies indicate that diverse bacteria have the potential to secrete eATP, especially during the growth phase and in the presence of glucose [22]. In addition, kinetics investigations revealed that exposure to amphipathic peptides (e.g., melittin, and mastoparan 7), which enhance membrane permeability to small solutes in a variety of cells, also increases the release of eATP from Escherichia coli [23]. In E. coli, eATP is packed into nano-scaled membrane particles, called outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) [23]. These OMVs are continuously formed by E. coli under normal growth conditions (Figure 1). Furthermore, eATP acts as a cross-communication agent between bacteria and their host and as an energy-exchange partner to facilitate the formation and survival of bacterial communities [20].
In the host immune system, eATP contributes to the initiation and activation of immune responses. Specifically, eATP mediates the “find-me” signal from injured or dead cells, and acts as a danger signal that elicits a variety of inflammatory responses [24,25]. For example, T helper 17 (Th17) cells are induced by eATP signaling, which is mediated by antigen-presenting cells, and are presumed to be important factors in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [5,26,27] (Figure 1). Furthermore, eATP derived from commensal bacteria drives the differentiation of intestinal Th17 cells, and the administration of ATP to mice exacerbates T-cell-mediated enterocolitis [5,28].
The reactivity of relevant cells and their responses (such as proliferation, migration, and activation; cell death; maintenance of homeostasis; and initiation of inflammation) differ depending on the eATP concentration and reactive receptors [29,30]. The eATP receptors, known as purinergic receptors, are divided into two types: P1, which binds adenosine, and P2, which binds nucleotides such as ADP/ATP and uridine diphosphate/triphosphate (UDP/UTP) [31,32,33,34]. The P1 adenosine receptors are G-protein-coupled (metabotropic) receptors comprising four subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3) [32,35]. P2 receptors fall into two families, P2Y and P2X [36,37]. The P2Y family of G-protein-coupled receptors has eight subtypes (P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, P2Y6, P2Y11, P2Y12, P2Y13, and P2Y14) [38,39]. The P2X family are nonselective cationic ligand-operated channel receptors. Opening of the pore, which is permeable to Na+, K+, and Ca2+, results in depolarization of the cellular membrane [40]. P2X receptors have seven subtypes (P2X1 through 7) and form homo- or hetero-trimeric complexes [40,41]. Various purinergic receptors are involved in the physical, physiologic, neurologic, and immunologic homeostasis of the gastrointestinal tract, and these receptors are expressed in the nervous, epithelial–mesenchymal, and immune systems [42,43,44].
The characteristics of P2X7R differ from those of other P2X receptors. P2X7R contains a cysteine-rich extracellular domain, a short intracellular N-terminus, and a long intracellular C-terminal domain [45,46]. The C-terminal domain of P2X7 contains a conserved lipopolysaccharide-binding motif, and directly coordinates signaling related to macrophage function and lipopolysaccharide action [46]. In addition, proteomic assays revealed that the P2X7R C-terminal region interacts with several proteins, including heat-shock proteins; these interactions may be important for efficient receptor activity [47,48]. Brief exposure of P2X7R to eATP or a nonselective agonist causes cellular depolarization and a massive influx of Ca2+, thus initiating inflammatory signal transduction through pore formation by mitogen-activated protein kinase and activation of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) [49,50]. Therefore, among the P2 receptors, P2X7R is involved mainly in the induction of inflammatory responses.
In addition, eATP acts as an inter-species messenger between commensal bacteria and various host cells, and is essential to maintaining the intestinal ecosystem. It is gradually becoming clearer that eATP also acts as a disease-induction and inflammation-exacerbating factor.

2. eATP as an Inflammatory Mediator in Intestinal Inflammation

Extracellular nucleotides (e.g., ATP and UTP), which trigger inflammation, are released from apoptotic cells through hemichannels (e.g., Panx1 and Conx43) [51,52,53]. In the initiation of inflammation, extracellular purines (adenosine, ADP, and ATP) and pyrimidines (UDP and UTP), released from various sources as described earlier, stimulate purinergic receptors in both an autocrine and a paracrine manner. For example, mice with hapten-induced colitis had increased levels of eATP in the intestinal lumen [18]. Moreover, eATP concentrations also increase during other intestinal inflammatory states, including graft-versus-host disease and irradiation-induced abdominal fibrosis [54,55].
These extracellular purines and pyrimidines are involved in the pathogenesis of IBD. One UDP receptor, P2Y6R, is highly expressed on the T-cells that infiltrate the inflamed colonic tissues in active IBD, but not on the T cells in unaffected intestine, thus suggesting that P2Y6R plays a role in the pathogenesis of IBD [56]. Expression of both P2Y6R and the ATP/UTP receptor P2Y2R increased in the colonic mucosa during colitis [57]. P2Y2R and P2Y6R are involved in the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 8 (CXCL8), respectively, implying that these receptors promote the accumulation of inflammatory cells [57]. It was recently reported that eATP stimulates P2X4R among several P2X receptors, and promotes secretion of CXCL5 from macrophages, which binds to CXCR2 selectively expressed in neutrophils [58]. It is still a controversial issue that P2X4R interacts with P2X7R [59]. However, both P2XRs are considered to be potential drug targets for various inflammatory disorders [60]. Since P2X7R was cloned from rat brain in 1996 [61], its multifunctional roles were reported in a variety of cells, including neural cells, mast cells, macrophages, fibroblasts, epithelial cells, lymphocytes, erythrocytes, and erythroleukemia cells [4,44,62,63]. The eATP-P2X7R pathways play important roles in the immune responses of inflammatory regulation, such as chemotaxis and activation of immune cells. In particular, P2X7R stimulation leads to the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, including IL-1β and IL-6 [64].
Activation of the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (Nod)-like receptor family protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activates caspase-1, which is required for the secretion of IL-1β [25,65,66]. In human macrophages, IL-1β production depends on the activation of both the Toll-like receptor (TLR) and P2X7R/NLRP3 pathways [67]. In contrast, dendritic cells (DCs) derived from either murine spleen or bone marrow can secrete substantial amounts of mature IL-1β after stimulation by the TLR pathway alone, in the absence of an ATP signal [68]. These results imply that the underlying mechanism of P2X7R signaling differs among cell types.
Blocking the P2X7R pathway using a specific antibody (1F11 monoclonal antibody) suppressed mast-cell activation and degranulation in colonic tissues, and consequently prevented the development of intestinal inflammation [18]. In addition, deficiency of CD300f, which inhibits mast cells, augmented eATP/P2X7R mast-cell-dependent inflammation [69]. Furthermore, eATP/P2X7R-mediated activation of mast cells not only induces degranulation and inflammatory cytokines, but also chemokines and leukotriene B4 (LTB4) to recruit inflammatory cells (e.g., neutrophils) and subsequently exacerbate intestinal inflammation [18] (Figure 1). Therefore, targeting eATP-mediated mast-cell activation might be a promising novel strategy for the prevention and treatment of intestinal inflammation [70]. In another setting, eATP-P2X7R induced the death of regulatory T cells (Treg), which suppress colitis [63,71]. Moreover, eATP released from commensal bacteria activates a unique subset of lamina proprial antigen-presenting cells (CD70highCD11clow cells), leading to the differentiation of Th17 cells (Figure 1). Collectively, these findings show that eATP disrupts the regulatory–inflammatory T-cell balance in the intestinal compartment and initiates intestinal inflammation. Data from both mouse and human studies suggest eATP/P2X7R pathways as promising therapeutic targets for overcoming IBD, and clinical trials for validation of therapeutic targets should be conducted in the future [72,73,74].
Several animals experiments revealed that eATP has not only short-term effects, but also long-term trophic roles; it affects cell proliferation, differentiation, motility, and even death in the chronic inflammatory phase [1]. Blockade of the P2X7R/NLRP3 inflammasome signaling pathway using a P2X7R antagonist suppressed chronic inflammation and fibrotic processes in the pancreas [75]. Recently, P2Y2R and P2X7R were shown to be involved in pulmonary fibrosis [76]. Moreover, an inhibitor of Panx1-mediated eATP release prevents liver and skin fibrosis [77]. These observations show that P2X7R is involved in chronic inflammation, such as fibrosis in various tissues (e.g., lung, kidney, and pancreas) [78]. In this regard, radiation-induced injury of small-intestinal epithelial cells led to increased eATP release due to cryptal cell death [55]; increased eATP release in the cryptal region occurred for at least several weeks. In addition, eATP stimulated excess collagen expression by myofibroblasts positive for α-smooth muscle actin and led to the induction of eosinophils via the release of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. This chronic fibrogenic loop led to irradiation-induced intestinal fibrosis [55]. Although fibrosis typically is a component of healing of injured tissue, accumulated evidence suggests that eATP is involved in detrimental fibrosis rather than healing in the gut.

3. Resolution of Inflammation

Once released—whether through secretion, degranulation, hemichannel-dependent release, the OMV pathway, or cell death—eATP is rapidly hydrolyzed to ADP, AMP, and adenosine by cell-surface enzymes such as the ecto-nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1 (ENTPDase1, CD39) and ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73) [2,79]. Enhanced expression of CD39 and CD73 and the production of extracellular adenosine terminate inflammatory responses. CD39 and CD73 are expressed not only in a variety of tissues, but also in various immune cells, including monocytes, neutrophils, DCs, and B- and T-cell subsets [80]. The expression levels of CD39 and CD73 differ depending on the intestinal environment and condition such as cytokine level, and thus, differently influence the immune response.
Low-level CD39 expression and consequently decreased adenosine production might hamper immunosuppression of inflammation in IBD. For example, intestinal inflammation in murine colitis models was increased in mice defective in CD73 and CD39 compared with wild-type mice [81,82]. Patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) often carry single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with decreased CD39 expression [81]. CD39 primarily is expressed by activated Tregs and exerts an anti-inflammatory function by reducing pro-inflammatory eATP [83,84,85] (Figure 1). Furthermore, deletion of CD39 in Tregs reduces their immune-suppressive properties [86]. Among Treg (which are CD4+ CD25high) subsets are cells that express high levels of CD39 [87]; this CD4+ CD25high CD39+ population suppresses pathogenic Th17 cells [88]. In addition, mesenchymal stromal cells promote CD39 expression on activated T cells and increase adenosine production to suppress excess immune activation in both an autocrine and paracrine manner [89].
Several reports also describe the function of CD39 in mast cells [90,91]. CD39 on the mast-cell surface suppresses the eATP reaching high levels and negatively regulates eATP/P2X7R-mediated cell death and the release of IL-1β [90]. Also, cardiac mast cells showed that CD39 on the cell surface suppresses eATP/P2X7R-mediated renin release which controls the activation of the renin–angiotensin system, thus ultimately exerting a cardioprotective effect [91]. Furthermore, ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase–phosphodiesterase 3 (E-NPP3), also known as CD203c, is involved in the clearance of eATP [92]. CD203c is highly expressed on activated basophils and mast cells, and is a useful biomarker for the diagnosis of allergic diseases [93]. The deficiency of CD203c led to elevated levels of serum eATP and pathology consistent with mast-cell-dependent allergic inflammation [92].
One of the eight ENTPDases, ENTPDase7, is selectively and highly expressed on small-intestinal epithelial cells [94]. Furthermore, eATP concentrations in the lumen and the number of IL-17-producing Th17 cells in the lamina propria were increased in the small intestines of ENTPDase7-deficient mice. In addition, ENTPDase7-deficient mice showed increased Th17 cell numbers and high tolerance to the intestinal pathogen, Citrobacter rodentium [94].
CD73 is a membrane-bound glycoprotein that hydrolyzes extracellular nucleoside monophosphates into bioactive nucleoside intermediates [95]. In humans, CD73 is expressed on subsets of T and B cells, on germinal center follicular DCs, and on thymic medullary reticular fibroblasts and epithelial cells [96]. In CD73-deficient mice, the production of extracellular adenosine is reduced in many tissues (e.g., colon, lung, liver, muscle, heart, and kidney), and interferon gamma (IFNγ)-producing activated T cells are significantly increased [97]. Both Tregs and stromal cells express CD73, and the extracellular adenosine produced in response to CD73 activation is related to the immunosuppressive roles of these cells [98,99]. A co-culture of CD39-expressing stromal cells and CD73-expressing T lymphocytes increased adenosine levels, and the CD39-expressing stromal cells inhibited the proliferation of activated T cells [89]. Pericellular accumulation of adenosine leads to immunosuppression through adenosine A2A receptors [89,100]. Murine Treg cells co-express CD39 and CD73, and promote the production of extracellular adenosine and immunosuppression [84,98]. Interestingly, Treg expression levels of CD39 and CD73 differed among patients with psoriasis vulgaris, pustular psoriasis, and erythrodermic psoriasis, suggesting this difference in expression pattern as a pathologic factor [101]. Similarly, patients with different forms of IBD (ulcerative colitis (UC) and CD) show unique profiles of purinergic receptor genes or other genes involved in purine metabolism such as CD73 expression [102]. Both colonic mucosal biopsy tissue and peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with CD showed abnormal (upregulated) expression of A2AR, but in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with UC, the expressions of both A2AR and A2BR were downregulated [102]. These differences in purinergic receptor genes or purine metabolism related genes dysregulation between CD and UC may contribute to the distinctive pathology of these two forms of IBD.
Extracellular adenosine regulates intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels though adenosine receptors [103]. Among the four adenosine receptors, A1R and A3R signaling reduces intracellular cAMP levels, whereas A2AR and A2BR signaling increases cAMP levels through the activation of adenylyl cyclase, and modulates immunosuppression [104,105]. A2AR and A2BR are upregulated in response to the activation of immune cells—that is, adenosinergic signaling mediates the suppressive effects of T cells, DCs, neutrophils, macrophages, and other immune cells [103]. In this regard, the expressions of CD39 and CD73 differ between M1 and M2 macrophages. In particular, M1 macrophages tend to accumulate ATP, whereas M2 macrophages typically rapidly convert ATP to adenosine [106]. The hydrolysis of eATP to adenosine that is mediated by CD39 and CD73 on the macrophage surface induces the downregulation of inflammatory cytokines and the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors through P1 signaling [107].
The expressions of A2AR and A2BR are induced not only by inflammatory hypoxia; A2AR is also induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), IL-1β, and NF-κB [108], and A2BR is highly transcriptionally upregulated by hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and IFNγ [109]. A2AR has high affinity for adenosine, whereas A2BR is a low-affinity receptor [110,111]. The adenosine-receptor-mediated pathways have both immunosuppressive and pro-inflammatory effects. For example, intracellular cAMP elevated through A2AR on mast cells suppresses histamine release due to degranulation, whereas the adenosine-induced deamination of inosine promotes the degranulation of mast cells through A3R [112]. In contrast, other studies showed that the inosine/A2R and inosine/A3R pathways can have tissue-protective effects [113].
Oral administration of Lactobacillus reuteri to Treg-deficient mice prolonged survival time and reduced systemic inflammation [114]. In particular, oral intake of L. reuteri improved villus height and crypt depth, and increased the expression of intestinal nucleoside transporters, including equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1) and concentrative nucleoside transporter 2 (CNT2).
Furthermore, L. reuteri improved the intestinal microflora, thus increasing the concentration of inosine from microbial origin, and leading to the immunosuppression of intestinal inflammation through A2AR [114].
In colitis, TNFα stimulation increases the expression of A2BR in epithelial cells [115], which helps protect against loss of the intestinal epithelial barrier [116]. Furthermore, A2BR signaling in the DCs of the small intestine indirectly induces Th17 cells [117]; the Th17-associated cytokine, IL-22, exerts tissue-protective effects during colitis [118]. These different roles of A2BR in inflammatory responses may result from differences in tissue-specific receptor-signaling mechanisms or from inflammatory-phase-dependent effects.
In summary, purinergic metabolites produced by the intestinal microflora are involved, through multiple purinergic signaling mechanisms, in the promotion or suppression of immune cell function. Crosstalk between the component bacteria of the microflora and various host cells plays an important role in achieving intestinal homeostasis.

4. Conclusions

This review focused on the pathophysiologic roles of eATP. The regulation of the initiation and resolution of inflammation through extracellular purinergic pathways is complex. In addition, recent findings suggest that commensal bacteria are the major source of eATP in the intestinal lumen. Furthermore, patients with CD have increased numbers of mucosa-associated adhesive E. coli [72]; direct purinergic communication between those bacteria and epithelial cells may lead to eATP-mediated mucosal inflammation. In the future, molecular imaging might be used to precisely elucidate the trafficking of ATP that is released into the luminal and mucosal inflammatory compartments in patients with IBD. Accumulating evidence suggests purinergic signaling as a promising drug target for treating intestinal inflammation, and this possibility warrants further investigation.

Author Contributions

A.I., H.K. and Y.K. conceived and wrote the review manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank our colleagues and former and current collaborators who shared their expertise regarding various aspects of mucosal immunology. This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) for the Translational Research Network Program (at the University of Tokyo) Seeds A (Y.K.), B (H.K.), and C (H.K.) and LEADER (Y.K.); the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) for CREST (H.K.) and PRIME (Y.K.); the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research S (H.K.) and Young Scientists A (Y.K.), the Challenging Research (Exploratory) (Y.K.), the Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS) (H.K.); the Senri Life Science Foundation (Y.K.); the Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research (Y.K.); the Takeda Science Foundation (Y.K.); the Uehara Memorial Foundation (Y.K.), the Sumitomo Foundation (Y.K.); the Naito Foundation (Y.K.); the Kato Memorial Bio Science Foundation (Y.K.); the Yakult Bio-Science Foundation (Y.K.), the Nippon Ham Foundation (Y.K.); and the Chiba University—UC San Diego Center for Mucosal Immunology, Allergy, and Vaccines (cMAV) (H.K.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

LPlamina propria
OMVouter membrane vesicle
Rreceptor
ROSreactive oxygen species
Tfh cellsfollicular helper T cells

References

  1. Burnstock, G. Physiology and pathophysiology of purinergic neurotransmission. Physiol. Rev. 2007, 87, 659–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yegutkin, G.G. Nucleotide- and nucleoside-converting ectoenzymes: Important modulators of purinergic signalling cascade. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1783, 673–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gillespie, J.H. The biological significance of the linkages in adenosine triphosphoric acid. J. Physiol. 1934, 80, 345–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ralevic, V.; Burnstock, G. Receptors for purines and pyrimidines. Pharmacol. Rev. 1998, 50, 413–492. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Atarashi, K.; Nishimura, J.; Shima, T.; Umesaki, Y.; Yamamoto, M.; Onoue, M.; Yagita, H.; Ishii, N.; Evans, R.; Honda, K.; et al. ATP drives lamina propria TH17 cell differentiation. Nature 2008, 455, 808–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Perruzza, L.; Gargari, G.; Proietti, M.; Fosso, B.; D’Erchia, A.M.; Faliti, C.E.; Rezzonico-Jost, T.; Scribano, D.; Mauri, L.; Colombo, D.; et al. T follicular helper cells promote a beneficial gut ecosystem for host metabolic homeostasis by sensing microbiota-derived extracellular ATP. Cell Rep. 2017, 18, 2566–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lazarowski, E.R. Vesicular and conductive mechanisms of nucleotide release. Purinergic Signal. 2012, 8, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Taruno, A. ATP release channels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sivaramakrishnan, V.; Bidula, S.; Campwala, H.; Katikaneni, D.; Fountain, S.J. Constitutive lysosome exocytosis releases ATP and engages P2Y receptors in human monocytes. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 4567–4575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Bodin, P.; Burnstock, G. Purinergic signalling: ATP release. Neurochem. Res. 2001, 26, 959–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Eltzschig, H.K.; Eckle, T.; Mager, A.; Kuper, N.; Karcher, C.; Weissmuller, T.; Boengler, K.; Schulz, R.; Robson, S.C.; Colgan, S.P. ATP release from activated neutrophils occurs via connexin 43 and modulates adenosine-dependent endothelial cell function. Circ. Res. 2006, 99, 1100–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Furuta, Y.; Tsai, S.H.; Kinoshita, M.; Fujimoto, K.; Okumura, R.; Umemoto, E.; Kurashima, Y.; Kiyono, H.; Kayama, H.; Takeda, K. E-NPP3 controls plasmacytoid dendritic cell numbers in the small intestine. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, Y.; Corriden, R.; Inoue, Y.; Yip, L.; Hashiguchi, N.; Zinkernagel, A.; Nizet, V.; Insel, P.A.; Junger, W.G. ATP release guides neutrophil chemotaxis via P2Y2 and A3 receptors. Science 2006, 314, 1792–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, Y.; Yao, Y.; Sumi, Y.; Li, A.; To, U.K.; Elkhal, A.; Inoue, Y.; Woehrle, T.; Zhang, Q.; Hauser, C.; et al. Purinergic signaling: A fundamental mechanism in neutrophil activation. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3, ra45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kronlage, M.; Song, J.; Sorokin, L.; Isfort, K.; Schwerdtle, T.; Leipziger, J.; Robaye, B.; Conley, P.B.; Kim, H.C.; Sargin, S.; et al. Autocrine purinergic receptor signaling is essential for macrophage chemotaxis. Sci. Signal. 2010, 3, ra55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Schenk, U.; Westendorf, A.M.; Radaelli, E.; Casati, A.; Ferro, M.; Fumagalli, M.; Verderio, C.; Buer, J.; Scanziani, E.; Grassi, F. Purinergic control of T cell activation by ATP released through pannexin-1 hemichannels. Sci. Signal. 2008, 1, ra6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Woehrle, T.; Yip, L.; Elkhal, A.; Sumi, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yao, Y.; Insel, P.A.; Junger, W.G. Pannexin-1 hemichannel-mediated ATP release together with P2X1 and P2X4 receptors regulate T-cell activation at the immune synapse. Blood 2010, 116, 3475–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Kurashima, Y.; Amiya, T.; Nochi, T.; Fujisawa, K.; Haraguchi, T.; Iba, H.; Tsutsui, H.; Sato, S.; Nakajima, S.; Iijima, H.; et al. Extracellular ATP mediates mast cell-dependent intestinal inflammation through P2X7 purinoceptors. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Murray, H.D.; Schneider, D.A.; Gourse, R.L. Control of rRNA expression by small molecules is dynamic and nonredundant. Mol. Cell 2003, 12, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mempin, R.; Tran, H.; Chen, C.; Gong, H.; Kim Ho, K.; Lu, S. Release of extracellular ATP by bacteria during growth. BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Iwase, T.; Shinji, H.; Tajima, A.; Sato, F.; Tamura, T.; Iwamoto, T.; Yoneda, M.; Mizunoe, Y. Isolation and identification of ATP-secreting bacteria from mice and humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 1949–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hironaka, I.; Iwase, T.; Sugimoto, S.; Okuda, K.; Tajima, A.; Yanaga, K.; Mizunoe, Y. Glucose triggers ATP secretion from bacteria in a growth-phase-dependent manner. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 2328–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Alvarez, C.L.; Corradi, G.; Lauri, N.; Marginedas-Freixa, I.; Leal Denis, M.F.; Enrique, N.; Mate, S.M.; Milesi, V.; Ostuni, M.A.; Herlax, V.; et al. Dynamic regulation of extracellular ATP in Escherichia coli. Biochem. J. 2017, 474, 1395–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ravichandran, K.S. Find-me and eat-me signals in apoptotic cell clearance: Progress and conundrums. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 1807–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Schroder, K.; Tschopp, J. The inflammasomes. Cell 2010, 140, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liang, J.; Huang, H.I.; Benzatti, F.P.; Karlsson, A.B.; Zhang, J.J.; Youssef, N.; Ma, A.; Hale, L.P.; Hammer, G.E. Inflammatory Th1 and Th17 in the intestine are each driven by functionally specialized dendritic cells with distinct requirements for MyD88. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 1330–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Liu, H.; Chen, F.; Wu, W.; Cao, A.T.; Xue, X.; Yao, S.; Evans-Marin, H.L.; Li, Y.Q.; Cong, Y. TLR5 mediates CD172α+ intestinal lamina propria dendritic cell induction of Th17 cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Atarashi, K.; Tanoue, T.; Ando, M.; Kamada, N.; Nagano, Y.; Narushima, S.; Suda, W.; Imaoka, A.; Setoyama, H.; Nagamori, T.; et al. Th17 cell induction by adhesion of microbes to intestinal epithelial cells. Cell 2015, 163, 367–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Idzko, M.; Hammad, H.; van Nimwegen, M.; Kool, M.; Willart, M.A.; Muskens, F.; Hoogsteden, H.C.; Luttmann, W.; Ferrari, D.; Di Virgilio, F.; et al. Extracellular ATP triggers and maintains asthmatic airway inflammation by activating dendritic cells. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 913–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Junger, W.G. Immune cell regulation by autocrine purinergic signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Burnstock, G. Do some nerve cells release more than one transmitter? Neuroscience 1976, 1, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Van Calker, D.; Muller, M.; Hamprecht, B. Adenosine regulates via two different types of receptors, the accumulation of cyclic amp in cultured brain cells. J. Neurochem. 1979, 33, 999–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Burnstock, G. Purinergic nerves and receptors. Prog. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1980, 16, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Schwartzman, M.; Pinkas, R.; Raz, A. Evidence for different purinergic receptors for ATP and ADP in rabbit kidney and heart. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1981, 74, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Londos, C.; Cooper, D.M.; Wolff, J. Subclasses of external adenosine receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1980, 77, 2551–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Burnstock, G.; Kennedy, C. Is there a basis for distinguishing two types of P2-purinoceptor? Gen. Pharmacol. 1985, 16, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abbracchio, M.P.; Burnstock, G. Purinoceptors: Are there families of P2X and P2Y purinoceptors? Pharmacol. Ther. 1994, 64, 445–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Communi, D.; Gonzalez, N.S.; Detheux, M.; Brezillon, S.; Lannoy, V.; Parmentier, M.; Boeynaems, J.M. Identification of a novel human ADP receptor coupled to Gi. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 41479–41485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Abbracchio, M.P.; Boeynaems, J.M.; Barnard, E.A.; Boyer, J.L.; Kennedy, C.; Miras-Portugal, M.T.; King, B.F.; Gachet, C.; Jacobson, K.A.; Weisman, G.A.; et al. Characterization of the udp-glucose receptor (re-named here the P2Y14 receptor) adds diversity to the P2Y receptor family. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2003, 24, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Abbracchio, M.P.; Burnstock, G.; Verkhratsky, A.; Zimmermann, H. Purinergic signalling in the nervous system: An overview. Trends Neurosci. 2009, 32, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. North, R.A.; Surprenant, A. Pharmacology of cloned P2X receptors. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2000, 40, 563–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Burnstock, G. Purinergic receptors as future targets for treatment of functional Gi disorders. Gut 2008, 57, 1193–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Skaper, S.D.; Debetto, P.; Giusti, P. The P2X7 purinergic receptor: From physiology to neurological disorders. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2010, 24, 337–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Cesaro, A.; Brest, P.; Hofman, V.; Hebuterne, X.; Wildman, S.; Ferrua, B.; Marchetti, S.; Doglio, A.; Vouret-Craviari, V.; Galland, F.; et al. Amplification loop of the inflammatory process is induced by P2X7R activation in intestinal epithelial cells in response to neutrophil transepithelial migration. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2010, 299, G32–G42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Roberts, J.A.; Vial, C.; Digby, H.R.; Agboh, K.C.; Wen, H.; Atterbury-Thomas, A.; Evans, R.J. Molecular properties of P2X receptors. Pflugers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2006, 452, 486–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Denlinger, L.C.; Fisette, P.L.; Sommer, J.A.; Watters, J.J.; Prabhu, U.; Dubyak, G.R.; Proctor, R.A.; Bertics, P.J. Cutting edge: The nucleotide receptor P2X7 contains multiple protein- and lipid–interaction motifs including a potential binding site for bacterial lipopolysaccharide. J. Immunol. 2001, 167, 1871–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kim, M.; Jiang, L.H.; Wilson, H.L.; North, R.A.; Surprenant, A. Proteomic and functional evidence for a P2X7 receptor signalling complex. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 6347–6358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Gu, B.J.; Rathsam, C.; Stokes, L.; McGeachie, A.B.; Wiley, J.S. Extracellular ATP dissociates nonmuscle myosin from P2X7 complex: This dissociation regulates P2X7 pore formation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2009, 297, C430–C439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Donnelly-Roberts, D.L.; Namovic, M.T.; Faltynek, C.R.; Jarvis, M.F. Mitogen-activated protein kinase and caspase signaling pathways are required for P2X7 receptor (P2X7R)-induced pore formation in human THP-1 cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004, 308, 1053–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Korcok, J.; Raimundo, L.N.; Ke, H.Z.; Sims, S.M.; Dixon, S.J. Extracellular nucleotides act through P2X7 receptors to activate NF-κB in osteoclasts. J. Bone Miner. Res. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bone Miner. Res. 2004, 19, 642–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Sandilos, J.K.; Chiu, Y.H.; Chekeni, F.B.; Armstrong, A.J.; Walk, S.F.; Ravichandran, K.S.; Bayliss, D.A. Pannexin 1, an ATP release channel, is activated by caspase cleavage of its pore-associated c-terminal autoinhibitory region. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 11303–11311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Eltzschig, H.K.; Sitkovsky, M.V.; Robson, S.C. Purinergic signaling during inflammation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 2322–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Idzko, M.; Ferrari, D.; Eltzschig, H.K. Nucleotide signalling during inflammation. Nature 2014, 509, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wilhelm, K.; Ganesan, J.; Muller, T.; Durr, C.; Grimm, M.; Beilhack, A.; Krempl, C.D.; Sorichter, S.; Gerlach, U.V.; Juttner, E.; et al. Graft-versus-host disease is enhanced by extracellular ATP activating P2X7R. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 1434–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Takemura, N.; Kurashima, Y.; Mori, Y.; Okada, K.; Ogino, T.; Osawa, H.; Matsuno, H.; Aayam, L.; Kaneto, S.; Park, E.J.; et al. Eosinophil depletion suppresses radiation-induced small intestinal fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10, eaan0333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Somers, G.; Hammet, F.M.A.; Trute, L.; Southey, M.; Venter, D. Expression of the P2Y6 purinergic receptor in human T cells infiltrating inflammatory bowel disease. Lab. Investig. J. Tech. Methods Pathol. 1998, 78, 1375–1383. [Google Scholar]
  57. Grbic, D.M.; Degagne, E.; Langlois, C.; Dupuis, A.A.; Gendron, F.P. Intestinal inflammation increases the expression of the P2Y6 receptor on epithelial cells and the release of CXC chemokine ligand 8 by UDP. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 2659–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Layhadi, J.A.; Turner, J.; Crossman, D.; Fountain, S.J. ATP evokes Ca2+ responses and CXCL5 secretion via P2X4 receptor activation in human monocyte-derived macrophages. J. Immunol. 2018, 200, 1159–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Schneider, M.; Prudic, K.; Pippel, A.; Klapperstuck, M.; Braam, U.; Muller, C.E.; Schmalzing, G.; Markwardt, F. Interaction of purinergic P2X4 and P2X7 receptor subunits. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Suurvali, J.; Boudinot, P.; Kanellopoulos, J.; Ruutel Boudinot, S. P2X4: A fast and sensitive purinergic receptor. Biomed. J. 2017, 40, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Surprenant, A. Functional properties of native and cloned P2X receptors. Ciba Found. Symp. 1996, 198, 208–222. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Cekic, C.; Linden, J. Purinergic regulation of the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Schenk, U.; Frascoli, M.; Proietti, M.; Geffers, R.; Traggiai, E.; Buer, J.; Ricordi, C.; Westendorf, A.M.; Grassi, F. ATP inhibits the generation and function of regulatory T cells through the activation of purinergic P2X receptors. Sci. Signal. 2011, 4, ra12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pelegrin, P.; Barroso-Gutierrez, C.; Surprenant, A. P2X7 receptor differentially couples to distinct release pathways for IL-1β in mouse macrophage. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 7147–7157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Franchi, L.; Kanneganti, T.D.; Dubyak, G.R.; Nunez, G. Differential requirement of P2X7 receptor and intracellular K+ for caspase-1 activation induced by intracellular and extracellular bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 18810–18818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Franchi, L.; Munoz-Planillo, R.; Reimer, T.; Eigenbrod, T.; Nunez, G. Inflammasomes as microbial sensors. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010, 40, 611–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Gicquel, T.; Robert, S.; Loyer, P.; Victoni, T.; Bodin, A.; Ribault, C.; Gleonnec, F.; Couillin, I.; Boichot, E.; Lagente, V. IL-1β production is dependent on the activation of purinergic receptors and NLRP3 pathway in human macrophages. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2015, 29, 4162–4173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. He, Y.; Franchi, L.; Nunez, G. TLR agonists stimulate NLRP3-dependent il-1beta production independently of the purinergic P2X7 receptor in dendritic cells and in vivo. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Matsukawa, T.; Izawa, K.; Isobe, M.; Takahashi, M.; Maehara, A.; Yamanishi, Y.; Kaitani, A.; Okumura, K.; Teshima, T.; Kitamura, T.; et al. Ceramide-CD300F binding suppresses experimental colitis by inhibiting ATP-mediated mast cell activation. Gut 2016, 65, 777–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ohbori, K.; Fujiwara, M.; Ohishi, A.; Nishida, K.; Uozumi, Y.; Nagasawa, K. Prophylactic oral administration of magnesium ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice through a decrease of colonic accumulation of P2X7 receptor-expressing mast cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 40, 1071–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Figliuolo, V.R.; Savio, L.E.B.; Safya, H.; Nanini, H.; Bernardazzi, C.; Abalo, A.; de Souza, H.S.P.; Kanellopoulos, J.; Bobe, P.; Coutinho, C.; et al. P2X7 receptor promotes intestinal inflammation in chemically induced colitis and triggers death of mucosal regulatory T cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2017, 1863, 1183–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Neves, A.R.; Castelo-Branco, M.T.; Figliuolo, V.R.; Bernardazzi, C.; Buongusto, F.; Yoshimoto, A.; Nanini, H.F.; Coutinho, C.M.; Carneiro, A.J.; Coutinho-Silva, R.; et al. Overexpression of ATP-activated P2X7 receptors in the intestinal mucosa is implicated in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2014, 20, 444–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Marques, C.C.; Castelo-Branco, M.T.; Pacheco, R.G.; Buongusto, F.; do Rosario, A., Jr.; Schanaider, A.; Coutinho-Silva, R.; de Souza, H.S. Prophylactic systemic P2X7 receptor blockade prevents experimental colitis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1842, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Burnstock, G.; Jacobson, K.A.; Christofi, F.L. Purinergic drug targets for gastrointestinal disorders. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2017, 37, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhang, G.X.; Wang, M.X.; Nie, W.; Liu, D.W.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.B. P2X7R blockade prevents NLRP3 inflammasome activation and pancreatic fibrosis in a mouse model of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 2017, 46, 1327–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Muller, T.; Fay, S.; Vieira, R.P.; Karmouty-Quintana, H.; Cicko, S.; Ayata, C.K.; Zissel, G.; Goldmann, T.; Lungarella, G.; Ferrari, D.; et al. P2Y6 receptor activation promotes inflammation and tissue remodeling in pulmonary fibrosis. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Feig, J.L.; Mediero, A.; Corciulo, C.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Perez-Aso, M.; Picard, L.; Wilder, T.; Cronstein, B. The antiviral drug tenofovir, an inhibitor of pannexin-1-mediated ATP release, prevents liver and skin fibrosis by downregulating adenosine levels in the liver and skin. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0188135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Goncalves, R.G.; Gabrich, L.; Rosario, A., Jr.; Takiya, C.M.; Ferreira, M.L.; Chiarini, L.B.; Persechini, P.M.; Coutinho-Silva, R.; Leite, M., Jr. The role of purinergic P2X7 receptors in the inflammation and fibrosis of unilateral ureteral obstruction in mice. Kidney Int. 2006, 70, 1599–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Burnstock, G. Historical review: ATP as a neurotransmitter. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2006, 27, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Takenaka, M.C.; Robson, S.; Quintana, F.J. Regulation of the T cell response by CD39. Trends Immunol. 2016, 37, 427–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Friedman, D.J.; Kunzli, B.M.; YI, A.R.; Sevigny, J.; Berberat, P.O.; Enjyoji, K.; Csizmadia, E.; Friess, H.; Robson, S.C. From the cover: CD39 deletion exacerbates experimental murine colitis and human polymorphisms increase susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 16788–16793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Louis, N.A.; Robinson, A.M.; MacManus, C.F.; Karhausen, J.; Scully, M.; Colgan, S.P. Control of IFN-α by CD73: Implications for mucosal inflammation. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 4246–4255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Yang, L.; Kobie, J.J.; Mosmann, T.R. CD73 and LY-6a/e distinguish in vivo primed but uncommitted mouse CD4 T cells from type 1 or type 2 effector cells. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 6458–6464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Dwyer, K.M.; Hanidziar, D.; Putheti, P.; Hill, P.A.; Pommey, S.; McRae, J.L.; Winterhalter, A.; Doherty, G.; Deaglio, S.; Koulmanda, M.; et al. Expression of CD39 by human peripheral blood CD4+ CD25+ T cells denotes a regulatory memory phenotype. Am. J. Transplant. Off. J. Am. Soc. Transplant. Am. Soc. Transpl. Surg. 2010, 10, 2410–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Borsellino, G.; Kleinewietfeld, M.; Di Mitri, D.; Sternjak, A.; Diamantini, A.; Giometto, R.; Hopner, S.; Centonze, D.; Bernardi, G.; Dell’Acqua, M.L.; et al. Expression of ectonucleotidase CD39 by Foxp3+ treg cells: Hydrolysis of extracellular ATP and immune suppression. Blood 2007, 110, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Beldi, G.; Wu, Y.; Banz, Y.; Nowak, M.; Miller, L.; Enjyoji, K.; Haschemi, A.; Yegutkin, G.G.; Candinas, D.; Exley, M.; et al. Natural killer T cell dysfunction in CD39-null mice protects against concanavalin a-induced hepatitis. Hepatology 2008, 48, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Mandapathil, M.; Hilldorfer, B.; Szczepanski, M.J.; Czystowska, M.; Szajnik, M.; Ren, J.; Lang, S.; Jackson, E.K.; Gorelik, E.; Whiteside, T.L. Generation and accumulation of immunosuppressive adenosine by human CD4+CD25HighFOXP3+ regulatory T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 7176–7186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Fletcher, J.M.; Lonergan, R.; Costelloe, L.; Kinsella, K.; Moran, B.; O’Farrelly, C.; Tubridy, N.; Mills, K.H. CD39+foxp3+ regulatory T cells suppress pathogenic TH17 cells and are impaired in multiple sclerosis. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 7602–7610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Saldanha-Araujo, F.; Ferreira, F.I.; Palma, P.V.; Araujo, A.G.; Queiroz, R.H.; Covas, D.T.; Zago, M.A.; Panepucci, R.A. Mesenchymal stromal cells up-regulate CD39 and increase adenosine production to suppress activated T-lymphocytes. Stem Cell Res. 2011, 7, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Kuhny, M.; Hochdorfer, T.; Ayata, C.K.; Idzko, M.; Huber, M. CD39 is a negative regulator of P2X7-mediated inflammatory cell death in mast cells. Cell Commun. Signal. CCS 2014, 12, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Aldi, S.; Marino, A.; Tomita, K.; Corti, F.; Anand, R.; Olson, K.E.; Marcus, A.J.; Levi, R. E-NTPDase1/CD39 modulates renin release from heart mast cells during ischemia/reperfusion: A novel cardioprotective role. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2015, 29, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Tsai, S.H.; Kinoshita, M.; Kusu, T.; Kayama, H.; Okumura, R.; Ikeda, K.; Shimada, Y.; Takeda, A.; Yoshikawa, S.; Obata-Ninomiya, K.; et al. The ectoenzyme e-npp3 negatively regulates ATP-dependent chronic allergic responses by basophils and mast cells. Immunity 2015, 42, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Bühring, H.-J.; Streble, A.; Valent, P. The Basophil-Specific Ectoenzyme e-npp3 (CD203C) as a marker for cell activation and allergy diagnosis. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2004, 133, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kusu, T.; Kayama, H.; Kinoshita, M.; Jeon, S.G.; Ueda, Y.; Goto, Y.; Okumura, R.; Saiga, H.; Kurakawa, T.; Ikeda, K.; et al. Ecto-nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 7 controls TH17 cell responses through regulation of luminal ATP in the small intestine. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 774–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Linden, J. Molecular approach to adenosine receptors: Receptor-mediated mechanisms of tissue protection. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2001, 41, 775–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Resta, R.; Yamashita, Y.; Thompson, L.F. Ecto-enzyme and signaling functions of lymphocyte CD73. Immunol. Rev. 1998, 161, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Thompson, L.F.; Eltzschig, H.K.; Ibla, J.C.; van de Wiele, C.J.; Resta, R.; Morote-Garcia, J.C.; Colgan, S.P. Crucial role for ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73) in vascular leakage during hypoxia. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 200, 1395–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Deaglio, S.; Dwyer, K.M.; Gao, W.; Friedman, D.; Usheva, A.; Erat, A.; Chen, J.F.; Enjyoji, K.; Linden, J.; Oukka, M.; et al. Adenosine generation catalyzed by CD39 and CD73 expressed on regulatory T cells mediates immune suppression. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 1257–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Sattler, C.; Steinsdoerfer, M.; Offers, M.; Fischer, E.; Schierl, R.; Heseler, K.; Daubener, W.; Seissler, J. Inhibition of T-cell proliferation by murine multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells is mediated by CD39 expression and adenosine generation. Cell Transplant. 2011, 20, 1221–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Sitkovsky, M.V.; Ohta, A. The ‘danger’ sensors that stop the immune response: The A2 adenosine receptors? Trends Immunol. 2005, 26, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Han, L.; Sugiyama, H.; Zhang, Q.; Yan, K.; Fang, X.; McCormick, T.S.; Cooper, K.D.; Huang, Q. Phenotypical analysis of ectoenzymes CD39/CD73 and adenosine receptor 2a in CD4+ CD25high foxp3+ regulatory T-cells in psoriasis. Aust. J. Dermatol. 2018, 59, e31–e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Rybaczyk, L.; Rozmiarek, A.; Circle, K.; Grants, I.; Needleman, B.; Wunderlich, J.E.; Huang, K.; Christofi, F.L. New bioinformatics approach to analyze gene expressions and signaling pathways reveals unique purine gene dysregulation profiles that distinguish between CD and UC. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2009, 15, 971–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Stagg, J.; Smyth, M.J. Extracellular adenosine triphosphate and adenosine in cancer. Oncogene 2010, 29, 5346–5358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Hasko, G.; Cronstein, B.N. Adenosine: An endogenous regulator of innate immunity. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Fredholm, B.B.; Chern, Y.; Franco, R.; Sitkovsky, M. Aspects of the general biology of adenosine A2A signaling. Prog. Neurobiol. 2007, 83, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zanin, R.F.; Braganhol, E.; Bergamin, L.S.; Campesato, L.F.; Filho, A.Z.; Moreira, J.C.; Morrone, F.B.; Sevigny, J.; Schetinger, M.R.; de Souza Wyse, A.T.; et al. Differential macrophage activation alters the expression profile of NTPDase and ecto-5′-nucleotidase. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Hamidzadeh, K.; Mosser, D.M. Purinergic signaling to terminate TLR responses in macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Khoa, N.D.; Montesinos, M.C.; Reiss, A.B.; Delano, D.; Awadallah, N.; Cronstein, B.N. Inflammatory cytokines regulate function and expression of adenosine a(2a) receptors in human monocytic THP-1 cells. J. Immunol. 2001, 167, 4026–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Xaus, J.; Mirabet, M.; Lloberas, J.; Soler, C.; Lluis, C.; Franco, R.; Celada, A. IFN-γ up-regulates the A2B adenosine receptor expression in macrophages: A mechanism of macrophage deactivation. J. Immunol. 1999, 162, 3607–3614. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  110. Bruns, R.F.; Lu, G.H.; Pugsley, T.A. Characterization of the A2 adenosine receptor labeled by [3h]neca in rat striatal membranes. Mol. Pharmacol. 1986, 29, 331–346. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  111. Aherne, C.M.; Kewley, E.M.; Eltzschig, H.K. The resurgence of A2B adenosine receptor signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1808, 1329–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Jin, X.; Shepherd, R.K.; Duling, B.R.; Linden, J. Inosine binds to A3 adenosine receptors and stimulates mast cell degranulation. J. Clin. Investig. 1997, 100, 2849–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Gomez, G.; Sitkovsky, M.V. Differential requirement for A2A and A3 adenosine receptors for the protective effect of inosine in vivo. Blood 2003, 102, 4472–4478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. He, B.; Hoang, T.K.; Wang, T.; Ferris, M.; Taylor, C.M.; Tian, X.; Luo, M.; Tran, D.Q.; Zhou, J.; Tatevian, N.; et al. Resetting microbiota by lactobacillus reuteri inhibits T REG deficiency-induced autoimmunity via adenosine A2A receptors. J. Exp. Med. 2017, 214, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Kolachala, V.; Asamoah, V.; Wang, L.; Obertone, T.S.; Ziegler, T.R.; Merlin, D.; Sitaraman, S.V. TNF-α upregulates adenosine 2B (A2B) receptor expression and signaling in intestinal epithelial cells: A basis for A2Br overexpression in colitis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 2005, 62, 2647–2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Aherne, C.M.; Saeedi, B.; Collins, C.B.; Masterson, J.C.; McNamee, E.N.; Perrenoud, L.; Rapp, C.R.; Curtis, V.F.; Bayless, A.; Fletcher, A.; et al. Epithelial-specific A2B adenosine receptor signaling protects the colonic epithelial barrier during acute colitis. Mucosal Immunol. 2015, 8, 1324–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Wilson, J.M.; Kurtz, C.C.; Black, S.G.; Ross, W.G.; Alam, M.S.; Linden, J.; Ernst, P.B. The A2B adenosine receptor promotes TH17 differentiation via stimulation of dendritic cell il-6. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 6746–6752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Zenewicz, L.A.; Yancopoulos, G.D.; Valenzuela, D.M.; Murphy, A.J.; Stevens, S.; Flavell, R.A. Innate and adaptive interleukin-22 protects mice from inflammatory bowel disease. Immunity 2008, 29, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. ATP as a pathophysiologic mediator for bacteria-host communication. The pathways through which extracellular ATP (eATP) mediates communication between bacteria and host immune cells in the intestinal compartment are shown. Bacteria (e.g., Escherichia coli) produce ATP in a growth-phase-dependent manner and secrete it in outer membrane vesicles (OMVs). ATP derived from commensal bacteria leads to the differentiation of intestinal T helper 17 (Th17) cells through the stimulation of antigen-presenting cells. The reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by adhesion of bacteria to epithelial cells promotes differentiation of Th17 cells. ATP activates mast cells and enhances inflammatory responses via P2X7 (e.g., chemical mediator release and inflammatory cell infiltration). In the small intestine, eATP released by commensal bacteria indirectly limits immunoglobulin A (IgA) responses to various bacteria by interacting with P2X7 on follicular helper T cells (Tfh cells), thus decreasing Tfh cell numbers. Purine metabolites, adenosine or inosine, inhibit inflammatory responses through interaction with adenosine receptors (e.g., A2AR.). The dotted line arrow shows the eATP acts immune cells. The regular arrow shows induction of IgA producing B cells via cytokine production from Tfh cells.
Figure 1. ATP as a pathophysiologic mediator for bacteria-host communication. The pathways through which extracellular ATP (eATP) mediates communication between bacteria and host immune cells in the intestinal compartment are shown. Bacteria (e.g., Escherichia coli) produce ATP in a growth-phase-dependent manner and secrete it in outer membrane vesicles (OMVs). ATP derived from commensal bacteria leads to the differentiation of intestinal T helper 17 (Th17) cells through the stimulation of antigen-presenting cells. The reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by adhesion of bacteria to epithelial cells promotes differentiation of Th17 cells. ATP activates mast cells and enhances inflammatory responses via P2X7 (e.g., chemical mediator release and inflammatory cell infiltration). In the small intestine, eATP released by commensal bacteria indirectly limits immunoglobulin A (IgA) responses to various bacteria by interacting with P2X7 on follicular helper T cells (Tfh cells), thus decreasing Tfh cell numbers. Purine metabolites, adenosine or inosine, inhibit inflammatory responses through interaction with adenosine receptors (e.g., A2AR.). The dotted line arrow shows the eATP acts immune cells. The regular arrow shows induction of IgA producing B cells via cytokine production from Tfh cells.
Ijms 19 02371 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Inami, A.; Kiyono, H.; Kurashima, Y. ATP as a Pathophysiologic Mediator of Bacteria-Host Crosstalk in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082371

AMA Style

Inami A, Kiyono H, Kurashima Y. ATP as a Pathophysiologic Mediator of Bacteria-Host Crosstalk in the Gastrointestinal Tract. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(8):2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082371

Chicago/Turabian Style

Inami, Akie, Hiroshi Kiyono, and Yosuke Kurashima. 2018. "ATP as a Pathophysiologic Mediator of Bacteria-Host Crosstalk in the Gastrointestinal Tract" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 8: 2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082371

APA Style

Inami, A., Kiyono, H., & Kurashima, Y. (2018). ATP as a Pathophysiologic Mediator of Bacteria-Host Crosstalk in the Gastrointestinal Tract. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(8), 2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19082371

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop