Next Article in Journal
Water-Soluble Fullerenol C60(OH)36 toward Effective Anti-Air Pollution Induced by Urban Particulate Matter in HaCaT Cell
Next Article in Special Issue
Dapagliflozin Prevents NOX- and SGLT2-Dependent Oxidative Stress in Lens Cells Exposed to Fructose-Induced Diabetes Mellitus
Previous Article in Journal
Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Neurodegenerative Diseases: New Evidence in Clinical Trials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Intermedin in Paraventricular Nucleus Attenuates Ang II-Induced Sympathoexcitation through the Inhibition of NADPH Oxidase-Dependent ROS Generation in Obese Rats with Hypertension
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 17
10.3390/ijms20174258
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Oxidative Stress: Role and Response of Short Guanine Tracts at Genomic Locations

by
Anju Singh
1,2,
Ritushree Kukreti
3,4,
Luciano Saso
5 and
Shrikant Kukreti
1,*
1
Nucleic Acids Research Lab, Department of Chemistry, University of Delhi (North Campus), Delhi 110007, India
2
Department of Chemistry, Ramjas College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India
3
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (CSIR-IGIB) Campus, Delhi 110007, India
4
Genomics and Molecular Medicine Unit, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (IGIB), Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Mall Road, Delhi 110007, India
5
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology “Vittorio Erspamer”, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(17), 4258; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174258
Submission received: 20 June 2019 / Revised: 20 July 2019 / Accepted: 26 July 2019 / Published: 30 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modulation of Oxidative Stress: Molecular and Pharmacological Aspects)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Over the decades, oxidative stress has emerged as a major concern to biological researchers. It is involved in the pathogenesis of various lifestyle-related diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerosis, and neurodegenerative diseases. The connection between oxidative stress and telomere shortening via oxidative guanine lesion is well documented. Telomeres are confined to guanine rich ends of chromosomes. Owing to its self-association properties, it adopts G-quadruplex structures and hampers the overexpression of telomerase in the cancer cells. Guanine, being the most oxidation prone nucleobase, when structured in G-quadruplex entity, is found to respond peculiarly towards oxidative stress. Interestingly, this non-Watson–Crick structural feature exists abundantly in promoters of various oncogenes, exons and other genomic locations. The involvement of G-quadruplex architecture in oncogene promoters is well recognized in gene regulation processes. Development of small molecules aimed to target G-quadruplex structures, have found to alter the overexpression of oncogenes. The interaction may lead to the obstruction of diseased cell having elevated level of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Thus, presence of short guanine tracts (Gn) forming G-quadruplexes suggests its critical role in oxidative genome damage. Present review is a modest attempt to gain insight on the association of oxidative stress and G-quadruplexes, in various biological processes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Indispensable role of Oxygen for living beings in biological system is undebatable. It is the element of utmost importance for the sustainability of life on earth. During respiration this oxygen gets reduced by the cells with concomitant generation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in the respiration process, occurring in the mitochondria. There are various reactive oxygen species identified in partially reduced form including superoxide anion (O2•−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (OH•), and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) (nitric oxide etc.) produced continuously from organism as the byproducts of various biochemical and physiological processes. Simultaneously, antioxidants such as glutathione, arginine [1,2], creatine [3], zinc [4], and vitamin A are produced against these reactive species to combat and proper regulation of these ROS/RNS. The imbalance between ROS and its scavenging is known as oxidative stress. Interestingly, presence of these free radicals in optimum concentration is desired in various biological processes [5]. Overproduction of these ROS is found to be the main culprit for the imbalance and deterioration of cell components (nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids) via interacting potentially with said macromolecules. These ROS can cause oxidation of cellular macromolecules specifically to nucleic acids via generating single nucleobase-lesions, DNA strand breaks, cross-linking of inter- and intrastrand of nucleic acid bases, as well as protein-DNA cross-links. [6,7]. Recently a new term, ferroptosis, has also drawn much attention owing to its association with iron metabolism. In ferroptosis, soluble and lipid ROS are generated by involvement of enzymatic reactions catalyzed by transition metal iron. OS plays substantial role in ferroptosis as well as mitochondrial malfunction/dysfunction, leads to the neuronal cell death along with apoptosis [8]. Undeniably, oxidation is supposed to play a pivotal role in causing various skin diseases, aging, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancers [9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
Lesions resulting from the oxidation of nucleic acids lead to various types of mutations and obstruct DNA replication, transcription, translation, and subsequently altered gene expression and regulation [16,17,18]. DNA bases, specifically the guanine, are very much susceptible to oxidation due to having a low redox potential. Literature is rich in describing the promoters and telomeric regions of most genomes as G-rich [19,20]. It is now evident that owing to the self-association property of the guanine base, these guanine-rich sequences can adopt G-quartets resulting in a folded G-quadruplex structure. G-quadruplex, a non-Watson–Crick DNA structure, has drawn attention of scientific community due to its unique stability and polymorphic behavior. These structures are abundantly found in gene promoters of various oncogenes such as c-myc [21,22], c-Kit [23], KRAS [24], VEGF [25,26], PDGF [27], BCL-2 [28], c-Myb [29], RET [30], AR [31], ADAM [32], hTERT [33], and MET [34], genes associated with telomere homeostasis [35], neurodegenerative diseases [36,37,38], mental retardation [39], involved in neoplasia [40], and untranslated regions [41]. Genes harboring putative G-quadruplex forming sequences (PQS) and related diseases are tabulated in Table 1. These G-rich regions and G-quadruplex structures are prone to chemically reactive molecules including ROS.
The increasing biological relevance of G-quadruplex entity in various biological processes and specifically their relationship with cancer diseases is well documented. The utmost importance is given to the investigation on the ROS caused lesions in guanine rich sequences. ROS can cause modification in guanines which could reduce the thermal stability of G-quadruplex motifs as well as affecting the binding of various G-quadruplex specific proteins [42]. This review is an attempt to mention the importance of the phenomenon of oxidative stress in biological system and its deleterious effect on the non-Watson–Crick structures like G-quadraplexes prone to be formed at G-rich genomic locations. This may add to the better understanding of the mechanism of oxidative stress and significance of repair pathways.

2. Role of ROS in Normal Cells

It is undeniable that an optimum level of ROS is required for the normal functioning of cell. It is required for cell signaling under both physiological as well as pathophysiological conditions. Overproduction of ROS is linked to various diseases but the indispensable role of ROS in redox homeostasis, the immune system, and facilitating various cellular functions cannot be ignored. Modulation of cell proliferation as well as apoptotic pathways for programmed cell death is also governed directly or indirectly via mediation of ROS [43]. A significant amount of ROS is required to regulate cell cycle and various signaling processes. Transcription nuclear factor-κB expression is also regulated by ROS. κB assists in the body’s inflammatory process via activation of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and interleukin-6 [44]. On invasion of foreign bodies in a cell, the immune system produces ROS which triggers phagocytosis of foreign bodies by macrophages, neutrophils, or dendritic cells [45]. Thus, the role of ROS in normal condition is unquestionable and their optimum level should be maintained in cellular environment.

3. ROS as Trigger of Oxidative Stress

The main wrongdoers of oxidative stress are the ROS, which can be produced exogenously as well as endogenously. Interestingly, the optimum levels of ROS are essential for the proper functioning of cells owing to their pivotal role in cell signaling and regulatory processes [46]. The exogenous source includes ionizing radiation, therapeutic agents, and environmental factors. ROS are continuously produced by radiolysis of water molecules as well as by product of secondary reactions which enhance ROS level resulting in prolonged toxicity in cell [47]. It has been proven that cancers in multiple target organs of human beings are induced by ionizing radiation and fatal carcinogens [48].
Environmental agents are also found to play a significant role in the induction of reactive oxygen species in cells [49]. A summarized schematic representation is depicted in Figure 1. These ROS significantly cause oxidative DNA damage, involved in carcinogenesis and aging along with alteration of gene expressions.

4. Oxidation Mechanism of Guanine Base via ROS

Guanine, one of the four DNA nucleotide bases is more prone to oxidation, resulting in the formation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxo-dG). This is the most important oxidized DNA base being used as biomarker to detect involvement of oxidation in aging, cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative diseases and cancer [50,51,52,53,54]. This oxidized guanine is now available for pairing with Adenine via Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding in place of cytosine, leading to the mutation and genomic instability [51]. Figure 2 demonstrates the mechanism of oxidation of guanine by oxygen (a) the product 8-oxo-dG so formed is paired with Adenine (b).
Oxygen is a key component of cellular metabolism and plays a pivotal role in cell signaling and various biological processes. Apart from its beneficial role it is also suggested that through ROS generation it can interact with macromolecules (DNA, protein etc.) and cause severe damage to macromolecules and other cell components [55]. During biological processes a number of bond-makings and -breakings take place and via these an imbalance of electrons occurs, leading to the generation of free radicals. These free radicals come in contact with oxygen molecules, abundantly present in biological system, react with them, and generate ROS. The resultant ROS drastically affect the macromolecules by obstructing the proper synthesis and repair process of DNA. When the ROS level is elevated in the cellular environment, it inhibits the scavenging ability of antioxidants (some proteins and enzymes), resulting in an oxidative stress condition [56].
It is worth mentioning here that higher-energy singlet molecular oxygen (1O2) act site specifically i.e., it affects DNA bases (guanine) and amino acids (histidine, tyrosine, tryptophan) in various proteins selectively whereas O2•− does not show any reactivity towards biomolecules, meaning it is inert towards biomolecules [57]. It is evident that organic molecules cannot react with molecular oxygen directly because of its existence in a singlet spin state whereas molecular O2 reside in the cell in the triplet spin state. Usually the reaction of triplet state with a singlet molecule is forbidden and takes place at very slow rate (<10−5 M−1·s−1). Various transition metals can act as bridges to overcome this barrier via reducing the molecular oxygen to free radical species. These free radical species then interact with organic molecules efficiently [58,59]. Among all the transition metals, iron plays a substantial role in catalyzing this reaction. Iron, being present at a higher concentration in biological systems, produces the oxygen radical. Other transition metals are also able to catalyze the reaction but at a slower rate and cause adverse effect to the biological system.
There are several mechanisms which include iron to produce reactive oxygen species. One such type of mechanism is depicted here involving various reactions in combination leading to the generation of a hydroxyl radical [60].
Reductant + Fe(III) → Oxidant + Fe(II)
Fe(II) + O2 → Fe(III) + O2•−
HO2• + O2•− → O2 + H2O2
Fe(II) + H2O2 → Fe(III) + OH− + HO•
It is clearly seen here that hydroxyl radical (•OH) is generated by decomposition of H2O2 and the reaction is mediated through Fe (II) [Fenton reaction]. In spite of having very short half-life, •OH is specifically very reactive and have tendency to damage DNA via the interaction of Fe(II)-ethylenediamminetetracetate (EDTA) as well as Fe(III)-nitrilotriacetate with H2O2 [61,62,63]. O2•− usually exists as the unprotonated species in physiological conditions whereas in aqueous conditions it undergoes dismutation which results in the formation of H2O2 and O2. Owing to this, H2O2 is produced in good amounts as a byproduct along with the formation of O2•−. It has also been proven that enzymatic dismutation of O2•− via superoxide dismutase is predominant over spontaneous dismutation at physiological pH. The rate of reaction of enzymatic dismutation is found to be four orders of magnitude faster than later. Interestingly, H2O2 which is produced as byproduct has no unpaired electron and cannot be categorized as a free radical. However, when it comes across redox-active transition metals it interacts with them, thus leads to the formation of •OH [64]. It is well documented that •OH can damage DNA in vivo involving Fenton reaction. •OH can interact with DNA sugar-phosphate backbone and abstract a proton, leading to DNA cleavage at every nucleotide without showing any site specificity [65].
•OH radical reactions can take place via involving any of the three routes i.e., hydrogen abstraction, addition, and electron transfer. Many less reactive species are generated by these reactions. •OH radicals efficiently react with DNA i.e. with all four bases, and deoxyribose, thus leads to deleterious effect on DNA. •OH can abstract hydrogen from all the five carbons of deoxyribose and form carbon-centered radicals. These carbon radicals further either reacts with oxygen results in peroxyl radical or join together leads to the formation of nonradical products. In anaerobic conditions, β-cleavage takes place in C4′-centered radical results in DNA strand breakage and via this produce an intact base and altered sugar. In contrast, C1′-centered radicals undergo oxidation leading to the formation of sugar lactone formation along with release of an intact base. On the other hand, in the presence of oxygen, the addition of molecular oxygen takes place at a carbon-centered radical thus forms peroxyl radicals. As the result of this, carbon–carbon bond is cleaved and an alkali-labile site is produced. In another stance, β-cleavage and strand breakage takes place when a C5′-centered peroxyl radical converts to an oxyl radical, eventually leading to either the formation of an altered sugar along with an intact base or aldehyde formation at the C5′ end along with the strand breakage [66].
OH can also produce various oxidation products by giving addition reaction with nucleic acid bases. It attacks guanine at three places namely C4, C5, and C8, where at two positions (C4 and C5) it shows reversible reaction. Two adducts formed as C4-adduct and C5-adduct are short lived, as soon as they receive an electron from the solution medium, it gets converted to guanine again and check/inhibit the permanent DNA damage. Whereas, adduct formed with C8 results in an intermediate having long half-life and thus it reacts with water and oxygen to produce 8-oxo-guanine and 2,6-diamino-5-formamido-4-hydroxypyrimidine (FAPy-G) [67]. Figure 3 shows the mechanism involving oxidation of guanine by hydroxyl radical. 8-oxo-G is well studied owing to its efficiency of pairing with Adenine and subsequently causes G→T transversion mutation in genome. The other purine i.e., adenine can also interact similarly with •OH but the lesion caused by oxidation of adenine is not very prevalent in DNA damage and genomic stability.
Another important reagent causing DNA damage identified recently is known as peroxynitrite i.e., the reactive nitrogen species (RNS). It is associated with chronic inflammation and carcinogenesis. Phagocytes are present abundantly in biological system. Invasion and infection of any foreign body to the cell, leads to inflammation of tissues. As the result the phagocytes, in immune and inflammatory responses, produce NO and O2− as cytotoxic agents. These entities react with each other and generate a highly reactive anionic species known as peroxynitrite (ONOO−) [68,69]. It plays a pivotal role in cellular signaling as well as it causes severe damage to nucleobases specifically guanine by converting it into nitration products.
It was hypothesized earlier that 8-oxo-guanine can be generated by hydroxyl radical and nitro product by peroxynitrite, however later it was demonstrated that this RNS react with both guanine and 8-oxo-guanine product but reacts more efficiently with the later [70]. Various other secondary oxidative products are produced via interaction of peroxynitrite with 8-oxo-guanine such as 2,5-diamino-4H-imdazol-4-one (Iz) and 2,2,4-triamino-5-(2H)-oxazolone (Oz). A schematic representation of mechanism of oxidation by RNS is drawn in Figure 4. Tretyakova et al. have demonstrated that various secondary lesions are caused on nucleobase guanine by peroxynitrite, which is then recognized via Fpg repair enzyme [71]. Thus, various studies have confirmed a substantial role of ROS and RNS, in causing oxidative stress and DNA damage in biological systems, specifically causing guanine lesions in cellular environment. We further discuss the role of these species in guanine rich regions and their role in genomic stability.

5. G-Quartet Formation and Role of ROS

A G-tetrad is formed by the association of four guanines paired via Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds. G-tetrads stack vertically one upon another to adopt a G-quadruplex structure linked by several loops. These Hoogsteen hydrogen base pairing is albeit different from typical Watson–Crick base pairing i.e., firstly it differs in the atom involved in hydrogen bonding, secondly in the number of hydrogen bonds via which nucleotides get paired. In case of G-G, Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds involve N7 and O6 of one face whereas N2 and N1 of another face. Figure 5 illustrated the base pairing scheme of Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding between G-G and Watson–Crick base pairing involved in G-C.
Absence of third hydrogen bond in Hoogsteen base pairing indicates the lesser stability of Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds than Watson–Crick base pairing. It is worth mention here that in G-tetrad total 8 hydrogen bonds are involved between four guanines which provides more stability to G-tetrad. G-tetrads arrange themselves one above the other to adopt secondary non-canonical G-quadruplex structures. On the basis of strand stoichiometry these can be tetramolecular (four strands), trimolecular (three strands), bimolecular (two strands), and unimolecular (one strand). Strand polarity also plays a pivotal role in determining the topology of G-quadruplexes i.e., parallel, antiparallel and mixed [19,72,73].
A central cavity is generated by the cyclic arrangement of guanine tetrads, where O6 atoms are arranged towards the center. Tetrads are stacked on one another so four O6 atoms are lined the cavity from one tetrad and four from the tetrad below or above to it. Oxygen is negatively charged so the cavity is neutralized and stabilized by monovalent cation. Cellular environment is rich in various cations. It is well documented that potassium having the best suitability towards the central cavity can effectively coordinate the oxygen atoms [74,75,76].
Literature is rich in the reports that guanine rich regions are abundantly present in telomeric ends as well as upstream promoter regions. These G-rich sequences have potential to adopt folded self-associated G-quadruplex structure. Enrichment of genome in these potential structures indicates towards their regulatory role in biological processes [77,78,79,80]. Recently in vivo evidence as well as their involvement in replication, transcription and recombination etc. is well established [19,81]. Various small molecules such as Quarfloxin, BRACO-19, Berberine, Telomstatin, and Sanguinarine [82,83] and proteins (Pif1 helicase, FMRP, RHAU etc.) specifically interact with these non-B-DNA structures in biological system to stabilize or destabilize these structures [84,85,86].
It has already been discussed in previous section that guanine having a low redox potential is most prone to oxidation. In view of this fact, guanine rich sequences, abundantly present at genomic locations may adopt G-quadruplex structure, and therefore also have potential to undergo oxidation and become vulnerable for oxidative stress. Figure 6a depicted the G-tetrad formation via 4 G•G Hoogsteen hydrogen bond and quartet stacked one above the other which in turn adopts folded G-quadruplex structure. G-quartet stabilized by harboring the K+ ion in the central core of the cavity. In presence of ROS, guanine converts into 8-oxo-Guanine and thus only two Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds are possible between two guanines leading to the obstruction of G-tetrad formation (Figure 6b).
Several groups have investigated the effect of ROS on the G-quadraplex formation with varied topology. In the following section we discuss the effect of ROS on the G-quadruplexes formed at telomeric and promoter locations, and their response towards oxidative damage.

5.1. (i) Telomeric G-Quadruplex and Role of ROS

Various research groups have investigated that guanine nucleobase is more vulnerable to oxidation. The telomeric 3′ overhang, at the end of chromosomes is a G-rich stretch of (TTAGGG)n repeats prone to adopts G-quadruplex structure, is likely to a hub for oxidative damage [87,88]. It is interesting to observe the presence of 50% more of the oxidized guanine in quadruplexes in comparison to the duplex DNA [89]. Telomere shortening and premature senescence is caused due to the oxidative damage to telomeric G-rich sequences. Accordingly, telomeric region is more susceptible for oxidative stress in comparison to other single stranded and double stranded DNA. Vorlickova et al. has reported that guanine lesion via ROS can be possible in vivo which results in destabilization of G-quadruplexes structure nearly unfolded state at physiological conditions. Therefore, the unfolded strand is prone to be cleaved by cellular nucleases and if left unrepaired, results in telomere shortening [42]. Apart from end replication problem, telomere shortening is also induced by various ROS, causing oxidative damage due to single strand break. Various oxidizing agents induce single strand break (SSBs) in greater extent at telomeric DNA as compared to the DNA of other genomic locations [90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98].
Length of telomere is controlled and influenced by genetic as well as environmental factors. The telomerase, a ribonucleoprotein complex, regulates telomere-length maintenance and its integrity by adding telomeric repeats to the 3′-end. It is established that telomerase is actively involved in 85% of human cancer and tumor growth whereas it is inactive in somatic cells [99,100]. It has also been discussed previously that in presence of ROS guanine bases gets oxidized into 8-oxoguanine (8-oxo-G) and 5-hydroxy-methyluracil. The 8-oxo-Gunaine elevated level in telomere hinder the telomerase activity and obstruct the binding of telomeric protein to telomere DNA sequence, resulting in telomere shortening, function and its maintenance [101,102]. The loss of telomere end capping affected majority of cellular processes such as apoptosis, aging, carcinogenesis, and chromosomal instability [100]. When these lesions are not repaired properly, single and double strand breaks (SSBs and DSBs) are caused along with GC-TA mutations, further inducing the genomic instability [103]. Bielskute et al. has demonstrated that substituted guanine of telomeric oligonucleotide sequences with major product of ROS i.e., 8-oxo-7,8-dhydroguanine, reduce hydrogen bonding capability between G-tetrads and thus G-quadruplex structure. It was also shown that glycosidic conformation of G’s are also very important to combat oxidative lesions [104]. A recent report by Bozkus has highlighted the role of telomerase and serum levels of it as a marker of oxidative stress [105]. Aeby et al. recently studied and analyzed chromatin composition and demonstrated that telomeres are abundantly present in an antioxidant enzyme peroxiredoxin 1 (PRDX1) in the S phase of cell cycle. It was demonstrated that in absence of PRDX1 gene enable telomeric DNA prone to oxidative stress. This study revealed that this gene shield telomere from ROS as well as restrain it from telomere damage [106].
Virgilio et al. have recently investigated effect of ROS on the bases present in loop of G-quadruplexes. It is demonstrated that the bases in loop have contrasting effect on stability of G-quadruplex. It was shown that the tetrad present in middle of G-quadruplex structure is less prone to oxidation in comparison to terminal tetrads. Figure 7 displayed the presence of telomeric G-quadruplex and modified bases in presence of ROS. This report also suggested the importance of nucleotides in loop and their substantial role in oxidative damage of G-quadruplex [107]. Therefore, the terminal G-tetrads shield the internal tetrads present in the quadruplexes. Fouquerel et al. and Sarkar et al. have recently given insight about the role of telomere length homeostasis. Their reports emphasized that in presence of increased levels of pre-existing 8-oxo-G (owing to defective OGG1 and ROS detoxification) telomerase-dependent telomere lengthening takes place [108,109].
Several laboratories worldwide are working for better understanding of the cause and consequences of oxidative stress on telomeric G-quadruplexes and its substantial role played in apoptosis, cellular senescence, carcinogenesis etc.

5.2. (ii) G-Quadruplexes in Promoter Region and Effect of ROS

Enrichment of Guanine rich sequences and G-quadruplex structures at promoter locations are well documented. Various oncogene promoters harbor G-rich stretches facilitating formation of non-canonical G-quadruplex structures [110]. The existence of G-quadruplex structures and their biophysical properties are well characterized at various functional regions (promoter, enhancer, 5′-UTR etc.). Involvement of these structures in transcription, translation, and gene regulation are well documented [111,112].
Oxidative DNA damage is well explained in literature specifically Guanine rich sequences and G-quadruplex structures. Fleming et al. have illustrated that a fifth G-track present near the G-quadruplex forming sequences is involved in the formation of these structure can act as a ‘spare-tire’ providing the platform for the oxidatively damaged Guanine stretches to bulge out in loop. These bulged-out Guanine stretches can behave as substrates for base excision repair enzymes. The existence and repair of these oxidatively-damaged guanine bases in promoter location might play a central role in epigenetic modification as well as regulation of gene expression [113].
In an another report Fleming et al. have again demonstrated that in the presence of ROS guanine is converted into 8-oxo-G and via this 8-oxoguanine glycosylase (OGG1) gets activated and induce base excision repair, resulting in the production of abasic sites (AP). The abasic site generated, unwinds the duplex to expose putative quadruplex sequences. Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) binds to the so formed G-quadruplex and cleaves the AP which in turn facilitate the proper activation and smooth functioning of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or endonuclease III-like protein 1 (NHL1) genes [114]. Fedeles has recently suggested that these structural motifs control transcription process as counteract ion against the oxidative stress [17].
Figure 8 depicts a model showing the presence of guanine rich sequences in coding region of a gene near transcription start site and via the formation of G-quadruplex transcription of the gene gets activated. In presence of ROS the guanine gets converted into 8-oxo-Guanine, disrupting the G-quadruplex formation which in turn inhibits transcription. Following the repair of the damaged Guanine, via cellular DNA repair mechanism (BER etc.) the G-quadruplex formation take place, further facilitating the smooth regulation of the transcription process.
Several reports are available revealing the association of oxidative DNA damage and cancer, as well as aging along with role of base excision repair in damaged DNA [53]. Byrd et al. have recently demonstrated the accumulation of G-quadruplexes as stress granule in cytoplasm against the oxidative stress. It is also shown that some proteins interact specifically to G-quadruplexes and modulate m-RNA translation which in turn facilitates the stress granule formation [115]. Fleming et al. reviewed it thoroughly, recently that various oxidation products (8-oxo-G, spiroiminodihydantoin (Sp), 5-guanidinohydantoin (Gh) etc.) formed in cell and cause lesions to secondary structure of DNA (double stranded DNA, G-quadruplex etc.). DNA glycosylases specifically identify these oxidation products in the cell, and BER is initiated via mammalian Nei-like1-3 (NEIL1-3) glycosylases [114]. Very recently, Shi et al. established that on ultraviolet light irradiation, poly-G-quadruplex-TMPyP4 complexes are prone to generate a high level of ROS. It leads to singlet oxygen production at cancer lesions and promotes apoptosis of malignant tissues. This study emphasized G-quadruplex-mediated photodynamic therapy targeting cancer cells [116]. A recent report has demonstrated that 8-oxo-G can play the role of an epigenetic marker for probing the employment of nuclear factors at promoter site substantial for KRAS transcription [117]. Thus with the prevalence of G-rich sequences at specific genomic locations, an interlacing between G-quadruplex and oxidative stress is well established.

6. Outlook

Oxidative stress research now encompasses cell biology, chemistry, biochemistry, physiology, and disease physiology to health and drug research. Major diseases, now even diabetes (type 2), are being considered as ‘redox diseases’ [118]. Oxidative stress is the precursor to oxidative damage. It can cause disruptions in normal mechanisms of cellular signaling and usually manifests into damaged DNA bases, protein oxidation, and lipid peroxidation products. Oxidative damage to DNA is of particular interest as it causes modification in DNA bases. However, owing to its low redox potential the guanine, among the four other nucleobases, is especially susceptible to oxidation. The range of G-rich sequences at genomic locations such as promoters, telomeric region, exons, enhancers, and immunoglobulin switch regions signifies their crucial role in various biological processes [119,120]. The formation of G-quadruplex structures harbor guanine in large numbers, making these structural forms subject to undergo oxidation at a greater extent. Oxidatively damaged G-quadruplexes may play a substantial role in down regulation of transcription process and gene regulation. The involvement of these non-Watson–Crick structures in diseases like neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer’s, and cancer is well established. Literature is rich in reports about deleterious effect of oxidation on DNA, causing damage; mutation etc., the same if left unrepaired further may lead to genomic instability.
The DNA damage on G-quadruplex (8-oxo-G) can possibly be utilized as biomarker or sensor to investigate the elevated level of ROS and thus oxidative stress in cellular environment. Specific proteins are identified which can exclusively recognize and repair these damaged guanines and facilitate G-quadruplex formation leading to smooth transcription and regulatory roles in biological system. Many of the antioxidant genes are known to be polymorphic, which can lead to altered enzyme activity. Since it is known that presence of G-rich segments on the promoter or coding region of the genes may facilitate the formation of quadruplex structures at physiological pH and salt conditions, the molecular insight will enhance the thrust of the concept of redox alterations due to oxidative stress. Due recognition of these structures at genomic locations by specific proteins (helicases) may modulate transcription, thus enabling them act as regulatory elements [121]. Though there have been various convincing reports regarding the pivotal role of oxidative stress in various biological processes involving G-quadruplexes, this review is a humble effort to give a glimpse about the role of these unusual structural forms of DNA in oxidative stress. Several research groups are active worldwide to congregate a more detailed molecular understanding and determine the exact role and mechanism of polymorphic G-quadruplex formation, as a response to stress into biology and medicine. Further studies would also deepen the translational impact of phenomenon of oxidative.

Author Contributions

A.S. performed the literature review and drafted the paper; R.K. and L.S. gave valuable input in writing the paper; S.K. conceived and designed the study as well as assisted in writing the paper. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Funding

Authors would like to acknowledge University of Delhi for the research grant DU-DST/PURSE Grant (CD/2018).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wallner, S.; Hermetter, A.; Mayer, B.; Wascher, T.C. The alpha-amino group of l-arginine mediates its antioxidant effect. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 31, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Shan, L.; Wang, B.; Gao, G.; Cao, W.; Zhang, Y. L-Arginine supplementation improves antioxidant defenses through L-arginine/nitric oxide pathways in exercised rats. J. Appl. Physiol. 2013, 115, 1146–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sestili, P.; Martinelli, C.; Colombo, E.; Barbieri, E.; Potenza, L.; Sartini, S.; Fimognari, C. Creatine as an antioxidant. Amino Acids 2011, 40, 1385–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Prasad, A.S. Zinc is an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent: Its role in human health. Front. Nutr. 2014, 1, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nathan, C.; Cunningham-Bussel, A. Beyond oxidative stress: An immunologist’s guide to reactive oxygen species. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Melis, J.P.M.; Steeg, H.V.; Luijten, M. Oxidative DNA damage and nucleotide excision repair. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 2409–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sheinman, M.; Hermsen, R. Effects of DNA oxidation on the evolution of genomes. bioRxiv 2017. [CrossRef]
  8. Pedro, J.; Angeli, F.; Miyamoto, S.; Schulze, A. Ferroptosis: The Greasy Side of Cell Death. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2019, 32, 362–369. [Google Scholar]
  9. Alam, Z.I.; Jenner, A.; Daniel, S.E.; Lees, A.J.; Cairns, N.; Marsden, C.D.; Jenner, P.; Halliwell, B. Oxidative DNA damage in the parkinsonian brain: An apparent selective increase in 8-hydroxyguanine levels in substantia nigra. J. Neurochem. 1997, 69, 1196–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Poulsen, H.E.; Prieme, H.; Loft, S. Role of oxidative DNA damage in cancer initiation and promotion. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 1998, 7, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gabbita, S.P.; Lovell, M.A.; Markesbery, W.R. Increased nuclear DNA oxidation in the brain in Alz-heimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 1998, 71, 2034–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Finkel, T.; Holbrook, N.J. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 2000, 408, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Arlt, S.; Beisiegel, U.; Kontush, A. Lipid per-oxidation in neurodegeneration: New insights into Alz-heimer’s disease. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2002, 13, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Boesten, D.M.P.H.J.; de Vos-Houben, J.M.J.; Timmermans, L.; den Hartog, G.J.M.; Bast, A.; Hageman, G.J. Accelerated Aging during Chronic Oxidative Stress: A Role for PARP-1. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 2013, 680414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Singh, A.; Kukreti, R.; Sasso, L.; Kukreti, S. Oxidative Stress: A Key Modulator in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Molecules 2019, 24, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Clark, D.W.; Phang, T.; Edwards, M.G.; Geraci, M.W.; Gillespie, M.N. Promoter G-quadruplex sequences are targets for base oxidation and strand cleavage during hypoxia-induced transcription. Free Radic Biol. Med. 2012, 53, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Fedeles, B.I. G-quadruplex–forming promoter sequences enable transcriptional activation in response to oxidative stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 2788–2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, S.C.; Zhang, J.; Strom, J.; Yang, D.; Dinh, T.N.; Kappeler, K.; Chen, Q.M. G-Quadruplex in the NRF2 mRNA 5’ Untranslated Region Regulates De Novo NRF2 Protein Translation under Oxidative Stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2016, 37, e00122-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bochman, M.L.; Paeschke, K.; Zakian, V.A. DNA secondary structures: Stability and function of G-quadruplex structures. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 770–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chambers, V.S.; Marsico, G.; Boutell, J.M.; Di Antonio, M.; Smith, G.P.; Balasubramanian, S. High-throughput sequencing of DNA G-quadruplex structures in the human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 877–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Simonsson, T.; Pecinka, P.; Kubista, M. DNA Tetraplex Formation in the Control Region of C-Myc. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26, 1167–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Siddiqui-Jain, A.; Grand, C.L.; Bearss, D.J.; Hurley, L.H. Direct Evidence for a G-Quadruplex In a Promoter Region and Its Targeting with a Small Molecule to Repress C-MYC Transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 11593–11598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rankin, S.; Reszka, A.P.; Huppert, J.; Zloh, M.; Parkinson, G.N.; Todd, A.K.; Ladame, S.; Balasubramanian, S.; Neidle, S. Putative DNA Quadruplex Formation within the Human C-Kit Oncogene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10584–10589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cogoi, S.; Xodo, L.E. G-quadruplex formation within the promoter of the KRAS proto-oncogene and its effect on transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 2536–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sun, D.; Guo, K.; Rusche, J.J.; Hurley, L.H. Facilitation of a Structural Transition in the Polypurine/Polypyrimidine Tract within the Proximal Promoter Region of the Human VEGF Gene by the Presence of Potassium and G-Quadruplex-Interactive Agents. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 6070–6080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sun, D.; Wei-Jun, L.; Guo, K.; Rusche, J.J.; Ebbinghaus, S.; Gokhale, V.; Hurley, L.H. The Proximal Promoter Region of the Human Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Has A G-Quadruplex Structure that can be targeted by G-Quadruplex–Interactive Agents. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 880–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, Y.; Agrawal, P.; Brown, R.V.; Hatzakis, E.; Hurley, L.; Yang, D. The Major G-Quadruplex Formed in the Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor Β (PDGFR-Β) Promoter Adopts a Novel Broken-Strand Structure in K+ Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13220–13223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Agrawal, P.; Lin, C.; Mathad, R.I.; Carver, M.; Yang, D. The major G-quadruplex formed in the human BCL-2 proximal promoter adopts a parallel structure with a 13-nt loop in K+ solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1750–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Palumbo, S.L.; Memmott, R.M.; Uribe, D.J.; Krotova-Khan, Y.; Hurley, L.H.; Ebbinghaus, S.W. A Novel G-Quadruplex-Forming GGA Repeat Region in the C-Myb Promoter is a Critical Regulator of Promoter Activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 1755–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tong, X.; Lan, W.; Zhang, X.; Wu, H.; Liu, M.; Cao, C. Solution structure of all parallel G-quadruplex formed by the oncogene RET promoter sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 6753–6763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mitchell, T.; Ramos-Montoya, A.; Di Antonio, M.; Murat, P.; Ohnmacht, S.; Micco, M.; Jurmeister, S.; Fryer, L.; Balasubramanian, S.; Neidle, S.; et al. Downregulation of androgen receptor transcription by promoter G-quadruplex stabilization as a potential alternative treatment for castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Biochemistry 2013, 52, 1429–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Brown, R.V.; Gaerig, V.C.; Simmons, T.; Brooks, T.A. Helping Eve overcome ADAM: G-quadruplexes in the ADAM-15 promoter as new molecular targets for breast cancer therapeutics. Molecules 2013, 18, 15019–15034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chaires, J.B.; Trent, J.O.; Gray, R.D.; Dean, W.L.; Buscaglia, R.; Thomas, S.D.; Miller, D.M. An improved model for the hTERT promoter quadruplex. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e115580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yan, J.; Zhao, D.; Dong, L.; Pan, S.; Hao, F.; Guan, Y. A novel G-quadruplex motif in the Human MET promoter region. Biosci. Rep. 2017, 37, BSR20171128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Min, J.; Choi, E.S.; Hwang, K.; Kim, J.; Sampath, S.; Venkitaraman, A.R.; Lee, H. The Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene BRCA2 is Required for the Maintenance of Telomere Homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 5091–5101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Grigg, J.C.; Shumayrikh, N.; Sen, D. G-quadruplex structures formed by expanded hexanucleotide repeat RNA and DNA from the neurodegenerative disease-linked C9orf72 gene efficiently sequester and activate heme. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Simone, R.; Fratta, P.; Neidle, S.; Parkinson, G.N.; Isaacs, A.M. G-Quadruplexes: Emerging Roles in Neurodegenerative Diseases and the Non-Coding Transcriptome. Fed. Eur. Biochem. Soc. 2015, 589, 1653–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhou, B.; Geng, Y.; Liu, C.; Miao, H.; Ren, Y.; Xu, N.; Shi, X.; You, Y.; Lee, T.; Zhu, G. Characterizations of Distinct Parallel and Antiparallel G-Quadruplexes Formed by Two-Repeat ALS and FTD Related GGGGCC Sequence. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Darnell, J.C.; Jensen, K.B.; Jin, P.; Brown, V.; Warren, S.T.; Darnell, R.B. Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein Targets G Quartet mRNAs Important for Neuronal Function. Cell 2001, 107, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Balkwill, G.D.; Kamila, D.; Garner, T.P.; Hodgman, C.; Flint, A.P.; Searle, M.S. Repression of Translation of Human Estrogen Receptor R by G-Quadruplex Formation. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 11487–11495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bugaut, A.; Balasubramanian, S. 5′-UTR RNA G-quadruplexes: Translation regulation and targeting. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 4727–4741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vorlícková, M.; Tomasko, M.; Sagi, A.J.; Bednarova, K.; Sagi, J. 8-Oxoguanine in a quadruplex of the human telomere DNA sequence. FEBS J. 2012, 279, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Patel, R.; Rinker, L.; Peng, J.; Chilian, W.M. Reactive Oxygen Species: The Good and the Bad, Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in Living Cells, Cristiana Filip and Elena Albu; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kohchi, C.; Inagawa, H.; Nishizawa, T.; Soma, G. Innate immunity. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29, 817–821. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Li, Q.; Verma, I.M. NF-kappaB regulation in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 2, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Thannickal, V.J.; Fanburg, B.L. Reactive oxygen species in cell signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2000, 279, L1005–L1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Tulard, A.; Hoffschir, F.; de Boisferon, F.H.; Luccioni, C.; Bravard, A. Persistent oxidative stress after ionizing radiation is involved in inherited radiosensitivity. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2003, 35, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Little, J.B. Ionizing Radiation. In Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine, 5th ed.; Bast, R.C., Jr., Croce, C.M., Hait, W.N., Hong, W.K., Kufe, D.W., Piccart-Gebart, M., Pollock, R.E., Weichselbaum, R.R., Wang, H., Holland, J.F., Eds.; BC Decker: Hamilton, ON, Canada, 2000; Chapter 14. [Google Scholar]
  49. Klaunig, J.E.; Kamendulis, L.M. The Role of Oxidative Stress in Carcinogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2004, 44, 239–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cooke, M.S.; Evans, M.D.; Dizdaroglu, M.; Lunec, J. Oxidative DNA Damage: Mechanisms, Mutation, and Disease. J. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2003, 17, 1195–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ohtsubo, T.; Ohya, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Kansui, Y.; Furuichi, M.; Matsumura, K.; Fujii, K.; Iida, M.; Nakabeppu, Y. Accumulation of 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine in Cardiovascular Tissues with the Development of Hypertension. DNA Repair 2007, 6, 760–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mariarosaria, D.; Eleonora, P.; Eugenia, D. Mechanism of Oxidative DNA Damage Repair and Relevance to Human Pathology. Mutat. Res. 2008, 659, 4–14. [Google Scholar]
  53. Maynard, S.; Schurman, S.H.; Harboe, C.; de Souza-Pinto, N.C.; Bohr, V.A. Base Excision Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage and Association with Cancer and Aging. Carcinogenesis 2009, 30, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mikkelsen, L.; Bialkowski, K.; Risom, L.; Løhr, M.; Loft, S.; Møller, P. Aging and Defense Against Generation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′deoxyguanosine in DNA. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2009, 47, 608–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sitkovsky, M.; Lukashev, D. Regulation of immune cells by local-tissue oxygen tension: HIF1 [alpha] and adenosine receptors. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 5, 712–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Krystona, T.B.; Georgieva, A.B.; Pissisb, P.; Georgakilasa, A.G. Role of oxidative stress and DNA damage in human carcinogenesis. Mutat. Res. 2011, 711, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Eiberger, W.; Volkmer, B.; Amouroux, R.; Dhérin, C.; Radicella, J.P.; Epe, B. Oxidative stress impairs the repair of oxidative DNA base modifications in human skin fibroblasts and melanoma cells. DNA Repair 2008, 7, 912–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Miller, D.M.; Buettner, G.R.; Aust, S.D. Transition Metals as Catalysts of “autoxidation” Reactions. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1990, 8, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Klaunig, J.E.; Kamendulis, L.M.; Hocevar, B.A. Oxidative Stress and Oxidative Damage in Carcinogenesis. Toxicol. Pathol. 2010, 38, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Lund, L.G.; Aust, A.E. Iron mobilization from asbestos by chelators and ascorbic acid. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1990, 270, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Imlay, J.A.; Chin, S.M.; Linn, S. Toxic DNA damage by hydrogen peroxide through the Fenton reaction in vivo and in vitro. Science 1988, 240, 640–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Inoue, S.; Kawanishi, S. Hydroxyl radical production and human DNA damage induced by ferric nitrilotriacetate and hydrogen peroxide. Cancer Res. 1987, 47, 6522–6527. [Google Scholar]
  63. Celander, D.W.; Cech, T.R. Iron (II)-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid catalyzed cleavage of RNA and DNA oligonucleotides: Similar reactivity toward single- and double-stranded forms. Biochemistry 1990, 29, 1355–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Grisham, M.B. Reactive Metabolites of Oxygen and Nitrogen in Biology and Medicine, Georgetown. Landes 1992, 43, 47–48. [Google Scholar]
  65. Halliwell, B.; Aruoma, O.I. DNA damage by oxygen-derived species. Its mechanism and measurement in mammalian systems. FEBS Lett. 1991, 281, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Goldberg, I.H. Free radical mechanism in neocarzinostatin-induced DNA damage. Free Radic Biol. Med. 1987, 3, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Aust, A.E.; Eveleigh, J.F. Mechanism of DNA Oxidation (44449). Exp. Biol. Med. 1999, 222, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Szabó, C.; Ohshima, H. DNA Damage Induced by Peroxynitrite: Subsequent Biological Effects. Nitric Oxide 1997, 1, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kawanishi, S.; Hiraku, Y.; Oikawa, S. Mechanism of guanine-specific DNA damage by oxidative stress and its role in carcinogenesis and aging. Mutat. Res. 2001, 488, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Niles, J.C.; Wishnok, J.S.; Tannenbaum, S.R. Peroxynitrite-induced oxidation and nitration products of guanine and 8-oxoguanine: Structures and mechanisms of product formation. Nitric Oxide 2006, 14, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tretyakova, N.Y.; Wishnok, J.S.; Tannenbaum, S.R. Peroxynitrite-Induced Secondary Oxidative Lesions at Guanine Nucleobases: Chemical Stability and Recognition by the Fpg DNA Repair Enzyme. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2000, 13, 658–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kaushik, M.; Kaushik, S.; Bansal, A.; Saxena, S.; Kukreti, S. Structural diversity and specific recognition of four stranded G-quadruplex DNA. Curr. Mol. Med. 2011, 11, 744–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Singh, A.; Kukreti, S. A triple stranded G-quadruplex formation in the promoter region of human myosin β (Myh7) gene. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2018, 36, 2773–2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Bhattacharyya, D.; Arachchilage, G.M.; Basu, S. Metal Cations in G-Quadruplex Folding and Stability. Front. Chem. 2016, 4, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Siebenmorgen, T.; Zacharias, M. Origin of Ion Specificity of Telomeric DNA G-Quadruplexes Investigated by Free-Energy Simulations. Biophys. J. 2017, 112, 2280–2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Kiziria, E.; Gorgoshidze, M.; Gogichaishvili, S.; Sokhadze, V.; Khachidze, D.; Kiladze, M.; Lomidze, E.; Barbakadze, S.; Tvauri, G.; Monaselidze, J. Influence of K+ Ions on Thermodynamic Stability of DNA G-Quadruplex. Bull. Georgian Natl. Acad. Sci. 2017, 11, 42–46. [Google Scholar]
  77. Rhodes, D.; Lipps, H.J. G-quadruplexes and their regulatory roles in biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 8627–8637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Bedrat, A.; Lacroix, L.; Mergny, J.L. Re-evaluation of G-quadruplex propensity with G4Hunter. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, 1746–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kouzine, F.; Wojtowicz, D.; Baranello, L.; Yamane, A.; Nelson, S.; Resch, W.; Kieffer-Kwon, K.R.; Benham, C.J.; Casellas, R.; Przytycka, T.M.; et al. Permanganate/S1 nuclease footprinting reveals non-B DNA structures with regulatory potential across a mammalian genome. Cell Syst. 2017, 4, 344–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rigo, R.; Palumbo, M.; Sissi, C. G-quadruplexes in human promoters: A challenge for therapeutic applications. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2017, 1861, 1399–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Biffi, G.; Tannahill, D.; McCafferty, J.; Balasubramanian, S. Quantitative visualization of DNA G-quadruplex structures in human cells. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Buket, O.; Clement, L.; DanZhou, Y. DNA G-quadruplex and its potential as anticancer drug target. Sci. China Chem. 2014, 57, 1605–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yang, F.; Sun, X.; Wang, L.; Li, Q.; Guan, A.; Shen, G.; Tang, Y. Selective recognition of c-myc promoter G-quadruplex and down-regulation of oncogene c-myc transcription in human cancer cells by 3,8 a-disubstituted indolizinone. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 51965–51969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Brázda, V.; Hároníková, L.; Liao, J.C.C.; Fojta, M. DNA and RNA Quadruplex-Binding Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 17493–17517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Heddi, B.; Cheong, V.V.; Martadinata, H.; Phan, A.T. Insights into G-quadruplex specific recognition by the DEAH-box helicase RHAU: Solution structure of a peptide–quadruplex complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 9608–9613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. McAninch, D.S.; Heinaman, A.M.; Lang, C.N.; Moss, K.R.; Bassell, G.J.; Mihailescua, M.R.; Evans, T.L. Fragile X mental retardation protein recognizes a G quadruplex structure within the survival motor neuron domain containing 1 mRNA 5′-UTR. Mol. BioSyst. 2017, 13, 1448–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Zhao, Y.; Hoshiyama, H.; Shay, J.W.; Wright, W.E. Quantitative telomeric overhang determination using a double-strand specific nuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Wang, Q.; Liu, J.-Q.; Chen, Z.; Zheng, K.-W.; Chen, C.-Y.; Hao, Y.-H.; Tan, Z. G-quadruplex formation at the 30 end of telomere DNA inhibits its extension by telomerase, polymerase and unwinding by helicase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 6229–6237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Delaney, S.; Barton, J.K. Charge Transport in DNA Duplex/Quadruplex Conjugates. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 14159–14165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Harley, C.B.; Futcher, A.B.; Greider, C.W. Telomeres shorten during ageing of human fibroblasts. Nature 1990, 345, 458–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Petersen, S.; Saretzki, G.; von Zglinicki, T. Preferential accumulation of single-stranded regions in telomeres of human fibroblasts. Exp. Cell Res. 1998, 239, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Oikawa, S.; Kawanishi, S. Site-specific DNA damage at GGG sequence by oxidative stress may accelerate telomere shortening. FEBS Lett. 1999, 453, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Zglinicki, T.V. Oxidative stress shortens telomeres. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002, 27, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Stewart, S.A.; Ben-Porath, I.; Carey, V.J.; O’Connor, B.F.; Hahn, W.C.; Weinberg, R.A. Erosion of the telomeric single-strand overhang at replicative senescence. Nat. Genet. 2003, 33, 492–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Kawanishi, S.; Oikawa, S. Mechanism of telomere shortening by oxidative stress. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2004, 1019, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Epel, E.S.; Blackburn, E.H.; Lin, J.; Dhabhar, F.S.; Adler, N.E.; Morrow, J.D.; Cawthon, R.M. Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 17312–17315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Passos, J.F.; Saretzki, G.; Zglinicki, T.V. DNA damage in telomeres and mitochondria during cellular senescence: Is there a connection? Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 7505–7513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Coluzzi, E.; Colamartino, M.; Cozzi, R.; Leone, S.; Meneghini, C.; O’Callaghan, N.; Sgura, A. Oxidative Stress Induces Persistent Telomeric DNA Damage Responsible for Nuclear Morphology Change in Mammalian Cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Jafri, M.A.; Ansari, S.A.; Alqahtani, M.H.; Shay, J.W. Roles of telomeres and telomerase in cancer, and advances in telomerase targeted therapies. Genome Med. 2016, 8, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Graham, M.K.; Meeker, A. Telomeres and telomerase in prostate cancer development and therapy. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2017, 14, 607–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Opresko, P.L.; Fan, J.; Danzy, S.; Wilson, D.M.; Bohr, V.A. Oxidative damage in telomeric DNA disrupts recognition by TRF1 and TRF2. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 1230–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Lee, H.-T.; Bose, A.; Lee, C.-Y.; Opresko, P.L.; Myong, S. Molecular mechanisms by which oxidative DNA damage promotes telomerase activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, 11752–11765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Grollman, A.P.; Moriya, M. Mutagenesis by 8-oxoguanine: An enemy within. Trends Genet. 1993, 9, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Bielskutė, S.; Plavec, J.; Podbevšek, P. Impact of Oxidative Lesions on the Human Telomeric G-Quadruplex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 2594–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Bozkus, F. Could serum levels of telomerase be considered as an oxidative stress marker in COPD? Telomere Telomerase 2016, 3, e1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Aeby, E.; Ahmed, W.; Redon, S.; Simanis, V.; Lingner, J. Peroxiredoxin 1 Protects Telomeres from Oxidative Damage and Preserves Telomeric DNA for Extension by Telomerase. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 3107–3114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Virgilio, A.; Esposito, V.; Mayol, L.; Giancola, C.; Petraccone, L.; Galeone, A. The oxidative damage to the human telomere: Effects of 5-hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxyuridine on telomeric G-quadruplex structures. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 7421–7429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Fouquerel, E.; Lormand, J.; Bose, A.; Lee, H.-T.; Kim, G.S.; Li, J.; Sobol, R.W.; Freudenthal, B.D.; Myong, S.; Opresko, P.L. Oxidative guanine base damage regulates human telomerase activity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016, 23, 1092–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Sarkar, J.; Liu, Y. The origin of oxidized guanine resolves the puzzle of oxidation induced telomere-length alterations. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016, 23, 1070–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Balasubramanian, S. Targeting G-quadruplexes in gene promoters: A novel anticancer strategy? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011, 10, 261–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhou, W.; Suntharalingam, K.; Brand, N.J.; Barton, P.J.R.; Vilar, R.; Ying, L. Possible Regulatory Roles of Promoter G-Quadruplexes in Cardiac Function-Related Genes—Human TnIc as a Model. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yuan, L.; Tian, T.; Chen, Y.; Yan, S.; Xing, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhai, Q.; Xu, L.; Wang, S.; Weng, X.; et al. Existence of G-quadruplex structures in promoter region of oncogenes confirmed by G-quadruplex DNA cross-linking strategy. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 01811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Fleming, A.M.; Zhou, J.; Wallace, S.S.; Burrows, C.J. A Role for the Fifth G-Track in G-Quadruplex Forming Oncogene Promoter Sequences during Oxidative Stress: Do These “Spare Tires” Have an Evolved Function? ACS Cent. Sci. 2015, 1, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Fleming, A.M.; Dinga, Y.; Burrowsa, C.J. Oxidative DNA damage is epigenetic by regulating gene transcription via base excision repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 2604–2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Byrd, A.K.; Zybailov, B.L.; Maddukuri, L.; Gao, J.; Marecki, J.C.; Jaiswal, M.; Bell, M.R.; Griffin, W.C.; Reed, M.R.; Chib, S.; et al. Evidence that G-quadruplex DNA Accumulates in the Cytoplasm and Participates in Stress Granule Assembly in Response to Oxidative Stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 18041–18057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Shi, T.; Wang, M.; Li, H.; Wang, M.; Luo, X.; Huang, Y.; Wang, H.-H.; Nie, Z.; Yao, S. Simultaneous Monitoring of Cell-surface Receptor and Tumor-targeted Photodynamic Therapy via TdT-initiated Poly-G-Quadruplexes. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Cogoi, S.; Ferino, A.; Miglietta, G.; Pedersen, E.B.; Xodo, L.E. The regulatory G4 motif of the Kirsten ras (KRAS) gene is sensitive to guanine oxidation: Implications on transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, 661–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Watson, J.D. Type 2 Diabetes as a redox disease. Lancet 2014, 383, 841–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Bartas, M.; Brazda, V.; Karlicky, V.; Cerven, J.; Pecinka, P. Bioinformatics analyses and in vitro evidence for five and six stacked G-quadruplex forming sequences. Biochimie 2018, 150, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Dvorkin, S.A.; Karslslotis, A.I.; da Silva, M.W. Encoding canonical DNA quadruplex structure. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaat3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Kaushik, M.; Kaushik, S.; Roy, K.; Singh, A.; Mahendru, S.; Kumar, M.; Chaudhary, S.; Ahmed, S.; Kukreti, S. A bouquet of DNA structures: Emerging diversity. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2016, 5, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 20 04258 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of biological role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in oxidative stress and various diseases.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of biological role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in oxidative stress and various diseases.
Ijms 20 04258 g001
Ijms 20 04258 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of mechanism of oxidation by oxygen (a) and base pairing via hydrogen bond between 8-oxo-guanine and Adenine (b).
Figure 2. Schematic representation of mechanism of oxidation by oxygen (a) and base pairing via hydrogen bond between 8-oxo-guanine and Adenine (b).
Ijms 20 04258 g002
Ijms 20 04258 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic representation of mechanism of oxidation of guanine by hydroxyl radical.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of mechanism of oxidation of guanine by hydroxyl radical.
Ijms 20 04258 g003
Ijms 20 04258 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic representation of mechanism of oxidation of guanine by peroxynitrite.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of mechanism of oxidation of guanine by peroxynitrite.
Ijms 20 04258 g004
Ijms 20 04258 g005 550
Figure 5. Base pairing scheme involved in G-G (Hoogsteen Base-pairing) and G-C (Watson–Crick Base-pairing).
Figure 5. Base pairing scheme involved in G-G (Hoogsteen Base-pairing) and G-C (Watson–Crick Base-pairing).
Ijms 20 04258 g005
Ijms 20 04258 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Guanines paired via Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding leads to stabilized tetrad formation and thus G-quadruplex formation (b) on oxidation 8-oxo-Guanine formed, so the Hoogsteen Hydrogen bonding disrupted leads to destabilization of G-tetrad.
Figure 6. (a) Guanines paired via Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding leads to stabilized tetrad formation and thus G-quadruplex formation (b) on oxidation 8-oxo-Guanine formed, so the Hoogsteen Hydrogen bonding disrupted leads to destabilization of G-tetrad.
Ijms 20 04258 g006
Ijms 20 04258 g007 550
Figure 7. G-quadruplex formation at telomeric end and possible modification in DNA bases due to ROS.
Figure 7. G-quadruplex formation at telomeric end and possible modification in DNA bases due to ROS.
Ijms 20 04258 g007
Ijms 20 04258 g008 550
Figure 8. Effect of ROS on G-quadruplex formation and transcription. (a) In the absence of ROS, the G-quadruplex formation takes place activating the transcription (b) G-quadruplex formation is disrupted by ROS, as a result transcription is suppressed (c) DNA gets repaired and G-quadruplex formation leads to transcription.
Figure 8. Effect of ROS on G-quadruplex formation and transcription. (a) In the absence of ROS, the G-quadruplex formation takes place activating the transcription (b) G-quadruplex formation is disrupted by ROS, as a result transcription is suppressed (c) DNA gets repaired and G-quadruplex formation leads to transcription.
Ijms 20 04258 g008
Table
Table 1. Human genes containing potential G-quadruplexe sequences, associated to various diseases.
Table 1. Human genes containing potential G-quadruplexe sequences, associated to various diseases.
S. No.GeneDiseaseReferences
1c-MycGastrointestinal, ovarian and breast cancer tumors[21,22]
2c-KitGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)[23]
3KRASPancreatic carcinoma[24]
4VEGFTumor angiogenesis[25,26]
5PDGFCancers and fibrotic disorders[27]
6BCL-2B-cell and T-cell lymphomas and breast prostate cervical Colorectal and non-small cell lung carcinomas[28]
7C-MybLeukemias[29]
8RETThyroid cancers[30]
9ARCastrate-resistant prostate cancer[31]
10ADAMBreast cancer[32]
11hTERTLimitless replication and cancer[33]
12METCancers of kidney, liver, stomach, breast, and brain[34]
13BRCA2Familial breast/ovarian cancer, telomere homeostasis[35]
14C9orf72 GeneAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or frontotemporal dementia (FTD)[36,37,38]
15FMR1 GeneFragile X syndrome[39]
16ESR1Cancer and neoplasia[40]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, A.; Kukreti, R.; Saso, L.; Kukreti, S. Oxidative Stress: Role and Response of Short Guanine Tracts at Genomic Locations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174258

AMA Style

Singh A, Kukreti R, Saso L, Kukreti S. Oxidative Stress: Role and Response of Short Guanine Tracts at Genomic Locations. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(17):4258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174258

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Anju, Ritushree Kukreti, Luciano Saso, and Shrikant Kukreti. 2019. "Oxidative Stress: Role and Response of Short Guanine Tracts at Genomic Locations" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 17: 4258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174258

APA Style

Singh, A., Kukreti, R., Saso, L., & Kukreti, S. (2019). Oxidative Stress: Role and Response of Short Guanine Tracts at Genomic Locations. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(17), 4258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20174258

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop