Next Article in Journal
Importance of the Interaction between Heading Date Genes Hd1 and Ghd7 for Controlling Yield Traits in Rice
Next Article in Special Issue
AMPK Activation Promotes Tight Junction Assembly in Intestinal Epithelial Caco-2 Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Post-Genomic Methodologies and Preclinical Animal Models: Chances for the Translation of Cardioprotection to the Clinic
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms20030515
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

AMPK-Mediated Regulation of Alpha-Arrestins and Protein Trafficking

by
Allyson F. O’Donnell
1,* and
Martin C. Schmidt
2,*
1
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
2
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(3), 515; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030515
Submission received: 18 December 2018 / Revised: 17 January 2019 / Accepted: 17 January 2019 / Published: 25 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Signalling 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) plays a central role in the regulation of cellular metabolism. Recent studies reveal a novel role for AMPK in the regulation of glucose and other carbohydrates flux by controlling the endocytosis of transporters. The first step in glucose metabolism is glucose uptake, a process mediated by members of the GLUT/SLC2A (glucose transporters) or HXT (hexose transporters) family of twelve-transmembrane domain glucose transporters in mammals and yeast, respectively. These proteins are conserved from yeast to humans, and multiple transporters—each with distinct kinetic properties—compete for plasma membrane occupancy in order to enhance or limit the rate of glucose uptake. During growth in the presence of alternative carbon sources, glucose transporters are removed and replaced with the appropriate transporter to help support growth in response to this environment. New insights into the regulated protein trafficking of these transporters reveal the requirement for specific α-arrestins, a little-studied class of protein trafficking adaptor. A defining feature of the α-arrestins is that each contains PY-motifs, which can bind to the ubiquitin ligases from the NEDD4/Rsp5 (Neural precursor cell Expressed, Developmentally Down-regulated 4 and Reverses Spt- Phenotype 5, respectively) family. Specific association of α-arrestins with glucose and carbohydrate transporters is thought to bring the ubiquitin ligase in close proximity to its membrane substrate, and thereby allows the membrane cargo to become ubiquitinated. This ubiquitination in turn serves as a mark to stimulate endocytosis. Recent results show that AMPK phosphorylation of the α-arrestins impacts their abundance and/or ability to stimulate carbohydrate transporter endocytosis. Indeed, AMPK or glucose limitation also controls α-arrestin gene expression, adding an additional layer of complexity to this regulation. Here, we review the recent studies that have expanded the role of AMPK in cellular metabolism to include regulation of α-arrestin-mediated trafficking of transporters and show that this mechanism of regulation is conserved over the ~150 million years of evolution that separate yeast from man.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cells must sense and respond to the carbohydrate supply in their environment to ensure continued energy supply. The preferred carbohydrate fuel for most eukaryotic cells is glucose, and its uptake from the environment is controlled by a family of facilitative glucose transporters known as GLUTs in mammalian cells or HXTs (hexose transporters) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [1,2,3]. Once inside the cell, glucose—through the concerted actions of glycolysis, the citric acid cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation—is used to generate a reservoir of adenonsine triphopshpate (ATP), the cellular energy currency. ATP in turn drives the vast majority of energy-requiring activities in the cell. This cascade of events highlights the critical importance of glucose uptake; without it, generation of ATP becomes inefficient in some cell types and a shortage in ATP supply can cause the energy-dependent reactions in the cell to grind to a halt. Indeed, dysregulation of glucose uptake is associated with a wide array of metabolic disorders, the most prevalent of which is diabetes with >30 million Americans diagnosed with this disorder (see CDC report 2017 https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/statistics/national-diabetes-statistics-report.pdf).
Given the interconnectedness of glucose uptake and the ATP energy balance in the cell, it makes intuitive sense that the cell coordinates these two processes. At the heart of this regulatory circuit lies the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK in mammals, Snf1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae), which is conserved across eukaryotes and becomes an active kinase when the AMP/ATP or ADP/ATP ratios in the cell increase [4]. Elevated adenosine monophosphate (AMP) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) acts as a molecular red flag, signaling that the cell may not be able to meet future cellular energy demands. In response, AMPK stimulates catabolic pathways needed to bolster ATP reserves while slowing cellular anabolic processes to reduce energy demands [5]. A key outcome of AMPK activation in response to falling energy levels is increased glucose uptake [6,7,8,9,10]. To achieve this end, AMPK alters the trafficking of glucose transporters in multiple ways. For example, in muscle cells AMPK phosphorylates TBC1 domain family member 1D (TBC1D), a RAB-GTPase activating protein (GAP) that inhibits fusion of glucose transporter isoform 4 (GLUT4) storage vesicles with the plasma membrane, to impair its function and so stimulate fusion of GLUT4-containing vesicles with the plasma membrane and improve glucose uptake [11,12]. A similar stimulation of glucose transporter isoform 1 (GLUT1) translocation to the plasma membrane occurs upon AMPK activation in hamster kidney cell lines [13]. In contrast, in rat liver cells AMPK can stimulate GLUT1-mediated glucose uptake in a translocation-independent fashion [9,10], a phenomenon first described almost 20 years ago; however, the mechanism underlying this AMPK-dependent activity remains unknown.
Excitingly, more recent studies have defined a new role for AMPK in regulating the protein trafficking of glucose and other carbohydrate transporters. These studies provide a long sought-after mechanistic answer to how AMPK stimulates glucose uptake in the absence of glucose transporter translocation [14,15]. In brief, AMPK has been shown to phosphorylate and inhibit multiple members of a protein trafficking adaptor family, known as the α-arrestins, which are responsible for the endocytosis of multiple carbohydrate transporters. The α-arrestins, conserved across eukaryotic lineages with the exception of plants, act as cargo selective trafficking adaptors that bind to both transmembrane proteins and a ubiquitin ligase [16]. By bringing the ubiquitin ligase into close proximity with select membrane proteins (referred to hereafter as “cargos”), α-arrestins facilitate ubiquitination of the membrane cargo, which serves as a mark for cargo incorporation into endocytic vesicles [17,18,19,20,21]. Herein we review a complementary suite of studies from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammalian cell lines. These studies have converged on a remarkably similar regulatory model whereby phosphorylation of the α-arrestins by AMPK prevents α-arrestin-mediated endocytosis of glucose and other carbohydrate transporters (Figure 1) [15,17,22]. In addition to regulating α-arrestin function, AMPK further exerts control over the expression of α-arrestins in mammalian cells, and possibly analogous carbon-source-dependent expression changes are also reported for yeast α-arrestins (Figure 2) [23,24,25,26]. Together, these studies reveal an ancient mechanism for sensing and responding to cellular energy status that predates the evolution of multicellularity and has important clinical ramifications for the treatment of human metabolic disorders.

2. The Arrestin Family of Protein Trafficking Adaptors

In 2008, the α-arrestins were first identified as part of the larger arrestin family, which spans the Spo0M-related proteins in bacteria, Vps26-related proteins found in all branches of life, the broadly conserved α-arrestins and the most recently evolved β- and visual-arrestins (the latter two referred to hereafter collectively as β-arrestins) [27]. The crystal structures for several family members have been solved identifying conserved N- and C-terminal arrestin-fold domains, each of which contains 7 anti-parallel beta-sheets connected by linker regions of variable length and composition [28,29,30,31]. These arrestin-folds are the defining feature of the family. β-arrestins, the most well-studied class of arrestins, operate as multi-faceted protein trafficking adaptors that bind to membrane cargo proteins, including G-protein coupled receptors, and interact with the AP-2 adaptin complex and clathrin to promote endocytic turnover of their cognate cargos [32,33]. β-arrestins control post-endocytic sorting of their membrane cargos and can also act as signaling scaffolds, binding to multiple protein kinases and thereby tethering their activity to a specific cellular location [33]. Phosphorylation of the β-arrestins is often associated with inhibition of their endocytic function [34,35,36]; however, to our knowledge AMPK has not been show to phosphorylate β-arrestins directly.
Unlike their β-arrestin relatives, functions for α-arrestins have only more recently been described and studies of the α-arrestins are closer to their inception. The α-arrestins are conserved from yeast to man; to date there are 14 α-arrestins identified in yeast (Rod1/Art4, Rog3/Art7, Aly1/Art6, Aly2/Art3, Ldb19/Art1, Csr2/Art8, Ecm21/Art2, Rim8/Art9, Art5, Art10, Bul1, Bul2, Bul3, and Spo23) and 6 in mammalian cells (Arrestin-Domain Containing Protein (ARRDC)1, ARRDC2, ARRDC3, ARRDC4, ARRDC5, and Thioredoxin Interacting Protein 1 (TXNIP)). Many of the initial studies defining α-arrestin function in protein trafficking come from work in S. cerevisiae [17,18,19,20,37]. These studies demonstrate that α-arrestins function in an analogous fashion to the β-arrestins; α-arrestins bind selectively to membrane cargo proteins and help stimulate their endocytosis in a signal-dependent manner [17,18,19,20,37]. A distinguishing feature of the α-arrestins is the presence of L/PPxY motifs in the C-terminal tail that extends from the C-terminal arrestin-fold domain. In yeast, these motifs are required for α-arrestin interaction with the WW-domains of the ubiquitin (Ub) ligase Rsp5, a member of the mammalian NEDD4 Ub ligase family. Almost all α-arrestins in yeast have been shown to bind to Rsp5 and mutation or deletion of the L/PPxY motifs typically renders the α-arrestin non-functional [18], unable to stimulate the trafficking of their known cargo proteins. Analogously, association of mammalian α-arrestins with Nedd4-family ubiquitin ligases has been shown to be required for ARRDC protein trafficking activity [38,39]. The membrane cargos targeted for α-arrestin regulation are a large and diverse group (Table 1 and Table 2), including G-protein coupled receptors, amino acid permeases, metal ion transporters and carbohydrate transporters [17,18,19,22,40,41,42].
α-Arrestin-mediated protein trafficking is regulated by posttranslational modifications including ubiquitination and phosphorylation [17,18,20,22,37,40,43,44,49,54,55,64,65]. Phospho-regulation of α-arrestins is particularly complex, with multiple phosphorylated residues identified in high-throughput or directed mass spectroscopy (MS) analyses [37,43,66,67,68]. For α-arrestins Aly1 and Ldb19, 24 and 13 phosphorylated residues were identified in targeted MS approaches, respectively [37,43]. The high degree of phospho-modification on α-arrestins is suggestive of a potentially complex combinatorial control acting to fine tune α-arrestin function. Many of the phosphorylated residues identified to date cluster in the C-terminal tail of the α-arrestin, which is predicted to be structurally flexible, or within predicted unstructured pockets in the N-terminal arrestin-fold domain ([37,43]; O’Donnell and Schmidt unpublished observation). In yeast, multiple kinases, including Snf1 (the yeast ortholog of mammalian AMPK), Npr1, Pho85, Yck1/Yck2 (the yeast ortholog of mammalian casein kinase 1) and Ypk1 (the yeast ortholog of mammalian Sgk1/2 kinases), are capable of directly phosphorylating the α-arrestins [20,37,40,55,69,70], and many more kinases have been shown to have catalytic activity towards the α-arrestins in high-throughput in vitro kinase assays [71,72]. The activity of the protein phosphatases calcineurin (type 3 protein phosphatase), Glc7 (type 1 protein phosphatase) and Sit4 (type2-related protein phosphatase) have been shown to either directly or indirectly regulate the phosphorylation and/or activity of α-arrestins [17,40,43,46,54,73,74].
The functional ramifications of α-arrestin phosphorylation are dependent upon the specific phosphorylation event examined [17,20,37,40,43,44,49,54,55,75]. However, an emerging theme in the phospho-regulation of α-arrestins is that phosphorylation typically impairs α-arrestins’ endocytic trafficking function while dephosphorylation of the α-arrestin facilitates or improves α-arrestin-mediated endocytosis [17,22,37,43]. The phosphorylated form of the α-arrestin may be important for intracellular sorting functions that are starting to be described for the α-arrestins in shuffling proteins between intracellular compartments, such as the endosome and Golgi [20,64,76]. This inhibition of α-arrestin function by phosphorylation is conserved in the studies of mammalian Txnip, where AMPK or AKT phosphorylation of Txnip impedes its endocytic activities [14,15]. The mechanisms underlying the AMPK-mediated inhibition of both yeast and mammalian α-arrestins are discussed in detail below.

3. AMPK-Regulation of α-Arrestin-Mediated Trafficking in S. cerevisiae

In yeast, the AMPK heterotrimer is comprised of: Snf1, the catalytic α subunit; Snf4, the γ subunit; and one of three β subunit isoforms—Gal83, Sip1 or Sip2 [77]. These regulatory β subunit isoforms localize to distinct cellular compartments, suggesting that they may play a role in sequestering the function of the Snf1 kinase, and their localization is dynamically altered in response to stress conditions that activate the kinase [78,79]. In yeast, as in mammalian cells, Snf1 acts as a sensor of the energy and nutritional status in the cell. Activated Snf1 is phosphorylated on threonine 210 in response to a variety of environmental changes, including low glucose, alkaline or heat shock stressors [80,81,82]. Perhaps the best-characterized roles of activated Snf1 is to phosphorylate the transcriptional activators Cat8 and Sip4 [83,84,85] and transcriptional repressors Mig1 and Mig2 [86,87,88,89,90]. This in turn leads to the gene expression alterations required for cells to adapt to the select stress agents [91]. This regulatory role is thought to be analogous to the phosphorylation of PCG-1α and FoxO1 by AMPK in mammalian cells [92,93]. Recently, multiple α-arrestins—including Rod1, Rog3, and Csr2—have been shown to be direct substrates of the Snf1 kinase [94], and still other α-arrestins have been identified as in vitro substrates of Snf1 in high-throughput analyses—including Aly2 and Bul2 [71]. Snf1 phosphorylation of α-arrestins has been shown to inhibit α-arrestin-mediated trafficking; however, the mechanism of this inhibition varies for each α-arrestins and may be dependent upon the mode of activation for Snf1. Here we describe the findings that demonstrate a direct role for Snf1 in controlling the α-arrestin-mediated protein trafficking of multiple carbohydrate transporters and also in the regulation of G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) function in yeast.

3.1. AMPK Inhibits α-Arrestin-Mediated Trafficking of Glucose Transporters

In 2007, Rod1 was first described as an arrestin and demonstrated to be a direct substrate of the Snf1 kinase complex in vitro [94], and this finding has been further supported by subsequent in vitro analyses [40] (Schmidt, unpublished observations). In vivo, mutation of serine 447 in Rod1 to alanine abolished the Snf1-dependent mobility shift of Rod1, suggesting that this residue—just downstream of the C-terminal arrestin-fold domain—is a site of Snf1 regulation [94]; however, the functional ramifications of this modification were not yet clear. Further in vitro assays identified 6 serine residues—Ser315, Ser447, Ser641, Ser706, Ser720 and Ser781—as required for phosphorylation of Rod1 by Snf1 [40]. Mutation of these 6 serines to alanines, mimicking the dephosphorylated form of Rod1, improved Rod1-mediated adaptation to the α-factor pheromone, which is a readout of activation of the G-protein coupled receptor Ste2 controlled mating pathway in yeast [40]. The fact that loss of Snf1-dependent phospho-sites improves Rod1 function suggests that Rod1 is negatively regulated by Snf1 in this pathway and could have implications for Rod1-mediated control of Ste2 trafficking.
The first evidence that Rod1 could act as an endocytic adaptor was a study that demonstrated Rod1 stimulation of the endocytosis of the high affinity glucose transporter Hxt6 [19], although this study did not explore the regulation of Rod1 by the Snf1 kinase. However, a subsequent study suggests that Snf1 kinase activity may impede Rod1 association with Hxt6 in vivo [65], but the mechanism of this regulation remains to be defined. Snf1-dependent, α-arrestin-mediated regulation of the low-affinity glucose transporters Hxt1 and Hxt3 has also been described. Hxt1 and Hxt3 are predominantly localized to the cell surface in yeast grown in standard 2% glucose-containing medium. Under these energy-replete conditions, the Snf1 kinase is not robustly activated. However, addition of the toxic glucose analog, 2-deoxyglucose (2DG), can activate the Snf1 kinase by promoting its phosphorylation at threonine 210 [95]. Even under glucose replete conditions, the presence of small quantities of 2DG is toxic to cells, and cells lacking the Snf1 kinase are even more sensitive to 2DG than their wild-type counterparts [95]. Surprisingly, over-expression of Hxt1 or Hxt3 suppresses the sensitivity of snf1∆ cells, spurring localization studies of these glucose transporters. In the absence of Snf1, Hxt1 and Hxt3 abundance at the plasma membrane is reduced, and this effect is further exacerbated by the addition of 2DG [22]. Excitingly, the α-arrrestin Rod1, and to a lesser extent its paralog Rog3, are required for the 2DG-induced endocytosis of Hxt1 and Hxt3. Consistent with a role for Rod1 and Rog3 downstream of Snf1, loss of Rod1 and Rog3 restores 2DG-resistance to snf1∆ cells back to wild-type levels. To regulate the 2DG-stimulated endocytosis if Hxt1 and Hxt3, Rod1 and Rog3 must interact with Rsp5, suggestive of a role for the α-arrestins in controlling ubiquitination of these glucose transporters (Figure 1a).
Consistent with the earlier in vitro findings, Rod1 and Rog3 are phosphorylated in a Snf1-dependnet manner and this phosphorylation is further promoted by addition of 2DG [22]. Interestingly, the Snf1-dependent phosphorylation of Rod1 precluded ubiquitination of the α-arrestin. Mono-ubiquitination of α-arrestins is associated with activation of their endocytic function. Phospho-inhibition of α-arrestin ubiquitination can therefore be a proxy for impaired trafficking activity. This is similar to the Snf1-induced phospho-inhibition of Rod1 ubiquitination described below for Rod1-mediated trafficking of Jen1 [65]. However, in this instance, we do not yet know if Rod1 association with the 14-3-3 proteins is altered as a result. Thus, our current model is that Snf1-dependent phosphorylation of Rod1 prevents its ubiquitination and impairs Rod1-mediated endocytosis of Hxt1 and Hxt3.
The mechanism of action for Snf1 phospho-inhibition of Rog3 appears to be dramatically different. In the presence of 2DG, Rog3 is also phosphorylated in a Snf1-depedent manner, which is likely inhibitory to Rog3-mediated protein trafficking of Hxts. However, when Snf1 is hyperactivated, as is the case in cells lacking the protein phosphatase Glc7/Reg1 complex needed to dephosphorylate and deactivate Snf1, Rog3 protein levels are very low [22]. When Snf1 is additionally deleted from cells lacking Reg1, Rog3 is stabilized. These findings demonstrate that Rog3 is phosphorylated in a Snf1-dependent manner and that this phosphorylation can result in loss of Rog3 stability. Deciphering the molecular mechanism underlying this Rog3 destabilization will undoubtedly be of great future interest to the cell biology community, as this regulator network has striking similarities to that demonstrated for AMPK-mediated control of Txnip [15], which has important ramifications in the treatment of metabolic diseases.

3.2. AMPK Inhibits α-Arrestin-Mediated Trafficking of the Jen1 Lactate Permease and Other Membrane Cargo

The first study that linked Snf1 to the trafficking activity of an α-arrestin focused on the role of Rod1 in glucose-induced degradation of the lactate transporter Jen1 [17], which is a member of the monocarboxylate SLC16/MCT family of transporters [96]. In marked contrast to the low-affinity Hxt1 and Hxt3 glucose transporters described above, in cells grown on glucose, the Jen1 lactate permease is internalized and degraded; in cells grown on lactate, Jen1 is stabilized at the cell surface, where it imports lactate as a carbon source. Growth of cells on lactate, which is not a preferred carbon source, likely activates the Snf1 kinase. Glucose-induced internalization of the Jen1 permease is partially impaired, and the post-endocytic sorting of Jen1 to the vacuole (yeast equivalent of the lysosome) is also impeded in the absence of Rod1 [17,46,76]. Rod1 acts redundantly in the glucose-induced endocytosis of Jen1 with the α-arrestin Bul1, and together the two adaptors are required for glucose-induced endocytosis of Jen1 [46]; however, Bul1 has not been shown to be regulated by Snf1. It has been shown that the glucose-induced trafficking of Jen1 requires the ubiquitin ligase Rsp5; mutation of the L/PPxY motifs in Rod1 needed for its interaction with Rsp5 impairs Jen1 trafficking to the vacuole in response to glucose [17]. Deletion of Rod1 also reduces the glucose-stimulated ubiquitination of Jen1, which is a precursor to Jen1 sorting to the vacuole [17]. Interestingly, in cells grown on lactate as a carbon source, conditions where the Jen1 permease is stabilized at the cell surface, Rod1 is highly phosphorylated, and this phosphorylation depends on the Snf1 kinase [17]. As stated above, Snf1 itself is activated by phosphorylation at threonine 210, and dephosphorylation of this site by type 1 protein phosphatase (PP1) in yeast (comprised of the Glc7 catalytic subunit and the Reg1 regulatory subunit) inactivates Snf1. As a result, in cells lacking Reg1, Snf1 is hyper-activated and Rod1 becomes hyper-phosphorylated, irrespective of the carbon source employed [80]. Hyper-phosphorylated Rod1 is unable to regulate trafficking of Jen1 to the vacuole.
From these studies, it is clear that Snf1-mediated phosphorylation of Rod1 impairs Rod1-mediated trafficking of the Jen1 permease to the vacuole. Furthermore, Rod1 phosphorylation in response to growth on lactate medium results in its association with the 14-3-3 proteins, Bmh1 and Bmh2 [17]. Phosphorylation and 14-3-3 protein interaction impede Rod1 ubiquitination, which is a modification needed to activate α-arrestin-mediated trafficking [17]. Thus, from these studies we can propose a model whereby Snf1 phosphorylation of Rod1 results in Rod1 binding to 14-3-3 proteins, impairing Rod1 ubiquitination and resulting in a trafficking-incompetent Rod1 that fails to simulate the degradative trafficking of Jen1 (Figure 1b) [17,46,76].
Most recently, phosphorylation of α-arrestin Bul1 has been shown to be regulated in response to glucose starvation [46]. Loss of the Sit4 phosphatase augments Bul1 phosphorylation; however, it is unclear if Sit4 is acting directly to dephosphorylate Bul1 under these conditions or if it may dephosphorylate and therefore inactivate Snf1 [97,98]. Bul1 is also important for the glucose-induced trafficking of Jen1 to the vacuole. It is tempting to speculate that Bul1 regulation maybe analogous to that described above for Rod1 in these conditions. It will be interesting to see in future studies if Bul1 is also targeted by the Snf1 kinase, expanding the functional connection between α-arrestins and AMPK.

4. AMPK- and Carbon-Source Regulation of α-Arrestin Gene Expression

In mammalian cells, the arrestin family is expanded to include both α-arrestins and β-arrestins. The mammalian α-arrestins are comprised of ARRDC1-5 and TXNIP/VDUP1 [27], while the β-arrestins include both the visual arrestins SAG and ARR3 and the β-arrestins ARRB1 and ARRB2. β-arrestins have well-described and important roles in controlling cellular metabolism (reviewed in Zhao and Pei [99]), including regulation of insulin receptor signaling [100] and insulin-resistance [101]. However, to date β-arrestins have not been shown to be phosphorylated by AMPK and so we will not describe their roles further here. Three α-arrestins—TXNIP, ARRDC3 and ARRDC4—have been reported to regulate glucose and lipid homeostasis in mammalian cells and/or mouse models [102,103,104,105]. Interestingly, some of this regulation is gender specific, with increased expression of ARRDC3 in males from Icelandic populations linked to obesity and increased expression of ARRDC3 in omental adipose correlated with obesity in males ([102] and references therein). In a mouse model, loss of ARRDC3 expression protects against obesity and increases energy use by improving the thermogenesis of both brown and white fat tissues [102]. Thus, the mechanism underlying this ARRDC3-driven metabolic alteration is not thought to be linked to glucose uptake, but rather is due to a change in the β3-adrenergic receptor activity, nor is it known to be associated with AMPK-regulation [102,103].
In marked contrast, the activities of TXNIP and ARRDC4 are tightly connected to glucose uptake, and the expression and activity of these two α-arrestins are regulated in response to glucose supply. TXNIP is the most highly induced gene in pancreatic β-islet cells in response to glucose and its expression is upregulated in mouse models of diabetes [26,106,107,108]. More recently, ARRDC4 expression was also shown to be induced by glucose treatment of β-islet cells [109]. Both TXNIP and ARRDC4 expression are under the glucose-stimulated control of the ChREBP/MondoA family of transcription factors. Phospho-regulation of these transcription factors is controlled by AMPK [25]. Here we will describe the current state of our understanding of AMPK-mediated control of α-arrestin transcription, which relies on ChREBP/MondoA, and also discuss the carbohydrate-responsive transcriptional changes observed for α-arrestins in yeast.

4.1. Control of Txnip Expression by MondoA and ChREBP

The identification of TXNIP as a key target of glucose-induced transcription predates the structural studies that defined the α-arrestin family and that conclusively define N- and C-terminal arrestin-fold domains in TXNIP [26,27,31]. Therefore, early studies of TXNIP do not refer to it as a member of the α-arrestin protein family. TXNIP is named for its ability to interact with and inhibit thioredoxin, which is a critical regulator of cellular redox potential. However, binding and inhibition of thioredoxin are not common features in α-arrestins, with TXNIP being the only α-arrestin known to bind this ligand to date [110,111]. While there are thioredoxin-associated functions for TXNIP (reviewed in [112]), TXNIP interaction with thioredoxin may not be required for its role in regulating glucose metabolism as mutations of TXNIP at cysteine 247, which is required for TXNIP association with thioredoxin, have no impact on TXNIP-mediated inhibition of glucose uptake in adipocytes [31,103]. Rather, two major players in the glucose-induced expression of the α-arrestin TXNIP are the MondoA/ChREBP transcription factors and AMPK.
The carbohydrate response element binding protein (ChREBP and also known as MondoB) and MondoA are a related pair of basic helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper (bHLHZ) transcription factors that bind to carbohydrate response elements in the promoters of target genes [113,114]. These transcription factors heterodimerize with Mlx, a shared interacting partner required for their role as transcriptional activators. Together ChREBP and MondoA are responsible for most the glucose-induced transcriptional changes across an array of tissue types, including β-islet cells, liver, heart and skeletal muscle [23,115] and reviewed in [113]. A key target of ChREBP and MondoA activity is the TXNIP gene (Figure 2). The TXNIP promoter contains a tandem copy of the E-box element (sequence 5’CACGTG3’), which is the consensus for a carbohydrate response element bound by ChREBP and Mondo A, and TXNIP is the highest transcriptionally activated gene upon glucose addition to β-islet cells [23,26]. TXNIP gene expression is upregulated by ChREBP in rodent β-islet cells and hepatocytes [23,116], while MondoA drives TXNIP expression in human β-islet cells, kidney cells and skeletal muscle cells [105,109,117].
The activity of ChREBP and MondoA is regulated by their localization; ChREBP and MondoA reside in puncta in the cytosol or on the mitochondrial surface, respectively, in limiting glucose conditions but relocalize to the nucleus in response to glucose addition [105,118,119]. The glucose-sensing factor needed to stimulate this localization change is somewhat controversial, with some reports suggesting that glucose-6-phosphate is important for this translocation while others demonstrate that 3-O-methylglucose, which is not metabolized by cells, is able to stimulate ChREBP/MondoA-induced gene expression [117,120,121,122]. In each of these studies, TXNIP expression was specifically monitored as a readout of ChREBP or MondoA activity, and in many of them, activation of TXNIP expression is linked to reduced glucose uptake.
Phosphorylation is a potent and complex regulator of ChREBP/MondoA nuclear translocation and/or its DNA binding activity. It has been proposed that under low-glucose conditions, protein kinase A (PKA) phosphorylates ChREBP, and that in response to glucose, protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) dephosphorylates it at serine 196 and threonine 666; dephosphorylation stimulates its nuclear localization and, in turn, its transcriptional activation function [119]. However more recent reports demonstrate that mutation of these phosphorylation sites does not alleviate the glucose-responsive function of ChREBP [124,125] and suggests that additional layers of phospho-regulation are critical for ChREBP function. Further studies have revealed multiple phosphorylation sites from distinct signaling pathways converge on ChREBP to generate complex combinatorial control of this transcription factor [113]. In contrast to glucose activation of ChREBP, increased fatty acid levels—as occurs in rats fed a high-fat diet—activates AMPK in the liver and stimulates AMPK-mediated phosphorylation of ChREBP at serine 568 [25]. The broader function of AMPK in response to a high-fat diet has previously been reviewed [126]. AMPK phosphorylated ChREBP fails to activate gene expression, which could therefore dampen TXNIP expression. Consistent with this model for AMPK-mediated inhibition of TXNIP expression, treatment of β-islet cells with free fatty acids, which acts in concert with low glucose to signal a starvation state, increases AMPK activity and decreases TXNIP expression in a ChREBP-dependent manner. In the presence of free-fatty acids, ChREBP is excluded from the nucleus and TXNIP expression is repressed [123]. Indeed, even in the presence of glucose, modest residual AMPK function impedes TXNIP expression, as knockdown of the AMPK-α1 catalytic subunit augmented TXNIP expression [123]. In sum, these experiments suggest a model whereby AMPK, either robustly or modestly activated by elevated free fatty acids or the glucose-fed state, phosphorylates ChREBP preventing induction of TXNIP gene expression (Figure 2b). This serves as an added layer of AMPK-mediated inhibition, on top of the AMPK-dependent inhibition of TXNIP-mediated protein trafficking (see Section 6, below).
The control of TXNIP expression by AMPK is more complex than this model would suggest. TXNIP can induce its own expression in a feedforward loop and this process is inhibited by AMPK [127]. TXNIP overexpression in rat β-islet cells promotes ChREBP dephosphorylation at serine 196 and subsequent nuclear translocation. Since TXNIP is a direct target for ChREBP, this stimulation of ChREBP by TXNIP represents a form of autoactivation of gene expression. Activation of AMPK, by addition of AICAR, inhibited TXNIP expression, demonstrating that AMPK plays an antagonistic role. Surprisingly, TXNIP overexpression impedes AMPK activation, as reduced phospho-AMPK was observed in cells over-expressing TXNIP [127]. The downstream factor that controls TXNIP-mediated inhibition of AMPK is not yet defined, but could be due to inhibition of the AMPK-activating kinases or activation of phosphatase that dephosphorylates AMPK. Thus, the interplay between TXNIP and AMPK is a complex one, with these two proteins each imposing regulation on the other at multiple levels.

4.2. Control of ArrDC4 Expression by MondoA

High glucose levels not only activate transcription of TXNIP, but also stimulates expression of α-arrestin ARRDC4 in human β-islet cells and this activation is dependent upon MondoA [109]. Phosphorylation plays a role in regulating this activity; however, to date it is PKA regulation that appears to be important rather than AMPK. Activated PKA by treatment with forskolin prevents MondoA nuclear localization, blocking ARRDC4 expression. Consistent with a role for MondoA in controlling ARRDC4 expression, in human embryonic kidney epithelial cells (HA1ER) glucose refeeding after starvation stimulates ARRDC4 transcription [117]. These findings suggest that glucose and ChREBP/MondoA regulated expression of α-arrestins may be global regulatory features. Indeed, in cultured bovine granulosa cells, a model for luteinization during folliculogenesis in ovulation, cells are grown to a high density and their transcriptional profiles mimic those observed during folliculogenesis. In this model, TXNIP and ARRDC4 gene expression are among the most highly down-regulated genes, suggesting that an analogous ChREBP and/or MondoA pathway may exist in this cell type, consistent with the increased glucose uptake observed for hormone-stimulated follicle cells [128].

4.3. Altered Expression of Yeast α-Arrestins in Response to Carbon Supply

Carbon source switching, and specifically shifts in glucose abundance, also alters α-arrestin transcription in S. cerevsiae. Specifically, expression of α-arrestin Csr2 in yeast is induced by a shift to lactate as a carbon source, which is thought to mimic glucose starvation conditions. In yeast cells grown in glucose replete conditions, Csr2 gene expression is inhibited with almost no Csr2 transcript detected ([24] and Schmidt, unpublished observations). However, when cells are shifted into lactate-containing medium, a condition known to activate the Snf1 kinase [85], Csr2 gene expression increases dramatically as the transcriptional repressors Mig1 and Mig2 are phospho-inhibited by Snf1-mediated phosphorylation and now fail to bind the Csr2 promoter [24]. Under these conditions, the endocytic function of Csr2 is active and the protein is ubiquitinated at lysine 670. This ubiquitination is needed for Csr2-mediated endocytosis of the high-affinity glucose transporter Hxt6. When cells are shifted into glucose-replete medium, Csr2 transcription is repressed and the protein becomes phosphorylated by PKA, which either impedes its ubiquitination or stimulates its deubiquitination, thereby blocking its endocytic function [24]. In contrast to the regulation observed for Csr2, expression and abundance of the α-arrestin Rod1 is very high in glucose grown cells and is repressed when cells are shifted into lactate-containing medium (Figure 2a). Expression and activity of Rod1 under glucose replete conditions is analogous to the expression changes observed for TXNIP. However to date the factors needed for this expression change are not defined in yeast and, while there are bHLH transcription factors of the Myc/Max family in yeast, and many of them are important regulators of nutrient balance [129], evolutionary analysis has yet to reveal a yeast homolog for ChREBP and MondoA [130]. It has been postulated that yeast may contain as-yet-undefined members of the bHLHZ family, as they contain E-box sequences and other interacting partners for this family [131]. Given the strong parallels in other regulatory features, it will be interesting to see if transcriptional activators are revealed in future studies of α-arrestin gene expression that could act analogously.

5. AMPK Regulation of α-Arrestin-Mediated Trafficking in Mammals

The fact that AMPK activation increases glucose uptake in skeletal muscle, kidney, adipose and liver cells is well documented [6,7,9,10,13,132,133]. In muscle cells, AMPK activity increases the amount of the Glut4 transporter at the cell surface by stimulating translocation of Glut4-containing storage vesicles (GSV) to the plasma membrane [11,12]. However, AMPK also stimulates GSV-trafficking independent increases in glucose uptake. Specifically, AMPK stimulates GLUT1-mediated glucose uptake in a translocation-independent fashion [9,10]. The mechanism underlying this AMPK- and GLUT1-controlled glucose uptake became clear when AMPK was shown to inhibit TXNIP-regulated endocytosis of GLUT1 in liver cells [15]. This study, aimed initially at understanding the ChREBP transcriptional control of TXNIP (described above in Section 4), identified a slower migrating form of TXNIP on immunoblots from cells starved for glucose or treated with the glucose analog, 2DG. This slower migrating band is the result of TXNIP phosphorylation by AMPK, as the band is more prominent in extracts from cells treated with AMPK activators or 2DG and was lost in cells lacking AMPK or when extracts were treated with phosphatase. In vitro assays demonstrate that AMPK phosphorylates TXNIP directly on serine 308 and this phosphorylation not only inhibits TXNIP-mediated endocytosis of GLUT1, which is compellingly demonstrated by co-localization of TXNIP with clathrin-coated vesicles using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy and measurements of GLUT1 internalization from the cell surface, but also increases the rate of TXNIP degradation [15]. These findings provide the molecular underpinnings for the long-standing question in the field of how AMPK activity can stimulate glucose uptake; the inhibition of the TXNIP-mediated endocytosis of the glucose transporter GLUT1 closes this regulatory circuit (Figure 1c).
This phospho-inhibition of TXNIP-regulated protein trafficking also occurs in liver and breast cancer cell lines that are treated with growth factor; however, the kinase responsible in this case is not AMPK, but is rather protein kinase B (AKT) [14]. AKT phosphorylates TXNIP at serine 308, the same site as AMPK, and this phosphorylation reduces the phospholipid binding of TXNIP, in turn impeding its ability to be recruited to cellular membranes and impact protein trafficking [14]. Consistent with the model of AMPK-regulation of TXNIP, phosphorylation of TXNIP by AKT in adipocytes similarly blocks TXNIP-mediated endocytosis of GLUT4.
Overall, the AMPK and AKT phospho-inhibition of TXNIP in mammalian cells shares considerable similarities with the AMPK phospho-regulation of α-arrestins Rod1 and Rog3 in yeast (Figure 1). AMPK targets an analogously located phospho-site in the c-terminal tail of Rod1 as that described for TXNIP. However, additional phosphorylation sites in Rod1 and Rog3 also seem to be controlled by AMPK. Phosphorylation impairs the endocytic trafficking of both TNXIP and Rod1. However, to our knowledge, AMPK-phosphorylated Rod1 is not destabilized upon phosphorylation [22]. The yeast paralog of Rod1, Rog3 is also phosphorylated in an AMPK-dependent manner and this phosphorylation destabilized the Rog3 protein (O’Donnell and Schmidt, unpublished). It is tempting, therefore, to speculate that this phosphorylation-controlled degradation of Rog3 is analogous to that observed for TXNIP. Additionally, though it is impossible to determine if Rod1/Rog3 and TXNIP are orthologous, these α-arrestins from yeast seem functionally analogous to TXNIP in mammalian cells. It will be intriguing to see if Rod1 and/or Rog3 have any additional TXNIP-associated functions, such as binding thioredoxin or controlling mitochondrial dynamics, in the yeast model. It will also be interesting to see if the phosphorylation of TXNIP results in 14-3-3 binding, as this is a rather common mode of α-arrestin inhibition in yeast [17,24,44,49]. Rod1 and Rog3 require the ubiquitin ligase Rsp5 to mediate glucose transporter trafficking. However, the ubiquitin ligase needed for TXNIP-mediated trafficking of mammalian GLUTs is yet to be defined. Given that other mammalian α-arrestins operate in concert with members of the NEDD4 family of ubiquitin ligases, the orthologs of yeast Rsp5, it is likely that this family is involved in TXNIP function. Indeed, AMPK-mediated regulation of the epithelial sodium transporter requires NEDD4-2 in an oocyte system providing an additional mechanism by which AMPK can regulate protein trafficking [134].

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

The studies summarized here reveal an exciting and highly conserved regulatory circuit linking AMPK to α-arrestin-mediated trafficking of glucose and other carbohydrate transporters (Figure 1). In broad strokes, activation of AMPK/Snf1 results in phospho-inhibition of α-arrestin-mediated trafficking of the GLUT/Hxt family of glucose transporters in both yeast and mammalian cells. AMPK phosphorylation impairs the ability of α-arrestins to stimulate endocytosis of glucose transporters, resulting in increased glucose uptake. In mammalian cells, AMPK-inhibition of α-arrestins also occurs at the level of transcription, where AMPK phosphorylation of the ChREBP/MondoA transcription factors impairs their localization to the nucleus, precluding transcriptional activation of TXNIP or ARRDC4 (Figure 2). The ChREBP/MondoA transcription activators and the expression of yeast and mammalian α-arrestins are highly responsive to the glucose status in cells. Interestingly, the Snf1 kinase plays a key role in altering the expression of α-arrestins, activating the expression of Csr2 in response to growth on lactate as a carbon source. This is the opposite of the effect observed for AMPK-mediated repression of TXNIP and ARRDC4. However, what maintains expression of α-arrestin Rod1 under replete glucose conditions in yeast? Rod1 expression could be analogously controlled by a pathway akin to the ChREBP/MondoA regulatory circuit that regulates TXNIP.
It will be interesting in the future to see if application of these current paradigms for AMPK-mediated control of α-arrestins can provide new mechanistic understanding to long-standing questions of AMPK-regulated uptake of glucose and other nutrients. For example, AMPK is a potent regulator of glucose uptake in the kidney; however, it is unclear what links AMPK to the glucose transporters in this system (reviewed in [135]). Are α-arrestins acting downstream of AMPK activation in this system to regulate glucose transporter availability at the cell surface? In the small intestine, GLUT2 activity at the cell surface is increased when AMPK is activated as well [136,137]; however, the details underlying this increased GLUT2 activity are not well described. Could α-arrestins be negatively regulated by AMPK in the intestine to help stimulate glucose uptake via GLUT2? It will be exciting to see the answer to these questions in the future and we anticipate the emergence of a more global role for AMPK-mediated regulation of α-arrestins and protein trafficking.

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written and revised by A.F.O. and M.C.S.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation (MCB CAREER 1902859 to A.F.O.) and the National Institutes of Health (R01 GM46443 to M.C.S.).

Acknowledgments

We thank the members of the O’Donnell and Schmidt laboratories for their critical reading of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

AICAR5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide
AMPAdenosine Monophosphate
ADPAdenosine Diphosphate
ARRDCArrestin Domain Containing Protein
ATPAdenosine Triphosphate
GLUTGlucose Transporters
GPCRG-protein coupled receptor
HXTHexose Transporters
NEDD4Neural precursor cell Expressed, Developmentally Down-regulated 4
PP2AProtein phosphatase 2A
RAB-GAPRAB-GTPase activating protein
Rsp5Reverses Spt- Phenotype 5
TBC1DTBC1 domain family member 1D
TXNIPThioredoxin Interacting Protein
MDPIMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
DOAJDirectory of open access journals
TLAThree letter acronym
LDlinear dichroism

References

  1. Deng, D.; Yan, N. GLUT, SGLT, and SWEET: Structural and mechanistic investigations of the glucose transporters. Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc. 2016, 25, 546–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ozcan, S.; Johnston, M. Function and regulation of yeast hexose transporters. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1999, 63, 554–569. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Augustin, R. The protein family of glucose transport facilitators: It’s not only about glucose after all. IUBMB Life 2010, 62, 315–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hardie, D.G.; Carling, D.; Carlson, M. The AMP-activated/SNF1 protein kinase subfamily: Metabolic sensors of the eukaryotic cell? Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998, 67, 821–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hardie, D.G.; Ross, F.A.; Hawley, S.A. AMPK: A nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Russell, R.R., 3rd; Bergeron, R.; Shulman, G.I.; Young, L.H. Translocation of myocardial GLUT-4 and increased glucose uptake through activation of AMPK by AICAR. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 277, H643–H649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kurth-Kraczek, E.J.; Hirshman, M.F.; Goodyear, L.J.; Winder, W.W. 5’ AMP-activated protein kinase activation causes GLUT4 translocation in skeletal muscle. Diabetes 1999, 48, 1667–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fryer, L.G.; Foufelle, F.; Barnes, K.; Baldwin, S.A.; Woods, A.; Carling, D. Characterization of the role of the AMP-activated protein kinase in the stimulation of glucose transport in skeletal muscle cells. Biochem. J. 2002, 363, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Barnes, K.; Ingram, J.C.; Porras, O.H.; Barros, L.F.; Hudson, E.R.; Fryer, L.G.; Foufelle, F.; Carling, D.; Hardie, D.G.; Baldwin, S.A. Activation of GLUT1 by metabolic and osmotic stress: Potential involvement of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115, 2433–2442. [Google Scholar]
  10. Abbud, W.; Habinowski, S.; Zhang, J.Z.; Kendrew, J.; Elkairi, F.S.; Kemp, B.E.; Witters, L.A.; Ismail-Beigi, F. Stimulation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is associated with enhancement of Glut1-mediated glucose transport. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000, 380, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, S.; Murphy, J.; Toth, R.; Campbell, D.G.; Morrice, N.A.; Mackintosh, C. Complementary regulation of TBC1D1 and AS160 by growth factors, insulin and AMPK activators. Biochem. J. 2008, 409, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Pehmoller, C.; Treebak, J.T.; Birk, J.B.; Chen, S.; Mackintosh, C.; Hardie, D.G.; Richter, E.A.; Wojtaszewski, J.F. Genetic disruption of AMPK signaling abolishes both contraction- and insulin-stimulated TBC1D1 phosphorylation and 14-3-3 binding in mouse skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. MeTable 2009, 297, E665–E675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Baldwin, S.A.; Barros, L.F.; Griffiths, M.; Ingram, J.; Robbins, E.C.; Streets, A.J.; Saklatvala, J. Regulation of GLUT1 in response to cellular stress. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1997, 25, 954–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Waldhart, A.N.; Dykstra, H.; Peck, A.S.; Boguslawski, E.A.; Madaj, Z.B.; Wen, J.; Veldkamp, K.; Hollowell, M.; Zheng, B.; Cantley, L.C.; et al. Phosphorylation of TXNIP by AKT Mediates Acute Influx of Glucose in Response to Insulin. Cell Rep. 2017, 19, 2005–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wu, N.; Zheng, B.; Shaywitz, A.; Dagon, Y.; Tower, C.; Bellinger, G.; Shen, C.H.; Wen, J.; Asara, J.; McGraw, T.E.; et al. AMPK-dependent degradation of TXNIP upon energy stress leads to enhanced glucose uptake via GLUT1. Mol. Cell 2013, 49, 1167–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Patwari, P.; Lee, R.T. An expanded family of arrestins regulate metabolism. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. TEM 2012, 23, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Becuwe, M.; Vieira, N.; Lara, D.; Gomes-Rezende, J.; Soares-Cunha, C.; Casal, M.; Haguenauer-Tsapis, R.; Vincent, O.; Paiva, S.; Leon, S. A molecular switch on an arrestin-like protein relays glucose signaling to transporter endocytosis. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 196, 247–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lin, C.H.; MacGurn, J.A.; Chu, T.; Stefan, C.J.; Emr, S.D. Arrestin-related ubiquitin-ligase adaptors regulate endocytosis and protein turnover at the cell surface. Cell 2008, 135, 714–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nikko, E.; Pelham, H.R. Arrestin-mediated endocytosis of yeast plasma membrane transporters. Traffic 2009, 10, 1856–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. O’Donnell, A.F.; Apffel, A.; Gardner, R.G.; Cyert, M.S. Alpha-arrestins Aly1 and Aly2 regulate intracellular trafficking in response to nutrient signaling. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21, 3552–3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nikko, E.; Sullivan, J.A.; Pelham, H.R. Arrestin-like proteins mediate ubiquitination and endocytosis of the yeast metal transporter Smf1. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9, 1216–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. O’Donnell, A.F.; McCartney, R.R.; Chandrashekarappa, D.G.; Zhang, B.B.; Thorner, J.; Schmidt, M.C. 2-Deoxyglucose impairs Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by stimulating Snf1-regulated and alpha-arrestin-mediated trafficking of hexose transporters 1 and 3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2015, 35, 939–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cha-Molstad, H.; Saxena, G.; Chen, J.; Shalev, A. Glucose-stimulated expression of Txnip is mediated by carbohydrate response element-binding protein, p300, and histone H4 acetylation in pancreatic beta cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 16898–16905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hovsepian, J.; Defenouillere, Q.; Albanese, V.; Vachova, L.; Garcia, C.; Palkova, Z.; Leon, S. Multilevel regulation of an alpha-arrestin by glucose depletion controls hexose transporter endocytosis. J. Cell Biol. 2017, 216, 1811–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kawaguchi, T.; Osatomi, K.; Yamashita, H.; Kabashima, T.; Uyeda, K. Mechanism for fatty acid “sparing” effect on glucose-induced transcription: Regulation of carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein by AMP-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 3829–3835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shalev, A.; Pise-Masison, C.A.; Radonovich, M.; Hoffmann, S.C.; Hirshberg, B.; Brady, J.N.; Harlan, D.M. Oligonucleotide microarray analysis of intact human pancreatic islets: Identification of glucose-responsive genes and a highly regulated TGFbeta signaling pathway. Endocrinology 2002, 143, 3695–3698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Alvarez, C.E. On the origins of arrestin and rhodopsin. BMC Evol. Biol. 2008, 8, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shi, H.; Rojas, R.; Bonifacino, J.S.; Hurley, J.H. The retromer subunit Vps26 has an arrestin fold and binds Vps35 through its C-terminal domain. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Granzin, J.; Cousin, A.; Weirauch, M.; Schlesinger, R.; Buldt, G.; Batra-Safferling, R. Crystal structure of p44, a constitutively active splice variant of visual arrestin. J. Mol. Biol. 2012, 416, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Han, M.; Gurevich, V.V.; Vishnivetskiy, S.A.; Sigler, P.B.; Schubert, C. Crystal structure of beta-arrestin at 1.9 A: Possible mechanism of receptor binding and membrane Translocation. Structure (Lond.) 2001, 9, 869–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hwang, J.; Suh, H.W.; Jeon, Y.H.; Hwang, E.; Nguyen, L.T.; Yeom, J.; Lee, S.G.; Lee, C.; Kim, K.J.; Kang, B.S.; et al. The structural basis for the negative regulation of thioredoxin by thioredoxin-interacting protein. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Weinberg, Z.Y.; Puthenveedu, M.A. Regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling by plasma membrane organization and endocytosis. Traffic 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Miller, W.E.; Lefkowitz, R.J. Expanding roles for beta-arrestins as scaffolds and adapters in GPCR signaling and trafficking. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2001, 13, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jean-Charles, P.Y.; Kaur, S.; Shenoy, S.K. G Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling Through beta-Arrestin-Dependent Mechanisms. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2017, 70, 142–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rajagopal, S.; Shenoy, S.K. GPCR desensitization: Acute and prolonged phases. Cell Signal. 2018, 41, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lin, A.; DeFea, K.A. beta-Arrestin-kinase scaffolds: Turn them on or turn them off? Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2013, 5, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. MacGurn, J.A.; Hsu, P.C.; Smolka, M.B.; Emr, S.D. TORC1 regulates endocytosis via Npr1-mediated phosphoinhibition of a ubiquitin ligase adaptor. Cell 2011, 147, 1104–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Han, S.O.; Kommaddi, R.P.; Shenoy, S.K. Distinct roles for beta-arrestin2 and arrestin-domain-containing proteins in beta2 adrenergic receptor trafficking. EMBO Rep. 2013, 14, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nabhan, J.F.; Pan, H.; Lu, Q. Arrestin domain-containing protein 3 recruits the NEDD4 E3 ligase to mediate ubiquitination of the beta2-adrenergic receptor. EMBO Rep. 2010, 11, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Alvaro, C.G.; Aindow, A.; Thorner, J. Differential Phosphorylation Provides a Switch to Control How alpha-Arrestin Rod1 Down-regulates Mating Pheromone Response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2016, 203, 299–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Prosser, D.C.; Pannunzio, A.E.; Brodsky, J.L.; Thorner, J.; Wendland, B.; O’Donnell, A.F. alpha-Arrestins participate in cargo selection for both clathrin-independent and clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J. Cell Sci. 2015, 128, 4220–4234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Smardon, A.M.; Kane, P.M. Loss of vacuolar H+-ATPase activity in organelles signals ubiquitination and endocytosis of the yeast plasma membrane proton pump Pma1p. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 32316–32326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. O’Donnell, A.F.; Huang, L.; Thorner, J.; Cyert, M.S. A calcineurin-dependent switch controls the trafficking function of alpha-arrestin Aly1/Art6. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 24063–24080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Crapeau, M.; Merhi, A.; Andre, B. Stress conditions promote yeast Gap1 permease ubiquitylation and down-regulation via the arrestin-like Bul and Aly proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 22103–22116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hatakeyama, R.; Kamiya, M.; Takahara, T.; Maeda, T. Endocytosis of the aspartic acid/glutamic acid transporter Dip5 is triggered by substrate-dependent recruitment of the Rsp5 ubiquitin ligase via the arrestin-like protein Aly2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010, 30, 5598–5607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hovsepian, J.; Albanese, V.; Becuwe, M.; Ivashov, V.; Teis, D.; Leon, S. The yeast arrestin-related protein Bul1 is a novel actor of glucose-induced endocytosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2018, 29, 1012–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kawai, K.; Moriya, A.; Uemura, S.; Abe, F. Functional implications and ubiquitin-dependent degradation of the peptide transporter Ptr2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. Cell 2014, 13, 1380–1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Suzuki, A.; Mochizuki, T.; Uemura, S.; Hiraki, T.; Abe, F. Pressure-induced endocytic degradation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae low-affinity tryptophan permease Tat1 is mediated by Rsp5 ubiquitin ligase and functionally redundant PPxY motif proteins. Eukaryot. Cell 2013, 12, 990–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Merhi, A.; Andre, B. Internal amino acids promote Gap1 permease ubiquitylation via TORC1/Npr1/14-3-3-dependent control of the Bul arrestin-like adaptors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012, 32, 4510–4522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, J.; Sitaram, A.; Burd, C.G. Regulation of copper-dependent endocytosis and vacuolar degradation of the yeast copper transporter, Ctr1p, by the Rsp5 ubiquitin ligase. Traffic 2007, 8, 1375–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Abe, F.; Iida, H. Pressure-induced differential regulation of the two tryptophan permeases Tat1 and Tat2 by ubiquitin ligase Rsp5 and its binding proteins, Bul1 and Bul2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 7566–7584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Villers, J.; Savocco, J.; Szopinska, A.; Degand, H.; Nootens, S.; Morsomme, P. Study of the Plasma Membrane Proteome Dynamics Reveals Novel Targets of the Nitrogen Regulation in Yeast. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2017, 16, 1652–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Snowdon, C.; van der Merwe, G. Regulation of Hxt3 and Hxt7 turnover converges on the Vid30 complex and requires inactivation of the Ras/cAMP/PKA pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Alvaro, C.G.; O’Donnell, A.F.; Prosser, D.C.; Augustine, A.A.; Goldman, A.; Brodsky, J.L.; Cyert, M.S.; Wendland, B.; Thorner, J. Specific alpha-arrestins negatively regulate Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone response by down-modulating the G-protein coupled receptor Ste2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Herrador, A.; Livas, D.; Soletto, L.; Becuwe, M.; Leon, S.; Vincent, O. Casein kinase 1 controls the activation threshold of an alpha-arrestin by multisite phosphorylation of the interdomain hinge. Mol. Biol. Cell 2015, 26, 2128–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Gomez-Raja, J.; Davis, D.A. The beta-arrestin-like protein Rim8 is hyperphosphorylated and complexes with Rim21 and Rim101 to promote adaptation to neutral-alkaline pH. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Xiao, J.; Shi, Q.; Li, W.; Mu, X.; Peng, J.; Li, M.; Chen, M.; Huang, H.; Wang, C.; Gao, K.; et al. ARRDC1 and ARRDC3 act as tumor suppressors in renal cell carcinoma by facilitating YAP1 degradation. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018, 8, 132–143. [Google Scholar]
  58. Puca, L.; Chastagner, P.; Meas-Yedid, V.; Israel, A.; Brou, C. Alpha-arrestin 1 (ARRDC1) and beta-arrestins cooperate to mediate Notch degradation in mammals. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126, 4457–4468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Nabhan, J.F.; Hu, R.; Oh, R.S.; Cohen, S.N.; Lu, Q. Formation and release of arrestin domain-containing protein 1-mediated microvesicles (ARMMs) at plasma membrane by recruitment of TSG101 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 4146–4151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Mackenzie, K.; Foot, N.J.; Anand, S.; Dalton, H.E.; Chaudhary, N.; Collins, B.M.; Mathivanan, S.; Kumar, S. Regulation of the divalent metal ion transporter via membrane budding. Cell Discov. 2016, 2, 16011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Dores, M.R.; Lin, H.; Grimsey, N.J.; Mendez, F.; Trejo, J. The alpha-arrestin ARRDC3 mediates ALIX ubiquitination and G protein-coupled receptor lysosomal sorting. Mol. Biol. Cell 2015, 26, 4660–4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Shea, F.F.; Rowell, J.L.; Li, Y.; Chang, T.H.; Alvarez, C.E. Mammalian alpha arrestins link activated seven transmembrane receptors to Nedd4 family e3 ubiquitin ligases and interact with beta arrestins. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Soung, Y.H.; Ford, S.; Yan, C.; Chung, J. The Role of Arrestin Domain-Containing 3 in Regulating Endocytic Recycling and Extracellular Vesicle Sorting of Integrin beta4 in Breast Cancer. Cancers 2018, 10, 507. [Google Scholar]
  64. Hager, N.A.; Krasowski, C.J.; Mackie, T.D.; Kolb, A.R.; Needham, P.G.; Augustine, A.A.; Dempsey, A.; Szent-Gyorgyi, C.; Bruchez, M.P.; Bain, D.J.; et al. Select alpha-arrestins control cell-surface abundance of the mammalian Kir2.1 potassium channel in a yeast model. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 11006–11021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Llopis-Torregrosa, V.; Ferri-Blazquez, A.; Adam-Artigues, A.; Deffontaines, E.; van Heusden, G.P.; Yenush, L. Regulation of the Yeast Hxt6 Hexose Transporter by the Rod1 alpha-Arrestin, the Snf1 Protein Kinase, and the Bmh2 14-3-3 Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 14973–14985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Swaney, D.L.; Beltrao, P.; Starita, L.; Guo, A.; Rush, J.; Fields, S.; Krogan, N.J.; Villen, J. Global analysis of phosphorylation and ubiquitylation cross-talk in protein degradation. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Holt, L.J.; Tuch, B.B.; Villen, J.; Johnson, A.D.; Gygi, S.P.; Morgan, D.O. Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution. Science 2009, 325, 1682–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Albuquerque, C.P.; Smolka, M.B.; Payne, S.H.; Bafna, V.; Eng, J.; Zhou, H. A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2008, 7, 1389–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Muir, A.; Ramachandran, S.; Roelants, F.M.; Timmons, G.; Thorner, J. TORC2-dependent protein kinase Ypk1 phosphorylates ceramide synthase to stimulate synthesis of complex sphingolipids. eLife 2014, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Shi, X.Z.; Ao, S.Z. Analysis of phosphorylation of YJL084c, a yeast protein. Sheng Wu Hua Xue Yu Sheng Wu Wu Li Xue Bao Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2002, 34, 433–438. [Google Scholar]
  71. Ptacek, J.; Devgan, G.; Michaud, G.; Zhu, H.; Zhu, X.; Fasolo, J.; Guo, H.; Jona, G.; Breitkreutz, A.; Sopko, R.; et al. Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast. Nature 2005, 438, 679–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Papinski, D.; Kraft, C. Atg1 kinase organizes autophagosome formation by phosphorylating Atg9. Autophagy 2014, 10, 1338–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Goldman, A.; Roy, J.; Bodenmiller, B.; Wanka, S.; Landry, C.R.; Aebersold, R.; Cyert, M.S. The calcineurin signaling network evolves via conserved kinase-phosphatase modules that transcend substrate identity. Mol. Cell 2014, 55, 422–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Talaia, G.; Gournas, C.; Saliba, E.; Barata-Antunes, C.; Casal, M.; Andre, B.; Diallinas, G.; Paiva, S. The alpha-Arrestin Bul1p Mediates Lactate Transporter Endocytosis in Response to Alkalinization and Distinct Physiological Signals. J. Mol. Biol. 2017, 429, 3678–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. O’Donnell, A.F. The running of the Buls: Control of permease trafficking by alpha-arrestins Bul1 and Bul2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012, 32, 4506–4509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Becuwe, M.; Leon, S. Integrated control of transporter endocytosis and recycling by the arrestin-related protein Rod1 and the ubiquitin ligase Rsp5. eLife 2014, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Schmidt, M.C.; McCartney, R.R. beta-subunits of Snf1 kinase are required for kinase function and substrate definition. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 4936–4943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Hedbacker, K.; Carlson, M. Regulation of the nucleocytoplasmic distribution of Snf1-Gal83 protein kinase. Eukaryot. Cell 2006, 5, 1950–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vincent, O.; Townley, R.; Kuchin, S.; Carlson, M. Subcellular localization of the Snf1 kinase is regulated by specific beta subunits and a novel glucose signaling mechanism. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 1104–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. McCartney, R.R.; Schmidt, M.C. Regulation of Snf1 kinase. Activation requires phosphorylation of threonine 210 by an upstream kinase as well as a distinct step mediated by the Snf4 subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 36460–36466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. McCartney, R.R.; Rubenstein, E.M.; Schmidt, M.C. Snf1 kinase complexes with different beta subunits display stress-dependent preferences for the three Snf1-activating kinases. Curr. Genet. 2005, 47, 335–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hong, S.P.; Carlson, M. Regulation of snf1 protein kinase in response to environmental stress. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 16838–16845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Hiesinger, M.; Roth, S.; Meissner, E.; Schuller, H.J. Contribution of Cat8 and Sip4 to the transcriptional activation of yeast gluconeogenic genes by carbon source-responsive elements. Curr. Genet. 2001, 39, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Vincent, O.; Carlson, M. Sip4, a Snf1 kinase-dependent transcriptional activator, binds to the carbon source-responsive element of gluconeogenic genes. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 7002–7008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Young, E.T.; Dombek, K.M.; Tachibana, C.; Ideker, T. Multiple pathways are co-regulated by the protein kinase Snf1 and the transcription factors Adr1 and Cat8. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 26146–26158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Ostling, J.; Ronne, H. Negative control of the Mig1p repressor by Snf1p-dependent phosphorylation in the absence of glucose. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998, 252, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Smith, F.C.; Davies, S.P.; Wilson, W.A.; Carling, D.; Hardie, D.G. The SNF1 kinase complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae phosphorylates the transcriptional repressor protein Mig1p in vitro at four sites within or near regulatory domain 1. FEBS Lett. 1999, 453, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Treitel, M.A.; Kuchin, S.; Carlson, M. Snf1 protein kinase regulates phosphorylation of the Mig1 repressor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 6273–6280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Serra-Cardona, A.; Petrezselyova, S.; Canadell, D.; Ramos, J.; Arino, J. Coregulated expression of the Na+/phosphate Pho89 transporter and Ena1 Na+-ATPase allows their functional coupling under high-pH stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2014, 34, 4420–4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chandrashekarappa, D.G.; McCartney, R.R.; O’Donnell, A.F.; Schmidt, M.C. The beta subunit of yeast AMP-activated protein kinase directs substrate specificity in response to alkaline stress. Cell Signal. 2016, 28, 1881–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zaman, S.; Lippman, S.I.; Schneper, L.; Slonim, N.; Broach, J.R. Glucose regulates transcription in yeast through a network of signaling pathways. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Jager, S.; Handschin, C.; St-Pierre, J.; Spiegelman, B.M. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) action in skeletal muscle via direct phosphorylation of PGC-1alpha. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 12017–12022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Yun, H.; Park, S.; Kim, M.J.; Yang, W.K.; Im, D.U.; Yang, K.R.; Hong, J.; Choe, W.; Kang, I.; Kim, S.S.; et al. AMP-activated protein kinase mediates the antioxidant effects of resveratrol through regulation of the transcription factor FoxO1. FEBS J. 2014, 281, 4421–4438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Shinoda, J.; Kikuchi, Y. Rod1, an arrestin-related protein, is phosphorylated by Snf1-kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 364, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. McCartney, R.R.; Chandrashekarappa, D.G.; Zhang, B.B.; Schmidt, M.C. Genetic analysis of resistance and sensitivity to 2-deoxyglucose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2014, 198, 635–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Casal, M.; Queiros, O.; Talaia, G.; Ribas, D.; Paiva, S. Carboxylic acids plasma membrane transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016, 892, 229–251. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Bozaquel-Morais, B.L.; Madeira, J.B.; Maya-Monteiro, C.M.; Masuda, C.A.; Montero-Lomeli, M. A new fluorescence-based method identifies protein phosphatases regulating lipid droplet metabolism. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Ruiz, A.; Liu, Y.; Xu, X.; Carlson, M. Heterotrimer-independent regulation of activation-loop phosphorylation of Snf1 protein kinase involves two protein phosphatases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 8652–8657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Zhao, J.; Pei, G. Arrestins in metabolic regulation. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2013, 118, 413–427. [Google Scholar]
  100. Hupfeld, C.J.; Olefsky, J.M. Regulation of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling by GRKs and beta-arrestins. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2007, 69, 561–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Luan, B.; Zhao, J.; Wu, H.; Duan, B.; Shu, G.; Wang, X.; Li, D.; Jia, W.; Kang, J.; Pei, G. Deficiency of a beta-arrestin-2 signal complex contributes to insulin resistance. Nature 2009, 457, 1146–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Patwari, P.; Emilsson, V.; Schadt, E.E.; Chutkow, W.A.; Lee, S.; Marsili, A.; Zhang, Y.; Dobrin, R.; Cohen, D.E.; Larsen, P.R.; et al. The arrestin domain-containing 3 protein regulates body mass and energy expenditure. Cell MeTable 2011, 14, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Patwari, P.; Chutkow, W.A.; Cummings, K.; Verstraeten, V.L.; Lammerding, J.; Schreiter, E.R.; Lee, R.T. Thioredoxin-independent regulation of metabolism by the alpha-arrestin proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 24996–25003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Bodnar, J.S.; Chatterjee, A.; Castellani, L.W.; Ross, D.A.; Ohmen, J.; Cavalcoli, J.; Wu, C.; Dains, K.M.; Catanese, J.; Chu, M.; et al. Positional cloning of the combined hyperlipidemia gene Hyplip1. Nat. Genet. 2002, 30, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Stoltzman, C.A.; Peterson, C.W.; Breen, K.T.; Muoio, D.M.; Billin, A.N.; Ayer, D.E. Glucose sensing by MondoA:Mlx complexes: A role for hexokinases and direct regulation of thioredoxin-interacting protein expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 6912–6917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Kibbe, C.; Chen, J.; Xu, G.; Jing, G.; Shalev, A. FOXO1 competes with carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP) and inhibits thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) transcription in pancreatic beta cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 23194–23202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Chen, J.; Hui, S.T.; Couto, F.M.; Mungrue, I.N.; Davis, D.B.; Attie, A.D.; Lusis, A.J.; Davis, R.A.; Shalev, A. Thioredoxin-interacting protein deficiency induces Akt/Bcl-xL signaling and pancreatic beta-cell mass and protects against diabetes. Faseb J. Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 2008, 22, 3581–3594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Minn, A.H.; Hafele, C.; Shalev, A. Thioredoxin-interacting protein is stimulated by glucose through a carbohydrate response element and induces beta-cell apoptosis. Endocrinology 2005, 146, 2397–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Richards, P.; Rachdi, L.; Oshima, M.; Marchetti, P.; Bugliani, M.; Armanet, M.; Postic, C.; Guilmeau, S.; Scharfmann, R. MondoA Is an Essential Glucose-Responsive Transcription Factor in Human Pancreatic beta-Cells. Diabetes 2018, 67, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Patwari, P.; Higgins, L.J.; Chutkow, W.A.; Yoshioka, J.; Lee, R.T. The interaction of thioredoxin with Txnip. Evidence for formation of a mixed disulfide by disulfide exchange. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 21884–21891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Oka, S.; Masutani, H.; Liu, W.; Horita, H.; Wang, D.; Kizaka-Kondoh, S.; Yodoi, J. Thioredoxin-binding protein-2-like inducible membrane protein is a novel vitamin D3 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma ligand target protein that regulates PPARgamma signaling. Endocrinology 2006, 147, 733–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Spindel, O.N.; World, C.; Berk, B.C. Thioredoxin interacting protein: Redox dependent and independent regulatory mechanisms. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 16, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Havula, E.; Hietakangas, V. Sugar sensing by ChREBP/Mondo-Mlx-new insight into downstream regulatory networks and integration of nutrient-derived signals. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2018, 51, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Richards, P.; Ourabah, S.; Montagne, J.; Burnol, A.F.; Postic, C.; Guilmeau, S. MondoA/ChREBP: The usual suspects of transcriptional glucose sensing; Implication in pathophysiology. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2017, 70, 133–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Yamashita, H.; Takenoshita, M.; Sakurai, M.; Bruick, R.K.; Henzel, W.J.; Shillinglaw, W.; Arnot, D.; Uyeda, K. A glucose-responsive transcription factor that regulates carbohydrate metabolism in the liver. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 9116–9121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Ma, L.; Robinson, L.N.; Towle, H.C. ChREBP*Mlx is the principal mediator of glucose-induced gene expression in the liver. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 28721–28730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Stoltzman, C.A.; Kaadige, M.R.; Peterson, C.W.; Ayer, D.E. MondoA senses non-glucose sugars: Regulation of thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) and the hexose transport curb. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 38027–38034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Sans, C.L.; Satterwhite, D.J.; Stoltzman, C.A.; Breen, K.T.; Ayer, D.E. MondoA-Mlx heterodimers are candidate sensors of cellular energy status: Mitochondrial localization and direct regulation of glycolysis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26, 4863–4871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Kawaguchi, T.; Takenoshita, M.; Kabashima, T.; Uyeda, K. Glucose and cAMP regulate the L-type pyruvate kinase gene by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of the carbohydrate response element binding protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 13710–13715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Svoboda, M.; Tastenoy, M.; Zhang, Y.; Gillet, C.; Rasschaert, J.; Malaisse, W.J.; Sener, A. D-glucose and 3-O-methyl-d-glucose-induced upregulation of selected genes in rat hepatocytes and INS1E cells: Reevaluation of the possible role of hexose phosphorylation. Mol. Med. Rep. 2013, 8, 829–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Dentin, R.; Tomas-Cobos, L.; Foufelle, F.; Leopold, J.; Girard, J.; Postic, C.; Ferre, P. Glucose 6-phosphate, rather than xylulose 5-phosphate, is required for the activation of ChREBP in response to glucose in the liver. J. Hepatol. 2012, 56, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Minn, A.H.; Couto, F.M.; Shalev, A. Metabolism-independent sugar effects on gene transcription: The role of 3-O-methylglucose. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 11047–11051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Shaked, M.; Ketzinel-Gilad, M.; Cerasi, E.; Kaiser, N.; Leibowitz, G. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) mediates nutrient regulation of thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) in pancreatic beta-cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e28804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Stoeckman, A.K.; Ma, L.; Towle, H.C. Mlx is the functional heteromeric partner of the carbohydrate response element-binding protein in glucose regulation of lipogenic enzyme genes. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 15662–15669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Tsatsos, N.G.; Towle, H.C. Glucose activation of ChREBP in hepatocytes occurs via a two-step mechanism. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 340, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Ruderman, N.B.; Carling, D.; Prentki, M.; Cacicedo, J.M. AMPK, insulin resistance, and the metabolic syndrome. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 2764–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Chen, J.; Jing, G.; Xu, G.; Shalev, A. Thioredoxin-interacting protein stimulates its own expression via a positive feedback loop. Mol. Endocrinol. 2014, 28, 674–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Baufeld, A.; Koczan, D.; Vanselow, J. Induction of altered gene expression profiles in cultured bovine granulosa cells at high cell density. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2017, 15, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Robinson, K.A.; Koepke, J.I.; Kharodawala, M.; Lopes, J.M. A network of yeast basic helix-loop-helix interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 4460–4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Brown, S.J.; Cole, M.D.; Erives, A.J. Evolution of the holozoan ribosome biogenesis regulon. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. McFerrin, L.G.; Atchley, W.R. Evolution of the Max and Mlx networks in animals. Genome Biol. Evol. 2011, 3, 915–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Merrill, G.F.; Kurth, E.J.; Hardie, D.G.; Winder, W.W. AICA riboside increases AMP-activated protein kinase, fatty acid oxidation, and glucose uptake in rat muscle. Am. J. Physiol. 1997, 273, E1107–E1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Daval, M.; Foufelle, F.; Ferre, P. Functions of AMP-activated protein kinase in adipose tissue. J. Physiol. 2006, 574, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Ho, P.Y.; Li, H.; Pavlov, T.S.; Tuerk, R.D.; Tabares, D.; Brunisholz, R.; Neumann, D.; Staruschenko, A.; Hallows, K.R. beta1Pix exchange factor stabilizes the ubiquitin ligase Nedd4-2 and plays a critical role in ENaC regulation by AMPK in kidney epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 11612–11624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Pastor-Soler, N.M.; Hallows, K.R. AMP-activated protein kinase regulation of kidney tubular transport. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2012, 21, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Sakar, Y.; Meddah, B.; Faouzi, M.A.; Cherrah, Y.; Bado, A.; Ducroc, R. Metformin-induced regulation of the intestinal d-glucose transporters. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. Off. J. Pol. Physiol. Soc. 2010, 61, 301–307. [Google Scholar]
  137. Walker, J.; Jijon, H.B.; Diaz, H.; Salehi, P.; Churchill, T.; Madsen, K.L. 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside (AICAR) enhances GLUT2-dependent jejunal glucose transport: A possible role for AMPK. Biochem. J. 2005, 385, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 20 00515 g001 550
Figure 1. Snf1/AMPK-mediated regulation of membrane transporter trafficking in yeast and humans. (a) Hyper-phosphorylation of yeast α-arrestin Rod1 by Snf1 kinase inhibits the ability of Rod1 to promote ubiquitination, endocytosis and degradation of hexose transporters 1 and 3 (Hxt1 and Hxt3) [22]. Hyper-phosphorylation of Rod1 may result in 14-3-3 binding and/or Rod1 degradation. (b) Hyper-phosphorylation of yeast α-arrestin Rod1 by Snf1 kinase sequesters Rod1 in a complex with 14-3-3 proteins and inhibits the ability of Rod1 to promote ubiquitination, endocytosis and degradation of lactate transporter Jen1 [76]. (c) Phosphorylation of human α-arrestin TXNIP promotes its degradation, thereby inhibiting its ability to promote endocytosis and degradation of glucose transporter GLUT1 [15]. The ubiquitin ligase involved in this process has yet to be defined. Grey arrows indicate pathway connections and red dashed arrows indicated protein trafficking events.
Figure 1. Snf1/AMPK-mediated regulation of membrane transporter trafficking in yeast and humans. (a) Hyper-phosphorylation of yeast α-arrestin Rod1 by Snf1 kinase inhibits the ability of Rod1 to promote ubiquitination, endocytosis and degradation of hexose transporters 1 and 3 (Hxt1 and Hxt3) [22]. Hyper-phosphorylation of Rod1 may result in 14-3-3 binding and/or Rod1 degradation. (b) Hyper-phosphorylation of yeast α-arrestin Rod1 by Snf1 kinase sequesters Rod1 in a complex with 14-3-3 proteins and inhibits the ability of Rod1 to promote ubiquitination, endocytosis and degradation of lactate transporter Jen1 [76]. (c) Phosphorylation of human α-arrestin TXNIP promotes its degradation, thereby inhibiting its ability to promote endocytosis and degradation of glucose transporter GLUT1 [15]. The ubiquitin ligase involved in this process has yet to be defined. Grey arrows indicate pathway connections and red dashed arrows indicated protein trafficking events.
Ijms 20 00515 g001
Ijms 20 00515 g002 550
Figure 2. Snf1/AMPK-mediated regulation of gene expression in yeast and human. (a) Snf1 kinase-mediated phosphorylation of the yeast transcriptional repressors Mig1 and Mig2 promotes their translocation out of the nucleus (denoted by solid black arrow) leading to derepression of α-arrestin Csr2 [24]. (b) AMPK-mediated phosphorylation of human transcriptional activator ChREBP blocks its ability to induce expression of α-arrestin TXNIP [123]. Upon dephosphorylation, ChREBP-Mlx can translocate into the nucleus to activate expression of TXNIP (denoted by dashed black line).
Figure 2. Snf1/AMPK-mediated regulation of gene expression in yeast and human. (a) Snf1 kinase-mediated phosphorylation of the yeast transcriptional repressors Mig1 and Mig2 promotes their translocation out of the nucleus (denoted by solid black arrow) leading to derepression of α-arrestin Csr2 [24]. (b) AMPK-mediated phosphorylation of human transcriptional activator ChREBP blocks its ability to induce expression of α-arrestin TXNIP [123]. Upon dephosphorylation, ChREBP-Mlx can translocate into the nucleus to activate expression of TXNIP (denoted by dashed black line).
Ijms 20 00515 g002
Table
Table 1. Yeast α-arrestins and their known cargos.
Table 1. Yeast α-arrestins and their known cargos.
α-Arrestin Genes and Cargos in Yeast
GeneAliasCargoReferences
ALY1ART6Gap1, Dip5, Ste3[20,41,43,44]
ALY2ART3Gap1, Dip5, Ste3[20,41,43,44,45]
ART5 Itr1[19]
ART10 No known cargo
BUL1SMM2, DAG1, RDS1Jen1, Gap1, Ptr2, Tat1, Tat2, Ctr1, Put4, Dal5[46,47,48,49,50,51,52]
BUL2 Gap1, Ptr2, Tat1, Tat2, Ctr1, Put4, Dal5[48,49,50,51,52]
BUL3 No known cargo
CSR2ART8, MRG19Hxt6, Hxt7, Hxt2, Hxt4[24,53]
ECM21ART2Tat2, Fur4, Lyp1, Smf1[19]
LDB19ART1Mup1, Ste2, Ste3, Can1, Lyp1, Tat2, Fur4[19,41,54]
RIM8ART9Rim21, Pma1[42,55,56]
ROD1ART4Hxt1, Hxt3, Hxt6, Jen1[17,19,22]
ROG3ART7Hxt3[22]
SPO23 No known cargo
Table
Table 2. Mammalian α-arrestins and their known cargos.
Table 2. Mammalian α-arrestins and their known cargos.
α-Arrestin Genes and Cargos in Humans
GeneAliasCargoReferences
ARRDC1 YAP1, Notch, TSG101, DMT1[57,58,59,60]
ARRDC2 No known cargo
ARRDC3 YAP1, PAR1, β3-AR, β2-AR, V2R, ITG β4[39,57,61,62,63]
ARRDC4 MDA5, DMT1, V2R, β2-AR[60,62]
ARRDC5 No known cargo
TXNIPVDUP1GLUT1, GLUT4[14,15]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

O’Donnell, A.F.; Schmidt, M.C. AMPK-Mediated Regulation of Alpha-Arrestins and Protein Trafficking. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030515

AMA Style

O’Donnell AF, Schmidt MC. AMPK-Mediated Regulation of Alpha-Arrestins and Protein Trafficking. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(3):515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030515

Chicago/Turabian Style

O’Donnell, Allyson F., and Martin C. Schmidt. 2019. "AMPK-Mediated Regulation of Alpha-Arrestins and Protein Trafficking" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 3: 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030515

APA Style

O’Donnell, A. F., & Schmidt, M. C. (2019). AMPK-Mediated Regulation of Alpha-Arrestins and Protein Trafficking. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(3), 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030515

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop