Next Article in Journal
Transthyretin Stabilization: An Emerging Strategy for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease?
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Dietary Interventions on DNA Methylation: Implications for Obesity Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms

Centre for Cell Factories and Biopolymers, Griffith Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(22), 8671; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228671
Submission received: 16 October 2020 / Revised: 9 November 2020 / Accepted: 13 November 2020 / Published: 17 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic human pathogen causing devastating acute and chronic infections in individuals with compromised immune systems. Its highly notorious persistence in clinical settings is attributed to its ability to form antibiotic-resistant biofilms. Biofilm is an architecture built mostly by autogenic extracellular polymeric substances which function as a scaffold to encase the bacteria together on surfaces, and to protect them from environmental stresses, impedes phagocytosis and thereby conferring the capacity for colonization and long-term persistence. Here we review the current knowledge on P. aeruginosa biofilms, its development stages, and molecular mechanisms of invasion and persistence conferred by biofilms. Explosive cell lysis within bacterial biofilm to produce essential communal materials, and interspecies biofilms of P. aeruginosa and commensal Streptococcus which impedes P. aeruginosa virulence and possibly improves disease conditions will also be discussed. Recent research on diagnostics of P. aeruginosa infections will be investigated. Finally, therapeutic strategies for the treatment of P. aeruginosa biofilms along with their advantages and limitations will be compiled.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an ubiquitous Gram-negative bacterium that causes nosocomial infections, as well as fatal infections in immunocompromised individuals, such as patients with cancer, post-surgery, severe burns or infected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [1,2,3]. In 2017, P. aeruginosa was recognised as one of the most life-threatening bacteria and listed as priority pathogen for Research and Development of new antibiotics by the World Health Organization [4]. Common antimicrobial agents like antibiotics frequently exhibit limited efficacy due to adaptability and high intrinsic antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa, thus increasing mortality [5]. Additionally, treatment of these infections is also hindered by the P. aeruginosa ability to form biofilms which protect them from surrounding environmental stresses, impedes phagocytosis and thereby confers capacity for colonization and long-term persistence [6]. Such ability is promoted by effective cell-to-cell communications within the microbial communities of P. aeruginosa known as quorum sensing. As a result, highly structured biofilms can be formed which is often identified in patients with chronic infections, such as chronic lung infection, chronic wound infection and chronic rhinosinusitis [7]. It has been estimated that biofilms have a substantial bearing on over 90% of chronic wound infections, resulting in poor wound healing. In the United States alone, approximately 6.5 million patients were affected by chronic wound infections, which resulted in high health-care burden and devastating economic consequences estimated at over US$25 billion annually [8]. It is important therefore to diagnose P. aeruginosa infections at an early stage before biofilm development which could enhance the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa towards antimicrobial treatments. However, the increasing incidence of acute and persisting infections worldwide also highlights the need to develop therapeutic strategies as an alternative to traditional antibiotics, expectedly to disarm and eradicate this Gram-negative bacterium.
This review highlights the P. aeruginosa biofilms starting from its composition, structure and development processes to the extraordinary capabilities of P. aeruginosa to invade host immune system and escape antibiotic treatments via biofilm-mediated resistance which is regulated mainly by quorum sensing. In the context of challenges facing P. aeruginosa devastating infections, recent diagnostics and therapeutic strategies will be discussed.

2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm

In nature, most bacteria can attach to different surfaces and form biofilms [9]. The biofilm is a complex aggregate of bacteria encased in a self-generated matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and is one of the key strategies for the survival of species during unexpected changes of living conditions such as temperature fluctuation and nutrient availability [10]. Bacteria within a biofilm can escape host immune responses and resist antimicrobial treatments up to 1000 times more than their planktonic counterparts [11]. P. aeruginosa is a well-known biofilm former, which makes it an excellent model to study biofilm formation [12,13]. A resilient biofilm is a critical weapon for P. aeruginosa to compete, survive and dominate in the cystic fibrosis lung polymicrobial environment [14]. P. aeruginosa also effectively colonizes a variety of surfaces including medical materials (urinary catheters, implants, contact lenses, etc.) [12], and food industry equipment (mixing tanks, vats and tubing) [15]. Therefore, a greater understanding of the composition and structure of the biofilm, and the molecular mechanisms underlying the antimicrobial tolerance of bacteria growing within a biofilm, are vital for the design of effective strategies to manage, prevent and more importantly to eradicate biofilm-associated infections.

2.1. Biofilm Composition

The biofilm is a complex aggregate of bacteria encased in a self-generated matrix of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and is one of the key strategies for the survival of species against unexpected changes of living conditions such as temperature and nutrient availability [10,16,17].
It has been shown that P. aeruginosa biofilm matrix primarily encompasses polysaccharides, extracellular DNA (eDNA), proteins and lipids [12,18]. The matrix, which is responsible for more than 90% of biofilm biomass, acts as a scaffold for adhesion to biotic and abiotic surfaces and shelter for encased bacteria in harsh environmental conditions (antibiotics and host immune responses). It also provides a repertoire of public goods including essential nutrients, enzymes and cytosolic proteins for the biofilm community. The matrix also facilitates cell-to-cell communication [18,19,20].
The three exopolysaccharides, i.e., Psl, Pel and alginate, are tremendously involved in surface attachment, formation and the stability of biofilm architecture [12,21]. The roles of individual exopolysaccharides are discussed below.
Psl is a neutral pentasaccharide typically comprising d-glucose, d-mannose and l-rhamnose moieties [22,23]. This exopolysaccharide is necessary for adhesion of sessile cells (cells attached to a surface) to surfaces and cell-to-cell interactions during biofilm initiation of both nonmucoid and mucoid strains [12,24,25]. Psl has the following characteristics: (i) Psl is beneficial for biofilm communities, but not for unattached populations; (ii) better growth of non-Psl producing cells was observed in mixed biofilm with Psl producing cells [21,26]; (iii) during biofilm growth, Psl positive populations dominate Psl negative populations; and (iv) Psl nonproducers are unable to exploit Psl producers [26]. In a mature biofilm, Psl is located in peripheries of the mushroom-like structure where it helps maintain structural stability [22]. Increased Psl expression is linked to induction of cell aggregates in a liquid culture which is a phenotype observed in CF patients’ sputum [27,28]. Psl functions as a signalling molecule to promote the production of c-di-GMP (bis-(3′-5′)-cyclic dimeric guanosine monophosphate) whose level, if elevated, results in thicker and more robust biofilms [28]. Additionally, Psl shields biofilm bacteria from antimicrobials [21] and neutrophil phagocytosis [29], making it an effective defence to achieve persistent infection.
Pel is a cationic polysaccharide polymer of partially deacetylated N-acetyl-d-glucosamine and N-acetyl-d-galactosamine. Like Psl, Pel is an essential matrix component of biofilm in nonmucoid strains and is involved in the initiation of surface attachment, as well as maintenance of biofilm integrity [30,31]. Pel is responsible for the pellicle biofilm which is formed at the air-liquid interface of a static broth culture [32]. The synthesis of Psl and Pel are strain-specific and can be switched in response to surrounding conditions [33]. Pel promotes the tolerance to aminoglycoside antibiotics for biofilm-embedded bacteria [34]. Furthermore, Pel containing biofilms has been demonstrated to be refractory to the antibiotic colistin and less susceptible to killing mediated by neutrophils derived from human HL-60 cell lines [35]. Unlike Psl, Pel is not public goods and not available for Pel negative cells in both biofilm and unattached populations [26].
Alginate is predominately produced in the biofilm of mucoid Pseudomonas strains due to a mutation in mucA22 allele. The mucoid phenotypes are found mostly in CF isolates, signifying the conversion from acute to chronic infection [36,37]. Alginate is a negatively charged acetylated polymer consisting of mannuronic acid and guluronic acid residues [38]. A wide range of important functions of alginate including biofilm maturation, protection from phagocytosis and opsonization, and decreased diffusion of antibiotics through the biofilm has been well-documented [18,39,40,41]. The ratios between mannuronic acid and guluronic acid influence the viscoelastic properties of biofilms which lead to impairment of cough clearance in the lung of CF patients infected with P. aeruginosa [42,43,44].
Cell lysis releases DNA into the environment, and this extracellular DNA (eDNA) is one of the crucial constituents of biofilms. Cell lysis can be caused by environmental stress such as the antimicrobial treatment via the endolytic activity of endolysin Lys which is encoded in the R- and F-pyocin gene cluster. This can occur in both early development of biofilms and the planktonic phase where rod-shaped bacteria rapidly turn into round cells resulting from structural damage of the cell wall and followed by lysis. The released eDNA, cytosolic proteins and particularly RNA are subsequently encapsulated into membrane vesicles (MVs) which are formed via membrane fragments originating from the lysed cells [45]. eDNA can also be localized on the surface and the stalk of the mushroom-like microcolonies [46,47]. eDNA is involved in various processes: (i) as a nutrient source for bacteria in the biofilm; (ii) supporting cellular organization and alignment via twitching motility; (iii) as a cation chelator that interacts with divalent cations (Mg2+ and Ca2+) on the outer membrane and subsequently activates the type VI secretion system which disseminates virulence factors within the host; (iv) the deposition of eDNA caused biofilm environment and infection sites to become acidic, limiting the penetration of antimicrobial agents; and (v) the presence of eDNA in P. aeruginosa biofilms can influence the inflammatory process activated by neutrophil [48,49,50,51].
It is noteworthy to mention the intracellular biopolymer, polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), that does not directly play a structural role in the biofilm matrix but is produced in cells within the biofilm. PHA, a carbon and energy storage polymer, has been implicated in stress tolerance as well as attachment to abiotic surfaces such as glass [52]. Within microaerophilic/anaerobic zones of the biofilm, PHA might serve as an electron sink to maintain energy-generating metabolic processes [6,16].

2.2. Biofilm Development

P. aeruginosa has been demonstrated to grow slowly as unattached cell aggregates under hypoxic and anoxic conditions, which are comparable to what has been observed in CF airways and chronic wounds [53]. Slow growth rates in the limited presence of oxygen are ascribed to antibiotic recalcitrance. Generally, biofilms of P. aeruginosa can be developed on abiotic surfaces, such as medical implants or industrial equipment. The biofilm development is divided into five distinct stages (Figure 1). Stage I: Bacterial cells adhere to a surface via support of cell appendages such as flagella and type IV pili [54,55]. The restricted flagellar movement has been implicated in mediating twitching motility and biosynthesis of exopolysaccharides required for surface association [56]. This adherence is reversible. A proteomic study with wild-type PAO1 concluded that the bacterial responses and biofilm formation are material specific. It is evident through records of the presence of specific bacterial proteins and their altered quantities when P. aeruginosa sense and react in response to a given surface [57]. Stage II: Bacterial cells undergo the switch from reversible to irreversible attachment. Stage III: Progressive propagation of attached bacteria into a more structured architecture, termed microcolonies. Stage IV: These microcolonies develop further into extensive three-dimensional mushroom-like structures, a hallmark of biofilm maturation. Stage V: In the center of the microcolony, matrix cavity is disrupted through cell autolysis for the liberation of dispersed cells [22] followed by the transition from sessile to planktonic growth mode for seeding of uncolonized spaces (Stage VI), which allows the biofilm cycle to repeat [58]. It was recently demonstrated that endonuclease EndA is required for dispersion of existing biofilm via eDNA degradation [59]. The structure of the formed biofilms is influenced by the swarming motility with flat biofilms resulting from highly motile bacteria, while mushroom-shaped biofilms are generated by cells with low motility, and that the motility rate was nutrient specific [60].
While it is well-perceived that biofilm cells are physiologically different from their planktonic counterparts and more recalcitrant to antimicrobial treatments [10], little is known about intermediate events between attached forms and the free-swimming lifestyle which generates highly virulent detached cells. It is suggested that the transition from detachment to planktonic growth involves a distinct stage of biofilm development (Stage VI) (Figure 1). These cells, in contrast to both planktonic and sessile cells, possess distinct physiology and represent the conversion from chronic to acute infections. They turn into a planktonic phenotype after remaining in a 2-h lag phase with decreased levels of pyoverdine and intracellular c-di-GMP [61,62]. Upregulation of virulence encoding genes and downregulation of iron uptake genes were observed in the dispersed population [10,63,64,65]. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments revealed that liberated cells are highly cytotoxic to macrophages, more sensitive to iron depletion and substantially virulent to nematode hosts relative to planktonic bacteria [63]. Notably, dispersed bacteria originating from biofilms treated with glycoside hydrolase rapidly disseminated and induced fatal septicaemia in a mouse chronic wound infection model [66].

2.3. Multispecies Biofilm

Generally, infections are not caused by monospecies alone but rather colonization of a complex polymicrobial community [67,68]. P. aeruginosa is often recognized as a co-colonizer along with other microbes such as Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Burkholderia cenocepacia (B. cenocepacia) and Streptococcus parasanguinis (S. parasanguinis). For example, colonization of the biofilm-forming bacteria P. aeruginosa and S. aureus coinfects the lungs of CF patients and in diabetic and chronic wounds [69,70]. During co-infection, P. aeruginosa could sequester iron and nutrients through lysis of Gram-positive bacteria, including S. aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Bacillus anthracis [67], as well as other Gram-negative bacteria Burkholderia cepacia [71].
In dual-species colonization containing P. aeruginosa and S. aureus, the presence of S. aureus derived peptidoglycan, N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), induced P. aeruginosa to produce pyocyanin which functions as antimicrobials and toxins that could reduce the viability of S. aureus within the biofilm [68]. The transition from nonmucoid P. aeruginosa, which generate antimicrobial siderophores, rhamnolipids and 2-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline-N-oxide (HQNO), to mucoid phenotypes, which overproduce alginate, resulted in the decline of these exoproducts, leading to the cohabitant of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus [72]. S. aureus could also secrete extracellular adhesin known as staphylococcal protein A (SpA) which bound to Psl and type IV pilli on the P. aeruginosa cell surface, resulted in the inhibition of both biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa and phagocytotic activity of neutrophil towards P. aeruginosa [73]. P. aeruginosa has been demonstrated to outcompete S. aureus in the dual-species community by producing diguanylate cyclase, SiaD, which is activated by Psl, during the early stage of biofilm formation [74].
Similarly, synergistic interactions between P. aeruginosa and B. cenocepacia have been observed [75]. In planktonic co-cultures, P. aeruginosa predominated due to the production of secondary metabolites which inhibited the growth of B. cenocepacia. Moreover, co-existence in B. cenocepacia biofilm promoted biofilm biomass of P. aeruginosa. Co-infection of the two species was found to advance lung damage in a mouse model [75].
Although P. aeruginosa remains dominant in mixed-species biofilms by producing antimicrobial compounds which modulate the growth of other microorganisms, its pathogenesis was shown to be inhibited by oral streptococci strains during co-infection, resulting in improved CF lung conditions [76]. The oral commensal streptococci outcompeted P. aeruginosa by the production of hydrogen peroxide in the presence of nitrite [77]. Furthermore, it was shown that oral commensal S. parasanguinis could effectively exploit the exopolysaccharide alginate produced by P. aeruginosa CF isolate FRD1 strain to promote its biofilm in vitro through the mediation of the streptococcal surface adhesin BapA1. However, either adhesin BapA1 or Fap1 was adequate to reduce the colonization of alginate producing P. aeruginosa in Drosophila melanogaster [78].

3. Quorum Sensing in Biofilm Development

The development of P. aeruginosa biofilms requires population-wide coordination of individual cells within bacterial communities [79]. P. aeruginosa uses multiple interconnected signal transduction pathways known as quorum sensing (QS), enabling the bacteria to communicate between the individual cells and ultimately orchestrate collective behaviour which is essential for the adaptation and survival of whole communities. P. aeruginosa enters into the QS mode in response to changes in cell density and environmental cues or stresses [80]. QS involves the production, secretion and accumulation of signalling molecules called autoinducers (AI) whose specificity and concentration are sensed by transcriptional regulators [81], resulting in the expressions of specific sets of genes on a population-wide scale. In addition to biofilm development, QS has been linked to the regulation of other physiological processes, including virulence-factor production, stress tolerance, metabolic adjustment and host-microbe interactions [6]. Thus, understanding and controlling these chemical communication systems could lead to new targets for alternative or complementary treatments to conventional antimicrobials and antibiotics.
There are four distinct pathways in the QS circuits of P. aeruginosa, namely Las, Rhl, PQS and IQS that intracellularly produces their cognate AI molecules, i.e., N-3-oxo-dodecanoyl-ʟ-homoserine lactone (3O-C12-HSL), N-butyryl-ʟ-homoserine lactone (C4-HSL), 2-heptyl-3-hydroxy-4-quinolone (PQS) and 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-thiazole-4-carbaldehyde (IQS), respectively (Figure 2). These QS circuits are organized in a hierarchy with the Las system at the top of the cascade [82]. Both Las and Rhl systems are triggered by an increased cell density at the preliminary exponential growth phase, whereas PQS and IQS systems are activated at late exponential growth phase [83] especially under iron limitation [84] and phosphate starvation conditions [85], respectively. The synthesized AIs undergo membrane trafficking directed to outside then inside of the cells, presumably mediated by free diffusion, efflux pumps or outer membrane vesicles [86]. The trafficked 3O-C12-HSL is then bound to the regulator protein LasR, and the formed complex activates lasI synthase gene, leading to the autoinduction feed-forward loop [87]. The LasR–3O-C12-HSL also induces the expression of rhlR and rhlI genes as well as the pqsR and pqsABCDH genes which encode the Rhl [82] and the PQS [88] systems, respectively. Similar to the Las system, the RhlR–C4-HSL complex induces rhlI gene expression that activates the second autoinduction feed-forward loop [89]. In the PQS system, the PqsR–PQS complex activates pqsABCDH genes as well as feeds back to induce rhlRI gene expression [90]. The expression of both pqsR and pqsABCDH genes can be inhibited by RhlR, which has been suggested as a way to control the correct ratio between 3-oxo-C12-HSL and C4-HSL, hence controlling the activation of PQS pathway [91]. The identification of IQS system was relatively new as compared to the other QS systems, In the IQS system, the identity of the transcriptional regulator is still unknown although its binding to the IQS has been found to activate the pqsR gene [92,93]. In addition, the IQS molecule was proposed to be enzymatically produced from the proteins encoded by ambBCDE genes [92]. However, the recent identification of the IQS molecule (an aeruginaldehyde) revealed that it is a byproduct of the siderophore pyochelin biosynthesis [94,95]. On the other hand, ambBCDE genes encode for proteins involved in the biosynthesis of the anti-metabolite L-2-amino-4-methoxy-trans-3-butenoic acid (AMB) [96].
The Las, Rhl and PQS systems in the QS network of P. aeruginosa play important roles in the production of the functional elements that have an impact on biofilm development (Figure 2). These include rhamnolipid [97,98], pyoverdine [99], pyocyanin [100,101], Pel polysaccharides [102], and lectins [103,104]. Rhamnolipid is a rhamnose-containing glycolipidic compound (i.e., biosurfactant) that functions to preserve the pores and channels between microcolonies, enabling the passage of liquid and nutrients within mature biofilms. Pyoverdine can sequester iron in the environment and delivery it to the cell which is an essential component for biofilm development. In an environment where iron is limited, twitching motility is more favoured than sessile growth and thus inhibiting biofilm formation [105]. Pyocyanin is a secondary metabolite with a cytotoxicity effect, thereby inducing cell lysis and releasing the cells’ DNA to extracellular space (i.e., eDNA–one of the biofilm components). Pyocyanin can bind to the eDNA and causes an increase in solution viscosity, thus also increasing the physicochemical interactions between biofilm matrices and the surrounding environment as well as promoting cellular aggregation. Pel polysaccharides can also interact with eDNA through cationic-anionic interactions within the biofilm matrix, strengthening the biofilm structure. Lectins are soluble proteins located in the outer membrane which consist of two forms, i.e., LecA (that binds to galactose and its derivatives) and LecB (that binds to fucose, mannose and mannose-containing oligosaccharides). Such adhesive properties of lectins facilitate the retention of both cells and exopolysaccharides in a growing biofilm, contributing to the biofilm structure, as well as adhesion to biological surfaces such as epithelium and mucosa. Collectively, such molecular and cellular interactions in combination with other polymeric substances lead to the establishment of a robust and mature biofilm.

4. Diagnostics

Rapid and accurate diagnostics for P. aeruginosa infections, especially at the early stages, are particularly important to ensure effective treatments and to prevent the conversion to devastating chronic infections. Although the conventional microbiological culture of patient sputum is a routine procedure in most of the laboratories, there are currently many innovative technologies that have been developed to improve speed, accuracy and specificity of detection methods, and thereby advancing management and surveillance of diseases. Here, the development of diagnostic tests and their advantages and disadvantages will be discussed.

4.1. Conventional Microbiological Culture

Misidentification of P. aeruginosa infections is not uncommon and is an increasing concern in the clinical environment as the bacteria exhibit diverse morphologies such as small colony variants, rough small colony variants, wrinkle variants, etc. As the diseases progress to chronic infections with biofilm formation, the isolated bacteria display distinct phenotype—cell aggregates which form “sticky” colonies [106]. Importantly, biofilm bacteria from long-term chronic infections in CF lung exhibit slow growth or uncultivability, which make biofilm infections difficult to be identified by conventional microbial culture of clinical specimens and biochemical reactions [107,108]. The use of automated identification systems including BD Phoenix [107], the bioMérieux Vitek 2 [109] and MicroScan WalkAway [110] for bacterial detection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) have been broadly used in several clinical settings. Various readouts such as turbidimetric, kinetic, colorimetric and fluorescent signals resulting from microbial growth, a variety of enzymatic based reactions and broth microdilution tests are measured to detect the bacterial presence and antimicrobial susceptibility [111,112,113]. Nonetheless, it has been reported that these expensive systems lack specificity and accuracy, and required highly skilled personnel, regular software upgrade and frequent reference database update [109,114].

4.2. Molecular Biology Methods

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is one of the most common methods utilized for the identification of P. aeruginosa. It has been designed to target several specific genes such as the 16S rRNA, oprI, oprL, algD, gyrB, toxA, ecfX, ETA, and fliC. Further examination of the specificity of P. aeruginosa genes showed that ecfX, oprL and gyrB have high sensitivity and specificity [115,116]. Multiplex PCR targeting more than one gene of interest in a single reaction may be an option to effectively address false positive and false negative results obtained using conventional PCR. This method, albeit, faces the main disadvantage of designing primers with high specificity in the abundant presence of gene targets [117]. Real-time fluorescence-based quantitative PCR (RT qPCR) has been established to identify pathogens accurately and specifically. Numerous studies have developed RT qPCR assay to detect P. aeruginosa in CF patients with shorter turnaround time [116,118,119]. Another approach is polymerase spiral reaction (PSR) which has allowed rapid identification of P. aeruginosa in the sputum of intensive care unit (ICU) patients within 60 min under isothermal conditions with 10-fold higher sensitivity compared to conventional PCR [120].

4.3. Mass Spectrometry

Matrixed-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has gained popularity for speedy and reliable detection of P. aeruginosa in microbiology practice with high throughput capabilities at low costs [121]. It generates ribosomal protein-based peptide mass fingerprint (PMF) profiles of investigated microorganisms which are compared to reference PMF database to identify and characterize bacteria in clinical samples [122,123]. Microbial identification by MALDI-TOF MS was not affected by culture conditions such as culture media and culture duration [124,125]. Recent applications of this technique include characterization of species and identification of resistance or virulence biomarkers of multidrug-resistant pathogens [126,127]. Additionally, MALDI-TOF MS profiling has been demonstrated to be capable of differentiating different biofilm stages and capturing phenotypic changes during biofilm development. This technique may be a valuable tool for clinical biofilm infection detection, particularly in early stages, and thus improvement of patient outcomes [128].

4.4. Nanoparticle Biosensor

Quorum sensing of P. aeruginosa produces specific molecules, including pyocyanin and LasA protease, that have been subjected to analyses for detection of P. aeruginosa. Traditional methods to identify pyocyanin are based on ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometry that detects absorbance peaks at both 382 and 521 nm, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) that measure molecular mass at 211 g/mol [129]. On the other hand, LasA protease can be identified using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [130]. However, those methods are time-consuming as they require the target molecules/proteins to be purified from bacterial cultures. Recently, nanoparticles have been developed to allow rapid identification of pyocyanin [131] and LasA protease [132] with high sensitivity even in the presence of other species within cell cultures. Gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) deposited onto indium tin oxide electrodes was able to enhance the detection of pyocyanin at a concentration as low as 40 µM as compared to the minimum 80 µM of pyocyanin detected using unmodified electrodes [131]. Encapsulating the Au NPs with a thin layer of polyaniline hydrochloride (PANI) forming PANI/Au core-shell NPs increased the sensitivity of the PANI/Au NPs-modified electrodes towards pyocyanin down to 36 µM, which could accelerate the diagnostic process, achieving effective treatments and prevention of chronic infections [131]. Magnetic NPs have also been developed as biosensors toward LasA protease by functionalizing the NPs with (glycine)3 peptides and then linking them onto a gold-coated paper substrate [132]. LasA protease in the cell cultures could cleave the peptides from NPs, and the cleaved NPs could attract to external magnetic forces revealing the golden colour of the sensor surface which could then be detected colorimetrically [132]. Such simple biochip allowed rapid identification of P. aeruginosa in clinical samples such as sputum, ear and wound in less than one minute with a detection limit of 102 cfu/mL [132], which could expectedly become a useful point-of-care diagnostic device.

5. Therapeutic Strategies

Therapeutic management of P. aeruginosa infections poses unique challenges for the clinical use of conventional antimicrobials. This bacterium displays multiple drug tolerance mechanisms which can be categorized into intrinsic, acquired and adaptive mechanisms. Biofilm formation as an adaptive mechanism is considered as the key virulence factor enhancing the survival of exposure to antibiotics and initiating chronic infections [133]. As the development and dispersal of biofilm are regulated by a multifactorial process entailing quorum sensing systems, exopolysaccharides and c-di-GMP [58], biofilm remediation strategies are required to target different constituents of biofilm matrix and biofilm-residing cells [134]. Moreover, it is critical to consider the interaction between the host immune system and the infectious agents when treating biofilm-related infections [135,136]. Importantly, clinical chronic infections are frequently diagnosed with co-infections of multi-species, which profoundly worsen the patient outcomes as compared to mono-infections. This has greatly challenged biofilm therapeutic strategies aiming at disrupting biofilm community of mono-species [137,138]. Efforts have been developed to tackle these challenges by targeting biofilm components, inducing biofilm dispersal, inhibiting quorum sensing and targeting iron metabolism using various antimicrobial agents, including antimicrobial peptides, biofilm-degrading enzymes, quorum sensing inhibitor, and iron chelator. We provided a summary of current therapeutic strategies targeting P. aeruginosa biofilms including advantages and limitation of individual approaches (Table 1).

5.1. Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles (NPs) have been used to assist in the delivery of such antimicrobial agents to the sites of infection such as penetration of antibiotics into biofilms. There are other promising delivery systems including liposomes, solid lipid NPs and polymeric NPs whose in vivo efficiency, potential cytotoxicity and interactions between host immunity and NPs, still await further investigation [177,178,179]. In addition to its carrier functionality, NPs have been used as an antimicrobial agent. For example, silver NPs were shown to have antimicrobial action with minimal cytotoxicity against clinical P. aeruginosa strains from nosocomial infections which are resistant to certain antibiotics [155]. Furthermore, polyphosphoester NPs co-loaded with silver acetate and minocycline substantially increased the susceptibility of P. aeruginosa [156]. Conjugation of azlocillin antibiotic onto silver NPs resulted in significantly promoted antibacterial efficacy compared to either NPs alone, or azlocillin alone, or co-administration of NPs and azlocillin [180].

5.2. Targeting EPS Component and Structure

Therapeutic approaches targeting components of biofilm matrices are an option to tackle P. aeruginosa infections. There are several types of enzymes employed to degrade biofilm matrix: alginate lyases [181], glucanohydrolases (e.g., dextranase and mutanase) [182], glycoside hydrolase (e.g., PelAh and PslGH) [35], and deoxyribonucleases (e.g., DNase I and DNase1L2) [183,184]. Furthermore, therapies involving a combination between biofilm matrix-degrading enzymes and antibiotics can facilitate biofilm dispersal, improve drug penetration, and therefore maximizing efficacy against established biofilms [160,185].
Alginate inhibitor, such as thiol-benzo-triazolo-quinazolinone, has been demonstrated to interfere with the binding of Alg44 to c-di-GMP. This interference resulted in a declined alginate production in P. aeruginosa, which could potentially limit mucoid conversion and reduce a complication in CF patients [186]. Alginate oligomer (i.e., OligoG) inhibited biofilm formation by inducing disruption of mucoid biofilm through interaction with both EPS and eDNA [161].

5.3. Immunotherapies

Bispecific monoclonal antibodies have been investigated as a promising agent to manage the bacterial infection. Anti-Psl, anti-PcrV (Type III Secretion System protein) and BiS4αPa (known as MEDI3902) have demonstrated their potential effectiveness towards both management and prevention of infection [187,188]. Monoclonal antibodies targeting a family of bacterial DNA-binding proteins (DNABII), a common component of biofilm which supports the structural stability, have been proved to be promising therapeutic candidates against P. aeruginosa biofilm in a mouse lung infection model [189].

5.4. Induction of Biofilm Dispersal

The signal molecule nitric oxide (NO) has been reported to induce biofilm dispersal through modification of intracellular c-di-GMP levels. However, biofilm dispersal was not enhanced by multiples treatments with NO due to the presence of flavohemoglobin in P. aeruginosa biofilms. To overcome this, imidazole was utilized to inhibit NO dioxygenase activity of flavohemoglobin produced in NO-pretreated biofilms and restored dispersal activity [162]. Furthermore, low dose NO gas can be used as an adjunctive strategy to potentiate antimicrobial efficacy by dispersing biofilm and exposing dispersed bacteria to antibiotic killing in ex vivo and clinical studies [190].

5.5. Inhibition of Quorum Sensing

Quorum sensing is an attractive target for inhibition and eradication of biofilm. Naturally occurring carotenoid zeaxanthin was found to inhibit biofilm and target LasIR and Rh1IR QS systems of wild-type PAO1 [191]. The plant flavonoid quercetin has been known for its their pharmacological effects such as reducing the production of pyocyanin and inhibiting the biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa [192]. A benzamide-benzimidazole compound, M64, restricted biofilm development and improved antibiofilm properties of meropenem and tobramycin achieved by inhibiting the controller of QS system, MvfR [193]. Another quorum quenching molecule, P. aeruginosa periplasmic enzyme PvdQ acylase, was proved to be a hydrolyzer of N-acyl homoserine lactone (AHL), thereby attenuating virulence and alleviating infections in vitro and in a mouse pulmonary infection model [194]. Notably, terrein, a bioactive fungal metabolite isolated from Aspergillus terreus, has been revealed for the first time as an inhibitor with dual activities against both QS system and c-di-GMP without affecting bacterial viability, thus limiting the development of drug resistance [164]. A recent study identified a quorum quenching enzyme AqdC which decreased the production of alkylquinolone and pyocyanin while increasing levels of elastase. Interestingly, the co-presence of Rhodococcus erythropolis isolated QsdA and AqdC resulted in the decline of N-acylhomoserine lactone, rhamnolipid as well as elastase levels, suggesting that targeting a complex quorum sensing network may require more than a single enzyme. Indeed, the presence of both enzymes improved the survival of Caenorhabditis elegans upon P. aeruginosa exposure [163].

5.6. Targeting Iron Metabolism

Iron is known to play vital roles in a range of cellular processes including bacterial growth, DNA replication, biofilm formation and infection establishment [195,196]. Evidently, the enhanced concentration of sputum iron was observed in the lung of CF patients compared to healthy controls [197]. P. aeruginosa acquires extracellular iron via iron uptake systems such as the siderophores pyocyanin and pyochelin. Hence, targeting iron metabolism using iron analogues and chelators could be promising strategies to combat P. aeruginosa infections. Gallium, structurally similar to iron, was utilized as an iron substitute to impede iron uptake, disrupt iron-dependent pathways, influence bacterial viability and disturb biofilm formation [166]. Combination of tobramycin and FDA-approved iron chelation compounds, i.e., deferoxamine and deferasirox, is another effective approach to disperse pre-existing biofilms, enhance bactericidal activity and prevent biofilm development [167]. Treatment using novel deferoxamine conjugated gallium complexes alone exhibited planktonic killing and biofilm formation disturbance, and when co-administered the complexes with gentamicin showed substantially enhanced antibiofilm actions [198].

5.7. Photodynamic Therapy

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been demonstrated as a promising approach to tackle bacterial infections in both planktonic and biofilm lifestyles. Its antimicrobial effect relies on the activation of non-toxic photosensitizers (PS) upon exposing to harmless visible light of appropriate spectra in the presence of oxygen to produce cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) on site [199,200]. These oxygen species act on multiple targets including biofilm matrix, cell membranes and other cellular organelles as well as macromolecules such as lipids, protein and nucleic acids [201]. Unlike conventional antimicrobials, the mechanism of PDT involves a distinct molecular pathway, hence unlikely inducing resistances [202]. As the efficacy of PDT mainly depends on the PS uptake by bacterial cells, different PS molecules have been employed to improve the cellular internalization [172,203]. Treating P. aeruginosa biofilms with the PS, tetracationic porphyrin [5,10,15,20-tetrakis(1-methylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin tetra-iodide, Tetra-Py+-Me], has resulted in a significant decline of EPS content, suggesting that the EPS may be the target of photoinactivation [204]. GD11, a member of a boron-dipyrrolemethene (BODIPY) dye family, has also been developed as PS against wild-type P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilms [170]. After the irradiation, a substantial cell lethality was observed with minimal impact on biofilm structure and without recurrence of microbial growth after 24h [170]. A glycosylated photosensitizer pGEMA-I derived from BODIPY has recently been developed to selectively bind to bacteria over human cells [205]. This improved selectivity has led to high bactericidal activity, effective biofilm suppression and reduction of side effects [205]. A recent study has revealed that curcumin mediated PDT was capable of efficiently decreasing viability of both planktonic and biofilm bacteria, and successfully repressing EPS production via inhibition of QS system [206]. Moreover, drug delivery systems such as nanoparticles are also utilized to enhance the stability and the diffusion of the PS into the biofilms. For example, the PS toluidine blue (TB) loaded in mesoporous silica nanoparticles was capable of considerably reducing the cell viability and biofilm biomass as compared to free TB [172].

5.8. Photothermal Therapy

Photothermal therapy (PTT) has emerged as an attractive therapeutic modality for combating antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. PTT involves the use of the near-infrared (NIR) light in a wavelength ranging from 700 to 1100 nm for irradiation of nanomaterials to generate localized heat which causes irreversible damage to nearby bacterial cells [207]. Various photothermal nanomaterials, including carbon-based nanocomposites [208,209,210], gold and silver nanoparticles [211,212] and conducting polymers [207,213], have been optimized for PTT. For example, gold nanorods (AuNR) surface engineered with phospholipid-polyethylene (PEG) have been developed and utilized against P. aeruginosa suspension and biofilm cultures [173]. Upon continuous or pulse activation of laser, severe cell membrane destruction of planktonic cells and marked lethality of the biofilm population were observed [173]. Thiolated graphene (TG) sheet has also been developed for photothermal therapy by functionalizing with S-nitrosothiols, a heat-sensitive NO donor, along with boronic acid, which facilitates cell attachment due to its dense hydroxyl groups, to obtain a multifunctional photothermal agent [175]. Application of this agent with single NIR has led to the simultaneous release of NO and localized heat, both of which are required for effective ablation of bacteria and biofilms in vitro and in vivo with fewer side effects [175]. Recently, bacteriophage has been developed for treatment against antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections due to its high affinity toward bacteria. To overcome the cytotoxicity limitation of bacteriophage-based antibacterial approach, the bacteriophage was conjugated with AuNR [174]. This bioconjugate, phage-AuNR, has shown rapid killing of both planktonic and biofilm cells with minimal effect on mammalian epithelial cells and successful inhibition of phage replication. In addition, this strategy has offered improved specificity towards targeted pathogens via aggregation of phage-AuNR on bacteria, thus it is possibly used for diagnosis of bacterial infections as well [174].

6. Conclusions

Antimicrobial treatments of P. aeruginosa infections are still challenging which is mostly due to the ability of P. aeruginosa to form dense and persistent biofilms. Biofilms of P. aeruginosa are composed of polysaccharides (Pel, Psl and alginate) and extracellular DNA that play critical roles in protecting the bacterial communities from exogenous stresses caused by antimicrobial agents. This extraordinary ability of P. aeruginosa to form biofilms is promoted by sophisticated cell communication system called quorum sensing that function in a hierarchical manner and are actively inducible upon an increase in cell density or via limitation of nutrients (e.g., iron and phosphate). The complexity of antimicrobial treatments for P. aeruginosa biofilm is compounded when multiple species are also involved in forming polymicrobial communities within the biofilms. Molecular diagnosis methods have been developed to detect and identify P. aeruginosa. These methods are heavily relied on the P. aeruginosa characteristics in terms of its genetic, microbial physiology and biochemical markers that can be characterized using, for example, polymerase chain reaction, cell cultures for antibiotic-resistance profiling, and nanoparticle biosensor, respectively. Despite the diagnosis advancement, major challenges include the enrichment of bacterial cells and biochemical markers for detection and the lack of biomarker database, as well as the high cost and/or time-consuming. In the perspective of therapeutic strategies, more targeted approaches for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections have been developed in the past years in efforts to target different components governing biofilm structure, biofilm dispersal, quorum sensing, and iron metabolism. Although promising results have been demonstrated, translation to clinical trials seems to be challenging due to the variation in biofilm lifestyle, composition and phenotypes which depend on various parameters such as nutrition conditions and the presence of other bacterial species. Future studies are required on the development of more advance techniques, aiming at providing high-throughput and specific diagnosis at an early stage of P. aeruginosa growth prior to biofilm development. On the other hand, more thorough understanding on genetic pathways that are responsible for all biofilm lifestyle cycles of P. aeruginosa warrants further investigation, which could provide informed decision to design therapeutic strategies that could impair the bacterial attachment and biofilm maturation capabilities.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.T.T., D.W., B.H.A.R.; Writing—original draft preparation, M.T.T.T., D.W.; Writing—Review and Editing, D.W., B.H.A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

B.H.A. Rehm acknowledges financial support from the award of the Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project (DP200100874) and the ARC Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities (LE200100140).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Gale, M.J.; Maritato, M.S.; Chen, Y.-L.; Abdulateef, S.S.; Ruiz, J.E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing inflammatory mass of the nasopharynx in an immunocompromised HIV infected patient: A mimic of malignancy. IDCases 2015, 2, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wu, W.; Jin, Y.; Bai, F.; Jin, S. Chapter 41—Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. In Molecular Medical Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Tang, Y.-W., Sussman, M., Liu, D., Poxton, I., Schwartzman, J., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 753–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gomila, A.; Carratalà, J.; Badia, J.M.; Camprubí, D.; Piriz, M.; Shaw, E.; Diaz-Brito, V.; Espejo, E.; Nicolás, C.; Brugués, M.; et al. Preoperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis reduces Pseudomonas aeruginosa surgical site infections after elective colorectal surgery: A multicenter prospective cohort study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. World Health Organization. Prioritization of Pathogens to Guide Discovery, Research and Development of New Antibiotics for Drug-Resistant Bacterial Infections, Including Tuberculosis; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pang, Z.; Raudonis, R.; Glick, B.R.; Lin, T.J.; Cheng, Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Moradali, M.F.; Ghods, S.; Rehm, B.H. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lifestyle: A Paradigm for Adaptation, Survival, and Persistence. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Romling, U.; Balsalobre, C. Biofilm infections, their resilience to therapy and innovative treatment strategies. J. Intern. Med. 2012, 272, 541–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sen, C.K.; Gordillo, G.M.; Roy, S.; Kirsner, R.; Lambert, L.; Hunt, T.K.; Gottrup, F.; Gurtner, G.C.; Longaker, M.T. Human skin wounds: A major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen 2009, 17, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Donlan, R.M. Biofilms: Microbial life on surfaces. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 881–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rollet, C.; Gal, L.; Guzzo, J. Biofilm-detached cells, a transition from a sessile to a planktonic phenotype: A comparative study of adhesion and physiological characteristics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009, 290, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lewis, K. Riddle of biofilm resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 999–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ghafoor, A.; Hay, I.D.; Rehm, B.H. Role of exopolysaccharides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and architecture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 5238–5246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Crespo, A.; Blanco-Cabra, N.; Torrents, E. Aerobic Vitamin B12 Biosynthesis Is Essential for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Class II Ribonucleotide Reductase Activity During Planktonic and Biofilm Growth. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Oluyombo, O.; Penfold, C.N.; Diggle, S.P. Competition in Biofilms between Cystic Fibrosis Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Is Shaped by R-Pyocins. mBio 2019, 10, e01828-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Coughlan, L.M.; Cotter, P.D.; Hill, C.; Alvarez-Ordonez, A. New Weapons to Fight Old Enemies: Novel Strategies for the (Bio)control of Bacterial Biofilms in the Food Industry. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Moradali, M.F.; Rehm, B.H.A. Bacterial biopolymers: From pathogenesis to advanced materials. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rehm, B.H.A. Bacterial polymers: Biosynthesis, modifications and applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 578–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Strempel, N.; Neidig, A.; Nusser, M.; Geffers, R.; Vieillard, J.; Lesouhaitier, O.; Brenner-Weiss, G.; Overhage, J. Human host defense peptide LL-37 stimulates virulence factor production and adaptive resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jackson, K.D.; Starkey, M.; Kremer, S.; Parsek, M.R.; Wozniak, D.J. Identification of psl, a locus encoding a potential exopolysaccharide that is essential for Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 4466–4475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ryder, C.; Byrd, M.; Wozniak, D.J. Role of polysaccharides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2007, 10, 644–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Billings, N.; Millan, M.; Caldara, M.; Rusconi, R.; Tarasova, Y.; Stocker, R.; Ribbeck, K. The extracellular matrix Component Psl provides fast-acting antibiotic defense in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. PLoS Pathog 2013, 9, e1003526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ma, L.; Conover, M.; Lu, H.; Parsek, M.R.; Bayles, K.; Wozniak, D.J. Assembly and development of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Byrd, M.S.; Sadovskaya, I.; Vinogradov, E.; Lu, H.; Sprinkle, A.B.; Richardson, S.H.; Ma, L.; Ralston, B.; Parsek, M.R.; Anderson, E.M.; et al. Genetic and biochemical analyses of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Psl exopolysaccharide reveal overlapping roles for polysaccharide synthesis enzymes in Psl and LPS production. Mol. Microbiol. 2009, 73, 622–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Ma, L.; Wang, S.; Wang, D.; Parsek, M.R.; Wozniak, D.J. The roles of biofilm matrix polysaccharide Psl in mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 65, 377–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Jones, C.J.; Wozniak, D.J. Psl Produced by Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa Contributes to the Establishment of Biofilms and Immune Evasion. mBio 2017, 8, e00864-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Irie, Y.; Roberts, A.E.L.; Kragh, K.N.; Gordon, V.D.; Hutchison, J.; Allen, R.J.; Melaugh, G.; Bjarnsholt, T.; West, S.A.; Diggle, S.P. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa PSL Polysaccharide Is a Social but Noncheatable Trait in Biofilms. mBio 2017, 8, e00374-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Staudinger, B.J.; Muller, J.F.; Halldórsson, S.; Boles, B.; Angermeyer, A.; Nguyen, D.; Rosen, H.; Baldursson, O.; Gottfreðsson, M.; Guðmundsson, G.H.; et al. Conditions associated with the cystic fibrosis defect promote chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2014, 189, 812–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Irie, Y.; Borlee, B.R.; O’Connor, J.R.; Hill, P.J.; Harwood, C.S.; Wozniak, D.J.; Parsek, M.R. Self-produced exopolysaccharide is a signal that stimulates biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 20632–20636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Mishra, M.; Byrd, M.S.; Sergeant, S.; Azad, A.K.; Parsek, M.R.; McPhail, L.; Schlesinger, L.S.; Wozniak, D.J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Psl polysaccharide reduces neutrophil phagocytosis and the oxidative response by limiting complement-mediated opsonization. Cell Microbiol. 2012, 14, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Colvin, K.M.; Alnabelseya, N.; Baker, P.; Whitney, J.C.; Howell, P.L.; Parsek, M.R. PelA deacetylase activity is required for Pel polysaccharide synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 2329–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Jennings, L.K.; Storek, K.M.; Ledvina, H.E.; Coulon, C.; Marmont, L.S.; Sadovskaya, I.; Secor, P.R.; Tseng, B.S.; Scian, M.; Filloux, A.; et al. Pel is a cationic exopolysaccharide that cross-links extracellular DNA in the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 11353–11358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Friedman, L.; Kolter, R. Genes involved in matrix formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 51, 675–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Colvin, K.M.; Irie, Y.; Tart, C.S.; Urbano, R.; Whitney, J.C.; Ryder, C.; Howell, P.L.; Wozniak, D.J.; Parsek, M.R. The Pel and Psl polysaccharides provide Pseudomonas aeruginosa structural redundancy within the biofilm matrix. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 14, 1913–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Yang, L.; Hu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ulstrup, J.; Molin, S. Distinct roles of extracellular polymeric substances in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 1705–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Baker, P.; Hill, P.J.; Snarr, B.D.; Alnabelseya, N.; Pestrak, M.J.; Lee, M.J.; Jennings, L.K.; Tam, J.; Melnyk, R.A.; Parsek, M.R.; et al. Exopolysaccharide biosynthetic glycoside hydrolases can be utilized to disrupt and prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1501632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ciofu, O.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Jensen, P.Ø.; Wang, H.; Høiby, N. Antimicrobial resistance, respiratory tract infections and role of biofilms in lung infections in cystic fibrosis patients. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 85, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Folkesson, A.; Jelsbak, L.; Yang, L.; Johansen, H.K.; Ciofu, O.; Høiby, N.; Molin, S. Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the cystic fibrosis airway: An evolutionary perspective. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 10, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Evans, L.R.; Linker, A. Production and Characterization of the Slime Polysaccharide of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 1973, 116, 915–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Tseng, B.S.; Zhang, W.; Harrison, J.J.; Quach, T.P.; Song, J.L.; Penterman, J.; Singh, P.K.; Chopp, D.L.; Packman, A.I.; Parsek, M.R. The extracellular matrix protectsPseudomonas aeruginosabiofilms by limiting the penetration of tobramycin. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 2865–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hay, I.D.; Rehman, Z.U.; Moradali, M.F.; Wang, Y.; Rehm, B.H.A. Microbial alginate production, modification and its applications. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013, 6, 637–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hay, I.D.; Rehman, Z.U.; Ghafoor, A.; Rehm, B.H.A. Bacterial biosynthesis of alginates. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 752–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gloag, E.S.; German, G.K.; Stoodley, P.; Wozniak, D.J. Viscoelastic properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa variant biofilms. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Wloka, M.; Rehage, H.; Flemming, H.-C.; Wingender, J. Structure and rheological behaviour of the extracellular polymeric substance network of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Biofilms 2005, 2, 275–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rehm, B.H.A.; Valla, S. Bacterial alginates: Biosynthesis and applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 48, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Turnbull, L.; Toyofuku, M.; Hynen, A.L.; Kurosawa, M.; Pessi, G.; Petty, N.K.; Osvath, S.R.; Cárcamo-Oyarce, G.; Gloag, E.S.; Shimoni, R.; et al. Explosive cell lysis as a mechanism for the biogenesis of bacterial membrane vesicles and biofilms. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Chiang, W.-C.; Nilsson, M.; Jensen, P.Ø.; Høiby, N.; Nielsen, T.E.; Givskov, M.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Extracellular DNA Shields against Aminoglycosides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 2352–2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Allesen-Holm, M.; Barken, K.B.; Yang, L.; Klausen, M.; Webb, J.S.; Kjelleberg, S.; Molin, S.; Givskov, M.C.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. A characterization of DNA release in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures and biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59, 1114–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wilton, M.; Charron-Mazenod, L.; Moore, R.; Lewenza, S. Extracellular DNA Acidifies Biofilms and Induces Aminoglycoside Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 60, 544–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Wilton, M.; Wong, M.J.Q.; Tang, L.; Liang, X.; Moore, R.; Parkins, M.D.; Lewenza, S.; Dong, T.G. Chelation of Membrane-Bound Cations by Extracellular DNA Activates the Type VI Secretion System in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 2016, 84, 2355–2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gloag, E.S.; Turnbull, L.; Huang, A.; Vallotton, P.; Wang, H.; Nolan, L.M.; Mililli, L.; Hunt, C.; Lu, J.; Osvath, S.R.; et al. Self-organization of bacterial biofilms is facilitated by extracellular DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 11541–11546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bass, J.I.F.; Russo, D.M.; Gabelloni, M.L.; Geffner, J.R.; Giordano, M.; Catalano, M.; Zorreguieta, Á.; Trevani, A.S. Extracellular DNA: A Major Proinflammatory Component of Pseudomonas aeruginosaBiofilms. J. Immunol. 2010, 184, 6386–6395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Pham, T.H.; Webb, J.S.; Rehm, B.H.A. The role of polyhydroxyalkanoate biosynthesis by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in rhamnolipid and alginate production as well as stress tolerance and biofilm formation. Microbiology 2004, 150, 3405–3413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Sønderholm, M.; Kragh, K.N.; Koren, K.; Jakobsen, T.H.; Darch, S.E.; Alhede, M.; Jensen, P.Ø.; Whiteley, M.; Kühl, M.; Bjarnsholt, T. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Aggregate Formation in an Alginate Bead Model System Exhibits In Vivo-Like Characteristics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. O’Toole, G.A.; Kolter, R. Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosabiofilm development. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 30, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Klausen, M.; Aaes-Jørgensen, A.; Molin, S.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Involvement of bacterial migration in the development of complex multicellular structures in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 50, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Hickman, J.W.; Harwood, C.S. Identification of FleQ fromPseudomonas aeruginosaas a c-di-GMP-responsive transcription factor. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 69, 376–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Guilbaud, M.; Bruzaud, J.; Bouffartigues, E.; Orange, N.; Guillot, A.; Aubert-Frambourg, A.; Monnet, V.; Herry, J.-M.; Chevalier, S.; Bellon-Fontaine, M.-N. Proteomic Response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Adhering to Solid Surfaces. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rasamiravaka, T.; Labtani, Q.; Duez, P.; El Jaziri, M. The Formation of Biofilms by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A Review of the Natural and Synthetic Compounds Interfering with Control Mechanisms. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 759348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Cherny, K.E.; Sauer, K. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Requires the DNA-Specific Endonuclease EndA To Degrade Extracellular Genomic DNA To Disperse from the Biofilm. J. Bacteriol. 2019, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Shrout, J.D.; Chopp, D.L.; Just, C.L.; Hentzer, M.; Givskov, M.; Parsek, M.R. The impact of quorum sensing and swarming motility on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation is nutritionally conditional. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 62, 1264–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chua, S.L.; Tan, S.Y.-Y.; Rybtke, M.T.; Chen, Y.; Rice, S.A.; Kjelleberg, S.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Yang, L.; Givskov, M. Bis-(3′-5′)-Cyclic Dimeric GMP Regulates Antimicrobial Peptide Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 2066–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Chua, S.L.; Hultqvist, L.D.; Yuan, M.; Rybtke, M.; E Nielsen, T.; Givskov, M.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Yang, L. In vitro and in vivo generation and characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm–dispersed cells via c-di-GMP manipulation. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 1165–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chua, S.L.; Liu, Y.; Yam, J.K.H.; Chen, Y.; Vejborg, R.M.; Tan, B.G.C.; Kjelleberg, S.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Givskov, M.; Yang, L. Dispersed cells represent a distinct stage in the transition from bacterial biofilm to planktonic lifestyles. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chambers, J.R.; Cherny, K.E.; Sauer, K. Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Dispersed Cells to Antimicrobial Agents Is Dependent on the Dispersion Cue and Class of the Antimicrobial Agent Used. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00846-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Li, Y.; Petrova, O.E.; Su, S.; Lau, G.W.; Panmanee, W.; Na, R.; Hassett, D.J.; Davies, D.G.; Sauer, K. BdlA, DipA and Induced Dispersion Contribute to Acute Virulence and Chronic Persistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Fleming, D.; Rumbaugh, K. The Consequences of Biofilm Dispersal on the Host. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Mashburn, L.M.; Jett, A.M.; Akins, D.R.; Whiteley, M. Staphylococcus aureus Serves as an Iron Source for Pseudomonas aeruginosa during In Vivo Coculture. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 554–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Korgaonkar, A.; Trivedi, U.; Rumbaugh, K.P.; Whiteley, M. Community surveillance enhances Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence during polymicrobial infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 110, 1059–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Willner, D.L.; Haynes, M.R.; Furlan, M.; Schmieder, R.; Lim, Y.W.; Rainey, P.B.; Rohwer, F.; Conrad, D. Spatial distribution of microbial communities in the cystic fibrosis lung. ISME J. 2012, 6, 471–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Hall-Stoodley, L.; Costerton, J.W.; Stoodley, P. Bacterial biofilms: From the Natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 2, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Weaver, V.B.; Kolter, R. Burkholderia spp. Alter Pseudomonas aeruginosa Physiology through Iron Sequestration. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 2376–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Limoli, D.H.; Whitfield, G.B.; Kitao, T.; Ivey, M.L.; Davis, M.R., Jr.; Grahl, N.; Hogan, D.A.; Rahme, L.G.; Howell, P.L.; O’Toole, G.A.; et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosaAlginate Overproduction Promotes Coexistence with Staphylococcus aureus in a Model of Cystic Fibrosis Respiratory Infection. mBio 2017, 8, e00186-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Armbruster, C.R.; Wolter, D.J.; Mishra, M.; Hayden, H.S.; Radey, M.C.; Merrihew, G.; MacCoss, M.J.; Burns, J.; Wozniak, D.J.; Parsek, M.R.; et al. Staphylococcus aureus Protein A Mediates Interspecies Interactions at the Cell Surface of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 2016, 7, e00538-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Chew, S.C.; Yam, J.K.H.; Matysik, A.; Seng, Z.J.; Klebensberger, J.; Givskov, M.; Doyle, P.; Rice, S.A.; Yang, L.; Kjelleberg, S. Matrix Polysaccharides and SiaD Diguanylate Cyclase Alter Community Structure and Competitiveness of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during Dual-Species Biofilm Development with Staphylococcus aureus. mBio 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Bragonzi, A.; Farulla, I.; Paroni, M.; Twomey, K.B.; Pirone, L.; Lorè, N.I.; Bianconi, I.; Dalmastri, C.; Ryan, R.P.; Bevivino, A. Modelling Co-Infection of the Cystic Fibrosis Lung by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cenocepacia Reveals Influences on Biofilm Formation and Host Response. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Filkins, L.M.; Hampton, T.H.; Gifford, A.H.; Gross, M.J.; Hogan, D.A.; Sogin, M.L.; Morrison, H.G.; Paster, B.J.; O’Toole, G.A. Prevalence of Streptococci and Increased Polymicrobial Diversity Associated with Cystic Fibrosis Patient Stability. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 4709–4717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Scoffield, J.A.; Wu, H. Oral Streptococci and Nitrite-Mediated Interference of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Scoffield, J.A.; Duan, D.; Zhu, F.; Wu, H. A commensal streptococcus hijacks a Pseudomonas aeruginosa exopolysaccharide to promote biofilm formation. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Yan, S.; Wu, G. Can Biofilm Be Reversed Through Quorum Sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa? Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Mukherjee, S.; Bassler, B.L. Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019, 17, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fuqua, W.C.; Winans, S.C.; Greenberg, E.P. Quorum sensing in bacteria: The LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Lee, J.; Zhang, L. The hierarchy quorum sensing network in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Protein Cell 2015, 6, 26–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Choi, Y.; Park, H.-Y.; Park, S.J.; Park, S.-J.; Kim, S.-K.; Ha, C.; Im, S.-J.; Lee, J.-H. Growth phase-differential quorum sensing regulation of anthranilate metabolism in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Cells 2011, 32, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Oglesby, A.G.; Farrow, J.M.I.; Lee, J.-H.; Tomaras, A.P.; Greenberg, E.P.; Pesci, E.C.; Vasil, M.L. The Influence of Iron on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Physiology: A regulatory link between iron and quorum sensing. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 15558–15567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Rampioni, G.; Falcone, M.; Heeb, S.; Frangipani, E.; Fletcher, M.P.; Dubern, J.-F.; Visca, P.; Leoni, L.; Cámara, M.; Williams, P. Unravelling the Genome-Wide Contributions of Specific 2-Alkyl-4-Quinolones and PqsE to Quorum Sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1006029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Mashburn, L.M.; Whiteley, M. Membrane vesicles traffic signals and facilitate group activities in a prokaryote. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 437, 422–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Seed, P.C.; Passador, L.; Iglewski, B.H. Activation of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasI gene by LasR and the Pseudomonas autoinducer PAI: An autoinduction regulatory hierarchy. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Déziel, E.; Lépine, F.; Milot, S.; He, J.; Mindrinos, M.N.; Tompkins, R.G.; Rahme, L.G. Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4-hydroxy-2-alkylquinolines (HAQs) reveals a role for 4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline in cell-to-cell communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 1339–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Winson, M.K.; Camara, M.; Latifi, A.; Foglino, M.; Chhabra, S.R.; Daykin, M.; Bally, M.; Chapon, V.; Salmond, G.P.; Bycroft, B.W. Multiple N-acyl-L-homoserine lactone signal molecules regulate production of virulence determinants and secondary metabolites in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 9427–9431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. McKnight, S.L.; Iglewski, B.H.; Pesci, E.C. The Pseudomonas Quinolone Signal Regulates rhl Quorum Sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 2702–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Cao, H.; Krishnan, G.; Goumnerov, B.; Tsongalis, J.; Tompkins, R.; Rahme, L.G. A quorum sensing-associated virulence gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa encodes a LysR-like transcription regulator with a unique self-regulatory mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 14613–14618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Lee, J.; Wu, J.; Deng, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Chang, C.; Dong, Y.; Williams, P.; Zhang, L.-H. A cell-cell communication signal integrates quorum sensing and stress response. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2013, 9, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Meng, X.; Ahator, S.D.; Zhang, L.-H. Molecular Mechanisms of Phosphate Stress Activation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quorum Sensing Systems. mSphere 2020, 5, 119–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Ye, L.; Cornelis, P.; Guillemyn, K.; Ballet, S.; Christophersen, C.; Hammerich, O. Structure Revision of N-Mercapto-4-formylcarbostyril Produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens G308 to 2-(2-Hydroxyphenyl)thiazole-4-carbaldehyde [aeruginaldehyde]. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 789–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Trottmann, F.; Franke, J.; Ishida, K.; Garcia-Altares, M.; Hertweck, C. A Pair of Bacterial Siderophores Releases and Traps an Intercellular Signal Molecule: An Unusual Case of Natural Nitrone Bioconjugation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 58, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Murcia, N.E.; Elee, X.; Ewaridel, P.; Emaspoli, A.; Imker, H.J.; Echai, T.; Walsh, C.T.; Reimmann, C. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa antimetabolite L -2-amino-4-methoxy-trans-3-butenoic acid (AMB) is made from glutamate and two alanine residues via a thiotemplate-linked tripeptide precursor. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Pamp, S.J.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Multiple Roles of Biosurfactants in Structural Biofilm Development by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 2531–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Pearson, J.P.; Pesci, E.C.; Iglewski, B.H. Roles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa las and rhl quorum-sensing systems in control of elastase and rhamnolipid biosynthesis genes. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 5756–5767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Banin, E.; Vasil, M.L.; Greenberg, E.P. From The Cover: Iron and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 11076–11081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Das, T.; Kutty, S.K.; Kumar, N.; Manefield, M. Pyocyanin Facilitates Extracellular DNA Binding to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Influencing Cell Surface Properties and Aggregation. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Das, T.; Kutty, S.K.; Tavallaie, R.; Ibugo, A.I.; Panchompoo, J.; Sehar, S.; Aldous, L.; Yeung, A.W.S.; Thomas, S.R.; Kumar, N.; et al. Phenazine virulence factor binding to extracellular DNA is important for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, srep08398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sakuragi, Y.; Kolter, R. Quorum-Sensing Regulation of the Biofilm Matrix Genes (pel) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 5383–5386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Da Silva, D.P.; Matwichuk, M.L.; Townsend, D.O.; Reichhardt, C.; Lamba, D.; Wozniak, D.J.; Parsek, M.R. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa lectin LecB binds to the exopolysaccharide Psl and stabilizes the biofilm matrix. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Diggle, S.P.; Stacey, R.E.; Dodd, C.; Cámara, M.; Williams, P.; Winzer, K. The galactophilic lectin, LecA, contributes to biofilm development in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 1095–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Visca, P.; Imperi, F.; Lamont, I.L. Pyoverdine siderophores: From biogenesis to biosignificance. Trends Microbiol. 2007, 15, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Kirisits, M.J.; Prost, L.; Starkey, M.; Parsek, M.R. Characterization of Colony Morphology Variants Isolated from Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 4809–4821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Whistler, T.; Sangwichian, O.; Jorakate, P.; Sawatwong, P.; Surin, U.; Piralam, B.; Thamthitiwat, S.; Promkong, C.; Peruski, L. Identification of Gram negative non-fermentative bacteria: How hard can it be? PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Abayasekara, L.M.; Perera, J.; Chandrasekharan, V.; Gnanam, V.S.; Udunuwara, N.A.; Liyanage, D.S.; Bulathsinhala, N.E.; Adikary, S.; Aluthmuhandiram, J.V.S.; Thanaseelan, C.S.; et al. Detection of bacterial pathogens from clinical specimens using conventional microbial culture and 16S metagenomics: A comparative study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Bobenchik, A.M.; Deak, E.; Hindler, J.A.; Charlton, C.L.; Humphries, R.M. Performance of Vitek 2 for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia with Vitek 2 (2009 FDA) and CLSI M100S 26th Edition Breakpoints. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 55, 450–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Sader, H.S.; Fritsche, T.R.; Jones, R.N. Accuracy of Three Automated Systems (MicroScan WalkAway, VITEK, and VITEK 2) for Susceptibility Testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against Five Broad-Spectrum Beta-Lactam Agents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 1101–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. O’Hara, C.M. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST System and NID Panel for Identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and Commonly Isolated Nonenteric Gram-Negative Bacilli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 928–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. McGregor, A.; Schio, F.; Beaton, S.; Boulton, V.; Perman, M.; Gilbert, G. The MicroScan WalkAway diagnostic microbiology system—An evaluation. Pathology 1995, 27, 172–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ligozzi, M.; Bernini, C.; Bonora, M.G.; De Fatima, M.; Zuliani, J.; Fontana, R.J. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 System for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Medically Relevant Gram-Positive Cocci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 1681–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Sekyere, J.O.; Sephofane, A.K.; Mbelle, N.M. Comparative Evaluation of CHROMagar COL-APSE, MicroScan Walkaway, ComASP Colistin, and Colistin MAC Test in Detecting Colistin-resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Qin, X.; Emerson, J.; Stapp, J.; Stapp, L.; Abe, P.; Burns, J.L. Use of Real-Time PCR with Multiple Targets To Identify Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Other Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli from Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 4312–4317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Anuj, S.N.; Whiley, D.M.; Kidd, T.J.; Bell, S.C.; Wainwright, C.E.; Nissen, M.D.; Sloots, T.P. Identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a duplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assay targeting the ecfX and the gyrB genes. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 63, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Aghamollaei, H.; Moghaddam, M.M.; Kooshki, H.; Heiat, M.; Mirnejad, R.; Barzi, N.S. Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a triplex polymerase chain reaction assay based on lasI/R and gyrB genes. J. Infect. Public Health 2015, 8, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Motoshima, M.; Yanagihara, K.; Fukushima, K.; Matsuda, J.; Sugahara, K.; Hirakata, Y.; Yamada, Y.; Kohno, S.; Kamihira, S. Rapid and accurate detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by real-time polymerase chain reaction with melting curve analysis targeting gyrB gene. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007, 58, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Le Gall, F.; Le Berre, R.; Rosec, S.; Hardy, J.; Gouriou, S.; Boisramé-Gastrin, S.; Vallet, S.; Rault, G.; Payan, C.; Héry-Arnaud, G. Proposal of a quantitative PCR-based protocol for an optimal Pseudomonas aeruginosa detection in patients with cystic fibrosis. BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Edong, D.; Ezou, D.; Eliu, H.; Eyang, Z.; Ehuang, S.; Eliu, N.; Ehe, X.; Eliu, W.; Huang, L. Rapid detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa targeting the toxA gene in intensive care unit patients from Beijing, China. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Oumeraci, T.; Jensen, V.; Talbot, S.R.; Hofmann, W.; Kostrzewa, M.; Schlegelberger, B.; Von Neuhoff, N.; Häussler, S. Comprehensive MALDI-TOF Biotyping of the Non-Redundant Harvard Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 Transposon Insertion Mutant Library. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Singhal, N.; Kumar, M.; Kanaujia, P.K.; Virdi, J.S. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: An emerging technology for microbial identification and diagnosis. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. He, Y.; Li, H.; Lu, X.; Stratton, C.W.; Tang, Y.-W. Mass Spectrometry Biotyper System Identifies Enteric Bacterial Pathogens Directly from Colonies Grown on Selective Stool Culture Media. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 3888–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Carbonnelle, E.; Beretti, J.-L.; Cottyn, S.; Quesne, G.; Berche, P.; Nassif, X.; Ferroni, A. Rapid Identification of Staphylococci Isolated in Clinical Microbiology Laboratories by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 2156–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Sogawa, K.; Watanabe, M.; Sato, K.; Segawa, S.; Ishii, C.; Miyabe, A.; Murata, S.; Saito, T.; Nomura, F. Use of the MALDI BioTyper system with MALDI–TOF mass spectrometry for rapid identification of microorganisms. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 400, 1905–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Cabrolier, N.; Sauget, M.; Bertrand, X.; Hocquet, D. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Identifies Pseudomonas aeruginosa High-Risk Clones. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 1395–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Flores-Treviño, S.; Garza-González, E.; Mendoza-Olazarán, S.; Morfín-Otero, R.; Camacho-Ortiz, A.; Rodríguez-Noriega, E.; Martínez-Meléndez, A.; Bocanegra-Ibarias, P. Screening of biomarkers of drug resistance or virulence in ESCAPE pathogens by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Pereira, F.D.; Bonatto, C.C.; Lopes, C.A.; Pereira, A.L.; Silva, L.P. Use of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to analyze the molecular profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms grown on glass and plastic surfaces. Microb. Pathog. 2015, 86, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. DeBritto, S.; Gajbar, T.D.; Satapute, P.; Sundaram, L.; Lakshmikantha, R.Y.; Jogaiah, S.; Ito, S.-I. Isolation and characterization of nutrient dependent pyocyanin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its dye and agrochemical properties. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Barequet, I.S.; Ben Simon, G.J.; Safrin, M.; Ohman, D.E.; Kessler, E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa LasA Protease in Treatment of Experimental Staphylococcal Keratitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1681–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Elkhawaga, A.A.; Khalifa, M.M.; El-Badawy, O.; Hassan, M.A.; El-Said, W.A. Rapid and highly sensitive detection of pyocyanin biomarker in different Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections using gold nanoparticles modified sensor. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. AlHogail, S.; Suaifan, G.A.; Bikker, F.J.; Kaman, W.E.; Weber, K.; Cialla-May, D.; Meyer, T.; Zourob, M. Rapid Colorimetric Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Clinical Isolates Using a Magnetic Nanoparticle Biosensor. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 21684–21688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Breidenstein, E.B.; De La Fuente-Nunez, C.; Hancock, R.E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: All roads lead to resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2011, 19, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Koo, H.; Yamada, K.M. Dynamic cell-matrix interactions modulate microbial biofilm and tissue 3D microenvironments. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2016, 42, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Hajishengallis, G.; Hajishengallis, E.; Kajikawa, T.; Wang, B.; Yancopoulou, D.; Ricklin, D.; Lambris, J.D. Complement inhibition in pre-clinical models of periodontitis and prospects for clinical application. Semin. Immunol. 2016, 28, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Watters, C.; Everett, J.A.; Haley, C.; Clinton, A.; Rumbaugh, K. Insulin Treatment Modulates the Host Immune System To Enhance Pseudomonas aeruginosa Wound Biofilms. Infect. Immun. 2013, 82, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Maliniak, M.; Stecenko, A.A.; Mccarty, N.A. A longitudinal analysis of chronic MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa co-infection in cystic fibrosis: A single-center study. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2016, 15, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Reffuveille, F.; De La Fuente-Nunez, C.; Fairfull-Smith, K.E.; Hancock, R.E. Potentiation of ciprofloxacin action against Gram-negative bacterial biofilms by a nitroxide. Pathog. Dis. 2015, 73, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Aoki, W.; Ueda, M. Characterization of Antimicrobial Peptides toward the Development of Novel Antibiotics. Pharmaceuticals 2013, 6, 1055–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Dosler, S.; Karaaslan, E. Inhibition and destruction of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by antibiotics and antimicrobial peptides. Peptides 2014, 62, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Gordon, Y.J.; Romanowski, E.G.; McDermott, A.M. A Review of Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Therapeutic Potential as Anti-Infective Drugs. Curr. Eye Res. 2005, 30, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Papareddy, P.; Kasetty, G.; Kalle, M.; Bhongir, R.K.V.; Mörgelin, M.; Schmidtchen, A.; Malmsten, M. NLF20: An antimicrobial peptide with therapeutic potential against invasive Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2015, 71, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Shin, S.C.; Ahn, I.H.; Ahn, D.H.; Lee, Y.M.; Lee, J.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, H.-W.; Park, H. Characterization of Two Antimicrobial Peptides from Antarctic Fishes (Notothenia coriiceps and Parachaenichthys charcoti). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Wnorowska, U.; Niemirowicz, K.; Myint, M.; Diamond, S.L.; Wróblewska, M.; Savage, P.B.; Janmey, P.A.; Bucki, R. Bactericidal Activities of Cathelicidin LL-37 and Select Cationic Lipids against the Hypervirulent Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain LESB58. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 3808–3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Flume, P.A.; VanDevanter, D.R.; Morgan, E.E.; Dudley, M.N.; Loutit, J.S.; Bell, S.C.; Kerem, E.; Fischer, R.; Smyth, A.R.; Aaron, S.D.; et al. A phase 3, multi-center, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levofloxacin inhalation solution (APT-1026) in stable cystic fibrosis patients. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2016, 15, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Wagner, S.; Hauck, D.; Hoffmann, M.; Sommer, R.; Joachim, I.; Müller, R.; Imberty, A.; Varrot, A.; Titz, A. Covalent Lectin Inhibition and Application in Bacterial Biofilm Imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 16559–16564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Johansson, E.M.; Crusz, S.A.; Kolomiets, E.; Buts, L.; Kadam, R.U.; Cacciarini, M.; Bartels, K.-M.; Diggle, S.P.; Cámara, M.; Williams, P.; et al. Inhibition and Dispersion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms by Glycopeptide Dendrimers Targeting the Fucose-Specific Lectin LecB. Chem. Biol. 2008, 15, 1249–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Krachler, A.M.; Orth, K. Targeting the bacteria–host interface. Virulence 2013, 4, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Ly-Chatain, M.H. The factors affecting effectiveness of treatment in phages therapy. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Pires, D.P.; Boas, D.P.A.V.; Sillankorva, S.; Azeredo, J. Phage Therapy: A Step Forward in the Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 7449–7456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Vandenheuvel, D.; Lavigne, R.; Brüssow, H. Bacteriophage Therapy: Advances in Formulation Strategies and Human Clinical Trials. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2015, 2, 599–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Penadés, J.R.; Chen, J.; Quiles-Puchalt, N.; Carpena, N.; Novick, R.P. Bacteriophage-mediated spread of bacterial virulence genes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2015, 23, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Hesse, S.E.; Adhya, S. Phage Therapy in the Twenty-First Century: Facing the Decline of the Antibiotic Era; Is It Finally Time for the Age of the Phage? Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 73, 155–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Melander, R.J.; Basak, A.K.; Melander, C. Natural products as inspiration for the development of bacterial antibiofilm agents. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Salomoni, R.; Léo, P.; Montemor, A.; Rinaldi, B.; Rodrigues, M. Antibacterial effect of silver nanoparticles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2017, 10, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Chen, Q.; Shah, K.N.; Zhang, F.; Salazar, A.J.; Shah, P.N.; Li, R.; Sacchettini, J.; Wooley, K.L.; Cannon, C.L. Minocycline and Silver Dual-Loaded Polyphosphoester-Based Nanoparticles for Treatment of Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Pharm. 2019, 16, 1606–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Türeli, N.G.; Torge, A.; Juntke, J.; Schwarz, B.C.; Schneider-Daum, N.; Türeli, A.E.; Lehr, C.-M.; Schneider, M. Ciprofloxacin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles against cystic fibrosis P. aeruginosa lung infections. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2017, 117, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Deacon, J.; Abdelghany, S.M.; Quinn, D.J.; Schmid, D.; Megaw, J.; Donnelly, R.F.; Jones, D.S.; Kissenpfennig, A.; Elborn, J.S.; Gilmore, B.F.; et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of tobramycin polymeric nanoparticles for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis: Formulation, characterisation and functionalisation with dornase alfa (DNase). J. Control. Release 2015, 198, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. D’Angelo, I.; Casciaro, B.; Miro, A.; Quaglia, F.; Mangoni, M.L.; Ungaro, F. Overcoming barriers in Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections: Engineered nanoparticles for local delivery of a cationic antimicrobial peptide. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 135, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Baelo, A.; Levato, R.; Julián, E.; Crespo, A.; Astola, J.; Gavaldà, J.; Engel, E.; Mateos-Timoneda, M.A.; Torrents, E. Disassembling bacterial extracellular matrix with DNase-coated nanoparticles to enhance antibiotic delivery in biofilm infections. J. Control. Release 2015, 209, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Powell, L.C.; Pritchard, M.F.; Ferguson, E.L.; Powell, K.A.; Patel, S.U.; Rye, P.D.; Sakellakou, S.-M.; Buurma, N.J.; Brilliant, C.D.; Copping, J.M.; et al. Targeted disruption of the extracellular polymeric network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by alginate oligosaccharides. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2018, 4, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Zhu, X.; Oh, H.-S.; Ng, Y.C.B.; Tang, P.Y.P.; Barraud, N.; Rice, S.A. Nitric Oxide-Mediated Induction of Dispersal in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms Is Inhibited by Flavohemoglobin Production and Is Enhanced by Imidazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 62, e01832-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Birmes, F.S.; Säring, R.; Hauke, M.C.; Ritzmann, N.H.; Drees, S.L.; Daniel, J.; Treffon, J.; Liebau, E.; Kahl, B.C.; Fetzner, S. Interference with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Quorum Sensing and Virulence by the Mycobacterial Pseudomonas Quinolone Signal Dioxygenase AqdC in Combination with the N-Acylhomoserine Lactone Lactonase QsdA. Infect. Immun. 2019, 87, e00278-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Kim, B.; Park, J.-S.; Choi, H.-Y.; Yoon, S.S.; Kim, W.-G. Terrein is an inhibitor of quorum sensing and c-di-GMP in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a connection between quorum sensing and c-di-GMP. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Kiymaci, M.E.; Altanlar, N.; Gumustas, M.; Ozkan, S.A.; Akin, A. Quorum sensing signals and related virulence inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by a potential probiotic strain’s organic acid. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 121, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Kaneko, Y.; Thoendel, M.; Olakanmi, O.; Britigan, B.E.; Singh, P.K. The transition metal gallium disrupts Pseudomonas aeruginosa iron metabolism and has antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 877–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Moreau-Marquis, S.; O’Toole, G.A.; Stanton, B.A. Tobramycin and FDA-Approved Iron Chelators Eliminate Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms on Cystic Fibrosis Cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2009, 41, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Soukos, N.S.; Goodson, J.M. Photodynamic therapy in the control of oral biofilms. Periodontol 2000 2010, 55, 143–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Kübler, A.C. Photodynamic therapy. Med Laser Appl. 2005, 20, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Orlandi, V.T.; Rybtke, M.; Caruso, E.; Banfi, S.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Barbieri, P. Antimicrobial and anti-biofilm effect of a novel BODIPY photosensitizer against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Biofouling 2014, 30, 883–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Vassena, C.; Fenu, S.; Giuliani, F.; Fantetti, L.; Roncucci, G.; Simonutti, G.; Romanò, C.L.; De Francesco, R.; Drago, L. Photodynamic antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of RLP068/Cl against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa forming biofilms on prosthetic material. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2014, 44, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Parasuraman, P.; Antony, A.P.; Sruthil, L.S.B.; Sharan, A.; Siddhardha, B.; Kasinathan, K.; Bahkali, N.A.; Dawoud, T.M.S.; Syed, A. Antimicrobial photodynamic activity of toluidine blue encapsulated in mesoporous silica nanoparticles against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Biofouling 2019, 35, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Al-Bakri, A.G.; Mahmoud, N.N. Photothermal-Induced Antibacterial Activity of Gold Nanorods Loaded into Polymeric Hydrogel against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm. Molecules 2019, 24, 2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  174. Peng, H.; Borg, R.E.; Dow, L.P.; Pruitt, B.L.; Chen, I.A. Controlled phage therapy by photothermal ablation of specific bacterial species using gold nanorods targeted by chimeric phages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 1951–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Zhao, B.; Wang, H.; Dong, W.; Cheng, S.; Li, H.; Tan, J.; Zhou, J.; He, W.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.; et al. A multifunctional platform with single-NIR-laser-triggered photothermal and NO release for synergistic therapy against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and their biofilms. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2020, 18, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Bilici, K.; Atac, N.; Muti, A.; Baylam, I.; Dogan, O.; Sennaroglu, A.; Can, F.; Acar, H.Y. Broad spectrum antibacterial photodynamic and photothermal therapy achieved with indocyanine green loaded SPIONs under near infrared irradiation. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 4616–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Wong, J.P.; Yang, H.; Blasetti, K.L.; Schnell, G.; Conley, J.; Schofield, L.N. Liposome delivery of ciprofloxacin against intracellular Francisella tularensis infection. J. Control Release 2003, 92, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Varshosaz, J.; Ghaffari, S.; Saadat, A.; Atyabi, F. Stability and antimicrobial effect of amikacin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2010, 6, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  179. Bargonia, A.; Cavallib, R.; Zara, G.P.; Fundaròc, A.; Caputob, O.; Gasco, M.R. Transmucosal transport of tobramycin incorporated in solid lipid nanoparticles (sln) after duodenal administration to rats. Part II—Tissue distribution. Pharmacol. Res. 2001, 43, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Alizadeh, A.; Salouti, M.; Alizadeh, H.; Kazemizadeh, A.R.; Safari, A.A.; Mahmazi, S. Enhanced antibacterial effect of azlocillin in conjugation with silver nanoparticles against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2017, 11, 942–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Lamppa, J.W.; Griswold, K.E. Alginate Lyase Exhibits Catalysis-Independent Biofilm Dispersion and Antibiotic Synergy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 57, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Pleszczyńska, M.; Wiater, A.; Janczarek, M.; Szczodrak, J. (1→3)-α-d-Glucan hydrolases in dental biofilm prevention and control: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 79, 761–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Eckhart, L.; Fischer, H.; Barken, K.B.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Tschachler, E. DNase1L2 suppresses biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Br. J. Dermatol. 2007, 156, 1342–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Okshevsky, M.; Regina, V.R.; Meyer, R.L. Extracellular DNA as a target for biofilm control. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Liu, Y.; Kamesh, A.C.; Xiao, Y.; Sun, V.; Hayes, M.; Daniell, H.; Koo, H. Topical delivery of low-cost protein drug candidates made in chloroplasts for biofilm disruption and uptake by oral epithelial cells. Biomaterials 2016, 105, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  186. Zhou, E.; Seminara, A.B.; Kim, S.-K.; Hall, C.L.; Wang, Y.; Lee, V.T. Thiol-benzo-triazolo-quinazolinone Inhibits Alg44 Binding to c-di-GMP and Reduces Alginate Production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 3076–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Warrener, P.; Varkey, R.; Bonnell, J.C.; DiGiandomenico, A.; Camara, M.; Cook, K.; Peng, L.; Zha, J.; Chowdury, P.; Sellman, B.; et al. A Novel Anti-PcrV Antibody Providing Enhanced Protection against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Multiple Animal Infection Models. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 4384–4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  188. DiGiandomenico, A.; Warrener, P.; Hamilton, M.; Guillard, S.; Ravn, P.; Minter, R.; Camara, M.M.; Venkatraman, V.; MacGill, R.S.; Lin, J.; et al. Identification of broadly protective human antibodies to Pseudomonas aeruginosa exopolysaccharide Psl by phenotypic screening. J. Exp. Med. 2012, 209, 1273–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. Novotny, L.A.; Jurcisek, J.A.; Goodman, S.D.; Bakaletz, L.O. Monoclonal antibodies against DNA-binding tips of DNABII proteins disrupt biofilms in vitro and induce bacterial clearance in vivo. EBioMedicine 2016, 10, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Howlin, R.P.; Cathie, K.; Hall-Stoodley, L.; Cornelius, V.; Duignan, C.; Allan, R.N.; Fernandez, B.O.; Barraud, N.; Bruce, K.D.; Jefferies, J.; et al. Low-Dose Nitric Oxide as Targeted Anti-biofilm Adjunctive Therapy to Treat Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Cystic Fibrosis. Mol. Ther. 2017, 25, 2104–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Chua, S.L.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Ting, H.J.; Kohli, G.S.; Cai, Z.; Suwanchaikasem, P.; Goh, K.K.K.; Ng, S.P.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; et al. Reduced Intracellular c-di-GMP Content Increases Expression of Quorum Sensing-Regulated Genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Ouyang, J.; Sun, F.; Feng, W.; Sun, Y.; Qiu, X.; Xiong, L.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y. Quercetin is an effective inhibitor of quorum sensing, biofilm formation and virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 120, 966–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  193. Maura, D.; Rahme, L.G. Pharmacological Inhibition of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa MvfR Quorum-Sensing System Interferes with Biofilm Formation and Potentiates Antibiotic-Mediated Biofilm Disruption. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e01362-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Utari, P.D.; Setroikromo, R.; Melgert, B.N.; Quax, W.J. PvdQ Quorum Quenching Acylase Attenuates Pseudomonas aeruginosa Virulence in a Mouse Model of Pulmonary Infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Oglesby-Sherrouse, A.G.; Djapgne, L.; Nguyen, A.T.; Vasil, A.I.; Vasil, M.L. The complex interplay of iron, biofilm formation, and mucoidy affecting antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pathog. Dis. 2014, 70, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  196. Ma, L.; Terwilliger, A.; Maresso, A.W. Iron and zinc exploitation during bacterial pathogenesis. Metallomics 2015, 7, 1541–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  197. Reid, D.W.; Carroll, V.; O’May, C.Y.; Champion, A.; Kirov, S.M. Increased airway iron as a potential factor in the persistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2007, 30, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Banin, E.; Lozinski, A.; Brady, K.M.; Berenshtein, E.; Butterfield, P.W.; Moshe, M.; Chevion, M.; Greenberg, E.P. The potential of desferrioxamine-gallium as an anti-Pseudomonas therapeutic agent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 16761–16766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Darabpour, E.; Kashef, N.; Mashayekhan, S. Chitosan nanoparticles enhance the efficiency of methylene blue-mediated antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation of bacterial biofilms: An in vitro study. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2016, 14, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Wainwright, M.; Phoenix, D.; Laycock, S.; Wareing, D.; Wright, P. Photobactericidal activity of phenothiazinium dyes against methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1998, 160, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Vatansever, F.; De Melo, W.C.; Avci, P.; Vecchio, D.; Sadasivam, M.; Gupta, A.; Chandran, R.; Karimi, M.; Parizotto, N.A.; Yin, R.; et al. Antimicrobial strategies centered around reactive oxygen species—Bactericidal antibiotics, photodynamic therapy, and beyond. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 955–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Tavares, A.; Carvalho, C.M.B.; Faustino, M.A.F.; Neves, M.G.P.M.S.; Tome, J.P.C.; Tomé, A.C.; Cavaleiro, J.A.S.; Cunha, Â.; Gomes, N.C.; Alves, E.; et al. Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy: Study of Bacterial Recovery Viability and Potential Development of Resistance after Treatment. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Misba, L.; Zaidi, S.; Khan, A.U. A comparison of antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of phenothiazinium dyes between Gram positive and Gram negative bacterial biofilm. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2017, 18, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Beirão, S.; Fernandes, S.; Coelho, J.; Faustino, M.A.; Tomé, J.P.C.; Neves, M.G.P.M.S.; Tomé, A.C.; Almeida, A. Cunha, Ângela Photodynamic Inactivation of Bacterial and Yeast Biofilms with a Cationic Porphyrin. Photochem. Photobiol. 2014, 90, 1387–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Zhao, Y.; Lu, Z.; Dai, X.; Wei, X.; Yu, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, C. Glycomimetic-Conjugated Photosensitizer for Specific Pseudomonas aeruginosa Recognition and Targeted Photodynamic Therapy. Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 3222–3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Abdulrahman, H.; Misba, L.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, A.U. Curcumin induced photodynamic therapy mediated suppression of quorum sensing pathway of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An approach to inhibit biofilm in vitro. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2020, 30, 101645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Korupalli, C.; Huang, C.-C.; Lin, W.-C.; Pan, W.-Y.; Lin, P.-Y.; Wan, W.-L.; Li, M.-J.; Chang, Y.; Sung, H. Acidity-triggered charge-convertible nanoparticles that can cause bacterium-specific aggregation in situ to enhance photothermal ablation of focal infection. Biomaterials 2017, 116, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Murali, V.S.; Wang, R.; Mikoryak, C.A.; Pantano, P.; Draper, R. The impact of subcellular location on the near infrared-mediated thermal ablation of cells by targeted carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 425102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  209. Qian, W.; Yan, C.; He, D.; Yu, X.; Yuan, L.; Liu, M.; Wang, S.; Deng, J. pH-triggered charge-reversible of glycol chitosan conjugated carboxyl graphene for enhancing photothermal ablation of focal infection. Acta Biomater. 2018, 69, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Behzadpour, N.; Sattarahmady, N.; Akbari, N. Antimicrobial Photothermal Treatment of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa by a Carbon Nanoparticles-Polypyrrole Nanocomposite. J. Biomed. Phys. Eng. 2019, 9, 661–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Dickerson, E.B.; Dreaden, E.C.; Huang, X.; El-Sayed, I.H.; Chu, H.; Pushpanketh, S.; McDonald, J.F.; El-Sayed, M.A. Gold nanorod assisted near-infrared plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) of squamous cell carcinoma in mice. Cancer Lett. 2008, 269, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  212. Huang, J.; Zhou, J.; Zhuang, J.; Gao, H.; Huang, D.; Wang, L.; Wu, W.; Li, Q.; Yang, D.-P.; Han, M.-Y. Strong Near-Infrared Absorbing and Biocompatible CuS Nanoparticles for Rapid and Efficient Photothermal Ablation of Gram-Positive and -Negative Bacteria. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 36606–36614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Abel, S.B.; A Gallarato, L.; Dardanelli, M.S.; A Barbero, C.; Rivarola, C.; Yslas, E.I. Photothermal lysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by polyaniline nanoparticles under near infrared irradiation. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express 2018, 4, 045037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Cycle of P. aeruginosa biofilm development. The development cycle is divided into six stages. Initially, the bacteria associate with the surface and produce extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids and eDNA. Next, cell division and the transition of reversible attachment into irreversible take place. The following steps are the formation of microcolonies and the further development of these microcolonies into mushroom-shaped structures. Cell-to-cell interaction and production of virulence factors play essential roles in maturation and robustness of biofilms. Matrix cavity is then formed in the centre of microcolony via cell autolysis to disrupt the matrix for the liberation of the dispersed population. Finally, the released cells undergo an approximately 2 h transition into planktonic phenotypes which subsequently occupy uncolonized spaces.
Figure 1. Cycle of P. aeruginosa biofilm development. The development cycle is divided into six stages. Initially, the bacteria associate with the surface and produce extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids and eDNA. Next, cell division and the transition of reversible attachment into irreversible take place. The following steps are the formation of microcolonies and the further development of these microcolonies into mushroom-shaped structures. Cell-to-cell interaction and production of virulence factors play essential roles in maturation and robustness of biofilms. Matrix cavity is then formed in the centre of microcolony via cell autolysis to disrupt the matrix for the liberation of the dispersed population. Finally, the released cells undergo an approximately 2 h transition into planktonic phenotypes which subsequently occupy uncolonized spaces.
Ijms 21 08671 g001
Figure 2. Hierarchical quorum-sensing (QS) network in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The four QS pathways are activated in response to the cell density and environmental stimuli, with four autoinducer synthases including LasI, RhlI, PqsABCDH and AmbBCDE that produce N-3-oxo-dodecanoyl-ʟ-homoserine lactone (3O-C12-HSL), N-butyryl-ʟ-homoserine lactone (C4-HSL), 2-heptyl-3-hydroxy-4-quinolone (PQS) and 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-thiazole-4-carbaldehyde (IQS), respectively. Note: the autoinduction is depicted in red arrows; the receptor for IQS is still unknown. The QS products are secreted through the cell membrane, that control the group behaviours and essential for the adaptation, survival and pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa. Abbreviation: CM, cytoplasmic membrane; OM, outer membrane.
Figure 2. Hierarchical quorum-sensing (QS) network in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The four QS pathways are activated in response to the cell density and environmental stimuli, with four autoinducer synthases including LasI, RhlI, PqsABCDH and AmbBCDE that produce N-3-oxo-dodecanoyl-ʟ-homoserine lactone (3O-C12-HSL), N-butyryl-ʟ-homoserine lactone (C4-HSL), 2-heptyl-3-hydroxy-4-quinolone (PQS) and 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-thiazole-4-carbaldehyde (IQS), respectively. Note: the autoinduction is depicted in red arrows; the receptor for IQS is still unknown. The QS products are secreted through the cell membrane, that control the group behaviours and essential for the adaptation, survival and pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa. Abbreviation: CM, cytoplasmic membrane; OM, outer membrane.
Ijms 21 08671 g002
Table 1. Summary of therapeutic strategies against P. aeruginosa infections.
Table 1. Summary of therapeutic strategies against P. aeruginosa infections.
Therapeutic ApproachActivityAdvantagesLimitationReferences
Antimicrobial peptides
  • Antibacterial
  • Antibiofilm
  • Immunological modulator
  • Low cytotoxicity
  • Combined treatment possibility
  • Low resistance
  • Sensitive to salt, serum and pH
  • Susceptible to host proteolysis
  • Expensive production
[139,140,141,142,143,144]
Antibiotics
  • Antibacterial
  • Inhaled antibiotic class
  • Broad-spectrum
  • Safety
  • Improvement of lung function in CF patients
  • Resistance development
[145]
Lectin inhibitor
  • Antibiofilm
  • High stability
  • Low resistance
  • No in vivo data
  • Toxicity
  • Narrow spectrum
[146,147,148]
Bacteriophages
  • Antibacterial
  • Delivery at the infection site
  • High specificity
  • Fewer side effects
  • Easy administration
  • Poor stability
  • Undesired cytotoxicity
  • Resistance development
  • Insufficient pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics data
[149,150,151,152,153]
Natural products
  • Antibacterial
  • Antibiofilm
  • Quorum sensing modulator
  • Broad-spectrum
  • Multiple mechanisms of action
  • Cytotoxicity
  • Resistance development
  • Limited penetration into biofilm
  • Limited killing effects on slow-growing bacteria
  • Availability and
  • Complex extraction and isolation
[154]
Nanoparticles
  • Antibacterial
  • Antibiofilm
  • Broad-spectrum
  • Combination with antibiotics/therapeutic agents
  • Small size, thus direct delivery to targets
  • Cytotoxicity
  • Host metabolism of nanoparticles
[155,156]
Nanocarriers (Liposomes, solid lipid and polymeric)
  • Drug delivery
  • Protection of therapeutic agents from inactivation and degradation by bacterial and host system
  • Enhancement of efficacy
  • Penetrability into the biofilm matrix
  • Cytotoxicity
  • Host metabolism of nanoparticles
[157,158,159]
EPS inhibitors
  • Anti-EPS
  • Biofilm matrix degradation
  • Limited/no effect on bacterial viability
  • Low risk of resistance development
  • Augmentation of antibiotic efficacy to clear the infection
  • Incomplete biofilm matrix disruption
  • Cytotoxicity
[35,160,161]
Biofilm dispersers
  • Dispersal induction
  • Augmentation of antibiotic efficacy to clear the infection
  • Promotion of self-disassembly
  • Low risk of resistance development
  • Release of harmful dispersed cells for re-colonization and lethal septic event
  • Cytotoxicity
[66,162]
QS inhibitors
  • Biofilm prevention
  • Biofilm inhibition
  • Reduction of virulence factors
  • No effect on bacterial viability
  • Narrow spectrum
  • Unwanted effect on bacteria
[163,164,165]
Iron chelator
  • Interference with iron metabolism
  • Bactericidal activity
  • Biofilm prevention
  • Low risk of resistance development
  • Cytotoxicity
[166,167]
Photodynamic therapy
  • Antibacterial
  • Antibiofilm
  • No resistance development
  • Improved selectivity
  • No photocytotoxicity
  • Potential side effects (e.g., burns, redness swelling of treated skin)
[168,169,170,171,172]
Photothermal therapy
  • Antibacterial
  • Antibiofilm
  • No resistance development
  • Improved selectivity
  • Negligible cytotoxicity
  • Photothermal ablation of host tissues
[173,174,175,176]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thi, M.T.T.; Wibowo, D.; Rehm, B.H.A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228671

AMA Style

Thi MTT, Wibowo D, Rehm BHA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(22):8671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228671

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thi, Minh Tam Tran, David Wibowo, and Bernd H.A. Rehm. 2020. "Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 22: 8671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228671

APA Style

Thi, M. T. T., Wibowo, D., & Rehm, B. H. A. (2020). Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(22), 8671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228671

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop