Next Article in Journal
Metabolic Insights into the Anion-Anion Antagonism in Sweet Basil: Effects of Different Nitrate/Chloride Ratios in the Nutrient Solution
Next Article in Special Issue
Hyaluronan-Metal Gold Nanoparticle Hybrids for Targeted Tumor Cell Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
The Contribution of Astrocyte Autophagy to Systemic Metabolism
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Intravitreal Injection of Lanosterol Nanoparticles Rescues Lens Structure Collapse at an Early Stage in Shumiya Cataract Rats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms21072480
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Basic Properties of Gold Nanoparticles and their Applications in Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment

by
Xue Bai
1,
Yueying Wang
1,
Zhiyun Song
1,
Yanmin Feng
1,2,
Yuanyuan Chen
1,2,
Deyuan Zhang
1,2 and
Lin Feng
1,2,*
1
School of Mechanical Engineering & Automation, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
2
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(7), 2480; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072480
Submission received: 12 March 2020 / Revised: 29 March 2020 / Accepted: 1 April 2020 / Published: 3 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials for Pro-/Anti-Angiogenic Therapies)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have been widely studied and applied in the field of tumor diagnosis and treatment because of their special fundamental properties. In order to make AuNPs more suitable for tumor diagnosis and treatment, their natural properties and the interrelationships between these properties should be systematically and profoundly understood. The natural properties of AuNPs were discussed from two aspects: physical and chemical. Among the physical properties of AuNPs, localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), radioactivity and high X-ray absorption coefficient are widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of tumors. As an advantage over many other nanoparticles in chemicals, AuNPs can form stable chemical bonds with S-and N-containing groups. This allows AuNPs to attach to a wide variety of organic ligands or polymers with a specific function. These surface modifications endow AuNPs with outstanding biocompatibility, targeting and drug delivery capabilities. In this review, we systematically summarized the physicochemical properties of AuNPs and their intrinsic relationships. Then the latest research advancements and the developments of basic research and clinical trials using these properties are summarized. Further, the difficulties to be overcome and possible solutions in the process from basic laboratory research to clinical application are discussed. Finally, the possibility of applying the results to clinical trials was estimated. We hope to provide a reference for peer researchers to better utilize the excellent physicochemical properties of gold nanoparticles in oncotherapy.

1. Introduction

The original application of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) in the biomedical field can be traced back to the Middle Ages, the so-called potable gold, known in old Latin texts as aurum potabile. Potable gold behaved as a fabulous curative power for various diseases, such as heart and venereal problems, arthritis, epilepsy and tumors, as well as for diagnosis of syphilis [1]. However, due to the lack of understanding the nature of AuNPs, the colloidal gold used is mostly in the oxidation state, so there are many serious side effects in the use process. Thanks to the development of modern nanotechnology, the biomedical application of AuNPs have made tremendous progress and continues to draw considerable research attention. In view of this, many previous reviews have summarized the superior properties of AuNPs and their applications in the field of biomedicine from different perspectives. Ghosh and Pal expound the interparticle coupling effect on the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of AuNPs through specialized explanations of assembling strategies, optical properties and applications [2]. Distinct from other published reviews, this review focuses more on the basic theories of the SPR of AuNPs, which requires readers to have certain expertise in this area. Dreaden et al. described the synthesis and functionalization of a wide variety of AuNPs and their applications in diagnostics, imaging and medicine [3]. What distinguishes this review from others is that it describes the metabolic dynamics of AuNPs in vivo. Dykman and Khlebtsov published a review focusing on the biomedical applications of AuNPs, particularly their immunological properties [4]. Yang et al. introduced the chemical synthesis, optical properties, biomedical applications and the pharmacokinetics of AuNPs. In contrast to other reviews, one focused on the tunable optical properties of AuNPs [5]. Other specific references on the physical and chemical properties and applications of AuNPs are listed in Supplementary Materials. Through these reviews, it is not difficult to find that the physical and chemical properties of AuNPs are greatly affected by their nanostructure (shape and crystal texture). This effect will eventually affect their biomedical applications. For example, compared with spherical AuNPs, gold nanorods or gold nanostars are more suitable for photothermal therapy (PTT) or photodynamic therapy (PDT), because they can absorb near-infrared light (NIR) more efficiently [6]. Au clusters can produce propylene oxide (PO) by using only O2 and water, whereas Au NPs cannot [7]. This will be covered in later paragraphs.
In a series of biomedical applications of AuNPs, its role in tumor diagnosis and treatment is particularly prominent. In order to make AuNPs more suitable for tumor diagnosis and treatment, their natural properties should be systematically and profoundly understood. In this review, we focused on disclosing the fundamental properties of AuNPs and the interrelationships between these properties. The fundamental properties of AuNPs were discussed from two aspects: physical and chemical. After the properties are introduced, their applications for tumor diagnosis and treatment are also listed. These applications include image agent, phototherapy, radiotherapy, targeting, nano-enzyme and drug delivery (Figure 1). The clinical trials of AuNPs with various physical and chemical properties are listed to provide a reference for the clinical transformation of the scientific research achievements.

2. Physical Properties

Among the physical properties of AuNPs, localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), radioactivity and high X-ray absorption coefficient are widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of tumors. The LSPR of AuNPs can further lead to surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), surface enhanced fluorescence (SEF), photothermal conversion, photochemical conversion and colorimetric responses. These excellent qualities have been widely applied for non-invasive detection in vivo and in situ, imaging, PTT, PDT and in vitro diagnostics (IVD). The radioactivity of AuNPs can be used for radiotherapy and radionuclide imaging (RNI). The high atomic number of AuNPs has been explored for radiotherapy sensitization.

2.1. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR)

Under the stimulation of light, conduction electrons on a noble metal oscillate collectively, which is called “plasmon” [8]. The plasmon resonance (PR) is an absorption band that occurs when the incident photon frequency is resonant with the collective oscillation of the conduction electrons [6]. The disturbance of the incident electromagnetic wave on the metal decreases rapidly with the depth of the metal, so the resonance often occurs on the metal surface, which is known as surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [9]. When the SPR is restricted to smaller volumes, so-called nanoparticles, which are comparable in size to the wavelength of the incident light, the LSPR occurs. With the help of LSPR, AuNPs present two important effects: an enhancement effect of the local electromagnetic field and an extinction coefficient (Figure 2).
When the LSPR occurs, the electromagnetic fields near the AuNP surface can be enhanced up to several orders of magnitude, and the largest enhancement occurs in the areas of highest local curvature (hot spots) [10]. The “hot spots” can enhance the spectral signals of the substances near their surface, which is called the surface enhancement spectrum (SES). SES studies related to oncotherapy mainly focus on SERS and SEF [11].
When the LSPR occurs, the optical extinction of the AuNPs can be maximized (e.g., 2.7 × 108 M–1 cm–1 for 13 nm AuNPs), more than 1000 times stronger than ordinary organic molecules [12], which strongly enhanced the photothermal conversion efficiency, photochemistry conversion and light energy absorption of the AuNPs. These properties can be used for the PTT, PDT and colorimetric assays in tumor diagnosis and in treatment facilities.
In this section, we focus on the physical properties of AuNPs that depend on LSPR and the relationship between these physical properties and LSPR. The size, shape, composition and microenvironment can significantly affect the LSPR of AuNPs. Readers interested in this area can consult the excellent reviews cited in Reference [13].

2.1.1. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy

When monochromatic light reaches the surface of a particle, Rayleigh scattering occurs when the particle is much smaller than the wavelength of light. Theoretically, the frequency and direction of the scattered light are the same as that of the incident light, but the molecules adsorbed on the surface of the particles also vibrate when receiving the incident light, resulting in the deviation of the frequency of part of the scattered light and the original incident light (Stokes scattering and anti-Stokes scattering). The energy difference between the scattered photon and the incident photon is called Raman scattering (RS) [14], which corresponds to the energy of the vibrational mode of the adsorbed molecule. Therefore, a Raman image can provide highly resolved vibrational information (≈0.1 nm), which is called a chemical fingerprint, to ensure the accuracy of single molecule detection [15]. However, the cross sections of RS are about 10–30 cm2/molecule, which make the signal sensitivity of RS too low to be detected [16]. This serious limitation of RS can be overcome using SERS, which can enhance the Raman signal from 106 to 1015 and therefore is widely used in sensing, detection and imaging applications for cancer diagnosis [17]. AuNPs, as contrast agents of SERS, are used to image the smaller tumors, distinguish tumor cells, monitor tumor metabolism and detect tumor markers.
Qian and co-workers used AuNPs conjugated with single-chain variable fragment (ScFv) antibodies to target epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) on human cancer cells and in xenograft tumor models. The results have shown that the RS signal of these nanoparticles can be enhanced and detected [18]. Hossain and co-workers used a homogenous AuNP-deposited ITO substrate to enhance the Raman signals and successfully characterized and distinguished two different sub-types of breast cancer cells that originated from the same or different organs [19]. Shiota and co-workers used AuNPs with horse-bean shapes, which can generate many SERS excitation sources, to visualize the anti-oxidant consumed hypotaurine in the global metabolic reprogramming of cancer. This is an important mechanism in cancer survival [20]. Lin and co-workers used AuNP-based SERS to detect the serum from patients (n = 38) and volunteers (n = 45). The results showed that the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the colorectal tumor markers can reach 97.4% [21]. For more information on the application of AuNPs as SERS imaging agents, please refer to other literature reviews (e.g., [22]).

2.1.2. Surface Enhanced Fluorescence

The LSPR of AuNPs can produce two completely opposite effects on the signal strength of fluorescent molecules: fluorescence quenching and fluorescence enhancement. This depends on the distance between the fluorescence molecules and the AuNPs. The free fluorescent molecules will jump from the ground state to an excited state after absorbing photons. The excited fluorophores will fall back to the first excited state after vibrational relaxation with a rate of internal conversion (kint) and then fall back to the ground state with energy decay. The total energy decay rate (Γ) consists of the radiative decay rate (γ) and nonradiative decay rate (knr). Radiative decay appears as fluorescence emission [23].
The nonradiative decay rate appears as intersystem transitions, energy transfer, thermal radiation and so on. In these non-radiative decay forms, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is the primary reason for the fluorescence quenching of AuNPs. The FRET between fluorescence molecules and AuNPs shows a marked decrease with distance. When the distance is less than 5 nm, the energy of the excited fluorescent group will be transferred to the AuNPs in totality, resulting in fluorescence quenching [24]. The quenching and coming back of the fluorescence can represent the interaction among the particles so that they can be used for diagnostics. The common practice is to link AuNPs and fluorescent molecules with different linkers. The linker interacts with the substance to change its structure, which further changes the distance between the AuNPs and fluorescent molecules. For example, researchers select the recognition sequences as the linker to recognize cancer cells in lung tumors [25], acute lymphocytic leukemia [26] and human Burkitt’s lymphoma [27]. This method is also used to determine the detection of intracellular mRNA [28] and even the simultaneous detection of multiple mRNA [29] in living cancer cells.
The enhancement effect of LSPR on SEF can be attributed to two factors: enhance the excitation efficiency and decay rate of fluorescence. First, the enhancement electromagnetic fields of “hot spots” lead to enhanced excitation of the molecules placed there. Second, AuNPs act as a resonant cavity to enhance the radiative rate of a quantum emitter, due to the increased local density of states [30]. Thanks to this excellent property, AuNPs are widely used as two-photon luminescence (TPL) imaging agents to perform tumor cell imaging [31] and three-dimensional in vivo imaging [32]. In addition, AuNPs can be used to connect quantum dots, fluorescent molecules or even the autofluorescence emission intensity from the cell, to improve the detectability of tumor cells and guided tumor therapy [33].

2.1.3. Photothermal Conversion

After absorbing photons, AuNPs convert the light energy of the electrons into kinetic energy. The moving electrons are scattered by the lattice/phonon, and part of the kinetic energy is transformed into vibration energy of the lattice. The vibration energy obtained by the lattice is finally expressed in the form of heat. This is the so-called “photothermal effect”. Compared with normal tissue blood vessels, tumor vascular variety has a lot of holes in the pipe wall, leading to tumor tissue inside the blood supply clogging; so, the tumor tissue cooling ability is worse than normal tissue, so the heat produced in the process of heat energy is more likely to accumulate within the tumor and its temperature can easily achieve 46 °C above, while the surrounding normal tissues can only be heated to 41 °C or so. In addition, tumor cells are inherently less heat-resistant than normal cells, with the former usually having a lethal temperature of 42.5~43 °C, while the latter can withstand temperatures as high as 47 °C. In addition, tumor cells are inherently less heat-resistant than normal cells, with the former usually having a lethal temperature of 42.5~43 °C, while the latter can withstand temperatures as high as 47 °C. Therefore, photothermal conversion has a promising prospect in cancer cell imaging and PTT [34]. Biological tissue has very low extinction and spontaneous fluorescence in the NIR [35], which is the most suitable excitation light for PTT. The surface plasmon absorption maximum of the AuNPs can be adjusted to the NIR region to achieve efficient photothermal conversion, which is called plasmonic-PTT (PPTT) [36]. In 2003, Lin and co-workers first demonstrated AuNPs have a photothermal effect after exposure to visible light in vitro [37]. Then, the PTT application of AuNPs under NIR in vivo was demonstrated through being interstitially injected [38] and intravenously injected [39]. After this, many methods have been used to modify the LSPR of AuNPs to improve the efficiency of the photothermal conversion and to be more suitable for in vivo application [40]. These methods include inducing the aggregation of small AuNPs (<10nm) and change the nanostructure of the AuNPs. For more information on the application of AuNPs in photothermal therapy, please refer to [41].
The photothermal conversion characteristics of AuNPs can be supervised by photothermal imaging (PTI) [34] and photoacoustic imaging (PAI), which can be effectively applied in clinical diagnosis of tumors, assisting or guiding the hyperthermia process as well as realizing the integration of visual therapy and diagnosis and treatment [42]. For more information on the application and principle of AuNPs in PTT and PAI, please refer to [43].

2.1.4. Photosensitization

Upon photoexcitation of the AuNPs, the excited state photon energy can undergo energy transfer to neighboring molecules, such as the organic photosensitizer or molecular oxygen (O2). This will lead to the generation of cytotoxic oxygen-based species (singlet oxygen (1O2), O2− and OH−, etc.), which is known to play a central role in the PDT treatment of cancer [44]. There are basically two major aspects concerning AuNP-based PDT, namely (1) using AuNPs to promote the photosensitization of photosensitizers to produce 1O2 and (2) AuNPs alone can sensitize the formation of 1O2. Thanks to the LSPR, AuNPs can efficiently absorb the energy of NIR and transfer it to a photosensitizer or O2, which resolves some drawbacks of common organic photosensitizers, such as poor photo-stabilities, being easily degraded by enzymes and a low efficiency of light energy conversion [45]. As a photosensitive enhancer, AuNPs can transfer absorbed light energy to the conjugated organic photosensitizer and promote its sensitization to generate 1O2 [46]. As a photosensitizer, AuNPs can transfer absorbed light energy directly to O2 to produce 1O2 and kill tumor cells [47]. In 2011, Vankayala and co-workers originally demonstrated that 1O2 can be formed through direct sensitization by AuNPs under visible light exposure [47]; they were the first to report that this sensitization can be implemented under NIR (915 nm) light excitation and can exert dramatic PDT effects on the destruction of solid tumors in mice [48], and that the yield of 1O2 is related to its shape [49]. At present, people are actively exploring to further improve the role of AuNPs in photodynamic therapy. For example, Chen and co-worker developed an AuNP-based photosensitizing agent that simultaneously enables fluorescence imaging, tumor hypoxia relief and NIR-II (1064 nm) light-induced PDT in vivo [50].
In many studies, PTT and PDT are often used in combination. These applications are listed in Table 1.

2.1.5. Colorimetric Responses

Thanks to the high molar absorption coefficient, the detection sensitivity of AuNPs by colorimetric analysis reach to nanomole level, which is much lower than the traditional colorimetric method. AuNP-based colorimetric biosensing assays take advantage of the color change of the AuNP-induced plasmon from red to blue, purple or gray when the AuNPs were turned to aggregate the analytes. These analytes include tumor-related proteins, nucleic acids or cytokines [62]. In 2010, Kang and co-workers first applied AuNPs-based colorimetric assay for cancer diagnosis by charge-induced AuNP aggregation [63]. In this study, they selected activated protein kinase Cα (PKCα) as the cancer marker [64], cationic PKCα-specific peptide as the substrate and AuNPs with anionic surface charges as the chromogenic agent. When the system was applied to cancer cells or tissue lysates, the cationic peptide substrate was phosphorylated and increased the anionic charges in the phosphorylation site, which suppressed AuNP aggregation, resulting in a red color. On the application of normal cells or tissue lysates, a blue color is produced. At the same time, Lu and co-workers used AuNP-based colorimetric assays for highly selective and sensitive detection of breast cancer with high HER2 expression from other breast cancer cells by antibody-induced AuNP aggregation [65]. In 2011, Lee and co-workers used AuNP-based colorimetric assays for ultra-selective detection of cancer mutation points (BRCA1) by base pairing-induced AuNP aggregation [66]. This system is also used for detection of the mutation of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) [67], the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue gene (KRAS) [68] or p53 [69]. In the AuNP-based colorimetric assay, the signal can be amplified through isothermal [68] or polymerase chain reaction [70]. This allows the cancer-related molecule with picomolar sensitivity to be visualized, which is suitable for point-of-care applications.

2.2. Radioactivity

As one of the metals, Au is a radionuclide, having nuclear properties. Thanks to the desirable nuclear properties, 198Au (t1/2 = 2.7 d) and 199Au (t1/2 = 3.2 d) can be excreted intact in the urine [71] or liver [72], and are generally used for biomedicine. 198Au can emit β-particles with a maximum energy of 0.96 MeV and a 412 keV γ-ray [73]. 198AuNPs contain a high percentage of these radioactive atoms and therefore require the use of fewer amounts of NPs to achieve the desired amount of radioactivity for treatment and imaging [74].
The high energy of β-emission 198AuNPs is effective for the destruction of tumor cells/tissue [75]. For example, in the mouse model of human prostate, the tumors received a 70 Gy dose when the mice were intravenously injected with 198AuNPs and significantly inhibited tumor volume [76]. Target-specific 198AuNPs was developed to reduce the injected dose of 198AuNPs to get the similar therapeutic effect. The tumor-specific antibodies or the nanocomposite device was used to increase the accumulation in tumor tissue.
The γ-rays can readily penetrate soft tissues free from interferences and are suboptimal for single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scanners [77], therefore AuNP-based drug carriers can be imaged in vivo [78]. Chen and co-workers produced a PEGylated 198AuNP and applied it to image and trace AuNPs in living animals and dissected tissues [79]. In addition to SPECT imaging, 198AuNPs were also synthesized for Cerenkov luminescence imaging [80].
199Au can emit β-particles with a maximum energy of 0.45 MeV and a 208 keV γ-ray, which is more suitable for SPECT image than 198Au [81]. For example, a 199AuNPs was synthesized by doping 199Au directly into the nanocrystals and performed SPECT tumor imaging in a mouse triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) model in a clinical study [82]. Fazaelia and co-worker synthesized the amino-functionalized graphene oxide sheets labeled by 198,199Au NPs for SPECT imaging in rats bearing fibrosarcoma tumors [83]. The initial interest of 199Au was from its ability to attach to monoclonal antibodies selectively. This allows 199AuNPs to be modified with more tumor-targeted monoclonal antibodies and could result in a higher specific activity, subsequently increasing the delivery of therapeutic payloads to the tumors [84]. For more information on the role of AuNPs in tumor radiographic imaging and treatment, please refer to the relevant reviews (e.g., [85]).

2.3. High Atomic Number

When the atomic number is higher than 53, the absorbed dose of the X-ray will increase [86]. Au has an atomic number of 79, which strongly increases the X-ray absorption coefficient [87]. This can minimize the damage of X-ray to normal tissues and becomes a promising radiotherapy sensitizer for oncotherapy [88]. Au increases the cross section of the cancer cell or tissue reaction to X-rays, and emit photoelectrons [89], Auger electrons [90], Compton electrons [91] and other secondary electrons [92]. These secondary electrons can ionize DNA molecules directly, which further break the DNA strand, base and sugar crosslinking [93]. What is more important, these secondary electrons can react with water in tissues to generate free radicals, which bind to DNA, causing electron transfer of target molecule DNA and oxidation [94]. This is the physical explanation of the mechanism of radiotherapy sensitization for AuNPs. This X-ray enhancement effect is usually expressed as a dose enhancement factor (DEF) [95]. The DEF of AuNPs was calculated by the theoretical model under different conditions, such as the diameter and concentration of the nanoparticles [96], X-rays of different energies [97], intracellular localization [98] and three-dimensional dose distribution [99]. The radiosensitization effect of AuNPs was initially highlighted based on the experiment of Hainfeld and co-workers [100]. Radiotherapy with AuNPs at the same dose significantly increased the survival time of tumor mice.
In addition of radiotherapy sensitization, the high absorption rate of AuNPs to X-rays makes it possible to be used as an X-ray (CT) imaging agent for cancer diagnosis, tumor therapy guiding or therapeutic evaluation. In 2008, Popovtzer and co-workers first presented in vitro proof of the molecular CT imaging of cancer based on the target AuNPs [101] and then demonstrated in vivo the feasibility of cancer diagnosis at the cellular and molecular level with a standard clinical CT [102]. They selected anti-EGFR to modify the AuNPs and injected them into human squamous cell carcinoma head and neck cancer xenograft mice through the tail vein. Small tumor tissues ingesting these target AuNPs can be clearly seen through CT. AuNP-based CT imaging was then developed for guiding cancer therapy through radiation or photo-thermal therapy. For a more detailed theory and application of gold nanoparticles in tumor radiotherapy, please refer to [95]. The author introduced the mechanisms of AuNP radiosensitization from three aspects: physics, chemistry and biology.

3. Chemical Properties

3.1. Easy to Couple

As an advantage over many other nanoparticles, AuNPs can form stable chemical bonds with S-and N-containing groups. This allows AuNPs to attach to a wide variety of organic ligands or polymers with a specific function. These surface modifications endow AuNPs with outstanding biocompatibility, targeting and drug delivery capabilities [103].

3.1.1. Biocompatibility

The biocompatibility of AuNPs is through their biological fate in vivo, which can be evaluated by pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, toxicity and clearance. Biocompatibility is the essential condition for all application of AuNPs in vivo, which can be improved by surface modification, most of which is based on the formation of Au–S bonds. Measures to optimize the pharmacokinetics of AuNPs is to increase the circulation half-life through reducing the clearance by the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) or optimize the physical size. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been widely applied to decrease phagocytosis of AuNPs by MPS and the circulation half-life increases as the length of the PEG chains increases [104]. Compared to 100 nm AuNPs, 15 nm AuNPs can circulate in vivo for a longer time [105]. However, smaller AuNPs (less than 6 nm) will be rapidly filtered out and cleared by the kidneys [106]. AuNPs used for tumor diagnosis and treatment need to increase their retention in tumor tissues and reduce their accumulation in other tissues. AuNPs enter the blood circulation and can reach opsonization within minutes, which leads to the formation of a protein crown on the AuNP surface to facilitate the recognition by phagocytic cells in the MPS. The MPS involves the liver, spleen and bone marrow. Therefore, most AuNPs are removed from the bloodstream and primarily up-concentrated in the liver, spleen and bone marrow [107]. Compared to a neutral surface, a charged surface of the AuNPs are more likely to form protein crowns [40]. AuNPs deposited in other organs outside the tumor tissue can cause toxicity, mainly manifested as an acute inflammatory response and cell apoptosis. For example, 13 nm AuNPs can disturb the metabolism of low-density lipoprotein in cells [108]; 8 to 37 nm AuNPs induced fatigue, loss of appetite, change of fur color and weight loss in mice, even death [109]. Fortunately, these toxic effects can be addressed by surface modification and physicochemical parameter optimization. To mitigate the toxic side effects, AuNPs must be quickly cleared from the healthy organs. The clearance of AuNPs from the body depend on the renal and biliary clearance, because AuNPs cannot be digested by enzymes within the body. Small AuNPs (less than 10 nm) are more easily removed than large ones. Small AuNPs can be removed from the body by renal clearance, up to 70% of it within 72 h [110]. Even if the detailed mechanism is unclear, the studies have shown that small AuNPs can be removed from the body via bile [111]. Interested readers can obtain more information from other reviews (e.g., [5,6,112]).

3.1.2. Targeting

The targeting of AuNPs can be introduced from two aspects: passive targeting (enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect and MPS escape) and active targeting (tumor cell targeting and stimuli-response). Due to the rapid growth of the tumor, the internal blood vessels are defective and the lymphatic vessels are underdeveloped [113]. This allows AuNPs of a certain size to pass through tumor vessels efficiently and accumulate in tumor sites, which has been applied for tumor imaging and therapy [114]. The MPS escape of AuNPs can be implemented through coatings of hydrophilic polymers [115], forming the particles from branched [116] or with hydrophilic and hydrophobic domains [117]. The tumor cell targeting of AuNPs mainly relies on the ligand and can be recognized by cancerous cells, such as Lam 67R [85] and GRP [118] human prostate tumors, and CCR5 and HER2 [65] for breast tumors. The stimuli-response includes exogenous stimuli, such as NIR [119], magnetic [120], ultrasound [121] and endogenous stimuli, such as Ph [56] and redox [122].

3.1.3. Delivery

AuNPs can be combined with chemotherapy drugs, proteins or nucleic acids through electrostatic adsorption or covalent bonds. This property, together with its superior biocompatibility and targeting, makes it the most promising delivery for tumor targeting. For chemotherapy, AuNPs can carry mitoxantrone (MTX) [123], phthalocyanine4 (Pc4) [124], doxorubicin (Dox) [125] and photosensitizer [46] to improve their tumor targeting and enhance its therapeutic effect. For immunotherapy, AuNPs can be loaded with immune target antibodies and stimulate the activation of immune cells. These antibodies include polyclonal anti-carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) [126], monoclonal anti-HER2 [121] and so on. Dumani et al. designed AuNPs coated with glycol-chitosan that can be taken up by immune cells and subsequently transported to the sentinel lymph node to detect metastases [121]. AuNPs can modified with nucleotide sequence for detecting [127], imaging [25] and therapy [26].

3.2. Catalytic Activity and Applications

In 1987, Haruta et al. reported that AuNPs can catalyze the oxidation of CO at or even below room temperature with extraordinary efficiency [128]. Based on this pioneering work, the study of AuNP-based biomimetic catalysts has also developed rapidly [129]. So far, the mimic enzyme activity of AuNPs has been reported that include nuclease, esterase, silicatein, glucose oxidase (GO), peroxidase (POD), catalase, superoxide dismutase and oxidase. In the mimic enzyme activities of the AuNPs, POD and GO mimic activity have been used in the diagnosis and therapy of tumors.
The POD-mimic activity of AuNPs was first discovered by catalyzing the oxidation of the peroxidase substrate 3,3,5,5-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) by H2O2 to develop a blue color in an aqueous solution [130]. This has been used to catalyze H2O2 located in tumor cells to generate ·OH under an acidic pH for intracellular oxidative damage of gastric tumors [131] or to detect the concentration of GSH for cancer diagnosis [132].
The GO-mimic activity of AuNPs was first demonstrated through the aerobic oxidation of glucose to gluconate and H2O2, which is regarded as a model reaction [133]. The production of H2O2 in situ can induce AuNP growth that can detect cancer biomarkers at the picomolar levels [134]. The H2O2 also can be used as a substrate that is catalyzed by POD to liberate high-toxic hydroxyl radicals for inducing tumor-cell death [135].

3.3. Biological Activity

AuNPs not only play a role in tumor therapy through extrinsic functionalization or activation, but also have intrinsic antineoplastic biological activity. This property is often associated with the size of the AuNPs. The smaller AuNPs (less than 2 nm) can induce cellular oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage and DNA interactions to kill cancer cell. The larger AuNPs did not show the same killing effect at the same concentration [136]. AuNPs with a particle size of about 5 nm can selectively interact with heparin-binding glycoproteins on the surfaces of endothelial cells and subsequently inhibit tumor activity by changing the conformation of the molecules [137]. In addition, the AuNPs have also been reported to enhance the apoptosis and inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells [138]. AuNPs have also been demonstrated to selectively accumulate in the mitochondria of tumor cells, decrease mitochondrial electrical potential, increase reactive oxygen species and eventually lead to apoptosis of tumor cells, while normal cells and stem cells have not shown the same effect [139]. Interested readers can refer to [3,4].

4. Application of AuNPs in Clinical Trials

In practical applications, especially in clinical trials, it is often necessary to comprehensively apply the physical and chemical properties of AuNPs to achieve the purpose of oncotherapy. The current applications of AuNPs in clinical trials are listed in Table 2.

5. Challenges and Prospects

Compared with the large amount of exciting data obtained in laboratory studies, there are very few tumor therapy strategies based on AuNPs that are actually currently used in clinical trials or entering clinical trials. The reason is that these strategies face many challenges in the process of clinical transformation from laboratory studies, such as how to evade the clearance of the mononuclear phagocytic system (MPS) or renal excretion and thus reach tumor tissue efficiently; how to cross multiple physiological barriers and play a therapeutic effect; and how are nanoparticles metabolized out of the body after treatment. The most promising solution is to rationalize the application of the physical and chemical properties of AuNPs. For example, Liu’s research group designed a multifunctional poly (amino acid)–gold–magnetic complex that could escape renal clearance because of its big-particle-diameter (≈170 nm); can cross the vascular barrier through the EPR effect; be used for CT imaging based on the high X-ray absorption coefficient; efficient uptake due to the guanidine group in coupling the arginine of the AuNPs; perform PTT by taking advantage of the high photothermal conversion; and can be cleared renally due to biodegradation into small particle sizes (≈3 nm). On the basis of studying the excellent physical and chemical properties of AuNPs, more AuNP-based tumor therapy strategies will enter clinical trials and be approved for the treatment of tumor patients.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/7/2480/s1.

Funding

This research was funded by National Key R&D Program of China, grant number 2019YFB1309702; Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, grant number 17L20128, and Beihang University, grant number ZG216S1751, ZG226S188D. The APC was funded by Beihang University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Higby, G.J. Gold in medicine: A review of its use in the West before 1900. Gold Bull. 1982, 15, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Ghosh, S.K.; Pal, T. Interparticle Coupling Effect on the Surface Plasmon Resonance of Gold Nanoparticles: From Theory to Applications. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 4797–4862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dreaden, E.C.; Alkilany, A.; Huang, X.; Murphy, C.; El-Sayed, M.A. The golden age: Gold nanoparticles for biomedicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 41, 2740–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Dykman, L.; Khlebtsov, N.G. Gold nanoparticles in biomedical applications: Recent advances and perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2256–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, X.; Yang, M.; Pang, B.; Vara, M.; Xia, Y. Gold Nanomaterials at Work in Biomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 10410–10488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jauffred, L.; Samadi, A.; Klingberg, H.; Bendix, P.M.; Oddershede, L.B. Plasmonic Heating of Nanostructures. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 8087–8130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ishida, T.; Murayama, T.; Taketoshi, A.; Haruta, M. Importance of Size and Contact Structure of Gold Nanoparticles for the Genesis of Unique Catalytic Processes. Chem. Rev. 2019, 120, 464–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Maier, S.A.; Atwater, H.A. Plasmonics: Localization and guiding of electromagnetic energy in metal/dielectric structures. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 011101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Schuller, J.A.; Barnard, E.S.; Cai, W.; Jun, Y.C.; White, J.S.; Brongersma, M.L. Plasmonics for extreme light concentration and manipulation. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moskovits, M. Surface-enhanced spectroscopy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1985, 57, 783–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gersten, J.I. Photophysics and photochemistry near surfaces and small particles. Surf. Sci. 1985, 158, 165–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Puig, H.; Tam, J.O.; Yen, C.-W.; Gehrke, L.; Hamad-Schifferli, K. Extinction Coefficient of Gold Nanostars. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 17408–17415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Shunping, Z.; Hongxing, X. Optimizing substrate-mediated plasmon coupling toward high-performance plasmonic nanowire waveguides. Acs Nano 2012, 6, 8128–8135. [Google Scholar]
  14. Shuker, R.; Gammon, R.W. Raman-Scattering Selection-Rule Breaking and the Density of States in Amorphous Materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1970, 25, 222–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zumbusch, A.; Holtom, G.R.; Xie, X.S. Three-Dimensional Vibrational Imaging by Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 4142–4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Nie, S. Probing Single Molecules and Single Nanoparticles by Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Science 1997, 275, 1102–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, M.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.-H.; Lim, H.-W.; Seong, G.H.; Lee, E.K.; Chang, S.-I.; Oh, C.H.; Choo, J. Highly reproducible immunoassay of cancer markers on a gold-patterned microarray chip using surface-enhanced Raman scattering imaging. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 2135–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Qian, X.; Nie, S.; Champion, P.M.; Ziegler, L.D. Surface-Enhanced Raman Nanoparticles for in-vivo Tumor Targeting and Spectroscopic Detection. AIP Conf. Proc. 2010, 1267, 81. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hossain, K.; Cho, H.-Y.; Choi, J.-W. Gold Nanosphere-Deposited Substrate for Distinguishing of Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2016, 16, 6299–6303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shiota, M.; Naya, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Hishiki, T.; Tani, T.; Takahashi, H.; Kubo, A.; Koike, D.; Itoh, M.; Ohmura, M.; et al. Gold-nanofève surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy visualizes hypotaurine as a robust anti-oxidant consumed in cancer survival. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, D.; Feng, S.; Pan, J.; Chen, Y.; Lin, J.; Chen, G.; Xie, S.; Zeng, H.; Chen, R. Colorectal cancer detection by gold nanoparticle based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy of blood serum and statistical analysis. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 13565–13577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lane, L.A.; Qian, X.; Nie, S. SERS Nanoparticles in Medicine: From Label-Free Detection to Spectroscopic Tagging. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 10489–10529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kühn, S.; Håkanson, U.; Rogobete, L.; Sandoghdar, V. Enhancement of single-molecule fluorescence using a gold nanoparticle as an optical nanoantenna. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 017402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Yun, C.S.; Javier, A.; Jennings, T.; Fisher, M.; Hira, S.; Peterson, S.; Hopkins, B.; Reich, N.O.; Strouse, G.F. Nanometal Surface Energy Transfer in Optical Rulers, Breaking the FRET Barrier. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3115–3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shi, H.; Ye, X.; He, X.; Wang, K.; Cui, W.; He, D.; Li, D.; Jia, X. Au@Ag/Au nanoparticles assembled with activatable aptamer probes as smart “nano-doctors” for image-guided cancer thermotherapy. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 8754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, J.; Zhu, G.; You, M.; Song, E.; Shukoor, M.I.; Zhang, K.; Altman, M.B.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Huang, C.Z.; et al. Assembly of aptamer switch probes and photosensitizer on gold nanorods for targeted photothermal and photodynamic cancer therapy. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5070–5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Han, D.; Zhu, G.; Wu, C.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, T.; Zhang, X.; Tan, W. Engineering a Cell-Surface Aptamer Circuit for Targeted and Amplified Photodynamic Cancer Therapy. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 2312–2319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Seferos, D.S.; Giljohann, D.A.; Hill, H.D.; Prigodich, A.E.; Mirkin, C.A. Nano-Flares: Probes for Transfection and mRNA Detection in Living Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15477–15479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Li, N.; Chang, C.; Pan, W.; Tang, B. Inside Back Cover: A Multicolor Nanoprobe for Detection and Imaging of Tumor-Related mRNAs in Living Cells (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 30/2012). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lakowicz, J.R. Plasmon-Enhanced Fluorescence from Single Fluorophores End-Linked to Gold Nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5540–5541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Li, J.-L.; Segui, A.R. Surface plasmonic gold nanorods for enhanced two-photon microscopic imaging and apoptosis induction of cancer cells. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 9492–9498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, H.; Huff, T.B.; Zweifel, D.A.; He, W.; Low, P.S.; Wei, A.; Cheng, J.-X. In vitro and in vivo two-photon luminescence imaging of single gold nanorods. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 15752–15756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Haran, G.; Chuntonov, L. Artificial Plasmonic Molecules and Their Interaction with Real Molecules. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 5539–5580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, X.; El-Sayed, I.H.; Qian, W.; El-Sayed, M.A. Cancer Cell Imaging and Photothermal Therapy in the Near-Infrared Region by Using Gold Nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2115–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Weissleder, R. A clearer vision for in vivo imaging. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 316–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, X.; El-Sayed, M.A. Plasmonic photo-thermal therapy (PPTT). Alex. J. Med. 2011, 47, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Pitsillides, C.M.; Joe, E.K.; Wei, X.; Anderson, R.R.; Lin, C.P. Selective Cell Targeting with Light-Absorbing Microparticles and Nanoparticles. Biophys. J. 2003, 84, 4023–4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hirsch, L.R.; Stafford, R.J.; Bankson, J.A.; Sershen, S.R.; Rivera, B.; Price, R.E.; Hazle, J.D.; Halas, N.J.; West, J.L. Nanoshell-mediated near-infrared thermal therapy of tumors under magnetic resonance guidance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13549–13554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. O’Neal, D.P.; Hirsch, L.R.; Halas, N.J.; Payne, J.D.; West, J.L. Photo-thermal tumor ablation in mice using near infrared-absorbing nanoparticles. Cancer Lett. 2004, 209, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nie, S. Editorial: Understanding and overcoming major barriers in cancer nanomedicine. Nanomedicine 2010, 5, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ali, M.; Wu, Y.; El-Sayed, M.A. Gold-Nanoparticle-Assisted Plasmonic Photothermal Therapy Advances Toward Clinical Application. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 15375–15393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Boyer, D.; Tamarat, P.; Maali, A.; Lounis, B.; Orrit, M. Photothermal Imaging of Nanometer-Sized Metal Particles Among Scatterers. Science 2002, 297, 1160–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Y.; Bhattarai, P.; Dai, Z.; Chen, X. Photothermal therapy and photoacoustic imaging via nanotheranostics in fighting cancer. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 2053–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lucky, S.S.; Soo, K.C.; Zhang, Y. Nanoparticles in Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1990–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vijayaraghavan, P.; Liu, C.-H.; Vankayala, R.; Chiang, C.-S.; Hwang, K.C. Designing Multi-Branched Gold Nanoechinus for NIR Light Activated Dual Modal Photodynamic and Photothermal Therapy in the Second Biological Window. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6689–6695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jang, B.; Park, J.-Y.; Tung, C.-H.; Kim, I.-H.; Choi, Y. Gold Nanorod−Photosensitizer Complex for Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging and Photodynamic/Photothermal Therapy In Vivo. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 1086–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vankayala, R.; Sagadevan, A.; Vijayaraghavan, P.; Kuo, C.-L.; Hwang, K.C. Metal Nanoparticles Sensitize the Formation of Singlet Oxygen. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10640–10644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vankayala, R.; Huang, Y.-K.; Kalluru, P.; Chiang, C.-S.; Hwang, K.C. First Demonstration of Gold Nanorods-Mediated Photodynamic Therapeutic Destruction of Tumors via Near Infra-Red Light Activation. Small 2013, 10, 1612–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ali, M.R.K.; Wu, Y.; El-Sayed, M.A. Gold-Nanoparticle-Assisted Plasmonic Photothermal Therapy Advances Toward Clinical Application. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 15375–15393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, Q.; Chen, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Dong, Z.; Liu, Z. NIR-II light activated photodynamic therapy with protein-capped gold nanoclusters. Nano Res. 2018, 11, 5657–5669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vankayala, R.; Lin, C.-C.; Kalluru, P.; Chiang, C.-S.; Hwang, K.C. Gold nanoshells-mediated bimodal photodynamic and photothermal cancer treatment using ultra-low doses of near infra-red light. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 5527–5538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gao, L.; Fei, J.; Zhao, J.; Li, H.; Cui, Y.; Li, J. Hypocrellin-Loaded Gold Nanocages with High Two-Photon Efficiency for Photothermal/Photodynamic Cancer Therapy in Vitro. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8030–8040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, S.; Huang, P.; Nie, L.; Xing, R.; Liu, D.; Wang, Z.; Lin, J.; Chen, S.; Niu, G.; Lu, G.M.; et al. Biomedical Applications: Single Continuous Wave Laser Induced Photodynamic/Plasmonic Photothermal Therapy Using Photosensitizer-Functionalized Gold Nanostars (Adv. Mater. 22/2013). Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Kuo, W.-S.; Chang, Y.-T.; Cho, K.-C.; Chiu, K.-C.; Lien, C.-H.; Yeh, C.-S.; Chen, S.-J. Gold nanomaterials conjugated with indocyanine green for dual-modality photodynamic and photothermal therapy. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 3270–3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, B.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Huang, H.; Chen, M.; Li, K.; Li, C.; Yu, X.; Chu, P.K. Rose-bengal-conjugated gold nanorods for in vivo photodynamic and photothermal oral cancer therapies. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 1954–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, N.; Zhao, Z.; Lv, Y.; Fan, H.; Bai, H.; Meng, H.; Long, Y.; Fu, T.; Zhang, X.-B.; Tan, W. Gold nanorod-photosensitizer conjugate with extracellular pH-driven tumor targeting ability for photothermal/photodynamic therapy. Nano Res. 2014, 7, 1291–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Terentyuk, G.; Panfilova, E.; Khanadeev, V.; Chumakov, D.; Genina, E.; Bashkatov, A.; Tuchin, V.; Bucharskaya, A.; Maslyakova, G.; Khlebtsov, N.G.; et al. Gold nanorods with a hematoporphyrin-loaded silica shell for dual-modality photodynamic and photothermal treatment of tumors in vivo. Nano Res. 2014, 7, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bucharskaya, A.; Maslyakova, G.; Terentyuk, G.; Yakunin, A.; Avetisyan, Y.; Bibikova, O.; Tuchina, E.; Khlebtsov, B.; Khlebtsov, N.G.; Tuchin, V.V. Towards Effective Photothermal/Photodynamic Treatment Using Plasmonic Gold Nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, J.; Chen, J.-Y. Synergistic effect to kill cancer cells by gold nanorod-aluminum phthalocyanine conjugates. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO), Birmingham, UK, 20–23 August 2012; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  60. Jang, B.; Park, J.Y.; Tung, C.H.; Kim, I.H.; Choi, Y. Gold nanorod-photosensitizer complex for near-infrared fluorescence imaging and photodynamic/photothermal therapy in vivo. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 1086–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yu, M.; Guo, F.; Wang, J.; Tan, F.; Li, N. Photosensitizer-Loaded pH-Responsive Hollow Gold Nanospheres for Single Light-Induced Photothermal/Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 17592–17597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhou, W.; Gao, X.; Liu, D.; Chen, X. Gold Nanoparticles for In Vitro Diagnostics. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 10575–10636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Kang, J.-H.; Asami, Y.; Murata, M.; Kitazaki, H.; Sadanaga, N.; Tokunaga, E.; Shiotani, S.; Okada, S.; Maehara, Y.; Niidome, T. Gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric assay for cancer diagnosis. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 25, 1869–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. O’Brian, C.A.; Chu, F.; Bornmann, W.G.; Maxwell, D.S. Protein kinase Cα and ε small-molecule targeted therapeutics: A new roadmap to two Holy Grails in drug discovery? Expert Rev. Anticancer. Ther. 2006, 6, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lu, W.; Arumugam, S.R.; Senapati, D.; Singh, A.K.; Arbneshi, T.; Khan, S.A.; Yu, H.; Ray, P.C.; Yu, S.A.K.H. Multifunctional Oval-Shaped Gold-Nanoparticle-Based Selective Detection of Breast Cancer Cells Using Simple Colorimetric and Highly Sensitive Two-Photon Scattering Assay. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1739–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Oh, J.-H.; Lee, J.-S. Designed Hybridization Properties of DNA–Gold Nanoparticle Conjugates for the Ultraselective Detection of a Single-Base Mutation in the Breast Cancer GeneBRCA1. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 7364–7370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ramanathan, S.; Gopinath, S.C.B.; Arshad, M.K.M.; Poopalan, P.; Anbu, P. A DNA based visual and colorimetric aggregation assay for the early growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation by using unmodified gold nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Valentini, P.; Fiammengo, R.; Sabella, S.; Gariboldi, M.; Maiorano, G.; Cingolani, R.; Pompa, P.P. Gold-Nanoparticle-Based Colorimetric Discrimination of Cancer-Related Point Mutations with Picomolar Sensitivity. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 5530–5538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Assah, E.; Goh, W.; Zheng, X.T.; Lim, T.X.; Li, J.; Lane, D.P.; Ghadessy, F.; Tan, Y.N. Rapid colorimetric detection of p53 protein function using DNA-gold nanoconjugates with applications for drug discovery and cancer diagnostics. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 169, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Huang, J.; Liou, Y.L.; Kang, Y.N.; Tan, Z.R.; Peng, M.J.; Zhou, H.H. Real-time colorimetric detection of DNA methylation of the PAX1 gene in cervical scrapings for cervical cancer screening with thiol-labeled PCR primers and gold nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 5335–5347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Berning, D.E.; Katti, K.V.; Volkert, W.A.; Higginbotham, C.J.; Ketring, A.R. 198Au-labeled hydroxymethyl phosphines as models for potential therapeutic pharmaceuticals. Nucl. Med. Boil. 1998, 25, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fent, G.M.; Casteel, S.W.; Kim, D.Y.; Kannan, R.; Katti, K.; Chanda, N.; Katti, K. Biodistribution of maltose and gum arabic hybrid gold nanoparticles after intravenous injection in juvenile swine. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Boil. Med. 2009, 5, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Curran, W.J.; Littman, P.; Raney, R.B. Interstitial radiation therapy in the treatment of childhood soft-tissue sarcomas. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 1988, 14, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cutler, C.S.; Hennkens, H.M.; Sisay, N.; Huclier-Markai, S.; Jurisson, S. Radiometals for Combined Imaging and Therapy. Chem. Rev. 2012, 113, 858–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rich, T.A. Radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer: Eleven year experience at the JCRT. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 1985, 11, 759–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chanda, N.; Kan, P.; Watkinson, L.D.; Shukla, R.; Zambre, A.; Carmack, T.L.; Engelbrecht, H.; Lever, J.R.; Katti, K.; Fent, G.M.; et al. Radioactive gold nanoparticles in cancer therapy: Therapeutic efficacy studies of GA-198AuNP nanoconstruct in prostate tumor-bearing mice. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Boil. Med. 2010, 6, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Floyd, C.E.; Jaszczak, R.J.; Harris, C.C.; Coleman, R.E. Energy and spatial distribution of multiple order Compton scatter in SPECT: A Monte Carlo investigation. Phys. Med. Boil. 1984, 29, 1217–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Knight, P.J.; Doornbos, J.F.; Rosen, D.; Lin, J.J.; Farha, G.J. The use of interstitial radiation therapy in the treatment of persistent, localized, and unresectable cancer in children. Cancer 1986, 57, 951–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, C.-H.; Lin, F.-S.; Liao, W.-N.; Liang, S.L.; Chen, M.-H.; Chen, Y.-W.; Lin, W.-Y.; Hsu, M.-H.; Wang, M.-Y.; Peir, J.-J.; et al. Establishment of a Trimodality Analytical Platform for Tracing, Imaging and Quantification of Gold Nanoparticles in Animals by Radiotracer Techniques. Anal. Chem. 2014, 87, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Luehmann, H.; Xia, X.; Wan, D.; Cutler, C.; Xia, Y. Radioluminescent Gold Nanocages with Controlled Radioactivity for Real-Time in Vivo Imaging. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 581–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Guo, Y.; Aweda, T.; Black, K.C.; Liu, Y. Chemistry and Theranostic Applications of Radiolabeled Nanoparticles for Cardiovascular, Oncological, and Pulmonary Research. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yaal-Hahoshen, N.; Shina, S.; Leider-Trejo, L.; Barnea, I.; Shabtai, E.L.; Azenshtein, E.; Greenberg, I.; Keydar, I.; Ben-Baruch, A. The Chemokine CCL5 as a Potential Prognostic Factor Predicting Disease Progression in Stage II Breast Cancer Patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 4474–4480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Fazaeli, Y.; Akhavan, O.; Rahighi, R.; Aboudzadeh, M.R.; Karimi, E.; Afarideh, H. In vivo SPECT imaging of tumors by 198,199Au-labeled graphene oxide nanostructures. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 45, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hainfeld, J.F. Gold cluster-labelled antibodies. Nature 1988, 333, 281–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Payton, S. Prostate cancer: Radioactive gold nanoparticles show promise for tumour shrinkage. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2012, 9, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Matsudaira, H.; Ueno, A.M.; Furuno, I. Iodine contrast medium sensitizes cultured mammalian cells to X rays but not to gamma rays. Radiat. Res. 1980, 84, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Hernandez-Rivera, M.; Kumar, I.; Cho, S.Y.; Cheong, B.Y.; Pulikkathara, M.X.; Moghaddam, S.E.; Whitmire, K.H.; Wilson, L.J. High-Performance Hybrid Bismuth-Carbon Nanotube Based Contrast Agent for X-ray CT Imaging. Acs Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 5709–5716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Seltzer, S.M. Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy–Absorption Coefficients NISTIR 5632. Pramana 1995, 72, 375–387. [Google Scholar]
  89. Leung, M.K.K.; Chow, J.C.L.; Chithrani, D.; Lee, M.J.G.; Oms, B.; Jaffray, D. Irradiation of gold nanoparticles by X-rays: Monte Carlo simulation of dose enhancements and the spatial properties of the secondary electrons production. Med Phys. 2011, 38, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Carter, J.D.; Cheng, N.N.; Qu, Y.; Suarez, G.D.; Guo, T. Nanoscale Energy Deposition by X-ray Absorbing Nanostructures. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 11622–11625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Michael, D.; Eva, B.; Scott, P. Monte Carlo investigation of the increased radiation deposition due to gold nanoparticles using kilovoltage and megavoltage photons in a 3D randomized cell model. Med. Phys. 2013, 40, 071710. [Google Scholar]
  92. Kwatra, D.; Venugopal, A.; Anant, S. Nanoparticles in radiation therapy: A summary of various approaches to enhance radiosensitization in cancer. Transl. Cancer Res. 2013, 2, 330–342. [Google Scholar]
  93. Wu, L.-J.; Randers-Pehrson, G.; Xu, A.; Waldren, C.A.; Geard, C.R.; Yu, Z.; Hei, T.K. Targeted cytoplasmic irradiation with alpha particles induces mutations in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 4959–4964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Berbeco, R.; Ngwa, W.; Makrigiorgos, G.M. Localized Dose Enhancement to Tumor Blood Vessel Endothelial Cells via Megavoltage X-rays and Targeted Gold Nanoparticles: New Potential for External Beam Radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 2011, 81, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Her, S.; Jaffray, D.; Allen, C. Gold nanoparticles for applications in cancer radiotherapy: Mechanisms and recent advancements. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017, 109, 84–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Brun, E.; Sanche, L.; Sicard-Roselli, C. Parameters governing gold nanoparticle X-ray radiosensitization of DNA in solution. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2009, 72, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Hyun, C.S.; Jones, B.L.; Sunil, K. The dosimetric feasibility of gold nanoparticle-aided radiation therapy (GNRT) via brachytherapy using low-energy gamma-/x-ray sources. Phys. Med. Biol. 2009, 54, 4889. [Google Scholar]
  98. Lechtman, E.; Chattopadhyay, N.; Cai, Z.; Mashouf, S.; Reilly, R.; Pignol, J.P. Implications on clinical scenario of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization in regards to photon energy, nanoparticle size, concentration and location. Phys. Med. Boil. 2011, 56, 4631–4647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Alqathami, M.; Blencowe, A.; Yeo, U.J.; Doran, S.J.; Qiao, G.; Geso, M. Novel multicompartment 3-dimensional radiochromic radiation dosimeters for nanoparticle-enhanced radiation therapy dosimetry. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2012, 84, e549–e555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hainfeld, J.F.; Slatkin, D.N.; Smilowitz, H.M. The use of gold nanoparticles to enhance radiotherapy in mice. Phys. Med. Boil. 2004, 49, N309–N315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Popovtzer, R.; Agrawal, A.; Kotov, N.A.; Popovtzer, A.; Balter, J.; Carey, T.E.; Kopelman, R. Targeted gold nanoparticles enable molecular CT imaging of cancer. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 4593–4596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Popovtzer, R.; Reuveni, T.; Motiei, M.; Romman, Z.; Popovtzer, A. Targeted gold nanoparticles enable molecular CT imaging of cancer: An in vivo study. Int. J. Nanomed. 2011, 6, 2859–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Jans, H.; Huo, Q. Gold nanoparticle-enabled biological and chemical detection and analysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2849–2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Perrault, S.D.; Walkey, C.; Jennings, T.; Fischer, H.C.; Chan, W.C.W. Mediating Tumor Targeting Efficiency of Nanoparticles Through Design. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 1909–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Sykes, E.A.; Chen, J.; Zheng, G.; Chan, W.C. Investigating the Impact of Nanoparticle Size on Active and Passive Tumor Targeting Efficiency. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 5696–5706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Chou, L.Y.T.; Chan, W.C.W. Fluorescence-Tagged Gold Nanoparticles for Rapidly Characterizing the Size-Dependent Biodistribution in Tumor Models. Adv. Heal. Mater. 2012, 1, 714–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Blanco, E.; Shen, H.; Ferrari, M. Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bai, X.; Zhang, J.; Chang, Y.-N.; Gu, W.; Lei, R.; Qin, Y.; Xia, S.; Ma, S.; Liang, Y.; Chen, K.; et al. Nanoparticles with High-Surface Negative-Charge Density Disturb the Metabolism of Low-Density Lipoprotein in Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Chen, Y.-S.; Hung, Y.-C.; Liau, I.; Huang, G.S. Assessment of the In Vivo Toxicity of Gold Nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2009, 4, 858–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Zhou, C.; Long, M.; Qin, Y.; Sun, X.; Zheng, J. Luminescent Gold Nanoparticles with Efficient Renal Clearance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 3168–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Cho, W.-S.; Cho, M.; Jeong, J.; Choi, M.; Han, B.-S.; Shin, H.-S.; Hong, J.; Chung, B.H.; Jeong, J.; Cho, M.-H. Size-dependent tissue kinetics of PEG-coated gold nanoparticles. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2010, 245, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Khlebtsov, N.; Dykman, L. Biodistribution and toxicity of engineered gold nanoparticles: A review of in vitro and in vivo studies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 1647–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Iyer, A.K.; Khaled, G.; Fang, J.; Maeda, H. Exploiting the enhanced permeability and retention effect for tumor targeting. Drug Discov. Today 2006, 11, 812–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Zhang, X.-D.; Wu, D.; Shen, X.; Chen, J.; Sun, Y.-M.; Liu, P.-X.; Liang, X.-J. Size-dependent radiosensitization of PEG-coated gold nanoparticles for cancer radiation therapy. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 6408–6419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Piao, J.; Wang, L.; Gao, F.; You, Y.-Z.; Xiong, Y.; Yang, L. Erythrocyte Membrane Is an Alternative Coating to Polyethylene Glycol for Prolonging the Circulation Lifetime of Gold Nanocages for Photothermal Therapy. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 10414–10425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Al Zaki, A.; Joh, D.; Cheng, Z.; De Barros, A.L.B.; Kao, G.; Dorsey, J.; Tsourkas, A. Gold-Loaded Polymeric Micelles for Computed Tomography-Guided Radiation Therapy Treatment and Radiosensitization. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Goy-López, S.; Castro, E.; Taboada, P.; Mosquera, V. Block Copolymer-Mediated Synthesis of Size-Tunable Gold Nanospheres and Nanoplates. Langmuir 2008, 24, 13186–13196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Chanda, N.; Kattumuri, V.; Shukla, R.; Zambre, A.; Katti, K.; Upendran, A.; Kulkarni, R.R.; Kan, P.; Fent, G.M.; Casteel, S.W.; et al. Bombesin functionalized gold nanoparticles show in vitro and in vivo cancer receptor specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 8760–8765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Yuan, H.; Fales, A.M.; Vo-Dinh, T. TAT Peptide-Functionalized Gold Nanostars: Enhanced Intracellular Delivery and Efficient NIR Photothermal Therapy Using Ultralow Irradiance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 11358–11361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Kim, J.; Park, S.; Lee, J.E.; Jin, S.M.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, I.S.; Yang, I.; Kim, J.-S.; Kim, S.K.; Cho, M.-H.; et al. Designed Fabrication of Multifunctional Magnetic Gold Nanoshells and Their Application to Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Photothermal Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7754–7758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Dumani, D.S.; Sun, I.-C.; Emelianov, S.Y. Ultrasound-guided immunofunctional photoacoustic imaging for diagnosis of lymph node metastases. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 11649–11659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Xianyu, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, N.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, X. A Dispersion-Dominated Chromogenic Strategy for Colorimetric Sensing of Glutathione at the Nanomolar Level Using Gold Nanoparticles. Small 2015, 11, 5510–5514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Tian, F.; Conde, J.; Bao, C.; Chen, Y.; Curtin, J.F.; Cui, D. Gold nanostars for efficient in vitro and in vivo real-time SERS detection and drug delivery via plasmonic-tunable Raman/FTIR imaging. Biomaterials 2016, 106, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Cheng, Y.; Samia, A.C.; Meyers, J.D.; Panagopoulos, I.; Fei, B.; Burda, C. Highly Efficient Drug Delivery with Gold Nanoparticle Vectors for in Vivo Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10643–10647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Li, G.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, M.; Li, S.; Li, L.; Wang, T.; Wang, C. Facile Approach to Synthesize Gold Nanorod@Polyacrylic Acid/Calcium Phosphate Yolk–Shell Nanoparticles for Dual-Mode Imaging and pH/NIR-Responsive Drug Delivery. Nano-Micro Lett. 2017, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Anderson, P.; Vaughan, A.T.; Varley, N.R. Antibodies labeled with 199Au: Potential of 199Au for radioimmunotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. Part B Nucl. Med. Boil. 1988, 15, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Luo, C.; Wen, W.; Lin, F.; Zhang, X.; Gu, H.; Wang, S. Simplified aptamer-based colorimetric method using unmodified gold nanoparticles for the detection of carcinoma embryonic antigen. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 10994–10999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hainfeld, J. A small gold-conjugated antibody label: Improved resolution for electron microscopy. Science 1987, 236, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lin, Y.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. Nano-Gold as Artificial Enzymes: Hidden Talents. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4200–4217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Jv, Y.; Li, B.; Cao, R. Positively-charged gold nanoparticles as peroxidiase mimic and their application in hydrogen peroxide and glucose detection. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 8017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zhang, A.; Pan, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chang, J.; Cheng, J.; Huang, Z.; Li, T.; Zhang, C.; De La Fuentea, J.M.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Carbon-gold hybrid nanoprobes for real-time imaging, photothermal/photodynamic and nanozyme oxidative therapy. Theranostics 2019, 9, 3443–3458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Feng, J.; Huang, P.; Shi, S.; Deng, K.-Y.; Wu, F.-Y. Colorimetric detection of glutathione in cells based on peroxidase-like activity of gold nanoclusters: A promising powerful tool for identifying cancer cells. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 967, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Comotti, M.; Della Pina, C.; Matarrese, R.; Rossi, M. The Catalytic Activity of “Naked” Gold Particles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5812–5815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Liu, D.; Yang, J.; Wang, H.-F.; Wang, Z.; Huang, X.; Wang, Z.; Niu, G.; Walker, A.R.H.; Chen, X. Glucose Oxidase-Catalyzed Growth of Gold Nanoparticles Enables Quantitative Detection of Attomolar Cancer Biomarkers. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 5800–5806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Gao, S.; Lin, H.; Zhang, H.; Yao, H.; Chen, Y.; Shi, J. Nanocatalytic Tumor Therapy by Biomimetic Dual Inorganic Nanozyme-Catalyzed Cascade Reaction. Adv. Sci. 2018, 6, 1801733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Pan, Y.; Leifert, A.; Ruau, D.; Neuss, S.; Bornemann, J.; Schmid, G.; Brandau, W.; Simon, U.; Jahnen-Dechent, W. Gold Nanoparticles of Diameter 1.4 nm Trigger Necrosis by Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Damage. Small 2009, 5, 2067–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Mukherjee, P.; Bhattacharya, R.; Wang, P.; Wang, L.; Basu, S.; Nagy, J.A.; Atala, A.; Mukhopadhyay, D.; Soker, S. Antiangiogenic Properties of Gold Nanoparticles. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 3530–3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Bhattacharya, R.; Patra, C.R.; Verma, R.; Kumar, S.; Greipp, P.R.; Mukherjee, P. Gold Nanoparticles Inhibit the Proliferation of Multiple Myeloma Cells. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 711–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Jiang, X.; Ji, Y.; Wu, X.; Xu, L.; Qiu, Y.; Zhao, K.; Wei, T.; et al. Selective Targeting of Gold Nanorods at the Mitochondria of Cancer Cells: Implications for Cancer Therapy. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Libutti, S.K.; Paciotti, G.F.; Byrnes, A.A.; Alexander, H.R.; Gannon, W.E.; Walker, M.; Seidel, G.D.; Yuldasheva, N.; Tamarkin, L. Phase I and pharmacokinetic studies of CYT-6091, a novel PEGylated colloidal gold-rhTNF nanomedicine. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 6139–6149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Abbas, M.; Malik, H.; Mehfooz, M.; Shah, O. Tumor Ablation using Gold Nanoparticles and Nanostructures—Aurolase® Therapy; Lahore University of Management Sciences: Lahore, Pakistan, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Dickerson, E.B.; Dreaden, E.C.; Huang, X.; El-Sayed, I.H.; Chu, H.; Pushpanketh, S.; McDonald, J.F.; El-Sayed, M.A. Gold nanorod assisted near-infrared plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) of squamous cell carcinoma in mice. Cancer Lett. 2008, 269, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Ma, J.; Li, P.; Wang, W.; Wang, S.; Pan, X.; Zhang, F.; Li, S.; Liu, S.; Wang, H.; Gao, G.; et al. Biodegradable Poly(amino acid)–Gold–Magnetic Complex with Efficient Endocytosis for Multimodal Imaging-Guided Chemo-photothermal Therapy. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 9022–9032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 21 02480 g001 550
Figure 1. Applications for tumor diagnosis and treatment based on the basic physical and chemical properties of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs).
Figure 1. Applications for tumor diagnosis and treatment based on the basic physical and chemical properties of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs).
Ijms 21 02480 g001
Ijms 21 02480 g002 550
Figure 2. Localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) of AuNPs and associated properties.
Figure 2. Localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) of AuNPs and associated properties.
Ijms 21 02480 g002
Table
Table 1. AuNPs are used for photodynamic therapy (PDT) and photothermal therapy (PTT) combination.
Table 1. AuNPs are used for photodynamic therapy (PDT) and photothermal therapy (PTT) combination.
Gold NanostructureLaser (nm)CoatingApplicationReference
Nanocages940LipidHela; PTT/PDT[51]
Nanocages980LipidB16F0 melanoma tumors[51]
Nanocages790Hypocrellin and
Lipid		Hela; PTT/PDT[52]
Nanostar671Chlorin e6breast cancer and lung cancer; PTT/PDT[53]
Nanorods808Styrene-alt-maleic acid Indocyanine greenanti-EGFR antibody; PTT/PDT[54]
Nanorods810Rose bengalHamster cheek pouches; PTT/PDT[55]
Nanorods770Ce6–pHLIPss Thiol-terminated monomethoxyl95-C cells; PTT/PDT[56]
Nanorod633 and 808Mesoporous silica Hematoporphyrinlarge solid tumors; PTT/PDT[57]
Nanorods808+633Neutrally charged polymerswhite outbred male rats with implanted cholangiocarcinoma PC-1; PTT/PDT[58]
Nanorods670–710Sulfonated aluminum Phthalocyanineshuman nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells; PTT/PDT[59]
Nanorod810 and 670 subsequentlyAlPcS4xenografted mouse tumor; PTT/PDT[60]
Hollow gold nanospheres670pHLIP and Ce6Hela; PTT/PDT[61]
Table
Table 2. AuNPs are used for clinical trials in tumor therapy and diagnosis.
Table 2. AuNPs are used for clinical trials in tumor therapy and diagnosis.
NameCompositionPhysical& Chemical PropertyApplicationPhasesRef.
CYT-6091
(Aurimune)		AuNsphere
rhTNF
tPEG		DeliveryMelanoma SarcomaPhaseⅠcomplete[140]
Aurolase®
therapy		AuNshell
Silica
PEG		EPR effect Photothermal conversionHead and Neck Cancer, Lung Tumors, Prostate CancerNot Applicable[141]
PEGylated
gold nanoparticles		AuNRod
PEG		Photothermal conversionDeep-tissue MalignanciesHuman pilot studies[142]
NU-0129Spherical Nucleic Acid AusphereDeliveryGlioblastoma GliosarcomaEarly Phase Ⅰ[143]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bai, X.; Wang, Y.; Song, Z.; Feng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, D.; Feng, L. The Basic Properties of Gold Nanoparticles and their Applications in Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2480. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072480

AMA Style

Bai X, Wang Y, Song Z, Feng Y, Chen Y, Zhang D, Feng L. The Basic Properties of Gold Nanoparticles and their Applications in Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(7):2480. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072480

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bai, Xue, Yueying Wang, Zhiyun Song, Yanmin Feng, Yuanyuan Chen, Deyuan Zhang, and Lin Feng. 2020. "The Basic Properties of Gold Nanoparticles and their Applications in Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 7: 2480. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072480

APA Style

Bai, X., Wang, Y., Song, Z., Feng, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, D., & Feng, L. (2020). The Basic Properties of Gold Nanoparticles and their Applications in Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(7), 2480. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21072480

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop