Next Article in Journal
NLRC4, ASC and Caspase-1 Are Inflammasome Components That Are Mediated by P2Y2R Activation in Breast Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Genomic Analysis of Vavilov’s Historic Chickpea Landraces Reveals Footprints of Environmental and Human Selection
Previous Article in Journal
Kandelia candel Thioredoxin f Confers Osmotic Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Tobacco
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development and Proof-of-Concept Application of Genome-Enabled Selection for Pea Grain Yield under Severe Terminal Drought
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Legume Genetics and Biology: From Mendel’s Pea to Legume Genomics

1
Department of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, Palacký University, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
2
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences and Gund Institute for the Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
3
Plant Sciences and Plant, Pathology Department, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(9), 3336; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093336
Submission received: 29 April 2020 / Revised: 4 May 2020 / Accepted: 6 May 2020 / Published: 8 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Legume Genetics and Biology: From Mendel's Pea to Legume Genomics)

Abstract

:
Legumes have played an important part in cropping systems since the dawn of agriculture, both as human food and as animal feed. The legume family is arguably one of the most abundantly domesticated crop plant families. Their ability to symbiotically fix nitrogen and improve soil fertility has been rewarded since antiquity and makes them a key protein source. The pea was the original model organism used in Mendel’s discovery of the laws of inheritance, making it the foundation of modern plant genetics. This Special Issue provides up-to-date information on legume biology, genetic advances, and the legacy of Mendel.

Introduction

Legumes have always been a part of everyday life, as human food and animal feed, being key protein sources. Legumes represent the second most important family of crop plants after Poaceae (grass family), accounting for approximately 27% of the world’s crop production. While in cereals the major storage molecule is starch, which is deposited in the endosperm, in most of the grain legumes (pulses) the endosperm is transitory and consumed by the embryo during seed maturation. Legume seeds contain a high proportion of proteins (20–40%), and either lipids (soybean, peanut) or starch (or both) as a further carbon source [1]. The importance of legumes for agriculture as well as science has been recognized by the establishment of International Legume Society (ILS) in 2010 (https://www.legumesociety.org), followed by biannual conferences bringing together people working on broad aspects of legume biology. The last ILS conference was held in 2019 in Poland and this Special Issue has been made to reflect some of the presented work. The long-term strategy of ILS is linking together the different aspects of agricultural research on grain and forage legumes worldwide.
The Fabaceae is the third-largest family of flowering plants, with over 800 genera and 20,000 species. Currently, three major groups are recognized and regarded as subfamilies: the mimosoid legumes, Mimosoideae (sometimes regarded as the family Mimosaceae with four tribes and 3270 species); the papilionoid legumes, Papilionoideae (or the family Fabaceae/Papilionaceae with 28 tribes and 13,800 species); and the caesalpinioid legumes, Caesalpinoideae (or the family Caesalpiniaceae with four tribes and 2250 species) [2]. It is an extremely diverse family with a worldwide distribution, from arctic-alpine herbs to annual xerophytes and forest trees.
Legumes have played an important part in cropping systems since the dawn of agriculture. Records from the oldest civilizations of Egypt and eastern Asia demonstrate the ancient use of various beans, peas, vetches, soybeans, and alfalfa. One of the early Greek botanists, Theophrastus, in the third century before Christ, wrote of leguminous plants “reinvigorating” the soil and stated that beans were not a burdensome crop to the ground but even seemed to manure it. The Romans emphasized the use of leguminous plants for green manuring; they also introduced the systematic use of crop rotations, a practice that was forgotten for a time during the early Middle Ages and partly also in today´s agricultural practice.
Members of the Fabaceae were domesticated as grain legumes in parallel with cereal domestications [3,4,5,6,7,8]. There are 13 genera (in six legume tribes) that constitute major legume crops [1,2]. Among the first legumes to be domesticated were members of the galegoid tribe such as peas, faba beans, lentils, grass peas and chickpeas, which arose in the Fertile Crescent of Mesopotamian agriculture. These grain legumes (pulse legumes) accompanied cereal production and formed important dietary components of early civilizations in the Near East and the Mediterranean regions. Similar domestications of Phaseolus in the New World and Glycine in East Asia have had similar importance for human dietary diversity and security.
Cultivated legumes fulfill many human needs beyond being directly consumed by people. Many tree-sized species in the legume family are valuable for their hard, durable timber. Species from the genera Aeschynomene, Arachis, Centrosema, Desmodium, Macroptilium, and particularly Stylosanthes offer promise for improved tropical pasture systems. The barks of some species of acacias (Acacia dealbata, A. decurrens, and A. pycnantha) are sometimes used as sources of tannins, chemicals that are mostly used to manufacture leather from animal skins. Some important dyes are extracted from species in the legume family. One of the world’s most important natural dyes is indigo, extracted from the foliage of the indigo (Indigofera tinctoria) of south Asia and to a lesser degree from American indigo (I. suffruticosa) of tropical South America. Derris or rotenone is a poisonous alkaloid extracted from Derris elliptica and D. malaccensis that has long been used by indigenous peoples of Southeast Asia as arrow and fish poisons. Rotenone is now used widely as a rodenticide to kill small mammals and as an insecticide to kill pest insects. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum), the seeds of which are used as a spice in curries. Legumes include also valuable fiber plants, such as the sunn-hemp of India (Crotalaria juncea) and Hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) used by the Indians of the southwestern United States. Some legumes such as licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) and goatsrue (Tephrosia virginiana) have medicinal value; many others rank among ornamental plants (for example Lathyrus odoratus), and legumes are of great importance for honey production.
The pea (Pisum sativum L.) was the original model organism used in Mendel´s discovery (1866) of the laws of inheritance, making it the foundation of modern plant genetics. It had already been an object of experimental work before Mendel [9,10]. Despite their close phylogenetic relationships, crop legumes differ greatly in their genome size, base chromosome number, ploidy level, and reproductive biology. To establish a unified genetic system for legumes, two legume species in the Galegoid clade, Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus, from Trifolieae and Loteae tribes, respectively, were selected as model systems for studying legume genomics and biology [11,12]. Now, many legume crops have well-studied genetic systems. In a few cultivated legumes, comprehensive genetic analysis is limited due to the large size of their genomes. For soybeans, the most widely grown and economically important legume, a genome has been available since 2010 [13]. For the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris), the most widely grown grain legume, a genome has been available since 2014 [14]. Many more legumes have been sequenced since. These genome sequences are now completed by a broad range of genomic resources, including tools for genome-wide association studies, diversity panels, and online databases [15]. These tools facilitated increasingly widespread efforts to implement molecular breeding in legumes. The existence of reference genomes is fundamental for the advancement of genetic mapping approaches using either classical biparental population or association mapping on wider panels. This has been shown in several papers in this issue [16,17] for soybean. Having genome-wide data on diversity on a sufficiently large and diverse set of accessions, along with accumulated phenotypic trait descriptions, provides the tools to conduct genome-wide association studies and genomic selection. This either might lead to the identification of candidate loci/genes governing studied traits or provide useful markers applicable for breeding [18,19].
The history of legume crop domestication is not only of theoretical interest to provide insight into evolution but also can be used in breeding of recently domesticated crops, as shown in lupine [20] and potentially applied to a broader range of crop wild relatives. Legumes are particular among the plant species in their ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen. Owing to their biology including symbiotic nitrogen fixation, legumes are vital components of sustainable agriculture. This has been acknowledged in all cropping systems. Although the fundamentals of bacteria and host plant symbiosis have been elicited, there are still numerous aspects to be studied, such as allelic variation of identified genes, as shown on red clover [21].
Since most of the legume crops are used as food or feed in form of mature, dry seeds, their nutritional composition is of great importance. The study of Sivasakthi et al. [22] shows an elegant application of basic knowledge of one of the genes underlying a classical Mendelian trait, green cotyledons, identified and applied in chickpea. Seed composition can be altered by water availability or other abiotic stresses, as shown in studies of lupine seeds [23]. Similarly, dissection of the molecular mechanisms of resistance to biotic and abiotic are of high relevance both in order to understand evolutionary mechanisms between pathogens/triggers and hosts as well as to facilitate the breeding process. Mutant lines are helpful in elucidation of gene function, as shown in soybeans [24]. Since pathogens display high variation potential and are able to quickly overcome single gene/allele resistance, it is important to identify the allelic variation of a given gene, as shown in powdery mildew resistance in peas [25]. Climate change is already impacting all crops including legumes. There is a great need to understand the mechanisms of stress avoidance/tolerance/resistance to minimalize this impact. The review of Kumar et al. [26] offers a view on breeding climate-resilient legume crops, which is vital particularly for tropical and subtropical countries already facing scarcity of water and soil resources. In current biology, there are commonly integrated various approaches in order to study complex biological pathways, such as that shown by the study of lupine flower development [27]. This work combines genomic, transcriptomic, and small RNA sequencing to understand the process of lupine flower ablation. Owing to progress in genomic methods such as next-generation sequencing, genetics and genomics is not limited to model species and is being applied to any species including crops with complex, polyploid genomes [28]. Evolutionary scenarios of speciation are a recurrent theme in biology, and especially in plants, there are often various pathways to speciation, including frequent hybridization and polyploidy. A central aspect of speciation is the establishment of gene-flow barriers. One of the ways to do this is the interaction between plastid and nuclear genomes leading to either viable to inviable progeny. In peas, the interaction between the chloroplast and nuclear-encoded genes results in either normal or albino/chlorotic plants. The study of Nováková et al. [29] shows the variation of respective genes in natural pea populations as well as identifying the influence of a domestication-imposed bottleneck.
Although Mendel’s peas were the first “model” plant, legume biology has long lagged behind more successful models from the Brassicaceae family or economically important cereals. For Borlaug, grain legumes were the “slow runners” of the green revolution because of the limited extent to which they saw the genetic gains that have characterized breeding of cereals for the past century. However, owing to progress in genomic and phenotyping technologies together with recognition of their importance for ecology of natural or agronomical systems, they are gradually gaining ground. We look for seeing new work in legumes, including releases around the world of new legume varieties bred with genomic resources.

Author Contributions

E.J.B.v.W., K.M. and P.S. writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

P.S. work is supported from Grant Agency of Czech Republic and Grant Agency of Palacký University, IGA-2020_003 project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smykal, P.; Coyne, C.J.; Ambrose, M.J.; Maxted, N.; Schaefer, H.; Blair, M.W.; Berger, J.; Greene, S.L.; Nelson, M.N.; Besharat, N.; et al. Legume Crops Phylogeny and Genetic Diversity for Science and Breeding. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2015, 34, 43–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Lewis, G.; Schrire, B.; Mackinder, B.; Lock, M. Legumes of the World; Royal Botanic Gardens: London, UK, 2005; ISBN 1900347806. [Google Scholar]
  3. De Candolle, A. Origin of Cultivated Plants; American Association for the Advancement of Science: Appleton, WI, USA, 1890. [Google Scholar]
  4. Vavilov, N.I. The Origin, Variation, Immunity and Breeding of Cultivated Plants; Starchester, K., Ed.; Chronica Botanica: Leyden, The Netherlands, 1951; Volume 13, pp. 1–364. [Google Scholar]
  5. Smartt, J. Grain Legumes: Evolution and Genetic Resources; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zohary, D.; Hopf, M.; Weiss, E. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The Origin and Spread of Domesticated Plants in Southwest Asia, Europe, and the Mediterranean Basin, 4th ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012; ISBN 9780199549061. [Google Scholar]
  7. Abbo, S.; van-Oss, R.P.; Gopher, A.; Saranga, Y.; Ofner, R.; Peleg, Z. Plant domestication versus crop evolution: A conceptual framework for cereals and grain legumes. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Smýkal, P.; Nelson, M.N.; Berger, J.D.; Von Wettberg, E.J.B. The Impact of Genetic Changes during Crop Domestication. Agronomy 2018, 8, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Smykal, P. Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in Biology prior and after Mendel’s Discovery. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2014, 50, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Smykal, P.; Varshney, R.K.; Singh, V.K.; Coyne, C.J.; Domoney, C.; Kejnovsky, E.; Warkentin, T. From Mendel’s discovery on pea to today’s plant genetics and breeding. Appl. Genet. 2016, 129, 2267–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Cook, D.R. Medicago truncatula—A model in the making! Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1999, 2, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sato, S.; Nakamura, Y.; Kaneko, T.; Asamizu, E.; Kato, T.; Nakao, M.; Sasamoto, S.; Watanabe, A.; Ono, A.; Kawashima, K.; et al. Genome structure of the legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Res. 2008, 15, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Schmutz, J.; Cannon, S.B.; Schlueter, J.; Ma, J.; Mitros, T.; Nelson, W.; Hyten, D.L.; Song, Q.; Thelen, J.J.; Cheng, J.; et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 2010, 465, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Schmutz, J.; McClean, P.E.; Mamidi, S.; Wu, G.A.; Cannon, S.B.; Grimwood, J.; Jenkins, J.; Shu, S.; Song, Q.; Chavarro, C.; et al. A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 707–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bauchet, G.J.; Bett, K.E.; Cameron, C.T.; Campbell, J.D.; Cannon, E.K.; Cannon, S.B.; Carlson, J.W.; Chan, A.; Cleary, A.; Close, T.J.; et al. The future of legume genetic data resources: Challenges, opportunities, and priorities. Legume Sci. 2019, 1, e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hina, A.; Cao, Y.; Song, S.; Li, S.; Sharmin, R.A.; Elattar, M.A.; Bhat, J.A.; Zhao, T. High-Resolution Mapping in Two RIL Populations Refines Major “QTL Hotspot” Regions for Seed Size and Shape in Soybean (Glycine max L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Zhang, T.; Wu, T.; Wang, L.; Jiang, B.; Zhen, C.; Yuan, S.; Hou, W.; Wu, C.; Han, T.; Sun, S. A Combined Linkage and GWAS Analysis Identifies QTLs Linked to Soybean Seed Protein and Oil Content. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Tafesse, E.G.; Gali, K.K.; Lachagari, V.B.R.; Bueckert, R.; Warkentin, T.D. Genome-Wide Association Mapping for Heat Stress Responsive Traits in Field Pea. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Annicchiarico, P.; Nazzicari, N.; Laouar, M.; Thami-Alami, I.; Romani, M.; Pecetti, L. Development and Proof-of-Concept Application of Genome-Enabled Selection for Pea Grain Yield under Severe Terminal Drought. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Plewiński, P.; Książkiewicz, M.; Rychel-Bielska, S.; Rudy, E.; Wolko, B. Candidate Domestication-Related Genes Revealed by Expression Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping of Narrow-Leafed Lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Trněný, O.; Vlk, D.; Macková, E.; Matoušková, M.; Řepková, J.; Nedělník, J.; Hofbauer, J.; Vejražka, K.; Jakešová, H.; Jansa, J.; et al. Allelic Variants for Candidate Nitrogen Fixation Genes Revealed by Sequencing in Red Clover (Trifolium pratense L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sivasakthi, K.; Marques, E.; Kalungwana, N.; Carrasquilla-Garcia, N.; Chang, P.L.; Bergmann, E.M.; Bueno, E.; Cordeiro, M.; Sani, S.G.A.S.; Udupa, S.M.; et al. Functional Dissection of the Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Stay-Green Phenotype Associated with Molecular Variation at an Ortholog of Mendel’s I Gene for Cotyledon Color: Implications for Crop Production and Carotenoid Biofortification. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Polit, J.T.; Ciereszko, I.; Dubis, A.T.; Leśniewska, J.; Basa, A.; Winnicki, K.; Żabka, A.; Audzei, M.; Sobiech, Ł.; Faligowska, A.; et al. Irrigation-Induced Changes in Chemical Composition and Quality of Seeds of Yellow Lupine (Lupinus luteus L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Al Amin, G.M.; Kong, K.; Sharmin, R.A.; Kong, J.; Bhat, J.A.; Zhao, T. Characterization and Rapid Gene-Mapping of Leaf Lesion Mimic Phenotype of spl-1 Mutant in Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sun, S.; Deng, D.; Duan, C.; Zong, X.; Xu, D.; He, Y.; Zhu, Z. Two Novel er1 Alleles Conferring Powdery Mildew (Erysiphe pisi) Resistance Identified in a Worldwide Collection of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Germplasms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kumar, J.; Choudhary, A.K.; Gupta, D.S.; Kumar, S. Towards Exploitation of Adaptive Traits for Climate-Resilient Smart Pulses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Glazińska, P.; Kulasek, M.; Glinkowski, W.; Wojciechowski, W.; Kosiński, J. Integrated Analysis of Small RNA, Transcriptome and Degradome Sequencing Provides New Insights into Floral Development and Abscission in Yellow Lupine (Lupinus luteus L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Krishnamurthy, P.; Tsukamoto, C.; Ishimoto, M. Reconstruction of the Evolutionary Histories of UGT Gene Superfamily in Legumes Clarifies the Functional Divergence of Duplicates in Specialized Metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Nováková, E.; Zablatzká, L.; Brus, J.; Nesrstová, V.; Hanáček, P.; Kalendar, R.; Cvrčková, F.; Majeský, Ľ.; Smýkal, P. Allelic Diversity of Acetyl Coenzyme A Carboxylase accD/bccp Genes Implicated in Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Conflict in the Wild and Domesticated Pea (Pisum sp.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Smýkal, P.; von Wettberg, E.J.B.; McPhee, K. Legume Genetics and Biology: From Mendel’s Pea to Legume Genomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093336

AMA Style

Smýkal P, von Wettberg EJB, McPhee K. Legume Genetics and Biology: From Mendel’s Pea to Legume Genomics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(9):3336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093336

Chicago/Turabian Style

Smýkal, Petr, Eric J.B. von Wettberg, and Kevin McPhee. 2020. "Legume Genetics and Biology: From Mendel’s Pea to Legume Genomics" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 9: 3336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093336

APA Style

Smýkal, P., von Wettberg, E. J. B., & McPhee, K. (2020). Legume Genetics and Biology: From Mendel’s Pea to Legume Genomics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(9), 3336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093336

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop