Next Article in Journal
A Signature of Four Circulating microRNAs as Potential Biomarkers for Diagnosing Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
The Emerging Roles of Chromogranins and Derived Polypeptides in Atherosclerosis, Diabetes, and Coronary Heart Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms22116120
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

RNA Interference by Ingested Dsrna-Expressing Bacteria to Study Porphyrin Pigmentation in Crassostrea gigas

by
Biyang Hu
1,
Qi Li
1,2,* and
Hong Yu
1
1
Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
2
Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(11), 6120; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22116120
Submission received: 3 March 2021 / Revised: 24 May 2021 / Accepted: 3 June 2021 / Published: 6 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Porphyrins are a widespread group of pigments in nature which are believed to contribute to shell colors in mollusks. Previous studies have provided candidate genes for porphyrin shell coloration, however, the linkage analysis between functional genes and porphyrin pigmentation remains unclear in mollusks. RNA interference is a powerful molecular tool for analyzing the loss of functions of genes in vivo and alter gene expression. In this study, we used unicellular alga Platymonas subcordiformis and Nitzschia closterium f. minutissima as vectors to feed oysters with Escherichia coli strain HT115 engineered to express double-stranded RNAs targeting specific genes involved in porphyrin synthesis. A strain of Crassostrea gigas with orange shell was used to target key haem pathway genes expression using the aforementioned approach. We show here that feeding the oysters with E. coli, containing dsRNA targeting pigmentation genes, can cause changes in the color of the newly deposited shell. For example, the RNAi knockdown of CgALAS and CgPBGD resulted in the loss of uroporphyrin pigmentation from the shell due to the accumulation of the pigment in the oyster’s mantle. The study probed the crucial role of ALAS and PBGD genes potential functions of uroporphyrin production and shell color pigmentation in C. gigas.

1. Introduction

The diversity of mollusks shell colors has been well reported [1,2,3,4]. Pigments deposited by mantle determined the shell color [5]. The outer fold of the mantle contributes to shell formation [6]. The dorsal mantle epithelium secretes the mollusk’s shell and controls pigmentation [7,8]. The formation of shell color has been studied in mollusks such as marine snails, Pacific oyster, pearl mussel and black-lipped pearl oyster [9,10,11,12]. Moreover, several lncRNA and mRNA transcripts associated with shell pigmentation have been identified which influence pigment biosynthesis including melanin, carotenoid and tetrapyrrole [13].
Porphyrins are a widespread group of pigments in nature which are believed to contribute to shell colors in mollusks [14], often leading to red, brown or purple shell pigmentation [3]. Among porphyrins, the uroporphyrin I and III are found in mollusks [15,16,17,18]. It has been suggested that porphyrin in shell pigmentation is produced de novo by the animal through the haem pathway, the production of uroporphyrin is derived from the oxidation of uroporphyrinogen I and III which belong to non-enzymatic side paths [17,19]. The regulation of the haem pathway initially occurs through the rate-limiting enzyme aminole-vulinic acid synthase (ALAS), by downregulating its transcription, upregulating mRNA breakdown, blocking its uptake into mitochondria, and increasing the breakdown of the protein in mammals [20]. The second gene in the haem pathway aminole-vulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) has been proven to catalyze the formation of porphobilinogen by the dimerization of two molecules of 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA). Then, the porphobilinogen deaminase (PBGD) condenses two molecules of porphobilinogen to form hydroxymethylbilane (HMB). The fourth enzyme uroporphyrinogen III synthase (UROS) subsequently converts HMB into uroporphyrinogen III by closing the linear tetrapyrrole molecule to form a ring (Ajioka et al., 2006), followed by the activation of the fifth enzyme uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase (UROD) which builds up the uroporphyrinogen III. Uroporphyrin formation can be enhanced when the metabolites ALA, porphobilinogen, and HMB are overproduced [21]. Furthermore, increasing levels of ALAS, along with decreasing levels of UROS and UROD, could simultaneously increase the production of uroporphyrin [22]. Genes in the haem pathway associated with the production of porphyrin pigments in tissues have been identified in marine snail Clanculus margaritarius and C. pharaonius [9]. In addition, a recent study indicated that 5-aminolaevulinate synthase (ALAS), which is the first and rate-limiting enzyme in this pathway plays an important role in shell coloration in Yesso scallops Patinopecten yessoensis [23]. The activation of ALAS and PBGD were indicated to own functions of increasing the uroporphyrin production, and UROS was claimed to decrease the level of uroporphyrin I. These studies provide candidate genes for porphyrin shell coloration. However, the linkage analysis between these functional genes and porphyrin pigmentation remains unclear in mollusks.
RNA interference (RNAi) is a powerful molecular tool for analyzing the loss of functions of genes in vivo and alter gene expression. RNAi can be delivered in a variety of ways, for example soaking animals in dsRNA or morpholinos, injecting dsRNA or morpholinos, or feeding dsRNA-expressing bacteria [24]. The traditional injection method has been described in mollusks, but this method is not only technically challenging but also harmful to the regular growth of organisms. A recent study successfully downregulated the tyrosinase gene of the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum by injecting dsRNA into Manila clam, however, there was no obvious change in the shell-color phenotypes indicating that the short-term knockdown of shell-color related genes may not rapidly change the phenotype of mollusks [25]. To verify the functional genes of shell color, long-term and noninvasive approaches are crucial. An effective feeding-based RNAi method was reported in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas by using the dinoflagellate Heterocapsa triquetra as a vector for the dsRNA-producing E. coli HT115 [26]. The algae–bacteria extracellular associations were utilized to retain the algae–bacteria particles by oyster gill filtration [27,28,29,30]. Evidence for the vital role of tyrosinase in shell pigmentation of C. gigas was gained through this non-invasive RNAi method [31]. The algae–bacteria interaction strategy not only provides an inexpensive and high-output RNAi method, but also supports the long-term RNA interference requirements for shell-color-related gene function analysis by producing large quantities of dsRNA [32,33].
C. gigas is a widely distributed and economically important species in the world. It has become a potential model for mollusk-related research [34]. Although the complete C. gigas genome sequence is available (PRJEB35351), due to the lack of molecular techniques to manipulate gene expression, the molecular mechanism of oyster porphyrin pigmentation remains unclear. Studies in purple-shell oysters revealed the presence of uroporphyrin in the shell and mantle of C. gigas [18]. Through selective breeding, mutant oysters possessing pure orange shells without any other pigmentation was obtained [35]. In our previous study, porphyrins were observed on the orange-shell surface and mantles (Hu et al., unpublished data). To assess the functions of candidate genes on orange shell color formation, five genes (CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD) encoding haem pathway enzymes that are potentially critical for uroporphyrinogens synthesis were analyzed through the feeding-based RNAi experiment. The interference efficiency was verified through qPCR. Uroporphyrin pigmentation was characterized in newly deposited shells. Candidate genes were successfully knocked down which led to the pigmentation phenotype changes in C. gigas. The study demonstrated the affection of downregulating key haem pathway genes in shell color formation and probed the crucial role of ALAS, PBGD and UROS genes potential functions of uroporphyrin production and pigmentation.

2. Results

2.1. Plasmid Constructs and Induction Assays

The expression of dsRNAs was induced in E. coli strains which were, respectively, engineered with 0.4 mM IPTG for 4 h at 37 °C. Total RNA was isolated from the induced and non-induced bacteria and analyzed via 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Bands of dsRNA corresponding to the ALAS, ALAD, PBGD, UROS, UROD and EGFP genes plus sequence between two T7 promoters of about 100 bp was observed in the IPTG-induced E. coli transformed with CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD and EGFP construct (Figure 1), but not in the non-induced E. coli transformed with CgALAS (Figure 1a), CgALAD (Figure 1b), CgPBGD (Figure 1c), CgUROS (Figure 1d), CgUROD (Figure 1e) and EGFP (Figure 1f) construct, indicating the corresponding expression of dsRNA in E. coli.

2.2. Impact of RNAi on Phenotypic Change

Oysters were fed with alga mixed with six different types of E. coli culture expressing distinct types of dsRNAs. Oysters were classified as growing obviously newly developed shell or not (Table 1 and Figure 2). Seven, nine and eight of the oysters fed on bacteria-expressing CgALAS, CgALAD and CgPBGD dsRNA displayed the newly deposited shell growth (Table 1). At the same time, the newly deposited shell growth was detected in nine, ten and ten oysters from the CgUROS, CgUROD and EGFP groups, respectively.
Compared with the images at the beginning of the experiment, the newly deposited shells of the ALAS and PBGD group represented a remarkable loss of orange pigmentation than the EGFP group (Figure 2). The L*a*b* value of the newly deposited shells was calculated to show the variations of the orange shell color phenotype (Figure 3). Oysters fed on E. coli-expressing dsRNA EGFP showed no significant changes in orange shell pigmentation (Figure 2c). In contrast, a number of oysters in the experiment groups displayed the orange pigmentation gain or loss phenotype. According to the L*a*b* value analysis, the a* and b* value of the ALAS group was significantly lower than the control group (Figure 3). As for the ALAD group, there were no significant phenotype changes in the shell orange pigmentation, and there was no significant difference in the L*a*b* value compared with the control group. It is noteworthy that oysters fed on the PBGD dsRNA displayed an obvious orange pigmentation loss. The newly deposited shell of PBGD group has higher lightness value (L*) and greater orange pigmentation loss than the control group (a*b* value of PBGD group was significantly lower than the control group). In contrast, the UROS UROD group showed more visible orange pigmentation and higher a*b* value than the EGFP group but was not significant.

2.3. Detection of RNAi Product in Mantle Tissues

The effectiveness of dsRNA delivery to oyster mantle tissues by feeding was determined by analyzing dsRNA in oysters fed on bacteria containing the L4440-EGFP by qPCR. EGFP dsRNA expression was detected in oysters fed on bacteria containing the L4440-EGFP plasmid but not in oysters fed on CgALAS-L4440, CgALAD-L4440, CgPBGD-L4440, CgUROS-L4440, CgUROD-L4440. The detection of RNAi products (CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD dsRNA) in oyster mantles was assessed as a function of the ratio of the interfering CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD dsRNAs to the endogenous CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD mRNA levels (Figure 4). A significant amount of RNAi products was found in CgALAS and CgUROS dsRNA oysters compared to EGFP dsRNA oysters at day 15 and at day 30. Significant amount of RNAi products was also found in CgALAD, CgPBGD and CgUROD dsRNA oysters at day 15. This is consistent with the dsRNA entrance in mantle tissues during the phase of interference treatment. At day 15, the levels of dsRNAs were 2.3, 2.1, 2.1, 3.9 and 2.1 times more abundant than endogenously expressed mRNAs in the CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD dsRNA oysters, respectively. At day 30, the levels of dsRNAs were 2.1 and 2.3 times more abundant than endogenously expressed mRNAs in RNAi-treated oysters expressing the CgALAS dsRNA and CgUROS dsRNA, respectively. Probabilities for two-tailed, paired t tests for differences in gene expression levels among control and experiment groups of C. gigas are shown in Supplementary Table S2.

2.4. Efficiency of RNAi on the Target Gene Transcription

qPCR results showed that in oysters fed on bacteria containing CgALAS-L4440, CgALAD-L4440, CgPBGD-L4440, CgUROS-L4440, CgUROD-L4440, dsRNA constructs showed reduced CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD expressions compared to the control group. As shown in Figure 5, CgALAS, CgPBGD and CgUROD mRNA levels were significantly diminished in C. gigas fed on bacteria-expressing CgALAS, CgPBGD and CgUROD dsRNA as compared to control group at day 15. In the ALAS group, these results were significant and the relative CgALAS mRNA expression levels dropped down to ~62% of the control values. Thus, the average knockdown was ~38%, with a maximum knockdown value of ~37.5% (p = 0.0476) at day 15. A significant decrease (97%) was observed in CgPBGD transcripts at day 15 compared to the EGFP dsRNA oysters (p < 0.0001). Remarkable decrease in CgUROD mRNA expression levels dropped down to ~98% of the control values (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in CgALAD/CgUROS transcripts neither between the ALAD group or UROS group and the control at both the middle and the end of interference exposure. At day 15, individual analysis revealed that 80% of individuals in the PBGD group, and all the individuals in UROD group showed decreased gene expression by more than 70% compared to the control (Supplementary Figure S1). At day 30, no individuals in experiment groups displayed decreased gene expression by more than 70% compared to the control group (Supplementary Figure S1).

3. Discussion

Oysters are filter-feeding animals, and their open vascular system makes traditional injection RNA interference methods unable to efficiently interfere the expression of genes. The bacteria-feeding RNAi method used in this study revealed the function of genes related to uroporphyrin pigmentation in C. gigas. The effect of porphyrin pigments on shell color has been reported in mollusks, and uroporphyrin I and III in oyster shells have also been identified [3,17,18]. Genes associated with the uroporphyrinogen synthesis have been characterized in marine snails and pacific oysters [9]. The first five genes were identified from C. gigas genome and were revealed to have significant expression levels among different shell-color oysters [36]. Previous studies provide candidate genes for porphyrin pigmentation in mollusks. The effect of dsRNA interference usually reached the maximum level at 15 to 30 days after the post-induction of dsRNA in C. gigas [26,37,38]. According to previous studies on C. gigas, feeding oysters with dsRNA for 35 days conducted the successful knockdown of the corresponding genes and observed oysters with newly deposited shell growth [31]. A total 30-day knockdown experiment was designed to obtain the maximum RNAi effect and RNAi phenotype of the newly deposited shell [26,31].
The data in this study revealed that the knockdown of the five haem pathway genes has different effects on orange pigmentation. To compare the level of color change in the newly deposited shell, the color parameters of L* (brightness), a* (red) and b* (yellow) between the experimental group and the control group were obtained. Results showed that the L* of the newly deposited shell of C. gigas in the CgPBGD group was significantly higher than that of the EGFP group, which means the newly formed shell was whiter. At the same time, the a* and b* values of the CgALAS group and the CgPBGD group were significantly lower than those of the control group, which means that the newly deposited shells in the experimental groups had less red and yellow. Through the RNAi bacterial feeding process, compared with the control group, on the fifteenth day, the average level of transcripts in the CgALAS and CgPBGD groups significantly decreased by 38% and 97%, which indicates that the loss of orange pigmentation has remarkable relations with the decreasing transcription of CgALAS and CgPBGD. In contrast, the CgUROS group newly deposited shells had a higher a* and b* value than the control group. It is noteworthy that the average level of transcripts in the CgUROS group was significantly reduced by 98% compared to the control group on the 15th day. ALAS is the rate-limiting enzyme of the haem pathway [39]. Studies have shown that the increasing expression levels of ALAS could simultaneously increase the production of uroporphyrin [22]. The rising activity of PBGD has been suggested to be associated with uroporphyrin I production [40,41]. Whiter shell appears when the activity of CgALAS and CgPBGD is reduced, and the non-enzymatic side paths fail to generate the uroporphyrins at regular bases. This phenotypic change revealed the functions of CgALAS and CgPBGD on uroporphyrin pigments synthesis. Accordingly, it could be proposed that the downregulation of CgALAS and CgPBGD gene affects the accumulation of uroporphyrin pigments in mantles and affects the coloration of the newly deposited shell.
The RNAi response was highly variable among individuals in this study. It had been inferred that the change in the amount of dsRNA that eventually enters the mantle cell may largely contribute to the variability of the RNAi response [37,38]. It should be noted that the expression level of CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS and CgUROD mRNA on the 30th day was lower than that on the 15th day. However, several individuals on the 30th day showed obvious high expression, such as No. 5 in the CgUROD group. These expression levels, which are significantly different from other individuals, affect the overall expression trend. The irregular expression level was also detected in the CgTyr knockdown and it has been speculated that the long-term feeding of bacteria may affect individual health and normal gene expression [31]. Although the significant downregulation of target genes was observed in this study, there are still parameters that need to be optimized. For example, the concentration of daily algae/bacterial co-inoculum, treatment duration and total number of individuals need to be optimized [26]. At the same time, when conducting research on shell-related interference, the selection of C. gigas at proper circadian rhythms is crucial. Higher shell growth could be obtained at water temperature between 18 °C and 24 °C, and shell development is increased in summer and autumn. Furthermore, the phenotypic change could take place in oyster mantles. With the expression modulation of the haem pathway genes, the accumulation of uroporphyrins could be affected. Therefore, the concentration of uroporphyrin between the experiment and control group could be analyzed by HPLC to make the data more detailed [17].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Oyster and Algal Culture

One-year-old Pacific oysters with the whole orange shell (120 individuals) were collected from the culture population in Weihai, Shandong, China (Oct 2020). Oysters were randomly stuck with labels, divided into six groups of 20 oysters, and placed into six tanks of 40 L aquarium equipped with an open circulatory system of natural seawater (30 psu) at a flow rate of 12 mL min−1. They were acclimated 7 days before the start of the experiment and continuously fed with Platymonas subcordiformis (25,000 cells mL−1) and Nitzschia closterium f. minutissima (35,000 cells mL−1). Alga P. subcordiformis and N. closterium f. minutissima cultures were grown in f/2 medium using sterilized seawater. Cultures were maintained at 19 ± 1 °C, under a light:dark (L:D) 14:10 cycle. P. subcordiformis has four flagellates and is 16–30 μm long; N. closterium f. minutissima has no flagellate and is 12–23 μm long.

4.2. Vector Construction and Expression of dsRNA

The L4440 vector was selected to generating dsRNAs in an inducible manner in E. coli. L4440 contains two convergent T7 polymerase promoters in opposite orientations separated by a multi-cloning site [33]. The first five genes of the haem pathway (aminole-vulinic acid synthase-CgALAS, aminole-vulinic acid dehydratase-CgALAD, porphobilinogen deaminase-CgPBGD, uroporphyrinogen-III synthase-CgUROS, uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase-CgUROD) were targeted for degradation by RNAi. The sequence of five genes were amplified by PCR based on the sequence information downloaded from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (Date: 1 February 2021; NCBI, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; Accession: PRJEB35351; ALAS: LOC105330021; ALAD: LOC105330983; PBGD: LOC105326792 UROS: LOC105336067; UROD: LOC105347428). DNA fragments of CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD were amplified from C. gigas by PCR using specific primers (Table 2). Appropriate restriction enzyme sites were engineered in the 5′ ends of both PCR primers for sub-cloning. Enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) was used as a negative control in the experiments as it did not have a natural target RNA in C. gigas. Fragments were purified and ligated into L4440 (VECT75473, Huayueyang Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) vectors, which were used to transform DH5α bacteria (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Noted for each construct, the bacteria were cultured in Luria broth (LB) containing 100 μg mL−1 ampicillin. L4440 (VECT75473, Huayueyang Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), generating constructed vectors CgALAS-L4440, CgALAD-L4440, CgPBGD-L4440, CgUROS-L4440, CgUROD-L4440, EGFP-L4440, as confirmed by sequencing. Competent E. coli cells HT115 (F-mcrA mcrB, IN(rrnD-rrnE)1 rnc14::Tn10(DE3 lavUV5::T7 polymerase)), lacking the dsRNA-specific endonuclease RNase III, were used to produce a high level of specific dsRNAs [33]. HT115 (DE3) competent cells were prepared using standard CaCl2 methodology and were transformed with CgALAS-L4440, CgALAD-L4440, CgPBGD-L4440, CgUROS-L4440, CgUROD-L4440, EGFP-L4440, respectively. RNA extraction was performed on non-induced E. coli and IPTG-induced E. coli transformed with a specific gene using Bacteria RNA Extraction Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China).

4.3. RNAi Feeding Procedures

During the interference phase, six tanks of orange shell oysters were continuously exposed to the alga/dsRNA-producing bacteria co-inoculum. Six dsRNA-producing bacteria were prepared by inducing E. coli strain HT115 (DE3) bacteria transformed with three constructed plasmids (CgALAS-L4440, CgALAD-L4440, CgPBGD-L4440, CgUROS-L4440, CgUROD-L4440, EGFP-L4440) with isopropylβ-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG). Algae/bacteria co-inoculum was produced by mixing algal culture and bacterial suspension at a ratio of 100 bacteria per algal cell, with a final p. subcordiformis concentration of 25,000 cells mL−1 and N. closterium f. minutissima concentration of 35,000 cells mL−1. The ratio was optimized by increasing algal concentration according to Payton et al. [26]. Food reserves were renewed with fresh algae/bacteria co-inoculum every 24 h. Specifically, E. coli strain HT115 bacteria containing recombinant plasmid were grown overnight with shaking in LB with ampicillin (50 μg mL−1) and tetracycline (12.5 μg mL−1) at 37 °C. Five milliliters of overnight culture was diluted 100-fold in 500 mL of fresh LB medium containing ampicillin (50 μg mL−1) and tetracycline (12.5 μg mL−1) and allowed to grow to OD595 = 0.4. dsRNA production was induced by 0.4 mM IPTG for 4 h at 37 °C under agitation. Then, induced bacterial cultures were centrifuged and bacterial pellets were resuspended in 500 mL P. subcordiformis and 125 mL N closterium f. minutissima algae culture liquid. Bacteria adsorption rate on the algae was evaluated by preliminary experiments [31]. The adsorption rate was assessed as the ratio between the number of colonies from filtrated suspension and from total inoculum, which was calculated as 99%. Concentrations of algae and bacteria were monitored daily with 2800 UV–visible spectrophotometer (Unico, USA) for the duration of the experiment. Mantle tissues from 10 oysters per condition were individually sampled at the end of the interference phase (day 15 and day 30). No oyster died during the 15-day and 30-day exposure experiments. A total of 120 oysters were dissected. All experiments were performed in accordance with our institutional guidelines.

4.4. Phenotypic Change Statistical Analyses

Computer vision was used to obtain the objective and non-destructive assessment of color patterns in non-uniformly colored surfaces. L*a*b* international standard for color measurements was used to measure the shell color changes though experiments. L* is the lightness component, which ranges from 0 to 100, and parameters a* (from green to red) and b* (from blue to yellow) range from −120 to 120 [42]. The photographs of oyster shells were taken by a digital camera (Nikon D4). By comparing with the photo at the start of the RNAi experiment, individual oysters from the six groups were classified to either be having the newly deposited shell or not, and the details could be found in Table 1. Oysters which had a newly deposited shell were used to analyze the L*, a* and b* values. The lightness, a, and b values obtained in Photoshop CS6 (Adobe System Incorporated, USA) were converted into L*a*b* values using the following formulas [43]:
L * = Lightness 255 × 100
a * = 240 a 255 − 120
b * = 240 b 255 − 120
Differences between groups (the color parameter) were investigated using a two-tailed Student’s t test. For all statistical results, a probability of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Analyses were performed using IBMSPSS Statistics 20.0 (SPSS, USA). Probabilities for two-tailed, paired t tests for differences in L*a*b* value among the control and experimental groups of C. gigas could be found in Supplementary Table S1.

4.5. Total RNA Extraction and qPCR Analyses

RNA extraction was performed on the individual sample using the RNA-easy isolation reagent (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), following the manufacturer’s instruction. The total RNA of 1 μg was subjected to reverse transcription using HiScript III 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit with gDNA wiper (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Relative quantification of gene expression was estimated for each gene using the ΔΔCt method [44]. Primer sets were designed from full cDNA sequences of CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD, EGFP [26], and elongation factor I (Ef1) which were used as reference genes (Table 2). A dissociation curve was generated in each case to check that only a single band was amplified. The primer sets (CgALAS-Q-O) for qPCR analysis of endogenous ALAS mRNA levels were derived from the region outside the cloned fragment of CgALAS to prevent the amplification of RNAi products (CgALAS dsRNA). The primer sets (CgALAS-Q-I) were designed in the region inside the cloned fragment. Similarly, the primer sets CgALAD-Q-O, CgPBGD-Q-O, CgUROS-Q-O, CgUROD-Q-O and CgALAD-Q-I, CgPBGD-Q-I, CgUROS-Q-I, CgUROD-Q-I were designed outside and inside of the cloned fragment of CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD, respectively. The qPCR was carried in triplicate for each sample on a LightCycler 480 real-time PCR instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Burgess Hill, UK) using ChamQ SYBR Color qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Cycling parameters were 95 °C for 5 min and then 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 20 s. Melting curve analyses were performed following the PCR to verify specific amplification. PCR efficiency (E) was assessed for each primer pair by determining the slope of standard curves obtained from cDNA serial dilution analyses of different experimental samples. Relative gene expression data were analyzed using the comparative threshold cycle (Ct) 2−ΔCt method, where the ΔCt = Ct (interest gene)−Ct (housekeeping gene). Interest gene values were normalized in each sample with Ef1 housekeeping gene level, as no significant differences in Ct values were observed in Ef1 among the conditions. Results were expressed as the number of copies of gene per copy of Ef1. Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Software 8 with an independent t-test. Differences were deemed statistically significant at p < 0.05.The detection of RNAi products (interest gene dsRNA) in oyster mantles was assessed as the mean ± SE of individuals 2−(ΔCt(CgInside)–ΔCt(CgOutside)), i.e., the ratio of the CgALAS mRNA level measured with primer sets CgALAS-I (quantification of both endogenously expressed CgALAS mRNAs and CgALAS dsRNAs) to the CgALAS mRNA level obtained with primer sets CgALAS-O (to quantify the endogenously expressed CgALAS mRNAs). Therefore, this ratio is equal to (gene dsRNAs + gene mRNAs)/gene mRNAs = (gene ds RNAs/gene mRNAs) + 1.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study is further evidence of the bacteria-feeding RNAi with algae as the carrier of E. coli HT115 that produces dsRNA, providing an effective long-lasting method to trigger specific RNAi responses of C. gigas. When genes related to the accumulation of uroporphyrin (e.g., CgALAS, CgPBGD) were knocked down, the newly deposited shell of C. gigas showed more whiteness and less orange. Conversely, when the genes involved in uroporphyrinogen degradation were interfered (e.g., CgUROS) with, the newly deposited shell exhibited more orange. The study indicated that key haem pathway genes possess a vital role in porphyrin pigmentation, and thus influenced the shell color formation of C. gigas.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22116120/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.L. and B.H.; methodology, B.H.; software, B.H.; validation, Q.L., H.Y. and B.H.; formal analysis, B.H.; investigation, B.H.; resources, Q.L.; data curation, B.H.; writing—original draft preparation, B.H.; writing—review and editing, Q.L.; visualization, B.H.; supervision, Q.L. and H.Y.; project administration, Q.L.; funding acquisition, Q.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972789), Industrial Development Project of Qingdao City (20-3-4-16-nsh), and Science and Technology Development Project of Weihai City (2018NS01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal care and use procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Ocean University of China (Permit Number: 20141201), and were performed according to the Chinese Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (GB/T 35892-2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data used in this study have been provided in the main text and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CgALAS: 5-aminolaevulinate synthase of Crassostrea gigas; CgALAD: delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase of C. gigas; CgPBGD: porphobilinogen deaminase of C. gigas; CgUROS: uroporphyrinogen-III synthase of C. gigas; CgUROD: uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase of C. gigas.

References

  1. Cuthill, I.C.; Allen, W.L.; Arbuckle, K.; Caspers, B.; Chaplin, G.; Hauber, M.E.; Hill, G.E.; Jablonski, N.G.; Jiggins, C.D.; Kelber, A.; et al. The biology of color. Science 2017, 357, eaan0221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Comfort, A. The pigmentation of molluscan shells. Biol. Rev. 1951, 26, 285–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Williams, S.T. Molluscan shell colour. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2017, 92, 1039–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kocot, K.M.; Aguilera, F.; McDougall, C.; Jackson, D.J.; Degnan, B.M. Sea shell diversity and rapidly evolving secretomes: Insights into the evolution of biomineralization. Front. Zool. 2016, 13, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Taylor, J.D.; Kennedy, W.J.; Hall, A. The shell structure and mineralogy of the Bivalvia. Introduction. Nuculacea-Trigonacea. Bull. Brit. Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool. 1969, 3, 1–125. [Google Scholar]
  6. Parvizi, F.; Monsefi, M.; Noori, A.; Ranjbar, M.S. Mantle histology and histochemistry of three pearl oysters: Pinctada persica, Pinctada radiata and Pteria penguin. Molluscan Res. 2017, 38, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boettiger, A.; Ermentrout, B.; Oster, G. The neural origins of shell structure and pattern in aquatic mollusks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 6837–6842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Budd, A.; McDougall, C.; Green, K.; Degnan, B.M. Control of shell pigmentation by secretory tubules in the abalone mantle. Front. Zool. 2014, 11, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Williams, S.T.; Lockyer, A.E.; Dyal, P.; Nakano, T.; Churchill, C.K.C.; Speiser, D.I. Colorful seashells: Identification of haem pathway genes associated with the synthesis of porphyrin shell color in marine snails. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 7, 10379–10397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Feng, D.; Li, Q.; Yu, H.; Kong, L.; Du, S. Identification of conserved proteins from diverse shell matrix proteome in Crassostrea gigas: Characterization of genetic bases regulating shell formation. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lemer, S.; Saulnier, D.; Gueguen, Y.; Planes, S. Identification of genes associated with shell color in the black-lipped pearl oyster, Pinctada margaritifera. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bai, Z.; Zheng, H.; Lin, J.; Wang, G.; Li, J. Comparative analysis of the transcriptome in tissues secreting purple and white nacre in the Pearl Mussel Hyriopsis cumingii. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Feng, D.; Li, Q.; Yu, H.; Kong, L.; Du, S. Transcriptional profiling of long non-coding RNAs in mantle of Crassostrea gigas and their association with shell pigmentation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Comfort, A. Acid-Soluble pigments of shells 1. The distribution of porphyrin fluorescence in molluscan shells. Biochem. J. 1949, 44, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Comfort, A. Molluscan shells as a practical source of uroporphyrin-I. Science 1950, 112, 279–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nicholas, R.E.H.; Comfort, A. Acid-Soluble pigments of molluscan shells.4. Identification of shell porphyrins with particular reference to conchoporphyrin. Biochem. J. 1949, 45, 208–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Williams, S.T.; Ito, S.; Wakamatsu, K.; Goral, T.; Edwards, N.P.; Wogelius, R.A.; Henkel, T.; de Oliveira, L.F.; Maia, L.F.; Strekopytov, S.; et al. Identification of shell colour pigments in marine snails Clanculus pharaonius and C. margaritarius (Trochoidea: Gastropoda). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Bonnard, M. Chemical evidence of rare porphyrins in purple shells of Crassostrea gigas oyster. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hendry, G.A.F.; Jones, O.T.G. Hemes and chlorophylls-comparison of function and formation. J. Med. Genet. 1980, 17, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Besur, S.; Hou, W.; Schmeltzer, P.; Bonkovsky, H.J.M. Clinically important features of porphyrin and heme metabolism and the porphyrias. Metabolites 2014, 4, 977–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Hibino, A.; Petri, R.; Buechs, J.; Ohtake, H. Production of uroporphyrinogen III, which is the common precursor of all tetrapyrrole cofactors, from 5-aminolevulinic acid by Escherichia coli expressing thermostable enzymes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 7337–7344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. To-Figueras, J.; Ducamp, S.; Clayton, J.; Badenas, C.; Delaby, C.; Ged, C.; Lyoumi, S.; Gouya, L.; de Verneuil, H.; Beaumont, C.; et al. ALAS2 acts as a modifier gene in patients with congenital erythropoietic porphyria. Blood 2011, 118, 1443–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yuan, C.; Zhang, W.; Hu, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, M.; Han, B.; Ding, J.; Chang, Y. Genome-wide identification, characterisation and expression analysis of the ALAS gene in the Yesso scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) with different shell colours. Gene 2020, 757, 144925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rivera, A.; Hammel, J.; Haen, K.; Danka, E.; Cieniewicz, B.; Winters, I.; Posfai, D.; Wörheide, G.; Lavrov, D.; Knight, S.; et al. RNA interference in marine and freshwater sponges: Actin knockdown in Tethya wilhelma and Ephydatia muelleri by ingested dsRNA expressing bacteria. BMC Biotechnol. 2011, 11, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Jiang, K.; Jiang, L.; Nie, H.; Huo, Z.; Yan, X. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of tyrosinases (tyr) in four shell-color strains of Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Payton, L.; Perrigault, M.; Bourdineaud, J.-P.; Marcel, A.; Massabuau, J.-C.; Tran, D. Trojan horse strategy for non-invasive interference of clock gene in the oyster Crassostrea gigas. Mar. Biotechnol. 2017, 19, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dupuy, C.; André, V.; Thong, L.; Claude, R.; Nabila, M.; Jacques, L.; Collos, Y.; Solange, L. Feeding rate of the oyster Crassostrea gigas in a natural planktonic community of the Mediterranean Thau Lagoon. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2000, 205, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cole, J. Interactions between bacteria and algae in aquatic ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2003, 13, 291–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tosteson, T.; Ballantine, D.; Tosteson, C.; Hensley, V.; Bardales, A. Associated bacterial flora, growth, and toxicity of cultured benthic dinoflagellates Ostreopsis lenticularis and Gambierdiscus toxicus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989, 55, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Doucette, G. Interactions between bacteria and harmful algae: A review. Nat. Toxins. 1995, 3, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Feng, D.; Li, Q.; Yu, H. RNA interference by ingested dsrna-expressing bacteria to study shell biosynthesis and pigmentation in Crassostrea gigas. Mar. Biotechnol. 2019, 21, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schumpert, C.A.; Dudycha, J.L.; Patel, R.C. Development of an efficient RNA interference method by feeding for the microcrustacean Daphnia. BMC Biotechnol. 2015, 15, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Timmons, L.; Court, D.L.; Fire, A. Ingestion of bacterially expressed dsRNAs can produce specific and potent genetic interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Gene 2001, 263, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yu, H.; Zhao, X.; Li, Q. Genome-wide identification and characterization of long intergenic noncoding RNAs and their potential association with larval development in the Pacific oyster. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Han, Z.; Li, Q. Mendelian inheritance of orange shell color in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Aquaculture 2020, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hu, B.; Li, Q.; Yu, H.; Du, S. Identification and characterization of key haem pathway genes associated with the synthesis of porphyrin in Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas). Comp. Biochem. Physio. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2021, 255, 110595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fabioux, C.; Corporeau, C.; Quillien, V.; Favrel, P.; Huvet, A. In vivo RNA interference in oyster -vasa silencing inhibits germ cell development. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 2566–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Huvet, A.; Béguel, J.-P.; Cavaleiro, N.; Thomas, Y.; Quillien, V.; Boudry, P.; Alunno-bruscia, M.; Fabioux, C. Disruption of amylase genes by RNA interference affects reproduction in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. J. Exp. Biol. 2015, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Hunter, G.A.; Ferreira, G.C. 5-aminolevulinate synthase: Catalysis of the first step of heme biosynthesis. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2009, 55, 102–110. [Google Scholar]
  40. Siersema, P.D.; Derooij, F.W.M.; Edixhoven-Bosdijk, A.; Wilson, J.H.P. Erythrocyte porphobilinogen deaminase activity in porphyria-cutanea-tarda. Clin. Chem. 1990, 36, 1779–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bayliss, R.I.S. The metabolic basis of inherited disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1967, 58, 600–601. [Google Scholar]
  42. Papadakis, S.; Abdul Malek, S.; Kamdem, R.E.; Yam, K. A versatile and inexpensive technique for measuring color of foods. Food Technol. 2000, 54, 48–51. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yam, K.L.; Papadakis, S.E. A simple digital imaging method for measuring and analyzing color of food surfaces. J. Food Eng. 2004, 61, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 22 06120 g001 550
Figure 1. Plasmid constructs and induction assays. The red box indicates bands associated with ALAS, ALAD, PBGD, UROS, UROD and EGFP double-stranded RNAs, from the RNA extraction of the IPTG-induced E. coli transformed with CgALAS-L4440, CgALAD-L4440, CgPBGD-L4440, CgUROS-L4440, CgUROD-L4440, EGFP-L4440: (a) Plasmid construction of CgALAS-L4440 with CgALAS fragment sizes and total plasmid sizes; (b) Plasmid construction of CgALAD-L4440 with CgALAD fragment sizes and total plasmid sizes; (c) Plasmid construction of CgPBGD-L4440 with CgPBGD fragment sizes and total plasmid sizes; (d) Plasmid construction of CgUROS-L4440 with CgUROS fragment sizes and total plasmid sizes; (e) Plasmid construction of CgUROD-L4440 with CgUROD fragment sizes and total plasmid sizes; (f) Plasmid construction of EGFP-L4440 with EGFP fragment sizes and total plasmid sizes.
Figure 1. Plasmid constructs and induction assays. The red box indicates bands associated with ALAS, ALAD, PBGD, UROS, UROD and EGFP double-stranded RNAs, from the RNA extraction of the IPTG-induced E. coli transformed with CgALAS-L4440, CgALAD-L4440, CgPBGD-L4440, CgUROS-L4440, CgUROD-L4440, EGFP-L4440: (a) Plasmid construction of CgALAS-L4440 with CgALAS fragment sizes and total plasmid sizes; (b) Plasmid construction of CgALAD-L4440 with CgALAD fragment sizes and total plasmid sizes; (c) Plasmid construction of CgPBGD-L4440 with CgPBGD fragment sizes and total plasmid sizes; (d) Plasmid construction of CgUROS-L4440 with CgUROS fragment sizes and total plasmid sizes; (e) Plasmid construction of CgUROD-L4440 with CgUROD fragment sizes and total plasmid sizes; (f) Plasmid construction of EGFP-L4440 with EGFP fragment sizes and total plasmid sizes.
Ijms 22 06120 g001
Ijms 22 06120 g002 550
Figure 2. Analysis of pigmentation in newly deposited shell. Newly deposited shells are highlighted in red. (a) Photographic representation of C. gigas from group ALAS. (b) Photographic representation of C. gigas from group PBGD. (c) Photographic representation of C. gigas from group EGFP. (d) Bigger image for newly deposited shell C. gigas from group ALAS. (e) Bigger image for newly deposited shell C. gigas from group PBGD.
Figure 2. Analysis of pigmentation in newly deposited shell. Newly deposited shells are highlighted in red. (a) Photographic representation of C. gigas from group ALAS. (b) Photographic representation of C. gigas from group PBGD. (c) Photographic representation of C. gigas from group EGFP. (d) Bigger image for newly deposited shell C. gigas from group ALAS. (e) Bigger image for newly deposited shell C. gigas from group PBGD.
Ijms 22 06120 g002
Ijms 22 06120 g003 550
Figure 3. The analysis of L*a*b* value of the newly deposited shell. Comparison of L*a*b* value of newly deposited shell between groups CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD and the EGFP group. The p values from a t-test demonstrate ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.0005 or **** p < 0.0001; and ns demonstrates no significance.
Figure 3. The analysis of L*a*b* value of the newly deposited shell. Comparison of L*a*b* value of newly deposited shell between groups CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD and the EGFP group. The p values from a t-test demonstrate ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.0005 or **** p < 0.0001; and ns demonstrates no significance.
Ijms 22 06120 g003
Ijms 22 06120 g004 550
Figure 4. Detection of RNAi products in mantle tissues. The ratio of the interfering CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD dsRNAs to the endogenous CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD mRNA level are in marked red on the top of each column. The orange bars represent the ratio of CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD of the RNAi groups, respectively, and the blue bars represent the CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD genes ratio of the EGFP group, respectively.
Figure 4. Detection of RNAi products in mantle tissues. The ratio of the interfering CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD dsRNAs to the endogenous CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD mRNA level are in marked red on the top of each column. The orange bars represent the ratio of CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD of the RNAi groups, respectively, and the blue bars represent the CgALAS, CgALAD, CgPBGD, CgUROS, CgUROD genes ratio of the EGFP group, respectively.
Ijms 22 06120 g004
Ijms 22 06120 g005 550
Figure 5. Quantitation of gene expression levels after RNAi treatment in C. gigas. Levels of respective gene transcripts relative to EfI transcripts analyzed by qPCR and expressed as the number of copies of interest gene per copy of EfI in the mantle of oysters at the end of interference day 15 and day 30 phases, expressed in fold change. The orange bars represent the gene expression level of the RNAi group and the blue bar represents the gene expression level of the EGFP group. The p values from a t-test demonstrate * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.0005.
Figure 5. Quantitation of gene expression levels after RNAi treatment in C. gigas. Levels of respective gene transcripts relative to EfI transcripts analyzed by qPCR and expressed as the number of copies of interest gene per copy of EfI in the mantle of oysters at the end of interference day 15 and day 30 phases, expressed in fold change. The orange bars represent the gene expression level of the RNAi group and the blue bar represents the gene expression level of the EGFP group. The p values from a t-test demonstrate * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.0005.
Ijms 22 06120 g005
Table
Table 1. Phenotypic change of C. gigas characterized by the whole orange shell after dsRNA interference (individual was denoted as − or + corresponding to showing the obviously newly deposited shell or not.).
Table 1. Phenotypic change of C. gigas characterized by the whole orange shell after dsRNA interference (individual was denoted as − or + corresponding to showing the obviously newly deposited shell or not.).
Group No. 1No. 2No. 3No. 4No. 5No. 6No. 7No. 8No. 9No. 10
ALASDay 15−−−−+−−−−−
Day 30+−−−+−++++
ALADDay 15−++−+−−−+−
Day 30++−−+++−−−
PBGDDay 15+−+−−+−+−−
Day 30+−−+−+−+−−
UROSDay 15++−−+−−−++
Day 30−+++−−+−−−
URODDay 15++−+−−−+−−
Day 30−++−+−+++−
EGFPDay 15−−−−++−+−−
Day 30+++−++++−−
Table
Table 2. Nucleotide sequences of specific primer pairs used in the present study.
Table 2. Nucleotide sequences of specific primer pairs used in the present study.
ExperimentPrimer Names Primer SequencesProduct Length
Plasmid construction
ALAS-RNAi-FCTCGAGCCCTCTCCATGAGGGGCTAG436 bp
ALAS-RNAi-RCTAGAGTCCCTCTGCCCTACTCCTGC
ALAD-RNAi-FAGCTTCAACTCTTCAGAGTGGGATCCATC 395 bp
ALAD-RNAi-RGCCGCATACCACAATGTCCATGACATGTATATG
PBGD-RNAi-FAGCTTATTGATGCCTTGTCAGCTGCA425 bp
PBGD-RNAi-RGCCGCCCAGTTTCTGTAGGCGCATGT
UROS-RNAi-FCTCGAGAGACAGTGAGCAGGCAAAGAACC437 bp
UROS-RNAi-RCTAGAGGATACATGGTACATTGGTTTAGGG
UROD-RNAi-FAGCTTTTAGGGATAGGAATAGAAATTGAAGAAG388 bp
UROD-RNAi-RGCCGCATTACTGTCAAACACCTGGAGCAA
EGFP-RNAi-FAGCTTAGCAAGGGCGAGGAGCTG714 bp
EGFP-RNAi-RGCCGCTTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCC
Quantitative real-time PCR
ALAS-Q-I-FATGAGGGGCTAGAGGCTGAGATAG184 bp
ALAS-Q-I-FATGAGGGGCTAGAGGCTGAGATAG
ALAD-Q-I-FAGGTACGGCATCAACACACTACG213 bp
ALAD-Q-I-FAGGTACGGCATCAACACACTACG
PBGD-Q-I-FAGACAGTCCTTATGATGTGGTAGTGATG161 bp
PBGD-Q-I-FAGACAGTCCTTATGATGTGGTAGTGATG
UROS-Q-I-FGAGAGACAGTGAGCAGGCAAAG211 bp
UROS-Q-I-FGAGAGACAGTGAGCAGGCAAAG
UROD-Q-I-FGGAATAGAAATTGAAGAAGGAAAGGGAATG179 bp
UROD-Q-I-RCCAGCGAAGCCGATGAGAGG
ALAS-Q-O-FCTTCATCTTCACCACCAGTCTCC211 bp
ALAS-Q-O-RGCATAAGGCAGCATCACCAAC
ALAD-Q-O-FGGGCGGGATACGGGAACAG217 bp
ALAD-Q-O-RGCTAGACCAGGCTTAACCATCAG
PBGD-Q-O-FCACAGCGAAATGGGAAAGGAGAG182 bp
PBGD-Q-O-RCGTGGATACTTTGGCGGTAATAAGC
UROS-Q-O-FAAAGGCTTTAGAGAGTCATGGTTACG183 bp
UROS-Q-O-RAGTGGAGTGTCTGTTGAGTTGAGG
UROD-Q-O-FCGACTCACGGAACAGAACATAGAAC199 bp
UROD-Q-O-RTGGAATACAGCATACATGGATCAAGG
EGFP-Q-FGTGCTTCAGCCGCTACCC202 bp
EGFP-Q-R GATGTTGCCGTCCTCCTTG
EFI-F CAAGAACGGAGATGCTGGTATGG175 bp
EF1-RGGTGACTTTGCCCTGTGATGG
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, B.; Li, Q.; Yu, H. RNA Interference by Ingested Dsrna-Expressing Bacteria to Study Porphyrin Pigmentation in Crassostrea gigas. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6120. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22116120

AMA Style

Hu B, Li Q, Yu H. RNA Interference by Ingested Dsrna-Expressing Bacteria to Study Porphyrin Pigmentation in Crassostrea gigas. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(11):6120. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22116120

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Biyang, Qi Li, and Hong Yu. 2021. "RNA Interference by Ingested Dsrna-Expressing Bacteria to Study Porphyrin Pigmentation in Crassostrea gigas" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 11: 6120. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22116120

APA Style

Hu, B., Li, Q., & Yu, H. (2021). RNA Interference by Ingested Dsrna-Expressing Bacteria to Study Porphyrin Pigmentation in Crassostrea gigas. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(11), 6120. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22116120

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop