Next Article in Journal
Advances in Lipid Extraction Methods—A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Polyphosphate Kinase 2 (PPK2) Enzymes: Structure, Function, and Roles in Bacterial Physiology and Virulence
Previous Article in Journal
Mucins Dynamics in Physiological and Pathological Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
The N-Acetylglucosamine Kinase from Yarrowia lipolytica Is a Moonlighting Protein
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Highly Active Thermophilic L-Asparaginase from Melioribacter roseus Represents a Novel Large Group of Type II Bacterial L-Asparaginases from Chlorobi-Ignavibacteriae-Bacteroidetes Clade

by
Maria Dumina
1,*,
Alexander Zhgun
1,
Marina Pokrovskaya
2,
Svetlana Aleksandrova
2,
Dmitry Zhdanov
2,
Nikolay Sokolov
2 and
Michael El’darov
1,†
1
Group of Fungal Genetic Engineering, Federal Research Center “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 117312 Moscow, Russia
2
Laboratory of Medical Biotechnology, Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, 119121 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Deceased.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(24), 13632; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413632
Submission received: 23 November 2021 / Revised: 15 December 2021 / Accepted: 17 December 2021 / Published: 20 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Molecular Microbiology)

Abstract

:
L-asparaginase (L-ASNase) is a biotechnologically relevant enzyme for the pharmaceutical, biosensor and food industries. Efforts to discover new promising L-ASNases for different fields of biotechnology have turned this group of enzymes into a growing family with amazing diversity. Here, we report that thermophile Melioribacter roseus from Ignavibacteriae of the Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi group possesses two L-ASNases—bacterial type II (MrAII) and plant-type (MrAIII). The current study is focused on a novel L-ASNase MrAII that was expressed in Escherichia coli, purified and characterized. The enzyme is optimally active at 70 °C and pH 9.3, with a high L-asparaginase activity of 1530 U/mg and L-glutaminase activity ~19% of the activity compared with L-asparagine. The kinetic parameters KM and Vmax for the enzyme were 1.4 mM and 5573 µM/min, respectively. The change in MrAII activity was not significant in the presence of 10 mM Ni2+, Mg2+ or EDTA, but increased with the addition of Cu2+ and Ca2+ by 56% and 77%, respectively, and was completely inhibited by Zn2+, Fe3+ or urea solutions 2–8 M. MrAII displays differential cytotoxic activity: cancer cell lines K562, Jurkat, LnCap, and SCOV-3 were more sensitive to MrAII treatment, compared with normal cells. MrAII represents the first described enzyme of a large group of uncharacterized counterparts from the Chlorobi-Ignavibacteriae-Bacteroidetes clade.

1. Introduction

L-asparaginase (EC 3.5.1.1; L-asparagine amidohydrolase) (L-ASNase) is a biotechnologically relevant enzyme used in the pharmaceutical, biosensor and food industries [1,2,3]. It catalyzes the conversion of the amino acid L-asparagine (L-Asn) to L-aspartic acid and ammonia [4]. The enzyme is firstly known for its anticarcinogenic properties. L-ASNase selectively targets the metabolism of susceptible cancer cells by exploiting deficiencies in metabolic pathways. The enzyme exhibits a depletion effect on the concentration of L-Asn in the extracellular fluid. A diminished level of L-Asn and the inability of susceptible tumor cells to synthesize their own L-Asn leads to the inhibition of protein synthesis, cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase, and ultimately apoptosis in leukemic cells [5,6].
The enzyme is used in the food industry as a processing agent to reduce the acrylamide levels in commercial fried foods [2,7]. L-ASNase catalyzes the hydrolysis of L-Asn, not allowing the reaction of reducing sugars with this amino acid for the generation of acrylamide, classified as “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen” [8].
The application of L-ASNase in biosensors allows monitoring L-Asn levels both for diagnostic purposes and the food industry [9,10,11,12].
Continuous research efforts to discover new promising L-ASNases for different fields of biotechnology have turned this group of enzymes into a growing family with amazing diversity. L-ASNases have been isolated from many archaea, bacteria, fungi, and yeast [3,13], and L-ASNases of plant and mammalian origin are now also known [14,15,16].
According to the classification historically applied, L-ASNases are divided into three major groups: bacterial-type L-asparaginases, plant-type L-asparaginases, and Rhizobial-type L-asparaginases [13].
Bacterial L-ASNases are subdivided into type I and type II [17]. Type I L-ASNases are involved in nitrogen metabolism and appear to be expressed constitutively [18]. These cytoplasmic enzymes show low affinity towards L-Asn, with KM values in the millimolar range [17]. On the other hand, bacterial type II L-ASNases appear to participate in carbon metabolism and their expression is tightly regulated by different factors [18]. Type-II enzymes are located in the periplasmic space. They exhibit high specific activity against L-Asn with KM values in two orders of magnitude lower (micromolar KM) compared to bacterial type I L-ASNases [13].
Plant-type L-ASNases or type III L-ASNases appear to play the dominant role in asparagine degradation, by hydrolyzing the side-chain amide bond of L-Asn or its β-peptides in a significant fraction of higher plants [19]. These enzymes belong to the superfamily of N-terminal nucleophile hydrolases [17]. Two forms of plant-type L-asparaginases are described, potassium-dependent and potassium-independent, which are immunologically distinct. High KM values (millimolar) of these enzymes restrict their application in biomedicine [17,19,20].
Rhizobial-type L-ASNases include L-ASNases displaying sequence homology with L-ASNase from the soil-living bacteria Rhizobium etli [19]. In R. etli, two asparaginase activities were identified: a thermostable and constitutive asparaginase activity (asparaginase I); and asparaginase II, characterized by its thermolability, induced by asparagine, and repressed by the carbon source [19]. The properties of R. etli L-ASNases have yet to be elucidated. However, preliminary kinetic data indicate that these enzymes display submillimolar KM and no glutaminase activity, and thus can be considered as potential antileukemic agents [21].
Despite widespread acceptance, this classification, which is based on the source of the first enzymes that were discovered, may be misleading. L-ASNases of the three canonical types, i.e., bacterial-type, plant-type and R. etli-type, are found throughout several kingdoms of life. For example, Escherichia coli possesses not only bacterial type I (EcAI, encoded by the ansA gene) and type II (EcAII, ansB) L-ASNases but also plant-type L-ASNase—EcAIII (ybiK) [17,22]. Plant-type L-ASNases are also found in insects and mammals [23,24].
To correct the situation, Schultz da Silva et al. have recently proposed to remove the class name, and rename bacterial-type L-asparaginases, plant-type L-asparaginases, and Rhizobial-type L-asparaginases as Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3, respectively [25].
Here, we identified that Melioribacter roseus, belonging to a novel proposed phylum Ignavibacteriae of the Bacteroidetes-Chlorobi group [26], possesses two L-ASNases—Class 1 (known as bacterial-type) and Class 2 (plant-type)—that share a high similarity with the respective counterparts originating from other members of the Bacteroidetes-Chlorobi group. Both Class 1 and Class 2 enzymes were identified in the genomes of most of these microorganisms. According to previous proteomic data, these bacteria are engaged in biofilm-derived organic matter degradation, through high expression of hydrolases and, in particular, L-asparaginases [27]. However, none of these L-ASNases have been characterized to date.
M. roseus itself is a recently described moderately thermophilic, facultative anaerobic chemoorganotrophic bacterium, isolated from a microbial mat under the flow of hot water (46 °C) from a 2775-m-deep oil exploration well (Russia) [26].
Among the two annotated in the genome of M. roseus L-ASNases, Class 2 (plant-type) L-ASNase (MrAIII) and Class 1 (bacterial type II) L-ASNase (MrAII), MrAII was chosen for further detailed elucidation, as currently only bacterial type II enzymes are approved for biomedical application.
The present study focuses on MrAII biochemical characterization and preliminary assessment of in vitro cytotoxic activity to evaluate its potential as an anticancer agent. MrAII represents the first described enzyme of a large group of closely related bacterial type II L-ASNases, originating from the members of the Bacteroidetes-Chlorobi group.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Sequence Comparison of L-Asparaginases from M. roseus

The genomic sequence of the moderately thermophilic bacterium M. roseus P3M-2 has been completed and deposited as GenBank accession number NC_018178.1 [26,28]. Bioinformatics analysis of the available whole genome sequence revealed that M. roseus P3M-2 possesses two enzymes exhibiting L-asparaginase activity—WP_014855981.1 and WP_014855710.1—encoded by the MROS_RS06765 and MROS_RS05340 genes, respectively.
Homology search demonstrated that putative isoaspartyl peptidase/L-asparaginase WP_014855981.1 shared the highest identity with the previously characterized isoaspartyl peptidase/L-asparaginase from E. coli—WP_146849425.1—with 55.2% classified as plant-type L-ASNase EcAIII. When the amino acid sequence of WP_014855981.1 was aligned with the known plant-type L-ASNases, all previously identified catalytic residues, including the nucleophilic threonine residue, involved in autocleavage and catalysis, followed by a conserved pentapeptide (VGAVA), were found to be conserved in all the sequences [29] (Supplementary Material, Figure S1). Thus, enzyme WP_014855981.1 of M. roseus represents plant-type (Class 2) L-asparaginase—MrAIII. However, MrAIII shares ~40% identity with other characterized plant-type L-ASNases from Thermococcus kodakarensis (Q5JHT1.1) and Pyrobaculum calidifontis (ABO08395.1), with 43.1% and 39.5%, respectively.
The second identified L-ASNase in the M. roseus P3M-2 genome WP_014855710.1 was classified as bacterial L-ASNase type II (Class 1) (MrAII). The amino acid sequence comparison showed that MrAII displayed high homology with the wide group of uncharacterized L-ASNases from recently annotated genomes of Ignavibacteria bacterium (HGR20494.1, HFO52226.1, MBI5730500.1, HET53601.1) [30,31]—80.3–79.0%, Melioribacter sp. (NJD22110.1, MBS3945884.1)—80.5–78.3%, and Bacteroidetes bacterium (MBU0558988.1, MBU1097831.1, MBU0473869.1)—78.7–76.1% identity. However, the level of homology between MrAII and known type II L-ASNases, including those of FDA-approved for use as antileukemic agents, is rather low—lower than between MrAII and MrAIII (44.4%). The identity of the putative type II L-ASNase from M. roseus and well-characterized periplasmic L-ASNases from Pectobacterium atrosepticum (Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica) (GenBank accession No. AAP92666.3) [32,33] and Rhodospirillum rubrum (GenBank accession No. QXG80441.1) [34,35,36] is about 32.7% and 41.7%, respectively. The identity between MrAII and FDA-approved L-ASNases from E. coli (UniProtKB accession number P00805, marketed under the brand name Elspar, GenBank accession No. AAA23445.1) and Erwinia chrysanthemi (Dickeya chrysanthemi, Pectobacterium chrysanthemi) (UniProtKB accession number P06608, marketed under the brand name Erwinaze, GenBank accession No. AAS67028.1) is only 35.2% and 32.4%, respectively. Interestingly, the identity between thermophilic MrAII and bacterial type I L-ASNases with known structures from other thermophiles Thermococcus kodakarensis KOD1 (WP_011250607], Pyrococcus furiosus (WP_011013191.1), Pyrococcus horikoshii (WP_010884185.1) is 26.7–26.5%. The data indicate the low overall sequence similarity of MrAII with other previously characterized L-ASNases, of various origins and types (Figure 1).
Among two annotated in the genome of M. roseus L-ASNases—plant-type L-ASNase MrAIII (Class 2) (WP_014855981.1) and bacterial L-ASNase type II MrAII (Class 1) (WP_014855710.1)—MrAII was chosen for further detailed elucidation, as currently only bacterial type II enzymes are approved for biomedical application.

2.2. Gene Cloning, Expression and Recombinant Enzyme Purification

The native type II L-asparaginase gene from M. roseus (mrAII), which consists of 981 nucleotides corresponding to a polypeptide of 327 amino acids, was artificially synthesized and cloned into the pET-28a(+) vector under the control of the T7 promoter.
The constructed plasmid was transformed into the host E. coli BL21 (DE3) for the heterogeneous expression of MrAII. Enzyme purification of MrAII was achieved by ion-exchange chromatography with a final yield of 75.5% (Table 1).
The purified enzyme showed electrophoretic homogeneity with a single major band on the SDS-PAGE (Figure 2). The molecular weight of the purified enzyme was estimated to be approximately 34.5 kDa by SDS-PAGE (Figure 2), which was consistent with the theoretical value calculated from the amino acid sequence of the processed enzyme form (35.3 kDa).

2.3. Specific Activity of MrAII and Enzyme Kinetics

The recombinant type II L-ASNase from M. roseus exhibited high hydrolysis activity toward L-Asn with a specific activity of 1530 U/mg. Substrate specificity experiments demonstrated that MrAII exhibits additional L-glutaminase activity but no D-asparaginase activity. The enzyme could utilize L-glutamine as a substrate, with approximately 19% of the enzyme activity when L-Asn was used as the substrate.
The kinetic properties of the recombinant type II L-ASNase from M. roseus were assessed. Vmax was found to be 5573 µM/min. The KM for the substrate L-Asn was estimated to be 1.4 mM for MrAII.

2.4. Effect of Temperature, pH and Metal Ions on Enzyme Activity. Chemical Stability of MrAII

The activity of MrAII was evaluated at different temperatures, ranging from 37 to 80 °C. It was shown that the enzyme exhibited high activity in a range of temperatures from 60 to 75 °C, with a maximum at 70 °C (Figure 3a). The time course of thermal inactivation of purified L-asparaginase is shown in Figure 3b.
Significantly, MrAII retained more than 70% of its initial activity after 60 min incubation at 40 °C, close to the physiological temperature (Figure 3b).
The enzymatic activity of the purified enzyme was monitored in different pH systems, ranging from pH 4.0 to 9.5. MrAII exhibited maximum activity at pH 9.3, and only 20% of its at acidic pH was less than 7.0. The pH-dependent activity profile of MrAII in a working range of pH 7.0–9.5 is given in Figure 3c. According to experimental data, the recombinant enzyme retained high relative activity in a range of pH 7.5–9.5, independent of the buffer system.
The effect of various metal cations Ni2+, Cu2+, Mg2+, Zn2+, Ca2+, Fe3+ and EDTA added at a concentration of 10 mM on MrAII activity was examined (Figure 3d). No significant change in the enzyme activity was observed in the presence of Ni2+, Mg2+, or EDTA. The addition of Cu2+ and Ca2+ resulted in a 56% and 77% increase in MrAII activity, respectively. On the other hand, Zn2+ and Fe3+ completely inhibited the activity of the enzyme (Figure 3d).
The same results were obtained in the presence of 2–8 M urea solutions: MrAII completely lost its activity at all concentrations tested.

2.5. Determination of MrAII Cytotoxic Activity

To test the cytotoxic activity of MrAII, different types of human leukemic and solid tumor cancer cells along with normal fibroblasts and normal CD4+ T cells were cultivated in the presence of different concentrations of the enzyme. Cell viability and apoptosis induction were measured after 72 h of incubation (Figure 4, Supplementary Material, Figure S2). Table 2 represents the IC50 and IC90 values for the tested cell lines.
The K562 cell line was the most sensitive among cancer cells, and the enzyme was able to significantly decrease cell viability even at the lowest concentration 1 U/mL (Figure 4a). Normal CD4+ T cells were more resistant than cancer lymphocytes, and a significant decrease in cell viability was observed at concentrations higher than 10 U/mL. Both solid tumor cell lines LnCap and SCOV-3 demonstrated almost equal sensitivity to the enzyme (Figure 4b). Normal human fibroblast WI-38 cells were also sensitive to low concentrations of the enzyme (1–15 U/mL); however, they appeared to be more resistant to higher concentrations (30–100 U/mL).
The results demonstrated that MrAII has cytotoxic activity and can induce apoptosis in cancer cells, whereas high concentrations were necessary for the induction of apoptosis in normal cells.

3. Discussion

The increasing need for more robust industrial L-ASNases attracts much attention to discovering new potential sources of the enzyme.
Recent proteomic data indicate that the members of the Bacteroidetes-Chlorobi group are engaged in biofilm-derived organic matter degradation, in particular, through high expression of asparaginases [27]. Nevertheless, the enzymes originating from microorganisms of this group still remain uncharacterized. In this report, we focused on the characteristics of L-ASNase originating from M. roseus belonging to the class Ignavibacteria Bacteroidetes-Chlorobi group.
Bioinformatics analysis revealed that M. roseus possesses two enzymes exhibiting L-asparaginase activity that were identified as plant-type (Class 2) (MrAIII) and bacterial type II (Class 1) (MrAII) L-ASNases, based on the amino acid sequence analysis.
The role of plant-type L-ASNases observed in microorganisms, insects, and mammals, is not obvious, especially in view of the presence of other types of the enzyme in these organisms. Plant-type enzymes have dual isoaspartyl aminopeptidase/L-asparaginase activity [17].
The first (L-asparaginase) activity is essential in plant metabolism [17]. Asparagine has an N:C ratio of 2:4 (in contrast to 2:5 for glutamine), which makes it an efficient molecule for the storage and transport of nitrogen in living organisms. The atmospheric nitrogen assimilated in the roots of plants is transported to metabolically active parts (shoots, leaves, and flowers) in the form of L-Asn, where it is liberated by hydrolysis. Thus, the metabolism of plants requires efficient l-asparaginase activity in fast growing tissues [17]. The second (isoaspartyl aminopeptidase) activity of plant-type L-ASNases protects dormant seeds from the spontaneous accumulation of highly toxic β-asparagine dipeptides [17].
In M. roseus, MrAIII appears to be involved in nitrogen metabolism in the absence of type I L-ASNase and in the degradation of β-aspartyl-containing proteins.
On the other hand, type II L-ASNases appear to participate in carbon metabolism, and their expression is tightly regulated by different factors [18,40]. Apparently, MrAII plays an essential role in the growth of the facultative anaerobe M. roseus under oxygene-limiting conditions. In the study using type II L-ASNase from E. coli (EcAII), it was confirmed that EcAII was activated by anaerobiosis (by fumarate and nitrate reductase and cyclic AMP receptor) [41]. Recent data suggest that EcAII enables anaerobic respiration and is part of a metabolic pathway leading to the production of fumarate as a terminal electron acceptor. EcAII is localized in the periplasm to be able to utilize exogenous (extracellular) L-Asn to produce fumarate, as under anaerobic conditions transport of L-Asn from the cytoplasm to the periplasm is abolished [21,40].
As previously reported, the L-ASNases enzyme “set” may be different for species of the genus [18]. Some can possess L-asparaginases of two (several) types, whereas others possess only one type. Nevertheless, both type II and type III L-ASNases are annotated in other recently deposited in GenBank genomes, not only Melioribacter sp. (GenBank accession No. VEPI00000000.1, JAGXSM000000000.1), but also Ignavibacteria bacterium (GenBank accession No. DSRE00000000.1, DSBF00000000.1), and Bacteroidetes bacterium (GenBank accession No. JAHJCD000000000.1, JAHITB000000000.1, JAHJDY000000000.1). Sequence identity for bacterial type II L-ASNases of these microorganisms is not less than 76% (80.5–76.1%), and type III L-ASNases not less than 54% (54.0–71.7%). Thus, enzymes from M. roseus MrAII and MrAIII represent a large group of uncharacterized type II and type III L-ASNases, respectively, originating from the members of the Bacteroidetes-Chlorobi group. These enzymes have no significant sequence similarity with the thoroughly studied counterparts.
Despite the importance of both L-ASNases MrAII and MrAIII, MrAII was chosen for further detailed elucidation as having higher potential for future biomedical applications.
M. roseus is a moderately thermophilic bacterium isolated from the flow of hot water (46 °C) [26]. To adapt to elevated habitat temperatures, thermophilic L-asparaginases acquired a number of specific features, in particular, a low occurrence of thermolabile residues [42]. A correlation between thermostability and the ratio of preferred (Glu and Lys) and avoided (Gln and His) amino acids was reported [43,44].
The amino acid sequence analysis revealed that the Glu and Lys content was 16.6%, whereas the Gln and His content was 2.5% in MrAII. The enzyme contained 38.5% of the preferred thermostable protein Ala, Gly, Glu, Val, and Lys residues.
According to experimental data, MrAII exhibits maximum activity at 70 °C and pH 9.3. Similar results were reported for L-ASNases from the thermophilic bacteria Streptomyces thermoluteus subsp. fuscus NBRC 14270, Thermus thermophilus, and Thermus aquaticus T351 with the optimum of temperature 63.6–75.0 °C, and pH 8.0–9.5 [3].
As a rule, thermophilic L-ASNases exhibit higher L-asparaginase activity compared with mesophilic counterparts [3,45]. The same was observed for MrAII. The recombinant type II L-ASNase from M. roseus hydrolyzed L-Asn with a specific activity of 1530 U/mg. According to experimental data, MrAII is more active not only than mesophilic L-ASNases from E. coli, Erwinia carotovora, Bacillus subtilis and Wolinella succinogenes, with specific activities of 235, 430, 92, and 200 U/mg, respectively [45], but it has the highest activity reported so far for thermophilic L-ASNases of bacterial origin. In previous studies, L-ASNase activity for the thermophilic bacteria S. thermoluteus subsp. fuscus NBRC 14270, T. thermophilus and T. aquaticus T351, was estimated to be 68.09, 840, and 585 U/mg, respectively [3].
The kinetic properties of the recombinant type II L-ASNase from M. roseus were found to be Vmax 5573 µM/min and KM 1.4 mM. The KM value for the enzyme was quite high compared to those of the non-thermophiles: E. coli—0.018 mM; E. carotovora—0.085–0098 mM; B. subtilis—0.43 mM; W. succinogenes—0.048 mM [45]. On the other hand, it was lower compared with the L-ASNases from the thermophilic bacteria: S. thermoluteus subsp. fuscus NBRC 14270—1.83 mM; T. thermophilus—2.8 mM; T. aquaticus—8.6 mM [3].
Increased KM values have previously been demonstrated for bacterial and eukaryotic enzymes originating from thermophilic microorganisms. The KM values were higher for thermophilic homologs than mesophilic ones, for enzymes such as phosphoglycerate kinase [46], glutamate dehydrogenase [47], alkaline phosphatase [48,49,50], GTPase (TrmE) [51] and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase [52].
It appears that adaptation at high environmental temperatures involves an increase in KM and kkat for thermophilic L-ASNases [53]. This characteristic feature allows optimizing catalytic efficiency by reaching a balance between substrate binding and the rate of product release.
In contrast to some L-ASNases that retain significant structural stability under denaturing conditions [3], MrAII completely lost its activity in the presence of urea solutions at 2–8 M.
The non-thermophilic bacterial L-ASNase II thermostability is poor compared with the thermophilic bacterial L-ASNase. When incubated at 70 °C for 30 min, 80% of E. coli L-asparaginase II activity was lost [54]. For MrAII, this figure was 42.4%. The enzyme retained more than 70% of its initial activity after 60 min incubation at 40 °C, close to physiological temperature.
The addition of Cu2+ or Ca2+ resulted in a 56% or 77% increase in MrAII activity, respectively. Previously, it was shown that some metal cations, including Ca2+, binding to a protein molecule, played an important role in stabilizing the structure, thus preventing denaturation at high temperatures [3].
The main field of biotechnology application for L-asparaginases is anticancer therapy [55,56]. Here, we have performed an attempt to evaluate the anticancer potential of MrAII.
To explore the cytotoxic activity in vitro, we incubated cells with 20 U/mL of the enzyme and measured the induction of apoptosis by the labeling of phosphatidylserine on cell membranes with annexin V-FITC and cell DNA by PI, followed by flow cytometry. The results of apoptosis measurement were in a good agreement with the results from the MTT-test. The enzyme induced apoptosis more efficiently in Jurkat, or K562 cancer lymphocytes: less than 12% or 25% of them remained alive after incubation, respectively (Figure 4c,d,i,j). Solid tumor cells LnCap and SCOV-3 cells appeared to be the most resistible, with 46 and 38% of living cells remaining alive, respectively (Figure 4f,g,l,m). The enzyme induced apoptosis in normal CD4+ T cells, and normal fibroblast at a concentration of 20 U/mL; however, cell viability was much higher than in tumor cells (Figure 4e,h,k,n). The results demonstrated that the enzyme has cytotoxic activity, and can induce apoptosis in cancer cells, whereas high concentrations are necessary for the induction of apoptosis in normal cells. The difference in the sensitivity to the enzyme between normal and cancer cells can become a basis for the further development of this enzyme as an antitumor drug.
Two ways of future MrAII biomedical application can be considered: as a single anticancer agent, and as a part of therapy in combination with glutaminase-free asparaginase, due to exhibited additional glutaminase activity.
Until recently, it was believed that the L-glutaminase activity exhibited by L-ASNases was highly undesirable, as it contributes to the toxic side effects of the enzyme treatment [57,58]. Thus, the research community was actively pursuing the search for glutaminase-free, or the development of glutaminase-deficient L-ASNase variants [5,57,59,60].
However, advancements in cancer cell metabolism suggest that the picture is much more complex. Recent data demonstrate that L-asparaginase activity alone may not be sufficient for L-ASNase cytotoxicity, and that glutaminase activity may be required for full antitumor efficacy against cancer [58,61,62,63].
Cancer cells are capable of reprogramming the survival amino acid metabolism by using compensatory pathways via transcriptional, epigenetic, and post-translational mechanisms [64]. Both L-glutamine and L-asparagine are essential for the growth of highly proliferative cells, and the anticancer activity of L-ASNase can require the enzyme’s glutaminase activity [61,62,64].
A key player in driving the resistance to L-ASNase treatment is the expression of asparagine synthetase (ASNS), the rate-limiting enzyme for de novo biosynthesis of L-asparagine [65,66,67].
In addition to the expression of ASNS itself, studies suggest that the availability of aspartate and glutamine, two indispensable substrates of ASNS, are also important for the cellular adaptation to the depletion of exogenous asparagine [67,68]. In cell culture conditions, most cancer cells can use glutamine to synthesize aspartate de novo.
The role of the tumor microenvironment in resistance to anticancer therapy has also been highlighted in recent years [69,70]. Related to L-ASNase treatment tolerance, it was shown that bone marrow adipocytes can protect cells of acute lymphoblastic leukemia from L-ASNase-induced cytotoxicity by exploiting the mechanism dependent on glutamine secretion [71].
Moreover, further research is required to investigate the role of aspartate and/or glutamine availability in L-ASNase resistance; in a series of recent works it was revealed that glutaminase activity of L-ASNase can contribute to the overall efficiency of the enzyme treatment, both in vitro and in vivo [58,61,62,63].
Parmentier et al. have reported that 9 of 11 tested human leukemia cell lines were more sensitive to L-ASNases with higher glutaminase activities [58]. The same results were obtained for two patient-derived ALL samples.
According to Chan et al., L-ASNase glutaminase activity contributed to durable anticancer activity, whereas L-ASNase activity alone yielded a mere growth delay [61]. In vivo studies demonstrated that glutaminase-deficient L-ASNase was insufficiently active to prevent the recurrence of leukemia. In contrast, ASNase with glutaminase activity at the same dose, in terms of asparaginase activity, yielded a durable response. The greater extent of L-Asn depletion was revealed for L-ASNase that exhibited glutaminase activity. The effect was presumably due to the additional depletion of glutamine, which is a substrate for the synthesis of L-Asn by ASNS in cells throughout the body [61].
Additionally, it is supposed that L-ASNase glutaminase activity can be associated with the suppression of ASNS upregulation [62].
In summary, considering the risk of toxic effects associated with L-ASNase glutaminase activity, a balance is needed between the asparaginase/glutaminase activity of the enzyme to provide prolonged anticancer activity with minimal adverse reactions. MrAII exhibits additional glutaminase activity that can be important to overpower the supportive microenvironment of cancer cells.
Thus, the novel bacterial type II L-ASNase from M. roseus has both fundamental and applied value. MrAII expands the spectrum of available L-ASNases and represents the first described enzyme from a large group of closely related counterparts from the members of the Bacteroidetes-Chlorobi group. MrAII seems to be promising for further investigation and biotechnology application in view of the highest L-ASNase activity reported so far for enzymes of bacterial origin, in combination with increased thermal stability and cytotoxic activity toward cancer cells.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Enzymes and Chemicals

All chemicals used in the experiments were of analytical grade and purchased from Fluka Chemical Corp. (Fluka Chemie GmbH, Buchs, Switzerland), Merck (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), Bio-Rad (1000 Alfred Nobel Drive, Hercules, CA, USA), Reanal (Reanal Finechemical Private Ltd., Budapest, Hungary), Serva (SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany), Paneco (Moscow, Russia) or Reachem (Moscow, Russia). Enzymes were purchased from SibEnzyme (SibEnzyme-M, Moscow, Russia).
Growth media for human cancer cell lines were produced by Gibco (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Medium RPMI 1640 was supplemented with fetal bovine serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), anti-CD28 (eBioscience Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), anti-CD3 mAbs (MedBioSpectr, Moscow, Russia), and recombinant human interleukin-2 (rHu IL-2) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).
Additionally, 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, trypsin, and PBS were used in the cytotoxicity assay, and were purchased from Serva (SERVA Electrophoresis GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany), Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA), and Paneco (Moscow, Russia), respectively.

4.2. Strains and Cell Lines

E. coli XL1-Blue (Stratagen, La Jolia, CA, USA) and E. coli BL21 (DE3) (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA) were used for plasmid amplification and expression, respectively.
Human chronic myelogenous leukemia K562, acute T cell leukemia Jurkat, prostate carcinoma LnCap, ovary adenocarcinoma SCOV-3 cell lines and normal human fibroblasts WI-38 (all from ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were used for the evaluation of L-ASNase cytotoxic activity.

4.3. Cloning of MrAII Coding Sequences

A putative gene predicted to encode L-ASNase MROS_RS05340 (mrAII) (sequence 1199322-1200302 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/397689003 (accessed on 15 October 2021), protein GenBank accession No. WP_014855710.1) flanked by the restriction sites NheI/SalI was artificially synthesized by TWIST Bioscience (Twist Bioscience HQ, San Francisco, CA, USA). The synthesized gene was hydrolyzed and cloned into the NheI/SalI digested vector pET-28a(+) under the control of the T7 promoter. The constructed vector was transformed and expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3).

4.4. Expression and Purification of Recombinant MrAII

The selected recombinant E. coli clones were grown as previously described [34,72,73]. Kanamycin 0.05 mg/mL was added into the medium for the cultivation of cells harboring plasmids. Target protein expression was induced by lactose added to the expressed culture at a density of A600 1.9 to a final concentration of 0.2%. The cells were grown for an additional 17–20 h, and pelleted by centrifugation at 4000× g for 15 min.
All enzyme purification stages were performed at +4 °C. Five grams of biomass were suspended in 50 mL of buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.2, 1 mM glycine, 1 mM EDTA) and destroyed by ultrasound treatment [34]. Cell debris and unbroken cells were removed by centrifugation (35,000× g, 30 min). The supernatant, containing the enzyme, was applied to a Q-Sepharose column. Protein was eluted with a linear gradient of 0–1.0 M NaCl. Column fractions, containing enzyme (0.46–0.7 M NaCl), were collected. Ultrafiltration, desalting and buffer exchange were performed using Amicon membranes (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), as described previously [74]. Samples were frozen and stored at −20 °C.
Protein concentration was determined by the method of Sedmak [75], with bovine serum albumin as the standard. SDS-PAGE was carried out to visualize and determine protein purity as previously described [76].
The molecular weight, theoretical pI, and amino acid frequencies were analyzed using ProtParam (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/ accessed on 11 November 2021).

4.5. Determination of Enzyme Activity and Kinetic Parameters of MrAII

L-asparaginase catalytic activity was measured with Jasco J-815 circular dichroism spectrometer (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) with a temperature-controlled cell, as previously described [77]. Samples were prepared by mixing L-asparagine 1–40 mM and MrAII solution 0.03–0.035 mg/mL. The reactions were performed in quartz cuvettes (volume 300 μL, pathlength 1 mm). The time-dependent ellipticity was recorded at 210 nm. Specific enzyme activity was expressed in U/mg protein.
L-glutaminase and D-asparaginase activities were measured by the same procedure using L-glutamine or D-asparagine as substrates, respectively.
The kinetic parameters of MrAII were determined in borate buffer (0.025 M, pH 9.3) at 70 °C with L-asparagine as substrate. The observed data were fitted to the Michaelis–Menten equation, and the kinetic constants KM and Vmax were calculated from Lineweaver–Burk plots [34].

4.6. Effect of Temperature and pH

The activity at different temperatures and pH levels was studied for the purified enzyme.
For the optimum temperature, the enzyme activity profile was analyzed at different temperatures, ranging from 45 to 80 °C, with 5 °C increments. Additionally, MrAII activity was measured at 37 °C. The mixture was assayed in borate buffer (0.025 M, pH 9.3).
The thermal stability of L-ASNase from M. roseus was determined by detecting the residual activity of the enzyme that had been preincubated at different temperatures, ranging from 40 to 70 °C, with 10 °C increments, in borate buffer (0.025 M, pH 9.3).
The optimum pH was determined by assessing the enzyme activity of different pH levels at 70 °C in five buffer systems. Namely, sodium acetate (0.05 M, pH 4.0–6.0), sodium phosphate (0.05 M, pH 6.0–7.0), Tris–HCl buffer (0.05 M, pH 7.0–9.0), borate (0.025 M, pH 9.3), and glycine–NaOH buffer (0.05 M, pH 9.5).

4.7. Chemical Denaturation Studies and Effect of Various Metal Ions

Enzyme stability was investigated after 1 h incubation in borate buffer (0.025 M, pH 9.3) in the presence of 0–8.0 M urea. The activity of MrAII examined at 70 °C in the absence of urea was taken as 100%. The measured activities were compared with the activity of the enzyme without urea addition under the same conditions.
The effects of metal ions on MrAII activity were investigated in the presence of various cations (Ni2+, Cu2+, Mg2+, Zn2+, Ca2+, Fe3+) and EDTA. Salts NiCl2, CuSO4, MgCl2, ZnCl2, CaCl2, FeCl3 and EDTA were added at a concentration of 10 mM. The enzyme activity was assayed at 70 °C and pH 9.3 (in 0.025 M borate buffer) by adding L-asparagine and the corresponding metal ion(s) or EDTA. The entire procedure was triplicated.
The activity without any metal ion addition was set to 100%. The measured activities were compared with the activity of the enzyme without metal ion or EDTA addition under the same conditions.

4.8. Determination of Cytotoxic Activity

Human chronic myelogenous leukemia K562, acute T cell leukemia Jurkat, prostate carcinoma LnCap, and ovary adenocarcinoma SCOV-3 cell lines were grown in RPMI-1640 medium. WI-38 normal human fibroblasts were grown in DMEM medium and used as normal control adhesive cells.
The study involving normal human CD4+ T cells was approved by the Ethical Committee at the Institute of Biomedical Chemistry; written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Blood from healthy 18–25-year old donors (n = 4) was collected in Vacuette K3EDTA tubes (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria). Fresh peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated using Lympholite-H (Cedarlane, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) density gradient centrifugation. CD4+ T cells were purified from PBMCs using CD4+ Human Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. CD4+ T cells were seeded at 5 × 105 cell/mL and cultured in 25 cm2 flasks in RPMI 1640 cell medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 5 µg/mL anti-CD28, 5 µg/mL anti-CD3 mAbs, and 100 U/mL rHu IL-2 [78]. All cell lines were cultivated in 5% CO2/95% air in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C, and tested for mycoplasma contamination before the experiment using the Mycoplasma Detection Kit PlasmoTest™ (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA).
To test acute toxicity, cells were cultivated for 72 h in 96-well plates (TPP, Trasadingen, Switzerland), in the presence of the enzyme within the range of concentrations 1–100 U/mL, and cell viability was tested by measuring the conversion of the tetrazolium salt, 3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide to formazan (MTT test). IC50 and IC90 values (the concentration of the enzyme where the response was reduced by 50% and 90%, respectively) were calculated from the curve-fitting equations [79].
To measure apoptosis, incubated cells were dissociated using trypsin, resuspended in PBS and incubated with Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) from a FITC Annexin V/Dead Cell Apoptosis kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The counting of 5 × 104 cells at each point was performed by flow cytometry with a MACS Quant Analyzer 10 (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), as we previously described [80].

4.9. Statistical Analysis

The experimental data are expressed as the mean value ± standard error, calculated from three parallel experiments. The statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), using Microsoft Excel (version 2016).
For the measurement of cytotoxic activity, statistical analysis involving the Student’s t-test was implemented with the Statistica software (version 9.0, StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA). Differences described by p ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. The results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms222413632/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.E., N.S., M.D. and A.Z.; methodology and investigation, M.P., S.A. and D.Z.; discussion of experimental results, M.D., A.Z. and D.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D.; writing—review and editing, A.Z.; visualization, A.Z. and D.Z.; supervision, N.S.; project administration, M.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by RFBR, grant number 19-08-01112, and performed in the framework of the Russian Federation fundamental research program for the long-term period for 2021–2030.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nunes, J.C.F.; Cristóvão, R.O.; Freire, M.G.; Santos-Ebinuma, V.C.; Faria, J.L.; Silva, C.G.; Tavares, A.P.M. Recent Strategies and Applications for L-Asparaginase Confinement. Molecules 2020, 25, 5827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cachumba, J.J.M.; Antunes, F.A.F.; Peres, G.F.D.; Brumano, L.P.; Dos Santos, J.C.; Da Silva, S.S. Current applications and different approaches for microbial L-asparaginase production. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2016, 47, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Dumina, M.V.; Eldarov, M.A.; Zdanov, D.D.; Sokolov, N.N. L-Asparaginases of Extremophilic Microorganisms in Biomedicine. Biochem. (Mosc.) Suppl. Ser. B Biomed. Chem. 2020, 14, 277–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lopes, A.M.; de Oliveira-Nascimento, L.; Ribeiro, A.; Tairum, C.A.; Breyer, C.A.; de Oliveira, M.A.; Monteiro, G.; de Souza-Motta, C.M.; Magalhães, P.d.O.; Avendaño, J.G.F.; et al. Therapeutic l-asparaginase: Upstream, downstream and beyond. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2017, 37, 82–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Mahajan, R.V.; Kumar, V.; Rajendran, V.; Saran, S.; Ghosh, P.C.; Saxena, R.K. Purification and characterization of a novel and robust L-asparaginase having low-glutaminase activity from bacillus licheniformis: In vitro evaluation of anti-cancerous properties. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ali, U.; Naveed, M.; Ullah, A.; Ali, K.; Shah, S.A.; Fahad, S.; Mumtaz, A.S. L-asparaginase as a critical component to combat Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL): A novel approach to target ALL. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 771, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mahajan, R.V.; Saran, S.; Kameswaran, K.; Kumar, V.; Saxena, R.K. Efficient production of L-asparaginase from Bacillus licheniformis with low-glutaminase activity: Optimization, scale up and acrylamide degradation studies. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 125, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Department of Health and Human Services. Report on Carcinogens, 14th ed.; Department of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 2019.
  9. Verma, N.; Kumar, K.; Kaur, G.; Anand, S.E. coli K-12 asparaginase-based asparagine biosensor for leukemia. Artif. Cells Blood Substit. Biotechnol. 2007, 35, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar, K.; Kataria, M.; Verma, N. Plant asparaginase-based asparagine biosensor for leukemia. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2013, 41, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Erdogan, A.; Koytepe, S.; Ates, B.; Yilmaz, I.; Seckin, T. Preparation of the L-asparaginase-based biosensor with polyimide membrane electrode for monitoring L-asparagine levels in leukemia. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2014, 63, 909–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, J.; Wang, J.; Bachas, L.G. Biosensor for asparagine using a thermostable recombinant asparaginase from Archaeoglobus fulgidus. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 3336–3341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jia, R.; Wan, X.; Geng, X.; Xue, D.; Xie, Z.; Chen, C. Microbial L-asparaginase for application in acrylamide mitigation from food: Current research status and future perspectives. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Schalk, A.M.; Nguyen, H.A.; Rigouin, C.; Lavie, A. Identification and structural analysis of an L-asparaginase enzyme from guinea pig with putative tumor cell killing properties. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 33175–33186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. De Morais, S.B.; De Souza, T.D.A.C.B. Human L-asparaginase: Acquiring knowledge of its activation. Int. J. Oncol. 2021, 58, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Michalska, K.; Bujacz, G.; Jaskolski, M. Crystal Structure of Plant Asparaginase. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 360, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Michalska, K.; Jaskolski, M. Structural aspects of L-asparaginases, their friends and relations. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2006, 53, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Sharafi, Z.; Barati, M.; Khoshayand, M.R.; Adrangi, S. Screening for type II L-Asparaginases: Lessons from the genus Halomonas. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2017, 16, 1565–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Izadpanah Qeshmi, F.; Homaei, A.; Fernandes, P.; Javadpour, S. Marine microbial L-asparaginase: Biochemistry, molecular approaches and applications in tumor therapy and in food industry. Microbiol. Res. 2018, 208, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bejger, M.; Imiolczyk, B.; Clavel, D.; Gilski, M.; Pajak, A.; Marsolais, F.; Jaskolski, M. Na+/K+ exchange switches the catalytic apparatus of potassium-dependent plant L-asparaginase. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2014, 70, 1854–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Loch, J.I.; Jaskolski, M. Structural and biophysical aspects of L -asparaginases: A growing family with amazing diversity. IUCrJ 2021, 8, 514–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Prahl, A.; Pazgier, M.; Hejazi, M.; Lockau, W.; Lubkowski, J. Structure of the isoaspartyl peptidase with L-asparaginase activity from Escherichia coli. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004, 60, 1173–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nomme, J.; Su, Y.; Konrad, M.; Lavie, A. Structures of apo and product-bound human L-asparaginase: Insights into the mechanism of autoproteolysis and substrate hydrolysis. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 6816–6826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Su, Y.; Karamitros, C.S.; Nomme, J.; McSorley, T.; Konrad, M.; Lavie, A. Free glycine accelerates the autoproteolytic activation of human asparaginase. Chem. Biol. 2013, 20, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. da Silva, L.S.; Doonan, L.B.; Pessoa, A.; de Oliveira, M.A.; Long, P.F. Structural and functional diversity of asparaginases: Overview and recommendations for a revised nomenclature. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2021, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Podosokorskaya, O.A.; Kadnikov, V.V.; Gavrilov, S.N.; Mardanov, A.V.; Merkel, A.Y.; Karnachuk, O.V.; Ravin, N.V.; Bonch-Osmolovskaya, E.A.; Kublanov, I.V. Characterization of Melioribacter roseus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel facultatively anaerobic thermophilic cellulolytic bacterium from the class Ignavibacteria, and a proposal of a novel bacterial phylum Ignavibacteriae. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 1759–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tee, H.S.; Waite, D.; Payne, L.; Middleditch, M.; Wood, S.; Handley, K.M. Tools for successful proliferation: Diverse strategies of nutrient acquisition by a benthic cyanobacterium. ISME J. 2020, 14, 2164–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kadnikov, V.V.; Mardanov, A.V.; Podosokorskaya, O.A.; Gavrilov, S.N.; Kublanov, I.V.; Beletsky, A.V.; Bonch-Osmolovskaya, E.A.; Ravin, N.V. Genomic Analysis of Melioribacter roseus, Facultatively Anaerobic Organotrophic Bacterium Representing a Novel Deep Lineage within Bacteriodetes/Chlorobi Group. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hejazi, M.; Piotukh, K.; Mattow, J.; Deutzmann, R.; Volkmer-Engert, R.; Lockau, W. Isoaspartyl dipeptidase activity of plant-type asparaginases. Biochem. J. 2002, 364, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. He, C.; Keren, R.; Whittaker, M.; Farag, I.F.; Doudna, J.; Cate, J.H.D.; Banfield, J. Huge and variable diversity of episymbiotic CPR bacteria and DPANN archaea in groundwater ecosystems. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y.; Xu, W.; Pan, J.; Luo, Z.-H.; Li, M. Genome- and Community-Level Interaction Insights into Carbon Utilization and Element Cycling Functions of Hydrothermarchaeota in Hydrothermal Sediment. mSystems 2020, 5, e00795-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Pourhossein, M.; Korbekandi, H. Cloning, expression, purification and characterisation of Erwinia carotovora L-asparaginase in Escherichia coli. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2014, 3, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kotzia, G.A.; Labrou, N.E. Cloning, expression and characterisation of Erwinia carotovora L-asparaginase. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 119, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pokrovskaya, M.V.; Aleksandrova, S.S.; Pokrovsky, V.S.; Veselovsky, A.V.; Grishin, D.V.; Abakumova, O.Y.; Podobed, O.V.; Mishin, A.A.; Zhdanov, D.D.; Sokolov, N.N. Identification of Functional Regions in the Rhodospirillum rubrum L-Asparaginase by Site-Directed Mutagenesis. Mol. Biotechnol. 2015, 57, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pokrovskaya, M.V.; Aleksandrova, S.S.; Veselovsky, A.V.; Zdanov, D.D.; Pokrovsky, V.S.; Eldarov, M.A.; Grishin, D.V.; Gladilina, Y.A.; Toropigin, I.Y.; Sokolov, N.N. Physical-Chemical Properties of L-asparaginase Mutants From Rhodospirillum rubrum which Showed Antitelomerase Activity. Biomed. Chem. Res. Methods 2019, 2, e00071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pechkova, E.; Fiordoro, S.; Sokolov, N.; Pokrovsky, V.; Pokrovskaya, M.; Aleksandrova, S.; Veselovsk, A.; Bragazzi, N.; Giannini, M.; Pellegrino, L.; et al. LB Crystallization and Preliminary X-ray Diffraction Analysis of L-Asparaginase from Rhodospirillum rubrum. NanoWorld J. 2017, 3, S2–S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Rzhetsky, A.; Nei, M. A simple method for estimating and testing minimum-evolution trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1992, 9, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; Mcgettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Srikhanta, Y.N.; Atack, J.M.; Beacham, I.R.; Jennings, M.P. Distinct physiological roles for the two L-asparaginase isozymes of Escherichia coli. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 436, 362–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Jennings, M.P.; Beacham, I.R. Analysis of the Escherichia coli gene encoding L-asparaginase II, ansB, and its regulation by cyclic AMP receptor and FNR proteins. J. Bacteriol. 1990, 172, 1491–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Guo, J.; Coker, A.R.; Wood, S.P.; Cooper, J.B.; Chohan, S.M.; Rashid, N.; Akhtar, M. Structure and function of the thermostable L-asparaginase from Thermococcus kodakarensis. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Struct. Biol. 2017, 73, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Farias, S.T.; Bonato, M.C.M. Preferred amino acids and thermostability. Genet. Mol. Res. 2003, 2, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  44. Gharib, G.; Rashid, N.; Bashir, Q.; Gardner, Q.t.A.A.; Akhtar, M.; Imanaka, T. Pcal_1699, an extremely thermostable malate dehydrogenase from hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrobaculum calidifontis. Extremophiles 2016, 20, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Xu, S.; Xu, M.; Yang, T.; Wang, L.; Zhang, H.; Fang, H.; Osire, T.; Rao, Z. Insight into the thermostability of thermophilic L-asparaginase and non-thermophilic L-asparaginase II through bioinformatics and structural analysis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 7055–7070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bentahir, M.; Feller, G.; Aittaleb, M.; Lamotte-Brasseur, J.; Himri, T.; Chessa, J.P.; Gerday, C. Structural, kinetic, and calorimetric characterization of the cold-active phosphoglycerate kinase from the antarctic Pseudomonas sp. TACII18. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 11147–11153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Thomas, T.M.; Scopes, R.K. The effects of temperature on the kinetics and stability of mesophilic and thermophilic 3-phosphoglycerate kinases. Biochem. J. 1998, 330, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Copeland, W.H.; Nealon, D.A.; Rej, R. Effects of temperature on measurement of alkaline phosphatase activity. Clin. Chem. 1985, 31, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Abubakar, M.; Wasagu, R.; Umar, M. Kinetic Studies of Alkaline Phosphatase from the Liver of Agama agama Lizard. Niger. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2013, 21, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mahesh, M.; Guleria, N.; Rajesh, T. Isolation and characterization of extracellular thermostable alkaline phosphatase enzyme from Bacillus spp. Int. J. Appl. Biol. Pharm. Technol. 2010, 1, 21–33. [Google Scholar]
  51. Singh, A.K.; Pindi, P.K.; Dube, S.; Sundareswaran, V.R.; Shivaji, S. Importance of trmE for growth of the psychrophile Pseudomonas syringae at low temperatures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 4419–4426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Hansen, B.M.S.; Brewer, J.; Fahlman, G.G.; Gibson, B.K.; Ibata, R.; Limongi, M.; Rich, R.M.; Richer, H.B.; Shara, M.M.; Stetson, P.B. The white dwarf cooling sequence of the globular cluster messier. Astrophys. J. 2002, 574, L155–L158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dumina, M.; Zhgun, A.; Pokrovskaya, M.; Aleksandrova, S.; Zhdanov, D.; Sokolov, N.; El’darov, M. A novel L-asparaginase from hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus sibiricus: Heterologous expression and characterization for biotechnology application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, Y.Q.; Tao, M.L.; Shen, W.D.; Zhou, Y.Z.; Ding, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, W.L. Immobilization of L-asparaginase on the microparticles of the natural silk sericin protein and its characters. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 3751–3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhdanov, D.D.; Pokrovsky, V.S.; Pokrovskaya, M.V.; Alexandrova, S.S.; Eldarov, M.A.; Grishin, D.V.; Basharov, M.M.; Gladilina, Y.A.; Podobed, O.V.; Sokolov, N.N. Rhodospirillum rubrum L-asparaginase targets tumor growth by a dual mechanism involving telomerase inhibition. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 492, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Song, P.; Ye, L.; Fan, J.; Li, Y.; Zeng, X.; Wang, Z.; Wang, S.; Zhang, G.; Yang, P.; Cao, Z.; et al. Asparaginase induces apoptosis and cytoprotective autophagy in chronic myeloid leukemia cells. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 3861–3873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Chan, W.K.; Lorenzi, P.L.; Anishkin, A.; Purwaha, P.; Rogers, D.M.; Sukharev, S.; Rempe, S.B.; Weinstein, J.N. The glutaminase activity of L-Asparaginase is not required for anticancer activity against ASNS-negative cells. Blood 2014, 123, 3596–3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Parmentier, J.H.; Maggi, M.; Tarasco, E.; Scotti, C.; Avramis, V.I.; Mittelman, S.D. Glutaminase activity determines cytotoxicity of L-asparaginases on most leukemia cell lines. Leuk. Res. 2015, 39, 757–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Nguyen, H.A.; Su, Y.; Lavie, A. Design and characterization of Erwinia chrysanthemi L-asparaginase variants with diminished L-glutaminase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 17664–17676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Derst, C.; Henseling, J.; Röhm, K.-H. Engineering the substrate specificity of Escherichia coli asparaginase II. Selective reduction of glutaminase activity by amino acid replacements at position 248. Protein Sci. 2000, 9, 2009–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chan, W.K.; Horvath, T.D.; Tan, L.; Link, T.; Harutyunyan, K.G.; Pontikos, M.A.; Anishkin, A.; Du, D.; Martin, L.A.; Yin, E.; et al. Glutaminase activity of L-asparaginase contributes to durable preclinical activity against acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2019, 18, 1587–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Chan, W.K.; Tan, L.; Harutyunyan, K.; Du, D.; Martin, L.; Yin, E.; Konopleva, M.Y.; Weinstein, J.; Lorenzi, P.L. The Glutaminase Activity of L-Asparaginase Mediates Suppression of Asns Upregulation. Blood 2018, 132, 3959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Offman, M.N.; Krol, M.; Patel, N.; Krishnan, S.; Liu, J.Z.; Saha, V.; Bates, P.A. Rational engineering of L-asparaginase reveals importance of dual activity for cancer cell toxicity. Blood 2011, 117, 1614–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Kuo, M.T.; Chen, H.H.W.; Feun, L.G.; Savaraj, N. Targeting the proline–glutamine–asparagine–arginine metabolic axis in amino acid starvation cancer therapy. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Avramis, V.I. Asparaginases: Biochemical pharmacology and modes of drug resistance. Anticancer Res. 2012, 32, 2423–2437. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Balasubramanian, M.N.; Butterworth, E.A.; Kilberg, M.S. Asparagine synthetase: Regulation by cell stress and involvement in tumor biology. Am. J. Physiol.-Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 304, E789–E799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Jiang, J.; Batra, S.; Zhang, J. Asparagine: A metabolite to be targeted in cancers. Metabolites 2021, 11, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Aslanian, A.M.; Kilberg, M.S. Multiple adaptive mechanisms affect asparagine synthetase substrate availability in asparaginase-resistant MOLT-4 human leukaemia cells. Biochem. J. 2001, 358, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Whiteside, T.L. The tumor microenvironment and its role in promoting tumor growth. Oncogene 2008, 27, 5904–5912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Wu, P.; Gao, W.; Su, M.; Nice, E.C.; Zhang, W.; Lin, J.; Xie, N. Adaptive Mechanisms of Tumor Therapy Resistance Driven by Tumor Microenvironment. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 641469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ehsanipour, E.A.; Sheng, X.; Behan, J.W.; Wang, X.; Butturini, A.; Avramis, V.I.; Mittelman, S.D. Adipocytes cause leukemia cell resistance to L-asparaginase via release of glutamine. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 2998–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Pokrovskaya, M.V.; Pokrovskiy, V.S.; Aleksandrova, S.S.; Anisimova, N.Y.; Andrianov, R.M.; Treschalina, E.M.; Ponomarev, G.V.; Sokolov, N.N. Recombinant intracellular Rhodospirillum rubrum L-asparaginase with low L-glutaminase activity and antiproliferative effect. Biochem. (Mosc.) Suppl. Ser. B Biomed. Chem. 2012, 6, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dumina, M.V.; Zhgun, A.A.; Pokrovskay, M.V.; Aleksandrova, S.S.; Zhdanov, D.D.; Sokolov, N.N.; El’darov, M.A. Comparison of Enzymatic Activity of Novel Recombinant L-asparaginases of Extremophiles. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2021, 57, 594–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Borisova, A.A.; Eldarov, M.A.; Zhgun, A.A.; Alexandrova, S.S.; Omelyanuk, N.M.; Sokov, B.N.; Berezov, T.T.; Sokolov, N.N. Purification and some properties of recombinant Erwinia carotovora L-asparaginase, expressed in E. coli cells. Biomed. Khim. 2003, 49, 502–507. [Google Scholar]
  75. Sedmak, J.J.; Grossberg, S.E. A rapid, sensitive, and versatile assay for protein using Coomassie brilliant blue G250. Anal. Biochem. 1977, 79, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kudryashova, E.V.; Sukhoverkov, K.V. “Reagent-free” L-asparaginase activity assay based on CD spectroscopy and conductometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 1183–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhdanov, D.D.; Vasina, D.A.; Orlova, E.V.; Orlova, V.S.; Pokrovsky, V.S.; Pokrovskaya, M.V.; Aleksandrova, S.S.; Sokolov, N.N. Cisplatin-induced apoptotic endonuclease EndoG inhibits telomerase activity and causes malignant transformation of human CD4+ T lymphocytes. Biomed. Khim. 2017, 63, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Denizot, F.; Lang, R. Rapid colorimetric assay for cell growth and survival. Modifications to the tetrazolium dye procedure giving improved sensitivity and reliability. J. Immunol. Methods 1986, 89, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhdanov, D.D.; Pokrovsky, V.S.; Pokrovskaya, M.V.; Alexandrova, S.S.; Eldarov, M.A.; Grishin, D.V.; Basharov, M.M.; Gladilina, Y.A.; Podobed, O.V.; Sokolov, N.N. Inhibition of telomerase activity and induction of apoptosis by Rhodospirillum rubrum L-asparaginase in cancer Jurkat cell line and normal human CD4+ T lymphocytes. Cancer Med. 2017, 6, 2697–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Comparison of L-asparaginases (L-ASNases) from M. roseus. (a) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of selected L-ASNases using the minimum evolution method [37]. The analysis involved 20 amino acid sequences. There were a total of 349 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X [38]. (b) Multiple sequence alignment of type II L-ASNase from M. roseus (MrAII) (WP_014855710.1, marked with red dashed line and green box) with its homologs from the members of the Bacteroidetes-Chlorobi group, marked with a red box and characterized bacterial type II L-ASNases from E. coli (AAA23445.1), P. atrosepticum (AAP92666.3), R. rubrum (QXG80441.1), and D. chrysanthemi (AAS67028.1). Identical amino acid residues are marked by blue. Multiple sequence alignments were carried out using Clustal version 2.1 [39].
Figure 1. Comparison of L-asparaginases (L-ASNases) from M. roseus. (a) Molecular phylogenetic analysis of selected L-ASNases using the minimum evolution method [37]. The analysis involved 20 amino acid sequences. There were a total of 349 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X [38]. (b) Multiple sequence alignment of type II L-ASNase from M. roseus (MrAII) (WP_014855710.1, marked with red dashed line and green box) with its homologs from the members of the Bacteroidetes-Chlorobi group, marked with a red box and characterized bacterial type II L-ASNases from E. coli (AAA23445.1), P. atrosepticum (AAP92666.3), R. rubrum (QXG80441.1), and D. chrysanthemi (AAS67028.1). Identical amino acid residues are marked by blue. Multiple sequence alignments were carried out using Clustal version 2.1 [39].
Ijms 22 13632 g001
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE analysis: 1—protein molecular weight marker; 2—MrAII in cell free homogenate at a concentration of 20 µg; 3—purified MrAII at a concentration of 11 µg.
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE analysis: 1—protein molecular weight marker; 2—MrAII in cell free homogenate at a concentration of 20 µg; 3—purified MrAII at a concentration of 11 µg.
Ijms 22 13632 g002
Figure 3. Effect of temperature on (a) activity, and (b) stability of MrAII. Stability is expressed as residual activity (%) after 0–60 min of incubation. Effects of (c) pH, and (d) various metal cations, on the catalytic activity of the MrAII; ND, not defined.
Figure 3. Effect of temperature on (a) activity, and (b) stability of MrAII. Stability is expressed as residual activity (%) after 0–60 min of incubation. Effects of (c) pH, and (d) various metal cations, on the catalytic activity of the MrAII; ND, not defined.
Ijms 22 13632 g003
Figure 4. Cytotoxic activity MrAII against cancer cells. Cancer and normal cells were cultivated for 72 h in the presence of different concentrations of the enzyme. (a) Cell viability measured by the MTT test for cancer and normal T lymphocytes; (b) cell viability measured by MTT test for solid tumor cells and fibroblasts; (ch) representative flow cytometry diagrams for cells incubated with 20 U/mL of the enzyme and labeled with annexin V-FITC and PI. Ratios of living cells (lower left quadrants), apoptotic cells (lower right quadrants) and dead cells (two upper quadrants) are presented. (in) Histograms of live, apoptotic and dead cells incubated with 20 U/mL of the enzyme. Conc., concentration. PI, propidium iodide. n = 4. * p ≤ 0.05 vs. control untreated cells.
Figure 4. Cytotoxic activity MrAII against cancer cells. Cancer and normal cells were cultivated for 72 h in the presence of different concentrations of the enzyme. (a) Cell viability measured by the MTT test for cancer and normal T lymphocytes; (b) cell viability measured by MTT test for solid tumor cells and fibroblasts; (ch) representative flow cytometry diagrams for cells incubated with 20 U/mL of the enzyme and labeled with annexin V-FITC and PI. Ratios of living cells (lower left quadrants), apoptotic cells (lower right quadrants) and dead cells (two upper quadrants) are presented. (in) Histograms of live, apoptotic and dead cells incubated with 20 U/mL of the enzyme. Conc., concentration. PI, propidium iodide. n = 4. * p ≤ 0.05 vs. control untreated cells.
Ijms 22 13632 g004
Table 1. Purification yield of recombinant type II L-asparaginase from M. roseus (MrAII).
Table 1. Purification yield of recombinant type II L-asparaginase from M. roseus (MrAII).
Purification StepTotal Protein, mgTotal Activity, USpecific Activity, U/mgYield, %Purification Fold
Crude enzyme205.0109,300.0533.2100.0-
Purified enzyme88.082,572.01530.075.52.9
The purification factor was defined as the ratio between the specific activity of the purified enzyme and enzyme in the crude extract sample.
Table 2. IC50 and IC90 values of MrAII for cancer and normal cell lines.
Table 2. IC50 and IC90 values of MrAII for cancer and normal cell lines.
Cell LineIC50, U/mLIC90, U/mL
K5623.014.8
Jurkat10.525.2
LnCap15.846.4
Scov-312.139.4
Normal CD4+44.596.3
WI-3839.5264.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dumina, M.; Zhgun, A.; Pokrovskaya, M.; Aleksandrova, S.; Zhdanov, D.; Sokolov, N.; El’darov, M. Highly Active Thermophilic L-Asparaginase from Melioribacter roseus Represents a Novel Large Group of Type II Bacterial L-Asparaginases from Chlorobi-Ignavibacteriae-Bacteroidetes Clade. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413632

AMA Style

Dumina M, Zhgun A, Pokrovskaya M, Aleksandrova S, Zhdanov D, Sokolov N, El’darov M. Highly Active Thermophilic L-Asparaginase from Melioribacter roseus Represents a Novel Large Group of Type II Bacterial L-Asparaginases from Chlorobi-Ignavibacteriae-Bacteroidetes Clade. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(24):13632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413632

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dumina, Maria, Alexander Zhgun, Marina Pokrovskaya, Svetlana Aleksandrova, Dmitry Zhdanov, Nikolay Sokolov, and Michael El’darov. 2021. "Highly Active Thermophilic L-Asparaginase from Melioribacter roseus Represents a Novel Large Group of Type II Bacterial L-Asparaginases from Chlorobi-Ignavibacteriae-Bacteroidetes Clade" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 24: 13632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413632

APA Style

Dumina, M., Zhgun, A., Pokrovskaya, M., Aleksandrova, S., Zhdanov, D., Sokolov, N., & El’darov, M. (2021). Highly Active Thermophilic L-Asparaginase from Melioribacter roseus Represents a Novel Large Group of Type II Bacterial L-Asparaginases from Chlorobi-Ignavibacteriae-Bacteroidetes Clade. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(24), 13632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413632

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop