Next Article in Journal
Recent Advancement in Atypical Lipomatous Tumor Research
Next Article in Special Issue
Changing Functional Signatures of Microglia along the Axis of Brain Aging
Previous Article in Journal
Green Synthesis of Selenium and Tellurium Nanoparticles: Current Trends, Biological Properties and Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Distinction of Microglia and Macrophages in Glioblastoma: Close Relatives, Different Tasks?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Little Helpers or Mean Rogue—Role of Microglia in Animal Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

by
Hilal Cihankaya
1,2,
Carsten Theiss
1,2 and
Veronika Matschke
1,*
1
Department of Cytology, Institute of Anatomy, Ruhr-University Bochum, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
2
International Graduate School of Neuroscience (IGSN), Ruhr-University Bochum, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(3), 993; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22030993
Submission received: 16 December 2020 / Revised: 15 January 2021 / Accepted: 16 January 2021 / Published: 20 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular, Cellular and Systemic Signature of Microglia)

Abstract

:
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is one of the most common neurodegenerative diseases, causing degeneration of both upper and lower motor neurons in the central nervous system (CNS). ALS patients suffer from hyperreflexia, spasticity, paralysis and muscle atrophy and typically die due to respiratory failure 1–5 years after disease onset. In addition to the degeneration of motor neurons on the cellular level, ALS has been associated with neuroinflammation, such as microgliosis. Microglial activation in ALS can either be protective or degenerative to the neurons. Among others, mutations in superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9Orf72), transactive response DNA binding protein (TDP) 43 and vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 54 (VPS54) genes have been associated with ALS. Here, we describe the dual role and functionality of microglia in four different in vivo ALS models and search for the lowest common denominator with respect to the role of microglia in the highly heterogeneous disease of ALS.

1. Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease which is characterized by rapid progressive degeneration of the upper motor neurons in the motor cortex and the lower motor neurons in the spinal cord and brain stem. The incidence of ALS is 2/100,000 in Europe, and older men are mostly affected, rather than women [1]. The most common form of ALS, seen in 90–95% of patients, is called sporadic ALS (sALS). To date, no genetic factors have been identified as being related to sALS. The second form of the disease is familial ALS (fALS), which is present only in 5–10% of the patients. Among others, mutations in superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9Orf72), transactive response DNA binding protein (TDP) 43 and fused in sarcoma (FUS) genes have been associated mostly with fALS [2]. Thirdly, there is a very rare form of ALS, known as juvenile ALS (jALS). ALS patients suffer from hyperreflexia, spasticity, paralysis, muscle weakness and muscle atrophy [3]. This progressive disease causes death due to respiratory failure 1–5 years after the onset of disease symptoms [3]. On the cellular level, ALS has been associated with motor neuron degeneration, neuroinflammation, increased oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, protein aggregation, impaired RNA processing, as well as impaired axonal transport [1]. A growing body of evidence suggests that not only motor neurons, but also glial cells like microglia are involved in ALS pathogenesis [4].
Microglia are the resident immune cells, and they comprise approximately 20% of the glial cell population in the central nervous system (CNS) [5]. Resting microglia have ramified morphology to survey the danger signals in the CNS parenchyma. Quiescent microglia transform into an amoeboid phenotype to become activated upon CNS diseases, injuries or pathogens. The morphology of microglia can be studied using specific markers, such as ionized calcium binding adaptor protein 1 (IBA1) or cluster of differentiation 11b molecule (CD11b) independently of their activation status. For example, IBA1, one of the microglia/macrophage markers and a calcium-binding protein [6], is well-studied in ALS animal models to demonstrate the cellular morphology of microglia and microgliosis, depending on the number and/or size of the IBA1 stained cells in the tissue. CD11b is an alpha integrin, which combines with CD18 to form a microglia/macrophage receptor on the cell membrane and plays a role in cell adhesion, migration, phagocytosis and survival at the inflammation site [7]. Additionally, other clusters of differentiation molecules are also utilized to characterize the microglia such as CD36 and CD68, which are activated by toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling [8,9], and CD40, which is required for microglia activation [10].
The morphology of microglia in ALS animal models varies depending on genetic background and the investigated region of the CNS (Table 1). It should be mentioned that both symptomatic and non-symptomatic animals of different models show predominantly amoeboid, and thus activated, microglia in the spinal cord and motor cortex.
Nowadays, it is known that the functional differentiation of microglia based on expression patterns, phenotype, and stimulus is far more complex than the concept of “classically activated” M1 and “alternatively activated” M2 polarization of microglia (Figure 1) [49]. In this review, we make use of this oversimplified microglial classification, since most studies in the field of ALS still use this categorization. M1-type microglia have been shown to contribute to motor neuron degeneration in ALS by releasing proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and chemokines such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) to initiate the immune response [4,50]. On the other hand, M2-type microglia can enhance the motor neuron survival in ALS by releasing anti-inflammatory cytokines such as transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ), interleukin 4 (IL-4), interleukin 10 (IL-10), interleukin 13 (IL-13) and neurotrophins such as insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) to repair and restore the damaged tissue [4,50].
Therefore, it is assumed that activated microglia play a dual role during the pathogenesis of ALS. It was hypothesized that M2-type microglia could be protective for the motor neurons during the early stage of ALS. However, as the disease progresses, a shift from neuroprotection to neurotoxicity has been noted, where M1-type microglia induce neuroinflammation and motor neuron degeneration at the later stages of ALS [51]. Thus, neuroinflammatory processes such as microgliosis seem to play a major role in the ALS pathology [52,53,54].
More recently, together with the identification of ALS-linked genes, the number of mouse models for ALS created by genetic engineering methods has increased significantly. Thus, various models are now available for the investigation of the pathological mechanisms in ALS. These mouse models show microgliosis in CNS tissue, similarly to ALS patients. It was demonstrated that proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory molecules are released by M1- and/or M2-type microglia, leading to modulation of the microglial activation states in ALS [55,56,57]. In various animal models of ALS, the application of different compounds has been able to improve the survival of motor neurons. Thereby, different targets of ALS pathology have been addressed, such as hyperexcitability and excitotoxicity, neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. Two compounds, riluzole and edaravone, which reduce excitotoxicity and oxidative stress, respectively, have already been approved for ALS patients, but with only moderate success. Other agents that interfere with immune response mechanisms and thus target neuroinflammation, such as TLR-4 inhibitors, H1-receptor agonists and glucocorticoid receptor modulators, also showed a positive outcome on motor neuron survival in ALS animal models. Nevertheless, they remained rather unsuccessful after translation into clinical trials [58]. Reasons for failure could include the following: (i) preclinical studies have mostly been performed in only one ALS animal model, so the strong heterogeneity of the causes of the disease in different ALS cohorts would not be taken into account; (ii) an appropriate time window for the successful use of agents cannot be maintained in human patients [58]. The heterogeneity of the disease’s etiology thus requires a target that addresses as many patient groups as possible. We thus compare in this review the behavior, properties and functions of microglia in the different animal models to get closer to the goal of a common target.

2. SOD1 Model

About 25 years ago, the first gene mutation in the human superoxide dismutase (SOD) 1 gene was linked to the disease of ALS [59]. However, in Europe only 15% of fALS and 1–2% of sALS cases have been associated with mutations in the SOD1 gene [60]. SOD1 encodes an enzyme responsible for the detoxification of free superoxide radicals by converting them to hydrogen peroxide and molecular oxygen. However, a mutated allele can acquire both gain-of-function and loss-of-function mutations. It is currently assumed that toxic gain-of-function mutations in the SOD1 gene generate mutation-induced misfolding of SOD1 and subsequent SOD1 aggregation [61]. This results in increased oxidative activity, leading to redundant production of hydrogen peroxide and molecular oxygen, together with an increased number of protein–protein interactions [62]. These days, more than 170 mutations have been described in human ALS cases (http://www.hgmd.org, accessed in January 2021) and numerous SOD1 animal models have been developed. Based on the genetic background, the type of mutation and the copy number of the mutated SOD1 allele, animals can vary in showing ALS symptoms with different progression rates [63,64,65,66]. In the case of the most studied mutation—that causing a glycine-to-alanine change at the 93rd codon (G93A) in the SOD1 gene—animals carrying mutant alleles, depending on the genetic background, have a range of survival of 17 to 26 weeks, and the disease onset starts about the 13th–17th weeks of age, when animals start to develop hind limb weakness [63,64,66,67,68]. One to two months after the disease onset, which is also called the symptomatic stage, SOD1G93A mice begin to show tremors, locomotor deficits, paralysis, mitochondrial vacuolization, neurofilament aggregations, gliosis and degeneration of axons and motor neurons [67]. This ALS model, as well as models with other SOD1 mutations underlying ALS, shows microglial changes predominantly in the disease onset and symptomatic phase in different regions of the CNS, as summarized in the following paragraphs and in Table 2.

2.1. Microglial Morphology of the SOD1 Models

It is known that SOD1G93A mice show increased microgliosis, as a significant increase in IBA1 in Western blot analysis was found in the spinal cords of the pre-symptomatic and symptomatic SOD1G93A mice [11]. Medial reticular formation of SOD1G93A mice showed IBA1+ activated microglia, which were found in close proximity to Chx10+ glutamatergic V2a neurons [15]. In 10- and 14-week-old SOD1G93A mice, mRNA expression of Iba1 was increased in the spinal cord when compared to WT-SOD1 mice13. A total of 96% of the IBA1 signal from the spinal cord of SOD1G93A mice showed colocalization with keratan sulfate marker 5D4 [69]. There were no significant changes observed between wild-type and end-stage SOD1G93A mice in terms of the number of IBA1+ microglia taken from the external plexiform layer of the olfactory bulb and the internal plexiform layer of the retina [17]. The numerical density of IBA1+ and pSTAT3+/IBA1+ microglia gradually increased from 9 weeks to 21 weeks of age in the ventral spinal cords of SOD1G93A mice and most of the pSTAT3+/IBA1+ microglia were also positive for proinflammatory microglial markers Kv1.3 and Kv1.5 in 21-week-old SOD1G93A mice [70]. The increased number of IBA1+ cells were reduced in the cervical spinal cord and in the motor cortex of transgenic Klotho-overexpressing 16-week-old SOD1G93A mice (Klotho is an anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, neuroprotective and promyelinating protein.) [26]. Ubiquitin-positive aggregations surrounded by IBA1+ microglia were observed in both SOD1His46Arg and SOD1His46ArgSQSTM1 (SQSTM1: sequestosome 1 is an adaptor protein regulating autophagy and anti-oxidative stress pathway) mice; however, there were no statistical differences between these groups [71]. Iba1 and CD68 mRNA levels remained unchanged, when NOX2 was knocked-out in SOD1G93A mice [19]. Broad spectrum NOX inhibitor perphenazine treatment of SOD1G93A mice increased Iba1 and CD68, whereas administration of another NOX inhibitor, thioridazine, resulted in a significant decrease of Iba1 and CD68 in the spinal cord of SOD1G93A mice [19]. Ablation of serotonin 2B receptor (5-HT2b) in SOD1G86R mice resulted in a reduced IBA1 immunoreactivity in the spinal cord, where almost 50% of IBA1+ cells displayed cytoplasmic fragmentation [27].
In detail, both female and male SOD1G93A mice showed increased IBA+ immunostaining in the ventral horn when compared to WT litters; however, long term interleukin 33 (IL-33) treatment of SOD1G93A mice failed to alter microgliosis in either gender [25]. IBA1 quantification of tempol (a cyclic nitroxide)-injected SOD1G93A mice at 14 weeks (early symptomatic phase) showed less microglial activation in the ventral horn of the spinal cord, and tempol-injected SOD1G93A mice at 20 weeks (end stage) revealed a significant reduction in the microglial activity in the ventral, intermediate and dorsal regions of the spinal cord, when compared to the vehicle and riluzole-treated groups, respectively [14]. In different studies, Gamisoyo-San (a herbal medicine), TRAM-34 (selective Ca2+ activated K+ channel KCa3.1 inhibitor), TAK-242 (exogenous synthetic selective inhibitor of TLR4) and KCHO-1 (a herbal combination compound containing 30% ethanol and nine different herbal extracts) administration to SOD1G93A mice attenuated the IBA1 expression in the spinal cord [18,23,28,29]. A tyrosine kinase inhibitor (masitinib) treatment of post-paralyzed SOD1G93A rats ameliorated the microgliosis in the ventral spinal cord, as shown by IBA1 immunostaining [72]. Infusion of 15-week-old SOD1G93A brains with antisense oligonucleotide against cytosolic phospholipase A2 alpha (cPLA2α) inhibited the microglial activation in the spinal cord sections, as detected by IBA1 and CD40 immunostaining [21]. Immunohistochemical staining of AMD3100 (an inhibitor of CXCL12 binding to CXCR4)-treated SOD1G93A mice revealed significantly reduced IBA1 and CD36 levels in the spinal cord [22].
Rather than IBA1, CD11b has also been used in studies to investigate microgliosis and the general morphology of the microglia. Symptomatic 22–24-week-old NLRP3-GFP-SOD1G93A mice demonstrated NLRP3-GFP colocalization with CD11b in the ventral lumbar spinal cord [73]. Brain-derived extracellular micro-vesicles (BDEVs) from 2- and 5-month-old SOD1G93A mice revealed less than 5% CD11b+ vesicles in the flow cytometry analysis, indicating the absence of microglial markers in these BDEVs [74]. Although surprisingly decreased CD11b mRNA was detected in the spinal cord of the pre-symptomatic SOD1G93A mice, a significant increase was seen in the CD11b levels in the symptomatic SOD1G93A mice [11]. CD11b expression was significantly decreased in the spinal cord of the SOD1G93AGrm5+/− mice, when compared to SOD1G93A mice (Grm5: mGluR5 inactivating mutation) [16]. Gamisoyo-San (GSS) treatment of SOD1G93A mice reduced the CD11b expression in the spinal cord [28]. Treatment of SOD1G93A mice with IL-2c reduced CD11b immunoreactivity by 50% in spinal cord sections [20]. SOD1G93A mice that were either forced to exercise or treated with nandrolone (an anabolic androgenic steroid) in addition to physical exercise showed enhanced CD11b immune reactivity in the ventral horn of the lumbar spinal cord [75].

2.2. Microglial Markers in the SOD1 Models

Proinflammatory factors have been intensively investigated in several SOD1 models due to their cytotoxic effects on motor neuron degeneration. TLR2, TLR4, nuclear factor kappa B (NFκB) and high mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) protein levels remained unaltered in the spinal cord of the pre-symptomatic SOD1G93A mice; however, protein levels of TLR2 and TLR4 were decreased, together with an increase in the HMBG1, NFκB and phosphorylated NFκB levels in the spinal cord of the symptomatic SOD1G93A mice [11]. mRNAs of M1-type markers MhcII, Cebpa and CD80 remained unchanged in the pre-symptomatic SOD1G93A mice; however, they were significantly increased in the symptomatic SOD1G93A mice [11]. CX3CR1, the only receptor of chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CX3CL1), was found to be located mainly in the microglia of SOD1G93A mice, as shown by IBA1 and CX3CR1 double immunofluorescent staining [76]. In the same study, the number of CD86+/IBA1+ microglia was significantly increased in the anterior horn of SOD1G93A mice at P90 and P120 [76]. Concordantly, M1-type markers iNOS and CD86, together with M1-type cytokines Il-1β and Tnfα, were increased at the mRNA level in P90 and P120 SOD1G93A mice [76]. HuR, an RNA binding protein, colocalized with IBA1 in the cytoplasm of activated microglia in spinal cord of 18-week-old mutant SOD1 mice [30]. Arylsulfatase B (ARSB) was found to be partially expressed by microglial cells in both wild-type and SOD1G93A mice [77]. Ablation of serotonin 2B receptor (5-HT2b) in SOD1G86R mice resulted in reduced mRNA levels of Nox2, Ccl4 and MhcII in the brain stem [27].
Nucleotide binding domain and leucine rich repeat containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is an intracellular multiprotein complex that can activate the innate immune system upon interaction with foreign molecules. This activation can trigger neuroinflammation, as observed in animal ALS models and ALS patients [73]. mRNA expressions of Il-1β, Nlrp3, Asc and Caspase-1 were upregulated in the spinal cord samples of 22–24-week-old SOD1G93A mice [73]. Nlrp3, Il-1β, Il-6 and Tnfα mRNAs were downregulated in pre-symptomatic SOD1G93A mice; however, Nlrp3, Il-1β, Il-10 and Tnfα mRNAs were upregulated in symptomatic SOD1G93A mice [11]. Nlrp3 and Il-1β mRNA expressions were induced in both 9-week-old and 14-week-old SOD1G93A mice, whereas Asc and Il-18 mRNA expressions remained unchanged among wild-type and SOD1G93A groups [12]. Protein levels of ASC, NLRP3, IL-1β, IL-18 and active caspase 1 were found to be increased in SOD1G93A mice [12]. IBA1+ cells did not colocalized with NLRP3; however, ASC colocalized with both GFAP and IBA1 cells of the SOD1G93A mice [12].
To attenuate the neurodegenerative proinflammatory effects of microglia, several therapeutic substances have been used in different SOD1 models. Tempol treatment of SOD1G93A mice reduced the expressions of proinflammatory cytokines Il-1β, Tnfα and iNos, whereas Ifnγ expression did not show any statistical difference in the spinal cord samples [14]. Gamisoyo-San (GSS) treatment of SOD1G93A mice downregulated the TLR4 signaling related proteins TLR4, CD14 and COX-2 in the spinal cord [28]. Noggin (an antagonist of bone morphogenetic protein)-treated SOD1His46Arg transgenic rats showed no statistical difference in IBA1 staining of the spinal cord, when compared to controls, however Western blot and immunostaining of CD68-activated microglia showed less immunoreactivity in the noggin-administered lumbar spinal cords of SOD1His46Arg transgenic rats [78]. In the same study, triple immunostaining of IL-1β-CD68-GFAP, iNOS-CD68-GFAP and TNFα-CD68-GFAP proved that astrocytes predominantly express IL-1β, iNOS and TNFα, rather than activated microglia [78]. Furthermore, noggin treatment of SOD1His46Arg transgenic rats demonstrated significantly decreased iNOS and TNFα expressions both in astrocytes and microglia, whereas Il-1β expression particularly decreased in the astrocytes [78]. BMP4-targeted anti-sense oligonucleotide administration of SOD1His46Arg rats downregulated CD68-activated microglia; however, IBA1+ microglia were not affected by BMP4 suppression [78]. TAK-242 treatment of SOD1G93A mice decreased Tnfα, but not Il-1β mRNA levels in the spinal cord samples [29]. KCHO-1 treatment of SOD1G93A mice reduced iNOS expression in the spinal cord when compared to the vehicle-treated samples [18]. Short-term clemastine treatment of SOD1G93A mice insignificantly reduced CD68 and NFκB; however, long term clemastine (1st generation histamine H1R antagonist) treatment produced the opposite effects, when compared to the vehicle-treated mice [24]. AMD3100-treated SOD1G93A mice revealed significantly reduced TNFα and IL-6 levels in the spinal cord [22].
In addition to proinflammatory cytokines, the effects of anti-inflammatory factors have also been examined in SOD1 models. The number of Arg1+/IBA1+ microglia was significantly higher in the anterior horn of the P90 SOD1G93A mice; however, it was reduced at P120 [76]. Concordantly, mRNA levels of M2-type markers Arg-1 and CD206, together with M2-type cytokine Il-10, were increased in P90, but declined in P120 SOD1G93A mice76. Arg1, Fizz1, Socs1, Tgfβ1 and CD206 mRNAs were found to be significantly decreased in the pre-symptomatic SOD1G93A mice; however, expressions of only Arg1 and Socs1 were reduced in the symptomatic SOD1G93A mice [11]. On the other hand, increased levels of Tgfβ1 and CD206 were detected in the symptomatic SOD1G93A mice [11]. Ablation of serotonin 2B receptor (5-HT2b) in SOD1G86R mice resulted in reduced mRNA levels of Tgfβ1, TgfβR1, Ym1 and Tyrobp in the brain stem [27].
To boost the neuroprotective anti-inflammatory effects of microglia, several drug treatments have been carried out using SOD1 models. Increased gene expression levels of the neurotrophic factors BDNF and GDNF were shown to be decreased in tempol- and riluzole-treated 14-week-old SOD1G93A mice, respectively [14]. In contrast with the predominant assumption that TGFβ is an anti-inflammatory cytokine, it can also induce inflammation, acting as a proinflammatory agent [79]. Consequently, the Tgfβ mRNA level was reduced by tempol administration in SOD1G93A mice, whereas Il-10 expression remained at the same level among vehicle-, riluzole- and tempol-treated groups [14]. Ninety-day-old SOD1G93A mice receiving total body irradiation together with intravenous transplantation of GFP+ donor bone marrow cells revealed an accumulation of bone-marrow-originated M2-type microglia in the ventral spinal cord, and this was attributed to the permeability in the blood brain barrier [80]. IL-33 treatment of SOD1G93A mice did not alter Arg-1 immunoreactivity in the female group; however, it increased the Arg-1 protein expression of the males in the ventral horn [25]. The amounts of Arg1 and CD163 after clemastine treatment of P120 SOD1G93A mice were increased by 2.5-fold and 3-fold, respectively, when compared to the wild-types [24]. Additionally, protein levels of purinergic receptors P2X7 and P2Y12 after clemastine treatment of P120 SOD1G93A mice were increased by 3-fold and 5-fold, respectively, when compared to the vehicle-treated mice, whereas the P2X4 level remained unchanged [24].

2.3. Transcriptome Profiling of the SOD1 Models

Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of wild-type and mutant SOD1 mice at P100 revealed 227 differentially expressed genes in the microglia of the brain stem, in which Sod1 and Camk2b genes were upregulated and Nav2, mt-Rnr2 and 1700112E06Rik genes were downregulated [81]. TaqMan gene expression assays of SOD1- and Klotho-overexpressing SOD1 mice revealed significant differences—Il-1β, Il-12a and Tnfα mRNAs were downregulated, whereas Mag mRNA was overexpressed in the motor cortex [26]. Furthermore, Fzd5, Il-1α, Tnfaip2 and Tnfα mRNAs were significantly downregulated, whereas Vegf, Mbp, Mag, Nrf2, Prx-3 and Prx-2 mRNAs were upregulated in the lumbar spinal cord [26]. Spatial transcriptomics of L3 to L5 sections of the spinal cord from both wild-type and mutant SOD1 mice at pre-symptomatic, symptomatic and end-stage time points revealed that upregulation of Iba1, Tyrobp and Trem2 at the pre-symptomatic phase triggers microgliosis and the formation of the phagocytic microglial phenotype in this ALS model [13]. Transcriptome analysis of microglia from SOD1G93A mice revealed two major gene clusters. Cluster 1 was related to suppressed homeostatic genes including P2ry12, Tmem119, Gpr34, Jun, Olfml3, Csf1r, Hexb, Mertk, Rhob, Cx3Cr1, Tgfbr1 and Tgfb1 and transcription factors such as Mef2a, Mafb, Jun, Sall1 and Egr1, which were enriched in adult microglia; and Cluster 2 was related to upregulated genes including Spp1, Itgax, Axl, Lilrb4, Clec7a, Ccl2, Csf1 and Apoe [82]. Microglia from SOD1G93A spinal cords showed a negative correlation in the expression levels of Mef2a, Sall1 and Tgfbr1 but a positive correlation in Apoe expression with the progression of disease [82]. In the microglia of SOD1G93ATrem−/− mice, 11 out of 36 downregulated inflammatory genes were identified, and in the microglia of SOD1G93ATrem+/− mice 66 out of 240 suppressed homeostatic genes were identified [82]. Clec7a+ P2ry12- microglia were detected in the spinal cord of SOD1G93ATrem+/− mice at P115, whereas Clec7a- P2ry12+ homeostatic microglia were detected in the SOD1G93ATrem−/− mice [82]. Male SOD1G93ATrem+/− mice showed Apoe induction; however, Trem2 deletion in these males suppressed Apoe and restored the homeostatic microglial genes including Spi1 (PU.1), Smad3, Tgfbr1 and Sall1, when compared to females through RNAseq analysis [82]. Additionally, miR-155 expression was not detected in SOD1G93A Trem−/− mice [82]. miR-155 was found to be increased in the spinal cord of the pre-symptomatic and symptomatic SOD1G93A mice; however, miR-125b, miR-146a, miR-21 and miR-124 were increased only in the symptomatic SOD1G93A mice [11]. Gene ontology enrichment and network analysis of SOD1G93A microglia revealed transcriptional differences in the genes responsible for the regulation of the immune response (for example, upregulation of Ccl5 and Cxcl13, downregulation of α-synuclein), chemotaxis (for example, upregulation of Spp1), DNA damage (for example, upregulation of Brca1, P21, Pcna and Stat1 and downregulation of Gadd45a, Sp3), angiogenesis, inflammation, blood coagulation and hypoxia processes [83]. All of these mentioned changes in different CNS regions regarding microglial markers and transcriptome profiling of different SOD1 mice is depicted in Table 2.
Table 2. Microglial alterations in different SOD1 animal models based on the age, tissue and method.
Table 2. Microglial alterations in different SOD1 animal models based on the age, tissue and method.
Model.StrainAgeTissueMoleculeVariationTreatmentEffect after TreatmentMethodMN SurvivalRef
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg4–6 weeksspinal cordNOS2, TLR2, TLR4, NFκB, HMGB1, IL-10, IL-18, MhcII, Cebpa, CD80, miR-125b, miR-146a, miR-21, miR-1240X WB, RT-PCR [11]
Nlrp3, Il-1β, Il-6, Tnfα, Arg1, Fizz1, Socs1, Tgf-β, CD206RT-PCR
miR-155+
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg9 and 14 weeksspinal cordNlrp3, Il-1β+X RT-PCR [12]
Asc, Il-180
IL-1β, ASC, IL-18, CAS1+WB
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg10 weeksspinal cordTyrobp, Trem2+X sc-RNA-seq [13]
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg12–14 weeksspinal cordNos2, Fizz1, Il-6, Il-180X RT-PCR [11]
HMGB1, NFκB, p- NFκB, MhcII, Cebpa, CD80, NLRP3, IL-1β, IL-10, TNFα, TGF-β, CD206, miR-155, miR-125b, miR-146a, miR-21, miR-124 +WB, RT-PCR
TLR2, TLR4, Arg1, Socs1
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg13 weeksspinal cordCcl5, Cxcl13, Spp1, Brca1, P21, Pcna, Stat1+X RNA-seq [83]
α-synuclein, Gadd45a, Sp3
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg13 and 17 weeksspinal cordCX3CR1, iNOS, CD86, IL-1β, TNFα, Arg1, CD206, IL-10+X IF, qPCR [76]
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg14 weeksspinal cordBdnf, Gdnf, Il-1β, Tnfα, Tgf-β, iNOS, Ifn-γ+X RT-PCR [14]
Il-100X
tempolBdnf, ↓Gdnf, ↓Il-1β, ↓Tnfα, ↓Tgf-β, ↔iNOS, ↔Ifn-γ, ↔Il-10
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg14 weeksbrain stemSod1, Camk2b+X sc-RNA-seq [81]
Nav2, mt-Rnr2, 1700112E06Rik
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg18 weeksspinal cordROS, iNOS+ IF, WB [18]
KCHO-1↓ROS, ↓iNOS
SOD1G93A mouseB6.Cg-Tg17 weeksspinal cordArg1, CD1630 WB [24]
clemastine↑Arg1, ↑CD163
SOD1G93A mouseB6.Cg-Tg21 weeksspinal cordpSTAT3, Kv1.3, Kv1.5+X IF [70]
SOD1G93A mouseB6.Cg-TgNMspinal cordSpp1, Itgax, Axl, Lilrb4, Clec7a, Ccl2, Csf1, Apoe+X RNA-seq [82]
SOD1G93A mouseC57BL/6J-Tg19–22 weeksspinal cordIl-1β, Nlrp3, Asc, Cas1+X RT-PCR [73]
SOD1H46R mouseC57BL/6N-Tg28 weeksspinal cordUbiquitin+X IF [71]
SOD1G86R mouseFVB/NNMbrain stemNox2, Ccl4, MhcII, Ym1, Tyrobp, Tgf-β, Tgf-βr1, Cx3Cr1, Hexb, Tmem119+X RT-PCR [27]
SOD1G93A mouseNM14 weeksspinal cordIl-1β, Tnfα+X RT-PCR [29]
TAK-242Il-1β, ↓Tnfα
SOD1G93A mouseNM15 weeksspinal cordTLR4, CD14, COX2+ WB [28]
gamisoyo-san↓TLR4, ↓CD14, ↓COX2
SOD1G93A mouseNM18 weeksspinal cordHuR+X WB, IF[30]
Variations in the expression of the molecules between wild-type and SOD1 model are marked with the following symbols: increase (+), no change (0) and decrease (−). Variations in the expression of the molecules between non-treated and treated SOD1 animal model are marked with the following symbols: increase (↑), no change (↔) and decrease (↓). X: no treatment was administered to the SOD1 animal models. MN survival: motor neuron survival; SOD1: superoxide dismutase 1; NOS2: nitric oxide synthase 2; TLR: toll-like receptor; HMGB1: high mobility group box protein 1; NFκB: nuclear factor kappa B; IL: interleukin; MhcII: major histocompatibility complex class II; Cebpa: CCAAT/enhancer binding protein; CD: cluster of differentiation; Nlrp3: nucleotide binding domain and leucine rich repeat containing protein 3; TNFα: tumor necrosis factor alpha; Arg1: arginase 1; Fizz1: found in inflammatory zone 1; Socs1: suppressor of cytokine signaling; TGF-β: transforming growth factor beta; Asc: apoptosis associated speck-like protein containing a CARD; Cas1: caspase 1; Tyrobp: TYRO protein tyrosine kinase binding protein; Trem2: triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2; p-NFκB: phosphorylated NFκB; Ccl: C-C motif chemokine ligand; Cxcl13: C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 13; Spp: secreted phosphoprotein; Brca1: breast cancer gene 1; P21: cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A; Pcna: proliferating cell nuclear antigen; Stat1: signal transducer and activator of transcription 1; Gadd45a: growth arrest and DNA damage inducible protein; Sp3: specificity protein 3; Cx3Cr1: C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1; iNOS: inducible nitric oxide synthase; BDNF: brain derived neurotrophic factor; GDNF: glial cell derived neurotrophic factor; Ifn-γ: interferon gamma; Camk2b: calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase beta 2; Nav2: neuron navigator 2; mt-Rnr2: mitochondrially encoded 16S rRNA; 1700112E06Rik: leucine rich melanocyte differentiation associated protein; COX2: cyclo-oxygenase 2; ROS: reactive oxygen species; pSTAT3: phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; Kv1.3/Kv1.5: voltage-gated potassium channel; Itgax: integrin subunit alpha X; Axl: tyrosine protein kinase receptor UFO; Lilrb4: leukocyte immunoglobulin like receptor B4; Clec7a: c-type lectin domain containing 7A; Csf1: colony stimulating factor 1; Apoe: apolipoprotein E; NOX2: NADPH oxidase 2; Ym1: chitinase 3 like 1; TGF-βR1: TGF-β receptor 1; Hexb: hexosaminidase subunit beta; Tmem119: transmembrane protein 119; HuR: ELAV-like RNA binding protein 1; WB: Western blotting; IF: immunofluorescence staining; RT-PCR: reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; qPCR: quantitative polymerase chain reaction; RNA-seq: RNA sequencing; sc-RNA-seq: single-cell RNA seq; NM: not mentioned.

2.4. Summary of the Microglial Characteristics of the SOD1 Models

The first mutation that was associated with ALS was discovered to be included in the SOD1 gene. The effects of the mutation in this gene, which codes for a detoxification enzyme, have been the focus of many studies aiming to interpret the pathological consequences of ALS disease more comprehensively. For this purpose, animals with SOD1G93A mutation on the B6SJL background were commonly utilized. Starting from the onset of the disease, increased microgliosis, together with elevated levels of neuroinflammation and NLRP3 inflammasome activation were detected as the main changes observed in microglia. Surprisingly, upregulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines was also observed, starting from the onset of the disease in the SOD1G93A mice. Finally, neuroprotective cytokines fail to provide the neurodegenerative counterbalance that causes microglia to induce non-cell autonomous motor neuron cell death. A large number of compounds intended to counteract the excess proinflammatory functions of microglia have been extensively studied to alleviate ALS symptoms. For example, tempol administration to both pre-symptomatic and symptomatic SOD1G93A mice and KCHO administration to pre-symptomatic SOD1G93A mice on the B6SJL background enhanced motor neuron survival by inhibiting proinflammatory cytokines and acting through the ROS/NOS mechanism, respectively. Similarly, clemastine treatment of pre-symptomatic SOD1G93A mice with a B6.Cg genetic background promoted both the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines and motor neuron survival. Furthermore, TAK-242 treatment at the early symptomatic phase and GSS treatment symptomatic of SOD1G93A mice cut down the release of proinflammatory cytokines, and probably supported motor neuron survival.
Having now acknowledged that many proinflammatory factors are secreted by microglia, indicating increased inflammatory activity, we have outlined putative signaling pathways that could explain the characteristics found in the spinal cord of SOD1G93A mice (Figure 2).

3. C9Orf72 Model

A characteristic that accounts for the largest proportion of both familial and sporadic cases of human ALS in Europe is an expansion of a hexanucleotide repeat (GGGGCC) in the 1st intron of C9Orf72 [60,84]. In Europe, approximately 30% of fALS patients and 5% of sALS patients have been identified with expansions in the C9Orf72 gene [60]. Healthy individuals carry 2-22 repeat expansions, whereas ALS patients can have hundreds or thousands of repeats in the C9Orf72 region [85]. Despite being the most common genetic mutation related to ALS, the function of C9Orf72 remains unclear. Several mechanisms have been proposed to describe C9Orf72-mediated ALS and all of them are not mutually exclusive [86]. Initial studies suggested that C9Orf72 expansion may be a loss-of-function mutation after an approximately 40% reduction in mRNA levels of C9Orf72 was found in the frontal cortex of ALS patients [87]. The second hypothesis is that the transcribed extensions of C9Orf72 form nuclear RNA foci that can sequester RNA-binding proteins and disrupt RNA homeostasis [87]. Finally, the repeat-associated non-ATG (RAN) translation of hexanucleotide repeats can cause aggregation of dipeptide repeat (DPR) proteins (such as poly-GA, -GP, -GR, -PA and -PR), leading to toxicity and cellular dysfunction [88]. So far, it has been challenging to create a suitable genetically modified model with a C9Orf72-background that resembles human ALS. Knockout mice that exhibited a general or cell-specific loss of C9Orf72 showed no motor or neurodegenerative abnormalities [89]. However, the same study demonstrated that C9Orf72 was essential for the balanced functionality of microglia [89]. Since the mentioned hexanucleotide repeats are assumed to lead to translation and accumulation of DPRs, models overexpressing these have also been used. However, it was also shown that the phenotype of this model was strongly dependent on the type and frequency of expressed DPRs [31,90,91,92,93]. One of the end-stage poly-GA mouse models needed to be euthanized by 7 weeks of age, due to the severity of the symptoms [31]. In another poly-GA model, when adeno-associated virus vaccination was carried out in the pre-symptomatic stage, it was shown to be effective. Thus, ALS disease progression also differs depending on the C9Orf72 model used, as reviewed in Batra and Lee, 2017 [94].

3.1. Microglial Morphology of the C9Orf72 Models

Three-week-old poly-GA mice exhibited activated amoeboid microglia in the CA2 region of the hippocampus, as shown by IBA1 staining, whereas both affected and asymptomatic poly-PR mice showed normal ramified morphology in the hippocampus region [31]. The density and the area of IBA1+ cells were reduced, together with the morphological alteration from amoeboid to ramified shape in ovalbumin-(GA)10-immunized poly-GA mice, when compared to control groups [33]. A promoter activity of the mouse ortholog of C9Orf72 was detected in a few IBA1-stained microglia in the 5th layer of the primary motor cortex (15.2%), primary somatosensory cortex (16.0%), dorsal (13.2%) and the ventral (5.9%) spinal cord using C9Orf72Lacz+/− mice [95]. Immunohistochemistry and qPCR results of the spinal cord of 6-month-old poly-GA-CFP mice showed a significant upregulation of phagocytic microglia markers CD68 and IBA1 [32]. IBA1 was also found to be increased in GFP-(GR)100 mice on both the mRNA and protein level [34]. As a modifier of frontotemporal lobe dementia (FTLD) risk, transmembrane protein 106b (Tmem106b) was examined in Tmem106b+/+, +/− and / mice, which were injected with adeno associated virus-(GGGGCC)66, and which showed no statistical differences in their Iba1 mRNA levels [96]. Similarly, mice injected with AAV1-GFP (control group), AAV1-GFP-(GA)50 (poly-GA group) and AAV1-GFP-(GA)50-mut (disrupted poly-GA group) revealed no statistical differences in the Iba1 mRNA levels [97].
Microglia of C9Orf72/ mice showed aggregation of lysotracker and Lamp1+ enlarged vesicles, together with increased levels of Il-6 and Il-1β cytokines, which could support the idea that changes in lysosomal function lead to neuroinflammation [89]. Molecular changes in the microglia of different C9Orf72 models are summarized in Table 3.

3.2. Transcriptome Profiling of the C9Orf72 Models

RNA sequencing analysis revealed upregulation of the immune response, including cytokine/chemokine mediated signaling and interferon-inducible genes in the brain samples of end-stage poly-GA mice, of which the expressions were correlated with the spinal cord and motor cortex samples from both ALS and C9Orf72-ALS patients [31]. Specifically, isolated microglia from poly-GA mice showed differential expression of interferon-stimulated genes such as Mx1, Isg15 and Oasl1/2 and complement factors like C3 and C4b in the transcriptome analysis [31]. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) on RNA-seq samples from 17-month-old C9Orf72/ mice revealed that a third (6 out of 19) of the upregulated pathways were related to neuroinflammation (such as interferon signaling), in which the majority (10 out of 19) of the pathways also showed upregulation in C9Orf72-ALS patients [89]. Similarly, transcriptome analysis of spinal cord samples revealed that there were 233 differentially expressed genes between transgenic-PBS (TG-PBS) and ovalbumin-(GA)10-immunized poly-GA groups, where ovalbumin-(GA)10 vaccination was able to attenuate several immune pathways (for instance, induction of C-C motif chemokine ligand 4, granulin, TYRO protein tyrosine kinase binding protein and complement factors), which were triggered in poly-GA mice [33]. Genome-wide identification of RNAs from C9Orf72 antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)- and control ASO-treated mice revealed only a few RNA expression changes in the spinal cord samples, including C9Orf72 itself and Cyr61 genes [98].

3.3. Summary of Microglial Characteristics of the C9Orf72 Models

Hexanucleotide repeat expansions in the intronic region of the C9Orf72 gene have been described as the major genetic cause of ALS. Since its discovery, several genetically altered animal models and adeno-associated virus injection methods have been utilized to examine these expansions in detail. Surprisingly, there are only few studies investigating proinflammatory cytokines in this model. For example, interleukin release was detected in the C9Orf72 knock-out mice. Additionally, mice overexpressing DPRs such as poly-GA and poly-GR demonstrated higher levels of microgliosis. Preferentially, studies in C9Orf72 models were mainly concentrated on transcriptome profiling. These analyses of the C9Orf72 models confirmed the upregulation of the genes related to neuroinflammation and immune pathways, especially including interferon-stimulated genes and complement factors.

4. TDP-43 Model

Even though mutations in transactive response DNA binding protein 43 (TARDBP or TDP-43) are rather rare in ALS patients, a mutation in about 4% of all European familial ALS cases can be found with an associated protein accumulation in the cytosol of affected cells; this process appears to play a role in the pathology of some ALS cases, although it remains unclear how these mutations cause ALS [60]. TDP-43 is a DNA and RNA binding protein, containing nuclear localization and export signals, a glycine-rich C-terminal domain and two RNA recognition motifs [99]. It plays role in RNA transcription, splicing, transport, stabilization and microRNA biogenesis [100]. TDP-43 is normally localized in the nucleus; however, under pathological conditions, it aggregates in the cytosol. The nuclear loss of TDP-43, together with its cytosolic accumulation, was shown to be involved in both ALS and FTLD pathogenesis [101]. The cleaved form of TDP-43 is the main component of the ubiquitinated and hyperphosphorylated inclusions that are present in neurons and glial cells of some ALS cases [101,102]. Until now, about 40 mutations in the TDP-43 gene have been associated with ALS (http://www.hgmd.org, accessed in January 2021). Many of these mutations have already been introduced into an animal model to study the pathology and effects of this mutations, as reviewed in McGoldrick et al., 2013 [103]. Unfortunately, it was also found that the phenotype is strongly dependent on the genetic background of the model and the promoter used, as well as the level of the transgene expression. Thus, the findings of this animal model must still be considered with limitations [86]. Since the TDP-43 mouse models for ALS are dependent on many individual factors, it is also not easy to define a uniform course of disease, so correlation or comparison with other ALS models appears difficult.

4.1. Microglial Morphology of the TDP-43 Models

Increased amounts of C5aR1, the main receptor of the proinflammatory complement peptide, and C1q, one of the complement components, were demonstrated to be localized in the microglia by double immunostaining with IBA1 in 16-month-old TDP-43Q331K mice [35]. Additionally, mRNA expressions of complement components C1qB, C3 and C4 were increased; on the other hand, CD55 was decreased both in the spinal cord samples from 10- and 16-month-old TDP-43Q331K mice, without altering C5a, fB and CD59a levels [35]. The number of activated IBA1+ microglia in prpTDP-43A315TUCHL1eGFP mice (having TDP-43 pathology in eGFP-labeled corticospinal motor neurons) increased with the disease progression, starting at P90 in the layer 2/3 and at P60 in the layer 5 of the motor cortex [36]. Additionally, affected upper motor neurons were found at close proximity to rod-like microglia [36]. Treatment of TDP-43A315T mice with root extract of anti-inflammatory Withania somnifera (ashwagandha) attenuated microgliosis and restored a less reactive microglia phenotype, as demonstrated in IBA1 staining [104].
The percentage of CD11b+ microglia and the number of amoeboid microglia were increased in the spinal cords of 16-month-old TDP-43Q331K mice, when compared to non-transgenic and wild-type TDP-43 mice [35]. Furthermore, female TDP-43A315T mice showed a two-fold increase in CD11b staining, and TDP-43A315TSMN (SMN: survival motor neuron) double transgenic mice attenuated the microglial activation relative to spinal cord samples of TDP-43A315T mice [37]. Chronic intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to heterozygous TDP-43A315T mice revealed cytoplasmic TDP-43 aggregations in LPS activated microglia, as shown by CD11b immunostaining [105].

4.2. Microglial Markers in the TDP-43 Models

No change in TNFα was detected in the spinal cords of ashwagandha-treated TDP-43A315T mice; however, spinal cord extracts of ashwagandha-treated TDP-43A315T mice revealed less NFκB activation [104]. On the other hand, M2-type microglia markers Ym-1 and Arginase1 were shown to be increased in ashwagandha-treated TDP-43A315T mice [104]. The molecular changes in the microglia of TDP-43 mice have been listed in Table 4.

4.3. Summary of the Microglial Characteristics of the TDP-43 Models

After the detection of mutations in the TDP-43 gene of human ALS patients, TDP-43 animal models drew attention. However, studies concerning microglia in these mouse models are scarce. In one study, complement components, which drive the proinflammatory pathways, were found to be deregulated in TDP-43Q331K mice. In another study, ashwagandha treatment of TDP-43A315T mice enhanced anti-inflammatory cytokines and reduced neuroinflammation possibly by acting on the NFκB signaling pathway.

5. Wobbler Mouse Model

The wobbler mouse, having an autosomal recessive wobbler (wr) mutation, was first described by Falconer in 1956 [106] in an C57BL/Fa mouse strain. It was shown that affected C54BL/6J mice have a spontaneous mutation in the vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 54 (Vps54) gene, which encodes for one of the components of the Golgi-associated retrograde protein (GARP) complex [107]. This complex plays a role in the retrograde vesicular transport of molecules from early/late endosomes to recycling endosomes and the trans-Golgi network (TGN). Nowadays, models with two different genetic backgrounds are available to study the consequences of this naturally occurring Vps54 mutation: C57BL/6J-wr and NFR-wr. The homozygous wr mutation causes a destabilization of the VPS54 protein, which in turn destabilizes the GARP complex, leading to the progressive loss of upper and lower motor neurons. As the wobbler mutation occurred spontaneously, this animal model was considered for the sporadic form of ALS. In some of the ALS cases, patients were identified with the Vps54 mutation through the Project MinE study (http://databrowser.projectmine.com, accessed in January 2021). Based on the severity of physical symptoms, wobbler mice can be grouped into three phases: (1) pre-symptomatic, (2) early clinical (evolutionary) and (3) stabilized (stable clinical). The pre-symptomatic phase lasts from birth to 3 weeks of age. During this phase, there is almost no difference between wild-type and wobbler mice in terms of clinical symptoms [108]. The early clinical phase lasts from 3 weeks to 3 months of age, when wobbler mice usually develop symptoms such as having head tremors, muscle atrophy, wobbly gait and reduced body weight [108]. The stabilized phase, which lasts from 3 months of age to death, can be identified by the arrest of motor neuron degeneration [108]. Wobbler mice at the stable clinical stage show enlarged endosome vacuolization, impaired anterograde/retrograde axonal transport, protein aggregation and mitochondrial dysfunction in the motor neurons, in addition to neuroinflammation, such as astrogliosis and microgliosis [109].

5.1. Microglial Morphology of Wobbler Mice

Several studies have shown neuroinflammation in different regions of the CNS of wobbler mice. The motor cortex of P20 to P60 wobbler mice showed an increased number of IBA1-labeled microglial cells [38]. P20, P40 and P60 wobbler mice also have activated microglia in all three layers of the cerebellum and white matter [39]. Increased TNFα was also demonstrated in the motor cortex and cerebellum of P40 wobbler mice by double immunostaining with IBA1 [38,39]. The percentage of amoeboid shaped IBA1+ microglia was increased in the dentate gyrus, and treatment with a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, CORT108297, reinstated the ramified phenotype in the wobbler mice [45]. Similarly, the increased number of IBA1+ cells was significantly decreased in the spinal cord sections of wobbler mice with short-term (4 days) and long-term (21 days) treatment with glucocorticoid receptor modulator CORT113176 [46,47]. In other studies, the high density of IBA1+ cells in the spinal cords was reduced when wobbler mice were treated with neuroactive steroids progesterone [42], synthetic progestin norethindrone [42] and high-affinity progesterone receptor agonist nestorone [48], respectively. Progesterone and nestorone were also able to change the amoeboid structure of microglia to a less reactive phenotype [42,48].
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of CD11b mRNA showed an increase in the spinal cord samples of wobbler mice, which was reduced with CORT113176 treatment [46,47]. In another study, progesterone treatment was shown to decrease CD11b mRNA levels in the wobbler mice compared to the control group, whereas norethindrone failed to perform such an effect [42]. Wobbler mice which were treated with nestorone [48] and nonhematopoietic erythropoietin derivatives carbamylated erythropoietin (CEPO) and asialo erythropoietin (ASIALO-EPO) [44] in individual studies demonstrated lowered levels of CD11b. Increased colocalization of CD11b with TNFα [40,43] and TNFα receptor 1 (TNFR1) [40] in the cervical spinal cord of wobbler mice was reduced with treatments of glutamate release inhibitor riluzole, an approved drug against ALS [43], and a toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) antagonist, VB3323 [43]. Surprisingly, treatment of wobbler mice with PRE-084, an agonist of endoplasmic reticulum resident receptor with chaperone-like activity (S1R), showed an increment in the number of CD11b+ cells in the white matter of the spinal cord, which was contributed to the increase in the numbers of both CD68+ (M1-type microglia) and CD206+ (M2-type microglia) cells [41].

5.2. Microglial Markers in the Wobbler Mouse

The expression and release of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNFα and interleukins, together with the stimulation of TLR4 signaling, are the hallmarks of M1 activated microglia. The cerebella of wobbler mice displayed significantly increased expression of TNFα at P40 and Il-1β at both P20 and P40 time points [39]. Spinal cord samples of wobbler mice showed an increase in Il-1β and Tnfα on the mRNA level, and treatment with Sigma-1 receptor agonist PRE-084 was not able to change this inflammatory response [41]. Similarly, treatment of wobbler mice with recombinant human TNFα-binding protein 1 (rhTBP-1) could not change TNFα and TNFR1 protein expressions [40]. In another study, wobbler mice showed upregulated Tnfα and inducible NOS (iNos) mRNAs, which were significantly lowered by nestorone treatment [48]. A decrease in NFκB, along with an increase in inhibitor of kappa B (IκB) α in the spinal cord samples of the nestorone administered wobbler mice, proved its anti-inflammatory effects, without affecting the TLR4 expression [48]. HMGB1, a ligand of TLR4, in the wobbler microglia was also illustrated by means of a double immunofluorescence experiment with IBA1 [46]. The increased number of HMGB1+ and TLR4+ cells in the spinal cord sections was downregulated by both short- and long-term in vivo CORT113176 treatments of wobbler mice [46,47]. mRNA levels of the proinflammatory mediators Tnfα, Tnfr1, Tlr4, iNos and p65 subunit of NFκB were shown to be elevated in wobbler mice, and their expressions were attenuated by short-term treatment with CORT113176 [46]. Similarly, long-term treatment of wobbler mice with CORT113176 significantly decreased the mRNA levels of TLR4, myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88), Tnfr and Il-18 [47]. Increased amounts of Tnfα, Tlr4 and iNos mRNAs were decreased by progesterone treatment, whereas norethindrone failed to perform such an effect [48]. Both progesterone and norethindrone treatment in wobbler mice increased IκBα mRNA levels, however only progesterone increased the mRNA level of the p65 subunit of NFκB [48].
The alternative M2 microglial activation is responsible for the production of anti-inflammatory molecules. Even though the M2 activation state does not attract enough attention, when compared to the M1 activation state, M2 markers have also been investigated in several studies. It was shown that Tgf-β gene expression was upregulated in the cerebellum of the P40 wobbler mice [39]. Furthermore, progesterone treatment of wobbler mice increased the expression level of Tgf-β mRNA [42]. The molecular changes in the microglia of wobbler mice have been summarized in Table 5.

5.3. Summary of the Microglial Characteristics of the Wobbler Mouse

Considered as an sALS animal model, wobbler mice have a mutated Vps54 gene. This mutation causes defects in the cellular transportation system, which eventually leads to neurobehavioral abnormalities in wobbler mice, mimicking ALS symptoms. Wobbler mice having a C57BL/6J background showed increased levels of M1-type markers in the motor cortex and cerebellum. Similarly, wobbler mice on the NFR background exhibited elevated levels of M1-type cytokines in the spinal cord. Because most studies have focused on M1-type markers, unfortunately, there are only a few studies investigating M2-type cytokines in wobbler mice. However, the histological and neurological outcomes of wobbler mice bring to mind the fact that neurodegenerative cytokines released by microglia overweigh the neuroprotective ones, which ultimately exacerbates the disease starting from the early clinical stage.
There have been several in vivo studies examining the effects of different treatments of wobbler mice on microglial function. Of these, the administration of neuroactive steroids such as progesterone, nestorone and CORT113176 diminished microgliosis and enhanced motor neuron survival in wobbler mice, acting through the NFκB signaling pathway. On the other hand, another steroid, norethindrone, failed to prevent the expression of neurodegenerative cytokines and therefore could not augment the motor neuron survival. Additionally, treatment of wobbler mice with rhTBP-1, an inhibitor of Tnfα, failed to change the expressions of either Tnfα or TNFR, even though it enhanced the motor neuron viability.

6. Conclusions

ALS is a fatal neurodegenerative disease. To date, numerous animal models have been generated to investigate the ALS disease in vivo. ALS is characterized by neuroinflammation in the CNS tissue of both patients and animal models. Together with motor neuron degeneration, microglia are activated in ALS and transform into an amoeboid shape. In a very simplified way, we can then refer to these processes as M1-type activation, where microglia release toxic proinflammatory agents, or M2-type activation, where microglia produce neuroprotective anti-inflammatory factors. The balance between M1 and M2 activation states is broken down during the course of ALS progression and M1-type activation can further exacerbate the disease. Many promising preclinical studies in some ALS models have shown that targeting the prevalent neuroinflammation has resulted in a slowing of symptoms, as well as reduced neurodegeneration. Unfortunately, however, transformation of these treatments into clinical trials has been unsuccessful. One possible reason for this is the strong heterogeneity of the causes of the disease. Our research has shown that of the four ALS mouse models considered here, only two models, SOD1 and wobbler, have been adequately studied with respect to neuroinflammation. Thus, the understanding of the role of microglia in the comparison between different models is still lacking. It has also been noticed that most of the studies deal with a pre-symptomatic or an early stage of onset of the disease. It must be considered that it will not be possible to treat future ALS-diagnosed patients before the onset or even directly at the onset of symptoms. These would be possible explanations for the failure of translation from preclinical to clinical investigations. Furthermore, the aspect of intracellular communication should be considered. Since all cell types of an ALS model have a genetic abnormality, affecting the functionality of these cells individually, it must be considered that the activity of microglia can also be affected by these cells of different backgrounds in different ways.
Neuroinflammation plays an essential role in all ALS patients. Due to the heterogeneity of the disease, it is mandatory to investigate the diverse roles of microglia, as reviewed by Cipollina et al., 2020, in many different models of ALS [110]. After all, this is the basis for finding an appropriate therapy for different ALS cohorts.

Author Contributions

H.C., C.T. and V.M. performed literature research and wrote the original manuscript draft. H.C. and V.M. made the figures. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by German Academic Exchange Service to Hilal Cihankaya. We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Funds of the Ruhr University Bochum. Graphical art in graphical abstract was prepare using (with modifications) Smart Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/) by Servier (Suresnes, France) licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

1700112E06RikLeucine rich melanocyte differentiation associated protein
5D4Keratan sulfate
ALSAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis
APOEApolipoprotein E
Arg1Arginase 1
AscApoptosis associated speck-like protein containing a CARD
ASIALO-EPOAsialo erythropoietin
AxlTyrosine protein kinase receptor UFO
BDNFBrain derived neurotrophic factor
Brca1Breast cancer gene 1
C1qComplement component 1q
C1qBC1q beta polypeptide
C3Complement component 3
C5aComplement component 5a
C5aR1C5a receptor 1
C9Orf72Chromosome 9 open reading frame 72
Camk2bCalcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase beta 2
CasCaspase
CCLC-C motif chemokine ligand
CDCluster of differentiation
CD11bCluster of differentiation molecule 11b
CD55Complement regulator
CD59aComplement regulator
CebpaCCAAT/enhancer binding protein
CEPOAsialo erythropoietin
CEPOCarbamylated erythropoietin
Clec7aC-type lectin domain containing 7A
CNSCentral nervous system
COX2Cyclo-oxygenase 2
Csf1Colony stimulating factor 1
CX3CR1C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1
Cyr61Cysteine rich angiogenic inducer 61
EPOErythropoietin
fALSFamilial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
fBComplement factor B
Fizz1Found in inflammatory zone 1
FUSFused in sarcoma
Gadd45aGrowth arrest and DNA damage inducible protein
GARPGolgi-associated retrograde protein
GDNFGlial cell line derived neurotrophic factor
GrnGranulin
HexbHexosaminidase subunit beta
HMGB1High mobility group box protein 1
HuRELAV-like RNA binding protein 1
IκBInhibitor of kappa B
IBA1Ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1
IFImmunofluorescence staining
IFN-γInterferon gamma
IGF1Insulin-like growth factor
IHCImmunohistochemistry
ILInterleukin
iNOSInducible NOS
Isg15Interferon stimulated gene 15
ItgaxIntegrin subunit alpha X
jALSJuvenile amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Kv1.3/Kv1.5Voltage-gated potassium channel
Lilrb4Leukocyte immunoglobulin like receptor B4
LPSLipopolysaccharide
MhcIIMajor histocompatibility complex class II
mt-Rnr2Mitochondrially encoded 16S rRNA
Mx1Interferon induced GTP binding protein Mx1
MyD88Myeloid differentiation primary response 88
Nav2Neuron navigator 2
NFκBNuclear factor kappa B
NLRP3Nucleotide binding domain and leucine rich repeat containing protein 3
NOSNitric oxide synthase
NOX2NADPH oxidase 2
Oasl1/22′-5′-oligoadenylate synthase-like protein 1
p-NFκBPhosphorylated NFκB
P21Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A
PcnaProliferating cell nuclear antigen
pSTAT3Phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
qRT-PCRQuantitative RT-PCR
RAGEReceptor for advanced glycation end products
rhTBP-1Recombinant human TNFα binding protein 1
RNA-seqRNA sequencing
ROSReactive oxygen species
RT-PCRReverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
S1REndoplasmic reticulum resident receptor with chaperone-like activity
sALSSporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
sc-RNA-seqSingle cell RNA-seq
Socs1Suppressor of cytokine signaling
SOD1Superoxide dismutase 1
Sp3Specificity protein 3
SppSecreted phosphoprotein
STAT1Signal transducer and activator of transcription 1
TDP-43Transactive response DNA protein 43
TGF-βRTGF-β receptor
TGFβTransforming growth factor beta
TGNTrans-Golgi network
TLR4Toll-like receptor 4
Tmem119Transmembrane protein 119
TNFαTumor necrosis factor alpha
TNFR1TNFα receptor 1
Trem2Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2
TyrobpTYRO protein tyrosine kinase binding protein
VPS54Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein 54
WBWestern blotting
WrWobbler
Ym1Chitinase 3 like 1

References

  1. Ferraiuolo, L.; Kirby, J.; Grierson, A.J.; Sendtner, M.; Shaw, P.J. Molecular Pathways of Motor Neuron Injury in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2011, 7, 616–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Robberecht, W.; Philips, T. The Changing Scene of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bruijn, L.I.; Miller, T.M.; Cleveland, D.W. Unraveling the Mechanisms Involved in Motor Neuron Degeneration in Als. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2004, 14, 248–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Philips, T.; Rothstein, J.D. Glial Cells in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Exp. Neurol. 2014, 262, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Polazzi, E.; Monti, B. Microglia and Neuroprotection: From in Vitro Studies to Therapeutic Applications. Prog. Neurobiol. 2010, 92, 293–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Imai, Y.; Kohsaka, S. Intracellular Signaling in M-CSF-Induced Microglia Activation: Role of Iba1. Glia 2002, 40, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Panni, R.Z.; Herndon, J.M.; Zuo, C.; Hegde, S.; Hogg, G.D.; Knolhoff, B.L.; Breden, M.A.; Li, X.; Krisnawan, V.E.; Khan, S.Q.; et al. Agonism of CD11b Reprograms Innate Immunity to Sensitize Pancreatic Cancer to Immunotherapies. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chistiakov, D.A.; Killingsworth, M.C.; Myasoedova, V.A.; Orekhov, A.N.; Bobryshev, Y.V. CD68/Macrosialin: Not Just a Histochemical Marker. Lab. Investig. 2017, 97, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Silverstein, R.L.; Febbraio, M. CD36, a Scavenger Receptor Involved in Immunity, Metabolism, Angiogenesis, and Behavior. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Benveniste, E.N.; Nguyen, V.T.; Wesemann, D.R. Molecular Regulation of CD40 Gene Expression in Macrophages and Microglia. Brain Behav. Immun. 2004, 18, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cunha, C.; Santos, C.; Gomes, C.; Fernandes, A.; Correia, A.M.; Sebastião, A.M.; Vaz, A.R.; Brites, D. Downregulated Glia Interplay and Increased MiRNA-155 as Promising Markers to Track ALS at an Early Stage. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 4207–4224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Johann, S.; Heitzer, M.; Kanagaratnam, M.; Goswami, A.; Rizo, T.; Weis, J.; Troost, D.; Beyer, C. NLRP3 Inflammasome Is Expressed by Astrocytes in the SOD1 Mouse Model of ALS and in Human Sporadic ALS Patients. Glia 2015, 63, 2260–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Maniatis, S.; Äijö, T.; Vickovic, S.; Braine, C.; Kang, K.; Mollbrink, A.; Fagegaltier, D.; Andrusivová, Ž.; Saarenpää, S.; Saiz-Castro, G.; et al. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Molecular Pathology in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Science 2019, 364, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chiarotto, G.B.; Cartarozzi, L.P.; Perez, M.; Biscola, N.P.; Spejo, A.B.; Gubert, F.; Francą Junior, M.; Mendez-Otero, R.; De Oliveira, A.L.R. Tempol Improves Neuroinflammation and Delays Motor Dysfunction in a Mouse Model (SOD1G93A) of ALS. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Romer, S.H.; Seedle, K.; Turner, S.M.; Li, J.; Baccei, M.L.; Crone, S.A. Accessory Respiratory Muscles Enhance Ventilation in ALS Model Mice and Are Activated by Excitatory V2a Neurons. Exp. Neurol. 2017, 287, 192–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bonifacino, T.; Cattaneo, L.; Gallia, E.; Puliti, A.; Melone, M.; Provenzano, F.; Bossi, S.; Musante, I.; Usai, C.; Conti, F.; et al. In-Vivo Effects of Knocking-down Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 in the SOD1G93A Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Neuropharmacology 2017, 123, 433–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ringer, C.; Weihe, E.; Schütz, B. SOD1G93A Mutant Mice Develop a Neuroinflammation-Independent Dendropathy in Excitatory Neuronal Subsets of the Olfactory Bulb and Retina. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2017, 76, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kook, M.G.; Choi, S.W.; Seo, Y.; Kim, D.W.; Song, B.K.; Son, I.; Kim, S.; Kang, K.S. KCHO-1, a Novel Herbal Anti-Inflammatory Compound, Attenuates Oxidative Stress in an Animal Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. J. Vet. Sci. 2017, 18, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sereddenina, T.; Nayernia, Z.; Sorce, S.; Maghzal, G.J.; Filippova, A.; Ling, S.-C.; Basset, O.; Plastre, O.; Daali, Y.; Rushing, E.J.; et al. Evaluation of NADPH Oxidases as Drug Targets in a Mouse Model of Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016, 97, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sheean, R.K.; McKay, F.C.; Cretney, E.; Bye, C.R.; Perera, N.D.; Tomas, D.; Weston, R.A.; Scheller, K.J.; Djouma, E.; Menon, P.; et al. Association of Regulatory T-Cell Expansion with Progression of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2018, 75, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Solomonov, Y.; Hadad, N.; Levy, R. Reduction of Cytosolic Phospholipase A2α Upregulation Delays the Onset of Symptoms in SOD1G93A Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 13, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Rabinovich-Nikitin, I.; Ezra, A.; Barbiro, B.; Rabinovich-Toidman, P.; Solomon, B. Chronic Administration of AMD3100 Increases Survival and Alleviates Pathology in SOD1G93A Mice Model of ALS. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 13, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Cocozza, G.; di Castro, M.A.; Carbonari, L.; Grimaldi, A.; Antonangeli, F.; Garofalo, S.; Porzia, A.; Madonna, M.; Mainiero, F.; Santoni, A.; et al. Ca2+ -Activated K+ Channels Modulate Microglia Affecting Motor Neuron Survival in HSOD1 G93A Mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018, 73, 584–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Apolloni, S.; Fabbrizio, P.; Amadio, S.; Volonte, C. Actions of the Antihistaminergic Clemastine on Presymptomatic SOD1-G93A Mice Ameliorate ALS Disease Progression. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 13, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Korhonen, P.; Pollari, E.; Kanninen, K.M.; Savchenko, E.; Lehtonen, Š.; Wojciechowski, S.; Pomeshchik, Y.; Van Den Bosch, L.; Goldsteins, G.; Koistinaho, J.; et al. Long-Term Interleukin-33 Treatment Delays Disease Onset and Alleviates Astrocytic Activation in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. IBRO Rep. 2019, 6, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zeldich, E.; Di Chen, C.; Boden, E.; Howat, B.; Nasse, J.S.; Zeldich, D.; Lambert, A.G.; Yuste, A.; Cherry, J.D.; Mathias, R.M.; et al. Klotho Is Neuroprotective in the Superoxide Dismutase (SOD1G93A) Mouse Model of ALS. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 69, 264–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. El Oussini, H.; Bayer, H.; Scekic-Zahirovic, J.; Vercruysse, P.; Sinniger, J.; Dirrig-Grosch, S.; Dieterlé, S.; Echaniz-Laguna, A.; Larmet, Y.; Müller, K.; et al. Serotonin 2B Receptor Slows Disease Progression and Prevents Degeneration of Spinal Cord Mononuclear Phagocytes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol. 2016, 131, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Cai, M.D.; Yang, E.J. Gamisoyo-San Ameliorates Neuroinflammation in the Spinal Cord of HSOD1G93A Transgenic Mice. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fellner, A.; Barhum, Y.; Angel, A.; Perets, N.; Steiner, I.; Offen, D.; Lev, N. Toll-Like Receptor-4 Inhibitor TAK-242 Attenuates Motor Dysfunction and Spinal Cord Pathology in an Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mouse Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Matsye, P.; Zheng, L.; Si, Y.; Kim, S.; Luo, W.; Crossman, D.K.; Bratcher, P.E.; King, P.H. HuR Promotes the Molecular Signature and Phenotype of Activated Microglia: Implications for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Neurodegenerative Diseases. Glia 2017, 65, 945–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. LaClair, K.D.; Zhou, Q.; Michaelsen, M.; Wefers, B.; Brill, M.S.; Janjic, A.; Rathkolb, B.; Farny, D.; Cygan, M.; de Angelis, M.H.; et al. Congenic Expression of Poly-GA but Not Poly-PR in Mice Triggers Selective Neuron Loss and Interferon Responses Found in C9orf72 ALS. Acta Neuropathol. 2020, 140, 121–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Schludi, M.H.; Becker, L.; Garrett, L.; Gendron, T.F.; Zhou, Q.; Schreiber, F.; Popper, B.; Dimou, L.; Strom, T.M.; Winkelmann, J.; et al. Spinal Poly-GA Inclusions in a C9orf72 Mouse Model Trigger Motor Deficits and Inflammation without Neuron Loss. Acta Neuropathol. 2017, 134, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, Q.; Mareljic, N.; Michaelsen, M.; Parhizkar, S.; Heindl, S.; Nuscher, B.; Farny, D.; Czuppa, M.; Schludi, C.; Graf, A.; et al. Active Poly-GA Vaccination Prevents Microglia Activation and Motor Deficits in a C9orf72 Mouse Model. EMBO Mol. Med. 2020, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, Y.J.; Gendron, T.F.; Ebbert, M.T.W.; O’Raw, A.D.; Yue, M.; Jansen-West, K.; Zhang, X.; Prudencio, M.; Chew, J.; Cook, C.N.; et al. Poly(GR) Impairs Protein Translation and Stress Granule Dynamics in C9orf72-Associated Frontotemporal Dementia and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1136–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, J.D.; Levin, S.C.; Willis, E.F.; Li, R.; Woodruff, T.M.; Noakes, P.G. Complement Components Are Upregulated and Correlate with Disease Progression in the TDP-43 Q331K Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. J. Neuroinflamm. 2018, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jara, J.H.; Gautam, M.; Kocak, N.; Xie, E.F.; Mao, Q.; Bigio, E.H.; Özdinler, P.H. MCP1-CCR2 and Neuroinflammation in the ALS Motor Cortex with TDP-43 Pathology. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 16, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Perera, N.D.; Sheean, R.K.; Crouch, P.J.; White, A.R.; Horne, M.K.; Turner, B.J. Enhancing Survival Motor Neuron Expression Extends Lifespan and Attenuates Neurodegeneration in Mutant TDP-43 Mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016, 25, 4080–4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Dahlke, C.; Saberi, D.; Ott, B.; Brand-Saberi, B.; Schmitt-John, T.; Theiss, C. Inflammation and Neuronal Death in the Motor Cortex of the Wobbler Mouse, an ALS Animal Model. J. Neuroinflamm. 2015, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Saberi, D.; Ott, B.; Dahlke, C.; Matschke, V.; Schmitt-John, T.; Theiss, C. The Spatiotemporal Pattern of Degeneration in the Cerebellum of the Wobbler Mouse. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2016, 75, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bigini, P.; Repici, M.; Cantarella, G.; Fumagalli, E.; Barbera, S.; Cagnotto, A.; De Luigi, A.; Tonelli, R.; Bernardini, R.; Borsello, T.; et al. Recombinant Human TNF-Binding Protein-1 (RhTBP-1) Treatment Delays Both Symptoms Progression and Motor Neuron Loss in the Wobbler Mouse. Neurobiol. Dis. 2008, 29, 465–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Peviani, M.; Salvaneschi, E.; Bontempi, L.; Petese, A.; Manzo, A.; Rossi, D.; Salmona, M.; Collina, S.; Bigini, P.; Curti, D. Neuroprotective Effects of the Sigma-1 Receptor (S1R) Agonist PRE-084, in a Mouse Model of Motor Neuron Disease Not Linked to SOD1 Mutation. Neurobiol. Dis. 2014, 62, 218–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Gargiulo-Monachelli, G.; Meyer, M.; Lara, A.; Garay, L.; Lima, A.; Roig, P.; De Nicola, A.F.; Gonzalez Deniselle, M.C. Comparative Effects of Progesterone and the Synthetic Progestin Norethindrone on Neuroprotection in a Model of Spontaneous Motoneuron Degeneration. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. De Paola, M.; Mariani, A.; Bigini, P.; Peviani, M.; Ferrara, G.; Molteni, M.; Gemma, S.; Veglianese, P.; Castellaneta, V.; Boldrin, V.; et al. Neuroprotective Effects of Toll-like Receptor 4 Antagonism in Spinal Cord Cultures and in a Mouse Model of Motor Neuron Degeneration. Mol. Med. 2012, 18, 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mennini, T.; De Paola, M.; Bigini, P.; Mastrotto, C.; Fumagalli, E.; Barbera, S.; Mengozzi, M.; Viviani, B.; Corsini, E.; Marinovich, M.; et al. Nonhematopoietic Erythropoietin Derivatives Prevent Motoneuron Degeneration in Vitro and in Vivo. Mol. Med. 2006, 12, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Meyer, M.; Gonzalez Deniselle, M.C.; Hunt, H.; De Kloet, E.R.; De Nicola, A.F. The Selective Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator CORT108297 Restores Faulty Hippocampal Parameters in Wobbler and Corticosterone-Treated Mice. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 143, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Meyer, M.; Lara, A.; Hunt, H.; Belanoff, J.; de Kloet, E.R.; Gonzalez Deniselle, M.C.; De Nicola, A.F. The Selective Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator Cort 113176 Reduces Neurodegeneration and Neuroinflammation in Wobbler Mice Spinal Cord. Neuroscience 2018, 384, 384–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Meyer, M.; Kruse, M.S.; Garay, L.; Lima, A.; Roig, P.; Hunt, H.; Belanoff, J.; de Kloet, E.R.; Deniselle, M.C.G.; De Nicola, A.F. Long-Term Effects of the Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator CORT113176 in Murine Motoneuron Degeneration. Brain Res. 2020, 1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Meyer, M.; Gonzalez Deniselle, M.C.; Garay, L.; Sitruk-Ware, R.; Guennoun, R.; Schumacher, M.; De Nicola, A.F. The Progesterone Receptor Agonist Nestorone Holds Back Proinflammatory Mediators and Neuropathology in the Wobbler Mouse Model of Motoneuron Degeneration. Neuroscience 2015, 308, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ransohoff, R.M. A Polarizing Question: Do M1 and M2 Microglia Exist. Nat. Neurosci. 2016, 19, 987–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kabba, J.A.; Xu, Y.; Christian, H.; Ruan, W.; Chenai, K.; Xiang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Saavedra, J.M.; Pang, T. Microglia: Housekeeper of the Central Nervous System. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 38, 53–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhao, W.; Beers, D.R.; Appel, S.H. Immune-Mediated Mechanisms in the Pathoprogression of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2013, 8, 888–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Henkel, J.S.; Engelhardt, J.I.; Siklós, L.; Simpson, E.P.; Kim, S.H.; Pan, T.; Goodman, J.C.; Siddique, T.; Beers, D.R.; Appel, S.H. Presence of Dendritic Cells, MCP-1, and Activated Microglia/Macrophages in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Spinal Cord Tissue. Ann. Neurol. 2004, 55, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Corcia, P.; Tauber, C.; Vercoullie, J.; Arlicot, N.; Prunier, C.; Praline, J.; Nicolas, G.; Venel, Y.; Hommet, C.; Baulieu, J.L.; et al. Molecular Imaging of Microglial Activation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Turner, M.R.; Cagnin, A.; Turkheimer, F.E.; Miller, C.C.J.; Shaw, C.E.; Brooks, D.J.; Leigh, P.N.; Banati, R.B. Evidence of Widespread Cerebral Microglial Activation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: An [11C](R)-PK11195 Positron Emission Tomography Study. Neurobiol. Dis. 2004, 15, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Evans, M.C.; Couch, Y.; Sibson, N.; Turner, M.R. Inflammation and Neurovascular Changes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 53, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lewis, C.A.; Manning, J.; Rossi, F.; Krieger, C. The Neuroinflammatory Response in ALS: The Roles of Microglia and T Cells. Neurol. Res. Int. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Santiago, A.R.; Bernardino, L.; Agudo-Barriuso, M.; Gonçalves, J. Microglia in Health and Disease: A Double-Edged Sword. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, J.; Wang, F. Role of Neuroinflammation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Cellular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Al-Chalabi, A.; Van Den Berg, L.H.; Veldink, J. Gene Discovery in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Implications for Clinical Management. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017, 13, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zou, Z.Y.; Zhou, Z.R.; Che, C.H.; Liu, C.Y.; He, R.L.; Huang, H.P. Genetic Epidemiology of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2017, 88, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bosco, D.A.; Morfini, G.; Karabacak, N.M.; Song, Y.; Gros-Louis, F.; Pasinelli, P.; Goolsby, H.; Fontaine, B.A.; Lemay, N.; McKenna-Yasek, D.; et al. Wild-Type and Mutant SOD1 Share an Aberrant Conformation and a Common Pathogenic Pathway in ALS. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13, 1396–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Allen, S.; Heath, P.R.; Kirby, J.; Wharton, S.B.; Cookson, M.R.; Menzies, F.M.; Banks, R.E.; Shaw, P.J. Analysis of the Cytosolic Proteome in a Cell Culture Model of Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Reveals Alterations to the Proteasome, Antioxidant Defenses, and Nitric Oxide Synthetic Pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 6371–6383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Heiman-Patterson, T.D.; Sher, R.B.; Blankenhorn, E.A.; Alexander, G.; Deitch, J.S.; Kunst, C.B.; Maragakis, N.; Cox, G. Effect of Genetic Background on Phenotype Variability in Transgenic Mouse Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Window of Opportunity in the Search for Genetic Modifiers. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2011, 12, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nardo, G.; Trolese, M.C.; Tortarolo, M.; Vallarola, A.; Freschi, M.; Pasetto, L.; Bonetto, V.; Bendotti, C. New Insights on the Mechanisms of Disease Course Variability in ALS from Mutant SOD1 Mouse Models. Brain Pathol. 2016, 26, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Nardo, G.; Trolese, M.C.; de Vito, G.; Cecchi, R.; Riva, N.; Dina, G.; Heath, P.R.; Quattrini, A.; Shaw, P.J.; Piazza, V.; et al. Immune Response in Peripheral Axons Delays Disease Progression in SOD1G93A Mice. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Marino, M.; Papa, S.; Crippa, V.; Nardo, G.; Peviani, M.; Cheroni, C.; Trolese, M.C.; Lauranzano, E.; Bonetto, V.; Poletti, A.; et al. Differences in Protein Quality Control Correlate with Phenotype Variability in 2 Mouse Models of Familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Neurobiol. Aging 2015, 36, 492–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Turner, B.J.; Talbot, K. Transgenics, Toxicity and Therapeutics in Rodent Models of Mutant SOD1-Mediated Familial ALS. Prog. Neurobiol. 2008, 85, 94–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gurney, M.E.; Pu, H.; Chiu, A.Y.; Dal Canto, M.C.; Polchow, C.Y.; Alexander, D.D.; Caliendo, J.; Hentati, A.; Kwon, Y.W.; Deng, H.X.; et al. Motor Neuron Degeneration in Mice That Express a Human Cu, Zn Superoxide Dismutase Mutation. Science 1994, 264, 1772–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Foyez, T.; Takeda-Uchimura, Y.; Ishigaki, S.; Narentuya, N.; Zhang, Z.; Sobue, G.; Kadomatsu, K.; Uchimura, K. Microglial Keratan Sulfate Epitope Elicits in Central Nervous Tissues of Transgenic Model Mice and Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2015, 185, 3053–3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ohgomori, T.; Yamasaki, R.; Takeuchi, H.; Kadomatsu, K.; Kira, J.I.; Jinno, S. Differential Activation of Neuronal and Glial STAT3 in the Spinal Cord of the SOD1G93A Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2017, 46, 2001–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mitsui, S.; Otomo, A.; Nozaki, M.; Ono, S.; Sato, K.; Shirakawa, R.; Adachi, H.; Aoki, M.; Sobue, G.; Shang, H.F.; et al. Systemic Overexpression of SQSTM1/P62 Accelerates Disease Onset in a SOD1H46R-Expressing ALS Mouse Model. Mol. Brain 2018, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Trias, E.; Ibarburu, S.; Barreto-Núñez, R.; Babdor, J.; Maciel, T.T.; Guillo, M.; Gros, L.; Dubreuil, P.; Díaz-Amarilla, P.; Cassina, P.; et al. Post-Paralysis Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition with Masitinib Abrogates Neuroinflammation and Slows Disease Progression in Inherited Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Deora, V.; Lee, J.D.; Albornoz, E.A.; McAlary, L.; Jagaraj, C.J.; Robertson, A.A.B.; Atkin, J.D.; Cooper, M.A.; Schroder, K.; Yerbury, J.J.; et al. The Microglial NLRP3 Inflammasome Is Activated by Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Proteins. Glia 2020, 68, 407–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Silverman, J.M.; Christy, D.; Shyu, C.C.; Moon, K.M.; Fernando, S.; Gidden, Z.; Cowan, C.M.; Ban, Y.; Greg Stacey, R.; Grad, L.I.; et al. CNS-Derived Extracellular Vesicles from Superoxide Dismutase 1 (SOD1)G93A ALS Mice Originate from Astrocytes and Neurons and Carry Misfolded SOD1. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 3744–3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Kassa, R.M.; Bonafede, R.; Boschi, F.; Bentivoglio, M.; Mariotti, R. Effect of Physical Exercise and Anabolic Steroid Treatment on Spinal Motoneurons and Surrounding Glia of Wild-Type and ALS Mice. Brain Res. 2017, 1657, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, S.; Cheng, C.; Chen, S.; Le, W. Dynamic Changes of CX3CL1/CX3CR1 Axis during Microglial Activation and Motor Neuron Loss in the Spinal Cord of ALS Mouse Model. Transl. Neurodegener. 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, J.; Liang, H.; Zhu, L.; Gan, W.; Tang, C.; Li, J.; Xu, R. Expression and Distribution of Arylsulfatase B Are Closely Associated with Neuron Death in SOD1 G93A Transgenic Mice. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 1323–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shijo, T.; Warita, H.; Suzuki, N.; Ikeda, K.; Mitsuzawa, S.; Akiyama, T.; Ono, H.; Nishiyama, A.; Izumi, R.; Kitajima, Y.; et al. Antagonizing Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 Attenuates Disease Progression in a Rat Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Exp. Neurol. 2018, 307, 164–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Han, G.; Li, F.; Singh, T.P.; Wolf, P.; Wang, X.J. The Pro-Inflammatory Role of TGFβ1: A Paradox? Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 8, 28–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Epperly, M.W.; Fisher, R.; Rigatti, L.; Watkins, S.; Zhang, X.; Hou, W.; Shields, D.; Franicola, D.; Bayir, H.; Wang, H.; et al. Amelioration of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in SOD1G93A Mice by M2 Microglia from Transplanted Marrow. In Vivo 2019, 33, 675–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, W.; Venugopal, S.; Majid, S.; Ahn, I.S.; Diamante, G.; Hong, J.; Yang, X.; Chandler, S.H. Single-Cell RNA-Seq Analysis of the Brainstem of Mutant SOD1 Mice Reveals Perturbed Cell Types and Pathways of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Krasemann, S.; Madore, C.; Cialic, R.; Baufeld, C.; Calcagno, N.; El Fatimy, R.; Beckers, L.; O’Loughlin, E.; Xu, Y.; Fanek, Z.; et al. The TREM2-APOE Pathway Drives the Transcriptional Phenotype of Dysfunctional Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Immunity 2017, 47, 566–581.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Noristani, H.N.; Sabourin, J.C.; Gerber, Y.N.; Teigell, M.; Sommacal, A.; Vivanco, M.D.M.; Weber, M.; Perrin, F.E. Brca1 Is Expressed in Human Microglia and Is Dysregulated in Human and Animal Model of ALS. Mol. Neurodegener. 2015, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Renton, A.E.; Chiò, A.; Traynor, B.J. State of Play in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Genetics. Nat. Neurosci. 2014, 17, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Taylor, J.P.; Brown, R.H.; Cleveland, D.W. Decoding ALS: From Genes to Mechanism. Nature 2016, 539, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Lutz, C. Mouse Models of ALS: Past, Present and Future. Brain Res. 2018, 1693, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. DeJesus-Hernandez, M.; Mackenzie, I.R.; Boeve, B.F.; Boxer, A.L.; Baker, M.; Rutherford, N.J.; Nicholson, A.M.; Finch, N.C.A.; Flynn, H.; Adamson, J.; et al. Expanded GGGGCC Hexanucleotide Repeat in Noncoding Region of C9ORF72 Causes Chromosome 9p-Linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 2011, 72, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Chen, H.; Kankel, M.W.; Su, S.C.; Han, S.W.S.; Ofengeim, D. Exploring the Genetics and Non-Cell Autonomous Mechanisms Underlying ALS/FTLD. Cell Death Differ. 2018, 25, 646–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. O’Rourke, J.G.; Bogdanik, L.; Yáñez, A.; Lall, D.; Wolf, A.J.; Muhammad, A.K.M.G.; Ho, R.; Carmona, S.; Vit, J.P.; Zarrow, J.; et al. C9orf72 Is Required for Proper Macrophage and Microglial Function in Mice. Science 2016, 351, 1324–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Chew, J.; Gendron, T.F.; Prudencio, M.; Sasaguri, H.; Zhang, Y.J.; Castanedes-Casey, M.; Lee, C.W.; Jansen-West, K.; Kurti, A.; Murray, M.E.; et al. C9ORF72 Repeat Expansions in Mice Cause TDP-43 Pathology, Neuronal Loss, and Behavioral Deficits. Science 2015, 348, 1151–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. O’Rourke, J.G.; Bogdanik, L.; Muhammad, A.K.M.G.; Gendron, T.F.; Kim, K.J.; Austin, A.; Cady, J.; Liu, E.Y.; Zarrow, J.; Grant, S.; et al. C9orf72 BAC Transgenic Mice Display Typical Pathologic Features of ALS/FTD. Neuron 2015, 88, 892–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Peters, O.M.; Cabrera, G.T.; Tran, H.; Gendron, T.F.; McKeon, J.E.; Metterville, J.; Weiss, A.; Wightman, N.; Salameh, J.; Kim, J.; et al. Human C9ORF72 Hexanucleotide Expansion Reproduces RNA Foci and Dipeptide Repeat Proteins but Not Neurodegeneration in BAC Transgenic Mice. Neuron 2015, 88, 902–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Liu, Y.; Pattamatta, A.; Zu, T.; Reid, T.; Bardhi, O.; Borchelt, D.R.; Yachnis, A.T.; Ranum, L.P.W. C9orf72 BAC Mouse Model with Motor Deficits and Neurodegenerative Features of ALS/FTD. Neuron 2016, 90, 521–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Batra, R.; Lee, C.W. Mouse Models of C9orf72 Hexanucleotide Repeat Expansion in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/ Frontotemporal Dementia. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2017, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Langseth, A.J.; Kim, J.; Ugolino, J.E.; Shah, Y.; Hwang, H.Y.; Wang, J.; Bergles, D.E.; Brown, S.P. Cell-Type Specific Differences in Promoter Activity of the ALS-Linked C9orf72 Mouse Ortholog. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Nicholson, A.M.; Zhou, X.; Perkerson, R.B.; Parsons, T.M.; Chew, J.; Brooks, M.; DeJesus-Hernandez, M.; Finch, N.C.A.; Matchett, B.J.; Kurti, A.; et al. Loss of Tmem106b Is Unable to Ameliorate Frontotemporal Dementia-like Phenotypes in an AAV Mouse Model of C9ORF72-Repeat Induced Toxicity. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2018, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Zhang, Y.J.; Gendron, T.F.; Grima, J.C.; Sasaguri, H.; Jansen-West, K.; Xu, Y.F.; Katzman, R.B.; Gass, J.; Murray, M.E.; Shinohara, M.; et al. C9ORF72 Poly(GA) Aggregates Sequester and Impair HR23 and Nucleocytoplasmic Transport Proteins. Nat. Neurosci. 2016, 19, 668–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Lagier-Tourenne, C.; Baughn, M.; Rigo, F.; Sun, S.; Liu, P.; Li, H.R.; Jiang, J.; Watt, A.T.; Chun, S.; Katz, M.; et al. Targeted Degradation of Sense and Antisense C9orf72 RNA Foci as Therapy for ALS and Frontotemporal Degeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Benajiba, L.; Le Ber, I.; Camuzat, A.; Lacoste, M.; Thomas-Anterion, C.; Couratier, P.; Legallic, S.; Salachas, F.; Hannequin, D.; Decousus, M.; et al. TARDBP Mutations in Motoneuron Disease with Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration. Ann. Neurol. 2009, 65, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lee, E.B.; Lee, V.M.Y.; Trojanowski, J.Q. Gains or Losses: Molecular Mechanisms of TDP43-Mediated Neurodegeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2012, 13, 38–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Neumann, M.; Sampathu, D.M.; Kwong, L.K.; Truax, A.C.; Micsenyi, M.C.; Chou, T.T.; Bruce, J.; Schuck, T.; Grossman, M.; Clark, C.M.; et al. Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Science 2006, 314, 130–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Zhang, H.; Tan, C.F.; Mori, F.; Tanji, K.; Kakita, A.; Takahashi, H.; Wakabayashi, K. TDP-43-Immunoreactive Neuronal and Glial Inclusions in the Neostriatum in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis with and without Dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 2008, 115, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. McGoldrick, P.; Joyce, P.I.; Fisher, E.M.C.; Greensmith, L. Rodent Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2013, 1832, 1421–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Dutta, K.; Patel, P.; Rahimian, R.; Phaneuf, D.; Julien, J.P. Withania Somnifera Reverses Transactive Response DNA Binding Protein 43 Proteinopathy in a Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration. Neurotherapeutics 2017, 14, 447–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Correia, A.S.; Patel, P.; Dutta, K.; Julien, J.P. Inflammation Induces TDP-43 Mislocalization and Aggregation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Falconer, D.S. Wobbler (Wr). Mouse News Lett. 1956, 15, 22. [Google Scholar]
  107. Schmitt-John, T.; Drepper, C.; Mußmann, A.; Hahn, P.; Kuhlmann, M.; Thiel, C.; Hafner, M.; Lengeling, A.; Heimann, P.; Jones, J.M.; et al. Mutation of Vps54 Causes Motor Neuron Disease and Defective Spermiogenesis in the Wobbler Mouse. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 1213–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Boillée, S.; Peschanski, M.; Junier, M.P. The Wobbler Mouse: A Neurodegeneration Jigsaw Puzzle. Mol. Neurobiol. 2003, 28, 65–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Moser, J.M.; Bigini, P.; Schmitt-John, T. The Wobbler Mouse, an ALS Animal Model. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2013, 288, 207–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Cipollina, G.; Serej, A.D.; Di Nolfi, G.; Gazzano, A.; Marsala, A.; Spatafora, M.G.; Peviani, M. Heterogeneity of Neuroinflammatory Responses in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Challenge or an Opportunity? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Classically activated M1-type microglia release proinflammatory cytokines, whereas alternatively activated M2-type microglia release anti-inflammatory cytokines. CD: cluster of differentiation; CX3CR1: C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1; TNFα: tumor necrosis factor alpha; TNFR: TNFα receptor; IFN-γ: interferon gamma; IFN-γR: IFN-γ receptor; TLR4: toll-like receptor 4; IL: interleukin; TGFβ: transforming growth factor beta; TGFβR: TGFβ receptor.
Figure 1. Classically activated M1-type microglia release proinflammatory cytokines, whereas alternatively activated M2-type microglia release anti-inflammatory cytokines. CD: cluster of differentiation; CX3CR1: C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1; TNFα: tumor necrosis factor alpha; TNFR: TNFα receptor; IFN-γ: interferon gamma; IFN-γR: IFN-γ receptor; TLR4: toll-like receptor 4; IL: interleukin; TGFβ: transforming growth factor beta; TGFβR: TGFβ receptor.
Ijms 22 00993 g001
Figure 2. Possible signaling cascades in the spinal cord microglia of the symptomatic SOD1G93A mice. Activation of TLR4 signaling induces the translocation of NFκB into the nucleus, where NFκB can upregulate the expression of M1-type proinflammatory cytokines such as TNFα, IFN-γ, iNOS, Pro-IL-1β and Pro-IL-18. Furthermore, increased production of reactive oxygen species by damaged mitochondria induces the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome, ultimately leading to the cleavage of IL-1β and IL-18 molecules. Surprisingly, M2-type microglia markers IL-10 and CD206 are upregulated. The balance between M1 and M2 activation states is broken down in symptomatic SOD1G93A mice, and M1-type microglia outweigh M2-type microglia, causing microgliosis and eventually motor neuron degeneration. Molecules that are written in light gray are not mentioned in this review. Black arrows indicate an increase in the amount of the respective molecule. CD206: cluster of differentiation 206; CX3CR1: C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1; TNFα: tumor necrosis factor alpha; IFN-γ: interferon gamma; TLR4: toll-like receptor 4; IL: interleukin; NFκB: nuclear factor kappa B; Cas1: caspase 1; iNOS: inducible nitric oxide synthase; ASC: apoptosis associated speck-like protein containing a CARD; NLRP3: nucleotide binding domain and leucine rich repeat containing protein 3; ROS: reactive oxygen species.
Figure 2. Possible signaling cascades in the spinal cord microglia of the symptomatic SOD1G93A mice. Activation of TLR4 signaling induces the translocation of NFκB into the nucleus, where NFκB can upregulate the expression of M1-type proinflammatory cytokines such as TNFα, IFN-γ, iNOS, Pro-IL-1β and Pro-IL-18. Furthermore, increased production of reactive oxygen species by damaged mitochondria induces the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome, ultimately leading to the cleavage of IL-1β and IL-18 molecules. Surprisingly, M2-type microglia markers IL-10 and CD206 are upregulated. The balance between M1 and M2 activation states is broken down in symptomatic SOD1G93A mice, and M1-type microglia outweigh M2-type microglia, causing microgliosis and eventually motor neuron degeneration. Molecules that are written in light gray are not mentioned in this review. Black arrows indicate an increase in the amount of the respective molecule. CD206: cluster of differentiation 206; CX3CR1: C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1; TNFα: tumor necrosis factor alpha; IFN-γ: interferon gamma; TLR4: toll-like receptor 4; IL: interleukin; NFκB: nuclear factor kappa B; Cas1: caspase 1; iNOS: inducible nitric oxide synthase; ASC: apoptosis associated speck-like protein containing a CARD; NLRP3: nucleotide binding domain and leucine rich repeat containing protein 3; ROS: reactive oxygen species.
Ijms 22 00993 g002
Table 1. Morphology of microglia in the different amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) animal models based on genetic background, age, strain, collected tissue and microglial markers.
Table 1. Morphology of microglia in the different amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) animal models based on genetic background, age, strain, collected tissue and microglial markers.
ModelStrainAgeTissueMicroglial MarkerMorphologyReference
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg4–6 weeksspinal cordIBA1, CD11bND[11]
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg9 and 14 weeksspinal cordIBA1ND[12]
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg10 and 14 weeksspinal cordIBA1ND[13]
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg12–14 weeksspinal cordIBA1, CD11bActivated[11]
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg14 and 20 weeksspinal cordIBA1ND[14]
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg16 and 19 weeksmedial reticular formationIBA1, CD68Amoeboid[15]
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg16–17 weeksspinal cordCD11bND[16]
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg17 weeksretina, olfactory bulbIBA1Ramified[17]
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-Tg18 weeksspinal cordIBA1ND[18]
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-TgNMspinal cordIBA1Activated[19]
SOD1G93A mouseB6SJL-TgNMspinal cordCD11bND[20]
SOD1G93A mouseB6.Cg-Tg15 weeksspinal cordIBA1, CD40Activated[21]
SOD1G93A mouseB6.Cg-Tg16 weeksspinal cordIBA1, CD36Activated[22]
SOD1G93A mouseB6.Cg-Tg16 weeksspinal cordIBA1ND[23]
SOD1G93A mouseB6.Cg-Tg17 weeksspinal cordIBA1, CD68ND[24]
SOD1G93A mouseB6.Cg-Tg22 weeksspinal cordIBA1ND[25]
SOD1G93A mouseB6J-Tg16 weeksmotor cortex, spinal cordIBA1ND[26]
SOD1G86R mouseFVB/NNMspinal cordIBA1Activated[27]
SOD1G93A mouseNM15 weeksspinal cordIBA1, CD11bND[28]
SOD1G93A mouseNM14 weeksspinal cordIBA1ND[29]
SOD1G93A mouseNM18 weeksspinal cordIBA1Activated[30]
Poly-GA mouseC57BL/6N-Tg3 weekshippocampusIBA1Amoeboid[31]
Poly-GA-CFP mouseC57BL/6N-Tg26 weeksspinal cordIBA1, CD68Phagocytic[32]
Poly-GA mouseC57BL/6J-Tg28 weeksspinal cordIBA1Activated[33]
Poly-PR mouseC57BL/6N-Tg4 and 68 weekshippocampusIBA1Ramified[31]
GFP-(GR)100C57BL/6J6 weeksbrainIBA1ND[34]
TDP-43Q331K mouseC57BL/6J-Tg10 and 16 monthsspinal cordIBA1Amoeboid[35]
TDP-43Q331K mouseC57BL/6J-Tg16 monthsspinal cordCD11bAmoeboid[35]
prpTDP-43A315T UCHL1eGFP mouseC57BL/6-Tg3, 4 and 5 monthsmotor cortexIBA1Activated[36]
TDP-43A315T mouseC57BL/6 x CBA-Tg4.5 monthsspinal cordCD11bND[37]
Wr mouseC57BL/6J-wrP20, P40 and P60motor cortex, cerebellumIBA1ND[38,39]
Wr mouseNFR-wrP28spinal cordCD11bRamified and clusters[40]
Wr mouseNFR-wrP42spinal cordCD11bRamified and amoeboid[41]
Wr mouseNFR-wrP60spinal cordIBA1Highly reactive[42]
Wr mouseNFR-wrP60spinal cordCD11bND[42]
Wr mouseNFR-wrP63spinal cordCD11bActivated[40]
Wr mouseNFR-wrP70spinal cordCD11bND[43]
Wr mouseNFR-wrP84spinal cordCD11bND[44]
Wr mouseNFR-wrP90dentate gyrusIBA1Amoeboid[45]
Wr mouseNFR-wrP150spinal cordIBA1ND[46,47]
Wr mouseNFR-wrP150spinal cordIBA1Highly ramified[48]
Wr mouseNFR-wrP150spinal cordCD11bND[46,47,48]
Wr: Wobbler; P (number): postnatal days; IBA1: ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1; CD: cluster of differentiation molecule; ND: not described; NM: not mentioned.
Table 3. Microglial alterations in C9Orf72 mice based on the age, collected tissue and method.
Table 3. Microglial alterations in C9Orf72 mice based on the age, collected tissue and method.
Model.StrainAgeTissueMoleculeVariationMethodReference
Poly-GA mouseC57BL/610 weeksspinal cordCyr61+RNA-seq[98]
Poly-GA mouseC57BL/6J-Tg28 weeksspinal cordCcl4, Grn, Tyrobp+RNA-seq[33]
Poly-GA mouseC57BL/6N-Tg7 weeksbrainMx1, Isg15, Oasl1/2, C3, C4b+RNA-seq[31]
C9Orf72−/− mouseC57BL/6J-TgN/Aspinal cordIl-1β, Il-6+qRT-PCR[89]
Variations are symbolized in terms of an increase (+) as compared to the age-matched wild type littermates. N/A: not applicable; Cyr61: cysteine rich angiogenic inducer 61; Ccl: C-C motif chemokine ligand; Grn: granulin; Tyrobp: TYRO protein tyrosine kinase binding protein; Mx1: interferon induced GTP binding protein Mx1; Isg15: interferon stimulated gene 15; Oasl1/2: 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthase-like protein 1; C3: complement component 3; C4b: complement component 4b; IL: interleukin; RNA-seq: RNA sequencing; qRT-PCR: quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
Table 4. Microglial alterations in TDP-43 animal models based on the age, collected tissue and method.
Table 4. Microglial alterations in TDP-43 animal models based on the age, collected tissue and method.
Model.StrainAgeTissueMoleculeVariationMethodReference
TDP-43Q331K mouseC57BL/6J-Tg10 and 16 monthsspinal cordC1qB, C4, C3, C5aR1, C1q+RT-PCR, IF[35]
TDP-43Q331K mouseC57BL/6J-Tg10 and 16 monthsspinal cordfB, CD59a, C5a0RT-PCR[35]
TDP-43Q331K mouseC57BL/6J-Tg10 and 16 monthsspinal cordCD55RT-PCR[35]
TDP-43A315T mouse *C57BL/6-TgN/Aspinal cordYm1, Arg1+WB[104]
TDP-43A315T mouse *C57BL/6-TgN/Aspinal cordTnfα0WB[104]
TDP-43A315T mouse *C57BL/6-TgN/Aspinal cordp65 of NFκBWB[104]
Variations are symbolized in terms of increase (+), no change (0) and decrease (−) as compared to age-matched wild-type littermates. (* In this study, vehicle treated TDP-43A315T mice were compared to ashwagandha-treated TDP-43A315T mice.) N/A: not applicable; C1q: complement component 1q; C3: complement component 3; C4: complement component 4; C1qB: C1q beta polypeptide; C5a: complement component 5a; C5aR1: C5a receptor 1; fB: complement factor B; CD59a: complement regulator; CD55: complement regulator; Ym1: chitinase 3 like 1; Arg1: arginase 1; Tnfα: tumor necrosis factor alpha; NFκB: nuclear factor kappa B; RT-PCR: reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, IF: immunofluorescent staining; WB: Western blotting.
Table 5. Microglial alterations in wobbler mice based on the age, collected tissue and method.
Table 5. Microglial alterations in wobbler mice based on the age, collected tissue and method.
Model.StrainAgeTissueMoleculeVariationTreatmentMolecule after TreatmentMethodMN SurvivalRef
Wr mouseC57BL/6J-wrP40motor cortexTNFα, Cas3+X IF [38]
Wr mouseC57BL/6J-wrP40cerebellumTnfα, Tgf-β+X RT-PCR [39]
Wr mouseC57BL/6J-wrP20 and P40cerebellumIl-1β, Il-10+X RT-PCR [39]
Wr mouseNFR/wrP28spinal cordTNFα, CD11b+X IF [40]
Wr mouseNFR/wrP63spinal cordTNFα, TNFR, + IF [40]
rhTBP-1↔TNFα, ↔TNFR,
↓CD11b
Wr mouseNFR/wrP70spinal cordTNFα+ IF [43]
riluzole↓TNFα, ↓CD11b
Wr mouseNFR/wrP70spinal cordTNFα+ IF [43]
VB3323↓TNFα,
↓CD11b
Wr mouseNFR/wrP84spinal cordTNFα, IL-1β+ IF, RT-PCR [41]
PRE-084TNFα, ↔IL-1β,
↑CD68,
↑CD206
Wr mouseNFR/wrP150spinal cordHMGB1, TLR4, IBA1, CD11b, TNFα, TNFR, iNOS, p65 of NFκB+ IHC, RT-PCR [46]
CORT113176↓HMGB1, ↓TLR4, ↓IBA1, ↓CD11b, ↓TNFα, ↓TNFR, ↓iNOS, ↓p65 of NFκB
Wr mouseNFR/wrP150spinal cordIBA1, CD11b, TNFα, TLR4, iNOS + IHC, RT-PCR [42]
Tgf-β, p65 of NFκB, RAGE0
IκB
progesterone↓IBA1, ↓CD11b, ↔TNFα, ↓TLR4, ↓iNOS,
Tgf-β, ↑p65 of NFκB, ↔RAGE, ↑IκB
Wr mouseNFR/wrP150spinal cordIBA1, CD11b, TNFα, TLR4, iNOS + IHC, RT-PCR [42]
Tgf-β, p65 of NFκB, RAGE0
IκB
norethindrone↓IBA1, ↔CD11b, ↑TNFα, ↔TLR4, ↑iNOS,
Tgf-β, ↔p65 of NFκB, ↔RAGE, ↑IκB
Wr mouseNFR/wrP150spinal cordHMGB1, TLR4, MyD88, TNFR, IL-18, IBA1, CD11b+ IHC, RT-PCR [47]
p50 of NFκB0
CORT113176↓HMGB1, ↓TLR4, ↓MyD88, ↓TNFR, ↓IL-18, ↓IBA1, ↓CD11b,
↓ p50 of NFκB
Wr mouseNFR/wrP150spinal cordIBA1, CD11b, TNFα, iNOS, NFκB, TLR4+ IHC, RT-PCR [48]
IκB0
nestorone↓IBA1, ↓CD11b, ↓TNFα, ↓iNOS, ↓NFκB, ↔TLR4, ↑IκB
Variations in the expression of the molecules between wild-type and wobbler model are marked with the following symbols: increase (+), no change (0) and decrease (−). Variations in the expression of the molecules between non-treated and treated wobbler animals are marked with the following symbols: increase (↑), no change (↔) and decrease (↓). X: no treatment was administered to the wobbler mice animal models. MN survival: motor neuron survival; Wr: wobbler; P(number): postnatal days; TNFα: tumor necrosis factor alpha; Cas3: caspase 3; TGF-β: transforming growth factor beta; IL: interleukin; CD: cluster of differentiation; TNFR: TNFα receptor; HMGB1: high mobility group box protein 1; TLR4: toll-like receptor 4; iNOS: inducible nitric oxide synthase; NFκB: nuclear factor kappa B; IBA1: ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1; Myd88: myeloid differentiation primary response 88; IκB: inhibitor of kappa B; RAGE: receptor for advanced glycation end products; rhTBP-1: recombinant human TNFα binding protein 1; IF: immunofluorescence staining; RT-PCR: reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; IHC: immunohistochemistry.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cihankaya, H.; Theiss, C.; Matschke, V. Little Helpers or Mean Rogue—Role of Microglia in Animal Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 993. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22030993

AMA Style

Cihankaya H, Theiss C, Matschke V. Little Helpers or Mean Rogue—Role of Microglia in Animal Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(3):993. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22030993

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cihankaya, Hilal, Carsten Theiss, and Veronika Matschke. 2021. "Little Helpers or Mean Rogue—Role of Microglia in Animal Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 3: 993. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22030993

APA Style

Cihankaya, H., Theiss, C., & Matschke, V. (2021). Little Helpers or Mean Rogue—Role of Microglia in Animal Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(3), 993. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22030993

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop