Next Article in Journal
Glyphosate and AMPA Induce Alterations in Expression of Genes Involved in Chromatin Architecture in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (In Vitro)
Next Article in Special Issue
Response Criteria in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis: Evolution in the Era of KIT Inhibitors
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Spheroid, Tumouroid and 3D Bioprinted In-Vitro Models of Adult and Paediatric Glioblastoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mediator-Related Symptoms and Anaphylaxis in Children with Mastocytosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms22062964
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Epigenetic Changes in Neoplastic Mast Cells and Potential Impact in Mastocytosis

by
Edyta Reszka
1,*,
Ewa Jabłońska
1,
Edyta Wieczorek
1,
Peter Valent
2,3,
Michel Arock
4,
Gunnar Nilsson
5,
Bogusław Nedoszytko
6,7 and
Marek Niedoszytko
8,*
1
Department of Molecular Genetics and Epigenetics, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, 91-348 Lodz, Poland
2
Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
3
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
4
Department of Hematological Biology, Pitié-Sapêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France
5
Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
6
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland
7
Invicta Fertility and Reproductive Center, Molecular Laboratory, Polna 64, 81-740 Sopot, Poland
8
Department of Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(6), 2964; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22062964
Submission received: 18 February 2021 / Revised: 10 March 2021 / Accepted: 12 March 2021 / Published: 15 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mastocytosis, MCAS, and Related Disorders – Diagnosis, Classification and Therapy)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a hematologic neoplasm with abnormal accumulation of mast cells in various organ systems such as the bone marrow, other visceral organs and skin. So far, only little is known about epigenetic changes contributing to the pathogenesis of SM. In the current article, we provide an overview of epigenetic changes that may occur and be relevant to mastocytosis, including mutations in genes involved in epigenetic processes, such as TET2, DNMT3A and ASXL1, and global and gene-specific methylation patterns in neoplastic cells. Moreover, we discuss methylation-specific pathways and other epigenetic events that may trigger disease progression in mast cell neoplasms. Finally, we discuss epigenetic targets and the effects of epigenetic drugs, such as demethylating agents and BET-targeting drugs, on growth and viability of neoplastic mast cells. The definitive impact of these targets and the efficacy of epigenetic therapies in advanced SM need to be explored in future preclinical studies and clinical trials.

1. Clinical Features and Classification of Mastocytosis

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a neoplastic disease of the bone marrow (BM) characterized by infiltration and abnormal accumulation of mast cells (MC) in the BM, liver, spleen, lymph nodes, skin and other organs. In a subset of patients, release of mediators from MC results in systemic symptoms, and sometimes even in anaphylaxis [1,2,3,4,5,6]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, mastocytosis can be divided into the following variants: cutaneous mastocytosis (CM), SM, and local MC tumors. SM is split into five categories with varying prognosis: the most prevalent form is indolent SM (ISM); less frequently detected variants of SM are smoldering SM (SSM), and advanced forms of SM; i.e., SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN), aggressive SM (ASM) and MC leukemia (MCL) [4,7,8].
Clinical manifestations of mastocytosis are manifold. Several of the symptoms recorded are induced by MC-derived mediators. Other symptoms are caused by MC infiltration in various organs. Main symptoms affecting the patients’ quality of life are symptoms related to skin lesions, anaphylaxis, osteoporosis, gastrointestinal problems, fatigue, anxiety, and depression [1,2,3].
In children and adults, mastocytosis is usually an acquired disease, although rare familial cases have been observed [1,8]. In a majority of younger patients, MC accumulation and infiltration is located primarily or even exclusively in the skin, leading to the diagnosis of CM. In many of these children, CM regresses at puberty. Indolent and advanced forms of SM are very rare in children, but are the dominant form of mastocytosis in adults. In SM variants, the detection or exclusion of B- and/or C-Findings is crucial for the proper classification and treatment. B-Findings indicate a huge MC burden: these B-Findings include (1) BM biopsy showing >30% infiltration by MC (focal dense aggregates) and tryptase level above 200 ng/mL (2) signs of dysplasia or myeloproliferation in non-MC lineages but insufficient to diagnose SM-AHN, (3) hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly without hypersplenism and/or lymphadenopathy on palpation or imaging [9]. C-Findings describe a clinically significant impairment of organ function (organ damage) caused by the MC infiltrates: (1) BM dysfunction with one or more cytopenia(s) (absolute neutrophil count = ANC < 1.0 × 109/L, Hgb < 10 g/dL, or platelets < 100 × 109/L, (2) hepatomegaly with impairment of liver function, ascites and/or portal hypertension, (3) skeletal involvement with large osteolytic lesions and pathological fractures, (4) palpable splenomegaly with hypersplenism, (5) malabsorption with weight loss [4,5,8]. The presence of one or more C-Finding(s) leads to the diagnosis of advanced SM: ASM, SM-AHN, or acute MCL [5,8,10]. While patients with CM or ISM have an excellent prognosis, patients with ASM, SM-AHN or MCL have a poor or very poor prognosis as their disease is often resistant to various treatments [11,12].

KIT Mutations

Stem cell factor (SCF)-induced KIT activation results in MC differentiation from their progenitor cells as well as MC survival and MC maturation [13,14,15]. At higher concentrations, SCF can also augment IgE-dependent mediator release from MC [13,14,15]. KIT (CD117) belongs to the type III receptor tyrosine kinase family and it is encoded by the KIT proto-oncogene. An aspartic acid to valine substitution (D816V) in exon 17 of 21 exons, which encodes a second catalytic domain, leads to autonomous activation of KIT and thus to enhanced MC differentiation and survival in the absence of SCF [16,17,18]. This mutation is found in >80% of all adult patients with SM, and thus, this gain-of-function mutation in KIT is considered to contribute to the development of SM [12,19]. However, other mutations in KIT, both at codon 816 or in other codons of KIT (for example 560) have also been reported. Familial mastocytosis has also been described to be associated with KIT variants: in these cases, other mutations in KIT, such as K509I, may be detected [20].
More than 80% of the observed KIT D816V point mutations have been associated with neoplastic phenotype of MC [20]. Interestingly, other KIT mutations, e.g., V560G (exon 11), K642E (exon 13) and Y269C (exon 5) have been found in patients with mastocytosis. The KIT mutation V560G is also expressed in the human HMC-1 cell line which has been established from the peripheral blood of a patient with MCL [21].

2. Epigenetic Changes in Mastocytosis

Epigenetics refers to mechanisms connecting the genetic background with environmental signals in order to provide adaptations to various conditions and threats, like aging, lifestyle factors and also intrinsic pathologic processes [22]. For example, physiologic cell functions and genomic stability are regulated by maintenance of biochemical processes regulated by the epigenome [23]. Epigenetic alterations contribute to the regulation of gene product expression independent of the nucleotide sequence in DNA [24]. Both heritable as well as non-heritable changes can lead to epigenetic modifications. There are different levels of epigenetic regulation that include DNA methylation, posttranscriptional modifications by non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), histone modifications and nucleosomes positioning, consequently affecting DNA and chromatin structure, respectively [25]. Somatic mutations in critical target genes regulating DNA methylation, chromatin shape and other nuclear processes may also act as epigenetic modifiers.
Unfortunately, very few studies have investigated the role of epigenetic modifications in neoplastic cells in SM. In the current study, we present an overview and update of epigenetic changes described in the context of mastocytosis so far: (1) Histone modifications in neoplastic MC, (2) Epigenetic modifications of KIT, (3) Methylation status of apoptosis-associated and tumor suppressor genes in HMC-1 cells, (4) Somatic mutations in genes regulating epigenetic mechanisms, (5) TET2, (6) DNMT3A, (7) 5-methylcytosine (5-mC), 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) level, (8) microRNA, (9) MITF and microRNA.

2.1. Histone Modifications in Neoplastic MC

A study by Martinelli et al. revealed that in advanced SM, specific histone modifications can be detected in neoplastic MC in SM, and the same was found in HMC-1 cells [17]. Several histone-modifying proteins were found to be expressed at lower levels in neoplastic MC compared to control cells. One of these proteins is the SET domain containing 2 histone lysine methyltransferase (SETD2) protein [17]. In fact, SETD2 showed reduced expression in patients with MCL. SETD2 is specific for lysine (K) -36 of histone H3, and methylation of this residue is associated with active chromatin. In the study by Martinelli et al., a decrease in H3K36Me3 methylation was correlated with SETD2 protein down-regulation in neoplastic MC in patients with MCL. Particularly, SETD2 loss of function may occur post-translationally, in the absence of mutations and other structural aberrations [26]. Loss of SETD2 function resulted in H3K36 trimethylation deficiency observed in human acute leukemia [27]. The interesting mechanism of epigenetic regulation is related with influence of tryptase on nuclei of MC. Tryptase possesses ability to cleave core histones at their N-terminal ends, leading to regulation of chromatin structure [28]. This part of histone is crucial for posttranslational modifications that have a wide epigenetic impact [29]. Tryptase clips nucleosomal histone 3 and histone 2B. Absence of tryptase leads to age-dependent accumulation of lysine 5-acetylated H2B which affects cell phenotype, up-regulation of markers of non-MC lineages and morphological alterations. The results prove that clipping of H2B by tryptase is a novel epigenetic mechanism and an example of intracellular action of tryptase [29]. Studies by Krajewski et al. showed that epigenetic regulation of MC activation during immune response may be caused by altered histone acetylation [30]. They showed that epigenetic properties of curcumin may suppress MC activation. Furthermore, trichostatin, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, may alter cytokine secretion (IL-4, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-13), and decrease expression of IL-33 by IgE-activated BM MC. In addition, continuous exposure with trichostatin led to MC apoptosis [28].

2.2. Epigenetic Modifications of KIT

It has turned out recently that chromatin epigenetic silencing might be one of the key regulators of mutated KIT inactivation [31]. However, the specific mechanism of action requires further investigation. Lyberg at al. in 2017 showed that epigenetic treatment with the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) suberoyl anilide hydroxamid acid (SAHA), is especially effective in KIT D816V-mutated BM MC and HMC-1 cells [32]. Among the applied HDACi, panobinostat, romidepsin and valproic acid, SAHA treatment rapidly increased total acetylated histones, followed by a decrease in phosphorylated KIT in the KIT-mutated human MC lines HMC-1 and ROSA (KIT D816V). Using ChIP qPCR resulted in a decreased active chromatin mark H3K18ac/H3 only in the KIT region but not in control genes upstream and downstream of KIT (PDGFRα and KDR). MC exposed to SAHA showed downregulation of KIT mRNA expression followed by decreased KIT protein expression, and apoptosis. Interestingly, primary MC isolated from SM patients, including one with MCL, were highly sensitive to SAHA-mediated cell death, while normal BM cells were resistant [32].

2.3. Methylation Status of Apoptosis-Associated and Tumor Suppressor Genes in HMC-1 Cells

Ghanim et al. explored the methylation status of 24 classical apoptosis-associated genes and 24 classical tumor suppressor genes (TSG) in HMC-1 cells and in control (normal BM) cells [31]. Their data showed that several of them were hypermethylated in the neoplastic MC line. Seven apoptosis-associated genes (CIDEB, GADD45A, HRK, TNFRSF25, BIK, BID and TNFRSF21) and six TSG (NEUROG1, CDH1, GSTP1, CDH13, TP73 and WIF1) were found to be methylated in HMC-1 cells but not in normal BM cells, suggesting that these genes are aberrantly hypermethylated in these neoplastic MC.

2.4. Somatic Mutations in Genes Regulating Epigenetic Mechanisms

Clinical presentations of the disease vary widely from indolent to advanced forms, and to the exceedingly rare MCL. KIT D816V mutation solely does not explain heterogeneity of SM with different disease phenotypes. Thus, extensive mutational analyses of patients may provide a better explanation of mastocytosis pathogenesis. Interestingly, several somatic mutations have been observed in epigenetically relevant genes.
There is still scarce research on non-KIT epigenetic-associated mutations in various types of mastocytosis. Genes related to epigenetic modification that have been found to be mutated in specific SM types are TET2 (TET methylcytosine dioxygenase 2), DNMT3A (DNA methyltransferase 3 alpha), ASXL1 (ASXL transcriptional regulator 1), EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2) and IDH1/2 (isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2) (Table 1).
In five studies on patients with different types of SM (Table 2), a panel of mutated non-KIT genes has been investigated. Bone marrow or peripheral blood were used as a source of target DNA with various sequencing applications [18,33,34,35].
Non-KIT mutations were less frequent but still comprised a substantial proportion of the mastocytosis patients. In the pilot study, the coding regions of 22 genes were investigated in 19 advanced SM patients. Overall, KIT D816V frequency was 89%, while non-KIT mutation was observed in fourteen patients (74%) who carried at least one additional mutation. The highest prevalence occurred for ASXL1/TET2 (n = 5, 26%), CBL (4 patients, 21%), SETBP1/SF3B1/DNMT3A (n = 2, 11%) and JAK2/CALR/FLT3/IDH-1/RUNX1/TP53 (n = 1, 5%) [17]. In a study of 150 ASM cases, Pardanani et al. observed a significantly different distribution of non-KIT mutations within 27 investigated gene targets in four SM-AHN groups, MCL and ISM. In the whole group of SM patients, the most frequent mutations have been observed for TET2 (29%), ASXL1 (17%) and CBL (11%) [33].
Additional molecular aberrations have been analyzed in a study of 39 patients with KIT D816V and various SM variants: ISM (n = 10), SSM (n = 2), SM-AHN (n = 5) and ASM (n = 15) or MCL (n = 7) with (n = 18) or without (n = 4) SM. Next-generation sequencing was applied to investigate mutational hotspot regions, and complete exon regions of EZH2, ETV6, RUNX1, and TET2 were analyzed [34]. A total of 17 mutations (13 frameshift, 2 nonsense and 2 missense) were documented in 2 (15%) of the 13 ISM patients examined, including 2/5 ASM patients (40%), and 8/23 patients with SM-AHN (35%) [35]. In addition, 9 missense, 4 nonsense, 13 frameshift mutations and one in-frame deletion, as well as one splice site mutation have been identified in TET2 in 15/39 (39%) SM patients. Ten of 15 (67%) patients carried more than one TET2 mutation. Eight ASXL1 mutations have been identified in 8 patients with 7 frameshift and 1 nonsense mutation. A missense mutation and 2 splice site mutations have been detected in EZH2 [34].
The overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in patients with additional aberrations as compared to those with KIT D816V alone [34]. Occurrence of 3 or more non-KIT mutations led to reduced OS (n = 4, 7 months) compared with fewer than 3 mutations (48 months) [17]. Interestingly, TET2, DNMT3A and ASXL1 mutations may affect prognosis, as demonstrated by worse OS in mutated patients. For example, mutation in epigenetic regulators, namely TET2 and/or ASXL1, was associated with reduced OS (11 months) compared with the absence of these mutations (84 months) [17]. In addition, significant differences in OS between patients with KIT-mutated SM and patients with combined TET2/DNMT3A/ASXL1 mutations independent of KIT and sole TET2 mutations (p < 0.001) have been observed [36]. To add, in SM-AHN patients ASXL1, but not TET2, mutation was associated with OS, suggesting different epigenetic changes in heterogeneous SM prognosis [37].
Importantly, mutations in TET2, DNMT3A, and ASXL1, EZH2 and IDH1/IDH2 have been observed more frequently in advanced SM, e.g., ASM, SM-AHN and MCL than in ISM patients (Table 2). Mutations in epigenetic driver targets in four groups of SM patients have been observed with the following relative frequencies: SM-AHN > ASM > ISM. In the whole group of SM patients, the most frequent mutations have been observed in TET2 (29%), ASXL1 (17%), and DNMT3A (6%). The only additional mutations observed in ISM patients are age-related somatic mutations that have also been associated with epigenetic changes, e.g., mutations in TET2 (7%) and DNMT3A (5%) [33]. Thus, mutations in three genes: TET2, DNMT3A, and ASXL1, may be associated with epigenetic features in SM. [36]. However, it remains unknown whether these mutations indeed lead to abnormal methylation patterns or other critical epigenetic changes in clonal cells and, if so, whether these changes indeed contribute to disease evolution and/or the aggressiveness of SM.
Patients with SM-AHN presented mutations in KIT, TET2, ASXL1 and CBL in 87%, 27%, 14%, and 11%, respectively. In these patients, mutated ASXL1 had a particularly adverse impact on OS [37].
Mutations in the discussed epigenetic modulators frequently occur in other hematological diseases. Recurrent TET2, DNMT3A, IDH1/2 mutations have been observed in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms and other hematological malignancies, such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) [38,39]. Thus, two questions can be raised: are these point mutations prognostic in SM and do these mutations have an impact on the responsiveness of neoplastic MC to various targeted drugs.

2.5. TET2

Ten-Eleven-Translocation proteins (with 3 isoforms) are enzymes dependent on a-ketoglutarate and Fe2+ TET2 is important in demethylation of 5-mC forming 5-hmC by oxidation that enables dynamic turnover of 5mc and 5hmC. In addition, mice with Tet2 knockdown presented late-onset hematological abnormalities. TET proteins and oxidized methylcytosines are implicated in several pathways of DNA demethylation. They are involved in (1) removal of 5-formylcytosine (5-fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5-caC) by thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG), and (2) inhibition of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT)1-mediated maintenance of DNA methylation [40].
Alterations of the numbers, location and function of MC are frequently observed in patients with SM [41]. Mutations in TET2 and other critical target genes are often detected in primary neoplastic cells in patients with advanced SM, suggesting a possible role of the gene products in abnormal MC accumulation and function in these neoplasms (see Table 2). For example, loss of Tet2 associated with Kit D816V mutation has been related to a transformation of the MC disease into a more aggressive phenotype in mice [42].
Recently, Montagner et al. found that TET2 might be a crucial regulator of MC proliferation and differentiation, and also of cytokine production [42]. MC lacking TET2 revealed disrupted gene expression, profound down-regulation of many genomic regions—enhancers, and reduced global 5-hmC deposition, delay in differentiation, defects in cytokine production and a marked increase in proliferation. Interestingly, while cell differentiation under TET2 absence has been found to be regulated with compensatory mechanisms mediated by TET1 and TET3 family members, MC proliferation was only dependent on TET2 without a compensatory effect by other TET family members [43].

2.6. DNMT3

Three DNMT enzymes have been described. DNMT1 is responsible for maintenance of DNA methylation, which recognizes hemimethylated CpG sites and replicates DNA methylation pattern in newly synthetized nucleotides in the cell. DNMT3A and DNMT3B are responsible for de novo DNA methylation [25].
DNA methylation and specifically DNA methyltransferase enzyme DNMT3A, involved in de novo methylation, modulates pathogenesis of various hematological diseases and is involved in regulating the function of immune cells. The role of DNA methylation and DNMT3A in MC regulation requires further investigations.
Moreover, it has been observed that DNMT3A is essential for hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) differentiation. HSC lacking Dnmt3a presented a level of global 5-mC levels comparable with control cells [44] and loss of Dnmt3a immortalized these cells in vivo [45]. Therefore, Dnmt3a seems to be critical in the epigenetic silencing of regulatory genes, thereby enabling efficient differentiation of HSC. Interestingly, in murine MC, overall levels of genomic 5-mC were not significantly different in both Dnmt3a- knockout and wildtype cells [46].

2.7. 5-mC, 5-hmC Level

The only study on global DNA methylation indices, like 5-hmC and 5-mC levels in patients with SM, has revealed that the correlation between SM diagnosis and significantly low 5-hmC levels may represent a systemic effect of SM. Overall reduced 5-hmC levels in all patients with SM have been reported. In SM, reduced level of 5-hmC was associated with the effect of KIT D816V mutated oncogene. Neither the loss of 5-hmC correlated with overall MC burden in those patients, nor was it due to inactivating mutations of TET2 or reduced TET2 expression [47]

2.8. MicroRNA

Non-coding RNA transcripts (ncRNAs), constituting almost 98% of human genome, have been demonstrated to play a significant role in various pathological processes. It is regarded that microRNAs (miRNAs) possess capacity to act as putative negative regulators of gene expression at transcriptional, posttranscriptional and epigenetic levels of the target genes [48].
miRNAs are recognized to be critical regulators of immune responses in various allergic diseases and are involved in cell differentiation, proliferation, survival and IgE-mediated allergic response [49]. In addition, specific miRNAs might be important for mouse MC differentiation. The analysis of expression of 181 mature miRNAs in selected highly purified hematopoietic murine cell types at immature, mature, and effector stages has revealed specific differences between the related cell types [50].
Additionally, in murine MC, miR-221-222 (miR-221 and its paralogue miR-222) has occurred to be significantly up-regulated upon cell activation. Overexpression of miR-221-222 resulted in altered cell morphology and cell cycle regulation without altering viability. Overall, this miRNA was involved in cell cycle regulation in MC in response to acute activation stimuli [51].
Currently, there is excessive evidence that exosome might provide cell-to-cell communication. In 2007, Valadi et al. showed that exosomes derived from a mouse and a human MC line (MC/9 and HMC-1, respectively), and primary bone marrow-derived mouse MC, contained RNA, both microRNA and mRNA. MC-derived RNAs can be further delivered to another cell, and can be functional in this new location. The authors have thus proposed that this RNA could be called “exosomal shuttle RNA” [52].
Characteristics of detailed RNA content have been determined in human MC line, HMC-1 using the microarray assay and miRCURYTM RNA array analysis. Note that 116 microRNAs were found in exosomes and 134 were identified in donor MC, the most abundant microRNAs in the exosomes, compared to the MC were: hsa-miR-451, hsa-miR-503, miRPlus_27560, miRPlus_2843, miRPlus_27564, hsa-miR-583, miRPlus_1795, miRPlus_17890, hsa-miR-663 and hsa-miR-30b. Predictions according to canonical pathways and networks showed involvement of MC-derived exosomal microRNA in cellular development, cellular movement, hematological system development and function as well as in cell cycle regulation [53].
However, it remains unknown whether all these miR species play a role in human (neoplastic) MC and it also remains unknown whether such miR molecules contribute to the pathogenesis of SM.

2.9. MITF and MicroRNA

A protein encoded by MITF is a transcription factor that contains both basic helix-loop-helix and leucine zipper structural features. The encoded protein regulates melanocyte development and is responsible for pigment cell-specific transcription of the melanogenesis enzyme genes [53]. The transcription factor, microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is critical for MC function and it is closely related to the regulation of KIT expression and activity. MITF may also be required for the neoplastic phenotype of MC in the SM context. It has been observed that MITF-deficient MC have down-regulated KIT expression, suggesting that KIT may be a target of MITF [54,55]. MITF has also been found to be highly expressed in neoplastic cells in BM biopsies in 9 of 10 patients with SM carrying KIT D816V. A study of Lee et al. indicated that MC with activating KIT mutation require MITF expression for MC proliferation [56].
Interestingly, it has been observed that miRNA regulation can link these two factors essential for MC function. Lee at al. have revealed that miR-539 and miR-381 are repressed by KIT D816V signaling through conserved miRNA binding sites in the MITF 3’-untranslated region. Normally, expression of these miRNAs is involved in MITF suppression and inhibition of colony-forming capacity of mastocytosis cell lines. Importantly, dysregulation of this pathway may contribute to abnormal MC proliferation and thus to the pathogenesis of aggressive MC diseases, both in humans and in the murine system [56].
Studies on the regulation of miRNA with other epigenetic key players are still at an initial stage. For example, findings from acute myeloid leukemia cells have indicated strong impact of miR-29 family members on three target DNMT izoenzymes: DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B resulting in global DNA hypomethylation as well as reexpression of tumor suppressor genes [57].
In the study on murine MC, although primary screening has not revealed modification of knockout Dnmt3a MC by any microRNA, it has been observed that miR-223 was dysregulated in cells lacking Dnmt3a [46]. Additionally, degranulation of MC followed by down-regulation of miR-223 has been observed in IgE-activated cells [58], suggesting the importance of miR-223 in epigenetic regulation of MC regardless of a MC immune response or differentiation.

3. Effects of Epigenetic Drugs on Growth and Viability of Neoplastic MC

The classical epigenetic drugs are the hypomethylating agents, such as azacytidine and decitabine. Both drugs are highly active in patients with advanced MDS, CMML and AML [59,60]. So far, however, only a few studies have examined the potential effects of these epigenetic drugs in the SM context or in SM-AHN.
A study of Ghanim et al. examined the antineoplastic effects of demethylating agents on human neoplastic MC. They found that the death regulator FAS is hypermethylated in neoplastic MC, but not in normal BM cells, and that azacytidine and decitabine can induce demethylation and thereby can promote expression of FAS mRNA, p21 mRNA, Noxa mRNA, and Bim mRNA in neoplastic MC [61].
Another potential epigenetic target in neoplastic MC is the epigenetic reader BRD4 which regulates expression of MYC in normal and neoplastic cells, including AML cells [62]. Wedeh et al. have shown that neoplastic MC in SM, including advanced SM, display BRD4 and MYC. The MC lines HMC-1 and ROSA also express BRD4 and MYC at the mRNA and protein level. Moreover, the BRD4-targeting drug JQ1 was found to induce dose-dependent growth inhibition and apoptosis in HMC-1 cells and ROSA cells and to suppress proliferation of primary neoplastic MC obtained from patients with ASM or MCL [63].
More recently, SETD2 histone methyltransferase was identified as a potential target in advanced SM. Indeed, Martinelli et al. have reported that very low or absent SETD2 protein expression was especially found in cases with advanced SM, and proteasomal degradation was found to have a major role in the observed lack this protein. Inhibitors of the proteasome, such as bortezomib, can rescue (the epigenetically decreased) expression of SETD2 and H3K36 trimethylation in neoplastic MC, resulting in a marked accumulation of ubiquitinated SETD2. Bortezomib was also found to counteract viability in neoplastic MC and to cooperate with midostaurin in inducing apoptosis in HMC-1 cells and neoplastic MC from patients with advanced SM [26].
The use of epigenetic drugs may pave the way for the development of improved treatment approaches in advanced SM. However, more preclinical studies and clinical trials need to be performed to confirm the impact of epigenetic targets and the efficacy of epigenetic therapies in patients with MC neoplasms.

4. Concluding Remarks

Mastocytosis is a group of heterogeneous diseases with a broad range of molecular patterns and markers and a variable clinical course. Several disease-specific processes may be triggered by the epigenome in these patients. However, only little is known about the role of epigenetic modifications in neoplastic cells in SM.
The current paper provides a summary of recent findings regarding epigenetic changes in neoplastic cells in various types of mastocytosis. In general, data published recently suggest that epigenetic changes may indeed trigger the pathogenesis of SM through several different mechanisms, including aberrant methylation of promoters of genes critically involved in DNA/RNA processing, apoptosis, and activation of MC, and modulation of KIT expression by epigenetic regulators. Moreover, genes whose products influence epigenetic processes including TET2, DNMT3A or ASXL1 may be altered (mutated) in mastocytosis. Such mutations are frequently observed in advanced SM and these mutations may also affect clinical behavior of SM and thus prognosis. In addition, TET2 and DNMT3A may play a role in MC responsiveness to acute and chronic activation. These observations suggest a potential influence of epigenetic processes on the pathogenesis of MC-related disorders.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.R., P.V., B.N., E.J.; writing—original draft preparation, E.R., P.V.; writing—review and editing, E.R., P.V., E.J., E.W., B.N., M.N., M.A., G.N.; funding acquisition, M.N., E.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This manuscript was financed by project 07-0045 provided by Polpharma Scientific Foundation, Poland and ST 02-0141/07/231 obtained by Marek Niedoszytko, a project of the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education—grant No. ST 02-0066/07/253 and by project 14.5 provided by Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland and obtained by Edyta ReszPolpharmaka. Peter Valent was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), grants P32470-B and F4704-B20.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AMLAcute Myeloid Leukemia
ASMaggressive systemic mastocytosis
ASXL1additional sex combs like 1
BETBromodomain and Extra-Terminal Motif
CALRcalreticulin
CBLcasitas B-cell lymphoma
CEBPACCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-alpha
CM cutaneous mastocytosis
CMMLchronic myelomonocytic leukemia
DNMT1DNA methyl transferase 1
DNMT3ADNA methyltransferase 3 alpha
DNMT3BDNA methyltransferase -3B
ECMextracutaneous mastocytoma
ETV6ets family transcription factor
EZH2enhancer of zeste homolog 2
FLT3Fms Related Tyrosine Kinase
HDACihistone deacetylase inhibitor
HSChematopoietic stem cells
IDH1/2isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2
IgEimmunoglobulin E
ISMindolent systemic mastocytosis
JAK2Janus Kinase-2
MCLmast cell leukemia
MDSmyelodysplastic syndrome
miRNAsmicro RNAs
MITFmicrophthalmia-associated transcription factor
MLL-PTDpartial tandem duplication of MLL
ncRNAnon-coding RNA
NPM1nucleophosmin 1
NRASneuroblastoma rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog
PTPN11protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 11
OSoverall survival
RUNX1runt-related transcription factor 1
SAHAsuberoyl anilide hydroxamid acid
SETBP1SET binding protein 1
SMsystemic mastocytosis
SM-AHNsystemic mastocytosis with an associated hematologic neoplasm
SRSF2serine/arginine-rich splicing factor 2
SSMsmouldering systemic mastocytosis
SUZ12suppressor of zeste 12 homolog
TDGthymine DNA glycosylase
TET2Ten-Eleven-Translocation 2
U2AF1U2 auxiliary factor 1
5-caC5-carboxylcytosine
5-fC5-formylcytosine
5-hmC5-hydroxymethylcytosine
5-mC5-methylcytosine

References

  1. Valent, P.; Sperr, W.R.; Schwartz, L.B.; Horny, H.-P. Diagnosis and classification of mast cell proliferative disorders: Delineation from immunologic diseases and non–mast cell hematopoietic neoplasms. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004, 114, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Theoharides, T.C.; Valent, P.; Akin, C. Mast cells, mastocytosis, and related disorders. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Valent, P.; Akin, C.; Gleixner, K.V.; Sperr, W.R.; Reiter, A.; Arock, M.; Triggiani, M. Multidisciplinary challenges in mastocytosis and how to address with personalized medicine approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Valent, P.; Horny, H.-P.; Escribano, L.; Longley, B.J.; Li, C.Y.; Schwartz, L.B.; Marone, G.; Nuñez, R.; Akin, C.; Sotlar, K. Diagnostic criteria and classification of mastocytosis: A consensus proposal. Leuk. Res. 2001, 25, 603–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Valent, P.; Akin, C.; Sperr, W.R.; Escribano, L.; Arock, M.; Horny, H.-P.; Bennett, J.M.; Metcalfe, D.D. Aggressive systemic mastocytosis and related mast cell disorders: Current treatment options and proposed response criteria. Leuk. Res. 2003, 27, 635–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Valent, P.; Akin, C.; Hartmann, K.; Nilsson, G.; Reiter, A.; Hermine, O.; Sotlar, K.; Sperr, W.R.; Escribano, L.; George, T.I. Advances in the classification and treatment of mastocytosis: Current status and outlook toward the future. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Valent, P.; Akin, C.; Escribano, L.; Födinger, M.; Hartmann, K.; Brockow, K.; Castells, M.; Sperr, W.; Kluin-Nelemans, H.; Hamdy, N. Standards and standardization in mastocytosis: Consensus statements on diagnostics, treatment recommendations and response criteria. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 37, 435–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Valent, P.; Akin, C.; Metcalfe, D.D. Mastocytosis: 2016 updated WHO classification and novel emerging treatment concepts. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 2017, 129, 1420–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pardanani, A. Systemic mastocytosis in adults: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management. Am. J. Hematol. 2016, 91, 1146–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Valent, P.; Sotlar, K.; Sperr, W.; Escribano, L.; Yavuz, S.; Reiter, A.; George, T.; Kluin-Nelemans, H.; Hermine, O.; Butterfield, J. Refined diagnostic criteria and classification of mast cell leukemia (MCL) and myelomastocytic leukemia (MML): A consensus proposal. Ann. Oncol. 2014, 25, 1691–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Soucie, E.; Brenet, F.; Dubreuil, P. Molecular basis of mast cell disease. Mol. Immunol. 2015, 63, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chatterjee, A.; Ghosh, J.; Kapur, R. Mastocytosis: A mutated KIT receptor induced myeloproliferative disorder. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 18250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Valent, P.; Bettelheim, P. Cell surface structures on human basophils and mast cells: Biochemical and functional characterization. In Advances in Immunology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992; Volume 52, pp. 333–423. [Google Scholar]
  14. Valent, P.; Spanblochl, E.; Sperr, W.R.; Sillaber, C.; Zsebo, K.M.; Agis, H.; Strobl, H.; Geissler, K.; Bettelheim, P.; Lechner, K. Induction of differentiation of human mast cells from bone marrow and peripheral blood mononuclear cells by recombinant human stem cell factor/kit-ligand in long-term culture. Blood 1992, 80, 2237–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Valent, P. The riddle of the mast cell: Kit (CD117)-ligand as the missing link? Immunol. Today 1994, 15, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Garcia-Montero, A.C.; Jara-Acevedo, M.; Teodosio, C.; Sanchez, M.L.; Nunez, R.; Prados, A.; Aldanondo, I.; Sanchez, L.; Dominguez, M.; Botana, L.M. KIT mutation in mast cells and other bone marrow hematopoietic cell lineages in systemic mast cell disorders: A prospective study of the Spanish Network on Mastocytosis (REMA) in a series of 113 patients. Blood 2006, 108, 2366–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pardanani, A.; Lasho, T.L.; Finke, C.; Zblewski, D.; Abdelrahman, R.; Wassie, E.; Gangat, N.; Hanson, C.A.; Ketterling, R.P.; Tefferi, A. ASXL1 and CBL mutations are independently predictive of inferior survival in advanced systemic mastocytosis. Blood 2015, 126, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Arock, M.; Sotlar, K.; Akin, C.; Broesby-Olsen, S.; Hoermann, G.; Escribano, L.; Kristensen, T.K.; Kluin-Nelemans, H.C.; Hermine, O.; Dubreuil, P. KIT mutation analysis in mast cell neoplasms: Recommendations of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis. Leukemia 2015, 29, 1223–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Furitsu, T.; Tsujimura, T.; Tono, T.; Ikeda, H.; Kitayama, H.; Koshimizu, U.; Sugahara, H.; Butterfield, J.H.; Ashman, L.K.; Kanayama, Y. Identification of mutations in the coding sequence of the proto-oncogene c-kit in a human mast cell leukemia cell line causing ligand-independent activation of c-kit product. J. Clin. Investig. 1993, 92, 1736–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. de Melo Campos, P.; Machado-Neto, J.A.; Scopim-Ribeiro, R.; Visconte, V.; Tabarroki, A.; Duarte, A.S.; Barra, F.F.; Vassalo, J.; Rogers, H.J.; Lorand-Metze, I. Familial systemic mastocytosis with germline KIT K509I mutation is sensitive to treatment with imatinib, dasatinib and PKC412. Leuk. Res. 2014, 38, 1245–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lasho, T.; Finke, C.; Zblewski, D.; Hanson, C.A.; Ketterling, R.P.; Butterfield, J.H.; Tefferi, A.; Pardanani, A. Concurrent activating KIT mutations in systemic mastocytosis. Br. J. Haematol. 2016, 173, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alegría-Torres, J.A.; Baccarelli, A.; Bollati, V. Epigenetics and lifestyle. Epigenomics 2011, 3, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kanherkar, R.R.; Bhatia-Dey, N.; Csoka, A.B. Epigenetics across the human lifespan. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2014, 2, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Barros, S.P.; Offenbacher, S. Epigenetics: Connecting environment and genotype to phenotype and disease. J. Dent. Res. 2009, 88, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Simo-Riudalbas, L.; Esteller, M. Cancer genomics identifies disrupted epigenetic genes. Hum. Genet. 2014, 133, 713–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Martinelli, G.; Mancini, M.; De Benedittis, C.; Rondoni, M.; Papayannidis, C.; Manfrini, M.; Meggendorfer, M.; Calogero, R.; Guadagnuolo, V.; Fontana, M. SETD2 and histone H3 lysine 36 methylation deficiency in advanced systemic mastocytosis. Leukemia 2018, 32, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, X.; He, F.; Zeng, H.; Ling, S.; Chen, A.; Wang, Y.; Yan, X.; Wei, W.; Pang, Y.; Cheng, H. Identification of functional cooperative mutations of SETD2 in human acute leukemia. Nat. Genet. 2014, 46, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Melo, F.R.; Vita, F.; Berent-Maoz, B.; Levi-Schaffer, F.; Zabucchi, G.; Pejler, G. Proteolytic histone modification by mast cell tryptase, a serglycin proteoglycan-dependent secretory granule protease. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 7682–7690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Melo, F.R.; Wallerman, O.; Paivandy, A.; Calounova, G.; Gustafson, A.-M.; Sabari, B.R.; Zabucchi, G.; Allis, C.D.; Pejler, G. Tryptase-catalyzed core histone truncation: A novel epigenetic regulatory mechanism in mast cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 140, 474–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Krajewski, D.; Kaczenski, E.; Rovatti, J.; Polukort, S.; Thompson, C.; Dollard, C.; Ser-Dolansky, J.; Schneider, S.S.; Kinney, S.R.; Mathias, C.B. Epigenetic regulation via altered histone acetylation results in suppression of mast cell function and mast cell-mediated food allergic responses. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ungerstedt, J.S. Epigenetic modifiers in myeloid malignancies: The role of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lyberg, K.; Ali, H.A.; Grootens, J.; Kjellander, M.; Tirfing, M.; Arock, M.; Hägglund, H.; Nilsson, G.; Ungerstedt, J. Histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA mediates mast cell death and epigenetic silencing of constitutively active D816V KIT in systemic mastocytosis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 9647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Pardanani, A.; Lasho, T.; Elala, Y.; Wassie, E.; Finke, C.; Reichard, K.K.; Chen, D.; Hanson, C.A.; Ketterling, R.P.; Tefferi, A. Next-generation sequencing in systemic mastocytosis: Derivation of a mutation-augmented clinical prognostic model for survival. Am. J. Hematol. 2016, 91, 888–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schwaab, J.; Schnittger, S.; Sotlar, K.; Walz, C.; Fabarius, A.; Pfirrmann, M.; Kohlmann, A.; Grossmann, V.; Meggendorfer, M.; Horny, H.-P. Comprehensive mutational profiling in advanced systemic mastocytosis. Blood 2013, 122, 2460–2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Tefferi, A.; Levine, R.; Lim, K.; Abdel-Wahab, O.; Lasho, T.; Patel, J.; Finke, C.; Mullally, A.; Li, C.; Pardanani, A. Frequent TET2 mutations in systemic mastocytosis: Clinical, KITD816V and FIP1L1-PDGFRA correlates. Leukemia 2009, 23, 900–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Traina, F.; Visconte, V.; Jankowska, A.M.; Makishima, H.; O’Keefe, C.L.; Elson, P.; Han, Y.; Hsieh, F.H.; Sekeres, M.A.; Mali, R.S. Single nucleotide polymorphism array lesions, TET2, DNMT3A, ASXL1 and CBL mutations are present in systemic mastocytosis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Damaj, G.; Joris, M.; Chandesris, O.; Hanssens, K.; Soucie, E.; Canioni, D.; Kolb, B.; Durieu, I.; Gyan, E.; Livideanu, C. ASXL1 but not TET2 mutations adversely impact overall survival of patients suffering systemic mastocytosis with associated clonal hematologic non-mast-cell diseases. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e85362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fong, C.Y.; Morison, J.; Dawson, M.A. Epigenetics in the hematologic malignancies. Haematologica 2014, 99, 1772–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Blecua, P.; Martinez-Verbo, L.; Esteller, M. The DNA methylation landscape of hematological malignancies: An update. Mol. Oncol. 2020, 14, 1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pastor, W.A.; Aravind, L.; Rao, A. TETonic shift: Biological roles of TET proteins in DNA demethylation and transcription. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 14, 341–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Theoharides, T.C.; Tsilioni, I.; Ren, H. Recent advances in our understanding of mast cell activation—Or should it be mast cell mediator disorders? Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2019, 15, 639–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. De Vita, S.; Schneider, R.K.; Garcia, M.; Wood, J.; Gavillet, M.; Ebert, B.L.; Gerbaulet, A.; Roers, A.; Levine, R.L.; Mullally, A. Loss of function of TET2 cooperates with constitutively active KIT in murine and human models of mastocytosis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e96209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Montagner, S.; Leoni, C.; Emming, S.; Della Chiara, G.; Balestrieri, C.; Barozzi, I.; Piccolo, V.; Togher, S.; Ko, M.; Rao, A. TET2 regulates mast cell differentiation and proliferation through catalytic and non-catalytic activities. Cell Rep. 2016, 15, 1566–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Challen, G.A.; Sun, D.; Jeong, M.; Luo, M.; Jelinek, J.; Berg, J.S.; Bock, C.; Vasanthakumar, A.; Gu, H.; Xi, Y. Dnmt3a is essential for hematopoietic stem cell differentiation. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Jeong, M.; Park, H.J.; Celik, H.; Ostrander, E.L.; Reyes, J.M.; Guzman, A.; Rodriguez, B.; Lei, Y.; Lee, Y.; Ding, L. Loss of Dnmt3a immortalizes hematopoietic stem cells in vivo. Cell Rep. 2018, 23, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Leoni, C.; Montagner, S.; Rinaldi, A.; Bertoni, F.; Polletti, S.; Balestrieri, C.; Monticelli, S. Dnmt3a restrains mast cell inflammatory responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E1490–E1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Leoni, C.; Montagner, S.; Deho’, L.; D’Antuono, R.; De Matteis, G.; Marzano, A.V.; Merante, S.; Orlandi, E.M.; Zanotti, R.; Monticelli, S. Reduced DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in patients with systemic mastocytosis. Eur. J. Haematol. 2015, 95, 566–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liz, J.; Esteller, M. lncRNAs and microRNAs with a role in cancer development. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 2016, 1859, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Shefler, I.; Salamon, P.; Mekori, Y.A. MicroRNA involvement in allergic and non-allergic mast cell activation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Monticelli, S.; Ansel, K.M.; Xiao, C.; Socci, N.D.; Krichevsky, A.M.; Thai, T.-H.; Rajewsky, N.; Marks, D.S.; Sander, C.; Rajewsky, K. MicroRNA profiling of the murine hematopoietic system. Genome Biol. 2005, 6, R71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Mayoral, R.J.; Pipkin, M.E.; Pachkov, M.; van Nimwegen, E.; Rao, A.; Monticelli, S. MicroRNA-221–222 regulate the cell cycle in mast cells. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 433–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Valadi, H.; Ekström, K.; Bossios, A.; Sjöstrand, M.; Lee, J.J.; Lötvall, J.O. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Ekström, K.; Valadi, H.; Sjöstrand, M.; Malmhäll, C.; Bossios, A.; Eldh, M.; Lötvall, J. Characterization of mRNA and microRNA in human mast cell-derived exosomes and their transfer to other mast cells and blood CD34 progenitor cells. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2012, 1, 18389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shahlaee, A.H.; Brandal, S.; Lee, Y.-N.; Jie, C.; Takemoto, C.M. Distinct and shared transcriptomes are regulated by microphthalmia-associated transcription factor isoforms in mast cells. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Tsujimura, T.; Morii, E.; Nozaki, M.; Hashimoto, K.; Moriyama, Y.; Takebayashi, K.; Kondo, T.; Kanakura, Y.; Kitamura, Y. Involvement of transcription factor encoded by the mi locus in the expression of c-kit receptor tyrosine kinase in cultured mast cells of mice. Blood 1996, 88, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Lee, Y.-N.; Brandal, S.; Noel, P.; Wentzel, E.; Mendell, J.T.; McDevitt, M.A.; Kapur, R.; Carter, M.; Metcalfe, D.D.; Takemoto, C.M. KIT signaling regulates MITF expression through miRNAs in normal and malignant mast cell proliferation. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 2011, 117, 3629–3640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Garzon, R.; Liu, S.; Fabbri, M.; Liu, Z.; Heaphy, C.E.; Callegari, E.; Schwind, S.; Pang, J.; Yu, J.; Muthusamy, N. MicroRNA-29b induces global DNA hypomethylation and tumor suppressor gene reexpression in acute myeloid leukemia by targeting directly DNMT3A and 3B and indirectly DNMT1. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 2009, 113, 6411–6418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Wang, Q.; Zhao, D.-Y.; Xu, H.; Zhou, H.; Yang, Q.-Y.; Liu, F.; Zhou, G.-P. Down-regulation of microRNA-223 promotes degranulation via the PI3K/Akt pathway by targeting IGF-1R in mast cells. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Leone, G.; D’Alo, F.; Zardo, G.; Voso, M.T.; Nervi, C. Epigenetic treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemias. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008, 15, 1274–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Gnyszka, A.; Jastrzebski, Z.; Flis, S. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and their emerging role in epigenetic therapy of cancer. Anticancer Res. 2013, 33, 2989–2996. [Google Scholar]
  61. Ghanim, V.; Herrmann, H.; Heller, G.; Peter, B.; Hadzijusufovic, E.; Blatt, K.; Schuch, K.; Cerny-Reiterer, S.; Mirkina, I.; Karlic, H. 5-azacytidine and decitabine exert proapoptotic effects on neoplastic mast cells: Role of FAS-demethylation and FAS re-expression, and synergism with FAS-ligand. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 2012, 119, 4242–4252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Zuber, J.; Shi, J.; Wang, E.; Rappaport, A.R.; Herrmann, H.; Sison, E.A.; Magoon, D.; Qi, J.; Blatt, K.; Wunderlich, M. RNAi screen identifies Brd4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature 2011, 478, 524–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Wedeh, G.; Cerny-Reiterer, S.; Eisenwort, G.; Herrmann, H.; Blatt, K.; Hadzijusufovic, E.; Sadovnik, I.; Müllauer, L.; Schwaab, J.; Hoffmann, T. Identification of bromodomain-containing protein-4 as a novel marker and epigenetic target in mast cell leukemia. Leukemia 2015, 29, 2230–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Mutated genes related to epigenetic modification in mastocytosis 1.
Table 1. Mutated genes related to epigenetic modification in mastocytosis 1.
Gene (H. sapiens)Gene IDProtein ProductProtein Function and Biological ImportanceExpressionLocation, Exon Count
TET254790TET methylcytosine dioxygenase 2catalyzes the conversion of methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. The encoded protein is involved in myelopoiesis, and defects in this gene have been associated with several myeloproliferative disordersubiquitous expression in bone marrow, appendix and 25 other tissues4q24
15
ASXL1171023ASXL transcriptional regulator 1ligand-dependent co-activator for retinoic acid receptor in cooperation with nuclear receptor coactivator 1. Mutations in this gene are associated with MDS and CMMLubiquitous expression in testis, lymph node and 25 other tissues20q11.21
18
DNMT3A1788DNA methyltransferase 3 alphade novo methylation, localizes to the cytoplasm and nucleus and its expression is developmentally regulatedubiquitous expression in placenta, ovary and 25 other tissues2p23.3
34
IDH23418isocitrate dehydrogenase (NADP(+)) 2catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of isocitrate to 2-oxoglutarate; localized in mitochondria, plays a role in intermediary metabolism and energy production. This protein may tightly associate or interact with the pyruvate dehydrogenase complexubiquitous expression in heart, kidney and 24 other tissues15q26.1
12
EZH22146enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunitinvolved in maintaining the transcriptional repressive state of genes over successive cell generationsbroad expression in bone marrow, testis and 14 other tissues7q36.1
25
1 NCBI: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 10 March 2021).
Table
Table 2. non-KIT and epigenetic mutations in different variants of mastocytosis.
Table 2. non-KIT and epigenetic mutations in different variants of mastocytosis.
Genes with No. of Mutations/No. of Patients (%)Samples; Molecular ScreeningRef.
AllISMASMSM-AHN
TET2 12/42 (29)TET2 2/13 (15)TET2 2/5 (40) BM; bidirectional sequences 1 [35]
TET2 44/150 (29)TET2 1/15 (7) BM and PB; direct genomic sequences 2[36]
ASXL1 25/150 (17)ASXL1 1/15 (7)
DNMT3A 9/150 (6)DNMT3A 2/15 (13)
EZH2 0EZH2 0
IDH1/2 0IDH1/2 0
TET2 15/39 (38) BM and PB; NGS, 18 genes 3[34]
ASXL1 8/39 (21)
EZH2 2/39 (5)
TET2 5/19 (26) TET2 1/6 (2)TET2 4/13 (31)BM; NGS, 22 genes[17]
ASXL1 5/19 (26)ASXL1 1/6 (2)ASXL1 4/13 (31)
DNMT3A 2/19 (10)DNMT3A 0DNMT3A 2/13 (15)
TET2 44/150 (29)TET2 3/44 (7)TET2 5/25 (20)TET2 36/80 (45)BM; NGS, 27 genes 4[33]
ASXL1 25/150 (17)ASXL1 0ASXL1 4/25 (16)ASXL1 21/80 (26)
DNMT3A 9/150 (6)DNMT3A 2/44 (5)DNMT3A 0DNMT3A 7/80 (9)
EZH2 3/150 (2)EZH2 0EZH2 1/25 (4)EZH2 2/80 (3)
IDH1/2 4/150 (3)IDH1/2 0IDH1/2 1/25 (4)IDH1/2 3/80 (4)
ISM, indolent systemic mastocytosis; ASM, aggressive SM; SM-AHN, SM with associated hematologic neoplasm; PB, peripheral blood; BM, bone marrow; 1 TET2 (all exons); 2 TET2 (all exons), DNMT3A (all exons), ASXL1 (exon 12), EZH2 (all exons), IDH1 (exon 4), IDH2 (exon 4), SM-AHN, aggressive mastocytosis and MC sarcoma included; 3 TET2 (all exons), EZH2 (all exons), ASXL1 (exon 12) by Sanger sequencing, SM, SM-AHN included; 4 MCL included.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reszka, E.; Jabłońska, E.; Wieczorek, E.; Valent, P.; Arock, M.; Nilsson, G.; Nedoszytko, B.; Niedoszytko, M. Epigenetic Changes in Neoplastic Mast Cells and Potential Impact in Mastocytosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2964. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22062964

AMA Style

Reszka E, Jabłońska E, Wieczorek E, Valent P, Arock M, Nilsson G, Nedoszytko B, Niedoszytko M. Epigenetic Changes in Neoplastic Mast Cells and Potential Impact in Mastocytosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(6):2964. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22062964

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reszka, Edyta, Ewa Jabłońska, Edyta Wieczorek, Peter Valent, Michel Arock, Gunnar Nilsson, Bogusław Nedoszytko, and Marek Niedoszytko. 2021. "Epigenetic Changes in Neoplastic Mast Cells and Potential Impact in Mastocytosis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 6: 2964. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22062964

APA Style

Reszka, E., Jabłońska, E., Wieczorek, E., Valent, P., Arock, M., Nilsson, G., Nedoszytko, B., & Niedoszytko, M. (2021). Epigenetic Changes in Neoplastic Mast Cells and Potential Impact in Mastocytosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(6), 2964. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22062964

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop