Next Article in Journal
Quantitative Proteomics Analysis Reveals the Function of the Putative Ester Cyclase UvEC1 in the Pathogenicity of the Rice False Smut Fungus Ustilaginoidea virens
Next Article in Special Issue
Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Compounds from Cudrania tricuspidata in HaCaT Human Keratinocytes
Previous Article in Journal
Pharmacological Modulators of Autophagy as a Potential Strategy for the Treatment of COVID-19
Previous Article in Special Issue
Magnoliae Cortex Alleviates Muscle Wasting by Modulating M2 Macrophages in a Cisplatin-Induced Sarcopenia Mouse Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms22084068
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Antihypertensive Effects and Potential Molecular Mechanism of Microalgal Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Like Peptides: A Mini Review

by
Qichen Jiang
1,†,
Qi Chen
2,3,†,
Tongqing Zhang
1,
Meng Liu
4,
Shunshan Duan
2 and
Xian Sun
5,6,*
1
Freshwater Fisheries Research Institute of Jiangsu Province, 79 Chating East Street, Nanjing 210017, China
2
Department of Ecology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
3
Guangdong Center for Marine Development Research, Guangzhou 510220, China
4
Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment of Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
5
Zhuhai Key Laboratory of Marine Bioresources and Environment, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Resources and Coastal Engineering, School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
6
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519080, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(8), 4068; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084068
Submission received: 3 February 2021 / Revised: 14 March 2021 / Accepted: 22 March 2021 / Published: 15 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Compounds from Natural Products for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hypertension causes many deaths worldwide and has shown an increasing trend as a severe non-communicable disease. Conventional antihypertensive drugs inevitably cause side effects, and great efforts have been made to exploit healthier and more-available substitutes. Microalgae have shown great potential in this regard and have been applied in the food and pharmaceutical industries. Some compounds in microalgae have been proven to have antihypertensive effects. Among these natural compounds, peptides from microalgae are promising angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors because an increasing number of peptides show hypertensive effects and ACE inhibitory-like activity. In addition to acting as ACE inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension, these peptides have other probiotic properties, such as antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, that are important for the prevention and treatment of hypertension. Numerous studies have revealed the important bioactivities of ACE inhibitors and their mechanisms. This review discusses the antihypertensive effects, structure-activity relationships, molecular docking studies, interaction mechanisms, and other probiotic properties of microalgal ACE inhibitory peptides according to the current research related to microalgae as potential antihypertensive drugs. Possible research directions are proposed. This review contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of microalgal antihypertensive peptides.

1. Introduction

Microalgae are the main contributors to primary production in aquatic ecosystems. They are widespread, fast-growing, and resilient in different harsh environments, such as those with high salinity and temperature, as well as wastewater. In recent years, microalgae and their derived natural compounds have been regarded as important and sustainable food supplements and biodiesel sources for the purpose of overcoming food shortages and energy crises associated with population growth and limited land resources [1,2,3]. Furthermore, microalgae species are rich in bioactive compounds such as the primary nutrients carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and probiotic materials such as vitamins and microelements [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. In addition to their high production of nutrients, researchers have also recently found that an increasing number of bioactive compounds from microalgae show antioxidant [13,14], anticancer [15,16], anti-inflammatory [17,18], antimicrobial [19,20], and antiaging [21] properties with potential for the treatment and prevention of chronic diseases and their syndromes [22,23,24].
Hypertension, a chronic disease in humans, is a multifactorial disorder that is considered one of the major causes of premature death worldwide. As a “silent killer”, this chronic disease causes over nine million deaths annually and affects approximately one billion people [25]. Hypertension is a key risk factor for inducing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and the contribution of hypertension to CVD mortality has increased in some countries during the last two decades, especially in certain low-income countries that have the highest prevalence of hypertension [26]. Long-term hypertension also increases the risks of fatal conditions or events such as myocardial infarction [27], stroke [28], and kidney failure [29]. The pathogenesis of hypertension is complicated and unclear, and many factors, such as body mass index, sex, insulin resistance, high alcohol and salt intake, low potassium and calcium intake, stress, aging, and a sedentary lifestyle, are involved [30]. It should also be noted that free radical formation mediates some of the effects of hypertension. For instance, the proinflammatory actions caused by hypertension could increase the formation of hydrogen peroxide and free radicals, such as superoxide anions and hydroxyl radicals, in plasma to finally reduce the formation of nitric oxide by the endothelium [31]. The imbalance in the production and function of endothelial factors, such as nitric oxide, is associated with vascular physiological function [32].
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is a ubiquitous enzyme in mammalian tissues that is involved in the renin-angiotensin and kinin nitric oxide systems, and blood pressure in humans is regulated by the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) through two main proteases, renin and ACE (Figure 1) [33]. Briefly, ACE can convert angiotensin I (Ang I) into angiotensin II (Ang II) and increase blood pressure by vasoconstriction, which is considered a useful therapeutic target for the treatment of hypertension [34]. To control angiotensin II production, initially, antihypertensive drugs such as captopril, enalapril, lisinopril, and benazepril were synthesized [35,36,37,38]. ACE inhibitors are employed in conditions such as hypertension, heart failure, and diabetes due to their ability to reduce angiotensin II levels, vasoconstriction, aldosterone secretion, and bradykinin [39,40,41]. However, these synthetic drugs usually cause side effects such as erectile dysfunction, persistent dry cough, angioedema, and congenital malformations [33]. Therefore, exploration of antihypertensive drugs has led to the discovery of healthier antihypertensive substances to relieve blood pressure, and an increasing number of ACE inhibitor-like natural compounds, especially biopeptides, have been found in foods such as milk, eggs, meat, fish, soybeans, and their derivatives [42]. These biopeptides show low/no toxicity or no side effects [43]. As promising functional food supplements, microalgae have also received increasing attention due to their high content of valuable natural compounds, and some of these compounds have been applied in the pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and nutraceutical industries [44]. In addition, microalgal hydrolysates, extracts, and biopeptides in particular have shown ACE inhibitory effects and gained increasing attention [45].
The first study of the antihypertensive effects of microalgae was conducted in the 1980s, when Miyakoshi et al., reported that Chlorella decreased blood pressure by modulating the RAAS [46,47]. Chlorella was also shown to decrease human blood pressure after ingestion [48]. Suetsuna et al., was the first to find that biopeptides from Chlorella vulgaris (C. vulgaris) and Spirulina platensis (S. platensis) showed marked antihypertensive effects on spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) [49]. After these findings, through in vivo and in vitro studies, an increasing number of biopeptides from microalgal hydrolysates from the genera Chlorella, Spirulina, Isochrysis, and Nannochloropsis were found to show ACE inhibitory effects with functions similar to those of conventional antihypertensive drugs [50,51,52,53]. Moreover, these peptides are often stable in the mammalian digestive system [54]. Since the isolation and identification of ACE inhibitory peptides from microalgae, their molecular mechanisms, such as those determined from molecular docking, and antioxidative properties have emerged [55,56,57]. The relationship between the structure and activity of ACE inhibitory peptides is important for the design of novel drugs [58]. Such a method is also widely used to screen for food-derived peptides and illustrate the biological mechanisms of their functions or activities [59]. The simulation of docking can aid in elaborating the interaction mechanisms of bioactive peptides with receptors from the binding sites and binding types between the receptor and ligands, and the apparent advantages of in silico studies are the time savings and low cost. Some studies on the structural model were also supported by traditional methods such as fluorescence and circular dichroism (CD) spectra, isothermal titration calorimetry, surface plasmon resonance and bio-layer interferometry, and the computational approaches can significantly aid in the study of the bioactive mechanisms of bioactive peptides [60,61,62]. Coincidentally, the molecular docking mechanism of microalgal ACE inhibitory peptides also emerged in recent years. Thus, this review attempts to review the current research related to the antihypertensive effects, ACE inhibitory effects, and molecular docking mechanisms of peptides from microalgae. The keywords “microalgae OR microalgal”, “antihypertensive OR antihypertension”, “peptides”, and “molecular docking” were searched in the Web of Science and Scopus.

2. The Relationship between the Primary Structure of Microalgal Peptides and the ACE Inhibitory Effect

ACE inhibitor and ACE inhibitor-like peptides could inhibit ACE through two strategies, namely, competitive and noncompetitive, which are determined by Lineweaver–Burk plots. Competitive inhibitors compete with the substrate and bind to the active site of ACE, and noncompetitive inhibitors change the conformation of ACE, which prevents the substrate from binding to the active site of ACE. When the Lineweaver-Burk plot cannot demonstrate the inhibitory strategy of the peptide, a mixed-noncompetitive pattern appears, which has been observed for some peptides [63,64,65]. Notably, the inhibitory activities of ACE inhibitors are not determined by their binding strategy [66]. The ACE inhibitory activity of peptides is expressed as the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), which indicates the ACE inhibitor concentration that leads to 50% inhibition of ACE activity. Moreover, a few studies have demonstrated that the composition of the peptide and the amino acid sequence impacts the inhibitory activity of hypertensive peptides [67]. Thus, we listed the microalgal bioactive peptides, their origin, and their IC50 values in Table 1; their primary structures are shown in Figure 2.
Daskaya-Dikmen et al., noted that potent ACE inhibitory peptides are generally short-chain peptides consisting of 2–12 amino acids [76]. To the best of our knowledge, the number of amino acids in peptides with antihypertensive properties from microalgae ranges from 2 to 11. To ensure the stability and bioactivity of ACE inhibitory peptides in mammalian gastrointestinal tissue, these peptides are usually obtained from the biomass of microalgal hydrolysates through hydrolytic enzymes under acidic conditions to simulate gastrointestinal digestion. Thus, the peptides identified from microalgae were regarded to be stable in the mammalian gastrointestinal tract.
A few in vitro and in vivo studies have reported IC50 values of microalgal ACE inhibitory peptides ranging from 0.5 to 474.36 μM, and most of these microalgal peptides were clearly noncompetitive ACE inhibitors (Table 1), as the noncompetitive pattern seemed to be more common and more effective than the competitive pattern. Except for the peptides with unavailable patterns, the IC50 values of competitive peptide inhibitors from C. sorokiniana and C. ellipsoidea were 307.61 and 128.4 μM, respectively, while most noncompetitive inhibitors from microalgae had lower IC50 values, with the exception of peptide Thr-Met-Glu-Pro-Gly-Lys-Pro (TMEPGKP) from Spirulina sp. (IC50 = 132 μM; the IC50 of others ranged from 0.5–61.38 μM). Pujiastuti et al., pointed out that there is no correlation between ACE inhibitory activity and the inhibitory pattern in marine organisms (mainly multicellular organisms such as fish, sharks, and shrimp) [66]. When focusing on only microalgal biopeptides, different inhibitory mechanisms were observed. Such a finding may be a misjudgment because limited research has been conducted on microalgal ACE inhibitory peptides, and more research is needed on microalgal biopeptides to verify the hypothesis that differences in species or genetics may dominate the inhibitory pattern and bioactivity. For instance, to the best of our knowledge, ACE inhibitor-like peptides in the genera Isochrysis, Spirulina, and Nannochloropsis have shown only noncompetitive properties in studies that have analyzed this pattern to date, and Chlorella shows both inhibition patterns (Table 1).
The primary structure of the peptide (chain composition, position, and sequence of amino acids) is also an important factor associated with ACE inhibitory activity. The N-terminus and C-terminus both strongly affect the ACE inhibitory activity of biopeptides [41]. Many short-chain peptides with hydrophobic and other amino acids (P, Y, F, or W) at the C-terminus are considered potent ACE inhibitory peptides [77]. In microalgal biopeptides, the residues C, F, L, V, W, P, E, G, A, Q, Y, K, and M at the C-terminus all exhibited ACE inhibitory-like properties to a greater extent than peptides from commercially available foods [41] but to a lesser extent than cereal protein peptides [78] and marine organisms [66].
To better understand the correlation between the structural ACE inhibitory activity from the C-terminal residues in microalgal biopeptides, the structural formulas of these amino acids are shown in Figure 2. F, W, G, and M at the C-terminus of short-chain peptides exhibit relatively strong inhibitory activity against ACE. For instance, when W was the C-terminal residue of microalgal peptides, these microalgal peptides (numbers 1–5) showed low IC50 values (0.5–1.11 μM), indicating a strong inhibitory effect, while W at the N-terminus of a dipeptide (number 4) showed a relatively high IC50 value (307.61 μM). In addition, Y as the C-terminal residue of the microalgal peptides did not have strong inhibitory effects [73,75].
In addition to the amino acids at the N- and C-termini, the type of functional group at these positions affects the ACE inhibitory effects of microalgal biopeptides. Hydrophobic and aromatic residues at the N- and C-termini usually show strong antihypertensive activity [79]. Notably, microalgal peptides showed a strong ACE inhibitory effect when short-chain alkyl residues were present at the N-terminus and C-terminus, such as peptides 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8. It may be inferred that the bioactivities of peptides 1, 2, and 5 are influenced by their crystal structures, which showed short-chain alkyl groups or a certain number of carbon atoms, whereby the isobutyl group showed the strongest inhibitory activity and n-butyl showed the lowest inhibitory activity. The different bioactivities among peptides with similar termini indicated that the other amino acid residues also affect the biofunctions and efficacy against ACE. For example, some residues or atoms can form hydrogen bonds (oxygen-, nitrogen-, benzene-, phenol- and amine-containing residues) [80,81].

3. Molecular Docking of Microalgal Peptides to ACE

Great efforts have been made in recent years in the molecular docking of biopeptides from conventional foods to ACE [82,83]. However, unlike ACE inhibitor-like peptides from traditional food sources, the molecular interaction mechanism and molecular docking of microalgal peptides are still untapped. The crystal structure often chosen is human tACE (PDB ID: 1O8A). The best pose and conformation of the peptide and ACE can be determined by LibDock scores and binding energies. LibDock scores are obtained from the IC50 value with the formula LibDock score = 10.063 lg (1/IC50) + 68.08 [84], and a lower binding energy is better.
Human tACE includes three active site pockets named S1, S2, and S1′ [85]. These pockets contain different amino acid residues: A354, E384, and Y523 in S1; Q281, H353, K511, H513, and Y520 in S2; and E162 in S1′ [75,86]. In addition, these active site pockets have different favorable amino acid residues that bind in them. The S1 pocket shows strong affinity to P, A, V, and L; Pro and Leu are the most favorable for S2 binding; and S1′ is more likely to bind I [87]. In addition, molecular interactions such as van der Waals forces, coordination interactions, hydrogen bonds, and electrostatic, hydrophobic, and hydrophilic forces should be considered. Peptides and ACE residues are linked through the main interaction forces involving van der Waals forces and some secondary interactions, such as hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic and electrostatic forces (Figure 3 [55]).
Even though these forces can contribute during molecular docking, the hydrogen bond is still considered the most important factor in binding stability [88]. The distance of hydrogen bonds between the amino acid residues of ACE and the peptide could reflect the affinity of the peptide. A shorter distance indicates a stronger affinity and more stable binding [89]. Considering the active sites in ACE, the hydrogen bonds between the amino acid residues in the microalgal peptides and the active sites of ACE affect their inhibitory activities and cause discrepancies. The microalgal peptide Thr-Thr-Trp (TTW) (LibDock score: 162) from C. vulgaris forms five short hydrogen bonds within the active sites of ACE (ranging from 2.08 to 2.48 Å), which include hydrogen bonds with H353 and H513 in the S2 pocket and A354 in the S1 pocket (Table 2). Moreover, Val-His-Trp (VHW) (LibDock score: 177) can form five short hydrogen bonds with ACE (ranging from 1.93 to 2.45 Å), which include hydrogen bonds with A354 and E384 in the S1 pocket and H353 and Y520 in the S2 pocket. These two peptides can finally construct stable conformations with ACE (Figure 3A,B and Table 2 [55]). However, two points should be noted: (1) these two peptides (TTW and VHW) form hydrogen bonds with P407 and E411, respectively, which are residues that do not belong to well-known active sites in ACE; and (2) E384 in the S1 pocket can coordinate with Zn2+, which contributes to the ACE inhibitory activity.
Another molecular docking analysis of ACE with the ACE inhibitory peptide Phe-Glu-Ile-His-Cys-Cys (FEIHCC) from I. zhanjiangensis indicated that the microalgal peptide could interact with ACE through hydrogen bonds in sites other than the active sites to have an inhibitory effect on ACE (Figure 3C [51]). However, the inhibitory activity was still affected by whether the peptide formed hydrogen bonds with the active site because the IC50 of FEIHCC (61.38 μM) is much higher than that of TTW (0.61 μM) and VHW (0.91 μM), even though FEIHCC formed more hydrogen bonds with ACE (seven hydrogen bonds with distances ranging from 1.78 to 6.39 Å, shown in Table 2). Moreover, hydrogen bonds between ACE and microalgal peptides usually occur with the N- and/or C-terminus, and this result could verify this theory based on their primary structures as mentioned above. In addition, short hydrogen bonds existed in the middle of these peptides. The oxygen and nitrogen atoms in the middle of TTW and VHW could form short hydrogen bonds with A354 in the S1 pocket.

4. The Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Microalgal ACE Inhibitory Peptides against Hypertension

Oxidative stress has been identified as a key etiological factor in the development of hypertension [90]. Some bioactive peptides possessing ACE inhibitory activity from microalgae also display antioxidant activity [54,91]. This is generally because peptides with antioxidant properties are thought to contribute either synergistically or independently to the antihypertensive effects [92]. ACE inhibitory protein hydrolysates from B. malleus increased the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging activity and metal chelation ability at a concentration of 2 mg/mL [93]. The ACE inhibitory peptide IQP from S. platensis at a concentration of 6.23 mg/mL exhibited a 75.72% radical scavenging activity (RSA) percentage, which reflects the DPPH radical scavenging effects [94]. The peptide Val-Glu-Cys-Tyr-Gly-Pro-Asn-Arg-Pro-Gln-Phe (VECYGPNRPQF) from C. vulgaris could effectively scavenge superoxide radicals (IC50 of 7.5 ± 0.12 μM); the IC50 value of the hydroxyl radical scavenging effect was 8.3 ± 0.15 μM; and the DPPH radical scavenging activity could reach more than 40% at a concentration of 60 μM [91]. A peptidomic study also showed that certain ACE inhibitory peptides from Tetradesmus obliquus, such as Ala-Asp-Val-Pro-Phe-Arg (ADVPFR), Ser-Gly-Ser-Trp-Asp-Gly-Thr-Leu-Arg (SGSWDGTLR), Gly-Pro-Lys-Asp-Asp-Pro-Ala-Ala-Trp (GPKDDPAAW), Ser-Trp-Asp-Gly-Thr-Leu-Arg (SWDGTLR), and Ser-Trp-Ile-Ala-Arg (SWIAR), showed antioxidant properties according to their DPPH scavenging activity [74].
The inflammatory processes are associated with hypertension and participate in its development and maintenance [95]. Inflammatory responses also cause endothelial dysfunction and activate endothelial damage and apoptosis [96]. Peptides from microalgae can also regulate some pathways related to inflammation and oxidative stress. The excellent work of Chen et al., revealed that the peptide FEIHCC from I. zhanjiangensis inhibits expression of the NF-κB, MAPK, and Akt signaling pathways to block inflammation and endothelial cell apoptosis after Ang II treatment and activates the Nrf2 signaling pathway [51]. In detail, the NF-κB inhibition could be beneficial in treating inflammatory diseases [97], and FEIHCC could inhibit the NF-κB pathway by protecting IκBα degradation and downregulating NF-κB expression and nuclear transport by inhibiting NF-κB DNA binding activity. The downregulation of MAPK expression also indicated that such peptides could mitigate cellular stress or inflammatory cytokines to some degree. The Akt signaling pathway could be regulated to a normal level corresponding to that resulting from Ang II treatment, and overexpression of the Akt pathway may enhance angiogenesis and lead to hepatic portal hypertension [98]. The activation of Nrf2 also mediated endothelial dysfunction, improved endothelial cell activity, and ameliorated mitochondrial and cellular injury [99,100]. It reduced inflammatory cytokine expression (NO, COX-2, and ICAM-1), inhibited the secretion of inflammatory mediators, and decreased the risk of hypertension.

5. Antihypertensive Effects of Microalgal Biopeptides

Microalgal biopeptides could be potential sources of ACE inhibitors [66]. The antihypertensive effects and kinetics are different and determined by the species and peptide. For instance, a single dose (200 mg/kg) of the peptidic fraction of C. vulgaris significantly reduced the systolic blood pressure of SHRs from 1 to 4 h, and the highest antihypertensive effect appeared at 1 h (a decrease of 49.9 mmHg). This antihypertensive effect continued for 4 h after oral administration, and the highest effect was comparable to that of the captopril group (10 mg/kg) [49]. A 30 mg/kg dose of the freeze-dried biomass of transplastomic Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (C. reinhardtii) significantly reduced the systolic blood pressure of SHRs after intragastric administration (metal cannula), which contained more than 29% of the peptide Val-Leu-Pro-Val-Pro (VLPVP) [101]. The antihypertensive effects of the recombinant protein from C. reinhardtii were demonstrated after intragastric administration of the genetically modified strain of SHRs at a dose of 10 mg of recombinant AHP3 (gene from the transplastomic strain; complete name: antihypertensive peptides 3) protein per kg of body weight; the maximal decrease in blood pressure was observed 6 h post-administration [56]. The peptide VHW achieved a 31 mmHg systolic blood pressure drop at the end of the experiment, whereas lisinopril achieved a drop of only 10 mmHg and TTW caused a maximal decrease in systolic blood pressure from 239 to 204 mmHg at 2 h (p > 0.05). Both TTW and VHW from C. vulgaris also influenced diastolic blood pressure (DBP), with TTW leading to a significant reduction in DBP from 180 to 140 mmHg at 2 h (p < 0.05) and VHW showing a decrease in DBP from 174 to 153 mmHg at 1 h (p > 0.05) in SHRs at a dose of 5 mg/kg body weight, where these peptides were digested in vitro and administered by gavage [55]. Protein hydrolysates from Bellerochea malleus (B. malleus) were found to reduce blood pressure in SHRs by 17 mmHg after 5 days of oral administration [93]. These findings indicate that proper application of microalgal peptides has potential protective and therapeutic effects against hypertension.

6. Conclusions

Microalgae have great potential for the prevention and treatment of hypertension due to excellent biological properties; they are easily cultured, possess low/no toxicity, and do not require land use. Some have found applications in many health-related industries. Microalgal peptides are effective ACE inhibitor peptides both in vivo and in vitro. The ACE inhibitory effects of these peptides are becoming a popular research topic, as are ACE inhibitor peptides from other food sources. Microalgal peptide activity may be determined by many factors, such as the species of origin, inhibitory pattern, sequence of amino acids, functional groups present, crystal structure, and molecular docking sites. In addition, these peptides protect cells by improving their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties through the regulation of physiological signaling pathways such as NF-κB, Nrf2, MAPK, and Akt, which also contribute to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hypertension and its syndrome. However, knowledge of the structure-activity relationships of microalgal peptides is still deficient, especially regarding contributions from other functional groups. Future studies should focus on the bioactivity of microalgal peptides, the diversity of microalgal biopeptides, the relationship between their higher-order structure and activity, and additional mechanisms of molecular docking and interactions to achieve a better understanding of their use in healthy food supplemental sources and drug design.

Author Contributions

Performed a literature search and wrote the manuscript, Q.J. and Q.C.; Provided skilled assistance and supervised the overall preparation of the manuscript, T.Z. and X.S.; Proposed and prepared the figures, M.L.; Performed manuscript editing, S.D. and X.S.; Contributed to the conception of the idea and revised the manuscript with critical reviews and comments, X.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Blue Granary Science and Technology Innovation (No.2020YFD0900305) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.41676099).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to extend our special thanks to LittleMew Liu, Loki Liu, and Kiki Liu, who provided excellent support and inspiration for this study. We also thank Zhiwei Liu (South China University of Technology, Guangzhou) for his valuable comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Morais, W.G.; Gorgich, M.; Correa, P.S.; Martins, A.A.; Mata, T.M.; Caetano, N.S. Microalgae for biotechnological applications: Cultivation, harvesting and biomass processing. Aquaculture 2020, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lafarga, T.; Fernandez-Sevilla, J.M.; Gonzalez-Lopez, C.; Acien-Fernandez, F.G. Spirulina for the food and functional food industries. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Verma, S.; Kuila, A. Involvement of green technology in microalgal biodiesel production. Rev. Environ. Health 2020, 35, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Markou, G.; Vandamme, D.; Muylaert, K. Microalgal and cyanobacterial cultivation: The supply of nutrients. Water Res. 2014, 65, 186–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Matos, J.; Cardoso, C.; Bandarra, N.M.; Afonso, C. Microalgae as healthy ingredients for functional food: A review. Food Funct. 2017, 8, 2672–2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. da Maia, J.L.; Cardoso, J.S.; Mastrantonio, D.J.D.; Bierhals, C.K.; Moreira, J.B.; Costa, J.A.V.; de Morais, M.G. Microalgae starch: A promising raw material for the bioethanol production. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 2739–2749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bekirogullari, M.; Figueroa-Torres, G.M.; Pittman, J.K.; Theodoropoulos, C. Models of microalgal cultivation for added-value products—A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chew, K.W.; Yap, J.Y.; Show, P.L.; Suan, N.H.; Juan, J.C.; Ling, T.C.; Lee, D.J.; Chang, J.S. Microalgae biorefinery: High value products perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 229, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Amorim, M.L.; Soares, J.; Coimbra, J.S.D.; Leite, M.D.; Albino, L.F.T.; Martins, M.A. Microalgae proteins: Production, separation, isolation, quantification, and application in food and feed. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Canavate, J.P. Advancing assessment of marine phytoplankton community structure and nutritional value from fatty acid profiles of cultured microalgae. Rev. Aquacult. 2019, 11, 527–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mahmoud, A.; Sabae, S.A.; Helal, A.M. Culture and Biorefinary of Two Freshwater Microalgae; Spirulina platensis and Chlorella vulgaris As Vitamins Sources. Biosci. Res. 2018, 15, 4584–4589. [Google Scholar]
  12. Panahi, Y.; Darvishi, B.; Jowzi, N.; Beiraghdar, F.; Sahebkar, A. Chlorella vulgaris: A Multifunctional Dietary Supplement with Diverse Medicinal Properties. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016, 22, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ugya, A.Y.; Imam, T.S.; Li, A.F.; Ma, J.C.; Hua, X.Y. Antioxidant response mechanism of freshwater microalgae species to reactive oxygen species production: A mini review. Chem. Ecol. 2020, 36, 174–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Novoveska, L.; Ross, M.E.; Stanley, M.S.; Pradelles, R.; Wasiolek, V.; Sassi, J.F. Microalgal Carotenoids: A Review of Production, Current Markets, Regulations, and Future Direction. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Mondal, A.; Bose, S.; Banerjee, S.; Patra, J.K.; Malik, J.; Mandal, S.K.; Kilpatrick, K.L.; Das, G.; Kerry, R.G.; Fimognari, C.; et al. Marine Cyanobacteria and Microalgae Metabolites—A Rich Source of Potential Anticancer Drugs. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hussein, H.A.; Abdullah, M.A. Anticancer Compounds Derived from Marine Diatoms. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tabarzad, M.; Atabaki, V.; Hosseinabadi, T. Anti-inflammatory Activity of Bioactive Compounds from Microalgae and Cyanobacteria by Focusing on the Mechanisms of Action. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 6193–6205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kapoor, S.; Nailwal, N.; Kumar, M.; Barve, K. Recent Patents and Discovery of Anti-Inflammatory Agents from Marine Source. Recent Pat. Infla Allergy Drug Discov. 2019, 13, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Leng, L.J.; Wei, L.; Xiong, Q.; Xu, S.Y.; Li, W.T.; Lv, S.; Lu, Q.; Wan, L.P.; Wen, Z.Y.; Zhou, W.G. Use of microalgae based technology for the removal of antibiotics from wastewater: A review. Chemosphere 2020, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Falaise, C.; Francois, C.; Travers, M.A.; Morga, B.; Haure, J.; Tremblay, R.; Turcotte, F.; Pasetto, P.; Gastineau, R.; Hardivillier, Y.; et al. Antimicrobial Compounds from Eukaryotic Microalgae against Human Pathogens and Diseases in Aquaculture. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yarkent, C.; Gurlek, C.; Oncel, S.S. Potential of microalgal compounds in trending natural cosmetics: A review. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2020, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Raposo, M.F.D.; de Morais, A.M.M.B.; de Morais, R.M.S.C. Carotenoids from Marine Microalgae: A Valuable Natural Source for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 5128–5155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Amato, A.; Terzo, S.; Mule, F. Natural Compounds as Beneficial Antioxidant Agents in Neurodegenerative Disorders: A Focus on Alzheimer’s Disease. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Lauritano, C.; Ianora, A. Marine Organisms with Anti-Diabetes Properties. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Haldar, R. Global Brief on Hypertension: Silent Killer, Global Public Health Crisis. Indian J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2013, 24, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mendis, S.; Davis, S.; Norrving, B. Organizational Update The World Health Organization Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2014; One More Landmark Step in the Combat Against Stroke and Vascular Disease. Stroke 2015, 46, 121–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Valensi, P.; Lorgis, L.; Cottin, Y. Prevalence, incidence, predictive factors and prognosis or silent myocardial infarction: A review of the literature. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2011, 104, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Spence, J.D.; Hammond, R. Hypertension and Stroke. In Hypertension and the Brain as an End-Organ Target; Girouard, H., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 39–54. [Google Scholar]
  29. Schiffrin, E.L.; Lipman, M.L.; Mann, J.F.E. Chronic kidney disease—Effects on the cardiovascular system. Circulation 2007, 116, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pullalarevu, R.; Akbar, G.; Teehan, G. Secondary Hypertension, Issues in Diagnosis and Treatment. Prim. Care 2014, 41, 749–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Tuttolomondo, A.; Di Raimondo, D.; Pecoraro, R.; Arnao, V.; Pinto, A.; Licata, G. Atherosclerosis as an Inflammatory Disease. Curr. Pharm. Design 2012, 18, 4266–4288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nava, E.; Llorens, S. The Local Regulation of Vascular Function: From an Inside-Outside to an Outside-Inside Model. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aluko, R.E. Food protein-derived renin-inhibitory peptides: In vitro and in vivo properties. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Erdmann, K.; Cheung, B.W.Y.; Schroder, H. The possible roles of food-derived bioactive peptides in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2008, 19, 643–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chirumamilla, R.R.; Marchant, R.; Nigam, P. Captopril and its synthesis from chiral intermediates. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2001, 76, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Todd, P.A.; Goa, K.L. Enalapril. Drugs 1992, 43, 346–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Burrello, J.; Erhardt, E.M.; Saint-Hilary, G.; Veglio, F.; Rabbia, F.; Mulatero, P.; Monticone, S.; D’Ascenzo, F. Pharmacological Treatment of Arterial Hypertension in Children and Adolescents: A Network Meta-Analysis. Hypertension 2018, 72, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Barrios, V.; Escobar, C. Antihypertensive and organ-protective effects of benazepril. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2010, 8, 1653–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Fernandez-Musoles, R.; Salom, J.B.; Martinez-Maqueda, D.; Lopez-Diez, J.J.; Recio, I.; Manzanares, P. Antihypertensive effects of lactoferrin hydrolyzates: Inhibition of angiotensin and endothelin-converting enzymes. Food Chem. 2013, 139, 994–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ruzicka, M.; Coletta, E.; White, R.; Davies, R.; Haddad, H.; Leenen, F.H.H. Effects of ACE Inhibitors on Cardiac Angiotensin II and Aldosterone in Humans: “Relevance of Lipophilicity and Affinity for ACE”. Am. J. Hypertens. 2010, 23, 1179–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Gomes, C.; Ferreira, D.; Carvalho, J.P.F.; Barreto, C.A.V.; Fernandes, J.; Gouveia, M.; Ribeiro, F.; Duque, A.S.; Vieira, S.I. Current genetic engineering strategies for the production of antihypertensive ACEI peptides. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2020, 117, 2610–2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nongonierma, A.B.; Fitzgerald, R.J. Enhancing bioactive peptide release and identification using targeted enzymatic hydrolysis of milk proteins. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 3407–3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li-Chan, E.C.Y. Bioactive peptides and protein hydrolysates: Research trends and challenges for application as nutraceuticals and functional food ingredients. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2015, 1, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Servaes, K.; Maesen, M.; Prandi, B.; Sforza, S.; Elst, K. Polar Lipid Profile of Nannochloropsis oculata Determined Using a Variety of Lipid Extraction Procedures. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 3931–3941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, Y.C.; Lammi, C.; Boschin, G.; Arnoldi, A.; Aiello, G. Recent Advances in Microalgae Peptides: Cardiovascular Health Benefits and Analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 11825–11838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Murakami, T.; Okamoto, K.; Ogaki, M.; Iizuka, Y. Effect of Chlorella on blood pressure, cerebral stroke lesions, hypertensive vascular changes and life-span in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi. 1987, 40, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Miyakoshi, M. Study of Chlorella producted from the Chikugo area. Clin. Rep. 1980, 14, 3931–3941. [Google Scholar]
  48. Inoue, K.; Mukaiyama, Y.; Oka, H.; Sansawa, H. Clinical Effects of Chlorella in Hypertensive Men. Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi. 1995, 48, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Suetsuna, K.; Chen, J.R. Identification of antihypertensive peptides from peptic digest of two microalgae, Chlorella vulgaris and Spirulina platensis. Mar. Biotechnol. 2001, 3, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Samarakoon, K.; Jeon, Y.J. Bio-functionalities of proteins derived from marine algae—A review. Food Res. Int. 2012, 48, 948–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, J.L.; Tan, L.; Li, C.Y.; Zhou, C.X.; Hong, P.Z.; Sun, S.L.; Qian, Z.J. Mechanism Analysis of a Novel Angiotensin-I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Peptide from Isochrysis zhanjiangensis Microalgae for Suppressing Vascular Injury in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 4411–4423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Heo, S.Y.; Ko, S.C.; Kim, C.S.; Oh, G.W.; Ryu, B.; Qian, Z.J.; Kim, G.; Park, W.S.; Choi, I.W.; Phan, T.T.V.; et al. A heptameric peptide purified from Spirulina sp. gastrointestinal hydrolysate inhibits angiotensin I-converting enzyme- and angiotensin II-induced vascular dysfunction in human endothelial cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 39, 1072–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Samarakoon, K.W.; O-Nam, K.; Ko, J.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Kang, M.C.; Kim, D.; Lee, J.B.; Lee, J.S.; Jeon, Y.J. Purification and identification of novel angiotensin-I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides from cultured marine microalgae (Nannochloropsis oculata) protein hydrolysate. J. Appl. Phycol. 2013, 25, 1595–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sheih, I.C.; Fang, T.J.; Wu, T.K. Isolation and characterisation of a novel angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptide from the algae protein waste. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xie, J.L.; Chen, X.J.; Wu, J.J.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, L.J.; Tang, Y.J.; Wei, D.Z. Antihypertensive Effects, Molecular Docking Study, and Isothermal Titration Calorimetry Assay of Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Peptides from Chlorella vulgaris. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 1359–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Carrizalez-Lopez, C.; Gonzalez-Ortega, O.; Ochoa-Mendez, C.E.; Galvan-Moreno, F.U.; Rosales-Mendoza, S.; Monreal-Escalante, E.; Banuelos-Hernandez, B.; Paz-Maldonado, L.M.T.; Castro-Moreno, P.; Ibarra-Barajas, M.; et al. Expression of multiple antihypertensive peptides as a fusion protein in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 1701–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Beaulieu, L. Insights into the Regulation of Algal Proteins and Bioactive Peptides Using Proteomic and Transcriptomic Approaches. Molecules 2019, 24, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Guedes, I.A.; de Magalhães, C.S.; Dardenne, L.E. Receptor–ligand molecular docking. Biophys. Rev. 2014, 6, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Tu, M.L.; Cheng, S.Z.; Lu, W.H.; Du, M. Advancement and prospects of bioinformatics analysis for studying bioactive peptides from food-derived protein: Sequence, structure, and functions. Trac-Trend Anal. Chem. 2018, 105, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. He, R.; Aluko, R.E.; Ju, X.R. Evaluating Molecular Mechanism of Hypotensive Peptides Interactions with Renin and Angiotensin Converting Enzyme. PLoS ONE 2014, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Fu, Y.; Alashi, A.M.; Young, J.F.; Therkildsen, M.; Aluko, R.E. Enzyme inhibition kinetics and molecular interactions of patatin peptides with angiotensin I-converting enzyme and renin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 101, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ni, H.; Li, L.; Liu, G.; Hu, S.Q. Inhibition Mechanism and Model of an Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme (ACE)-Inhibitory Hexapeptide from Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). PLoS ONE 2012, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Hou, W.C.; Chen, H.; Lin, Y.H. Antioxidant peptides with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory activities and applications for angiotensin converting enzyme purification. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 1706–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Chen, J.L.; Ryu, B.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Liang, P.; Li, C.Y.; Zhou, C.X.; Yang, P.; Hong, P.Z.; Qian, Z.J. Comparison of an angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptide from tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) with captopril: Inhibition kinetics, in vivo effect, simulated gastrointestinal digestion and a molecular docking study. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Lin, S.Y.; Wang, C.C.; Lu, Y.L.; Wu, W.C.; Hou, W.C. Antioxidant, anti-semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase, and anti-hypertensive activities of geraniin isolated from Phyllanthus urinaria. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 2485–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pujiastuti, D.Y.; Amin, M.N.G.; Alamsjah, M.A.; Hsu, J.L. Marine Organisms as Potential Sources of Bioactive Peptides that Inhibit the Activity of Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme: A Review. Molecules 2019, 24, 2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Zhao, C.; Wu, Y.J.; Yang, C.F.; Liu, B.; Huang, Y.F. Hypotensive, hypoglycaemic and hypolipidaemic effects of bioactive compounds from microalgae and marine micro-organisms. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 50, 1705–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lin, Y.H.; Chen, G.W.; Yeh, C.H.; Song, H.; Tsai, J.S. Purification and Identification of Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitory Peptides and the Antihypertensive Effect of Chlorella sorokiniana Protein Hydrolysates. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Lu, J.; Sawano, Y.; Miyakawa, T.; Xue, Y.L.; Cai, M.Y.; Egashira, Y.; Ren, D.F.; Tanokura, M. One-Week Antihypertensive Effect of Ile-Gln-Pro in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Qian, Z.J.; Heo, S.J.; Oh, C.H.; Kang, D.H.; Jeong, S.H.; Park, W.S.; Choi, I.W.; Jeon, Y.J.; Jung, W.K. Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitory Peptide Isolated from Biodiesel Byproducts of Marine Microalgae, Nannochloropsis Oculata. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenerg. 2013, 7, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lu, J.; Ren, D.F.; Xue, Y.L.; Sawano, Y.; Miyakawa, T.; Tanokura, M. Isolation of an Antihypertensive Peptide from Alcalase Digest of Spirulina platensis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 7166–7171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wu, H.; Xu, N.J.; Sun, X.; Yu, H.; Zhou, C.X. Hydrolysis and purification of ACE inhibitory peptides from the marine microalga Isochrysis galbana. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 27, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ko, S.C.; Kang, N.; Kim, E.A.; Kang, M.C.; Lee, S.H.; Kang, S.M.; Lee, J.B.; Jeon, B.T.; Kim, S.K.; Park, S.J.; et al. A novel angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptide from a marine Chlorella ellipsoidea and its antihypertensive effect in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 2005–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Montone, C.M.; Capriotti, A.L.; Cavaliere, C.; La Barbera, G.; Piovesana, S.; Chiozzi, R.Z.; Lagana, A. Peptidomic strategy for purification and identification of potential ACE-inhibitory and antioxidant peptides in Tetradesmus obliquus microalgae. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 3573–3586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Cao, D.Q.; Lv, X.J.; Xu, X.T.; Yu, H.; Sun, X.; Xu, N.J. Purification and identification of a novel ACE inhibitory peptide from marine alga Gracilariopsis lemaneiformis protein hydrolysate. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 1829–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Daskaya-Dikmen, C.; Yucetepe, A.; Karbancioglu-Guler, F.; Daskaya, H.; Ozcelik, B. Angiotensin-I-Converting Enzyme (ACE)-Inhibitory Peptides from Plants. Nutrients 2017, 9, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. de Castro, R.J.S.; Sato, H.H. Biologically active peptides: Processes for their generation, purification and identification and applications as natural additives in the food and pharmaceutical industries. Food Res. Int. 2015, 74, 185–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gong, X.X.; An, Q.; Le, L.Q.; Geng, F.; Jiang, L.Z.; Yan, J.; Xiang, D.B.; Peng, L.X.; Zou, L.; Zhao, G.; et al. Prospects of cereal protein-derived bioactive peptides: Sources, bioactivities diversity, and production. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wang, Q. Preparation of Functional Peanut Oligopeptide and Its Biological Activity. In Peanut Processing Characteristics and Quality Evaluation; Wang, Q., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 461–537. [Google Scholar]
  80. Steiner, T. Structural Evidence for the Aromatic–(i+1) Amine Hydrogen Bond in Peptides: L-Tyr-L-Tyr-L-Leu Monohydrate. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 1998, 54, 584–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Huang, A.Z.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, D.W.; Yao, J.L.; Zhang, Y. Molecular design and validation of halogen bonding orthogonal to hydrogen bonding in breast cancer MDM2-peptide complex. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2016, 70, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fan, H.B.; Liao, W.; Wu, J.P. Molecular interactions, bioavailability, and cellular mechanisms of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Caballero, J. Considerations for Docking of Selective Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors. Molecules 2020, 25, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Wu, H.X.; Liu, Y.L.; Guo, M.R.; Xie, J.L.; Jiang, X.M. A Virtual Screening Method for Inhibitory Peptides of Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme. J. Food Sci. 2014, 79, C1635–C1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wang, X.M.; Chen, H.X.; Fu, X.G.; Li, S.Q.; Wei, J. A novel antioxidant and ACE inhibitory peptide from rice bran protein: Biochemical characterization and molecular docking study. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 75, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Rohit, A.C.; Sathisha, K.; Aparna, H.S. A variant peptide of buffalo colostrum beta-lactoglobulin inhibits angiotensin I-converting enzyme activity. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 53, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Jao, C.L.; Huang, S.L.; Hsu, K.C. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides: Inhibition mode, bioavailability, and antihypertensive effects. BioMedicine 2012, 2, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tu, M.L.; Wang, C.; Chen, C.; Zhang, R.Y.; Liu, H.X.; Lu, W.H.; Jiang, L.Z.; Du, M. Identification of a novel ACE-inhibitory peptide from casein and evaluation of the inhibitory mechanisms. Food Chem. 2018, 256, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Yuan, L.; Sun, L.P.; Zhuang, Y.L. Preparation and identification of novel inhibitory angiotensin-I-converting enzyme peptides from tilapia skin gelatin hydrolysates: Inhibition kinetics and molecular docking. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 5251–5259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Briones, A.M.; Touyz, R.M. Oxidative Stress and Hypertension: Current Concepts. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2010, 12, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sheih, I.C.; Wu, T.K.; Fang, T.J. Antioxidant properties of a new antioxidative peptide from algae protein waste hydrolysate in different oxidation systems. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 3419–3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Majumder, K.; Wu, J.P. Molecular Targets of Antihypertensive Peptides: Understanding the Mechanisms of Action Based on the Pathophysiology of Hypertension. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 256–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Barkia, I.; Al-Haj, L.; Hamid, A.A.; Zakaria, M.; Saari, N.; Zadjali, F. Indigenous marine diatoms as novel sources of bioactive peptides with antihypertensive and antioxidant properties. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 1514–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mahdieh, G.; Fazilati, M.; Izadi, M.; Pilehvarian, A.; Nazem, H. Investigation of ACE Inhibitory Effect and Antioxidant Activity of Peptide Extracted from Spirulina Platensis. Chem. Methodol. 2020, 4, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Barrows, I.R.; Ramezani, A.; Raj, D.S. Inflammation, Immunity, and Oxidative Stress in Hypertension-Partners in Crime? Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 2019, 26, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Guzik, T.J.; Hoch, N.E.; Brown, K.A.; McCann, L.A.; Rahman, A.; Dikalov, S.; Goronzy, J.; Weyand, C.; Harrison, D.G. Role of the T cell in the genesis of angiotensin II-induced hypertension and vascular dysfunction. J. Exp. Med. 2007, 204, 2449–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Joo, D.; Sun, S.-C. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Xu, W.; Liu, P.; Mu, Y.P. Research progress on signaling pathways in cirrhotic portal hypertension. World J. Clin. Cases 2018, 6, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, M.; Liu, X.; He, Y.P.; Zheng, Q.Y.; Wang, M.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Y.P.; Wang, C.Y. Celastrol attenuates angiotensin II mediated human umbilical vein endothelial cells damage through activation of Nrf2/ERK1/2/Nox2 signal pathway. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 797, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhou, X.L.; Liang, L.W.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, H. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Ameliorates Angiotensin II-Induced Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells through the Activation of Nrf2/Caspase-3 Signaling. J. Vasc. Res. 2017, 54, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Ochoa-Méndez, C.E.; Lara-Hernández, I.; González, L.M.; Aguirre-Bañuelos, P.; Ibarra-Barajas, M.; Castro-Moreno, P.; González-Ortega, O.; Soria-Guerra, R.E. Bioactivity of an antihypertensive peptide expressed in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 240, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 22 04068 g001 550
Figure 1. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in the regulation of blood pressure and the function of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE).
Figure 1. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in the regulation of blood pressure and the function of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE).
Ijms 22 04068 g001
Ijms 22 04068 g002 550
Figure 2. The structural formulas of microalgal ACE-inhibitory peptides. The number of each peptide is consistent with Table 1. The IC50 value and amino acid sequence are provided in parentheses.
Figure 2. The structural formulas of microalgal ACE-inhibitory peptides. The number of each peptide is consistent with Table 1. The IC50 value and amino acid sequence are provided in parentheses.
Ijms 22 04068 g002
Ijms 22 04068 g003 550
Figure 3. Molecular docking of ACE and the peptides. Docking pose, hydrophobic interaction diagram with active pocket, and two-dimensional diagram of TTW (Thr-Thr-Trp, A), VHW (Val-His-Trp, B), and FEIHCC (Phe-Glu-Ile-His-Cys-Cys, C) binding with ACE, respectively. The dotted lines represent hydrogen bonds, the atoms in green indicate van der Waals interaction forces in (A,B), and the atoms in light green in (C) represent the van der Waals interaction force. The pink atoms indicate an electrostatic interaction force, and gray atoms represent zinc in (A,B). The difference density map (blue clouds) is the electron cloud of hydrophobic interactions.
Figure 3. Molecular docking of ACE and the peptides. Docking pose, hydrophobic interaction diagram with active pocket, and two-dimensional diagram of TTW (Thr-Thr-Trp, A), VHW (Val-His-Trp, B), and FEIHCC (Phe-Glu-Ile-His-Cys-Cys, C) binding with ACE, respectively. The dotted lines represent hydrogen bonds, the atoms in green indicate van der Waals interaction forces in (A,B), and the atoms in light green in (C) represent the van der Waals interaction force. The pink atoms indicate an electrostatic interaction force, and gray atoms represent zinc in (A,B). The difference density map (blue clouds) is the electron cloud of hydrophobic interactions.
Ijms 22 04068 g003
Table
Table 1. The ACE inhibitor-like peptides from microalgae and their inhibitory effects.
Table 1. The ACE inhibitor-like peptides from microalgae and their inhibitory effects.
Inhibitory PatternSpeciesNo.Peptides
Sequence		IC50 (μM)Study TypeReference
NoncompetitiveChlorella sorokiniana1IW0.5In vitro (rabbit lung)[68]
2VW0.58In vitro (rabbit lung)
Chlorella vulgaris3TTW0.61In vivo (rats)[55]
4VHW0.91In vivo (rats)
Chlorella sorokiniana5LW1.11In vitro (rabbit lung)[68]
Spirulina platensis6IQP5.77In vivo (rats)[69]
Nannochloropsis oculata7LVTVM18In vitro[70]
Spirulina platensis8VEP27.36In vivo (rats)[71]
Chlorella vulgaris9VECYGPNRPQF29.6In vitro[54]
Isochrysis galbana10YMGLDLK36.1In vitro[72]
Isochrysis zhanjiangensis11FEIHCC61.38In vitro [51]
Spirulina sp.12TMEPGKP132In vitro [52]
CompetitiveChlorella ellipsoidea13VEGY128.4In vivo (rats)[73]
Tetradesmus obliquus14WV307.61In vitro (rabbit lung)[68]
Not availableTetradesmus obliquus15WYGPDRPKFL0.82In vitro[74]
16GPDRPKFLGPF5.73In vitro
Spirulina platensis17IAPG11.4In vivo (rats)[49]
Chlorella vulgaris18FAL26.3In vivo (rats)
Spirulina platensis19IAE34.7In vivo (rats)
20VAE35.8In vivo (rats)
Chlorella vulgaris21AEL57.1In vivo (rats)
22AFL63.8In vivo (rats)
23VVPPA79.5In vivo (rats)
Nannochloropsis oculata24GMNNLTP123In vitro[53]
25LEQ173In vitro
Chlorella vulgaris26IVVE315.3In vivo (rats)[49]
Gracilariopsis lemaneiformis27QVEY474.36In vitro[75]
Abbreviations of amino acids: A (Ala), R (Arg), N (Asn), D (Asp), C (Cys), Q (Gln), E (Glu), G (Gly), H (His), I (Ile), L (Leu), K (Lys), M (Met), F (Phe), P (Pro), T (Thr), W (Trp), Y (Tyr), V (Val).
Table
Table 2. Distances and binding sites of hydrogen bonds for each peptide.
Table 2. Distances and binding sites of hydrogen bonds for each peptide.
PeptidesHydrogen BondDistance (Å)Active Sites Pockets
TTWHis3532.17S2
Ala3542.08S1
His5132.48S2
Ala3542.02S1
Ala3542.46S1
Pro4071.89-
VHWGlu4112.08-
Ala3542.41S1
Ala3541.96S1
His3532.45S2
Tyr5202.23S2
Glu3841.93S1
FEHICCArg5226.39-
His3872.17-
Arg4022.09-
Tyr3602.12-
Lys1182.52-
2.50
Asp1211.78-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, Q.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, T.; Liu, M.; Duan, S.; Sun, X. The Antihypertensive Effects and Potential Molecular Mechanism of Microalgal Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Like Peptides: A Mini Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084068

AMA Style

Jiang Q, Chen Q, Zhang T, Liu M, Duan S, Sun X. The Antihypertensive Effects and Potential Molecular Mechanism of Microalgal Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Like Peptides: A Mini Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(8):4068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084068

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Qichen, Qi Chen, Tongqing Zhang, Meng Liu, Shunshan Duan, and Xian Sun. 2021. "The Antihypertensive Effects and Potential Molecular Mechanism of Microalgal Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Like Peptides: A Mini Review" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 8: 4068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084068

APA Style

Jiang, Q., Chen, Q., Zhang, T., Liu, M., Duan, S., & Sun, X. (2021). The Antihypertensive Effects and Potential Molecular Mechanism of Microalgal Angiotensin I-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Like Peptides: A Mini Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(8), 4068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084068

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop