Next Article in Journal
Structural and Functional Remodeling of Mitochondria in Cardiac Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantifying Mitochondrial Dynamics in Patient Fibroblasts with Multiple Developmental Defects and Mitochondrial Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
The Neutrophil Secretome as a Crucial Link between Inflammation and Thrombosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Antibiotic Doxycycline Impairs Cardiac Mitochondrial and Contractile Function
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Remodeling of Mitochondrial Plasticity: The Key Switch from NAFLD/NASH to HCC

1
General Medicine and Metabolic Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Pad. Granelli, Via F Sforza 35, 20122 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122 Milano, Italy
3
Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Balzaretti 9, 20133 Milano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to the manuscript.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(8), 4173; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084173
Submission received: 30 March 2021 / Revised: 15 April 2021 / Accepted: 16 April 2021 / Published: 17 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeting Mitochondria in Metabolic Diseases)

Abstract

:
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the liver and the third-leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Currently, the global burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has dramatically overcome both viral and alcohol hepatitis, thus becoming the main cause of HCC incidence. NAFLD pathogenesis is severely influenced by lifestyle and genetic predisposition. Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles that may adapt in response to environment, genetics and epigenetics in the liver (“mitochondrial plasticity”). Mounting evidence highlights that mitochondrial dysfunction due to loss of mitochondrial flexibility may arise before overt NAFLD, and from the early stages of liver injury. Mitochondrial failure promotes not only hepatocellular damage, but also release signals (mito-DAMPs), which trigger inflammation and fibrosis, generating an adverse microenvironment in which several hepatocytes select anti-apoptotic programs and mutations that may allow survival and proliferation. Furthermore, one of the key events in malignant hepatocytes is represented by the remodeling of glucidic–lipidic metabolism combined with the reprogramming of mitochondrial functions, optimized to deal with energy demand. In sum, this review will discuss how mitochondrial defects may be translated into causative explanations of NAFLD-driven HCC, emphasizing future directions for research and for the development of potential preventive or curative strategies.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the main subtype of liver tumor and the third-leading cause of cancer death worldwide, whose incidence reflects the etiologies of liver diseases and their geographical distribution [1,2]. The Asian population has the highest HCC prevalence, and it is amenable to viral hepatitis in more than 50% of cases. Viral hepatitis C (HCV) and alcohol abuse prevail in western countries, where HCC is much less frequent [2]. However, the global spreading of obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) have rapidly increased the incidence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) over the past two decades and, in parallel, that of NAFLD-related HCC in industrialized society due also to the development of anti-viral therapies and effective HBV immunization programs. Nowadays, NAFLD is the most common chronic liver disorder, affecting 25–30% of te general population, and it is closely intertwined with insulin resistance (IR), overweight, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), dyslipidemia, hypertension, and hyperglycemia. NAFLD is defined as hepatic fat content >5% of liver weight (steatosis), a potential reversible condition that could evolve into nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in 10–25% of subjects, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. It has been reported that NASH patients with advanced fibrosis (F3–F4) were seven times more likely to develop HCC and, in a small proportion, HCC arises in NAFLD individuals without fibrosis [3,4]. Additionally, 30–40% of HCC cases occurred in subjects with cryptogenic cirrhosis, some of which were further affected by dyslipidemia, obesity, T2DM, and possibly by NASH [5]. A study analyzing the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) registries recorded a 9% annual increase in NAFLD–HCC cases from 2004 to 2009. The survey also examined the prevalence and mortality of 4.929 HCC individuals. Among them, 14.1% of HCC was due to fatty liver, 5% received NAFLD-related liver transplantation (LT), and the presence of NAFLD increased the risk of 1-year mortality, especially in older subjects with previous heart disease [6,7]. Therefore, NAFLD is currently representing not only a clinical and socio-economic burden for health, but it is predicted to overcome HCV, HBV, and alcoholic hepatitis, thus becoming the leading cause of HCC and LT [1,2,3,4,6].
The pathogenesis of NAFLD involves the interplay of environmental, epigenetic, and genetic factors. The outbreak of HCC results from the continuous cycle of parenchymal disruption and tissue regeneration sustained by inflammation, oxidative stress, fibrogenesis and hypoxia. In this scenario, mitochondria, which are extremely adaptable to external cues, play a key role as bioenergetic factories and for the regulation of liver metabolism. Compelling evidence has suggested that mitochondrial dysfunction may precede IR or arise before NASH development, thereby reinforcing the concept that NAFLD may be considered a mitochondrial disorder. Loss of mitochondrial plasticity in terms of functions, morphology and dynamics may support hepatocellular injury and the onset of the Warburg effect, the mechanism by which hepatocytes exploit anaerobic glycolysis even in the presence of oxygen in order to sustain energy demand and cell proliferation [8,9,10,11]. A schematic overview of mitochondrial alterations during NAFLD progression is represented in Figure 1.
Therefore, this review will focus on how environmental factors, genetics/epigenetics and metabolic alterations may impact mitochondrial dysfunction and prime the hepatocytes to epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). The main goal of the present work will be to summarize the main aspects related to NAFLD–HCC pathophysiology driven by mitochondrial failure and the current knowledge about mitochondrial dynamics, which could lay the groundwork for the development of new therapeutic approaches to prevent and/or manage NAFLD progression towards HCC.

2. Mitochondria: The Workforce of the Liver

The liver is enriched in mitochondria, highly dynamic organelles endowed with their own mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in multiple copies encoding 13 subunits of the electron transport chain (ETC), 22 transfer RNAs, and two ribosomal RNAs [12]. Mitochondria are vital for cell homeostasis and its metabolic activities, as they provide the bulk of energy requirements through oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis, as well as regulating redox status, β-oxidation, tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), ketogenesis and glucidic/lipidic metabolism. Physiologically, mitochondria are renewed from pre-existing ones in a cycle known as mitobiogenesis, encompassing fusion and fission events, since they cannot be generated de novo [12,13]. Recently, our group has proposed an extensive review of mitochondrial dynamics and its involvement in NAFLD pathogenesis [11].
Energy shortage and low ATP availability stimulate hepatic mitobiogenesis by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-γ coactivators 1 alpha (PGC1α), which are induced by fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) and promote the Krebs cycle, lipid catabolism and gluconeogenesis [14,15]. Notably, Bhalla et al. demonstrated that PGC1α overexpression may promote HCC development by coordinately sustaining mitochondrial biogenesis and β-oxidation [16]. Mitochondrial fusion supports OXPHOS and mitochondrial coupling efficiency during cell proliferation. The elongation of mitochondria is orchestrated by Mitofusin ½ (MFN1, MFN2) and optical atrophy 1 (OPA1), which mediate the merging of mitochondrial outer membranes (MOMs) and inner membranes (IMMs), respectively [17,18,19]. Conversely, during fission, mitochondria are separated into two or more daughter organelles by dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), which is recruited around MOMs by specific adaptors such as fission 1 (FIS1), mitochondrial fission factor (Mff) and mitochondrial dynamics (MiD) Proteins 49/50 [20,21,22]. Aberrancies in mitochondrial dynamics are drivers of HCC development and progression. In particular, alterations in MFNs and OPA1 functions may lead to metabolic reprogramming and EMT, while DRP1 de-regulation may prompt cell growth, tumor microenvironment and invasiveness [23].
Mitochondrial dynamics further include a mechanism that allows them to either repair damaged mitochondria through mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt) or definitively disrupt them by autophagy (mitophagy) in order to prevent mitochondrial failure [12]. Mitophagy is fine-tuned and regulated within hepatocytes to the extent that three types of mitophagy participate to preserve cell homeostasis. When mitochondria are preparing to separate, one daughter mitochondrion is transiently hyperpolarized while the other one is hypopolarized. The latter may run into complete depolarization by losing protonmotive force, uncoupling OXPHOS and dissipating mitochondrial membrane potential [20,24]. Suboptimal mitochondria that do not pass the quality check are selected for type 1 mitophagy, which is mediated by phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN)-induced kinase 1 (PINK1)/Parkin signaling [20,24,25]. Both fructose and the western diet, exploited as a dietary model of hepatic steatosis, may hasten mitochondrial depolarization and mitophagy, thus giving rise to mitochondrial dysfunction at early stages of NASH, possibly contributing to liver disease progression towards HCC [26]. Type 1 mitophagy is tightly linked to nutrient availability and insulin signaling, while type 2 mitophagy may either occur in parallel with PINK1/Parkin-dependent mitophagy or be induced by photodamage in a phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-independent manner [20,24,27]. In both type 1 and 2 mitophagy, E3 ubiquitin ligases are enrolled on MOMs and provide polyubiquitin tails to mitochondrial receptors (i.e., BNIP3, FUNDC1) containing light chain 3 (LC3)-interactive region (LIR) motifs. The ubiquitination of LIR domains is required for binding the autophagic compartments, and deficiency in autophagic processes was associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and genomic instability in murine hepatocytes [27]. Finally, type 3 micromitophagy embedded mitochondrial-derived vesicles (MDVs) containing selected oxidized cargoes and mitochondrial fragments into multivesicular bodies, which then merge into lysosomes for degradation [20,24,28].

3. Mitochondrial Alterations at Early Stages of Hepatic Steatosis: Cause or Consequence?

The mechanisms underlying NAFLD pathogenesis are highly complex and multifactorial, and parallel factors participate in the disease onset and progression. A sedentary lifestyle and hypercaloric diet are the major risk factors that influence visceral adiposity and the development of peripheral IR. It has been reported that defects in mitochondrial biogenesis may rapidly accelerate beige-to-white adipocytes transition, thus contributing to adipose tissue expansion [29]. Benador et al. revealed that the mitochondria surrounding lipid droplets (LDs) in the adipose tissue, termed peri-droplet mitochondria (PDM), showed a different bioenergetic metabolism compared to those non-adjacent to the LDs surface, thus contributing to their enlargement and adiposity [28]. Furthermore, signs of hepatic mitochondrial dysfunction have been observed in insulin-resistant rats without overt NAFLD, thereby suggesting that mitochondrial failure may appear as an early event before steatosis onset [30].
Fatty liver results from the unbalance between lipid synthesis and catabolism within the hepatocytes. IR promotes adipose tissue lipolysis, which consequently causes an efflux of free fatty acids (FFAs) to the liver, where they are stored as triglycerides (TGs) to counteract the harmful effect of FFA surplus. In addition, the compensatory hyperinsulinemia activates the hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL) through sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBP1, SREBP2), ATP-citrate lyase (ACLY), acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) and fatty acid synthase (FASN), which provide precursors for TG synthesis, thus exacerbating LDs accumulation [31]. In response to high caloric intake, IR and obesity, hepatic mitochondria adapt in number, biomass and activity through a mechanism known as “mitochondrial flexibility”. Firstly, the liver increases FFA transport into mitochondria through carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1/2 (CPT1/2) and enhances both β-oxidation and OXPHOS. Indeed, megamitochondria were observed in liver biopsies of both NAFLD and NASH patients, suggestive of an enhanced mitochondrial density [32]. Shami and colleagues have recently proposed a detailed description of the three-dimensional ultrastructure of giant mitochondria in NAFLD subjects. The authors provided a classification of these organelles, distinguishing elongated, irregular, and spheroidal shapes based on the characterization of their internal ultrastructure [33], although further investigations are required to elucidate whether the rise in mitochondrial content observed in NAFLD/NASH hepatic tissues reflects high levels of mitobiogenesis or reduced mitophagy [34]. Then, FFA overload overwhelms both TCA and FA catabolism, from which NADH/FADH2 are generated. Both NADH and FADH2 transfer electrons to the respiratory chain coupled to the synthesis of ATP, and a small fraction of protons leak from ETC, react with oxygen (O2), and generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) [35]. Elevated concentrations of lipid species, especially those incorporating saturated/monounsaturated FA chains, critically promote both ROS-induced lipotoxicity and hepatocellular damage, thus favoring liver disease progression and loss of mitochondrial dynamics [35,36]. Therefore, this section will discuss how lipid metabolism, in terms of composition, anabolism and catabolism, may impact mitochondrial dysfunction and favor per se a pro-tumorigenic microenvironment from the early stages of NAFLD.

3.1. Fatty Acids Metabolism, De Novo Lipogenesis and β-Oxidation: From Steatosis to HCC

NAFLD development is directly involved in hepatocarcinogenesis and tumor adaptation to local micro-environment independently of NASH. The most studied mechanisms linked to carcinogenesis affect mitochondria and include the Warburg effect, from which lactate and pyruvate are produced to support energy demand [8,9,11], and glutaminolysis, which exploits glutamine to sustain the Krebs cycle by generating a high citrate concentration [37]. These facts notwithstanding, the aberrant activation of DNL is one of the major metabolic events occurring in NAFLD–HCC onset. In this field, the role of lipid species is attracting increasing attention, as they can modify mitochondrial functionality and contribute to metabolic switching in hepatocytes, to the extent that alterations in lipid metabolism are currently recognized as a hallmark of hepatic cancer.
Many malignant tumors showed LDs accumulation and the activation of lipogenic pathways, which were correlated with the pro-survival phenotype in human HCC cell lines and poor prognosis in HCC patients [38]. Among lipid classes, TGs, diglycerides and ceramides are enriched in steatotic livers and contribute to the onset of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, whose alterations in terms of functions and architecture participate in both DNL and IR [39]. It has been demonstrated that lipid overload may disrupt ER–mitochondrial communications in steatotic hepatocytes and ob/ob mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD). Lipids altered the abundance of calcium (Ca2+) transporters and channels leading to Ca2+ efflux into the cytoplasm. The increased intracellular Ca2+ concentration enhanced ROS content and the mutagenesis of both nuclear DNA and mtDNA, thereby inducing the activation of oncogenes or the inhibition of onco-suppressors, and affecting mtDNA replication [40,41].
Several studies revealed that aberrantly activated DNL is critical for HCC development and progression. The inhibition of stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD), FASN and ACC, which provide FFAs within hepatocytes, abrogated Akt-driven HCC and reduced the hepatic cancer stem cells (CSC) pool [42,43]. Consistently, FFAs per se derived from adipose tissue lipolysis, combined with those newly synthetized from DNL, may hasten hepatocytes degeneration and foster mechanisms of tumor escape by activating anti-apoptotic programs. FFAs may be converted into mono-unsatured fatty acids (MUFAs) by desaturase enzymes as fatty acid desaturase (FADS) and SCD. Increased MUFAs, Fads1/2 and Scd2 levels have been observed in mice affected by NAFLD–HCC and human HCC specimens [40,44,45]. Moreover, rat hepatocytes treated with palmitic acid (PA) affected insulin signaling, enhanced β-oxidation rate and exacerbated ROS content. PA also activated the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK), which is the most constitutively activated factor in HCC involved in mitochondrial cytochrome c release, cell death, and compensatory proliferation [46,47]. Kudo et al. found that hepatocyte-specific Pik3ca transgenic mice, a genetic model of hepatosteatosis, developed hepatocellular adenomas with abundant LDs and HCC, but both without inflammation and fibrosis, supporting a direct role of lipids as pro-tumorigenic factors. Notably, they demonstrated that the accumulation of oleic acid (OA) and PA promoted liver cancer development by suppressing Pten, an inhibitor of Pi3k/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling [44].
In response to an excessive FFA concentration, mitochondria enhance CPT1/2-mediated mitochondrial lipid flux and β-oxidation to protect against lipotoxicity, a mechanism that is lost during the NAFLD course. Moreover, uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2) activity is upregulated due to FA surplus, thus boosting mitochondrial proton leak and increasing NASH susceptibility [35]. Defects in the mitochondrial trifunctional protein (MTP), which catalyzes long-chain FA β-oxidation, induced hepatic IR and steatosis development, alongside an increase in antioxidant defenses and cytochrome P-450 to counteract ROS production [45]. Reduced FA catabolism, ATP and mitochondrial membrane potential have been reported in progressive NAFLD and in many NAFLD–HCC cases. Diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-injected mice fed with HFD downregulated both CPT2 and β-oxidation during HCC onset. The suppression of FA oxidation enables HCC cells to adapt to a lipid-rich microenvironment and to escape lipotoxicity by blocking JNK [48]. CPT2 reduction results in the accumulation of acylcarnitine species, which further hamper β-oxidation and facilitate the acquisition of stem cell properties through the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) [48,49].
However, T2DM, obesity or NAFLD etiologies may contribute to the development of “oxidative” HCCs, a metabolic HCC variant observed in a subset of patients, as these conditions provide FFAs in bulk that, in turn, may be re-routed towards β-oxidation rather than TG re-esterification [11,49,50,51,52]. In this context, PPARα, the master regulator of FFA catabolism, activates and stimulates the WNT/β-catenin oncogenic cascade which, in turn, sustains FFA dismissal. Additionally, β-oxidation is further supported by either the hydrolysis of intrahepatic TGs, which provide FFA substrates, or acetyl-CoA, which derives from β-oxidation and promotes ketogenesis. In “oxidative” HCCs, FFA degradation efficiently feeds the ETC and supplies ATP, thus rendering its synthesis dependent on FFAs oxidation at the expense of ATP produced by the Warburg effect [52].

3.2. The Role of LDs and Lipophagy in NAFLD-Related HCC

LDs, whose biogenesis starts from ER-Golgi compartments, are highly dynamic organelles stocking energy sources and working as a buffering system incorporating lipotoxic species. LDs may either re-arrange in size according to nutritional status, or support cell survival by providing FFAs via autophagic processes during stressful conditions. A computational analysis performed in 11 human HCC tissues highlighted that the majority of HCCs reduced FFA uptake and β-oxidation, despite the fact that TG content was enormously raised compared to its non-tumoral counterpart. In in vitro models of hepatic steatosis, our group demonstrated that the presence of a saturated lipid profile, including TG species, was associated with an aggressive hepatocellular phenotype mimicking HCC [10]. Consistently, a lipidomic analysis evaluating 20 HCC tissues revealed that levels of TGs with multiple double bonds were downregulated, while saturated TG species were greatly overexpressed [53]. Berndt et al. suggested that TG content in HCCs does not reflect the rate of FFA uptake, but it was determined by the combination of FFA esterification and the degradation of lipases hydrolyzing LDs [51]. Tumor cells largely exploit LDs breakdown in the absence of energy availability and hypoxia to support cell growth and tumor expansion [54,55,56,57]. It has been shown by Tian et al. that unbalanced lipophagy is unexpectedly involved in carcinogenesis in hepatoma cell lines, NAFLD murine models, and NAFLD–HCC human samples [58]. Specifically, Nogo-B oncogene, which localizes at the ER–LDs interface, interacts with autophagy related 5 (ATG5) to promote LDs self-catabolism. LDs’ breakdown releases lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) mediator, which enhances the pro-proliferative Hippo/Yes-associated protein (YAP) cascade [58]. Moreover, oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) and free cholesterol accumulate in the hepatic microenvironment of NASH mice [58] and NAFLD subjects [59]. The increased uptake of oxLDL in the liver via CD36 receptor may represent a triggering stimulus for the metabolic rewiring of the hepatocytes, as it can promote Nogo-B transcriptional activation [58].
Furthermore, in both human hepatocytes laden with large LDs and cirrhotic scars flanked by macrovescicular steatosis, the nuclear localization of the YAP protein was increased compared to hepatocytes accumulating small LDs and cirrhotic sections with micro-steatosis [60], suggesting a link between macro-steatosis and cancer. Conversely, the characterization of the LDs proteome highlighted that perilipin (PLIN1), ADRP (PLIN2) and TIP47 (PLIN3) proteins mediate LDs–mitochondria crosstalk, thus regulating LDs’ expansion and disposal. Notably, PLIN1, PLIN2 and PLIN3 are differentially expressed during tumorigenesis and usually dwell on the LDs’ surface according to the LDs’ dimension. PLIN2 and PLIN3 mainly coat small LDs and are commonly overexpressed at early stages of HCC, as the LD dimension allows rapid dynamics between synthesis and consumption to sustain phases of cell proliferation or metabolism. PLIN1 expression is lost during hepatocarcinogenesis and may reflect the differentiation grade of hepatocytes [61]. Th eactivation of SREBP1 via PI3K/Akt/mTOR further contributes to neoplastic steatogenesis and PLINs expression [38]. These studies pointed out a differential role of micro/macro-LDs in HCC onset and progression, although details on the mechanisms and respective roles need to be addressed in the future.

4. Mitochondria Play a Crucial Role in the Switch from NASH towards HCC

A continuous flux of FFAs into mitochondria results in increased oxidative damage associated with mitochondrial dysfunction, ER stress and tissue inflammation, which may contribute to the progression from NAFLD to NASH, and up to HCC [60]. Over the course of NAFLD, mitochondrial failure in terms of functions, morphology and dynamics occurs in attempting to deal with energy surplus and to protect against FA-induced lipotoxicity, with the consequent loss of mitochondrial plasticity. In both mice and humans affected by NASH, blunted ketogenesis and mitochondrial respiration were observed, whereas the citric acid cycle was increased in the attempt to discard lipid overload [61].
Compromised OXPHOS, ketogenesis, low ATP synthesis and incomplete β-oxidation coupled to an overreactive Krebs cycle incremented ROS production, causing mitochondrial abnormalities, lipid peroxidation and mtDNA damage. Increased serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), a byproduct derived from the oxidative degradation of lipids, were detected in NAFLD patients, while antioxidants coenzyme Q10 and CuZn-superoxide dismutase (SOD) were reduced [62]. The mitochondrial ROS production triggers mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and induces JNK phosphorylation (p-JNK), affecting the mitochondrial ETC and damaging ROS production [63]. Interestingly, if on one hand p-JNK may antagonize oxidative damage by enhancing apoptosis, on the other hand, the signals arising from necrotic hepatocytes may stimulate the JNK cascade in Kupffer cells (KCs) in order to express the pro-tumorigenic cytokines interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), which promote EMT, migration and invasiveness [62].
ROS induce the activation of 5′ AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which prompts PGC1α. The latter is a powerful sensor of nutritional status that is activated in response to fasting, glucocorticoids and dietary FFAs, and it plays a crucial in role in the regulation of OXPHOS, mitobiogenesis and glucidic/lipidic metabolism [14]. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR cascade mediates PGC1α activation, and in turn induces transcriptional factors (i.e., PPARs, nuclear respiratory factors (NRF1/2,), estrogen-related receptors) that increase the levels of ROS scavengers, including SOD2 and glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1). However, antioxidant defenses are not able to manage the long-term ROS exposure during NASH. Indeed, lower levels of SOD2 were observed in both HFD-fed rodents and humans [63], while higher circulating levels of the glutathione disulfide/glutathione (GSSG/GSH) ratio and glutathione transferase (GST) were found in a small cohort of 21 pediatric NASH patients, as a possible compensatory mechanism against oxidative stress [64].
In response to mtDNA, proteins and lipids damage induced by oxygen radicals, the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)-dependent histone deacetylase sirtuins (SIRTs), localizing on mitochondria, promote SOD2 activation through its deacetylation. In NAFLD subjects, SIRT1, SIRT3, SIRT5 and SIRT6 are downregulated, while SIRT4 was overexpressed in response to the exacerbated DNL [65]. Moreover, several members of the SIRT family may alleviate ROS-induced hepatocellular injury and promote apoptosis, thus preventing compensatory proliferation and tumorigenesis [66,67].
NASH is characterized by the loss of mitochondrial flexibility, the activation of Kupffer cells (KCs), hepatic macrophages, and even by the presence of fibrosis. Cytokines released by both hepatocytes and KCs may activate hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), which produce collagen and fibrotic scars, and further stimulate apoptotic receptors, such as Fas, TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) on hepatocytes surface [67,68,69]. Consequently, the pro-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) and JNK pathways stimulate the mitochondrial membrane’s permeabilization through their translocation on MOMs, where they can create tunnels, from which apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) and cytochrome c are released, promoting mitochondrial derangement and apoptosis [69]
Furthermore, the low rate of mitophagy in NAFLD hampers the disruption of degenerative mitochondria, causing the release of mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns (mito-DAMPs) that even trigger inflammation. Mito-DAMPs may prompt pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) by binding and activating the Toll-like receptor 4/9 (TLR4/9) plus the downstream nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (Nf-κB) signaling, the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs), the pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome and interferon regulatory factor-dependent type 1 (IRF1) [68]. Ping et al. demonstrated that the presence of hepatocytes-derived mtDNA, secreted from damaged liver tissues, in the circulation triggers the fibrotic response, by interacting with TLR9 on KCs and inducing collagen deposition by activated HSCs [69].
Although mitochondrial dysfunction plays a prominent role in NAFLD progression, ER stress also contributes to the severity of liver damage. Indeed, these two organelles physically communicate through mitochondrial-associated membranes (MAMs) in response to stress conditions [70]. MAMs are required for the transport of lipids, Ca2+, insulin signaling and glucose homeostasis, and even for the interplay with the UPR, which is considered a sensor of ER stress [71]. As previously mentioned, fat accumulation may disturb the ER–mitochondria network, causing either Ca2+-induced apoptosis or DNA injury. Additionally, cytosolic Ca2+ may contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis by activating the compensatory proliferation of hepatic CSCs (Figure 2) [70,71]. Therefore, this section aims to delineate the contribution of mitochondrial dysfunction and the loss of mitochondrial flexibility to the progression from simple steatosis to NASH, and how these abnormalities may generate an advantageous microenvironment for tumorigenesis.

4.1. The Loss of “Mitochondrial Flexibility” during NASH May Play a Role in HCC Development

As previously underlined, the derangement of mitochondrial adaptability, through which mitochondria modify their function and number in response to nutrients availability, may drive and/or accelerate NASH development and its progressive forms, despite further studies being required to elucidate which mechanisms among fusion, fission or mitophagy most influence the natural history of NAFLD [32,72].
The disequilibrium of mitobiogenesis and the accumulation of damaged mitochondria, mainly due to the failure of mitophagy, have been observed in the liver tissues of several NASH subjects, and NASH has even been correlated with alterations in mitochondrial architecture [73]. In murine models, the genetic deletion of Mfn2, which is involved in mitochondrial elongation during fusion, led to mitochondrial failure, ER stress and higher levels of H2O2 [74]. Contrariwise, the administration of omega-3 polyunsaturated FAs (PUFAs) in HepG2 cells, previously incubated with PA and OA to mimic steatosis, increased the expression of Mfn2 with the consequent elongation of mitochondrial tubules [75]. It has been observed that Mfn1-deficent mice displayed an increase in Mfn2 and Opa1, as a possible compensatory mechanism. Higher levels of Opa1 promote the remodeling of mitochondrial cristae and avoid apoptosis by inhibiting cytochrome c release [72]. Fibrotic mice fed with a high-trans-fat, high-fructose and high-cholesterol (AMLN) diet showed an increased number of disrupted mitochondria, accompanied by reduced OXPHOS capacity, and the loss of both mitochondrial integrity and cristae structure. In these rodents, the expression of Mnf1 and Opa1 was significantly reduced, and they reflected a higher number of separated mitochondria [76]. Recently, Zahng et al. demonstrated that Mnf1 expression was reduced in 34 HCC patients. To explore the role of mitochondrial fusion, they exploited an in vitro model using an MHCC97-H cell line and observed that Mnf1 inhibits cell proliferation, migration and invasion. These results suggest that the loss of mitochondrial dynamics, mainly due to the deletion of Mnf1, plays a crucial role in impeding HCC development [77].
Regarding alterations in mitochondrial fission, it has been remarked that the deletion of Drp1 in mice inhibited Bcl-2 and the release of cytochrome c [20]. In mice challenged with HFD, lacking the Drp1 gene ameliorated hepatic fat content and ER stress through the expression of Fgf21, which plays a beneficial role in mitochondrial dynamics and prevents the release of pro-fibrotic mediators, suggesting that the inhibition of mitochondrial separation may improve NAFLD severity [78]. Nevertheless, Pollard et al. generated a liver-specific murine model in which AMPK and fission were constitutively activated (iAMPKCA). Chronic mitochondrial scission protected against obesity, steatosis, necroinflammation and fibrosis, as it swiftly drove damaged mitochondria into the autophagic compartments [79].

4.2. Megamitochondria and Mitophagy: The Impact of Morphological Alterations in NASH

Fusion–fission unbalancing affects mitochondrial architecture and promotes the formation of megamitochondria, which were detected in both adult and pediatric NAFLD/NASH patients [32,33]. In a cohort of 31 biopsied NASH patients, megamitochondria localized in the central lobule adjacent to the central vein and the portal triads have been, and these featured crystalline insertions [80]. In another study, liver biopsies of NASH patients showed an alteration of mitochondrial morphology characterized by megamitochondria, cristae paucity and opacity of granules [81]. Ahishali and colleagues performed quantitative and semi-quantitative ultrastructural evaluations of liver biopsies from 23 patients, 10 with NAFLD and 13 with NASH [82]. Both NAFLD and NASH hepatic tissues were characterized by the presence of megamitochondria with no significant differences among the two groups. However, NASH patients, much more so than NAFLD ones, showed higher mitochondrial diameters, intra-mitochondria crystalline inclusions and granules in the matrix, which correlated with both mitochondrial swelling and OXPHOS failure [80]. Recently, Verhaegh et al. observed ultrastructural changes by using transmission electron microscopy in 37 NAFLD patients, of whom 12 had NASH [83]. In this study, the presence of giant mitochondria showed no differences between patients with or without NASH, according to the results of Ahishali et al. [82], suggesting that the appearance of megamitochondria could represent a transitory phase between simple steatosis and NASH. However, their exact role in NAFLD pathophysiology needs to be clarified.
The presence of giant and/or globular mitochondria in fatty liver has been associated with the suppression of mitophagy to the extent that restoring mitophagy may enable the rescuing of mitochondrial dysfunction in NAFLD [84]. Mice carrying a Parkin deficiency, which is involved in type 1 mitophagy, displayed swollen mitochondria with loss of cristae [85]. Moreover, the high caloric intake in these mice reduced the expression of LC3 receptors, with the consequent activation of inflammatory response, which leads to the inhibition of mitophagy and NASH progression [86]. Glick and colleagues exploited two murine models deleted for Parkin or BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa–protein-interacting protein 3 (Bnip3) genes, in which lipid synthesis was exacerbated, possibly developing a NASH phenotype. In these rodents, the authors observed the presence of globular mitochondria and unidentifiable cristae [87]. Moreover, changes in mitochondrial ultrastructure were evaluated in a mouse model of NASH, in which the CXCR3 factor was strongly upregulated. The presence of CXCR3 promotes inflammation in chronic liver disease and may impact mitochondrial morphology, which appear round shaped with disrupted cristae. On the contrary, the deletion of the CXCR3 gene ameliorated mitochondrial architecture in terms of less swollen mitochondria and more organized cristae, suggesting that its ablation could prevent morphological alterations [88].
Finally, the lipidomic analysis of NASH patients revealed higher hepatic levels of dihydroceramide and dihexosylceramide species that were correlated to defects of mitophagy, oxidative stress and inflammation [89]. The accumulation of dihexosylceramide has even been found in human HCC tissue, suggesting that reduced mitophagy may be involved in the progression from NASH to HCC [90].

4.3. The Contribution of Hepatocellular Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Inflammatory Response to NASH

In the large spectrum of NAFLD pathogenesis, inflammation and apoptosis are benchmarks of NASH progression. De-regulated mitochondrial activity within hepatic cells and hepatocytes-derived danger signals may directly or indirectly induce inflammation and apoptosis, precipitating fibrosis, cirrhosis and, eventually, HCC development. Clinical and experimental evidence has showed that ROS-induced apoptosis triggers TRAIL receptors that, subsequently, promote the release of cytokines and chemokines [68]. Nevertheless, the role of TRAIL is controversial. TRAIL−/− mice showed worsened inflammation and fibrosis but improved adipose tissue injury, suggesting that TRAIL is indispensable for adipose tissue homeostasis but promotes the hepatic inflammatory and fibrotic response [69]. A common defect observed in obesity and NAFLD/NASH is cardiolipin peroxidation, a mitochondrial phospholipid that regulates mitochondrial dynamics and morphology. Pathological cardiolipin species may be generated by either acyl-coA lysocardiolipin acyltransferase 1 (ALCAT1) or oxidative stress, causing cardiolipin exposure to MOMS of damaged mitochondria [91]. The externalization of oxidated cardiolipin activates apoptotic processes by inducing cytochrome c release [92], and represents a mitophagic signal to induce mitochondrial dismissal [11]. Cardiolipin inhibitors could ameliorate NAFLD pathogenic manifestations by modulating NLRP3 inflammasome and KCs recruitment [93]. It is noteworthy that cardiolipin is frequently downregulated during HCC progression as a possible strategy to avoid apoptosis [92].
Apoptotic signals impaired mitochondrial biogenesis as they dampened mitophagy and induced the release of mito-DAMPs. Many components of mitochondria, such as formyl peptides, share structural similarities with bacteria and could allow cell-to-cell communications by binding the PRRs expressed on the surface of KCs and HSCs, thus exacerbating the systemic secretion of pro-inflammatory TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β and IL-8 (Figure 2) [94,95,96]. Among mito-DAMPS, mtDNA represents the major active components released by damaged hepatocytes, and may interact with TLR9, thereby activating inflammation and fibrosis [41]. Both mtDNA and formyl peptides could recruit and induce the migration of polymorphonuclear neutrophils through MAPKs, thus eliciting neutrophil-mediated hepatic injury [97]. Consistently, elevated concentrations of mito-DAMPs were detected in HFD-fed mice and serum samples of NAFLD/NASH patients, especially in those with advanced fibrosis. Moreover, circulating levels of mtDNA reflected hepatocellular injury, and were associated with histological parameters of disease progression in both rodents and humans [41,98].
Inflammasome activation is closely linked to progressive NAFLD, and its expression was higher in both NASH mice and patients [70]. TLRs, TNFR1 and harmful stimuli, including mito-DAMPs, increased intracellular levels of ATP and Ca2+ ions as well mitochondrial-derived ROS, and activate NLRP3 inflammasome and co-adjuvate its assembly. Interestingly, excessive mitochondrial fission at the expense of fusion has been associated with NLRP3 activity under hyperglycemic and diabetic conditions [99]. Wei and collaborators first demonstrated that the expression of NLP3 inflammasome was completely lost or significantly downregulated in 128 HCC patients. NLRP3 promoted not only the activation of inflammatory pathways, but also the reestablishment of hepatic homeostasis, by activating apoptosis. Therefore, a complete deficiency of NLRP3 favored the compensatory proliferation of hepatocytes and HCC onset [100]. Conversely, NLRP2, belonging to the inflammasome cascade as an inhibitor of NF-kB signaling, may participate in NASH improvement. The suppression of the Nlrp2 gene accelerated steatosis development in mice. The hepatic expression of NLRP2 was also found to be lower in NASH subjects, with a consequent increase in IL-1β and IL-18 caused by KCs [71].
The mito-DAMPs-induced inflammation, combined with mitochondrial oxidative damage within hepatocytes, further modulates the efficacy of nuclear receptors, such as liver X receptors (LXRα, LXRβ) and members of the PPAR family (PPARα, PPARβ, PPARγ), which are key regulators of mitochondrial activity (i.e., β-oxidation) and may be crucial in NASH progression. In particular, LXRs’ downregulation may sustain fat accumulation by increasing SREBP1-c and reducing the very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) catabolism [101]. The administration of SR9238, which is an agonist of LXR, is able to significantly reduce hepatic inflammation in NASH mice [102,103]. Moreover, Pparγ-deficient mice displayed higher levels of TNF-α, suggesting that PPARγ may regulate the KCs-mediated inflammatory response [104]. Likewise, PPARα blocks NF-κB and oxidative burst, and it prevents the progression towards fibrosis [105,106]. Mice fed a choline-deficient, ethionine-supplemented (CDE) diet showed increased hepatic TG content and developed NASH alongside reduced PPARs and PGC1α, showing lower levels of mitochondrial mitobiogenesis [107]. Additionally, in PGC1α−/− mice exposed to an obesogenic diet, Besse-Patin et al. correlated the inefficient β-oxidation and ROS production with a fibrotic response, suggesting that mitochondrial damage in hepatocytes may directly aggravate the NASH condition [108]. In a cohort of 85 biopsied patients, it has been found that a lower expression of PPARα correlated with the severity of liver disease, suggesting that it may represent a possible pharmacological target in NASH treatment [109].
Finally, some have postulated an interplay between PPARα and hepatocytes proliferation. The oncogene Cyclin D1 inhibits its expression, and consequently reduces the levels of β-oxidation in HCC cell lines, confirming that PPARα is even involved in carcinogenesis [110]. Ergo, such findings provide an overview of the cross-talk among mitochondrial dysfunction occurring in hepatocytes and activated inflammatory response, highlighting the relevance of mitochondria dysregulation in active NASH.

4.4. The Crosstalk among Parenchymal Mito-DAMPs, HSCs and Inflammation in NASH-Driven HCC

As discussed above, mitochondrial dysfunctions activate both KCs and HSCs, which, in turn, exacerbate inflammation and promote fibrotic response, respectively. The ROS production, lipid peroxidation, mito-DAMPs and cell death signals activating caspases augment the hepatic infiltration of pro-inflammatory cells, and together trigger fibrogenesis (Figure 2) [111,112]. In particular, 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), an end-product of lipid peroxidation, acts as a potent pro-fibrogenic stimulus for the expression of genes involved in extracellular matrix deposition, the primary mechanism of fibrosis and cirrhosis [113,114]. HSCs can be activated by the cytokines and chemokines, such as TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, TGF-β, and C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand (CCL) 2 and 5, released from hepatocytes and KCs. In turn, KCs may enhance the production of chemoattractant factors and ROS by NADPH oxidase, and further worsen the inflammatory response and HSCs-activated phenotypes. Recently, Ping et al. demonstrated that the chronic administration of hepatotoxic thioacetamide (TAA) in mice for 6 weeks can cause hepatocytic cell death along with hepatic collagen accumulation. According to these findings, the upregulation of pro-fibrotic genes, such as TGFβ1, pro-collagen α1 and Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1), were detected. TAA-induced liver fibrosis was further correlated with the high levels of circulating mtDNA arising from death hepatocytes. Notably, freshly isolated HSCs exposed to mito-DAMPs assumed morphological features of their activation, with the loss of LDs, a myofibroblast-like phenotype and a robust positivity to alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), a marker of HSCs activation [98]. In two independent cohorts of NAFLD subjects, it has been observed that mtDNA levels were higher in NASH patients, and much higher in those with fibrosis, compared to NAFLD subjects and matched controls, according to the results obtained in mice [98].
Pro-inflammatory pathways activated by mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidized mtDNA contribute not only to fibrosis, but also to HCC onset. For instance, it has been demonstrated that the NF-κB cascade is involved in cell survival [115]. Park et al. demonstrated that the TNF-α and IL-6 produced by KCs may activate pro-oncogenic pathways via JNK signal transducer and activator of STAT3, Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), MAPK, and PI3K. In dietary and genetic models of hepatosteatosis, it has been shown that IL-6 induced STAT3 activation and triggered hepatocyte proliferation, leading to HCC [116]. Uysal and coworkers proposed a panel of circulating markers of liver damage, including proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8), ferritin, nitric oxide and mediators of mitochondrial damage (i.e., MDA), which when used in clinics may predict NASH progression to HCC [117]. Finally, the upregulation of hypoxia inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) occurs in response to intrahepatic ROS production. HIF-1α is stable under hypoxia, while it is degraded under normal oxygen conditions (normoxia). In NASH, oxygen is unevenly distributed in the hepatic lobules due to both inflammation and fibrotic scars, thus promoting hypoxia. Interestingly, non-tumoral cells such as mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are typically recruited to the injured or hypoxic area. In mice treated with DEN and exposed to a high-fat, high-cholesterol and high-sugar diet (HF-HC-HSD), which triggers liver fibrosis, it has been observed that the increase in HIF-1α coupled with the release in inflammatory cytokines mediated metabolic reprogramming, angiogenesis and proliferation, thereby prompting switching from NASH to HCC [118,119].

4.5. “Evasion” from Mitochondrial-Induced Apoptosis Drives HCC

The development of HCC is almost never a sporadic event, but rather a Darwinian selection of those clonal cells able to trigger mechanisms of escape from intrinsic cues, and to adapt to exogenous restraints imposed by the environment. During NASH, lipid peroxidation, mito-DAMPs, oxidative/ER stress and inflammation activate apoptotic receptors, such as FAS, TNFR1 and TRAIL, resulting in parenchymal disruption and regeneration through fibrotic scars (Figure 2) [120]. The infiltration of pro-inflammatory cells and the presence of apoptotic bodies have been observed in the liver of several NASH patients [121]. Although NASH progression is characterized by an extensive apoptosis, non-hepatocytes and non-cellular components (such as the extracellular matrix) allow the generation of the tumor microenvironment, in which hepatic stem cell progenitors may carry out strategies to elude cell death and induce compensatory proliferation [122]. Recently, Anstee and colleagues proposed a review to provide a detailed description of the key NAFLD/NASH mechanisms that promote HCC-evading programs [120].
Inami and collaborators revealed that the liver-specific loss of autophagy is crucial for hepatocellular survival. From the early stages of NAFLD, FFAs and TG overload inhibits autophagy through the activation of mTOR. The abundance of lipid species induces oxidative stress that may also promote the activation of p62, involved in the p62–KEAP1–NRF2 pathway. Phosphorylated p62 triggers NFR2 expression which, in turn, stimulates antioxidant defences [123,124,125]. The improvement of mitochondrial ROS production through p62–KEAP1–NRF2 signaling may represent one of the pro-survival events allowing tumor initiation. The activation of the KEAP1–NRF2 pathway has been reported in more 25% of HCC subjects, and the inhibition of autophagic proteins such as ATG7 and beclin1 may provide an escaping strategy from ROS-induced apoptosis [126,127,128].
Moreover, mitochondrial oxidative stress altered MAMs and incremented the ER-induced efflux of Ca2+, thus contributing to hepatocytic cell death. HFD-fed mice treated with cyclosporin A, which inhibited mitochondrial permeabilization by regulating Ca2+ turnover, displayed lower levels of apoptosis [129]. Guerra et al. examined the contribution of Ca2+ signaling in HCC pathogenesis. The authors exploited HCC cell lines, murine models and human liver samples to investigate the role of the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (InsP3) receptor that acts as Ca2+ channel, and observed that its release was linked to the proliferation of both hepatocytes and tumor cells. Such findings may suggest that the inhibition of Ca2+ entry into mitochondria may sustain tumorigenesis as an escaping mechanism of apoptosis [130].
Interestingly, Huang et al. demonstrated that even the defects in mitochondrial biogenesis during NASH may enhance anti-apoptotic signals and favor cell growth [131]. In human HCC cell lines, such as Bel7402 and SMMC7721, MFN1 genetic ablation increased mitochondrial fission, leading to ROS generation and ROS-induced mutagenesis, such as the constitutive activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR network. Akt drives the downstream degradation of the TP53 onco-suppressor gene via the E3 ubiquitin–protein ligase MDM2 and, on the other hand, promotes the transcriptional activity of Nf-κB and inhibits autophagy. Indeed, increased levels of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR axis have been observed in about 40–50% of HCC patients [132,133].
Long-lasting exposure to inflammatory response and oxidative burst represents the major force that encourages genomic instability, sensitizing hepatocytes to JAK/STAT, ERK and MAPK growing signals. Cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6, were correlated with carcinogenesis and cell division. In particular, TNF-α and IL-6 stimulate the compensatory growth of hepatocytes through Nf-κB, mTOR and STAT3 in response to mitochondrial-induced apoptosis and, simultaneously, sustain a pro-survival tumor microenvironment via the paracrine/autocrine release of chemokines (CCL2, CCL7 and CXCL13) and cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF–α) [116,133,134,135,136].
The progression from NASH to HCC in obese people is even mediated by the unbalance between leptin and adiponectin. Leptin is involved in the inflammatory and fibrotic response via triggering the JAK/STAT, PI3KAkt and ERK signaling pathways [137]. Increased serum leptin was found in HCC patients with or without cirrhosis [138]. On the contrary, adiponectin can suppress tumor growth by either activating JNK-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis and caspases, or inhibiting Akt and STAT3 [137]. Nevertheless, low levels of adiponectin are unable to repress the KCs-mediated inflammatory response and promote HCC development [139].

5. Metabolic Reprogramming and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in HCC

Metabolic reprogramming is one of the key events determining the shifting from NASH to HCC, and a growing body of evidence has recognized it as a hallmark of hepatic cancer and not as an epiphenomenon of malignant transformation. Inflammation, fibrosis, ROS, fat accumulation, hypoxia and apoptotic signals challenge the hepatocytes to rewire liver metabolism in terms of cell survival, proliferation and, eventually, invasiveness. To support the high energy demand and macromolecule biosynthesis (lipids, nuclei acids, proteins), and to escape from disadvantageous conditions that may lead to programmed cell death, transformed hepatocytes metabolize glucose through glycolysis to produce ATP in the presence of oxygen, rather than proceeding with the mitochondrial respiratory chain. This rapid but low-efficiency phenomenon is paradoxically known as aerobic glycolysis or the Warburg effect, discovered by Otto Warburg in 1950 [9,11], and it allows the quick introduction and processing of glucose by accelerating glucose transport into the hepatocytes, increasing the kinetics of glycolytic enzymes and secreting glycolytic by-products, such as lactic acid.
Many studies have revealed the prognostic value of glucose transporters’ (GLUTs) upregulation in human HCCs. Among them, it has recently been suggested by Gao et al. that GLUT3 overexpression correlates with elevated α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, tumor size, poor histological differentiation, and tumor node metastasis (TNM) stages, and it may predict the survival of HCC patients [140]. Hexokinase (HK), which traps glucose inside hepatocytes by its phosphorylation at the six-carbon (glucose-6 phosphate), further increases the glycolytic rate and, as in GLUTs, high HK activity sensitizes HCC cells to invasiveness and metastasis [141,142]. A microarray analysis of 153 HCC subjects revealed that HK2 was overexpressed in both dysplastic and carcinogenic tissues. Consistently, liver-specific HK2 knockout (KO) mice showed a reduced incidence of DEN-induced HCC, an ameliorated oxygen consumption rate (OCR), and a response to Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor exploited as a pharmacological approach in advanced HCCs [141]. Notably, a novel HK domain containing 1 (HKDC1) isoform led to liver tumorigenesis via the Wnt/β-catenin cascade, and was associated with poor outcome and metastasis in HCC [143]. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), catalyzing the sixth step of glycolysis, exerts pleiotropic roles, and is stably expressed within cells to the extent that it is duly used as a reference gene in research fields. However, it has been demonstrated that GAPDH may regulate mTOR-C1 signaling and cell growth according to glucose availability [144]. In addition, GAPDH can interact with the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC1) to activate apoptosis by inducing IMMs permeabilization, the loss of inner transmembrane potential, matrix swelling, the release of cytochrome c, and AIF [145]. In GAPDH transgenic mice and in HCC murine models induced by DEN, GAPDH overexpression accelerated tumor development and progression by regulating inflammatory cytokines (Il-6, Il-1β, Mcp1, Icam1, Vcam1) at the transcriptional level and redirecting metabolic intermediates of glycolytic flux towards the one-carbon cycle, which is essential for cell proliferation [146]. Higher mRNA levels of GAPDH have also been observed in HCC biopsies compared to non-HCC adjacent sides and normal liver [147].
According to Warburg’s theory, the aerobic glycolysis adopted by tumoral cells results from changes in the mitochondrial metabolism and, specifically, it involves pyruvate fate. At the final phases of glycolysis, pyruvate kinase (PK) converts phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) into pyruvate, which, in turn, can be used to generate acetyl-CoA by pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), thus linking cytosolic glycolysis to mitochondrial TCA. In HCCs, hypoxic conditions stimulate HIF-1α to inhibit PDH, and pyruvic acid is re-routed towards lactate production through lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Several findings have revealed that HFD models alter hepatic GLUT1/3 expression and aggravate LDH levels, supporting the pathogenic role of lipids in mitochondrial dysfunction and glucidic reprogramming from the early stages of NAFLD [148]. Moreover, lactate overflowing may contribute to H2O2 production in isolated mitochondria from murine hepatic tissue, directly taking part in oxidative damage [149]. A meta-analysis including 10 non-randomized controlled studies highlighted that a pre-operative increase in LDH levels was significantly associated with poor life-expectancy in individuals affected by HCC, thus appearing as a promising factor to evaluate HCC prognosis [150].
Finally, the abundance of mitochondrial pyruvate carriers (MPC) that transfer pyruvic acid from cytosol to mitochondria for oxidation is reduced in HCCs, thereby sustaining tumorigenesis and glucose utilization. It was observed that low MPC1 protein expression may represent an attractive biomarker for monitoring tumor relapse over the time period following hepatectomy in HCC patients [151]. All this notwithstanding, Tompkins et al. showed that MPC disruption in a murine model of HCC induced by N-nitrosodiethylamine plus carbon tetrachloride (CCL4) administration impairs hepatocarcinogenesis by hijacking and redirecting glutamine onto the Krebs cycle, rather than glutathione synthesis, the downregulation of which impedes tumor growth [152].

5.1. Mitochondrial Dynamics in HCC: Embarking on New Paths for Novel Therapeutic Targets

Contradictory results concerning the alterations in mitobiogenesis and mitophagy have led to misleading information about the role of mitochondria in NAFLD-related HCC, and need to be deeply elucidated. Alterations in mitochondrial morphology towards a fragmented shape are suggestive of carcinogenesis and a metastatic phenotype. Consistently, low levels of fusion proteins have been observed in human HCC micrographs compared to their non-cancerous counterparts, and were associated with cancer development, progression and refractoriness to medical treatments. MFN1 reduction was correlated either with EMT and the reprogramming of glucose metabolism alongside vascular invasion and poor outcome in HCC patients [77], while MFN2 overexpression induced cell death by enhancing cytochrome c release, Ca2+ entry and lowering mitochondrial membrane potential in HepG2 cells, thus inhibiting HCC cell growth [153,154]. Up to 40% of HCC patients showed decreased hepatic expression of OPA1 isoforms [155,156]. Among them, OPA1-Exon4b is mandatory for maintenance of mitochondrial respiration and IMMs potential, and it also regulates mitochondrial bioenergetics at the transcriptional level by binding the D-loop region of mtDNA [156]. In HCC, the inhibition of OPA1-Exon4b causes low ATP synthesis and compromises membrane potential along with alterations of TFAM distribution, an essential factor in determining the abundance of the mitochondrial genome by regulating its packaging, stability, and replication [156]. The low mtDNA copy number in HCC has been associated with reduced proliferation and migration, although it improved chemotherapy sensitivity [157].
In contrast to aforementioned evidence, Li et al. revealed that Mfn1 and Opa1 knockdown hampered cell proliferation paralleled by apoptosis, low O2 consumption and ATP production in HCC organoids and in vivo models [158]. Furthermore, the mitochondrial dimension was found to be larger in 10 HCC specimens compared to non-tumoral tissues, suggesting that mitochondrial elongation may sustain cancer metabolism and growth [158]. These findings were supported by analyzing five HCC cohorts from the Oncomine microarray database (https://www.oncomine.org) (accessed on 4 January 2020), including more than 400 HCC patients for whom RNA-seq data were available [158]. It has been reported that OPA1 expression is strictly involved in sensitizing HCC cells to cytotoxicity induced by Sorafenib [159]. Zhao and collaborators demonstrated that Sorafenib exposure led to mitochondrial fragmentation by downregulating OPA1 and enhancing apoptosis through cardiolipin peroxidation. Additionally, Sorafenib mixed with FH535, a β-catenin antagonist, synergically targeted complexes of respiratory chain and reduced aerobic glycolysis, suggesting that Sorafenib-FH535 treatment may overcome the low efficacy of current single pharmacotherapies used in HCC [160].
Emerging evidence has pointed out that mitochondrial fission promoted proliferation, tumor microenvironment and invasiveness. In 15 HCC tissues, Huang et al. observed a prevalence of globular mitochondria with a lower length compared to those of matched non-HCC tissues accompanied by high DRP1 protein expression and reduced mitofusins. Fragmented mitochondria staunching in the hepatocytes exacerbate ROS production, which stimulates Akt-mediated NF-kB activation and cell cycle activity, alongside the inhibition of the TP53 gene and autophagy [131]. DRP1 also enhances HCC growth by promoting G1/S phase transition through coordinately modulating NF-kB and p53 pathways. Consistently, Drp1 silencing led to cell cycle arrest in both in vitro and preclinical models [23]. In HCC mice, Drp1 overexpression caused mtDNA stress, promoting Ccl2 secretion and the infiltration of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Moreover, DRP1 levels correlated with the percentage of TAMs in 69 HCC biopsies [161], and modulate the efficacy of chemotherapy response. Cisplatin coupled to DRP1 inhibitor (Mdivi-1) synergically activated apoptosis by augmenting the Bcl2-associated X/Bcl extra-large (Bax/Bcl-xL) ratio and increasing both the mitochondrial membrane permeability and cytochrome c release.

5.2. Recovery of Mitophagy in HCC: Friend or Foe?

There is mounting evidence highlighting that mitochondrial quality control and mitophagy may attenuate chronic liver injury in the NAFLD/NASH background, and consequently HCC occurrence, by rescuing mitochondrial integrity and functions [19,72,84,162,163,164]. As previously described, deranged mitochondria increase oxidative damage and the release of hepatocyte-derived mito-DAMPs (i.e., mtDNA) which may recruit Kupffer cells, exacerbate innate immune response, and activate HSCs, thus promoting carcinogenesis [98]. Empowering mitophagic processes by overexpressing E3 ubiquitin ligases (Fundc1, Bnip3) prevents DEN-induced HCC in mice and alleviates inflammasome cascade, JNK signaling, cell proliferation, migration, and invasiveness [165,166]. Excess mitophagy may cause ATP shortage and Ca2+ mobilization from ER, affecting filamentous actin polymerization and the lamellipodium-based migration of malignant hepatocytes [166]. Consistently, Parkin null mice showed reduced body weight but also showed liver enlargement as they spontaneously developed advanced HCC paralleled with high AFP and β-catenin expression, thus recapitulating human HCC [167]. Parkin downregulation was detected in up to 80% of HCC cases and PINK1 inhibition was associated with poor clinical outcome [168,169,170]. Notably, hypoxia may reduce PINK1/Parkin-dependent mitophagy, resulting in the loss of mitochondrial cristae, mass, and augmented CSC progenitors (Figure 2) [168].
All this notwithstanding, unbalanced mitophagy may initiate and/or accelerate hepatocarcinogenesis to the extent that blocking mitophagy may restore Sorafenib sensitivity [171]. Huang et al. showed that the number of mitochondria in the fission state was frequently high in HCC tissues compared to adjacent non-tumor ones, and these morphological alterations were accompanied by enhanced autophagic processes [131]. Furthermore, ERK/HIF-1α-mediated BNIP3 upregulation promoted the acquisition of anoikis resistance, a type of programmed cell death occurring when cells lose their attachment to the ECM and to neighboring cells [172]. Liu and coworkers demonstrated that the activation of PINK1-dependent mitophagy both provides a selective removal of the onco-suppressor p53 and maintains hepatic stem cell population [173].

5.3. Metabolic and Epigenetic Dysregulation of Mitochondrial Metabolism in HCC: A Huge Variability

The regulation of mitochondrial turnover mostly occurs in response to low-energy conditions and through AMPK/SIRT/PGC1α nutrient sensors. Controversial pre-clinical and human studies reported that both up- and downregulation of the AMPK/SIRTs/PGC1α network can lead to glycolytic reprogramming and HCC [174], thereby making it mandatory to focus research efforts to elucidate discrepancies.
Several investigations reported that PGC1α deficiency was associated with the degeneration of mitochondrial morphology [175], the de-differentiation of cultured hepatocytes [175,176], and a high glycolytic rate in human HCCs [177]. Downregulation of PGC1α expression has been reported in publicly available repositories, such as the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://www.cbioportal.org/) (accessed on 4 January 2017) and GSE14520 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/info/overview.html) (accessed on 2 January 2021), containing transcriptomic analyses of HCC patients, and in clinical findings [175,178]. Recently, the loss of PGC1α was correlated with poor prognosis and favored the Warburg effect through the WNT/β-catenin/pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) axis, and also metastasizing in HCC patients [178,179]. Likewise, low SIRT3 expression was associated with serum AFP levels, which has both diagnostic and prognostic value in the context of HCC, tumor multiplicity and high relapse rate, thus representing a prognostic marker of overall survival in HCC patients [66]. Importantly, it has been reported that SIRT3 can link to four hallmarks of cancer, such as genomic instability, sustained proliferation, dysregulated energetic status, and tumor-promoting inflammation. However, in HCCs, SIRT3 acts as a tumor suppressor, as it mitigates ROS-induced hepatocellular injury and interacts with glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK-3β) to induce Bax translocation to the mitochondria, causing apoptosis [67].
On the other hand, it has been reported by Bhalla et al. that Pgc1α−/− mice were protected against DEN-induced liver cancer, and Pgc1α overexpression in mice induced gene expression reprogramming, supporting DNL, glycolysis, and oxidative metabolism [16]. In keeping with these findings, several studies showed that sirtuins, NAD+-dependent epigenetic modifiers of liver metabolism, mitochondrial functionality, telomere length and genomic stability, were repeatedly found to be overexpressed in human HCC cell lines such as HKC1-4, SNU-423, HKC1-2, PLC5 SNU-449, SK-Hep-1, Huh-7, HepG2 and Hep3B, and in multiple malignancies [180,181,182,183,184]. SIRT1 upregulation triggers mitobiogenesis via PGC1α and correlates with tumor microvascular invasion, advanced TNM score and predicted HCC recurrence [184]. Sirt1 genetic ablation (Sirt1−/−) mitigated tumor growth and invasiveness in both in vitro and in vivo models. Interestingly, when mitochondrial biogenesis was re-activated by overexpressing Pgc1α in Sirt1−/− mice, they re-developed an aggressive HCC phenotype, suggesting that mitobiogenesis may sustain tumor progression [184]. It has been shown that SIRT6 overexpression favors hepatoma cell proliferation through the extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2) pathway [183,185], whereas SIRT2 plays a critical role in promoting HCC metastasis and invasion rather than cell growth by re-routing liver cancer metabolism [182]. SIRT2 mediated mitochondrial deacetylation and the stabilization of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK), involved in gluconeogenesis, by catalyzing the conversion of oxaloacetate into PEP, and glutaminase (GLS), which converts glutamine into glutamate, thus replenishing the Krebs cycle of glucidic and aminoacidic substrates [182]. Either PGC1α-mediated mitochondrial biogenesis or the fueled citric acid cycle enhanced NADH/ATP production and O2 consumption rate, and both contribute to the occurrence of HCC metastasis [182,186]. In addition, both SIRT2 and SIRT6 inhibit the adhesion properties of E-cadherin proteins, further supporting their role in cell migration and invasiveness [182,183].
Just recently, Zhao and collaborators provided the first evidence that the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) MALAT1 controls metabolic reprogramming in hepatocytes, and its downregulation increased the number of swollen mitochondria, along with dampening OXPHOS, ATP production and mtDNA copy number. Additionally, MALAT1-deficient cells affected mitophagy by reducing PINK1, SQSTM1/p62, NDP52, BNIP3 and LC3 expression, thereby supporting its oncogenic role as an lncRNA in HCC onset [187].

5.4. The Impact of Hypoxia on Hepatic Metabolic Reprogramming and Mitodynamisms

The liver is the major organ that stocks nutritional surplus into glycogen, LDs, cholesterols, and supplies energy-producing substrates to the peripheral tissues even under fasting conditions. A remarkable amount of O2 is required to regulate anabolic and catabolic processes occurring in the hepatocytes, thus causing a steep O2 gradient throughout the hepatic lobules that may get back to normoxia through cell-adapting systems [119]. HIF-1 and HIF-2, oxygen-sensitive transcription factors recognizing hypoxia response elements (HRE) on promoter regions, mediate cellular adaptation to low oxygen and regulate both glucose and lipid metabolism, respectively [188]. Excessive dietary intake together with fatty liver, necroinflammation, fibrotic scars and tissue regeneration may bother hepatic oxygen distribution, thus precipitating pathological hypoxia. It has been reported that HFD provoked hepatic hypoxia and impaired mitochondrial dynamics and functions (i.e., defective β-oxidation) through the HIF-2/PPARα pathway, thereby exacerbating NAFLD progression [188,189,190]. Fat-laden hepatocytes receiving cobalt chloride (CoCl2) to mimic hypoxia increased mitochondrial superoxide production and released extracellular vesicles enriched in chemoattractant cytokines (i.e., IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, iNOS, NLRP3) for KCs and inflammasome activation [168,191]. DEN-treated mice fed with a western diet showed increased expression of both HIF-1α and pro-inflammatory cytokines, allowing the recruitment of TAM with a M2 phenotype and the switching from NASH to HCC [118].
Under the hypoxic environment, HIF-2 overexpression may drive NAFLD–HCC development by triggering the PI3K/Akt/mTOR cascade and inducing lipid reprogramming [192], while HIF-1α stabilization forces the switching from OXPHOS to aerobic glycolysis by upregulating glycolytic enzymes and LDH [193]. Moreover, low oxygen availability induced high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1)-TLR9 binding, which mediates PGC1α phosphorylation and activation, thereby sustaining mitochondrial biogenesis and cell proliferation in in vitro, in vivo and human HCC samples [194]. It has been shown that hypoxia causes inefficient electron transfer to the mitochondrial respiratory chain, and affects mitophagy. Chiu and collaborators found an HRE consensus sequence on the promoter of the Hairy/enhancer-of-split related with YRPW motif protein 1 (HEY1) gene, belonging to NOTCH signaling. HEY1 was overexpressed in HCC patients who underwent surgical resection and in 49 HCC cases from the TCGA dataset. HEY1 transcriptionally represses PINK1 in Huh7, reduces mitochondrial mass and alters inner cristae morphology [168].

6. The Link among NAFLD, Mitochondrial Dysfunction and HCC: The Relevance of Genetics

Environmental factors, above all IR and obesity, influence NAFLD pathogenesis. However, it has emerged that there is a substantial variability in hepatic lipid deposition among individuals with the same grade of adiposity, raising the possibility that several other risk factors may participate in steatosis development. Familial, twin, and epidemiological studies indicated that NAFLD has a strong heritable component, which contributes to the huge inter-individual phenotypic variability. Dongiovanni et al. demonstrated that hepatic fat accumulation represents the main driver of the progression to the end-stage of liver damage in genetically predisposed individuals, and recently proposed a detailed review including all the candidate genes related to NAFLD susceptibility [195,196].
Currently, the rs738409 C >G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the Patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3 gene (PNPLA3 or adiponutrin) is the major genetic variant associated with NAFLD onset and its progressive forms, including HCC. PNPLA3 is mainly localized on the ER and LDs surface in hepatocytes, adipocytes and HSCs, and it may be transcriptionally induced or post-translationally modified to provide TG hydrolysis during the post-prandial or hyper-insulinemic state. Patients carrying the G allele lost PNPLA3 enzymatic activity, which impedes TG disposal and interferes with the activity of other lipases, such as PNPLA2 [196,197]. Beyond the triacylglycerol remodeling, PNPLA3 exerts widespread effects on human liver metabolome [198], influencing mitochondrial functions, glucose reprogramming and tumorigenesis. Huh-7 hepatoma cells overexpressing the PNPLA3 I148M variant showed high levels of lactate and γ-glutamyl-amino acids, thus mirroring the metabolic switching to aerobic glycolysis and mitochondrial failure, respectively [198]. Moreover, the rs738409 SNP impacts retinol secretion in HSC cells, leading to the myofibroblast-like phenotype and collagen deposition, and boosting fibrogenesis in NASH subjects [199]. In a small cohort of 54 NAFLD subjects, it has been demonstrated that carriers of the G risk allele had a severe profile of liver disease, characterized by enhanced steatosis, activation of pro-inflammatory pathways and an increased proliferative activity of hepatocytes [200]. Interestingly, Bruschi et al. demonstrated that the presence of I148M substitution in the PNPLA3 gene further affected metabolic reprogramming in TGFβ-activated HSCs, shifting towards aerobic glycolysis, lactate release and the activation of YAP/Hedgehog signaling [201].
The rs641738 C > T variant in the Membrane bound o-acyltransferase domain-containing 7/Transmembrane channel-like 4 (MBOAT7/TMC4) locus, encoding the MBOAT7 enzyme, was associated with the entire spectrum of NAFLD, including HCC [202]. Recently, the role of the MBOAT7 variant in NAFLD progression has been evaluated in a large meta-analysis. Data were collected from 1047.265 subjects, of whom 8303 had liver biopsies, and displayed a correlation between the T minor allele and hepatic fat deposition, ALT levels, and advanced stages of NAFLD, such as fibrosis and HCC. In particular, carriers of the rs641738 variant show a 30% risk of developing HCC compared to non-carriers [203]. Physiologically, MBOAT7 localizes on MAMs and mediates phosphatidylinositol (PI) acyl-chain remodeling in the Land’s cycle. Our group demonstrated that hepatic MBOAT7 expression is reduced during hyperinsulinemia and by the presence of the rs641738 C > T variant [204,205]. MBOAT7 downregulation induces an enrichment of saturated PIs, which are shunted towards the synthesis of TGs, thus contributing to fat accumulation. Though no evidence linking MBOAT7, mitochondrial lifecycle and metabolic reprogramming has been reported, it could be postulated that the wealth of saturated lipids induced by MBOAT7 downregulation may affect membrane composition and dynamics, possibly breaking ER–mitochondria communications.
The rs58542926 C > T variant in the Transmembrane 6 Superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2) gene induces TM6SF2 loss-of-function and hastens its hepatic protein turnover [206]. TM6SF2 dwells on ER-Golgi compartments where fat biosynthesis, LDs and lipoprotein formation occur. TM6SF2 inactivation induced by the presence of the polymorphisms impairs the assembly and trafficking of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), which remains trapped in hepatocytes [206]. In Huh-7 cells, TM6SF2 deficiency reduces the amount of PUFAs, along with causing alterations in mitochondrial β-oxidation and higher numbers of lysosomal compartments [207]. In the small intestine of zebrafish, the TM6SF2 loss-of-function induces changes in ER architecture appearing with enlarged cisternae, supporting the notion that TM6SF2 may impact organelles’ morphology [208]. However, the rs58542926 polymorphism has been associated with the NAFLD/NASH spectrum, but its role in HCC development remains to be explored. A meta-analysis including 24,147 subjects affected by chronic liver disorders revealed that the presence of the T risk allele was correlated with a higher risk of developing NAFLD and its advanced stages, such as HCC [209]. Raksayot et al. performed a cross-sectional study in a cohort of 502 NAFLD patients and observed that carriers of the T allele are at a higher risk of HCC progression [210].
To delve inside the mechanisms underlying NAFLD pathogenesis and to investigate possible synergisms among PNPLA3, MBOAT7 and TM6SF2 leading to hepatocytic metabolic rewiring, our group has generated in vitro models of genetic NAFLD. We stably silenced MBOAT7 (MBOAT7−/−), TM6SF2 (TM6SF2−/−), or both genes (MBOAT7−/−TM6SF2−/−), in HepG2 cells, homozygous for the I48M PNPLA3 variant, by exploiting clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) technology [10,11,205]. MBOAT7−/− spontaneously accumulated giant LDs associated with a dramatic increment in ROS and peroxides levels, while TM6SF2−/− and MBOAT7−/−TM6SF2−/− models showed mitochondria with small and globular shapes, the loss of cisterns’ architecture, and ultrastructural electron density, suggestive of mitochondria degeneration. The numbers of mitochondria were progressively increased in all mutated cell lines, suggesting that either MBOAT7 and/or TM6SF2 deficiency impact mitochondrial biogenesis. Notably, the compound knockout re-routed its metabolism towards glucose-dependent ATP production, enhancing glycolytic enzymes, LDH and lactate release, thereby suggesting that the depletion of both MBOAT7/TM6SF2 combined with the genetic background of I148M PNPLA3 may affect mitochondria turnover, possibly accelerating metabolic reprogramming [10,13].
Recently, the opportunity has emerged to translate the genetics into clinics by aggregating these genetic variants into polygenic risk scores, which may better discriminate NAFLD patients who are at-risk of developing progressive liver damage and HCC [211]. In a large cohort of biopsied NAFLD patients, it has been observed that the cumulative number of risk alleles is associated with serum markers of disease severity and increased risk of developing HCC [10,212,213]. A cross-sectional study consisting of 2566 NAFLD participants evaluated the impact of these genetic polymorphisms on hepatocytic fat accumulation in HCC progression. For this purpose, the authors generated a polygenic risk score based on the presence of variants in PNPLA3, TM6SF2 MBOAT7 and GCKR genes, which was able to predict HCC occurrence much more effectively than the presence of a single genetic variant [211].

6.1. Mitochondrial Polymorphisms Are Correlated with NAFLD Pathogenesis

Several polymorphisms in mitochondrial genes have been associated with NAFLD development and progression. In genetically modified mice, the non-synonymous nt7778 G > T genetic variation in the mitochondrial ATP synthase protein 8 (mt-ATP8) increased susceptibility to diet-induced NASH [214]. The identification of mitochondrial haplotypes was even associated with NAFLD predisposition, opening new avenues for mito-genetic screening in patients, and new experimental applications [212].
Manganese-dependent SOD, encoded by the nuclear SOD2 gene, mitigates oxidative damage by catalyzing the conversion of superoxide radicals to hydrogen peroxide. The rs4880 C47T variant in the SOD2 gene encodes the valine to alanine amino acid substitution at position 16 in the signal region targeting the protein to the mitochondrial matrix. The C47T mutation causes a reduction in MnSOD2 activity and the consequent failure to neutralize superoxide radicals. In case–control and familial studies, Al-Serri et al. demonstrated that the inherited T risk allele was an independent predictor of NASH severity and was strictly associated with fibrosis in both adults and children [213]. Conversely, the −866 G > A polymorphism localized in the promoter region of the UCP2 gene, involved in heat dissipation, has been associated with a reduced risk of obesity [215]. The A allele promotes UCP2 overexpression in the liver and has a protective role in progression from simple steatosis to NASH [216]. Likewise, the rs1800849 −55 C/T UCP3 variant ameliorates the circulating lipid profile and correlates with loss of body weight [217]. These findings were not confirmed by Aller et al. and Qian et al., who associated both the −866 G > A polymorphism and the rs1800849 variant with higher risk of IR, obesity, lower levels of adiponectin, severe steatosis, and inflammation in NAFLD subjects [218,219].
Polymorphisms in sirtuins further contribute to the regulation of mitochondrial functionality and dynamics, possibly contributing to NAFLD/NASH advancement and its cardiovascular comorbidities [220]. Patients carrying the rs11246020 variant (V208I) in the SIRT3 gene displayed a higher susceptibility to NAFLD. Consistently, Sirt3 knockout mice fed an HFD showed IR and a worsened adiposity and NASH [221]. The rs107251 in the SIRT6 gene affected SIRT6 activity, influencing its role in DNA repair and the maintenance of telomeric chromatin [222]. It has been described that the rs7895833 G > A in the SIRT1 gene represents a risk factor for body fat content and high diastolic blood pressure [222,223]. Interestingly, low SIRT1 levels were detected in 70 cirrhotic HCC patients carrying the rs7895833 variant, and SIRT1 reduction was inversely correlated with high AFP, Child–Pugh score and tumor stage [224].
Recently, rs2642438 A165T polymorphisms at the N-terminal domain of the Mitochondrial amidoxime reducing component 1 (MARC1) gene have been described, localizing on MOMs. The A165T variant has been associated with low fat content in the liver and a reduced risk of NALD progression toward cirrhosis. Such findings were independently validated by Lukkonen et al., showing that carriers of the rs2642438 variant had alleviated NASH severity accompanied by an improvement of the hepatic lipid profile, mainly consisting of polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholines, thus suggesting that MARC1 could represent a candidate therapeutic target [225,226].

6.2. Rare NAFLD Pathogenic Variants Are Involved in Switching towards HCC

Part of the missing hereditability in NAFLD may be attributed to rare genetic variants with a large effect size.
Rare mutations in the telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter may arise in NAFLD–cirrhosis, in 10–20% of both low-grade and high-grade dysplastic nodules and in familial HCC, suggesting that TERT germline genetic variants may be involved in tumor initiation [227]. In a cohort of 40 NAFLD–HCC, 45 cirrhotic patients and 64 healthy controls, telomere length decreased with the progression of NAFLD towards cirrhosis and mainly with HCC [228]. Four rare mutations have emerged in the hTERT gene in NAFLD–HCC subjects, such as the Glu113Arg_fs*79 frameshift in the second exon, and three missense mutations (Ala67Val, Pro193Leu, Glu668Asp), which correlated with shorter telomere length. In particular, the Ala67Val and Glu668Asp SNPs led to TERT’s loss-of-function and decreased its hepatic expression. On the contrary, Pro193Leu substitution did not affect TERT catalytic activity but reduced its chromatin binding capacity [229]. Furthermore, in a cross-sectional study, it was observed that NAFLD–HCC patients showed an enrichment of rare genetic variants in Regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1 (RTEL1) and Telomeric repeat binding factor 2 (TERF2) genes, which are involved in telomere preservation, and in RB1, which mediates the oxidative stress response. Mutations in STK11, TSC1, TSC2, NF2 and SMAD4 candidate genes, which regulate cell growth and proliferation, were also strongly correlated to HCC risk [230].
HCC surveillance may be addressed to NAFLD subjects with a family history of hypobetalipoproteinaemia caused by ApoB mutations. The ApoB gene is involved in hepatic lipid metabolism, and its genetic variants lead to an impaired synthesis of ApoB100, with the consequent alteration of the hepatic VLDL export. Uncommon variants in the ApoB gene result in the impairment of VLDL export and the development of severe hepatic steatosis. Some of the genetic variants causative of ineffective ApoB100 synthesis may even alter the ApoB48 isoform expressed in the enterocytes, provoking the malabsorption of fat and insoluble vitamins, the retention of chylomicrons, and alterations of the intestinal barrier [231].
Finally, a novel association between variants in Sequestosome 1 (SQSMT1) and HCC onset has been identified in NAFLD–HCC patients. SQSMT1 encodes the ubiquitin-binding protein p62, an autophagosome cargo protein that targets other proteins for selective autophagy. p62 contributes to Mallory–Denk bodies (MDBs), a cytoplasmatic protein aggregate found in several chronic liver diseases including NAFLD, as well as in HCC, and it is involved in the hepatocyte’s transformation through the activation of the mTOR pathway and the regulation of telomere length machinery [27,232].

7. Targeting Mitochondria in NAFLD–HCC: New Challenges for a Bright Future

The staging and treatment selection of HCC patients follow the Barcelona Clinic for Liver Cancer (BCLC) criteria employed by both the American and European Associations for the Study of Liver Diseases [120,233]. The BCLC system includes the evaluation of liver function, patient’s well-being and ability to perform daily activities, combined with the assessment of tumor number, mass, and spreading. Resection, LT and ablation may be curative for small tumors at early stages of BCLC classification (0, A), while subjects with intermediate BCLC score (B), presenting multifocal tumors without vascular invasion, usually undergo transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as the first-line therapy. Interestingly, in NAFLD patients who developed HCC without cirrhosis, lifestyle changes and weight loss are encouraged to ameliorate steatosis, mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial morphology, and to promote an anticancer immune microenvironment. However, the identification of NAFLD–HCC patients staging BCLC-0, BCLC-A and BCLC-B is challenging, and the majority of NAFLD–HCC cases are diagnosed at advanced stages (BCLC-C/D). To date, sorafenib is the only pharmacological therapy with proven benefits for HCC management, although it is poorly tolerated and increases life expectancy by 9–11 months [120]. Additionally, sorafenib proved to be ineffective in patients in the BCLC-D category, to which only palliative care is offered as the medical option.
Ongoing efforts strive towards early detection, preventive strategies, and the introduction of novel therapeutic approaches based on immunological modulation and/or surveillance, pan-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and vaccination [120]. Moreover, several agents (i.e., vitamin E, vitamin B6 plus Coenzyme Q10), which indirectly improve mitochondrial activities and dynamics, have shown positive outcomes in NALFD management, and they are currently being tested for HCC medical applications. Vitamin E, the best antioxidant against mitochondrial damage, is considered the first-line treatment for non-cirrhotic and non-diabetic subjects affected by NAFLD/NASH [234]. Fantappiè and collaborators demonstrated that vitamin E prevents HCC development in mice by downregulating nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and NADPH oxidase [235], and it also protects against ROS-induced DNA damage in HCC cells [236]. In a randomized controlled trial (NCT01964001), the administration of vitamin B6 alone or supplemented with Coenzyme Q10 significantly increased antioxidant enzymes and reduced oxidative stress, along with inflammation, in HCC patients after tumor resection [237,238].
Antihyperglycemic drugs, such as pioglitazone, a potent ligand of PPARγ, delay liver fibrosis and hepatocarcinogenesis in dietary NASH models and DEN-treated mice by enhancing AMPK pathways and mitobiogenesis [239]. Clinical evidence has suggested considering pioglitazone administration alone or preferably in combination with statins to prevent cirrhosis, LT and HCC occurrence in NAFLD/NASH subjects at high risk of cardiovascular complications [240]. Interestingly, a phase II clinical trial is currently evaluating the effect of rosiglitazone combined with nivolumab on immune response and mitochondrial activities in different solid tumors, including HCC (NCT04114136).
AMP mimics, such as aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleoside (AICAR) and indirect AMPK activators (metformin), have provided advantageous effects for the management of metabolic disorders. It has been demonstrated that AICAR exposure suppresses aerobic glycolysis, reduces TCA intermediates and lactate production, and also dampens HSCs activation by inhibiting mTORC1 signaling [241,242]. Metformin blocks HIF1α-phosphofructokinase (PFK), which catalyzes the third step of glycolysis, and lactate release in hepatoma cells and tumor tissues, thereby attenuating HCC growth [243].
In recent years, the development of mitochondrial-based strategies has offered beneficial effects in metabolic diseases [11], to the extent that they may represent an interesting avenue to pursue for NAFLD-related HCC treatment, either as prophylaxis or patient care. Wang’s research group recently introduced the tri-phenyl-phosphine (TPP) groups into the copper–terpyridine complex, thus generating a novel molecule, called CTB, which exhibits mitochondrial-targeting properties [244]. CTB administration in HepG2 cells inhibits aerobic glycolysis and promotes DRP1 recruiting and the opening of mitochondrial pores, thus contributing to the activation of fission and mitophagy [244]. Furthermore, CTB affects TERT methylation and expression, leading to the inhibition of both cell senescence and the growth of implanted tumors in mice [245]. Parvalbumin, a mitochondrial Ca2+-buffering protein, dramatically lowered ROS production and invasiveness, and suppressed EMT in HCC cells by modulating the Ca2+ flow into mitochondria and rescuing the NAD+/SIRT3/SOD2 axis [246,247].

8. Concluding Remarks

Over the last two decades, NAFLD has shown an upsloping trend, mirroring both lifestyle changes (wealth in food supplies, lack of physical activity, etc.) and the increasing incidence of MetS worldwide. Up to now, NAFLD has represented the most common chronic liver disorder affecting both adult and pediatric populations, and it will rapidly become the foremost cause of LT and HCC due to the high efficacy of anti-viral therapies.
One of the key steps of NAFLD pathophysiology is the burst of mitochondrial dysfunction, which may arise from the earliest events of fatty liver in response to environmental, genetic and epigenetic factors, supporting a new view of NAFLD as a mitochondrial disorder. Ever-growing findings have indicated that mitochondria adapt in number, size, morphology, and organelle communications to overcome energy demands and to provide essential macromolecules for cell viability. Throughout the NAFLD course, hepatocytes are exposed to endogenous hardship and extrinsic constrains, rendering burdensome the survival of parenchymal cells. In this context, mitochondria actively participate to evade apoptotis, to escape inflammation, to induce mutagenesis through oxidative damage, and to rewire hepatocellular metabolism with the goal of favoring the clonal selection of malignant hepatocytes forming tumor mass (Figure 3).
The study of mitochondrial dynamics in NAFLD/NASH and NAFLD-related HCC is challenging, and currently still in the early phase, due to the high phenotypic variability that characterizes this complex disease. Liver resection and transplantation represent the ongoing curative options in NASH-related HCC. Therefore, deep knowledge of the mitochondrial lifecycle and networking in metabolic disorders, especially those severely impacting HCC susceptibility, may offer novel insights for research purposes. On the other hand, it may pave the way for the development of new mitochondrial-based strategies, which could be introduced into clinics for either preemptive use or as accompaniments of approved treatments already used in HCC patient care.

Author Contributions

M.L., E.P., M.M. and P.D. all took part in writing the manuscript, preparing figures, and read and approved the final draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by Ricerca Corrente Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ricerca Finalizzata Ministero della Salute RF-2013-02358319 and Ricerca Finalizzata Ministero della Salute GR-2019-12370172.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CC: acetyl-CoA carboxylase; ACLY, ATP-citrate lyase; AFP, α-fetoprotein; AIF, apoptosis induced factor; AMLN; high trans-fat, high fructose and high-cholesterol; AMPK, 5′AMP-activated protein kinase; ATG5, autophagy related 5; ATP, adenosine Triphosphate; BCL, B-cell lymphoma; Bax/Bcl-xL, BCL2 associated X/Bcl-extra-large; BNIP3, BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa-protein-interacting protein 3; Ca2+, calcium; CCL, C-C-motif chemokine ligand; CDE; choline-deficient, ethionine-supplemented diet; CPT1/2, Carnitine Palmitoyl-Transferase 1/2; CRISPR/Cas9, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9; CSC, cancer stem cells; DEN, diethylnitrosamine; DNL, de novo lipogenesis; DRP1, dynamin-related protein 1; EMT, epithelial–mesenchymal transition; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; ETC, electron transport chain; FADS, fatty acid desaturase; FASN; fatty acid synthase; FFAs, free fatty acids; Fis1, fission 1; FGF21, fibroblast growth factor 21; FUNDC1, FUN14 domain-containing 1; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GPX1, glutathione peroxidase 1; GLUTs, glucose transporters; GSSG/GSH, glutathione disulfide/glutathione; GST, glutathione transferase; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; HBV, hepatitis B viral; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C viral; HFD, high-fat diet; HEY, YRPW motif protein 1; HK, hexokinase; HRE, hypoxia response elements; HSCs, hepatic stellate cells; IL-6, interleukin 6; IMMs, inner mitochondrial membranes; IR, insulin resistance; IRF1, interferon regulatory factor-dependent type 1; JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase; KCs, Kupffer cells; LC3, light chain 3; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; LDL, low-density lipoproteins; LDs, lipid droplets; LIR, LC3-interactive region; LPA, lysophosphatidic acid mediator; LT, liver transplantation; LXR, liver X receptor; MAMs, mitochondrial-associated ER membranes; MAPKs, mitogen-activated protein kinases; MDVs, mitochondrial-derived vesicles; MetS, metabolic syndrome; Mff; mitochondrial fission factor; MFNs, Mitofusins; MiD49/50, mitochondrial dynamics 49/50; MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; MOMs, mitochondrial outer membranes; MPC, mitochondrial pyruvate carriers; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; MTP, mitochondrial trifunctional protein; MUFAs, mono-unsatured fatty acids; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; Nf-κB, nuclear factor-kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; NLR, NOD-like receptors; NOD, nucleotide binding oligomerization domain; NRF1/2, nuclear respiratory factor 1/2; O2, oxygen; OA, oleic acid; Opa1, optic atrophy 1; OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylation; PA, palmitic acid; PDH, pyruvate dehydrogenase; PDM, peri-droplets mitochondria; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PGC1s, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase; PINK1, PTEN-induced kinase 1; PK, pyruvate kinase PLIN, perilipin; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; PRRs, pattern recognition receptors; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homologue; PUFAs; polyunsaturated fatty acids; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SCD, stearoyl-CoA desaturase; SIRT, Sirtuin; SREBP1/2, sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1/2; STAT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages; TCA, tricarboxylic acid; TGs, triglycerides; CPT TLR, toll-like receptor; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; TNM, tumor node metastasis; Tri-phenyl-phosphine, (TPP); TRAIL, TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand; UCP2, uncoupling protein 2; UPRmt, mitochondrial unfolded protein response; VLDL, very-low density lipoproteins; YAP, yes-associated protein.

References

  1. Stepanova, M.; Rafiq, N.; Makhlouf, H.; Agrawal, R.; Kaur, I.; Younoszai, Z.; McCullough, A.; Goodman, Z.; Younossi, Z.M. Predictors of All-Cause Mortality and Liver-Related Mortality in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Dig. Dis. Sci. 2013, 58, 3017–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Farrell, A.; Ryan, M.; Howell, J. Epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A western perspective. Hepatoma Res. 2020, 6, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mittal, S.; El-Serag, H.B.; Sada, Y.H.; Kanwal, F.; Duan, Z.; Temple, S.; May, S.B.; Kramer, J.R.; Richardson, P.A.; Davila, J.A. Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Absence of Cirrhosis in United States Veterans is Associated With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Off. Clin. Pract. J. Am. Gastroenterol. Assoc. 2016, 14, 124–131.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Younossi, Z.M.; Koenig, A.B.; Abdelatif, D.; Fazel, Y.; Henry, L.; Wymer, M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016, 64, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Bugianesi, E.; Leone, N.; Vanni, E.; Marchesini, G.; Brunello, F.; Carucci, P.; Musso, A.; De Paolis, P.; Capussotti, L.; Salizzoni, M.; et al. Expanding the natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: From cryptogenic cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2002, 123, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Younossi, Z.M.; Otgonsuren, M.; Henry, L.; Venkatesan, C.; Mishra, A.; Erario, M.; Hunt, S. Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States from 2004 to 2009. Hepatology 2015, 62, 1723–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dongiovanni, P.; Paolini, E.; Corsini, A.; Sirtori, C.R.; Ruscica, M. NAFLD or MAFLD diagnoses and cardiovascular diseases: From epidemiology to drug approaches. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, e13519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. DeBerardinis, R.J.; Chandel, N.S. We need to talk about the Warburg effect. Nat. Metab. 2020, 2, 127–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Warburg, O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 1956, 123, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Longo, M.; Meroni, M.; Erconi, V.; Carli, F.; Macchi, C.; Fortunato, F.; Ronchi, D.; Sabatini, S.; Paolini, E.; De Caro, E.R.; et al. TM6SF2/PNPLA3/MBOAT7 loss-of-function genetic variants impact on NAFLD development and progression both in patients and in in vitro models. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Longo, M.; Meroni, M.; Paolini, E.; Macchi, C.; Dongiovanni, P. Mitochondrial dynamics and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): New perspectives for a fairy-tale ending? Metabolism 2021, 117, 154708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ploumi, C.; Daskalaki, I.; Tavernarakis, N. Mitochondrial biogenesis and clearance: A balancing act. FEBS J. 2017, 284, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mishra, P.; Chan, D.C. Metabolic regulation of mitochondrial dynamics. J. Cell Biol. 2016, 212, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Piccinin, E.; Villani, G.; Moschetta, A. Metabolic aspects in NAFLD, NASH and hepatocellular carcinoma: The role of PGC1 coactivators. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 160–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Potthoff, M.J.; Inagaki, T.; Satapati, S.; Ding, X.; He, T.; Goetz, R.; Mohammadi, M.; Finck, B.N.; Mangelsdorf, D.J.; Kliewer, S.A.; et al. FGF21 induces PGC-1alpha and regulates carbohydrate and fatty acid metabolism during the adaptive starvation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 10853–10858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Bhalla, K.; Hwang, B.J.; Dewi, R.E.; Ou, L.; Twaddel, W.; Fang, H.B.; Vafai, S.B.; Vazquez, F.; Puigserver, P.; Boros, L.; et al. PGC1α promotes tumor growth by inducing gene expression programs supporting lipogenesis. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 6888–6898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ishihara, N.; Eura, Y.; Mihara, K. Mitofusin 1 and 2 play distinct roles in mitochondrial fusion reactions via GTPase activity. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 6535–6546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Sood, A.; Jeyaraju, D.V.; Prudent, J.; Caron, A.; Lemieux, P.; McBride, H.M.; Laplante, M.; Tóth, K.; Pellegrini, L. A Mitofusin-2–dependent inactivating cleavage of Opa1 links changes in mitochondria cristae and ER contacts in the postprandial liver. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 16017–16022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Varanita, T.; Soriano, M.E.; Romanello, V.; Zaglia, T.; Quintana-Cabrera, R.; Semenzato, M.; Menabò, R.; Costa, V.; Civiletto, G.; Pesce, P.; et al. The Opa1-Dependent Mitochondrial Cristae Remodeling Pathway Controls Atrophic, Apoptotic, and Ischemic Tissue Damage. Cell Metab. 2015, 21, 834–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Youle, R.J.; van der Bliek, A.M. Mitochondrial Fission, Fusion, and Stress. Science 2012, 337, 1062–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Williams, J.A.; Ding, W.-X. Mitophagy, mitochondrial spheroids, and mitochondrial-derived vesicles in alcohol-induced liver injury. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2015, 309, G515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Roberts, R.F.; Tang, M.Y.; Fon, E.A.; Durcan, T.M. Defending the mitochondria: The pathways of mitophagy and mitochondrial-derived vesicles. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2016, 79, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhan, L.; Cao, H.; Wang, G.; Lyu, Y.; Sun, X.; An, J.; Wu, Z.; Huang, Q.; Liu, B.; Xing, J. Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission promotes cell proliferation through crosstalk of p53 and NF-κB pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 65001–65011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Lemasters, J.J. Variants of mitochondrial autophagy: Types 1 and 2 mitophagy and micromitophagy (Type 3). Redox Biol. 2014, 2, 749–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Lemasters, J.J.; Zhong, Z. Mitophagy in hepatocytes: Types, initiators and role in adaptive ethanol metabolism. Liver Res. 2018, 2, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Krishnasamy, Y.; Gooz, M.; Li, L.; Lemasters, J.J.; Zhong, Z. Role of mitochondrial depolarization and disrupted mitochondrial homeostasis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis in mice. Int. J. Physiol. Pathophysiol. Pharmacol. 2019, 11, 190–204. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Inami, Y.; Waguri, S.; Sakamoto, A.; Kouno, T.; Nakada, K.; Hino, O.; Watanabe, S.; Ando, J.; Iwadate, M.; Yamamoto, M.; et al. Persistent activation of Nrf2 through p62 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 193, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Benador, I.Y.; Veliova, M.; Mahdaviani, K.; Petcherski, A.; Wikstrom, J.D.; Assali, E.A.; Acín-Pérez, R.; Shum, M.; Oliveira, M.F.; Cinti, S.; et al. Mitochondria Bound to Lipid Droplets Have Unique Bioenergetics, Composition, and Dynamics that Support Lipid Droplet Expansion. Cell Metab. 2018, 27, 869–885.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Mooli, R.G.R.; Mukhi, D.; Watt, M.; Edmunds, L.; Xie, B.; Capooci, J.; Reslink, M.; Eze, C.; Mills, A.; Stolz, D.B.; et al. Sustained mitochondrial biogenesis is essential to maintain caloric restriction-induced beige adipocytes. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2020, 107, 154225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rector, R.S.; Thyfault, J.P.; Uptergrove, G.M.; Morris, E.M.; Naples, S.P.; Borengasser, S.J.; Mikus, C.R.; Laye, M.J.; Laughlin, M.H.; Booth, F.W.; et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction precedes insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis and contributes to the natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in an obese rodent model. J. Hepatol. 2010, 52, 727–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Grundy, S.M.; Cleeman, J.I.; Daniels, S.R.; Donato, K.A.; Eckel, R.H.; Franklin, B.A.; Gordon, D.J.; Krauss, R.M.; Savage, P.J.; Smith, S.C., Jr.; et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: An American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Circulation 2005, 112, 2735–2752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Mansouri, A.; Gattolliat, C.H.; Asselah, T. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Signaling in Chronic Liver Diseases. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 629–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Shami, G.J.; Cheng, D.; Verhaegh, P.; Koek, G.; Wisse, E.; Braet, F. Three-dimensional ultrastructure of giant mitochondria in human non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Koliaki, C.; Szendroedi, J.; Kaul, K.; Jelenik, T.; Nowotny, P.; Jankowiak, F.; Herder, C.; Carstensen, M.; Krausch, M.; Knoefel, W.T.; et al. Adaptation of hepatic mitochondrial function in humans with non-alcoholic fatty liver is lost in steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 2015, 21, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Serviddio, G.; Bellanti, F.; Tamborra, R.; Rollo, T.; Capitanio, N.; Romano, A.D.; Sastre, J.; Vendemiale, G.; Altomare, E. Uncoupling protein-2 (UCP2) induces mitochondrial proton leak and increases susceptibility of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) liver to ischaemia–reperfusion injury. Gut 2008, 57, 957–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ly, L.D.; Xu, S.; Choi, S.-K.; Ha, C.-M.; Thoudam, T.; Cha, S.-K.; Wiederkehr, A.; Wollheim, C.B.; Lee, I.-K.; Park, K.-S. Oxidative stress and calcium dysregulation by palmitate in type 2 diabetes. Exp. Mol. Med. 2017, 49, e291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wise, D.R.; Thompson, C.B. Glutamine addiction: A new therapeutic target in cancer. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Yamashita, T.; Honda, M.; Takatori, H.; Nishino, R.; Minato, H.; Takamura, H.; Ohta, T.; Kaneko, S. Activation of lipogenic pathway correlates with cell proliferation and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2009, 50, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Özcan, U.; Cao, Q.; Yilmaz, E.; Lee, A.-H.; Iwakoshi, N.N.; Özdelen, E.; Tuncman, G.; Görgün, C.; Glimcher, L.H.; Hotamisligil, G.S. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Links Obesity, Insulin Action, and Type 2 Diabetes. Science 2004, 306, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Ali, E.S.; Rychkov, G.Y.; Barritt, G.J. Deranged hepatocyte intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis and the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease to hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Calcium 2019, 82, 102057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Garcia-Martinez, I.; Santoro, N.; Chen, Y.; Hoque, R.; Ouyang, X.; Caprio, S.; Shlomchik, M.J.; Coffman, R.L.; Candia, A.; Mehal, W.Z. Hepatocyte mitochondrial DNA drives nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by activation of TLR9. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Li, L.; Pilo, G.M.; Li, X.; Cigliano, A.; Latte, G.; Che, L.; Joseph, C.; Mela, M.; Wang, C.; Jiang, L.; et al. Inactivation of fatty acid synthase impairs hepatocarcinogenesis driven by AKT in mice and humans. J. Hepatol. 2016, 64, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ma, X.-L.; Sun, Y.-F.; Wang, B.-L.; Shen, M.-N.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, J.-W.; Hu, B.; Gong, Z.-J.; Zhang, X.; Cao, Y.; et al. Sphere-forming culture enriches liver cancer stem cells and reveals Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 as a potential therapeutic target. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kudo, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Tateishi, K.; Yamamoto, K.; Yamamoto, S.; Mohri, D.; Isomura, Y.; Seto, M.; Nakagawa, H.; Asaoka, Y.; et al. Altered composition of fatty acids exacerbates hepatotumorigenesis during activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. J. Hepatol. 2011, 55, 1400–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ibdah, J.A.; Perlegas, P.; Zhao, Y.; Angdisen, J.; Borgerink, H.; Shadoan, M.K.; Wagner, J.D.; Matern, D.; Rinaldo, P.; Cline, J.M. Mice heterozygous for a defect in mitochondrial trifunctional protein develop hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance. Gastroenterology 2005, 128, 1381–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nakamura, S.; Takamura, T.; Matsuzawa-Nagata, N.; Takayama, H.; Misu, H.; Noda, H.; Nabemoto, S.; Kurita, S.; Ota, T.; Ando, H.; et al. Palmitate induces insulin resistance in H4IIEC3 hepatocytes through reactive oxygen species produced by mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 14809–14818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Mucha, S.R.; Rizzani, A.; Gerbes, A.L.; Camaj, P.; Thasler, W.E.; Bruns, C.J.; Eichhorst, S.T.; Gallmeier, E.; Kolligs, F.T.; Göke, B.; et al. JNK inhibition sensitises hepatocellular carcinoma cells but not normal hepatocytes to the TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. Gut 2009, 58, 688–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Fujiwara, N.; Nakagawa, H.; Enooku, K.; Kudo, Y.; Hayata, Y.; Nakatsuka, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Tateishi, R.; Hikiba, Y.; Misumi, K.; et al. CPT2 downregulation adapts HCC to lipid-rich environment and promotes carcinogenesis via acylcarnitine accumulation in obesity. Gut 2018, 67, 1493–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nakagawa, H.; Hayata, Y.; Kawamura, S.; Yamada, T.; Fujiwara, N.; Koike, K. Lipid Metabolic Reprogramming in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers 2018, 10, 447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Tilg, H.; Moschen, A.R. Evolution of inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: The multiple parallel hits hypothesis. Hepatology 2010, 52, 1836–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Berndt, N.; Eckstein, J.; Heucke, N.; Gajowski, R.; Stockmann, M.; Meierhofer, D.; Holzhütter, H.-G. Characterization of Lipid and Lipid Droplet Metabolism in Human HCC. Cells 2019, 8, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Senni, N.; Savall, M.; Cabrerizo Granados, D.; Alves-Guerra, M.C.; Sartor, C.; Lagoutte, I.; Gougelet, A.; Terris, B.; Gilgenkrantz, H.; Perret, C.; et al. β-catenin-activated hepatocellular carcinomas are addicted to fatty acids. Gut 2019, 68, 322–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, Z.; Guan, M.; Lin, Y.; Cui, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Zhu, J. Aberrant Lipid Metabolism in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Revealed by Liver Lipidomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Boya, P.; Reggiori, F.; Codogno, P. Emerging regulation and functions of autophagy. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cingolani, F.; Czaja, M.J. Regulation and Functions of Autophagic Lipolysis. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. TEM 2016, 27, 696–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Wu, W.Y.; Kim, H.; Zhang, C.L.; Meng, X.L.; Wu, Z.S. Clinical significance of autophagic protein LC3 levels and its correlation with XIAP expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Med. Oncol. 2014, 31, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lee, Y.J.; Ha, Y.J.; Na Kang, Y.; Kang, K.J.; Hwang, J.S.; Chung, W.J.; Cho, K.B.; Park, K.S.; Kim, E.S.; Seo, H.-Y.; et al. The Autophagy-Related Marker LC3 Can Predict Prognosis in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e81540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tian, Y.; Yang, B.; Qiu, W.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, B.; Li, N.; Cheng, S.; Lin, Z.; Rui, Y.-c.; et al. ER-residential Nogo-B accelerates NAFLD-associated HCC mediated by metabolic reprogramming of oxLDL lipophagy. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ho, C.-M.; Ho, S.-L.; Jeng, Y.-M.; Lai, Y.-S.; Chen, Y.-H.; Lu, S.-C.; Chen, H.-L.; Chang, P.-Y.; Hu, R.-H.; Lee, P.-H. Accumulation of free cholesterol and oxidized low-density lipoprotein is associated with portal inflammation and fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Inflamm. 2019, 16, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Chin, L.; Theise, N.D.; Loneker, A.E.; Janmey, P.A.; Wells, R.G. Lipid droplets disrupt mechanosensing in human hepatocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2020, 319, G11–G22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Straub, B.K.; Herpel, E.; Singer, S.; Zimbelmann, R.; Breuhahn, K.; Macher-Goeppinger, S.; Warth, A.; Lehmann-Koch, J.; Longerich, T.; Heid, H.; et al. Lipid droplet-associated PAT-proteins show frequent and differential expression in neoplastic steatogenesis. Mod. Pathol. 2010, 23, 480–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Das, M.; Garlick, D.S.; Greiner, D.L.; Davis, R.J. The role of JNK in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 634–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Krautbauer, S.; Eisinger, K.; Lupke, M.; Wanninger, J.; Ruemmele, P.; Hader, Y.; Weiss, T.S.; Buechler, C. Manganese superoxide dismutase is reduced in the liver of male but not female humans and rodents with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2013, 95, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Nobili, V.; Pastore, A.; Gaeta, L.M.; Tozzi, G.; Comparcola, D.; Sartorelli, M.R.; Marcellini, M.; Bertini, E.; Piemonte, F. Glutathione metabolism and antioxidant enzymes in patients affected by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin. Chim. Acta Int. J. Clin. Chem. 2005, 355, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wu, T.; Liu, Y.H.; Fu, Y.C.; Liu, X.M.; Zhou, X.H. Direct evidence of sirtuin downregulation in the liver of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2014, 44, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Zhang, C.Z.; Liu, L.; Cai, M.; Pan, Y.; Fu, J.; Cao, Y.; Yun, J. Low SIRT3 expression correlates with poor differentiation and unfavorable prognosis in primary hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. De Matteis, S.; Granato, A.M.; Napolitano, R.; Molinari, C.; Valgiusti, M.; Santini, D.; Foschi, F.G.; Ercolani, G.; Vespasiani Gentilucci, U.; Faloppi, L.; et al. Interplay Between SIRT-3, Metabolism and Its Tumor Suppressor Role in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2017, 62, 1872–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hirsova, P.; Gores, G.J. Death Receptor-Mediated Cell Death and Proinflammatory Signaling in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 1, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Hirsova, P.; Weng, P.; Salim, W.; Bronk, S.F.; Griffith, T.S.; Ibrahim, S.H.; Gores, G.J. TRAIL Deletion Prevents Liver, but Not Adipose Tissue, Inflammation during Murine Diet-Induced Obesity. Hepatol. Commun. 2017, 1, 648–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Alegre, F.; Pelegrin, P.; Feldstein, A.E. Inflammasomes in Liver Fibrosis. Semin. Liver Dis. 2017, 37, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Li, C.; Liu, Q.; Xie, L. Suppressing NLRP2 expression accelerates hepatic steatosis: A mechanism involving inflammation and oxidative stress. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 507, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, L.; Liu, X.; Nie, J.; Zhang, J.; Kimball, S.R.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, W.J.; Jefferson, L.S.; Cheng, Z.; Ji, Q.; et al. ALCAT1 controls mitochondrial etiology of fatty liver diseases, linking defective mitophagy to steatosis. Hepatology 2015, 61, 486–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Rautou, P.-E.; Cazals-Hatem, D.; Feldmann, G.; Mansouri, A.; Grodet, A.; Barge, S.; Martinot-Peignoux, M.; Duces, A.; Bièche, I.; Lebrec, D.; et al. Changes in Autophagic Response in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 178, 2708–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Sebastián, D.; Hernández-Alvarez, M.I.; Segalés, J.; Sorianello, E.; Muñoz, J.P.; Sala, D.; Waget, A.; Liesa, M.; Paz, J.C.; Gopalacharyulu, P.; et al. Mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) links mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum function with insulin signaling and is essential for normal glucose homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 5523–5528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Zhang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Hu, W.; Zheng, Q.; Xiang, W. Mitochondrial dysfunction during in vitro hepatocyte steatosis is reversed by omega-3 fatty acid-induced up-regulation of mitofusin 2. Metabolism 2011, 60, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Boland, M.L.; Oldham, S.; Boland, B.B.; Will, S.; Lapointe, J.M.; Guionaud, S.; Rhodes, C.J.; Trevaskis, J.L. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis severity is defined by a failure in compensatory antioxidant capacity in the setting of mitochondrial dysfunction. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 24, 1748–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhang, Z.; Li, T.-E.; Chen, M.; Xu, D.; Zhu, Y.; Hu, B.-Y.; Lin, Z.-F.; Pan, J.-J.; Wang, X.; Wu, C.; et al. MFN1-dependent alteration of mitochondrial dynamics drives hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis by glucose metabolic reprogramming. Br. J. Cancer 2020, 122, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Wang, L.; Ishihara, T.; Ibayashi, Y.; Tatsushima, K.; Setoyama, D.; Hanada, Y.; Takeichi, Y.; Sakamoto, S.; Yokota, S.; Mihara, K.; et al. Disruption of mitochondrial fission in the liver protects mice from diet-induced obesity and metabolic deterioration. Diabetologia 2015, 58, 2371–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Pollard, A.E.; Martins, L.; Muckett, P.J.; Khadayate, S.; Bornot, A.; Clausen, M.; Admyre, T.; Bjursell, M.; Fiadeiro, R.; Wilson, L.; et al. AMPK activation protects against diet-induced obesity through Ucp1-independent thermogenesis in subcutaneous white adipose tissue. Nat. Metab. 2019, 1, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Le, T.H.; Caldwell, S.H.; Redick, J.A.; Sheppard, B.L.; Davis, C.A.; Arseneau, K.O.; Iezzoni, J.C.; Hespenheide, E.E.; Al-Osaimi, A.; Peterson, T.C. The zonal distribution of megamitochondria with crystalline inclusions in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 2004, 39, 1423–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Pirola, C.J.; Gianotti, T.F.; Burgueño, A.L.; Rey-Funes, M.; Loidl, C.F.; Mallardi, P.; Martino, J.S.; Castaño, G.O.; Sookoian, S. Epigenetic modification of liver mitochondrial DNA is associated with histological severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut 2013, 62, 1356–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ahishali, E.; Demir, K.; Ahishali, B.; Akyuz, F.; Pinarbasi, B.; Poturoglu, S.; Ibrisim, D.; Gulluoglu, M.; Ozdil, S.; Besisik, F.; et al. Electron microscopic findings in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Is there a difference between hepatosteatosis and steatohepatitis? J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010, 25, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Verhaegh, P.; Wisse, E.; de Munck, T.; Greve, J.W.; Verheij, J.; Riedl, R.; Duimel, H.; Masclee, A.; Jonkers, D.; Koek, G. Electron microscopic observations in perfusion-fixed human non-alcoholic fatty liver disease biopsies. Pathology 2021, 53, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Yamada, T.; Murata, D.; Adachi, Y.; Itoh, K.; Kameoka, S.; Igarashi, A.; Kato, T.; Araki, Y.; Huganir, R.L.; Dawson, T.M.; et al. Mitochondrial Stasis Reveals p62-Mediated Ubiquitination in Parkin-Independent Mitophagy and Mitigates Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Cell Metab. 2018, 28, 588–604.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Williams, J.A.; Ni, H.M.; Ding, Y.; Ding, W.X. Parkin regulates mitophagy and mitochondrial function to protect against alcohol-induced liver injury and steatosis in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2015, 309, G324–G340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Zhang, N.P.; Liu, X.J.; Xie, L.; Shen, X.Z.; Wu, J. Impaired mitophagy triggers NLRP3 inflammasome activation during the progression from nonalcoholic fatty liver to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Lab. Investig. 2019, 99, 749–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Glick, D.; Zhang, W.; Beaton, M.; Marsboom, G.; Gruber, M.; Simon, M.C.; Hart, J.; Dorn, G.W., 2nd; Brady, M.J.; Macleod, K.F. BNip3 regulates mitochondrial function and lipid metabolism in the liver. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012, 32, 2570–2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Du, J.; Zhang, X.; Han, J.; Man, K.; Zhang, Y.; Chu, E.S.; Nan, Y.; Yu, J. Pro-Inflammatory CXCR3 Impairs Mitochondrial Function in Experimental Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis. Theranostics 2017, 7, 4192–4203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Peng, K.Y.; Watt, M.J.; Rensen, S.; Greve, J.W.; Huynh, K.; Jayawardana, K.S.; Meikle, P.J.; Meex, R.C.R. Mitochondrial dysfunction-related lipid changes occur in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progression. J. Lipid Res. 2018, 59, 1977–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Okada, Y.; Arima, T.; Hada, H.; Fukushima, M.; Watanabe, J.; Nagashima, H. Human hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with quantitative and qualitative changes in glycolipids. Liver 1985, 5, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, J.; Romestaing, C.; Han, X.; Li, Y.; Hao, X.; Wu, Y.; Sun, C.; Liu, X.; Jefferson, L.S.; Xiong, J.; et al. Cardiolipin Remodeling by ALCAT1 Links Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction to Obesity. Cell Metab. 2010, 12, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Zhong, H.; Xiao, M.; Zarkovic, K.; Zhu, M.; Sa, R.; Lu, J.; Tao, Y.; Chen, Q.; Xia, L.; Cheng, S.; et al. Mitochondrial control of apoptosis through modulation of cardiolipin oxidation in hepatocellular carcinoma: A novel link between oxidative stress and cancer. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017, 102, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Liu, J.; Wang, T.; He, K.; Xu, M.; Gong, J.P. Cardiolipin inhibitor ameliorates the non-alcoholic steatohepatitis through suppressing NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 8158–8167. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Szabo, G.; Petrasek, J. Inflammasome activation and function in liver disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 12, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kubes, P.; Mehal, W.Z. Sterile inflammation in the liver. Gastroenterology 2012, 143, 1158–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Miura, K.; Kodama, Y.; Inokuchi, S.; Schnabl, B.; Aoyama, T.; Ohnishi, H.; Olefsky, J.M.; Brenner, D.A.; Seki, E. Toll-like receptor 9 promotes steatohepatitis by induction of interleukin-1beta in mice. Gastroenterology 2010, 139, 323–334.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Zhang, Q.; Raoof, M.; Chen, Y.; Sumi, Y.; Sursal, T.; Junger, W.; Brohi, K.; Itagaki, K.; Hauser, C.J. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature 2010, 464, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. An, P.; Wei, L.-L.; Zhao, S.; Sverdlov, D.Y.; Vaid, K.A.; Miyamoto, M.; Kuramitsu, K.; Lai, M.; Popov, Y.V. Hepatocyte mitochondria-derived danger signals directly activate hepatic stellate cells and drive progression of liver fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, A.; Zhang, S.; Li, J.; Liu, K.; Huang, F.; Liu, B. Metformin and resveratrol inhibit Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission and prevent ER stress-associated NLRP3 inflammasome activation in the adipose tissue of diabetic mice. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016, 434, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wei, Q.; Mu, K.; Li, T.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Jia, X.; Zhao, W.; Huai, W.; Guo, P.; Han, L. Deregulation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in hepatic parenchymal cells during liver cancer progression. Lab. Investig. 2014, 94, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Luo, W.; Xu, Q.; Wang, Q.; Wu, H.; Hua, J. Effect of modulation of PPAR-γ activity on Kupffer cells M1/M2 polarization in the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Pessayre, D. Role of mitochondria in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2007, 22 (Suppl. 1), S20–S27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cave, M.C.; Clair, H.B.; Hardesty, J.E.; Falkner, K.C.; Feng, W.; Clark, B.J.; Sidey, J.; Shi, H.; Aqel, B.A.; McClain, C.J.; et al. Nuclear receptors and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1859, 1083–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Shan, W.; Nicol, C.J.; Ito, S.; Bility, M.T.; Kennett, M.J.; Ward, J.M.; Gonzalez, F.J.; Peters, J.M. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-beta/delta protects against chemically induced liver toxicity in mice. Hepatology 2008, 47, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Bouhlel, M.A.; Derudas, B.; Rigamonti, E.; Dièvart, R.; Brozek, J.; Haulon, S.; Zawadzki, C.; Jude, B.; Torpier, G.; Marx, N.; et al. PPARgamma activation primes human monocytes into alternative M2 macrophages with anti-inflammatory properties. Cell Metab. 2007, 6, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Pawlak, M.; Baugé, E.; Bourguet, W.; De Bosscher, K.; Lalloyer, F.; Tailleux, A.; Lebherz, C.; Lefebvre, P.; Staels, B. The transrepressive activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha is necessary and sufficient to prevent liver fibrosis in mice. Hepatology 2014, 60, 1593–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Aharoni-Simon, M.; Hann-Obercyger, M.; Pen, S.; Madar, Z.; Tirosh, O. Fatty liver is associated with impaired activity of PPARγ-coactivator 1α (PGC1α) and mitochondrial biogenesis in mice. Lab. Investig. 2011, 91, 1018–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Besse-Patin, A.; Léveillé, M.; Oropeza, D.; Nguyen, B.N.; Prat, A.; Estall, J.L. Estrogen Signals Through Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-γ Coactivator 1α to Reduce Oxidative Damage Associated With Diet-Induced Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2017, 152, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Shah, Y.M.; Morimura, K.; Yang, Q.; Tanabe, T.; Takagi, M.; Gonzalez, F.J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha regulates a microRNA-mediated signaling cascade responsible for hepatocellular proliferation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2007, 27, 4238–4247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Kamarajugadda, S.; Becker, J.R.; Hanse, E.A.; Mashek, D.G.; Mashek, M.T.; Hendrickson, A.M.; Mullany, L.K.; Albrecht, J.H. Cyclin D1 represses peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and inhibits fatty acid oxidation. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 47674–47686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Tell, G.; Vascotto, C.; Tiribelli, C. Alterations in the redox state and liver damage: Hints from the EASL Basic School of Hepatology. J. Hepatol. 2013, 58, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Canbay, A.; Taimr, P.; Torok, N.; Higuchi, H.; Friedman, S.; Gores, G.J. Apoptotic body engulfment by a human stellate cell line is profibrogenic. Lab. Investig. 2003, 83, 655–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Zhan, S.S.; Jiang, J.X.; Wu, J.; Halsted, C.; Friedman, S.L.; Zern, M.A.; Torok, N.J. Phagocytosis of apoptotic bodies by hepatic stellate cells induces NADPH oxidase and is associated with liver fibrosis in vivo. Hepatology 2006, 43, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Gandhi, C.R. Oxidative Stress and Hepatic Stellate Cells: A PARADOXICAL RELATIONSHIP. Trends Cell Mol. Biol. 2012, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  115. Hsu, C.C.; Lee, H.C.; Wei, Y.H. Mitochondrial DNA alterations and mitochondrial dysfunction in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19, 8880–8886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Park, E.J.; Lee, J.H.; Yu, G.-Y.; He, G.; Ali, S.R.; Holzer, R.G.; Österreicher, C.H.; Takahashi, H.; Karin, M. Dietary and Genetic Obesity Promote Liver Inflammation and Tumorigenesis by Enhancing IL-6 and TNF Expression. Cell 2010, 140, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Uysal, S.; Armutcu, F.; Aydogan, T.; Akin, K.; Ikizek, M.; Yigitoglu, M.R. Some inflammatory cytokine levels, iron metabolism and oxidan stress markers in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin. Biochem. 2011, 44, 1375–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ambade, A.; Satishchandran, A.; Saha, B.; Gyongyosi, B.; Lowe, P.; Kodys, K.; Catalano, D.; Szabo, G. Hepatocellular carcinoma is accelerated by NASH involving M2 macrophage polarization mediated by hif-1αinduced IL-10. Oncoimmunology 2016, 5, e1221557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Wilson, G.K.; Tennant, D.A.; McKeating, J.A. Hypoxia inducible factors in liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: Current understanding and future directions. J. Hepatol. 2014, 61, 1397–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Anstee, Q.M.; Reeves, H.L.; Kotsiliti, E.; Govaere, O.; Heikenwalder, M. From NASH to HCC: Current concepts and future challenges. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 411–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Takahashi, T.; So-Wan, T.; Kamimura, T.; Asakura, H. Infiltrating polymorphonuclear leukocytes and apoptotic bodies derived from hepatocytes but not from ballooning hepatocytes containing Mallory bodies show nuclear DNA fragmentation in alcoholic hepatitis. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2000, 24 (Suppl. 4), 68s–73s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Pessayre, D.; Fromenty, B. NASH: A mitochondrial disease. J. Hepatol. 2005, 42, 928–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Taniguchi, K.; Yamachika, S.; He, F.; Karin, M. p62/SQSTM1-Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde that prevents oxidative stress but promotes liver cancer. FEBS Lett. 2016, 590, 2375–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Ichimura, Y.; Waguri, S.; Sou, Y.S.; Kageyama, S.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishimura, R.; Saito, T.; Yang, Y.; Kouno, T.; Fukutomi, T.; et al. Phosphorylation of p62 activates the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway during selective autophagy. Mol. Cell 2013, 51, 618–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Taguchi, K.; Motohashi, H.; Yamamoto, M. Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1–Nrf2 pathway in stress response and cancer evolution. Genes Cells Devoted Mol. Cell. Mech. 2011, 16, 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Petrelli, A.; Perra, A.; Cora, D.; Sulas, P.; Menegon, S.; Manca, C.; Migliore, C.; Kowalik, M.A.; Ledda-Columbano, G.M.; Giordano, S.; et al. MicroRNA/gene profiling unveils early molecular changes and nuclear factor erythroid related factor 2 (NRF2) activation in a rat model recapitulating human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hepatology 2014, 59, 228–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Yu, L.; Alva, A.; Su, H.; Dutt, P.; Freundt, E.; Welsh, S.; Baehrecke, E.H.; Lenardo, M.J. Regulation of an ATG7-beclin 1 program of autophagic cell death by caspase-8. Science 2004, 304, 1500–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Takamura, A.; Komatsu, M.; Hara, T.; Sakamoto, A.; Kishi, C.; Waguri, S.; Eishi, Y.; Hino, O.; Tanaka, K.; Mizushima, N. Autophagy-deficient mice develop multiple liver tumors. Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 795–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Yin, X.; Zheng, F.; Pan, Q.; Zhang, S.; Yu, D.; Xu, Z.; Li, H. Glucose fluctuation increased hepatocyte apoptosis under lipotoxicity and the involvement of mitochondrial permeability transition opening. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2015, 55, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Guerra, M.T.; Florentino, R.M.; Franca, A.; Lima Filho, A.C.; dos Santos, M.L.; Fonseca, R.C.; Lemos, F.O.; Fonseca, M.C.; Kruglov, E.; Mennone, A.; et al. Expression of the type 3 InsP3 receptor is a final common event in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 2019, 68, 1676–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Huang, Q.; Zhan, L.; Cao, H.; Li, J.; Lyu, Y.; Guo, X.; Zhang, J.; Ji, L.; Ren, T.; An, J.; et al. Increased mitochondrial fission promotes autophagy and hepatocellular carcinoma cell survival through the ROS-modulated coordinated regulation of the NFKB and TP53 pathways. Autophagy 2016, 12, 999–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Matter, M.S.; Decaens, T.; Andersen, J.B.; Thorgeirsson, S.S. Targeting the mTOR pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma: Current state and future trends. J. Hepatol. 2014, 60, 855–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Kolb, R.; Sutterwala, F.S.; Zhang, W. Obesity and cancer: Inflammation bridges the two. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2016, 29, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Calvisi, D.F.; Ladu, S.; Gorden, A.; Farina, M.; Conner, E.A.; Lee, J.S.; Factor, V.M.; Thorgeirsson, S.S. Ubiquitous activation of Ras and Jak/Stat pathways in human HCC. Gastroenterology 2006, 130, 1117–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Nakagawa, H.; Umemura, A.; Taniguchi, K.; Font-Burgada, J.; Dhar, D.; Ogata, H.; Zhong, Z.; Valasek, M.A.; Seki, E.; Hidalgo, J.; et al. ER stress cooperates with hypernutrition to trigger TNF-dependent spontaneous HCC development. Cancer Cell 2014, 26, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Baffy, G.; Brunt, E.M.; Caldwell, S.H. Hepatocellular carcinoma in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: An emerging menace. J. Hepatol. 2012, 56, 1384–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Karagozian, R.; Derdák, Z.; Baffy, G. Obesity-associated mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis. Metabolism 2014, 63, 607–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Sadik, N.A.; Ahmed, A.; Ahmed, S. The significance of serum levels of adiponectin, leptin, and hyaluronic acid in hepatocellular carcinoma of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2012, 31, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Yu, J.; Shen, J.; Sun, T.T.; Zhang, X.; Wong, N. Obesity, insulin resistance, NASH and hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2013, 23, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Gao, H.; Hao, Y.; Zhou, X.; Li, H.; Liu, F.; Zhu, H.; Song, X.; Niu, Z.; Ni, Q.; Chen, M.-S.; et al. Prognostic value of glucose transporter 3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2020, 19, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. DeWaal, D.; Nogueira, V.; Terry, A.R.; Patra, K.C.; Jeon, S.-M.; Guzman, G.; Au, J.; Long, C.P.; Antoniewicz, M.R.; Hay, N. Hexokinase-2 depletion inhibits glycolysis and induces oxidative phosphorylation in hepatocellular carcinoma and sensitizes to metformin. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Zhu, W.-W.; Lu, M.; Wang, X.-Y.; Zhou, X.; Gao, C.; Qin, L.-X. The fuel and engine: The roles of reprogrammed metabolism in metastasis of primary liver cancer. Genes Dis. 2020, 7, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Zhang, Z.; Huang, S.; Wang, H.; Wu, J.; Chen, D.; Peng, B.; Zhou, Q. High expression of hexokinase domain containing 1 is associated with poor prognosis and aggressive phenotype in hepatocarcinoma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 474, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Ganapathy-Kanniappan, S.; Kunjithapatham, R.; Geschwind, J.-F. Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase: A Promising Target for Molecular Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncotarget 2012, 3, 940–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Tarze, A.; Deniaud, A.; Le Bras, M.; Maillier, E.; Molle, D.; Larochette, N.; Zamzami, N.; Jan, G.; Kroemer, G.; Brenner, C. GAPDH, a novel regulator of the pro-apoptotic mitochondrial membrane permeabilization. Oncogene 2007, 26, 2606–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Liu, S.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, M.; Li, Y.; Tian, Y.; Xue, W.; Ding, N.; Sun, Y.; Cheng, C.; Li, J.; et al. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase promotes liver tumorigenesis by modulating phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase. Hepatology 2017, 66, 631–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Gong, Y.; Cui, L.; Minuk, G.Y. Comparison of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and 28S-ribosomal RNA gene expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 1996, 23, 734–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Jha, D.; Mitra Mazumder, P. High fat diet administration leads to the mitochondrial dysfunction and selectively alters the expression of class 1 GLUT protein in mice. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 1727–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Young, A.; Oldford, C.; Mailloux, R.J. Lactate dehydrogenase supports lactate oxidation in mitochondria isolated from different mouse tissues. Redox Biol. 2020, 28, 101339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kong, W.; Zuo, X.; Liang, H.; Hu, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Chen, W. Prognostic Value of Lactate Dehydrogenase in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 1723184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ma, X.; Cui, Y.; Zhou, H.; Li, Q. Function of mitochondrial pyruvate carriers in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 9110–9116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Tompkins, S.C.; Sheldon, R.D.; Rauckhorst, A.J.; Noterman, M.F.; Solst, S.R.; Buchanan, J.L.; Mapuskar, K.A.; Pewa, A.D.; Gray, L.R.; Oonthonpan, L.; et al. Disrupting Mitochondrial Pyruvate Uptake Directs Glutamine into the TCA Cycle away from Glutathione Synthesis and Impairs Hepatocellular Tumorigenesis. Cell Rep. 2019, 28, 2608–2619.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Wang, W.; Xie, Q.; Zhou, X.; Yao, J.; Zhu, X.; Huang, P.; Zhang, L.; Wei, J.; Xie, H.; Zhou, L.; et al. Mitofusin-2 triggers mitochondria Ca2+ influx from the endoplasmic reticulum to induce apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2015, 358, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Ali, E.S.; Rychkov, G.Y.; Barritt, G.J. Targeting Ca(2+) Signaling in the Initiation, Promotion and Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Legros, F.; Malka, F.; Frachon, P.; Lombès, A.; Rojo, M. Organization and dynamics of human mitochondrial DNA. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 2653–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Yang, L.; Tang, H.; Lin, X.; Wu, Y.; Zeng, S.; Pan, Y.; Li, Y.; Xiang, G.; Lin, Y.-F.; Zhuang, S.-M.; et al. OPA1-Exon4b Binds to mtDNA D-Loop for Transcriptional and Metabolic Modulation, Independent of Mitochondrial Fusion. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Yu, C.; Wang, X.; Huang, L.; Tong, Y.; Chen, L.; Wu, H.; Xia, Q.; Kong, X. Deciphering the Spectrum of Mitochondrial DNA Mutations in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using High-Throughput Sequencing. Gene Expr. 2018, 18, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Li, M.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, G.; Lieshout, R.; Ma, B.; Liu, J.; Qu, C.; Verstegen, M.M.A.; et al. Mitochondrial Fusion Via OPA1 and MFN1 Supports Liver Tumor Cell Metabolism and Growth. Cells 2020, 9, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Zhao, X.; Tian, C.; Puszyk, W.M.; Ogunwobi, O.O.; Cao, M.; Wang, T.; Cabrera, R.; Nelson, D.R.; Liu, C. OPA1 downregulation is involved in sorafenib-induced apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Lab. Investig. 2013, 93, 8–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Turcios, L.; Vilchez, V.; Acosta, L.F.; Poyil, P.; Butterfield, D.A.; Mitov, M.; Marti, F.; Gedaly, R. Sorafenib and FH535 in combination act synergistically on hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting cell bioenergetics and mitochondrial function. Dig. Liver Dis. 2017, 49, 697–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Bao, D.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, X.; Yang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, J.; Yuan, P.; Yang, J.; Qin, T.; Wan, S.; et al. Mitochondrial fission-induced mtDNA stress promotes tumor-associated macrophage infiltration and HCC progression. Oncogene 2019, 38, 5007–5020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Fuller, K.N.Z.; McCoin, C.S.; Allen, J.; Bell-Glenn, S.; Koestler, D.C.; Dorn, G.W.; Thyfault, J.P. Sex and BNIP3 genotype, rather than acute lipid injection, modulate hepatic mitochondrial function and steatosis risk in mice. J. Appl. Physiol. 2020, 128, 1251–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Zhou, T.; Chang, L.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J. Mst1 inhibition attenuates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease via reversing Parkin-related mitophagy. Redox Biol. 2019, 21, 101120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Sentelle, R.D.; Senkal, C.E.; Jiang, W.; Ponnusamy, S.; Gencer, S.; Selvam, S.P.; Ramshesh, V.K.; Peterson, Y.K.; Lemasters, J.J.; Szulc, Z.M.; et al. Ceramide targets autophagosomes to mitochondria and induces lethal mitophagy. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012, 8, 831–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Li, W.; Li, Y.; Siraj, S.; Jin, H.; Fan, Y.; Yang, X.; Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, L.; et al. FUN14 Domain-Containing 1-Mediated Mitophagy Suppresses Hepatocarcinogenesis by Inhibition of Inflammasome Activation in Mice. Hepatology 2019, 69, 604–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Shi, C.; Cai, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Hu, N.; Ma, S.; Hu, S.; Zhu, P.; Wang, W.; Zhou, H. Yap promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis and mobilization via governing cofilin/F-actin/lamellipodium axis by regulation of JNK/Bnip3/SERCA/CaMKII pathways. Redox Biol. 2018, 14, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Fujiwara, M.; Marusawa, H.; Wang, H.Q.; Iwai, A.; Ikeuchi, K.; Imai, Y.; Kataoka, A.; Nukina, N.; Takahashi, R.; Chiba, T. Parkin as a tumor suppressor gene for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 2008, 27, 6002–6011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Kung-Chun Chiu, D.; Pui-Wah Tse, A.; Law, C.-T.; Ming-Jing Xu, I.; Lee, D.; Chen, M.; Kit-Ho Lai, R.; Wai-Hin Yuen, V.; Wing-Sum Cheu, J.; Wai-Hung Ho, D.; et al. Hypoxia regulates the mitochondrial activity of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through HIF/HEY1/PINK1 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Wang, F.; Denison, S.; Lai, J.P.; Philips, L.A.; Montoya, D.; Kock, N.; Schüle, B.; Klein, C.; Shridhar, V.; Roberts, L.R.; et al. Parkin gene alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2004, 40, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Xu, L.; Lin, D.-C.; Yin, D.; Koeffler, H.P. An emerging role of PARK2 in cancer. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 92, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Wu, H.; Wang, T.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.; Xu, S.; Wu, C.; Zou, H.; Cao, M.; Jin, G.; Lang, J.; et al. Mitophagy promotes sorafenib resistance through hypoxia-inducible ATAD3A dependent Axis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 39, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Sun, L.; Li, T.; Wei, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, X.; Wan, Z.; Han, L. Upregulation of BNIP3 mediated by ERK/HIF-1α pathway induces autophagy and contributes to anoikis resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Future Oncol. 2014, 10, 1387–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Liu, K.; Lee, J.; Kim, J.Y.; Wang, L.; Tian, Y.; Chan, S.T.; Cho, C.; Machida, K.; Chen, D.; Ou, J.-H.J. Mitophagy Controls the Activities of Tumor Suppressor p53 to Regulate Hepatic Cancer Stem Cells. Mol. Cell 2017, 68, 281–292.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Jiang, X.; Tan, H.-Y.; Teng, S.; Chan, Y.-T.; Wang, D.; Wang, N. The Role of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase as a Potential Target of Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers 2019, 11, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Liu, R.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Liu, B.; Zen, K.; Zhang, C.Y.; et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 alpha acts as a tumor suppressor in hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol. J. Int. Soc. Oncodev. Biol. Med. 2017, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Martínez-Jiménez, C.P.; Gómez-Lechón, M.J.; Castell, J.V.; Jover, R. Underexpressed coactivators PGC1alpha and SRC1 impair hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha function and promote dedifferentiation in human hepatoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 29840–29849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Wang, B.; Hsu, S.-H.; Frankel, W.; Ghoshal, K.; Jacob, S.T. Stat3-mediated activation of microRNA-23a suppresses gluconeogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma by down-regulating glucose-6-phosphatase and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha. Hepatology 2012, 56, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Zuo, Q.; He, J.; Zhang, S.; Wang, H.; Jin, G.; Jin, H.; Cheng, Z.; Tao, X.; Yu, C.; Li, B.; et al. PGC1α suppresses metastasis of HCC by inhibiting Warburg effect via PPARγ-dependent WNT/β-catenin/PDK1 axis. Hepatology 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Zuo, Q.; He, J.; Zhang, S.; Wang, H.; Jin, G.; Jin, H.; Cheng, Z.; Tao, X.; Yu, C.; Li, B.; et al. PPARγ Coactivator-1α Suppresses Metastasis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Inhibiting Warburg Effect by PPARγ-Dependent WNT/β-Catenin/Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Kinase Isozyme 1 Axis. Hepatology 2021, 73, 644–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Farcas, M.; Gavrea, A.-A.; Gulei, D.; Ionescu, C.; Irimie, A.; Catana, C.S.; Berindan-Neagoe, I. SIRT1 in the Development and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Chen, J.; Zhang, B.; Wong, N.; Lo, A.W.; To, K.F.; Chan, A.W.; Ng, M.H.; Ho, C.Y.; Cheng, S.H.; Lai, P.B.; et al. Sirtuin 1 is upregulated in a subset of hepatocellular carcinomas where it is essential for telomere maintenance and tumor cell growth. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 4138–4149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Huang, S.; Zhao, Z.; Tang, D.; Zhou, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhou, L.; Yin, Y.; Wang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Dorfman, R.G.; et al. Downregulation of SIRT2 Inhibits Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Inhibiting Energy Metabolism. Transl. Oncol. 2017, 10, 917–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Han, L.L.; Jia, L.; Wu, F.; Huang, C. Sirtuin6 (SIRT6) Promotes the EMT of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Stimulating Autophagic Degradation of E-Cadherin. Mol. Cancer Res. MCR 2019, 17, 2267–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Li, Y.; Xu, S.; Li, J.; Zheng, L.; Feng, M.; Wang, X.; Han, K.; Pi, H.; Li, M.; Huang, X.; et al. SIRT1 facilitates hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis by promoting PGC-1α-mediated mitochondrial biogenesis. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 29255–29274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  185. Zhang, C.; Yu, Y.; Huang, Q.; Tang, K. SIRT6 regulates the proliferation and apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma via the ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 20, 1575–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. LeBleu, V.S.; O’Connell, J.T.; Gonzalez Herrera, K.N.; Wikman, H.; Pantel, K.; Haigis, M.C.; de Carvalho, F.M.; Damascena, A.; Domingos Chinen, L.T.; Rocha, R.M.; et al. PGC-1α mediates mitochondrial biogenesis and oxidative phosphorylation in cancer cells to promote metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16, 992–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Zhao, Y.; Zhou, L.; Li, H.; Sun, T.; Wen, X.; Li, X.; Meng, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Liu, S.; et al. Nuclear-Encoded lncRNA MALAT1 Epigenetically Controls Metabolic Reprogramming in HCC Cells through the Mitophagy Pathway. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2021, 23, 264–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Rankin, E.B.; Rha, J.; Selak, M.A.; Unger, T.L.; Keith, B.; Liu, Q.; Haase, V.H. Hypoxia-inducible factor 2 regulates hepatic lipid metabolism. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 29, 4527–4538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  189. Chen, J.; Chen, J.; Fu, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Luo, S.; Lu, H. Hypoxia exacerbates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease via the HIF-2α/PPARα pathway. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 317, E710–E722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Zhang, X.; Huang, C.; Li, X.; Shangguan, Z.; Wei, W.; Liu, S.; Yang, S.; Liu, Y. HFD and HFD-provoked hepatic hypoxia act as reciprocal causation for NAFLD via HIF-independent signaling. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020, 20, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Hernández, A.; Geng, Y.; Sepúlveda, R.; Solís, N.; Torres, J.; Arab, J.P.; Barrera, F.; Cabrera, D.; Moshage, H.; Arrese, M. Chemical hypoxia induces pro-inflammatory signals in fat-laden hepatocytes and contributes to cellular crosstalk with Kupffer cells through extracellular vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Chen, J.; Chen, J.; Huang, J.; Li, Z.; Gong, Y.; Zou, B.; Liu, X.; Ding, L.; Li, P.; Zhu, Z.; et al. HIF-2α upregulation mediated by hypoxia promotes NAFLD-HCC progression by activating lipid synthesis via the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway. Aging 2019, 11, 10839–10860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Semenza, G.L.; Jiang, B.H.; Leung, S.W.; Passantino, R.; Concordet, J.P.; Maire, P.; Giallongo, A. Hypoxia response elements in the aldolase A, enolase 1, and lactate dehydrogenase A gene promoters contain essential binding sites for hypoxia-inducible factor 1. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 32529–32537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Tohme, S.; Yazdani, H.O.; Liu, Y.; Loughran, P.; van der Windt, D.J.; Huang, H.; Simmons, R.L.; Shiva, S.; Tai, S.; Tsung, A. Hypoxia mediates mitochondrial biogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma to promote tumor growth through HMGB1 and TLR9 interaction. Hepatology 2017, 66, 182–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Dongiovanni, P.; Stender, S.; Pietrelli, A.; Mancina, R.M.; Cespiati, A.; Petta, S.; Pelusi, S.; Pingitore, P.; Badiali, S.; Maggioni, M.; et al. Causal relationship of hepatic fat with liver damage and insulin resistance in nonalcoholic fatty liver. J. Intern. Med. 2018, 283, 356–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Meroni, M.; Longo, M.; Dongiovanni, P. Genetic and metabolic factors: The perfect combination to treat metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Explor. Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Wang, Y.; Kory, N.; BasuRay, S.; Cohen, J.C.; Hobbs, H.H. PNPLA3, CGI-58, and Inhibition of Hepatic Triglyceride Hydrolysis in Mice. Hepatology 2019, 69, 2427–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. Min, H.-K.; Sookoian, S.; Pirola, C.J.; Cheng, J.; Mirshahi, F.; Sanyal, A.J. Metabolic profiling reveals that PNPLA3 induces widespread effects on metabolism beyond triacylglycerol remodeling in Huh-7 hepatoma cells. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2014, 307, G66–G76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Dongiovanni, P.; Donati, B.; Fares, R.; Lombardi, R.; Mancina, R.M.; Romeo, S.; Valenti, L. PNPLA3 I148M polymorphism and progressive liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19, 6969–6978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Carpino, G.; Pastori, D. PNPLA3 variant and portal/periportal histological pattern in patients with biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A possible role for oxidative stress. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Bruschi, F.V.; Tardelli, M.; Einwallner, E.; Claudel, T.; Trauner, M. PNPLA3 I148M Up-Regulates Hedgehog and Yap Signaling in Human Hepatic Stellate Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Mancina, R.M.; Dongiovanni, P.; Petta, S.; Pingitore, P.; Meroni, M.; Rametta, R.; Borén, J.; Montalcini, T.; Pujia, A.; Wiklund, O.; et al. The MBOAT7-TMC4 Variant rs641738 Increases Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Individuals of European Descent. Gastroenterology 2016, 150, 1219–1230.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  203. Teo, K.; Abeysekera, K.W.M.; Adams, L.; Aigner, E.; Banales, J.M.; Banerjee, R.; Basu, P.; Berg, T.; Bhatnagar, P.; Buch, S.; et al. rs641738C>T near MBOAT7 is positively associated with liver fat, ALT, and histological severity of NAFLD: A meta-analysis. medRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Meroni, M.; Dongiovanni, P.; Longo, M.; Carli, F.; Baselli, G.; Rametta, R.; Pelusi, S.; Badiali, S.; Maggioni, M.; Gaggini, M.; et al. Mboat7 down-regulation by hyper-insulinemia induces fat accumulation in hepatocytes. EBioMedicine 2020, 52, 102658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  205. Meroni, M.; Longo, M.; Fracanzani, A.L.; Dongiovanni, P. MBOAT7 down-regulation by genetic and environmental factors predisposes to MAFLD. EBioMedicine 2020, 57, 102866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Smagris, E.; Gilyard, S.; BasuRay, S.; Cohen, J.C.; Hobbs, H.H. Inactivation of Tm6sf2, a Gene Defective in Fatty Liver Disease, Impairs Lipidation but Not Secretion of Very Low Density Lipoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 10659–10676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  207. Ruhanen, H.; Nidhina Haridas, P.A.; Eskelinen, E.L.; Eriksson, O.; Olkkonen, V.M.; Käkelä, R. Depletion of TM6SF2 disturbs membrane lipid composition and dynamics in HuH7 hepatoma cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2017, 1862, 676–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. O’Hare, E.A.; Yang, R.; Yerges-Armstrong, L.M.; Sreenivasan, U.; McFarland, R.; Leitch, C.C.; Wilson, M.H.; Narina, S.; Gorden, A.; Ryan, K.A.; et al. TM6SF2 rs58542926 impacts lipid processing in liver and small intestine. Hepatology 2017, 65, 1526–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  209. Chen, X.; Zhou, P.; De, L.; Li, B.; Su, S. The roles of transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 rs58542926 polymorphism in chronic liver disease: A meta-analysis of 24,147 subjects. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2019, 7, e824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Raksayot, M.; Chuaypen, N.; Khlaiphuengsin, A.; Pinjaroen, N.; Treeprasertsuk, S.; Poovorawan, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Tangkijvanich, P. Independent and additive effects of PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 polymorphisms on the development of non-B, non-C hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 54, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Bianco, C.; Jamialahmadi, O.; Pelusi, S.; Baselli, G.; Dongiovanni, P.; Zanoni, I.; Santoro, L.; Maier, S.; Liguori, A.; Meroni, M.; et al. Non-invasive stratification of hepatocellular carcinoma risk in non-alcoholic fatty liver using polygenic risk scores. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Mehta, R.; Jeiran, K.; Koenig, A.B.; Otgonsuren, M.; Goodman, Z.; Baranova, A.; Younossi, Z. The role of mitochondrial genomics in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). BMC Med. Genet. 2016, 17, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  213. Al-Serri, A.; Anstee, Q.M.; Valenti, L.; Nobili, V.; Leathart, J.B.; Dongiovanni, P.; Patch, J.; Fracanzani, A.; Fargion, S.; Day, C.P.; et al. The SOD2 C47T polymorphism influences NAFLD fibrosis severity: Evidence from case-control and intra-familial allele association studies. J. Hepatol. 2012, 56, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  214. Schröder, T.; Kucharczyk, D.; Bär, F.; Pagel, R.; Derer, S.; Jendrek, S.T.; Sünderhauf, A.; Brethack, A.-K.; Hirose, M.; Möller, S.; et al. Mitochondrial gene polymorphisms alter hepatic cellular energy metabolism and aggravate diet-induced non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Mol. Metab. 2016, 5, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Abd El Daim, H.A.; Elsaid, A.M.; Mousa, A.A.; El-Eshmawy, M.M.; Lashin, L.S.; Toraih, E.A.; Elshazli, R.M. Unleash the Association of Mitochondrial Uncoupling Protein (UCP2) Promoter Variant (G-866A; rs659366) with Obesity: Stepping from a Case–Control Study to a Meta-analysis. Biochem. Genet. 2020, 58, 738–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Fares, R.; Petta, S.; Lombardi, R.; Grimaudo, S.; Dongiovanni, P.; Pipitone, R.; Rametta, R.; Fracanzani, A.L.; Mozzi, E.; Craxì, A.; et al. The UCP2 -866 G>A promoter region polymorphism is associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Liver Int. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Liver 2015, 35, 1574–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Hamada, T.; Kotani, K.; Fujiwara, S.; Sano, Y.; Domichi, M.; Tsuzaki, K.; Sakane, N. The common -55 C/T polymorphism in the promoter region of the uncoupling protein 3 gene reduces prevalence of obesity and elevates serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in the general Japanese population. Metabolism 2008, 57, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Aller, R.; De Luis, D.A.; Izaola, O.; González Sagrado, M.; Conde, R.; Alvarez, T.; Pacheco, D.; Velasco, M.C. Role of -55CT polymorphism of UCP3 gene on non alcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance in patients with obesity. Nutr. Hosp. 2010, 25, 572–576. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  219. Qian, L.; Xu, K.; Xu, X.; Gu, R.; Liu, X.; Shan, S.; Yang, T. UCP2 -866G/A, Ala55Val and UCP3 -55C/T polymorphisms in association with obesity susceptibility—A meta-analysis study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  220. Dong, C.; Della-Morte, D.; Wang, L.; Cabral, D.; Beecham, A.; McClendon, M.S.; Luca, C.C.; Blanton, S.H.; Sacco, R.L.; Rundek, T. Association of the sirtuin and mitochondrial uncoupling protein genes with carotid plaque. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  221. Hirschey, M.D.; Shimazu, T.; Jing, E.; Grueter, C.A.; Collins, A.M.; Aouizerat, B.; Stančáková, A.; Goetzman, E.; Lam, M.M.; Schwer, B.; et al. SIRT3 Deficiency and Mitochondrial Protein Hyperacetylation Accelerate the Development of the Metabolic Syndrome. Mol. Cell 2011, 44, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  222. Kurylowicz, A. In Search of New Therapeutic Targets in Obesity Treatment: Sirtuins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  223. Lee, M.; Choi, S.; Lee, Y.; Oh, H.H. The Gender Association of the SIRT1 rs7895833 Polymorphism with Pediatric Obesity: A 3-Year Panel Study. J. Nutr. Nutr. 2016, 9, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Yassin, H.A.; Mahmoud, S.A.; El-Din, S.H.M.; Aggan, H.E.; Dwedar, F. The impact of SIRT1 serum level and its gene single nucleotide polymorphism (rs7895833) on the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma in a cohort of cirrhotic population. Senses Sci. 2019, 6, 864–881. [Google Scholar]
  225. Emdin, C.A.; Haas, M.E. A missense variant in Mitochondrial Amidoxime Reducing Component 1 gene and protection against liver disease. PLoS Genet. 2020, 16, e1008629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  226. Luukkonen, P.K.; Juuti, A.; Sammalkorpi, H.; Penttilä, A.K.; Orešič, M.; Hyötyläinen, T.; Arola, J.; Orho-Melander, M.; Yki-Järvinen, H. MARC1 variant rs2642438 increases hepatic phosphatidylcholines and decreases severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in humans. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 725–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Müller, M.; Bird, T.G.; Nault, J.-C. The landscape of gene mutations in cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2020, 72, 990–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  228. Donati, B.; Pietrelli, A.; Pingitore, P.; Dongiovanni, P.; Caddeo, A.; Walker, L.; Baselli, G.; Pelusi, S.; Rosso, C.; Vanni, E.; et al. Telomerase reverse transcriptase germline mutations and hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cancer Med. 2017, 6, 1930–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Park, J.I.; Venteicher, A.S.; Hong, J.Y.; Choi, J.; Jun, S.; Shkreli, M.; Chang, W.; Meng, Z.; Cheung, P.; Ji, H.; et al. Telomerase modulates Wnt signalling by association with target gene chromatin. Nature 2009, 460, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. Pelusi, S.; Baselli, G.; Pietrelli, A.; Dongiovanni, P.; Donati, B.; McCain, M.V.; Meroni, M.; Fracanzani, A.L.; Romagnoli, R.; Petta, S.; et al. Rare Pathogenic Variants Predispose to Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Lee, G.; Jeong, Y.S.; Kim, D.W.; Kwak, M.J.; Koh, J.; Joo, E.W.; Lee, J.-S.; Kah, S.; Sim, Y.-E.; Yim, S.Y. Clinical significance of APOB inactivation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp. Mol. Med. 2018, 50, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Stumptner, C.; Fuchsbichler, A.; Zatloukal, K.; Denk, H. In vitro production of Mallory bodies and intracellular hyaline bodies: The central role of sequestosome 1/p62. Hepatology 2007, 46, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2018, 69, 182–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  234. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2016, 64, 1388–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Calvisi, D.F.; Ladu, S.; Hironaka, K.; Factor, V.M.; Thorgeirsson, S.S. Vitamin E down-modulates iNOS and NADPH oxidase in c-Myc/TGF-alpha transgenic mouse model of liver cancer. J. Hepatol. 2004, 41, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Fantappiè, O.; Lodovici, M.; Fabrizio, P.; Marchettia, S.; Fabbroni, V.; Solazzo, M.; Lasagna, N.; Pantaleo, P.; Mazzanti, R. Vitamin E protects DNA from oxidative damage in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. Free Radic. Res. 2004, 38, 751–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Cheng, S.B.; Lin, P.T.; Liu, H.T.; Peng, Y.S.; Huang, S.C.; Huang, Y.C. Vitamin B-6 Supplementation Could Mediate Antioxidant Capacity by Reducing Plasma Homocysteine Concentration in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Tumor Resection. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 7658981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  238. Liu, H.T.; Huang, Y.C.; Cheng, S.B.; Huang, Y.T.; Lin, P.T. Effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on antioxidant capacity and inflammation in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after surgery: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Nutr. J. 2016, 15, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  239. Li, S.; Ghoshal, S.; Sojoodi, M.; Arora, G.; Masia, R.; Erstad, D.J.; Lanuti, M.; Hoshida, Y.; Baumert, T.F.; Tanabe, K.K.; et al. Pioglitazone Reduces Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development in Two Rodent Models of Cirrhosis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2019, 23, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  240. Athyros, V.G.; Alexandrides, T.K.; Bilianou, H.; Cholongitas, E.; Doumas, M.; Ganotakis, E.S.; Goudevenos, J.; Elisaf, M.S.; Germanidis, G.; Giouleme, O.; et al. The use of statins alone, or in combination with pioglitazone and other drugs, for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and related cardiovascular risk. An Expert Panel Statement. Metabolism 2017, 71, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Yan, M.; Qi, H.; Xia, T.; Zhao, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, Z.; Lu, C.; Ning, Z.; Chen, H.; Li, T.; et al. Metabolomics profiling of metformin-mediated metabolic reprogramming bypassing AMPKα. Metabolism 2019, 91, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Böttcher, K.; Longato, L.; Marrone, G.; Mazza, G.; Ghemtio, L.; Hall, A.; Luong, T.V.; Caruso, S.; Viollet, B.; Zucman-Rossi, J.; et al. AICAR and compound C negatively modulate HCC-induced primary human hepatic stellate cell activation in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2021, 320, G543–G556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Hu, L.; Zeng, Z.; Xia, Q.; Liu, Z.; Feng, X.; Chen, J.; Huang, M.; Chen, L.; Fang, Z.; Liu, Q.; et al. Metformin attenuates hepatoma cell proliferation by decreasing glycolytic flux through the HIF-1α/PFKFB3/PFK1 pathway. Life Sci. 2019, 239, 116966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Li, M.; Shao, J.; Guo, Z.; Jin, C.; Wang, L.; Wang, F.; Jia, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, F.; et al. Novel mitochondrion-targeting copper(II) complex induces HK2 malfunction and inhibits glycolysis via Drp1-mediating mitophagy in HCC. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 3091–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  245. Jin, C.; Li, Y.; Su, Y.; Guo, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Shao, J.; Zheng, S. Novel copper complex CTB regulates methionine cycle induced TERT hypomethylation to promote HCC cells senescence via mitochondrial SLC25A26. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Ren, T.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Zhu, J.; Jin, M.; Wu, Y.; Guo, X.; Ji, L.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, H.; et al. MCU-dependent mitochondrial Ca2+ inhibits NAD+/SIRT3/SOD2 pathway to promote ROS production and metastasis of HCC cells. Oncogene 2017, 36, 5897–5909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Jin, M.; Wang, J.; Ji, X.; Cao, H.; Zhu, J.; Chen, Y.; Yang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Ren, T.; Xing, J. MCUR1 facilitates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis via the mitochondrial calcium dependent ROS/Nrf2/Notch pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The prominent role of mitochondria in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sedentary lifestyle coupled to hypercaloric diet and genetic background lead to the development of insulin resistance (IR), which causes NAFLD onset. In addition, compensatory hyperinsulinemia activates de novo lipogenesis (DNL) and exacerbates hepatocytic fat accumulation. From the early stages of NAFLD, mitochondria adapt in number and function in response to lipid overload, increasing β-oxidation, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) capacity and biomass (mitochondrial adaptability). Nevertheless, mitochondrial flexibility is compromised during fatty liver progression towards NASH, resulting in blunted ketogenesis, tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), OXPHOS and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production. Consequently, mitochondrial oxidative stress and the release of mitochondrial danger signals worsen inflammation by recruiting and activating Kupffer cells (KCs) alongside fibrogenesis through hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) activation. The inflammatory response together with enhancing apoptosis and hypoxia contribute to generating the surrounding microenvironment that influences malignant transformation and tumor escaping mechanisms. Thus, the loss of mitochondrial dynamics, the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and the remodeling of mitochondrial activities may lead to metabolic reprogramming of hepatocytes, characterized by the switch towards the Warburg effect, mutagenesis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and several strategies of tumor escape from apoptosis in order to promote the compensatory proliferation and HCC onset.
Figure 1. The prominent role of mitochondria in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sedentary lifestyle coupled to hypercaloric diet and genetic background lead to the development of insulin resistance (IR), which causes NAFLD onset. In addition, compensatory hyperinsulinemia activates de novo lipogenesis (DNL) and exacerbates hepatocytic fat accumulation. From the early stages of NAFLD, mitochondria adapt in number and function in response to lipid overload, increasing β-oxidation, oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) capacity and biomass (mitochondrial adaptability). Nevertheless, mitochondrial flexibility is compromised during fatty liver progression towards NASH, resulting in blunted ketogenesis, tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), OXPHOS and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production. Consequently, mitochondrial oxidative stress and the release of mitochondrial danger signals worsen inflammation by recruiting and activating Kupffer cells (KCs) alongside fibrogenesis through hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) activation. The inflammatory response together with enhancing apoptosis and hypoxia contribute to generating the surrounding microenvironment that influences malignant transformation and tumor escaping mechanisms. Thus, the loss of mitochondrial dynamics, the accumulation of damaged mitochondria and the remodeling of mitochondrial activities may lead to metabolic reprogramming of hepatocytes, characterized by the switch towards the Warburg effect, mutagenesis, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and several strategies of tumor escape from apoptosis in order to promote the compensatory proliferation and HCC onset.
Ijms 22 04173 g001
Figure 2. The landscape of HCC microenvironment in NAFLD/NASH. Over NAFLD progression, ER/oxidative stress, loss of mitochondrial adaptability and mitochondrial failure activate hepatocellular apoptotic and inflammatory pathways. Hepatocytes release mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns (mito-DAMPs) derived from damaged mitochondria. Mito-DAMPs bind pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) on the Kupffer cells’ (KCs) and HSCs’ surface, exacerbating tissue inflammation and fibrosis. In addition, HSCs’ activation may also be stimulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines released from both hepatocytes and KCs. In turn, KCs enhance pro-proliferative signals (i.e., IL-6), thus triggering the compensatory proliferation of hepatocytes, a possible mechanism to avoid apoptosis. The continuous exposure to inflammation, fibrosis, and apoptotic signals worsens hepatic oxygen distribution (hypoxia). Hypoxia together with increased Ca2+ efflux, derived from the disruption of ER–mitochondrial communications, promote the growth of CSCs and the recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), T-regulatory cells (Treg) and dendritic cells, which suppress cytotoxic immune response and co-adjuvate hepatocarcinogenesis.
Figure 2. The landscape of HCC microenvironment in NAFLD/NASH. Over NAFLD progression, ER/oxidative stress, loss of mitochondrial adaptability and mitochondrial failure activate hepatocellular apoptotic and inflammatory pathways. Hepatocytes release mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns (mito-DAMPs) derived from damaged mitochondria. Mito-DAMPs bind pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) on the Kupffer cells’ (KCs) and HSCs’ surface, exacerbating tissue inflammation and fibrosis. In addition, HSCs’ activation may also be stimulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines released from both hepatocytes and KCs. In turn, KCs enhance pro-proliferative signals (i.e., IL-6), thus triggering the compensatory proliferation of hepatocytes, a possible mechanism to avoid apoptosis. The continuous exposure to inflammation, fibrosis, and apoptotic signals worsens hepatic oxygen distribution (hypoxia). Hypoxia together with increased Ca2+ efflux, derived from the disruption of ER–mitochondrial communications, promote the growth of CSCs and the recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), T-regulatory cells (Treg) and dendritic cells, which suppress cytotoxic immune response and co-adjuvate hepatocarcinogenesis.
Ijms 22 04173 g002
Figure 3. Mitochondrial pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of NASH-related HCC. Sedentary lifestyle, dietary habits and genetic background contribute to NAFLD development and its progression to NASH-driven HCC. The excess of hepatic fat accumulation promotes DNL, mitochondrial dysfunctions and the disruption of ER–mitochondrial contact sites. Consequently, the increased content of LDs may favor either lipotoxicity or energetic substrates for cell viability. The loss of mitochondrial flexibility and reduced mitophagy exacerbate the number of degenerated mitochondria, which produce ROS and release cytochrome C and AIF, thus activating apoptosis. The oxidative stress overwhelms antioxidant defenses, affects OXPHOS capacity, and triggers inflammatory signals (tumorigenic cytokines). In addition, ROS induce the mutagenesis of both nuclear DNA and mtDNA, causing the aberrant activation of proliferative pathways and the delivery of mito-DAMPs, respectively. Mito-Damps, including mitochondrial formyl-peptides and mtDNA fragments, could activate PRR receptors on the hepatocellular surface, KCs and HSCs, prompting inflammation and fibrosis. ROS-induced pro-survival signaling (i.e., JAK/STAT, ERK, MAPK) is able to counteract cell death by inducing the degradation of onco-suppressors and expanding the amount of hepatic progenitor cells. Moreover, the interruption of ER–mitochondria communication raises the efflux of cytosolic Ca2+, further contributing to ROS production and mutagenesis. Finally, hepatocytes undergo metabolic reprogramming, characterized by enhanced glucose uptake, high rates of glycolysis, and lactate production, which is rapidly secreted to avoid cytosolic acidification. Overall, a lipid-rich microenviroment combined with early loss of mitochondrial adaptability, both hallmarks of NAFLD onset and progression, may rearrange hepatocellular metabolism and the interplay between hepatocytes and non-parenchymal cells in order to overcome an adverse environment and trigger tumorigenesis.
Figure 3. Mitochondrial pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of NASH-related HCC. Sedentary lifestyle, dietary habits and genetic background contribute to NAFLD development and its progression to NASH-driven HCC. The excess of hepatic fat accumulation promotes DNL, mitochondrial dysfunctions and the disruption of ER–mitochondrial contact sites. Consequently, the increased content of LDs may favor either lipotoxicity or energetic substrates for cell viability. The loss of mitochondrial flexibility and reduced mitophagy exacerbate the number of degenerated mitochondria, which produce ROS and release cytochrome C and AIF, thus activating apoptosis. The oxidative stress overwhelms antioxidant defenses, affects OXPHOS capacity, and triggers inflammatory signals (tumorigenic cytokines). In addition, ROS induce the mutagenesis of both nuclear DNA and mtDNA, causing the aberrant activation of proliferative pathways and the delivery of mito-DAMPs, respectively. Mito-Damps, including mitochondrial formyl-peptides and mtDNA fragments, could activate PRR receptors on the hepatocellular surface, KCs and HSCs, prompting inflammation and fibrosis. ROS-induced pro-survival signaling (i.e., JAK/STAT, ERK, MAPK) is able to counteract cell death by inducing the degradation of onco-suppressors and expanding the amount of hepatic progenitor cells. Moreover, the interruption of ER–mitochondria communication raises the efflux of cytosolic Ca2+, further contributing to ROS production and mutagenesis. Finally, hepatocytes undergo metabolic reprogramming, characterized by enhanced glucose uptake, high rates of glycolysis, and lactate production, which is rapidly secreted to avoid cytosolic acidification. Overall, a lipid-rich microenviroment combined with early loss of mitochondrial adaptability, both hallmarks of NAFLD onset and progression, may rearrange hepatocellular metabolism and the interplay between hepatocytes and non-parenchymal cells in order to overcome an adverse environment and trigger tumorigenesis.
Ijms 22 04173 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Longo, M.; Paolini, E.; Meroni, M.; Dongiovanni, P. Remodeling of Mitochondrial Plasticity: The Key Switch from NAFLD/NASH to HCC. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084173

AMA Style

Longo M, Paolini E, Meroni M, Dongiovanni P. Remodeling of Mitochondrial Plasticity: The Key Switch from NAFLD/NASH to HCC. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(8):4173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084173

Chicago/Turabian Style

Longo, Miriam, Erika Paolini, Marica Meroni, and Paola Dongiovanni. 2021. "Remodeling of Mitochondrial Plasticity: The Key Switch from NAFLD/NASH to HCC" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 8: 4173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084173

APA Style

Longo, M., Paolini, E., Meroni, M., & Dongiovanni, P. (2021). Remodeling of Mitochondrial Plasticity: The Key Switch from NAFLD/NASH to HCC. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(8), 4173. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22084173

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop