Next Article in Journal
Thymosin β4 Is an Endogenous Iron Chelator and Molecular Switcher of Ferroptosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Sporulation Strategies and Potential Role of the Exosporium in Survival and Persistence of Clostridium botulinum
Previous Article in Journal
Multitalented Synthetic Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Antibacterial, Antifungal and Antiviral Mechanisms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enigmatic Pilus-Like Endospore Appendages of Bacillus cereus Group Species
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 1
10.3390/ijms23010550
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Insights into the Structure and Protein Composition of Moorella thermoacetica Spores Formed at Different Temperatures

by
Tiffany Malleck
1,2,
Fatima Fekraoui
2,
Isabelle Bornard
3,
Céline Henry
4,
Eloi Haudebourg
4,
Stella Planchon
2,* and
Véronique Broussolle
1,*
1
INRAE, Avignon Université, UMR SQPOV, F-84000 Avignon, France
2
Unité EMaiRIT’S, CTCPA, F-84911 Avignon, France
3
INRAE, Pathologie Végétale, F-84143 Avignon, France
4
PAPPSO, Micalis Institute, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, F-78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(1), 550; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010550
Submission received: 29 September 2021 / Revised: 22 December 2021 / Accepted: 23 December 2021 / Published: 4 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacterial Endospores: Stress Resistance and Germination)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The bacterium Moorella thermoacetica produces the most heat-resistant spores of any spoilage-causing microorganism known in the food industry. Previous work by our group revealed that the resistance of these spores to wet heat and biocides was lower when spores were produced at a lower temperature than the optimal temperature. Here, we used electron microcopy to characterize the ultrastructure of the coat of the spores formed at different sporulation temperatures; we found that spores produced at 55 °C mainly exhibited a lamellar inner coat tightly associated with a diffuse outer coat, while spores produced at 45 °C showed an inner and an outer coat separated by a less electron-dense zone. Moreover, misarranged coat structures were more frequently observed when spores were produced at the lower temperature. We then analyzed the proteome of the spores obtained at either 45 °C or 55 °C with respect to proteins putatively involved in the spore coat, exosporium, or in spore resistance. Some putative spore coat proteins, such as CotSA, were only identified in spores produced at 55 °C; other putative exosporium and coat proteins were significantly less abundant in spores produced at 45 °C. Altogether, our results suggest that sporulation temperature affects the structure and protein composition of M. thermoacetica spores.

1. Introduction

Endosporulation is an ancient mechanism, first appearing about 2 billion years ago, that allows Gram-positive bacteria to adapt to harsh environmental conditions. Bacterial spores are much more resistant than vegetative cells and are considered to be dormant forms, providing sporulated bacteria the ability to persist in the environment for several years [1].
The structure of a spore differs greatly from that of vegetative cells, with the chromosome in a dehydrated core, surrounded by several concentric layers: the inner forespore membrane, the germ cell wall, the cortex, the outer forespore membrane, the coat layers, and an outer layer structure, called the crust in Bacillus subtilis and the exosporium in other species of Bacillus and Clostridium [2]. This particular structure has been shown to provide the spores some ability to adhere to biotic and abiotic surfaces, as well as protection against various types of stress [1,2].
Dehydration of the spore core is a major factor in spores’ resistance to wet heat, which increases as the core water content decreases [3,4]. The cortex appears to play an important role in reducing the water content of the spore during spore formation, together with the accumulation of dipicolinic acid (DPA), a specific component of spores that complexes with Ca2+ late in sporulation and displaces core water [5,6]. The two spore maturation proteins SpmA and SpmB have been shown to play a major role in spore core dehydration, as spores lacking these proteins are characterized by higher core hydration [3,4]. Furthermore, the small acid-soluble proteins (SASPs) α/β, which saturate and stabilize spore DNA, contribute to spores’ resistance to UV-C and dry heat, as well as to genotoxic compounds such as nitrous acid and formaldehyde [7,8,9,10]. The external layers formed by the proteinaceous coat are associated with protection against lysozyme and oxidizing agents [11,12,13,14].
These spore resistance properties, as well as spore structure and composition, depend strongly on the conditions of sporulation. Sporulation temperature is known to alter spores’ resistance to various stress, such as wet heat and biocides [15,16,17,18,19,20,21], and can have significant effects, together with medium composition, on spore structure and composition, such as fatty acid content and protein content [15,16,17,22,23,24].
The resistance of bacterial spores to extreme conditions represents a particular challenge in the food industry, where they can be a major cause of food spoilage. Moorella thermoacetica is a significant problem in the canned food industry because its spores are the most heat resistant of any so far retrieved, with D values (decimal reduction times) up to 110 min at 121 °C [20,25]. Formerly known as Clostridium thermoaceticum, M. thermoacetica is a strictly anaerobic and thermophilic spore-forming bacterium [26]. Recently, we showed that M. thermoacetica spores produced at the lowest temperature at which growth is possible (i.e., 45 °C) were less heat resistant and less resistant to biocides than spores produced at the optimal growth temperature (i.e., 55 °C) [27].
To date, M. thermoacetica spore structure has been only poorly described and its spore protein composition remains unknown. Here, we aimed to determine if M. thermoacetica spores produced at two different temperatures, 45 °C and 55 °C, exhibited differences in terms of structure and protein composition. To achieve this, the surface structure and ultrastructure of spores produced at these two temperatures were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), respectively. Spore protein composition was then further analyzed using an LC-MS/MS label-free approach.
Using this approach, we are able to report that the coat ultrastructure of M. thermoacetica spores and the protein composition of spore layers are modified by suboptimal sporulation conditions.

2. Results

2.1. Spore Surface Structure

Spores of M. thermoacetica ATCC 39073 were produced on agar plates at either optimal growth temperature (55 °C) or suboptimal temperature (45 °C), with four batches of each. They were then observed by SEM (n = 78 and n = 73 spores, respectively). Spores produced at 55 °C appeared spherical and highly heterogeneous in terms of size (Figure 1A).
Indeed, spore diameter ranged from 0.87 to 1.65 µm, with an average size of 1.2 ± 0.1 µm. Spores produced at 45 °C exhibited the same morphology as at 55 °C (Figure S1), but were significantly smaller (p < 0.05), with a diameter ranging from 0.85 to 1.46 µm and an average size of 1.1 ± 0.1 µm (Tables S1 and S2). A large, loose structure was observed surrounding the spores (Figure 1B). This structure, which is assumed to be the exosporium, was more easily distinguished when spores were formed at 45 °C. The spore surface structure, as observed by SEM, did not seem to differ based on sporulation temperature.

2.2. Spore Ultrastructure

To determine if the spore ultrastructure is affected by sporulation temperature, we used TEM to describe M. thermoacetica spores produced at 55 °C or 45 °C (four independent batches; n = 38 and n = 45 spores, respectively). Spores produced at 55 °C were characterized, from the inner to the outer structure, by the presence of a core, a cortex and a coat, all surrounded by a large, loose exosporium, which appeared to be separated from the coat by an interspace (Figure 2A). The exosporium was observed, regardless of the sporulation temperature. The global structure of spores produced at 45 °C was very similar (Figure 2B); however, the border between the core and the cortex layer was more easily observed than in spores produced at 55 °C (Figure 2A,B).
Overall, two types of spores were observed: (1) spores with a lamellar inner coat in direct contact with a thinner, electron-dense and diffuse outer coat layer (Figure 3A), mainly observed in spores produced at 55 °C (30 spores out of the 45 observed); and (2) spores exhibiting the same inner and outer coat layers, which seemed to be separated by a less electron-dense zone (Figure 3B), mainly observed in spores produced at 45 °C (34 spores out of the 39 observed). Moreover, we sometimes observed the presence of highly electron-dense material accumulated in the inner spore coat layer, either surrounding the spore or present as small deposits (Figure 3C).
These structures were more frequently observed in spores produced at 55 °C than at 45 °C (18 and 2 spores, respectively). Moreover, some spores exhibited misarranged coats, which were loosely attached to the spore surface at some points, with protuberances in the outer coat (Figure 3E) or the outer coat and part of the inner coat partially detached from the spore surface (Figure 3D). These misarrangements were more frequently observed in spores produced at 45 °C than at 55 °C (17 out of the 39 observed spores and 9 out of 45 spores, respectively).

2.3. Identification of Spore Proteins in Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073

To identify spore-associated proteins in the genome of M. thermoacetica ATCC 39073 [28], we performed a BLAST search using amino-acid sequences of spore proteins, identified in previous proteomic or genomic analysis on Clostridium difficile, Clostridium perfringens, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus anthracis (see references in Table 1), belonging to the Clostridiales and Bacillales orders of the Firmicutes [29]. We mainly focused on proteins from the coat and exosporium layers, as well as proteins described as being involved in spore resistance properties. We searched for the presence/absence of about 200 spore-associated proteins (Table 1 and Table S2). From this, a total of 62 putative orthologs was identified in the M. thermoacetica genome (Table 1), with 51 of those corresponding to proteins known to be localized in the coat, exosporium, or spore membranes in other spore-forming bacteria.
Among the proteins associated with the exosporium, we identified orthologs of two rubrerythrins from C. difficile, as well as orthologs of CD0116, CD0117, and CD0118, which might play a role in oxidative stress resistance [30,31]. The moth_2167 gene was found to encode a putative alanine racemase and two putative arginases were also identified. Among the proteins associated with the coat, the moth_1319 gene appeared to encode an ortholog of the morphogenetic protein SpoIVA, which is necessary for proper assembly of the inner coat of B. subtilis. Among the structural coat proteins, we found orthologs of the inner coat layer proteins CotJB and CotJC, a putative CotSA ortholog, and two coat F-containing proteins. One of these latter proteins, encoded by the moth_1782 gene, was identified according to genome annotation and a blastP search against Clostridium proteins confirmed that this protein likely corresponds to an unidentified coat protein. The second coat F-containing protein, encoded by the moth_2016 gene, is homologous to the uncharacterized protein YhcQ of B. subtilis. In addition, we found an ortholog of a YabG protease that is associated with spore coat protein modification [32]. Among the spore coat proteins, we also identified a superoxide dismutase protein, which is thought to play a potential role in spore resistance to hydrogen peroxide [31]. Other putative spore coat proteins included the spore cortex-lytic hydrolases YaaH, YdhD, and YhxC, for which an additional role in B. subtilis competence has recently been reported [33]; and several proteins, such as YkvN, whose roles have not yet been described.
In this in silico analysis, we also identified proteins that are not described as coat or exosporium proteins but were isolated from spore coat and/or exosporium fractions in other spore formers. Among these, we found orthologs of proteins involved in germination such as Gpr, SleB, or YpeB, as well as an ortholog of the DacB protein, which modifies the degree of glycan cross-linking in the cortex [39]. Finally, we also identified six proteins corresponding to orthologs of α/β-SASPs, which have been implicated in spore resistance, as well as the proteins SpmA, SpmB, SpoVFA, and SpoVFB, which are involved in spore core hydration [4,7,8,10].

2.4. Proteomic Analysis of Spores Formed at Different Temperatures

A proteomic analysis was performed on total protein extracts of spores of M. thermoacetica ATCC 39073 produced at either 45 °C or 55 °C, which enabled the identification of a total of 1018 proteins (Tables S3 and S4). Of these, 91 were significantly differentially produced in spores formed at 45 °C versus 55 °C (Table S3).
Of the 62 putative spore-associated proteins identified by our in silico analysis, 24 were identified by LC-MS/MS and changes in their relative abundance between the two sporulation conditions were determined (Table 2). Based on localization data reported for other spore-forming bacteria, we found 7 putative exosporium-related proteins, 11 putative coat proteins, and 6 proteins that were putatively localized in the core, in the inner membrane, or had no assigned localization (Table 1 and Table 2).
Nineteen proteins were identified in both sets of spores (45 °C and 55 °C), although nine of these were significantly less abundant (padjust_value < 0.05) when spores were produced at 45 °C than at 55 °C (Table 2). For example, the exosporium oxidoreductase protein (Q2RIB2) was quantified with an average of 32 ± 4.6 versus 53 ± 4.6 spectra, respectively. Similar patterns were detected for the coatF-like protein Q2RHK6 (2.3 ± 2.1 versus 9.7 ± 3.2 spectra), the CotJC protein (1.7 ± 1.5 versus 8.3 ± 4.7 spectra), and the putative YmxG coat protein (2.3 ± 0.6 versus 8.3 ± 1.2 spectra in spores produced at 45 °C and 55 °C, respectively). The SpoIVA protein, which plays a role in spore coat formation, was detected with an average of 21.3 ± 12 versus 41 ± 6.6 spectra in spores produced at 45 °C and 55 °C, respectively.
Five proteins were identified in only one sporulation temperature condition (Table 2): the proteins CotSA, YpeB, SodF, the 2-oxoglutarate synthase (Q2RMG5), and CotJB were only identified in spores produced at 55 °C. Significant differences in relative abundance were noted for CotSA, YpeB, and SodF (padjust_value = 0.0002, 0.0057 and 0.0275, respectively), while CotJB and Q2RMG5 were present only at low levels in spores produced at 55 °C, and only in one and two of the three biological replicates, respectively (Table 2). We also noticed a high variability in the relative abundance of certain proteins, such as YpeB, SodF, and the oxidoreductase YqiG, which was due to a low number of spectral counts for these proteins and the variability among replicates of protein extracts. The potential exosporium-related arginase (Q2RHH4) was detected with 2.7 ± 1.2 spectra in spores produced at 45 °C and 1.3 ± 1.2 spectra in spores produced at 55 °C.

3. Discussion

3.1. Coat Layers of Moorella thermoacetica Differ According to Sporulation Temperature

Previous work by our group revealed that spores of M. thermoacetica ATCC 39073 that were produced on solid medium at 45 °C were less resistant to wet heat and peracetic acid (PAA) than spores produced at 55 °C [27]. Here, we investigated whether these differences in resistance could be explained by modification in the structure and/or protein composition of spores formed at different sporulation temperatures.
Using SEM and TEM, we characterized the spore surface and ultrastructure of M. thermoacetica spores formed at either 45 °C or 55 °C. To our knowledge, this work produced the first SEM images describing spore surface features of M. thermoacetica. These SEM observations showed that the spores were spherical and had a similar shape regardless of sporulation temperature. However, spores produced at the optimal temperature (55 °C) were significantly bigger than spores produced at 45 °C, as previously reported for B. weihenstephanensis [18]. At both sporulation temperatures, we observed a loose structure on the spore surface, which we assumed to be the exosporium layer.
Observations using TEM revealed that M. thermoacetica spores exhibited the layers classically described in bacterial endospores, namely, the cortex, the coat, and a large exosporium surrounding the spore. The presence of an exosporium was previously described for spores of M. thermoacetica JW/DB-2 [20]; in this strain, as for C. difficile, the exosporium is in close contact with the spore coat [20,36]. In contrast, the exosporium of M. thermoacetica ATCC 39073 seemed to be loose and separated from the coat layers by an interspace, as observed in B. cereus and B. anthracis [40]. Moreover, the exosporium surface of Moorella spores lacked any discernable “hair-like” projections, which have been reported in spores of C. difficile, C. sporogenes, B. cereus, and B. anthracis [36,37,41,42,43].
While the structure of the exosporium did not seem to differ between sporulation temperatures, we observed that the coat structure was indeed altered. Most of the spores produced at 55 °C exhibited a coat composed of a lamellar inner coat in direct contact with a thinner and more diffuse, but electron-dense, outer coat, while the inner and outer coat of spores produced at 45 °C were more frequently separated by a less electron-dense intermediate layer. A similar pattern was previously observed for B. subtilis spores produced at suboptimal temperature [44]. Moreover, spore coat misarrangements were more frequently observed for spores produced at 45 °C than at 55 °C. We hypothesize that the coat may be less organized when spores are produced at temperatures closer to the lower limit possible for growth. In line with this, we also noticed that the spore core and cortex were more easily observed in spores produced at 45 °C. This observation might be due to a better permeation of staining inside spores produced at the lower temperature and, thus, certain structural differences.
Taken together, these observations might help to explain the weaker resistance properties we previously reported for M. thermoacetica spores produced at 45 °C [27]. In a similar way, previous research has reported that B. subtilis cotE spores that lack most coat proteins were more sensitive to glutaraldehyde, lysozyme, and oxidizing agents [11,12,13,14]. Another study showed that B. cereus spores lacking CotE exhibited coat defects and were less resistant to lysozyme and an oxidizing agent; interestingly, though, the mutant spores were also more resistant to heat [45].

3.2. Identification of Spore Protein Orthologs in Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073

To further investigate the differences in coat structure, we analyzed and compared the protein composition of M. thermoacetica spores produced at 45 °C and 55 °C. We chose to focus our data analysis on proteins that have been linked with the spore coat and exosporium in other spore formers and on proteins associated with spore resistance properties.
As the M. thermoacetica ATCC 39073 genome is poorly annotated with respect to these proteins, we first searched for orthologs for about 200 proteins that have been previously retrieved from coat or exosporium fractions of other spore-forming bacteria. In total, about 25% of these had orthologs in M. thermoacetica [34,35,37,38]. None of the morphogenetic proteins that have been reported as components of the B. cereus or B. anthracis exosporium—such as ExsA, ExsY, CotY, BxpB, ExsM, and ExsFB [38,41,42,46]—were identified in the M. thermoacetica genome. We did identify putative orthologs of several C. difficile exosporium proteins, but not of the morphogenetic CdeC, CdeM, or BclA proteins (Table S2) [37,38]. As TEM images clearly showed the presence of a large exosporium surrounding the M. thermoacetica spores, we hypothesize that the Moorella exosporium proteins are different from those of other spore formers, including closely related Clostridium species. Indeed, spore surface proteins are thought to be subjected to a great deal of evolutionary pressure for adaptation to different ecological niches [41]. The in silico analysis also allowed us to identify an ortholog of the well-conserved inner coat morphogenetic protein, SpoIVA [47,48,49,50]. However, no matches were found for the morphogenetic coat proteins SafA and CotE, which are essential for the assembly of the coat basement layer and the outer coat layer, respectively, in B. subtilis and B. cereus spores [41,45]. This observation is consistent with the fact that these proteins are not conserved in Clostridia [41,47,48,50]. Furthermore, we found no equivalent in M. thermoacetica for the spore coat morphogenetic protein SipL, which plays an essential role in spore coat assembly in C. difficile by interacting with SpoIVA [51,52,53]. SipL is thought to be a homolog of the B. subtilis spore coat morphogenetic protein SpoVID, which does not seem to be conserved in Clostridia or M. thermoacetica [41,48,50]. Moreover, although it has been hypothesized that the C. difficile CotA protein could play a role in outer spore coat assembly, similarly to the Bacillus CotE protein [54], our in silico analysis did not identify any CotA ortholog in the M. thermoacetica genome.
Apart from spore coat morphogenetic proteins, few coat proteins were identified by the in silico analysis. Among the proteins known to be associated with the inner coat, we identified CotJB and CotJC, but not CotJA. In B. subtilis, these three proteins are encoded by the tricistronic operon cotJA-cotJB-cotJC [55]; however, a comparative genomic study showed that the CotJA, CotJB, and CotJC orthologs are not always found together [47]. Our analysis also identified a YhaX ortholog, corresponding to a spore-coat basement protein, as well as an ortholog of the C. difficile CotG catalase [54]. However, we found no ortholog of B. subtilis CotG, which has a negative effect on CotU, CotC and CotS assembly [56]; these three coat proteins were likewise absent in the M. thermoacetica genome.
Several orthologs of inner membrane proteins were present in M. thermoacetica, including three putative spore cortex lytic enzymes (SleB) and the YpeB protein, which has been shown to be required for SleB stabilization, via protein–protein interactions, and subsequent germination of B. anthracis spores [57]. We also identified orthologs of two other widely conserved germination proteins, Gpr and YtfJ/GerW [49]. Moreover, we found two serine-type D-Ala-D-Ala carboxypeptidases that correspond to putative orthologs of DacB (the first and second BlastP hits were Q2RIR9 (moth_1058) and Q2RJL7 (moth_1357), respectively), which is involved in peptidoglycan cross-linking [4,39,58]. In B. subtilis, the dacB gene is located in an operon with spmA and spmB, while in C. perfringens dacB is monocistronic [4]. In M. thermoacetica, SpmA and SpmB are encoded by moth_1356 and moth_1355, respectively. As the Q2RIR9 and Q2RJL7 proteins were similar, we considered them both to be potential DacB proteins. Interestingly, we identified several orthologs encoding proteins that are thought to play a role in preventing spore germination, such as the alanine racemase Alr, or that have been implicated in spore resistance, such as the coat protein SodF, which is associated with a potential resistance to oxidizing agents, and two potential exosporium-related rubrerythrins. However, as mentioned above, the CotA protein, which is associated with resistance to oxidizing chemicals in B. subtilis but is absent in Clostridia [41], was not identified here.
We also identified orthologs for all the spore resistance-associated proteins localized in the inner spore layers, including the α/β-type SASPs SspA and SspF. Several studies have shown that α/β-type SASPs in Bacilli and Clostridia play a major role in protecting spore DNA against UV-C and genotoxic chemicals [1,8,10]. We also found orthologs of the two conserved proteins SpmA and SpmB, which play an essential role in spore core hydration [1,3,4,39,49], as well as SpoVFA and SpoVFB, which are essential for DPA production. DPA chelates with Ca2+ to form Ca-DPA, which is imported into the forespore core and lowers the spore water content, thus improving its resistance properties [2]. Ca-DPA has been shown to play a role in spore resistance to both heat and chemicals [5,31,59].

3.3. Proteins Extracted from Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073 Spores Differ Based on Sporulation Temperature

Our morphological analysis revealed that spore structure in M. thermoacetica, and more precisely, the arrangement of the coat layers, seemed to be modified by sporulation temperature at a temperature close to the lower limit for growth. We therefore investigated if the differences we observed in coat structure could be due to a difference in protein composition.
A proteomic analysis allowed the identification of 1018 spore proteins (Tables S3 and S4). However, despite the purification steps we carried out after spore harvesting, it is possible that spore suspensions may have contained some debris from vegetative cells, due to the low sporulation efficiency of this bacterium; indeed, an earlier report on another strain of M. thermoacetica found that only 5% of the cells formed spores [60]. For this reason, we focused only the putative spore structural or spore-associated proteins, identified in our in silico analysis.
Of the 62 spore proteins identified in the genome of M. thermoacetica ATCC 39073, 24 were detected by LC-MS/MS analysis. We found seven proteins that were potentially associated with the exosporium layer, such as the two rubrerythrins Rbr, encoded by the moth_1286 and moth_1279 loci [31], as well as a putative arginase [61], an enolase, and an alanine racemase. The protein product of the moth_1518 locus, which was identified as an ortholog of an uncharacterized exosporium protein, was significantly less abundant in spores produced at 45 °C, while the putative arginase encoded by the moth_1815 locus was slightly more abundant.
Among the 11 putative coat proteins retrieved, the coat morphogenetic protein SpoIVA appeared to be less abundant in protein extracts from spores produced at 45 °C than at 55 °C (padjust_value < 0.05). Given that our TEM analysis found that spores produced at 45 °C exhibited more coat misarrangement, and that SpoIVA is essential for coat formation [41], it is tempting to hypothesize that the lower amount of this protein in spores produced at 45 °C may lead to a reduced cohesion of the M. thermoacetica spore coat.
Four spore coat proteins were less abundant in protein extracts of spores produced at the suboptimal compared to the optimal temperature, such as the coat-F containing protein, encoded by the moth_1782 locus and the inner coat protein CotJC. Instead, CotSA and SodF were not detected in spores produced at 45 °C. In C. difficile, the superoxide dismutase SodF likely plays a role in polymerizing the spore coat protein monomers by oxidative cross-linking in the presence of H2O2, while CotJC might be involved in resistance to oxidative stress, although in both cases their protective role remains to be elucidated [41,54]. If SodF and CotJC do in fact play a protective role and are less abundant in spores produced at 45 °C than at 55 °C, this might explain, at least partially, the lower resistance of M. thermoacetica spores to peracetic acid when formed at a suboptimal temperature [27].
Altogether, we report that certain proteins were relatively less abundant in spores produced at 45 °C than in those formed at 55 °C. This could be due to a true difference in abundance between spores formed at different temperatures and/or that a different structuration of spores allowed these proteins to be more readily extracted at 55 °C. Our results do not allow us to determine which hypothesis is valid, but overall, they point to modifications in M. thermoacetica spore coat composition and/or structure that appear to be based on sporulation temperature. In this, our study is in agreement with work in B. subtilis, showing that the amount of extracted outer spore coat proteins, such as CotA, CotU, CotG, or CotQ, as well as crust proteins, such as CotX, CotY, and CotZ, varied depending on the sporulation conditions [23]. It was also shown that fewer CotA and CotS proteins were extracted from B. subtilis spores produced at a high temperature [15], while another recent study revealed that CotG and CotB were more abundantly extracted from spores produced at 25 °C than from spores produced at 42 °C [44].
In conclusion, we investigated the structure and protein composition of M. thermoacetica spores produced at optimal and low-limit growth temperatures. Using electron microscopy, we showed that spores produced at 45 °C were smaller than those formed at 55 °C. Moreover, spores exhibited some differences in the inner coat structure depending on the sporulation temperature. We found that the spore protein composition varied between sporulation temperatures and, more precisely, that fewer spore coat proteins were extracted from spores produced at 45 °C. It is possible to hypothesize that the morphological differences observed between spores produced at 45 °C and 55 °C could be due to (1) a lower abundance of structural proteins in spores produced at 45 °C, leading to a more loosely arranged coat aspect; and/or (2) differences in protein cross-linking between spores produced at 45 °C and 55 °C. The differences observed in terms of protein composition and, in particular, the lower abundance of SodF and certain structural coat proteins in spores produced at 45 °C might be involved in the differing resistance properties of these spores to wet heat and biocides. However, more work is needed to improve the purification process for Moorella spores, as well as the extraction of insoluble spore proteins to (1) provide a more thorough characterization of M. thermoacetica spore proteins and those associated with specific layers (i.e., coat and exosporium); and (2) confirm the differences we noticed in spore protein composition between the two temperature conditions and highlight other potential variations. Indeed, several parameters play a role in spore resistance to chemicals and wet heat, such as DPA content, spore core dehydration, and inner-membrane fatty-acid content [16,22,62]. It would therefore be interesting to further characterize M. thermoacetica spores in order to better understand how sporulation temperature affects Moorella spore resistance, to decipher how these spores are able to exhibit such robust resistance properties.

4. Material and Methods

4.1. Strain and Spore Production

This study was performed with the Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073 strain. The bacteria were stored in a cryogenic preservative solution with beads (AES Chemunex, Bruz, France). Pre-cultures were performed by dropping three beads in 10 mL of modified deoxygenated DTB medium (modDTB: 9 g/L tryptone, 4 g/L tryptose, 7 g/L soytone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L sodium chloride, 1 g/L potato starch, and 10 g/L D-glucose). All components were purchased from Biokar Diagnostics, (Allonne, France) or Thermo Fisher Diagnostics (Dardilly, France). Pre-cultures were incubated at 55 °C for 4 to 6 days in anaerobiosis with paraffin. A volume of 200 µL of pre-culture was inoculated into 10-mL tubes of modDTB that have been previously reduced in an anaerobic chamber for 24 to 48 h (90% N2, 5% H2, 5% CO2, Whitley A35 Workstation, Don Whitley Scientific, Bingley, UK). Anaerobiosis was maintained with paraffin and cultures were incubated either at 55 °C for 4 to 5 days or at 45 °C for 13 days. Sporulation was then promoted by pouring 2 mL of cultures onto the surface of 140-mm-diameter meat liver agar plates (MLA, Biokar Diagnostics, Allonne, France). Plates were incubated under anaerobiosis (Oxoïd™ AnaeroGen™ jars and sachets, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France) at either 45 °C or 55 °C. Sporulation was checked and stopped after 3 to 4 weeks of incubation; plates were incubated at room temperature for an additional week. Spores were then harvested with cold sterile water, centrifuged at 1400× g for 20 min at 4 °C, and resuspended in sterile water. Unless otherwise stated, the suspensions were heat-treated at 100 °C for 10 min to inactivate the residual vegetative forms and germinated spores [27]. Spore suspensions were stored at 4 °C until use.

4.2. Spore Purification

One-milliliter aliquots of heat-treated spore suspensions were briefly centrifuged at 200× g for 1 min at 4 °C and the supernatant was removed. The spore purification protocol, adapted from Aoyama [60], was as follows: spores were resuspended in 1 mL of 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 8.0 containing 1.7 µg/µL lysozyme (Sigma Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) and incubated overnight at 37 °C with continuous stirring. Lysis of remaining vegetative cells was checked under a phase-contrast microscope (Leica DM750, France). Spore suspensions were washed three times in 1 mL of cold sterile distilled water, centrifuged at 5000× g for 10 min at 8 °C, resuspended in 1 mL of 1% SDS (v/v) (Sigma Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France), and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h with continuous stirring. Spores were then washed three times in cold sterile distilled water at 5000× g for 10 min at 20 °C and the presence of phase-bright spores was checked under a phase-contrast microscope. Spore suspensions were stored at 4 °C until use.

4.3. Spore Structure Analysis

For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), freshly harvested and non-heat-treated spores were re-suspended in 40 mL of cold sterile water and washed four times by centrifugation at 1400× g for 20 min. Spores were prepared as previously described [45], except that post-fixation was performed with 1% osmium tetroxide. Four independent spore batches per sporulation temperature (45 °C and 55 °C) were used and up to 17 spores were observed per batch.
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), freshly harvested and non-heat-treated spore suspensions were filtered on a 0.45-µm porosity membrane (Nucleopore, Whatman, Dutscher, Bernolsheim, France). Spores retained on the filter were fixed for 1 h at room temperature with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (v/v) in a 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 1 mg/mL ruthenium red. The filter was washed three times in 0.2 M sodium cacodylate. Spores were post-fixed for 1 h at room temperature with 1% osmium tetroxide. Filters were then washed several times with water and placed in 30% ethanol. Spores were subjected to successive agitated dehydration baths containing increasing concentrations of ethanol (50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%). Next, samples were transferred into a hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) bath until completely evaporated. Filters were pasted on a metallic support and gold plated. Observations were performed at 10 KV (SEM; Microscope FEI—Philips XL-30, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). Four batches were used per sporulation temperature and a total of up to 35 spores was observed per batch.

4.4. Spore Size Measurement

To measure the diameter of spores produced at 45 °C and 55 °C, SEM images were analyzed using ImageJ analysis software (v. 1.51j8, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). A total of 73 and 78 spores from the four batches produced at 45 °C and 55 °C, respectively, was measured. The normality of the data distribution and the homogeneity of variance were tested using a Shapiro–Wilk test and a Fisher test, respectively. A Student’s t-test was performed to compare mean diameter values (Table S1). All statistical tests were conducted using XLSTAT (v. 2017.7) or utility software (Anastats Scop SARL, Rilly-sur-Vienne, France).

4.5. Spore Protein Extraction and Electrophoresis

Aliquots of 1 mL of spore suspensions (approx. 107 spores/mL, depending on the batch) were centrifuged at 5000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. Spores were then resuspended in 1 mL of extraction buffer composed of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 7.5, 1 X protease-inhibiting cocktail (cOmplete™ mini Protease inhibitor cocktail EDTA-free Roche, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France) and 5 mM EDTA pH 8.0 (UltraPure™ 0.5 M EDTA, ThermoFisher Scientific, Villebon sur Yvette, France). Spores were lysed using 0.1-mm-diameter silica beads (MP biomedicals, Illkirch, France) in a Fast-Prep 120 machine (FastPrep® FP120 Cell Disrupter, Thermo Savant, Illkirch, France). A series of 20 to 25 runs of 45 s at the maximal speed of 6.5 were performed until spores were completely lysed, as observed under a phase-contrast microscope. Samples were placed on ice for 1 min between runs to prevent protein degradation by over-heating.
Proteins were quantified using a colorimetric method based on the Bradford dye-binding assay, following the manufacturer’s instructions (Bio-Rad protein assay, Life Science, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). Extracted proteins were mixed with 1X Laemmli buffer (Bio-Rad, Life Science, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) to which 2.5% β-mercaptoethanol was added, and heated at 100 °C for 10 min. A short migration of the proteins was carried out on a 12% polyacrylamide gel using the following program: 20 min at 90 V and at 150 V to obtain a 5 mm in length migration. The gel was stained with imperial blue (Imperial™ Protein Stain, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Villebon sur Yvette, France) (Figure S3) and destained overnight in water; each lane was then cut in 3-mm squares for subsequent proteomic analysis.

4.6. LC-MS/MS Analysis

4.6.1. Protein In-Gel Digestion

Each cut piece of gel was washed for 15 min with a 1:1 mixture of acetonitrile and 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate. The proteins contained in the gel were reduced with 10 mM dithiothreitol (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and alkylated with 55 mM iodoacetamide (Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) [63]. Digestion was performed in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH 8.0) and the quantity of modified trypsin (sequencing grade Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was adjusted in order to have an enzyme-to-protein ratio (w/w) equal to 1:50 in each sample. Digestion was carried out overnight at 37 °C and the supernatant was conserved. Peptides were extracted with 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in water/acetonitrile (v/v). Supernatants and extracted tryptic peptides were dried and resuspended at a concentration of 40 ng/µL in 0.08% (v/v) TFA and 2% (v/v) acetonitrile. We then injected 160 ng (according to the protein concentration measured prior to digestion) in the LC-MS/MS apparatus.
Peptide samples were solubilized in a buffer of 2% CH3CN, 0.08% TFA. Liquid chromatography was performed on a NanoLC Ultra system (Eksigent, AB SCIEX, Dublin, CA, USA). Samples were loaded at 7.5 μL min−1 on a C18 precolumn (5 μm, 100 μm i.d. × 2 cm length; NanoSeparations, Nieuwkoop, The Netherlands) connected to a separating Thermo PepMap 2 C18 column (2 μm, 75 μm i.d. × 25 cm length, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in water and solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in ACN. Peptide separation was achieved using a linear gradient from 5% to 30% of solvent B for 75 min at 300 nL min−1. Including the regeneration and the equilibration steps, a single run took 93 min. Eluted peptides were analyzed with a Q Exactive PLUS mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) using a nanoelectrospray interface. Ionization was performed with a 1.3 kV spray voltage applied to an uncoated capillary probe (10μm i.d., New Objective, Littleton, MA, USA). Acquisition was performed in data-dependent mode and fragmentation occurred in HCD (Higher energy collisional dissociation). This included a full MS scan covering a mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 300 to 1400 with a resolution of 70,000 and an MS/MS step (normalized collision energy, 27%; resolution, 17,500). Dynamic exclusion was set to 40 s.
The mass spectrometry proteomics raw data were deposited in the PRIDE partner repository [64], as a ProteomeXchange dataset [65], with the identifier PXD029621 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD029621, accessed on 8 November 2021).

4.6.2. Identification and Quantification of Proteins

Data were converted to mzXML format using MS convert (ProteoWizard v 3.0.8934). Proteins were identified using X!Tandem v.2015.04.01.1 [66] by matching peptides against the UniprotKB Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073 database containing 2452 entries (http://www.uni-prot.org/proteomes/UP000007053, accessed on 29 September 2021). Proteins were filtered and grouped using the X!TandemPipeline software v.3.4.2 [67], open-source software developed by PAPPSO (http://pappso.inrae.fr/bioinfo/xtandempipeline/, accessed on 29 September 2021). To eliminate the spectra created by the contaminants, data were also compared to a contaminant database.
Proteome identification was carried out with a precursor mass tolerance of 10 ppm and a fragment mass tolerance of 0.02 Da. Enzymatic cleavage rules were set to trypsin digestion (“after Arg and Lys, unless Pro follows directly after”) and no semi-enzymatic cleavage rules were allowed. The fix modification was set to cysteine carbamidomethylation and methionine oxidation was considered as a potential modification. In a second pass, N-terminal acetylation was added as another potential modification, but all other previous settings were retained. The identified proteins were filtered as follows: (1) peptide E-value < 0.05 with a minimum of 2 peptides per protein; and (2) a protein E-value of <10−4. Table S3 contains information on the number of spectra of at least 2, in at least one condition, for the 45 °C and the 55 °C samples and FDR peptides = 0.02% and FDR proteins = 0.09%. Table S4 reports peptides corresponding to proteins identified in Table S3.
Protein abundance values were calculated using spectral counts from three independent biological replicates. We used a rough semi-quantitative method, which allows us to detect large variations in abundance, including presence/absence variations [68,69,70]. In addition, normalization was done according to the method
n × M s T s
where n refers to the number of spectra identified per protein in the sample, Ms refers to the mean sum of spectra identified for each sample, and Ts refers to the total number of spectra per sample.
MassChroqR (version 0.3.7), an R toolbox developed by the PAPPSO platform (http://pappso.inrae.fr/, accessed on 29 September 2021), was used to check the quality of the data and perform statistical analysis on the proteomic data. The significance of variation was determined by an ANOVA (analysis of variance) test in all analyses. The obtained p-values were adjusted for multiple testing by the Benjamini–Hochberg approach [71]. The padjust_values obtained from the ANOVA for the proteomic data were considered significant below a value of 0.05 in SC.

4.7. Identification of Spore-Associated Proteins

Using the Blast-P tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 29 September 2021), the amino-acid sequences of the spore-associated proteins from several spore-forming species [34,35,37,38,72] were used to query the M. thermoacetica ATCC 39073 genome. To define a “hit”, we considered several criteria: % of identity or homology, % of protein coverage, and a minimal E-value of 2.00 × 10−6.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23010550/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.B., T.M. and S.P.; methodology, T.M., F.F., I.B. and E.H.; validation, T.M., V.B. and S.P.; formal analysis, T.M. and S.P.; investigation, T.M., F.F. and I.B.; resources, T.M. and F.F.; data curation, T.M., E.H., C.H. and S.P.; writing—original draft preparation, T.M., S.P. and V.B.; writing—review and editing, T.M., S.P., I.B., F.F., E.H., C.H. and V.B.; visualization, T.M., I.B., V.B. and S.P.; supervision, S.P. and V.B.; project administration, S.P. and V.B.; funding acquisition, S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Tiffany Malleck received financial support for her PhD thesis from the Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie (ANRT), France and FranceAgriMer (FAM).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw LC-MS/MS data were deposited in the PRIDE partner repository as a ProteomeXchange dataset (PXD029621).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Isabelle Martin-Verstraete, Mohammed Jebbar and Frédéric Carlin for helpful discussions and Bénédicte Doublet for providing help with protein extraction. Part of this work was supported by the microscopy facilities of Platform 3A, funded by the European Regional Development Fund, the French Ministry of Research, Higher Education and Innovation, the Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur region, the Departmental Council of Vaucluse and the Urban Community of Avignon.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Setlow, P. Spore Resistance Properties. Microbiol. Spectr. 2014, 2, 201–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Leggett, M.J.; McDonnell, G.; Denyer, S.; Setlow, S.; Maillard, J.-Y. Bacterial spore structures and their protective role in biocide resistance. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 113, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Popham, D.L.; Sengupta, S.; Setlow, P. Heat, hydrogen peroxide, and UV resistance of Bacillus subtilis spores with increased core water content and with or without major DNA-binding proteins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 3633–3638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Paredes-Sabja, D.; Raju, D.; Torres, J.A.; Sarker, M.R. Role of small, acid-soluble spore proteins in the resistance of Clostridium perfringens spores to chemicals. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 122, 333–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Setlow, P. Spores of Bacillus subtilis: Their resistance to and killing by radiation, heat and chemicals. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 101, 514–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Setlow, P.; Christie, G. What’s new and notable in bacterial spore killing! World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tennen, R.; Setlow, B.; Davis, K.; Loshon, C.; Setlow, P. Mechanisms of killing of spores of Bacillus subtilis by iodine, glutaraldehyde and nitrous acid. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 89, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Raju, D.; Setlow, P.; Sarker, M.R. Antisense-RNA-Mediated Decreased Synthesis of Small, Acid-Soluble Spore Proteins Leads to Decreased Resistance of Clostridium perfringens Spores to Moist Heat and UV Radiation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 2048–2053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Setlow, P. I will survive: DNA protection in bacterial spores. Trends Microbiol. 2007, 15, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paredes-Sabja, D.; Bond, C.; Carman, R.J.; Setlow, P.; Sarker, M.R. Germination of spores of Clostridium difficile strains, including isolates from a hospital outbreak of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD). Microbiology 2008, 154, 2241–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Riesenman, P.J.; Nicholson, W.L. Role of the Spore Coat Layers in Bacillus subtilis Spore Resistance to Hydrogen Peroxide, Artificial UV-C, UV-B, and Solar UV Radiation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ghosh, S.; Setlow, B.; Wahome, P.G.; Cowan, A.E.; Plomp, M.; Malkin, A.J.; Setlow, P. Characterization of Spores of Bacillus subtilis That Lack Most Coat Layers. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 6741–6748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Leggett, M.J.; Schwarz, J.S.; Burke, P.A.; McDonnell, G.; Denyer, S.P.; Maillard, J.-Y. Resistance to and killing by the sporicidal microbicide peracetic acid. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 70, 773–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Leggett, M.J.; Schwarz, J.S.; Burke, P.A.; McDonnell, G.; Denyer, S.P.; Maillard, J.-Y. Mechanism of Sporicidal Activity for the Synergistic Combination of Peracetic Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Melly, E.; Genest, P.; Gilmore, M.; Little, S.; Popham, D.; Driks, A.; Setlow, P. Analysis of the properties of spores of Bacillus subtilis prepared at different temperatures. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 92, 1105–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Planchon, S.; Dargaignaratz, C.; Levy, C.; Ginies, C.; Broussolle, V.; Carlin, F. Spores of Bacillus cereus strain KBAB4 produced at 10°C and 30°C display variations in their properties. Food Microbiol. 2011, 28, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Baweja, R.B.; Zaman, M.S.; Mattoo, A.R.; Sharma, K.; Tripathi, V.; Aggarwal, A.; Dubey, G.P.; Kurupati, R.K.; Ganguli, M.; Chaudhury, N.K.; et al. Properties of Bacillus anthracis spores prepared under various environmental conditions. Arch. Microbiol. 2007, 189, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garcia, D.; van der Voort, M.; Abee, T. Comparative analysis of Bacillus weihenstephanensis KBAB4 spores obtained at different temperatures. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 140, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mtimet, N.; Trunet, C.; Mathot, A.-G.; Venaille, L.; Leguérinel, I.; Coroller, L.; Couvert, O. Modeling the behavior of Geobacillus stearothermophilus ATCC 12980 throughout its life cycle as vegetative cells or spores using growth boundaries. Food Microbiol. 2015, 48, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Byrer, D.E.; Rainey, F.A.; Wiegel, J. Novel strains of Moorella thermoacetica form unusually heat-resistant spores. Arch. Microbiol. 2000, 174, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Baril, E.; Coroller, L.; Couvert, O.; El Jabri, M.; Leguerinel, I.; Postollec, F.; Boulais, C.; Carlin, F.; Mafart, P. Sporulation boundaries and spore formation kinetics of Bacillus spp. as a function of temperature, pH and aw. Food Microbiol. 2012, 32, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rose, R.; Setlow, B.; Monroe, A.; Mallozzi, M.; Driks, A.; Setlow, P. Comparison of the properties of Bacillus subtilis spores made in liquid or on agar plates. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 103, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abhyankar, W.R.; Kamphorst, K.; Swarge, B.N.; Van Veen, H.; van der Wel, N.; Brul, S.; de Koster, C.; De Koning, L.J. The Influence of Sporulation Conditions on the Spore Coat Protein Composition of Bacillus subtilis Spores. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bressuire-Isoard, C.; Broussolle, V.; Carlin, F. Sporulation environment influences spore properties in Bacillus: Evidence and insights on underlying molecular and physiological mechanisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 42, 614–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. André, S.; Vallaeys, T.; Planchon, S. Spore-forming bacteria responsible for food spoilage. Res. Microbiol. 2017, 168, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Collins, M.D.; Lawson, P.A.; Willems, A.; Córdoba, J.J.; Fernandez-Garayzabal, J.F.; Garcia, P.; Cai, J.; Hippe, H.; Farrow, J.A.E. The Phylogeny of the Genus Clostridium: Proposal of Five New Genera and Eleven New Species Combinations. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1994, 44, 812–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Malleck, T.; Daufouy, G.; André, S.; Broussolle, V.; Planchon, S. Temperature impacts the sporulation capacities and spore resistance of Moorella thermoacetica. Food Microbiol. 2018, 73, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pierce, E.; Xie, G.; Barabote, R.D.; Saunders, E.; Han, C.S.; Detter, J.C.; Richardson, P.; Brettin, T.S.; Das, A.; Ljungdahl, L.G.; et al. The complete genome sequence of Moorella thermoacetica (f. Clostridium thermoaceticum). Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 10, 2550–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Antunes, L.C.; Poppleton, D.; Klingl, A.; Criscuolo, A.; Dupuy, B.; Brochier-Armanet, C.; Beloin, C.; Gribaldo, S. Phylogenomic analysis supports the ancestral presence of LPS-outer membranes in the Firmicutes. eLife 2016, 5, e14589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Das, A.; Coulter, E.D.; Kurtz, D.M.; Ljungdahl, L.G. Five-Gene Cluster in Clostridium thermoaceticum Consisting of Two Divergent Operons Encoding Rubredoxin Oxidoreductase- Rubredoxin and Rubrerythrin–Type A Flavoprotein–High-Molecular-Weight Rubredoxin. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 1560–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Gil, F.; Lagos-Moraga, S.; Calderón-Romero, P.; Pizarro-Guajardo, M.; Paredes-Sabja, D. Updates on Clostridium difficile spore biology. Anaerobe 2017, 45, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Takamatsu, H.; Imamura, A.; Kodama, T.; Asai, K.; Ogasawara, N.; Watabe, K. The yabG gene of Bacillus subtilis encodes a sporulation specific protease which is involved in the processing of several spore coat proteins. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000, 192, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Boonstra, M.; Schaffer, M.; Sousa, J.; Morawska, L.; Holsappel, S.; Hildebrandt, P.; Sappa, P.K.; Rath, H.; de Jong, A.; Lalk, M.; et al. Analyses of competent and non-competent subpopulations of Bacillus subtilis reveal yhfW, yhxC and ncRNAs as novel players in competence. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 2312–2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Abhyankar, W.; Ter Beek, A.; Dekker, H.; Kort, R.; Brul, S.; de Koster, C.G. Gel-free proteomic identification of the Bacillus subtilis insoluble spore coat protein fraction. Proteomics 2011, 11, 4541–4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abhyankar, W.; Hossain, A.H.; Djajasaputra, A.; Permpoonpattana, P.; Ter Beek, A.; Dekker, H.L.; Cutting, S.M.; Brul, S.; de Koning, L.J.; de Koster, C.G. In Pursuit of Protein Targets: Proteomic Characterization of Bacterial Spore Outer Layers. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 4507–4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Paredes-Sabja, D.; Shen, A.; Sorg, J. Clostridium difficile spore biology: Sporulation, germination, and spore structural proteins. Trends Microbiol. 2014, 22, 406–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Díaz-González, F.; Milano, M.; Olguin-Araneda, V.; Pizarro-Cerda, J.; Castro-Córdova, P.; Tzeng, S.-C.; Maier, C.S.; Sarker, M.R.; Paredes-Sabja, D. Protein composition of the outermost exosporium-like layer of Clostridium difficile 630 spores. J. Proteom. 2015, 123, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stewart, G.C. The Exosporium Layer of Bacterial Spores: A Connection to the Environment and the Infected Host. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2015, 79, 437–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Popham, D.L.; Illades-Aguiar, B.; Setlow, P. The Bacillus subtilis dacB gene, encoding penicillin-binding protein 5 *, is part of a three-gene operon required for proper spore cortex synthesis and spore core dehydration. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 4721–4729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Driks, A.; Eichenberger, P. The Spore Coat. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4, 179–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Henriques, A.O.; Moran, J.C.P. Structure, Assembly, and Function of the Spore Surface Layers. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 61, 555–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fazzini, M.M.; Schuch, R.; Fischetti, V.A. A Novel Spore Protein, ExsM, Regulates Formation of the Exosporium in Bacillus cereus and Bacillus anthracis and Affects Spore Size and Shape. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 4012–4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Janganan, T.K.; Mullin, N.; Tzokov, S.B.; Stringer, S.; Fagan, R.P.; Hobbs, J.K.; Moir, A.; Bullough, P.A. Characterization of the spore surface and exosporium proteins of Clostridium sporogenes; implications for Clostridium botulinum group I strains. Food Microbiol. 2016, 59, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Isticato, R.; Lanzilli, M.; Petrillo, C.; Donadio, G.; Baccigalupi, L.; Ricca, E. Bacillus subtilis builds structurally and functionally different spores in response to the temperature of growth. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bressuire-Isoard, C.; Bornard, I.; Henriques, A.; Carlin, F.; Broussolle, V. Sporulation Temperature Reveals a Requirement for CotE in the Assembly of both the Coat and Exosporium Layers of Bacillus cereus Spores. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 232–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Johnson, M.J.; Todd, S.J.; Ball, D.A.; Shepherd, A.M.; Sylvestre, P.; Moir, A. ExsY and CotY Are Required for the Correct Assembly of the Exosporium and Spore Coat of Bacillus cereus. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 7905–7913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. De Hoon, M.J.; Eichenberger, P.; Vitkup, D. Hierarchical Evolution of the Bacterial Sporulation Network. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, R735–R745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Galperin, M.Y.; Mekhedov, S.L.; Puigbo, P.; Smirnov, S.; Wolf, Y.I.; Rigden, D.J. Genomic determinants of sporulation in Bacilli and Clostridia: Towards the minimal set of sporulation-specific genes. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 14, 2870–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Abecasis, A.B.; Serrano, M.; Alves, R.; Quintais, L.; Pereira-Leal, J.B.; Henriques, A. A Genomic Signature and the Identification of New Sporulation Genes. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 2101–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ramos-Silva, P.; Serrano, M.; O Henriques, A. From Root to Tips: Sporulation Evolution and Specialization in Bacillus subtilis and the Intestinal Pathogen Clostridioides difficile. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2019, 36, 2714–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Putnam, E.; Nock, A.M.; Lawley, T.D.; Shen, A. SpoIVA and SipL Are Clostridium difficile Spore Morphogenetic Proteins. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 1214–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Touchette, M.H.; de la Puebla, H.B.; Ravichandran, P.; Shen, A. SpoIVA-SipL Complex Formation Is Essential for Clostridioides difficile Spore Assembly. J. Bacteriol. 2019, 201, e00042-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. De la Puebla, H.B.; Giacalone, D.; Cooper, A.; Shen, A. Role of SpoIVA ATPase Motifs during Clostridioides difficile Sporulation. J. Bacteriol. 2020, 202, e00387-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Permpoonpattana, P.; Phetcharaburanin, J.; Mikelsone, A.; Dembek, M.; Tan, S.; Brisson, M.-C.; La Ragione, R.; Brisson, A.R.; Fairweather, N.; Hong, H.A.; et al. Functional Characterization of Clostridium difficile Spore Coat Proteins. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 1492–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Henriques, A.; Beall, B.W.; Roland, K.; Moran, C.P. Characterization of cotJ, a sigma E-controlled operon affecting the polypeptide composition of the coat of Bacillus subtilis spores. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 3394–3406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Saggese, A.; Isticato, R.; Cangiano, G.; Ricca, E.; Baccigalupi, L. CotG-Like Modular Proteins Are Common among Spore-Forming Bacilli. J. Bacteriol. 2016, 198, 1513–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Sayer, C.V.; Popham, D.L. YpeB dimerization may be required to stabilize SleB for effective germination of Bacillus anthracis spores. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Zhang, P.; Thomas, S.; Li, Y.-Q.; Setlow, P. Effects of Cortex Peptidoglycan Structure and Cortex Hydrolysis on the Kinetics of Ca2+-Dipicolinic Acid Release during Bacillus subtilis Spore Germination. J. Bacteriol. 2012, 194, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Paredes-Sabja, D.; Sarker, N.; Setlow, B.; Setlow, P.; Sarker, M.R. Roles of DacB and Spm Proteins in Clostridium perfringens Spore Resistance to Moist Heat, Chemicals, and UV Radiation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 3730–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Aoyama, Y. Germination Behavior of Moorella Thermoacetica Spores; Toyo Food Research Institute: Tokyo, Japan, 2014; pp. 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  61. Weaver, J.; Kang, T.J.; Raines, K.W.; Cao, G.-L.; Hibbs, S.; Tsai, P.; Baillie, L.; Rosen, G.M.; Cross, A.S. Protective Role of Bacillus anthracis Exosporium in Macrophage-Mediated Killing by Nitric Oxide. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 3894–3901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Jamroskovic, J.; Chromikova, Z.; List, C.; Bartova, B.; Barak, I.; Bernier-Latmani, R. Variability in DPA and Calcium Content in the Spores of Clostridium Species. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Shevchenko, A.; Wilm, M.; Vorm, O.; Mann, M. Mass Spectrometric Sequencing of Proteins from Silver-Stained Polyacrylamide Gels. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 850–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Perez-Riverol, Y.; Csordas, A.; Bai, J.; Bernal-Llinares, M.; Hewapathirana, S.; Kundu, D.J.; Inuganti, A.; Griss, J.; Mayer, G.; Eisenacher, M.; et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: Improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D442–D450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Deutsch, E.W.; Bandeira, N.; Sharma, V.; Perez-Riverol, Y.; Carver, J.J.; Kundu, D.J.; García-Seisdedos, D.; Jarnuczak, A.F.; Hewapathirana, S.; Pullman, B.S.; et al. The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2020: Enabling ‘big data’ approaches in proteomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D1145–D1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Craig, R.; Beavis, R.C. TANDEM: Matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 1466–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Langella, O.; Valot, B.; Balliau, T.; Blein-Nicolas, M.; Bonhomme, L.; Zivy, M. X!TandemPipeline: A Tool to Manage Sequence Redundancy for Protein Inference and Phosphosite Identification. J. Proteome Res. 2017, 16, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Carvalho, P.; Hewel, J.; Barbosa, V.; Iii, J.Y. Identifying differences in protein expression levels by spectral counting and feature selection. Genet. Mol. Res. 2008, 7, 342–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lundgren, D.H.; Hwang, S.; Wu, L.; Han, D.K. Role of spectral counting in quantitative proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteom. 2010, 7, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Usaite, R.; Wohlschlegel, J.; Venable, J.D.; Park, S.K.; Nielsen, J.; Olsson, L.; Iii, J.R.Y. Characterization of Global Yeast Quantitative Proteome Data Generated from the Wild-Type and Glucose RepressionSaccharomyces cerevisiaeStrains: The Comparison of Two Quantitative Methods. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xiao, Y.; van Hijum, S.; Abee, T.; Wells-Bennik, M.H.J. Genome-Wide Transcriptional Profiling of Clostridium perfringens SM101 during Sporulation Extends the Core of Putative Sporulation Genes and Genes Determining Spore Properties and Germination Characteristics. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 00550 g001 550
Figure 1. Spores of Moorella thermoacetica strain ATCC 39073, produced on agar plates at 55 °C and observed by scanning electron microscopy: (A) spores of different sizes with a smooth surface; (B) two spores enveloped by a large, loose structure corresponding to the exosporium (Ex), as indicated by the white arrow.
Figure 1. Spores of Moorella thermoacetica strain ATCC 39073, produced on agar plates at 55 °C and observed by scanning electron microscopy: (A) spores of different sizes with a smooth surface; (B) two spores enveloped by a large, loose structure corresponding to the exosporium (Ex), as indicated by the white arrow.
Ijms 23 00550 g001
Ijms 23 00550 g002 550
Figure 2. Ultrastructure of spores of Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073 produced at 55 °C (A) or 45 °C (B) on agar plates, observed by transmission electron microscopy. Ex: exosporium; Is: interspace; Ct: coat; Cx: cortex; Co: core.
Figure 2. Ultrastructure of spores of Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073 produced at 55 °C (A) or 45 °C (B) on agar plates, observed by transmission electron microscopy. Ex: exosporium; Is: interspace; Ct: coat; Cx: cortex; Co: core.
Ijms 23 00550 g002
Ijms 23 00550 g003 550
Figure 3. Coat structure of Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073 spores produced at 55 °C (panels (A,C) and at 45 °C (panels (B,D,E)). Two types of spores were obtained under both sporulation conditions (panels (A,B)). The spore coat in panel (A) is made of an inner lamellar layer in direct contact with a dense, diffuse outer layer, while in panel (B) the spore inner and outer coats are separated from each other by a less electron-dense zone (white arrow). Panel (C) shows electron-dense deposits often observed in the inner spore coat of spores produced at 55 °C (black arrows). Outer and inner spore coat misarrangements are shown in panels (D,E) (gray arrows). Ex: exosporium; Is: interspace; OCt: outercoat; ICt: innercoat; Cx: cortex; Co: core.
Figure 3. Coat structure of Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073 spores produced at 55 °C (panels (A,C) and at 45 °C (panels (B,D,E)). Two types of spores were obtained under both sporulation conditions (panels (A,B)). The spore coat in panel (A) is made of an inner lamellar layer in direct contact with a dense, diffuse outer layer, while in panel (B) the spore inner and outer coats are separated from each other by a less electron-dense zone (white arrow). Panel (C) shows electron-dense deposits often observed in the inner spore coat of spores produced at 55 °C (black arrows). Outer and inner spore coat misarrangements are shown in panels (D,E) (gray arrows). Ex: exosporium; Is: interspace; OCt: outercoat; ICt: innercoat; Cx: cortex; Co: core.
Ijms 23 00550 g003
Table
Table 1. Spore-related proteins identified in Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073.
Table 1. Spore-related proteins identified in Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073.
Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073
LocusS a		Protein ID bM. thermoacetica
Protein Identification b		Putative
Protein
Name c		Hypothetical
Function d		Putative
Localization d		ProteinsS of Bs/Bc/Ba/Cd/Cp c,d
moth_1518 Q2RIB2 Ferredoxin-NADP(+) reductase subunit alpha-Nd eExosporiumCD1536
moth_1286 moth_1879 Q2RIY9 Q2RHB0 RubrerythrinRbrLikely to play a role in spore resistanceExosporiumCD0825 CD1524
moth_0602 Q2RKV7 Uncharacterized protein-ndExosporiumCD2434
moth_1747 moth_1815Q2RHP1 Q2RHH4Uncharacterized protein/AgmatinaseArginasendExosporiumBAS0155
BAS2260
moth_2167Q2RGI3Alanine racemaseAlrSpore protectionExosporiumBSU17640
BAS0238
moth_1405Q2RIM1Nucleoside recognitionFeoBndExosporiumCD1517
moth_1683Q2RHV4Cation diffusion facilitator family transporter-ndExosporiumCD0902
moth_0034 Q2RMG5 2-oxoglutarate synthase-ndExosporiumCD0117
moth_0033 Q2RMG6 Pyruvate flavodoxin/ferredoxin oxidoreductase-like protein-ndExosporiumCD0116
moth_0035Q2RMG42-oxoacid: acceptor oxidoreductase, gamma subunit, pyruvate/2-ketoisovalerate-ndExosporiumCD0118
moth_0266Q2RLT8EnolaseEnondCoat/exosporiumCD3170
moth_0837Q2RK85Stage V sporulation protein DSpoVDmother-cell specific penicillin-binding protein (spore cortex)Coat/exosporiumBC3915
moth_2301Q2RG51Kynurenine formamidase-Metal-dependent hydrolaseCoat/exosporiumBC0395
moth_0739Q2RKI2Polysaccharide deacetylaseYlxY or Pda or PdaBPdaA/PdaB:spore cortex peptidoglycan synthesisCoat/exosporiumCD2598
moth_1414Y1414_MOOTAUPF0597 protein moth_1414-ndCoat/exosporiumCD630
moth_0738Q2RKI3Peptidase M1, membrane alanine aminopeptidase-ndCoat/exosporiumCD3652
moth_1693Q2RHU4Protein translocase subunit YajCYajCndCoat/exosporiumBC4410
moth_1319Q2RIV7Stage IV sporulation protein A SpoIVAAnchors the spore coat to the spore surface via SpoVMSpore coat
basement		BSU22800 BC1509 CD2629
moth_1782 fQ2RHK6CoatF-ndCoat-
moth_1059Q2RJL6Peptidase M16-like proteinYmxGndCoatBC3786
moth_1391Q2RIN5Spore coat peptide assembly protein CotJBCotJBndInner coatBSU06900 BC0822 CD630
moth_1392Q2RIN4Manganese containing catalaseCotJCMay protect against oxydative stressInner coatBSU06910 BC0821 CD0598 CD2401 CPR0934
moth_0257Q2RLU7HAD-superfamily hydrolase subfamily IIBYhaXProtection of the spore Spore coat
basement		BSU09830
moth_1069Q2RJK6Ribonuclease J RnjARNA processingCoatBC3977
moth_2016Q2RGX7CoatF-like proteinYhcQndCoatBSU30910
moth_1365Q2RIR1Coat protein SACotSASpore resistanceCoatBSU30910
moth_1126Q2RJE9Amino acid ABC transporter substrate-binding protein, PAAT familyTcyA (YckK)Cystine uptakeCoatBSU03610
moth_1016Q2RJQ9Spore coat protein manganese catalaseCotGndCoatCD1567
moth_1693Q2RHU4Protein translocase subunit YajCYajC/YrbFndInner
membrane/coat		BSU27700
moth_1916Q2RH73Superoxide dismutaseSodF/SodADetoxication of oxygen radicalsCoatBSU19330 BC1468 CD1631
moth_0056Q2RME4Sporulation-specific proteaseYabGModification of spore coat proteinsCoatBSU00430 BC0047 CD3569 CPR2191
moth_0373Q2RLI2Putative transcriptional regulatorYkvNMarR/DUF24 family transcription regulatorCoatBSU13760
moth_0426Q2RLD2Short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase YhxCSimilar to alcohol dehydrogenaseCoatBSU10400
moth_0517Q2RL42N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase-Involved in germinationCoatBC2207
moth_0527Q2RL32Trigger Factor-ndCoatBC4480
moth_0063Q2RMD7Glycoside hydrolase, family 18YaaH ot YdhDYaaH: spore germination cortex lytic enzyme
YdhD: spore coat peptidoglycan hydrolase 		Inner coat (YaaH)
Coat (YdhD)		BSU01160/BSU05710 BC3607
moth_0088Q2RMB2Uncharacterized proteinYabPRequired for sporulation at a late stageOuter membraneBSU00600 BC0063 CPR2486
moth_1357 g
moth_1058		 Q2RIR9
Q2RJL7 		Serine-type D-Ala-D-Ala carboxypeptidaseDacBSporulation-specific carboxypeptidase involved in spore cortex peptidoglycane cross-linkingCortexBSU23190 CPR1770
moth_0201Q2RM03Propeptide, PepSY amd peptidase M4YpeBGermination protein, essential for SleB assembly in sporesInner membraneBSU22920 BC2752
moth_1499 Q2RID1 Serine-type D-Ala-D-Ala carboxypeptidaseDacFPenicillin-binding protein IInner membraneBSU23480 BC4075 CD1291 CPR1775
moth_0887Q2RK35ATPase, E1-E2 typeAtcLSimilar to the E. coli magnesium transporterInner membraneBSU15650
moth_0734
moth_0054
moth_0202		Q2RKI7
Q2RME6
Q2RM02		Cell wall hydrolaseSleBSpore cortex-lytic enzyme involved in germinationOuter surface of the inner spore membraneBSU13930 BC2753
moth_1358Q2RIR8Uncharacterized proteinGerW/YtfJGermination proteinInner membraneBSU29500 BC4640/BC2095
moth_0926Q2RJZ6Germination protease GprDegradation of SASPsInner membrane/coreBSU25540 BC4319 CPR2013
moth_2417
moth_0736		Q2RFU0
Q2RKI5		Peptidase S1 and S6, chymotrypsin/HapYyxASimilar to quality control membrane serine protease HtrAInner membraneBSU40360
moth_0925Q2RJZ7Small acid-soluble spore protein, alpha/beta typeSspAProtection of spore DNACoreBSU29750 CD2688
moth_0806Q2RKB5Small, acid-soluble spore protein, alpha/beta familySspFProtection of the spore DNACoreBSU24210
moth_1875Q2RHB4Small, acid-soluble spore proteinSASPSmall, acid-soluble spore proteinCoreCPR1870
moth_2056Q2RGT7NADH:flavin oxidoreductase/NADH oxidaseYqiGndndBSU24210
moth_1272Q2RJ03N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidaseCwlCSporulation-specific N-acetylmuramoyl_L-alanine amidase ndBSU17410
moth_1828Q2RHG1Uncharacterized proteinYckDndndBSU03400
moth_1059Q2RJL6Peptidase M16-like proteinYmxGControl of proteolytic activityndBSU16710
moth_1356Q2RIS0Nucleoside recognitionSpmASpore maturation protein, spore core dehydration, involved in germinationndBSU23180 BC1470
moth_1355Q2RIS1Nucleoside recognitionSpmBSpore maturation protein, spore core dehydration, involved in germinationndBSU23170 BC1471
moth_1064Q2RJL1Alanine dehydrogenase/PNT-like proteinSpoVFADipicolinate synthase (subunit A)ndBSU16730 BC3801
moth_1065Q2RJL0FlavoproteinSpoVFBDipicolinate synthase (subunit B)ndBSU16740 BC3800
aMoorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073 database [28]; b Information from the UniProtKB database (http://www.uniprot.org, accessed on 29 September 2021); c All proteins were identified by Blast-P from the spore coat and/or exosporium of Bacillus subtilis 168 (Bs, BSU), B. cereus ATCC 14579 (Bc, BC), B. anthracis Sterne (Ba, BAS), C. difficile 630 (Cd, CD), and C. perfringens (Cp, CPR); d Data obtained from Abhyankar et al., 2011 [34]; Abhyankar et al., 2013 [35]; Paredes-Sabja et al., 2014 [36]; Diaz-Gonzalez et al., 2015 [37]; Stewart, 2015 [38]; Abhyankar et al., 2016 [23]; Subtiwiki (http://subtiwiki.uni-goettingen.de/, accessed on 29 September 2021); e nd: protein function and/or localization not determined; f Protein annotated as Coat F protein in the M. thermoacetica genome but with spore coat proteins of B. subtilis; g Amino acid sequences encoded by moth_1058 and moth_1357 are highly similar. The dacB gene is described as being in an operon with the spmA and spmB genes. Thus, the moth_1357 locus more likely encodes DacB.
Table
Table 2. Spore-associated proteins identified by proteomic analysis of Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073 spores produced at 55 °C and 45 °C.
Table 2. Spore-associated proteins identified by proteomic analysis of Moorella thermoacetica ATCC 39073 spores produced at 55 °C and 45 °C.
Protein ID aMoorella thermoacetica Protein Identification aMean Spectral Countsp Adjust Value
55 °C b45 °C b
Q2RIR1Glycosyl transferase (CotSA)5.3 ± 2.9 0.0 ± 0.0 0.0002
Q2RIV7Stage IV sporulation protein A (SpoIVA)41.0 ± 6.6 21.3 ± 11.5 0.0007
Q2RGT7NADH:flavin oxidoreductase/NADH oxidase (YqiG)11.3 ± 7.6 c2.7 ± 3.1 0.0016
Q2RIB2FAD/NAD(P)-binding oxidoreductase53.0 ± 4.6 32.0 ± 4.6 0.0027
Q2RHK6Coat protein F d9.7 ± 3.2 2.3 ± 2.1 0.0045
Q2RM03Propeptide, PepSY amd peptidase M4 (YpeB)3.3 ± 3.1 e0.0 ± 0.0 0.0057
Q2RJL6Peptidase M16-like protein (YmxG)8.3 ± 1.2 2.3 ± 0.6 0.0190
Q2RH73Superoxide dismutase (SodF)2.3 ± 2.1 e0.0 ± 0.0 0.0275
Q2RIN4Manganese containing catalase (CotJC)8.3 ±± 4.7 1.7 ± 1.5 0.0043
Q2RGX7Coat protein YhcQ6.0 ± 1.72.0 ± 2.00.0949
Q2RIY9Rubrerythrin (Rbr)30.0 ± 4.541.0 ± 3.00.1141
Q2RMG52-oxoglutarate synthase1.0 ± 1.00.0 ± 0.00.1841
Q2RGI3Alanine racemase (Alr)8.0 ± 1.04.0 ± 1.00.1907
Q2RJQ9Catalase (CotG)2.3 ± 0.60.7 ± 1.20.2825
Q2RJE9Amino acid ABC transporter substrate-binding protein (TcyA/YckK)4.0 ± 1.01.7 ± 1.50.2825
Q2RHU4Protein translocase subunit (YajC)0.7 ±0.62.3 ± 2.30.2825
Q2RIN5Spore coat protein (CotJB)0.7 ± 1.20.0 ± 0.00.2931
Q2RJZ7Small acid-soluble spore protein, alpha/beta type (SspA)5.0 ± 1.02.7 ± 1.20.3763
Q2RLT8Enolase (Eno)46.0 ± 6.553.0 ± 7.20.4941
Q2RHH4Agmatinase1.3 ± 1.22.7 ± 1.20.5072
Q2RKV7Hypothetical protein 2.7 ± 1.23.3 ± 1.50.8454
Q2RLU7HAD-superfamily hydrolase subfamily IIB (YhaX)5.7 ± 1.26.3 ± 1.20.8787
Q2RHB0Rubrerythrin (Rbr)20.0 ± 3.221.3 ± 2.30.9068
Q2RJK6Ribonuclease J (RnjA)3.0 ± 0.03.3 ± 0.60.9207
a Information from the UniProtKB database; b Spectral counting performed on three independent biological replicates; proteins whose abundance varies significantly between 45 °C and 55 °C are in bold (p adjust_value < 0.05) (n = 3); c Overlap of standard deviations; d Protein annotated as CoatF protein in the M. thermoacetica genome not homologous with the spore coat proteins of B. subtilis; e No spectra found in one of the three biological replicates.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malleck, T.; Fekraoui, F.; Bornard, I.; Henry, C.; Haudebourg, E.; Planchon, S.; Broussolle, V. Insights into the Structure and Protein Composition of Moorella thermoacetica Spores Formed at Different Temperatures. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010550

AMA Style

Malleck T, Fekraoui F, Bornard I, Henry C, Haudebourg E, Planchon S, Broussolle V. Insights into the Structure and Protein Composition of Moorella thermoacetica Spores Formed at Different Temperatures. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(1):550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010550

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malleck, Tiffany, Fatima Fekraoui, Isabelle Bornard, Céline Henry, Eloi Haudebourg, Stella Planchon, and Véronique Broussolle. 2022. "Insights into the Structure and Protein Composition of Moorella thermoacetica Spores Formed at Different Temperatures" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 1: 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010550

APA Style

Malleck, T., Fekraoui, F., Bornard, I., Henry, C., Haudebourg, E., Planchon, S., & Broussolle, V. (2022). Insights into the Structure and Protein Composition of Moorella thermoacetica Spores Formed at Different Temperatures. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(1), 550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010550

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop