Next Article in Journal
Progesterone Receptor Modulates Extraembryonic Mesoderm and Cardiac Progenitor Specification during Mouse Gastrulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of a Novel Myrosinase with High Activity from Marine Bacterium Shewanella baltica Myr-37
Previous Article in Journal
Targeting NMDA Receptors at the Neurovascular Unit: Past and Future Treatments for Central Nervous System Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Signal Peptide via Site-Directed Mutagenesis for Enhanced Secretion of Heterologous Proteins in Lactococcus lactis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation and Characterization of Homologically Expressed Methanol Dehydrogenase from Methylorubrum extorquens AM1 for the Development of Bioelectrocatalytical Systems

1
Biotechnology Department, Tula State University, Pr. Lenina 92, 300012 Tula, Russia
2
Laboratory of Methylotrophy, Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms of Russian Academy of Sciences—A Separate Subdivision of Federal State Budget Institution of Science, Federal Research Center (IBPM RAS), Pushchino Scientific Center of Biological Research of Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospekt Nauki 5, 142290 Pushchino, Russia
3
Laboratory of Ecological and Medical Biotechnology, Tula State University, Friedrich Engels Street 157, 300012 Tula, Russia
4
Laboratory of Biotechnology and Physiology of Phototrophic Organisms, Institute of Basic Biological Problems Russian Academy of Sciences—A Separate Subdivision of of Federal State Budget Institution of Science Federal Research Center (IBBP RAS), Pushchino Scientific Center of Biological Research of Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya Street 2, 142290 Pushchino, Russia
5
Laboratory of Microbe Enzymology, Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms of Russian Academy of Sciences—A Separate Subdivision of Federal State Budget Institution of Science, Federal Research Center (IBPM RAS), Pushchino Scientific Center of Biological Research of Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospekt Nauki 5, 142290 Pushchino, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(18), 10337; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810337
Submission received: 28 July 2022 / Revised: 27 August 2022 / Accepted: 2 September 2022 / Published: 7 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Enzymes and Metabolites)

Abstract

:
(Ca2+)-dependent pyrroloquinolinequinone (PQQ)-dependent methanol dehydrogenase (MDH) (EC: 1.1.2.7) is one of the key enzymes of primary C1-compound metabolism in methylotrophy. PQQ-MDH is a promising catalyst for electrochemical biosensors and biofuel cells. However, the large-scale use of PQQ-MDH in bioelectrocatalysis is not possible due to the low yield of the native enzyme. Homologously overexpressed MDH was obtained from methylotrophic bacterium Methylorubrum extorquens AM1 by cloning the gene of only one subunit, mxaF. The His-tagged enzyme was easily purified by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (36% yield). A multimeric form (α6β6) of recombinant PQQ-MDH possessing enzymatic activity (0.54 U/mg) and high stability was demonstrated for the first time. pH-optimum of the purified protein was about 9–10; the enzyme was activated by ammonium ions. It had the highest affinity toward methanol (KM = 0.36 mM). The recombinant MDH was used for the fabrication of an amperometric biosensor. Its linear range for methanol concentrations was 0.002–0.1 mM, the detection limit was 0.7 µM. The properties of the invented biosensor are competitive to the analogs, meaning that this enzyme is a promising catalyst for industrial methanol biosensors. The developed simplified technology for PQQ-MDH production opens up new opportunities for the development of bioelectrocatalytic systems.

1. Introduction

The biological conversion of one-carbon compounds is an attractive area of biotechnology because it could lead to significant breakthroughs in the production and utilization of renewable fuels, such as biogas and methanol [1,2]. Methylobacteria are a special group of microorganisms with significant biotechnological potential due to their ability to utilize methanol, methane, and other C1-compounds as a source of carbon and energy [3,4,5,6,7]. Methanol dehydrogenases (MDHs) are crucial enzymes for the utilization of methanol as a carbon and energy source in methylotrophy [8]. The engineering of MDHs has thus been actively investigated to enhance methanol conversion [9,10]. One of these interesting biocatalysts is periplasmic pyrroloquinolinequinone (PQQ)-dependent methanol dehydrogenase (EC: 1.1.2.7) [11,12] Its active site includes Ca2+ ion. Recently, MDH quinoproteins have attracted a growing interest due to recently found lantanide-dependent isoenzymes of PQQ-MDH (XoxF) [13,14,15,16,17]. However, lanthanide-dependent isoenzymes are less specific to methanol. In all the MDH isoforms, the PQQ cofactor tightly bound to the apoenzyme catalyzes pH-dependent two-electron/two-proton reaction of oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde at relatively low positive potentials, which distinguishes it from other redox cofactors, such as flavins and nicotinamides [18,19].
The native electron acceptor of PQQ-dependent MDH is cytochrome c [20]. MDH is known to manifest in vitro activity in presence of phenazine methosulfate (PMS) or phenazine ethosulfate towards artificial electron acceptors (2,6—dichlorophenolindophenol, 1,6-dichlorophenolindophenol, Wurster’s blue (N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyl-п-phenylenediamine and 2,2′-azino-(-3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfuric acid)), which are able to receive electrons from the reduced PQQ-enzyme [21]. This fact is the rationale for the application of PQQ-MDH in the development of electrochemical biosensors and biofuel cells (BFCs) [22,23,24,25,26]. In these works, only native methanol dehydrogenases were used.
The application of PQQ-MDH in bioelectrocatalysis is limited by issues related to the purification of homogeneous enzymes. Conventional chromatography methods are used for the isolation and purification of native PQQ-MDH, but they are time-consuming, and they provide low yield because of protein losses at each stage of the multistage process. It is possible to simplify and accelerate the procedure of isolation of homogeneous enzymes by methods of molecular biotechnology based on cloning of the corresponding genes, their expression in superproducer strains, and subsequent purification of the recombinant enzyme by metal chelate affinity chromatography [27]. However, expression of PQQ-MDH in heterologous systems according to conventional cloning protocol leads to isolation of just apoenzyme, because the traditionally used producer strains are genetically incapable of PQQ synthesis. The addition of an expensive PQQ cofactor to the reaction medium for restoration of recombinant MDH activity, as was proposed for glucose dehydrogenase [28], is not promising for further application of the enzyme in bioelectrochemical systems. Huang et al. mentioned that they attempted to express Ln3+-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase, classified as XoxF4, XoxF5, in Escherichia coli using commercial pET vectors, but the use of such constructs did not result in the production of active enzymes even when cells were grown in the presence of PQQ and Ln3+, the natural cofactors, or when the expressed proteins were incubated with these cofactors in attempts to reconstitute active holoenzymes [29]. Their earlier work [30] demonstrated a certain success achieved by a more complicated strategy involving a modified pCM80-PxoxF vector that contained a native promoter for the mxaF gene from Methylorubrum extorquens AM1 [31]. The modified vector included a 411 bp-long fragment of synthetic DNA presumably containing the native promoter of xoxF gene of the same organism, synthetic Shine-Dalgarno sequence, unique NcoI restriction site for cloning of the genes of interest, TEV protease cleavage site, and 8-His-tag encoding sequence [30]. However, known methylobacterial strains are also proposed to be used as hosts for obtaining PQQ-MDH [5,30]).
Methylorubrum extorquens AM1 (formerly Methylobacterium extorquens AM1) is a model strain in methylotrophy studies with a completely sequenced genome [32], and physiological, biochemical, transcriptomic, and proteogenomic aspects of the metabolism of this strain are well-studied. Large and small subunits of MDH are encoded by mxaF and mxaI gene sequences. PQQ cofactor biosynthesis genes (pqqABC/DE, pqqFG) are located in two clusters in another genome locus [33,34,35]. The mxaF gene fragment was earlier used as a probe for sequencing of mxa genes from Hyphomicrobium methylovorum GM2 [36]. Moreover, overexpression of mxaF gene was suggested to be used for the elevation of L-serine production by methylotrophic bacteria Methylobacterium sp. MB200 [37], but not for obtaining the recombinant protein. Based on the aforementioned data, we proposed to use the homologous protein expression method to obtain active recombinant MDH with a polyhistidine tag for one-step purification of the target enzyme.
The goal of the current work was to obtain active recombinant MDH of Methylorubrum extorquens via amplification and cloning of a large subunit gene, mxaF, followed by the production of the complete functional protein in a homologous expression system for its further application as a biocatalyst for amperometric mediator biosensor.

2. Results

2.1. Construction of the Expression Vector

The obtained genetic construct named pCM160::mxaF is presented in Figure 1.
Amplification of DNA fragment from Methylorubrum extorquens AM1 containing mxaF gene (GenBank locus tag: MexAM1_META1p4538, chromosome accession: NC_012808) was carried out using specific primers and the genomic DNA of the strain as a template. The resulting PCR fragment containing full-length mxaF gene ORF with encoded leader peptide and C-end fusion with His6-tag was cloned into mobilizable vector pCM160 [33] under the control of MDH promoter (PmxaF) from AM1 strain. Construct pCM160::mxaF was used for the transformation of competent E. coli TOP10 cells. PCR-screening of the clones for the presence of recombinant plasmid showed an insertion of the corresponding length in 60% of the samples (Figure S1). After isolation of plasmid DNA, PCR and restriction analysis was carried out for plasmid examination (Figure S2). The analyses confirmed the presence of the insertion of the desired size and correct arrangement of the construct. The obtained recombinant plasmid was checked for the absence of mutation by direct sequencing. To obtain the active recombinant MDH, the enzyme was expressed in the host organism, M. extorquens AM1.

2.2. Expression and Purification of the Recombinant MDH

His6-tagged recombinant protein (MDH-His6-tag) was isolated by affinity metal chelate chromatography to an electrophoretically homogeneous state. Denaturing SDS-PAAG electrophoresis of the purified protein revealed the presence of a large subunit (α) (MW around 66 kDa) and a small subunit (β) (around 18 kDa) in the collected fractions (Figure 2a).
The data are in accordance with the value calculated from translated nucleotide sequence for mxaF gene for the large subunit of MDH (68434 Da) (Refseq/GenBank NC_012808/MEXAM1_RS21435). When comparing the electropherograms of the supernatants, elevated production of α-protomer of MDH in M. extorquens pCM160::mxaF is clearly seen (Figure 2a, band 2), which confirms the functioning of the inserted mxaF gene.
Native electrophoresis of the purified protein preparation showed the presence of two enzyme forms, heterodimeric (αβ) and multimeric (presumably α6β6) with MW around 75 and 450 kDa, respectively (Figure 2b, I). It should be noted that the molecular weight of the low molecular weight fraction of the recombinant protein determined by gel filtration was 75 kDa, which is in accordance with native electrophoresis data. A surprising result was the presence of enzymatic activity only in oligomeric form (Figure 2b, II). The results of MDH-His6-tag purification are listed in Table 1.
The highest specific activity was observed in the first fraction of the elution buffer. The enzyme was purified 7-fold up to the specific activity of 3.74 U/mg protein. The activity of the recombinant MDH-His6-tag in the supernatant equaled 0.54 U/mg, which was higher compared to the native MDH from wild-type strain M. extorquens AM1 comprising 0.34 U/mg. The yield of the purified protein was 36%.

2.3. Characterization of the Recombinant MDH

An absorption maximum at 350 nm and a wide absorption shoulder to 410 nm were observed in the absorption spectrum of the purified preparation of MDH-His6-tag.
The activity of the purified MDH-His6-tag preparation was decreased by only 10% after 30-day storage at +4 °C, whereas the enzyme remained fully active upon storage at −70 °C (Figure 3a).
The thermostability study revealed that in 20 min of incubation in a temperature range from 20 to 50 °C the enzyme lost up to 20% of its activity, whereas complete denaturation was observed at 80 °C (Figure 3b).
The enzyme activity decrease rate is around 0.5% × min−1 at 40 °C and 50 °C, and around 1% × min−1 at 60 °C (Table 2).
The recombinant MDH was stable in a pH range from 7 to 11 (Table 3), which is in agreement with data for native MDH from M. extorquens AM1 [38].
With the increase of the primary alcohol carbon chain length, the apparent value of KM of the recombinant enzyme was also increased, whereas maximal reaction velocity did not change significantly (Table 4).

2.4. Biosensor Based on the Recombinant MDH

After immobilization of MDH-His6-tag onto the surface of the electrode containing 30% hydroxyl apatite and 10% ferrocene in the graphite paste, the response of the biosensor to methanol was elevated by more than 2 times compared to paste without hydroxyl apatite under identical measurement conditions. The mean value for the obtained responses of the biosensors to 0.05 mM methanol (the medium value for the linear range) was 1600 ± 100 nA for the hydroxyl apatite-modified electrode, and the relative standard deviation for 15 consequent measurements was 7.1% (p = 0.95).
Specificity of the recombinant MDH-His6-tag-based biosensor in presence of ferrocene revealed the dependence of the decrease of sensor responses (nA) on the increase of carbon chain length: methanol, 19,600 ± 100; ethanol, 13,000 ± 2000; butanol-1, 9200 ± 700; 3-methylbutanol-1, 7000 ± 100; 2-methylpropanol-1, 2400 ± 200 (p = 0.95; n = 3). The highest responses of the biosensors were achieved for such substrates as methanol, formaldehyde (17,000 ± 2000 nA), and ethanol, which is in agreement with the substrate specificity of the enzyme (Table 4).
To determine the parameters of the biosensor (sensitivity coefficient and detection limit), the linear segment of the calibration dependence was used. The linear range for the detected concentrations was from 0.002 to 0.1 mM for methanol, detection limit was equal to 0.7 µM CH3OH, and the duration of a single measurement comprised 5 min.

3. Discussion

One of the recent reviews on the expression of halobacteria proteins notes the potential of methods for the homologous expression of proteins containing a specific cofactor, such as metalloproteins [39]. This method can also be used to obtain PQQ-methanol dehydrogenase. At present time, expression vectors based on a strong promoter of the methanol dehydrogenase gene from M. extorquens (PmxaF) are used for cloning different proteins into methylotrophic bacteria [31]. In the present work, one of the known vectors was used, a shuttle vector pCM160 containing a constitutive promoter of MDH from M. extorquens (318 bp) which is capable of replication in both methylotrophic bacteria and E. coli [31]. This is important for the development of an efficient technique for homologous cloning of MDH. (Table 5). The limiting stages in the technique of homologous expression of active recombinant MDH are the stages of Methylobacterium cell cultivation on liquid and solidified media, which is due to their growth physiology. It should be noted that the recombinant strain Methylorubrum extorquens pCM160::mxaF does not differ from the initial AM1 strain by its growth properties. The other stages, including mxaF gene cloning, sequence analysis of the plasmid construction, transformation of competent E. coli Top10 cells, clone selection, conjugative transfer into M. extorquens and purification of recombinant MDH do not take more than a week. The overall process from PCR amplification to isolation of the desired enzyme can be carried out for 23 days. The time of isolation of active PQQ-MDH could be reduced when using the ready recombinant strain containing the modified plasmid.
According to proteomic studies ([7], MDH is one of the most abundant proteins in AM1 strains during methylotrophic and other variants of heterotrophic growth. Since the mxaF gene is located in one cluster with mxaI, the small subunit should be synthesized in a comparable amount [11]. Despite the fact that PQQ biosynthesis genes are located in other separate clusters, the cofactor appears to be produced in sufficient amounts even upon the insertion of extra copies of the mxaF gene on the plasmid. All of the above allows to isolate active recombinant holoenzyme.
It was possible to increase the yield of recombinant MDH compared to native MDH, despite the fact that only one subunit of the mxaF gene was cloned. In the majority of papers on PQQ-MDH, the reported yield did not exceed 29% after several consequent stages of chromatography [40,41,42,43,44]. This is additional proof of elevation of the expression of functionally active MDH. Thus, the one-step technique elaborated in our work could increase the yield and reduce the time required for enzyme isolation.
The absorption spectrum of MDH-His6-tag is identical to the spectra of PQQ-dependent native MDHs of methylobacteria [25,45,46]. It should be noted the majority of native MDHs characterized before are heterodimers [47] or heterotetramers [41,48]. The active site with non-covalently bound prosthetic groups, PQQ and Ca2+ ion, is located in the large α-subunits M. extorquens AM1 with MW ~66 kDa [20,40,48], ~62 кДa [49]. The small subunit (7.5–10 kDa) is not present in other quinoproteins, and its role remains unclear [40,48]. Heterohexameric form (α6β6) of the recombinant MDH possessing enzymatic activity (a trimer of canonical α2β2 form) was revealed for the first time.
The addition of an activator, NH4+, is required for manifestation of the MDH-His6-tag activity, as well as for native PQQ-MDHs [40,42,47,48]. In presence of ammonium chloride, MDH-His6-tag is capable of oxidizing primary alcohols and formaldehyde with the highest affinity towards methanol, similar to other MDHs [43,44,47,50].
Storage stability is one of the important characteristics of enzymes for manufacturing enzymatic biosensors. Compared to the native MDHs [47,50], whose activity decreased by around 20% upon storage at +4 °C, the recombinant MDH was characterized by higher stability. It is intriguing because one paper mentioned that the thermal stability of the recombinant MDH is comparable to that of the native enzyme [47]. The relatively high stability of the recombinant MDH is an important aspect for using the enzyme in bioelectrocatalytic systems.
The application of native MDH as a base for biosensors was described in several papers. Immobilized MDH from Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 was applied for amperometric detection of ammonia in presence of phenazine methosulfate [23] and methanol [24]. In another work [25], MDH from Methylobacterium nodulans was immobilized on the graphite paste electrode for amperometric determination of methanol concentration in presence of the electron transport mediator, ferrocene. The electrochemical oxidation of methanol and formaldehyde catalyzed by Eu3+-MDH with its own native cytochrome electron acceptor, cGJ, co-adsorbed by chitosan biopolymer, was studied in the work [26]. It is known that the most sensitive biosensing systems based on PQQ-dehydrogenases are developed using ferrocene and its derivatives as electron transfer mediators [51,52]. The preparation of the MDH-His6-tag was used for the development of amperometric biosensor based on graphite paste electrode and ferrocene. To immobilize the recombinant MDH, a method for modification of graphite paste by hydroxyl apatite elaborated earlier [25] was used, which improves the adsorption of the enzyme onto the surface of the hydrophobic electrode. The process occurring upon oxidation of primary alcohols under the action of the PQQ cofactor-containing MDH-His6-tag is drawn in Figure 4. The active site of the enzyme interacts with ferrocenium ion, reducing it to ferrocene. Under the external potential applied to the working electrode, ferrocene is oxidized to ferrocenium ion and gets involved in the new interaction cycle.
The dependence of current on methanol concentration had a hyperbolic character (R2 = 0.96) (Figure 4b), which is in accordance with typical enzymatic kinetics [53]. This dependence was approximated by a Michaelis–Menten-like equation (p = 0.95; n = 3). The high response of the biosensor to formaldehyde is presumably determined by the non-specific oxidation of the hydrated formaldehyde species (geminal diol) by MDH [54]. Being simple and economical in fabrication, MDH-His6-tag-biosensor does not give way to other methanol biosensors [55,56,57], and even surpasses them in some analytical and metrological characteristics.
Thus, the recombinant MDH could serve as an effective biocatalyst for amperometric mediator biosensors for methanol, and the characteristics of the invented biosensor are enough to compete with the analogs.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Objects of the Study and Cultivation Conditions

The presented method of homologous expression of active recombinant MDH with His6-tag consists of the stages listed in Table 5.
Aerobic methylotrophic bacteria from the collection of the laboratory of methylotrophy of Skryabin Institute for Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms (Russia). Were used in the study (strain Methylorubrum extorquens AM1 CIP 106,787 = DSM 6343 = VKM B-2191), as well as Escherichia coli Top 10 and S17-1.
Bacterial strains and plasmids are listed in Table 6.
M. extorquens was cultivated in 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks in «K» medium with the following composition (g/L): KH2PO4—2, (NH4)2SO4—2, NaCl—0.5, MgSO4 ∙7H2O—0.025, FeSO4·7H2O—0.002, pH 7.2 supplied with 1% methanol (v/v). The cultures were grown in thermostabilizable shakers (180 rpm, 29 °C). A solid medium for M. extorquens colony selection contained 1.5% agar
E. coli strains were grown at 37 °C in liquid or solidified (1.5% agar) LB medium with kanamycin antibiotic added up to 50 µg/mL.

4.2. Construction of Vector for Expression/Production of the Recombinant Protein

Gene mxaF from M. extorquens (GenBank locus tag: MexAM1_META1p4538, chromosome accession: NC_012808) (2248 bp) was amplified using the designed primers: forward, 5′-CTAATGCATGCGCCCGTTGACGACAACGGTG-3′, and reverse, 5′-TAGAATTCTCAGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGCTTGGCGGCCGACTTCCACTC-3′. The reverse primer contains a sequence encoding poly-His-tag (shown by italic). The primers’ sequences contained PaeI (forward) and EcoRI (reverse) restriction endonucleases sites (underlined in the sequences). The insertion of this sequence allows obtaining a protein with a C-terminal His-tag.
The genomic DNA of AM1 strain was used as a template for amplification. Obtained 2248-bp PCR product was treated with PaeI and EcoRI endonucleases and cloned into pCM160 expression vector cleaved at the same sites. Thus, a recombinant plasmid pCM160::mxaF was obtained.

4.3. Conventional Methods

4.3.1. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

PCR was performed on MJ Mini thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in 20 µL of a mixture containing 0.26 pmol/µL of each primer, 2 µL of 10× PCR buffer solution, 3% of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA), 0.075 mmol/L of deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 0.5 µL of KAPA Hi-Fi DNA polymerase (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA).
To amplify the mxaF gene from M. extorquens, the following time–temperature profile was used: preliminary denaturation—94 °C, 5 min; 32 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 30 s), annealing (64 °C, 20 s), elongation (72 °C, 3 min 30 s); final elongation (72 °C, 5 min).

4.3.2. Treatment of DNA with Restriction Endonucleases

Hydrolysis of PCR amplicons and vectors with different endonucleases was conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), using recommended buffer solution and corresponding temperature conditions for each enzyme. DNA fragments were separated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel. DNA molecular weight markers (GeneRuler DNA Ladder Mix, Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were used for the estimation of the size of DNA fragments. After electrophoresis, the DNA fragments were purified from gel using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

4.3.3. Ligation of DNA Fragments

The ligation reaction was performed in 10 µL volume containing 1 µL of 10× ligation buffer (SibEnzyme, Novosibirsk, Russia), 50–100 ng of vector DNA and 3–5× molar excess of the cloned DNA fragment, 10 units of T4 DNA ligase (SibEnzyme, Novosibirsk, Russia). Sticky-end ligation was carried out for 10–16 h at 4 °C. The reaction was stopped by enzyme inactivation for 15 min at 65 °C, and the competent E. coli TOP10 cells were transformed with the ligation mixture.

4.3.4. Isolation of Plasmid DNA and Transformation of Competent Cells

Isolation of plasmid DNA, cloning, and transformation of competent cells was performed according to conventional techniques [59].

4.3.5. Conjugative Plasmid Transfer

Conjugative plasmid transfer from E. coli S17-1 cells to recipient strain AM1 was carried out on Petri dishes with solidified «K» medium (1.5% agar) containing 2% methanol (v/v) and 0.5% LB medium for 24 h. Donor to recipient ratio was 1:1 by cell number. After the 24-h incubation, the cultures were washed from the filters with 2 mL of «K» medium, and the dilutions were plated onto the selective solid «K» medium with kanamycin (50 µg/mL), nalidixic acid (100 µg/mL), and 2% methanol (v/v) as a sole source of carbon and energy. Transconjugants were analyzed by PCR and sequencing for the presence of the plasmids and the mxaF gene.

4.4. Isolation of Recombinant Methanol Dehydrogenase by Metal Chelate Affinity Chromatography

Transconjugants of methylobacteria carrying the recombinant plasmids were grown in 200 µ of K medium supplied with 50 µg/mL kanamycin and 1% methanol at 29 °C. To purify the recombinant proteins, cells (0.8 g) were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in 2.5 mL of cold lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole, pH 8.0), and disintegrated by a sonicator (Misonix Ultrasonic Liquid Processor S-4000/CL5 ultrasonic disintegrator, UK) (16 × 30 s with 30 s interval). The cell lysate was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was applied to a 0.5 mL Ni2+-NTA-agarose column (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). After washing with washing buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 60 mM imidazole) the bound protein was eluted from the column with the analogous buffer containing 200 mM imidazole. The protein spectrum of the collected fractions was analyzed by SDS-PAAG-electrophoresis. All the purification steps were carried out at 4 °C.

4.5. Methanol Dehydrogenase Activity Measurement

MDH activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 600 nm (ε = 1,9 × 104 M−1cm−1) at 30 °C, according to the technique by Kuznetsova and co-workers [47].
The amount of MDH catalyzing conversion of 1 µmol of methanol into formaldehyde in 1 min at pH 9.0 and t = 30 °C was taken as activity unit.
Determination of kinetic parameters of MDH with different substrates (methanol, ethanol, butanol, amyl alcohol, formaldehyde) was carried out in the concentration range 0–10 mM, the plots were built using 13 different substrate concentrations. The measurements were performed in triplicates.
pH-stability of the purified preparation of MDH-His6-tag was analyzed in pH range from 4 to 11. For this purpose, the enzyme was incubated in buffer solutions (Acetate-NaOH, KH2PO4-NaOH, Tris-HCl, Glycine-NaOH, Na2HPO4-NaOH) with the corresponding pH values for 40 min at 30 °C. Then the residual activity was measured in standard conditions at pH = 9.0. To test the thermal stability of the enzyme, MDH samples were incubated at temperatures from 20 to 80 °C for 20–60 min, after that the residual activity was determined in a standard reaction mixture at 30 °C.

4.6. Electrophoresis in Polyacrylamide Gel

The purity of protein preparations and subunit composition was determined by denaturing electrophoresis in PAAG with 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) according to the Laemmli method. The concentration of the separating gel was 12%. Electrophoresis was carried out at 60 V for concentrating gel and 100 V for separating gel in 0.75 mm PAAG slabs at room temperature. Separation was carried out in Tris-glycine buffer system, pH 8.3. The samples were prepared in 0.0625 M Tris-HCl buffer, pH 6.8, supplied with 2% SDS, 0.001% bromophenol blue, 10% glycerol, and 5% β-mercaptoethanol. The samples were boiled for 10 min for protein denaturation. Standard protein ladder PageRuler Prestained Protein Ladder (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with molecular masses from 14 to 116 kDa was used for protein mass determination.
The quaternary structure of the native enzyme was determined according to the results of native electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gel (PAAG) with a concentration gradient from 5 to 12%. The protein bands were stained according to Fairbanks et al. (1971) with some modifications using Coumassie R-250 and also stained by activity in presence of nitroblue tetrazolium and phenazine methosulfate according to the known technique [60].

4.7. Protein Molecular Mass Determination

The molecular mass of the native protein was determined by gel filtration on Sephacryl S-200 column (1.5 × 60 cm, Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) calibrated using standard protein set MWGF200 S8445 (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA) containing 150 mM KCl. As the elution buffer, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, was used. The flow rate was adjusted to 0.2 mL/min. The protein content was assessed by the Bradford method using standard BSA solutions.

4.8. Electrochemical Measurements

Fabrication of working electrodes and electrochemical measurements were conducted according to the described technique [25]. The electrode was filled with graphite paste containing 10% ferrocene and 30% hydroxyl apatite (w/w). The enzyme (0.26 units) was applied onto the electrode surface and dried for 30 min. The composition of the measurement buffer solution was as follows: 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 8.0, supplied with 15 mM NH4Cl. The electrode was stored at 4 °C in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer solution, pH 7.0. The measurements were taken in triplicates.

5. Conclusions

The method for homologous expression of the recombinant PQQ-MDH with polyhistidine tag elaborated in the present study allows obtaining an active enzyme in quite a short time. Overexpression of just one subunit, mxaF, was sufficient to achieve overproduction of the MDH holoenzyme. One-stage purification of the recombinant enzyme is more economically feasible, which is especially important when designing the consumables for biosensor analytics. The recombinant enzyme does almost not differ from the native MDH of Methylorubrum extorquens AM1 in its catalytic properties, but it has higher stability. The developed simplified technology for producing recombinant PQQ-MDH opens up new opportunities for the development of methanol biosensors and biofuel cells. A similar strategy, based on the overexpression of just one subunit and its modification by His-tag insertion, might be used in future works on the enzymes of this class from other methylobacteria.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms231810337/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.M. and O.P.; methodology, D.F. and S.A.; software, S.A.; validation, T.K., S.B., and D.F.; formal analysis, G.E. and T.K.; investigation, T.K., S.B. and L.T.; resources, O.P.; data curation, S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, T.K.; writing—review and editing, S.B., A.A. and O.P.; visualization, T.K., A.A. and S.A.; supervision, I.M.; project administration, O.P.; funding acquisition, O.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation in the framework of state assignment, grant number FEWG-2020-0008.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pham, D.N.; Nguyen, A.D.; Lee, E.Y. Outlook on engineering methylotrophs for one-carbon-based industrial biotechnology. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 449, 137769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chistoserdova, L.; Kalyuzhnaya, M.G. Current Trends in Methylotrophy. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Anthony, C. The Biochemistry of Methylotrophs; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  4. Doronina, N.V.; Torgonskaya, M.L.; Fedorov, D.N.; Trotsenko, Y.A. Aerobic methylobacteria as promising objects of modern biotechnology (Review). Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2015, 51, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ochsner, A.M.; Sonntag, F.; Buchhaupt, M.; Schrader, J.; Vorholt, J.A. Methylobacterium extorquens: Methylotrophy and biotechnological applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 517–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Khmelenina, V.N.; But, S.Y.; Rozova, O.N.; Trotsenko, Y.A. Metabolic Features of Aerobic Methanotrophs: News and Views. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2019, 33, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bosch, G.; Skovran, E.; Xia, Q.; Wang, T.; Taub, F.; Miller, J.A.; Lidstrom, M.E.; Hackett, M. Comprehensive proteomics of Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 metabolism under single carbon and nonmethylotrophic conditions. Proteomics 2008, 8, 3494–3505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, M.; Yuan, X.J.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, L.P.; Mo, X.H.; Chen, W.J.; Yang, S. Bioconversion of methanol into valueadded chemicals in native and synthetic methylotrophs. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2019, 33, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Le, T.K.; Lee, Y.J.; Han, G.H.; Yeom, S.J. Methanol dehydrogenases as a key biocatalysts for synthetic methylotrophy. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 428, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Le, T.K.; Ju, S.B.; Lee, H.W.; Lee, J.Y.; Oh, S.H.; Kwon, K.K.; Sung, B.H.; Lee, S.G.; Yeom, S.J. Biosensor-based directed evolution of methanol dehydrogenase from Lysinibacillus xylanilyticus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Anthony, C. Methanol dehydrogenase, a PQQ-containing quinoprotein dehydrogenase. Sub-Cell. Cell. Biochem. 2000, 35, 73–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gvozdev, A.R.; Tukhvatullin, I.A.; Gvozdev, R.I. Quinone-dependent alcohol dehydrogenases and FAD-dependent alcohol oxidases. Biochemistry 2012, 77, 843–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Keltjens, J.T.; Pol, A.; Reimann, J.; Op den Camp, H.J.M. PQQ-dependent methanol dehydrogenases: Rare-earth elements make a difference. Appl. Microbiol. Microbiol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 6163–6183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Firsova, Y.E.; Torgonskaya, M.L.; Trotsenko, Y.A. Functionality of the xoxF gene in Methylobacterium dichloromethanicum DM4. Microbiology 2015, 84, 796–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yanpirat, P.; Nakatsuji, Y.; Hiraga, S.; Fujitani, Y.; Izumi, T.; Masuda, S.; Mitsui, R.; Nakagawa, T.; Tani, A. Lanthanide-dependent methanol and formaldehyde oxidation in Methylobacterium aquaticum strain 22A. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vu, H.N.; Subuyuj, G.A.; Vijayakumar, S.; Good, N.M.; Martinez-Gomez, N.C.; Skovran, E.; Metcalf, W.W. Lanthanide-dependent regulation of methanol oxidation systems in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 and their contribution to methanol growth. J. Bacteriol. 2016, 198, 1250–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Good, N.M.; Fellner, M.; Demirer, K.; Hu, J.; Hausinger, R.P.; Martinez-Gomez, N.C. Lanthanide-dependent alcohol dehydrogenases require an essential aspartate residue for metal coordination and enzymatic function. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 8272–8284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Misra, H.S.; Rajpurohit, Y.S.; Khairnar, N.P. Pyrroloquinoline-quinone and its versatile roles in biological processes. J. Biosci. 2012, 37, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ikeda, T.; Kano, K. Bioelectrocatalysis-based application of quinoproteins and quinoprotein-containing bacterial cells in biosensors and biofuel cells. Biochim. Biophys Acta 2003, 1647, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Williams, P.A.; Coates, L.; Mohammed, F.; Gill, R.; Erskine, P.T.; Coker, A.; Wood, S.P.; Anthony, C.; Cooper, J.B. The atomic resolution structure of methanol dehydrogenase from Methylobacterium extorquens. Acta Crystallographica. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2005, 61 Pt 1, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jahn, B.; Jonasson, N.S.W.; Hu, H.; Singer, H.; Pol, A.; Good, N.M.; den Camp, H.; Martinez-Gomez, N.C.; Daumann, L.J. Understanding the chemistry of the artificial electron acceptors PES, PMS, DCPIP and Wurster’s Blue in methanol dehydrogenase assays. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 25, 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Davis, G.; Hill, H.A.O.; Aston, W.J.; John Higgins, I.; Turner, A.P.F. Bioelectrochemical fuel cell and sensor based on a quinoprotein, alcohol dehydrogenase. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1983, 5, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Suye, S.-i.; Nakamura, Y.; Inuta, S.; Ikeda, T.; Senda, M. Mediated amperometric determination of ammonia with a methanol dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas sp. AM-1 immobilized carbon paste electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 1996, 11, 529–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Q.F.; Kirchhoff, J.R. Amperometric detection of methanol with a methanol dehydrogenase modified electrode sensor. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2007, 601, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kuznetsova, T.A.; Beschastnyi, A.P.; Alferov, S.V.; Trotsenko Iu, A. Properties of modified amperometric biosensors based on methanol dehydrogenase and Methylobacterium nodulans cells. Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol. 2013, 49, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kalimuthu, P.; Daumann, L.J.; Pol, A.; Op den Camp, H.J.M.; Bernhardt, P.V. Electrocatalysis of a Europium-Dependent Bacterial Methanol Dehydrogenase with Its Physiological Electron-Acceptor Cytochrome cGJ. Chemistry 2019, 25, 8760–8768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kadowaki, M.A.S.; Magri, S.; de Godoy, M.O.; Monclaro, A.V.; Zarattini, M.; Cannella, D. A fast and easy strategy for lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase-cleavable His6-Tag cloning, expression, and purification. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2021, 143, 109704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hofer, M.; Bonsch, K.; Greiner-Stoffele, T.; Ballschmiter, M. Characterization and Engineering of a Novel Pyrroloquinoline Quinone Dependent Glucose Dehydrogenase from Sorangium cellulosum So ce56. Mol. Biotechnol. 2011, 47, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Groom, J.D.; Yu, Z.; Chistoserdova, L. Chapter Four—Expression, purification and properties of the enzymes involved in lanthanide-dependent alcohol oxidation: XoxF4, XoxF5, ExaF/PedH, and XoxG4. In Methods in Enzymology; Cotruvo, J.A., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; Volume 650, pp. 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, J.; Yu, Z.; Groom, J.; Cheng, J.-F.; Tarver, A.; Yoshikuni, Y.; Chistoserdova, L. Rare earth element alcohol dehydrogenases widely occur among globally distributed, numerically abundant and environmentally important microbes. ISME J. 2019, 13, 2005–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marx, C.J.; Lidstrom, M.E. Development of improved versatile broad-host-range vectors for use in methylotrophs and other Gram-negative bacteria. Microbiology 2001, 147 Pt 8, 2065–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Vuilleumier, S.; Chistoserdova, L.; Lee, M.C.; Bringel, F.; Lajus, A.; Zhou, Y.; Gourion, B.; Barbe, V.; Chang, J.; Cruveiller, S.; et al. Methylobacterium genome sequences: A reference blueprint to investigate microbial metabolism of C1 compounds from natural and industrial sources. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chistoserdova, L.; Chen, S.W.; Lapidus, A.; Lidstrom, M.E. Methylotrophy in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 from a genomic point of view. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 2980–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Morris, C.J.; Biville, F.; Turlin, E.; Lee, E.; Ellermann, K.; Fan, W.H.; Ramamoorthi, R.; Springer, A.L.; Lidstrom, M.E. Isolation, phenotypic characterization, and complementation analysis of mutants of Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 unable to synthesize pyrroloquinoline quinone and sequences of pqqD, pqqG, and pqqC. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176, 1746–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Toyama, H.; Chistoserdova, L.; Lidstrom, M.E. Sequence analysis of pqq genes required for biosynthesis of pyrroloquinoline quinone in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 and the purification of a biosynthetic intermediate. Microbiology 1997, 143 Pt 2, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tanaka, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Watanabe, K.; Izumi, Y.; Mitsunaga, T. Cloning and analysis of methanol oxidation genes in the methylotroph Hyphomicrobium methylovorum GM2. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1997, 154, 397–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chao, H.; Wu, B.; Shen, P. Overexpression of the methanol dehydrogenase gene mxaF in Methylobacterium sp. MB200 enhances L-serine production. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 61, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Goodwin, M.G.; Avezoux, A.; Dales, S.L.; Anthony, C. Reconstitution of the quinoprotein methanol dehydrogenase from inactive Ca(2+)-free enzyme with Ca2+, Sr2+ or Ba2+. Biochem. J. 1996, 319 Pt 3, 839–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Martínez-Espinosa, R.M. Heterologous and Homologous Expression of Proteins from Haloarchaea: Denitrification as Case of Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Anthony, C.; Williams, P. The structure and mechanism of methanol dehydrogenase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Proteins Proteom. 2003, 1647, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, H.G.; Han, G.H.; Kim, D.; Choi, J.S.; Kim, S.W. Comparative analysis of two types of methanol dehydrogenase from Methylophaga aminisulfidivorans MPT grown on methanol. J. Basic Microbiol. 2012, 52, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hothi, P.; Sutcliffe, M.J.; Scrutton, N.S. Kinetic isotope effects and ligand binding in PQQ-dependent methanol dehydrogenase. Biochem. J. 2005, 388 Pt 1, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Grosse, S.; Voigt, C.; Wendlandt, K.-D.; Kleber, H.-P. Purification and properties of methanol dehydrogenase from Methylosinus sp. WI 14. J. Basic Microbiol. 1998, 38, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Grosse, S.; Wendlandt, K.D.; Kleber, H.P. Purification and properties of methanol dehydrogenase from Methylocystis sp. GB 25. J. Basic Microbiol. 1997, 37, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Frank, J.; Duine, J.A. Methanol Dehydrogenase from Hyphomicrobium-X. Method Enzymol. 1990, 188, 202–209. [Google Scholar]
  46. Richardson, I.W.; Anthony, C. Characterization of mutant forms of the quinoprotein methanol dehydrogenase lacking an essential calcium ion. Biochem. J. 1992, 287 Pt 3, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kuznetsova, T.A.; Beschastny, A.P.; Ponamoreva, O.N.; Trotsenko, Y.A. Purification and characterization of methanol dehydrogenase of Methylobacterium nodulans rhizosphere phytosymbionts. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2012, 48, 546–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Anthony, C. The quinoprotein dehydrogenases for methanol and glucose. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 428, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Liu, Q.; Kirchhoff, J.R.; Faehnle, C.R.; Viola, R.E.; Hudson, R.A. A rapid method for the purification of methanol dehydrogenase from Methylobacterium extorquens. Protein Expr. Purif. 2006, 46, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chang, A.K.; Lim, C.Y.; Kim, S.W.; You, H.J.; Hahm, K.S.; Yoon, S.M.; Park, J.K.; Lee, J.S. Purification and characterization of two forms of methanol dehydrogenases from a marine methylotroph. J. Basic Microbiol. 2002, 42, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Martic, S.; Labib, M.; Shipman, P.O.; Kraatz, H.B. Ferrocene-peptido conjugates: From synthesis to sensory applications. Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 7264–7290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Beitollahi, H.; Khalilzadeh, M.A.; Tajik, S.; Safaei, M.; Zhang, K.; Jang, H.W.; Shokouhimehr, M. Recent Advances in Applications of Voltammetric Sensors Modified with Ferrocene and Its Derivatives. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 2049–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Kurganov, B.I.; Lobanov, A.V.; Borisov, I.A.; Reshetilov, A.N. Criterion for Hill equation validity for description of biosensor calibration curves. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 427, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, X.; Reddy, S.Y.; Bruice, T.C. Mechanism of methanol oxidation by quinoprotein methanol dehydrogenase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 745–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Alferov, V.A.; Zaitsev, M.G.; Ponomareva, O.N.; Kuznetsova, T.A.; Rogova, T.V.; Reshetilov, A.N. An Alcohol Oxidase-Based Electrochemical Sensor for the Rapid Determination of Lower Alcohols. J. Anal. Chem. 2011, 66, 1205–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gulce, H.; Gulce, A.; Kavanoz, M.; Coskun, H.; Yildiz, A. A new amperometric enzyme electrode for alcohol determination. Biosens Bioelectron 2002, 17, 517–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lee, J.-Y.; Sung, B.H.; Oh, S.-H.; Kwon, K.K.; Lee, H.; Kim, H.; Lee, D.-H.; Yeom, S.-J.; Lee, S.-G. C1 Compound biosensors: Des. functional study and applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Simon, R.; Priefer, U.; Pühler, A. A Broad Host Range Mobilization System for In Vivo Genetic Engineering: Transposon Mutagenesis in Gram Negative Bacteria. Bio/Technology 1983, 1, 784–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Green, M.R.; Sambrook, J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 4th ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012; Volume 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  60. Skovran, E.; Palmer, A.D.; Rountree, A.M.; Good, N.M.; Lidstrom, M.E. XoxF is required for expression of methanol dehydrogenase in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 6032–6038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Genetic map of the expression vector with mxaF gene from Methylorubrum extorquens AM1.
Figure 1. Genetic map of the expression vector with mxaF gene from Methylorubrum extorquens AM1.
Ijms 23 10337 g001
Figure 2. (a) SDS-PAAG electrophoresis of the purified recombinant protein MDH-His6-tag and supernatant of recombinant and wild-type strains of M. extorquens. The concentration of the separating gel was 12%, SDS was added to 0.1% concentration. 1—purified enzyme, 2—supernatant of M. extorquens pCM160::mxaF, 3—supernatant of M. extorquens AM1, MW—molecular weight markers (Unstained Protein MW Marker, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). (b) Native PAAG with 5–12% concentration gradient. (I) 1—purified enzyme, MW—molecular weight markers (High MW Native Marker Kit, GE Healthcare, USA); (II) Visualization of MDH activity. Methanol dehydrogenase activity was detected using nitroblue tetrazolium and phenazine methosulfate in the presence of 20 mM methanol and 15 mM ammonium chloride.
Figure 2. (a) SDS-PAAG electrophoresis of the purified recombinant protein MDH-His6-tag and supernatant of recombinant and wild-type strains of M. extorquens. The concentration of the separating gel was 12%, SDS was added to 0.1% concentration. 1—purified enzyme, 2—supernatant of M. extorquens pCM160::mxaF, 3—supernatant of M. extorquens AM1, MW—molecular weight markers (Unstained Protein MW Marker, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). (b) Native PAAG with 5–12% concentration gradient. (I) 1—purified enzyme, MW—molecular weight markers (High MW Native Marker Kit, GE Healthcare, USA); (II) Visualization of MDH activity. Methanol dehydrogenase activity was detected using nitroblue tetrazolium and phenazine methosulfate in the presence of 20 mM methanol and 15 mM ammonium chloride.
Ijms 23 10337 g002
Figure 3. Stability of MDH-His6-tag (1.3 mg/mL): (a) Upon storage in 25 mM potassium phosphate buffer solution (pH 6.5) at +4 °C without stabilizing agents, and at −70 °C with 50% glycerol supply; (b) Thermostability of MDH-His6-tag at pH 8.0. Activity of the non-heated enzyme was defined as 100%.
Figure 3. Stability of MDH-His6-tag (1.3 mg/mL): (a) Upon storage in 25 mM potassium phosphate buffer solution (pH 6.5) at +4 °C without stabilizing agents, and at −70 °C with 50% glycerol supply; (b) Thermostability of MDH-His6-tag at pH 8.0. Activity of the non-heated enzyme was defined as 100%.
Ijms 23 10337 g003
Figure 4. Process occurring upon oxidation of primary alcohols under the action of PQQ-cofactor-containing MDH-His6-tag in presence of ferrocene (a). Dependence of amperometric MDH-His6-tag -based mediator biosensor response (∆I) on methanol concentration (b). Biosensor operation conditions: 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 8.0, supplied with 15 mM NH4Cl;.
Figure 4. Process occurring upon oxidation of primary alcohols under the action of PQQ-cofactor-containing MDH-His6-tag in presence of ferrocene (a). Dependence of amperometric MDH-His6-tag -based mediator biosensor response (∆I) on methanol concentration (b). Biosensor operation conditions: 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 8.0, supplied with 15 mM NH4Cl;.
Ijms 23 10337 g004
Table 1. Purification of MDH-His6-tag from M. extorquens pCM160::mxaF_M.ext.
Table 1. Purification of MDH-His6-tag from M. extorquens pCM160::mxaF_M.ext.
Purification StepSpecific Activity, Units/mgActivity, Units/mLProtein, mg/mLTotal Activity, UnitsTotal Protein, mgYield, %Purification Degree
Supernatant0.541.041.932.604.82100.01.0
MDH- His6-tag3.740.930.250.930.2535.67.00
Table 2. Thermal stability of MDH-His6-tag measured by residual activity, %.
Table 2. Thermal stability of MDH-His6-tag measured by residual activity, %.
Temperature, °CIncubation Time, min
20304560
4082.671.369.461.1
5081.464.764.764.1
6068.343.749.129.9
Table 3. The used buffer solutions and corresponding MDH-His6-tag activities.
Table 3. The used buffer solutions and corresponding MDH-His6-tag activities.
Buffer Solution, 0.1MpHActivity, %
Acetate-NaOH456.1 ± 0.6
Acetate-NaOH577 ± 3
KH2PO4-NaOH684 ± 2
KH2PO4-NaOH792 ± 3
Tris-HCl892 ± 2
Tris-HCl9100
Glycine-NaOH1093 ± 0.2
Na2HPO4-NaOH1191 ± 0.1
Table 4. Michaelis–Menten parameters of MDH-His6-tag in reactions with different substrates (p = 0.95; n = 3). Reaction rates were measured at 30 °C, pH 9.0.
Table 4. Michaelis–Menten parameters of MDH-His6-tag in reactions with different substrates (p = 0.95; n = 3). Reaction rates were measured at 30 °C, pH 9.0.
SubstrateApparent KM, mMVmax, U/mg ProteinActivity, %
Methanol0.36 ± 0.074.2 ± 0.2100
Ethanol0.61 ± 0.062.9 ± 0.179
Butanol-11.9 ± 0.22.7 ± 0.171
Amyl alcohol1.4 ± 0.12.8 ± 0.167
Formaldehyden.a.n.a.91
Table 5. The sequence of stages of obtaining the recombinant MDH by homologous expression method.
Table 5. The sequence of stages of obtaining the recombinant MDH by homologous expression method.
Stage of Recombinant MDH PurificationTime Required, Days
  • Designing and purchasing primers
1
2.
Amplification of mxaF from M. extorquens by PCR method
1
3.
Purification of PCR product (amplicon)
4.
Restriction of pCM160 plasmid and amplicon by PaeI and EcoRI enzymes
1
5.
Ligation of the fragments and obtaining the recombinant plasmid pCM160/mxaF
6.
Transformation of E.coli Top10 by pCM160mxaF plasmid constructions
1
7.
Plasmid isolation and sequencing
1 (plus shipping time in case of sequencing in other institutions)
8.
Clone selection
2
9.
Conjugative transfer into M. extorquens
3
10.
Selection on kanamycin medium
7
11.
Cultivation of biomass in bulk volume and protein expression
7
12.
Enzyme purification and activity determination
1
Total time, days:25
Table 6. Bacterial strains and plasmids.
Table 6. Bacterial strains and plasmids.
Strain or PlasmidSpecificationReference
Escherichia coli
S17-1thi pro recA hsdR [RP4-2Tc::Mu-Km::Tn7] Tpr Smr[58]
TOP10F
crAΔ(mrr + hsdRMS + mcrBC)
ϕ80lacZΔM15ΔlacΧ74recA1araD139
Δ(ara + leu)7697 galU galK rpsL (Strr) endA1 nupG λ-
Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA
Methylorubrum extorquens
AM1Wild-type strain
pCM160::mxaFRecombinant strains containing pCM160mxaF, Kmr plasmidThis work
Plasmids
pCM160Mobilizable vector for protein expression in M. extorquens under control of mxaF gene promoter, Kmr[31]
pCM160::mxaFpCM160 containing PaeI/EcoRI-fragment with MxaF gene from M. extorquens AM1, KmrThis work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karaseva, T.; Fedorov, D.; Baklagina, S.; Ponamoreva, O.; Alferov, S.; Ekimova, G.; Abdullatypov, A.; Trubitsina, L.; Mustakhimov, I. Isolation and Characterization of Homologically Expressed Methanol Dehydrogenase from Methylorubrum extorquens AM1 for the Development of Bioelectrocatalytical Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810337

AMA Style

Karaseva T, Fedorov D, Baklagina S, Ponamoreva O, Alferov S, Ekimova G, Abdullatypov A, Trubitsina L, Mustakhimov I. Isolation and Characterization of Homologically Expressed Methanol Dehydrogenase from Methylorubrum extorquens AM1 for the Development of Bioelectrocatalytical Systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(18):10337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810337

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karaseva, Tatiana, Dmitry Fedorov, Sophia Baklagina, Olga Ponamoreva, Sergey Alferov, Galina Ekimova, Azat Abdullatypov, Liubov Trubitsina, and Ildar Mustakhimov. 2022. "Isolation and Characterization of Homologically Expressed Methanol Dehydrogenase from Methylorubrum extorquens AM1 for the Development of Bioelectrocatalytical Systems" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 18: 10337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810337

APA Style

Karaseva, T., Fedorov, D., Baklagina, S., Ponamoreva, O., Alferov, S., Ekimova, G., Abdullatypov, A., Trubitsina, L., & Mustakhimov, I. (2022). Isolation and Characterization of Homologically Expressed Methanol Dehydrogenase from Methylorubrum extorquens AM1 for the Development of Bioelectrocatalytical Systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(18), 10337. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810337

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop