1. Introduction
Research on therapies for inflammatory diseases such as intestinal bowel disease (IBD) typically investigates cytokines and/or cell surface receptors that directly control downstream immune responses or signaling molecules. Examples are studies on antibody drugs against IL-6 and TNF-α which have successful anti-inflammatory effects in IBD patients. Nevertheless, it is established that targeting a single molecule is only partially effective and additional administration of multiple drugs directed to various targets is usually required to efficiently control the disease. In this respect, processes involving proteins of endosomes, lysosomes, and related intracellular vesicles are being increasingly investigated to find out new potential therapeutic routes for treating inflammatory diseases [
1]. Endolysosomes are subcellular organelles central in regulating membrane repair, autophagy, cell death, endocytosis, and other aspects of cellular homeostasis [
2,
3]. Many features of endolysosomes, including internal pH, levels of amino acids, ions content and transport processes across membranes are finely tuned to optimize signaling events: dysregulation of these properties causes disturbance of their functions including signal transduction [
4]. The solute carrier family 15 member A4 (SLC15A4), also known as peptide/histidine transporter 1 (PHT1), is an endolysosome-resident transporter which transports histidine, oligopeptides with certain specificity for histidine-containing dipeptides, and NOD1 ligands as L-Ala-γ-D-Glu-meso-diaminopimelic acid (tri-DAP), from inside the lysosome outwardly to the cytosol exploiting proton gradients [
5,
6].
SLC15A4 gene is specifically expressed in immune cells such as B cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells [
7,
8] playing a critical role in autoimmune and other inflammatory diseases: genome-wide analyses as well as data from murine models indicate that it is closely associated with processes causing type 2 diabetes [
9], systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [
10] and IBD [
6,
7,
11]. In fact, SLC15A4/PHT1 is critical for TLR7- and TLR9-dependent production of cytokines including type I interferons (IFN-I) and IL-6 [
6,
12,
13]. In addition, SLC15A4/PHT1 colocalizes with mechanistic targets of rapamycin (mTOR) in LAMP1+ compartments and is also important for the regulation of mTORC1 activity, that is required not only for TLR7- and TLR9-mediated signaling but for IFN-regulatory factors (IRFs) activation also [
7]. SLC15A4/PHT1 mediates TLR7/TLR9-dependent signaling through several mechanisms. One mechanism involves its transporter activity [
7]. As a carrier, SLC15A4/PHT1 is acknowledged for transport activity of histidine from the endolysosome into the cytosol, and thus SLC15A4/PHT1 deficiency causes histidine accumulation in the endolysosomal compartment. Histidine is the only amino acid possessing an imidazole ring and has unique acid–base properties (pKa ~6), and so it is highly effective in controlling pH; in this respect, the accumulation of histidine in endolysosomes prevents the vesicular acidification by buffering action [
7]. De-acidification of endolysosomes interferes with activation of the mTORC1 signaling axis; hence, SLC15A4/PHT1 is crucial to control endolysosomes pH in TLR7/TLR9 and IFN-I circuits [
7]. Another mechanism through which SLC15A4/PHT1 mediates TLR7/TLR9-dependent signaling is its scaffolding function with respect to IRF5 [
14]. This function is exerted by association with the adaptor protein TASL (“TLR adaptor interacting with SLC15A4 on the lysosome”), encoded by the SLE-associated gene, CXorf21 [
15,
16]. Deletion of SLC15A4/PHT1 or TASL specifically impairs the activation of the IRF pathway without affecting NF-κB and MAPK signaling, that indicates that ligand recognition and TLR engagement in the endolysosome occur normally. Furthermore, TASL contains a conserved motif (namely pLxIS) that mediates the recruitment and activation of IRF5. This finding shows that TASL is an innate immune mediator for TLR7, TLR8, and TLR9 signaling, revealing a clear mechanistic analogy with the IRF3 adaptors STING, MAVS, and TRIF. The identification of TASL as a component linking endolysosomal TLRs to the IRF5 transcription factor via SLC15A4/PHT1 provides a mechanistic explanation for the involvement of these proteins in inflammatory disease processes. Finally, a novel function of SLC15A4/PHT1 has been further revealed in the maintenance of mitochondrial integrity required to maintain autophagy [
11].
In mouse models, the loss of
SLC15A4 gene products significantly ameliorates the symptoms of several diseases, presumably by affecting multiple signaling pathways mediated by TLR7/TLR9, IRFs, and mTORC1. For example, in mouse models of SLE, loss of SLC15A4/PHT1 suppresses the IFN-I secretion and production of pathogenic anti-dsDNA and anti-snRNP autoantibodies. Katewa et al. also demonstrated that lack of SLC15A4/PHT1 protects mice from developing spontaneous lupus nephritis and from lupus disease development after IFN-α administration [
10]. In an acute psoriasiform dermatitis model, SCL15A4
feeble mice (mice with one base-pair mutation in the SCL15A4 gene that renders the transport activity inactive) are resistant to TLR-7 agonist imiquimod inducing weight loss and epidermal skin thickening [
16]. Finally, SLC15A4/PHT1 protein is also a potential therapeutic target in patients with colitis.
SLC15A4/PHT1-deficient mice show alleviation of DSS-induced colitis [
6]. In mucosal immune cells, as dendritic cells and macrophages, SLC15A4 presumably promotes gut inflammation by mediating NOD1- and TLR9-dependent inflammatory responses [
6]; therefore, it is conceivable that SLC15A4/PHT1 loss efficiently ameliorates gut inflammation by diminishing both TLR9-mediated and NOD1-mediated signaling.
To date, the role of the SLC15A4/PHT1 gene in cellular physiology is not fully characterized and the functional importance of this transporter is being more deeply investigated only recently. The major information presented to date in the literature highlight the evidence that the SLC15A4/PHT1 protein pivotally and widely affects inflammatory and metabolic signaling at the endolysosome level, and that functional loss of it inhibits multiple inflammatory signals in various inflammatory cellular settings. Several studies describe the association of SLC15A4/PHT1 “gain-of-function” with the immune/autoimmune/inflammatory processes, also concerning GI (gastrointestinal) inflammatory diseases; nevertheless, the relevant knowledge is mainly limited to immune cells, still lacking established information regarding intestinal cells and tissue districts. In this work, we aimed to characterize the physiological and pathophysiological expression features of the SLC15A4/PHT1 gene products in the intestinal epithelial monolayer in the context of responses to stimuli and processes eliciting inflammation of the GI epithelial barrier, and to identify SLC15A4/PHT1 expression and functional significance in the context of inflammatory alterations related to the human IBD etiological framework.
3. Discussion
SLC15A4/PHT1 (solute carrier family 15 member 4; peptide histidine transporter 1) is an endo-lysosomal carrier involved in TLR7-9/NOD1 signaling pathways in immune cells and intestinal epithelial cells. In humans, it has been investigated with respect to autoimmune syndromes, including IBD. Although in this pathophysiological context some mechanisms and pathways involving SLC15A4/PHT1 in immune cells have been described, knowledge of its gene products in cells of the gastrointestinal tract is still poor. Here, we investigated
SLC15A4/PHT1 gene products in vitro in differentiated enterocyte-like Caco-2 monolayers, as a model of the intestinal epithelial layer, responding to proinflammatory DSS (dextran sodium sulphate). Compromised epithelium/barrier function is a feature of inflammatory intestinal disease and may be critical to both initial pathogenesis and reactivation of chronic intestinal disorders [
17]. In this view, DSS is a chemical agent specifically mirroring inflammatory processes of IBD in vivo in mouse models of ulcerative colitis, which has been widely used to induce epithelial barrier disruptive inflammation in vivo and in vitro [
18,
19], although many mechanisms associated with DSS-induced colitis are still to be clarified.
We challenged differentiated enterocyte-like Caco-2 monolayers in order to elicit a framework of inflammation within which assessing SLC15A4/PHT1 modulation and localization i.e., its (dys) regulation in inflamed vs. healthy epithelial layer. As contemplated in the Introduction, SLC15A4/PHT1 involves TLR7 and MTORC1 which run also on NfKB-independent inflammation routes. In our in vitro intestinal cell model, we analyzed NfKB1, IL-6, and IL-1 mRNAs for checking the “ab initio” responsiveness in terms of inflammation activation. In this framework, NF-kB1 and IL-6mRNA levels significantly increased by all treatments in a DSS dose-dependent manner (see
Figure 1), together with CASP3 mRNA, indicating that activations of inflammation and apoptosis pathways concur in Caco-2 monolayers challenged with DSS, as reported by other studies [
20,
21]. In our in vitro model, mRNA expression variations of the
SLC15A4/PHT1 gene have been detected. The SLC15A4/PHT1 mRNA increases in DSS dose-dependent manner (see
Figure 2). These results are, remarkably, in agreement with the immunofluorescence analysis in which anti-human SLC15A4/PHT1 immunoreactivity increases in DSS-treated monolayers depending on dose (
Figure 3 and
Figure 4). Moreover, SLC15A4/PHT1 immunoreactivity increases in DSS dose-dependent manner feasibly according to DSS-induced morphological derangement of monolayers, although this qualitative association deserves further quantitative/molecular assessment. From the overall data emerges that, in parallel to NF-kB1, IL-6, and CASP3 mRNA expression, DSS treatments coherently increase the amount of the
SLC15A4/PHT1 gene products in enterocyte-like monolayers; so, the in vitro model hints a potentially amplified function of SLC15A4/PHT1 associated to inflammation triggering in enterocyte-like cells.
In parallel, investigations have been moved to the human clinical setting. In light of studies that have linked SLC15A4/PHT1 to inflammatory diseases [
10,
16] and IBD [
6], here it has been investigated for the first time the expression of SLC15A4/PHT1 protein in colon histological sections of IBD patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), finding its major localization in epithelial cells. Then, of great importance was the evidence of subcellular localization of SLC15A4/PHT1. In previous studies, the cellular localization of the transporter was studied by immunofluorescence only in epithelial cell lines demonstrating that this protein was expressed in early endosomes [
12]. In human colon biopsies from UC patients, SLC15A4/PHT1 immunoreactivity was localized in absorptive enterocytes (near brush border) putatively in intracellular vesicular formations in agreement with its endo/lysosome localization, and rarely in secretory cells (Goblet cells) besides in immune cells of lamina propria (
Figure 5). Histological analysis revealed that anti-human SLC15A4/PHT1 immunoreactivity has been found abundant along the entire inflamed epithelial layer of UC patients with respect to healthy control patients, in which it is only faintly detected (
Figure 6). The intense SLC15A4/PHT1 labeling in colon biopsies of UC patients hints at confirmation of the assessment of SLC15A4/PHT1 as a marker of intestinal monolayer’s response to inflammation, as strongly corroborated by the results of in vitro studies presented. It is worth noting that the DSS Caco-2 monolayer model is shown to be valuably predictive, in light of the findings in vivo in human patients. According to histochemistry data, qPCR analysis revealed that the expression of SLC15A4/PHT1 mRNA increases in UC patients with respect to healthy controls (
Figure 7); this evidence is in accordance with Lee et al. which preliminarily described the up-regulation of SLC15A4/PHT1 mRNA in inflamed areas of the colon in UC and Chron’s disease patients [
12]. Taken together, the mRNA/protein up-regulations are found according to a hypothesis of gain of SLC15A4/PHT1 function associated with GI inflammation pathways and, particularly, to IBD; dysregulation, i.e., increased expression of SLC15A4/PHT1 is revealed as deeply associated to inflammation in patients’ intestinal epithelium, allowing to point
SLC15A4/PHT1 gene as a novel marker to be exploited in studying IBD manifestation.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Reagents and Materials
All chemicals, reagents, and kits were purchased at cell culture/molecular biology grade. Plasticware were invariably purchased sterilized, disposable, and treated for cell culture. Fetal bovine serum (FBS), Dulbecco’s phosphate buffer saline (D-PBS), Eagle’s minimum essential medium (MEM), penicillin/streptomycin solutions, trypsin, L-glutamine, and non-essential amino acids were purchased from Corning-Fisher Scientific (Rodano, MI, Italy). 4’,6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole (DAPI; Cat.: 28718-90-3), Triton X-100, paraformaldehyde (PFA; Cat. 30525-89-4), bovine serum albumin (BSA), dextran sulfate sodium salt from Leuconostoc spp. (DSS Mr 5000; Cat.: 9011-18-1) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milano, Italy).
4.2. Cell Culture and Treatments
Human epithelial Caco-2 cells (ATCC n. HTB-37™) were grown at 37 °C, in a humidified atmosphere (5% CO
2 in air), in MEM supplemented with 10% (
v/
v) FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 µg/mL penicillin-streptomycin and 1% (
v/
v) non-essential amino acid mix solution. The culture medium was replaced every third day and propagation occurred routinely every 4–5 days post-seeding (dps). For the experimental treatments, cells between passage 3 and passage 10 of propagation were used, after continuous growth for 21 dps in standard culture conditions, in order to obtain a spontaneously differentiated enterocyte-like intestinal epithelial monolayer according to standard Caco-2 cell differentiation protocols [
22,
23]. At 21 dps, monolayers grown in 12-well plates (Corning-Fisher Scientific, Rodano, MI, Italy; seeding density 0.5 × 10
5 cells per well) were incubated for 48 h in the presence of 2% or 4% (
w/
v) DSS (final concentrations in the culture medium); 100X DSS solutions in D-PBS were filtered through 0.22 µm pore sterile filters before use.
4.3. Immunocytochemistry (ICC)
Briefly, 1.5 × 10
5 Caco-2 cells were seeded and grown on autoclaved, UV-sterilized glass coverslips for 21 dps, then fixed with 4% (
w/
v) paraformaldehyde (PFA) after the experimental treatments as described above. Cells were washed with D-PBS (3 times for 10 min), permeabilized with 0.25% (
v/
v) saponin in D-PBS for 10 min at room temperature, and blocked against unspecific binding with 5% (
w/
v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.1% (
v/
v) Triton X-100 in D-PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Afterwards, the cells were incubated with the anti-SLC15A4 primary antibody (Cat. n. #PA5-42513, ThermoFisher;1:200 dilution) overnight at 4 °C. After washing, the cells were incubated with the anti-rabbit IgG F (ab`)
2 fragment-FITC secondary antibody (Cat. n. F1262, Sigma-Aldrich; 1:500 dilution) for 1 h at 37 °C. A technical negative control was performed by omitting primary antibody and replacing it with D-PBS. Following ICC protocol, nuclei were counterstained by incubating cells for 5 min with DAPI (0.1 mg/mL in D-PBS, l
ex 340 nm, l
em 488 nm). Coverslips were finally mounted with 1:1 glycerol/D-PBS on glass slides and examined with an LSM 710 Zeiss confocal laser microscope equipped with the Zen2012 Black Edition program (Zeiss, Dresden, Germany). The quantification of immunofluorescence in acquired pictures was carried out using the ImageJ open-source program (
https://imagej.net/ImageJ (accessed on 27 December 2021). In each image, ten digital areas were selected in appropriate regions and corresponding fluorescence intensity was calculated as integrated density (i.e., area value multiplied by mean gray value). For each of the three biological replicates, the average values of fluorescence intensity were expressed as a percentage with respect to the untreated control cells (100%).
4.4. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) on Biopsy Sections from IBD Ulcerative Colitis Patients
Ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and healthy controls (HC) were retrospectively enrolled at the Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy of the National Institute of Gastroenterology “S. de Bellis”, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. The study was carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Institutional Ethics Review Boards.
Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were obtained from 40 patients divided into two groups:
Healthy Control group (n = 20 patients) including intestinal surgical resections from patients without ulcerative colitis
Ulcerative colitis group (n = 20 patients, mean age 61 years, range 33–80) including total or subtotal proctocolectomies from patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis refractory to medical therapies.
Sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin were reviewed by a pathologist to confirm the adequacy of the sample and to evaluate the morphologic and or pathological characteristics of the samples.
For IHC detection, 4 µm sections were cut and mounted on Apex Bond IHC slides (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA). Tissue sections were incubated with human anti-SLC15A4 polyclonal antibody (Cat n. PA5-42513 Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA, 1:100 dilution) for 30 min at room temperature. Antigen retrieval was performed by BOND Epitope Retrieval Solution 2 using EDTA pH 9. The Bond Polymer Refine Detection Kit (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) was used as a visualization and chromogen reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were recorded as negative when the number of stained cells was less than 5%.
4.5. RNA Extraction
RNA extractions from cell cultures were performed using the All-Prep DNA/RNA/Protein mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells grown in multi-well plates were washed twice with D-PBS and then lysed with the kit lysis buffer by scraping directly on the plate surface. At the end of the RNA/protein extraction protocols, RNA aliquots were stored in RNase-free conditions at −80 °C until use. RNA concentrations were calculated by spectrophotometry, and the λ260/λ280 ratios were calculated to evaluate RNA purity; all the RNA extractions were qualitatively tested by electrophoresis of RNA samples on 1% (w/v) agarose gels. Total RNA extraction from FFPE histological sections of 5 μm thickness was performed with the miRNeasy FFPE Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol including the treatment of sections with Deparaffinization Solution (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Total RNA was then eluted in ribonuclease-free water. The RNA concentration was determined with the NanoDrop ND-2000 Spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).
4.6. Primer Design, Reverse Transcription and Real Time PCR (qPCR) Assays
The mRNA reference sequences of the investigated genes were collected from the GenBank database (
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene) and were used to select oligonucleotide sequences as primer pairs for consequent real-time PCR (qPCR) assays. By mRNA-to-genomic sequence alignment, the gene-specific forward and reverse primers were designed on different exons (intron spanning) to avoid amplification of genomic DNA. The AmplifX software version 2.0.7 (free download at
https://inp.univ-amu.fr/en/amplifx-manage-test-and-design-your-primers-for-pcr) was used to test PCR size, GC content, end stability, self/cross-dimer formation, and melting temperature for the selected primer pairs. Details of the gene-specific oligonucleotide sequences are reported in
Table 1. Reverse transcription on the extracted RNAs was performed on 500 ng total RNA for each sample, using the iScript Select cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Segrate, MI, Italy) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with random primers in the reaction mix. Before qPCR analysis, primer pairs were tested for efficiency, according to the amplification efficiency parameters for genes of interest and internal controls proposed by Schmittgen and Livak [
19]. qPCR assays were performed using the iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) with the CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). In the qPCR analysis, gene expression relative quantification was performed by analyzing the threshold values (C
T) with the comparative C
T method (also referred to as the 2
−ΔCT or 2
−ΔΔCT method), and qPCR data shown were the 2
−ΔCT values, which are considered as proportional to the amount of detected target mRNA. For each target gene and internal control (housekeeping), ΔC
T values (ΔC
T = target gene C
T − housekeeping gene C
T) were obtained from 2 different rounds of qPCR for each of the three biological replicates. Statistical analysis was performed after the 2
−ΔCT transformation [
24].
4.7. Statistical Analysis
Unless otherwise stated, all data were expressed as the means ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M.). Data means derive from two independent assays for each of the three biological replicates. Statistical analysis by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test was performed using GraphPad Prism 9.4.0; p-value ≤ 0.05 were considered significantly different.