Next Article in Journal
Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase, Redox Homeostasis and Embryogenesis
Next Article in Special Issue
Analgesic Effect of Tranilast in an Animal Model of Neuropathic Pain and Its Role in the Regulation of Tetrahydrobiopterin Synthesis
Previous Article in Journal
Severe Acute Hepatic Dysfunction Induced by Ammonium Acetate Treatment Results in Choroid Plexus Swelling and Ventricle Enlargement in the Brain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Calcium in Neuronal and Glial Response to Axotomy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms23042012
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Contribution of TSLP Activation to Hyperalgesia in Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons of a Rat

by
Chun-Ching Lu
1,2,
Ying-Yi Lu
3,4,
Hung-Pei Tsai
5 and
Chieh-Hsin Wu
5,6,*
1
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan
2
Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
3
Department of Dermatology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan
4
Department of Nursing, Shu-Zen Junior College of Medicine and Management, Kaohsiung 821, Taiwan
5
Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
6
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(4), 2012; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042012
Submission received: 8 January 2022 / Revised: 31 January 2022 / Accepted: 8 February 2022 / Published: 11 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Neuropathic Pain and Nerve Injury)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Peripheral nerve injury involves divergent alterations within dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons sensitized by persistent inflammation. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) production is crucial in the development of chronic inflammatory responses. Herein, we investigate the changes of TSLP expression in rats’ DRG neurons between injured and uninjured sides in the same rat. Linalyl acetate (LA) was served as a TSLP inhibitor and given intraperitoneally. Rats were assigned to be group of chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve and the group of CCI of the sciatic nerve administrated with LA. Over 14 days, the rats were measured for paw withdrawal thresholds. DRGs were collected to assess morphological changes via immunofluorescence study. After receiving CCI, the rats rapidly developed mechanical hyperalgesia. TSLP expression at DRG, on the ipsilateral injured side, was consistent with changes in pain behaviors. TSLP appeared in nerve fibers with both small diameters and large diameters. Additionally, TSLP was expressed mostly in transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1)-positive nociceptive neurons. Administration with LA can attenuate the pain behaviors and expression of TSLP in DRG neurons, and in apoptotic neurons at the injured side, but not in the contra-lateral uninjured side. Overall, these results imply that altered expressions of TSLP in nociceptive DRG neurons contributed to mechanical hyperalgesia in a CCI rat model.

1. Introduction

Acting as a bridge between somatosensory information and the spinal cord, dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons transmit stimuli from peripheral nerve terminals to central nervous structures [1]. DRGs consist of various cells, including macrophages, satellite glial cells and primary sensory neurons [2]. In response to nerve injury, primary sensory neurons adapt their morphology and function to augment the peripheral sensitization and influence expression of nociceptors [3]. Depending on the sizes of cell bodies, DRG neurons are divided into A-neurons (large cell bodies) and C-neurons (small cell bodies). Not only C-neurons (high-threshold Aδ-fibers and C-fibers) but also A neurons (low-threshold Aβ-nociceptors) can relay pain signals [4]. Prolonged inflammation from peripheral nerve injury induces the perception of pain though the activation or sensitization of nociceptors [5]. Neuropathic pain arises from lesions on somatosensory systems and manifests as paresthesia, dysesthesias, allodynia, hyperalgesia, and spontaneous unprovoked pain [6]. It usually occurs simultaneously with sensory loss and weakness [7,8,9] in the same afflicted nerve segment [10], which lacks efficient treatment options [11,12,13]. It compromises quality of life and consumes substantial healthcare resources, leading to major economic consequences [14,15,16,17,18]. Nerve injury induces the release of inflammatory factors at damaged sites, thus further leading to sensory dysfunction within innervated skin. However, the blockade of both A-neurons and C-neurons can prevent mechanical allodynia effectively after nerve injury [19].
Neuro-inflammation, a localized inflammation in nervous systems, leads to enhanced vascular permeability and leukocytes infiltration, thereby activating glial cells and cytokines production [20]. In DRGs, the activation of glial cells and neuronal changes after nerve injury reciprocally promote neuro-inflammation through glial—neuron interaction [21,22,23]. Neuro-inflammation further induces peripheral sensitization and central sensitization, thus resulting in neuropathic pain [24,25]. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) emerges as a cytokine with pleiotropic properties, which is not only involved in various allergic disorders, but is also implicated in chronic inflammatory diseases and cancers [26,27,28,29]. TSLP works through binding to a heteromeric receptor comprising a thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor (TSLPR) chain and interleukin-7 receptor-α (IL-7Rα) [30,31,32,33]. In a demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system (CNS), TSLP was generated by choroid plexus epithelial cells and spinal cord astrocytes [33]. Through working with the TSLPR expressed on microglia cells, the survival of MHC class II+ immune cells was regulated to influence the myelin-degenerative CNS [34]. By activating sensory neurons directly, and/or targeting sensory neurons indirectly through inflammatory mediators secreted by activated immune cells, TSLP excites itch behaviors [35]. Although pain and itch are distinct sensations, they both relay on a nervous system to transmit and interact. Since nociceptive stimuli relieve itch, pain perception is considered to be dominant over itch [36]. Activation of the nociceptive neural pathways alerts harm signals to induce acute withdrawal behaviors [37].
While TSLP’s action is known to regulate itch sensory neurons, its effect on DRG nociceptive neurons needs further clarification. In this study, we used linalyl acetate (LA) as a TSLP inhibitor to see the changes in TSLP in DRG neurons between the injured and uninjured sides of the same rat in a rat chronic constriction injury (CCI) model.

2. Results

2.1. Nerve Injury-Induced Expression of TSLP in DRG Neurons

Sensory stimuli from peripheral tissue are conveyed to the spinal cord by DRG neurons with different sizes depending on their distinct functions [38]. A CCI rat model was established to evaluate nociception via calibrated forceps tests, and sciatic nerve exposure was also performed in a sham group but without sciatic nerve ligation. CCI rats showed mechanical hyperalgesia in the ipsilateral injured side, as compared to the contralateral side in the uninjured and sham group. The paw-withdrawal thresholds between the contralateral side and the sham group were similar (Figure 1A). To assess whether the involvement of TSLP in sensory neurons differed between the ipsilateral injured side and the contralateral side, we examined the changes in TSLP expressed in rat DRGs. Figure 1B shows that 7 days and 14 days after nerve injury, the level of TSLP proteins in lumbar 4/5th DRG from the ipsilateral injured side increased approximately by 3-fold as compared to that from the contralateral uninjured side and the sham group (Figure 1C). These results imply that mechanical hyperalgesia in the ipsilateral injured side of the nerve might be attributed to the changes in TSLP.

2.2. Nerve Injury-Induced TSLP Expression in Both Small-Sized and Large-Sized DRG Neurons

Most of the time, small-sized neurons are responsible for nociceptive information transmission, although Aβ fibers convey pain stimulus in part [39]. To assess the TSLP expression between large- and small-sized DRG neurons, the prevalence of TSLP-positive DRG neurons co-localized with NF200 (marker for large-sized Aβ fiber neurons) and with peripherin (marker for small-sized Aδ and C-fiber neurons) was examined through immunofluorescence [40,41]. Our results demonstrate that the increased TSLP-positive DRG neurons were not only NF200-positive (Figure 2A) but peripherin-positive (Figure 2B) on the ipsilateral injured side, as compared to that on the contralateral, uninjured side and in the sham group. Overall, the TSLP-positive neurons increased in both small-sized and large-sized DRG neurons from the ipsilateral injured side to convey sensory signals after nerve injury.

2.3. Nociceptive DRG Neurons Expressed TSLP after Nerve Injury

Transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) expressed in DRG sensory neurons exerts as a sensor for endogenous or exogenous noxious stimuli [42]. Functioning as a major nociceptive contributor, the TRPV1 in DRG neurons is activated by inflammatory factors to convey pain signals to the spinal cord [43,44]. TRPV1 is preferentially expressed in small-sized DRG sensory neurons [37]. To examine the cellular subtypes of TSLP-positive neurons, we detected the expressions of various neurons markers, including substance P (SP) for peptidergic DRG neurons and TRPV1 for nociceptive DRG neurons. Most TSLP-positive DRG neurons did not express SP in both sides or in the sham group (Figure 2C). In contrast, TRPV1 was expressed and increased in TSLP-positive DRG neurons from the ipsilateral injured side as compared to that from the contralateral uninjured side and the sham group (Figure 2D). These results indicate that TSLP was upregulated in nociceptive DRG neurons after peripheral nerve injury, contributing to the transmission of pain signals.

2.4. LA Decreased Not Only Small-Sized but Also Large-Sized DRG Neurons, Especially Nociceptive DRG Neurons

LA, a main constituent of lavender oil [45], can modulate inflammatory response through downregulating TSLP production, which A23187 and PMA induced in HMC-1 mast cells [46,47,48]. Additionally, LA can ameliorate phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-induced ear edema by inhibiting TSLP in an allergic mouse model [45,49]. Therefore, to address the function of TSLP in mechanical sensitivity, we administered LA as a TSLP inhibitor at a dose of 100 ug/kg into the rats’ peritoneum before CCI. LA decreased the TSLP-positive small-sized DRG neurons (Figure 3A), TSLP-positive large-sized DRG neurons (Figure 3B) and TSLP-positive nociceptive DRG neurons (Figure 3C) in the ipsilateral side and the injured side, as compared to those in the contralateral uninjured side.

2.5. LA Attenuated the Mechanical Hyperalgesia through TSLP/TSLPR Complex

Mechanical hyperalgesia was evaluated at 3, 7 and 14 days after administering LA. CCI rats showed mechanical hyperalgesia in the ipsilateral side as compared to the contralateral side. Moreover, LA-injected CCI rats showed an increase in the paw-withdrawal threshold in response to mechanical stimuli in the ipsilateral side, while rats showed no significant change in paw-withdrawal threshold in the contralateral side in response to LA (Figure 4A).
Meanwhile, to determine whether the LA influenced neuronal apoptosis between the DRGs of both sides, which is crucial in nociception transmission, TUNEL staining was also arranged. The results show that apoptotic neurons increased to nearly 15-fold in the ipsilateral injured side on 7 days and 14 days after nerve injury as compared to the contralateral uninjured side. After treating with LA, the apoptotic DRG neurons in the ipsilateral injured side decreased. However, there was no obvious difference in the contralateral side after treating with LA (Figure 4B,C).
Additionally, we examined the changes in TSLP expressed in rat DRGs after the administration of LA (Figure 5A). At 7 days and 14 days after nerve injury, the level of TSLP proteins in the lumbar 4/5th DRG from the ipsilateral injured side increased, and then reduced after LA injection (Figure 5B).
For transmitting nociceptive signals, TSLP requires a distinctive receptor, TSLPR. Therefore, the TSLP and TSLPR expressions in DRG neurons after nerve injury were examined by immunofluorescence staining in parallel studies. The results show that TSLP and TSLPR were co-expressed (Figure 5C). As expected, the expression of TSLP and its receptor TSLPR substantially increased in lumbar 4/5th DRG from the ipsilateral injured side 7 days and 14 days after nerve injury, suggesting that TSLP expression may have functional roles in DRG neurons through working with TSLPR. This increased expression of TSLP/TSLPR in the ipsilateral injured side persisted for at least 14 days after nerve injury. Furthermore, the expression of TSLP/TSLPR in the ipsilateral injured side DRG decreased after administering LA, while rats showed obvious changes in the contralateral side. Taken together, TSLP-positive DRG neurons might convey pain signals through TSLPR; administration with LA could ameliorate mechanical hyperalgesia and apoptotic neurons by decreasing TSLP/TSLPR signals.

3. Discussion

The present rat study revealed that mechanical hyperalgesia developed in the ipsilateral side as compared to the contralateral side in rats after nerve injury. The TSLP level in lumbar 4/5th DRGs increased consistently with pain behaviors, too. Notably, TSLP-positive neurons were expressed in nociceptive neurons. Besides this, its expression increased regardless of neuronal size. Administering a TSLP inhibitor attenuated the aforementioned changes. Our findings suggest that the TSLP in nociceptive DRG neurons contributes to mechanical hyperalgesia in the ipsilateral injured side.
Since peripheral nerve injury can induce neurons to release inflammatory mediators to alter neuronal excitability [50,51], the abnormal spontaneous activity of DRG sensory neurons can augment pain sensations in supraspinal areas [52]. Additionally, TSLP is known to work with TSLPR to induce pruritic behaviors by activating sensory neurons with the coordination of inflammatory factors [35]. Studies also indicate that herniated intervertebral disc cells induce the release of pro-inflammatory mediators at damaged intervertebral disc nerves [53], in which process the production of TSLP in discs was correlated with patients’ pain scores. Our results show that the expression of TSLP increased in lumbar 4/5th DRG in the ipsilateral injured side after CCI as compared to the contralateral uninjured site, which was consistent with the mechanical threshold. Neuro-glial interactions further enhance the development of persistent pain [54,55], which initiates glial cell activation or proliferation, or DRG neuron death [56,57,58]. TRPV1 in neurons is critical in regulating neuro-inflammation and transmitting pain signals [59]. Through inflammation mediators, the activation of TRPV1 induces nociceptor sensitization and maintains the sensory neurons’ hypersensitivity, thereby contributing to hyperalgesia. Our study has showed that TSLP increased in TPRV1-positive DRG neurons in the ipsilateral injured side after CCI, and LA decreased TSLP’s involvement in nociceptive sensory neurons, suggesting TSLP-positive nociceptive neurons contribute to mechanical hyperalgesia in CCI rats.
Sensory DRG neurons are classified as large myelinated Aβ, thinly myelinated Aδ and small unmyelinated C fiber neurons [60,61,62]. Mechanical allodynia includes dynamic allodynia, punctate allodynia, and static allodynia, which are transmitted by Aβ, Aδ and C primary sensory fibers, respectively [62,63]. These nociceptors activate in response to noxious stimuli [64]. The A-fibers respond to pain with a short withdrawal latency as compared to slow-conducting C-fibers with a long latency movement. Therefore, A-fibers are responsible for evoking the initial pain response, or sharp pain, whereas C-fibers mediate secondary, or burning, pain [65]. Additionally, A-fibers are important for controlling pain characteristics because they provide the CNS with more information about pain intensity compared to C-fibers [66]. Since TSLP is localized in both large-sized and small-sized DRG neurons, we hypothesize that both sizes of DRG neurons produce the TSLP protein in response to nerve injury to convey pain signals.
In post-herpetic mice, dynamic allodynia has a stronger association with damage in C-fiber neurons compared to damage in A-fiber neurons [67]. However, CCI rats demonstrated that hyperalgesia onset is associated with a preferential loss of large fibers to small myelinated or unmyelinated axons [68]. Axon ligation can cause unmyelinated fiber loss as high as 60% and myelinated fiber loss as high as 80% [14,69]. According to the immunofluorescence staining results in our study, DRG was confirmed by TSLP increases observed in NF200-positive and peripherin-positive neuron cells after CCI, which demonstrates that TSLP was expressed not only in Aβ fiber neurons with thick myelin sheaths, but also in Aδ fiber neurons with thin myelin sheaths and in C-fiber neurons without myelin sheaths. Notably, LA decreased the TSLP involvement in both neuronal sizes, which suggests that neurons in A- and C-fibers both play a key role in pain signaling in accordance with the decreased pain withdrawal threshold after CCI [61,62]. The TSLP in DRG neurons might be able to initiate the pain signal and transmit to the CNS so as to consolidate the pain intensity, which contributes to mechanical allodynia.
After nerve injury, DRG macrophages can release mediators to influence both A-neurons and C-neurons to initiate and maintain mechanical hyperalgesia [70,71]. By the release of inflammatory mediators, DRG sensory neurons also augment pain sensation in supraspinal areas by alterations in neuronal excitability [51,52]. The interaction between neurons and glial cells enhances persistent pain by regulating DRG neuron death [55,56]. Through binding with TSLPR, TSLP can regulate inflammatory signals. Our study shows that TSLP co-expressed with TSLPR in DRG, which increased in the ipsilateral injured side as compared to that in the uninjured side, which is consistent with the changes in apoptotic neurons. LA decreased the apoptotic neurons and the TSLP/TSLPR complex in the ipsilateral injured side. These results imply that TSLP might contribute to neuron death after nerve injury by regulating the TSLPR complex.
However, the pharmacokinetics of LA in rats via intraperitoneal administration remain unclear. Although the current results show that LA improved the mechanical hyperalgesia in CCI rats for 14 days, the relevance of precise rat serum or tissue levels of LA or its metabolites to anti-nociceptive effects is unknown, and needs further study.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Antibodies

The following primary antibodies were used for immunofluorescence assay and western blot analysis: Anti-NF200 was from Sigma-Aldrich (1:50, N5389; Saint Louis, MO, USA), anti-peripherin was from Sigma-Aldrich (1:200, P5117; Saint Louis, MO, USA), anti-TRPV1 was from proteintech (1:500, 66983-1-Ig; Rosemont, IL, USA), anti-TSLP was from Sigma-Aldrich (immunofluorescence: 1:100 and western blot: 1:200, PRS4025; Saint Louis, MO, USA), anti-TSLPR was from Sigma-Aldrich (1:500, WH0064109M3; Saint Louis, MO, USA), anti-substance P was from Abcam (1:500, ab14184; Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-NeuN was from Millipore (1:400, MAB377; Burlington, MA, USA), and anti-β-actin was from Millipore (1:10,000, MAB1501R; Burlington, MA, USA). The following secondary antibodies were used: anti-rabbit IgG HRP (immunofluorescence: 1:500, 111-545-144; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA; western blot: 1:2000, 111-035-444; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) and goat anti-mouse IgG HRP (immunofluorescence: 1:500, 115-585-146; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA; western blot: 1:2000, AP124P; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA). TUNEL staining was performed by in situ cell death detection kit (11-684-795-910; Roche, NJ, USA).

4.2. Experimental Animals

The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Kaohsiung Medical University approved the animal study (108296). Male Sprague-Dawley rats (8–10 weeks old, body weight: 300–350 g) were purchased from the BioLASCO (Taipei, Taiwan). All animal experimental protocols were carried out in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines and the Kaohsiung Medical University IACUC guidelines. Rats were housed under controlled room temperature and humidity, in a 12-h light–dark cycle with food and water given ad libitum.
To study neuropathic pain after nerve injury, Bennett and Xie’s (1988) unilateral sciatic nerve CCI rat model was generated [72,73]. A total of 60 rats were used for studies and euthanized at the indicated time. The rats were anesthetized intraperitoneally with Zolitil 50 (Virbac; France; 06516), and the right-side sciatic nerve was exposed at the mid-thigh level proximal to the sciatic trifurcation. Without arresting the epineural blood supply, loose ligatures of 4-0 chromic gut (ETHICON; Raritan, NJ, USA; VE601) were tied around the nerve at 1 mm intervals. LA was diluted into PBS and injected into the peritoneum of a rat at the dose of 100 ug/kg before CCI. Rats were assigned as CCI or CCI administrated with LA. The CCI rat group was run in parallel with CCI rats administrated with LA group.

4.3. Behavior Responses

Mechanical pain threshold (paw-withdrawal response) was scored using an algometer with calibrated forceps (Bioseb In Vivo Research Instruments, Vitrolles, France). As described by Luis-Delgado et al., the influence of stimulation on each hindpaw was recorded three times [74]. As demonstrated at the time of withdrawal, the maximum force applied to the paw was recorded as the grams (g) of force on the dynamometer. The pain threshold was expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) in each group.

4.4. Western Blot Analysis

Lumbar 4/5th DRGs samples were homogenized in lysis buffer (T-PER Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent, Thermo; USA; 78510). The protein contents of supernatant were measured by BCA Protein Assay Kit (Sigma; St. Louis, MO, USA; B9643). Equal amounts of proteins were separated on 8 or 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and then transferred to the polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes in a transfer buffer after electrophoresis. After the PVDF membranes were blocked at room temperature for 1 h with 5% non-fat milk in Tris-buffered saline Tween-20 (TBST), they were incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. Then, the membranes were washed with TBST several times, before incubating with the corresponding secondary antibody for 1.5 h at room temperature. Finally, the protein bands were measured by chemiluminescence using an ECL Western Blotting Detection kit and visualized using a MiniChemi™ imaging and analysis system (Beijing, China).

4.5. Immunofluorescence Assay

Serial sections of lumbar 4/5th DRGs were dissected and post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight, and then transferred into 10, 20 or 30% sucrose in PBS. After washing with PBS several times, the sections were incubated with a blocking buffer containing 1% normal goat serum and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS at room temperature. Next, sections were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. On the second day, these sections were washed with PBS solution three times and then incubated with the desired secondary antibodies at room temperature for 2 h. Images were obtained using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus, State College, PA, USA, U-RFL-T). Fluorescence intensity was scored using the Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

4.6. Data Analyses

All analyses were undertaken by experienced trained technicians blinded to the study groups. Data expressed as mean + s.e.m. were calculated and analyzed using SPSS (V24.0) statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) in the study. Comparisons between two groups were performed by Student’s t test, and those among multiple groups were performed using two-way ANOVA following normal distribution. Values of p less than 0.05 were indicated as statistically significant. The representative values were derived from at least three tests.

5. Conclusions

Our data show that TSLP-positive nociceptive DRG neurons increased in the ipsilateral side after nerve injury. Additionally, TSLP increased in thickly myelinated Aβ neurons, thinly myelinated Aδ neurons and in unmyelinated C-fiber neurons, which are the primary afferent neurons involved in the transmission of noxious stimuli. LA treatment ameliorated these changes. That is, the expression of TSLP in primary sensory neurons showed a strong relevance to mechanical hyperalgesia, which offers evidence that we can regulate DRG neurons with varying diameters in pain signaling through regulating the TSLP/TSLPR complex.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.-H.W. and C.-C.L.; methodology, Y.-Y.L. and H.-P.T.; validation, C.-H.W. and C.-C.L.; formal analysis, Y.-Y.L. and H.-P.T.; investigation, C.-H.W. and C.-C.L.; data curation, Y.-Y.L. and H.-P.T.; writing—original draft preparation, C.-C.L.; writing—review and editing, C.-H.W.; visualization, C.-C.L. and C.-H.W.; supervision, C.-H.W.; project administration, C.-H.W. and Y.-Y.L.; funding acquisition, C.-H.W. and Y.-Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants MOST-108-2314-B-075B-001-MY3 and MOST-110-2314-B-037-095 from the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology, KMUH110-0R31 from Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, and KSVGH 111-094 from Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Kaohsiung Medical University approved the protocols of all experiments involving animals (approval number: 108296).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

CNScentral nervous system
CCIchronic constriction injury
contracontralateral
DRGdorsal root ganglia
IL-7Rαinterleukin-7 receptor-α
ipsiipsilateral
LAlinalyl acetate
PMAphorbol myristate acetate
SPsubstance P
TSLPthymic stromal lymphopoietin
TSLPRthymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor
TRPV1transient receptor potential vanilloid-1
TBSTTris-buffered saline Tween-20

References

  1. Basbaum, A.I.; Bautista, D.M.; Scherrer, G.; Julius, D. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain. Cell 2009, 139, 267–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Berta, T.; Qadri, Y.; Tan, P.H.; Ji, R.R. Targeting dorsal root ganglia and primary sensory neurons for the treatment of chronic pain. Expert Opin. Targets 2017, 21, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Baron, R.; Maier, C.; Attal, N.; Binder, A.; Bouhassira, D.; Cruccu, G.; Finnerup, N.B.; Haanpaa, M.; Hansson, P.; Hullemann, P.; et al. Peripheral neuropathic pain: A mechanism-related organizing principle based on sensory profiles. Pain 2017, 158, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Devor, M. Unexplained peculiarities of the dorsal root ganglion. Pain 1999, 82 (Suppl. 6), S27–S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Matsuda, M.; Huh, Y.; Ji, R.R. Roles of inflammation, neurogenic inflammation, and neuroinflammation in pain. J. Anesth. 2019, 33, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Woolf, C.J.; Mannion, R.J. Neuropathic pain: Aetiology, symptoms, mechanisms, and management. Lancet 1999, 353, 1959–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Barrell, K.; Smith, A.G. Peripheral Neuropathy. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 103, 383–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tesfaye, S.; Vileikyte, L.; Rayman, G.; Sindrup, S.H.; Perkins, B.A.; Baconja, M.; Vinik, A.I.; Boulton, A.J.M. Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Consensus recommendations on diagnosis, assessment and management. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2011, 27, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Misery, L.; Brenaut, E.; Le Garrec, R.; Abasq, C.; Genestet, S.; Marcorelles, P.; Zagnoli, F. Neuropathic pruritus. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2014, 10, 408–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Binder, A.; Koroschetz, J.; Baron, R. Disease mechanisms in neuropathic itch. Nat. Clin. Pr. Neurol. 2008, 4, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lewis, R.A.; Williams, N.H.; Sutton, A.J.; Burton, K.; Din, N.U.; Matar, H.E.; Hendry, M.; Phillips, C.J.; Nafees, S.; Fitzsimmons, D.; et al. Comparative clinical effectiveness of management strategies for sciatica: Systematic review and network meta-analyses. Spine J. 2015, 15, 1461–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Tubach, F.; Beaute, J.; Leclerc, A. Natural history and prognostic indicators of sciatica. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2004, 57, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Woolf, C.J.; Ma, Q. Nociceptors—Noxious stimulus detectors. Neuron 2007, 55, 353–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Finnerup, N.B.; Haroutounian, S.; Kamerman, P.; Baron, R.; Bennett, D.L.H.; Bouhassira, D.; Cruccu, G.; Freeman, R.; Hansson, P.; Nurmikko, T.; et al. Neuropathic pain: An updated grading system for research and clinical practice. Pain 2016, 157, 1599–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Baron, R. Mechanisms of disease: Neuropathic pain—A clinical perspective. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 2006, 2, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Konstantinou, K.; Dunn, K.M. Sciatica: Review of epidemiological studies and prevalence estimates. Spine 2008, 33, 2464–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, C.H.; Wu, M.K.; Lu, C.C.; Tsai, H.P.; Lu, Y.Y.; Lin, C.L. Impact of Hepatoma-Derived Growth Factor Blockade on Resiniferatoxin-Induced Neuropathy. Neural Plast 2021, 2021, 8854461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bridges, D.; Thompson, S.W.; Rice, A.S. Mechanisms of neuropathic pain. Br. J. Anaesth. 2001, 87, 12–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Suter, M.R.; Berta, T.; Gao, Y.J.; Decosterd, I.; Ji, R.R. Large A-fiber activity is required for microglial proliferation and p38 MAPK activation in the spinal cord: Different effects of resiniferatoxin and bupivacaine on spinal microglial changes after spared nerve injury. Mol. Pain 2009, 5, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ji, R.R.; Xu, Z.Z.; Gao, Y.J. Emerging targets in neuroinflammation-driven chronic pain. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014, 13, 533–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Siniscalco, D.; Fuccio, C.; Giordano, C.; Ferraraccio, F.; Palazzo, E.; Luongo, L.; Rossi, F.; Roth, K.A.; Maione, S.; de Novellis, V. Role of reactive oxygen species and spinal cord apoptotic genes in the development of neuropathic pain. Pharmacol. Res. 2007, 55, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Saal, J.A.; Saal, J.S. Nonoperative treatment of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc with radiculopathy. An outcome study. Spine 1989, 14, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ozaktay, A.C.; Kallakuri, S.; Takebayashi, T.; Cavanaugh, J.M.; Asik, I.; DeLeo, J.A.; Weinstein, J.N. Effects of interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor on sensitivity of dorsal root ganglion and peripheral receptive fields in rats. Eur. Spine J. 2006, 15, 1529–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Julius, D.; Basbaum, A.I. Molecular mechanisms of nociception. Nature 2001, 413, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Woolf, C.J.; Costigan, M. Transcriptional and posttranslational plasticity and the generation of inflammatory pain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 7723–7730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Volpe, E.; Pattarini, L.; Martinez-Cingolani, C.; Meller, S.; Donnadieu, M.H.; Bogiatzi, S.I.; Fernandez, M.I.; Touzot, M.; Bichet, J.C.; Reyal, F.; et al. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin links keratinocytes and dendritic cell-derived IL-23 in patients with psoriasis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 134, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Koyama, K.; Ozawa, T.; Hatsushika, K.; Ando, T.; Takano, S.; Wako, M.; Suenaga, F.; Ohnuma, Y.; Ohba, T.; Katoh, R.; et al. A possible role for TSLP in inflammatory arthritis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 357, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ferretti, E.; Hohaus, S.; Di Napoli, A.; Belmonte, B.; Cuccaro, A.; Cupelli, E.; Galli, E.; Rufini, V.; Tripodi, G.; Fraternali-Orcioni, G.; et al. Interleukin-31 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin expression in plasma and lymph node from Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 85263–85275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Moret, F.M.; Hack, C.E.; van der Wurff-Jacobs, K.M.; Radstake, T.R.; Lafeber, F.P.; van Roon, J.A. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin, a novel proinflammatory mediator in rheumatoid arthritis that potently activates CD1c+ myeloid dendritic cells to attract and stimulate T cells. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014, 66, 1176–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Esnault, S.; Rosenthal, L.A.; Wang, D.S.; Malter, J.S. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) as a bridge between infection and atopy. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2008, 1, 325–330. [Google Scholar]
  31. Protti, M.P.; De Monte, L. Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin and Cancer: Th2-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tsilingiri, K.; Fornasa, G.; Rescigno, M. Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin: To Cut a Long Story Short. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 3, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Friend, S.L.; Hosier, S.; Nelson, A.; Foxworthe, D.; Williams, D.E.; Farr, A. A thymic stromal cell line supports in vitro development of surface IgM+ B cells and produces a novel growth factor affecting B and T lineage cells. Exp. Hematol. 1994, 22, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Kitic, M.; Wimmer, I.; Adzemovic, M.; Kogl, N.; Rudel, A.; Lassmann, H.; Bradl, M. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin is expressed in the intact central nervous system and upregulated in the myelin-degenerative central nervous system. Glia 2014, 62, 1066–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Ziegler, S.F.; Roan, F.; Bell, B.D.; Stoklasek, T.A.; Kitajima, M.; Han, H. The biology of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). Adv. Pharmacol. 2013, 66, 129–155. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dhand, A.; Aminoff, M.J. The neurology of itch. Brain 2014, 137, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Moore, C.; Gupta, R.; Jordt, S.E.; Chen, Y.; Liedtke, W.B. Regulation of Pain and Itch by TRP Channels. NeuroSci. Bull. 2018, 34, 120–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Bourinet, E.; Altier, C.; Hildebrand, M.E.; Trang, T.; Salter, M.W.; Zamponi, G.W. Calcium-permeable ion channels in pain signaling. Physiol. Rev. 2014, 94, 81–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Harper, A.A.; Lawson, S.N. Conduction velocity is related to morphological cell type in rat dorsal root ganglion neurones. J. Physiol. 1985, 359, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Amaya, F.; Decosterd, I.; Samad, T.A.; Plumpton, C.; Tate, S.; Mannion, R.J.; Costigan, M.; Woolf, C.J. Diversity of expression of the sensory neuron-specific TTX-resistant voltage-gated sodium ion channels SNS and SNS2. Mol. Cell NeuroSci. 2000, 15, 331–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, Q.P. Expression of capsaicin receptor (VR1) by myelinated primary afferent neurons in rats. NeuroSci. Lett. 2002, 319, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Caterina, M.J.; Leffler, A.; Malmberg, A.B.; Martin, W.J.; Trafton, J.; Petersen-Zeitz, K.R.; Koltzenburg, M.; Basbaum, A.I.; Julius, D. Impaired nociception and pain sensation in mice lacking the capsaicin receptor. Science 2000, 288, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Davis, J.B.; Gray, J.; Gunthorpe, M.J.; Hatcher, J.P.; Davey, P.T.; Overend, P.; Harries, M.H.; Latcham, J.; Clapham, C.; Atkinson, K.; et al. Vanilloid receptor-1 is essential for inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia. Nature 2000, 405, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jara-Oseguera, A.; Simon, S.A.; Rosenbaum, T. TRPV1: On the road to pain relief. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008, 1, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Peana, A.T.; D’Aquila, P.S.; Panin, F.; Serra, G.; Pippia, P.; Moretti, M.D. Anti-inflammatory activity of linalool and linalyl acetate constituents of essential oils. Phytomedicine 2002, 9, 721–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Moon, P.D.; Kim, H. M Thymic stromal lymphopoietin is expressed and produced by caspase-1/NF-kappaB pathway in mast cells. Cytokine 2011, 54, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Moon, P.D.; Choi, I.S.; Go, J.H.; Lee, B.J.; Kang, S.W.; Yoon, S.; Han, S.J.; Nam, S.Y.; Oh, H.A.; Han, N.R.; et al. Inhibitory effects of BiRyuChe-bang on mast cell-mediated allergic reactions and inflammatory cytokines production. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2013, 41, 1267–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Moon, P.D.; Han, N.R.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, H.M.; Jeong, H.J. Effects of Linalyl Acetate on Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin Production in Mast Cells. Molecules 2018, 23, 1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Peng, H.Y.; Lin, C.C.; Wang, H.Y.; Shih, Y.; Chou, S.T. The melanogenesis alteration effects of Achillea millefolium L. essential oil and linalyl acetate: Involvement of oxidative stress and the JNK and ERK signaling pathways in melanoma cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Watkins, L.R.; Maier, S.F. Beyond neurons: Evidence that immune and glial cells contribute to pathological pain states. Physiol. Rev. 2002, 82, 981–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xie, W.; Tan, Z.Y.; Barbosa, C.; Strong, J.A.; Cummins, T.R.; Zhang, J.M. Upregulation of the sodium channel NaVbeta4 subunit and its contributions to mechanical hypersensitivity and neuronal hyperexcitability in a rat model of radicular pain induced by local dorsal root ganglion inflammation. Pain 2016, 157, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Trapp, L.D. Mechanisms of acute pain: An update. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 2006, 34, 955–958. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Kokubo, Y.; Uchida, K.; Kobayashi, S.; Yayama, T.; Sato, R.; Nakajima, H.; Takamura, T.; Mwaka, E.; Orwotho, N.; Bangirana, A.; et al. Herniated and spondylotic intervertebral discs of the human cervical spine: Histological and immunohistological findings in 500 en bloc surgical samples. Laboratory investigation. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2008, 9, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hanani, M.; Huang, T.Y.; Cherkas, P.S.; Ledda, M.; Pannese, E. Glial cell plasticity in sensory ganglia induced by nerve damage. Neuroscience 2002, 114, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Pannese, E. The satellite cells of the sensory ganglia. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 1981, 65, 1–111. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ji, R.R.; Berta, T.; Nedergaard, M. Glia and pain: Is chronic pain a gliopathy? Pain 2013, 154 (Suppl. 1), S10–S28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lekan, H.A.; Chung, K.; Yoon, Y.W.; Chung, J.M.; Coggeshall, R.E. Loss of dorsal root ganglion cells concomitant with dorsal root axon sprouting following segmental nerve lesions. Neuroscience 1997, 81, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, J.Y.; Xie, W.; Strong, J.A.; Guo, Q.L.; Zhang, J.M. Mechanical hypersensitivity, sympathetic sprouting, and glial activation are attenuated by local injection of corticosteroid near the lumbar ganglion in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth. Pain Med. 2011, 36, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Han, S.B.; Kim, H.; Cho, S.H.; Lee, J.D.; Chung, J.H.; Kim, H.S. Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid-1 in Epidermal Keratinocytes May Contribute to Acute Pain in Herpes Zoster. Acta Derm.-Venereol. 2016, 96, 319–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ton, B.H.; Chen, Q.; Gaina, G.; Tucureanu, C.; Georgescu, A.; Strungaru, C.; Flonta, M.L.; Sah, D.; Ristoiu, V. Activation profile of dorsal root ganglia Iba-1 (+) macrophages varies with the type of lesion in rats. Acta Histochem. 2013, 115, 840–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lawson, S.N. Phenotype and function of somatic primary afferent nociceptive neurones with C-, Adelta- or Aalpha/beta-fibres. Exp. Physiol. 2002, 87, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Baba, H.; Doubell, T.P.; Woolf, C.J. Peripheral inflammation facilitates Abeta fiber-mediated synaptic input to the substantia gelatinosa of the adult rat spinal cord. J. NeuroSci. 1999, 19, 859–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Djouhri, L.; Lawson, S.N. Abeta-fiber nociceptive primary afferent neurons: A review of incidence and properties in relation to other afferent A-fiber neurons in mammals. Brain Res. Rev. 2004, 46, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jensen, T.S.; Finnerup, N.B. Allodynia and hyperalgesia in neuropathic pain: Clinical manifestations and mechanisms. Lancet Neurol. 2014, 13, 924–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Campbell, J.N.; LaMotte, R.H. Latency to detection of first pain. Brain Res. 1983, 266, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Garell, P.C.; McGillis, S.L.; Greenspan, J.D. Mechanical response properties of nociceptors innervating feline hairy skin. J. NeuroPhysiol. 1996, 75, 1177–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sasaki, A.; Inomata, Y.; Serizawa, K.; Andoh, T.; Kuraishi, Y. Contribution of sensory C-fiber neuron injury to mechanical dynamic allodynia in a murine model of postherpetic neuralgia. Neuroreport 2013, 24, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Coggeshall, R.E.; Dougherty, P.M.; Pover, C.M.; Carlton, S.M. Is large myelinated fiber loss associated with hyperalgesia in a model of experimental peripheral neuropathy in the rat? Pain 1993, 52, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shimoyama, M.; Tanaka, K.; Hasue, F.; Shimoyama, N. A mouse model of neuropathic cancer pain. Pain 2002, 99, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vega-Avelaira, D.; Geranton, S.M.; Fitzgerald, M. Differential regulation of immune responses and macrophage/neuron interactions in the dorsal root ganglion in young and adult rats following nerve injury. Mol. Pain 2009, 5, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Yu, X.; Liu, H.; Hamel, K.A.; Morvan, M.G.; Yu, S.; Leff, J.; Guan, Z.; Braz, J.M.; Basbaum, A.I. Dorsal root ganglion macrophages contribute to both the initiation and persistence of neuropathic pain. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Bennett, G.J.; Xie, Y.K. A peripheral mononeuropathy in rat that produces disorders of pain sensation like those seen in man. Pain 1988, 33, 87–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Austin, P.J.; Wu, A.; Moalem-Taylor, G. Chronic constriction of the sciatic nerve and pain hypersensitivity testing in rats. J. Vis. Exp. 2012. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Luis-Delgado, O.E.; Barrot, M.; Rodeau, J.L.; Schott, G.; Benbouzid, M.; Poisbeau, P.; Freund-Mercier, M.J.; Lasbennes, F. Calibrated forceps: A sensitive and reliable tool for pain and analgesia studies. J. Pain 2006, 7, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 02012 g001 550
Figure 1. Nerve injury-induced expression of TSLP in ipsilateral DRG neurons. (A) The hindpaw-withdrawal threshold (g) was detected using the calibrated forceps test at day 3, 7, and 14 after CCI. The ipsilateral (ipsi) injured sides showed a decreased paw-withdrawal threshold as compared to that in the contralateral (contra) side and sham group after injury. Values are presented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 6 rats). * p < 0.05; ANOVA test. (B) Lumbar 4/5th DRG on both sides were dissected. TSLP proteins were measured by western blot analysis when β-actin was used as the loading control. At day 7 and day 14 after CCI, TSLP proteins were increased in DRG in the ipsilateral injured side as compared to those in the contralateral side and sham group. (C) Each band signal density was quantitated and normalized to that of its own β-actin in each side. Values are presented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 6 rats). * p < 0.05, compared to contra side and sham group, Student’s t test.
Figure 1. Nerve injury-induced expression of TSLP in ipsilateral DRG neurons. (A) The hindpaw-withdrawal threshold (g) was detected using the calibrated forceps test at day 3, 7, and 14 after CCI. The ipsilateral (ipsi) injured sides showed a decreased paw-withdrawal threshold as compared to that in the contralateral (contra) side and sham group after injury. Values are presented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 6 rats). * p < 0.05; ANOVA test. (B) Lumbar 4/5th DRG on both sides were dissected. TSLP proteins were measured by western blot analysis when β-actin was used as the loading control. At day 7 and day 14 after CCI, TSLP proteins were increased in DRG in the ipsilateral injured side as compared to those in the contralateral side and sham group. (C) Each band signal density was quantitated and normalized to that of its own β-actin in each side. Values are presented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 6 rats). * p < 0.05, compared to contra side and sham group, Student’s t test.
Ijms 23 02012 g001
Ijms 23 02012 g002 550
Figure 2. Nerve injury-induced TSLP expression in both small-sized and large-sized DRG neurons, esp. nociceptive DRG neurons. Distribution of TSLP was detected when DRG neurons were double-labeled (yellow) with TSLP (green) and neuronal markers (red). (A) Detection of peripherin presented as a small-sized neuronal marker and (B) NF200 as a large-sized neuronal marker. TSLP-positive DRG neurons expressed not only peripherin but also NF200 in the ipsilateral (ipsi) injured side as compared to that in the contralateral (contra) side and sham group. (C) Detection of substance P presented as a peptidergic non-myelinated neuronal marker and (D) TRPV1 as a nociceptive marker. TSLP-positive DRG neurons expressed TRPV1 mostly in the ipsilateral (ipsi) injured side as compared to that in the contralateral (contra) side and sham group. Pairs of merged images are shown on the right panel. White arrows indicate doubled-labeled cells. Scale bars represent 50 μm (n = 6 rats).
Figure 2. Nerve injury-induced TSLP expression in both small-sized and large-sized DRG neurons, esp. nociceptive DRG neurons. Distribution of TSLP was detected when DRG neurons were double-labeled (yellow) with TSLP (green) and neuronal markers (red). (A) Detection of peripherin presented as a small-sized neuronal marker and (B) NF200 as a large-sized neuronal marker. TSLP-positive DRG neurons expressed not only peripherin but also NF200 in the ipsilateral (ipsi) injured side as compared to that in the contralateral (contra) side and sham group. (C) Detection of substance P presented as a peptidergic non-myelinated neuronal marker and (D) TRPV1 as a nociceptive marker. TSLP-positive DRG neurons expressed TRPV1 mostly in the ipsilateral (ipsi) injured side as compared to that in the contralateral (contra) side and sham group. Pairs of merged images are shown on the right panel. White arrows indicate doubled-labeled cells. Scale bars represent 50 μm (n = 6 rats).
Ijms 23 02012 g002
Ijms 23 02012 g003 550
Figure 3. LA decreased not only expression of small-sized but also expression of large-sized DRG neurons, esp. nociceptive DRG neurons. The distribution of TSLP was detected when DRG neurons were double-labeled (yellow) with TSLP (green) and neuronal markers (red). LA serves as a TSLP inhibitor. (A) LA decreased the TSLP-positive small-sized DRG neurons, (B) TSLP-positive large-sized DRG neurons, and (C) TSLP-positive nociceptive DRG neurons in the ipsilateral (ipsi) injured side as compared to that in the contralateral (contra) side. Pairs of merged images are shown in the right panels. White arrows indicate doubled-labeled cells. Scale bars represent 50 μm (n = 6 rats).
Figure 3. LA decreased not only expression of small-sized but also expression of large-sized DRG neurons, esp. nociceptive DRG neurons. The distribution of TSLP was detected when DRG neurons were double-labeled (yellow) with TSLP (green) and neuronal markers (red). LA serves as a TSLP inhibitor. (A) LA decreased the TSLP-positive small-sized DRG neurons, (B) TSLP-positive large-sized DRG neurons, and (C) TSLP-positive nociceptive DRG neurons in the ipsilateral (ipsi) injured side as compared to that in the contralateral (contra) side. Pairs of merged images are shown in the right panels. White arrows indicate doubled-labeled cells. Scale bars represent 50 μm (n = 6 rats).
Ijms 23 02012 g003
Ijms 23 02012 g004 550
Figure 4. LA attenuated the apoptotic DRG neurons. (A) The hindpaw-withdrawal threshold (g) was detected using calibrated forceps test at day 3, 7, and 14 after CCI. LA serves as a TSLP inhibitor. CCI decreased the paw-withdrawal threshold in the ipsilateral (ipsi) injured side as compared to the contralateral (contra) side in rats. Values are presented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 6 rats). * p < 0.05, compared to CCI group (contra), # p < 0.05, compared to CCI group (ipsi); ANOVA test. LA increased the paw-withdrawal threshold in the ipsilateral side. (B) Apoptotic neurons were measured when DRG neurons were double-labeled (yellow) with TUNEL (green) and NeuN (red). Pairs of merged images are shown in the right panels. White arrows indicate apoptotic neurons. Scale bars represent 100 μm. (C) Merge immunoreactivities were parallel-measured in ipsilateral and contralateral sides of DRG neurons at 7 and 14 days. This expression of apoptotic neurons in the ipsilateral (ipsi) injured side increased after nerve injury and decreased after LA administration as compared to that in the contralateral (contra) side. Values are presented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 6 rats). * p < 0.05, compared to LA administration group, Students’ t test.
Figure 4. LA attenuated the apoptotic DRG neurons. (A) The hindpaw-withdrawal threshold (g) was detected using calibrated forceps test at day 3, 7, and 14 after CCI. LA serves as a TSLP inhibitor. CCI decreased the paw-withdrawal threshold in the ipsilateral (ipsi) injured side as compared to the contralateral (contra) side in rats. Values are presented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 6 rats). * p < 0.05, compared to CCI group (contra), # p < 0.05, compared to CCI group (ipsi); ANOVA test. LA increased the paw-withdrawal threshold in the ipsilateral side. (B) Apoptotic neurons were measured when DRG neurons were double-labeled (yellow) with TUNEL (green) and NeuN (red). Pairs of merged images are shown in the right panels. White arrows indicate apoptotic neurons. Scale bars represent 100 μm. (C) Merge immunoreactivities were parallel-measured in ipsilateral and contralateral sides of DRG neurons at 7 and 14 days. This expression of apoptotic neurons in the ipsilateral (ipsi) injured side increased after nerve injury and decreased after LA administration as compared to that in the contralateral (contra) side. Values are presented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 6 rats). * p < 0.05, compared to LA administration group, Students’ t test.
Ijms 23 02012 g004
Ijms 23 02012 g005 550
Figure 5. LA attenuated the mechanical hyperalgesia through the TSLP/TSLPR complex. (A) Lumbar 4/5th DRG at both sides were dissected. TSLP proteins were measured by western blot analysis when β-actin was used as the loading control. At day 7 and day 14 after CCI, TSLP proteins were increased in DRG in the ipsilateral injured side as compared to those in the contralateral side. LA reduced the TSLP expression in the ipsilateral injured side. (B) Each band signal density was quantitated, and normalized to that of its own β-actin in each side. Values are presented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 6 rats). * p < 0.05, compared to LA administration group, Students’ t test. (C) The distribution of TSLP was detected when DRG neurons were double-labeled (yellow) with TSLP (green) and TSLPR (red). Merge immunoreactivities were parallel-measured in the ipsilateral and contralateral sides of DRG neurons at 7 and 14 days. This expression of TSLP/TSLPR in the ipsilateral (ipsi) injured side increased after nerve injury, and decreased LA administration as compared to that in the contralateral (contra) side. Pairs of merged images are shown in the right panels. White arrows indicate doubled-labeled cells. Scale bars represent 50 μm (n = 6 rats).
Figure 5. LA attenuated the mechanical hyperalgesia through the TSLP/TSLPR complex. (A) Lumbar 4/5th DRG at both sides were dissected. TSLP proteins were measured by western blot analysis when β-actin was used as the loading control. At day 7 and day 14 after CCI, TSLP proteins were increased in DRG in the ipsilateral injured side as compared to those in the contralateral side. LA reduced the TSLP expression in the ipsilateral injured side. (B) Each band signal density was quantitated, and normalized to that of its own β-actin in each side. Values are presented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 6 rats). * p < 0.05, compared to LA administration group, Students’ t test. (C) The distribution of TSLP was detected when DRG neurons were double-labeled (yellow) with TSLP (green) and TSLPR (red). Merge immunoreactivities were parallel-measured in the ipsilateral and contralateral sides of DRG neurons at 7 and 14 days. This expression of TSLP/TSLPR in the ipsilateral (ipsi) injured side increased after nerve injury, and decreased LA administration as compared to that in the contralateral (contra) side. Pairs of merged images are shown in the right panels. White arrows indicate doubled-labeled cells. Scale bars represent 50 μm (n = 6 rats).
Ijms 23 02012 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, C.-C.; Lu, Y.-Y.; Tsai, H.-P.; Wu, C.-H. The Contribution of TSLP Activation to Hyperalgesia in Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons of a Rat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042012

AMA Style

Lu C-C, Lu Y-Y, Tsai H-P, Wu C-H. The Contribution of TSLP Activation to Hyperalgesia in Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons of a Rat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(4):2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Chun-Ching, Ying-Yi Lu, Hung-Pei Tsai, and Chieh-Hsin Wu. 2022. "The Contribution of TSLP Activation to Hyperalgesia in Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons of a Rat" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 4: 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042012

APA Style

Lu, C. -C., Lu, Y. -Y., Tsai, H. -P., & Wu, C. -H. (2022). The Contribution of TSLP Activation to Hyperalgesia in Dorsal Root Ganglia Neurons of a Rat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(4), 2012. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042012

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop