Next Article in Journal
Adipsin Serum Concentrations and Adipose Tissue Expression in People with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes
Next Article in Special Issue
Involvement of IL-33 in the Pathophysiology of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Review
Previous Article in Journal
Breeding and Genomics Interventions for Developing Ascochyta Blight Resistant Grain Legumes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Functional Changes of T-Cell Subsets with Age and CMV Infection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms23042219
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Role of Ghrelin Receptor in Gut Dysbiosis and Experimental Colitis in Aging

by
Ji Yeon Noh
1,
Chia-Shan Wu
1,
Jennifer A. A. DeLuca
1,
Sridevi Devaraj
2,
Arul Jayaraman
3,
Robert C. Alaniz
4,
Xiao-Di Tan
5,
Clinton D. Allred
1,6 and
Yuxiang Sun
1,7,*
1
Department of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
2
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
3
Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
4
Department of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, College Station, TX 77843, USA
5
Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
6
Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA
7
USDA/ARS Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(4), 2219; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042219
Submission received: 27 January 2022 / Revised: 13 February 2022 / Accepted: 14 February 2022 / Published: 17 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Immunopathology and Immunosenescence)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chronic low-grade inflammation is a hallmark of aging, which is now coined as inflamm-aging. Inflamm-aging contributes to many age-associated diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We have shown that gut hormone ghrelin, via its receptor growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), regulates energy metabolism and inflammation in aging. Emerging evidence suggests that gut microbiome has a critical role in intestinal immunity of the host. To determine whether microbiome is an integral driving force of GHS-R mediated immune-metabolic homeostasis in aging, we assessed the gut microbiome profiles of young and old GHS-R global knockout (KO) mice. While young GHS-R KO mice showed marginal changes in Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, aged GHS-R KO mice exhibited reduced Bacteroidetes and increased Firmicutes, featuring a disease-susceptible microbiome profile. To further study the role of GHS-R in intestinal inflammation in aging, we induced acute colitis in young and aged GHS-R KO mice using dextran sulfate sodium (DSS). The GHS-R KO mice showed more severe disease activity scores, higher proinflammatory cytokine expression, and decreased expression of tight junction markers. These results suggest that GHS-R plays an important role in microbiome homeostasis and gut inflammation during aging; GHS-R suppression exacerbates intestinal inflammation in aging and increases vulnerability to colitis. Collectively, our finding reveals for the first time that GHS-R is an important regulator of intestinal health in aging; targeting GHS-R may present a novel therapeutic strategy for prevention/treatment of aging leaky gut and inflammatory bowel disease.

1. Introduction

Aging is symbolized by chronic low-grade inflammation, thus the term inflamm-aging has been created [1]. Inflamm-aging is linked to many age-associated diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and various inflammatory diseases. Gut microbiome interacts with the host to modulate intestinal immunity and the host’s disease susceptibility. The microbiota profile is shaped by multifaceted factors, including diet, age, host genetics, environmental factors, and lifestyles; thus, there is huge variation in microbiome signatures among individuals [2,3,4]. Emerging evidence shows that gut microbiome plays an immense role in the biology of aging [5,6]. Nobel Prize Laureate Elie Metchnikoff, the father of immunity, stated that senescence is caused by the poisons originating from human intestinal flora, which underscores the significance of the gut microbiota and the interrelationship between gut microbiome and host aging [7]. We have shown that the intestinal microbiome in aging mice has a unique composition, exhibiting reduced beneficial metabolites, such as tryptophan and indole [8].
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the intestinal tract. The incidence of IBD has increased over the past 20 years, especially in Western countries and developed Asian countries [9]. There are two types of IBD: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) [10]. Clinically, UC and CD share similar symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, and bloody stool [10]. While the inflammation sites of CD are sporadic throughout the ileum, cecum, and colon, UC primarily involves the colon and rectum [11]. Even though IBD itself is not life threatening [10], it severely affects patients’ quality of life and it is a lifelong disease. Moreover, IBD significantly increases the risk of colorectal cancer in later life [12]. Recent reports revealed that aging increases vulnerability to gastrointestinal disorders [13], and the incidence of IBD in the aging population is on the rise [14,15]. As the age of IBD diagnosis is increasing, IBD patients are more likely to develop proctitis and left-sided colitis [16,17]. Since the etiology of IBD is multifactorial [10,11], currently the therapeutic options are extremely limited.
Previous studies have revealed that the etiology and pathogenesis of IBD are affected by genetic factors, microbiome composition, and immunological abnormalities [11,18]. Ghrelin is a 28-peptide hormone which is mainly produced by the X/A-like cells in the gastrointestinal tract [19,20]. Ghrelin is known as a hunger hormone; we and others have shown that ghrelin signaling is a major metabolic regulator involved in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases such as obesity and diabetes [21,22]. However, the effect of ghrelin in intestinal health is controversial; both protective and detrimental effects have been reported [23]. IBD patients, especially UC patients, have high circulating ghrelin [24], and exogenous ghrelin administration has been shown to aggravate experimental colitis [25]. At the same time, other studies showed that ghrelin protects against tissue damage in ulcerative colitis by inhibiting apoptosis of intestinal epithelial cells [26,27].
Growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), a G-protein receptor, is the biologically relevant receptor for ghrelin. We previously showed that the effects of ghrelin on growth hormone release and food intake are mediated through GHS-R [28], but the role of GHS-R in aging-associated microbiome change and intestinal inflammation is unknown. To decipher the controversial effects of ghrelin signaling on intestinal inflammation and to determine whether GHS-R regulates microbiome-host interaction, in the current study we investigated the role of GHS-R on gut dysbiosis and intestinal inflammation in aging using GHS-R global knockout mice (KO, Ghsr−/−) with GHS-R ablated in all cell types. We studied the gut microbiome profiles and experimental colitis of both young and aged GHS-R KO mice.

2. Results

2.1. Microbiome of Aged GHS-R KO Exhibited Increased Firmicutes and Reduced Bacteroidetes

Emerging evidence suggests that the symbiosis between microbiota and their hosts is a new mechanism underpinning the complex host physiology and pathophysiology [29], and that the gut microbiome can be a risk predictor for diseases [30]. To determine whether GHS-R modulates microbiome homeostasis in aging, the feces from young and aged global GHS-R knockout (KO, Ghsr−/−) and wild-type (WT) were analyzed. To achieve consistency of the data, the feces from aged mice were collected for 3 consecutive days. To investigate how the GHS-R affects the microbiota composition in aging, the α-diversity and β-diversity were analyzed. The Chao1 diversity is the index to assess the number of taxa by predicting the number of low-abundance or missing species [31]. The Chao1 analysis showed higher diversity in aged mice compared to young mice (Figure 1A), which is in line with our previous report [8]. However, a genotype difference was not detected in Chao1 diversity. The β-diversity was also analyzed, whereas no difference was found between age groups or different genotypes (Figure 1B).
To investigate the effect of GHS-R on microbial colonization in aging, we analyzed microbial 16S rRNA at the phylum and family level (Figure 1C,D). First, we assessed the age effect, by focusing on the common difference between young and old mice (regardless of the genotype). At the phylum level, the dominant phyla were Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria in both young and old mice. The relative abundance of Bacteroidetes decreased with age, whereas the Firmicutes and Proteobacteria maintained similar relative abundance. Moreover, Candidatus Saccharibacteria was more abundant in old compared to young mice (Figure 1C). When the microbiome proportional abundance of feces was analyzed at the family level, Porphyromonadaceae and Prevotellaceae showed a decrease in old mice (Figure 1D).
Second, we assessed the genotype effect by focusing on the difference between the genotypes at young or old age. At the phyla level, Verrucomicrobia was very abundant in young KO mice compared to young WT mice (Figure 1C). At the family level, young GHS-R KO mice showed low Lachnospiraceae and Prevotellaceae, but high Erysipelotrichaceae and Verrucomicrobiaceae (Figure 1D). In the young group, the ratio of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes (F/B ratio) was similar between young KO and WT mice. Interestingly, Bacteroidetes were lower and Firmicutes were higher in aged KO mice compared to aged WT mice, resulting in increased F/B ratio in the aged KO mice (Figure 1C). Furthermore, aged KO mice had less Porphyromonadaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Prevotellaceae, but much more Erysipelotrichaceae compared to aged WT mice (Figure 1D). Collectively, these findings suggest that GHS-R regulates microbiome homeostasis, and the effect is more pronounced in aging.

2.2. Ablation of GHS-R Exacerbates DSS-Induced Colitis in Both Young and Aged Mice

Our microbiome data above reveal that the microbiome profile is altered by GHS-R ablation and the effect is exacerbated by aging. A report showed that GHS-R expression in colon is responsive to the treatment of colitis-inducing reagent dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) [32]. Indeed, we have seen GHS-R expression in colon increases in response to DSS in both young and old mice, and aged mice showed more pronounced increase of GHS-R expression (Supplemental Figure S1). This result is in line with the disease-susceptible microbiota profile in aging described above and suggests that GHS-R might be involved in colitis. To test the effect of GHS-R on intestinal inflammation and colitis susceptibility in aging, we induced experimental colitis in both young (4–6-month-old) and aged (18-month-old) male global GHS-R knockout and WT mice. Mice were exposed to 2% (w/v) DSS for 7 consecutive days. The severity of colitis was evaluated using disease activity index (DAI) score, which includes three criteria: body weight change, rectal bleeding, and fecal consistency, as previously reported [33].

2.2.1. DAI of Young Mice

In young mice, at the start of the study, average body weight of each group was not significantly different (data not shown). Body weight change in young mice was marginal at the beginning of DSS treatment (Figure 2A). However, on day 7, young KO mice showed a noticeable trend of decrease in body weight compared to WT (Figure 2A).
Young WT mice showed a significant increase of rectal bleeding by 5 days of DSS treatment compared to controls (Figure 2B). Compared to DSS-treated WT, DSS-treated KO mice showed more severe rectal bleeding at the end of the study (Figure 2B). The fecal consistency score of young mice was increased after 3 days of DSS treatment and continued to increase throughout the remaining course of the DSS treatment (Figure 2C). At the end of the study, young KO mice showed a significantly higher fecal consistency score compared to young WT (Figure 2C). Higher rectal bleeding and fecal consistency scores of young GHSR KO mice contributed to the significant increase of DAI scores at the end of DSS treatment (Figure 2D).

2.2.2. DAI of Old Mice

On the other hand, aged mice showed an average 5% decrease in body weight within 2 days of DSS treatment and continued this reduction throughout the DSS treatment period (Figure 2E). Within 6 days of DSS treatment, body weight was significantly decreased compared to non-DSS treatment in aged mice (Figure 2E). The non-DSS-treated group showed a small reduction of body weight during the study, but did not show a difference between genotypes at the end of the study. The body weight decrease was more pronounced with DSS treatment. The body weight difference between genotypes was evident from day 4 of DSS treatment; at 7 days of DSS treatment, aged KO mice exhibited more significant body weight reduction than their WT counterparts (Figure 2E).
Similar to young WT with DSS treatment, aged WT mice with DSS treatment showed significantly increased rectal bleeding after 5 days of DSS treatment compared to WT controls (Figure 2F). Compared to DSS-treated aged WT, DSS-treated aged KO mice showed significantly more severe rectal bleeding at the end of DSS treatment (Figure 2F). Moreover, aged KO exhibited significantly higher fecal consistency scores after 2 days of DSS treatment and this trend continued until day 6 of DSS treatment (Figure 2G). The greater body weight loss, worse rectal bleeding and fecal consistency scores of aged KO with DSS treatment contributed to the significantly increased DAI (Figure 2H).
Of note, the rectal bleeding was detected earlier in the aged group than the young group (Figure 2A,E). Moreover, the aged group showed significantly worsened fecal consistency scores earlier in the course of the DSS exposure (Figure 2C,G). At the end of DSS treatment, both young and aged GHS-R KO mice had significantly increased rectal bleeding and worsened fecal consistency scores compared to WT. Unlike young mice, the aged mice given water only showed a slightly increased DAI, less than 2 (Figure 2H), which is likely contributed by the body weight reduction that is likely caused by the acclimatization to the new environment (new cage and new water bottle) as others reported [34].
Collectively, a significantly higher DAI was observed in DSS-treated KO mice compared to the WT control in both young and aged groups (Figure 2D,H). The worse DAI score of the KO group was mainly contributed by the increased rectal bleeding and fecal consistency scores, indicating that GHS-R ablation exacerbates DSS-induced colitis.

2.2.3. Colon Weight/Length and Spleen Weight

It is known that colon length is shortened in DSS-induced colitis [34], so we assessed colon weight and length. In the young group, the average colon length of DSS-treated young WT mice had a trend of decrease compared to water-fed WT controls, but it was not statistically significant (Figure 3A). The young KO mice showed a significant decrease in colon length with the DSS treatment (Figure 3A), while colon weight was not affected by DSS treatment compared to water treatment (Figure 3B). The weight/length ratio of colon in young KO mice was significantly increased (Figure 3C), mainly due to the shortened colon length by DSS treatment. However, genotype differences were not seen with either water control or DSS treatment (Figure 3C).
In the aged group, decreased colon length was observed in DSS treatment (Figure 3E), whereas colon weight was not changed compared to the water control group (Figure 3F). Colon weight/length ratio was not changed by DSS treatment (Figure 3G). Moreover, genotype difference was not found in colon length, weight, or weight/length ratio in both water and DSS groups (Figure 3E–G). Compared to the young group, the aged group had decreased colon length (Figure 3A,E) and increased colon weight (Figure 3B,F). It is noteworthy that while the colon weight and length were not significantly different between two genotypes in either young or old mice, we observed that aging significantly affects the colon length and weight. As shown in Supplemental Figure S2, aging significantly decreased colon length and increased colon weight in aged mice compared to young mice in both water control and DSS-treated groups. Aging increased the colon weight/length ratio compared to young mice mainly due to decreased colon length (Figure 3E,G).
Besides the colon, we also measured the weight of the spleen, which is one of the key organs involved in inflammation. In the young group, the weight of the spleen was significantly increased in DSS-treated KO compared to control KO; the weight of the spleen of DSS-treated KO had a trend of increase compared to WT, but it did not reach statistical significance (Figure 3D). The spleen weight was slightly higher (not statistically significant) in DSS-treated aged WT mice compared to water controls (Figure 3H). The genotype differences in spleen weights were much more pronounced in the aged group than the young group. Spleen weight was significantly higher in KO mice compared to that of WT in both water control and DSS treatment groups (Figure 3H).

2.3. Ablation of GHS-R Increases Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Expression and Decreases Gut Tight Junction Proteins in Colon Mucosa

The expression of inflammatory cytokines and gap junction proteins are signatures of intestinal inflammation and intestinal permeability; here, we have assessed pro-inflammatory cytokines and gap junction proteins in young and old GHS-R KO mice under experimental colitis.
In the young mice, DSS treatment significantly increased TNFα gene expression in the colons of young WT mice (Figure 4A). The young KO group did not show significant differences compared to young WT, but young KO had a trend of higher TNFα gene expression compared to WT in both control and DSS groups (Figure 4A). DSS treatment did not alter IL-1b expression in the colons of young WT mice (Figure 4B). Moreover, young KO did not show a difference in the IL-1b level compared to young WT (Figure 4B). We also tested tight junction markers in the colon to see if alteration of gut permeability contributes to increased inflammation in the colon. DSS treatment showed a trend of decline in expression of ZO-1, Occludin, and Claudin-2 (Figure 4C–E). Comparing among genotypes, water control young KO showed a trend of decrease of ZO-1 compared to WT (Figure 4C); DSS-treated young KO mice showed a significantly decreased ZO-1 expression compared to WT (Figure 4C). Interestingly, while the expression of Occludin was significantly reduced in young KO mice given water, no genotype difference was observed under DSS treatment (Figure 4D). In contrast, young KO given water showed a trend of decrease in Claudin-2 gene expression compared to WT, but the DSS-treated young KO mice showed significantly decreased Claudin-2 expression (Figure 4E).
In the aged group, DSS treatment did not elevate the TNFα level in the colons of aged WT mice, but DSS treatment significantly increased the TNFα level in aged KO animals compared to mice that received water (Figure 4F). Moreover, TNFα gene expression in the aged KO group with DSS treatment was significantly increased compared to aged WT (Figure 4F). In contrast to young mice, DSS treatment significantly increased the level of IL-1b in the colons of both aged WT and KO, whereas no genotype difference was detected in either normal water or DSS treatment groups (Figure 4G). DSS treatment did not alter the expression of ZO-1 (Figure 4H), but it reduced Occludin and Claudin-2 expression (Figure 4I,J) in the aged group. Aged KO mice had significantly decreased Occludin in the normal water group compared to aged WT, while a genotype effect was not found with DSS treatment (Figure 4I). DSS-treated aged KO animals also showed significantly decreased Claudin-2 gene expression compared to WT (Figure 4J).
Collectively, these data suggest that global ablation of GHS-R elevates colonic inflammation and decreases gut tight junction expression, which is consistent with increased gut permeability and exacerbated colitis.

3. Discussion

The gut microbiota coevolve with the host, and the composition of gut microbiota change during aging [8]. Emerging evidence shows that gut microbiota impact the immune responses and affect the onset/susceptibility of many diseases [35,36]. Our finding in the current study reveals that GHS-R plays a critical role in regulating gut microbiota homeostasis and intestinal inflammation in aging. We found that the global ablation of GHS-R promotes gut dysbiosis and increases susceptibility to experimental colitis in aging.
Our data showed that the aged mice had improved microbial diversity compared to the young mice (Figure 1A), which is in line with previous reports by us and others which showed that the α-diversity is increased in 15- and 19-month-old mice compared to 2-month-old mice [8,37]. Although GHS-R ablation did not affect the microbial community diversity in aging (Figure 1A,B), GHS-R ablation shifted the relative abundance of dominant phyla and families in fecal microbiota towards a proinflammatory profile. At the phylum level, young KO showed increased Verrucomicrobia compared to young WT; at the family level, young KO showed higher abundance of Verrucomicrobiaceae, which is in the family of Verrucomicrobia (Figure 1C). Others reported a high abundance of Verrucomicrobia in biopsy samples from IBD patients [38]. Our study indicates that GHS-R KO mice are more susceptible to experimental colitis, which is consistent with the microbiome profile.
In young mice, GHS-R ablation did not alter the major taxa of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, but young GHS-R KO did show decreased Prevotellaceae and increased Erysipelotrichaceae at the family level. The role of Prevotellaceae is still not fully understood [39,40,41], but Prevotella, the main genus of the Prevotellaceae family, is thought to be beneficial as its increased abundance is associated with improved glucose metabolism [42]. Erysipelotrichaceae is highly relevant to metabolic disorders including obesity [43,44,45]. Collectively, our findings suggest that the microbial community in young GHS-R KO is prone to an inflammatory state.
Our data also showed that the aged group had a higher Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio (F/B ratio) as expected (Figure 1C), which is in support of inflamm-aging. Interestingly, aged GHS-R KO mice showed a significantly increased F/B ratio, which is in line with the microbiome profiles observed in diseases such as obesity, hypertension, and stroke [46,47,48]. Higher F/B ratio in the microbiota of aged GHS-R KO suggests that GHS-R ablation modifies the microbiota toward a disease-susceptible state. Indeed, our result showed that aged GHS-R KO mice are more vulnerable to DSS-induced colitis (Figure 4). At the family level, decreased Prevotellaceae and increased Erysipelotrichaceae were observed in aged GHS-R KO mice, similar to that in young GHS-R KO mice (Figure 1D). These data suggest that the effect of GHS-R on microbiome modulation remains throughout the aging process.
The gut barrier is an interface between the host and microbiome [49]. Consistent with the pro-inflammatory microbiome profile in GHS-R KO mice, we also observed that both young and aged GHS-R KO mice have increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines but decreased expression of tight junction markers (Figure 4). Our data are consistent with the reports that age-related dysbiosis of the microbiome exacerbates gut leakiness in aging [5], and experimental colitis is exacerbated in aging [6]. Our data collectively suggest that gut microbiome shifts toward a proinflammatory state in GHS-R KO mice, which likely contributes to the increased gut permeability, primes the gut toward dysbiosis, and increases vulnerability/severity of colitis.
The functional impact of GHS-R-mediated microbiome changes on susceptibility of colitis could be further determined by cohousing and/or fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). FMT is an exciting new tool to remodel microbiota that has been used in prevention or treatment of metabolic/inflammatory diseases [50,51,52]. It has been reported that microbiota transplantation from aged mice to young mice increases intestinal permeability and circulating TNF level [5]. Co-housing aged mice with young mice for 10 weeks has been shown to decrease inflammation in liver and spleen of aged mice [53], which may be caused by increased differentiation of pro-inflammatory immune cells in mice receiving FMT from aged mice [54]. Further study of co-housing WT and GHS-R KO and FMT from aged KO to young mice will help to further define the effect of GHS-R mediated microbiome programming on intestinal inflammation and colitis susceptibility.
It also remains to be further determined as to what are the cellular and molecular mechanisms that mediate these GHS-R-induced effects in microbiome regulation and colitis pathogenesis. Intestinal microbiota have been known to produce metabolites such as short chain fatty acids or tryptophan metabolites that are impaired in an age-dependent manner in humans and mice as we and others have reported [8,55,56]. The unique metabolite composition in aging alters immune response, thus exacerbating vulnerability/susceptibility to various age-related diseases [57,58]. Future studies to define how GHS-R affects metabolites would help to elucidate the mechanism of GHS-R mediated microbiome-host interaction in intestinal inflammation and IBD.
Our data showed that aging is associated with decreased Bacteroidetes with similar abundance of Firmicutes, resulting in increased F/B ratio (Figure 1), which is a hallmark microbiome signature of a proinflammatory state. Moreover, compared to young mice, our aged mice had increased Candidatus Saccharibacteria, which is known to change the local microbiome community toward an inflammatory state [59], and is associated with active IBD in humans [60]. To further study whether ablation of GHS-R in aging exacerbates diseases such as IBD, we exposed GHS-R KO and WT mice to 7 days of DSS to induce experimental colitis. We observed that aged mice lost more body weight and showed worse DAI scores sooner during DSS treatment compared to young mice (Figure 2). Similarly, others have reported that old mice have higher F/B ratio in fecal microbiota and more severe DSS-induced colitis [6], and aging exacerbates the severity of colitis in humans and mice [61,62]. Intriguingly, GHS-R KO mice showed worse disease activity index under DSS-induced colitis (Figure 2D,H), increased proinflammatory cytokine expression in the colon (Figure 4A–G), and reduced tight junction gene expression (Figure 4C–J), suggesting that GHS-R-ablated mice are more vulnerable to experimental colitis. We previously showed that aged GHS-R KO mice are lean and insulin sensitive [63,64] and are protected from age-associated impairment of thermogenesis [21]. The unhealthy microbiome profile and severe colitis phenotype observed in aged GHS-R KO mice in the current study are contrary to the healthy metabolic phenotype previously reported under normal aging, which suggests that the effect of GHS-R in colon is different from that in adipose tissue and its effect in the intestinal system is likely dependent on the health state of the intestine.
The study of GHS-R in the intestinal system is very limited. Only one report showed attenuated experimental colitis in GHS-R ablated mice [32]. This result is different from ours in that both young and old GHS-R KO mice displayed more severe DSS-induced colitis than controls. Our GHS-R KO mice have been backcrossed onto a pure C57BL/6J background and we studied them under both young (4–6 months) and old (18 months) ages. The report by others used GHS-R ablated mice with mixed backgrounds of 129S3/SvImJ and C57BL/6J at the very young age of 2 months old only [32]. That has shown that the susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis in mice is different depending on the genetic background [65,66,67]. It has been reported that C57BL/6 mice have greater body weight decrease and more severe diarrhea and fecal bleeding under DSS treatment than BALB/c mice [67]. However, it is not known if susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis differs between mice of C57BL/6J and 129S3/SvImJ backgrounds. Moreover, the age of the mice may affect the development of colitis. UC could develop at any age, but the peak incidence of colitis is 20–30 years old in humans [68]. Therefore, in the current study, we used 4–6-month-old mice as the young group which is equivalent to 20–30 years old in humans. More studies are needed to further investigate the role and mechanism of GHS-R on intestinal inflammation in different ages and under different genetic backgrounds.
Lastly, given that the mouse model used in the current study is a global ablation of GHS-R, several types of cells that express GHS-R may contribute to the outcome of gut microbiome and DSS-induced colitis. We and others previously reported that the highest level of GHS-R expression was detected in the brain, with low expression in several peripheral tissues [69,70], suggesting the possibility of involvement of the GHS-R mediated gut-brain axis in the pathogenesis of DSS-induced colitis. We previously showed that GHS-R is also expressed in peritoneal macrophages, approximately 60% of the highest expression tissue hypothalamus [71]. In addition to macrophages, other immune cells such as monocytes, dendritic cells, neutrophils, natural killer cells, and T and B lymphocytes also express GHS-R [72,73,74,75], which may all contribute to the phenotype we observed in the global KO mice. Of note, the colon is where the most immune cells reside in the body and age-related downregulation of host inflammatory immune responses in the colon has been suggested to be a major contributor to disease pathogenesis and progression [37]. In our current mouse model, we were not able to differentiate the effect of GHS-R in specific cell types. Cell-specific deletion of GHS-R in immune cells would be of great interest for further mechanistic understanding.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animal Model

We previously reported the generation of GHS-R KO mice (Ghsr−/−) that has been fully backcrossed onto the C57BL/6J background [28,63]. The mice were housed and bred at the laboratory animal facility at Texas A&M University under controlled lights and temperature (12 h light-dark cycle, 75 ± 1 °F) with free access to regular diet—Harlan-Teklad 2018X (Harlan-Teklad, Madison, WI, USA) that contains 18% of calories from fat, 58% from carbohydrates, and 24% from protein. To determine the age-associated gut dysbiosis, young (4–6-month-old, n = 5–10) and aged (18-month-old, n = 4–5) male mice were studied. The mice were randomly divided into two groups and given either water (H2O) or 2% (w/v) dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) solution.

4.2. DSS-Induced Colitis

To induce experimental colitis, 2% (w/v) DSS (MP Biomedicals; 36–50 kDa, Santa Ana, CA, USA) was provided in drinking water for 7 days ad libitum, and DSS was replaced every 48 h to maintain freshness and potency. Body weight loss, fecal consistency, and rectal bleeding were scored daily based on the scoring system reported by co-author Dr. Allred’s group [33]. Briefly, body weight change was scored as 0: body weight gain or 0–1% loss, 1: 1–5% loss, 2: 5–10% loss, 3: 10–15% loss, 4: >15% loss compared to day 0 of the study. Fecal consistency was scored as 0: normal stool, 1: soft but formed pellet, 2: very soft pellet, 3: diarrhea (no pellet), or 4: dysenteric diarrhea (blood in diarrhea). Rectal bleeding was scored as 0: no bleeding, 2: presence of visible blood in stool (red/dark pellet), 4: gross macroscopic bleeding (blood around anus).

4.3. Feces Collection and 16S rRNA Microbiota Analysis

Animals were single housed for 4 days and the feces were collected for 3 consecutive mornings. Feces were flash frozen then stored at −80 °C until analysis was performed. The microbiome analysis was conducted as we described previously [76]. In brief, nucleic acid extraction of feces was performed using MO BIO PowerSoil extraction kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA). NEXTflex 16S V4 ampliconSeq Kit 2.0 (Bio Scientific, Austin, TX, USA) was used to sequence the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The sequences of the 16S V4 forward and reverse primes are: 16S V4 forward: GACGCTCTTCCGATCTTATGGTAATTGTGTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA; reverse: TGTGCTCTTCCGATCTAGTCAGTCAGCCGGACTA CHVGGGTWTCTAAT.
A minimum of 800 and an average of 7500 sequences per sample were generated on Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The processing of sequencing data was performed as previously reported [77]. Sequence data were processed through the LotuS pipeline, and the UPARSE algorithm was used to decrease error rates as a quality filter. For taxonomic assignment, RDP was used as the classifier, and HItDB and SILVA were utilized as the selected databases. Chao1 alpha diversity was generated using QIIME 1.7. Beta diversity was calculated by the unweighted UniFrac distance and Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. Phylum and family taxonomic levels were compared between the groups.

4.4. Tissue Collection, RNA Extraction, and Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Colons were collected and washed with ice-cold saline and then opened longitudinally. The proximal 1 cm in colon was scraped and homogenized in RNA lysis solution from Aurum™ Total RNA mini kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Samples were stored at −80 °C until further analysis. Total RNA was isolated using Aurum™ Total RNA mini kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. For reverse transcription, iScript™ Reverse Transcription Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) was used to synthesize complementary DNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using SsoAdvanced™ Universal SYBR (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) and CFX384 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The primer sequences for GHS-R are: GHS-R-1a forward: 5′-GGACCAGAACCACAAACAGACA-3′; GHS-R-1a reverse: 5′-CAGCAGAGGATGAAAGCAAACA-3′. The rest of the primer information is available upon request.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) and presented as mean ± SEM. Student’s t-test, two-tailed t-test, one-way or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test were used. * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.

5. Conclusions

Here, we investigated the novel effects of GHS-R on microbiome homeostasis and experimental colitis in aging. Both young and old global GHS-R KO mice were more vulnerable to experimental colitis, showing increased proinflammatory cytokines and reduced gut tight junction expressions. We observed that GHS-R suppression shifted the gut microbiota towards a proinflammatory state, which likely contributes to increased susceptibility to experimental colitis. Our findings highlight the relevance of GHS-R in the modulation of the microbial community in aging and underscore the importance of GHS-R in intestinal health in aging. Targeting GHS-R may present a novel therapeutic strategy for prevention and treatment of aging leaky gut and inflammatory bowel disease.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23042219/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Y.N., C.-S.W. and Y.S.; methodology, J.Y.N., C.-S.W., J.A.A.D., C.D.A. and Y.S.; software, J.Y.N.; investigation, J.Y.N. and C.-S.W.; resources, Y.S.; data acquisition and analysis, J.Y.N. and S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Y.N.; writing—review and editing, J.Y.N., C.-S.W., J.A.A.D., S.D., A.J., X.-D.T., C.D.A., R.C.A. and Y.S.; visualization, J.Y.N.; supervision, Y.S.; project administration, Y.S.; funding acquisition, Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by NIH/NIDDK R01DK118334, NIH/NIA R01AG064869-01/R01AG064869-03S1, and BrightFocus Foundation Grant A2019630S (Y.S.). This work was also supported in part by NIH/NIEHS P30ES029067 (PI: David Threadgill), the USDA Hatch project 1010840, Multistate project NE1939 (Y.S.), R01 DK123826 and VA MERIT Award I01BX004120 (X.D.T.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Texas A&M University (protocol code: IACUC 2019-0378 and approval date: 22 November 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Michael R. Honig at Houston’s Community Public Radio Station KPFT for his excellent editorial assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Franceschi, C.; Garagnani, P.; Parini, P.; Giuliani, C.; Santoro, A. Inflammaging: A new immune-metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018, 14, 576–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Qin, J.; Li, R.; Raes, J.; Arumugam, M.; Burgdorf, K.S.; Manichanh, C.; Nielsen, T.; Pons, N.; Levenez, F.; Yamada, T.; et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010, 464, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 2012, 486, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Claesson, M.J.; Jeffery, I.B.; Conde, S.; Power, S.E.; O’Connor, E.M.; Cusack, S.; Harris, H.M.B.; Coakley, M.; Lakshminarayanan, B.; O’Sullivan, O.; et al. Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature 2012, 488, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Thevaranjan, N.; Puchta, A.; Schulz, C.; Naidoo, A.; Szamosi, J.C.; Verschoor, C.P.; Loukov, D.; Schenck, L.P.; Jury, J.; Foley, K.P.; et al. Age-Associated Microbial Dysbiosis Promotes Intestinal Permeability, Systemic Inflammation, and Macrophage Dysfunction. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 21, 455–466.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Liu, A.; Lv, H.; Wang, H.; Yang, H.; Li, Y.; Qian, J. Aging Increases the Severity of Colitis and the Related Changes to the Gut Barrier and Gut Microbiota in Humans and Mice. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2020, 75, 1284–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Metchnikoff, E. The Prolongation of Life: Optimistic Studies; Heinemann: London, UK, 1907. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu, C.-S.; Muthyala, S.D.V.; Klemashevich, C.; Ufondu, A.U.; Menon, R.; Chen, Z.; Devaraj, S.; Jayaraman, A.; Sun, Y. Age-dependent remodeling of gut microbiome and host serum metabolome in mice. Aging 2021, 13, 6330–6345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Molodecky, N.A.; Soon, I.S.; Rabi, D.M.; Ghali, W.A.; Ferris, M.; Chernoff, G.; Benchimol, E.I.; Panaccione, R.; Ghosh, S.; Barkema, H.W.; et al. Increasing incidence and prevalence of the inflammatory bowel diseases with time, based on systematic review. Gastroenterology 2012, 142, 46–54.e42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Szigethy, E.; McLafferty, L.; Goyal, A. Inflammatory bowel disease. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 2010, 19, 301–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Flynn, S.; Eisenstein, S. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Presentation and Diagnosis. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 99, 1051–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stidham, R.W.; Higgins, P.D.R. Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clin. Colon Rectal Surg. 2018, 31, 168–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hall, K.E.; Proctor, D.D.; Fisher, L.; Rose, S. American Gastroenterological Association Future Trends Committee Report: Effects of Aging of the Population on Gastroenterology Practice, Education, and Research. Gastroenterology 2005, 129, 1305–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nguyen, G.C.; Sheng, L.; Benchimol, E.I. Health Care utilization in elderly onset inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based study. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Benchimol, E.I.; Manuel, D.G.; Guttmann, A.; Nguyen, G.C.; Mojaverian, N.; Quach, P.; Mack, D.R. Changing age demographics of inflammatory bowel disease in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cohort study of epidemiology trends. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2014, 20, 1761–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Quezada, S.M.; Cross, R.K. Association of age at diagnosis and ulcerative colitis phenotype. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2012, 57, 2402–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zammarchi, I.; Lanzarotto, F.; Cannatelli, R.; Munari, F.; Benini, F.; Pozzi, A.; Lanzini, A.; Ricci, C. Elderly-onset vs adult-onset ulcerative colitis: A different natural history? BMC Gastroenterol. 2020, 20, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guan, Q. A Comprehensive Review and Update on the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J. Immunol. Res. 2019, 2019, 7247238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kojima, M.; Hosoda, H.; Date, Y.; Nakazato, M.; Matsuo, H.; Kangawa, K. Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature 1999, 402, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gnanapavan, S.; Kola, B.; Bustin, S.A.; Morris, D.G.; McGee, P.; Fairclough, P.; Bhattacharya, S.; Carpenter, R.; Grossman, A.B.; Korbonits, M. The tissue distribution of the mRNA of ghrelin and subtypes of its receptor, GHS-R, in humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, L.; Lee, J.H.; Bongmba, O.Y.; Ma, X.; Zhu, X.; Sheikh-Hamad, D.; Sun, Y. The suppression of ghrelin signaling mitigates age-associated thermogenic impairment. Aging 2014, 6, 1019–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Pradhan, G.; Samson, S.L.; Sun, Y. Ghrelin: Much more than a hunger hormone. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2013, 16, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Eissa, N.; Ghia, J.E. Immunomodulatory effect of ghrelin in the intestinal mucosa. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2015, 27, 1519–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peracchi, M.; Bardella, M.T.; Caprioli, F.; Massironi, S.; Conte, D.; Valenti, L.; Ronchi, C.; Beck-Peccoz, P.; Arosio, M.; Piodi, L. Circulating ghrelin levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2006, 55, 432–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. De Smet, B.; Thijs, T.; Moechars, D.; Colsoul, B.; Polders, L.; Ver Donck, L.; Coulie, B.; Peeters, T.L.; Depoortere, I. Endogenous and exogenous ghrelin enhance the colonic and gastric manifestations of dextran sodium sulphate-induced colitis in mice. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2009, 21, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, L.; Cheng, J.; Shen, J.; Wang, S.; Guo, C.; Fan, X. Ghrelin Inhibits Intestinal Epithelial Cell Apoptosis Through the Unfolded Protein Response Pathway in Ulcerative Colitis. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 661853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gonzalez-Rey, E.; Chorny, A.; Delgado, M. Therapeutic action of ghrelin in a mouse model of colitis. Gastroenterology 2006, 130, 1707–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sun, Y.; Wang, P.; Zheng, H.; Smith, R.G. Ghrelin stimulation of growth hormone release and appetite is mediated through the growth hormone secretagogue receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 4679–4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kundu, P.; Blacher, E.; Elinav, E.; Pettersson, S. Our Gut Microbiome: The Evolving Inner Self. Cell 2017, 171, 1481–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Griffin, J.L.; Wang, X.; Stanley, E. Does our gut microbiome predict cardiovascular risk? A review of the evidence from metabolomics. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2015, 8, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kim, B.R.; Shin, J.; Guevarra, R.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, D.W.; Seol, K.H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, H.B.; Isaacson, R. Deciphering Diversity Indices for a Better Understanding of Microbial Communities. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 2089–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Liu, Z.Z.; Wang, W.G.; Li, Q.; Tang, M.; Li, J.; Wu, W.T.; Wan, Y.H.; Wang, Z.G.; Bao, S.S.; Fei, J. Growth hormone secretagogue receptor is important in the development of experimental colitis. Cell Biosci. 2015, 5, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. DeLuca, J.A.; Allred, K.F.; Menon, R.; Riordan, R.; Weeks, B.R.; Jayaraman, A.; Allred, C.D. Bisphenol-A alters microbiota metabolites derived from aromatic amino acids and worsens disease activity during colitis. Exp. Biol. Med. 2018, 243, 864–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cochran, K.E.; Lamson, N.G.; Whitehead, K.A. Expanding the utility of the dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) mouse model to induce a clinically relevant loss of intestinal barrier function. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Godel, C.; Kunkel, B.; Kashani, A.; Lassmann, H.; Arumugam, M.; Krishnamoorthy, G. Perturbation of gut microbiota decreases susceptibility but does not modulate ongoing autoimmune neurological disease. J. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 17, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ochoa-Reparaz, J.; Mielcarz, D.W.; Ditrio, L.E.; Burroughs, A.R.; Foureau, D.M.; Haque-Begum, S.; Kasper, L.H. Role of gut commensal microflora in the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 6041–6050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Sovran, B.; Hugenholtz, F.; Elderman, M.; Van Beek, A.A.; Graversen, K.; Huijskes, M.; Boekschoten, M.V.; Savelkoul, H.F.J.; De Vos, P.; Dekker, J.; et al. Age-associated Impairment of the Mucus Barrier Function is Associated with Profound Changes in Microbiota and Immunity. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Momozawa, Y.; Deffontaine, V.; Louis, E.; Medrano, J.F. Characterization of bacteria in biopsies of colon and stools by high throughput sequencing of the V2 region of bacterial 16S rRNA gene in human. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Serena, C.; Ceperuelo-Mallafré, V.; Keiran, N.; Queipo-Ortuño, M.I.; Bernal, R.; Gomez-Huelgas, R.; Urpi-Sarda, M.; Sabater, M.; Pérez-Brocal, V.; Andrés-Lacueva, C.; et al. Elevated circulating levels of succinate in human obesity are linked to specific gut microbiota. ISME J. 2018, 12, 1642–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Unger, M.M.; Spiegel, J.; Dillmann, K.U.; Grundmann, D.; Philippeit, H.; Burmann, J.; Fassbender, K.; Schwiertz, A.; Schafer, K.H. Short chain fatty acids and gut microbiota differ between patients with Parkinson’s disease and age-matched controls. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2016, 32, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, Z.; Knight, R. Dietary effects on human gut microbiome diversity. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 113, S1–S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kovatcheva-Datchary, P.; Nilsson, A.; Akrami, R.; Lee, Y.S.; De Vadder, F.; Arora, T.; Hallen, A.; Martens, E.; Björck, I.; Bäckhed, F. Dietary Fiber-Induced Improvement in Glucose Metabolism Is Associated with Increased Abundance of Prevotella. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 971–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Kaakoush, N.O. Insights into the Role of Erysipelotrichaceae in the Human Host. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2015, 5, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Turnbaugh, P.J.; Bäckhed, F.; Fulton, L.; Gordon, J.I. Diet-induced obesity is linked to marked but reversible alterations in the mouse distal gut microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 2008, 3, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Zhang, H.; DiBaise, J.K.; Zuccolo, A.; Kudrna, D.; Braidotti, M.; Yu, Y.; Parameswaran, P.; Crowell, M.D.; Wing, R.; Rittmann, B.E.; et al. Human gut microbiota in obesity and after gastric bypass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 2365–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Denou, E.; Marcinko, K.; Surette, M.G.; Steinberg, G.R.; Schertzer, J.D. High-intensity exercise training increases the diversity and metabolic capacity of the mouse distal gut microbiota during diet-induced obesity. Am. J. Physiol-Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 310, E982–E993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, T.; Santisteban, M.M.; Rodriguez, V.; Li, E.; Ahmari, N.; Carvajal, J.M.; Zadeh, M.; Gong, M.; Qi, Y.; Zubcevic, J.; et al. Gut dysbiosis is linked to hypertension. Hypertension 2015, 65, 1331–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Brichacek, A.L.; Nwafor, D.C.; Benkovic, S.A.; Chakraborty, S.; Kenney, S.M.; Mace, M.E.; Jun, S.; Gambill, C.A.; Wang, W.; Hu, H.; et al. Experimental Stroke Induces Chronic Gut Dysbiosis and Neuroinflammation in Male Mice. bioRxiv 2020. bioRxiv:2020.2004.2029.069575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Okumura, R.; Takeda, K. Roles of intestinal epithelial cells in the maintenance of gut homeostasis. Exp. Mol. Med. 2017, 49, e338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Barcena, C.; Valdes-Mas, R.; Mayoral, P.; Garabaya, C.; Durand, S.; Rodriguez, F.; Fernandez-Garcia, M.T.; Salazar, N.; Nogacka, A.M.; Garatachea, N.; et al. Healthspan and lifespan extension by fecal microbiota transplantation into progeroid mice. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1234–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gupta, S.; Allen-Vercoe, E.; Petrof, E.O. Fecal microbiota transplantation: In perspective. Therap. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2016, 9, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Kim, K.O.; Gluck, M. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: An Update on Clinical Practice. Clin. Endosc. 2019, 52, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ma, J.; Hong, Y.; Zheng, N.; Xie, G.; Lyu, Y.; Gu, Y.; Xi, C.; Chen, L.; Wu, G.; Li, Y.; et al. Gut microbiota remodeling reverses aging-associated inflammation and dysregulation of systemic bile acid homeostasis in mice sex-specifically. Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 1450–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fransen, F.; van Beek, A.A.; Borghuis, T.; Aidy, S.E.; Hugenholtz, F.; van der Gaast-de Jongh, C.; Savelkoul, H.F.J.; De Jonge, M.I.; Boekschoten, M.V.; Smidt, H.; et al. Aged Gut Microbiota Contributes to Systemical Inflammaging after Transfer to Germ-Free Mice. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Rampelli, S.; Candela, M.; Turroni, S.; Biagi, E.; Collino, S.; Franceschi, C.; O’Toole, P.W.; Brigidi, P. Functional metagenomic profiling of intestinal microbiome in extreme ageing. Aging 2013, 5, 902–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Zierer, J.; Jackson, M.A.; Kastenmuller, G.; Mangino, M.; Long, T.; Telenti, A.; Mohney, R.P.; Small, K.S.; Bell, J.T.; Steves, C.J.; et al. The fecal metabolome as a functional readout of the gut microbiome. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 790–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Parada Venegas, D.; De la Fuente, M.K.; Landskron, G.; Gonzalez, M.J.; Quera, R.; Dijkstra, G.; Harmsen, H.J.M.; Faber, K.N.; Hermoso, M.A. Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs)-Mediated Gut Epithelial and Immune Regulation and Its Relevance for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Lavelle, A.; Sokol, H. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as key actors in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol 2020, 17, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Brinig, M.M.; Lepp, P.W.; Ouverney, C.C.; Armitage, G.C.; Relman, D.A. Prevalence of bacteria of division TM7 in human subgingival plaque and their association with disease. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 1687–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Kuehbacher, T.; Rehman, A.; Lepage, P.; Hellmig, S.; Fölsch, U.R.; Schreiber, S.; Ott, S.J. Intestinal TM7 bacterial phylogenies in active inflammatory bowel disease. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 57, 1569–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Mishra, J.; Quazi, S.; Kumar, N. Increased severity of high molecular weight DSS induced colitis in aged mice: P-196. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2011, 17, S70–S71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Albert, E.J.; Marshall, J.S. Aging in the absence of TLR2 is associated with reduced IFN-gamma responses in the large intestine and increased severity of induced colitis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2008, 83, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Lin, L.; Saha, P.K.; Ma, X.; Henshaw, I.O.; Shao, L.; Chang, B.H.J.; Buras, E.D.; Tong, Q.; Chan, L.; McGuinness, O.P.; et al. Ablation of ghrelin receptor reduces adiposity and improves insulin sensitivity during aging by regulating fat metabolism in white and brown adipose tissues. Aging Cell 2011, 10, 996–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Lee, J.H.; Fang, C.; Li, X.; Wu, C.S.; Noh, J.Y.; Ye, X.; Chapkin, R.S.; Sun, K.; Sun, Y. GHS-R suppression in adipose tissues protects against obesity and insulin resistance by regulating adipose angiogenesis and fibrosis. Int. J. Obes. 2021, 45, 1565–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mähler, M.; Bristol, I.J.; Leiter, E.H.; Workman, A.E.; Birkenmeier, E.H.; Elson, C.O.; Sundberg, J.P. Differential susceptibility of inbred mouse strains to dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis. Am. J. Physiol. 1998, 274, G544–G551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Perše, M.; Cerar, A. Dextran Sodium Sulphate Colitis Mouse Model: Traps and Tricks. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012, 718617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Melgar, S.; Karlsson, A.; Michaelsson, E. Acute colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium progresses to chronicity in C57BL/6 but not in BALB/c mice: Correlation between symptoms and inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2005, 288, G1328–G1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Loftus, E.V., Jr. Update on the Incidence and Prevalence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United States. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 12, 704–707. [Google Scholar]
  69. Sun, Y.; Garcia, J.M.; Smith, R.G. Ghrelin and Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor Expression in Mice during Aging. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 1323–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Takeshita, E.; Matsuura, B.; Dong, M.; Miller, L.J.; Matsui, H.; Onji, M. Molecular characterization and distribution of motilin family receptors in the human gastrointestinal tract. J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 41, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lin, L.; Lee, J.H.; Buras, E.D.; Yu, K.; Wang, R.; Smith, C.W.; Wu, H.; Sheikh-Hamad, D.; Sun, Y. Ghrelin receptor regulates adipose tissue inflammation in aging. Aging 2016, 8, 178–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Hosomi, S.; Oshitani, N.; Kamata, N.; Sogawa, M.; Yamagami, H.; Watanabe, K.; Tominaga, K.; Watanabe, T.; Fujiwara, Y.; Maeda, K.; et al. Phenotypical and functional study of ghrelin and its receptor in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2008, 14, 1205–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hattori, N.; Saito, T.; Yagyu, T.; Jiang, B.H.; Kitagawa, K.; Inagaki, C. GH, GH receptor, GH secretagogue receptor, and ghrelin expression in human T cells, B cells, and neutrophils. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 86, 4284–4291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Dixit, V.D.; Yang, H.; Sun, Y.; Weeraratna, A.T.; Youm, Y.H.; Smith, R.G.; Taub, D.D. Ghrelin promotes thymopoiesis during aging. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 2778–2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Uhlen, M.; Fagerberg, L.; Hallstrom, B.M.; Lindskog, C.; Oksvold, P.; Mardinoglu, A.; Sivertsson, A.; Kampf, C.; Sjostedt, E.; Asplund, A.; et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 2015, 347, 1260419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wu, C.-S.; Wei, Q.; Wang, H.; Kim, D.M.; Balderas, M.; Wu, G.; Lawler, J.; Safe, S.; Guo, S.; Devaraj, S.; et al. Protective Effects of Ghrelin on Fasting-Induced Muscle Atrophy in Aging Mice. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 2018, 75, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Pahwa, R.; Balderas, M.; Jialal, I.; Chen, X.; Luna, R.A.; Devaraj, S. Gut Microbiome and Inflammation: A Study of Diabetic Inflammasome-Knockout Mice. J. Diabetes Res. 2017, 2017, 6519785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 02219 g001 550
Figure 1. The microbiome profile is shifted in GHS-R KO of both young and aged mice. Reduced Bacteroidetes and increased Firmicutes are more pronounced in aged GHS-R KO rather than young mice. Feces from young (5-month) and old (14-month) male GHS-R KO mice were collected for 3 consecutive days (D1, D2, D3) and analyzed for microbial 16S rRNA. (A) α-diversity, (B) β-diversity, (C) relative abundance (%) at phyla level and (D) at family level. n = 4–5.
Figure 1. The microbiome profile is shifted in GHS-R KO of both young and aged mice. Reduced Bacteroidetes and increased Firmicutes are more pronounced in aged GHS-R KO rather than young mice. Feces from young (5-month) and old (14-month) male GHS-R KO mice were collected for 3 consecutive days (D1, D2, D3) and analyzed for microbial 16S rRNA. (A) α-diversity, (B) β-diversity, (C) relative abundance (%) at phyla level and (D) at family level. n = 4–5.
Ijms 23 02219 g001
Ijms 23 02219 g002 550
Figure 2. Young and aged GHS-R KO showed exacerbated colitis. Young (4–6-month-old) or old (18-month-old) male mice were exposed to 2% (w/v) DSS for 7 consecutive days. The left panels are from the young group and the right panels are from the old group. (A,E) Body weight change (%), (B,F) rectal bleeding, (C,G) fecal consistency, (D,H) disease activity index (DAI) scored by sum of body weight change, fecal consistency, and rectal bleeding. n = 5–10 in young group, n = 4–5 in aged group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 WT vs. Ghsr−/−. #, p < 0.05, ##, p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 DSS vs. normal water in each genotype.
Figure 2. Young and aged GHS-R KO showed exacerbated colitis. Young (4–6-month-old) or old (18-month-old) male mice were exposed to 2% (w/v) DSS for 7 consecutive days. The left panels are from the young group and the right panels are from the old group. (A,E) Body weight change (%), (B,F) rectal bleeding, (C,G) fecal consistency, (D,H) disease activity index (DAI) scored by sum of body weight change, fecal consistency, and rectal bleeding. n = 5–10 in young group, n = 4–5 in aged group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 WT vs. Ghsr−/−. #, p < 0.05, ##, p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 DSS vs. normal water in each genotype.
Ijms 23 02219 g002
Ijms 23 02219 g003 550
Figure 3. Tissue changes in young and aged Ghsr−/− mice under DSS-induced colitis. Young (4–6-month-old) or aged (18-month-old) male mice were exposed to 2% (w/v) DSS for 7 consecutive days. The left panels are from the young group and the right panels are from the old group. (A,E) Colon length, (B,F) colon weight, (C,G) colon weight/length ratio on termination day, (D,H) weight of spleen on termination day. n = 5–10 in young group, n = 4–5 in aged group. * p < 0.05, WT vs. Ghsr−/−. # p < 0.05, DSS vs. normal water in each genotype.
Figure 3. Tissue changes in young and aged Ghsr−/− mice under DSS-induced colitis. Young (4–6-month-old) or aged (18-month-old) male mice were exposed to 2% (w/v) DSS for 7 consecutive days. The left panels are from the young group and the right panels are from the old group. (A,E) Colon length, (B,F) colon weight, (C,G) colon weight/length ratio on termination day, (D,H) weight of spleen on termination day. n = 5–10 in young group, n = 4–5 in aged group. * p < 0.05, WT vs. Ghsr−/−. # p < 0.05, DSS vs. normal water in each genotype.
Ijms 23 02219 g003
Ijms 23 02219 g004 550
Figure 4. Young and aged Ghsr−/− showed elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines and worsened gut permeability gene expression in colon. Young (4–6-month-old) or aged (18-month-old) male mice were exposed to 2% (w/v) DSS for 7 consecutive days. The left panels are from the young group and the right panels are from the old group. Expression of proinflammatory cytokines, (A,F) TNFα and (B,G) IL-1b in colon mucosa. Gene expression of tight junction markers: (C,H) ZO-1, (D,I) Occludin, and (E,J) Claudin 2. n = 4–5. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, WT vs. Ghsr−/−; #, p < 0.05, ##, p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 DSS vs. control in each genotype.
Figure 4. Young and aged Ghsr−/− showed elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines and worsened gut permeability gene expression in colon. Young (4–6-month-old) or aged (18-month-old) male mice were exposed to 2% (w/v) DSS for 7 consecutive days. The left panels are from the young group and the right panels are from the old group. Expression of proinflammatory cytokines, (A,F) TNFα and (B,G) IL-1b in colon mucosa. Gene expression of tight junction markers: (C,H) ZO-1, (D,I) Occludin, and (E,J) Claudin 2. n = 4–5. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, WT vs. Ghsr−/−; #, p < 0.05, ##, p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 DSS vs. control in each genotype.
Ijms 23 02219 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Noh, J.Y.; Wu, C.-S.; DeLuca, J.A.A.; Devaraj, S.; Jayaraman, A.; Alaniz, R.C.; Tan, X.-D.; Allred, C.D.; Sun, Y. Novel Role of Ghrelin Receptor in Gut Dysbiosis and Experimental Colitis in Aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042219

AMA Style

Noh JY, Wu C-S, DeLuca JAA, Devaraj S, Jayaraman A, Alaniz RC, Tan X-D, Allred CD, Sun Y. Novel Role of Ghrelin Receptor in Gut Dysbiosis and Experimental Colitis in Aging. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(4):2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042219

Chicago/Turabian Style

Noh, Ji Yeon, Chia-Shan Wu, Jennifer A. A. DeLuca, Sridevi Devaraj, Arul Jayaraman, Robert C. Alaniz, Xiao-Di Tan, Clinton D. Allred, and Yuxiang Sun. 2022. "Novel Role of Ghrelin Receptor in Gut Dysbiosis and Experimental Colitis in Aging" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 4: 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042219

APA Style

Noh, J. Y., Wu, C. -S., DeLuca, J. A. A., Devaraj, S., Jayaraman, A., Alaniz, R. C., Tan, X. -D., Allred, C. D., & Sun, Y. (2022). Novel Role of Ghrelin Receptor in Gut Dysbiosis and Experimental Colitis in Aging. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(4), 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042219

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop